hmis data quality plan - havenforhope.org 201… · web viewhmis data quality plan. south alamo...
TRANSCRIPT
HMIS Data Quality PlanSouth Alamo Regional Alliance for the Homeless
(SARAH)San Antonio/Bexar County Approved: October 20th 2016
Developed by HMIS Lead Agency, CoC, & HMIS Committee
I INTRODUCTIONThis document describes the Homeless Management System (HMIS) data quality plan for San Antonio/Bexar County Continuum of Care (CoC) – the South Alamo Regional Alliance for the Homeless (SARAH). HMIS is a locally administered electronic system that stores client-level information about persons who access homeless services in a community. The document includes a Data Quality Plan and protocols for ongoing data quality monitoring that meet requirements set forth by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is developed by the HMIS Administrator (Haven for Hope), the CoC in coordination with the HMIS Committee of SARAH and HMIS participating agencies, and community service providers. This HMIS Data Quality Plan is to be updated annually, considering the latest HMIS data standards and locally developed Data Quality Thresholds.
HMIS Data and Technical StandardsEach CoC receiving HUD funding is required to implement and participate in HMIS to capture standardized data about all persons accessing homeless assistance in the area. The Homeless Management Information System complies with HUD’s official data and technical standards published on HUD’s Resource Exchange.
In 2010, the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) affirmed HMIS as the official method of measuring outcomes for homelessness in Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness. Many federal partners that provide services to specific homeless populations have joined together to work in a coordinated effort to end homelessness using HMIS data:
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)• U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VA)
In May of 2014, HUD published final HMIS Data Standards to ensure consistent reporting across federal agencies. The 2014 Data Standards revise and replace the 2010 HMIS Data Standards which guide client- and program-level data reporting. The 2014 Data Standards identify Universal Data Elements and Program Specific Data Elements that are required of all homeless programs participating in the HMIS.
What is Data Quality?Data quality is the reliability and validity of client-level data collected. Good data quality accurately reflects actual client information in the real world and has the ability to tell a client’s story. It also aids case management in assessing client needs and determining appropriate services. Data quality is determined by several factors such as timeliness, completeness, and accuracy. For system performance measurement, HUD’s expectation is that HMIS data be complete and accurate dating back to October 1st, 2012.
What is a Data Quality Plan?A data quality plan is a community-level document that assists the CoC in achieving statistically valid and reliable data. The plan sets expectations for both the community and the end users to capture reliable and valid data on persons accessing the homeless assistance system. The plan:
Establishes specific data quality benchmarks for timeliness, completeness, accuracy, and consistency;
2
Identifies the responsibilities of all parties within the CoC with respect to data quality; Establishes a timeframe for monitoring data quality on a regular basis.
What is a Data Quality Monitoring Plan?A data quality monitoring plan is a set of procedures that outlines a regular, on-going process for analyzing and reporting on the reliability and validity of the data entered into the HMIS at both the program and aggregate system levels. This plan includes roles and responsibilities for the CoC, the HMIS Administrator, and the HMIS Committee.
II DATA QUALITY PLAN
Data Entry Expectations:
Universal Data Elements (UDEs)The Universal Data Elements are baseline data collection elements required for all projects reporting data into the HMIS. These include:
Name Social Security Number Date of Birth Race Ethnicity Gender Veteran Status Disabling Condition Living situation
Project Entry Date Project Exit Date Destination Personal ID (Generated by HMIS) Household ID (Generated by HMIS) Relationship to Head of Household Client Location
Program Specific Data Elements (PDEs)Program Specific Data Elements (PDEs) differ from the Universal Data Elements (UDEs) in that no one project must collect every single element in this section. Required data elements are dictated by the reporting requirements set forth by each Federal partner for the projects they fund. A Partner may require all of the fields or response categories or may specify which of the fields or response categories are required for their report. Data Quality Thresholds are included in Appendix C of the Data Quality Plan outlining required data elements and thresholds for each Federal partner.
The Program Specific Data Elements include the following:
Housing Status Income and Sources Non-Cash Benefits Health Insurance Physical Disability Developmental Disability
3
Chronic Health Condition HIV/AIDS Mental Health Substance Abuse Domestic Violence Contact Date of Engagement Services Provided Financial Assistance Provided Referrals Provided Residential Move-In Date Housing Assessment Disposition Housing Assessment at Exit
Benchmarks and Goals:
TimelinessTimeliness answers the question: “Is the necessary client information entered into HMIS within a reasonable period of time?”
When data is entered in a timely manner, it can reduce human error due to too much time between data collection and data entry. Relying on notes or memory of a conversation can lead to incorrect or incomplete data entry. Timely data entry also ensures accessibility of information for the entire CoC for Coordinated Entry and project evaluation. There is a Timeliness Report that agencies can use under “Data Quality Reports” in the HMIS Administration section to monitor the timeliness of data entry for entry into a project and exit from a project.
Each type of project has different expectations on timely data entry. Timeliness is measured by comparing the enrollment entry/exit date to the assessment entry/exit created date. Timeliness cannot be edited, only improved going forward – but assessment information dates should match the date the client interview occurred.
Data entry timeframe by project type:
Emergency Shelter projects: Universal Data Elements and Housing Check-In/Check-Out must be entered within 2 business days.
Transitional Housing projects: Universal Data, Program-Specific Data, and Housing Check- In/Check-Out must be entered within 2 business days.
Permanent Housing projects: Universal Data, Program-Specific Data, and Housing Check- In/Check-Out must be entered within 2 business days.
Rapid Re-Housing projects: Universal and Program-Specific Data Elements must be entered within 2 business days.
4
Prevention projects: Universal and Program-Specific Data Elements must be entered within 2business days.
Supportive Services Only (including SSVF and safe sleeping) projects: Universal and Program- Specific Data Elements must be entered within 2 business days.
Safe Haven projects: Universal Data, Program-Specific Data, and Housing Check-In/Check-Out must be entered within 2 business days.
Outreach Projects: Limited data elements must be entered within 3 business days of the first outreach encounter. Universal Data Elements should be collected upon engagement in services.
CompletenessCompleteness answers the question: “Are all of the clients we serve being entered into HMIS? Are all of the necessary data elements being recorded into HMIS?”
Complete data is the key to assisting clients in finding the right services and benefits to end their homelessness. Incomplete data may hinder an organization’s ability to provide comprehensive care to the clients it serves. Incomplete data can also negatively impact SARAH’s ability to make generalizations of the population it serves, track patterns in client information and changes within the homeless population, and adapt strategies appropriately. HMIS data quality is also part of funding applications, including CoC and ESG funding. Low HMIS data quality scores may impact, and could result in denial of future funding requests.
SARAH’s goal is to collect 100% of all data elements. Therefore, the HMIS Committee, with the CoC Board’s approval, has established Data Quality Thresholds (see Table 1 through 7, Appendix C). The Data Quality Thresholds set an acceptable range of “null/not collected”, and “client doesn’t know/client refused” responses, depending on the data element. To determine compliance, percentages will be rounded (example: .04% becomes 0%).
All programs using the HMIS shall enter data on one hundred percent (100%) of the clients they serve. These standards will be reviewed and revised annually to make sure the thresholds are reasonable.
TABLE 1: CoC Data Quality Thresholds – See Appendix C
Bed/Unit Utilization Rates:
One of the primary features of an HMIS is the ability to record the number of client stays or bed nights at a homeless residential facility. Case managers or shelter staff enter a client into the HMIS and assign them to a bed and/or a unit. The client remains there until he or she exits the program. When the client exits the project, they are also exited from the bed or unit in the HMIS. All Emergency Shelters and Transitional Housing units funded by the COC must use the bed check-in software in HMIS. Bed/unit utilization will be determined based on bed check-ins and by project enrollment dates.
5
Acceptable range of bed/unit utilization rates for established projects: Emergency Shelters: 65%-105% Transitional Housing: 65%-105% Permanent Supportive Housing: 65%-105% Safe Haven: 65%-105%
The CoC recognizes that new projects may require time to reach the projected occupancy numbers and will not expect them to meet the utilization rate requirement during the first six months of operating.
AccuracyAccuracy answers the question: “Does HMIS data accurately reflect true client information? Are the necessary data elements being recorded in HMIS in a consistent manner?”
Information entered into the HMIS needs to be valid, i.e. it needs to accurately represent information on the people that enter any of the homeless service programs contributing data to the HMIS. The best way to measure accuracy of client data is to compare the HMIS information with more accurate sources, such as a social security card, birth certificate, or driver’s license. To ensure the most up-to-date and complete data, data entry errors should be corrected on a monthly basis.
As a general rule, it is a better practice to select “client doesn’t know/refused” than to misrepresent the population.
Data consistency will ensure that data is understood, collected, and entered consistently across all projects in the HMIS. Consistency directly affects the accuracy of data; if an end user collects all of the data, but they don’t collect it in a consistent manner, then the data may not be accurate. All data in HMIS shall be collected and entered in a common and consistent manner across all programs. To that end, all intake and data entry workers will complete an initial training before accessing the live HMIS system, and access additional training opportunities offered by the HMIS Lead.
Data Consistency Checks
The HMIS staff may check data accuracy and consistency by running reports that check for entry errors such as duplicate files created, overlapping enrollments or inconsistent assessment responses. The HMIS team also reserves the right to provide HMIS client identification numbers to the CoC for their program auditing or monitoring purposes.
III DATA QUALITY MONITORING PLAN
Roles and Responsibilities:
CoC Board of Directors The CoC Board of Directors will provide overall direction to the HMIS team and provide oversight of the HMIS Committee. Additionally, the CoC Board of Directors will enforce measures of community data quality.
6
HMIS Lead (Haven for Hope)
Report Maintenance –
The HMIS Administrator is responsible for building reports and making them available to the CoC. This includes the data quality reports necessary for data correction. The HMIS staff will be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of existing reports as well, which includes changes in reports as updates are made to the system.
Training –
The HMIS team at Haven for Hope is also responsible for providing the necessary training for the CoC. Currently, the HMIS team offers the following trainings: New User training, Management Training, Report training, HMIS Security Awareness Training, Refresher Training (groups or one-on-one sessions) and Role Specific training. In addition, HMIS staff is available to provide technical assistance to users that need help correcting data entry errors.
Monthly Monitoring –On a quarterly basis, the HMIS staff will provide to the HMIS committee data quality reports for all agencies using HMIS, and offer additional training to those agencies that need to improve their data quality. The quarterly reports for the HMIS committee will provide information on timeliness, bed utilization rates, and data completeness for all projects.
Quarterly Monitoring - On a quarterly basis, the HMIS staff will provide to the HMIS committee data quality reports for all agencies using HMIS, and offer additional training to those agencies that need to improve their data quality. The quarterly reports for the HMIS committee will provide information on timeliness, bed utilization rates, and data completeness for all projects.
HMIS CommitteeThis HMIS Committee of his HMIS Committee of the CoC Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing data quality reports quarterly and working with HMIS staff and providers to correct data that does not comply with community-wide standards as established in the Data Quality Plan. The HMIS Committee will maintain an ongoing relationship with HMIS to identify training needs for the continuum based on the reports provided by the HMIS Team.
The quarterly data quality reports provided by the HMIS Team to the HMIS Committee will include several categories: CoC, ESG, HOPWA, RHY, VA, PATH, and a Universal Data Quality Report. The Universal Data Quality Report will include all agencies that do not have program-specific data element requirements based on a Federal funding source.
7
The HMIS Team will provide these reports to the HMIS Committee members with a recommended plan of action for the agencies out of compliance. The HMIS Committee will discuss and vote to approve the recommended plan. An e-mail should be sent by the HMIS Lead to the agencies identified as having data quality issues within 5 business days of the committee meeting, and saved for record keeping purposes.
At the next quarterly review, if the agency does not show significant improvement in the areas identified by the HMIS Team, the HMIS Committee Chair will report the agency with issues to the CoC Board of Directors. Additionally, the HMIS Committee may require that the agencies provide a corrective action plan which may include HMIS refresher training for all staff members in the project and technical assistance to the agencies’ program manager(s).
If the data quality issues are not resolved by the third quarterly review, the HMIS Committee may also request a meeting with agency directors, and recommend to the CoC Board that the agency’s access to HMIS be suspended.
8
IV APPENDICES
Appendix A: Suggestions for Accuracy
Attend regular trainings sponsored by the Haven for Hope HMIS team.
You may request training online through the virtual helpdesk at [email protected] under the HMIS Resources section. See types of trainings below in the “HMIS Lead Agency” section of this plan.
Read through the training guide posted online as needed.
An up-to-date training guide is available online at www.havenforhope.org under the HMIS Resources section. It covers most sections within HMIS and can be a helpful tool to ensure data is entered accurately.
Maintain a personal Data Quality Log
As you find data quality issues, keep a log of information. Issues include items such as duplicate files or incorrect demographic information. If you aren’t sure how to correct a data entry mistake, submit a service request online instead of ignoring the data quality issue. The virtual helpdesk can be found online at [email protected] under the HMIS Resources section. A member of the HMIS team will be able to assist you with technical issues such as these.
Maintain uniform data collection techniques. Some examples include:
No numerals in name fields (except Suffix)
Use “01/01” for Month/Day if only year of birth is known.
Spot-check data entered monthly and compare to paper documents.
If a copy of an official document is obtained, compare those responses with the responses within HMIS to perform data quality checks on intake staff.
Have a document explaining your individual intake forms.
Have a document available to all intake/data entry staff that includes explanations on all questions covered on intake forms. HUD offers examples on the HUD Exchange.
Work with intake specialists on interviewing techniques and wording of questions.
Regular training of intake staff to improve on interviewing techniques and wording of questions can assist in increasing consistency of data quality.
9
Review HUD’s HMIS Data Standards.
The 2014 HMIS Data Standards, Released August 2016, Version 5.1, are available online at www.hudexchange.info. This resource includes information on required data elements, when they should be captured (at entry or exit), and which types of programs are responsible for capturing them. Make sure your programs are meeting HUD’s baseline compliance requirements.
Appendix B: References
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/HMIS-Data-Standards-Manual.pdf
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.<http://www.hudhre.info/documents/HUDDataQualityToolkit.pdf>
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.<http://www.hudhre.info/documents/4thHomelessAssessmentReport.pdf>
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.<http://www.hudhre.info/documents/DataQualityMonitoringPlan_Handout.pdf>
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. < http://www.hudhre.info/documents/VPHD_HMISDataStandards.pdf>
Department of VA. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs <http://www.va.gov/
Homeless Resource Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/HMIS-Data-Standards-Manual.pdf
Appendix C: Universal Data Quality Thresholds
10
Pr
oject
Type
Requ
irem
ent
Unive
rsal D
ata E
lemen
tAl
l Clie
nts,
Adult
s, or
HOH
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
Acce
ptab
le %
Clien
t Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
Acce
ptab
le %
Clien
t Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
Acce
ptab
le %
Clien
t Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
Acce
ptab
le %
Clien
t Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
Acce
ptab
le %
Clien
t Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Nam
eAl
l0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%1%
10%
0%0%
Socia
l Sec
urity
Num
ber
All
0%2%
0%1%
0%2%
1%10
%0%
3%Da
te of
Birth
All
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
1%10
%0%
0%Ra
ceAl
l0%
2%0%
1%0%
2%1%
5%0%
3%Et
hnici
tyAl
l0%
2%0%
1%0%
2%1%
5%0%
3%Ge
nder
All
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
1%5%
0%0%
Vete
ran S
tatu
sAd
ults
0%2%
0%1%
0%2%
1%5%
0%3%
Disa
bling
Cond
ition
All
0%2%
0%1%
0%2%
1%5%
0%2%
Living
Situ
ation
HO
H &
Adult
s0%
2%0%
1%0%
0%1%
5%0%
2%Pr
oject
Entry
Dat
eAl
l0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%Pr
oject
Exit D
ate
All
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
Desti
natio
nAl
l5%
1%2%
1%5%
2%20
%5%
5%1%
Perso
nal ID
All
2%2%
0%0%
0%0%
5%5%
0%0%
Hous
ehold
ID
All
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
Relati
onsh
ip to
Hea
d of H
ouse
hold
All
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
1%10
%0%
1%Cli
ent L
ocati
onHO
H0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%0%
0%
Unive
rsal D
ata Q
ualit
y Thr
esho
lds FY
2016
Dem
ogra
phics
ES, D
ay Sh
elter
TH, P
SH, S
H, O
PH Pr
ev/R
RHSt
reet
Out
reac
hSS
O/Ot
her H
omele
ss
Assis
tanc
e Pro
vider
Unive
rsal T
hres
holds
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
All C
lient
s, A
dults
, HO
H an
d/or
U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
thES
TLP
Data
Ele
men
tsAl
l Clie
nts,
Adu
lts,
HOH,
or U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
Acce
ptab
le %
Nul
l/Not
Co
llect
ed/C
lient
Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Nul
l/Not
Co
llect
ed/C
lient
Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Inco
me
and
sour
ceHO
H a
nd A
dults
N/A
5%No
n-Ca
sh B
enefi
tsHO
H a
nd A
dults
N/A
5%He
alth
Insu
ranc
eAL
L5%
5%Ph
ysic
al D
isab
ility
AL
L5%
5%De
velo
pmen
tal D
isab
ility
AL
L5%
5%Ch
roni
c H
ealth
Con
ditio
nAL
L5%
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth P
robl
emAL
L5%
5%Su
sbta
nce
Abus
eAL
L5%
5%Se
rvice
Pro
vide
d- P
ATH
Fund
edHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Re
ferr
als P
rovi
ded-
PAT
H F
unde
dHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%RH
Y: B
CP S
tatu
sAL
L5%
N/A
Sexu
al O
rient
ation
HO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%La
st G
rade
Com
plet
edHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Sc
hool
Sta
tus
HOH
, Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
5%5%
Empl
oym
ent S
tatu
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Ge
nera
l Hea
lth S
tatu
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%De
ntal
Hea
lth S
tatu
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth S
tatu
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Pr
egna
ncy
Stat
usFe
mal
e- H
OH,
Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
5%5%
Form
erly
a W
ard
of C
hild
War
fare
/Fos
ter C
are
Agen
cyHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Fo
rmer
ly a
War
d of
Juve
nile
Justi
ce S
yste
m
HOH
, Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
5%5%
Youn
g Pe
rson
's cr
itica
l Iss
ues
HOH
, Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
5%5%
Refe
rral
sour
ceHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Co
mm
erci
al S
exua
l Exp
loita
tion
HOH
, Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
You
th
5%5%
Com
mer
cial
Lab
or E
xplo
itatio
nHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Tr
ansi
tiona
l, Ex
it-ca
re, o
r Afte
rcar
e Pl
an a
nd A
ction
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Pr
ojec
t Com
pleti
on S
tatu
sHO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%Fa
mily
Reu
nific
ation
Ach
ieve
d HO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed Y
outh
5%
5%
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Dat
a Q
ualit
y Th
resh
olds
FY
2016
RHY
Prog
ram
Spec
ific
Requ
irem
ent
Prev
entio
nRR
HSt
reet
Out
reac
h
Data
Elem
ents
All C
lient
s, Ad
ults
, or H
OHAc
cept
able
% Nu
ll/No
t Co
llect
ed/D
oesn
’t Kn
ow/R
efus
ed
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Clie
nt D
oesn
't Kn
ow/R
efus
edIn
com
e and
sour
ces
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
Non-
Cash
Ben
efits
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
Healt
h In
sura
nce
ALL
5%5%
5%Ph
ysica
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
5%5%
Deve
lopm
enta
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
5%5%
Chro
nic H
ealth
Con
ditio
nAL
L5%
5%5%
HIV/
AIDS
ALL
5%5%
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth Pr
oblem
ALL
5%5%
5%Su
bsta
nce A
buse
ALL
5%5%
5%Do
mes
tic V
iolen
ceHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%5%
5%Co
ntac
tHO
H an
d Ad
ults
N/A
N/A
5%Da
te o
f Eng
agem
ent
HOH
and
Adul
tsN/
AN/
A5%
Resid
entia
l Mov
e-in
Dat
eAL
LN/
A5%
N/A
Hous
ing A
sses
smen
t Disp
ositi
on
HOH
2%2%
2%Ho
usin
g ass
essm
ent a
t Exit
ALL
5%N/
AN/
A
Prog
ram
Spec
ific D
ata Q
ualit
y Thr
esho
lds F
Y 201
6ES
G
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Re
quire
men
tSt
reet
Out
reac
h
Data
Ele
men
tsAl
l Clie
nts,
Adu
lts, o
r HO
HAc
cept
able
% N
ull/N
ot
Colle
cted
/Clie
nts D
oesn
't Kn
ow/R
efus
ed
Hous
ing
Stat
us a
t Ent
ry
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
Inco
me
and
Sour
ceHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%No
n-Ca
sh B
enefi
ts
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
Heal
th In
sura
nce
ALL
5%Ph
ysica
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
Deve
lopm
enta
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
Chro
nic
Heal
th C
ondi
tion
ALL
5%HI
V/AI
DS
ALL
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth P
robl
emAL
L5%
Susb
tanc
e Ab
use
ALL
5%Co
ntac
tAL
L5%
Date
of E
ngag
emen
tHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%Se
rvice
Pro
vide
d-PA
TH F
unde
d HO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%Re
ferr
als P
rovi
ded-
PATH
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
PATH
Sta
tus
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
Conn
ectio
n to
SO
ARHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Dat
a Q
ualit
y Th
resh
olds
FY
201
6PA
TH
Requ
irem
ent
Prev
entio
nPS
HRR
HTH
Dat
a Ele
men
tAl
l Clie
nts,
Adul
ts, o
r HOH
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Clie
nt D
oesn
't Kn
ow/R
efus
ed
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Clie
nt D
oesn
’t Kn
ow
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Clie
nt D
oesn
't Kn
ow
Acce
ptab
le %
Null/
Not
Colle
cted
/Clie
nt D
oesn
't Kn
ow/R
efus
ed
Inco
me
and
sour
ces
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
5%No
n-Ca
se B
enefi
tsHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%5%
5%5%
Heal
th In
sura
nce
ALL
5%5%
5%5%
Phys
ical D
isabi
lity
ALL
5%5%
5%5%
Deve
lopm
enta
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
5%5%
5%Ch
roni
c Hea
lth C
ondi
tion
ALL
5%5%
5%5%
HIV/
AIDS
ALL
5%5%
5%5%
Men
tal H
ealth
Pro
blem
AL
L5%
5%5%
5%Su
bsta
nce
Abus
eAL
L5%
5%5%
5%Do
mes
tic V
iole
nce
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
5%Ho
usin
g Ass
essm
ent D
ispos
ition
HOH
2%2%
2%2%
Hous
ing A
sses
smen
t at E
xitAL
L5%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Prog
ram
Spec
ific D
ata Q
ualit
y Thr
esho
lds F
Y 20
16
CoC
Prog
ram
Spec
ific
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Requ
irem
ent
PHTH
Data
Ele
men
tsAl
l Clie
nts,
Adu
lts, o
r HO
HAc
cept
able
% N
ull/N
ot
Colle
cted
/ Clie
nt D
oesn
't Kn
ow/R
efus
ed
Acce
ptab
le %
Nul
l/Not
Co
llect
ed/C
lient
Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Hous
ing
Stat
us a
t Ent
ry
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%In
com
e an
d So
urce
sHO
H an
d Ad
ults
5%5%
Non-
Cash
Ben
efits
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%He
alth
Insu
ranc
eAL
L5%
5%Ph
ysica
l Disa
bilit
y AL
L5%
5%De
velo
pmen
tal D
isabi
lity
ALL
5%5%
Chro
nic H
ealth
Con
ditio
nAL
L5%
5%HI
V/AI
DSAL
L5%
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth P
robl
emAL
L5%
5%Su
bsta
nce
Abus
eAL
L5%
5%Do
mes
tic V
iole
nce
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%Se
rvice
Pro
vide
d-HO
PWA
ALL
5%5%
Hous
ing
Asse
ssm
ent a
t Exi
tAL
L5%
5%M
edica
l Ass
istan
ceAl
l hou
seho
ld m
embe
rs w
ith H
IV/A
IDS
5%5%
T-ce
ll an
d Vi
ral L
oad
Onl
y cli
ents
fund
ed in
a H
OPW
A pr
ojec
t with
HIV
/AID
S5%
5%
HOPW
A
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Dat
a Q
ualit
y Th
resh
olds
FY
2016
Prog
ram
Spe
cific
Requ
irem
ent
Data
Ele
men
tsAl
l Clie
nts,
Adu
lts, o
r HOH
Acce
ptab
le %
Nul
l/Not
Co
llect
ed/C
lient
Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Clie
nt
Does
n't K
now
/Ref
used
Acce
ptab
le %
Nu
ll/No
t Col
lect
ed
Acce
ptab
le %
Cl
ient
Doe
sn't
Know
/Ref
used
Inco
me
and
sour
ces
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
5%No
n-Ca
sh B
enefi
ts
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%5%
5%He
alth
Insu
ranc
eAL
L5%
5%5%
5%Ph
ysica
l Disa
bilit
yAL
LN/
AN/
A5%
5%De
velo
pmen
tal D
isabi
lity
ALL
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Chro
nic H
ealth
Con
ditio
nAL
LN/
AN/
A5%
5%HI
V/AI
DSAL
LN/
AN/
A5%
5%M
enta
l Hea
lth
ALL
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Subs
tanc
e Ab
use
ALL
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Dom
estic
Vio
lenc
eHO
H an
d Ad
ults
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Serv
ices P
rovi
ded-
SSVF
ALL
5%5%
N/A
N/A
Fina
ncia
l Ass
istan
ce- S
SVF
ALL *
5%5%
N/A
N/A
Last
gra
de co
mpl
eted
HO
H, A
dults
and
Una
ccom
pani
ed y
outh
5%
5%5%
5%Em
ploy
men
t Sta
tus
ALL
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Gene
ral H
ealth
Sta
tus
HOH,
Adu
lts a
nd U
nacc
ompa
nied
you
th
N/A
N/A
5%5%
Resid
entia
l Mov
e-in
Dat
eAL
L5%
(RRH
onl
y)5%
(RRH
onl
y)N/
AN/
AVe
tera
n's i
nfor
mati
on#
5%5%
N/A
N/A
Perc
ent o
f AM
I HO
H 5%
5%N/
AN/
ALa
st P
erm
anen
t Add
ress
HOH
5%5%
N/A
N/A
VAM
C St
ation
Num
ber
HOH
5%5%
5%5%
SSVP
HP
Targ
eting
HOH
5%
(HP
only
)5%
(HP
only
)N/
AN/
AUs
e of
Oth
er C
risis
Serv
ices
HOH
and
Adul
ts5%
5%N/
AN/
A
* =
limite
d to
thos
e w
ho re
ceiv
e fin
ancia
l ass
istan
ce
Prog
ram
Spe
cific D
ata
Qua
lity
Thre
shol
ds F
Y 20
16
# =
All p
erso
ns w
ho a
nsw
ered
'YES
" to
Vete
ran
Stat
us
SSVF
VASH
VA