history: indian aesthetics

26
Mandala

Upload: archieducph

Post on 16-Feb-2017

287 views

Category:

Design


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Mandala

Page 2: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Is a spiritual and ritual symbol in Indian religions, representing the universe.

In common use, "mandala" has become a generic term for any diagram, chart or geometric pattern that represents the cosmos

metaphysically or symbolically; a microcosm of the universe.

Page 3: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 4: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 5: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 6: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

GarbhagrihaIs the sanctum sanctorum, the innermost sanctum of a Hindu temple where resides the murti (idol or icon) of the primary

deity of the temple.

Literally the word means "womb chamber", from the Sanskrit words garbha for womb and griha for house. Only 'priests'

(pujari) are allowed to enter this chamber.

Page 7: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 8: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 9: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Graeco-Buddhist “aesthetic”

Page 10: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Greco-Buddhist art is the artistic manifestation of Greco-Buddhism, a cultural syncretism between the

Classical Greek culture and Buddhism, which developed over a period of close to 1000 years in Central Asia,

between the conquests of Alexander the Great in the 4th century BC, and the Islamic conquests of the 7th

century AD.

Page 11: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Gandhara Buddha

Page 12: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Wine-drinking and music (Detail from Chakhil-i-Ghoundi stupa, Hadda, 1st-2nd century AD)

Page 13: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Vastu Shastra

Page 14: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Vastu ShastraIs a traditional Hindu system of architecture, which literally translates to

"science of architecture.“

These are texts found on the Indian subcontinent that describe principles of design, layout, measurements, ground preparation, space arrangement

and spatial geometry.

Vastu Shastras incorporate traditional Hindu and in some cases Buddhist beliefs.

The designs are intended to integrate architecture with nature, the relative functions of various parts of the structure, and ancient beliefs utilizing

geometric patterns (yantra), symmetry and directional alignments.

Page 15: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 16: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 17: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 18: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Hafeez Contractor

Page 19: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 20: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 21: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Le Corbusier’s Master Plan for the City of Chandigarh

Page 22: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS
Page 23: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Palace of Assembly

Page 24: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

High Court

Page 25: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Le Corbusier had a social agenda behind his theories. He believed that there is a scientific, universal basis for everything including the needs and preferences of

human beings.

Thus, the same design scheme would be applicable all around. He “proclaimed democracy and equality through the built environment” and believed that “good or

enlightened buildings would elicit similar attitudes or behaviors in individuals interacting with those buildings” (Birmingham, 1999, 296).

The notion that the physical environment impacts human behavior remains highly contested. The relatively new discipline, related to urban planning and design, is

known as ‘Design Influencing Social Practice (DiSP)’.

Page 26: HISTORY: INDIAN AESTHETICS

Le Corbusier theories are criticized on many grounds. He contradicts himself when he claims to be a proponent of democracy, yet paternalistically imposes an

order upon people with his vision of an advanced built environment.

Scholars such as Jane Jacobs claim that Le Corbusier’s vision of cities is disassociated from popular input.

Jacobs says “The materiality of the building is a relational effect.

It is a building event rather than simply a building” (Jacobs, 2006, 11). This means that social interactions and contexts have much to do with the nature of a

building and merely providing a technical concept and “purity” of design, such as Le Corbusier’s emphasis on geometry, cannot solely predict the impacts a

building will have on its inhabitants.