highlights fro tr

21
Highlights fro TR Collaboration meeting CERN 12/11/2012

Upload: jacie

Post on 22-Feb-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Highlights fro TR. Collaboration meeting CERN 12/11/2012. Experimental Setup. y. 2 views 4 covers per view 2 SRB read via VME. z. x. Jura. Saleve. View V. View U. = active regions. Beam Profile. The instrumented straws showed the radial beam profile . Entries per Channel. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Highlights fro TR

Highlights fro TRCollaboration meetingCERN 12/11/2012

Page 2: Highlights fro TR

2

Experimental Setup

= active regions

View V

View U

Jura Saleve

z

y

x

- 2 views- 4 covers per view- 2 SRB read via VME

12/11/12

Page 3: Highlights fro TR

3

Beam ProfileThe instrumented straws showed the radial

beam profile En

tries

per

Cha

nnel

12/11/12

Page 4: Highlights fro TR

4

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el

Beam ProfileThe straws instrumented have shown the

radial beam profile

SRB 3 SRB 212/11/12

Page 5: Highlights fro TR

5

Beam ProfileThe straws instrumented have shown the

radial beam profile En

tries

per

Cha

nnel

SRB 3 SRB 2

Missing straws

12/11/12

Page 6: Highlights fro TR

6

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el

Beam ProfileThe straws instrumented have shown the

radial beam profile Dead channel

SRB 3 SRB 212/11/12

Page 7: Highlights fro TR

7

Burst StructureAnd burst time structure

Even

ts/3

33m

s

SOB EOB12/11/12

Page 8: Highlights fro TR

8

Bad Words and Data Contamination Data suffers of contamination due to lost of part of

data structure, some times this is recognizable and data can be used. But in a lot of cases this is not possible

Spill Time Structure

Even

ts/3

33m

s

12/11/12

Page 9: Highlights fro TR

9

Bad Words and Data Contamination Data suffers of contamination due to lost of part of

data structure, some times this is recognizable and data can be used. But in a lot of cases this is not possible

Beam Profile Structure

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el

12/11/12

Page 10: Highlights fro TR

10

Bad Words and Data Contamination With the threshold equalization we have seen a

strange behavior, not present channels start to populate when at least one channel increase beyond 40Hz

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el *

Spill

widt

h

12/11/12

Page 11: Highlights fro TR

11

Bad Words and Data Contamination With the threshold equalization we have seen a

strange behavior, not present channels start to populate when at leas one channel increase beyond 40Hz

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el *

Spill

widt

h

12/11/12

Page 12: Highlights fro TR

12

Bad Words and Data Contamination With the threshold equalization we have seen a

strange behavior, not present channels start to populate when at leas one channel increase beyond 40Hz

Entri

es p

er C

hann

el *

Spill

widt

h

12/11/12

Page 13: Highlights fro TR

13

Data SelectionReadout problems -> data selection

◦ Mismatch between the SRBs number of triggers

◦ “Bad Words”◦ Thresholds ok from run 388, 1.25V before

Analysis performed on run 368, taken in low intensity conditions (0.1 x1011 prontons on T10) for CEDAR alignment

Quality cuts applied to data contamination (<5 per mill)

12/11/12

Page 14: Highlights fro TR

14

Run 368300 out of ~600 bursts match triggers

quality cut (same number of triggers in the SRBs)

132 bursts out of 300 good for data analysis (contamination lower than 5 per mill )

12/11/12

Page 15: Highlights fro TR

15

Results

Time (ns)

The corrected CHOD time has been used to find the T0 for all channels.

12/11/12

Page 16: Highlights fro TR

16

Results (drift time all ch)Drift time measurement has been performed using the T0 from CHOD

Time (ns)12/11/12

Page 17: Highlights fro TR

17

Results (drift time ch 10)

Time (ns)

Drift time measurement has been performed using the T0 from CHOD

12/11/12

Page 18: Highlights fro TR

18

Results (wire distance ch 10)Wire distance measurement has been performed using the drift velocity curve measured during the test beam

Time (ns)12/11/12

Page 19: Highlights fro TR

19

Results (“assumed” drift velocity curve)

Drift Time (ns)

Wire

Dist

ance

(mm

)

12/11/12

Page 20: Highlights fro TR

20

The End

12/11/12

Page 21: Highlights fro TR

21

Run 368Good Data

12/11/12