high speed visualization and analysis of maximum · pdf fileonto a hot surface and water spray...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10832
High Speed Visualization and Analysis of Maximum Spreading of Water
Droplet during Impact on Hot Horizontal Surface
Suhaimi Illias1,*
, Mohamad Shaiful Ashrul Ishak1, Suhaila Hussain
1 and Khairul Azwan Ismail
1
1School of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis,
Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia.
Abstract
This paper discusses about droplet spreading phenomena
during impact with hot surface in the film boiling region. In
this experiment, aluminum material was selected as a test
surface. Degassed and distilled water was used as the test
liquid. The water droplet diameter, Do was 4.0 mm and the
droplet temperature was fixed at 16.0 °C. The droplet falling
height was 65.0 mm corresponding to droplet impact velocity,
v of 1.129 m/s. This unique droplet impact phenomenon was
recorded at 10,000 frames per second (fps) by using a high
speed camera. Results show that variation in surface
temperature does not affect the spreading dynamics of water
droplet in the film boiling region. The measured residence
time also agrees closely with the theoretical calculation.
Keywords: Droplet spreading, droplet impact, hot horizontal surface, high
speed camera
INTRODUCTION
In material manufacturing process, spray cooling can be
considered as one of the important factors that can affect the
quality of finish material. If the hot material is being cooled
too fast or too slow, it will give enormous effect on the
strength, hardness and ductility of the final material product.
In order to study this complex phenomenon of liquid-solid
contact, drop impact test have been studied widely by
numerous researchers using high speed camera [1-10].
These droplet behaviors are very unique due to its complexity
upon impact on hot surface. Furthermore, this droplet impact
experiment can give us better understanding on how to
enhance the heat transfer rate between the liquid and the solid
surface. Although it has been studied for decades, there are
still many new interesting findings that can be understood
through droplet impact experiments.
Richard et al. [1-2] studied the droplet bouncing phenomena
on solid surface without wetting it. From the experimental
work, they hoped that their findings could help to quantify the
efficiency of water repellent surfaces (super-hydrophobic
solids) and to improve water-cooling of hot solids. Tuan Tran
et al. [3] studied the spreading dynamics of droplets in the
film boiling region. They focused on the deformation of
droplets impacting on superheated surfaces in the film boiling
region. From their report, they suggested that the maximum
spreading diameter of impacting droplets on superheated
surfaces in the film boiling region is not strongly influenced
by the geometry of the structure and is higher than that on
unheated surfaces.
Takata et al. [4-7] also performed several experimental studies
regarding droplet impact on hot surface using high speed
camera. They conducted many experimental works in order to
investigate the behavior of small water droplets impinging
onto a hot surface and water spray cooling using a micro-jet.
They measured the solid-liquid contact time, maximum
spreading ratio on a hot surface and cooling time until the
surface temperature drops from 500 °C to 100 °C. In their
report, they concluded that the maximum spreading ratio gets
bigger with increase in the impinging velocity. They also
reported that the cooling rate increases with decrease in
droplet diameter mainly in low temperature regions [4].
Other researchers such as Araki et al. [8] studied theoretically
the deformation behavior of a liquid droplet impinging on a
hot metal surface. From their report, they have developed a
new correlation to evaluate the maximum extent of the spread,
Rmax, and time-integral of the heat transmitting base area.
Fujimoto et al. [9-10] studied the collision of single water
droplets using hot Inconel 625 alloy surface. They reported
that at the temperature of less than or equal to 300 °C, the
blowout of vapor bubbles occurred at the early stages for a
large droplet. At a surface temperature of 500 °C, the two
dimensionless deformation behaviors of the droplets were
very similar to each other.
Skripov et al. [11] reported that if the liquid temperature
reaches the limit of superheat due to abrupt heating, both
heterogeneous nucleation and homogeneous nucleation occur,
resulting in the nucleation of numerous vapor bubbles.
Wachters and Westerling [12] conducted an experimental
study of water droplet impacting on a polished gold surface.
The surface temperature was heated up to 400 °C. They
reported that when the surface temperature was increased to
about 400 °C, the fully spheroidal state appears to occur and
no bubbles were seen in the drop.
Suhaimi et al. [13] also performed several experimental works
regarding droplet impact experiment. In their report, they
concluded that the surface inclination angle, degree of liquid
subcooling and the initial temperature will give an effect on
the vapor film generation time in the film boiling region.
Other researchers [14-22] also have conducted several
experimental studies on droplet impact using high speed
camera in order to understand the boiling phenomena and
droplet impact characteristics on hot surfaces.
In this experiment, we studied and investigated the
hydrodynamic behaviors of impacting droplets on hot
horizontal aluminum surface. We focused our study on
spreading dynamics of water droplet until it reached
maximum spreading during the impact with a hot horizontal
surface in the film boiling region. We also compared the
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10833
residence time of droplet using both experimental and
theoretical values.
EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the experimental
apparatus which was also used in previous reports [15-16].
The heated surface was a disk material made of aluminum.
The disk material was of 8.0 mm in height and 30.0 mm in
diameter. The heated surface was retained levelly and was
heated from its periphery by an electric cartridge-type heater.
In the experiment, degassed and distilled water was used as a
test liquid. The water droplet diameter was retained at 4.0
mm. Meanwhile, the falling height was maintained at 65.0
mm corresponding to the impact velocity, v of 1.129 m/s. This
height is in the range that the droplet itself does not
disintegrate by the collision energy of the droplet. The
halogen lamp was used as a lighting system. The temperature
of the water droplet was kept at 16.0 ºC. On the other hand,
the temperature of the heating surface was measured by
attaching the thermocouple with ceramic adhesive at two
points on the hot aluminum surface. The high speed camera
was in horizontal position. The droplet spreading phenomena
was photographed in real time and was recorded by a frame
rate of 10,000 fps.
1. High speed video camera 2. Main memory 3. TV monitor 4. TV monitor controller 5. Computer 6. Pen recorder 7. Degassed
and distilled water 8. Circulating water at constant temperature 9. Halogen lamp 10. Droplet 11. Shutter 12. Cartridge heater 13.
Thermocouple 14. Material disc
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus
RELATED FORMULA
In this experiment, degassed and distilled water was used as a
test liquid. Water drop is released at the height of 65.0 mm.
This height is in the range that the droplet itself does not
disintegrate by the collision energy of the droplet. Neglecting
the viscosity and friction, one can estimate the velocity before
the impact using Eq. (1), where h and g are the droplet falling
height and gravity, respectively. The property of the
√ or thermal inertia is an important parameter related to
the interfacial temperature at the moment of contact between
two bodies of different temperatures (ρ, Cp and k, are the
density, specific heat and heat conductivity, respectively). The
interfacial temperature, Ti at the moment of contact is given
by Eq. (2) ;
√ (1)
(2)
where Twi is the initial surface temperature of the heated
surface, Tf is initial temperature of the droplet, the subscripts
w and f of the thermal property β indicates the case for the
heated surface and the droplet, respectively. The Weber
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10834
number, We of the droplets, which is known as the ratio of the
inertia force to the surface tension force, is very important and
often regarded as the key parameter in droplet impact research
is given by Eq. (3) ;
(3)
where ρ, v, Do and σ are the liquid density, impact velocity of
the droplet, initial diameter of the droplet, and the surface
tension force, respectively. Meanwhile, for the residence time
or liquid-solid contact time , it can be estimated using Eq.
(4) [4,12,21] ;
(
)√
(4)
where ρ, Do and σ are the liquid density, initial diameter of the
droplet, and the surface tension force, respectively. From the
theoretical calculation, the liquid-solid contact time , for
this experiment was approximately 23.0 ms.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figures 2 and 3 show the images of boiling conditions at two
different initial surface temperatures, Twi of 300 °C and 320
°C during impact with hot surface at the same impact velocity,
v of 1.129 m/s. The numerical value under each photograph is
the elapsed time from the droplet impact. From Fig. 2, it is
observed that the liquid dispersion can still be seen after the
droplet impact on the hot surface at 4.0 ms up to 12.0 ms. This
droplet is then split into several number of smaller droplets as
shown in Fig. 2 at 14.0 ms up to 22.0 ms.
In contrast, a fully developed film boiling took place after the
impact at the initial surface temperature, Twi of 320 °C as
shown in Fig. 3. At the initial surface temperature, Twi of 320
°C, a stable vapor film layer was formed beneath the liquid. In
other words, the vapor film was developed between the liquid
and the solid surface. In this film boiling period, the droplet
does not touch the solid surface. This condition is also known
as film boiling. During this film boiling region, the existence
of vapour film between liquid and hot surface hinders heat
transfer from the surface. As can be seen in Fig. 3, after the
first impact, the droplet keeps spreading on the hot surface
without any liquid dispersion. Then, the mother droplet
reaches its maximum spreading on the hot surface.
From the experimental analysis, the maximum spreading of
the droplet was approximately 12.30 mm in diameter at about
7.0 ms after the first impact. Furthermore, this maximum
spreading situation seems to take place for about 1.0 or 2.0 ms
on the hot surface. Then, after the maximum spreading
occurred, the droplet begins to retract or recede on the hot
surface as shown in Fig. 3 beginning from 8.0 ms up to 22.0
ms. Finally, the mother droplet begins to bounce from the hot
surface at the time of 23.0 ms as shown in Fig. 3. This unique
bouncing phenomena continues at the time of 24.0, 26.0, 28.0
and 30.0 ms after the first impact. This bouncing phenomenon
occurs due to the vapour pressure released by the hot surface.
From Figs. 2 and 3, it can be concluded that the
hydrodynamics behaviour and deformation mechanics of the
droplet during evaporation, spreading and bouncing are
strongly dependent on the local or initial temperature of the
solid surface.
Figure 4 shows the diameter D of the deforming droplet
normalized by the droplet diameter Do versus time t measured
for droplets impacting upon hot surface for three different
surface temperatures of 320, 340 and 360 °C. As mention
before, the impact velocity, v was 1.129 m/s. From Fig. 4, it
is observed that the maximum spreading of droplet took place
at approximately 7.0 ms (12.30 mm) for initial surface
temperature, Twi of 320 °C as shown by the red broken line.
Meanwhile, for higher initial surface temperatures, Twi of 340
°C and 360 °C, the maximum spreading of droplet took place
at about 6.5 ms (11.60 mm) and 6.3 ms (12.00 mm) which is
very close to each other as shown by the black and blue
broken line in Fig. 4. From Fig. 4 also, it is observed that the
droplet keeps spreading smoothly on the hot surface without
any liquid dispersion until it reaches maximum spreading.
After that, the droplet begins to recede until it begins to
bounce from the surface. Furthermore, it is observed that the
time that it takes for the droplet to recede until it bounces
from the surface is almost double compared to the time that it
takes for the droplet to reach maximum spreading. The details
of initial surface temperature, droplet impact time and
maximum spreading measurement were shown in Table 1 for
easy understanding.
From the high speed images, it is observed that after the
mother droplet reaches the maximum spreading on the hot
surface, the droplet will enter the receding process or
retraction process and the droplet diameter will decrease
again, very close to its original initial diameter. Finally, the
mother droplet will start bouncing on the hot surface at about
23.0 ms (Twi = 320 °C), 22.8 ms (Twi = 340 °C) and 23.6 ms
(Twi = 360 °C) as shown by the red, black and blue arrows
respectively in Fig. 4. These unique bouncing phenomena
only took place at very high temperatures or in the film
boiling region.
In addition, based on theoretical calculation of Eq. (4), it was
estimated that the liquid-solid contact time, also known as
residence time, was approximately 23.0 ms. Therefore, this
experimental data for residence time shown in Fig. 4 proved
that the experimental data agrees closely with the theoretical
calculation in Eq. (4).
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10835
4.0 mm
0.0 ms
2.0 ms
4.0 ms
6.0 ms
8.0 ms
10.0 ms
12.0 ms
14.0 ms
16.0 ms
18.0 ms
20.0 ms
22.0 ms
Figure 2: Boiling situation for initial surface temperature, Twi of 300 °C at the impact velocity, v of 1.129 m/s.
4.0 mm
0.0 ms
2.0 ms
4.0 ms
6.0 ms
8.0 ms
10.0 ms
12.0 ms
14.0 ms
16.0 ms
18.0 ms
20.0 ms
22.0 ms
24.0 ms
26.0 ms
28.0 ms
30.0 ms
Figure 3: Boiling situation for initial surface temperature, Twi of 320 °C at the impact velocity, v of 1.129 m/s.
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10836
Figure 4: Diameter D of the deforming droplet normalized by the initial droplet diameter Do versus time t measured for droplets
impacting upon three different surface temperatures. The diameter of mother droplet Do = 4.0 mm, droplet impact velocity v =
1.129 ms-1
, and Weber number We = 70.
Table 1: Initial surface temperature, droplet impact time and maximum spreading
Initial surface
temperature, Twi (°C)
Time, t
(ms)
Maximum spreading of droplet, D
(mm)
Initial droplet diameter,
D0 (mm)
D/D0
320 7.00 12.30 4.00 3.10
340 6.50 11.60 4.00 2.90
360 6.30 12.00 4.00 3.00
CONCLUSION
From the present study, the maximum spreading of droplets
on heated surfaces will occur at almost the same period even
when the initial surface temperatures are different. From the
high speed images, it was observed that after the droplet
achieved its maximum spreading value, the droplet will enter
the receding or retraction process and the droplet diameter
begins to decrease again, very close to its initial diameter. The
droplet spreading data also shows a similarity pattern even at
different surface temperatures. Finally, the droplet will start to
bounce from the hot surface. These unique bouncing
phenomena only occur in the film boiling region where there
is no contact between liquid and solid surface. At a very high
temperature, a stable vapor film was formed beneath the
liquid which hindered heat being transferred from the surface.
From the experimental results, it shows that variation in
surface temperature will not give a significant effect to the
spreading dynamics of water droplet in the film boiling
region. In addition, the measured residence time agrees
closely with the theoretical calculation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank to Heat Transfer Laboratory,
Gunma University, Japan for providing research facilities and
space to undertake this work. Special thanks also to Universiti
Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP) and Ministry of Education,
Malaysia for providing scholarship during the author’s
graduate study at Gunma University, Japan.
REFERENCES
[1] Richard, D., Clanet, C., & Quéré, D. (2002). Surface
phenomena: Contact time of a bouncing
drop. Nature, 417 (6891), 811-811.
[2] Richard, D., & Quéré, D. (2000). Bouncing water
drops. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 50(6), 769.
[3] Tran, T., Staat, H. J., Susarrey-Arce, A., Foertsch, T.
C., van Houselt, A., Gardeniers, H. J., ... & Sun, C.
(2013). Droplet impact on superheated micro-
structured surfaces. Soft Matter, 9(12), 3272-3282.
[4] Takata, Y., Hidaka, S., Yamashita, A., & Yamamoto,
H. (2004). Evaporation of water drop on a plasma-
irradiated hydrophilic surface. International Journal
of Heat and Fluid Flow, 25(2), 320-328.
[5] Y, Fukatani., S, Fukuda., S, Hidaka., M, Kohno.,Y,
Takata. Heat transfer of small droplet impinging onto
a hot surface. Proceedings of the International
Conference on Boiling and Condensation Heat
Transfer ECI 8th
, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de
Lausanne, 3-7 June 2012, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aluminum (mirror polished)
Residence time
𝞃r = 23.0 ms (Eq. 4)
Maximum
Spreading Twi = 320 °C
Twi = 340 °C
Twi = 360 °C
t (ms)
Droplet starts
to bounce
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 11, Number 22 (2016) pp. 10832-10837
© Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com
10837
[6] Hidaka, S., Yamashita, A., & Takata, Y. (2006).
Effect of contact angle on wetting limit
temperature. Heat Transfer—Asian Research, 35(7),
513-526.
[7] Takata, Y., Hidaka, S., Cao, J. M., Nakamura, T.,
Yamamoto, H., Masuda, M., & Ito, T. (2005). Effect
of surface wettability on boiling and evaporation.
Energy, 30(2), 209-220.
[8] Araki, K., & Moriyama, A. (1981). Theory on
deformation behavior of a liquid droplet impinging
onto hot metal surface. Transactions of the Iron and
Steel Institute of Japan, 21(8), 583-590.
[9] Fujimoto, H., Oku, Y., Ogihara, T., & Takuda, H.
(2010). Hydrodynamics and boiling phenomena of
water droplets impinging on hot solid. International
Journal of Multiphase Flow, 36(8), 620-642.
[10] Fujimoto, H., Doi, R., & Takuda, H. (2012). An
Experimental Study on the Oblique Collisions of
Water Droplets With a Smooth Hot Solid. Journal of
Fluids Engineering, 134(7), 071301.
[11] Skripov, V.P. (1974). Metastable liquids, John Wiley
and Son, New York, pp. 83-177.
[12] Wachters, L. H. J., & Westerling, N. A. J. (1966). The
heat transfer from a hot wall to impinging water drops
in the spheroidal state. Chemical Engineering
Science, 21(11), 1047-1056.
[13] Illias, S., Hasan, M. N., Mitsutake, Y., & Monde, M.
(2014). Generation Time of Stable Vapor Film during
Impact of a Droplet on Hot Surface. Thermal Science
and Engineering, 22(2), 21-31.
[14] Inada, S., Sumiya, H., Shinagawa, K., & Illias, S.
(2006). Mechanism Elucidation For The
Miniaturization-Boiling Phenomenon In Droplet
Collision Boiling System. Proceedings of 13th
International Heat Transfer Conference, IHTC-13,
Sydney, Australia.
[15] Illias, S., Idris, M. A., & Zain, M. Z. M. (2011).
Experimental Studies of Film Boiling Phenomena on
Carbon Heated Surface. International Review of
Mechanical Engineering, 5(5), 812-817.
[16] Illias, S., Idris, M.A., Zain, M. Z. M. (2011). The
Concept and Application of Miniaturization Boiling in
Reactor Cooling System. International Review of
Mechanical Engineering, 5 (4), 754-759.
[17] Hasan, M. N., Hasan, A., Illias, S., Mitsutake, Y., &
Monde, M. (2014). Homogeneous Boiling Explosion
Condition: From an Energy Point of View. Procedia
Engineering, 90, 618-623.
[18] Hasan, M. N., Hasan, A., Illias, S., Mitsutake, Y., &
Monde, M. (2014). Characteristics of Homogeneous
Nucleation Boiling in Ethanol during Rapid Linear
Boundary Heating. Procedia Engineering, 90, 624-
630.
[19] Mitsutake, Y., Illias, S., Tsubaki, K., Hasan, M. N., &
Monde, M. (2015). Measurement and Observation of
Elementary Transition Boiling Process after Sudden
Contact of Liquid with Hot Surface. Procedia
Engineering, 105, 5-21.
[20] Illias, S., Hasan, M. N., Mitsutake, Y., & Monde, M.
(2014). High speed observation and measurement of
surface temperature and surface heat flux during
impact of a droplet on hot surface. Proceedings of
15th International Heat Transfer Conference, IHTC-
15, Kyoto, Japan.
[21] L. Rayleigh (1879). Proc. R. Soc. London, 29, 71-97.
[22] Durickovic, B., & Varland, K. A. T. H. L. E. E. N.
(2005). Between bouncing and splashing: Water drops
on a solid surface. Applied Mathematics thesis. USA:
University of Arizona.