hideo mabuchi stanford university · coherent feedback control and autonomous quantum circuits....
TRANSCRIPT
Coherent feedback control and autonomous quantum circuitsHideo MabuchiStanford University
DARPA-MTOAFOSR, ARO, NSF
http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/209400216
�𝑺𝑺 �𝑹𝑹 𝑄𝑄
1 1 hold
0 1 → 1
1 0 → 0
0 0 undef
Feedback (control) motifs in circuit design
Stabilization(robustness)
Synthesis
Steady-state analysis can be intuitive, but need theory for dynamics (transients), noise
v2 = ¡v1GR2
R1 + R2 + GR1
! ¡R2
R1v1
Nanophotonic integration: on the roadmap?Y. Vlasov, CLEO Plenary (2012)
switching/routing, combinational logic, cache management, error correction…?
Spontaneous switching in attojoule “bistability”
Cs
J. Kerckhoff, M. A. Armen and HM, Opt. Express 19, 24468 (2011)
P. W. Smith, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 313, 349 (1984)
Ultra-low power nanophotonic circuit theory
PLINC exploits cavity-enhanced nonlinearity and circuit-scale
optical coherence to implement attojoule photonic logic
PLINC is a natural scheme for near-future integrated
nanophotonics, testable today using single-atom cavity QED
PLINC circuit theory = coherent-feedback quantum control
In1
In2 Out1
w x
¯
¯ ’
Out2
µ
µ ’
¼/4
¼/4
1. Develop QHDL, a subset of industry-standard VHDL for the specification of PLINC circuits
2. Develop software for compiling QHDL into rigorous quantum optical models
3. Use QHDL toolbox + high-performance numerical simulation for analysis and design of functional circuits
4. Validate key coherent feedback concepts in single-atom cavity QED experiments
HM, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 193109 & 99, 153103 (2011)
PLINC: Photonic Logic via Interferometry with Nonlinear Components
β
β
ϕ(P)ϕ0 P
Nonlinear dynamiccontroller
Attojoule nanophotonic switch stabilizationHM, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 193109 (2011)
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
β
ϕ(P)ϕ0 P
Nonlinear dynamiccontroller
Attojoule nanophotonic switch stabilizationHM, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 193109 (2011)
In1
In2 Out1
w x
¯
¯ ’
Out2
µ
µ ’
¼/4
¼/4
In1
In2
Out1
w z Out2
Combinatorial logic: a PLINC NAND gateHM, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 153103 (2011)
Hierarchical Design
SR NAND latch
NAND gate
Quantum models for attojoule photonic switchingHM, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 153103 (2011)
N. Tezak, A. Niederberger, D. S. Pavlichin, G. Sarma and HM, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 370, 5270 (2012)
http://mabuchilab.github.com/QNET/
QHDL / Modelica workflowN. Tezak, A. Niederberger, D. S. Pavlichin, G. Sarma and HM, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 370, 5270 (2012)
G. Sarma, R. Hamerly, N. Tezak, D. S. Pavlichin and HM, IEEE Photonics J. 5, 7500111 (2013)
http://mabuchilab.github.com/QNET/
Quantum noise in large-scale coherent circuitsC. Santori et al. (HP Labs + Stanford), Phys. Rev. Appl. 1, 054005 (2014)
4-bit ripple counter
= 4 flip-flops
= 88 resonators
Ener
gyU
101 102
Time t
N=2-5 Free-Carrier Ising Machine
100 101 102 103
Time t
10-1
100
101
102
Ener
gyU−
Um
in
16-Gon
100 101 102 103
Time t
10-1
100
101
102
Frustrated 16-Gon
20 40 60 80t
100 120 140
30201001020304050
0
Re[
α]0 50 100
Re[βout]150 200
20
10
0
40
30
50
Im[β
out]
0 10002000300040005000Nph
0
500
1000
2500
2000
1500
Nc
Limit-cycle oscillators, synchronization and Ising-XYRyan Hamerly and HM, Phys. Rev. Appl. 4, 024016 (2015)
Role of entanglement? Y. Yamamoto et al., PRA 92, 043821
Coherent perceptron for all-optical machine learningN. Tezak and HM, EPJ Quantum Technology 2:10 (2015)
Embedded photonic signal-processing• MHz-GHz natural bandwidths
• Coherent ) very low dissipation (power in ¼ power out)
• Homogeneous platforms: nano/micro-photonic circuits; fiber sensor networks?
J. Vuckovic et al., 2011 New J. Phys. 13 055025 B. Park et al., 2011 IEEE Sensors J. 11 2643
Quantum error correction “circuits”
http://openbookproject.net/electricCircuits/Digital/DIGI_15.htmlphysicsworld.com (UCSB)
“superconducting trio get entangled”
Coherent-feedback autonomous quantum memoryJ. Kerckhoff, H. Nurdin, D. Pavlichin and HM, PRL 105, 040502 (2010)
J. Kerckhoff, D. S. Pavlichin, H. Chalabi and HM, New J. Phys.13, 055022 (2011)
R
OUT
OUTPOWER
in
SET in
RESETin
A. Faraon et al. New J. Phys. 15 025010 (2013)
B3
B1
R12
R11 B5
Q32
Q11
Q13
Q22
Q21
Coherent-feedback network “wiring diagram”J. Kerckhoff, H. Nurdin, D. Pavlichin and HM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 040502 (2010)
J. Gough and M. R. James, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 54, 2530 (2009)L. Bouten, R. van Handel and A. Silberfarb, Journal of Functional Analysis 254, 3123 (2008)
Gp = R12 / B3 / ((Q13 / Q21) ¢ (1; 0; 0)) / B1
Gf = (Q11 ¢ Q32 ¢ Q22) / (B5 ¢2 (1; 0; 0)) / (R11 ¢ (1; 0; 0))
N = Gp ¢ Gf ¢ Gp0 ¢ Gf
0 ¢ G¡
Network component modelsL. Bouten, R. van Handel and A. Silberfarb, J. Funct. Anal. 254, 3123 (2008) J. Kerckhoff, L. Bouten, A. Silberfarb and HM, Phys. Rev. A 79, 024305 (2009)
H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 045802 (2009)
RSET in
RESET in
POWERin
OUT
OUTR
OUT
OUTPOWER
in
SET in
RESET in
jei
jsi
jgijhi
set
pow
er
¢jri
jei
jgijhi
¢jri
jei
jgijhi
j®i 7! j ¡ ®i
j®i 7! j®ij+i
j®i 7! j ¡ ®ij¡i
Probe interaction: Z- (Duan-Kimble/Nielsen) or X-parity (Kerckhoff)
Closed-loop master equation; simulationsJ. Kerckhoff, H. Nurdin, D. Pavlichin and HM, PRL 105, 040502 (2010)
_½t = ¡i[H; ½t] +
7X
i=1
µLi½tL
¤i ¡
1
2fL¤iLi; ½tg
¶
H =p
2¦(R1)g ¦
(R2)h X1 +
p2¦
(R1)h ¦(R2)
g X3 ¡ ¦(R1)g ¦(R2)
g X2
L1 =®p2f¾(R1)
hg (1 + Z1Z2)
+¦(R1)h (1¡ Z1Z2)g
L2 =®p2f¾(R1)
gh (1¡ Z1Z2)
+¦(R1)g (1 + Z1Z2)g
L3 =®p2f¾(R2)
hg (1 + Z3Z2)
+¦(R2)h (1¡ Z3Z2)g
L4 =®p2f¾(R2)
gh (1¡ Z3Z2)
+¦(R2)g (1 + Z3Z2)g
Autonomous quantum circuit design automationJ. Kerckhoff, D. S. Pavlichin, H. Chalabi and HM, New J. Phys.13, 055022 (2011)
G. Sarma, R. Hamerly, N. Tezak, D. S. Pavlichin and HM, IEEE Photonics 5, 7500111 (2013)G. Sarma and HM, New J. Phys. 15 035014 (2013)
00000
00100 00001
11000
11010
10000 01000
10100 01001
11100 11001
10010 01010
M12+ M23+
M12+
M23+M12- M23-
M12-M23-
X1+ X3+
X1- X3-
X2+
X1- X3-
X2- X2-
code separability, subsystem structurel
robust circuit layout
Classical computation Fully-quantum computation
?
Computational power of semi-quantum architectures?
Decoherence-dependent complexity of classically simulating quantum models?
Dimensional reduction of open quantum networksN. Tezak, R. Hamerly, D. Pavlichin, G. Tabak; N. Amini (CNRS); M. Maggione (Johns Hopkins)
• MIT curriculum ca. 2010
• How will it look in 2030?
Abstraction is fundamental to modern engineering
Anant Agarwal and Jeffrey Lang, course materials for 6.002 Circuits and Electronics, Spring 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare(http://ocw.mit.edu/), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on 3/17/09.
There is no simplequantum amplifier
abstraction!
Typical qubits andquantum circuits
Quantum/classicalprobability
Quantum andnanoscale device
physics
Vast majority of work in “quantum
engineering” today
?
Kinetic (as opposed to equilibrium) hysteresisJ. Kerckhoff, M. A. Armen and HM, Opt. Express 19, 24468 (2011)