Herbert Blumer 1

Herbert Blumer

Herbert George Blumer

Born March 7, 1900St. Louis, Missouri

Died April 13, 1987 (aged87)

Maininterests Sociology, Symbolic interactionism, Sociological research methods

Herbert George Blumer (March 7, 1900 April 13, 1987) was an American sociologist whose main scholarlyinterests were symbolic interactionism and methods of social research.[1] Believing that individuals create their ownsocial reality through collective and individual action,[] he was an avid interpreter and proponent of George HerbertMeads work on symbolic interactionism.[] An ongoing theme throughout his work, he argued that the creation ofsocial reality is a continuous process.[] Most scrutinized for his negative critiques of positivistic social research,Blumer insisted that valid sociological research methods are based in naturalistic observation and in-depthparticipant observation.[][]

Personal historyBlumer was born March 7, 1900 in St. Louis, Missouri. He grew up in Webster Groves, Missouri, with his parentsand attended Webster Groves High School and later the University of Missouri from 1918 to 1922. After graduation,he secured a teaching position there, but in 1925 he relocated to the University of Chicago where he was greatlyinfluenced by the social psychologist George Herbert Mead, and sociologists W. I. Thomas and Robert Park.[2] Uponcompleting his doctorate in 1928, he accepted a teaching position at the University of Chicago, where he continuedhis own research and the work of Mead.[]

Blumer was the secretary treasurer of the American Sociological Association from 19301935, and was the editor ofthe American Journal of Sociology from 1941-1952. In 1952, he moved from the University of Chicago, andpresided and developed the newly-formed Sociology Department at the University of California, Berkeley. In 1952,he became the president of the American Sociological Association, and he received the association's award for aCareer of Distinguished Scholarship in 1983.[] Blumer served as the 46th president of the American SociologicalAssociation and his Presidential Address was his paper "Sociological Analysis and the 'Variable'".[3] Herbert Blumerdied on April 13, 1987.

Professional football careerDuring much of the period that Blumer was at the University of Chicago from, 1925 through 1933, including all ofthe years that he was completing his doctorate,[4] Blumer played football professionally for the Chicago Cardinals(now the Arizona Cardinals), a team in the American Professional Football Association which would later becomethe NFL. Blumer played as an end, guard and a series of other positions. During his first year of his doctorate, healso scored two touchdowns for the Cardinals.[5][] During that season, the Cardinals won the leaguechampionshipalthough that victory remains controversial due to the disqualification of the Pottsville Maroons, ateam with a better record. Blumer was selected to the 1929 All-Pro Team.[]

Herbert Blumer 2

Intellectual contributions

Sociology

Outline

Theory History

Positivism Antipositivism Functionalism Conflict theories Middle-range Mathematical Critical theory Socialization Structure and agency

Research methods

Quantitative Qualitative Historical Computational Ethnographic Network-analytic

Topics Subfields

Change Cities Class Crime Culture Development Deviance Demography Education Economy Environment Family Gender Health Industry Internet Knowledge

Herbert Blumer 3

Law Literature Medicine Mobility Movements Networks Organizations Politics Race & ethnicity Religion Science Soc. psychology Stratification

Browse

Portal Sociologists Journals Lists

Symbolic interactionismAlthough Blumer devised the term symbolic interactionism in 1969, the early development of this theoreticalapproach to social analysis is largely credited to the work of George Herbert Mead during his time at the Universityof Chicago.[][][] Prior to symbolic interactionism, Blumer said there were two traditional ways of understanding themeaning of things, the realist approach or the opposite. The realist would say that meaning is inherent in the thingitself and the opposite of realist the subjective theory that attributes meaning to psychological makeup.[] Blumerpresented his articles on symbolic interactionism in a single volume in which he conceptualized symbolic interactioninto three main points: Humans act towards things (including other individuals) on the basis of the meanings they have for them.[][]

The meaning of things arises out of the social interactions one has with one's fellows.[]

Meanings are handled in, and modified through, an interpretive process a person uses in dealing with the things heor she encounters.[][][][][]

Blumer believed that what creates society itself is people engaging in social interaction. It follows than that socialreality only exists in the context of the human experience.[] His theory of symbolic interaction, some argue, is thuscloser to a theoretical framework (based on the significance of meanings[][] and the interaction between individuals[])than an applicable theory.[]

According to Blumer's theory, interaction between individuals is based on autonomous action,[] which in turn isbased on the subjective meaning actors attribute to social objects and/or symbols.[][][][] Thus individual actorsregulate their behavior based on the meaning they attribute to objects and symbols in their relevant situation.[]

Blumer theorized that assigning objects meaning is an ongoing, two-fold process: first is the identification of theobjects that have situational meaning, and the second is the process of internal communication to decide whichmeaningful object to respond to.[] Acknowledging that others are equally autonomous, individuals use theirsubjectively derived interpretations of others (as social objects) to predict the outcome of certain behaviors, and usesuch predictive insight to make decisions about their own behavior in the hopes of reaching their goal.[] Thus, whenthere is consensus among individual actors about the meaning of the objects that make up their situation, socialcoordination ensues.[] Social structures are determined as much by the action of individual actors as they determinethe action of those individuals.[]

Herbert Blumer 4

This complex interaction between meanings, objects, and behaviors, Blumer reiterated, is a uniquely human processbecause it requires behavioral responses based on the interpretation of symbols, rather than behavioral responsesbased on environmental stimuli.[] For example, the symbolic interpretation of language and gestures, and of other'sactions.[][][] As social life is a "fluid and negotiated process," to understand each other, humans must intrinsicallyengage in symbolic interaction.[] Blumer criticized the contemporary social science of his day because instead ofusing symbolic interactionism they make false conclusions about humans by reducing human decisions to socialpressures like social positions and roles.

Criticisms of symbolic interactionism

Blumer's idea is criticized for putting too much emphasis on day-to-day life and the social formation of theindividual while ignoring social structure.[6] He also tended to ignore class relations, and the restraints brought aboutby differing social classes. Some critics believe that Blumer deviated from Mead's ideas of scientific behaviorism,and which has not led to the development of any useful concepts based on the observations of overt behavior.[]

Methodological contributions to sociologyAccording to Herbert Blumer, the most valid and desirable social research is conducted through qualitative,ethnographic methodology. He persistently critiqued the idea that that the only form of valid knowledge is derivedthrough a totally objective perspective.[] As this directly challenges the thought process of traditional,positivism-based approach to sociological method, much controversy surrounds Blumers sociological approach toempirical research.[]

Blumer believed that when positivistic methods were applied to social research, they created results that wereignorant to the empirical realties of the social world. Because people act towards the world based on the subjectivemeanings they attribute to different objects (symbolic interactionism), individuals construct worlds that areinherently subjective. Therefore "objective" analysis is intrinsically subjugated to the researcher's own social reality,only documents the researchers own grotesque personal assumptions about social interaction, and ultimately yieldsbias findings.[][] For a researcher to truly understand sociological phenomena, Blumer asserted, they must understandtheir subjects subjective interoperations of reality.[]

Following this logic, Blumer discounted social research that blindly applies methods that have been traditionallyused in the natural sciences. Such quantitative, objective analysis, he argued, does not acknowledge the differencebetween humans and animals specifically the difference in cognitive ability to consciously entertain opinions andto apply meanings to objects, both which enables humans to take an active role in shaping their world.[] Becausesociety is composed of interactions between individuals or "joint actions",[7] the only empirical reality is that whichstems from human interaction. Therefore contextual understanding of human action is intrinsic to valid socialresearch.[]

Thus Blumer advocated for sociological research that sympathetically and subjectively incorporates the viewpointsof the subject. Concluding that there is little validity in research that attempted to understand the social worldobjectively, Blumer felt that objective interpretations of society are intrinsically bias to the researchers sociallocation and thus have little empirical value.[] To truthfully uncover the social realities of individuals different fromone's self, an observer must be mindful of their framework and be open to different understanding of social reality.[][]

Sociological analysis and the "variable"In 1952, Herbert Blumer became President of the American Sociological Association and his Presidential Address was his paper "Sociological Analysis and the 'Variable'.[] In this paper, Blumer addresses the shortcomings with variable analysis that he sees in social research. Herbert Blumer says "there is a conspicuous absence of rules, guides, limitations and prohibitions to govern the choice of variables." Overall he felt that variable analysis needed to be looked at more carefully and precisely to see if the variables are correct and connected to the social research at

Herbert Blumer 5

hand.Generic variables Blumer does not find generic:

The frequent variable that stands for a class of object that is tied down to a given historical and cultural situation. Abstract sociological categories. Example- "social integration" Special set of class terms. Examples- "Age, time, authority"Blumer believed these shortcomings are a serious but not crucial and that with increase experience they can beovercame. This address was meant to question how well does variable analysis is suited to the study of human grouplife in its fuller dimensions."

Blumer's criticisms of Thomas and Znaniecki

In 1939, Blumer published Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki'sThe Polish Peasant in Europe and America, criticizing what at the time was a popular social theory.[] Blumerclaimed that Thomas and Znaniecki failed to properly distinguish between attitude as subjective and value as asocietal collective element. He said they used the terms interchangeably, and therefore making the theory unreliable.It is difficult to disentangle subjective factors and objective correlates because the objective world is dealt with onlyto the extent that it enters subjective experiences.[] Blumer said,

"This scheme declares that a value playing upon a pre-existing attitude gives rise to a new attitude, or anattitude playing upon a pre-existing value gives rise to a new value. With terms that are uncertain andnot clearly disjunctive, the presumed causal relation becomes suspect."[8]

In conclusion, Blumer recognized that in society there was no clear distinction between attitude and value, and thateven social theorists have difficulty distinguishing between the two.

Collective behaviorBased on the work of Robert E. Park, Blumer, in a 1939 article, called to attention a new subfield of sociology:collective behavior. This now developed area of inquiry is devoted to the exploration of collective action andbehavior that is not yet organized under an institutional structure or formation. Blumer was particularly interested inthe spontaneous collective coordination that occurs when something that is unpredicted disrupt standardized groupbehavior. He saw the combination of events that follows such phenomena as a key factor in society's ongoingtransformation.[]

Major works Sociological Analysis and the "Variable" pp. 683690 in American Sociological Review, Vol 21, No. 6. (Dec.,

1956) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (1969) Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki's The Polish Peasant in

Europe and America (1939) George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct (2004) "Movies and Conduct" (1933)One of Blumer's best-known studies, "Movies and Conduct" (1933), was part of the Payne Fund research project.The project, which included more than 18 social scientists who produced eleven published reports, was initiated outof fear about effect movies might have on children and young adults. Blumer thus conducted an ethnographic,qualitative study on more than fifteen hundred college and high school students by asking them to writeautobiographies of their movie-going experiences. His findings were that children and young adult spectatorsreported that they learned from movies life skills such as attitudes, hairstyles, how to kiss, and even how topickpocket.[9]

Herbert Blumer 6

Other works

Movies, Delinquency, and Crime (1933) The Human Side of Social Planning (1935) "Social Psychology", Chapter 4 in Emerson Peter Schmidt (ed.) Man and Society: A Substantive Introduction to

the Social Science. New York, Prentice-Hall (1937) "Sociological Theory in Industrial Relations", pp.271278 in American Sociological Review, Vol. 12, No. 3

(1947) "Collective Behavior." pp.166222. New Outline of the Principles of Sociology, ed. A. M. Lee. New York:

Barnes & Noble. (1951)

Scholarly critiques of Blumer

On his theory of symbolic interaction Too subjective[]

Deflects attention away from the impact social structures (like the state, culture, and the economy) have onindividual behavior.[]

On his perspective of empirical research Methodological contributions are hard to implement in practice Because Blumer rejected the behaviorism approach to the study of meaning, societal research from symbolic

interactionist framework poses empirical challenges.[]

Notes[4] Cf. Herbert Blumer, 1928, Method in Social Psychology, Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of

Chicago.[7] Cf. Kuwabara, T., and K. Yamaguchi, 2013, An Introduction to the Sociological Perspective of Symbolic Interactionism: Revised Edition

(http:/ / hdl. handle. net/ 10232/ 16983), Journal of Economics and Sociology, Kagoshima University, 80, pp. 118-119.

Further reading Blumer, Herbert (1939). An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki's The Polish Peasant in Europe and America.

New York: Social Science Research Council. Blumer, Herbert (1933). Movies and Conduct (http:/ / www. brocku. ca/ MeadProject/ Blumer/ 1933/ 1933_11.

html). New York: Macmillan & Company. Blumer, Herbert (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Baugh, Kenneth, Jr. (1990). The Methodology of Herbert Blumer. ISBN0-521-38246-7. Coser, Lewis A. (1977). Masters of Sociological Thought; Ideas in the Historical and Sociological Context. New

York: Harcourt Brace Jonanovich. ISBN0-15-555130-2. Couch, Carl J. (1991). "Review: The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition,

by Martyn Hammersley". Contemporary Sociology 20 (1): 160161. JSTOR 2072168 (http:/ / www. jstor. org/stable/ 2072168).

Farganis, James (2008). Readings in Social Theory (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. ISBN0-07-352813-7. Gerhardt, Uta (2000). "Ambivalent Interactionist: Anselm Strauss and the schools of Chicago Sociology". The

American Sociologist 31 (4): 3464. doi: 10.1007/s12108-000-1010-3 (http:/ / dx. doi. org/ 10. 1007/s12108-000-1010-3).

Griffin, E. (1997). A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Herbert Blumer 7

Larson, Calvin J. (1986). Sociological Theory from the Enlightenment to the Present. Bayside, NY: General Hall.ISBN0-930390-72-5.

Lyman, Stanford M.; Vidich, Arthur J. (1988). Social Order and the Public Philosophy: An Analysis andInterpretation of the Work of Herbert Blumer. The University of Arkansas Press.

Ritzer, George (1996). Classical Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN0-07-053017-3. Keys, David; Maratea, R. J. (2011). "Life experience and the value-free foundations of Blumer's collective

behavior theory". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47 (2): 173186. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20494(http:/ / dx. doi. org/ 10. 1002/ jhbs. 20494).

External links A Blumer Bibliography (http:/ / www. brocku. ca/ MeadProject/ Blumer/ Blumer_Bibliography1. html) Movies and Conduct (http:/ / www. brocku. ca/ MeadProject/ Blumer/ 1933/ 1933_11. html) Profile (http:/ / www. databasefootball. com/ players/ playerpage. htm?ilkid=BLUMEHER01) at

DatabaseFootball.com

Article Sources and Contributors 8

Article Sources and ContributorsHerbert Blumer Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=563932018 Contributors: AK456, Bender235, Benjamin Mako Hill, Betacommand, Bomzhik, Cellolover7, CharlesMatthews, ChicJanowicz, CommonsDelinker, Corlier, D6, Darwinek, EvolutionRevolution, Hahnchen, Hawkestone, Highwind65, Izbski, Jazzno21, Jcarrohcf12, John of Reading, JustAGal,Kai-Hendrik, KnightRider, Lolamuffin, Malcolmxl5, Mandarax, Meclee, Merodack, Mike Christie, Niceguyedc, Obersachse, Omnipaedista, Piotrus, Rich Farmbrough, Rl, Robofish, RogDel,Saintswithin, ShelfSkewed, Sllenh11, Socgeek, SteveW, Tsukasa Kuwabara, Waacstats, Webclient101, Xaver David, 45 anonymous edits

Image Sources, Licenses and ContributorsImage:SNA segment.png Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:SNA_segment.png License: GNU General Public License Contributors: Screenshot taken byUser:DarwinPeacock

LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

Herbert BlumerPersonal historyProfessional football career

Intellectual contributionsSymbolic interactionismCriticisms of symbolic interactionism

Methodological contributions to sociologySociological analysis and the "variable"Blumer's criticisms of Thomas and Znaniecki

Collective behaviorMajor worksOther works

Scholarly critiques of BlumerOn his theory of symbolic interaction On his perspective of empirical research

NotesFurther readingExternal links

License