hemorrhagic versus ischemic stroke
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Hemorrhagic Versus Ischemic Stroke
1/5
-
8/11/2019 Hemorrhagic Versus Ischemic Stroke
2/5
CHAPTER 65 HEMORRHAGIC VERSUS ISCHEMIC STROKE 625
the most widely used is the Siriraj stroke score, developed by Poungvarinand others7in 1991 (Table 65-1).
III. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEThe data in EBM Boxes 65-1 and 65-2 stem from the analysis of 35 studies
enrolling more than 9000 patients with stroke from across the globe. Thediagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke in these studies includes both intracranialand subarachnoid hemorrhage, although relatively few patients had sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. Diagnostic accuracy of bedside findings is the sameif patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage are excluded.3
A. SYMPTOMS
According to a systematic review,3 the following symptoms increase theprobability of hemorrhagic stroke: seizures accompanying the neurologicdeficit (likelihood ratio [LR] = 4.7), vomiting (LR = 3), severe headache
Small left
basal gangliahemorrhage
Hemiparesis
Continuedbleeding
Rapid neurologic deterioration
Headache and vomiting
Uncal herniation(arrow)orbilateral cerebral
dysfunction
Drowsiness and coma
Neck stiffnessIntraventricularbleeding,leading tosubarachnoidblood
Increased
intracranialpressure
FIGURE 65-1 Additional findings of hemorrhagic stroke (coronary section ofbrain).Top half:There is a small hemorrhage in the left basal ganglia, causing hemiparesis and clini-cal findings indistinguishable from ischemic stroke. Bottom half:Progressive intracranial hemorrhagecauses the additional findings of hemorrhage, including rapid neurologic deterioration, headache,vomiting, coma, and neck stiffness. Intraventricular blood follows the normal path of cerebrospinalcirculation through the median and lateral apertures of the fourth ventricle to reach the subarach-noid space at the base of the brain. (Only rarely does intracerebral hemorrhage directly rupture inthe subarachnoid space.)
-
8/11/2019 Hemorrhagic Versus Ischemic Stroke
3/5
626 PART 13 SELECTED NEUROLOGIC DISORDERS
TABLE 65-1 Siriraj Stroke Score*
Characteristic Points
Mental status
Coma or semicoma + 5Drowsy or stupor + 2.5
Vomiting + 2
Headache within 2 hours + 2
Diastolic blood pressure + 0.1 DBP in mm Hg
Diabetes, angina, or intermittentclaudication
3
Correction factor 12
*From reference 7. Interpretation of total score: >1, hemorrhage;1 to 1, uncertain; 220 mmHg8
17 96 4.0 NS
Systolic BP
-
8/11/2019 Hemorrhagic Versus Ischemic Stroke
4/5
CHAPTER 65 HEMORRHAGIC VERSUS ISCHEMIC STROKE 627
Finding(Reference)
Sensitivity(%)
Specificity(%)
Likelihood Ratio
if Finding IsPresent Absent
Neurologic Deficits
Deviation ofeyes11,12,17,18
27-62 64-81 1.9 0.7
Hemiparesis1012,1719 17-87 12-73 NS NS
Aphasia11,12,17,20 12-35 62-92 NS NS
Hemisensory distur-
bance
1012,17,180-80 40-98 1.3 NS
Hemianopia11,12 35 73 1.3 NS
Ataxia11,12 15 80 NS NS
Other Findings
Cervical bruit9,11,12 1 81-93 0.1 NS
Atrial fibrillation onECG10,15,17,18
1-21 69-91 0.4 1.2
*Diagnostic standard: for hemorrhagic stroke, computed tomography (all studies), sometimes
with magnetic resonance imaging14,21
or autopsy.14,22
Definition of findings: for both toes extensor, the Babinski response ispresenton both feet;for both toes flexor, the Babinski response is absentin both feet.
Likelihood ratio (LR) if finding present = positive LR; LR if finding absent = negativeLR.
ECG, electrocardiogram; NS, not significant.Click here to access calculator.
Probability
+45%+30%+15%15%30%45%
LRs
Decrease Increase
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10LRs
HEMORRHAGIC STROKE
Coma
Neck stiffness
Neurologic deterioration duringfirst 3 hours
Systolic blood pressure >220 mm Hg
Both toes extensor
Cervical bruit
Absence of neurologicdeterioration during first
3 hours
EBM BOX 65-1
Hemorrhagic Strokecontd
(LR = 2.9), and loss of consciousness (LR = 2.6). Chronic anticoagulationwith warfarin also increases the probability of hemorrhagic stroke (LR =5.4).8,20A history of prior transient ischemic attack decreases the prob-ability of hemorrhagic stroke (LR = 0.3).
http://coursewareobjects.elsevier.com/objects/elr/ExpertConsult/McGee/diagnosis3e/calculator/http://coursewareobjects.elsevier.com/objects/elr/ExpertConsult/McGee/diagnosis3e/calculator/ -
8/11/2019 Hemorrhagic Versus Ischemic Stroke
5/5
628 PART 13 SELECTED NEUROLOGIC DISORDERS
B. INDIVIDUAL PHYSICAL FINDINGS
According to the LRs in EBM Box 65-1, the physical findings that increasethe probability of hemorrhagic stroke are coma (LR = 6.3), neurologicdeterioration during the first 3 hours (LR = 5.8), neck stiffness (LR = 5.4),systolic blood pressure higher than 220 mm Hg (LR = 4), and Babinskiresponse in both toes (LR = 2.4).
The findings that decrease the probability of hemorrhagic stroke are cer-vical bruit (LR = 0.1) and absence of neurologic deterioration during thefirst 3 hours (LR = 0.2).
As expected (see the section on Findings), the presence or absence ofneurologic deficitshemiparesis, hemisensory disturbance, deviation ofeyes, aphasia, hemianopia, and ataxiafail to distinguish hemorrhagic
stroke from ischemic stroke.
C. COMBINED FINDINGS (SIRIRAJ STROKE SCORE)
A Siriraj score greater than 1 (hemorrhage) increases the probability ofhemorrhagic stroke (LR = 5.4; see EBM Box 65-2), whereas a score lessthan 1 (infarction) decreases the probability (LR = 0.3). Nonetheless, inthese studies, an average of 20% of patients with stroke (range, 8% to 48%)were classified as uncertain by the Siriraj score, a score lacking diagnosticvalue. (LR is not significant.)
The references for this chapter can be found on www.expertconsult.com.
EBM BOX 65-2
Siriraj Score for Hemorrhagic Stroke*
Finding(Reference)
Sensitivity(%)
Specificity(%)
Likelihood Ratio
if Finding IsPresent Absent
Siriraj score hemor-rhage (>1)
23-87 65-99 5.4
Siriraj score uncertain(1 to 1)
1-51 NS
Siriraj score infarction(