heavy metal resistant bacteria

109

Upload: alaa-al-charrakh

Post on 18-Jul-2015

517 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 2: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 3: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 4: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 5: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 6: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Heavy Metal Resistant Bacteria:Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model

By

Raafat M. J. Al-Enzi Alaa H. Al-CharrakhM.Sc Microbiology Ph.D Microbial Biotechnology

Babylon University, Iraq

Page 7: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Dedication

To….

All martyrs and Iraqi peoples who died or vanished during

violence waves that devastated Iraq in the last few years

We dedicate this work

Authors

Page 8: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Acknowledgements

Praise to the Almighty Allah, the glorious creator of the universe, for

his kindness and mercy, and blessing upon Mohammad the prophet and

upon his family and followers.

The authors would like to thank Department of Microbiology, College of

Medicine, Babylon University for providing all the needed facilities, which were

essential for successful completion of the present work. Our thanks are also

extended to all members of the Department of Microbiology for their generous

help and co-operation. We would like to thank Dr. Hussein Oliewi AL-

Dahmoshi for his help and advice in this work.

Authors

Page 9: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

a

List of Contents

No. Subject Page

List of contents a

List of tables c

List of figures d

List of Abbreviations e

Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review 1-34

1.1. Introduction 1

1.2. Literatures review 2

1.2.1. History and description of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 2

1.2.2. Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5

1.2.3. The Antigenic Structure 8

1.2.4. Antibiotic resistance 8

1.2.5. Occurrence of heavy metals in the Environment 9

1.2.6. Bacterial tolerance against heavy metals 12

1.2.7. Beneficial heavy metals 14

1.2.8. Toxic heavy metals 15

1.2.9. Review of some important heavy metals 16

1.2.9.1. copper 16

1.2.9.2 silver 17

1.2.9.3 Mercury 19

1.2.9.4 Lead 29

1.2.9.5 Zinc 21

1.2.9.6 Cadmium 21

1.2.9.7 Nickel 22

1.2.10 Health application of heavy metals 23

1.2.11 Detection of heavy metals resistance in laboratory 24

1.2.11.1 Phenotypic characteristics 24

Page 10: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

b

1.2.11.2 Genotypic methods 25

Chapter two : Materials and Methods 29-46

2.1. Materials 29

2.1.1. Samples 29

2.1.2. Laboratory apparatus and instruments 29

2.1.3. Chemical and biological materials 30

2.1.4. Culture media 31

2.1.5. Standard strain used in the study 32

2.1.6 Plasmid extraction kit 32

2.1.7. DNA marker ladder 33

2.2. Reagent and Solutions 33

2.3. Preparation of culture media 35

2.4 Methods 38

2.4.1 Specimen collection 38

2.5. Laboratory diagnosis 39

2.6. Detection of virulence factors 41

2.7 Detection of biofilm production 43

2.8 Genotyping assays 44

2.9 Plasmid curing 46

Chapter three: Results and Discussion 47-70

3.1. Isolation, identification and distribution of isolates 47

3.2. Heavy metals susceptibility test of Pseudomonas

aeruginosa 54

3.3 Plasmid profile of heavy metals resistant isolates 62

3.4 Plasmid curing by elevated temperature 66

3.5 Biofilm assay 68

4.1. Conclusions and Recommendations 71

References 72-93

Page 11: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

c

List of Tables

TableNo. Title Page

1-2Different inheritable shared mechanisms of metal andantibiotic resistance systems in Pseudomonads and otherprokaryotes.

11

2-1-2 Laboratory apparatus and instruments 29

2-1-3 Chemical and biological materials 30

2-1-3-1 Heavy metals used in the study 31

2-1-4 Culture media 31

2-1-5 Standard strain used in the study 32

2-1-7 DNA Marker 33

3-1 Distribution of Patients according to Sex and Residence 48

3-2 Morphological properties and Biochemical testes for

identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

50

3-3 Distribution of isolates from different Clinical samplescollected during study

50

3-4 Distribution of isolates from different hospitalenvironmental Samples collected during study

52

3-5 Numbers and percentage of clinical and environmentalPseudomonas aeruginosa detected by screening test

54

3-6 Antibacterial activity of heavy metals againstPseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from clinical andhospital environmental samples

55

3-7 MIC values of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates toSilver sulfate, Zinc sulfate, Cadmium sulfate, Nickelsulfate in Molar concentrations

57

3-8 MIC values of Copper sulfate, Mercury chloride, andLead nitrate in (g/ml) concentrations towardsPseudomonas aeruginosa

60

3-9 MIC values of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ps.3 aftercuring exposed to following heavy metals

68

3-10

Biofilm production by P. aeruginosa isolates recovered

by clinical and hospital environment samples 69

Page 12: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

d

List of Figures

Figure

No.Title Page

1-1 Model showing examples of three major molecularmechanisms responsible for dual tolerance inPseudomonads.

13

3-1 Number and percentages of Pseudomonas aeruginosaisolates in clinical sample.

47

3-2 Distribution of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosaisolates according to age groups.

48

3-3 Number and percentage of Pseudomonas aeruginosaisolates in hospital environment samples.

52

3-4-a Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content ofPseudomonas aeruginosa isolates after (1:30) hr. at 60voltages.

63

3-4-b Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content ofPseudomonas aeruginosa isolates after (1:30) hr. at 60voltages.

64

3-4-c Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content ofPseudomonas aeruginosa isolates after (1:30) hr. at 60voltages

65

3-5 Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content of Ps.aeruginosa isolate before and after curing after (1:30)hr. at 60 voltages.

67

Page 13: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

e

List of Abbreviations

Abbreviation Keyµg Microgramµl microliter

AgSo4 Silver Sulfate

ATPase Adenosine triphosphate synthetaseBHI Brain heart infusionbp base pair

CDC Center of disease control and preventionCDF Cations diffusion facilitation

CdSo4 Cadmium sulfate

CuSo4 Copper Sulfate

EDTA Ethylene di-amine tetra acetic acidEPS Extracellular polymeric substance

H2O2 hydrogen peroxideHgcl2 Mercury chloride

HM Heavy metalHMR Heavy metal resistancehrs hoursLPS LipopolysaccharideLTA Lipoteichoic acidmg Milligram

MIC Minimum Inhibitory Concentrationmin minute

MR-VPReagent

Methyl red-vogues proskauer reagent

MTC Minimum tolerance ConcentrationNiSo4 Nickel sulfate

nm NanometerNNIS National nosocomial infections surveillance

Page 14: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

1.1. Introduction

Pseudomonads present a versatile group of gram negative motile, rod bacteria

of genus Pseudomonas and considered to be cosmopolitan in environment

(Johansen et al., 1996) having multiple metal and antibiotic resistance (Oyetibo et

al., 2010). The genus Pseudomonas is Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium,

strict aerobic with unipolar flagella motility ((Forbes et al., 2007).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an ubiquitous environmental species widely

spread in soil and natural water, and an opportunistic human pathogen responsible

for severe infections in immune-compromised patients. This organism infects the

pulmonary tract, urinary tract, burns, wounds, and also cause blood infections.

Due to its large occurrence in hospital water systems and its capacity to persist on

medical devices, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital acquired

pneumonia. In addition, P. aeruginosa is the major pathogen in cystic fibrosis

(CF) lung pathology (Lipuma, 2010).

Heavy metals are ubiquitous and persistent environmental pollutants that are

introduced into the environment through anthropogenic activities, such as mining

and smelting, as well as through other sources of industrial waste. In fact, over

one-half the superfund sites in the United States are contaminated with at least

one heavy metal. Heavy metals contaminate drinking water reservoirs and

freshwater habitats and can alter macro- and microbiological communities (Ivorra

et al., 2000).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous, environmentally important microbe

that may employ many resistance mechanisms, such as the mer operon that

reduces toxic Hg2+ to volatile Hg0, which then diffuses out of the cell (Outten,

2000). However, in bacteria, efflux systems are a more common resistance

mechanism for dealing with heavy metals.

Studies on the effects of heavy metals copper, lead, and zinc on biofilm and

planktonic P. aeruginosa determined that biofilm were 2 to 600 times more

Page 15: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

resistance to heavy metal stress than free- swimming cells (Teitzel and Parsek,

2003).

There are many methods used for detection of heavy metals resistance in bacteria.

These methods include agar dilution methods; determination of MIC and MTC of

different heavy metals. Molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain

reaction (PCR), DNA– DNA hybridization and an analysis of restriction fragment

length polymorphism (RFLP) (Nakamura and Silver, 1994) can also be used.

The aim of this work was to study the prevalence of heavy metals resistance

(HMR) in Ps. aeruginosa recovered from clinical and environmental samples, as

well as studying production of the biofilm and its correlation with heavy metals

resistance.

This book is suited for all kinds of students (Undergraduate and postgraduate) and

doesn’t require any prerequisite knowledge of biology or chemistry. If any student

is interested in entering the health care profession in some way, this book will

give him a strong background in the biology of HMR bacteria, without

overwhelming unnecessary details.

1.2. Literatures review

1.2.1. History and description of Pseudomonas aeruginosa:

The opportunistic bacteria pathogen currently known as P. aeruginosa has

received several names throughout its history based on the characteristic blue-

green coloration produced during culture. Sédillot in 1850 was first to observe

that the discoloration of surgical wound dressings was associated with a

transferable agent. The pigment responsible for the blue coloration was extracted

by Fordos in 1860, and in 1862 Lucke was the first to associate this pigment with

rod-shaped organisms (Pitt, 1998).

Page 16: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was not successfully isolated in pure culture until

1882, when Carle Gessard reported in a publication entitled “On the Blue and

Green Coloration of Bandages” the growth of the organism from cutaneous

wounds of two patients with bluish-green pus (Gessard, 1984). In several

additional reports between 1889 and 1894, P. aeruginosa (Bacillus pyocyaneus)

was described as the causative agent of blue-green purulence in the wounds of

patients (Villavicencio, 1998). A more thorough presentation on the routes of

invasion and dissemination of P. aeruginosa leading to acute or chronic infection

was provided by Freeman in a 1916 article (Philips et al., 2009).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a non-fermentative, aerobic Gram negative rod,

measuring 0.5 to 0.8 m by 1.5 to 3.0 m. Almost all strains are motile by means

of a single polar flagellum. It normally lives in moist environments, and uses a

wide range of organic compounds for growth, thus giving it an exceptional ability

to colonize ecological niches where nutrients are limited, from water and soil to

plant and animal tissues. Typical biochemical features of P. aeruginosa isolates

are: positive oxidase test, growth at 42°C, hydrolysis of arginine and gelatine, and

nitrate reduction. P. aeruginosa strains produce two types of soluble pigments,

pyoverdin and pyocyanin. The latter blue pigment is produced abundantly in

media of low-iron content and functions in iron metabolism in the bacterium.

Pyocyanin (from "pyocyaneus") refers to "blue pus", which is characteristic for

suppurative infections caused by P. aeruginosa (Murray et al., 2003).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa also produces pyocin, these substance resembles

antibiotics and have active effect on different strain from the same species or

other species. These substances used in typing of P. aeroginsa and diagnosis of

species (Aboud, 2001).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is seldom a member of normal microbial flora in

humans. Representative colonization rates for specific sites in humans are 0 to 2%

for skin, 0 to 3.3% for nasal mucosa, 0 to 6.6% for throat, and 2.6 to 24% for fecal

Page 17: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

samples (Morrison and Wenzel, 1984). However, colonization rates may exceed

50% during hospitalization

(Pollack, 1995), especially among patients who have experienced trauma to or a

breach in cutaneous or mucosal barriers by mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy,

catheters, surgery, or severe burns (Blanc et al., 1998; Erol, 2004; Ohara, 2003;

Thuong, 2003; and Valles, 2004).

Patients with impaired immunity have higher risks for colonization by this

organism (Morrison, and Wenzel, 1984; Pollack, 1995), and disruption in the

normal microbial flora as a result of antimicrobial therapy has also been shown to

increase colonization by P. aeruginosa (Blane et al., 1998; Bonten et al., 1999;

Takesue et al., 2002).

Despite the wide distribution of P. aeruginosa in nature and the potential for

community-acquired infections, serious infections with P. aeruginosa are

predominantly hospital acquired. A review of surveillance data collected by the

center of disease control and prevention (CDC), National Nosocomial Infections

surveillance system from 1986 to 1998 shows that P. aeruginosa was identified as

the fifth most frequently isolated nosocomial pathogen, accounting for 9% of all

hospital-acquired infection in united states (Emori, and Gaynes, 1993; NNIS,

1998).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the second leading cause of nosocomial

pneumonia (14 to 16%), the third most common cause of urinary tract infections

(7 to 11%), the fourth most frequently isolated pathogen in surgical site infections

(8%), and seventh leading contributor to bloodstream infections (2 to 6%). Data

from other studies continue to show P. aeruginosa as the second most common

cause of nosocomial pneumonia, health care-associated pneumonia, and

ventilator-associated pneumonia (Gaynes and Edwards, 2005; Kolleff et al., 2005)

and the leading cause of pneumonia among pediatric patients in the intensive care

unit (ICU) (Richards et al., 1999).

Page 18: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is especially problematic for seriously ill patients in

ICUs. From 1992 to 1997, data from the National Nosocomial Infection

Surveillance System showed that P. aeruginosa was responsible for 21% of

pneumonias, 10% of urinary tract infection, 3% of bloodstream infections, and

13% of eye, ear, nose, and throat infections within ICUs in the United State

(Richards et al., 1999). A similar study conducted in Europe identified P.

aeruginosa as the second most frequently isolated organism in reported cases of

ICU-acquired infections (Spencer, 1996).

1.2.2. Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa can infect almost any external site or organ. Most

community infections are mild and superficial, but in hospitalized patients,

infections are more common, more severe and more varied.

P. aeruginosa is pathogenic only when introduced into areas devoid of normal

defenses, e.g. when mucous membranes and skin are disrupted by direct tissue

damage; when intravenous or urinary catheters are used; or when neutropenia is

present, as in cancer chemotherapy. The bacterium attaches to, and colonizes the

mucous membranes or skin, invades locally and produces systemic disease

(Sambrook and Rusell, 2001).

These processes are promoted by the Pili, enzymes and toxins.

Lipopolysaccharide plays a direct role in causing fever, shock, oliguria,

leukocytosis and leucopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation and adult

respiratory distress syndrome (Pollack, 2000).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative, opportunistic pathogen

implicated in sight-threatening ocular infectious diseases such as keratitis

(Sharma et al., 2006; Willcox, 2007; Green et al., 2008). Pseudomonas keratitis is

a serious ocular infection that can lead to corneal scarring and severe visual

disability if aggressive and appropriate therapy is not promptly initiated (Keay et

al., 2006; Stapleton et al., 2007).

Page 19: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)

and most of nosocomial infections are ascribed to this organisms, as most of the

hospital environments are colonized by it (Hatchette et al., 2000).

Bacteremia and septic shock due to P. aeruginosa continue to be the major

problems in hospitalized patients with underlying malignancies, cardiopulmonary

disease, renal failure or diabetes. Bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in

intravenous drug users is usually associated with bacterial endocarditis and may

also develop osteomyelitis of a variety bones (Boffi et al., 2001).

For an opportunistic pathogen such as P. aeruginosa, the disease process

begins with some alteration or circumvention of normal host defenses. The

pathogenesis of Pseudomonas infections is multifactorial, as suggested by the

number and wide array of virulence determinants possessed by the bacterium.

Most Pseudomonas infections are both invasive and toxinogenic. The ultimate

Pseudomonas infection may be seen as composed of three distinct stages: (1)

bacterial attachment and colonization; (2) local invasion; (3) disseminated

systemic disease (Brooks et al., 2010).

1- Colonization:

Although colonization usually precedes infections by P. aeruginosa, the exact

source and mode of transmission of the pathogen are often unclear because of its

ubiquitous presence in the environment. It is sometimes present as part of the

normal flora of humans, although the prevalence of colonization of healthy

individuals outside the hospital is relatively. The pili of P. aeruginosa will adhere

to the epithelial cells of the upper respiratory tract and, by inference, to other

epithelial cells as well. These adhesins appear to bind to specific galactose or

mannose or sialic acid receptors on epithelial cells. Colonization of the respiratory

tract by Pseudomonas requires pili adherence and may be aided by production of

a protease enzyme that degrades fibronectin in order to expose the underlying

pilus receptors on the epithelial cell surface. Mucoid strains, which produce an

Page 20: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

exopolysaccharide (alginate), have an additional or alternative adhesin which

attaches to the tracheobronchial mucin. Also, it is possible that surface-bound

exoenzyme S could serve as an adhesin for glycolipids on respiratory cells.

Alginate slime forms the matrix of the Pseudomonas biofilm which anchors the

cells to their environment and in medical situations; it protects the bacteria from

the host defenses such as lymphocytes, phagocytes, the ciliary action of the

respiratory tract, antibodies and complement. Mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa are

most often isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis and they are usually found in

lung tissues from such individuals (Brooks et al., 2010).

2-Invasion:

The ability of P. aeruginosa to invade tissues depends upon production of

extracellular enzymes and toxins that break down physical barriers and damage

host cells, as well as resistance to phagocytosis and the host immune defenses. P.

aeruginosa produces three other soluble proteins involved in invasion: a cytotoxin

and two hemolysins. The cytotoxin is a pore-forming protein. It was originally

named leukocidin because of its effect on neutrophils, but it appears to be

cytotoxic for most eukaryotic cells. Of the two hemolysins, one is a phospholipase

and the other is a lecithinase. They appear to act synergistically to break down

lipids and lecithin. The cytotoxin and hemolysins contribute to invasion through

their cytotoxic effects on neutrophils, lymphocytes and other eukaryotic cells

(Brooks et al., 2010).

3-Dissemination:

Blood stream invasion and dissemination of Pseudomonas from local sites of

infection are probably mediated by the same cell-associated and extracellular

products responsible for the localized disease, although it is not entirely clear how

the bacterium produces systemic illness. P aeruginosa is resistant to phagocytosis

and the serum bactericidal response due to its mucoid capsule and possibly LPS.

Page 21: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

The Lipid A moiety of Pseudomonas LPS (endotoxin) mediates the usual

pathologic aspects of Gram-negative septicemia, e.g. fever, hypotension,

intravascular coagulation, etc. It is also assumed that Pseudomonas exotoxin A

exerts some pathologic activity during the dissemination stage (Brooks et al.,

2010).

1.2.3. The Antigenic Structures:

Somatic antigen: There are seventeen somatic antigens designated as O1 to O17

that divide the strains of P. aeruginosa into 17 serogroups.

Flagellar antigen: Two flagellar antigens have been isolated from strains of P.

aeruginosa. One of these is uniform and the other is complex and may consist of

5- 7 factors (Brooks et al., 2010). Flagellum yields heat–labile antigens (H–

antigen).Consequently it is not specific (Liu, 1974).

1.2.4. Antibiotic resistance:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is pathogen that causes a substantial portion of

hospital infections. It is frequently multi resistant, which contributes to the high

morbidity and mortality of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), burn units and

surgery wards. A major reason for its prominence as a pathogen is its high

intrinsic resistance to antibiotics, such that even for the most recent antibiotics

(Fluit et al., 2000).

Its high intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and ability to develop multidrug

resistance pose serious therapeutic problems. Broad-spectrum B-lactams, such as

carbapenems, are potential drugs for the therapy of infections caused by P.

aeruginosa (Aloush, 2006; Rossolini, 2005), However, the increasing use of these

compounds has resulted in the emergence of carbapenem- resistant P. aeruginosa

isolates, limiting treatment options (Falagas et al., 2006; Zavascki et al., 2005).

Most carbapenem resistance is due to impermeability, which arises via loss of

the OprD (D2) porin, but carbapenem hydrolysing metallo-B-lactamases (MBLs)

are increasingly reported (Livermore et al., 2000).

Page 22: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Genes encoding MBLs are located as cassettes in integrons that provide them

with the potential for expression and dissemination (Walsh et al., 2005; Queenan,

2007).

Nosocomial isolates of P. aeruginosa are found in high proportion of resistance

to a new advanced–generation Fluorquinolone with a high potency and a broad

spectrum of antimicrobial activity, in European hospitals (Brisse et al., 2000).

A study at the Centers for Disease Control and prevention revealed that

resistance to Imipenem for P. aeruginosa isolated from the respiratory tract of

patients in (ICUs) and in teaching hospitals has increased (Pierson and Friedman,

1992; Cavallo et al., 2000).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed higher levels of resistance to gentamicin and

imipenem. Rossolini reported that P. aeruginosa isolates were highly resistant to

carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem) and to carbenicillin, ticarcillin,

clavulanate, piperacillin, tazobactam, mezlocillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin,

tobramycin, netilmicin, ceftazidime and cefeprime (Rossolini et al., 2005).

Anti Pseudomonal antibiotics include the third-generation cephalosporins

(cefoperazone, cefsulodin, ceftazidime), fourth-generation cephalosporins

(cefepime, cefpirome, cefclidin), extended–spectrum penicillins (ticarcillin,

piperacillin, azlocillin), monobactams (aztreonam), carbapenems (imipenem,

meropenem) and Quiolones (ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, ofloxacin). The addition of

beta–lactamase inhibitors to extended–spectrum penicillins and cephalosporins

has expanded the antibacterial spectra of these agents against most of gram–

positive and gram–negative organisms (Wateret and Wunderink, 2001).

1.2.5. Occurrence of Heavy metals in the Environment:

Metal pollutants pose a severe threat to ecological system due to their negative

impact on most life forms. Though some heavy metals are essential trace

elements, most can be, at high concentrations, toxic to all forms of life, including

microbes, by forming complex compounds within the cell. The heavy metal

Page 23: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

protagonists have been divided into three main groups: (i) micronutrient cations

(copper, cobalt, nickel, zins), (ii) toxic cations (cadmium, lead, mercury), and (iii)

toxic oxyanions (arsenate/arsenite, chromate and tellurite) (Aguilar et al., 2010).

Although, higher organisms readily succumb to the toxic influence of metals,

microbes are known to possess a wide array of genetic composition that allows

them to circumvent metallic stress (Valdman et al., 2001).

Since heavy metals are increasingly found in microbial habitats due to natural

and environmental processes, microbes have evolved several mechanisms to

tolerate the presence of heavy metals (Adrash et al., 2007).

This increasing heavy metal tolerance has another implication in the

environment as it may contribute to the maintenance of antibiotic resistance gene

by increasing the selective pressure of the environment. The occurrence of

multiple metals and antibiotic resistance property in microbial community poses a

potential threat towards human and environmental health. There is concern that

metal contamination functions as a selective agent in the proliferation of antibiotic

resistance. There is substantial overlap between known mechanisms for metals

and antibiotic resistance, such as those for copper and tetracyclines, copper and

ciprofloxacin, and arsenic and -lactamse (Baker-Austin et al., 2006).

Many researchers have speculated and have even shown that a correlation exists

between metal tolerance and antibiotic resistance in bacteria (Table 1-2) (Oyetibo

et al., 2010; Abd et al., 2011; Al- Imran, 2006).

Page 24: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Table 1-2: Different inheritable shared mechanisms of metal and antibiotic resistance systems

in Pseudomonads and other prokaryotes (Sarma et al., 2010).

Microbial species, such as Pseudomonas, have been shown to be relatively

efficient in bioaccumulation of uranium, copper, lead, and other metal ions from

polluted effluents (Mullen et al., 1989; Gupta et al., 2001).

Environmental pollution with toxic heavy metals is spreading throughout the

world along with industrial progress. The important toxic metals cadmium, nickel

and lead find its way to the water bodies through wastewater (Ajmal et al., 1998).

Hazardous characteristics of the pollutants cause renal dysfunction, bone

degeneration, liver, lungs and blood damage (Ebdon et al., 2001).

Cadmium is the most dangerous metal ion for human health due to its hazardous

characteristics and non biodegradability. It has been reported that cadmium

damages the cells by a broad spectrum of effects metabolism. It is known to bind

with essential respiratory enzymes (Nies, 2003), cause oxidative stress

(Banjerdkji et al., 2005), and inhibits DNA repair (Jin et al., 2003).

Page 25: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Nickel is the most abundant heavy metal contaminants of the environment due

to its release during mining and smelting practices (Prasad and Strazalka, 2000).

Nickel is required as an essential co- factor in several bacterial enzymes, which

carry out metabolic functions (Mulrooney and Hausinger, 2003). But it disrupts

processes when it is present in excess (Babich and Stotzky, 1983).

Lead is hazardous waste and is highly toxic to human, plants, animals (Low et

al., 2000). In human chronic lead exposure produces neurotoxicity, anaemia, and

kidney damage and acute lead toxicity can be fatal (Rensing et al., 1998).

The known mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity include inducing oxidative

stress and interfering with protein folding and function (Nies, 1999). Chemical

and physical weather of igneous and metamorphic rocks and soils often release

heavy metals into the sediment and into the air (Moore and Ramamoorthy, 1984).

Other contributions include the decomposition of plant and animal detritus,

precipitation or atmospheric deposition of airborne particles from volcanic

activity, wind erosion, forest fire smoke, plant exudates, and oceanic spray

(Kennish, 1992).

1.2.6. Bacterial tolerance against heavy metals:

Bacteria, being one of the most primitive life forms on earth, naturally

developed tolerance to wide range of toxic heavy metals including As, Cd, Co,

Cu, Hg, Ni ,Sb , Te, Zn (Silver and Walerhaug 1992; Silver and Ji 1994) in its

genome.

Copper, nickel, cobalt and iron are essential to bacteria because of their use as

catalytic and structural elements in enzymes and other molecule (Cobine et al.,

1999). In many cases, the first response toxic metal contamination is a large

reduction in microbial activity (Pennanen et al., 1996).

Microbes may play a large role in biogeochemical cycling of toxic heavy metals

also in cleaning up or remediating metal-contamination environments.

Page 26: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Bacteria have developed a variety of resistance mechanisms to counteract

heavy metal stress. These mechanisms include the formation and sequestration of

heavy metals in complexes, reduction of a metal to a less toxic species, and direct

efflux of a metal out of the cell (Nies, 1999; Outten et al., 2000).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous, environmentally important microbe

that may employ many resistance mechanisms, such as the mer operon that

reduces toxic Hg2+ to volatile Hg0, which then diffuses out of the cell (Outten et

al., 2000). However, in bacteria, efflux systems are a more common resistance

mechanism for dealing with heavy metals (Figure 1-1).

Figure 1-1. Model showing examples of three major molecular mechanisms responsible fordual tolerance in pseudomonads.(i) Co-resistance towards Ni and ampicilin due to physical linkage of resistance determinants for the twoantimicrobial factors on pBC15 plasmid (Raja and Selvam, 2009). (ii) Cross resistance due to presenceof a membrane-bound DsbA–DsbB disulfide bond formation system that confers resistance to fiveantibiotics accompanied by two metals (Hayashi et al., 2000), (iii) Co-regulatory resistance due to thelinkage of mex and czc operons leads to expression of metal efflux and imipenem resistance (Perron etal., 2004).

Page 27: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

One such system is the cop system of Pseudomonas syringae, which contains

the structural genes copABCD and is homologous to the pco system in

Escherichia coli. The copB and copD genes are involved in the transport of

copper across the membrane, while the products of the copA and copC genes are

outer membrane proteins that bind Cu2+ in the periplasm, protecting the cell from

copper (Cooksey, 1994; Silver, 1996). Other types of efflux systems simply

pump toxic metal ions out of the cell; these systems include the P-type ATPase

cadA, which was first identified in Staphylococcus aureus and is found in other

gram-positive bacteria, that pumps out Cd2+ and Zn2+ by using a phospho-

aspartate intermediate (Nies, 1999; Nusifora, 1989; Silver, 1996).

The genetics and biochemistry of heavy metal resistance mechanisms have been

carefully studied in free-swimming organisms; however, many bacteria in the

environment exist in surface-attached communities called biofilms. Biofilm

bacteria are usually embedded in an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)

matrix composed of polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids (Flemming et al.,

2001; Platt, 1985; Sutherland, 2001; Whitchurch et al., 2002, Whitfield, 1988).

Exposures have been shown to increase the incidence of bacterial antibiotic co-

resistance through the transfer of genetic elements containing both metal and

antibiotic resistance genes (Ugur et al., 2003). also through the selection of

organism that contain elements, such as non specific efflux pumps, which can

convey cross- resistance to both metals and antibiotic (Summers, 2002).

Active efflux from either the cytoplasm or the periplasm is well-known as a

major mechanism of bacterial heavy metal resistance (Nies, 2007; Summers,

2009).

1.2.7. Beneficial heavy metals:

Metals play a vital role in biological systems as a living cell cannot exist

without metals ions. It's estimated that over 50% of all protein are metalloprotiens

and that about a third of all structurally characterized proteins contain metals

(Degtyarenko, 2000). Copper, nickel, cobalt and iron are essential to all

Page 28: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

organisms because of their use as catalytic and structural elements in enzymes and

other molecules (Cobine et al., 1999). Trace amounts of some heavy metals are

also required by living organisms, including, manganese, molybdenum, nickel,

vanadium, strontium and zinc (Gort et al., 1999).

Excessive levels of essential metals, however, can be high toxic to the organism

(Gadd, 1992; Franke et al., 2003). Essential heavy metal ions present a dual

challenge to both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells in that they are useful but can

also be lethal, Therefore, a cell must meet its physiological requirement for

essential metal ions while prevention their deleterious effect (Adalkkalam and

swarup, 2002).

1.2.8. Toxic heavy metals:

Some of the heavy metals are purely toxic with unknown cellular role (Shi et al.,

2002). Other metals essential for life at low concentration but become toxic at

high concentration, (Badar et al., 2000). High concentration of all the heavy

metals Fe, Mo, Mn are classified to have low toxicity, Zn, Ni, Cu, V, Co, W, Cr,

are categorized to have average toxicity, while As, Ag, Sb, Cd, Hg, Pb, U, are

grouped in high toxic heavy metals (Nies, 1999).

Wide range of essential cell components is potential targets for metal induced

damage such as DNA for replication as a result of which cell death can occur

(Malakul et al., 1998).

Slightly elevated metal levels in natural waters may cause the following sub lethal

effects in aquatic organism:

1- Histological or morphological change in tissue.

2- Change in physiological, such as suppression of growth and development, poor

swimming performance, change in circulation.

3- Change in biochemistry, such as enzyme activity and blood chemistry.

4- Change in behavior.

5- Change in reproduction (Connell and Miller, 1984).

Page 29: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

1.2.9. Review of some important heavy metals:

1.2.9.1. Copper:

Copper is an essential metal, mainly required by aerobic cells as a factor for

electron transport and redox enzyme system (Rensing, C. and Grass, 2003). It is

used as a biocide for centuries (Dollwet et al., 2001).

In ancient Egypt (2000 BC), copper was used to sterilize water and wounds.

The ancient Greeks in the time of Hippocrates (400 BC) prescribed copper for

pulmonary diseases and for purifying drinking water. Gangajal, “Holy water”,

given to Hindu devotees to drink as a blessed offering, is stored in copper utensils

as it keeps the water sparkling clean.

During the Roman Empire, copper cooking utensils were used to prevent the

spread of disease. The early Phoenicians nailed copper strips to ships’ hulls to

inhibit fouling and thus increase speed and maneuverability. The Aztecs used

copper oxide and malachite for treating skin conditions. Early American pioneers

moving west across the American continent put copper coins in large wooden

water casks to provide safe drinking water for their long journey.

By the 18th century, copper had come into wide clinical use in the Western

world in the treatment of lung and mental disorders. In the Second World War,

Japanese soldiers put pieces of copper in their water bottles to help prevent

dysentery. Copper sulphate was (and is still) highly prized by some inhabitants of

Africa and Asia for healing sores and skin diseases.

All these civilizations right in using copper for the above mentioned purposes.

The following sections review scientific studies demonstrating the potent biocidal

properties of copper and copper compound and their current uses in health related

application. Interestingly, bacteria exposed to metallic copper surfaces do not

enter a viable but on culturable physiological state, in which they are viable but

do not multiply, but are completely inactivated (Wilks et al., 2006).

Importantly, based on the vast amount of antimicrobial efficacy testing (180 tests,

utilizing 3235 control and test samples, conducted in independent microbiology

Page 30: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

laboratories) sponsored by the Copper Development Association (CDA), the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently (March 2008) approved the

registration of copper alloys as materials with antimicrobial properties, thus

allowing the CDA to make public health claims (Copper Development

Association. 2008).

The following statement is included in the registration: "When cleaned

regularly, antimicrobial copper alloys surfaces kill greater than 99.9% of bacteria

within two hours, and continue to kill more than 99% of bacteria even after

repeated contamination". These public health claims acknowledge that copper,

brass and bronze are capable of killing harmful, potentially deadly bacteria, such

as Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). MRSA is one of the most virulent

strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and a common cause of hospital and

community-acquired infections. Copper is the first solid surface material to

receive this type of EPA registration ( Borkow and Gabbay, 2008).

1.2.9.2. Silver:

Ionic silver (Ag ions) is considered to be effective against a broad range of

micro-organisms, with low concentrations documented to have therapeutic

activity (Russell et al., 1994; Lansdown et al., 1997).

Silver has been described as being ‘oligodynamic’ because of its ability to exert

abactericidal effect at minute concentrations (Clement et al., 1994).

Consequently, a large number of healthcare products now contain silver,

principally due to its antimicrobial activities and low toxicity to human cells.

Such products include silver-coated catheters

(Sampath et al., 1994; Dasgupta, 1994), municipal water systems (Chambers et

al., 1962; Kool et al., 1999) and wound dressings (Adams et al., 1999).

Wounds often provide a favorable environment for the colonization of

microorganisms (Chambers et al., 1962; Adams, 1999; Bowler and Davies 1999).

Page 31: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In order to improve the opportunity for wound healing, it is important to create

conditions that are unfavorable to micro-organisms and favorable for the host

repair mechanisms, and topical antimicrobial agents are believed to facilitate this

process. Antiseptic agents are now considered for the treatment of localized skin

and wound infections because they have a lower propensity to induce bacterial

resistance than antibiotics. One example of the early use of silver in wound care is

silver sulphadiazine (AgSD) cream, developed in the 1960s, for the treatment of

burns.

Recently, a trend towards the use of wound cover dressings that contain

silver has been evident, and today, a selection of foam, film, hydrocolloid, gauze

and dressings with Hydrofiber technology impregnated with silver are

commercially available. However, concerns are being expressed regarding the

overuse of silver and the possible emergence of bacterial resistance to silver,

particularly within the clinical environment (Pirnay et al, 2003; Gupta et al.,

2001).

Silver-resistant bacteria have been reported since 1975 (McHugh et al., 1975;

Deshpande and Chopade, 1994) and research within this area is clearly increasing

(Silver et al., 2003).

A preliminary understanding of the genetics underlying silver resistance has

been known since 1998 (Gupta and Silver, 1998, Silver et al., 1999) with a greater

understanding of the biochemistry documented a year later (Gupta A., et al.,

1999).

Clinical evidence of silver-resistant bacteria has been principally in hospitals,

specifically in burns wards, where silver salts (in the form of silver nitrate) are

used as antiseptic agents (Mchugh et al., 1975; Klasen, 2000).

Many clinicians and researchers have questioned whether the widespread usage

of silver could lead to cross-resistance to antibiotics, as has been suggested with a

number of biocides, specifically triclosan, chlorhexidine and quaternary

ammonium compounds (QACs) (Aiello and Larson 2003; Russell, 2003)

Page 32: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

However, in reference to the available evidence to date, this appears to represent

an unjustifiable concern.

Silver Nitrate has antiseptic properties. A very dilute solution is sometimes

dropped into newborn babies' eyes at birth to prevent contraction of Neisseria

gonorrhoea or Chlamydia from the mother.

1.2.9.3. Mercury:

Mercury (Hg), the heavy metal cation with the strongest toxicity, it is affinity to

thiole groups is even stronger than the affinity of cadmium for sulfide; the

solubility product of Hgs is 6.38 x 10.53 (Weast, 1984).

Consequently, it is the most toxic of all tested elements for Escherichia coli, the

MIC was 10 mM (Mergeay et al, 1985).

Because of high toxicity mercury has no beneficial function. However, since

bacteria may be confronted with toxic Hg2+ with high probability, mercury

resistance determinants, Mer, are very wide spreading (Hobman and Brown 1997;

Reniero et al., 1998; Smith et al., 1998).

Resistance to mercury is based on unique peculiarities of mercury; it is redox

potential and the vapour pressure/ melting/ boiling point of metallic mercury

which extraordinary low for a metal, melting point

-38. 87oC, boiling point 356.56oC (Weast, 1984).

Thus, living cells are able to reduce Hg to the metal, and this metal does not

remain inside the cell with the potential to become oxidized again, but it leaves

the cell by passive diffusion (Silver and Phung 1996; Silver 1996), metallic

mercury may also oxidizing again by bacteria (Smith, et al., 1998).

In Gram negative bacteria, the periplasmic Hg2+ binding protein Mer p binds the

cation as the first step of detoxification (Qian et al., 1998).

Mer P probably delivers the toxic cation to the mercury transporter Mer T which

transports the cation into the cytoplasm (Hobman and Brown, 1996).

Page 33: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Alternatively or in addition to Mer PT, an alternative up take route exists which

involves the Mer C protein ( Hamlett et al., 1992; Sahlman et al., 1997).

Once inside the cell, Hg is reduced by NADPH- depended to Hg(0) by Mer A

protein which is related to glutathione reductase and other proteins (Schiering et

al., 1991).

Mercury resistance is tightly regulated, mainly by the Mer R protein (Brunker et

al., 1996; Hobman and Brown 1997; Yurieva et al., 1997).

This protein binds as a dimer to the Mer promoter and inhibits transcription

initiation without Hg2+.

1.2.9.4. Leads:

Lead (Pb) has been used in high amount since 2500 years (Hong et al., 1994),

e.g. as fuel ad dictum, although lead toxicity is well known for a long time

(Johnson, 1998). In sea water, it is even rare than mercury (Weast, 1984). Due to

it is low solubility, especially lead phosphate is insoluble with a solubility product

of 10-54; it is biologically available concentration is low. Therefore; it is MIC for

Escherichia coli is only 5 mM (Mergeay et al., 1985). Thus, lead is not

extraordinary toxic for microorganism, only it is excessive use by man makes lead

problem. There is no molecular information about uptake of lead. Lead tolerant

bacteria have been isolated (Trajanovska et al., 1997), and precipitation of lead

phosphate within the cells of these bacteria has been reported (Levinson et al.,

1996; levinson and Mahler 1998). The only information about molecular biology

of any lead resistance comes from Ralstonia eutropha CH34. It has been shown

that resistance to lead in this bacterium is mediated by a P-type ATPase

(Borremans et al., 2001). Thus, lead resistance may also be based predominantly

on metal ion efflux.

Page 34: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

1.2.9.5. Zinc:

Zinc (Zn) is another essential trace element. It is not biologically redox reactive

and is thus not used in respiration. It is, however, important in forming complexes

(such as zinc fingers in DNA) and as a component in cellular enzymes (Nies,

1999). Bacterial cells accumulate zinc by a fast, unspecific uptake mechanism and

it is normally found in higher concentrations (but is less toxic) than other heavy

metals (Nies, 1999). Uptake of zinc ions is generally coupled to that of

magnesium, and the two ions may be transported by similar mechanisms in

bacteria (Nies and Silver, 1995). Industrial plants producing metallic zinc by

roasting or heating are always potential sources of environmental zinc (Diels and

Mergeay, 1990).

Zinc is component in such a variety of enzyme and DNA – binding protein in

like zinc finger proteins, which also exist in bacteria (Chou et al., 1998), that life

seems to be not possible without zinc. The toxicity of zinc to Escherichia coli is

similar to the toxicity of copper, nickel and cobalt, the MIC was 1Mm (Mergeay

et al., 1985). The P- type ATPase transport zinc only across the cytoplasmic

membrane, the RND-systems are hypothized to efflux a cross the complete cell

wall of Gram-negative bacteria the first of these systems was cloned as the

Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance CZC from Ralstonia eutrophus CH34 (Mergeay,

et al.1985; Nies et al., 1987). Resistance is based on energy-depended metal ion

efflux (Nies et al., 1989b).

1.2.9.6. Cadmium:

Cadmium is extremely toxic for all living organisms even when present at a low

concentration. It has been reported that Cd2+ damages the cells by a broad

spectrum of effects on cell metabolism for instances by binding to essential

respiratory enzymes (Nies, 2003), inducing oxidative stress (Banjerdkij et al.,

2005) or inhibiting DNA repair (Jin et al., 2003).

Page 35: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Cadmium ions can easily enter bacterial cells by the transport systems for

essential divalent cations such as Mn+2 (Tynecka et al., 1981) or Zn ions (Laddaga

and Silver, 1985), so almost all prokaryotes and eukaryotes have developed

mechanisms to prevent excessive accumulation of Cd2+ in the cells. The relatively

low intracellular Cd2+ concentration is maintained through the regulation of

sequestration or efflux. Microbial resistance to Cd2+ is usually based on energy

dependent efflux mechanisms (Silver, 1996; Nies, 2003).

A distinct Cadmium resistance mechanism reported in Pseudomonas involves

Cadmium – binding proteins called Pseudothioneins (PT) (Higham et al., 1986).

Three major groups are responsible for this cadmium efflux: CBA-type

chemiosmotic antiporters, P-type ATPases and cation diffusion facilitators (CDF).

The CBA-type anti porters are protein complexes that are able to span the

complete cell wall of a gram-negative bacterium, while CDF proteins and P-type

ATPases are located in the cytoplasmic membrane and are single-subunit systems

(Aguilar et al., 2010).

1.2.9.7. Nickel:

Nickel (Ni) is widely distributed in nature and 85% of the earth crust is nickel

(Carson et al., 1986). Nickel is used in production of stainless steel, as a chemical

catalyst in electroplating, ceramics, pigments, batteries and coins (IARC, 1990).

Nickel is classified as a borderline metal ion because it has both soft and hard

metal properties and can bind to sulfur, Nitrogen, and oxygen groups (Moore and

Ramamoothy, 1984b). In many bacteria nickel is required for enzyme such as

urease, dehydrogenase, hydrogenase (Van valiet et al., 2001). However excess

nickel is toxic, nickel binds to protein and nucleic acid and frequently inhibits

enzymatic activity, DNA replication transcription and translation (Grosse et al.,

1999).

Page 36: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Nickel occurs mostly in Ni (II) cation form, Ni (III) is unstable (Weast, 1984).

The MIC of Ni2+ to Escherichia coli is 1mM (Mergeay et al., 1985).

Accumulation of Ni2+ as a resistance strategy has been reported in strains of P.

aeruginosa (Gupta. et al., 2004), but the mechanisms involved have not yet been

studied (Aguilar et al., 2010).

1.2.10. Health application of heavy metals:

Heavy metals, particularly silver and mercury, have a variety of applications in

controlling microbial population (Kenneth and Jeffery 2006). Silver salts alone or

in combination with other drugs appear to have a significant potential as topical

antimicrobial agent (Fox, 1977; de gracia, 2001). Mercury in the form of less

toxic organic compounds is being used as skin disinfectant (Gerald, 2007).

Copper is considered safe to humans, as demonstrated by the widespread and

prolonged use by women of copper intrauterine devices (Anonymous, 2002;

O'Brien, 2008). The risk of adverse reactions due to dermal contact with copper is

considered extremely low (Hostynek, 2003; Gorter, 2004).

Copper is an essential trace element involved in numerous human physiological

and metabolic processes (Olivares and Uauy 1996, Uauy and Olivares, 1998),

including in wound repair (Borkow and Gabbay 2008), and many over-the-

counter treatments for wound healing contain copper (Pereira and Felcman,

1998). The National Academy of Sciences Committee established the U.S.

Recommended Daily Allowance of 0.9 mg of copper for normal adults (Chen et

al., 2008).

Copper exerts its toxicity to microorganisms through several parallel

mechanisms, which eventually may lead to the microorganisms’ death even

within minutes of their exposure to copper (Ohsumi et al., 1988; Espirito et al.,

2008; Borkow et al., 2007). Harrison et al., (2008) identified that Cu2+ works

synergistically with quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs); specifically

benzalkonium chloride, cetalkonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride,

Page 37: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

myristalkonium chloride, and Polycide) to kill P. aeruginosa biofilms. In some

cases, adding Cu2+ to QACs resulted in a 128-fold decrease in the biofilm

minimum bactericidal concentration.

1.2.11. Detection of heavy metals resistance in laboratory

1.2.11.1. Phenotypic characteristics:

There are many methods used for detection of heavy metals resistance in

bacteria. These methods include agar dilution methods and pouring methods,

determination of MIC and maximal tolerant concentrations MTC of different

heavy metals.

Regarding of resistance to cadmium, Hu and Zhao, (2007) studied

determination of cadmium resistance in P. Putida CD2 using maximal tolerant

concentrations (MTC) method, and they found that the MTC was the highest

metal concentration at which the growth of bacteria was still observed.

Raja et al., (2009) studied resistance of P. aeruginosa to Nickel, Chromium,

and lead, and they found that Pseudomonas BC15 was capable of absorbing 93%

Ni, 65% Pb, 50% Cd and 30% Cr within 48 h from the medium containing 100

mg of each heavy metal per liter. The multiple metal tolerance of this strain was

also associated with resistance to antibiotics such as ampicillin, tetracycline,

chloramphenicol, erythromycin, kanamycin and streptomycin.

Sevgi et al., (2010) studied resistance and determined the (MTCs) of six heavy

metals, Cr, Cu, Ni, Co, Cd, and Zn, and they found that Pseudomonas spp.

Revealed that resistance to Cr was found in 73.9% of the bacterial strains isolated

from soil samples, whereas 26% of the isolates exhibited resistance to Ni, 18.4%

to Zn, 11.5% to Cd, 9.2% to Co, and 7.3% to Cu. Observed maximum MTCs

were 5 mM for Zn and Cu, 3 mM for Ni, and 2 mM for Cr.

Page 38: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In a study undertaken to examine the effects of heavy metals arsenic, silver,

nickel, cobalt, cadmium, lead and mercury on P. aeruginosa isolated from

infected wounds using an agar dilution method, Prasad et al., (2009) found that P.

aeruginosa strains were highly susceptible to heavy metals ions and two strains

were found to be resistant against silver ions isolated from burns infections.

Regarding resistance of Pseudomonas spp. to chromium, copper, nickel, and

cadmium, Singh et al., (2010), studied the tolerance of Pseudomonas spp. isolated

from sewage of industrial effluents from waste water treatment plant, and they

found that all the isolates exhibited high resistance to heavy metals with minimum

inhibitory concentration (MIC) for heavy metals ranging from 50g/ml to

350g/ml. They also revealed that the isolates showed multiple tolerances to

heavy metals and the heavy metal tolerance test indicated maximum microbial

tolerance of Pseudomonas spp. to copper (300 g/ml) and lo west to Chromium

(60 g/ml) .

Abdelatey et al., (2011) studied resistance and screening for heavy metal

tolerance, they isolated and characterized some bacteria from an Egyptian soil.

Three Gram positive isolates were identified as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus

subtilis, Bacillus cereus and two Gram negative isolates were identified as

Pseudomonas spp. and Bordetella spp. Both Gram positive and Gram negative

bacteria. Showed the metal tolerance against Cd2+ and Co2+ at different

concentrations ranging from 0.0- 1.0 mg L-1 and determined that metals tolerance

in all bacteria showed the higher sensitivity to Cd2+ more than Co2+.

1.2.11.2. Genotypic characteristics:

Investigations of adaptive responses commonly involve studying phenotypic

changes. However, a more basic understanding of adaptation is possible if the

molecular mechanisms of resistance are also characterized. Approaches that can

be used include the use of molecular techniques such as the polymerase chain

reaction (PCR), DNA– DNA hybridization and an analysis of restriction fragment

Page 39: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

length polymorphism (RFLP) (Barkay et al., 1985; Diels and Mergeay, 1990;

Rochelle et al., 1991; Nakamura and Silver, 1994).

These techniques are, in general, more sensitive and rapid than some of the

traditional methods. A significant advantage is that these approaches can be aimed

precisely at a particular genetic determinant and thereby may provide a useful

means of investigating bacterial responses to environmental stress and reveal the

molecular mechanisms of adaptation (Abou-Shanab et al., 2007).

Exogenous plasmid isolation has been used to detect heavy metals resistance

genes to mercury in soil bacteria. This method allows capture of plasmids from

the total bacterial fraction of an environmental sample without the necessity to

culture the host organism (Smit et al., 1998). They also identified plasmids of

10−50 kb carrying resistance to copper, streptomycin and chloramphenicol by

amended soil with mercuric chloride and found this to subsequently increase the

recovery of resistance plasmids. Plasmids carrying resistance to mercury have

also been captured from polluted soils and slurries (Top et al., 1994; Smalla et al.,

2000).

In addition to multi-resistance plasmids, resistance genes are situated on

transposable elements that can associate with other elements such as

chromosomes and plasmids. These transposable elements include transposons and

integrons, which can be transferred horizontally. Integrons are thought to play an

important role in the evolution of resistance as they contain mobile gene cassettes

which bear a recombination site known as a 59-base element (59-be) that is

recognized by the integron encoded integrase IntI most cassette genes described

are antibiotic or quaternary ammonium compound resistance genes (Hall et al.,

1991).

Jaysankar et al., (2008) used the biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequence

analyses and they revealed the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other

bacteria like Bacillus spp. to detoxification efficiency for Hg, Cd, and Pb

indicates good potential for application in bioremediation of toxic heavy metals.

Page 40: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In a study for determination of heavy metals resistance (Cd), (Mn), (Zn), (Cu),

(Pb), (Co) using Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain E1, Xiao-xi et al., (2009) used

16S rDNA sequence analysis to identified strain E1, and they found that strain

E1was resistant to heavy metals and the order is found to be

Cd Mn Zn Cu Pb Co in solid media. Strain E1 also exhibits the

resistance to 12 antibiotics (Xiao-xi et al., (2009).

Sobral et al., (2012) used multiple locus variable number of tandem repeats

(VNTR) analysis (MLVA) has been shown to provide a high level of information

for epidemiological investigations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic infection.

In this study, an automatized MLVA assay has been developed for the analysis of

16 VNTRs in two multiplex polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), they used

MLVA-16Orsay scheme to identify the genotyping of 83 isolates from eight

cystic fibrosis patients, demonstrating that the same genotype persisted during

eight years of chronic infection in the majority of cases.

De la Iglesia et al., (2010) used PCR primer pair to specifically detect copper

P-type ATPases gene sequences. And new copper P-type ATPases gene

sequences were found, and a high degree of change in the genetic composition

because of copper exposure was also determined.

Abdelatey et al., (2011) studied a number of bacteria isolated and

characterized from an Egyptian soil. The semi-quantitative reverse transcription-

PCR (RT-PCR) was used to investigate the gene expression mechanism

responsible for the metal resistance in some of these gram positive and gram-

negative bacteria that were, highly resistant to Co2+ and Cd2+. The mer, chr, czc,

and ncc genes that are responsible for resistance to heavy metals, were shown to

be present in these bacteria by using RT-PCR. The results of the gene expression

analysis revealed that merA and chrB genes were down-regulated in the all strains

of bacteria (Staphylococcus. aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus,

Pseudomonas spp. and Bordetella spp.) treated with Co2+ and Cd2+. However,

cobalt-zinc-cadmium (czcD) and nickel-cobalt-cadmium (nccA) gene were up-

Page 41: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

regulated in the all strains of bacteria treated with Co2+ and Cd2+., and they found

Co2+ and Cd2+ resistance genes are widely distributed in both gram-positive and

gram-negative isolates obtained from different samples of Egyptian soils.

Page 42: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

29

2.1 Materials:

2.1.1 Samples:

1- Clinical sample including (Burn swaps, Ears swaps, and Wound swaps) were

collected from (150) patients suffering from burns, Otitis media and wound

infections, The age range of patients was (1-60) years of both sexes.

2- Environmental sample, 150 samples were collected from Hilla Teaching

hospital environment which included disinfectants, fomites, beds, wall, bath

rooms and catheters.

3- The period of collection was extended from November 2011 to March 2012.

2.1.2 Laboratory apparatus and Instruments:

The apparatus and instruments used throughout this study are listed in

Table (2- 1).

Table (2-1) Lab apparatus and instrumentsNo. Instruments Company/Country

1. Centrifuge Hettich/Germany2. Benson burner Germany3. Water bath Memmert/Germany4. Inoculating loop Memmert/Germany5. Distillator GFL/Germany6. Autoclave Stermite/Japan7. ELISA Mixer Denley/UK8. ELISA Reader Beckman/Germany9. ELISA Shaker Jean Robin/France10. ELISA Washer Beckman/Germany11. Eppendrof Centrifuge Hermle/Germany12. Incubator Memmert/Germany13. Micropipettes USA14. Light Microscope Olympus/ Japan15. Refrigerator Concord/Italy16. Sensitive electronic balance A&D/Japan17. Shaker water bath Memmert/Germany18. Ultra Violet transilluminator San. Gabriel/ USA19. Vortex Yamato/Japan20. Digital camera Sony/ Japan21. Electrophoresis Albent/ Taiwan22. Water bath Memmert/Germany

Page 43: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

30

23. Screw tube China24, E. Graph Japan25. Wooden sticks China26. Safety cabinet Labogene /Denmark

27. polystyrene Tarson, Kolkata/India

2.1.3 Chemical and biological materials:

The chemical materials used in the study are shown in Table (2-2)

Table (2-2) Chemical and biological materials

No. Material Company/country1. H2O2, 99% Ethanol alcohol, Glycerol,

Kovac's reagent, urea solutionFluka chemika/Switzerland

2. KH2PO4, Na2HPO4, NaCl, NH4Cl,MgSo4, CaCl2, -naphthol, Methyl red,Glycerol, Agarose,Phosphate buffer saline (pH=7.2),Tetramethyl-p-paraphylen diaminedihydrochloride

B.D.H/ England

3. Ethidium Bromide Promega/USA4. NaCl, H2SO4 Merk Darmstadt,

Germany5. Crystal Violet Sigma/USA6. Gram stain set KSA7. TBE buffer Promega, USA8. Agarose Promega, USA9. Loading dye (bromophenole blue) Promega, USA10. 100 bp DNA ladder Geneaid, Korea

Page 44: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

31

2.1.3.1 Heavy metals:

Table (2-2) Heavy metals used in the study.

Heavy metals Assembly Content Origin

Mercury chloride Hgcl2 30gm Analytical reagent/ India

Nickel sulfate NiSo4 25gm Analar /England

Lead nitrate PbNo3 25gm Himedia laboratory pvt. Ltd/

India

Cadmium sulfate CdSo4 25gm lab reagent/ India

Zinc sulfate ZnSo4 25gm DIDACTIC, Barcelona/Spain

Silver Sulfate AgSo4 25gm BDH/ England

Copper Sulfate CuSo4 25gm BDH/d England

2.1.4 Culture media:

The culture media used in the study are shown in Table (2-3)

Table (2-4) Culture mediaNo. Media Company/country1. Blood agar base, brain heart infusion agar, Brain

heart infusion broth, Müller-Hinton agar,MacConkey agar, Peptone broth, Yeast extract,Tryptic soy agar, Agar-agar.

Mast diagnostic/U.K

2. Nutrient agar, Nutrient broth, Peptone waterbroth.

Oxiod

3. Simon citrate agar, Triple sugar iron agar, MR-VP broth, Tryptic soy agar.

Diffco/U.k

4. Cetrimide agar Biolife/Italy

Page 45: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

32

2.1.5 Cetrimide agar (Forbes et al., 2007).

This medium composed of:-

dissolved in 850 ml of distilled water, adjusted pH to 7, sterilized by autoclaving

then the volume was completed to 1000 ml. cetrimide agar was used as a selective

media for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

2.1.6 Standard strain used in the study:

Bacterial isolate Genetic properties Source

Escherichia coli MM294 hsdR-, hsdM+, ednAI,

pro-, thi-, Rif+

Genetic engineering

Institute/Baghdad

2.1.7 Plasmid extraction kit:

Table (2-3) plasmid extraction kit (Geneaid kit, USA):

Diagnostic kits Company/origin

Geneaid kit USA

Peptone 20g

MgCl2 1.5g

K2SO4 10g

Cetrimide 0.3g

Agar 15g

Page 46: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

33

2.1.8 DNA Marker (Ladder):

DNA

MarkerDescription Origin

100 bpLadder

100-300 base pairs (bp). The ladder consistsof 12 double strand DNA fragment ladderwith size of (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600,700, 800, 900, 1000, 1500, 3000 bp). The500bp present at triple the intensity of otherfragments and serve as a reference. All otherfragments appear with equal intensity on gel.

Geneaid/Korea

2.2 Reagents and Solutions:

2.2.1. Reagents:

2-2-1-1 Oxidase test reagent:

This reagent was prepared by dissolving 0.1 gram of tetra methyl-P-

phenylene diamine dihydrochloride in 10 ml of distilled water. It was used

immediately after preparation (Collee et al., 1996).

2-2-1-2 Catalase test reagent:

This reagent was prepared in 3% concentration of H2O2 and it was used to

identify bacterial ability to produce catalase enzyme (McFaddin, 2000).

2.2.1.3 Methyl red reagents:

A weight of 0.1gm of methyl red was dissolved in 300ml of 99% ethanol and

then the volume was completed to 500ml by distilled water. It was used to detect

the acidity of the medium, which was produced by complete fermentation of

carbohydrates (McFaddin, 2000).

Page 47: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

34

2.2.1.4 Voges-Proskauer reagent (Barritt's reagent):

This reagent was prepared according to Collee et al (1996). It consisted of two

solutions:

A- - Naphthol- reagent 5%: It was prepared by dissolving 5gm of -

Naphthol in 100 ml of 99% ethanol.

B- Potassium hydroxide KOH 40% solution: 40 grams of KOH was

dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water. This reagent was used to detect

the partial glucose hydrolysis.

2.2.1.5 Kovac's reagents:

It was prepared by dissolving 10gm of p-dimethylamine benzaldehyde

(DAMB) in 150ml amyle-alcohol, and then 50ml concentrated HCL was

gradually added to this mixture. This solution was stored in a dark bottle, and

gently shaken before use. It was used in the demonstration of indole production

(McFadden, 2000).

2.2.2 Solutions:

2.2.2.1 Normal saline solution:

This solution was prepared by dissolving 0.85 gm NaCl in 90 ml distilled water

(D.W), and further completed to 100 ml with D.W (MacFaddin, 2000).

[

2.2.2.2 Gram Stains Solutions:

The solutions were prepared according to the required microbiological

methods. These solutions included: four solutions crystal violate, iodine, absolute

alcohol, and safranine (Collee et al., 1996).

[

2.2.2.3 Phosphate buffer saline:

Phosphate buffer solution was prepared according to the manufacturer

instructions, by dissolving one tablet of PBS (pH 7.3 checked pre-and post autoclave) in

100 ml of distilled water and then sterilized by autoclave.

Page 48: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

35

2.2.2.4 Urea Solution (20%)

It was prepared by dissolving 20 gm of urea in small volume of distilled

water, and completed up to 100 ml D.W. and then sterilized by Millipore filter

paper. It was used in urease test for the detection of urease positive bacteria

(McFaddin, 2000).

2.2.2.5 Stock solution:

It was prepared by a content of metal dissolving in sterile normal saline, and

then shaken at 75 rpm in water bath for 15 minute at 37C (Sergio Vaca Pacheco et

al., 1995).

2.2.2.6 DNA loading buffer:

This buffer was prepared by dissolving 25mg bromophenol blue and 4mg

sucrose in 10ml distilled water, and stored at 4oC until used (Sambrook and

Rusell, 2001).

2.2.2.4 Ethidium Bromide Solution:

It was prepared by dissolving 0.05gm of Ethidium Bromide in 10ml distilled

water and stored in dark reagent bottle (Sambrook and Rusell, 2001).

2.2.2.5 Tris-Borate-EDTA Buffer (TBE):

Tris-OH, 0.08M, Boric acid, 0.08M, EDTA and 0.02M ,were added to 800ml

distilled water, the pH was adjusted to 8 and completed to one litter by distilled

water, then autoclave at 121oC for 15 minutes, and stored at 4oC until used

(Sambrook and Rusell, 2001).

2.3 Preparation of culture media:

Culture media were prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer

company and serialized by autoclaving in 1 bar at 121oC for 15 minutes.

2.3.1 MacConkey agar medium:

MacConkey agar medium was prepared according to the method

recommended by the manufacturing company. It was used for the primary

Page 49: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

36

isolation of most Gram-negative bacteria and to differentiate lactose fermenters

from non-lactose fermenters (Benson, 1998).

2.3.2 Nutrient agar medium:

Nutrient agar medium was prepared according to the manufacturing

company. It was used for cultivation of the bacterial isolates when it was

necessary (McFadden, 2000).

2.3.3 Nutrient broth:

This medium was used to grow and preserve the bacterial isolates

supplemented with 15% glycerol (McFadden, 2000).

2.3.4 Blood agar medium:

Blood agar medium was prepared according to manufacturer by

dissolving 40 gm blood agar base in 1000 ml D.W. The medium was autoclaved at

121ºC for 15 min, cooled to 50 ºC and 5% of fresh human blood was added. This

medium was used as enrichment medium for the cultivation of the bacterial isolates

and to determine their ability of blood hemolysis (Forbes et al., 2007).

2.3.5 Muller-Hinton agar:

Muller-Hinton agar medium was prepared according to the manufacturing

company (Himedia, India) and it was used in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

2.3.6 Brain heart infusion broth with 5% glycerol:

This medium was prepared by adding 5ml of glycerol to 95ml of BHI agar before

autoclaving (McFadden, 2000). This medium was used for preservation of

bacterial isolation for long period of time.

2.3.7 Peptone water medium:

This medium was prepared by dissolving 8gm peptone in 1000ml of distilled

water, then distributed into test tubes, and autoclaved. It was used for the

demonstration of the bacterial ability to decompose the amino acid tryptophan to

Indole (McFadden, 2000).

Page 50: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

37

2.3.8 Urea agar medium:

This medium was prepared according to manufacturing company, by suspended

2.4 grams urea agar base in 95 ml distilled water and the medium was boiled to

dissolve the medium completely. The pH was adjusted at 6.8 then this medium

was autoclaved and cooled to 50ºC then 5ml of 20% filtration sterilized urea

solution was added. The medium was distributed into sterile tube and allowed to

set in a slope position. This medium was used for detecting bacterial ability to

produce urease enzyme (MacFaddin, 2000).

2.3.9 MR-VP medium:

MR-VP medium has been prepared and used to detect the partial and complete

hydrolysis of glucose according to McFadden, (2000).

2.3.10 Tryptic Soy agar medium:

This medium was prepared according to manufacturer by dissolving 40gm of

tryptic soy agar in 1000ml of distilled water. To enhance growth of bacterial isolates,

this medium was modified by adding 5% fresh blood after autoclaving the medium at

121ºC for 15 minutes, and cooling it to 50ºC. This medium was used as enrichment

medium for cultivation of the bacterial isolates (McFadden, 2000). This medium was

used in Biofilm assay procedure.

2.3.11 M9 Media:

6 gm of Na2HPO4, 3 gm of KH2PO4, 0.5 gm of NaCl, and 1gm of NH4Cl

were dissolved in 950 ml of distilled water with 2% agar , then they were sterilized

into autoclave , after cooling the mixture to 50oC , 2 ml of 1M of MgSO4 , 10 ml of

20% glucose and 0.1 ml of 1 M of CaCl2 (all of them were sterilized separately by

filtration ) were added to it ,then the volume was completed to 1000 ml (Sambrook

and Rusell, 2001).

Page 51: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

38

2.3.13 Motility medium:

It was prepared by dissolving 0.5gm agar with 100ml of nutrient broth, and

then dispensed into sterile test tubes (5ml in each).This medium has been used to

detect the motility of bacteria (Collee et al., 1996).

2.3.12 Simmons' citrate medium:

Simmon's citrate medium was used for determining the ability of bacteria to

utilize citrate as the sole carbon source (McFadden, 2000).

2.3.13 Agarose gel medium:

The agarose gel was prepared according to the method of (Sambrook and

Rusell, 2001) by adding 1gm agarose to 100ml of 1x TBE buffer. The solution

was heated to boiling (using water bath) until all the gel particles dissolved, the

solution was allowed to cool down within 50-60oC, and mixed with 0.5µg/ml

ethidium bromide.

2.4 Methods:

2.4.1 Specimens collection:

A Total of (300) swab specimens were collected, of which, 150 Specimens

were collected from different sites of infections (burns, wounds and otitis media.

Information about (age, antibiotic usage, residence and hospitalization) of patients

were taken into consideration.

Each swab taken carefully from the site of infection by using transport media

to maintain the swab wet until taken to laboratory. Whereas 150 samples were

collected from AL- Hilla Teaching hospital environment (beds, bathroom,

fomites, wall, catheters and disinfectants) by using wet swabs. Each specimen was

inoculated on (MacConkey agar, Nutrient agar) and then incubation at 37ºC for 24

hrs. For confirmation of bacterial isolation, isolates were then inoculated on

cetrimide medium.

Page 52: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

39

2.5 Laboratory diagnosis:

2.5.1 Morphological tests:

2.5.1.1Colonial morphology and microscopic examination:

The grown colonies on the Muller-Hinton agar characterized by diffusible

pigments and sweet-grape odor were selected for further diagnostic tests. The

results of the following tests regarding diagnosis at P. aeruginosa were according

to (MacFadden, 2000). Cultural characteristics include; colonial morphology

(smooth mucoid), grape odor, its color and diffusible pigments on Muller-Hinton

agar (bluish green or yellowish green) and inability to ferment lactose on

MacConkey agar (Collee et al, 1996). Microscopic examination includes the

examination of shape (rods), gram–stain reaction, arrangement of cells with each

other.

2.5.2 Biochemical tests:

2.5.2.1 Oxidase test:

A piece of clean filter paper was saturated with oxidase reagent. If the color

turned rose to purple, the oxidase test would be positive (Forbes et al., 2007).

2.5.2.2 Catalase test:

A colony of organisms is transferred by sterile wooden stick to the surface of

a clean, dry glass slide, and one drop of 3% H2O2 is added to it. The formation of

gas bubbles indicated the positive result (Forbes et al., 2007).

2.5.2.3 Indole test:

It was used for determination of organism's ability to produce indole from

deamination of tryptophan by tryptophanase. The formation of red color ring at

top of broth indicates for positive reaction while a yellow color ring indicated a

negative reaction (MacFaddin, 2000).

Page 53: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

40

2.5.2.4 Methyl Red test:

It is employed to detect the production of sufficient acid during the

fermentation of glucose. The change of color to orange was positive reaction

(Murray et al., 2003).

2.5.2.5 Voges-Proskauer (acetoin production) test:

The VP test is used to detect acetone (acetyl-methyl-carbinol), which is

produced by certain bacteria during growth in peptone glucose broth (MR-VP

broth) the positive result was changing of the color of the medium to red

(McFadden, 2000).

2.5.2.6 Simmon's Citrate test:

The citrate test was used to determine the ability of bacterium to utilize citrate

as its only source of carbon. The positive result was changing of color of media

from green to blue (Forbes et al., 2007).

2.5.2.7 Urease test:

The urea base agar was sterilized by autoclave, after that it was cooled to 50°C

and urea substrate was added to it and it was poured in sterile tubes; then it was

inoculated by bacterial culture, which was incubated for (24-48) hours at 37°C.

When urea was broken down, ammonia was released and the pH of medium

increased. This pH change was detected by a pH indicator that turned pink in a

basic environment. A pink medium indicated a positive test for urease. Failure of

deep pink color to develop indicates a negative reaction (Collee et al., 1996).

2.5.2.8 Motility:

Tubes containing motility medium were stabbed once at the center with on

inoculating needle then, incubated at 35°C for 24–48 hours. The motile bacteria

spread out from the line of inoculating (Forbes et al., 2007).

2.5.2.9 Growth at 42o C:

P. aeruginosa has a characteristic ability to grow at 42°C in successive

subculture. Tubes containing nutrient broth were inoculated with selected

Page 54: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

41

colonies and incubated at 42°C for 24 hours. The ability to grow was indicated as

a positive result (Collee et al., 1996).

2.7 Detection of virulence factors:

2.7.1 Hemolysin production:

Hemolysin production was carried out by inoculating of blood agar medium

with bacterial isolate at 3°C for 24-48 hrs. An appearance of clear zone around the

colonies referred to complete hemolysis ( -hemolysis) or greenish zone around

the colonies referred to partial hemolysis ( -hemolysis), while no changing

referred to non-hemolytic ( -hemolytic) (McFadden, 2000).

2.7.2 Siderophores production:

M9 medium agar was prepared and 200µl of Dipyridyl was added and mixed the

media with inoculums, incubated at 37oC for24 hrs. The positive result is growing

of bacteria in the media (Nassif and Sansonetti, 1986).

2.7.3 Detection of HMR in bacterial isolates:

We were used (3) method to detect the MIC of HMR, included:

2.7.3.1 Screening test for one of heavy metals was leads.

2.7.3.2 Agar dilution method, for four of heavy metals included (Cadmium,

Nickel, Zinc, and Silver).

2.7.3.3 Pouring method, for three of heavy metals included (Copper, Mercury,

and Leads). All method mentions previous described in details following:

2.7.3.1 Determination of MIC using lead as a screening test:

All isolated were tested (screening test) with leads at concentration 400 µg/ml,

were prepared as follows:

a- Prepared stock solution by dissolve 500000 µg of Lead in 20ml normal

saline.

b- Stock solution of leads was prepared by dissolve 250000 µg of leads in

20ml normal saline.

c- Mueller-Hinton agar was used as inoculums medium.

Page 55: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

42

d- Muller-Hinton medium was supplement with different cationic

concentration of leads included (100,200.400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200

µg/ml).

e- A loopfull of refresh bacterial growth was transferred and streaked on plate

supplemented with metals and incubated at 37C for 24 hrs.

f- After incubation presence of bacterial growth indicates ability of bacterial

isolate to resistance the metals ions.

2.7.3.2 Determination of MIC using Agar dilution method:

All isolates were also tested to determine the minimal inhibitory

concentrations (MICs). MICs of four metal including (Cadmium, Nickel, Zinc,

and Silver) was carried out by using supplement method was determined by an

agar dilution method with modification as described by Riley, were prepared as

follows:

a- Mueller-Hinton agar was prepared in 50 ml distilled water, and

approximate concentration 0.0001M, 0,001M, 0.01M for Cadmium and

0.0001M, 0.001M, 0.01M, 0.1M for Nickel, Zinc, and Silver, added to

flask contained 50 ml Mueller-Hinton, mixed well ,and autoclaved.

b- After autoclaving, inoculated medium was allowed to cool (45C) and then

poured into a plate.

c- Inoculating by refreshed growth and incubated at 37C for 24 hrs.

d- After incubation if there is growth, meaning resistance and if there is no

growth meaning sensitive.

2.7.3.3 Determination of MIC using Pouring method:

All isolates were also tested to determine the minimal inhibitory

concentrations (MICs). MICs of three metals (Copper, Mercury, and Lead)

carried out by used pouring method was determined by stock method with

Page 56: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

43

modification as described by (Forbes et al., 1998), were prepared as

follows:-

a- Prepared stock solution by dissolve 500000 µg of Copper and Lead in

20ml normal saline.

b- Stock solution of Mercury was prepared by dissolving 250000 µg of

Mercury in 20ml normal saline.

c- Mueller-Hinton agar was used as medium.

d- Muller-Hinton medium was supplement with different cationic

concentration of leads included (100,200.400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200

µg/ml).

e- A loopfull of refresh bacterial growth was transferred and streaked on plate

supplemented with metals and incubated at 37C for 24 hrs.

f- After incubation presence of bacterial growth indicates ability of bacterial

isolate to resistance the metals ions.

2.8 Biofilm assays:

Semi-quantitative measurements of biofilm formation were determined

using tissue culture-treated, 96-well polystyrene plates, based on the methods of

Christensen et al. (1985) and Ziebuhr et al. (1997). Bacteria were grown in

individual wells of 96-well plates at 37 ºC in BHI medium supplemented with 1%

glucose. After 24 h growth, the plates were washed vigorously. This involved

three rounds of plunging the plates into a large volume of distilled water and

decanting to remove unattached bacteria. The plates were subsequently dried for 1

h at 60 ºC prior to staining with a 0.4% crystal violet solution. The A492 of the

adhered, stained biofilms was measured using a microtitre plate reader. Biofilm

formation by each strain was measured. A biofilm-positive phenotype was

defined as having a value of 0.17 at absorbance of 492 nm.

Page 57: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

44

2.9 Genotyping assays:

Plasmid profile of HMR isolates:

2.9.1 Plasmid extraction:

Plasmid extraction of gram negative bacteria was extracted by using Geneaid kit

the step of the method was according to the manufacturing company information

as following:

Step one (Harvesting):-

• 1.5 ml of bacterial culture was transferred to a micro centrifuge tube.

• Bacterial culture was centrifuged at 14 - 16,000xg for 1 minute and the

supernatant discard.

Step two (Re-suspension):

• An aliquot of 200µl of PD1Buffer (RNase A added) was add to the tube and

the cell pellet resuspend by vortex or pipetting.

Step Three (Lysis):-

• An aliquot of 200 µl of PD2 Buffer was added and mix gently by inverting

the tube 10 times. Do not vortex to avoid shearing the genomic DNA.

• The suspension was allowed to stand at room temperature for 2 minutes or

until the lysate is homologous.

Step four (Neutralization):-

• An aliquot of 300 µl of PD3 Buffer was added and mix immediately by

inverting the tube 10 times.

• Bacterial culture was Centrifuge at 14 – 16,000 x g for 3 minutes.

Step five (DNA-Binding):-

• Place a PD column in a 2 ml collection tube.

• Add the supernatant from step 4 to the PD column and Centrifuge at 14 –

16,000 x g for 30 seconds.

• The – flow through was discard and the PD column was placed back in the

2ml collection.

Page 58: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

45

Step six (Washing):-

• An aliquot of 400 µl of W1 Buffer was in to the PD column.

• Bacterial culture was Centrifuge at 14 – 16,000 x g for 30 seconds.

• The – flow through was discard and the PD column was placed back in the

2ml collection.

• An aliquot of 600 µl of Wash Buffer (ethanol added), was added into the PD

column.

• Bacterial culture was Centrifuge at 14 – 16,000 x g for 30 seconds.

• The – flow through was discard and the PD column was placed back in the

2ml collection.

• Bacterial culture was Centrifuge at 14 – 16,000 x g again for 3 minute to dry

the column matrix.

Step seven (DNA Elution):-

• The PD column was transferred to anew microcentrifuge tube.

• Add 50 µl of Elution Buffer into the center of column matrix.

• The suspension was allowed to stand for 2 minutes or until the Elution

Buffer is absorbed by matrix.

• Bacterial culture was Centrifuge at 14 – 16,000 x g for 2 minute to elute the

DNA.

2.8.2 Agarose gel electrophoresis:

The method of Sambrook& Russel, (2001), was used follows:

1. One gm of the agarose was dissolved in 100 ml of TBE buffer by using water

bath at 100oC after that it was cooled to 50oC and 10 µl of ethidium bromide

solution was added to it.

2. Suitable amount of the agarose was poured in the tray and left to solidify.

3. The comb was raised from the agarose and the tray was transferred to the

electrophoresis chamber and covered with TBE buffer.

Page 59: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

46

4. Ten microliter of the DNA was mixed with 3microliter of the loading buffer

and placed in the agarose wells.

5. The electrophoresis process was carried using low voltage (about 6 vol /cm

and by passing 20 milliamper) for 1-2 hours.

6. The bands of the plasmid DNA were detected by UV-trans illuminator in a

wave length of (260)Nanometesr.

2.9.2 Plasmid curing:

There are many method used for plasmid curing as (Elevated Temperature,

SDS, ethidium bromide, Novobiocin…..etc). Elevated Temperature method was

used for plasmid curing according to Kheder (2002), as follows:

Plasmid curing by physical agents (elevated temperature)

A single colony of P. aeruginosa isolate was inoculated into 10ml of

nutrient broth, after incubation at 37°C for 24 hrs, then 0.2 ml.of bacterial culture

was inoculated to 10ml of fresh nutrient broth, and incubated at elevated

temperature from 20 to 46°C for 24hr with shaking water bath 100rpm, after

incubation time several dilutions were performed up to 10-7 dilutions, then 0.1ml

of last three dilutions were spread on plates of nutrient agar which contain heavy

metals and incubated at 37° C for 24hr.

After that the isolates are cultured on Mueller Hinton agar was supplement with

heavy metals at different concentration, after incubation that the results were

recorded by the loss of ability of the tested bacteria to survive on the medium

which contains the heavy metal concentration; However if there was growth

detected the responsible gene for resistance present on chromosome.

Page 60: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

3.1 Isolation, identificatio

Out of 150 (50%) clin

culture, 13(32.5%) were fr

Such variations in Pseudo

other studies (Anonymous

the percentage of rural (75

related to infected with P.

between residence and sex

Figure (3-1) Num

The high percentage (75%

due to the fact that people

information about health c

with patients lived in urban

on, and distribution of isolates:

nical samples (patient), only 40(26.6

rom male and 27 (67.5%) were from fe

omonas infections between both sexes

s, 1997; Suman, et al., 2005). Also re

5%) more than urban (25%) which is

. aeruginosa, (p 0.01); while there wa

x (p>0.05).

mber and percentages of P. aeruginosa isolate

%) of rural patients infected with P. a

e in rural regions are almost uneducate

care and the pathogenicity of microorg

n regions (Table 3-1).

6%) gave positive

male (Figure 3-1).

were reported by

esults showed that

highly significant

s no relationship

es in clinical sample.

eruginosa may be

ed, they have little

ganisms compared

Page 61: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Table (3-1) Distri

Reside

Urban

4

6

10(25%)

Regarding the age

infection of P. aeruginos

groups (16-30) years was

However this results were

and Gourley (2000) wh

susceptible to Pseudomon

some disorders such as

hygienic conditions may i

and Sriram, 2005).

Figure (3-2): Distributio

۰

۲

٤

٦

۸

۱۰

۱۲

۱٤

۱٦

ibution of Patients according to Sex and R

ence

Rural

No. of Patients

(%)

S

9 13(32.5) M

21 27(67.5) Fem

30(75%) 40(100) To

groups, the results showed difference w

sa among different age groups (Figu

s more susceptible to infections, acco

e in disagreement with the results obta

o found that children and older pa

nal infections compared with other ag

immunodeficiency, malnutrition as

increase the chance of Pseudomonal in

on of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates according

Residence:

ex

Male

male

otal

with respect to the

ure 3-2). The age

ounted for (40%).

ained by Herfindal

atients were more

ge groups because

well as the poor

nfections (Hauser

g to age groups.

Page 62: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

For isolation and identification of P. aeruginosa, all clinical samples were

subjected to different selective media. (Cetrimide agar) medium was used for

primary isolation of P. aeruginosa, on which appeared circular, mucoid, and

smooth. On blood agar, most isolates produced -hemolysis but others did not

produce hemolysis. All isolates grew well on MacConkey agar, (but did not

ferment lactose sugar, and on Muller Hinton agar they produced the distinguished

exo- pigments that varied from yellowish-green to bluish-green as well as they

emitted a sweet grape-like odor.

In addition to the cultural characteristics of isolates on the different culture

media mentioned above, most biochemical tests were carried out (Table 3-2) and

the results compared with standard results documented by (MacFaddin, 2000). All

isolates were Gram negative rods and positive for oxidase, catalase, able to grow

at 42oC and did not sugar fermentation.

Out of 40 positive clinical samples, 21(52.5%) were from burn, 7(17.5%)

wound, and 12(30%) ear infections (otitis media) isolates (Table 3-3). In the

present study, the distribution of P. aeruginosa isolates according to the site of

infection was studied; it was found that the most infections of this bacterium

occurred in the burn (52.5%). This may be due to the selected samples of this

study. This study was designed to isolate P. aeruginosa from selected clinical

samples (burn, wound, and ear infections). Other sites of infection like blood,

urine, stool, and sputum were excluded and not included during period of

sampling. According to this interpretation, the recovery rate of P. aeruginosa

isolates from selected clinical was more than reported by many researcher

worldwide. The result obtained by Nadeem et al., (2008) who found that among

that (2800) isolates of P. aeruginosa 420(15%) isolates were from burn

infections; Vives-Flórez and Garnica, (2006) found that among the 65 isolates of

this bacterium only 5 (7.7%) isolates obtained from burn.

Page 63: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Table (3-2) Morphological properties and Biochemical tests for identification of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates:

ResultTest

Gram negative, Rods shapeGram's

Stain

+Capsule

+Oxidase

+Catalase

_Indole

_Methyl Red

_Voges Proskaur

+Citrate utilization

±Urease

K/K no changeTriple Sugar Iron

_H2S production

+Motility

±Swarming

Hemolysis on blood agar

_Lactose fermentation

+Pigment production

+ Positive test, Negative test, K: Alkaline

Table (3-3) Distribution of isolates from different clinical samples collected during study:

%

of isolates

No. of P.

aeruginosa

% of samplesNo.Samples

Source

52.5%

17.5%

30%

21

7

12

33.3%

33.3%

33.3%

50

50

50

Burn

Wound

Ear Swab

100%40100%150Total

Ear Swabs were obtained from patients with otitis media.

Page 64: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Pseudomonas aeruginosa in burn units are still associated with high (60%)

death rates, bacteremia is associated with 50% increase in mortality, and patients

are characteristically susceptible to chronic infection by P. aeruginosa

(Mendelson et al., 1994).

In the present study P. aeruginosa in wound infections were studied. It was

found that infection with this bacterium in wounds was less than the infection in

burns. The interpretation may be due to wound wards of female were excluded

from the present study. The percentage of (17.5%) of burn infection in present

study may be due to persistence of patient in hospital for long period time after

operation which made them more vulnerable lead to infection with opportunistic

bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa; (Kluytmans et al., 1997) found that P.

aeruginosa were rare in wound infection (5.76%), while Lari et al., (2000) found

that P. aeruginosa predominant in wound infection (92%).

The result obtained in this study showed that twelve isolates (30%) of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa were obtained from patients with otitis media (Table 3-

3). Al-Amir (1998) showed that the isolation rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

was reached to (11%) among other causative agents (aerobic and anaerobic

bacteria) isolates from otitis media.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism isolated from mild to

severe form of otitis external and chronic suppartive otitis media, different types

of bacteria can reach to the middle ear because they can persistent or recurrent

discharge through a chronic perforation of the tympanic membrane due to

perforated tympanic membrane, bacteria can gain entry into the middle ear via the

external ear canal. Infection of middle ear mucosa subsequently results in ear

discharge (Hauser and Sriram, 2005).

From the 150(50%) clinical samples only 40(26.6%) isolates were belonged to P.

aeruginosa and other 110(73.3%) belonged to the other genera that were not

determined during this study (Figure 3-1, Table 3-3).

Page 65: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

From the 150(50%) hospi

to the P. aeruginosa whi

(Figure 3-3). The hospita

their numbers and percent

Figure (3-3) Number and perc

Table (3-4) Distribution of

during study:

Samp

Cath

B

Bath

Fom

Wall o

Disinf

T

ital environment samples only 3 (2%)

ile other 147 (98%) belonged to othe

al environment samples were distribu

tages (Table 3-4).

centage of P. aeruginosa isolates in hospital e

f isolate from different hospital environmen

ples type

No. of

samples % of isolates

heters

Beds

h rooms

mites

of wards

fectants

26

25

24

25

30

20

1 (0.7%)

0

0

1 (0.7)%

0

1 (0.7)%

otal 150 3 (2)%

isolates belonged

er bacterial genera

uted according to

environment samples.

nt samples collected

Page 66: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In present work, only three P. aeruginosa isolates were detected in samples of

(catheters, fomites, and disinfectant) at the same percentage (0.7%). This

percentage may be that due to P. aeruginosa has resistance to antibiotic,

disinfectant, and heavy metals, and it has virulence factors enough to prevent

action of these agents. However, in other hospital environment sites like wards,

beds and bath room the percentage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was not detected

(Table 3-4). This result may be due to good antiseptic agent used in hospitals,

good management though designed scientific schedule for using antiseptic agent

to cleaning wards and tools of hospitals, using educated poster, and increase

awareness of health workers about the pathogenicity of nosocomial infection and

method of prevention. P. aeruginosa were isolated in different percentages by

several authors worldwide.

Vives-Flórez and Garnica, (2006) found that 30% of isolates of P. aeruginosa

were obtained from hospital environment; Alia et al., (2000) had succeeded to

isolate P. aeruginosa from catheters at rate reaching to 8% while Yagoub and El-

Agbash, (2010) isolated this bacteria from hospital disinfectant at rate reached to

5%.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa was very common in hospital conditions due to its

resistance to most antibiotics and disinfectants, and heavy metals. The production

of virulence factors is affected by the differences in the site of antibiotic

resistance genes which may be chromosomal or plasmid – borne and with the

presence of transposable elements which facilitate the transmission of these genes

from the plasmid to the chromosome and vice versa (Nordmann et al., 1993).

3.2. Heavy metals susceptibility test of Pseudomonas aeruginosa:

3.2.1. Results Agar screening test:

In present study, all isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing by screening

test by using agar medium supplemented with (PbNO3 400g/ml).

Page 67: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Results revealed that 37 isolates 85% were resistant to lead nitrate, these isolates

were distributed into 34 clinical and 3 hospital environment samples (Table 3-5).

Whereas, Vaca Pacheco et al., (1995) used lead nitrate as a screening test for

detection of heavy metals resistant P. aeruginosa isolates and they found all their

isolated were resistance to lead nitrate (PbNO3) at concentration of (400g/ml).

Table (3-5) Numbers and percentage of clinical and hospital environment Pseudomonasaeruginosa detected by screening test:

(%)TotalNo. of isolates (%)

ClinicalEnvironmental

Susceptibility toPbNO3

( 400g/ml)

85%3734(85%) 3(100%)Resistant

15%6(15%) 06Sensitive

100%4340(92.8%) 3(6.9%)Total

3.2.2 Susceptibility to heavy metals using Agar dilution method:

In present study, the effects of four heavy metals on P. aeruginosa isolates were

investigated by using MIC of heavy metals in different molar concentration, the

heavy metals were used silver sulfate, zinc sulfate, cadmium sulfate, and nickel

sulfate. Results revealed that 34 isolates were resistant to silver sulfate at

concentration 0.0001M; 32 isolates were resistant to zinc sulfate at concentration

0.0001M, 33 isolates were resistant to cadmium sulfate, and 37 isolates were

resistance to nickel sulfate at concentration 0.0001M; However all isolates of P.

aeruginosa were sensitive 100% to all heavy metals mentioned above at

concentration (0.1M) (Table 3-6).

Page 68: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

The interpretation of these results may be due to the fact that P. aeruginosa has

many mechanisms for heavy metals resistance; Firstly, the accumulation of

specific ions can be diminished, not by interference with uptake but by active

extrusion of the heavy metals ion from the cells this mechanism is specific only

for Pseudomonas spp., Secondly, cations can be segregated in to complex

compound by thiol- containing molecules and then ejected from cell, Thirdly,

some metal ions may be reduced to a less toxic oxidative state by the complex

enzymes and special oxidation mechanisms in the cells, Finally, for many metals

resistance and homoeostasis is a combination of two or three of the mentioned

basic mechanisms that is the case which P. aeruginosa success (Abdul-Sada,

2008). Prasad et al., (2009) found that all isolates were sensitive to heavy metals

(Cd2+, Ag+, Ar2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+) at concentration 0.1M, and most of

them were resistant to heavy metals at concentration (0.0001M). Singh et al,

(2010) found the MIC values of Ni2+ were ranged from (80-250 g/ml), Cd 2+ was

(80-210 g /ml).

Table (3-6): Antibacterial activity of heavy metals against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

isolated from clinical and hospital environment samples.

No. of resistant isolates at different molar conc. of heavy

metalsMetal ion

0.10.010.0010.0001

001634Silver

0153333Zinc

001332Cadmium

003737Nickel

Page 69: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In the present study, regarding to silver sulfate, out of 37 isolates, 16 isolates

were able to grow in concentration 0.0001M and 0.001M respectively. However,

all isolates inhibited in concentration 0.1M (Table 3-6, 3-7). According to

hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, and P.41) revealed resistant to silver

sulfate and the MIC ranged from (0.001-0.01g/ml ).

These results obtained by Prasad et al., (2009) who found that all isolates of

P. aeruginosa were resistant to silver nitrate at concentration 0.0001M and all

isolates were sensitive to silver nitrate at concentration 0.01M and 0.1M; Dong et

al., (2001) obtained 100 g/ml of sliver effective to prevent P. aeruginosa ATCC

27853 production biofilm and inhibition of bacterial attachment. Several authors

found that resistance to Ag+ was plasmid mediated gene in P. aeruginosa were

resistant to silver, (Tennent et al., 1985; Kucken et al., 2000) found plasmid

mediated gene in Pseudomonas spp. the reason to silver salts were resistance.

Regarding to zinc sulfate, out of 37 isolates, 33 isolates were able to grow in

both concentration 0.0001M and 0.001M (Table 3-6, 3-7); and 22 isolates were

inhibited in concentration 0.01M (Table 3-7). However, all isolates inhibited in

concentration 0.1M (Tables 3-6, 3-7).

According to hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, and P.41) were resistant

to zinc sulfate and the MIC was (0.01g/ml ).

In a local study, Abdul-Sada, (2008) found that P. aeruginosa isolated from

wastewater in Basrah, Iraq, were resistant to Zn2O3 at concentration 0.4M. Xiao-

xi et al., (2009) found that P. aeruginosa isolate E1 were resistant to Zn2+ in

concentrations of (16.5 mmol/L), 0,0165M. Nies (2003) interpreted that P.

aeruginosa respond to excess Zn2+ by metal-inducible resistance mechanisms,

Zn2+ were resistant in bacteria is mainly based on active efflux of metal ions to

prevent toxic effects in the cell. In many cases, Zn2+ resistance mechanisms are

indistinguishable; the efflux of Zn2+ is facilitated by P-type ATPases, CBA

transporters and CDF chemiosmotic transporters.

Page 70: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Table (3-7): MIC values of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to Silver sulfate, Zincsulfate, Cadmium sulfate, Nickel sulfate in Molar concentrations.

IsolatesMIC of

Silver sulfateMIC of

Zinc sulfateMIC of

Cadmiumsulfate

MIC ofNickelsulfate

P.1 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.2 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.3 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.01P.4 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.5 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.6 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.01P.8 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01P.9 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.01P.12 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.13 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.14 0.01 0.1 0.001 0.01P.15 0.01 0.1 0.01 0.01P.16 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.17 0.001 0.1 0.0001 0.01P.19 0.0001 0.0001 0.001 0.01P.20 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.21 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.22 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.01P.24 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.25 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.01P.26 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.27 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01P.28 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.01P.29 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.30 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.31 0.0001 0.0001 0.01 0.01P.32 0.001 0.1 0.01 0.01P.33 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01P.34 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.36 0.0001 0.0001 0.01 0.01P.37 0.001 0.01 0.0001 0.01P.38 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01P.39 0.001 0.01 0.001 0.01P.40 0.01 0.01 0.0001 0.01P.41 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.01P.42 0.001 0.1 0.0001 0.01P.43 0.001 0.0001 0.0001 0.01

Page 71: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In present study, P. aeruginosa resistance to cadmium sulfate revealed that out

of 37 isolates, 32 isolates were able to grow in concentration 0.0001M (Table 3-6,

3-7). However all isolates were inhibited in concentration 0.01M and 0.1M (Table

3-7).

According to hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, and P.41) revealed

were resistant to cadmium sulfate and the MIC ranged from (0.0001-0.01 g/ml ).

In a local study, Abdul-Sada, (2008) found that P. aeruginosa isolated from

wastewater in Basrah were resistant to cadmium chloride at concentration 0.1M.

Prasad et al., (2009) found that all isolates of P. aeruginosa were resistant to

cadmium sulfate in concentration 0.0001M but they were sensitive to this metal in

concentration 0.01M and 0.1M respectively. Xiao-xi et al., (2009) found that P.

aeruginosa isolate E1 was resistant to Cd2+ at concentrations (18.5 mmol/L)

(0.018M) respectively.

Nies, (2003) interpreted that P. aeruginosa respond to excess cd2+ by metal-

inducible resistance mechanisms. Cd2+ resistance in bacteria is mainly based on

active efflux of metal ions to prevent toxic effects in the cell. In many cases, the

efflux of Cd2+ is facilitated by P-type ATPases, CBA transporters and CDF

chemiosmotic transporters.

Several authors found that Microbial resistance to Cd2+ is usually based on energy

dependent efflux Three major groups are responsible for this cadmium efflux:

CBA-type chemiosmotic antiporters, P-type ATPases and cation diffusion

facilitators (CDF) (Silver, 1996; Nies, 2003). The CBA-type antiporters are

protein complexes that are able to span the complete cell wall of a gram-negative

bacterium, while CDF proteins and P-type ATPases are located in the cytoplasmic

membrane and are single-subunit systems. Pseudomonas species resistant to

cadmium up to 1.2 mM maximum tolerable concentration was isolated from

heavy metal contaminated soil (Roane and Kellogg, 1996).

Page 72: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In the present work, the resistance of P. aeruginosa to nickel sulfate revealed

that 37 isolates were able to grow at concentrations 0.0001M, and 0.001M.

However, all isolates inhibited in concentration 0.01M and 0.1M (Table 3-6, 3-7).

According to hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, and P.41), results

revealed were that they resistant to nickel sulfate and the MIC was (0.01g/ml ).

In a local study, Abdul-Sada, (2008) found that P. aeruginosa isolated from

wastewater in Basrah, Iraq were resistant to nickel sulfate at concentration 0.4M.

Prasad et al., (2009) found that 40% P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to Ni+2

in concentration 0.001M and all isolates were sensitive to silver nitrate in

concentration 0.01M and 0.1M respectively Singh et al; (2010) found the MIC of

Ni2+ was ranged from (80-250 g/ml). Silver, (1996) found that these mechanisms

are sometime encoded in plasmid genes facilitating the transfer of toxic metal

resistance from one cell to another; (Aguilar- Barajas, et al., 2010) revealed that

P. aeruginosa were resistant to nickel sulfate by accumulation of Ni2+ ions, and

the identification of homologous gene for metal cations resistance in the genome

of species Pseudomonas indicates that these bacteria have the potential to display

tolerance mechanism against Ni2+.

3.2.3 Susceptibility to heavy metals using Pouring plate method:

In the present study, the effects of three heavy metals (copper sulfate, mercury

chloride, and lead nitrate) on P. aeruginosa isolates were investigated using MIC

of heavy metals in different concentrations.

Our results showed that all isolates were resistant to copper sulfate and the MIC

values ranged from (400-3200 g/ml) (Table 3-8). Results also showed that most

of isolates 33:37 were tolerant to copper sulfate at concentration 800 g/ml ;

however, two of the isolates were tolerant to copper sulfate at concentration of

1750 g/ml . According to hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, P.41) they

were resistant to copper sulfate and the MIC was 1600g/ml .

Page 73: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Table (3-8): MIC values of Copper sulfate, Mercury chloride, and Lead nitrate in( g/ml) concentrations towards Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

IsolateMIC ofCoppersulfate

MIC ofMercurychloride

MIC ofLead

nitrateP.1 1600 2.7 3200P.2 1750 54.3 3200P.3 1750 86.4 3200P.4 1600 86.4 3200P.5 1750 43.2 3200P.6 1750 54.3 3200P.8 1750 86.4 3200P.9 1750 86.4 3200P.12 1600 54.3 3200P.13 1750 43.2 3200P.14 1750 86.4 800P.15 1600 86.4 3200P.16 1600 86.4 3200P.17 1600 54.3 3200P.19 1600 86.4 3200P.20 3200 86.4 3200P.21 1600 86.4 800P.22 1600 2.7 2400P.24 400 54.3 3200P.25 1600 43.2 3200P.26 1600 86.4 3200P.27 1600 21.6 2400P.28 800 43.2 2400P.29 400 21.6 3200P.30 1600 21.6 3200P.31 1600 21.6 1600P.32 1600 21.6 3200P.33 1600 21.6 3200P.34 1600 21.6 3200P.36 1600 86.4 3200P.37 800 21.6 3200P.38 3200 21.6 3200P.39 1600 43.2 1600P.40 1600 86.4 3200P.41 1600 54.3 3200P.42 1600 54.3 3200P.43 1600 43.2 3200

Page 74: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

In a local study, Abdul-Sada, (2008) found that P. aeruginosa isolate from

wastewater in Basrah were resistant to copper chloride at concentration 0.3M.

Also, results were similar to that obtained by Karbasizaed et al., (2003) who

revealed that coliforms were tolerant to copper sulfate in 1750 g/ml.

Singh et al., (2010) found the MIC of Pseudomonas spp. to Cu2+ ranged (120-300)

g/ml. Xiao -xi et al., (2009) found P. aeruginosa isolate E1 were resistant to Cu2+

in concentration (12.0 mmol/L) (0.01M).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistant to Cu2+ in which contains the structural

genes copABCD and is homologous to the pco system in Escherichia coli. The

copB and copD genes are involved in the transport of copper across the

membrane, while the products of the copA and copC genes are outer membrane

proteins that bind Cu2+ in the periplasm, protecting the cell from copper (Silver,

1996). Cooksey, (1994) found the plasmid pPT23D was one of the first

Pseudomonas spp. copper resistance system.

Regarding to mercury chloride, results reported that all isolates were resistant to

mercury chloride and the MIC value ranged from (2.7-86.4 g/ml) (Table 3 -8).

Results also showed that most of isolates 20:37 were tolerant to mercury chloride

at concentration from (10.8- 43.2 g/ml ), However most of isolate 35:37 were

tolerant to Mercury chloride at concentration of 2.7 g/ml (Table 3 -8). According

to hospital environment isolates (P.39, P.40, P.41) they were resistant to mercury

chloride and the MIC values ranged from (43.2-86.4g/ml ).

The result obtained by karbasizaed et al., (2003) revealed that coliforms were

tolerant to mercury chloride was in 54.3 g/ml. Prasad et al., (2009) found that all

isolates of P. aeruginosa were sensitive to mercury chloride in concentration

0.0001M, 0.001M , 0.01M and 0.1M.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa were able to resist to mercury because it has mer

operon that reduced toxic Hg2+ to volatile Hg0, which then diffuses out of the cell.

The result obtained by karbasizaed et al., (2003) revealed that coliforms were

Page 75: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

tolerant to mercury chloride was in 54.3 g/ml. Prasad et al., (2009) found that all

isolates of P. aeruginosa were sensitive to mercury chloride at concentrations

0.0001M, 0.001M, 0.01M and 0.1M respectively.

According to lead nitrate, the results showed that all isolates were resistant to

lead nitrate and the MIC values ranged from (800-3200 g/ml) (Table 3-8). The

Results also showed that most of isolates 30:37 were tolerant to lead nitrate at

concentration 2400 g/ml ; however six of isolates were sensitive to lead nitrate at

concentration of 400 g/ml . According to hospital environment isolates (P.39,

P.40, P.41) they were resistant to lead nitrate and the MIC values ranged from

(1600-3200 g/ml ).

The present study showed, the results were similar to that obtained by

Karbasized et al., (2003) who revealed the coliforms were tolerant to lead nitrate

was in 3200 g/ml. Xiao -xi et al., (2009) found P. aeruginosa isolate E1 were

resistant to pb+2 in concentration (10.0 mmol/L)(0.01M). Prasad et al., (2009)

found that all isolates of P. aeruginosa were sensitive to lead nitrate at

concentrations 0.001M, 0.01M and 0.1M.

Many authors found that P. aeruginosa were resistant pb2+ by the system

localized in cad AC operon, cad A catalyzed the active efflux of Cd2+, Zn2+, and

Pb2+, also they found Pseudomonads have P-type ATPase that can resist Pb2+

(Nucifora et al., 1989).

3.3. Plasmid profile of heavy metals resistant isolates:

The plasmid content was investigated for all 37 isolates of P. aeruginosa (34

clinical and 3 hospital environments). The results revealed that most isolates

32:37 harbored large (mega) plasmid with huge molecular weight cannot be

detected using 3000 bp size marker (ladder) used in the present study (Figure 3-4-

a).

Out of 32 plasmid-carrying isolates, 31(97%) were from clinical samples andonly one isolate was from hospital environment samples.

Page 76: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Out of 34 clinical isolate

when they detected by ele

from clinical samples and

(Figure 3-4-a, b).

From these results, this st

HMR isolates may be corr

Many researchers world

large (mega) plasmids. Ra

aeruginosa that were hea

revealed the P. aeruginosa

molecular weight 100 kbp

was not available at the p

all of the plasmid bands w

Figure (3-4a): Gel electrop

Lane (M): DNA molecular si

Lane (E): Show negative con

Lanes: show clinical isolates

Lane (P39): Show hospital en

e, 32 isolates carried only one plasmid

ectrophoresis. The results also showed

d two isolate from hospital environmen

tudy can conclude that the presence of

related with their ability to resist differ

dwide reported that HMR in P. aerugi

aja and Selvam, (2009) found that the

avy metal resistant was 23 kbp. Nikbin

a isolated from hospital in Tahran, Iran

p. However in this study a large size m

eriod of the study, so only 3000bp ma

were in the gel out of ladder.

phoresis of plasmid DNA content of P. aerug

(1:30) hr. at (60) voltage.

ize marker (3000-bp ladder).

ntrol (E. coli standard strain MM294).

(P1), (P5), (P8), (P9), (P12), (P22), (P24), a

nvironment isolate.

d (only one band)

d that three isolate

nt have no plasmid

f plasmids in these

rent HM.

inosa is carried on

plasmid size of P.

n et al., 2007 that

n has plasmid with

marker (40000bp)

arker was used and

ginosa isolates after

and (P43).

Page 77: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Figure (3-4b): Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content of P. aeruginosa isolates after(1:30) hr. at 60 voltages.

Lane (M): DNA molecular size marker (3000-bp ladder).

Lane (E): Show negative control (E. coli standard strain MM294).

Lanes: (P13), (P14), (P15), (P16), (P17), (P19), (P20), (P21), (P25), (P27), (P28), (P29),(P30), (P31), (P32), (P33), (P34), (P36), (P37), and (P38) shows clinical isolates.Lanes :( P40), (P41) Show hospital environment isolates.

Page 78: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Figure (3-4-c): Gel electropho(1:30) hr. in (60) voltage.

Lane (M): DNA molecular si

Lane (E): Show negative con

Lanes: (P2), (P3), (P4), (P6), (P

The presence of plasm

authors. (Chakrabarty, 19

also known to code for

compounds. (Weiss et al

resistance to HgCl2, but

phenylmercuric acetate.

Collard et al., (1994) fou

determinats move from ch

(Raja and Selvam 2009)

heavy metals such as c

plasmid DNA was designa

oresis of plasmid DNA content of P. aerugino

ize marker (3000-bp ladder).

ntrol (E. coli standard strain MM294).

P26), (P42) show clinical isolates.

mids in HMR isolates was also rep

976) showed that plasmids in Pseudom

r heavy metal resistance and degrad

l., 1978) reported that many plasmids

t also resistance to several organom

und that in P. aeruginosa some heavy

hromosome to plasmid (or in the revers

) revealed isolate P. aeruginosa exhib

cadmium, chromium, nickel and lead

ated as pBC15, The size of the plasmid

osa isolates after

ported by several

monas species are

dation of organic

s carried not only

mercurials such as

y metal resistance

se direction).

bited resistance to

d, due to present

d DNA was

Page 79: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

approximately 23 kb, and suggest that nickel and ampicillin resistance gene was

conferred by plasmid DNA. Cadmium resistant gene was present on chromosomal

DNA along with the gene for chromium resistance.

Lead resistance gene was shown to be present on the chromosomal DNA

rather than the plasmid DNA.

(Silver, 1996) obtained that plasmid genes facilitating the transfer of toxic metal

resistance from one cell to another in P. aeruginosa.

The reason of presence plasmid that confers resistance to HM in P. aeruginosa

may be due to the fact that most of this large plasmid carrying in addition to HM,

resistance other biocides likes antibiotics (Lawrence, 2000).

Many isolates of P. aeruginosa have no plasmid content and still show heavy

metals resistance that lead to think that gene responsible for these resistances

found on the chromosome ( Raja and Selvam, 2009).

On the other hand (Silver, 1992) revealed the mercuric ions chemically reduced,

and detoxified by plasmid- encoded enzyme.

3.4 Plasmid curing by elevated temperature:

Plasmids are small autonomously replicating circular pieces of double-stranded

circular DNA, The bacterial cells may loss their plasmids during cell division;

these types of cell were said to be cured. Curing may occur naturally through cell

division or by treating the cells with chemical and physical agents (Snyder and

Champness, 1997).

Plasmid curing was achieved in the present study using elevated temperature for

detection whether HMR trait was plasmid or chromosome – mediated.

Only one P. aeruginosa isolate (P.3) was chosen and treated with physical agent

(elevated temperature 46oC) to detect the plasmid curing for isolate used in this

study.

Page 80: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

After curing, isolates were retested for its ability to resist HM using Mueller

Hinton agar supplement with heavy metal at different concentrations.

Our Results showed that the tested isolate exposed to curing has lost it is plasmid

(Figure 3-5).

Figure (3-5): Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA content of Ps. aeruginosa isolate before andafter curing after (1:30) hr. at(60) voltage.

Lane (M): DNA molecular size marker (3000-bp ladder).

Lane (P3/1): shows clinical isolate (first dilution).

Lanes (P3/2): shows clinical isolate (second dilution).

Lanes (P3/3): shows clinical isolate (third and last dilution).

P.3 isolate was missing their plasmid as revealed that DNA content of their cured

cells on gel electrophoresis. Also this isolate still survived and grow in the present

of HM, but resistance to some HM decreased compared to wild type isolates

(Table 3-9).

Page 81: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

This result indicates that the HM resistance trait was carried on chromosome

rather than plasmid. This also can be interpreted that in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

some heavy metal resistance determinants move from plasmid to chromosome

(Collard et al., 1994).

Many isolates of P. aeruginosa have no plasmid content and still show heavy

metals resistance that lead to think that gene responsible for these resistances

found on the chromosome ( Raja and Selvam, 2009).

Table (3-9): MIC values of Pseudomonas aeruginosa P.3 before and after curingexposed to different heavy metals:

Heavy metals MIC beforecuring

MIC aftercuring

Silver sulfate (Ag2So4) 0.01M 0.01MZinc sulfate (ZnSo4) 0.1M 0.01M

Cadmium sulfate(3CdSo4)

0.01M 0.01M

Nickel sulfate (NiSo4) 0.01M 0.01MCopper sulfate (CuSo4) 1750 g/ml 1600 g/ml

Mercury chloride(HgCl2)

10.8 g/ml 86.4 g/ml

Lead nitrate (PbN2O6) 3200 g/ml 3200 g/ml

Perron et al., (2004) revealed that P. aeruginosa resistant to metals ions by

metals efflux express czc operons. Raja and Selvam, (2009) found that P.

aeruginosa resistant to cadmium; chromium and lead could be chromosomal

encoded.

3.5. Biofilm assay:

In the present study, the results showed that 20 isolates of P. aeruginosa had

biofilm. All hospital environment isolates were biofilm producers (3 isolates),

whereas only 17:40 (42.5%) of clinical isolates were biofilm producers. The

relationship between biofilm production and HMR was studied. It was found that

Page 82: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

the HMR of P. aeruginosa isolates was not correlated with production of the

biofilm.

The results shown in (Tables 3-10, 3-8) reveal that the isolate P. 22 (planktonic)

and the isolate 43 (biofilm) were similar in their resistance to copper sulfate (1600

g/ml ), which indicate that the biofilm production had no role in increase of

resistance to HM compared to the resistance of free-swimming (planktonic)

organisms.

This result was also detected for other HM studied (silver, zinc, cadmium,

nickel, copper, and lead) in which there was no relationship between biofilm

formation and HM resistance (Table 3-10, 3-8, 3-7). However there was a clear

correlation between biofilm production and mercury resistance (Table 3-10, 3-8).

It was found that the resistance to mercury was increased in biofilm isolates P.43

(43.2 g/ml ) in comparsion with planktonic isolate P. 22(2.7 g/ml ) (Table 3-8).

Table (3-10): Biofilm production by P. aeruginosa isolates

Page 83: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

From these results, this study concluded that the increase of HM resistance was

correlated with biofilm production for some (but not all) HM used. A hallmark

trait of biofilms is increased resistance to antimicrobial agent compared to the

resistance of free-swimming organism (Costerton et al., 1999; Hentzer et al.,

2001; Teizel and Parsek, 2003).

A proposed mechanism that contributes to this increased resistance is binding

and sequestration of antimicrobial agents by EPS component, such as negatively

charged phosphate, sulfate, and carboxylic acid groups (Hunt, 1986).

Another factor that may contribute to the resistance of biofilms is that many

antimicrobial agents target metabolically active cells. Biofilms are subjected to a

wide range of chemical gradients that result in decreased metabolic activity within

the depths of a biofilm.

Studies of biofilm and heavy metal interactions have mainly focused on the

sorption of heavy metals. Several researchers have reported that biofilms are

capable of removing HM ions from bulk liquid (Ferris et al., 1989, Huang et al.,

2000, Labrenz et al., 2000, Liehr et al., 1994).

Teizel and Parsek (2003) reported that biofilms were from 2 to 600 times more

resistant to HM stress than free-swimming cells. They also showed that biofilms

are more resistant to HM than either stationary-phase or logarithmically growing

plankotonic cells. The exterior of the biofilm was preferentially killed after

exposure to elevated concentrations of copper. A potential explanation for this is

that EPS that encase a biofilm may be responsible for protecting cells from heavy

metals stress by binding the heavy metals and retarding their diffusion within the

biofilm (Teizel and Parsek, 2003).

In another study, Dong Gu et al., (2001) found that100 g/ml of sliver was

effective to prevent P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 production biofilm and inhibition

of bacterial attachment.

Page 84: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Conclusions and Recommendation_______________________________________

71

Conclusions:

1- Burns were more accessible for being contaminated with Ps.

aeruginosa.

2- Most of isolates were resistant to most of heavy metals studied.

3- Most of the isolates were harbored plasmid, which could have a

role in resistance to HM. However curing experiment of HM

resistant isolate showed the HM resistance was harbored on

chromosome, which may be transmitted from plasmid to

chromosome.

4- About half of HM resistant isolates had biofilm and the increase of

to HM resistance was correlated with biofilm production for some

(but not all) HM used.

Recommendations:

1- Studying HMR of Ps. aeruginosa using advanced molecular

techniques (PCR).

2- Heavy metals should be used for treatment of Ps. aeruginosa, like

silver and mercury salts which were found to be very effective.

These heavy metals can be used for topical treatment instead of

antibiotics cream which may induce resistance in Ps. aeruginosa

when applied in sub-inhibitory concentrations.

3- Heavy metals should be used in disinfectants and antiseptics

production.

4- Studying the HMR in organism other than Pseudomonas

aeruginosa especially that associated with nosocomial infections.

Page 85: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

REFERENCES:

• Aboud, Z. M. (2001). The effect of antibiotic combination on S. aureus

and Ps. aeruginosa. M. Sc thesis in Microbiology. College of Science,

Kufa University, Iraq.

• Adailkkalam, V. and Swarup, S. 2002. Molecular characterization of an

operon, cue AR, encoding a putative P1- type ATpase and a Mer R- type

regulation protein involved in copper homeostasis in Pseudomonas Putida.

Microbiology, 148(9); 2857-2867.

• Adams AP, Santschi EM, Mellencamp MA. Antibacterial properties of a

silver chloride-coated nylon wound dressing. Vet Surg 1999; 28:219—225.

• Adarsh VK, Mishra M, Chowdhury S, Sudarshan M, Thakur AR, Ray

Chaudhuri S (2007). Studies on metal microbe interaction of three bacterial

isolates from east Calcutta wetland, OnLine J. Biol. Sci., 7(2): 80-88.

• Aiello AE, Larson E. Antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products as an

emerging risk factor for antibiotic resistance in the community. Lancet

Infect Dis 2003;3:501—506.

• Ajmal, M.; Mohammad, A.; Yousuf, R.; Ahmad, A., (1998). Adsorption

behaviour of cadmium, zinc, nickel and lead from aqueous solution by

Mangifera indica seed shell. Indian J. Environ. Health., 40 (1), 5-26.

• Aloush V, Navon-Venezia S, Seigman-Igra Y, Cabili S, Carmeli Y:

Multidrugresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and clinical

impact. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006, 50:43-48.

• Anonymous. Copper IUDs, infection and infertility. Drug Ther Bull 2002;

40: 67-9.

• Babich, H.; Stotzky, G., (1983). Toxicity of nickel to microbes:

Environmental aspects. Adv. Appl. Microbiol., 29 (1), 195- 265.

Page 86: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Badar, V., Ahmed, N., Beswick, A. J., pattana pipitpaisal, P., and

Macaskie, L. E. 2000. Reduction of chromate by microorganism isolated

From metal contaminated sites of Karachi, Pakistan.

• Baker-Austin C, Wright MS, Stepanauskas R, McArthur JV (2006).

Coselection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol., 14(4):

176-182.

• Banjerdkij, P.; Vattanaviboon, P.; Mongkolsuk, S., (2005). Exposure to

cadmium elevates expression of genes in the oxy R and Ohr R regulons

and induces cross-resistance to peroxide killing treatment in Xanthomonas

campestris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71 (4), 1843-1849.

• Baron, E.J.; Jorgensen, J. H.;Pfaller, M. A. and Yolken, R. H. (2003).

ASM Manual of Clinical Microbiology 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington

• Benson, R.H. (1998). Microbiological application: laboratory

Manual in general Microbiology. 17th Ed. WB. M.C. Graw. HILL.

• Bert F, Lambert-Zechovsky N 1996. Comparative distribution of

resistance patterns and serotypes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from

intensive care units and others wards. J Antimicrob Chemother., 37: 809-

813.

• Blanc, D. S., C. Petignat, B. Janin, J. Bille, and P. Fancioli. 1998.

Frequency and molecular diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa upon

admission and during hospitalization: a prospective epidemiologic study.

Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4:242-247.

• Bonten, M. J., D. C. Bergmans, H. Speijer, and E. E. Stobberingh. 1999.

Characteristics of polyclonal endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

colonization in intensive care units. Implications for infection control. Am.

J. Crit. Care Med. 160:1212-1219.

• Borkow G, Sidwell RW, Smee DF, et al. Neutralizing viruses in

suspensions by copper oxide based filters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother

2007; 51: 2605-7.

Page 87: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Borkow G, Lara HH, Covington CY, Nyamathi A, Gabbay J. Deactivation

of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in medium by copper oxide-

containing filters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 518-25.

• Borremans, B., Hobman, J. L., Provoast, A., Brown, N. L., and Van Der,

L. D.2001. Cloning and functional analysis of the pbr lead resistance

determinant of Ralstonia metalliduranc Ch34 J Bacterial., 183(19): 5651-

5658.

• Bowler PG, Davies B. (1999). The microbiology of infected and non-

infected leg ulcers. Int J Dermatol., 38: 573-578.

• Brisse, S.; Milatovic, D.; Fluit, A. C.; Kusters, K.; Toelstra, A.; Verhoef, J.

and Schmitz, F. J. (2000). Molecular surveillance of European Quinolone –

resistant clinical isolates of Ps. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. using

automated ribotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol., 3636-3645.

• Brunker, P., Rother, D., sedlmeier, R., klein, J., Matters, R., and

Altenbuchner, J. 1996. Regulation of the operon responsible for broad

spectrum mercury resistance in Streptomyces lividans 1326. Mol Gen

Genet, 251: 307-315.

• Cavallo, J. D.; Fabre, R.; Lablane, F.;Chonoine – Necolas, M. H. and

Thabaut, A. (2000). The GERPB. Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms

of -lactam resistance in 1310 strains of Ps. aeruginosa: a France

multicenter study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46: 133-136.

• Chelliah Edward Raja, Kolandaswamy Anbazhagan and Govindan

Sadasivam Selvam (2006), Isolation and characterization of a metal-

resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. World Journal of Microbiology

& Biotechnology., 22: 577–585.

• Chambers CW, Proctor CM, Kabler PW. Bactericidal effect of low

concentrations of silver. J Am Water Works Assoc 1962; 54:208—216.

Page 88: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Chen YS, Lin YE, Liu YC, et al. Efficacy of point-of-entry copper- -silver

ionisation system in eradicating Legionella pneumophila in a tropical

tertiary care hospital: implications for hospitals contaminated with

Legionella in both hot and cold water. J Hosp Infect 2008; 68: 152-8.

• Chou A. Y. Archeacon J., and Kado C. I. 1998. Agro bacterium

Transcriptional regulator Rosis a prokaryotic Zinc Finger protein that

regulates the plant oncogene ipt. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 95 5293-5298.

• Clement JL, Jarrett PS. Antibacterial silver. Met Based Drugs 1994;

1:467—482.

• Cobine, P., Wickramasinghe, W.A., Harrison, M. D., Weber, T., Solioz,

M., and Dameron, C.T.1999. The Enterococcus hirae copper chaperone

COPZ delivers copper (1) to Cop Y repressor. FEBS letters, 445(1): 27-30.

• Collee, J.G.; Fraser, A. G.;Marmion, B. P. and Simmons, A. (1996).

Mackie and Mecartney. Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th ed. Churchill

Living stone, USA.PP:413 – 424.

• Connell, D. W. and Miller, G. J. 1984. Chemistry and Eco toxicology of

pollution. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y., New York.

• Cooksey, D. A. 1994. Molecular mechanisms of copper resistance and

accumulation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 14:381-386.

• Copper Development Association. U.S. EPA Approves Registration of

Antimicrobial Copper Alloys. Copper Development Association 2008.

http://www.copper.org/about/pressreleases/2008/pr- 2008_Mar_25.html

• Cooper, M.; Tavankar, G. R. and Williams, H. D. (2003). Regulation of

expression of the cyanid-insensetive terminal oxidase in Pseudomonas

aeruginosa. Microbiol. 149 (5): 1275-1284.

• Dasgupta MK. 1994. Silver peritoneal catheters reduce bacterial

colonization. Adv Perit Dial., 10: 195—198.

Page 89: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Degtyarenko, L. M. and Chopade, B. A. 1994. Plasmid mediated silver

resistance in Acinetobacter baumanii. Biometals, 7:49-56.

• De Jaysankar, N. Ramaiah and L. Vardanyan (2008), Detoxification of

toxic heavy metals by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Marine

Biotechnology. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 471-477, 2008.

• Diels, L. and Mercury, M. 1990. DNA probe- mediated detection of

resistant bacteria from soils highly polluted by heavy metals. Appl

Environ. Microbiol, 56: 1485-1491.

• Denning GM, Wollenweber LA, Railsback MA, Cox CD, Stoll LL,

Britigan BE. 1998. Pseudomonas pyocyanin increases interleukin-8

expression by human airway epithelial cells. Infect Immun.,; 66:5777–84.

• Deshpande LM, Chopade BA. Plasmid mediated silver resistance in

Acinetobacter baumannii. Biometals 1994; 7: 49—56.

• Dollwet HHA, Sorenson JRJ. Historic uses of copper compounds in

medicine. Trace Elements Med 2001; 2: 80-7.

• D. Sobral & P. Mariani-Kurkdjian & E. Bingen & H. Vu-Thien & K.

Hormigos & B. Lebeau & F. Loisy-Hamon & A. Munck & G. Vergnaud

& C. Pourcel (2012). A new highly discriminatory multiplex capillary-

based MLVA assay as a tool for the epidemiological survey of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis patients, Eur J Clin Microbiol

Infect Dis., DOI 10.1007/s10096-012-1562-5.

• Ebdon, L.; Pitts, I.; Cornelis, R.; Crews, H.; Donard, O. F. X.;

Quevauviller, P., (2001). Trace element speciation for environment, food

and health. Cambridge UK: Royal society of chemistry, ISBN

0854044590.

• Emori, T. G., and R. P. Gaynes. 1993. An overview of nosocomial

infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin.

Microbiol. Rev. 6:428-442.

Page 90: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Erol, S., U. Altoparlak, M. N. Akcay, F. Celebi, and M. Parlak. 2004.

Changes of microbial flora and wound colonization in burned patients.

Burns 30:357-361.

• Ersoy SEVG ,G khan CORAL, A. Murat G ZR,and M. K emal SANG N

(2010), Investigation of heavy metal resistance in some bacterial strains

isolated from industrial soils. Turk J Biol ., 34 (2010) 423-431

• Espirito SC, Taudte N, Nies DH, Grass G. 2008. Contribution of copper

ion resistance to survival of Escherichia coli on metallic copper surfaces.

Appl Environ Microbiol., 74: 977-86.

• Falagas ME, Kopterides P. 2006. Risk factors for the isolation of multi-

drugresistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a

systematic review of the literature. J Hosp Infect., 64:7-15.

• Flemming, H.-C., and J. Wingender. 2001. Relevance of microbial

extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). Part I. Structural and ecological

aspects. Water Sci. Technol. 43:1-8.

• Fluit, A. C.; Verhoef, J. and Schmitz, F. J. (2000). The European sentray

participants. Antimicrobial resistance in European isolates of Ps.

aeruginosa. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 19: 370-374.

• Forbes, B. A.;Sahm, D. F. and Weissfeld, A. S. (2007). Bailey and Scott’s

diagnostic microbiology. 12th ed. Elesevier.

• Fox CL JR, Monafo WW JR, Ayvazian vtt, Skinner AM, Modaks,

Stanford J. Topical Chemotherapy for burn using cerium salts and Silver

Sulfadiazine surg. Gynecol. Obstect, 1977, 144: 668-672.

• Franke, S., Grass, G., Rensing, C., Rensing, C., and Nies, D. H. Molecular

Analysis of the copper- Transporting Efflux system cus CFBA of

Escherichia coli, J Bacterial, 185 (13): 3804-3812.

• Gadd, G. M. 1992, Metals and Microbiology: A problem of definition.

FEMS Microbiology letters, 100:197-204.

Page 91: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Gatti, D., Mitra, B., and Rosen, B.P. 2000. Minireview: Escherichia coli

soft Metal Ion-tranlocating ATPases. The journal of Biological chemistry,

275(44): 34009-34012.

• Gessard, C. 1984. Classics in infectious diseases. On the blue and green

coloration that appears on bandages. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6 (Suppl. 3):S775-

S776

• Gilligan P.H. (1991). Microbiology of airway disease in patients with

cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev., 4:35-51

• Goering, P. L., Aposhian, H. V., Mass, M. J., Cerbian, M., Beck, B. O.,

and Waalkes, M. P. 1999. The enigma of arsenic carcinogenesis: role of

metabolism. Toxicol Sci 49 (1): 5-14.

• Gort, A. S., Ferber F. M., and Imlay, J. A. 1999. The regulation and role of

periplasmic copper, zinc superoxide dismutase of Escherichia coli. Mol.

Microbiol, 32: 179-191.

• Gorter RW, Butorac M, Cobian EP. Examination of the cutaneous

absorption of copper after the use of copper-containing ointments. Am J

Ther 2004; 11: 453-8.

• Green, M., Apel, A. & Stapleton, F. (2008). A longitudinal study of trends

in keratitis in Australia. Cornea, 27, 33–39

• Grosse, C., Grass, G., Anton, A., Franke, S., Navarrete, A., lawley, B.,

Brown, N.L., and Nies, D. H. 1999. Transcriptional organization of the

CZC heavy – metals homeostasis determinant From Alcaligenes eutrophus.

J. Bacterial., 181: 2385-2393.

• Gupta A, Silver S. Silver as a biocide: will resistance become a problem?

Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16:888.

• Gupta A, Matsui K, Lo J-F, Silver S. (1999). Molecular basis for resistance

to silver cations in Salmonella. Nat Med., 5: 183—188.

Page 92: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Gupta A, Phung LT, Taylor DE, Silver S. Silver resistance genes in

plasmids of the IncH incompatibility group and on Escherichia coli

chromosome. Microbiology 2001; 147: 3393—3402.

• Gupta. A., kumar, M. and Goel. R. (2004) Bioaccumulation properties of

nickel-cadmium and chromium- resistance mutants of P. aeruginosa NBRI

4014 at alkaline PH. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 99:269-277.

• Gupta, A., Whitton, B. A., Morby, A. P., Huckle, J. W., Robinson, N. J,

Amplification and rearrangement of a prokaryotic metallothionein locus

smt in synechococcus PCC-6301 selected for tolerance to cadmium. Proc

Royal Sac, London, 273-281.

• Hamlett, N. V. Landale, E. C., Davis, B. H. and Summers, A. O. 1992.

Roles of the Tn21 MerT, MerP, and MerC gene products in mercury

resistance and mercury binding, J Bacterial, 174: 6377-6785.

• Higham, D.P., sadler, P.J. and scawent, M.D. (1986) Cadmium-binding

proteins in Pseudomonas Putida, Pseudothioneins. Environ. Health

Perspect, 65: 5-11.

• Hobman, J. L. and Brown, N. L. 1996. Overexpression of MerT. The

mercuric ion transport protein of transposon Tn 501, and genetic selection

of mercury Hypersensitivity mutations. Mol Gen Genet, 250: 129-134.

• Hobman, J. L. and Brown, N. L. 1997. Bacterial mercury. Resistance

genes. Met Ions Biol syst, 34: 527-568.

• Hong, S. M., candelone, J. P. Patterson, C. C. and Boutron, C. F. 1994.

Green land ice evidence of hemispheric lead pollution two millennia ago

by Greek and Roman civilization science, 265: 1841-1843.

• Ivorra, N., S. Bremer, H. Guasch, M. H. S. Kraak, and W. Admiraal. 2000.

Differences in the sensitivity of benethic microalgae to Zn and Cd

regarding biofilm development and exposure history. Environ. Toxicol.

Chem. 19:1332-1339.

Page 93: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Jarvis WR, Martone WJ. 1992. Predominant pathogens in hospital

infections. J Antimicrob Chemother., 29:19—24.

• Jin, Y. A.; Clark, A. B.; Slebos, R. J.; AL-Refai, H.; Taylor, J. A.; Kunkel,

T. A.; Resnick, M. A.; Gordenin, D. A., (2003). Cadmium is a mutagen

that acts by inhibiting mismatch repair. Nat. Genet., 34 (3), 239-241.

• Johansen K, Andersen S, Jacobsen CS (1996). Phenotypic and genotypic

characterization of phenenthrene-degrading fluorescent Pseudomonas

biovars. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62: 3818-3825.

• Johnson, F. M. 1998. The genetic effects of environmental lead. Mutat.

Res- Rev., 410: 123-140.

• Keay, L., Edwards, K., Naduvilath, T., Forde, K. & Stapleton, F. (2006).

Factors affecting the morbidity of contact lens-related microbial keratitis: a

population study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47, 4302–4308.

• Kenneth AA, Jeffery TSH. (editors) Manual of dematologic therapeutics:

with essential of diagnosis. 7th ed, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

2006:314.

• Kennish, M. J. 1992. Ecology of estuarines: anthropogenic effects CRC

press, Boca, Raton, Florida.

• Kinoshita M, Sawabe E, Okamura N 1997. Concept of segmentation in

nosocomial epidemiology: Epidemiological relation among antimicrobial-

resistant isolates Of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect., 35: 269-276.

• Klasen HJ. Historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns.

Part I. Early uses. Burns 2000; 26:117—130.

• Kohlenberg A, Weitzel-Kage D, van der Linden P, Sohr D, Vogeler S,

Kola A, Halle E, Ruden H, Weist K:Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a surgical intensive care unit. J

Hosp Infect 2010, 74:350-357.

• Kool JL, Bergmire-Swear D, Butler JC, et al. 1999. Hospital characteristics

associated with colonization of water systems by Legionella and risk of

Page 94: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

nosocomial legionnaires’ disease: a cohort study of 15 hospitals. Infect

Control Hosp Epidemiol., 20: 798—805.

• Koropat Z. R. K. 2000. Toxic and Essential Metal in the cellular Response

to signals. In R. K. Zalups and J. koropatnik, eds., Molecular Biology and

Toxicity of Metals, Taylor and Fancislnc., London, 551-576.

• Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004). Bacterial biofilms:

from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.,

2: 95-108.

• Harrison JJ, Turner RJ, Ceri H (2005). Persister cells, the biofilm matrix

and tolerance to metal cations in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas

aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol., 7: 981-994.

• Hostynek JJ, Maibach HI. Copper hypersensitivity: dermatologic aspects--

an overview. Rev Environ Health 2003; 18: 153-83.

• International Agency for Research on Cancer (1990). Chromium, Nickel

and Welding, IARC Monographs on the Evalution of Carcinogenic Risks

of Chemical to Humans. (49): 49-256. Lyon, World Health Organization.

• Kolleff, M. H., A. Shorr, Y. P. Tabak, V. Gupta, L. Z. Liu, and R. S.

Johannes. 2005. Epidemiology and outcomes of health-care-associated

pneumonia: results from a large US database of culture-positive

pneumonia. Chest 128:3854-3862

• Laddaga RA & Silver S (1985) Cadmium uptake in Escherichia coli K-12.J. Bacteriol., 162: 1100–1105.

• Laila M. Abdelatey, Wagdy K. B. Khalil, Thanaa H. Ali, and Karima F.

Mahrous, (2011). Heavy metal resistance and gene expression analysis of

metal resistance genes in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria present

in Egyptian soils, Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental

Sanitation, 6 (2): 201-211

Page 95: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Lamont IL, Beare PA, Ochsner U, Vasil AI, Vasil ML.

Siderophoremediated signaling regulates virulence factor production in

Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 2–7077.

• Lansdown ABG, Sampson B, Laupattarakasem P, Vuttivirojana A. Silver

aids healing in the sterile skin wound: experimental studies in the

laboratory rat. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137:728—735.

• Lefcort, H., M. Q. Aguon, K. A. Bond, K. R. Chapman, R. Chaquette, J.

Clark, P. Kornachuk, B. Z. Lang, and J. C. Martin. 2002. Indirect effects of

heavy metals on parasites may cause shifts in snail species compositions.

Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 43:34-41.

Leidal KG, Munson KL, Denning GM. Small molecular weight secretory

factors from Pseudomonas aeruginosa have opposite effects on il-8 and

rantes expression by human airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol

Biol 2001; 25:186–95.

• Lipuma JJ (2010). The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis.

Clin Microbiol Rev 23(2):299–323.

• Li Q, Wu S, Liu G, Liao X, Deng X, Sun D, Hu Y, Huang Y (2004).

Simultaneous biosorption of cadmium (II) and lead (II) ions by pretreated

biomass of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Sep. Purif. Technol., 34: 135–

142.

• Liu, P.V. (1974). Extracellular Toxins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J.

Infect. Dis. 130: S95-S107.

• Levinson, H. S. and Mahler, I. 1998. Phosphatasc activity and lead

resistance in Citrobacter freundi and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS

Microbiol bett, 161: 135-138.

• Livermore DM, Woodford N: Carbapenemases: a problem in waiting?

Curr Opin Microbiol 2000, 3:489-

Page 96: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Low, K. S.; Lee, C. K.; Liew, S. C., (2000). Sorption of Cadmium and

Lead form aqueous solution by spent grain. Proc. Biochem., 36 (1-2), 59-

64.

• Lysczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB. (2000). Establishment of Pseudomonas

aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist. Microbes

Infect., 2:1051-60.

• MacFaddin, J. F. (2000). Biochemical tests for Identification of Medical

Bacteria 3rdEd. The Williams & Wilkins Co., USA.PP: 689 – 691.

• Malakul, P., Srinivason, K. R., and Wang, H. Y. 1998. Metal Toxicity

reduction in naphthalene biodegradation by use of Metal Chelating

adsorbents. Appl. Environ microbial, 64 (11): 4610-4613.

• Maniatis, A.N.; Karkavitsus,C. ; Maniatis,N.A.; Tsiftsakis,E.; Genimata,V

and Legakis,N.J. (1995). Pseudomonas aeruginosa Folliculitis due to non–

O: 11 Serogroups Acquisition through Use of Contaminated Synthetic

Sponges. Clin. Infect. Dis., 21: 437 – 439.

• Matheson NR, Potempa J, Travis J. Interaction of a novel form of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa alkaline protease (aeruginolysin) with

interleukin-6 and interleukin-8. Biol Chem 2006; 387:911—5.

• McHugh GL, Moellering RC, Hopkins CC, Swartz MN. Salmonella

typhimurium resistance to silver nitrate, chloram-phenicol, and ampicillin.

Lancet 1975; 1:235—240.

• M. Krsek,W.H. Gaze, N.Z. Morris, and E.M.H. Wellington, (2006). Gene

Detection, Expression and Related Enzyme Activity in Soil, springer

Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006: volume (8).

• Mergeay, M., Nies, D. H., Schiegel. H. G., Gerits, J., Charles, P., and Van

Gijsegem, F. 1985. Alcaligenes eutrophus CH34 is a facultative

chemiolitho troph with plasmid-bound resistance to heavy metals. J

Bacteriol, 162: 328-334.

Page 97: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Meyer JM, Neely A, Stintzi A, Georges C, Holder IA. Pyoverdin is

essential for virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 1996;

64:518–23.

• Moore, J. W. and Ramamoorthy, S. 1984a. Impact of Heavy Metals in

Natural waters. Heavy Metals in Natural waters: Applied Monitoring and

Impact Assessment., Springer-Verlag, New York, 205-233.

• Moore, J. W. and Ramamoorthy, S. 1984b. Nickel, Heavy Metals in

Natural Waters: Applied Monitoring and Impact Assessment, Springer-

Verlag, New York, 161-181.

• Morrison, A. J., and R. P. Wenzel. 1984. Epidemiology of infections due to

Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6(Suppl. 3):S627-S642.

• Müller-Premru M, Gubina M 1999. Serotype, antimicrobial susceptibility

and clone distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a university hospital.

Zent bl Bakteriol 289: 857-867.

• Murray, P. R.; Baron, F. J.; Ellen, J. and James, H. (2003). Manual of

Clinical Microbiology.8th ed. 1. ASM, press, Washington, D.C. PP: 719-

728.

• Nassif, X. and Sansonetti, P. J. (1986). Correlation of the virulence of

Klebsiella pneumoniae K1 and K2 with the presence of a plamid encoding

aerobactin. Infect. Immune. 54(3): 603-608.

• National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. 1998. National

Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary

from October 1986 to April 1998, issued June 1998. Am. J. Infect. Control

26:522-533.

• Nichols WW, Evans MJ, Slack MPE, Walmsley HL (1989). The

Penetration of Antibiotics into Aggregates of Mucoid and Non-mucoid

Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Gen. Microbiol., 135: 1291-1303.

• Nies, D.H., and Silver, S. (1995). Ion efflux systems involved in bacterial

metal resistances. Journal of Industrial Microbiology 14: 186-199.

Page 98: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Nies, D. H., Schleged, H. G., Friedrich, B., and Schiegel, H. G. 1987.

Cloning of the plasmid coded resistance to Cobalt, Zinc, and Cadmium

from Alcaligenes eutrophus. CH34. J. Bacteriol., 167: 4865-4868.

• Nies, D. H., Nies, A., Chu, L., ans Silver, S. 1989. Expression and

nucleotide sequence of a plasmid determined divalent cation efflux system

from Alcaligenes eutrophus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86: 7352-7355.

• Nies, D. H. 1999. Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl. Microbiol.

Biotechnol. 51:730-750.

• Nies, D. H., (2003). Efflux mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes.

FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27 (2-3), 313-339 (27 pages).

• Nies DH (2007) Bacterial transition metal homeostasis. In: Nies DH, Silver

S (eds) Molecular microbiology of heavy metals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

Heidelberg, pp 117–142.

• Nivens D E, Ohman D E, Williams J, Franklin M J. Role of alginate and its

O – acetylation in formation of P. aeruginosa microcolonies and biofilms.

J Bacteriol. 2001:1047-1057.

• Nucifora, G., L. Chu, T. K. Misra, and S. Silver. 1989. Cadmium

resistance from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258 cadA gene results

from a cadmium-efflux ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:3544-

3548.

• O'Brien PA, Kulier R, Helmerhorst FM, Usher-Patel M, d'Arcangues C.

Copper-containing, framed intrauterine devices for contraception: a

systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Contraception 2008; 77:

318-27.

• Ohara, T., and K. Itoh. 2003. Significance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. Intern. Med. 42:1072-1076.

• Ohsumi Y, Kitamoto K, Anraku Y. Changes induced in the permeability

barrier of the yeast plasma membrane by cupric ion. J Bacteriol 1988; 170:

2676-82.

Page 99: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Olivares M, Uauy R. Copper as an essential nutrient. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;

63: 791S-6S.

• Outten, F. W., C. E. Outten, and T. O'Halloran. 2000. Metalloregulatory

systems at the interface between bacterial metal homeostasis and

resistance, p. 145-157. In G. Storz and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial

stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.

• Oyetibo GO, Ilori MO, Adebusoye SA, Obayori OS, Amund OO (2009).

Bacteria with dual resistance to elevated concentrations of heavy metals

and antibiotics in Nigerian contaminated systems. Environ. Monit. Assess.

http://www.springerlink.com /content/5x212710x3114077/.

• Pennanen, T., Frostegard, A., Fritze H., and Baath, E. 1996. Phospholipid

Fatty Acid composition and Heavy Metal Tolerance of soil Microbial

communities a long two Heavy Metal- polluted Gradients in Coniferous

Forests, APP/Environ Microbial, 62 (2): 420-428.

• Pereira CE, Felcman J. Correlation between five minerals and the healing

effect of Brazilian medicinal plants. Biol Trace Elem Res 1998; 65: 251-9.

• Pierson, C. L. and Friedman, B. (1992). Comparison of susceptibility to -

lactam antimicrobial agents among bacteria isolated from intensive care

units. Diagn. Microbial. Infect. Dis. 15: 19S-30S.

• Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Cochez C, et al. (2003). Molecular epidemiology of

Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in a burn unit: persistence of a

multidrug-resistant clone and a silver sulfadiazine-resistant clone. J Clin

Microbiol., 41:1192—1202.

• Pitt TL 1988. Epidemiological typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J

Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 7: 238-247.

• Pitt, T. L. 1998. Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and related genera, p. 1109-

1138. In B. I. Duerden (ed.), Microbiology and microbial infections, vol. 2.

Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NY.

Page 100: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Pitt, T. L. 1998. Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and related genera, p. 1109-

1138. In B. I. Duerden (ed.), Microbiology and microbial infections, vol. 2.

Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NY.

• Philips D. Lister, Daniel J. Wolter and Nancy D. Hanson. 2009. Clin.

Microbiol. Rev., 22(4): 582.

• Platt, R. M., G. G. Geesey, J. D. Davis, and D. C. White. 1985. Isolation

and partial chemical analysis of firmly bound exopolysaccharide from

adherent cells of a freshwater sediment bacterium. Can. J. Microbiol.

31:675-680.

• Pollack, M. 1995. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, p. 1820-2003. In G. L.

Mandell, R. Dolan, and J. E. Bennett (ed.), Principles and practices of

infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY.

• Prasad, M. N. V.; Strazalka, K., (2000). In: Physiology and biochemistry

of metal toxicity and tolerance in plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers,

Boston, 153-160.

• Pollack, M. (2000). P. aeruginosa. In G.L. Mandell, J.E. Eennett and R.

Dolin (ed) Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th Ed. Churchill

Livingstone, Inc. New York .p.1980-2003.

• Qian, H., Sahlman, L., Eriksson, P. O., Hambraeus, C., Edund, U., and

Sethson, I. 1998. NHR solution structure of the oxidized from of MerP,

amercuricion binding protein involved in bacterial mercuric ion resistance.

Biochemistry- USA, 37: 9316-9322.

• Quinn, J. P. (1998). Clinical problems posed by multi-resistant non-

fermenting Gram-Negative pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 27: S117-S124.

• Rasmussm, B. 2000. Filamentous microfossis in a 3,235-million-year-old

volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit. Nature, 405(6787): 676-679.

• R. De la Iglesia1,2, D. Valenzuela-Heredia1, J.P. Pavissich1, S.

Freyhoffer1, S. Andrade2, J.A. Correa2 and B. Gonza´ lez (2010), Novel

polymerase chain reaction primers for the specific detection of bacterial

Page 101: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

copper P-type ATPases gene sequences in environmental isolates and

metagenomic DNA, Journal compilation a 2010 The Society for Applied

Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 50 (2010) 552–562 .

• Reniero, D., Mozzon, E., Galli, E., and Barbieri, P. 1998. Two aberrant

mercury resistance transponsons in Pseudomonas Stutzeri plasmid pbB.

Gene, 208: 37-42.

• Rensing, C.; Sun, Y.; Mitra, B.; Rosen, B. P., (1998). Pb (II) translocating

P-type ATPases. J. Biol. Chem., 273 (49), 32614-32617.

• Rensing, C. and Grass, G. 2003 Escherichia coli mechanism of copper

homeostasis a changing environment FEMS microbial. REV. 27: 197-213.

• Richards, M. J., J. R. Edwards, D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, et al. 1999.

Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States.

Crit. Care Med. 5:887-892.

• Richards, M. J., J. R. Edwards, D. H. Culver, R. P. Gaynes, et al. 1999.

Nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in the United States.

Pediatrics 103:e39.

• Rossolini G M, Riccio M L, Cornaglia G,Pagani L, Lagatolla C, Selan L,

Fontana R. Carbapenem – resistant P. aeruginosa with acquired blavim

metallo – – lactamase determinants, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000; 6.

• Rossolini GM, Mantengoli E: Treatment and control of severe infections

caused by multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Microbiol Infect

2005, 11(Suppl 4):17-32.

• Russell AD, Hugo WB. Antimicrobial activity and action of silver. ProgMed Chem 1994; 31:351—370.

• Russell AD. Biocide usage and antibiotic resistance: the relevance of

laboratory findings to clinical and environmental situations. Lancet Infect

Dis 2003; 3:795—803.

• Ryan, K. J. and Ray, C. G. (2010). Sherris Medical Microbiology 5th ed.

McGraw Hill. PP: 617-623.

Page 102: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Sahlman, L., Wong, W., and Powlowski, J. 1997. Amercuric ion uptake

role for the integral inner membrane protein, MerC. Involved in bacterial

mercuric ion resistance. J. Bio chem, 272: 29518-29126.

• Saiman L, Siegel J (2004) Infection control in cystic fibrosis. Clin

Microbiol Rev 17(1):57–71

• Sambrook, J. and Rusell, D.W. (2001). Molecular cloning. A laboratory

manual. Third ed. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor

Laboratory Press, N.Y.8 (15):31-45.

• Sampath LA, Chowdhury N, Caraos L, Modak SM. Infection resistance of

surface modified catheters with either shortlived or prolonged activity. J

Hosp Infect 1995;30:201—210.

• Schiering, N., Kabsech, W., Moore, M. J., Distefano, M. D., Walsh,

Walsh, C. T. and Pai, E. F. 1991, structure of detoxification catalyst

mercuric ion reductase From Bacillus Spp.strain Rc 607. Nature, 352: 168-

172.

• Schlemm DJ, Crowe MJ, McNeill RB, Stanley AE, Keller SJ. Medicinal

yeast extracts. Cell Stress Chaperones 1999; 4: 171-6.

• Sergio Vaca Pacheco, Raul Miranda and Carlos Cervantes (1995), Antonie

van leeuwenhoek 67:333-337, 1995.

• SSeverino P, Darini AL, Magalhães VD 1999. The discriminatory power

of ribo-PCR compared to conventional ribotyping for epidemiological

purposes. APMIS 107: 1079- 1084.

• Sharma, N., Sinha, R., Singhvi, A. & Tandon, R. (2006). Pseudomonas

keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 32, 519–

521.

• Shi, W., Becker, J., Bischoff, M., Turco, R. F., and Konopka, A. E. 2002.

Association of Microbial Community Composition and Activity with Lead,

Chromium, and Hydrocarbon Contamination. Appl Environ Microbial, 68

(8): 3859-3866.

Page 103: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Silver, S. 1996. Bacterial resistance to toxic metal ions—a review. Gene179:9-19.

• Silver, S. and Ji, G. 1994a. Newer systems for bacterial resistance; New

surprises, Annu Rev microbial, 50: 753-789.

• Silver, S. and Walderhaug, M. 1992. Gene regulation of plasmid-and

chromosome-determined inorganic ion transport in bacteria, Microbial,

Rev, 56: 195-228.

• Silver S (1996) Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions: a review. Gene179: 9–19

• Silver, S. and Phung, L. T. 1996. Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new

surprises. Annu Rev microbial, 50: 753-789.

• Silver S, Lo J-F, Gupta A. Silver cations as an antimicrobial agent: clinical

uses and bacterial resistance. APUA Newsl 1999; 17:1—3.

• Silver S. Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and

misuses of silver compounds. FEMS Microbiol Rev2003; 27:341—353.

• Smith, R. L., Gottlieb, E., kucharki, L. M. and Magunire, M. E. 1998.

Functional similarity between Archaeal and Bacteria CorA Mangnesium

Transporters. J Bacterial, 180: 2788-2791.

• Spencer, R. C. 1996. Predominant pathogens found in the European

prevalence of infection in intensive care study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol.

Infect. Dis. 15:281-285.

• Stapleton, F., Keay, L., Jalbert, I. & Cole, N. (2007). The epidemiology of

contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci 84, 257–272.

• Stewart TS, Costerton JW (2001). Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in

biofilms. Lancet. 358: 135–138.

• Summers, A.O., 2002. Generally overlooked fundamentals of bacterial

genetics and ecology. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34, S85eS92.

• Summers AO (2009) Damage control: regulating defenses against toxic

metals and metalloids. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:138–144

Page 104: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Sutherland, I. W. 2001. Exopolysaccharides in biofilms, flocs and related

structures. Water Sci. Technol. 43:77-86.

• Takesue, Y., T. Yokoyama, S. Akagi, H. Ohge, Y. Imamura, Y. Murakami,

and T. Sueda. 2002. Changes in the intestinal flora after the administration

of prophylactic antibiotics to patients undergoing a gastrectomy. Surg.

Today 32:581-586.

• Thuong, M., K. Arvaniti, R. Ruimy, P. de la Salmoniere, A. Scanvic-

Hameg, J. C. Lucet, and B. Regnier. 2003. Epidemiology of Pseudomonas

aeruginosa and risk factors for carriage acquisition in an intensive care

unit. J. Hosp. Infect. 53:274-282.

• Todar, K. (2004).Pseudomonas. Sci. 304: 1421-1426.

• Trajanovska,S., Britz, M. L., and B. have, M. 1997. Detection of heavy

metal ion resistance genes in gram positive and gram negative bacteria

isolated from lead contaminated site. Biodegradation, 8(2): 113-124.

• Tsakris A, Pournaras S, Woodford N, Palepou MF, Babini GS, Douboyas

J,

Livermore DM. (2000). Outbreak of infections caused by Pseudomonas

aeruginosa producing VIM-1 carbapenemase in Greece. J Clin Microbiol.,

38:1290- 1292.

• Uauy R, Olivares M, Gonzalez M. Essentiality of copper in humans. Am J

Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 952S-9S.

• Ugur, A., Ceylan, O., 2003. Occurrence of resistance to antibiotics, metals,

and plasmids in clinical strains of Staphylococcus spp. Arch. Med. Res.

34 (2), 130e136

• Valdman E, Erijman L, Pessoa FLP, Leite SGF (2001). Continuous

biosorption of Cu and Zn by immobilized waste biomass Sargassum sp.

Proc. Biochem., 36: 869-873.

• Valles, J., D. Mariscal, P. Cortes, P. Coll, A. Villagra, E. Diaz, A. Artigas,

and J. Rello. 2004. Patterns of colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in

Page 105: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

intubated patients: a 3-year prospective study of 1607 isolates using

pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with implications for prevention of

ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 30:1768-1775.

• Van Valiet, A. H. M., kuipess, E. J. Waidner, B., Davies, B. J., Vries, N.,

penn, C. W., Vander, C. M. J. E., kist M., Bereswill, S., and kusters, J. G.

2001, Nickel-Responsive induction of urease Expression in Helicobacter

Pylori is Mediated at theTranscriptional level. Infected Immun, 69: 4891-

4897.

• Veesenmeyer JL, Hauser AR, Lisboa T, Rello J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa

virulence and therapy: evolving translational strategies. Crit Care Med

2009; 37:1777—86.

• Villavicencio, R. T. 1998. The history of blue pus. J. Am. Coll. Surg.

187:212-216.

• Virender Singh1, P.K. Chauhan, Rohini Kanta, Tejpal Dhewa, and Vinod

Kumar, (2010). Isolation and characterization of pseudomonas resistant to

heavy metals contaminants, Volume 3, Issue 2, July – August 2010.

• Vishnu Prasad. S., Mamatha Ballal, and P. G. Shivananda, (2009), action

of heavy metals on Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from

infection wound. Journal of chienese clinical medicine Volume 4/ Number

3/ March 2009.

• Wateret, G.W. and Wunderink,R.G .(2001) . Increasing threat of gram–

Negative bacteria. Crit. Care Med. 29 (4): 75 – 81.

• Willcox, M. D. (2007). Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and

inflammation during contact lens wear: A review. Optom Vis Sci 84, 273–

278.

• Williams, H. D.; Zlosnik, J. E. andRyall, B. (2007). Oxygen, cyanide and

energy generation in the cystic fibrosis pathogen pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Adv. Microb. Physiol. 52: 1-71.

Page 106: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

• Walsh TR, Toleman MA, Poirel L, Nordmann P: Metallo- -lactamases: the

quiet before the storm? Clin Microbiol Rev 2005, 18:306-325.

• Weast, R. C. 1984. CRC hand book of chemistry and physics. CRC press,

Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

• Wilks SA, Michels HT, Keevil CW. Survival of Listeria monocytogenes

Scott A on metal surfaces: implications for crosscontamination. Int J Food

Microbiol 2006; 111: 93-8.

• Whitfield, C. 1988. Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides. Can. J.Microbiol. 34:415-42

• Whitchurch, C. B., T. Tolker-Nielsen, P. C. Ragas, and J. S. Mattick. 2002.

Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science

295:1487.

• Woods DE, Schaffer MS, Rabin HR, Campbell GD, Sokol PA. Phenotypic

comparison of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a variety of

clinical sites. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24:260—4.

• Yurieva, O., Koholodii, G., Minakin, L., Gorlenko, Z. Kalyaeva, E.,

Mindlin, S., and Nikiforov, V. 1997. Intercontinental spread of

promiscuous mercury- resistance tranposon in environmental bacteria. Mol

Microbiol., 24: 321-329.

• ZENG Xiao-xi, TANG Jian-xin, LIU Xue-duan, and JIANG Pei (2009)

Isolation, identification and characterization of cadmium-resistant

Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain E1. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. (2009)

16: 0416−0421

• Zavascki AP, Cruz RP, Goldani LZ. 2005. Risk factors for imipenem-

resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a comparative analysis of two case-

control studies in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Infect., 59:96-101.

Page 107: Heavy metal resistant bacteria
Page 108: Heavy metal resistant bacteria

Buy your books fast and straightforward online - at one of world’s

fastest growing online book stores! Environmentally sound due to

Print-on-Demand technologies.

Buy your books online at

www.get-morebooks.com

Kaufen Sie Ihre Bücher schnell und unkompliziert online – auf einer

der am schnellsten wachsenden Buchhandelsplattformen weltweit!

Dank Print-On-Demand umwelt- und ressourcenschonend produzi-

ert.

Bücher schneller online kaufen

www.morebooks.deVDM Verlagsservicegesellschaft mbH

Heinrich-Böcking-Str. 6-8 Telefon: +49 681 3720 174 [email protected] - 66121 Saarbrücken Telefax: +49 681 3720 1749 www.vdm-vsg.de

Page 109: Heavy metal resistant bacteria