heavy flavor production at the tevatron jennifer pursley the johns hopkins university on behalf of...

20
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty 2006 - University of Oxford, UK September 25-29, 2006

Post on 20-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Heavy Flavor Production at the

TevatronJennifer Pursley

The Johns Hopkins Universityon behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations

Beauty 2006 - University of Oxford, UK September 25-29, 2006

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 2

BRAND NEW RESULT! b(*)± search

B hadron relative fragmentation fractions

B + cross section using B + → J/ K+

(1S) production cross section b→ J/J/ search and production

upper limit

Focus of this talk

See many other CDF and D0 talks for more interesting b and c results from the Tevatron!

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 3

Triggers and Data Samples Analyses use between

160 pb-1 and 1.1 fb-1 of data

Trigger paths used by these analyses: Di-Muon (J/) [CDF + D0] Displaced track + lepton

(e, ) [CDF] 2 track trigger [CDF]

Skipping all detector and Tevatron review!

D0

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 4

b Motivation b only established B baryon Enough statistics at Tevatron to

probe other heavy baryons Next accessible baryons:

b: b{qq}, q = u,d; JP = SQ + sqq

= 3/2+(b*)

= 1/2+ (b) HQET extensively tested for Qq

systems; interesting to check predictions for Qqq systems

Baryon spectroscopy also tests Lattice QCD and potential quark models

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 5

Reconstructing b With 1.1 fb-1, world’s

largest sample of b:

~3000 Use 2 track trigger to

reconstruct:

b decays at primary vertex

Combine b with a prompt

track to make a b candidate

b Mass Plot

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 6

b Search Methodology Separate b

- and b+:

(+ c.c.)

(+ c.c.)

Search for resonances in mass difference: Q = m(b) - m(b) – m

Use reconstructed b mass →

remove b mass systematic

error Unbiased optimization

Optimize b cuts with b signal

region blinded: 30 <

Q < 100 MeV/c2

b backgrounds: b Hadronization + Underlying

Event – Dominant! B meson Hadronization Combinatorial Bkg

Fix background contributions from data or PYTHIA Monte Carlo

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 7

b Observation Observe signals consistent with

lowest lying charged b states With unbinned likelihood fit,

measure events

And mass difference values:

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 8

b Fragmentation Fractions Measure flavor dependence

of fragmentation process for b quarks (non-perturbative)

Reconstruct semi-leptonic decays of B 0, B -, Bs

0, and b0

in 360 pb-1 of data ℓ –D 0, ℓ –D +, ℓ –D *+, ℓ – Ds

+, ℓ – c+

Use Particle ID likelihood cuts (important for c

+ signal) Determine sample comp.

from charm hadron BRs Indirect semi-lep decays and

excited B hadrons explicitly included

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 9

Fragmentation Fraction Results

fu, fd, fs, f = probability to result in B -, B 0, Bs0, b

0

Use B hadron transverse momentum (pT) threshold of 7 GeV/c

Agrees with world average of fragmentation fraction of B - relative to B 0

fb differs from LEP by ~2.2

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 10

B+ Production Cross Section

8197 ± 239 B ± mesons total Divide in 5 bins of pT and

measure differential cross section as a function of pT, in units of nb/GeV/c

Integrated cross section for pT ≥ 25 GeV/c = 21.7 ± 3.7 nb

Using 740 pb-1 of data, reconstruct B+ → J/ K+

To be submitted to PRD very soon…

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 11

Total B+ Production Cross Section

Combined stat & syst errors

Agrees with previous Tevatron measurements 1.8 TeV cross section

increased by 10% Also within the range of

FONLL theoretical predictions with fu = 0.389 CTEQ6M fits to parton

distribution functions

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 12

(1S) Production With 160 pb-1, reconstruct

(1S) → +-

Unresolved (2S) and (3S) signals

Previous studies at CDF limited to at √s = 1.8 TeV

Divide into three rapidity regions:

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 13

(1S) Diff. Cross Section

Little variation between rapidity regions

Also consistent with previous CDF measurement

Allows a more precise determination of parameters of bottomonium production models

Phys. Rev. Lett. {94},232001 (2005)

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 14

Search for b → J/ J/ Spin-singlet bb bound

state b yet to be observed

(pp → b X) ~ b at Tevatron energy scale

Look for b decay into

J/ J/ in 1.1 fb-1

Large uncertainty in expected BR

Expect between 0.2 and 20 events with both J/ decaying to + -

Reconstruct as 3 + track

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 15

b → J/ J/ Results Expected 3.6 bkg events; observe 3 events Set upper limit for production cross section:

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 16

First observation of lowest lying charged b states! With m(b) = 5619.7 ± 1.2 (stat) ± 1.2 (syst) MeV/c2,

Precision measurements of b production properties b fragmentation fractions (1S) and B + production cross sections Upper limit on b → J/ J/ production

More results on the way…

Summary

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 17

Backup Slides

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 18

b SystematicsParameterParameter TrackingTracking b b

Sample Sample CompComp..

b b

Ha+UEHa+UE

Norm.Norm.

b b

Ha+UE Ha+UE ShapeShape

b b Ha+UE Ha+UE

ReweightReweightDet. Det. Reso.Reso.

b b Nat. Nat.

WidthWidthTotalTotal

bb-- Q Q

(Mev/c(Mev/c22))0.06

-0.06

0.00

-0.03

0.009

-0.002

0.000

-0.011

0.04

-0.0004

0.0

-0.011

0.009

-0.005

0.07

-0.07

bb+ + Q Q

(Mev/c(Mev/c22))0.06

-0.06

0.03

0.0

0.013

-0.013

0.013

0.0

0.0

-0.11

0.0

-0.014

0.01

-0.02

0.07

-0.13

bb**--bb

Q Q

(Mev/c(Mev/c22))0.06

-0.06

0.05

0.0

0.14

-0.13

0.04

0.0

0.32

0.0

0.02

0.0

0.07

-0.07

0.37

-0.16

bb-- events events 0.0

0.0

0.7

0.0

2.2

-2.2

0.3

0.0

7.4

0.0

0.3

0.0

3.4

-3.4

8.5

-4.0

bb++ events events 0.0

0.0

3.3

0.0

2.1

-2.1

1.2

0.0

2.3

-1.8

0.3

0.0

1.8

-2.0

5.0

-3.4

bb*-*- events events 0.0

0.0

0.4

0.0

4.8

-4.7

0.3

0.0

14.7

0.0

0.1

0.0

1.7

-1.7

15.6

-5.0

bb*+*+ events events 0.0

0.0

7.3

0.0

4.8

-4.8

2.8

0.0

4.6

-2.9

0.2

0.0

0.8

-0.8

10.3

-5.7

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 19

b Fit Likelihood Ratios

HypothesisHypothesis (-ln £) 1/LR

““NULL” vs. “4 NULL” vs. “4 Peak”Peak”

44.7 2.6e19

““2 Peak” vs. “4 2 Peak” vs. “4 Peak”Peak”

14.3 1.6e6

No No bb- - PeakPeak 10.4 3.3e4

No No bb+ + PeakPeak 1.1 3

No No bb*- *- PeakPeak 10.1 2.4e4

No No bb*+ *+ PeakPeak 9.8 1.8e4

J. Pursley, Beauty 06 20

b Two Peak Fit