heartbeat – jan 2003 allhat allhat and allhat-llt valentin fuster md director, cardiovascular...
TRANSCRIPT
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT and ALLHAT-LLT
Valentin Fuster MDDirector, Cardiovascular InstituteMount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, NY
Christopher Cannon MDCardiologistBrigham and Women's HospitalBoston, MA
James Ferguson MDAssociate Director, CardiologySt Luke's Episcopal Hospital and Texas Heart InstituteHouston, TX
Michael Weber MDProfessor of MedicineSUNY Downstate College of MedicineBrooklyn, NY
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT and ALLHAT-LLT
Special Guest Commentator
Thomas G Pickering MD, PhDDirector, Integrative and Behavioral Cardiovascular
Health Program And Hypertension ProgramMount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, NY
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Randomized designof ALLHAT
High-risk hypertensive patients
Consent / Randomize
(42 418)
AmlodipineChlorthalidoneDoxazosinLisinopril
Eligible for lipid-lowering
Not eligible for lipid-lowering
Consent / Randomize (10 355)
Pravastatin Usual care
Follow for CHD and other outcomes until death or end of study (up to 8 yrs).
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Trial design
•33 357 patients age >55 with hypertension and 1 additional risk factor
•Randomized to:
chlorthalidone (12.5 mg to 25 mg/day, n=15 255)
amlodipine (2.5 mg to 10 mg/day, n=9048)
lisinopril (10 mg to 40 mg/day, n=9054)
•Primary end point: fatal CHD or nonfatal MI
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
JAMA 2002; 288:2981-2997
ALLHAT: Primary end point
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
Events
(%
)
Chlorthalidone Lisinopril Amlodipine
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Secondary outcomes: Amlodipine vs chlorthalidone
End point
Amlodipine (%)
Chlorthalidone (%)
Relative risk
p
6-year rate of heart failure
10.2 7.7 1.38 (1.25-1.52)
<0.001
JAMA 2002; 288:2981-2997
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Summary
Why did diuretics do so well in this population, when we've all been talking about how great the ACE inhibitors are?
How do we unravel this surprising finding?
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
A negative study
"I was frustrated by the authors immediately portraying this paper in public policy and economic terms."
"I am by no means convinced that this study is anything other than what you might normally call a negative study."
"I'm not convinced the discrepancies between the drugs are as obviously apparent as claimed."
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
JAMA 2002; 288:2981-2997
ALLHAT: Blood pressure
125
130
135
140
145
150
0 1 2 3 4 5
Years
Systo
lic B
P (
mm
Hg
)Chlorthalidone Lisinopril Amlodipine
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Heart-failure protection
"I was astonished with the heart-failure result."
It seems an ACE inhibitor would be a superior protector against heart failure
Could the chlorthalidone be masking the symptoms of heart failure and resulting in missed diagnoses?
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Blood-pressure effect
It is possible the blood-pressure difference explains some, if not most, of the final results
There was a consistent difference throughout the trial
ACE inhibitors have been shown to be more effective in younger patients, and the age of the trial participants may be a factor in ALLHAT
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Blood-pressure difference
Can the blood pressure have had significant impact when the difference was so small?
Blood-pressure difference compared with chlorthalidone
Amlodipine: +0.8 mm Hg
Lisinopril: +2.0 mm Hg
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Stroke risk: Lisinopril vs chlorthalidone
Subgroup Relative risk 95% CI
Nonblack 1.00 0.85-1.17
Black 1.40 1.17-1.68
JAMA 2002; 288:2981-2997
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Masking heart failure
It is possible the diuretics were masking some of the clinical manifestations of heart failure
"I don't think that [ALLHAT] means that we should throw out all the new forms of therapy and go back to treating everybody with diuretics."
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Understanding the biology
"Is it the blood-pressure control or is it the specific agents?"
We have confounding results and don't have the absolute answer right now
We haven't had a chance to examine all the different subgroups yet
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Fundamental principles
"We've been going along fat, dumb, and happy thinking we've got all these great new forms of therapy and they're so much better than what we had before. And now we've got to reexamine that."
We need to apply the principles of risk stratification to the world of hypertension
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: A surprise
"I think we were all somewhat surprised."
Consensus of meta-analyses was CCBs are better at preventing stroke, while ACE inhibitors are better at preventing coronary events when compared to standard diuretic and beta-blocker treatment
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Elderly population
ALLHAT had a relatively elderly population:
mean age: 67 years 57% of patients >65
We don't have as many comparative trials in the elderly
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT: Heart failure
Increased heart failure was a factor involved in stopping the doxazosin arm of ALLHAT
"It may be that the diuretic tends to reduce sodium retention whereas some of these agents may be associated with sodium retention if not given in combination with a diuretic."
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
HOPE: Primary end points
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Even
ts (
%)
CV death MI Stroke Combined
Ramipril Placebo
N Engl J Med 2000; 342(3):145-153
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
African American population
There seems to be an inconsistency between HOPE and ALLHAT concerning ACE inhibitors
ALLHAT was designed to have a large black population (35%) in the study
ACE inhibitors may be less effective in this population
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Overinterpreting the findings?
30% to 40% of the benefit seen in HOPE may come from lowering blood pressure
Can argue that in the white cohort in ALLHAT, ACE inhibitors may have reduced coronary events 5% to 8% once blood pressure is factored in
"I am rather concerned that the authors of the study [ALLHAT]have perhaps overinterpreted their own findings" Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Biochemical changes
Past studies with diuretics suggested that one of the problems with the drug was an effect on elements like fasting glucose, potassium, etc
These may increase risk for people with hypertension
Does ALLHAT tell us we should stop worrying so much about these things?
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
New-onset diabetes
In SHEP, diabetics did well on chlorthalidone
Beta blockers may help prevent new-onset diabetes
ACE inhibitors have also been linked to prevention of new-onset diabetes
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
JAMA 2002; 288:2981-2997
ALLHAT: Fasting glucose levels
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Fasti
ng g
lucose >
126
mg/dL (
%)
Baseline 2 years 4 years
Chlorthalidone Lisinopril Amlodipine
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Three patients
Which would be the first drug of choice?
Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease
Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF
Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
First patient
Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease
Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF
Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
First patient: First drug
Weber: Start with calcium channel blocker, maybe a diuretic in a black patient
Pickering: Diuretic
Ferguson: Diuretic
Cannon: Diuretic, maybe a generic ACE inhibitor
Fuster: ACE inhibitor in the past–not sure now
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Digesting ALLHAT
We must teach our colleagues that the last word is not yet in on all this
"This is a very complicated story, ALLHAT, we're going to have to take a few months to fully digest it."
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Second patient
Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease
Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF
Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Second patient: First drug
Weber: ACE inhibitor
Pickering: Beta blocker
Ferguson: ACE inhibitor
Cannon: Beta blocker, followed by ACE inhibitor
Fuster: ACE inhibitor
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Third patient
Patient 1: Age 65; BP 170/100; no evidence of atherosclerotic disease
Patient 2: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous MI, good LVF
Patient 3: Age 65; BP 170/100; previous stroke
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Third patient: First drug
According to PROGRESS study, you should use a combination of ACE inhibitor and a diuretic
Likely to start with diuretic for older patient and ACE inhibitor for younger, but will end up with both
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Third patient: First drug
This patient is a quandary right now, having both manifest atherosclerotic disease and hypertension
I am still biased toward ACE inhibitors and will make that the first line of therapy
Cannot lose sight of the underlying atherosclerotic disease
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Third patient: First drug
I want to finish up with both ACE inhibitor and a diuretic (PROGRESS trial) so it doesn't matter which I start with
"Someone who comes in with 170 systolic, you aren't going to get him down to 140 with 1 drug anyway."
We all seem likely to end up with an ACE inhibitor and a diuretic as a combination
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Third patient: First drug
Start with an ACE inhibitor for the vascular disease risk and then titrate to blood pressure with diuretic as a follow-up drug
Cannon
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Drug choice based on patient
An ACE inhibitor followed by a diuretic
Seems that for a patient age 65 with
•No manifestation of disease–start with a diuretic
•CAD with good VF–ACE inhibitor
•After a stroke–combination of ACE inhibitor and diuretic
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Implications of ALLHAT
ALLHAT suggested that all of these drugs are similar in their effect
"Tragically, ALLHAT never examined the sorts of combinations that we use."
ALLHAT is complicated by the fact the patients weren't treated in the way they would be in the real world
Weber
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT mortalityC
um
ula
tive m
ort
ality
rate
Years to death0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
.05
.1
.15
.2
.25
.3
HR (95% CI) p
A/C 0.96 (0.89-1.02) 0.20
L/C 1.00 (0.94-1.08) 0.90
ChlorthalidoneAmlodipineLisinopril
ALLHAT trial site
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Trial design
•10 355 patients age >55 with hypertension and 1 additional risk factor and moderate hypercholesterolemia
•Randomized to:
pravastatin (40 mg/day, n=15 255)
usual care
•Primary end point: all-cause mortality
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Primary results
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6-y
ear
even
t ra
te/
100 p
ati
en
ts
Mortality CHD and nonfatal MI
Pravastatin Usual care
JAMA 2002; 288:2998-3007
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
HPS: Mortality results
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Event
rate
(%
)
All-cause mortality Vascular death
Simvastatin Placebo
Lancet 2002; 360:7-22
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Statin use
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
% o
n s
tati
n
2 years 4 years 6 years
Statin arm Usual care arm
JAMA 2002; 288:2998-3007
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Evolving standard of care
"We've been going along thinking that the statins are the answer to all of our atherosclerotic disease problems, and they're not."
If usual standard of care means 30% are on statins anyway, it's hard to improve on that with a statin
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Open label
ALLHAT-LLT was not a double-blind trial, it was open-label
Lots of dropouts (22.6% of statin arm came off their drug over the course of the trial)
The big difference with other statin trials lies in the study design
Cannon
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Designing clean studies
Must construct clean, well-designed studies that can give meaningful results even in the face of an improving standard of care
ALLHAT-LLT was also underpowered due to lack of enrollment
Cannon
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: Crossovers
It may become more difficult to see differences in the future, the real danger is crossovers
An unblinded trial makes it much easier to use the study drug as part of usual care
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
ALLHAT-LLT: LDL-CLD
L-C
in
mg
/dL
0 2 4 6100
110
120
130
140
150
Usual care
Pravastatin
Year of blood draw
7% *
11%
16%
23%
28% 30%
* Percent decrease from baseline.
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Summary: ALLHAT
In a hypertensive population, a diuretic was as good as the use of amlodipine and lisonipril
"Diuretics may not be as bad as I thought."
The results may be due in part to blood-pressure effects
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Summary: ALLHAT-LLT
"It's not a good study."
There was a lot of crossover, and that makes it difficult to draw conclusions
It hasn't changed my opinion on statins
Fuster
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Final word: Ferguson
In both studies our preconceived notions were wrong
The studies reinforce which mechanisms we should be targeting
•ALLHAT: focus on blood pressure in hypertensive patients
•ALLHAT-LLT: should still be treating cholesterol is a priority
Ferguson
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Final word: Pickering
ALLHAT makes me think people should be using diuretics more
•Current trends show diuretics being used less and less
ALLHAT-LLT won't change the way I use statins in my practice
Pickering
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Final word: Cannon
"One will be much more apt to turn to diuretics and include them as part of combination therapy."
The lesson from LLT is that one wants to do a clean trial as the way to examine if something is beneficial
Cannon
Heartbeat – Jan 2003
ALLHAT
Next program
AHA 2002 Part 2
Valentin Fuster MDDirector, Cardiovascular InstituteMount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, NY
Christopher Cannon MDCardiologistBrigham and Women's HospitalBoston, MA
James Ferguson MDAssociate Director, CardiologySt Luke's Episcopal Hospital and Texas Heart InstituteHouston, TX
Michael Weber MDProfessor of MedicineSUNY Downstate College of MedicineBrooklyn, NY