health system dynamics
TRANSCRIPT
Health System dynamics
Peter S. Hovmand, PhD, MSWFounding Director, Social System Design Lab
Washington University in St. Louis
7th EUSPR Conference October 31‐November 2, 2016| Berlin, Germany
What makes it difficult for these kids to get the health and mental services they need?
From: https://aeon.co/essays/the‐grim‐intensity‐of‐a‐childhood‐on‐the‐street
What makes it difficult for these kids to get the health and mental services they need?
From: https://aeon.co/essays/the‐grim‐intensity‐of‐a‐childhood‐on‐the‐street
• Environmental shocks• Discrimination• Exclusion from classroom• Poverty• Homelessness and unstable
housing• Undernutrition• Crime• Child abuse and neglect• Domestic violence, sexual assault,
and sexual exploitation • Drug use• Mental illness• Infectious diseases • Chronic diseases
“Reality”Complex social systems and
wicked problems
Perception
Action
Mental modelsPolicycycle
Revisiting the policy cycle
Image of mandala from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chenrezing_Mandala.svg
Linear cause‐effect thinking versus feedback thinking
Linear cause‐effect thinking
Proportionusing MCP
Women's healthstatus
Access torepdocutive health
services
Quality of supply
Accessibility toinstitutional delivery
Maternal deaths
Linear cause‐effect thinking versus feedback thinking
Linear cause‐effect thinking
Maternal deaths
Proportion ofpregnancies at riskProportion
using MCP
-
Preganancies
+
Spacing
+
-
+
Live births
+
Average women'shealth status
-
Women ofreproductive
age Girls+
+
+
-
-
R1
B1
B2
Feedback thinking
Proportionusing MCP
Women's healthstatus
Access torepdocutive health
services
Quality of supply
Accessibility toinstitutional delivery
Maternal deaths
Linear cause‐effect thinking versus feedback thinking
Linear cause‐effect thinking Feedback thinking
Maternal deaths
Proportion ofpregnancies at riskProportion
using MCP
-
Preganancies
+
Spacing
+
-
+
Live births
+
Average women'shealth status
-
Women ofreproductive
age Girls+
+
+
-
-
R1
B1
B2
Proportionusing MCP
Women's healthstatus
Access torepdocutive health
services
Quality of supply
Accessibility toinstitutional delivery
Maternal deaths
Linear cause‐effect thinking versus feedback thinking
Linear cause‐effect thinking Feedback thinking
Maternal deaths
Proportion ofpregnancies at riskProportion
using MCP
-
Preganancies
+
Spacing
+
-
+
Live births
+
Average women'shealth status
-
Women ofreproductive
age Girls+
+
+
-
-
R1
B1
B2
Proportionusing MCP
Women's healthstatus
Access torepdocutive health
services
Quality of supply
Accessibility toinstitutional delivery
Maternal deaths
Linear cause‐effect thinking versus feedback thinking
Linear cause‐effect thinking Feedback thinking
Maternal deaths
Proportion ofpregnancies at riskProportion
using MCP
-
Preganancies
+
Spacing
+
-
+
Live births
+
Average women'shealth status
-
Women ofreproductive
age Girls+
+
+
-
-
R1
B1
B2
Proportionusing MCP
Women's healthstatus
Access torepdocutive health
services
Quality of supply
Accessibility toinstitutional delivery
Maternal deaths
Some consequences of ignoring feedback in complex social systems • Focusing efforts on low
leverage solutions
• Unintended consequences
• Limited accessibility, acceptability, and utilization of programs
• Not reaching people with greatest need
• Policy resistance, shifting the burden, and victim blaming
“Reality”Complex social systems and
wicked problems
Perception
Action
Mental modelsPolicycycle
Some consequences of ignoring feedback in complex social systems • Focusing efforts on low
leverage solutions
• Unintended consequences
• Limited accessibility, acceptability, and utilization of programs
• Not reaching people with greatest need
• Policy resistance, shifting the burden, and victim blaming
“Reality”Complex social systems and
wicked problems
Perception
Action
Mental modelsPolicycycle
Pictures
Informal causal maps
Mathematical simulation models
Mental models
There is a system
The components of a system
How the components are related through feedback
How people might think about a system
Where one could intervene
What is transformation
What is the generic structure
What are the implications of accumulations and nonlinear relationships
What systems can generate the dynamic behavior
Where are the leverage points
When do boundary conditions determine behavior
Why do things happen
Levels of system insightsDe
ep sy
stem
insig
hts
Surface system
insig
hts
Implicit models Explicit models
“Reality”Complex social systems and
wicked problems
Perception
Action
Mental modelsPolicycycle
Revisiting the policy cycle
Image of mandala from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chenrezing_Mandala.svg
Skills ofDeliveryTeams Changes in Skills of
Delivery Team+Learning Rate
Max Skills
+
+ProgramResources
ProgramDevelopment
Cost per ProgramDeveloped
-
Initial Skills ofDelivery Teams
ProgramDevelopment
Budget
+
Proportion ofProgram Changes
+-
Initial ProgramResources
-
Delivery TeamsHiring of
Delivery Teams
Initial DeliveryTeams
Proportion ofChange in Delivery
Teams
- +
-
Delivery TeamStaffing Gap
+-
Staffing GapAdj Time
+
Programs
+
Outcomes -
Quality +
+
PerformanceGoal
PerformanceGap
- +
+
Data Systemsand Processes
Data SystemsDevelopment
Data SystemsDevelopment
Budget
+
MeasuredOutcomes on
Health
+
+
-
Budget
Net Change inBudget
+
+
Cost per DataSystem Change
-
<Max Skills>Initial DataSystems
Time to MeasureOutcomes
Time to MeasurePerformance
-
Data Systemsper Program
Data SystemsNeeded
+
-
<Data Systems Needed>
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Program
Development
+
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Data
Systems
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Programs
+
-
Obsolescence
+
Program Budget+
+
+
Efficacy
Budget AT
Effect of Data Systemson OutcomesMeasurement
Effect of DataSystems on
Performance Gap
Cost per Program
Staff per Program
<Programs>
+
Revenue perOutcome
-
Partnerships
PartnershipDevelopment
Selectivity ofPartners
+
+
+
-
PartnershipDevelopment Adj
Time
Initial Budget
+
Revenue
+
+
<Staff perProgram>
-Implementation+
Skills ofDeliveryTeams Changes in Skills of
Delivery Team+Learning Rate
Max Skills
+
+ProgramResources
ProgramDevelopment
Cost per ProgramDeveloped
-
Initial Skills ofDelivery Teams
ProgramDevelopment
Budget
+
Proportion ofProgram Changes
+-
Initial ProgramResources
-
Delivery TeamsHiring of
Delivery Teams
Initial DeliveryTeams
Proportion ofChange in Delivery
Teams
- +
-
Delivery TeamStaffing Gap
+-
Staffing GapAdj Time
+
Programs
+
Outcomes -
Quality +
+
PerformanceGoal
PerformanceGap
- +
+
Data Systemsand Processes
Data SystemsDevelopment
Data SystemsDevelopment
Budget
+
MeasuredOutcomes on
Health
+
+
-
Budget
Net Change inBudget
+
+
Cost per DataSystem Change
-
<Max Skills>Initial DataSystems
Time to MeasureOutcomes
Time to MeasurePerformance
-
Data Systemsper Program
Data SystemsNeeded
+
-
<Data Systems Needed>
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Program
Development
+
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Data
Systems
Fraction of BudgetAllocated to Programs
+
-
Obsolescence
+
Program Budget+
+
+
Efficacy
Budget AT
Effect of Data Systemson OutcomesMeasurement
Effect of DataSystems on
Performance Gap
Cost per Program
Staff per Program
<Programs>
+
Revenue perOutcome
-
Partnerships
PartnershipDevelopment
Selectivity ofPartners
+
+
+
-
PartnershipDevelopment Adj
Time
Initial Budget
+
Revenue
+
+
<Staff perProgram>
-Implementation+
Modelingcycle
• System dynamics is the use of informal maps and formal models with computer simulation to uncover and understand endogenous sources of system behavior (Richardson, 2011, p. 241)
15
System Dynamics
Richardson, G.P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27(3), 219‐243.
• System dynamics is the use of informal maps and formal models with computer simulation to uncover and understand endogenous sources of system behavior (Richardson, 2011, p. 241)
16
System Dynamics
Richardson, G.P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27(3), 219‐243.
Figure 2: stock and flow diagramFigure 1: causal loop diagram
• System dynamics is the use of informal maps and formal models with computer simulation to uncover and understand endogenous sources of system behavior (Richardson, 2011, p. 241)
17
System Dynamics
Richardson, G.P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27(3), 219‐243.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Best caseID and PPC QI+, ID Aff. and PPC Acc.
All QI+ID and PPC QI+
ID QI+All QIID QI
PNC QI+All Aff. and Acc.
ANC QI+PPC QI
MCP QI+MCP QIANC QI
Base case
MMR NMR
Maternal deaths
Proportion ofpregnancies at riskProportion
using MCP
-
Preganancies
+
Spacing
+
-
+
Live births
+
Probability ofneonatal
death
Neonataldeaths
+
+
+
Averageneonatal
health status-Average women'shealth status
-
Women ofreproductive
age Girls+
+
+
- MaternalMortality
Ratio
NeonatalMortatlity
Rate+
-
-
+-
Proportionusing service
Gettingservice
+
Qualitysupply ofservice
+
Ratio of supplyto demand
+
Acceptability
AccessibilityAffordabilityof service
+
+
Seekingservice
+
++
+
+
+
Averagequality
+
+
Performance
+
+Observed
performance
Performancegap
+
+
+
+
+
+
+-
-
-
-
-
+
-
R1
B1
B2
B3
B4
R2
R3
B5
B6
-
R4R5
R6R7
Link to ISEE Exchange version
• Participatory method for involving actors in the process of building and using system dynamics models (e.g., Richardson and Andersen, 1995; Vennix, 1996)
• Emphasis in community based system dynamics on building capacity in communities to use models to understand and change systems
Group Model Building
Why engage communities with systems approaches in the first place?
Social determinants of influenced by broader inequities
Systems of oppressions are complex adaptive systems
Improving quality of research• Correcting for bias• Addressing inherent problem of
indeterminacy in system specification
Building capacity for systems change and “dignity of risk”
Improving design of policies and programs to address social and health inequities
Meaning
Techno
logy
Radical change
Incrementalchange
Incrementalchange
Radical change
Market pull (user‐
centered)
Design driven
Technology push
Using community based system dynamics to support design driven innovation
Adapted from Verganti (2009). Design‐Driven Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press
Mental stability• Patience skills• Communication skills• Life‐long learners, continuing education
• Role switching• Classes and education on ways to relieve stress
• Building self‐esteem with parents
• Outreach for developing child as a leader
• Bonding events• Education on setting boundaries with parents
• Counseling sessions (family, couples, individual)
• Spiritual support• Child feeling safety• Sensitivity training with men
Lancet Commission on Obesity• Global increase in obesity is ‘the canary in the
coalmine’ of deeper problems within the societal systems which are driving overconsumption in general, denigrating environments, and creating inequalities and societal problems
• Transdisciplinary and translational
• Taking a systems approach including group model building and formal modeling with computer simulation to:
• Identify common drivers of obesity, undernutrition and climate change
• Stimulate action and strengthen accountability systems
Some closing observations about methods…Engaging communities is an intervention with valued tangible and intangible benefits
“Structural empathy” – having and knowing others understand the structural complexity of a situation
Identifying and sharing knowledge
Complexity a fact of life, having tools makes it more manageable
Believing people can learn how to model and use models
Question Answer
What is the problem? Is the problem dynamic?
Drawing a reference mode with the desired and feared behavior over time over a defined period of time
What kind of problem is it? Primary diagnosis as a learning, coordination, analysis, or restructuring problem
Does the system involve feedbackmechanisms?
Drawing a diagram of the system that involves one or more feedback loops
What kinds of insights would help solve the problem?
Identifying the types of model based insights such as visualizing the system or identifying leverage points that will help solve the problem
What is the purpose of the model? Write a model project description that defines the problem, explains why it is dynamic and involves feedback, and clearly states the purpose in terms of the type of insights that will help solve the problem.
Thank you!