hazel 1st 2011-2012

Upload: hannah-mae-gabriel

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 hazel 1st 2011-2012

    1/2

    PART II. CRITICAL FACTORS

    CRITICAL FACTORS

    RATING SUMMARY OF RATINGS

    Supervisor Employee Rater Weighted Ave. Scores

    Part I Part II1 Courtesy Polite, kind and thoughtful behavior toward the public

    Supervisor Rater 50%

    clintele in manner of speech and actions.

    2 Human Relations Integrates concern for people at work, office clientele, and

    supervisor-subordinate relationship into work situation.

    3 Punctuality and Observed behavior of coming to the office on time or to be

    Attendance present at work to complete assigned responsibilities

    4 Initiative Starts action projects and performed assigned tasks without

    being told and under minimal supervision5 Leadership The manner of guiding, influencing, motivating and

    Self Rater 25%(to the supervisors only) developing confidence of subordinates to work as a team

    and accomplish tasks, leading the organizational unit to

    achieve its goals and objectives enthusiastically

    6 Judgment/ Ability to develop alternative solutions to problems to

    Client Rater 10%Decision-Making evaluate fact or courses of actions, and to reach sound(to the supervisors only) decision and readiness to take action or commit oneself.

    7 Stress and Stability of performance under pressure or opposition Peer Rater 15%Tolerance

    8 Others (Specify)Add rating on In terview Task (If any)

    Total Points Scores 50Divide by # of entries 5

    Average Points Scores 10.00Multiply by Part II (weight 30%) 0.30

    Equivalent Adjectival RatingWeighted Average Scores 3.00

    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: We discuss and agree on the above ratings

    Reynaldo E. Samonte,Ph.D. Hazel Ann M. GabrielRater Ratee Confirmed by next Higher Supervisor

    PERC Action:

    OverallPoint

    Scores

    Weight(%)

    Final NumericalPeformance Rating

  • 8/6/2019 hazel 1st 2011-2012

    2/2

    CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITYTANZA CAMPUS

    PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMFor June - October 2011

    Employee: HAZEL ANN M. GABRIEL Office/Division : CvSU - Tanza Campus

    Position: INSTRUCTOR I Unit :

    Work/Activity Units of Measure Indicator

    TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS

    Quantity Quality Time Supervisor Employee

    Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS

    70% A. TEACHING 0.

    20% 1. Instruction no. of contact hours 27 hrs/week at least 70% proficiency 18 weeks 0.0

    SET, classroom observation Rating of 8.00 in student evaluation 80% satisfactory within the semester 0.

    Rating 3.5 in class observation 80% satisfactory within the semester 0.

    10% 2. Syllabus Preparation no. of syllabus prepared four syllabi 60% standardized within the semester 0.

    10% 3. Long Exam no. of long exam prepared four long exams per subject 85% valid and reliable within the semester 0.

    10% 4. Instructional Materials no. of instructional materials developed four instructional materials 70% complete within the semester 0.

    10% 5. Projects no. of projects prepared three projects 70% complete within the semester 0.10% 6. Lecture Notes no. of lecture notes prepared nine lecture notes 70% complete within the semester 0.

    10% B. STUDENT DEVELOPMENT1. Field trip/Exposure trip no. of field trips conducted two field trips 70% complete within the semester 0.2. Seminar no. of seminars conducted one seminar 70% acceptable within the semester 0.3. Film Showing no. of film showing conducted one film showing 70% acceptable within the semester 0.

    20% C. OTHERS5% 1. Resource Generation amount of resource and income generated P 8, 000.00 80% accomplished within the semester 0.5% 2. Info- Digest no. of published issues one issue per month 80% accomplished within the year 0.05% 3. Job placement no. of career seminar one seminar 100% accomplished within the semester 0.

    4. Guidance Counselor 2.5% a. Counsel Students no. of times three 80% suited to the students needs within the semester 0.2.5% b. Counseling Reports Prepared no. of reports prepared three reports 80% accomplished within the semester 0.

    100%

    Total Equivalent Point Score 0

    Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) 0.70 0.

    Weight Average Score (WAS) 0We discuss and agree on the above target Legend: PERC Action :

    QN - QuantityQL - QualityT - Timeliness

    REYNALDO E. SAMONTE, Ph.D. HAZEL ANN M. GABRIEL July 25, 2011 APS - Average Points ScoreRater Ratee Date EPS - Equivalent Points Score

    Weight(%)

    XX XX X