hays cisd · engauge community survey service is provided by tasb’s planning and research...

Hays CISD Family/Community

Satisfaction Survey Report May 2013

Prepared by TASB’s Engage Community Survey Service

Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................ 1

Purpose and Background .................................................................. 1

Methodology .......................................................................................... 1

Distribution ............................................................................................ 2

Response ................................................................................................ 2

Findings ................................................................................................... 2

District Results ................................................................................. 2

Campus Results ................................................................................ 3

Comments ........................................................................................... 5

About TASB ............................................................................................ 5

Survey Data ........................................................................................... 6

Trend Data ............................................................................................. 6

1

Executive Summary Purpose and Background Hays CISD strives to nurture students to become extraordinary citizens through unique, personal education experiences. To this end, the district engaged the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) to administer a Family/Community Satisfaction Survey, which was conducted March 18 through March 31, 2013. The data obtained through the survey will help Hays CISD in determining whether the district is meeting its strategic goals. The purpose of the survey was to obtain feedback from parents and community members about their experiences with Hays CISD, including likes and dislikes, and opportunities for improvement. The survey allowed respondents to openly and honestly share their opinions of the district to assist Hays CISD in creating an organization that caters to the needs of the next generation. Methodology The methodology used for this survey was selected to provide useful and scientifically valid data that would help Hays CISD identify areas of progress and opportunities for improvement. To achieve this, TASB invited every student household in Hays CISD to participate in the family/community satisfaction survey. Community members and relatives were also welcome to respond. TASB prepared, in consultation with the district, a survey consisting of 62 close-ended questions and one open-ended question. The survey used a Likert response scale: strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree, or no opinion to collect the data. Questions focused on:

• Demographics • Communication Preferences • Overall Opinion • District Mission and Beliefs • Student Learning • Extracurricular Activities • Customer Service • District Infrastructure

2

Distribution Because Hays CISD desired broad participation, honest feedback, and a strong survey response rate, the survey was distributed to all student households with a valid email or physical address on file with the district. The survey was also made available to members of the community via the district website. The survey was distributed in both English and Spanish in an electronic and paper format. Parents and guardians received an email invitation (if an email address was provided) or a paper survey mailed to their homes. Paper surveys included return postage to ensure that every parent or guardian had the opportunity to respond at no cost to them. Response One thousand six hundred and fifty (1,650) people responded to the survey. The overall response rate was 19.6 percent, based on the number of student households in the district. Over 93 percent of those responses were from parents or guardians. The response rate provides for statistically valid survey results. The district can be 95 percent confident that responses are accurate to within plus or minus 2.2 percent. Findings The overall survey results for both the district, and all campuses, were very positive. District Results The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with all district-level questions. Highlights:

Over 80 percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following: • Hays CISD seeks balance to promote well-being in all areas of life. • Hays CISD strives to be a responsible steward of resources.

3

Over 85 percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following: • I am proud of the schools in my community. • I believe children receive a good education. • Principals are committed to learning. • Teachers are committed to learning.

Over 90 percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following: • Staff members are committed to learning. • District buildings are well maintained. • The district implements sound environmental practices. • The district provides quality student health services. • The district provides quality transportation services.

Five questions (outside of the campus breakout reports) resulted in slightly less than 75 percent of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing. These questions may need further exploration:

• The district spends my tax dollars wisely. • Students are prepared for success after school. • Hays CISD makes decisions based on what is best for students. • Hays CISD does not compromise excellence • Hays CISD does not give up on any student.

Campus Results Student learning, extracurricular activities, and customer service sections were completed by campus. Highlights:

At the Elementary School level, 80 percent or more respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following statements: • Students are encouraged to do their best. • Staff respects cultural diversity. • Teachers are responsive when I have a concern. • Front end staff/office staff is friendly, courteous, and helpful. • Children are safe at school. • This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve high

academic performance. • The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors and sponsors) is friendly

and courteous. • Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning environment for

my student.

4

• Families and community members feel welcome to visit this school. • Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings and events. • Programs are accessible to those with disabilities. • Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities. • Information is accessible to those with disabilities.

At the Middle School level, 80 percent or more respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following statements regarding student learning, extracurricular activities, and customer satisfaction: • This campus has high expectations for student academic success. • Students are encouraged to do their best. • Staff respects cultural diversity. • Campus administrators provide strong leadership. • Front end staff/office staff is friendly, courteous, and helpful. • Children are safe at school. • Additional academic assistance is provided as needed. • There is a proper balance between academics and extra-curricular

activities. • I am satisfied with student access to current technology at school. • This campus is successful in helping special education students achieve

high academic performance. • This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve high

academic performance. • This campus provides a variety of extracurricular opportunities. • The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors, and sponsors) is friendly

and courteous. • Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning environment for

my student. • Families and community members feel welcome to visit this school. • Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings and events. • Programs are accessible to those with disabilities. • Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities. • Information is accessible to those with disabilities. • The campus provides information in my preferred language.

At the High School level, 80 percent or more respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the following statements regarding student learning, extracurricular activities, and customer satisfaction: • Front end staff/office staff is friendly, courteous, and helpful. • Children are safe at school. • I am satisfied with student access to current technology at school. • This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve high

academic performance. • This campus provides a variety of extracurricular activities.

5

• Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning environment for my student.

• Programs are accessible to those with disabilities. • Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities. • Information is accessible to those with disabilities. • The campus provides information in my preferred language.

*Note: Hays and Lehman were the only two schools in this category with statistically valid data. Thus, the above information reflects on these two high schools.

Comments Comments were shared by 414 (25 percent) survey respondents. The topic that received the most comments, by far, was accolades for the district and staff with 111 mentions (27 percent). Additional areas that received the most comments/concerns were:

• Miscellaneous references to staff at the campus level (23 percent) • Curriculum, including materials, STAAR, and CSCOPE (22 percent) • Communication, including information to parents, forms of

communication, and response time in reciprocal communication (17 percent)

• Policies, most often mentioning grading and discipline (14 percent) • District comments (13 percent)

About TASB The Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) is a voluntary, nonprofit, statewide educational association that serves and represents local Texas school districts. TASB’s mission is to promote educational excellence for Texas schoolchildren through advocacy, visionary leadership, and high quality services to school districts. The Association prides itself on the quality of its services, knowledge of Texas schools, cost-effectiveness, and ability to respond quickly and effectively to member needs. Engauge Community Survey Service is provided by TASB’s Planning and Research (P&R) Division, which has conducted internal and external surveys since 2000. P&R has developed and conducted a variety of surveys to assess parent and customer satisfaction, needs, and opinions.

Project Team: Marie Jones, Manager, Planning and Research Kelly Kyle, Consultant, Planning and Research

6

Nancy Cotton, Associate Executive Director, Planning and Human Resources

Survey Data The following sections provide a graphical depiction of survey results. The first section is a comprehensive summary report from all respondents. Response totals for each question may differ from total number of respondents due to each question being optional. You may also note in the overall results that Customer Service responses represent community members and relatives only. Parent and guardian responses to Customer Service can be found in the campus breakout sections. Immediately following the overall district results is a data comparison for 2012 and 2013 responses. Trend Data Response rates for 2012 (21.1 percent) and 2013 (19.6 percent) were very similar, within 1.5 percentage points of each other. The confidence level, 95 percent, remained the same, and the confidence intervals for 2012 (±1.5) and 2013 (±2.2) were less than one percentage point different. Data from each year is statistically valid, and thus can be compared against each other to identify emerging trends. Eighty-two (82) percent of comparable responses stayed within the 2.2 percent confidence interval from 2012 to 2013. The following statements scored slightly lower in 2013 than in 2012:

• The district spends my tax dollars wisely; • Students are prepared for success after school; and • Hays CISD strives to be a responsible steward of resources.

The following statements scored slightly higher in 2013 than in 2012:

• The district provides quality transportation services; and • The district provides quality child nutrition services.

Following the campus reports are Heat Maps depicting overall responses for all elementary, middle, and high schools. These color-coded charts help to see strengths and opportunities for improvement at a glance. A heat map is

7

a graphical representation where individual values in a matrix are represented as colors. In this case, the values represent the percentage of respondents ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Agree’ with the survey statements. Noteworthy is that while overall district ratings were slightly lower in 2013, the Heat Charts indicate that responses for elementary schools were fairly stable, responses for middle schools improved noticeably, and responses for high schools improved slightly on campus performance questions, but fell slightly on the customer service related questions.

Total Survey Responses at Hays CISD: 1,650 Response Rate: 19.6 Percent

Please select which identifier best describes you.

# %

Parent or guardian of a Hays CISD student 1,341 93.4%

Relative of a Hays CISD student 47 3.3%

Community resident 47 3.3%

Total Responses 1,435

Which campus(es) do your children attend? (Check all that apply)

# %

Blanco Vista Elementary School 42 2.9%

Buda Elementary School 84 5.9%

Camino Real Elementary School 34 2.4%

Carpenter Hill Elementary School 97 6.8%

Elm Grove Elementary School 70 4.9%

Fuentes Elementary School 78 5.5%

Green Elementary School 46 3.2%

Hemphill Elementary School 47 3.3%

Kyle Elementary School 101 7.1%

Negley Elementary School 166 11.6%

Pfluger Elementary School 54 3.8%

Science Hall Elementary School 50 3.5%

Tobias Elementary School 68 4.8%

Barton Middle School 133 9.3%

Chapa Middle School 59 4.1%

Dahlstrom Middle School 120 8.4%

Simon Middle School 34 2.4%

Wallace Middle School 83 5.8%

Live Oak Academy 10 0.7%

Hays High School 301 21.0%

Lehman High School 209 14.6%

Impact Center/JJAEP 3 0.2%

None of the above 26 1.8%


Hays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction SurveyComprehensive Summary Report

Parent or guardian of aHays CISD student

Relative of a Hays CISDstudent

Community resident

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Blanco Vista Elementary…

Buda Elementary School

Camino Real Elementary…

Carpenter Hill Elementary…

Elm Grove Elementary School

Fuentes Elementary School

Green Elementary School

Hemphill Elementary School

Kyle Elementary School

Negley Elementary School

Pfluger Elementary School

Science Hall Elementary…

Tobias Elementary School

Barton Middle School

Chapa Middle School

Dahlstrom Middle School

Simon Middle School

Wallace Middle School

Live Oak Academy

Hays High School

Lehman High School

Impact Center/JJAEP

Overall

Which of the following best describes your ethnicity?

# %

Asian/Pacific Islander 15 1.1%

Black/African-American 46 3.2%

Caucasian 797 55.9%

Hispanic 483 33.9%

Native American/Alaska Native 8 0.6%

Other/Multi-Racial 77 5.4%


What language is most often spoken in your household?

# %

English 1,350 93.9%

Spanish 79 5.5%

Other 9 0.6%


0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black/African-American

Caucasian

Hispanic

Native American/Alaska Native

Other/Multi-Racial

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

Overall

Which range best describes your total annual household income level?

# %

Less than $25,000 77 5.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 247 17.7%

$50,000 to $74,999 309 22.2%

$75,000 to $99,999 253 18.1%

$100,000 to $124,999 202 14.5%

$125,000 to $149,999 95 6.8%

$150,000 or more 106 7.6%

Decline to respond 106 7.6%


0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Overall

Identify which of the following communication resources you can access at home or at work. (Check all that apply)

% # % #

Phone 94.4% 1,298 96.1% 1,125

Access to Internet 91.3% 1,255 85.9% 1,006

Email 94.2% 1,295 89.4% 1,047

Facebook account 72.4% 995 41.4% 485

Twitter account 25.3% 348 17.8% 209

Device for texting 83.3% 1,146 69.5% 814

Television 91.1% 1,252 27.7% 324

Radio 83.2% 1,144 42.9% 502

Total 1,375 1,171

Home access Work access

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Phone Access toInternet

Email Facebookaccount

Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Overall

% # % #

Daily/weekly folders 52.3% 714 46.2% 584

District/school Web Sites 49.0% 668 35.9% 454

Headlines from Hays CISD 19.2% 262 22.2% 281

Campus newsletters 22.9% 313 27.1% 342

Local newspapers 12.7% 173 8.2% 103

Local radio/TV stations 4.5% 61 5.5% 69

Automated calling system 47.7% 650 37.2% 470

Online Parent Portal 41.1% 561 39.2% 495

Word of mouth 26.5% 362 7.0% 88



Email 66.3% 905 79.3% 1,002

Mail 11.9% 162 14.1% 178

Other 2.7% 37 2.5% 32

Total 1,364 1,263

Current method Preferred method

Where do you currently get most of your information about Hays CISD and how would you prefer to receive information in the future?

(Check all that apply)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Overall

What types of information are you most interested in receiving from the district or campus? (Check all that apply)

# %

1,219 89.7%

692 50.9%

630 46.4%

792 58.3%

858 63.1%

780 57.4%

811 59.7%

701 51.6%

485 35.7%

621 45.7%

853 62.8%

915 67.3%

451 33.2%

546 40.2%

529 38.9%

290 21.3%

361 26.6%

678 49.9%

650 47.8%

445 32.7%

690 50.8%

1,359

Scholarships and pursuing higher education after graduation

Total Responses

Community education opportunities

Volunteer involvement opportunities

Rational and reasons for decisions made by school/district leadership

General news about events, activities, and achievements on campus

Calendar of events for a specific school

Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter

Lunch menus and nutritional information

School building and construction updates

School Board election or voter information

Decisions made by the School Board

State standardized testing

Parent involvement opportunities

Progress of my child

Descriptions of the district curriculum and instructional programs

Student graduation and course requirements

How the school is performing compared with other schools

Student safety incidents & precautions taken by the school/district

Quality of teaching

Extracurricular activities at the school

Overall

Please share your OVERALL OPINION of Hays CISD.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

I am proud of the schools in my community. 29.6% 373 58.3% 735 8.2% 104 3.9% 49 1,261

I believe children receive a good education. 25.3% 323 61.5% 785 9.6% 122 3.7% 47 1,277

I trust the school board and administration. 16.3% 180 60.7% 669 16.0% 177 7.0% 77 1,103

Principals are committed to learning. 26.6% 324 59.1% 719 8.8% 107 5.5% 67 1,217

Teachers are committed to learning. 30.6% 386 59.1% 746 7.9% 100 2.5% 31 1,263

Staff members are committed to learning. 26.7% 323 63.7% 770 6.7% 81 2.9% 35 1,209

Administrators provide strong leadership. 19.8% 208 55.2% 580 17.4% 183 7.5% 79 1,050

The district spends my tax dollars wisely. 14.1% 143 53.0% 537 22.4% 227 10.6% 107 1,014

Students are prepared for success after school. 18.0% 178 52.9% 524 20.0% 198 9.2% 91 991

Strongly disagree

No opinion' responses have been removed from percentage calculations and total

DisagreeStrongly agree Agree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Overall

Please share your opinion about the DISTRICT MISSION AND BELIEFS at Hays CISD.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Hays CISD makes decisions based on what is best for students. 14.4% 166 58.1% 669 20.8% 240 6.7% 77 1,152

Hays CISD honors relationships and treats all people with dignity

and respect.19.1% 223 60.6% 706 13.5% 157 6.8% 79 1,165

Hays CISD seeks balance to promote well-being in all areas of life. 17.6% 192 62.7% 683 14.9% 162 4.9% 53 1,090

Hays CISD strives to be a responsible steward of resources. 18.1% 196 63.4% 687 14.1% 153 4.3% 47 1,083

Hays CISD does not compromise excellence. 16.4% 179 55.0% 599 21.7% 236 6.9% 75 1,089

Hays CISD does not give up on any student. 19.1% 201 55.1% 580 17.6% 185 8.3% 87 1,053


Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Hays CISD makesdecisions based on

what is best forstudents.

Hays CISD honorsrelationships andtreats all peoplewith dignity and

respect.

Hays CISD seeksbalance to

promote well-being in all areas of

life.

Hays CISD strivesto be a responsible

steward ofresources.

Hays CISD does notcompromiseexcellence.

Hays CISD does notgive up on any

student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Overall

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Hays CISD.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Families and community members feel welcome to visit schools. 14.3% 2 64.3% 9 14.3% 2 7.1% 1 14

Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings and events. 7.7% 1 61.5% 8 30.8% 4 0.0% 0 13

Programs are accessible to those with disabilities. 18.2% 2 81.8% 9 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11

Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities. 27.3% 3 72.7% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 11

Information is accessible to those with disabilities. 44.4% 4 55.6% 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 9

The school district values my opinion. 15.4% 2 38.5% 5 30.8% 4 15.4% 2 13

The school district provides me with adequate opportunity to

provide feedback on major decisions.18.2% 2 36.4% 4 36.4% 4 9.1% 1 11



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Families andcommunity

members feelwelcome to visit

schools.

Families feelwelcome to

participate atschool meetings

and events.

Programs areaccessible tothose withdisabilities.

Facilities areaccessible tothose withdisabilities.

Information isaccessible tothose withdisabilities.

The schooldistrict valuesmy opinion.

The schooldistrict provides

me withadequate

opportunity toprovide

feedback onmajor decisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Overall

Please share your opinion about the DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURE at Hays CISD.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

District buildings are well maintained. 27.1% 308 66.2% 753 4.7% 53 2.1% 24 1,138

The district implements sound environmental practices. 26.1% 258 67.9% 672 4.4% 44 1.6% 16 990

The district provides quality student health services. 27.4% 278 66.4% 673 4.8% 49 1.4% 14 1,014

The district provides quality transportation services. 26.9% 277 66.2% 681 5.1% 52 1.8% 18 1,028

The district provides quality child nutrition services. 21.1% 223 55.9% 591 15.8% 167 7.3% 77 1,058



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

District buildings arewell maintained.

The districtimplements sound

environmentalpractices.

The district providesquality student health

services.

The district providesquality transportation

services.

The district providesquality child nutrition

services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Overall

2012 Total Survey Responses at Hays CISD: 2,729 2012 Response Rate: 21.1 Percent*

2013 Total Survey Responses at Hays CISD: 1,650 2013 Response Rate: 19.6 Percent

*This percentage shows the number of Hays CISD students who were represented in this survey


# % # %Parent or guardian 2,343 96.2% 1,341 93.4%

Relative 46 1.9% 47 3.3%

Community resident 47 1.9% 47 3.3%

Total Responses 2,436 1,435

Which campus(es) do your children attend? (Check all that apply)

# % # %

Blanco Vista Elementary School 93 3.8% 42 2.9%

Buda Elementary School 114 4.6% 84 5.9%

Camino Real Elementary School 74 3.0% 34 2.4%

Carpenter Hill Elementary School 170 6.9% 97 6.8%

Elm Grove Elementary School 144 5.8% 70 4.9%

Fuentes Elementary School 143 5.8% 78 5.5%

Green Elementary School 96 3.9% 46 3.2%

Hemphill Elementary School 122 4.9% 47 3.3%

Kyle Elementary School 136 5.5% 101 7.1%

Negley Elementary School 221 8.9% 166 11.6%

Pfluger Elementary School 119 4.8% 54 3.8%

Science Hall Elementary School 105 4.3% 50 3.5%

Tobias Elementary School 126 5.1% 68 4.8%

Barton Middle School 196 7.9% 133 9.3%

Chapa Middle School 126 5.1% 59 4.1%

Dahlstrom Middle School 224 9.1% 120 8.4%

Simon Middle School 87 3.5% 34 2.4%

Wallace Middle School 193 7.8% 83 5.8%

Live Oak Academy 21 0.9% 10 0.7%

Hays High School 515 20.9% 301 21.0%

Lehman High School 329 13.3% 209 14.6%

Impact Center/JJAEP 10 0.4% 3 0.2%

None of the above 27 1.1% 26 1.8%


2012 2013

2012 2013

Hays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction SurveyComprehensive Summary Report

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

2012

2013

0% 10% 20%

Blanco Vista…Buda…

Camino…Carpenter…Elm Grove…

Fuentes…Green…

Hemphill…Kyle…

Negley…Pfluger…

Science Hall…Tobias…Barton…Chapa…

Dahlstrom…Simon…

Wallace…Live Oak…

Hays High…Lehman…Impact…

2012

2013

Trend Data - 2012 and 2013


# % # %

Asian/Pacific Islander 26 1.1% 15 1.1%

Black/African-American 65 2.7% 46 3.2%

Caucasian 1,319 53.9% 797 55.9%

Hispanic 864 35.3% 483 33.9%

Native American/Alaska Native 18 0.7% 8 0.6%

Other/Multi-Racial 155 6.3% 77 5.4%



# % # %

English 2,287 93.1% 1,350 93.9%

Spanish 152 6.2% 79 5.5%

Other 17 0.7% 9 0.6%


2012 2013

2012 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2012

2013

0% 50% 100%

English

Spanish

Other

2012

2013


# % # %

Less than $25,000 187 7.7% 77 5.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 454 18.8% 247 17.7%

$50,000 to $74,999 534 22.1% 309 22.2%

$75,000 to $99,999 417 17.3% 253 18.1%

$100,000 to $124,999 320 13.3% 202 14.5%

$125,000 to $149,999 141 5.8% 95 6.8%

$150,000 or more 176 7.3% 106 7.6%

Decline to respond 186 7.7% 106 7.6%


2012 2013


0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Less than$25,000

$25,000 to$49,999

$50,000 to$74,999

$75,000 to$99,999

$100,000 to$124,999

$125,000 to$149,999

$150,000 ormore

Decline torespond

2012

2013


# % # %

Phone 1,298 94.4%

Access to Internet 1,255 91.3%

Email 2,205 80.0% 1,295 94.2%

Facebook account 995 72.4%

Twitter account 348 25.3%

Device for texting 1,146 83.3%

Television 2,122 77.8% 1,252 91.1%

Radio 1,928 70.6% 1,144 83.2%

Total 2,729 1,375

Some responses were slightly different in 2012 -

no comparable data available



Identify which of the following communication resources you can access at home. (Check all that apply)

2012 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

2012

2013


# % # %

Phone 1,125 96.1%

Access to Internet 1,006 85.9%

Email 1,479 54.2% 1,047 89.4%

Facebook account 485 41.4%

Twitter account 209 17.8%

Device for texting 814 69.5%

Television 480 17.6% 324 27.7%

Radio 957 35.1% 502 42.9%

Total 2,729 1,171





Identify which of the following communication resources you can access at work. (Check all that apply)

2012 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitter account Device fortexting

Television Radio

2012

2013


# % # %

Daily/weekly folders 1,362 49.9% 714 52.3%

District/school Web Sites 1,290 47.3% 668 49.0%

Headlines from Hays CISD 586 21.5% 262 19.2%

Campus newsletters 792 29.0% 313 22.9%

Local newspapers 372 13.6% 173 12.7%

Local radio/TV stations 216 7.9% 61 4.5%

Automated calling system 1,398 51.2% 650 47.7%

Online Parent Portal 1,121 41.1% 561 41.1%

Word of mouth 607 22.2% 362 26.5%

Facebook account 179 6.6% 195 14.3%

Twitter account 47 1.7% 27 2.0%

Email 1,548 56.7% 905 66.3%

Mail 434 15.9% 162 11.9%

Other 66 2.4% 37 2.7%

Total 2,729 1,364

2012 2013

Where do you currently get most of your information about Hays CISD? (Check all that apply)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2012

2013


# % # %

Daily/weekly folders 746 27.3% 584 46.2%

District/school Web Sites 618 22.6% 454 35.9%

Headlines from Hays CISD 389 14.3% 281 22.2%

Campus newsletters 407 14.9% 342 27.1%

Local newspapers 113 4.1% 103 8.2%

Local radio/TV stations 91 3.3% 69 5.5%

Automated calling system 755 27.7% 470 37.2%

Online Parent Portal 674 24.7% 495 39.2%

Word of mouth 87 3.2% 88 7.0%

Facebook account 177 6.5% 221 17.5%

Twitter account 46 1.7% 45 3.6%

Email 1,354 49.6% 1,002 79.3%

Mail 204 7.5% 178 14.1%

Other 28 1.0% 32 2.5%

Total 2,729 1,263

2013

How would you prefer to receive information about Hays CISD in the future? (Check all that apply)

2012

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2012

2013



# % # %

2,154 92.9% 1,219 89.7%

1,240 53.5% 692 50.9%

1,182 51.0% 630 46.4%

1,345 58.0% 792 58.3%

1,575 67.9% 858 63.1%

1,360 58.7% 780 57.4%

1,485 64.1% 811 59.7%

1,330 57.4% 701 51.6%

922 39.8% 485 35.7%

1,087 46.9% 621 45.7%

1,686 72.7% 853 62.8%

1,815 78.3% 915 67.3%

838 36.2% 451 33.2%

1,144 49.4% 546 40.2%

1,095 47.2% 529 38.9%

586 25.3% 290 21.3%

634 27.4% 361 26.6%

1,245 53.7% 678 49.9%

1,221 52.7% 650 47.8%

826 35.6% 445 32.7%

1,246 53.8% 690 50.8%

2,318 1,359

2012 2013







Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Quality of teaching


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2012

2013



# % # %

I am proud of the schools in my community. 1,953 89.0% 1,108 87.9%

I believe children receive a good education. 1,967 88.4% 1,158 86.8%

I trust the school board and administration. 1,437 78.6% 1,042 77.0%

Principals are committed to learning. 1,092 85.7%

Teachers are committed to learning. 1,119 89.6%

Staff members are committed to learning. 1,143 90.4%

Administrators provide strong leadership. 1,344 76.6% 953 75.0%

The district spends my tax dollars wisely. 1,189 69.6% 910 67.1%

Students are prepared for success after school. 1,269 73.4% 897 70.8%




2012 2013

Strongly agree

or agree

Strongly agree

or agree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2012

2013



# % # %

Hays CISD makes decisions based on what is best for students. 1,475 74.5% 835 72.5%


and respect.1,602 79.7% 929 79.7%

Hays CISD seeks balance to promote well-being in all areas of life. 1,540 82.4% 875 80.3%

Hays CISD strives to be a responsible steward of resources. 1,570 84.2% 883 81.5%

Hays CISD does not compromise excellence. 1,363 72.2% 778 71.4%

Hays CISD does not give up on any student. 1,384 74.9% 781 74.2%

Strongly agree

or agree


2012 2013

Strongly agree

or agree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




respect.


promote well-beingin all areas of life.

Hays CISD strives tobe a responsible




student.

2012

2013


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Hays CISD.

# % # %

Families and community members feel welcome to visit schools. 13 86.7% 11 78.6%

Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings and events. 14 93.3% 9 69.2%

Programs are accessible to those with disabilities. 11 100.0%

Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities. 11 100.0%

Information is accessible to those with disabilities. 9 100.0%

The school district values my opinion. 12 80.0% 7 53.8%

The school district provides me with adequate opportunity to

provide feedback on major decisions.9 64.3% 6 54.5%




Strongly agree

or agree

Strongly agree

or agree

2012 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


members feelwelcome to visit

schools.


participate atschool meetings

and events.




The school districtvalues myopinion.

The school districtprovides me with

adequateopportunity to

provide feedbackon majordecisions.

2012

2013



# % # %

District buildings are well maintained. 1,876 95.0% 1,061 93.2%

The district implements sound environmental practices. 1,607 95.3% 930 93.9%

The district provides quality student health services. 1,664 94.4% 951 93.8%

The district provides quality transportation services. 1,680 92.4% 958 93.2%

The district provides quality child nutrition services. 1,419 75.1% 814 76.9%


Strongly agree

or agree

Strongly agree

or agree

2012 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%




The district providesquality studenthealth services.

The district providesquality

transportationservices.

The district providesquality child

nutrition services.

2012

2013


Total Responses at Campus: 42 Response Rate: %

Total Survey Responses at Hays CISD: 1,650


# %

Parent or guardian of a Hays CISD student 39 92.9%



Total Responses 42


# %



Caucasian 16 38.1%

Hispanic 22 52.4%



Total Responses 42

Blanco Vista Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Blanco Vista Elementary


# %

English 34 81.0%

Spanish 8 19.0%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 42


# %

Less than $25,000 1 2.4%

$25,000 to $49,999 11 26.8%

$50,000 to $74,999 10 24.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 10 24.4%

$100,000 to $124,999 1 2.4%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 2.4%

$150,000 or more 3 7.3%


Total Responses 41

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 89.7% 35 93.3% 28

Access to Internet 92.3% 36 83.3% 25

Email 92.3% 36 76.7% 23



Device for texting 82.1% 32 60.0% 18

Television 92.3% 36 26.7% 8

Radio 79.5% 31 33.3% 10

Total 39 30

Work accessHome access

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 17.9% 7 2.9% 1



Email 46.2% 18 67.6% 23

Mail 17.9% 7 11.8% 4

Other 2.6% 1 0.0% 0

Total 39 34


Where do you currently get most of your information about Hays CISD and how would you prefer to receive information in the

future? (Check all that apply)

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

36 92.3%

24 61.5%

14 35.9%

19 48.7%

21 53.8%

22 56.4%

24 61.5%

17 43.6%

15 38.5%

16 41.0%

22 56.4%

27 69.2%

10 25.6%

22 56.4%

20 51.3%

6 15.4%

8 20.5%

16 41.0%

14 35.9%

11 28.2%

11 28.2%

39





Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter


Total Responses












Quality of teaching





Total

% # % # % # % # #

I am proud of the schools in my community. 30.3% 10 60.6% 20 6.1% 2 3.0% 1 33

I believe children receive a good education at Hays CISD. 29.4% 10 67.6% 23 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 34

I trust the school board and administration. 29.6% 8 70.4% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27

I believe the district employs principals who are committed to

student learning.20.6% 7 73.5% 25 5.9% 2 0.0% 0 34

I believe the district employs teachers who are committed to



'No opinion' responses have been removed from percentage calculations and total

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

I am proud of theschools in mycommunity.

I believe childrenreceive a good

education at Hays CISD.

I trust the school boardand administration.

I believe the districtemploys principals who

are committed tostudent learning.

I believe the districtemploys teachers who


Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your OVERALL OPINION of Hays CISD. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #

I believe the district employs staff members who are committed to


District administrators provide strong leadership. 21.4% 6 67.9% 19 7.1% 2 3.6% 1 28

The district spends my tax dollars wisely. 21.7% 5 60.9% 14 13.0% 3 4.3% 1 23

The district prepares students for success after high school. 23.8% 5 61.9% 13 14.3% 3 0.0% 0 21



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

I believe the district employsstaff members who arecommitted to student

learning.

District administratorsprovide strong leadership.

The district spends my taxdollars wisely.

The district prepares studentsfor success after high school.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Hays CISD makes decisions based on what is best for students. 16.1% 5 71.0% 22 12.9% 4 0.0% 0 31


and respect.20.0% 6 66.7% 20 13.3% 4 0.0% 0 30

Hays CISD seeks balance to promote well-being in all areas of life. 24.1% 7 58.6% 17 17.2% 5 0.0% 0 29

Hays CISD strives to be a responsible steward of resources. 17.9% 5 75.0% 21 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

Hays CISD does not compromise excellence. 16.1% 5 61.3% 19 22.6% 7 0.0% 0 31

Hays CISD does not give up on any student. 33.3% 8 45.8% 11 20.8% 5 0.0% 0 24



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.

Hays CISD seeksbalance to promote

well-being in allareas of life.





student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Blanco Vista Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

All students are provided equal opportunities for learning. 27.3% 9 60.6% 20 9.1% 3 3.0% 1 33

This campus has high expectations for student academic success. 37.5% 12 56.3% 18 3.1% 1 3.1% 1 32

Curriculum is innovative. 26.5% 9 50.0% 17 20.6% 7 2.9% 1 34

Learning environments are innovative. 29.4% 10 55.9% 19 11.8% 4 2.9% 1 34

Students are encouraged to do their best. 39.4% 13 57.6% 19 0.0% 0 3.0% 1 33


Strongly agree Strongly disagreeAgree Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

All students areprovided equal

opportunities forlearning.

This campus has highexpectations for

student academicsuccess.

Curriculum isinnovative.

Learning environmentsare innovative.

Students areencouraged to do their

best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Blanco Vista Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #

I am satisfied with the academic opportunities this campus

provides.35.3% 12 44.1% 15 17.6% 6 2.9% 1 34

Families are informed about their children's academic progress in a

timely manner.44.1% 15 41.2% 14 11.8% 4 2.9% 1 34

Students are treated fairly. 39.4% 13 57.6% 19 0.0% 0 3.0% 1 33

The district-wide discipline policy is consistently applied at this

campus.31.0% 9 62.1% 18 6.9% 2 0.0% 0 29

Staff respect cultural diversity. 45.5% 15 48.5% 16 6.1% 2 0.0% 0 33



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

I am satisfied with theacademic opportunitiesthis campus provides.

Families are informedabout their children's

academic progress in atimely manner.

Students are treatedfairly.

The district-widediscipline policy is

consistently applied atthis campus.

Staff respect culturaldiversity.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Campus administrators provide strong leadership. 30.0% 9 53.3% 16 13.3% 4 3.3% 1 30

Teachers are responsive when I have a concern. 44.1% 15 44.1% 15 8.8% 3 2.9% 1 34

Front end staff/office staff are friendly, courteous, and helpful. 65.6% 21 34.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

Children are safe at school. 34.4% 11 65.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

Additional academic assistance is provided as needed. 37.9% 11 48.3% 14 10.3% 3 3.4% 1 29



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Campus administratorsprovide strong

leadership.

Teachers areresponsive when I have

a concern.

Front end staff/officestaff are friendly,

courteous, and helpful.

Children are safe atschool.

Additional academicassistance is provided

as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

There is a proper balance between academics and extra-curricular

activities.18.8% 6 59.4% 19 15.6% 5 6.3% 2 32

I am satisfied with student access to current technology at school. 30.3% 10 57.6% 19 9.1% 3 3.0% 1 33

This campus is successful in helping special education students

achieve high academic performance.45.0% 9 55.0% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20

This campus is successful in helping gifted and talented students


This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve high

academic performance.40.9% 9 54.5% 12 4.5% 1 0.0% 0 22

Strongly agree


Agree Disagree Strongly disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

There is a properbalance between

academics and extra-curricular activities.

I am satisfied withstudent access to

current technology atschool.

This campus issuccessful in helping

special educationstudents achieve high

academic performance.

This campus issuccessful in helpinggifted and talented

students achieve highacademic performance.

This campus issuccessful in helpingESL students achieve

high academicperformance.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Blanco Vista Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

This campus provides a variety of extracurricular opportunities. 22.2% 6 55.6% 15 22.2% 6 0.0% 0 27

The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors, and sponsors) is

friendly and courteous.35.0% 7 65.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20

Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning environment

for my student.20.8% 5 70.8% 17 8.3% 2 0.0% 0 24

I am well informed about extracurricular events in which my

student is involved.23.1% 6 57.7% 15 19.2% 5 0.0% 0 26



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

This campus provides avariety of extracurricular

opportunities.

The extracurricular staff(coaches, directors, andsponsors) is friendly and

courteous.

Extracurricular activitiesprovide a positive learning

environment for my student.

I am well informed aboutextracurricular events in

which my student is involved.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Blanco Vista Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Families and community members feel welcome to visit this

school.47.1% 16 47.1% 16 0.0% 0 5.9% 2 34





The campus provides information in my preferred language. 62.5% 20 37.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

The campus values my opinion. 25.0% 6 58.3% 14 12.5% 3 4.2% 1 24

The campus provides me with adequate opportunity to provide

feedback on major decisions.27.6% 8 44.8% 13 20.7% 6 6.9% 2 29



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


members feelwelcome to

visit thisschool.


participate atschool

meetings andevents.




The campusprovides

information inmy preferred

language.

The campusvalues myopinion.

The campusprovides me

with adequateopportunity to

providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

District buildings are well maintained. 36.4% 12 63.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33


The district provides quality student health services. 46.2% 12 42.3% 11 11.5% 3 0.0% 0 26

The district provides quality transportation services. 39.3% 11 53.6% 15 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

The district provides quality child nutrition services. 35.5% 11 45.2% 14 16.1% 5 3.2% 1 31


Agree Disagree Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


The district implementssound environmental

practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 83


# %



Caucasian 52 62.7%

Hispanic 17 20.5%



Total Responses 83

Buda Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Buda Elementary


# %

English 80 97.6%

Spanish 1 1.2%

Other 1 1.2%

Total Responses 82


# %

Less than $25,000 4 5.2%

$25,000 to $49,999 17 22.1%

$50,000 to $74,999 16 20.8%

$75,000 to $99,999 16 20.8%

$100,000 to $124,999 12 15.6%

$125,000 to $149,999 6 7.8%

$150,000 or more 5 6.5%


Total Responses 77

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Buda Elementary


% # % #

Phone 89.9% 71 92.5% 62


Email 92.4% 73 88.1% 59




Television 92.4% 73 29.9% 20

Radio 88.6% 70 52.2% 35

Total 79 67


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Buda Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 35.1% 27 7.1% 5



Email 53.2% 41 68.6% 48

Mail 11.7% 9 10.0% 7

Other 1.3% 1 2.9% 2

Total 77 70




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Buda Elementary


# %

72 86.7%

50 60.2%

30 36.1%

53 63.9%

52 62.7%

44 53.0%

50 60.2%

42 50.6%

31 37.3%

36 43.4%

58 69.9%

57 68.7%

30 36.1%

35 42.2%

41 49.4%

21 25.3%

17 20.5%

43 51.8%

38 45.8%

24 28.9%

32 38.6%

83


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.18.0% 11 77.0% 47 1.6% 1 3.3% 2 61







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Buda Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Buda Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.22.1% 15 54.4% 37 20.6% 14 2.9% 2 68


timely manner.27.9% 19 64.7% 44 2.9% 2 4.4% 3 68



campus.28.6% 14 49.0% 24 10.2% 5 12.2% 6 49




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.25.9% 15 62.1% 36 5.2% 3 6.9% 4 58










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Buda Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.32.3% 20 62.9% 39 3.2% 2 1.6% 1 62





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Buda Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.46.4% 32 44.9% 31 5.8% 4 2.9% 2 69











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Buda Elementary




# %




Total Responses 32


# %



Caucasian 10 30.3%

Hispanic 21 63.6%



Total Responses 33

Camino Real Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Camino Real Elementary


# %

English 25 75.8%

Spanish 8 24.2%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 33


# %

Less than $25,000 9 28.1%

$25,000 to $49,999 10 31.3%

$50,000 to $74,999 5 15.6%

$75,000 to $99,999 2 6.3%

$100,000 to $124,999 2 6.3%

$125,000 to $149,999 2 6.3%

$150,000 or more 0 0.0%


Total Responses 32

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 90.6% 29 100.0% 21


Email 71.9% 23 81.0% 17




Television 81.3% 26 9.5% 2

Radio 84.4% 27 42.9% 9

Total 32 21


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 21.9% 7 7.4% 2



Email 46.9% 15 81.5% 22

Mail 18.8% 6 22.2% 6

Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total 32 27




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

30 93.8%

16 50.0%

23 71.9%

17 53.1%

24 75.0%

16 50.0%

19 59.4%

13 40.6%

10 31.3%

13 40.6%

23 71.9%

21 65.6%

13 40.6%

15 46.9%

17 53.1%

9 28.1%

8 25.0%

16 50.0%

19 59.4%

12 37.5%

22 68.8%

32


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching




Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.32.3% 10 51.6% 16 16.1% 5 0.0% 0 31







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Camino Real Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Camino Real Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.40.0% 12 40.0% 12 20.0% 6 0.0% 0 30


timely manner.35.5% 11 48.4% 15 9.7% 3 6.5% 2 31



campus.26.9% 7 65.4% 17 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.19.4% 6 74.2% 23 6.5% 2 0.0% 0 31










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Camino Real Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.48.0% 12 52.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Camino Real Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.51.7% 15 48.3% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 97


# %



Caucasian 79 82.3%

Hispanic 12 12.5%



Total Responses 96

Carpenter Hill Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Carpenter Hill Elementary


# %

English 94 97.9%

Spanish 1 1.0%

Other 1 1.0%

Total Responses 96


# %

Less than $25,000 2 2.1%

$25,000 to $49,999 6 6.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 6 6.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 23 24.5%

$100,000 to $124,999 19 20.2%

$125,000 to $149,999 14 14.9%

$150,000 or more 20 21.3%


Total Responses 94

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 95.8% 91 96.2% 76


Email 97.9% 93 96.2% 76




Television 94.7% 90 40.5% 32

Radio 91.6% 87 60.8% 48

Total 95 79


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 33.7% 32 10.0% 9



Email 77.9% 74 94.4% 85

Mail 7.4% 7 10.0% 9

Other 2.1% 2 2.2% 2

Total 95 90


future? (Check all that apply)Current method Preferred method

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

83 89.2%

58 62.4%

39 41.9%

55 59.1%

53 57.0%

54 58.1%

63 67.7%

57 61.3%

46 49.5%

52 55.9%

65 69.9%

68 73.1%

41 44.1%

38 40.9%

41 44.1%

24 25.8%

28 30.1%

53 57.0%

46 49.5%

24 25.8%

40 43.0%

93







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses



Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly agree Agree Strongly disagree


Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.23.3% 17 60.3% 44 12.3% 9 4.1% 3 73







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Carpenter Hill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Carpenter Hill Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.37.8% 31 48.8% 40 9.8% 8 3.7% 3 82


timely manner.30.5% 25 57.3% 47 9.8% 8 2.4% 2 82



campus.35.5% 22 58.1% 36 3.2% 2 3.2% 2 62




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.34.2% 25 57.5% 42 6.8% 5 1.4% 1 73










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Carpenter Hill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.44.3% 27 54.1% 33 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 61





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Carpenter Hill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.72.3% 60 26.5% 22 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 83











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 70


# %



Caucasian 50 72.5%

Hispanic 15 21.7%



Total Responses 69

Elm Grove Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Elm Grove Elementary


# %

English 68 98.6%

Spanish 0 0.0%

Other 1 1.4%

Total Responses 69


# %

Less than $25,000 0 0.0%

$25,000 to $49,999 4 6.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 11 16.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 18 26.9%

$100,000 to $124,999 14 20.9%

$125,000 to $149,999 7 10.4%

$150,000 or more 9 13.4%


Total Responses 67

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 97.1% 68 93.5% 58


Email 95.7% 67 91.9% 57




Television 92.9% 65 27.4% 17

Radio 92.9% 65 41.9% 26

Total 70 62


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 30.4% 21 3.0% 2



Email 75.4% 52 84.8% 56

Mail 8.7% 6 13.6% 9

Other 5.8% 4 3.0% 2

Total 69 66




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

63 91.3%

35 50.7%

28 40.6%

40 58.0%

44 63.8%

40 58.0%

46 66.7%

39 56.5%

25 36.2%

26 37.7%

47 68.1%

52 75.4%

29 42.0%

37 53.6%

35 50.7%

18 26.1%

24 34.8%

35 50.7%

33 47.8%

24 34.8%

34 49.3%

69


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching




Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.25.4% 16 65.1% 41 7.9% 5 1.6% 1 63







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Elm Grove Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Elm Grove Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.42.1% 24 49.1% 28 8.8% 5 0.0% 0 57


timely manner.45.8% 27 44.1% 26 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 59



campus.49.1% 26 47.2% 25 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 53




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.32.1% 18 53.6% 30 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 56










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Elm Grove Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.40.0% 18 60.0% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Elm Grove Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.60.3% 35 37.9% 22 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 58











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 77


# %



Caucasian 38 48.7%

Hispanic 31 39.7%



Total Responses 78

Fuentes Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Fuentes Elementary


# %

English 74 96.1%

Spanish 3 3.9%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 77


# %

Less than $25,000 3 3.9%

$25,000 to $49,999 17 22.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 22 28.9%

$75,000 to $99,999 19 25.0%

$100,000 to $124,999 9 11.8%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 1.3%

$150,000 or more 2 2.6%


Total Responses 76

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Fuentes Elementary


% # % #

Phone 98.6% 72 97.0% 65


Email 98.6% 72 86.6% 58




Television 91.8% 67 19.4% 13

Radio 83.6% 61 35.8% 24

Total 73 67


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Fuentes Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 22.2% 16 8.8% 6



Email 73.6% 53 88.2% 60

Mail 11.1% 8 19.1% 13

Other 2.8% 2 1.5% 1

Total 72 68




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Fuentes Elementary


# %

67 94.4%

35 49.3%

19 26.8%

44 62.0%

47 66.2%

36 50.7%

45 63.4%

40 56.3%

26 36.6%

30 42.3%

49 69.0%

49 69.0%

19 26.8%

23 32.4%

26 36.6%

7 9.9%

11 15.5%

29 40.8%

33 46.5%

19 26.8%

26 36.6%

71


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.36.5% 23 47.6% 30 12.7% 8 3.2% 2 63







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Fuentes Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Fuentes Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.40.0% 26 40.0% 26 18.5% 12 1.5% 1 65


timely manner.40.0% 26 40.0% 26 15.4% 10 4.6% 3 65



campus.40.7% 22 51.9% 28 5.6% 3 1.9% 1 54




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.39.0% 23 47.5% 28 11.9% 7 1.7% 1 59










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Fuentes Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.51.8% 29 44.6% 25 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 56





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Fuentes Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.53.0% 35 39.4% 26 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 66











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Fuentes Elementary




# %




Total Responses 46


# %



Caucasian 15 33.3%

Hispanic 24 53.3%



Total Responses 45

Tom Green Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Tom Green Elementary


# %

English 39 84.8%

Spanish 5 10.9%

Other 2 4.3%

Total Responses 46


# %

Less than $25,000 3 6.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 8 17.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 17 37.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 12 26.1%

$100,000 to $124,999 0 0.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 2.2%

$150,000 or more 1 2.2%


Total Responses 46

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 90.9% 40 87.2% 34


Email 97.7% 43 92.3% 36




Television 95.5% 42 28.2% 11

Radio 84.1% 37 51.3% 20

Total 44 39


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 20.9% 9 0.0% 0



Email 55.8% 24 76.9% 30

Mail 9.3% 4 15.4% 6

Other 7.0% 3 5.1% 2

Total 43 39




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

41 95.3%

18 41.9%

12 27.9%

28 65.1%

28 65.1%

30 69.8%

26 60.5%

27 62.8%

15 34.9%

18 41.9%

26 60.5%

28 65.1%

17 39.5%

15 34.9%

21 48.8%

8 18.6%

7 16.3%

19 44.2%

21 48.8%

17 39.5%

21 48.8%

43


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching




Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.21.4% 9 71.4% 30 7.1% 3 0.0% 0 42







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Tom Green Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Tom Green Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.12.8% 5 59.0% 23 17.9% 7 10.3% 4 39


timely manner.15.4% 6 66.7% 26 10.3% 4 7.7% 3 39



campus.16.2% 6 73.0% 27 5.4% 2 5.4% 2 37




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.21.6% 8 70.3% 26 5.4% 2 2.7% 1 37










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Tom Green Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.32.4% 11 64.7% 22 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 34





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Tom Green Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.30.8% 12 66.7% 26 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 39











0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 44


# %



Caucasian 20 42.6%

Hispanic 23 48.9%



Total Responses 47

Hemphill Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Hemphill Elementary


# %

English 37 80.4%

Spanish 9 19.6%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 46


# %

Less than $25,000 7 15.6%

$25,000 to $49,999 13 28.9%

$50,000 to $74,999 9 20.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 5 11.1%

$100,000 to $124,999 4 8.9%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 2.2%

$150,000 or more 1 2.2%


Total Responses 45

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Hemphill Elementary


% # % #

Phone 91.1% 41 94.1% 32


Email 86.7% 39 88.2% 30




Television 80.0% 36 23.5% 8

Radio 73.3% 33 44.1% 15

Total 45 34


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Hemphill Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 25.0% 11 11.1% 4



Email 52.3% 23 61.1% 22

Mail 11.4% 5 19.4% 7

Other 4.5% 2 2.8% 1

Total 44 36




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Hemphill Elementary


# %

40 87.0%

20 43.5%

20 43.5%

28 60.9%

31 67.4%

29 63.0%

27 58.7%

18 39.1%

15 32.6%

20 43.5%

34 73.9%

33 71.7%

26 56.5%

15 32.6%

24 52.2%

11 23.9%

14 30.4%

21 45.7%

20 43.5%

21 45.7%

26 56.5%

46


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.27.5% 11 57.5% 23 5.0% 2 10.0% 4 40







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Hemphill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Hemphill Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.34.3% 12 42.9% 15 14.3% 5 8.6% 3 35


timely manner.33.3% 12 41.7% 15 13.9% 5 11.1% 4 36



campus.34.3% 12 45.7% 16 8.6% 3 11.4% 4 35




0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.30.3% 10 57.6% 19 3.0% 1 9.1% 3 33










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Hemphill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.51.6% 16 45.2% 14 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 31





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Hemphill Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.44.7% 17 44.7% 17 2.6% 1 7.9% 3 38











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hemphill Elementary




# %




Total Responses 101


# %



Caucasian 58 58.6%

Hispanic 27 27.3%



Total Responses 99

Kyle Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Kyle Elementary


# %

English 97 98.0%

Spanish 1 1.0%

Other 1 1.0%

Total Responses 99


# %

Less than $25,000 1 1.0%

$25,000 to $49,999 16 16.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 28 28.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 21 21.0%

$100,000 to $124,999 16 16.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 6 6.0%

$150,000 or more 6 6.0%


Total Responses 100

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Kyle Elementary


% # % #

Phone 94.8% 91 95.1% 77


Email 96.9% 93 91.4% 74




Television 92.7% 89 34.6% 28

Radio 84.4% 81 49.4% 40

Total 96 81


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Kyle Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 26.0% 25 5.7% 5



Email 69.8% 67 77.0% 67

Mail 7.3% 7 11.5% 10

Other 2.1% 2 1.1% 1

Total 96 87




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Kyle Elementary


# %

85 88.5%

47 49.0%

37 38.5%

59 61.5%

62 64.6%

54 56.3%

63 65.6%

50 52.1%

34 35.4%

40 41.7%

53 55.2%

69 71.9%

30 31.3%

37 38.5%

53 55.2%

23 24.0%

24 25.0%

48 50.0%

45 46.9%

35 36.5%

39 40.6%

96


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.15.5% 13 65.5% 55 13.1% 11 6.0% 5 84







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Kyle Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Kyle Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.19.8% 16 56.8% 46 14.8% 12 8.6% 7 81


timely manner.22.0% 18 57.3% 47 12.2% 10 8.5% 7 82



campus.23.5% 16 60.3% 41 8.8% 6 7.4% 5 68




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.14.3% 10 61.4% 43 17.1% 12 7.1% 5 70










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Kyle Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.30.4% 14 65.2% 30 2.2% 1 2.2% 1 46





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Kyle Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.49.4% 40 44.4% 36 3.7% 3 2.5% 2 81











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Kyle Elementary




# %




Total Responses 165


# %



Caucasian 117 71.3%

Hispanic 30 18.3%



Total Responses 164

Negley Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Negley Elementary


# %

English 161 97.6%

Spanish 2 1.2%

Other 2 1.2%

Total Responses 165


# %

Less than $25,000 3 1.9%

$25,000 to $49,999 14 8.6%

$50,000 to $74,999 44 27.2%

$75,000 to $99,999 37 22.8%

$100,000 to $124,999 23 14.2%

$125,000 to $149,999 10 6.2%

$150,000 or more 18 11.1%


Total Responses 162

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Negley Elementary


% # % #

Phone 96.3% 158 97.9% 140


Email 95.7% 157 91.6% 131




Television 93.3% 153 27.3% 39

Radio 82.9% 136 41.3% 59

Total 164 143


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Negley Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 31.1% 51 7.8% 12



Email 77.4% 127 85.1% 131

Mail 8.5% 14 11.7% 18

Other 3.7% 6 3.9% 6

Total 164 154




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Negley Elementary


# %

157 95.7%

94 57.3%

69 42.1%

98 59.8%

98 59.8%

98 59.8%

114 69.5%

98 59.8%

57 34.8%

81 49.4%

113 68.9%

125 76.2%

61 37.2%

75 45.7%

66 40.2%

35 21.3%

53 32.3%

90 54.9%

85 51.8%

49 29.9%

60 36.6%

164


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.14.1% 19 64.4% 87 16.3% 22 5.2% 7 135







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Negley Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Negley Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.21.6% 30 59.0% 82 16.5% 23 2.9% 4 139


timely manner.26.8% 38 59.2% 84 11.3% 16 2.8% 4 142



campus.27.7% 33 61.3% 73 9.2% 11 1.7% 2 119




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.23.1% 27 68.4% 80 7.7% 9 0.9% 1 117










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Negley Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.29.5% 31 66.7% 70 2.9% 3 1.0% 1 105





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Negley Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.40.6% 56 50.0% 69 6.5% 9 2.9% 4 138











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Negley Elementary




# %




Total Responses 54


# %



Caucasian 18 34.6%

Hispanic 31 59.6%



Total Responses 52

Pfluger Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Pfluger Elementary


# %

English 51 96.2%

Spanish 1 1.9%

Other 1 1.9%

Total Responses 53


# %

Less than $25,000 2 3.8%

$25,000 to $49,999 8 15.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 17 32.7%

$75,000 to $99,999 10 19.2%

$100,000 to $124,999 5 9.6%

$125,000 to $149,999 2 3.8%

$150,000 or more 3 5.8%


Total Responses 52

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Pfluger Elementary


% # % #

Phone 96.2% 51 98.0% 48


Email 92.5% 49 89.8% 44




Television 92.5% 49 28.6% 14

Radio 84.9% 45 44.9% 22

Total 53 49


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Pfluger Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 18.9% 10 8.2% 4



Email 69.8% 37 79.6% 39

Mail 3.8% 2 10.2% 5

Other 3.8% 2 4.1% 2

Total 53 49



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Pfluger Elementary


# %

50 94.3%

27 50.9%

27 50.9%

31 58.5%

34 64.2%

31 58.5%

35 66.0%

29 54.7%

21 39.6%

22 41.5%

32 60.4%

36 67.9%

22 41.5%

20 37.7%

27 50.9%

11 20.8%

13 24.5%

27 50.9%

30 56.6%

20 37.7%

32 60.4%

53







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.28.9% 13 53.3% 24 13.3% 6 4.4% 2 45







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Pfluger Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Pfluger Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.46.5% 20 41.9% 18 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 43


timely manner.43.2% 19 43.2% 19 11.4% 5 2.3% 1 44



campus.43.9% 18 41.5% 17 9.8% 4 4.9% 2 41




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.43.9% 18 51.2% 21 2.4% 1 2.4% 1 41










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Pfluger Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.41.0% 16 56.4% 22 0.0% 0 2.6% 1 39





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Pfluger Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.57.8% 26 40.0% 18 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 45











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Pfluger Elementary




# %




Total Responses 49


# %



Caucasian 21 42.9%

Hispanic 26 53.1%



Total Responses 49

Science Hall Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Science Hall Elementary


# %

English 39 78.0%

Spanish 11 22.0%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 50


# %

Less than $25,000 4 8.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 17 36.2%

$50,000 to $74,999 6 12.8%

$75,000 to $99,999 6 12.8%

$100,000 to $124,999 8 17.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 4 8.5%

$150,000 or more 0 0.0%


Total Responses 47

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 95.8% 46 97.1% 34


Email 89.6% 43 97.1% 34




Television 93.8% 45 34.3% 12

Radio 79.2% 38 51.4% 18

Total 48 35


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 16.7% 8 9.5% 4



Email 56.3% 27 78.6% 33

Mail 4.2% 2 7.1% 3

Other 2.1% 1 4.8% 2

Total 48 42



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

41 85.4%

26 54.2%

17 35.4%

29 60.4%

29 60.4%

28 58.3%

28 58.3%

29 60.4%

19 39.6%

20 41.7%

25 52.1%

31 64.6%

14 29.2%

19 39.6%

21 43.8%

11 22.9%

14 29.2%

23 47.9%

20 41.7%

18 37.5%

22 45.8%

48







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses



Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.27.5% 11 47.5% 19 10.0% 4 15.0% 6 40







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Science Hall Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Science Hall Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.25.0% 10 60.0% 24 7.5% 3 7.5% 3 40


timely manner.25.0% 10 65.0% 26 10.0% 4 0.0% 0 40



campus.26.5% 9 55.9% 19 5.9% 2 11.8% 4 34




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.21.1% 8 57.9% 22 10.5% 4 10.5% 4 38










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Science Hall Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.36.4% 12 54.5% 18 3.0% 1 6.1% 2 33





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Science Hall Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.35.0% 14 47.5% 19 10.0% 4 7.5% 3 40











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 61


# %



Caucasian 26 38.8%

Hispanic 25 37.3%



Total Responses 67

Tobias Elementary SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Tobias Elementary


# %

English 65 97.0%

Spanish 2 3.0%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 67


# %

Less than $25,000 5 7.9%

$25,000 to $49,999 14 22.2%

$50,000 to $74,999 20 31.7%

$75,000 to $99,999 12 19.0%

$100,000 to $124,999 6 9.5%

$125,000 to $149,999 0 0.0%

$150,000 or more 2 3.2%


Total Responses 63

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Tobias Elementary


% # % #

Phone 97.0% 65 98.3% 58


Email 98.5% 66 83.1% 49




Television 95.5% 64 27.1% 16

Radio 86.6% 58 44.1% 26

Total 67 59


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Tobias Elementary

% # % #









Word of mouth 22.4% 15 4.8% 3



Email 65.7% 44 79.4% 50

Mail 9.0% 6 14.3% 9

Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total 67 63



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Tobias Elementary


# %

63 94.0%

40 59.7%

19 28.4%

38 56.7%

44 65.7%

36 53.7%

44 65.7%

36 53.7%

22 32.8%

28 41.8%

45 67.2%

46 68.7%

28 41.8%

37 55.2%

35 52.2%

17 25.4%

12 17.9%

29 43.3%

35 52.2%

22 32.8%

28 41.8%

67







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.19.3% 11 63.2% 36 10.5% 6 7.0% 4 57







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Tobias Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Tobias Elementary School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.26.8% 15 51.8% 29 16.1% 9 5.4% 3 56


timely manner.23.7% 14 59.3% 35 8.5% 5 8.5% 5 59



campus.19.6% 10 66.7% 34 5.9% 3 7.8% 4 51




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.25.5% 13 66.7% 34 5.9% 3 2.0% 1 51










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Tobias Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.37.5% 18 58.3% 28 2.1% 1 2.1% 1 48





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Tobias Elementary School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.24.1% 14 65.5% 38 1.7% 1 8.6% 5 58











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Tobias Elementary

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at each campus.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 27.3% 9 60.6% 20 9.1% 3 3.0% 1 33

Buda 21.2% 14 57.6% 38 16.7% 11 4.5% 3 66

Camino Real 36.7% 11 46.7% 14 16.7% 5 0.0% 0 30

Carpenter Hill 31.2% 24 55.8% 43 11.7% 9 1.3% 1 77

Elm Grove 40.4% 23 50.9% 29 8.8% 5 0.0% 0 57

Fuentes 28.6% 18 57.1% 36 9.5% 6 4.8% 3 63

Tom Green 15.4% 6 64.1% 25 12.8% 5 7.7% 3 39

Hemphill 38.2% 13 38.2% 13 8.8% 3 14.7% 5 34

Kyle 20.2% 17 60.7% 51 10.7% 9 8.3% 7 84

Negley 23.2% 32 58.7% 81 13.0% 18 5.1% 7 138

Pfluger 47.7% 21 43.2% 19 6.8% 3 2.3% 1 44

Science Hall 34.1% 14 48.8% 20 9.8% 4 7.3% 3 41

Tobias 23.2% 13 60.7% 34 5.4% 3 10.7% 6 56

Elementary School Summary ReportHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey

All students are provided equal opportunities for learning.

This chart shows the percentage of respondents who answered either 'Strongly agree' or 'Agree' from each elementary

school campus


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree

Elementary School Summary Report

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 37.5% 12 56.3% 18 3.1% 1 3.1% 1 32

Buda 26.1% 18 52.2% 36 18.8% 13 2.9% 2 69

Camino Real 34.5% 10 55.2% 16 10.3% 3 0.0% 0 29

Carpenter Hill 48.1% 39 46.9% 38 3.7% 3 1.2% 1 81

Elm Grove 53.4% 31 43.1% 25 3.4% 2 0.0% 0 58

Fuentes 47.5% 29 42.6% 26 8.2% 5 1.6% 1 61

Tom Green 16.2% 6 59.5% 22 21.6% 8 2.7% 1 37

Hemphill 44.1% 15 44.1% 15 8.8% 3 2.9% 1 34

Kyle 31.0% 26 50.0% 42 13.1% 11 6.0% 5 84

Negley 31.7% 44 54.7% 76 12.2% 17 1.4% 2 139

Pfluger 42.2% 19 46.7% 21 6.7% 3 4.4% 2 45

Science Hall 26.8% 11 58.5% 24 9.8% 4 4.9% 2 41

Tobias 25.9% 15 58.6% 34 10.3% 6 5.2% 3 58


school campus

This campus has high expectations for student academic success.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 26.5% 9 50.0% 17 20.6% 7 2.9% 1 34

Buda 18.3% 11 55.0% 33 16.7% 10 10.0% 6 60

Camino Real 25.9% 7 51.9% 14 22.2% 6 0.0% 0 27

Carpenter Hill 29.5% 23 55.1% 43 11.5% 9 3.8% 3 78

Elm Grove 36.8% 21 45.6% 26 12.3% 7 5.3% 3 57

Fuentes 31.1% 19 41.0% 25 23.0% 14 4.9% 3 61

Tom Green 18.4% 7 60.5% 23 15.8% 6 5.3% 2 38

Hemphill 32.3% 10 48.4% 15 12.9% 4 6.5% 2 31

Kyle 15.8% 12 57.9% 44 17.1% 13 9.2% 7 76

Negley 22.3% 29 46.9% 61 23.8% 31 6.9% 9 130

Pfluger 46.3% 19 39.0% 16 14.6% 6 0.0% 0 41

Science Hall 35.9% 14 46.2% 18 10.3% 4 7.7% 3 39

Tobias 16.4% 9 52.7% 29 20.0% 11 10.9% 6 55

Curriculum is innovative.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 29.4% 10 55.9% 19 11.8% 4 2.9% 1 34

Buda 19.7% 12 57.4% 35 18.0% 11 4.9% 3 61

Camino Real 34.5% 10 51.7% 15 13.8% 4 0.0% 0 29

Carpenter Hill 32.1% 25 57.7% 45 7.7% 6 2.6% 2 78

Elm Grove 38.2% 21 49.1% 27 10.9% 6 1.8% 1 55

Fuentes 31.1% 19 45.9% 28 21.3% 13 1.6% 1 61

Tom Green 15.8% 6 63.2% 24 18.4% 7 2.6% 1 38

Hemphill 32.4% 11 52.9% 18 5.9% 2 8.8% 3 34

Kyle 22.4% 17 64.5% 49 9.2% 7 3.9% 3 76

Negley 23.3% 30 49.6% 64 22.5% 29 4.7% 6 129

Pfluger 45.2% 19 38.1% 16 16.7% 7 0.0% 0 42

Science Hall 30.0% 12 55.0% 22 7.5% 3 7.5% 3 40

Tobias 23.6% 13 56.4% 31 14.5% 8 5.5% 3 55

Learning environments are innovative.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 39.4% 13 57.6% 19 0.0% 0 3.0% 1 33

Buda 34.3% 24 55.7% 39 8.6% 6 1.4% 1 70

Camino Real 41.9% 13 51.6% 16 6.5% 2 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 45.1% 37 52.4% 43 1.2% 1 1.2% 1 82

Elm Grove 53.6% 30 46.4% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 56

Fuentes 48.4% 30 46.8% 29 4.8% 3 0.0% 0 62

Tom Green 23.7% 9 73.7% 28 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 38

Hemphill 50.0% 19 42.1% 16 7.9% 3 0.0% 0 38

Kyle 40.2% 33 50.0% 41 6.1% 5 3.7% 3 82

Negley 36.2% 50 57.2% 79 4.3% 6 2.2% 3 138

Pfluger 47.7% 21 47.7% 21 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 44

Science Hall 36.6% 15 51.2% 21 4.9% 2 7.3% 3 41

Tobias 38.6% 22 57.9% 33 0.0% 0 3.5% 2 57


school campus


Students are encouraged to do their best.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 35.3% 12 44.1% 15 17.6% 6 2.9% 1 34

Buda 22.1% 15 54.4% 37 20.6% 14 2.9% 2 68

Camino Real 40.0% 12 40.0% 12 20.0% 6 0.0% 0 30

Carpenter Hill 37.8% 31 48.8% 40 9.8% 8 3.7% 3 82

Elm Grove 42.1% 24 49.1% 28 8.8% 5 0.0% 0 57

Fuentes 40.0% 26 40.0% 26 18.5% 12 1.5% 1 65

Tom Green 12.8% 5 59.0% 23 17.9% 7 10.3% 4 39

Hemphill 34.3% 12 42.9% 15 14.3% 5 8.6% 3 35

Kyle 19.8% 16 56.8% 46 14.8% 12 8.6% 7 81

Negley 21.6% 30 59.0% 82 16.5% 23 2.9% 4 139

Pfluger 46.5% 20 41.9% 18 11.6% 5 0.0% 0 43

Science Hall 25.0% 10 60.0% 24 7.5% 3 7.5% 3 40

Tobias 26.8% 15 51.8% 29 16.1% 9 5.4% 3 56

I am satisfied with the academic opportunities this campus provides.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 44.1% 15 41.2% 14 11.8% 4 2.9% 1 34

Buda 27.9% 19 64.7% 44 2.9% 2 4.4% 3 68

Camino Real 35.5% 11 48.4% 15 9.7% 3 6.5% 2 31

Carpenter Hill 30.5% 25 57.3% 47 9.8% 8 2.4% 2 82

Elm Grove 45.8% 27 44.1% 26 10.2% 6 0.0% 0 59

Fuentes 40.0% 26 40.0% 26 15.4% 10 4.6% 3 65

Tom Green 15.4% 6 66.7% 26 10.3% 4 7.7% 3 39

Hemphill 33.3% 12 41.7% 15 13.9% 5 11.1% 4 36

Kyle 22.0% 18 57.3% 47 12.2% 10 8.5% 7 82

Negley 26.8% 38 59.2% 84 11.3% 16 2.8% 4 142

Pfluger 43.2% 19 43.2% 19 11.4% 5 2.3% 1 44

Science Hall 25.0% 10 65.0% 26 10.0% 4 0.0% 0 40

Tobias 23.7% 14 59.3% 35 8.5% 5 8.5% 5 59

Families are informed about their children's academic progress in a timely manner.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 39.4% 13 57.6% 19 0.0% 0 3.0% 1 33

Buda 33.3% 21 50.8% 32 9.5% 6 6.3% 4 63

Camino Real 27.6% 8 62.1% 18 6.9% 2 3.4% 1 29

Carpenter Hill 36.7% 29 55.7% 44 5.1% 4 2.5% 2 79

Elm Grove 44.1% 26 47.5% 28 5.1% 3 3.4% 2 59

Fuentes 38.5% 25 50.8% 33 6.2% 4 4.6% 3 65

Tom Green 15.4% 6 71.8% 28 7.7% 3 5.1% 2 39

Hemphill 30.6% 11 47.2% 17 8.3% 3 13.9% 5 36

Kyle 18.9% 14 60.8% 45 12.2% 9 8.1% 6 74

Negley 28.3% 39 60.1% 83 8.0% 11 3.6% 5 138

Pfluger 48.9% 22 44.4% 20 6.7% 3 0.0% 0 45

Science Hall 23.1% 9 59.0% 23 12.8% 5 5.1% 2 39

Tobias 19.0% 11 69.0% 40 5.2% 3 6.9% 4 58


school campus

Students are treated fairly.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 31.0% 9 62.1% 18 6.9% 2 0.0% 0 29

Buda 28.6% 14 49.0% 24 10.2% 5 12.2% 6 49

Camino Real 26.9% 7 65.4% 17 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26

Carpenter Hill 35.5% 22 58.1% 36 3.2% 2 3.2% 2 62

Elm Grove 49.1% 26 47.2% 25 3.8% 2 0.0% 0 53

Fuentes 40.7% 22 51.9% 28 5.6% 3 1.9% 1 54

Tom Green 16.2% 6 73.0% 27 5.4% 2 5.4% 2 37

Hemphill 34.3% 12 45.7% 16 8.6% 3 11.4% 4 35

Kyle 23.5% 16 60.3% 41 8.8% 6 7.4% 5 68

Negley 27.7% 33 61.3% 73 9.2% 11 1.7% 2 119

Pfluger 43.9% 18 41.5% 17 9.8% 4 4.9% 2 41

Science Hall 26.5% 9 55.9% 19 5.9% 2 11.8% 4 34

Tobias 19.6% 10 66.7% 34 5.9% 3 7.8% 4 51


school campus

The district-wide discipline policy is consistently applied at this campus.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 45.5% 15 48.5% 16 6.1% 2 0.0% 0 33

Buda 28.1% 16 61.4% 35 3.5% 2 7.0% 4 57

Camino Real 33.3% 8 62.5% 15 4.2% 1 0.0% 0 24

Carpenter Hill 37.3% 25 62.7% 42 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 67

Elm Grove 51.0% 26 47.1% 24 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 51

Fuentes 45.8% 27 49.2% 29 1.7% 1 3.4% 2 59

Tom Green 16.7% 6 77.8% 28 2.8% 1 2.8% 1 36

Hemphill 40.0% 14 45.7% 16 5.7% 2 8.6% 3 35

Kyle 25.0% 18 68.1% 49 1.4% 1 5.6% 4 72

Negley 26.4% 32 69.4% 84 2.5% 3 1.7% 2 121

Pfluger 52.4% 22 40.5% 17 2.4% 1 4.8% 2 42

Science Hall 31.6% 12 55.3% 21 5.3% 2 7.9% 3 38

Tobias 27.8% 15 68.5% 37 0.0% 0 3.7% 2 54


school campus

Staff respect cultural diversity.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 30.0% 9 53.3% 16 13.3% 4 3.3% 1 30

Buda 27.4% 17 50.0% 31 17.7% 11 4.8% 3 62

Camino Real 29.0% 9 61.3% 19 6.5% 2 3.2% 1 31

Carpenter Hill 40.5% 32 49.4% 39 8.9% 7 1.3% 1 79

Elm Grove 49.1% 27 45.5% 25 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 55

Fuentes 46.4% 26 51.8% 29 1.8% 1 0.0% 0 56

Tom Green 18.9% 7 59.5% 22 13.5% 5 8.1% 3 37

Hemphill 44.4% 16 36.1% 13 5.6% 2 13.9% 5 36

Kyle 21.3% 16 57.3% 43 14.7% 11 6.7% 5 75

Negley 32.3% 41 48.0% 61 11.8% 15 7.9% 10 127

Pfluger 51.2% 21 46.3% 19 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 41

Science Hall 27.8% 10 47.2% 17 16.7% 6 8.3% 3 36

Tobias 22.2% 12 63.0% 34 5.6% 3 9.3% 5 54

Campus administrators provided strong leadership.


school campus


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 44.1% 15 44.1% 15 8.8% 3 2.9% 1 34

Buda 46.3% 31 47.8% 32 4.5% 3 1.5% 1 67

Camino Real 45.2% 14 45.2% 14 9.7% 3 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 51.9% 42 37.0% 30 7.4% 6 3.7% 3 81

Elm Grove 60.0% 36 36.7% 22 1.7% 1 1.7% 1 60

Fuentes 47.0% 31 40.9% 27 7.6% 5 4.5% 3 66

Tom Green 30.8% 12 66.7% 26 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 39

Hemphill 45.9% 17 40.5% 15 2.7% 1 10.8% 4 37

Kyle 45.7% 37 46.9% 38 3.7% 3 3.7% 3 81

Negley 40.8% 58 47.2% 67 9.2% 13 2.8% 4 142

Pfluger 60.0% 27 35.6% 16 4.4% 2 0.0% 0 45

Science Hall 46.2% 18 41.0% 16 10.3% 4 2.6% 1 39

Tobias 47.5% 28 42.4% 25 8.5% 5 1.7% 1 59



school campus

Teachers are responsive when I have a concern.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 65.6% 21 34.4% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

Buda 55.9% 38 42.6% 29 0.0% 0 1.5% 1 68

Camino Real 48.4% 15 48.4% 15 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 65.5% 55 28.6% 24 3.6% 3 2.4% 2 84

Elm Grove 62.7% 37 37.3% 22 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 59

Fuentes 56.1% 37 39.4% 26 3.0% 2 1.5% 1 66

Tom Green 30.8% 12 61.5% 24 7.7% 3 0.0% 0 39

Hemphill 51.4% 19 43.2% 16 5.4% 2 0.0% 0 37

Kyle 51.9% 42 48.1% 39 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 81

Negley 41.5% 59 50.7% 72 4.9% 7 2.8% 4 142

Pfluger 64.4% 29 33.3% 15 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 45

Science Hall 48.7% 19 41.0% 16 7.7% 3 2.6% 1 39

Tobias 44.1% 26 50.8% 30 1.7% 1 3.4% 2 59


school campus

Front end staff/office staff are friendly, courteous, and helpful.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 34.4% 11 65.6% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

Buda 28.4% 19 53.7% 36 11.9% 8 6.0% 4 67

Camino Real 32.3% 10 64.5% 20 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 41.0% 34 54.2% 45 3.6% 3 1.2% 1 83

Elm Grove 47.5% 28 42.4% 25 8.5% 5 1.7% 1 59

Fuentes 37.3% 25 58.2% 39 0.0% 0 4.5% 3 67

Tom Green 21.1% 8 65.8% 25 10.5% 4 2.6% 1 38

Hemphill 59.5% 22 27.0% 10 5.4% 2 8.1% 3 37

Kyle 31.6% 25 60.8% 48 6.3% 5 1.3% 1 79

Negley 35.3% 49 60.4% 84 3.6% 5 0.7% 1 139

Pfluger 43.2% 19 52.3% 23 2.3% 1 2.3% 1 44

Science Hall 28.2% 11 64.1% 25 7.7% 3 0.0% 0 39

Tobias 41.7% 25 53.3% 32 3.3% 2 1.7% 1 60


school campus

Children are safe at school.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 37.9% 11 48.3% 14 10.3% 3 3.4% 1 29

Buda 18.6% 11 62.7% 37 13.6% 8 5.1% 3 59

Camino Real 25.8% 8 61.3% 19 6.5% 2 6.5% 2 31

Carpenter Hill 43.3% 29 47.8% 32 7.5% 5 1.5% 1 67

Elm Grove 45.3% 24 49.1% 26 3.8% 2 1.9% 1 53

Fuentes 43.3% 26 45.0% 27 11.7% 7 0.0% 0 60

Tom Green 19.4% 7 61.1% 22 13.9% 5 5.6% 2 36

Hemphill 39.4% 13 45.5% 15 3.0% 1 12.1% 4 33

Kyle 27.9% 19 54.4% 37 8.8% 6 8.8% 6 68

Negley 27.9% 36 51.9% 67 13.2% 17 7.0% 9 129

Pfluger 51.3% 20 30.8% 12 15.4% 6 2.6% 1 39

Science Hall 20.0% 7 57.1% 20 17.1% 6 5.7% 2 35

Tobias 23.5% 12 64.7% 33 5.9% 3 5.9% 3 51


school campus

Additional academic assistance is provided as needed.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 18.8% 6 59.4% 19 15.6% 5 6.3% 2 32

Buda 25.9% 15 62.1% 36 5.2% 3 6.9% 4 58

Camino Real 19.4% 6 74.2% 23 6.5% 2 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 34.2% 25 57.5% 42 6.8% 5 1.4% 1 73

Elm Grove 32.1% 18 53.6% 30 14.3% 8 0.0% 0 56

Fuentes 39.0% 23 47.5% 28 11.9% 7 1.7% 1 59

Tom Green 21.6% 8 70.3% 26 5.4% 2 2.7% 1 37

Hemphill 30.3% 10 57.6% 19 3.0% 1 9.1% 3 33

Kyle 14.3% 10 61.4% 43 17.1% 12 7.1% 5 70

Negley 23.1% 27 68.4% 80 7.7% 9 0.9% 1 117

Pfluger 43.9% 18 51.2% 21 2.4% 1 2.4% 1 41

Science Hall 21.1% 8 57.9% 22 10.5% 4 10.5% 4 38

Tobias 25.5% 13 66.7% 34 5.9% 3 2.0% 1 51


school campus

There is a proper balance between academics and extra-curricular activities.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 30.3% 10 57.6% 19 9.1% 3 3.0% 1 33

Buda 16.9% 11 67.7% 44 12.3% 8 3.1% 2 65

Camino Real 28.6% 8 67.9% 19 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 28

Carpenter Hill 38.8% 31 47.5% 38 10.0% 8 3.8% 3 80

Elm Grove 27.6% 16 60.3% 35 8.6% 5 3.4% 2 58

Fuentes 23.3% 14 51.7% 31 23.3% 14 1.7% 1 60

Tom Green 17.9% 7 74.4% 29 5.1% 2 2.6% 1 39

Hemphill 33.3% 12 55.6% 20 2.8% 1 8.3% 3 36

Kyle 17.5% 14 66.3% 53 10.0% 8 6.3% 5 80

Negley 23.9% 32 57.5% 77 12.7% 17 6.0% 8 134

Pfluger 45.2% 19 50.0% 21 4.8% 2 0.0% 0 42

Science Hall 20.0% 8 75.0% 30 5.0% 2 0.0% 0 40

Tobias 28.6% 16 64.3% 36 5.4% 3 1.8% 1 56


school campus

I am satisfied with student access to current technology at school.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 45.0% 9 55.0% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20

Buda 29.5% 13 47.7% 21 13.6% 6 9.1% 4 44

Camino Real 32.0% 8 60.0% 15 8.0% 2 0.0% 0 25

Carpenter Hill 40.0% 16 55.0% 22 0.0% 0 5.0% 2 40

Elm Grove 50.0% 19 39.5% 15 5.3% 2 5.3% 2 38

Fuentes 44.7% 17 47.4% 18 5.3% 2 2.6% 1 38

Tom Green 19.4% 6 58.1% 18 12.9% 4 9.7% 3 31

Hemphill 40.0% 12 46.7% 14 3.3% 1 10.0% 3 30

Kyle 26.1% 12 67.4% 31 2.2% 1 4.3% 2 46

Negley 24.1% 19 63.3% 50 7.6% 6 5.1% 4 79

Pfluger 50.0% 16 46.9% 15 0.0% 0 3.1% 1 32

Science Hall 40.9% 9 40.9% 9 18.2% 4 0.0% 0 22

Tobias 37.8% 14 48.6% 18 0.0% 0 13.5% 5 37


school campus

This campus is successful in helping special education students achieve high academic performance.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 31.8% 7 59.1% 13 9.1% 2 0.0% 0 22

Buda 22.0% 9 56.1% 23 12.2% 5 9.8% 4 41

Camino Real 30.8% 8 61.5% 16 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26

Carpenter Hill 35.8% 19 52.8% 28 11.3% 6 0.0% 0 53

Elm Grove 37.8% 14 37.8% 14 18.9% 7 5.4% 2 37

Fuentes 26.8% 11 51.2% 21 19.5% 8 2.4% 1 41

Tom Green 15.6% 5 62.5% 20 15.6% 5 6.3% 2 32

Hemphill 33.3% 10 50.0% 15 3.3% 1 13.3% 4 30

Kyle 22.2% 12 51.9% 28 16.7% 9 9.3% 5 54

Negley 17.0% 15 59.1% 52 13.6% 12 10.2% 9 88

Pfluger 48.4% 15 41.9% 13 9.7% 3 0.0% 0 31

Science Hall 32.1% 9 53.6% 15 10.7% 3 3.6% 1 28

Tobias 30.0% 9 46.7% 14 3.3% 1 20.0% 6 30


school campus

This campus is successful in helping gifted and talented students achieve high academic performance.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 40.9% 9 54.5% 12 4.5% 1 0.0% 0 22

Buda 25.0% 8 62.5% 20 6.3% 2 6.3% 2 32

Camino Real 30.4% 7 69.6% 16 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23

Carpenter Hill 50.0% 11 50.0% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 22

Elm Grove 47.6% 10 42.9% 9 9.5% 2 0.0% 0 21

Fuentes 41.2% 14 50.0% 17 8.8% 3 0.0% 0 34

Tom Green 20.8% 5 62.5% 15 12.5% 3 4.2% 1 24

Hemphill 30.0% 9 50.0% 15 13.3% 4 6.7% 2 30

Kyle 18.8% 6 75.0% 24 3.1% 1 3.1% 1 32

Negley 22.4% 11 69.4% 34 8.2% 4 0.0% 0 49

Pfluger 44.4% 12 51.9% 14 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 27

Science Hall 32.0% 8 60.0% 15 4.0% 1 4.0% 1 25

Tobias 26.1% 6 65.2% 15 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 23


school campus

This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve high academic performance.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITES at each campus.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 22.2% 6 55.6% 15 22.2% 6 0.0% 0 27

Buda 23.3% 14 66.7% 40 6.7% 4 3.3% 2 60

Camino Real 32.1% 9 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

Carpenter Hill 24.3% 17 54.3% 38 20.0% 14 1.4% 1 70

Elm Grove 26.9% 14 50.0% 26 23.1% 12 0.0% 0 52

Fuentes 37.7% 23 45.9% 28 14.8% 9 1.6% 1 61

Tom Green 23.5% 8 64.7% 22 8.8% 3 2.9% 1 34

Hemphill 40.0% 12 50.0% 15 3.3% 1 6.7% 2 30

Kyle 12.5% 8 40.6% 26 37.5% 24 9.4% 6 64

Negley 21.8% 26 62.2% 74 14.3% 17 1.7% 2 119

Pfluger 37.5% 15 50.0% 20 12.5% 5 0.0% 0 40

Science Hall 26.5% 9 38.2% 13 32.4% 11 2.9% 1 34

Tobias 31.3% 15 56.3% 27 6.3% 3 6.3% 3 48

This campus provides a variety of extracurricular opportunities



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 35.0% 7 65.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 20

Buda 28.8% 17 69.5% 41 0.0% 0 1.7% 1 59

Camino Real 40.0% 10 60.0% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25

Carpenter Hill 40.3% 25 59.7% 37 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 62

Elm Grove 35.7% 15 61.9% 26 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 42

Fuentes 49.1% 27 47.3% 26 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 55

Tom Green 22.9% 8 71.4% 25 5.7% 2 0.0% 0 35

Hemphill 46.9% 15 46.9% 15 6.3% 2 0.0% 0 32

Kyle 21.7% 10 69.6% 32 6.5% 3 2.2% 1 46

Negley 23.4% 26 66.7% 74 7.2% 8 2.7% 3 111

Pfluger 43.2% 16 56.8% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 37

Science Hall 37.5% 12 56.3% 18 0.0% 0 6.3% 2 32

Tobias 36.2% 17 59.6% 28 2.1% 1 2.1% 1 47

The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors, and sponsors) is friendly and courteous.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 20.8% 5 70.8% 17 8.3% 2 0.0% 0 24

Buda 32.3% 20 62.9% 39 3.2% 2 1.6% 1 62

Camino Real 48.0% 12 52.0% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 25

Carpenter Hill 44.3% 27 54.1% 33 1.6% 1 0.0% 0 61

Elm Grove 40.0% 18 60.0% 27 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45

Fuentes 51.8% 29 44.6% 25 1.8% 1 1.8% 1 56

Tom Green 32.4% 11 64.7% 22 2.9% 1 0.0% 0 34

Hemphill 51.6% 16 45.2% 14 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 31

Kyle 30.4% 14 65.2% 30 2.2% 1 2.2% 1 46

Negley 29.5% 31 66.7% 70 2.9% 3 1.0% 1 105

Pfluger 41.0% 16 56.4% 22 0.0% 0 2.6% 1 39

Science Hall 36.4% 12 54.5% 18 3.0% 1 6.1% 2 33

Tobias 37.5% 18 58.3% 28 2.1% 1 2.1% 1 48

Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning environment for my student.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 23.1% 6 57.7% 15 19.2% 5 0.0% 0 26

Buda 20.0% 12 66.7% 40 8.3% 5 5.0% 3 60

Camino Real 40.0% 10 48.0% 12 8.0% 2 4.0% 1 25

Carpenter Hill 22.2% 14 58.7% 37 15.9% 10 3.2% 2 63

Elm Grove 32.7% 16 42.9% 21 22.4% 11 2.0% 1 49

Fuentes 40.7% 24 42.4% 25 15.3% 9 1.7% 1 59

Tom Green 20.6% 7 61.8% 21 14.7% 5 2.9% 1 34

Hemphill 48.4% 15 41.9% 13 3.2% 1 6.5% 2 31

Kyle 13.8% 8 50.0% 29 25.9% 15 10.3% 6 58

Negley 18.2% 20 42.7% 47 32.7% 36 6.4% 7 110

Pfluger 40.5% 15 35.1% 13 18.9% 7 5.4% 2 37

Science Hall 20.6% 7 41.2% 14 26.5% 9 11.8% 4 34

Tobias 29.8% 14 57.4% 27 8.5% 4 4.3% 2 47

I am well informed about extracurricular events in which my student is involved.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at each campus.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 47.1% 16 47.1% 16 0.0% 0 5.9% 2 34

Buda 46.4% 32 44.9% 31 5.8% 4 2.9% 2 69

Camino Real 51.7% 15 48.3% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 29

Carpenter Hill 72.3% 60 26.5% 22 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 83

Elm Grove 60.3% 35 37.9% 22 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 58

Fuentes 53.0% 35 39.4% 26 7.6% 5 0.0% 0 66

Tom Green 30.8% 12 66.7% 26 2.6% 1 0.0% 0 39

Hemphill 44.7% 17 44.7% 17 2.6% 1 7.9% 3 38

Kyle 49.4% 40 44.4% 36 3.7% 3 2.5% 2 81

Negley 40.6% 56 50.0% 69 6.5% 9 2.9% 4 138

Pfluger 57.8% 26 40.0% 18 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 45

Science Hall 35.0% 14 47.5% 19 10.0% 4 7.5% 3 40

Tobias 24.1% 14 65.5% 38 1.7% 1 8.6% 5 58

Families and community members feel welcome to visit this school.


school campus


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 54.5% 18 36.4% 12 6.1% 2 3.0% 1 33

Buda 46.3% 31 49.3% 33 1.5% 1 3.0% 2 67

Camino Real 43.3% 13 50.0% 15 6.7% 2 0.0% 0 30

Carpenter Hill 65.9% 54 32.9% 27 1.2% 1 0.0% 0 82

Elm Grove 58.3% 35 41.7% 25 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 60

Fuentes 53.1% 34 43.8% 28 3.1% 2 0.0% 0 64

Tom Green 28.2% 11 64.1% 25 7.7% 3 0.0% 0 39

Hemphill 48.6% 17 42.9% 15 2.9% 1 5.7% 2 35

Kyle 43.8% 35 52.5% 42 2.5% 2 1.3% 1 80

Negley 43.9% 61 48.2% 67 6.5% 9 1.4% 2 139

Pfluger 56.8% 25 38.6% 17 4.5% 2 0.0% 0 44

Science Hall 43.6% 17 48.7% 19 5.1% 2 2.6% 1 39

Tobias 21.1% 12 66.7% 38 5.3% 3 7.0% 4 57


school campus

Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings and events.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 34.8% 8 65.2% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23

Buda 32.4% 12 64.9% 24 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 37

Camino Real 43.5% 10 56.5% 13 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 23

Carpenter Hill 56.8% 21 40.5% 15 2.7% 1 0.0% 0 37

Elm Grove 57.1% 16 42.9% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 28

Fuentes 47.9% 23 50.0% 24 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 48

Tom Green 18.5% 5 74.1% 20 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 27

Hemphill 41.9% 13 45.2% 14 3.2% 1 9.7% 3 31

Kyle 29.2% 14 68.8% 33 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 48

Negley 39.7% 31 57.7% 45 2.6% 2 0.0% 0 78

Pfluger 69.0% 20 27.6% 8 0.0% 0 3.4% 1 29

Science Hall 29.6% 8 63.0% 17 3.7% 1 3.7% 1 27

Tobias 32.4% 12 59.5% 22 0.0% 0 8.1% 3 37

Programs are accessible to those with disabilities.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 62.5% 20 37.5% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 32

Buda 28.2% 11 66.7% 26 2.6% 1 2.6% 1 39

Camino Real 50.0% 12 50.0% 12 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 24

Carpenter Hill 57.8% 26 42.2% 19 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 45

Elm Grove 53.3% 16 46.7% 14 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30

Fuentes 44.0% 22 54.0% 27 2.0% 1 0.0% 0 50

Tom Green 23.3% 7 76.7% 23 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 30

Hemphill 45.2% 14 48.4% 15 0.0% 0 6.5% 2 31

Kyle 28.8% 15 69.2% 36 1.9% 1 0.0% 0 52

Negley 42.5% 37 55.2% 48 2.3% 2 0.0% 0 87

Pfluger 69.7% 23 30.3% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33

Science Hall 30.8% 8 61.5% 16 3.8% 1 3.8% 1 26

Tobias 35.9% 14 61.5% 24 0.0% 0 2.6% 1 39

Strongly disagree


school campus

Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities.

Strongly agree Agree Disagree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 25.0% 6 58.3% 14 12.5% 3 4.2% 1 24

Buda 27.0% 10 70.3% 26 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 37

Camino Real 42.9% 9 52.4% 11 4.8% 1 0.0% 0 21

Carpenter Hill 54.5% 18 45.5% 15 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 33

Elm Grove 59.3% 16 40.7% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27

Fuentes 40.9% 18 56.8% 25 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 44

Tom Green 25.0% 6 66.7% 16 4.2% 1 4.2% 1 24

Hemphill 44.8% 13 48.3% 14 0.0% 0 6.9% 2 29

Kyle 30.2% 13 67.4% 29 2.3% 1 0.0% 0 43

Negley 40.9% 27 57.6% 38 1.5% 1 0.0% 0 66

Pfluger 66.7% 20 26.7% 8 3.3% 1 3.3% 1 30

Science Hall 25.0% 6 66.7% 16 8.3% 2 0.0% 0 24

Tobias 33.3% 11 63.6% 21 0.0% 0 3.0% 1 33


school campus

Information is accessible to those with disabilities.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 27.6% 8 44.8% 13 20.7% 6 6.9% 2 29

Buda 44.8% 30 52.2% 35 1.5% 1 1.5% 1 67

Camino Real 45.2% 14 51.6% 16 3.2% 1 0.0% 0 31

Carpenter Hill 64.9% 48 35.1% 26 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 74

Elm Grove 63.2% 36 36.8% 21 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 57

Fuentes 56.5% 35 40.3% 25 3.2% 2 0.0% 0 62

Tom Green 22.2% 8 77.8% 28 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 36

Hemphill 48.6% 18 48.6% 18 0.0% 0 2.7% 1 37

Kyle 43.1% 31 55.6% 40 0.0% 0 1.4% 1 72

Negley 42.6% 55 55.0% 71 2.3% 3 0.0% 0 129

Pfluger 65.0% 26 32.5% 13 0.0% 0 2.5% 1 40

Science Hall 50.0% 20 50.0% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 40

Tobias 34.0% 18 60.4% 32 1.9% 1 3.8% 2 53


school campus

The campus provides information in my preferred language.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 25.0% 6 58.3% 14 12.5% 3 4.2% 1 24

Buda 24.2% 15 56.5% 35 12.9% 8 6.5% 4 62

Camino Real 44.0% 11 44.0% 11 12.0% 3 0.0% 0 25

Carpenter Hill 37.2% 29 53.8% 42 7.7% 6 1.3% 1 78

Elm Grove 52.8% 28 39.6% 21 5.7% 3 1.9% 1 53

Fuentes 43.9% 25 43.9% 25 10.5% 6 1.8% 1 57

Tom Green 21.6% 8 59.5% 22 16.2% 6 2.7% 1 37

Hemphill 47.1% 16 32.4% 11 8.8% 3 11.8% 4 34

Kyle 26.4% 19 59.7% 43 9.7% 7 4.2% 3 72

Negley 26.8% 33 54.5% 67 13.8% 17 4.9% 6 123

Pfluger 60.5% 23 28.9% 11 5.3% 2 5.3% 2 38

Science Hall 32.4% 11 47.1% 16 8.8% 3 11.8% 4 34

Tobias 20.4% 10 59.2% 29 10.2% 5 10.2% 5 49


school campus

The campus values my opinion.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Blanco Vista 27.6% 8 44.8% 13 20.7% 6 6.9% 2 29

Buda 19.3% 11 54.4% 31 15.8% 9 10.5% 6 57

Camino Real 44.0% 11 44.0% 11 8.0% 2 4.0% 1 25

Carpenter Hill 34.8% 24 50.7% 35 13.0% 9 1.4% 1 69

Elm Grove 49.1% 26 39.6% 21 9.4% 5 1.9% 1 53

Fuentes 37.9% 22 44.8% 26 15.5% 9 1.7% 1 58

Tom Green 19.4% 7 58.3% 21 13.9% 5 8.3% 3 36

Hemphill 44.1% 15 35.3% 12 8.8% 3 11.8% 4 34

Kyle 22.7% 15 57.6% 38 13.6% 9 6.1% 4 66

Negley 20.9% 24 54.8% 63 18.3% 21 6.1% 7 115

Pfluger 63.6% 21 27.3% 9 6.1% 2 3.0% 1 33

Science Hall 26.5% 9 44.1% 15 14.7% 5 14.7% 5 34

Tobias 20.0% 10 58.0% 29 14.0% 7 8.0% 4 50

The campus provides me with adequate opportunity to provide feedback on major decisions.



school campus

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Blanco Vista

Buda

Camino Real

Carpenter Hill

Elm Grove

Fuentes

Tom Green

Hemphill

Kyle

Negley

Pfluger

Science Hall

Tobias

Strongly agree

Agree





# %




Total Responses 133


# %



Caucasian 71 53.4%

Hispanic 48 36.1%



Total Responses 133

Barton Middle SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial



# %

English 130 98.5%

Spanish 1 0.8%

Other 1 0.8%

Total Responses 132


# %

Less than $25,000 3 2.3%

$25,000 to $49,999 20 15.3%

$50,000 to $74,999 31 23.7%

$75,000 to $99,999 18 13.7%

$100,000 to $124,999 20 15.3%

$125,000 to $149,999 9 6.9%

$150,000 or more 18 13.7%


Total Responses 131

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 94.5% 120 94.0% 110


Email 94.5% 120 90.6% 106




Television 92.9% 118 26.5% 31

Radio 85.8% 109 39.3% 46

Total 127 117


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 29.1% 37 3.3% 4



Email 84.3% 107 89.4% 110

Mail 16.5% 21 16.3% 20

Other 3.1% 4 4.9% 6

Total 127 123



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

114 89.8%

65 51.2%

74 58.3%

72 56.7%

86 67.7%

67 52.8%

83 65.4%

71 55.9%

53 41.7%

55 43.3%

84 66.1%

96 75.6%

38 29.9%

59 46.5%

34 26.8%

20 15.7%

33 26.0%

69 54.3%

56 44.1%

37 29.1%

73 57.5%

127







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses



Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.16.5% 19 60.0% 69 19.1% 22 4.3% 5 115







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Barton Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Barton Middle School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.17.6% 19 56.5% 61 20.4% 22 5.6% 6 108


timely manner.56.6% 30 11.3% 6 20.8% 11 11.3% 6 53



campus.21.6% 19 58.0% 51 13.6% 12 6.8% 6 88




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.23.5% 24 65.7% 67 7.8% 8 2.9% 3 102










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Barton Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.33.3% 32 52.1% 50 10.4% 10 4.2% 4 96





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Barton Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.23.8% 24 62.4% 63 11.9% 12 2.0% 2 101











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 58


# %



Caucasian 20 35.1%

Hispanic 30 52.6%



Total Responses 57

Chapa Middle SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Chapa Middle School


# %

English 52 88.1%

Spanish 7 11.9%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 59


# %

Less than $25,000 7 12.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 10 17.9%

$50,000 to $74,999 12 21.4%

$75,000 to $99,999 12 21.4%

$100,000 to $124,999 8 14.3%

$125,000 to $149,999 2 3.6%

$150,000 or more 1 1.8%


Total Responses 56

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Chapa Middle School


% # % #

Phone 94.3% 50 97.7% 43


Email 90.6% 48 86.4% 38




Television 90.6% 48 31.8% 14

Radio 79.2% 42 43.2% 19

Total 53 44


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Chapa Middle School

% # % #









Word of mouth 18.9% 10 12.8% 6



Email 66.0% 35 78.7% 37

Mail 13.2% 7 12.8% 6

Other 3.8% 2 4.3% 2

Total 53 47



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Chapa Middle School


# %

50 100.0%

20 40.0%

27 54.0%

26 52.0%

35 70.0%

28 56.0%

21 42.0%

25 50.0%

20 40.0%

14 28.0%

27 54.0%

31 62.0%

11 22.0%

15 30.0%

16 32.0%

7 14.0%

10 20.0%

22 44.0%

20 40.0%

16 32.0%

33 66.0%

50







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.20.9% 9 67.4% 29 4.7% 2 7.0% 3 43







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Chapa Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Chapa Middle School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.18.4% 7 60.5% 23 15.8% 6 5.3% 2 38


timely manner.16.3% 7 65.1% 28 14.0% 6 4.7% 2 43



campus.16.2% 6 73.0% 27 2.7% 1 8.1% 3 37




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.15.8% 6 73.7% 28 5.3% 2 5.3% 2 38










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Chapa Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.26.3% 10 68.4% 26 0.0% 0 5.3% 2 38





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Chapa Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.27.5% 11 65.0% 26 0.0% 0 7.5% 3 40











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Chapa Middle School




# %




Total Responses 119


# %



Caucasian 90 76.3%

Hispanic 22 18.6%



Total Responses 118

Dahlstrom Middle SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial



# %

English 117 97.5%

Spanish 2 1.7%

Other 1 0.8%

Total Responses 120


# %

Less than $25,000 3 2.6%

$25,000 to $49,999 5 4.3%

$50,000 to $74,999 16 13.9%

$75,000 to $99,999 24 20.9%

$100,000 to $124,999 22 19.1%

$125,000 to $149,999 16 13.9%

$150,000 or more 20 17.4%


Total Responses 115

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 96.5% 109 97.0% 98


Email 96.5% 109 95.0% 96




Television 94.7% 107 30.7% 31

Radio 89.4% 101 47.5% 48

Total 113 101


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 27.4% 31 6.5% 7



Email 75.2% 85 88.0% 95

Mail 12.4% 14 13.0% 14

Other 3.5% 4 2.8% 3

Total 113 108




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

96 86.5%

60 54.1%

62 55.9%

59 53.2%

64 57.7%

63 56.8%

80 72.1%

64 57.7%

40 36.0%

53 47.7%

76 68.5%

81 73.0%

34 30.6%

43 38.7%

37 33.3%

22 19.8%

30 27.0%

60 54.1%

53 47.7%

35 31.5%

59 53.2%

111


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching




Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.14.9% 15 63.4% 64 16.8% 17 5.0% 5 101







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Dahlstrom Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Dahlstrom Middle School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.20.4% 20 61.2% 60 15.3% 15 3.1% 3 98


timely manner.24.2% 24 56.6% 56 15.2% 15 4.0% 4 99



campus.24.7% 20 58.0% 47 12.3% 10 4.9% 4 81




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.20.8% 20 68.8% 66 8.3% 8 2.1% 2 96










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Dahlstrom Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.29.7% 27 64.8% 59 2.2% 2 3.3% 3 91





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Dahlstrom Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.34.7% 34 60.2% 59 4.1% 4 1.0% 1 98











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree





# %




Total Responses 34


# %



Caucasian 6 17.6%

Hispanic 22 64.7%



Total Responses 34

Simon Middle SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Simon Middle School


# %

English 25 75.8%

Spanish 7 21.2%

Other 1 3.0%

Total Responses 33


# %

Less than $25,000 5 14.7%

$25,000 to $49,999 11 32.4%

$50,000 to $74,999 8 23.5%

$75,000 to $99,999 3 8.8%

$100,000 to $124,999 2 5.9%

$125,000 to $149,999 0 0.0%

$150,000 or more 2 5.9%


Total Responses 34

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Simon Middle School


% # % #

Phone 90.9% 30 96.0% 24


Email 84.8% 28 84.0% 21




Television 87.9% 29 24.0% 6

Radio 75.8% 25 44.0% 11

Total 33 25


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Simon Middle School

% # % #









Word of mouth 33.3% 11 7.1% 2



Email 48.5% 16 78.6% 22

Mail 15.2% 5 14.3% 4

Other 3.0% 1 3.6% 1

Total 33 28




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Simon Middle School


# %

31 93.9%

18 54.5%

20 60.6%

21 63.6%

21 63.6%

20 60.6%

17 51.5%

19 57.6%

16 48.5%

20 60.6%

21 63.6%

26 78.8%

15 45.5%

13 39.4%

11 33.3%

11 33.3%

10 30.3%

16 48.5%

17 51.5%

18 54.5%

25 75.8%

33


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.21.9% 7 65.6% 21 9.4% 3 3.1% 1 32







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Simon Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Simon Middle School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.28.6% 8 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 3.6% 1 28


timely manner.32.1% 9 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28



campus.30.8% 8 61.5% 16 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.36.0% 9 52.0% 13 12.0% 3 0.0% 0 25










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Simon Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.37.0% 10 59.3% 16 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 27





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Simon Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.35.7% 10 60.7% 17 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 28











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Simon Middle School




# %




Total Responses 82


# %



Caucasian 40 51.9%

Hispanic 35 45.5%



Total Responses 77

Wallace Middle SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial



# %

English 77 95.1%

Spanish 3 3.7%

Other 1 1.2%

Total Responses 81


# %

Less than $25,000 4 5.3%

$25,000 to $49,999 9 11.8%

$50,000 to $74,999 25 32.9%

$75,000 to $99,999 15 19.7%

$100,000 to $124,999 12 15.8%

$125,000 to $149,999 7 9.2%

$150,000 or more 3 3.9%


Total Responses 76

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more



% # % #

Phone 96.2% 76 98.6% 70


Email 96.2% 76 88.7% 63




Television 94.9% 75 26.8% 19

Radio 83.5% 66 33.8% 24

Total 79 71


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access


% # % #









Word of mouth 29.1% 23 13.0% 10



Email 68.4% 54 72.7% 56

Mail 15.2% 12 15.6% 12

Other 0.0% 0 2.6% 2

Total 79 77




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod



# %

64 81.0%

33 41.8%

39 49.4%

48 60.8%

56 70.9%

42 53.2%

48 60.8%

31 39.2%

22 27.8%

35 44.3%

52 65.8%

56 70.9%

30 38.0%

23 29.1%

27 34.2%

17 21.5%

17 21.5%

34 43.0%

34 43.0%

31 39.2%

46 58.2%

79


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching




Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.18.5% 12 61.5% 40 12.3% 8 7.7% 5 65







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Wallace Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Wallace Middle School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.29.5% 18 54.1% 33 9.8% 6 6.6% 4 61


timely manner.27.9% 17 62.3% 38 6.6% 4 3.3% 2 61



campus.32.0% 16 54.0% 27 12.0% 6 2.0% 1 50




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.26.8% 15 66.1% 37 5.4% 3 1.8% 1 56










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Wallace Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.38.2% 21 56.4% 31 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 55





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree


Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Wallace Middle School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.41.4% 24 55.2% 32 1.7% 1 1.7% 1 58











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 19.6% 21 54.2% 58 22.4% 24 3.7% 4 107

Chapa 16.7% 7 64.3% 27 14.3% 6 4.8% 2 42

Dahlstrom 27.3% 27 60.6% 60 9.1% 9 3.0% 3 99

Simon 32.1% 9 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

Wallace 26.3% 15 61.4% 35 7.0% 4 5.3% 3 57

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 21.5% 23 63.6% 68 10.3% 11 4.7% 5 107

Chapa 19.5% 8 61.0% 25 12.2% 5 7.3% 3 41

Dahlstrom 26.0% 26 60.0% 60 10.0% 10 4.0% 4 100

Simon 38.5% 10 57.7% 15 3.8% 1 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 30.0% 18 55.0% 33 10.0% 6 5.0% 3 60

This chart shows the percentage who answered either 'Strongly agree' or 'Agree' from each middle school campus.



Middle School Summary ReportHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey




0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

Middle School Summary Report

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 13.3% 13 59.2% 58 18.4% 18 9.2% 9 98

Chapa 11.9% 5 64.3% 27 19.0% 8 4.8% 2 42

Dahlstrom 18.1% 17 54.3% 51 20.2% 19 7.4% 7 94

Simon 28.0% 7 68.0% 17 0.0% 0 4.0% 1 25

Wallace 26.4% 14 56.6% 30 11.3% 6 5.7% 3 53

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 13.1% 13 62.6% 62 15.2% 15 9.1% 9 99

Chapa 9.5% 4 66.7% 28 19.0% 8 4.8% 2 42

Dahlstrom 21.1% 19 52.2% 47 20.0% 18 6.7% 6 90

Simon 28.0% 7 68.0% 17 0.0% 0 4.0% 1 25

Wallace 24.1% 13 61.1% 33 11.1% 6 3.7% 2 54







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 26.9% 29 62.0% 67 4.6% 5 6.5% 7 108

Chapa 29.3% 12 56.1% 23 9.8% 4 4.9% 2 41

Dahlstrom 26.7% 27 59.4% 60 12.9% 13 1.0% 1 101

Simon 37.0% 10 55.6% 15 7.4% 2 0.0% 0 27

Wallace 30.5% 18 62.7% 37 3.4% 2 3.4% 2 59

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 17.6% 19 56.5% 61 20.4% 22 5.6% 6 108

Chapa 18.4% 7 60.5% 23 15.8% 6 5.3% 2 38

Dahlstrom 20.4% 20 61.2% 60 15.3% 15 3.1% 3 98

Simon 28.6% 8 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 3.6% 1 28

Wallace 29.5% 18 54.1% 33 9.8% 6 6.6% 4 61







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 56.6% 30 11.3% 6 20.8% 11 11.3% 6 53

Chapa 16.3% 7 65.1% 28 14.0% 6 4.7% 2 43

Dahlstrom 24.2% 24 56.6% 56 15.2% 15 4.0% 4 99

Simon 32.1% 9 60.7% 17 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

Wallace 27.9% 17 62.3% 38 6.6% 4 3.3% 2 61

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 16.8% 17 60.4% 61 12.9% 13 9.9% 10 101

Chapa 9.8% 4 75.6% 31 7.3% 3 7.3% 3 41

Dahlstrom 19.2% 19 60.6% 60 18.2% 18 2.0% 2 99

Simon 29.6% 8 59.3% 16 11.1% 3 0.0% 0 27

Wallace 22.0% 13 54.2% 32 20.3% 12 3.4% 2 59







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 21.6% 19 58.0% 51 13.6% 12 6.8% 6 88

Chapa 16.2% 6 73.0% 27 2.7% 1 8.1% 3 37

Dahlstrom 24.7% 20 58.0% 47 12.3% 10 4.9% 4 81

Simon 30.8% 8 61.5% 16 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 32.0% 16 54.0% 27 12.0% 6 2.0% 1 50

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 20.9% 19 70.3% 64 4.4% 4 4.4% 4 91

Chapa 15.8% 6 78.9% 30 2.6% 1 2.6% 1 38

Dahlstrom 26.3% 20 67.1% 51 6.6% 5 0.0% 0 76

Simon 32.0% 8 60.0% 15 8.0% 2 0.0% 0 25

Wallace 34.0% 17 58.0% 29 6.0% 3 2.0% 1 50







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 27.2% 28 60.2% 62 6.8% 7 5.8% 6 103

Chapa 15.0% 6 72.5% 29 7.5% 3 5.0% 2 40

Dahlstrom 30.9% 29 56.4% 53 8.5% 8 4.3% 4 94

Simon 36.0% 9 60.0% 15 4.0% 1 0.0% 0 25

Wallace 35.1% 20 52.6% 30 8.8% 5 3.5% 2 57

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 42.5% 45 45.3% 48 8.5% 9 3.8% 4 106

Chapa 22.5% 9 50.0% 20 22.5% 9 5.0% 2 40

Dahlstrom 31.0% 31 60.0% 60 7.0% 7 2.0% 2 100

Simon 38.5% 10 50.0% 13 11.5% 3 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 29.8% 17 61.4% 35 7.0% 4 1.8% 1 57




Campus administrators provide strong leadership.



0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 39.6% 42 54.7% 58 4.7% 5 0.9% 1 106

Chapa 30.8% 12 56.4% 22 5.1% 2 7.7% 3 39

Dahlstrom 39.2% 38 55.7% 54 5.2% 5 0.0% 0 97

Simon 53.6% 15 39.3% 11 7.1% 2 0.0% 0 28

Wallace 40.7% 24 42.4% 25 11.9% 7 5.1% 3 59

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 21.9% 23 64.8% 68 9.5% 10 3.8% 4 105

Chapa 15.4% 6 66.7% 26 12.8% 5 5.1% 2 39

Dahlstrom 28.4% 27 58.9% 56 10.5% 10 2.1% 2 95

Simon 29.6% 8 55.6% 15 11.1% 3 3.7% 1 27

Wallace 32.8% 20 54.1% 33 11.5% 7 1.6% 1 61







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 29.0% 29 60.0% 60 7.0% 7 4.0% 4 100

Chapa 15.4% 6 76.9% 30 2.6% 1 5.1% 2 39

Dahlstrom 28.1% 25 58.4% 52 12.4% 11 1.1% 1 89

Simon 30.8% 8 61.5% 16 3.8% 1 3.8% 1 26

Wallace 32.7% 18 52.7% 29 9.1% 5 5.5% 3 55

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 23.5% 24 65.7% 67 7.8% 8 2.9% 3 102

Chapa 15.8% 6 73.7% 28 5.3% 2 5.3% 2 38

Dahlstrom 20.8% 20 68.8% 66 8.3% 8 2.1% 2 96

Simon 36.0% 9 52.0% 13 12.0% 3 0.0% 0 25

Wallace 26.8% 15 66.1% 37 5.4% 3 1.8% 1 56







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 22.6% 24 59.4% 63 13.2% 14 4.7% 5 106

Chapa 17.1% 7 65.9% 27 12.2% 5 4.9% 2 41

Dahlstrom 22.4% 22 61.2% 60 10.2% 10 6.1% 6 98

Simon 34.6% 9 57.7% 15 7.7% 2 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 23.6% 13 67.3% 37 7.3% 4 1.8% 1 55

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 31.9% 15 59.6% 28 6.4% 3 2.1% 1 47

Chapa 20.8% 5 70.8% 17 0.0% 0 8.3% 2 24

Dahlstrom 27.5% 14 62.7% 32 5.9% 3 3.9% 2 51

Simon 40.0% 8 55.0% 11 0.0% 0 5.0% 1 20

Wallace 35.3% 12 61.8% 21 0.0% 0 2.9% 1 34







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 22.1% 17 54.5% 42 11.7% 9 11.7% 9 77

Chapa 12.5% 4 65.6% 21 12.5% 4 9.4% 3 32

Dahlstrom 19.4% 13 47.8% 32 25.4% 17 7.5% 5 67

Simon 43.5% 10 39.1% 9 13.0% 3 4.3% 1 23

Wallace 29.3% 12 48.8% 20 12.2% 5 9.8% 4 41

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 22.9% 8 68.6% 24 5.7% 2 2.9% 1 35

Chapa 28.6% 6 61.9% 13 0.0% 0 9.5% 2 21

Dahlstrom 32.3% 10 64.5% 20 0.0% 0 3.2% 1 31

Simon 41.2% 7 52.9% 9 5.9% 1 0.0% 0 17

Wallace 37.0% 10 63.0% 17 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 27







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 28.0% 28 64.0% 64 8.0% 8 0.0% 0 100

Chapa 18.4% 7 76.3% 29 0.0% 0 5.3% 2 38

Dahlstrom 25.0% 24 65.6% 63 7.3% 7 2.1% 2 96

Simon 35.7% 10 53.6% 15 7.1% 2 3.6% 1 28

Wallace 25.9% 15 65.5% 38 6.9% 4 1.7% 1 58

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 25.3% 24 58.9% 56 8.4% 8 7.4% 7 95

Chapa 17.5% 7 75.0% 30 2.5% 1 5.0% 2 40

Dahlstrom 31.1% 28 56.7% 51 7.8% 7 4.4% 4 90

Simon 37.0% 10 55.6% 15 3.7% 1 3.7% 1 27

Wallace 29.1% 16 60.0% 33 9.1% 5 1.8% 1 55







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 33.3% 32 52.1% 50 10.4% 10 4.2% 4 96

Chapa 26.3% 10 68.4% 26 0.0% 0 5.3% 2 38

Dahlstrom 29.7% 27 64.8% 59 2.2% 2 3.3% 3 91

Simon 37.0% 10 59.3% 16 0.0% 0 3.7% 1 27

Wallace 38.2% 21 56.4% 31 5.5% 3 0.0% 0 55

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 20.8% 20 56.3% 54 18.8% 18 4.2% 4 96

Chapa 19.5% 8 70.7% 29 4.9% 2 4.9% 2 41

Dahlstrom 28.0% 26 48.4% 45 20.4% 19 3.2% 3 93

Simon 28.6% 8 46.4% 13 17.9% 5 7.1% 2 28

Wallace 23.2% 13 57.1% 32 16.1% 9 3.6% 2 56







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 23.8% 24 62.4% 63 11.9% 12 2.0% 2 101

Chapa 27.5% 11 65.0% 26 0.0% 0 7.5% 3 40

Dahlstrom 34.7% 34 60.2% 59 4.1% 4 1.0% 1 98

Simon 35.7% 10 60.7% 17 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 28

Wallace 41.4% 24 55.2% 32 1.7% 1 1.7% 1 58

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 27.3% 27 66.7% 66 5.1% 5 1.0% 1 99

Chapa 22.0% 9 70.7% 29 2.4% 1 4.9% 2 41

Dahlstrom 34.4% 33 57.3% 55 6.3% 6 2.1% 2 96

Simon 29.6% 8 66.7% 18 3.7% 1 0.0% 0 27

Wallace 31.6% 18 63.2% 36 3.5% 2 1.8% 1 57







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 28.3% 13 69.6% 32 2.2% 1 0.0% 0 46

Chapa 21.7% 5 69.6% 16 0.0% 0 8.7% 2 23

Dahlstrom 33.3% 15 62.2% 28 2.2% 1 2.2% 1 45

Simon 44.4% 8 55.6% 10 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 18

Wallace 37.1% 13 54.3% 19 2.9% 1 5.7% 2 35

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 31.3% 15 66.7% 32 2.1% 1 0.0% 0 48

Chapa 29.2% 7 62.5% 15 0.0% 0 8.3% 2 24

Dahlstrom 30.2% 16 69.8% 37 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 53

Simon 42.1% 8 57.9% 11 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 19

Wallace 37.8% 14 56.8% 21 5.4% 2 0.0% 0 37







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 29.3% 12 68.3% 28 2.4% 1 0.0% 0 41

Chapa 33.3% 7 57.1% 12 0.0% 0 9.5% 2 21

Dahlstrom 35.7% 15 61.9% 26 0.0% 0 2.4% 1 42

Simon 50.0% 8 50.0% 8 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 16

Wallace 43.8% 14 46.9% 15 6.3% 2 3.1% 1 32

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 38.8% 38 61.2% 60 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 98

Chapa 25.0% 10 67.5% 27 2.5% 1 5.0% 2 40

Dahlstrom 41.5% 39 57.4% 54 1.1% 1 0.0% 0 94

Simon 39.3% 11 57.1% 16 3.6% 1 0.0% 0 28

Wallace 50.0% 29 48.3% 28 1.7% 1 0.0% 0 58







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 18.0% 16 55.1% 49 16.9% 15 10.1% 9 89

Chapa 20.6% 7 58.8% 20 11.8% 4 8.8% 3 34

Dahlstrom 27.4% 23 53.6% 45 13.1% 11 6.0% 5 84

Simon 34.6% 9 50.0% 13 15.4% 4 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 31.1% 14 60.0% 27 4.4% 2 4.4% 2 45

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Barton 15.6% 12 45.5% 35 27.3% 21 11.7% 9 77

Chapa 17.6% 6 58.8% 20 17.6% 6 5.9% 2 34

Dahlstrom 23.0% 20 42.5% 37 29.9% 26 4.6% 4 87

Simon 30.8% 8 53.8% 14 15.4% 4 0.0% 0 26

Wallace 35.7% 15 47.6% 20 14.3% 6 2.4% 1 42







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Barton

Chapa

Dahlstrom

Simon

Wallace

Strongly agree

Agree





# %




Total Responses 9


# %



Caucasian 2 20.0%

Hispanic 4 40.0%



Total Responses 10

Live Oak AcademyHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Live Oak Academy


# %

English 9 90.0%

Spanish 1 10.0%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 10


# %

Less than $25,000 1 12.5%

$25,000 to $49,999 2 25.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 0 0.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 3 37.5%

$100,000 to $124,999 0 0.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 12.5%

$150,000 or more 0 0.0%


Total Responses 8

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Live Oak Academy


% # % #

Phone 100.0% 10 100.0% 8


Email 80.0% 8 62.5% 5




Television 70.0% 7 37.5% 3

Radio 80.0% 8 50.0% 4

Total 10 8


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Live Oak Academy

% # % #









Word of mouth 22.2% 2 22.2% 2



Email 55.6% 5 44.4% 4

Mail 11.1% 1 22.2% 2

Other 0.0% 0 11.1% 1

Total 9 9




0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Live Oak Academy


# %

8 80.0%

3 30.0%

4 40.0%

6 60.0%

6 60.0%

2 20.0%

5 50.0%

4 40.0%

6 60.0%

0 0.0%

4 40.0%

5 50.0%

0 0.0%

4 40.0%

2 20.0%

3 30.0%

3 30.0%

1 10.0%

2 20.0%

5 50.0%

4 40.0%

10


Total Responses






Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter












Quality of teaching


Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #








Strongly disagree



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.42.9% 3 57.1% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 7







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Live Oak Academy.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Live Oak Academy. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.25.0% 1 75.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4


timely manner.25.0% 1 75.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4



campus.75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.0.0% 0 100.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4










0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%







academicperformance.


students achieve highacademic

performance.



Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Live Oak Academy.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.0.0% 0 100.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3





0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Live Oak Academy.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Live Oak Academy




# %




Total Responses 300


# %



Caucasian 194 65.1%

Hispanic 82 27.5%



Total Responses 298

Hays High SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Hays High School


# %

English 293 98.0%

Spanish 5 1.7%

Other 1 0.3%

Total Responses 299


# %

Less than $25,000 8 2.8%

$25,000 to $49,999 45 15.7%

$50,000 to $74,999 46 16.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 45 15.7%

$100,000 to $124,999 57 19.9%

$125,000 to $149,999 30 10.5%

$150,000 or more 26 9.1%


Total Responses 287

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Hays High School


% # % #

Phone 95.3% 262 97.2% 244


Email 95.3% 262 92.4% 232




Television 91.3% 251 25.9% 65

Radio 84.4% 232 37.8% 95

Total 275 251


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Hays High School

% # % #









Word of mouth 28.1% 77 5.3% 14



Email 71.5% 196 81.3% 213

Mail 17.5% 48 17.6% 46

Other 3.6% 10 3.1% 8

Total 274 262



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Hays High School


# %

236 87.1%

127 46.9%

184 67.9%

152 56.1%

178 65.7%

155 57.2%

153 56.5%

141 52.0%

95 35.1%

133 49.1%

169 62.4%

170 62.7%

77 28.4%

105 38.7%

77 28.4%

53 19.6%

85 31.4%

154 56.8%

133 49.1%

94 34.7%

188 69.4%

271







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.14.1% 34 57.3% 138 21.2% 51 7.5% 18 241







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Hays High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Hays High School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.14.2% 33 52.8% 123 25.3% 59 7.7% 18 233


timely manner.17.5% 41 51.7% 121 19.2% 45 11.5% 27 234



campus.13.3% 26 57.4% 112 15.9% 31 13.3% 26 195




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.14.8% 33 60.1% 134 20.2% 45 4.9% 11 223










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Hays High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.29.2% 59 60.4% 122 6.4% 13 4.0% 8 202





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Hays High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.17.5% 39 63.2% 141 16.1% 36 3.1% 7 223











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Hays High School




# %




Total Responses 204


# %



Caucasian 86 42.6%

Hispanic 89 44.1%



Total Responses 202

Lehman High SchoolHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Lehman High School


# %

English 184 88.9%

Spanish 20 9.7%

Other 3 1.4%

Total Responses 207


# %

Less than $25,000 16 8.0%

$25,000 to $49,999 47 23.5%

$50,000 to $74,999 50 25.0%

$75,000 to $99,999 28 14.0%

$100,000 to $124,999 18 9.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 12 6.0%

$150,000 or more 9 4.5%


Total Responses 200

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Lehman High School


% # % #

Phone 91.2% 177 94.0% 156


Email 89.7% 174 79.5% 132




Television 83.0% 161 25.3% 42

Radio 71.1% 138 35.5% 59

Total 194 166


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Lehman High School

% # % #









Word of mouth 25.3% 48 9.2% 16



Email 54.7% 104 71.8% 125

Mail 12.6% 24 17.8% 31

Other 4.2% 8 3.4% 6

Total 190 174



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Lehman High School


# %

169 88.9%

82 43.2%

119 62.6%

101 53.2%

119 62.6%

101 53.2%

85 44.7%

82 43.2%

53 27.9%

92 48.4%

89 46.8%

108 56.8%

56 29.5%

58 30.5%

47 24.7%

37 19.5%

46 24.2%

81 42.6%

86 45.3%

68 35.8%

125 65.8%

190







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


learning.




Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.11.5% 18 52.6% 82 19.9% 31 16.0% 25 156







0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%




respect.







student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Lehman High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at Lehman High School. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.10.7% 15 50.0% 70 29.3% 41 10.0% 14 140


timely manner.14.5% 21 51.0% 74 23.4% 34 11.0% 16 145



campus.11.2% 14 52.8% 66 15.2% 19 20.8% 26 125




0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.13.4% 16 63.0% 75 18.5% 22 5.0% 6 119










0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%












Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at Lehman High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #





for my student.23.5% 31 61.4% 81 7.6% 10 7.6% 10 132





0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at Lehman High School.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.17.5% 25 60.1% 86 11.2% 16 11.2% 16 143











0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%



practices.


services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Lehman High School




# %




Total Responses 3


# %



Caucasian 3 100.0%

Hispanic 0 0.0%



Total Responses 3

Impact Center/JJAEPHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey



Community resident

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%



Caucasian

Hispanic


Other/Multi-Racial

Impact Center/JJAEP


# %

English 3 100.0%

Spanish 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0%

Total Responses 3


# %

Less than $25,000 0 0.0%

$25,000 to $49,999 0 0.0%

$50,000 to $74,999 1 33.3%

$75,000 to $99,999 0 0.0%

$100,000 to $124,999 0 0.0%

$125,000 to $149,999 1 33.3%

$150,000 or more 1 33.3%


Total Responses 3

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%

English

Spanish

Other

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%

Less than $25,000

$25,000 to $49,999

$50,000 to $74,999

$75,000 to $99,999

$100,000 to $124,999

$125,000 to $149,999

$150,000 or more

Impact Center/JJAEP


% # % #

Phone 100.0% 2 100.0% 2


Email 50.0% 1 100.0% 2




Television 50.0% 1 50.0% 1

Radio 50.0% 1 100.0% 2

Total 2 2


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



Twitteraccount

Device fortexting

Television Radio

Home access

Work access

Impact Center/JJAEP

% # % #









Word of mouth 50.0% 1 50.0% 1



Email 0.0% 0 50.0% 1

Mail 0.0% 0 50.0% 1

Other 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total 2 2



0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Currentmethod

Preferredmethod

Impact Center/JJAEP


# %

2 66.7%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

0 0.0%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

0 0.0%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

0 0.0%

2 66.7%

0 0.0%

1 33.3%

1 33.3%

0 0.0%

2 66.7%

1 33.3%

3







Quality of teaching







Weekly newsletter

Monthly newsletter







Total Responses

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #










Disagree

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%









Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #








0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%


learning.



The district preparesstudents for success after

high school.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #



and respect.100.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1







0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%




respect.


promote well-being in all areas of

life.

Hays CISD strivesto be a responsible




student.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at the Impact Center/JJAEP.

Total

% # % # % # % # #






No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%








best.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP

Please share your opinion about STUDENT LEARNING at the Impact Center/JJAEP. (Continued)

Total

% # % # % # % # #


provides.


timely manner.



campus.


No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%








Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Campus administrators provide strong leadership.





No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%


leadership.


a concern.





as needed.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #


activities.



achieve high academic performance.


achieve high academic performance.



No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%







academicperformance.


students achieve highacademic

performance.



Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP

Please share your opinion about EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES at the Impact Center/JJAEP.

Total

% # % # % # % # #

This campus provides a variety of extracurricular opportunities.


friendly and courteous.


for my student.


student is involved.

No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%


opportunities.


courteous.





Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP

Please share your opinion about CUSTOMER SERVICE at the Impact Center/JJAEP.

Total

% # % # % # % # #


school.








feedback on major decisions.

No data available



0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%

100.0%



visit thisschool.



meetings andevents.




The campusprovides


language.




providefeedback on

majordecisions.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #

District buildings are well maintained.

The district implements sound environmental practices.

The district provides quality student health services.

The district provides quality transportation services.

The district provides quality child nutrition services.

No data available



0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%





services.


services.


services.

Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Impact Center/JJAEP


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 20.0% 1 5

Hays 12.9% 29 56.7% 127 21.4% 48 8.9% 20 224

Lehman 11.9% 16 52.6% 71 23.7% 32 11.9% 16 135

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 16.4% 37 56.2% 127 21.2% 48 6.2% 14 226

Lehman 12.9% 18 57.9% 81 17.1% 24 12.1% 17 140

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data




High School Summary ReportHays CISD Family/Community Satisfaction Survey




0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

High School Summary Report

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 10.0% 21 53.3% 112 26.2% 55 10.5% 22 210

Lehman 10.2% 13 48.0% 61 32.3% 41 9.4% 12 127

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 11.4% 23 51.5% 104 26.2% 53 10.9% 22 202

Lehman 12.6% 16 47.2% 60 27.6% 35 12.6% 16 127

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data

Agree Disagree Strongly disagree






Strongly agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 13.5% 30 60.5% 135 19.7% 44 6.3% 14 223

Lehman 16.2% 22 55.1% 75 21.3% 29 7.4% 10 136

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 25.0% 1 75.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 14.2% 33 52.8% 123 25.3% 59 7.7% 18 233

Lehman 10.7% 15 50.0% 70 29.3% 41 10.0% 14 140

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 25.0% 1 75.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 17.5% 41 51.7% 121 19.2% 45 11.5% 27 234

Lehman 14.5% 21 51.0% 74 23.4% 34 11.0% 16 145

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 20.0% 1 5

Hays 11.4% 24 55.5% 117 21.8% 46 11.4% 24 211

Lehman 11.4% 15 47.7% 63 21.2% 28 19.7% 26 132

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 13.3% 26 57.4% 112 15.9% 31 13.3% 26 195

Lehman 11.2% 14 52.8% 66 15.2% 19 20.8% 26 125

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 14.9% 28 66.0% 124 8.0% 15 11.2% 21 188

Lehman 15.3% 18 62.7% 74 11.9% 14 10.2% 12 118

Impact/JJAEP No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 17.5% 35 55.5% 111 16.5% 33 10.5% 21 200

Lehman 12.0% 15 58.4% 73 17.6% 22 12.0% 15 125

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 22.3% 51 55.0% 126 13.5% 31 9.2% 21 229

Lehman 18.4% 26 56.7% 80 18.4% 26 6.4% 9 141

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data





Campus administrators provided strong leadership.


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 40.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5

Hays 29.2% 68 59.7% 139 7.3% 17 3.9% 9 233

Lehman 33.8% 48 52.1% 74 7.7% 11 6.3% 9 142

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 17.7% 39 69.5% 153 9.1% 20 3.6% 8 220

Lehman 16.3% 22 63.7% 86 14.1% 19 5.9% 8 135

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 60.0% 3 40.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 5

Hays 19.1% 40 58.9% 123 13.9% 29 8.1% 17 209

Lehman 19.2% 25 56.9% 74 16.9% 22 6.9% 9 130

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 100.0% 4 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 14.8% 33 60.1% 134 20.2% 45 4.9% 11 223

Lehman 13.4% 16 63.0% 75 18.5% 22 5.0% 6 119

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 25.0% 1 75.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 16.7% 37 67.6% 150 10.8% 24 5.0% 11 222

Lehman 16.8% 23 67.2% 92 12.4% 17 3.6% 5 137

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 4

Hays 20.8% 22 58.5% 62 10.4% 11 10.4% 11 106

Lehman 21.4% 18 54.8% 46 11.9% 10 11.9% 10 84

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2

Hays 16.8% 26 51.0% 79 20.6% 32 11.6% 18 155

Lehman 19.2% 15 59.0% 46 6.4% 5 15.4% 12 78

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2

Hays 22.4% 19 62.4% 53 5.9% 5 9.4% 8 85

Lehman 25.0% 16 56.3% 36 10.9% 7 7.8% 5 64







No data


0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 75.0% 3 25.0% 1 0.0% 0 4

Hays 25.7% 56 67.9% 148 4.6% 10 1.8% 4 218

Lehman 24.6% 33 68.7% 92 5.2% 7 1.5% 2 134

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 33.3% 1 66.7% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3

Hays 24.0% 49 59.8% 122 10.3% 21 5.9% 12 204

Lehman 15.6% 20 61.7% 79 10.2% 13 12.5% 16 128

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 100.0% 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3

Hays 29.2% 59 60.4% 122 6.4% 13 4.0% 8 202

Lehman 23.5% 31 61.4% 81 7.6% 10 7.6% 10 132

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 100.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2

Hays 21.9% 43 58.7% 115 13.8% 27 5.6% 11 196

Lehman 16.7% 21 50.8% 64 23.0% 29 9.5% 12 126

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree



Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 17.5% 39 63.2% 141 16.1% 36 3.1% 7 223

Lehman 17.5% 25 60.1% 86 11.2% 16 11.2% 16 143

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 17.7% 38 67.0% 144 12.6% 27 2.8% 6 215

Lehman 17.0% 24 59.6% 84 15.6% 22 7.8% 11 141

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 2

Hays 24.1% 27 67.9% 76 5.4% 6 2.7% 3 112

Lehman 20.5% 15 65.8% 48 8.2% 6 5.5% 4 73

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 2

Hays 22.4% 26 74.1% 86 1.7% 2 1.7% 2 116

Lehman 20.5% 18 73.9% 65 3.4% 3 2.3% 2 88

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 0.0% 0 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 0.0% 0 2

Hays 22.1% 23 72.1% 75 2.9% 3 2.9% 3 104

Lehman 22.5% 18 63.8% 51 11.3% 9 2.5% 2 80

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 32.8% 67 65.2% 133 1.0% 2 1.0% 2 204

Lehman 29.4% 40 64.7% 88 2.2% 3 3.7% 5 136








No data

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 13.3% 24 52.2% 94 21.7% 39 12.8% 23 180

Lehman 13.5% 15 44.1% 49 19.8% 22 22.5% 25 111

Impact/JJAEP

Total

% # % # % # % # #

Live Oak 40.0% 2 40.0% 2 20.0% 1 0.0% 0 5

Hays 11.9% 22 46.5% 86 30.3% 56 11.4% 21 185

Lehman 15.3% 17 42.3% 47 19.8% 22 22.5% 25 111

Impact/JJAEP

No data

No data







0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Live Oak

Hays

Lehman

Impact/JJAEP

Strongly agree

Agree


2012 Average Results by School Type(Percent of respondents who strongly agre or agree)

Elem Middle High Elem Middle High

All students are provided equal opportunities for learning. 85.0 79.2 75.8 This campus provides a variety of extracurricular

opportunities.

This campus has high expectations for student academic

success.

90.4 78.9 81.6 The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors, and sponsors)

is friendly and courteous.

Curriculum and learning environments are innovative and

student-focused.

87.8 74.6 76.3 Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning


Students are encouraged to do their best. 94.1 84.1 82.5 I am well informed about extracurricular events in which my



provides.

82.5 73.6 70.3

Families are informed about their children's academic

progress in a timely manner.

85.2 73.9 62.7

Students are treated fairly. 87.1 73.4 72.7Elem Middle High

The district-wide discipline policy is consistently applied at

this campus.

88.9 75.8 70.1 Families and community members feel welcome to visit

this school.

91.9 84.2 88.3

Staff respect cultural diversity. 92.1 87.7 81.1 Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings

and events.

92.8 86.8 90.0

Campus administrators provide strong leadership. 86.9 73.5 79.2 Programs, facilities, and information are accessible to

those with disabilities.

94.20 92.60 88.4

Teachers are responsive when I have a concern. 89.8 82.8 80.9 The campus provides information in my preferred

language.

97.4 96.4 92.0

Front end staff/office staff are friendly, courteous, and

helpful.

96.4 85.0 86.4The campus values my opinion.

85.8 71.2 71.2

Children are safe at school. 95.0 81.7 86.1 The campus provides me with adequate opportunity to

provide feedback on major decisions.

79.3 64.7 62.1

Additional academic assistance is provided as needed. 86.3 82.2 84.6

There is a proper balance between academics and extra-

curricular activities.

88.2 85.7 71.2

I am satisfied with student access to current technology at

school.

88.9 83.8 78.7

This campus is successful in helping special education

students achieve high academic performance.

88.8 81.9 74.8

This campus is successful in helping gifted and talented


82.0 77.2 65.4

This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve

high academic performance.

91.9 85.1 81.7

I would support a uniform dress code at this campus. 62.00 62.20 60.4

This chart is a heat map which highlights strengths (green) and areas for improvement (red).

Campus Feedback Extracurricular Activities

Customer Service

The Extracurricular Activities

section is new in 2013, thus,

there is no comparable data

from 2012.

2013 Average Results by School Type(Percent of respondents who strongly agre or agree)

Elem Middle High Elem Middle High

All students are provided equal opportunities for learning. 83.9 84.6 71.4 This campus provides a variety of extracurricular

opportunities.

81.2 91.6 87.3

This campus has high expectations for student academic

success.

87.2 86.5 81.1 The extracurricular staff (coaches, directors, and sponsors)

is friendly and courteous.

96.2 89.2 87.0

Curriculum is innovative. 77.4 80.0 73.8 Extracurricular activities provide a positive learning


96.3 93.1 91.5

Learning environments are innovative. 82.6 81.3 74.2 I am well informed about extracurricular events in which my


78.2 79.8 82.7

Students are encouraged to do their best. 94.3 89.3 81.8


provides.

80.9 81.5 75.9

Families are informed about their children's academic

progress in a timely manner.

84.7 82.6 78.2Elem Middle High

Students are treated fairly. 87.7 81.5 68.7 Families and community members feel welcome to visit

this school.

93.6 93.3 79.5

The district-wide discipline policy is consistently applied at

this campus.

87.8 86.0 78.3 Families feel welcome to participate at school meetings

and events.

94.1 93.9 80.4

Staff respect cultural diversity. 93.6 92.7 86.2Programs are accessible to those with disabilities.

96.1 95.2 76.1

Campus administrators provide strong leadership. 85.3 89.1 74.4Facilities are accessible to those with disabilities.

97.8 96.8 80.3

Teachers are responsive when I have a concern. 91.0 86.1 77.5Information is accessible to those with disabilities.

95.2 95.2 76.9

Front end staff/office staff are friendly, courteous, and

helpful.

95.8 90.5 91.6 The campus provides information in my preferred

language.

96.0 97.2 90.7

Children are safe at school. 92.6 85.6 89.0The campus values my opinion.

84.6 81.8 67.8

Additional academic assistance is provided as needed. 84.9 89.1 84.7 The campus provides me with adequate opportunity to

provide feedback on major decisions.

80.3 74.2 65.3

There is a proper balance between academics and extra-

curricular activities.

87.5 89.8 83.8

I am satisfied with student access to current technology at

school.

88.3 86.4 89.4

This campus is successful in helping special education


88.9 93.1 85.2

This campus is successful in helping gifted and talented


82.1 76.5 82.0

This campus is successful in helping ESL students achieve

high academic performance.

91.8 94.6 88.7

Campus Feedback Extracurricular Activities

Customer Service

This chart is a heat map which highlights strengths (green) and areas for improvement (red).

hays cisd · engauge community survey service is provided by tasb’s planning and research...

Documents