hanys’ continuing care issues forum nursing home surveyor guidance for incontinence and catheters...
TRANSCRIPT
HANYS’ Continuing Care Issues Forum
Nursing Home Surveyor Guidance for Incontinence and Catheters
Debbie LeBarron, Director
2
New F Tag 315
Premise- Urinary incontinence is not normal aging
Collapses current F Tags 315 and 316 Effective date – June 27, 2005 Contains
Interpretative Guidance New Investigative Protocol Compliance and Severity Guidance
3
New F Tag 315
§483.25(d)(1) - A resident who enters the facility without an indwelling catheter is not catheterized unless the resident’s clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary; and
§483.25(d)(2) - A resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bladder function as possible.
4
New F Tag 315 Intent
Each incontinent resident is identified, assessed and provided appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much normal urinary function as possible;
An indwelling catheter is not used without valid medical justification;
An indwelling catheter which is not medically justified is discontinued as soon as clinically warranted;
5
New F Tag 315 Intent(cont.)
Services are provided to restore or improve normal bladder function to the extent possible, after the catheter; and •
A resident receives the appropriate care and services to prevent infections to the extent possible.
6
New F Tag 315
Definitions Resources Resident choice Presence of Advanced Directive
7
Urinary Incontinence
“…resident receives appropriate treatment and services…” Identify resident at-risk-for or with
incontinence Accurate, thorough assessment Appropriate, individualized interventions Monitor effectiveness Modify plan as necessary
8
Urinary Incontinence
Risk factors Types of Incontinence Interventions – physiological and
functional; measured by least to most invasive
9
Catheters
Resident admitted Without – no catheter until/ unless clinical condition demonstrates it was necessary
Resident admitted With - comprehensive assessment should include underlying factors supporting the medical justification for the initiation and continuing need for catheter use, determination of which factors can be modified or reversed (or rationale for why those factors should not be modified), and the development of a plan for removal.
10
Catheters
“Because of the risk of substantial complications with the use of indwelling urinary catheters, they should be reserved primarily for short-term decompression of acute urinary retention.”
11
Catheters
Intermittent- New onset incontinence, from transient hypo-atonic bladder (e.g.- post Hospital catheter use)
Until bladder tone returns – up to7 days As evidenced by voiding trial and post void residual
12
Catheters
Indwelling- Appropriate indications for continuing use of an indwelling catheter beyond 14 days may include: Urinary retention and no treatment
Documented post void residual (PVR) volumes in a range over 200 milliliters (ml);
Inability to manage the retention/incontinence w/ intermittent catheterization; and
Persistent overflow incontinence, symptomatic infections, and/or renal dysfunction.
Contamination of Stage III or IV pressure ulcer w/ impeded healing; and
Terminal illness or severe impairment, with intractable
pain
13
Catheters
Complications Must assess/document for risk Must monitor/document for signs Bacteriuria and UTIs/Urosepsis
indwelling catheters for more than 7 days (>2 to 4 weeks) increases the chances of having a
symptomatic UTI and urosepsis. Urine C&S from catheterized resident
14
Catheters
Acute UTI (symptomatic/not chronic) Lab tests w/ clinical findings
fever with hematuria + urine culture presence of pyuria or nitrites (indicating the
presence of Enterobacteriaceae).
15
UTI Indications to treat - No catheter & three of the following
present… Fever (increase in temp >2 degrees F (1.1 degrees C) or rectal
temperature >99.5 degrees F (37.5 degrees C) or single measurement of temperature >100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C) );14
New or increased burning pain on urination, frequency or urgency;
New flank or suprapubic pain or tenderness; Change in character of urine (e.g., new bloody urine, foul smell,
or amount of sediment) or as reported by the laboratory (new pyuria or microscopic hematuria); and/or
Worsening of mental or functional status (e.g., confusion, decreased appetite, unexplained falls, incontinence of recent onset, lethargy, decreased activity).
16
UTI
Indications to treat – w/ catheter & two of the following
Fever or chills; New flank pain or suprapubic pain or tenderness; Change in character of urine (e.g., new bloody urine, foul
smell, or amount of sediment) or as reported by the laboratory (new pyuria or microscopic hematuria); and/or
Worsening of mental or functional status. Local findings such as obstruction, leakage, or mucosal trauma
(hematuria) may also be present.
17
UTI Follow up
Recurrent UTIs Predisposing Factors
structural abnormalities - a referral to a urologist
poor perineal hygiene PRIMARY - reconsider the relative risks
and benefits of continuing the use of an indwelling catheter.
18
Investigative Protocol
Objectives To determine whether the initial insertion or continued
use of an indwelling catheter is based upon clinical indication for use of a urinary catheter;
To determine the adequacy of interventions to prevent, improve, and/or manage urinary incontinence; and
To determine whether appropriate treatment and services have been provided to prevent and/or treat UTIs.
19
Investigative Protocol
Process - for a sampled resident with an indwelling urinary catheter or for a resident with urinary incontinence. Observation Interviews Record Review Interviews with Health Care Practitioners and
Professionals
20
Investigative Protocol
Observation Staff Understanding and Implementation of
care plan Delivery of care – Infection Control/Skin Care Staff approach/resident dignity & privacy Awareness of complications >observations
>reporting
21
Investigative Protocol
Interviews - resident, family or responsible party about…. Care plan development Education and involvement in care Awareness of resident issues/illnesses/response
to care Staff accommodations to need for resident
changes to plan
22
Investigative Protocol
Record Review Assessment and Evaluation. Care Plan. Care Plan Revision.
23
Investigative Protocol
Surveyors: Do interviews with Health Care Practitioners and Professionals…
“If inconsistencies in care or potential negative outcomes have been identified, or care is not in accord with standards of practice, interview the nurse responsible for coordinating or overseeing the resident’s care.”
24
For the Nurse Overseeing Care For inconsistencies…
How the staff monitor use of the care plan, changes in continence, skin condition, and the status of UTIs;
If the resident resists toileting, how staff have been taught to respond;
Types of interventions that have been attempted to promote continence (i.e., special clothing, devices, types and frequency of assistance, change in toileting schedule, environmental modifications);
If the resident is not on a restorative program, how it was determined that the resident could not benefit from interventions such as a scheduled toileting program;
25
For the Nurse Overseeing Care
For resident on toileting program… type of incontinence; interventions to address that specific type; How it is determined that the schedule and program is
effective (i.e., how continence is maintained or if there has been a decline or improvement in continence, how the program is revised to address the changes); and
Whether the resident has any physical or cognitive limitations that influence potential improvement of his/her continence;
26
For the Nurse Overseeing Care
For residents with urinary catheters, whether the nursing staff: Can provide appropriate justification for the use
of the catheter; Can identify previous attempts made (and the
results of the attempts) to remove a catheter; Can identify a history of UTIs (if present), and
interventions to try to prevent recurrence.
27
Investigative Protocol
Surveyors: Do interviews with Health Care Practitioners and Professionals…
Interventions/care inconsistent with recognized standards of practice interview one or more health care practitioners and professionals as necessary (e.g., physician, charge nurse, director of nursing) who, by virtue of training and knowledge of the resident, should be able to provide information about the causes, treatment and evaluation of the resident’s condition or problem.
28
For the Physician, Medical Director, Charge Nurse or DoN
Depending on the issue, ask about: How it was determined that the chosen interventions
were appropriate; Risks identified for which there were no interventions; Changes in condition that may justify additional or
different interventions; or how they validated the effectiveness of current interventions; and
How they monitor the approaches to continence programs
29
F Tag Non-Compliance
Areas of Evaluation Indwelling catheter upon or after admission Incontinence Symptomatic UTI
30
Failure to …
Prevent or improve incont. Medically justify/care for catheter Assess/Prevent/Rx UTI Assess Resident Continence status Identify/address Risk Factors Implement interventions Clinically justify Manage symptomatic UTIs Manage Indwelling Catheters Follow relevant policies and procedures Notify Physician
31
Potential Additional Tags
F157, Notification of Changes F241, Dignity F272, Comprehensive Assessments F279, Comprehensive Care Plans F280, Comprehensive Care Plan Revision F281, Services Provided Meet Professional
Standards F309, Quality of Care
32
Potential Additional Tags
F312, Quality of Care F385, Physician Supervision F444, Infection Control: Hand Washing F498, Proficiency of Nurse Aides F353, Sufficient Staff F501, Medical Director
33
Severity Determination
Elements Presence of HARM
Incontinence not result of clinical condition Complications of catheters Complications of incontinence Negative changes in Psychosocial func.
34
Severity Determination
Elements Degree of HARM
Occurred Serious injury, impairment, death, discomfort
Not yet occurred Potential for…
35
Severity Determination
Immediacy of Correction Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 – not an option for this requirement
36
Resources
Survey and Certification letter
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/survey-cert/sc0523.pdf