handbook of reproductive health indicators inds

60
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Handbook on Reproductive Health Indicators United Nations

Upload: martin-vera

Post on 30-Sep-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Indicadores elaborados por la Comisión Económica y Social para Asia Pacífico de la ONU

TRANSCRIPT

  • Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific

    Handbook on Reproductive Health

    Indicators

    United Nations

  • Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific

    Handbook on Reproductive Health Indicators

    United Nations New York, 2003

  • ii

    This publication has been issued without formal editing. Copies may be obtained from:

    Chief Emerging Social Issues Division Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Building Rajdamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand Fax: (66-2) 288-1009

    ST/ESCAP/2280

  • iii

    PREFACE

    The Emerging Social Issues Division is pleased to bring out the publication entitled Handbook on Reproductive Health Indicators. This is an outcome of one of several recommendations provided by the participants attending the Workshop on Reproductive Health Indicators and RH Indicators Database Development, held at Seoul from 13 to 17 November 2000. The Workshop was organized by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific in collaboration with the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, with financial support provided by the Government of the Republic of Korea. The main objective of this Handbook is to provide a list of reproductive health indicators that are essential to assess, monitor and evaluate reproductive health programmes. An attempt has been made to provide for selected indicators simple definitions, data requirements, data sources, and usefulness and limitations. It is hoped that this Handbook will be useful for planners, policy makers and researchers who are involved in the implementation of reproductive health programmes at the national and subnational levels.

    The ESCAP secretariat is thankful to Mr. A.T.P.L. Abeykoon for his contribution in preparing this publication. Thanks are also due to the Government of the Republic of Korea for providing financial support to prepare and publish the Handbook. This publication has been issued without formal editing.

  • iv

  • v

    CONTENTS

    Page

    Preface................. iii

    INTRODUCTION............................................................... 1

    I . CRITERIA FOR SELECTING INDICATORS.. 2

    II. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

    A. Input indicators....................................................... 4

    B. Process indicators................................................... 4

    C. Output indicators.................................................... 6

    D. Impact indicators.................................................... 6

    III. METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION

    A. Management information and service statistics systems...................................................................

    7

    B. Population census.................................................... 7

    C. Vital registration system.......................................... 7

    D. Population-based surveys........................................ 7

    IV. LIST OF SELECTED INDICATORS

    A. Input indicators........................................................ 8

    B. Process indicators.................................................... 16

    C. Output indicators..................................................... 23

    D. Impact indicators..................................................... 30

    REFERENCES.................................................................... 39

  • vi

    Page

    APPENDIX

    I. Indicators for policy and administrative procedures related to reproductive health........

    41

    II. Quality of care indicators.. 51

    III. Adolescent RH information and services indicators. 52

  • 1

    INTRODUCTION

    Reproductive health (RH) indicators summarize data which have been collected to answer questions that are relevant to the planning and management of reproductive health programmes. The indicators provide a useful tool to assess needs, and monitor and evaluate programme implementation and impact. The indicators capture the occurrence of events such as live births, the prevalence of a characteristic in persons such as the use of contraceptive methods or the prevalence of characteristics of a health facility, for example, health centres which provide family planning services. The indicators are expressed in rates, proportions, averages, categorical variables or absolute numbers. Following a number of international conferences in the 1990s, in particular the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), many countries have endorsed a number of goals and targets in the broad area of reproductive health. Most of these goals and targets have been formulated with quantifiable and time-bound objectives as part of their national health policies and programmes. In order to assess the achievements of goals and targets, it is necessary to establish a system for monitoring and evaluation. This involves the definition of essential indicators and guidelines on how to use them. With the expansion and evolution of services of reproductive health, many agencies have been working on developing indicators. As a result, there have been a number of indicators put forward by these organizations, in addition to existing national indicators. With the trend towards the integration and development of comprehensive reproductive health programmes and their decentralization,

  • 2

    the responsibility for planning and management of programmes has been placed at the subnational level. Therefore, indicators are not only required at the national level but also at the subnational level to monitor the effective implementation and evaluate the impact of programmes. However, many reproductive health indicators that have been produced are not necessarily appropriate at the subnational level. The objective of this handbook, therefore, is to present a guide to a core set of illustrative and practical indicators with examples, wherever possible, to enable programme managers at national and in particular at the subnational level to monitor and evaluate reproductive health programmes and projects. This handbook draws heavily from previous work undertaken in this area (United Nations, 1998; UNFPA, 1996, 1998; Bertrand and others, 1994; Abeykoon, 1999; WHO, 1997a, 1997b).

    I. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING INDICATORS Indicator selection raises technical questions about the implications of data collection as well as other operational issues. For some programmatic issues, the basic statistics required to construct indicators already exist, but the major task is to ensure consistent use and proper interpretation. However, for others, considerable innovative thinking is required. A good indicator has a number of important attributes and those recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 1997c) are outlined below.

    To be useful an indicator must be able to act as a marker

    of progress towards improved reproductive health status, either as a direct or proxy measure of impact or as a measure of progress towards specified process goals.

  • 3

    To be scientifically robust an indicator must be a valid, specific, sensitive and reliable reflection of that which it purports to measure. A valid indicator must actually measure the issue or factor it is supposed to measure. A specific indictor must only reflect changes in the issue or factor under consideration. The sensitivity of an indicator depends on its ability to reveal important changes in the factor of interest. A reliable indicator is one which would give the same value if its measurement was repeated in the same way on the same population and at almost the same time.

    To be representative an indicator must adequately encompass

    all the issues or population groups it is expected to cover. To be understandable an indicator must be simple to define

    and its value must be easy to interpret in terms of reproductive health status.

    To be accessible the data required for an indicator should

    be available or relatively easy to acquire by feasible data collection methods that have been validated in field trials.

    To be ethical an indicator requires data which are ethical to

    collect, process and present in terms of the rights of the individual to confidentiality, freedom of choice in supplying data, and informed consent regarding the nature and implications of the data required.

    II. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK An important objective of a conceptual framework is to depict clearly the desired programme and population outcomes targeted by interventions and the main paths of influence that connect the

  • 4

    pertinent actions as shown in the figure on page 5. A conceptual framework for reproductive health helps those involved in programme design, management and implementation to select the appropriate input, process, output and impact indicators to monitor and evaluate whether and how these interventions have helped to achieve RH objectives.

    A. Input indicators

    In a reproductive health programme, specific interventions directed at achieving the desired outcomes need to be supported by a conducive environment, where policies and organizational resources are in place. The inputs needed to meet the desired implementing processes are resources and the policy environment. Resources include manpower, material and financial resources. Policies and administrative procedures include national policies and legislation with regard to reproductive health to create an enabling environment for the effective implementation of activities. RH indicators directed at policies and administrative issues are designed to show whether the enabling national policy conditions and guidelines are in place to support appropriate RH interventions. All these policy indicators require qualitative information on the existence of policy statements or legislation in support of RH goals.

    B. Process indicators

    Implementation of RH activities is the process through which the desired interventions are carried out to achieve programme outputs. The process indicators of reproductive health address operational issues and questions that can be answered with programme level data and measures. The indicators may enable policy makers and programme managers to assess and improve RH services so that clients can achieve their reproductive health intentions.

  • 5

    Figure

    A Conceptual Framework for Monitoring and Evaluating Reproductive Health Programme Components

    Inputs Process Outputs Outcomes Resources Services Results Impacts Manpower Contacts Knowledge Fertility Material Visits Acceptance Mortality Finance Examinations Practice Morbidity Utilization Referrals Prevalence Policies & Procedures Products National Policies & Advocacy and IEC Legislation Materials Contraceptives Logistics _______________________________________________________ Source: A.T.P.L. Abeykoon (1999).

    Reproductive Health Impact Organizational

    Resources and Policies

    Implementation

    Service Outputs

    Service Utilization

  • 6

    C. Output indicators If the activities of a RH programme are implemented as desired, then the resulting outputs should contribute to achieving expected impacts. The output indicators of a RH programme are knowledge of RH, utilization of RH services and prevalence of contraception, etc.

    D. Impact indicators

    The effect of RH intervention introduced through programme activities and the resulting outputs must have an impact on the population. Therefore, the outcomes of a programme must be eventually measured at the population level. The impact indicators that measure changes at the population level are fertility, mortality and morbidity rates.

    III. METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION

    Indicators summarize data collected to answer questions relevant to the planning and management of reproductive health programmes. Thus the compilation of indicators depends on the availability of data (both quantitative and qualitative) from a number of sources. These include routine service statistics, census and vital statistics reports, special studies and sample surveys. Indicators based on programme level record keeping are important to ongoing management concerns as well as to evaluate programme outputs. Population based indicators are needed to measure programme effects and impacts.

  • 7

    A. Management information and service statistics systems Through the above systems, data are collected on such indicators as the number of clients, number of visits, methods accepted, workers employed, facilities used, etc. This data source also provides information on internal programme features, such as training, logistics, supervision, etc. The programme level measurements of inputs and activities provided by these data sources enable the construction of input and process indicators, which in turn serve as the basis for evaluation.

    B. Population census

    The data collected at population censuses such as population by age and sex, marital status, and urban and rural residence provide the denominator for the construction of process, output and impact indicators.

    C. Vital registration system The vital registration system collects data on births, deaths and marriages. These data are available by age, sex and residence. These data provide the numerator for the construction of process, output and impact indicators.

    D. Population-based surveys The programme-based data very often lack representativeness in that they provide information only on those who use services. Similarly, data from the vital registration systems and censuses also may be deficient in coverage and content. Therefore, the need for population-based data not only fills the gaps in data systems of other sources but also validates programme indicators such as contraceptive use rates, fertility rates, etc.

  • 8

    IV. LIST OF SELECTED INDICATORS The following provides illustrative lists of selected input, process, output, and impact indicators to enable readers to understand the concepts that are used to monitor and evaluate reproductive health programmes. Appendix summarizes the reproductive health indicators developed by UNFPA into input, process, output and impact indicators (Abeykoon, 1999).

    A. Input indicators (a) Percentage of health personnel trained in midwifery Definition: The number of health personnel who are trained in midwifery as a percentage of all health personnel who attended delivery in a given period and in a given geographical area. It is calculated as: Number of health personnel who are trained in midwifery ------------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Number of all health personnel who attended delivery Data requirements: The number of health personnel who are trained in midwifery in a given period and in a given geographical area; and the total number of health personnel who attended delivery in the same period and in the same geographical area.

  • 9

    Data sources: Health service statistics; Facility-based surveys Uses and limitations: It is an indicator of the quality of services. The WHO defines trained midwifery as those who have successfully completed a prescribed course of midwifery and are able to give the necessary supervision, care and advice to women during pregnancy and labour, and in the post-partum period, and conduct deliveries and provide care for infants. (b) Percentage of public sector expenditures on contraceptive commodities Definition: It is defined as the percentage of public sector expenditure on contraceptive commodities to the total expenditure on contraceptive procurements during a given year. Data requirements: Public sector expenditure on contraceptive procurements during a year; and the total expenditure on contraceptives procurements during the same year. Data sources: Ministry of Health statistics on expenditures on contraceptives; Donors, NGOs and commercial sector expenditures on contraceptive commodities.

  • 10

    Uses and limitations: This is a measure of the commitment of resources by a country to its reproductive health programme. (c) Percentage of service delivery points offering at least two methods of family planning. Definition: The number of service delivery points (SDPs) offering at least two methods of contraception as a percentage of all service delivery points offering family planning. Data requirements: Different types of contraceptive methods provided at SDPs in a given period. Data sources: Service statistics; Facility-based surveys. Uses and limitations: It is an indicator of accessibility and availability of family planning services. The number of methods available at SDPs indicates the choices the clients have in practicing family planning. (d) Percentage of service delivery points (SDPs) which routinely screen and provide referral for infertility Definition: The number of service delivery points that routinely offer

  • 11

    screening and provide referral for infertility per 100 health care delivery facilities. It is calculated as: Number of SDPs providing screening and referrals for infertility -------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Total number of SDPs Data requirements: Service statistics; Facility-based surveys Uses and limitations: This indicator measures the availability of screening facility for infertility and the provision of referral services. However, the measure does not reflect the quality of services and the personnel needed to deliver the service. (e) Percentage of trainees provided with knowledge and skills on RH in a given year

    Definition:

    The number of trainees who received various training programmes on RH as a percentage of the number scheduled for training in a given year.

    Data requirements:

    List of all training programmes on RH during a given period; and the total number of training programme on RH scheduled during that period.

  • 12

    Data sources: Records maintained by implementing agencies for administrative purposes. Uses and limitations: This indicator serves as a crude measure of determining whether the programme meets its targets or in tracking progress from year to year. However, the unit of measurement may not be strictly uniform, as the type and duration of the training programme may vary. (f) Percentage of service delivery points stocked with family planning commodities according to needs. Definition: The percentage of SDPs having stock levels between their calculated minimum and maximum levels at a given point in time. Data requirements: Minimum and maximum levels of stocks for each SDP; and the actual stock levels at a specific point in time. Data sources: Service statistics; Facility-based surveys Uses and limitations: The indicator provides an overall measure of efficiency of the logistics system.

  • 13

    (g) Number of referral facilities providing essential and emergency obstetric care per 100,000 married women in the reproductive age group Definition: The number of referral facilities providing essential and emergency obstetric care per 100,000 women in the reproductive age group (15 to 49 years). Data requirements: The number of essential obstetric care referral facilities available; and the number of married women aged 15-49 years. Data sources: Health services statistics; Health facility surveys; Census of population. Uses and limitations: The indicator measures the availability of facilities towards the reduction of maternal morbidity and mortality. National level indicator may not reflect the disparities at subnational level. (h) Number of service delivery points offering family planning services per 10,000 women in the reproductive age group. Definition: Number of service delivery points offering family planning services per 10,000 women in the reproductive age group (15 to 49 years).

  • 14

    Data requirements: Number of service delivery points offering family planning services in a specific period and in the specific geographical area; and the number of women in the reproductive age group (15 to 49 years) in the specified period and the specified geographical area. Data sources: Health service statistics; Health facility surveys; Population census. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of accessibility and availability of family planning services. It is, however, assumed that the facilities are adequately staffed and have the required commodities and supplies. (i) Existence of the national population and reproductive health policy Definition: This is an ordinal scale (yes/no) indicator. The value of yes is given if: a) The policy document addresses reproductive health including family planning and sexual health; and b) It reflects clearly the population considerations in development sectors such as health, education, food, housing, etc. Data requirements: Approved policy document addressing population and reproductive health.

  • 15

    Data sources:

    National population and reproductive health policy document; and National Development Plans addressing population and reproductive health issues. Uses and limitations:

    The indicator reflects the policy environment in which the government is committed in dealing with population and reproductive health issues. It can be used for advocacy for population and reproductive health programmes. The limitation is that the indicator may suffer from subjectivity in interpretation. (j) Government policy on abortion Definition: The existence of any government policy or laws which either permit or restrict induced abortions. If abortion is permitted it may be classified under the following circumstances:

    a) Legal and available on request b) Permitted on broad social and health grounds c) Permitted on limited health grounds d) Permitted only for special circumstances (rape, incest)

    Data requirements: Official policy and laws regarding induced abortion. Data sources: National policy documents and/or laws.

  • 16

    Uses and limitations: The indicator reflects the conditions under which access to safe abortion services are permitted and gives information on the environment towards abortion services.

    B. Process indicators (a) Proportion of service providers trained in family planning and reproductive health Definition: The number of service providers trained as a percentage of all service providers in family planning and reproductive health during a given perid. Data requirements: The number of persons in service delivery points who were trained in family planning and reproductive health during the reference period; and the total number of service providers in the area of family planning and reproductive health. Data sources: Service statistics; Records on training programmes. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides information on the strength of IEC (information, education and communication) and reproductive health services.

  • 17

    (b) Percentage of births attended by trained health personnel Definition: Percentage of births attended by trained health personnel in a given period. The indicator is calculated as: Number of births attended by trained health personnel in a year ------------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Total number of live births occurred during the same year Data requirements: Number of births attended by trained personnel during a specific year; and the total number of live births occurred during the same year. Data sources: Health service statistics; Birth registration data. Uses and limitations: The indicator is useful in assessing maternal and child health programme. (c) Percentage of clients given counselling on family planning at SDPs during a year Definition: The indicator is calculated as:

  • 18

    Number of clients given counselling on family planning during their visits to service delivery points during a given period ------------------------------------------------------------------ x 100 Total number of clients who visited service delivery points during the same period Data requirements: Clients who received counselling on family planning during a given period; and the total number of clients who visited service delivery points during the same period. These data are collected from clinic records. Data sources: Health services statistics; Facility-based surveys Uses and limitations: The indicator helps to improve counselling services on family planning. (d) Percentage of pregnant women who had at least two prenatal visits attended by trained health personnel during the last completed pregnancy Definition: Percentage of women who had at least two prenatal visits related to pregnancy and attended by health care personnel trained in the provision of prenatal care during their last completed pregnancies.

  • 19

    The indicator is calculated as: Number of women who had at least two prenatal visits attended by trained health personnel during their last completed pregnancies ------------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Total number of births during the reference period x 1.15 Data requirements: The number of pregnant women seen at least twice by trained health personnel for pregnancy-related care during their last completed pregnancy; and the total number of pregnancies during the reference period. As the most commonly used denominator for this indicator is the number of live births, it is corrected by a factor of 1.15 on the assumption of 15 per cent pregnancy wastage. Data sources: Demographic and Health Surveys; Health service statistics; Registration of births. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides information on the level of utilization of antenatal care by pregnant women. It also reflects the accessibility and the level of awareness of maternal and child health services. (e) Percentage of contraceptive supplies that are wasted Definition: The percentage of contraceptives that are wasted (supplies that

  • 20

    are expired, damaged or lost) to the total number of supplies issued to clients during a given period of time (e.g. one year) Data requirements: Quantities of contraceptive commodities dispensed to clients; and the amount of commodities wasted. Data sources: Commodities and logistics management information system. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides an overall measure of efficiency of the logistics system. It is not expected that the indicator should reach zero as a small amount of wastage due to expiry date is preferable to occasional or frequent shortages of commodities. (f) Percentage of communication material disseminated to target audiences Definition: The number of communication material produced and transmitted or distributed via electronic and print media as a percentage of all print and electronic material targeted during a given year. Data requirements: List of communication products disseminated and targeted during the given period.

  • 21

    Data sources: Record of the number of programmes disseminated by radio and TV during a year; record of the number of posters, brochures distributed at service delivery points and during home visits to target populations during a year; and the number of print and electronic material targeted during a year. Uses and limitations: The indicator measures the productivity of IEC activities. (g) Percentage of training programmes on RH that achieves the learning objectives Definition: The number of training programmes that achieve the learning objectives (as outlined in the course curriculum or syllabus) to the total number of training programmes conducted during a given period. Data requirements: Responses by trainees to the question in your opinion, did the course meet the objectives outlined at the beginning of the training session? Data sources: Course evaluation by trainees upon its completion. Uses and limitations: The indicator is helpful in determining whether the course content provided trainees with knowledge and skills outlined in the course objectives.

  • 22

    (h) Percentage of follow-up visits by contraceptive users to the total number of continued users of a particular method Definition: Number of recorded clinic visits for follow-up by clients using a specific contraceptive method as a percentage to the total number of continued users of that contraceptive method. Data requirements: The number of clinic visits by client to the service delivery points for follow-up advice, management of side effects and complications of a contraceptive method; and the estimated total number of continuous users of that method. Data sources: Clinic records; Service statistics Uses and limitations: The indicator measures the quality of care and users satisfaction with the method. (i) Proportionate share of contraceptives distributed to users by NGOs Definition: Number of contraceptive methods distributed by NGOs as a percentage of all contraceptive methods distributed to users during a specified period.

  • 23

    Data requirements: Distribution of contraceptives to users through NGOs by method; and the total number of contraceptives distributed to users by method from all sources. Data sources: Service statistics maintained by government and NGOs. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of the contribution of NGOs to the overall national family planning programme.

    C. Output indicators (a) Contraceptive prevalence rate Definition: The proportion of currently married women aged 15-49 years who are currently using a contraceptive method at the time of the survey. The indicator is calculated as: Number of currently married women aged 15-49 years using a contraceptive method ------------------------------------------------------------------ x 100 Total number of currently married women aged 15-49 years

  • 24

    Data requirements: Number of currently married women aged 15-49 years using a contraceptive method; and the total number of currently married women aged 15-49 years; The data should refer to a given point in time. The contraceptive prevalence rate can also be calculated by specific method and by age group if the data are available. Data sources: Population-based surveys, such as Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Uses and limitations: The indicator measures the prevalence of contraceptive use taking into account all sources of supply and methods of contraception available to the target population. It is a widely used indicator to assess the level of contraceptive use in a given population. (b) Number of new acceptors of modern methods of family planning Definition: Number of clients who accept for the first time in their lives any modern method of contraception in a given period, usually one year. Data requirements: Records of clients who accept a family planning method for the first time during the given period.

  • 25

    Data sources: Service statistics Uses and limitations: The indicator measures the effectiveness of the family planning programme to attract new clients form the target population. As the contraceptive prevalence rate reaches a high level (e.g. over 70 per cent) the number of new acceptors is likely to decrease because of the fact that most of the eligible couples have been recruited as users. (c) Percentage of women in reproductive ages with knowledge of the modern methods of contraception Definition: Percentage of women in the reproductive age group, 15-49 years, who knows at least one modern methods of family planning. Data requirements: Number of women in the reproductive ages with knowledge of contraceptives by methods; and the total number of women in the reproductive ages. Data sources: Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of the level of knowledge or awareness in the target population of different methods of modern

  • 26

    contraception. This indicator can be calculated by age of the respondent and by contraceptive methods. (d) Proportion of high-risk births to women Definition: The proportion of births during a given period to women above and below a specified age (e.g. above age 35 and below age 20). High-risk births can also be defined as those of high parity or high order. The indicator is calculated as: Number of live births to women above age 35 and below age 20 in a given year --------------------------------------------------------------- x 100 Total number of live births during the same year Data requirements: Number of live births during a given year classified by age of mother. If higher birth order is used as a measure of high risk births, data on the total number of births during a given year need to be classified by birth order. Data sources: Vital statistics; Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator is used for various purposes to implement and

  • 27

    monitor maternal and child health programmes. It enables programme managers to help prevent pregnancies that are risky to the health of mothers and children. (e) Percentage of women aged 35 years and above with knowledge of the need for annual screening for breast and cervical cancer Definition: Women aged 35 years and over who are knowledgeable about the need to have screening for breast and cervical cancers on an annual basis per 100 of all women aged 35 years and over. Data requirements: Women aged 35 years and over who indicate knowledge of the need to screen for cervical and breast cancers in a given population; and the total number of women aged 35 years and over in the same population. Data sources: Sample survey; Population census. Uses and limitations: The indicator shows the knowledge gap that needs to be filled by information, education and communication programmes. It also indicates the care-seeking behaviour among women with regard to prevention of breast and cervical cancers.

  • 28

    (f) Proportion of children aged 9-12 months who are fully immunized Definition: Number of children aged 9-12 months who are fully immunized as a percentage of all children aged 9-12 years in a calendar year. Data requirements: Number of children aged 9-12 months who are fully immunized in a given period and the given population; and all children aged 9-12 months during the same period and the same population. Data sources: Service statistics; Population census. Uses and limitations: The indicator shows the effectiveness of the immunization programme. The fully immunized status generally includes immunization with three doses of poliomyelitis, three doses of DPT and measles. (g) Prevalence of breast cancer among women aged 35 years and over Definition: Number of women aged 35 years and over diagnosed with breast cancer during a given period per 1,000 of all women aged 35 years and over. Data requirements: Number of women aged 35 years and over who are clinically

  • 29

    diagnosed with breast cancer; and the number of women aged 35 years and over in the population screened. Data sources: Service statistics from health facilities providing diagnostic and management service for breast cancer. Uses and limitations: As a measure of prevalence of breast cancer the indicator provides the magnitude of the problem in the target population during a given period. The indicator facilitates prevention and treatment efforts of breast cancer. The data may be subject to underreporting as the entire eligible population in the target population may not be screened. (h) Unmet need for family planning Definition: The proportion of currently married women aged 15-49 years who do not want any more children during the next two years but are not currently using any method of contraception. Data requirements: Desire for additional children of currently married women aged 15-49 years in the future (next two years); and current contraceptive use status of these women. Data sources: Population-based surveys, such as DHS.

  • 30

    Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of the latent demand for family planning. It indirectly shows the extent of accessibility and availability to family planning services. (i) Mean desired family size Definition: The average number of children that women of reproductive age would choose if they could have exactly the number of children desired. Data requirements: Desired number of children by women of reproductive age. Data sources: Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: It is a widely used indicator of fertility preference. This indicator is subject to errors such as inability or unwillingness on the part of the respondents to quantify their fertility desires.

    D. Impact indicators

    (a) Total fertility rate (TFR) Definition: Total number of children a woman would have by the end of

  • 31

    her reproductive period if she experienced the currently prevailing age-specific fertility rates throughout her childbearing life. Data requirements: Number of live births occurred during a reference period classified by five-year age group of women; and the total number of women classified also by five-year age group. Data sources: Vital registration; Population census; Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: TFR is one of the most widely used fertility measures to assess the impact of family planning programmes. The measure is not affected by the age structure of the female population. (b) Maternal mortality ratio Definition: Number of women who die as a result of childbearing in a given year per 100,000 live births. Maternal deaths are those caused by complications of pregnancy and childbirth. Data requirements: Number of maternal deaths occurred during a given period and given population; and the total number of live births during the same period and same population.

  • 32

    Data sources: Vital registration; Health survey. Uses and limitations: The indicator is widely used as a measure of maternal health. It is also used to indirectly assess the effectiveness of antenatal and post-natal care for mothers. (c) Neonatal mortality rate Definition: Number of infant deaths up to 28 days after delivery per 1,000 live births. Data requirements: Number of infant deaths occurred up to 28 days after delivery; and the total number of live births. Data sources: Vital registration; Population-based survey, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of immediate post-natal care. However, the indicator may be underestimated as newborn babies who die within few hours after birth may not be reported.

  • 33

    (d) Induced abortion rate Definition: Number of induced abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-49 in a given year. Data requirements: Number of induced abortions in a given period; and the total number of women aged 15-49 during the same period. Data sources: Population-based surveys; Population census. Uses and limitations: The indicator shows the extent to which unwanted pregnancies occur in the population. The number of induced abortions may be underreported in countries where abortion is not legal. (e) Adolescent fertility rate Definition: Number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-19. Data requirements: Number of live births occurred to women aged 15-19; and the total number of women in the same age group.

  • 34

    Data sources: Vital registration; Population census; Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator shows the prevalence of adolescent childbearing. (f) Infant mortality rate Definition: Number of deaths to infants under one year of age per 1,000 live births in a given year. Data requirements: Number infants less than a year old who died during a given year; and the total number of live births occurred during the same year. Data sources: Vital registration; Population census; Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides a measure of antenatal and post-natal care to mothers and infants. This is considered as a good indicator of the health status of a given population.

  • 35

    (g) Perinatal mortality rate Definition: Perinatal deaths comprise still births plus early neonatal deaths (infants dying within 7 days). It is defined as the number of perinatal deaths per 1,000 live births. Data requirements: Number of still births and infant deaths occurred within the first 7 days in a given year; and the total number of live births occurred in the same year. Data sources: Vital registration; Population-based surveys, such as DHS. Uses and limitations: The indicator directly reflects prenatal, intrapartum and neonatal care and therefore, gives an indication of the quality of maternal and child health services. However, accurate data on still births and early infant deaths may be difficult to obtain. (h) Annual population growth rate Definition: The rate at which a population is increasing (or decreasing) in a given year due to the contribution of natural increase and net migration, expressed as percentage of the base population.

  • 36

    The indicator is calculated as: a) The average annual rate of population growth can be calculated from two points in time (e.g. two national population censuses) using the following formula:

    Pn = Po (1 + r)n Where Po = Population at the beginning of period Pn = Population at the end of period r = Average annual rate of population growth n = Duration in years b) Rate of natural increase

    CBR CDR = RNI Where CBR = Crude birth rate CDR = Crude death rate RNI = Rate of natural increase (usually expressed as a per cent) In a population where net migration is negligible, the above method can be employed as a close approximation to the rate of population growth. Data requirements: Number of live births, deaths and mid-year population during a calendar year. It can also be calculated from data available at two national population censuses. Data sources: Vital registration; Population censuses.

  • 37

    Uses and limitations: It is one of the most widely used indicators to assess the overall impact of family planning programmes. (i) Life expectancy at birth Definition: Average number of years a newborn child would be expected to live if the child is subject to the age pattern of mortality prevailing at the time of its birth. Data requirements: Age-specific death rates by sex. Data sources: Vital statistics; Population census. Uses and limitations: It is an age-standardized mortality rate. The indicator is widely used as a measure of the general level of mortality in a population. (j) Prevalence of RTIs/STDs by type in a defined target population Definition: The number of persons diagnosed with a specific reproductive tract infections (RTIs) or sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) at a given point in time per 100 persons in the target population.

  • 38

    Data requirements: Number of persons diagnosed either by clinical examination or laboratory tests with a specific STD at a given point in time; and the total number of persons screened. Data sources: Special laboratory-based surveys; case and laboratory reports from clinicians and diagnostic laboratories. Uses and limitations: The indicator provides the prevalence of RTIs/STDs in the target population. It is useful to assess the impact of RTIs and STDs control programmes. (k) Prevalence of HIV infection in a defined target population Definition: The number of persons diagnosed with an HIV infection at a given point in time per 1,000 persons in the target population. Data requirements: Number of persons diagnosed with HIV infections at a given point in time and in the specific group; and the total number of persons in the target population group screened. Data sources: Special serologic surveys (i.e. blood supply screening activities or sentinel surveillance).

  • 39

    Uses and limitations: The indicator provides the prevalence of HIV infection in the target population. It is useful to assess the impact of HIV/AIDS control programmes.

  • 40

    REFERENCES Abeykoon, A.T.P.L. (1999). Monitoring Progress and Ensuring

    Accountability of Reproductive Health Services Provision A Road Map, Innovations, vol. 7-8: 213-238, (Kuala Lumpur, International Council on Management of Population Programme).

    Bertrand, Jane T., Robert J. Magnani and James C. Knowles (1994).

    Handbook of Indicators for Family Planning Program Evaluation (Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina).

    UNFPA (1996). Guidance Note on Reproductive Health Programme

    Performance Indicators (New York, United Nations Population Fund).

    UNFPA (1998). Indicators for Population and Reproductive Health

    Programmes (New York, United Nations Population Fund). United Nations (1998). Asia-Pacific Population Policies and

    Programmes: Future Directions: Report, Key Future Actions and Background Paper at a High-Level Meeting, Asian Population Studies Series No. 153 (Bangkok, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific and United Nations Population Fund).

    WHO (1997a). Monitoring Reproductive Health: Selecting a Short

    List of National and Global Indicators (Geneva, World Health Organization).

    WHO (1997b). Selecting Reproductive Health Indicators: A Guide

    for District Managers (Geneva, World Health Organization).

  • 41

    WHO (1997c). Reproductive Health Indicators for Global Monitoring: Report of an Inter-agency Technical Meeting, 9-11 April 1997 (Geneva, World Health Organization).

  • 42

    APPENDIX

    I. INDICATORS FOR POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES RELATED TO REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH1

    A. Policies Administrative Procedures Input Indicators National policy specifying written standards of quality of care for: i. FP information services ii. Maternal care iii. Prevention and management of RTIs and STDs iv. Abortion care v. Treatment of abortion complications vi. Provision of post-abortion FP counselling and services Legislation or policy that prohibits provision of family planning to persons who are: i. Unmarried ii. Below a given age iii. Without spousal and/or parental consent National policy for the provision of reproductive health care in i. Family planning ii. Maternal care iii. STD/RTI programmes Provisions for: i. Enquiries/audits into maternal deaths ii. Special measure(s) to reduce maternal mortality 1 These indicators are adopted from UNFPA (1997), Indicators for Population and Reproductive Health Programmes, New York: Technical and Evaluation Division.

  • 43

    National strategic plan to prevent and control RTIs and STDs, including HIV-AIDS Provision to protect the basic rights of HIV infected individuals with reference to: i. Employment ii. Marriage/divorce iii. Travel Legislation about age at first marriage by sex: i. Does a legal minimum age exist? ii. What is the legal minimum age? iii. Is the legal minimum age enforced? B. Family Planning Indicators Input Indicators Ratio of contraceptive methods available at SDPs to number of method officially approved by the programme Percentage of SDPs with availability of: i. Sterilized instruments ii. Safely treated water Number of contraceptive stock-outs within last six months Process Indicators Percentage of population within one hour walk from FP service delivery point

  • 44

    Percentage of FP SDPs with provision of RTI/STD services Percentage of post-partum women (six weeks after delivery) offered FP Output Indicators Percentage of married women of reproductive age who want to postpone or stop child-bearing and who are not currently using any contraceptive method Percentage of clients asked about their: i. Reproductive intentions ii. Concerns about contraceptive methods Adolescent (

  • 45

    Output Indicators Percentage of delivering women who developed obstetric complications and received emergency obstetric care Percentage of deliveries that are C-section Percentage of pregnant women attending antenatal services who received i. Iron/folate (100 tablets) ii. Tetanus immunization (two doses) Percentage of pregnant women receiving maternal services expressing satisfaction with: i. Prenatal care ii. Delivery services iii. Post-natal care Percentage of health personnel given in-service training over the past two years

    D. Reproductive Tract Infection and Sexually Transmitted Disease Indicators Process Indicators Percentage of SDPs offering condoms Percentage of SDPs offering diagnosis and treatment of: i. Syphilis ii. Gonorrhea iii. Chlamydia

  • 46

    Percentage of SDPs offering i. Pap smears at secondary/ tertiary facilities Availability of counselling services for sexual health Output Indicators Prevalence of RTIs/STDs among women attending gynaecological clinics Estimated prevalence of HIV among adolescents, men and women Prevalence of urethral discharge among men aged 15-49 Percentage of clients expressing satisfaction with RTI services Percentage of RH workers who have been provided with in-service training in the past two years E. Abortion and Post-Abortion Care Indicators Process Indicators Percentage of women i. Having a legal abortion who are referred for post-abortion FP counselling and services ii. Treated for abortion complications iii. Referred for post-abortion FP and services Availability of in-service training on post-abortion FP counselling for health providers

  • 47

    Output Indicators Annual number of: i. Legal abortions ii. Estimated illegal abortions Percentage of obstetric and gynaecological admittances due to abortion complications Percentage of hospitals/clinics with personnel trained to treat abortion complications F. Infertility Indicators Process Indicators Percentage of women aged 20-44 who: i. Have never been pregnant or ii. Have had at least one pregnancy in the past and want to become pregnant, are not using contraception and have not become pregnant during past two years

    G. Harmful Practices Indicators Output Indicators Estimated prevalence of women who have been genitally mutilated

    Sex ratio of births

    Implementation of policy measures to:

  • 48

    i. Eliminate female genital mutilation ii. Eliminate prenatal sex selection and sex-selective abortion Prevalence of wasting and stunting by sex (ratio)

    H. Indicators for Clinic-based Counselling Services Input Indicators Percentage of SDP offering counselling services Output Indicators Percentage of service providers trained in counselling techniques/interpersonal skills Percentage of SDP clients expressing satisfaction with the counselling services received

    I. Indicators for Media Promotions Input Indicators Existence of national strategy for IEC in support of the RH/FP/population programme Process Indicators Number of media programmes/materials used for RH/FP/population campaigns:

  • 49

    Frequency of media campaigns in support of RH/FP/Population programme Use and type of media, outside of the clinic setting, to disseminate information on RH/FP/population issues Output Indicators Level of media promotions in support of RH/FP/population programmes

    J. Indicators for Community Involvement and Outreach Process Indicators Number and types of IEC interventions/ directed at NGOs and community leaders: Percentage of NGOs with health/FP programmes offering integrated RH services Percentage of community leaders supporting RH/FP programmes Output Indicators Percentage of households visited by health workers

  • 50

    K. Indicators for Capacity-building of Personnel Output Indicators Percentage of service providers trained in counselling/interpersonal communication skills

    Percentage of media personnel trained in RH/population reporting: Percentage of RH/FP personnel trained in i. Media/public relations/production of radio/TV programmes ii. Planning and management of IEC programme iii. IEC research/evaluation

    L. Indicators for Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Reproductive Health Family Planning

    Output Indicators

    Percentage of IEC target audience who can name at least one specific contraceptive method

    Percentage of IEC target audience who knows at least two methods to prevent STD/HIV infection

    Percentage of IEC target audience that can name one RH/FP service delivery point Percentage of IEC target audience that approves of using contraception

    Percentage of target audience that has discussed RH, STD/HIV and sexual issues with their partners

    Percentage of target audience using contraception

  • 51

    M. Indicators for Population Education Output Indicators Percentage of students who know about key population issues Percentage of students who know about RH issues Percentage of students having received family life education Percentage of students knowledgeable about major gender issues Percentage of students who know how to prevent STDs and HIV/AIDS Percentage of school teachers trained in target areas to teach Population Education Percentage of students who have taken courses with population contents

    N. Other Advocacy/IEC Indicators Process Indicators Allocation of resources to RH as percentage of total health budget Percentage of SDPs offering integrated RH services Output Indicators Number of organization/membership of coalitions formed to achieve advocacy objectives Users of male methods as percentage of all contraceptive users

  • 52

    II. QUALITY OF CARE INDICATORS2

    A. Quality of Care in RH Services for Women - Context and Process Indicators

    2 Extracted from The Cairo Consensus: Women Exercising Citizenship through Monitoring - The Cairo+5 Process LACWHN, December 1998.

    Type of indicator Indicators

    Judicial framework (Context)

    Legal regulation to prevent abuse regarding caesarean section and sterilization.

    Existence of training programmes on quality of care aspects and gender approach for health staff.

    Education/Communication/ Services (Process)

    Existence of training programmes on quality of care aspects for health staff.

    Existence of RH programmes for women incorporating aspects other than family planning and maternal/infant care.

    Availability of contraceptive methods. Possibility to choose (broad offer and affordability).

    Existence of programmes/regulations in-corporating and operationalizing sexual and reproductive rights.

    Resources allocated (Process)

    Availability of financial resources for training on quality of care and gender approach.

    Amount of financial resources allocated to structure/inputs.

  • 53

    Type of indicator Indicators

    Judicial framework Judicial legal norms on sex education.

    Judicial legal norms on the treatment of pregnant adolescents at school.

    Education/ Communication/Services

    Regulations and RH care programmes exclusively for adolescents.

    Number of centres for exclusive adolescent services.

    Existence of networks for distribution of condoms in places visited by adolescents.

    Training courses in adolescent care.

    Sex education programmes for adoles-cents in the formal education system.

    Non-formal sex education programmes and activities for adolescents.

    III. ADOLESCENT RH INFORMATION AND SERVICES INDICATORS

    A. Access of Adolescents to Information and Services - Context and Process Indicators

    B. Access by Adolescents to Education and Services: Impact Indicators

    Indicators

    Percentage of adolescent births Number of adolescents seen in RH services Percentage of adolescents covered by sex education programmes Percentage of maternal deaths among adolescent women