hampshire minerals and waste plan - safeguarding study...
TRANSCRIPT
H A M P S H I R E
CITIES OF PORTSMOUTH & SOUTHAMPTON
AND NEW FOREST & SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARKS
Hampshire Minerals & Waste
Plan
SAFEGUARDING STUDY
Version 4 (Submission)
February 2012
All Plans reproduced within this document meet copyright of the data suppliers Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution of civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 2012. © Environment Agency Copyright 2012. All rights reserved. Reproduced from the British Geological Survey Map data at the original scale of 1:100,000. Licence 2008/202 British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved.
Executive Summary
2Executive Summary
5Introduction1
6What is safeguarding?2
8Safeguarding in policy context3
15Minerals and waste safeguarding in Hampshire4
20Conclusion5
Glossary and Abbreviations
22Glossary and Abbreviations7
24Appendix One: Safeguarded sites
36Appendix Two: Location of safeguarded sites
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Executive Summary
To support the preparation of HampshireMinerals andWaste Plan (HMWP), a series of studies have been undertakento provide more detailed information on key issues. The safeguarding study considers the safeguarding of mineralresources and associated infrastructure - wharves, depots, processing plant etc - including that associated withwaste management. The study covers the following issues:
What is 'safeguarding'?;Safeguarding in policy context - national, regional and local;Safeguarding of minerals resources- suggested approach;Safeguarding of minerals infrastructure - suggested approach;Safeguarding of waste infrastructure - suggested approach;Long term strategic options;Implementation of safeguarding – Minerals Safeguarding Area and Minerals Consultation Area;Recommended approach to safeguarding for the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan.
Safeguarding land, resources and infrastructure helps planning authorities to resist developments that could jeopardiseplanning options for future generations. Accordingly safeguarding is a core element in delivering sustainable mineralsand waste development. Safeguarding helps to protect important mineral reserves and existing minerals and wastesites that are considered to be strategically important (both now and in the future).
Current national and regional policy sets the context for safeguarding of mineral resources and minerals and wasteinfrastructure. This is then translated at the local level through the emerging Minerals and Waste Plan.
Safeguarding has an essential role to play in ensuring that there are enough minerals and waste development andmineral reserves to secure the delivery of the Minerals and Waste Plan.
Safeguarding of Minerals Resources
The safeguarding of mineral resources helps ensure a steady and adequate supply of material. Minerals are a valuableresource which require protection from sterilisation if they are to be kept available for society by avoiding beingbuilt on by incompatible developments e.g. housing. This helps to secure future economic stability of Hampshire.It is very unlikely that mineral which is sterilised by other development can be extracted after development takesplace.
Mineral in Hampshire is generally split into two groups:
Aggregates (sharp sand and gravel and soft sand); andOther minerals (brick-making clay, chalk and oil and gas).
The key minerals for Hampshire and its economy are those most closely linked to the construction industry, theseinclude the deposits of sharp sand, soft sand and brick-making clay. The safeguarding of these resources is basedon data supplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS) on resources considered to be economically viable. Howeverhistorically there has been evidence from industry that supports areas outside of the BGS data that would beconsidered for extraction. It is for this reason that in addition to the BGS, information obtained from 'localknowledge' of mineral reserves is also applied to ensure those areas considered to be of importance for the sustainableeconomy of Hampshire in the future. This data forms the basis of the Mineral Safeguarding Area (MSA). Areas ofmineral previously sterilised by other development cannot be included within the MSA.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 42
To protect both the existing sites and the potential resources are located within the MSA, the use of 'buffer' zonesshould be considered. Buffers help to protect sites which may be threatened by other development close to thesite. The Minerals and Waste Planning Authorities should be consulted on other development within 250 metresof existing or proposed sand and gravel quarries, to ensure that incompatible development (development whichrestricts the current or future operation of a site) is restricted.
Safeguarding of minerals infrastructure
It is important to consider minerals infrastructure for safeguarding as it supports the supply of minerals Infrastructureis also often located in specific areas due to specific siting needs. Minerals infrastructure also requires safeguardingdue to their vulnerability to redevelopment pressures from higher value uses (such as regeneration). The infrastructurewhich is considered important for safeguarding is as follows:
aggregate wharves (and any associated plants) including waste uses;aggregate rail depots (and any associated plants) including waste uses;concrete batching and production plants which are in use on existing quarries, wharves, or rail depots;existing other clay extraction sites;existing oil and gas extraction and processing sites;any sites which would be proposed in the HMWP for any of the above activities.
Safeguarding these types of infrastructure would ensure that the minerals planning authority is able to commenton, and resist any future developments which may be considered to negatively impact the existing operations. Onlyinfrastructure that is required to meet the supply capacity in the Plan would be safeguarded.
Wharf sites in Southampton and Portsmouth offer important opportunities for waterside regeneration. Whilstthey are safeguarded, redevelopment will be supported if the capacity of the infrastructure can be relocated orprovided elsewhere; or if the infrastructure is no longer needed (for example, if it no longer meets the modernneeds of the marine aggregates industry).
The use of buffer zones is a method that can be employed to ensure that the minerals infrastructure is not encroachedupon by incompatible development. The Minerals and Waste Planning Authorities should be consulted on otherdevelopment within 50 metres for other mineral sites, to ensure that incompatible development (developmentwhich restricts the current or future operation of a site) is restricted.
Waste infrastructure
Hampshire has a complex network of waste facilities which handle commercial, industrial and household waste.These facilities are critical to meeting the long term waste management needs of Hampshire.
The safeguarding of waste management sites often require different consideration to minerals, because they areless geographically and geologically restricted. Similarly to mineral infrastructure however, waste management sitescan face pressures from incompatible non-waste development. This is because many waste management activitiesare similar to other industrial type processes, and can be located on industrial land which has competitive landrental values. Waste management typically generates less high value end products which means activities on primeindustrial locations are not always viable to sustain for instance.
3Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
It is important to avoid the loss of facilities or allocated waste management sites as this capacity may not be replacedelsewhere. This limits the ability to manage waste close to where it is generated and in sustainable locations in termsof transport, and the ability to maintain provision to meet waste management needs. However, it is not alwaysappropriate to protect existing waste management sites from redevelopment or encroachment by other uses,although this should be considered on a case by case basis. It is suggested that existing waste management sitesshould be safeguarded from incompatible development, where there is a justifiable need. There are two factorswhich influence whether this is justified:
the waste management capacity provided; andthe waste management 'need' that the existing operation is satisfying (and whether this can be metelsewhere).
It is therefore suggested that:
existing (and planned i.e. included in the Minerals andWaste Plan) waste management sites with a capacityto manage 50,000 tonnes per annum or greater should be safeguarded against competing and encroachingdevelopment;safeguarding policy should acknowledge existing or planned specialist waste management facilities inHampshire;Facilities that are of regional and national significance, or those that provide a specialist function shouldbe safeguarded.Facilities that provide water/rail transport of waste materials should be safeguarded.
Long term strategic options
The Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan will cover the period 2012-2030, however it is recognised that parts ofthe Plan won’t be sustainable following that period. This includes issues such as limited supply of sand and gravelresources, major environmental constraints (including the two national parks), land use conflicts with existing builtup areas, and also pressures for redevelopment on infrastructure, particularly at the ports, and potentially thechanging requirements of the industry.
In order to ensure these issues are considered before the end of the plan period, it is important to review the planand develop potential options for sustainable provision of minerals and waste in Hampshire.
It is suggested that up until a review is carried out, any land that had the potential to be used for transport ofminerals and waste resources should be safeguarded. These sites could become much more important to mineralsupply or delivering waste to recycling or recovery facilities in the longer term. Land which is important to thisshould be safeguarded and should include:
land identified in the Port of Southampton Master Plan;military/naval land in Southampton Water and Portsmouth Harbour;existing commercial port land; andexisting and former railway sidings and other land that could be rail linked.
The study makes a number of recommendations for safeguarding policy formulation, as summarised below. Thesehave been formulated using the evidence base prepared for the Minerals and Waste Plan.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 44
1 Introduction
1.1 To support the preparation of Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (HMWP), a series of studies have beenundertaken to provide more detailed information on key issues. This study considers the safeguarding ofmineral resources and associated infrastructure - wharves, depots, processing plant etc - includingthat associated with waste management.
1.2 The study covers the following:
What is 'safeguarding'?;Safeguarding in policy context - national, regional and local;Safeguarding of minerals resources- suggested approach;Safeguarding of minerals infrastructure - suggested approach;Safeguarding of waste infrastructure - suggested approach;Long term strategic options;Implementation of safeguarding – Minerals Safeguarding Area & Minerals Consultation Area;Recommended approach to safeguarding for the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan.
1.3 This study is a 'living document' and contains the most up to date information on safeguarding. If furtherinformation is obtained on safeguarding, the study will be updated as required.
Further Information
For further information on this study, the Minerals and Waste Plan and supporting documents, please see:
visit the website at: http://www3.hants.gov.uk/planning-policy-home.htm
visit the consultation portal at: http://consult.hants.gov.uk/portal
Contact Us:
Planning PolicyCounty PlanningEconomy, Transport & Environment DepartmentHampshire County CouncilFloor 1, Elizabeth II Court WestWinchesterSO23 8UD
Tel: 0845 603 5634 (Contact Centre - Hantsdirect)Email: [email protected]
5Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
2 What is safeguarding?
2.1 Safeguarding land, resources and infrastructure allows planning authorities to resist developments that couldjeopardise planning options for future generations. Accordingly safeguarding is a core element in deliveringsustainable development. With regard to minerals, safeguarding resources helps ensure a steady and adequatesupply of material. The safeguarding of infrastructure protects facilities, that by virtue of special locationrequirements, are not readily replaced.
2.2 Minerals are a valuable resource which require protection from sterilisation if they are to be kept availablefor society by avoiding being built on by incompatible developments e.g. housing. It is very unlikely thatmineral which is sterilised by other development can be extracted after development takes place. Likewise,associated minerals infrastructure and waste facility developments also require protection from incompatibledevelopment and encroachment. Safeguarding helps to protect important mineral reserves and existingminerals and waste sites that are considered to be strategically important (both now and in the future).
2.3 It is important to recognise that if minerals resources are identified for safeguarding – other than thoseplanned for extraction – there is not a presumption they will be extracted. Safeguarding of mineral resourcesor deposits enables consideration to be given to preserving a mineral or its ‘prior extraction’ to developmentin the event that land in which it is situated is proposed for a development that would prevent extractionin the future.
2.4 Likewise, the safeguarding of mineral and waste management infrastructure such as processing andtreatment plants, wharves, rail depots, landfills and other associated facilities is vital. This infrastructurehelps secure a steady and adequate supply of minerals and ensure there is capacity for the sustainablemanagement of waste. It is often tied to certain locations, like rail sidings and wharves that are not easilyreplaced. Infrastructure often needs to be sited in areas that are less sensitive to the operational impacts likelorry traffic and noise. Accordingly if infrastructure is ‘lost’ to other developments directly, or indirectly byencroachment of incompatible uses like housing it cannot always be readily replaced. However there aresome potential opportunities for new wharves, as indicated below.
2.5 Nevertheless, an approach to safeguarding has to be realistic. Mineral deposits that are unlikely to be exploitedin the foreseeable future may not need to be safeguarded. Alternatively the need for a development mayoutweigh the merits of safeguarding a deposit. Furthermore, the opportunity for prior extraction may notbe available because of the programming of the development or other reasons. In these circumstances thesafeguarding may be relinquished. Similar considerations have to be given for proposals that directly orindirectly threaten infrastructure. In some cases alternative sites can be found or the lost capacity may notbe needed or replaced on other land. Moreover, some non strategic infrastructure may not merit safeguardingat all. A number of the wharves in Southampton and Portsmouth offer important opportunities for watersideregeneration.
2.6 The safeguarding of prospective infrastructure is problematic as future sites are not readily identifiablewithout detailed analysis of potential spatial options. However, some potential options are identifiable inbroad terms, and should be safeguarded to enable their use for minerals and waste be considered. Moreover,blanket safeguarding of potential options would jeopardise other development opportunities. In some caseswhere sites have long term options for further transport infrastructure that might service mineral supplyand movement of waste may be safeguarded. There are also some possible opportunities for new wharves,for example: at land identified in the Port of Southampton Master Plan, and at Marchwood military port;as well as potential extensions of existing wharves, for example at Marchwood.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 46
2.7 Safeguarding has an essential role to play in ensuring that there are enoughminerals and waste developmentand mineral reserves to secure the delivery of the Minerals and Waste Plan.
7Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
3 Safeguarding in policy context
National Policy
3.1 National policy on safeguarding is set out in Minerals Policy Statement 1: Planning and Minerals(1) (hereinMPS1) and Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management(2) (herein PPS10).Although these documents will be superseded in due course by the National Planning Policy Framework,it is anticipated that the current provisions will remain. The Draft National Planning Policy Framework(3)
(NPPF), published on 25 July 2011, confirms this approach to minerals policy.
Minerals
3.2 National planning policy for minerals safeguarding is mostly contained within MPS1, and contains thefollowing provisions in relation to safeguarding:
Define Mineral Safeguarding Areas (MSAs) in Local Development Documents (LDDs), in order thatproven resources are not needlessly sterilised by non-mineral development, although there is nopresumption that resources defined in MSAs will be worked;
Encourage the prior extraction of minerals, where practicable, if it is necessary for non-mineraldevelopment to take place in MSAs;
In two-tier planning areas, include policies and proposals to safeguard mineral resources within MSAsin county LDDs and show MSAs in district LDDs. Counties should define Mineral Consultation Areas(MCAs) based on their MSAs.
District councils responsible for spatial planning of land defined in MSAs should not normally includepolicies and proposals in their LDDs for non-minerals development in those areas, or sensitivedevelopment around safeguarded mineral areas, where such policies would affect the potential for futureextraction of minerals;
Safeguard existing, planned and potential rail heads, wharfage and associated storage, handling andprocessing facilities for the bulk transport by rail, sea or inland waterways of minerals, particularly coaland aggregates, including recycled, secondary and marine-dredged materials;
Identify future sites to accommodate the above facilities and reflect any such allocations in the LDDs ofdistrict councils in two-tier planning areas. District councils in these areas should not normally permitother development proposals near such safeguarded sites where they might constrain future use for thesepurposes;
Safeguard existing, planned and potential sites including rail and water-served, for concrete batching, themanufacture of coated materials, other concrete products and the handling, processing and distributionof substitute, recycled and secondary aggregate material. Where appropriate, identify future sites for theseuses and reflect any such allocations in the LDDs of district councils in two-tier planning areas.
1 http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningand building/pdf/152993pdf.2 http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningand building/pdf/1876202.pdf3 http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningand building/pdf/1951811.pdf
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 48
3.3 Tomeet the requirements of MPS1, in two tier authority areas (County/District, rather than Unitary/NationalPark Authority), the Mineral Planning Authority (MPA) is expected to create a Mineral Consultation Area(MCA) which will be used by districts to consider the need to consult the County on non-mineral planningapplications. The MCA is largely comprised of the MSA plus existing infrastructure. MCAs should also bereflected in district local development documents. Where a planning application is made for non-mineraldevelopment within a MCA, the district should consult the MPA on the application.
3.4 To support greater use of alternatives to primary aggregate extraction, sites should be considered forsafeguarding. National guidance states that sites which offer the opportunity to recycle aggregates shouldbe afforded protection through safeguarding of these increasingly important sites. This is also the approachtaken in the NPPF, as set out in Paragraph 102, for local planning authorities to safeguard:
Existing, planned and potential rail heads, rail links to quarries, wharfage and associated storage, handling and processingfacilities for bulk transport by sail, sea or inland waterways of minerals, including recycled, secondary and marine-dredgedmaterials; and
Existing, planned and potential sites for concrete batching, the manufacture of coated materials, other concrete products andthe handling, processing and distribution of substitute, recycled and secondary aggregate material.
Waste infrastructure
3.5 The safeguarding of waste developments is considered within PPS10, and states:
"In determining planning applications, all planning authorities should, where relevant, consider the likely impact of proposed,non-waste related, development on existing waste management facilities, and on sites and areas allocated for waste management"
3.6 The safeguarding of waste development is also not considered in as much detail as minerals development withinnational planning policy. This means that this issue needs to be addressed at a local level through local planningpolicy to ensure sustainable waste infrastructure is delivered. The draft NPPF does not address waste planning,and it is government intention that this will form part of the National Waste Management Plan for England.
Regional Policy
3.6 The Government is intending to revoke the South East Plan - the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) forHampshire. In the meantime, the South East Plan will remain part of the ‘development plan’ and theHampshire Minerals and Waste Plan will have to be in general conformity with it unless materialconsiderations indicate otherwise. It must be noted that the South East Plan does not cover the small partof Wiltshire which forms part of the Hampshire Plan area as it is located within the South West, wherethere is no adopted RSS.
Minerals
3.7 Policy M5 (Safeguarding of mineral reserves, wharves and rail depots) of the RSS - the South East Planstates the following:
9Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
''Mineral planning authorities should assess the need for wharf and rail facilities for the handling and distribution of importedminerals and processed materials, and identify strategic sites for safeguarding in their minerals development frameworks. Thesestrategic facilities should be safeguarded from other inappropriate development in local development documents. Existing mineralsites, and proposed sites and ‘areas of search’, should be identified in mineral development documents for the extraction andprocessing of aggregates, clay, chalk, silica sand and gypsum. These should then be safeguarded in local development documents''.
3.8 Policy M5 requires mineral planning authorities to undertake assessments of the need for wharves, to assistthe identification of those sites to be safeguarded, the following strategic criteria should be used:
Capacity to supply imported material to the region;
Proximity to markets;
Value of the specialist infrastructure; and
Adequacy of existing or potential environmental safeguards.
3.9 The RSS also states that existing mineral workings and processing plants which have regional significanceshould also be protected from other development and further consideration given to extending safeguardingarrangements to larger known resources which are not specifically allocated in mineral developmentdocuments.
Waste
3.10 There are a number of waste policies within the South East Plan which make reference to safeguarding.
3.11 Policy W6 (Recycling and Composting) of the South East Plan sets out targets for recycling and compostingacross the waste planning authorities within the region. The policy's supporting text states that:
To ensure that sufficient facilities are developed, development plan documents will identify specific sites to allow for recycling,composting, reprocessing and transfer facilities, and safeguarded to protect them from other development since high land prices canhinder the development of waste recycling facilities. Sites should generally be located in or near to urban areas, close to the mainsources of waste, although a range of facilities will also be needed to serve rural areas.
3.12 Policy W7 (Waste Management Capacity Requirement) sets out the capacity requirements for the wasteplanning authorities within the region. It sets out specific targets that WPAs need to achieve, and touchesupon the importance of safeguarding.
3.13 Policy W15 (Hazardous and other specialist waste facilities) sets out the requirements for hazardous wastemanagement. With regards to safeguarding, its states that “Waste development documents will…identify and safeguardsites for storage, treatment and remediation of contaminated soils and demolition waste”.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 410
3.14 Policy W16 (Waste Transport Infrastructure) sets out the need to identify infrastructure facilities for wastetransfer and bulking facilities, essential for the sustainable transport of waste materials and that these shouldbe safeguarded. It states:
Waste development documents should identify infrastructure facilities, including sites for waste transfer and bulking facilities,essential for the sustainable transport of waste materials. These sites and facilities should be safeguarded in local developmentdocuments. Policies should aim to reduce the transport and associated impacts of waste movement. Use of rail and water-bornetransport with appropriate depot and wharf provision should be encouraged wherever possible, particularly for large facilities.
Wharves and Rail Depots
3.15 The South East Plan contains a number of policies which relate to wharves and rail depots. Policy T12(Freight and site safeguarding) considers the need to safeguard and promote the use of wharves and raildepot sites for the transportation of materials.
Relevant regional strategies, local development documents and local transport plans should include policiesand proposals that:
safeguard wharves, depots and other sites that are, or could be, critical in developing the capability ofthe transport system to move freight, particularly by rail or water;
safeguard and promote sites adjacent to railways, ports and rivers for developments, particularly newintermodal facilities and rail related industry and warehousing, that are likely to maximise freight movementby rail or water.
3.16 Acknowledging the intention to revoke the RSS, Hampshire have identified many key points from theirevidence base and can demonstrate that their approach matches that as suggested by the RSS:
The potential impact of incompatible development on Hampshire's existing minerals and waste sitesneeds to be considered;
The potential impact of incompatible development on Hampshire's existing rail depots and aggregateneeds to be considered;
Hampshire has significant mineral reserves that are considered to be economically viable by the BritishGeological Survey (BGS);
Hampshire has approximately 30 sites which produce recycled and secondary aggregates, whichaccounted for 24% of total aggregate sold during 2010;
The designation of both specific waste sites and areas suitable for waste management infrastructureallows Hampshire to demonstrate a reasonable approach to capacity requirements;
Hampshire produces hazardous/specialist waste and lacks many places for it to be processed. Atpresent some of that produced has to be exported to suitable facilities elsewhere in the country;
11Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Specific areas of need for waste management facilities have been identified, with the South and NorthEast parts of Hampshire still being the most likely to require some strategic waste facilities;
Specific areas of need have been identified, with the South and North East parts of Hampshire stillbeing the most likely to require some strategic waste facilities.
Current Hampshire Policy
3.17 The inclusion of safeguarding policies in the draft South East Plan and the advice in national policy meantHampshire could apply similar policy within the adopted Core Strategy (2007); but allowing a more localapproach. The Core Strategy included policy S14 (Safeguarding of Existing Development) and Policy S15(Sterilisation of Mineral Deposits) which referred to this issue of safeguarding.
3.18 Policy S14(4) was subsequently quashed following a High Court Challenge in 2008. This has left a policyvacuum, and leaves existing minerals and waste sites (including associated transport infrastructure) vulnerable.
3.19 The approach to safeguarding mineral deposits within the 2007 Core Strategy (excluding provisions set outin Policy S14) is detailed below:
The Mineral Safeguarding Area (MSA) concentrated on the minerals considered to be at most risk bydevelopment; sand and gravel, soft sand and clay. TheMSA used data supplied by the British GeologicalSurvey (BGS) that detailed mineral reserves that were considered to be economically viable. Theremaining minerals found in Hampshire, were not safeguarded against as chalk was considered to betoo widely available to merit it, and oil and gas lie deep enough beneath the surface that any developmentwould not necessarily sterilise the reserves;
All existing sites required to meet future requirements were safeguarded to ensure that any incompatibledevelopment would not result in the loss of capacity to process mineral or waste, or the ability totransport the resource. The sites safeguarded were considered to be strategic for the delivery of theStrategy. This took into account the operation effectiveness, need and the degree to which alternativeuses of the land would promote positive regeneration of the site;
The Mineral Consultation Area (MCA) was developed based up on both the MSA and the existingsites. The MCA is a defined area where the council expected to be consulted on any incompatibledevelopment that may impact on the mineral reserve or site. Buffers of 250 metres were applied toexisting or proposed quarries or landfill and one of 50 metres to other mineral and waste sites, anydevelopment proposed within these buffers would be opposed;
Sites were safeguarded for their permitted life span;
Despite mineral being protected through the MSA it did not mean development could not occur, itwould be resisted, but the recommendation that prior extraction be provided before the developmentcommenced.
4 Quashed Policy S14 of the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy - All existing minerals and waste sites, including associated transport infrustructures, whichare needed for future requirements will be safeguarded. These requirements will be determined by a review of all such sites. Sites identified, in the HampshireMineralsor Waste Management Plans, or on the Proposals map, to fulfill the requirements of htis strategy will also be safeguarded. Pending the outcome of thisreview, all existing sites will be safeguarded. Incompatible development, within 250 metres of existing or planned quarries and landfills or within 50 metresof otherminerals/waste operations, will not be supported.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 412
3.20 Policy S15 (Sterilisation of Mineral Deposits) states:
Proposals for permanent development which would sterilise mineral deposits shown on the Key Diagram, or subsequently in theHampshire Minerals Plan or on the Proposals Map, will be resisted unless provision is made for extraction prior to thecommencement of development, or other planning considerations apply.
3.21 The Core Strategy policies went some way to establishing a procedure for the safeguarding of both themineral and waste resources and the infrastructure that was in place to process and transport them. However,following the adoption of the Core Strategy in 2007 Associated British Ports (ABP) successfully challengeda number of the policies in the High Court. This resulted in the policies, including S14 and supporting text,being subsequently 'quashed' meaning that these parts of the Strategy are no longer considered policy. Assuch, new policy on safeguarding will be developed though the Minerals and Waste Plan.
3.22 In the absence of the Core Strategy policies, ‘saved’ policy 21 of the Hampshire, Portsmouth andSouthampton Minerals and Waste Local Plan 1998 applies. It supports the principle of the developmentand the safeguarding of wharves and rail depots sites, as highlighted below.
13Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
TheMineral Planning Authorities will seek to safeguard the following sites for use for the landing or unloading,handling and distribution of marine dredged, sea-borne or rail-borne aggregates and will normally opposeproposals for development which would prevent or prejudice the use of these sites for those purposes:
(i) the following existing aggregates wharves and rail-head aggregates depots:
Aggregates wharves
Bakers Wharf, Chapel, SouthamptonBurnley Wharf, Chapel, SouthamptonLeamouth Wharf, Chapel, SouthamptonWillments Shipyard, Woolston, SouthamptonMarchwood Power Station WharfUpper Quay, FarehamTipner Point Wharf, PortsmouthKendalls Wharf, Langstone Harbour, PortsmouthBedhampton Wharf, Havant
Rail-head aggregates depots
Chickenhall Lane, EastleighBotley StationFareham Station
(ii) the following preferred site for a rail-head aggregates depot, as shown on the proposals map inset map:
Site A - Micheldever Station
(iii) any other sites where permission is granted for the establishment of an aggregates wharf or a rail-headaggregates depot or where such use is established without the need for planning permission.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 414
4 Minerals and waste safeguarding in Hampshire
Safeguarding of Minerals Resources
4.1 Mineral resources in Hampshire are generally split into two groups:
Aggregates (sharp sand and gravel and soft sand); andOther minerals (brick-making clay, chalk and oil and gas).
4.2 The key minerals for Hampshire and its economy are those most closely linked to the construction industry.These include the deposits of sharp sand, soft sand and brick-making clay. In addition to these, there arealso significant resource of chalk in Hampshire.
4.3 Safeguarding offers the most reasonable approach to the protection ofmineral reserves and infrastructure,to secure future economic stability of Hampshire. It is important that existing permitted sand and gravelsites and unworked sand and gravel deposits (sharp sand and gravel and soft sand) are protected fromsterilisation.
4.4 Clay reserves found in Hampshire are used for the manufacturing of bricks and tiles at Hampshire's twobrickworks. Hampshire was previously guided by the South East Plan to maintain enough reserve for 25years worth of brick making. It is important that existing clay extraction sites, which support the brick works,are safeguarded and the potential reserves are also protected, to support the local brick-works.
4.5 Chalk deposits are common in Hampshire, however there are only limited markets resulting in lowproduction. As a result, there is no need to safeguard chalk reserves against its sterilisation when consideringnew development . There may however be a need to safeguard existing chalk extraction sites, which will beconsidered alongside the safeguarding of existing sites.
4.6 Oil and gas deposits are found at much deeper levels in the earth than the other minerals worked inHampshire and thus are less threatened by surface development. As a result of this, it is unnecessary tosafeguard the deposits. In any case the extent of oil and gas resources is commercially sensitive informationunavailable to mineral planning authorities. It is still important however that existing oil and gas infrastructureis safeguarded. In Hampshire there are three active production oilfields, a oil rail depot, a gas storage facility,and one exploration well site.
How safeguarding is determined
4.7 The safeguarding of Hampshire's sand and gravel and brick making clay will, in the first instance, use datasupplied by the British Geological Survey (BGS). This data is considered, by the BGS, to be that which iseconomically viable. However historically there has been evidence from industry that supports areas outsideof the BGS data that would be considered for extraction. It is for this reason that in addition to the BGS,information obtained from 'local knowledge' of mineral reserves is also applied to ensure those areasconsidered to be of importance for the sustainable economy of Hampshire in the future. This data will formthe base to theMineral Safeguarding Area (MSA).
4.8 Areas of mineral previously sterilised by other development cannot be included within the MSA. Thisincludes minerals which are located under existing towns, urban areas and transport infrastructure, wheremineral extraction is rarely going to be possible.
15Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
4.9 To protect both the existing sites and the potential resources are located within the MSA, the use of 'buffer'zones should be considered. Buffers help to protect sites which may be threatened by other developmentclose to the site. Guidance suggests that there should be a requirement for a 250 metre buffer for existingor proposed sand and gravel quarries and 50 metres for other mineral sites.(1) This would mean that theMinerals Planning Authority would be consulted on other non minerals and waste proposals within thesedistance requirements to ensure that incompatible development (development which restricts the currentor future operation of a site) is restricted.
Safeguarding of minerals infrastructure
4.10 It is important to consider minerals infrastructure for safeguarding as it supports the supply of mineralsInfrastructure is also often located in specific areas due to specific siting needs. Minerals infrastructure alsorequires safeguarding due to their vulnerability to redevelopment pressures from higher value uses (such asregeneration).
4.11 The infrastructure which is considered important for safeguarding is as follows:
aggregate wharves (and any associated plants) including waste uses;aggregate rail depots (and any associated plants) including waste uses;concrete batching and production plants which are in use on existing quarries, wharves, or raildepots;existing other clay extraction sites;existing oil and gas extraction and processing sites;any sites which would be proposed in the HMWP for any of the above activities.
4.12 Themovement of minerals and waste is still predominantly carried out by road with HGVs to move materialsfrom source to final destination (market or facility for recycling, re-use or disposal etc). However, there isscope for a more sustainable approach to the movement of resources, through the greater considerationof water based and rail transport options (wharves and rail depots). Hampshire has a number of aggregaterail depots and wharves which are all currently found in southern Hampshire. More information on wharvesand rail depots can be found in the Wharves and Rail Depots Topic Paper(2) and the Wharves and RailDepots Needs Assessment.(3)
4.13 Safeguarding these types of infrastructure would ensure that the minerals planning authority is able tocomment on, and resist any future developments which may be considered to negatively impact the existingoperations. Only that infrastructure that is required to meet the supply capacity in the Plan wouldbe safeguarded. Sites which are afforded safeguarded status may lose this if other more suitable sitesbecome available, or changes in operations mean there is no requirement to continue to safeguard specificsites.
4.14 Wharf sites in Southampton and Portsmouth offer important opportunities for waterside regeneration.Whilst they are safeguarded, redevelopment will be supported if the capacity of the infrastructure can berelocated or provided elsewhere; or if the infrastructure is no longer needed (for example, if it no longermeets the modern needs of the marine aggregates industry).
1 A Guide to Mineral Safeguarding in England2 Wharves and Rail Depots (Draft) Topic Paper, Hampshire County Council February 20113 Wharves and Rail Depots Needs Assessment, land and Minerals Management Limited, Update 2011
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 416
4.15 The use of buffer zones is a method that can be employed to ensure that the minerals infrastructure is notencroached upon by incompatible development. It is thought that a buffer zone of 50 metres would besufficient to ensure that the county council can fully safeguard important minerals infrastructure.
Safeguarding of Waste infrastructure
4.16 Hampshire has a complex network of waste management facilities which handle commercial, industrial andhousehold waste. These facilities are critical to meeting the long termwaste management needs of Hampshire.
4.17 The safeguarding of waste management sites often require different consideration to minerals, because theyare less geographically and geologically restricted. Similarly to mineral infrastructure however, wastemanagement sites can face pressures from incompatible non-waste development. This is becausemany waste management activities are similar to other industrial type processes, and can be located onindustrial land which has competitive land rental values. Waste management typically generates less highvalue end products which means activities on prime industrial locations are not always viable to sustain forinstance.
4.18 Planning policy has a role to play in protecting such sites from competing pressures. It is important toavoid the loss of facilities or allocated wastemanagement sites as this capacity may not be replacedelsewhere. This limits the ability to manage waste close to where it is generated and in sustainable locationsin terms of transport, and the ability to maintain provision to meet waste management needs.
4.19 It is not always appropriate to protect existing waste management sites from redevelopment orencroachment by other uses.Many planning permissions for waste management activities are temporary,which may reflect the aim of returning the land to its previous use or developing/restoring it for an alternativeuse longer term. It may be appropriate to redevelop some safeguarded sites if they offer strong regenerationpotential. However, this would need to be considered on a case by case basis and would need to considerthe impact on capacity if lost. Furthermore, some waste management activities result from a legacy of useson certain sites, and it may be that such facilities would not be supported if judged by current standards.Whilst the decision to resist the redevelopment or encroachment of an existing waste management site istypically judged on a case-by-case basis, it is important to set the parameters for such decision-making andprovide clarity for planning purposes. Therefore the Plan states that non waste development will be resistedunless the merits of the development clearly outweigh the need for safeguarding; or the waste managementactivity is no longer needed; or the capacity can be relocated or provided elsewhere.
4.20 It is suggested that existing waste management sites should be safeguarded from incompatibledevelopment, where there is a justifiable need. There are two factors which influence whether this isjustified:
the waste management capacity provided; and
the waste management 'need' that the existing operation is satisfying (and whether this can be metelsewhere).
4.21 It is therefore suggested that existing (and planned i.e. included in the Minerals and Waste Plan) wastemanagement sites with a capacity to manage 50,000 tonnes per annum or greater(4) should besafeguarded against competing and encroaching development.
4 DCLG guidance - Circular 09/99: Environmental impact assessment
17Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
4.22 It is also suggested that a safeguarding policy should acknowledge existing or planned specialistwaste management facilities in Hampshire. This is considered within a study on the need for SpecialistWastes(5). It is not straightforward to make alternative provision for these regionally significant facilities,thus it is important to ensure they are afforded the protection they require.
4.23 It is also suggested that allHousehold Waste Recycling Centres (HWRCs) and other facilities whichrecycle or recover energy from waste should be safeguarded. The HWRC network is delivered insupport of the Hampshire-wide municipal waste management strategy and any losses which are not replacedwould undermine the ability to deliver this strategy in all the service areas identified. The re-location ofHWRCs to new locations will result in the removal of a safeguarding status from a site if these sites are nolonger required.
4.24 A key sustainability objective is the provision of low-carbon energy and planning authorities are beingurged to plan for local heating and electricity networks. Safeguarding these networks is supported by draftnational planning policy which states proposed development should avoid prejudicing renewable or lowcarbon energy supply(6).
4.25 Not withstanding this suggested framework for safeguarding policy, it is important to acknowledge othersafeguarding approaches which relate to specific areas. For instance, the city of Southampton faces challengesin terms of developing brownfield land to meet regeneration objectives, and therefore may require a differentapproach to the redevelopment or encroachment of waste management sites. The Plan’s approach tosafeguarding therefore sets out a degree of flexibility.
Long term strategic options
4.26 The Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan will cover the period 2012-2030, however it is recognised thatparts of the Plan won’t be sustainable following that period. This includes issues such as limited supplyof sand and gravel resources, major environmental constraints (including the two national parks), landuse conflicts with existing built up areas, and also pressures for redevelopment on infrastructure,particularly at the ports, and potentially the changing requirements of the industry.
4.27 In order to ensure these issues are considered before the end of the plan period, it is important to reviewthe plan and develop potential options for sustainable provision ofminerals andwaste inHampshire.
4.28 It is suggested that up until a review is carried out, any land that had the potential to be used for transportof minerals and waste resources should be safeguarded. These sites could become much more importantto mineral supply or delivering waste to recycling or recovery facilities in the longer term. Land which isimportant to this should be safeguarded and should include:
land identified in the Port of Southampton Master Plan;military/naval land in Southampton Water and Portsmouth Harbour;existing commercial port land; andexisting and former railway sidings and other land that could be rail linked.
5 Assessments of need for waste management facilities in Hampshire - Specialist Waste Facilities (draft), Hampshire County Council, March 20116 see planning for a low carbon future in a changing climate: consultation (2010) (Policy LCF 15: Safeguarding renewable and low carbon energy supplies)
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 418
Implementation of safeguarding
4.29 National guidance set out in MPS1 will be followed regarding the creation of a MSA, which will ensure thatHampshire’s minerals are protected from sterilisation.
4.30 In two tier planning areas there is a requirement for the creation of aMineral Consultation Area (MCA)as well as a Mineral Safeguarding Area (MSA). The area covered, and purpose of the MCA is differentto that of the MSA. The MCA provides the mechanism for Hampshire County Council to be consulted bydistricts on non mineral or waste developments.
4.31 District authorities are supplied a copy of the MCA along with development criteria that the MineralPlanning Authority wish to be consulted on. It is the districts’ responsibility to ensure that the MCA is usedwhen considering planning applications or future developments and that the County Council is consultedon developments located within the MCA. The MCA is likely to comprise the MSA but has in additionexisting sites that are protected under safeguarding in their own right.
4.32 For convenience, it is thought the best approach to ensure safeguarded waste facilities are afforded thecorrect protection, they should also be included within the MCA.
4.33 Where major developments are known to be proposed there is a need to consider prior extraction. Priorextraction refers to the process of the extraction of minerals from the ground before development occurson top of the reserves, effectively sterilising them. This is particularly pertinent where new developmentsare planned in areas if known mineral resources. Areas where there are areas of known and planned majordevelopment which may occur during the plan period will need to be specifically identified i.e. the proposedEco-Town at Whitehill-Bordon.
4.34 The MSA and MCA do not prevent development from occurring. They act as a policy guide as toHampshire County Council’s approach on protection of mineral reserves.
19Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
5 Conclusion
5.1 Given the increasing and conflicting demand for land, it is important that suitable minerals and wastesites and mineral reserves are safeguarded to ensure that they are protected from other incompatibledevelopments. Safeguarding has an essential role to play in ensuring that there is enough minerals andwaste development and mineral reserves to secure the delivery of the Minerals and Waste Plan. It protectsthose sites which are considered to be crucial to the delivery of the plan. Safeguarding also has an importantrole to play in delivering economic growth and development and ensuring communities have access to thenecessary minerals and waste infrastructure and mineral reserves to meet their needs.
5.2 Using the evidence base prepared for the Minerals and Waste Plan, it is possible to draw some conclusionsand put forward recommendations for policy formulation relating to safeguarding of minerals and wastedevelopment in Hampshire. These are as follows:
Recommendation 1
Existing minerals and waste infrastructure needed to meet the plan’s objectives should be safeguarded againstpotential incompatible development. The possibility of applying buffers to ensure encroachment is not anissue should be considered. The safeguarding of sites will be considered against the following areas:
Overall minerals and waste need for the site to meet the needs of the plan period;Operational effectiveness of the existing site;The lifespan of the site; andThe degree to which alternative use of the land would promote positive regeneration of the site.Sites will not needlessly be safeguarded.The quarries, wharves and rail depots identified in the Appendix will be safeguarded unless the meritsof redevelopment clearly outweigh the need for safeguarding, the infrastructure is no longer needed, orthe capacity can be relocated or provided elsewhere.
Minerals Resources
Recommendation 2
The productions of a Mineral Safeguarding Area that takes the British Geological Survey data as its basis withthe application of 'local knowledge' about the reserves. This is considered to be the best way to protect themineral reserves.
Recommendation 3
AMineral Consultation Area will be created to act as a guide for district and borough council's when consideringplanning applications and future developments/policy in areas of viable mineral reserves.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 420
Recommendation 4
Areas where there are known major planned developments which are likely to occur during the plan periodand could result in the sterilisation of mineral reserves should be identified for specific safeguarding and whereprior extraction should be prioritised. This may include the Eco-Town at Whitehill Bordon where there areimportant reserves of soft sand.
Waste
Recommendation 5
Waste management sites, including non hazardous landfills, with a capacity to manage 50,000 tonnes perannum or greater should be safeguarded.
Recommendation 6
Facilities that are of regional and national significance, or those which provide a specialist function e.g. metalrecycling, hazardous waste facilities.
Sustainable Transportation (Wharves and Rail Depots)
Recommendation 7
Existing wharves and rail depots required to meet the plan’s objectives will be safeguarded to support a;
sustainable strategic transport network and to ensure that their capacity is maintained throughout theplan period. The redevelopment of a wharf will be supported if the merits of redevelopment clearlyoutweigh the need for safeguarding, the infrastructure is no longer needed, or the capacity can be relocatedor provided elsewhere.
Recommendation 8
New land which may become available within Southampton Water (eg at land identified in the Port ofSouthampton Master Plan, or at Marchwood military port), and Portsmouth Harbour and is suitable for thelocation of a new minerals and waste wharf should be safeguarded, to enable its use for a minerals and wastewharf to be considered.
21Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
7 Glossary and Abbreviations
Composting:Aerobic decomposition of organic matter to produce compost for use as a fertiliser or soil conditioner.
Eco-town: A government-sponsored programme of new towns to be built in England, which are intended toachieve exemplary standards of sustainability.
ELV: End of Life Vehicle such as an old car disposed of as scrap
Hazardous waste: Waste that contains hazardous properties that may render it harmful to human health or theenvironment. Hazardous wastes are listed in the European Waste Catalogue (EWC).
Household waste recycling centre (HWRC): A facility provided by the Local Authority which is accessible tothe general public to deposit waste which cannot be collected with the normal household waste, such as bulkyitems, garden waste and engine oil (formerly known as civic amenity sites).
Landfill: The deposit of waste into voids in the ground.
Materials Recovery Facility (MRF): A facility where elements of the waste stream are mechanically or manuallyseparated before recycling and/or are, bulked, crushed, baled and stored for reprocessing, either on the same siteor at a material reprocessing plant.
Minerals and Waste Planning Authorities: The local planning authorities (County and Unitary Councils)responsible for minerals and waste planning. In Hampshire, Hampshire County Council, Portsmouth andSouthampton City Councils, the New Forest National Park Authority and South Downs National Park Authorityare minerals and waste planning authorities.
Minerals Consultation Area (MCA): An area identified to ensure consultation between the relevant district orborough planning authority, the minerals industry and the Minerals and Waste Planning Authorities before certainnon-mineral planning applications made within the area are determined. The Hampshire Mineral Consultation Areacovers the same areas as the Mineral Safeguarding Area.
Minerals Policy Statements:National guidance on minerals planning issues, slowly replacing the previous MineralPlanning Guidance Notes.
Mineral Safeguarding Area (MSA): TheMSA is defined by minerals and waste planning authorities. They includeviable resources of aggregates and are defined so that proven resources of aggregates are not sterilised by non-mineraldevelopment. The MSA does not provide a presumption for these resources to be worked.
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW): Solid waste collected by waste collection authorities, predominantly householdwaste.
Non-hazardous landfill: One of the three classifications of landfills made by the Landfill Directive, takingnon-hazardous waste.
Non-hazardous waste:Waste permitted for disposal at a non-hazardous landfill. It is not inert or hazardous andincludes the majority of household and commercial wastes.
Planning Policy Statements (PPS):National planning policy guidance, and includes PPS10 on sustainable wastemanagement, PPS12 on developing local development frameworks and PPS25 on development and flood risk.
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 422
Rail depot:A railway facility where trains regularly stop to load or unload passengers or freight (goods). It generallyconsists of a platform and building next to the tracks providing related services.
Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS): Prepared by the regional body, the RSS sets out policies in relation to thedevelopment and use of land in the region (The South East Plan was adopted in 2007 but Government policy isto remove this part of the development plan).
Safeguarding: The method of protecting needed facilities or mineral resources and of preventing inappropriatedevelopment from affecting it. Usually, where sites are threatened, the course of action would be to object to theproposal or negotiate an acceptable resolution.
Sharp sand and gravel: Coarse sand and gravel suitable for use in making concrete.
Soft sand: Fine sand suitable for use in such products as mortar, asphalt and plaster.
South East Plan (SEP): See Regional Spatial Strategy.
Sterilisation: When a change of use, or the development, of land prevents possible mineral exploitation in theforeseeable future.
Waste: The Waste Framework Directive 75/442 (as amended) defines waste as “any substance that the holderdiscards or intends or is required to discard”.
Waste Transfer Station (WTS): A location where waste can be temporarily stored, separated and bulked afterbeing dropped off by domestic waste-collection lorries and before being carried off by larger vehicles for subsequenttreatment or ultimate disposal.
Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW): A facility where sewage volumes are reduced by de-watering andaerobic and anaerobic biological treatment.
Wharf: A landing place or pier where ships may tie up and load or unload.
23Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
App
endixOne:Safeguarded
sites
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Quarries
New
Milton
Sand
and
Ballast
31/07/2013
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Ringwoo
dAv
onTyrrell
NF2
32
Sitecurrently
mothb
alled
Cem
e-
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Fawley
Badm
inston
Farm
NF1
61
Includes
Nea
Farm
andPlum
leyWoo
dviaa
conveyor
link
Tarm
ac31/12/2026
(includes
restoration)
Sharpsand
and
gravel&softsand
quarry
NearR
ingw
ood
BlashfordQuarry
NF2
55
Sitealso
used
forrecyclingaggregates
Cem
e31/12/2018
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Somerley
BleakHillQuarry
NF0
91
Sitealso
used
forrecyclingaggregates
Cem
e31/12/2013
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Bram
shill
Bram
shillQuarry
HR0
42
Remaining
reserves
areundera
processin
gplant
which
isused
form
ineralextra
ctioninBe
rkshire
(Fincham
pstead)
Cem
ex31/12/2014
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Eversley
ChandlersFarm
HR0
38
Due
tocommence
durin
g2012
New
Milton
Sand
and
Ballast
21/06/2018
(includes
restoration)
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Dow
nton
Dow
nton
Manor
Farm
NF1
77
LafargeUK
31/12/2016
(includes
restoration)
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Eversley
EversleyQuarry
HR0
40
Grundon
31/12/2018
(includes
restoration)
Softsand
quarry
Bordon
Frith
endQuarry
EH121
Sitealso
used
forrecyclingaggregates
and
soil/sand
blending
forspo
rtsp
itches
(31/12/2018)
Tarm
ac31/12/2018
Softsand
quarry
Kingsley
KingsleyQuarry
EH025
Sitealso
asawastetra
nsferstatio
nandrecycling
aggregates.A
pplicationcurrently
beingc
onsid
ered
GBFo
ot(and
Basin
gstoke
SkipHire)
31/12/2011
Chalkquarry
Basin
gstoke
Manor
Farm
BA054
foranextensionof
timeof
10yearstoextra
ct
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 424
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
moremineral,restorethroughinertfill,and
continue
wasteop
erations
Sitealso
used
forrecyclingaggregates.Permitted
to31/08/2012
orwhenminerals
andtip
ping
ends
-whichevercomes
soon
er.
Marchwoo
dAggregates
30/06/2012
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Marchwoo
dMarchwoo
dQuarry
NF1
72
Clay
used
forthe
brickworks
only
Michelmersh
Brickand
TileLtd
30/06/2015
Clay
quarry
Michelmersh
Mich
elmersh
Brick
Works
TV111
Includes
extensionatBe
nyon
'sEnclosure(fo
rwhich
thelegalagreementisy
etto
beissued)
HansonUK
30/09/2023
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Mortim
erWest
End
Mortim
erQuarry
BA060
Due
tocommence
durin
g2012
Raym
ondBrow
nMineralsa
ndRe
cycling
Ltd
11yearsfrom
commencement
Sharpsand
and
gravelquarry
Romsey
Roke
Manor
TV226
Includes
concretemanufacturin
gplan
(22/02/2042)
SomborneC
halkQuarry
Chalkquarry
Winchester
Sombo
rneChalkQuarry
TV116
OilandGas
Tempo
rary
explorationwell
StarEnergyUK
Onsho
reLrd
01/03/2013
Oilexploration
well-site
Itchen
Valley
Avington
WR1
86
Tempo
rary
explorationwell-
drillingyetto
commence
NorthernPetro
leum
(GB)
Ltd
11/2012
Oilexploration
well-site
LeighPark
Havant
HV047
Oilfieldinproductio
nStarEnergyW
ealdBa
sinLtd
31/01/2020
Oilfield
Horndean
Horndean
EH066,
EH067,EH058
Oilfieldinproduction,includinggatheringstation,
gasstorage
andrailterm
inal
StarEnergyUK
Onsho
reLrd
30/09/2025
Oilfield
Lasham
Hum
blyGrove
EH133,
BA105,BA
106,
HR0
73,H
R091
Oilfieldinproductio
nStarEnergyUK
Onsho
reLrd
31/12/2016
Oilfield
Stockbrid
geStockbrid
geWR0
80,
WR1
57
Wharves
Tarm
acPerm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Havant
Bedham
pton
Wharf
HV026
Tarm
acPerm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Southampton
BurnleyWharf
SN038
25Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Dudman
Group
Limited
Perm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Southampton
DiblesW
harf
SN070
LafargeUK
Perm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Fareham
Fareham
Warf
FA054
KendalB
ros
(Portsmouth
Ltd)
Perm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Portsm
outh
Kendalls
Wharf
PT027
Cem
exPerm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Southampton
Leam
outh
Wharf
SN035
LafargeUK
Perm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Marchwoo
dMarchwoo
dWharf
NF2
22
AggregateIndustries
Perm
anent
Aggregatewharf
Southampton
Superm
arineWharf
SN040
RailD
epots
AggregateIndustries
Perm
anent
Aggregatesraildepot
Botley
BotleyRa
ilDepot
WR0
81
Sitealso
used
forrecyclingspentrailway
ballast
(see
belowEA101)
AggregateIndustries
Perm
anent
Aggregatesrail
depo
tEastleigh
EastleighRa
ilDepot
EA046
HansonUK
Perm
anent
Aggregatesraildepot
Fareham
Fareham
RailDepot
FA048
StarEnergyUK
Onsho
reLrd
31/12/2016
Oilterm
inalandrail
depo
tHolybourne,nr
Alto
nHolybourneRa
ilDepot
EH133
Construction,Dem
olition
andExcavation(CDE)R
ecyclin
gSites
New
Milton
Sand
and
Ballast
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
New
Milton
Caird
Ave
NF0
02
With
inop
erationalportland,so
cann
otbe
safeguardedform
ineralso
rwasteuse.
K&BCrushers
Perm
itted
developm
ent
CDErecycling
Southampton
Docks
DockGate20
-
Siteop
erates
inconjunctionwith
EastleighRa
ilDepot
AggregateIndustries
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Eastleigh
EastleighRa
ilSidings
EA101
RCollard
Ltd
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Eversley
EversleyHaulage
Park
HR0
85
Also
awastetra
nsferstatio
nL&
SWasteManagem
ent
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Havant
FarlingtonRe
doubt
HV017
Hazardous
Waste
Managem
entL
tdPerm
anent
CDErecycling
Otterbourne
Four
DellF
arm
WR2
05
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 426
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Skiphiresitewith
mixed
wasteimpo
rts
Taurus
WasteRe
cycling
Group
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Aldershot
Hollybush
Lane
RM015
Raym
ondBrow
nMineralsa
ndRe
cycling
Ltd
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Andover
Barton
Stacey
TV231
Raym
ondBrow
nMineralsa
ndRe
cycling
Ltd
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Nursling
LeeLane
TV055
Also
wastetra
nsferand
biom
assp
lant
Econo
metric
Ltd
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Farnbo
rough
LynchfordLane
RM033
Otheruses
includecommercialandindustrial
MRF
andCom
posting
New
Milton
Sand
and
Ballast
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Lymington
Manor
Farm
NF0
42
Sitealso
used
asan
inertlandfillperm
itted
until
31/07/2026
Raym
ondBrow
nMineralsa
ndRe
cycling
Ltd
31/12/2021
CDErecycling
Swanwick
RookeryFarm
FA032
Hutchings
&CarterL
tdPerm
anent
CDErecycling
Alto
nWaterbroo
kRo
adEH156
Skiphiresitewith
mixed
wasteimpo
rts
Ace
Liftaway
Perm
anent
CDErecycling
Romsey
YokesfordHill
TV188
EnergyRecoveryFacilities(in
clud
ingspecialistincineration)
Siteperm
issionno
tyetimplem
ented
Basin
gstoke
SkipHire
andSouthern
Waste
Managem
ent
Perm
anent
Biom
assfacility
usingwastewoo
dBa
singstoke
Arm
strong
Road
BA161
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
EnergyRe
covery
facility
Chineham
Chineham
BA019
1xenergy
recovery,1
xdisposal(hightempfor
hazardousw
aste)
TradebeLtd
Perm
anent
2xincinerators
Fawley
FawleyIncinerator
NF0
01
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
EnergyRe
covery
facility
Marchwoo
dMarchwoo
dNF0
18
Mixed
usesiteincludingaMRF
andtra
nsfer
station
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
EnergyRe
covery
facility
Portsm
outh
Portsm
outh
PT031
27Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Siteperm
issionno
tyetimplem
ented
CarouselR
enew
ables
Limited
Perm
anent
AnaerobicDigestio
nusingfood
and
agriculturalslurries
FarleighWallop
TheCarousel
BA170
Land
fill
Subsidiary
operations:H
WRC
,WasteTransfer
(22/03/2020)andIBArecycling(31/12/2012).
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
22/03/2020
Non
-hazardous
landfill
Somerley
Blue
HazeLandfill
NF1
05
Inrestorationusinginertm
aterialson
lyVe
oliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
31/12/2012
Non
-hazardous
landfill
Lymington
Efford
NF0
42
Inrestoration
SitaSolent
Ltd
Noenddate
Non
-hazardous
landfill
FairOak
Mortim
ersL
ane
EA083
Specifichazardousw
aste(asbestos)canbe
depo
sited.
CSG
Ltd
Noenddate
Non
-hazardous
and
hazardouslandfill
Redlynch
PoundBo
ttom
NFN
P001
Capacity
until2013
basedon
currentrates
offill
Viridor
31/11/2012
Non
-hazardous
landfill
Romsey
Squabb
Woo
dTV
072
MaterialR
ecoveryFacilities(M
RFs)
MSW
MRF
andWTS
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
MRF
Alto
nAlto
nMRF
EH141
Com
mercialMRF
DSSm
ithPaperL
tdLawfulD
evelop
ment
Certificate
MRF
Gospo
rtCranb
ourneRo
adGP0
21
Com
mercialMRF
SCARe
cycling(UK)
LawfulD
evelop
ment
Certificate
MRF
Portsm
outh
DundasL
ane
-
MSW
MRF
Perm
anent
MRF
Portsm
outh
Quartremaine
MRF
PT057
Com
mercialMRF
BiffaW
asteServicesLtd
Perm
anent
MRF
HartleyWintney
StarhillMRF
HR0
34
Com
mercialMRF
SCARe
cyling(UK)
Perm
anent
MRF
Totto
nTo
ttonMRF
NF2
57
MetalRecyclin
gSites(M
RS)
&End
ofLifeVehicles
(ELV
)
JamesHuntley&
Sons
MRS
Southampton
AshleyCrescent
SN065
Silverlake
Autom
otive
Recycling
Perm
anent
ELV
Shedfield
BotleyRo
adWR2
00
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 428
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
SafetyAutos
Perm
anent
ELV
Bordon
Broxhead
TradingEstate
EH148
BryanHirstL
tdPerm
anent
MRS
&ELV
Sutto
nScotney
BullingtonCross
TV246
John
Huntly
(Petersfield)
Ltd
Noplanning
history
MRS
&ELV
Petersfield
Buriton
-
BryanHirstL
tdPerm
anent
MRS
&ELV
Chineham
Crockford
Lane
BA160
EMR
Perm
anent
MRS
&ELV
Portsm
outh
DundasS
pur
-
DaseEngineerin
gLtd
LawfulD
evelop
ment
Certificate
ELV
BishopsW
altham
GarfieldRo
adWR2
20
How
ard'sC
arSpares
Perm
anent
ELV
HaylingIsland
HaylingIsland
HV044
Aldershot
CarSpares
Perm
anent
ELV
Aldershot
Hollybush
Lane
RM023
DeneWoo
dExportL
tdNoplanning
history
MRS
&ELV
Aldershot
Hollybush
Lane
-
JHirst&
Sons
Noplanning
history
MRS
Andover
Hurstbo
urne
Station
-
New
bury
Reclaim
Perm
anent
MRS
Burghclere
IvoryFarm
BA122
Ring
andBringLtd
NoPlanning
History
ELV
Waterlooville
Lovedean
-
TillburyMetalsL
tdPerm
anent
MRS
Portsm
outh
OldRe
servoirroad
-
EMR
Perm
anent
MRS
&Metal
Exportin
gSouthampton
PrincessStreet
-
A.W.Smith
(Gospo
rt)
Ltd
Noplanning
history
MRS
Gospo
rtQuayLane
Hardw
ay-
With
inop
erationalportland,so
cann
otbe
safeguardedform
ineralso
rwasteuse.
SNorton.
Perm
itted
developm
ent
MRS
&Metal
Exportin
gSouthampton
Southampton
-Berth
108/109
-
Sim
MetalManagem
ent
Perm
anent
MRS
&ELV
Yateley
VigoLane
HR0
32
Com
postingSites
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
30/06/2023
Com
postingfacility
Stockbrid
geChilboltonDow
nTV
183
29Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Also
awastetra
nsferstatio
nVe
oliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
31/12/2025
Com
postingfacility
Basin
gstoke
LittleBu
shyWarren
Cop
seBA
103
HouseholdWasteRecyclin
gCentre(H
WRC)
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Aldershot
HWRC
Aldershot
RM004
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Alresford
HWRC
Alresford
WR0
08
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Alto
nHWRC
Alto
nEH137
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Andover
HWRC
Andover
TV234
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Gospo
rtHWRC
atGrangeRo
adGP0
01
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Basin
gstoke
HWRC
Basin
gstoke
BA018
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
BishopsW
altham
HWRC
Bishop
sWaltham
WR0
72
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Bordon
HWRC
Bordon
EH049
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
31/12/2015
HWRC
Romsey
HWRC
Casbroo
kTV
024
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Southampton
HWRC
DockGate20
-
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Eastleigh
HWRC
Eastleigh
EA019
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
FairOak
HWRC
FairOak
EA011
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
HartleyWintney
HWRC
HartleyWintney
HR0
08
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Havant
HWRC
Havant
HV004
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
31/12/2015
HWRC
HaylingIsland
HWRC
HaylingIsland
HV010
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Hedge
End
HWRC
Hedge
End
EA012
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Marchwoo
dHWRC
Marchwoo
dNF0
18
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
31/12/2020
HWRC
Penn
ington
HWRC
MilfordRo
adNF0
42
Also
awastetra
nsferstatio
nHop
kins
RecyclingLtd
30/04/2014
HWRC
Netley
HWRC
Netley
EA027
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Portsm
outh
HWRC
Paulsgrove
PT001
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 430
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Petersfield
HWRC
Petersfield
EH123
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Segensworth
HWRC
Segensworth
FA069
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
31/12/2019
HWRC
Somerley
HWRC
Somerley
NF0
21
Thissitewillbe
closed
upon
openingof
anew
HWRC
inWaterlooville(W
R225)
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Waterlooville
HWRC
Waterlooville
HV008
Perm
issionyettobe
implem
ented
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Waterlooville
HWRC
Waterlooville
WR2
25
Hop
kins
RecyclingLtd
Perm
anent
HWRC
Winchester
HWRC
Winchester
WR1
83
WasteTransferStation
Com
mercial&Industrial
James
Huntley&Sons
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Southampton
229AshleyCrescent
SN072
Pure8TyreTech
Perm
anent
Tyrerecycling
facility
Romsey
AshfieldTyreDepot
TV228
Com
mercial&Industrial
ZebraWasteDisp
osal
Services
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Fareham
BroadcutsW
TSFA
070
Municipalwaste.A
lsoan
HWRC
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Farnbo
rough
Eelmoo
rRoadWTS
RM002
Com
mercial&Industrial
SitaUK
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Southampton
EmpressR
oad
SN060
Municipalwaste
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Andover
Harew
oodTransfer
Station
TV177
Com
mercial&Industrial
TJW
aste&Re
cycling
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
HartsFarn
Way
HV039
Com
mercial&Industrial
ChambersWaste
Managem
entL
td31/12/2018
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Aldershot
Hollybush
Lane
RM025
Com
mercial&Industrial
Taurus
WasteRe
cycling
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Aldershot
Hollybush
Lane
RM031
Com
mercial&Industrial
Bridge
SkipsL
tdPerm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Portsm
outh
How
ards
Yard
PT060
31Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Municipalwaste
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Lymington
Lymington
WTS
NF2
15
MunicipalWaste
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
31/07/2023
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Netley
NetleyWTS
EA027
Municipalwaste
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Marchwoo
dNormandy
Road,
Marchwoo
dNF0
18
Municipalwaste
VeoliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Winchester
OtterbourneWTS
WR0
18
Com
mercial&Industrial
L&SWasteManagem
ent
Perm
anent
WasteTransfer
Station
Titchfield
Pegham
IndustrialE
state
UnitsD&E
WR1
92
Com
mercial&Industrial
BiffaW
asteServicesLtd
LawfulD
evelop
ment
Certificate
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Marchwoo
dUnit2C,
North
End
NF2
61
Com
mercial&Industrial
SitaUK
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Portsm
outh
Quartermaine
Road
PT053
Com
mjercialand
industrialw
aste,also
recycling
operations
onsite
SitaSolent
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Fareham
Wallington
Depot
FA064
Also
actin
gas
MRF
toproduceSR
FVe
oliaESHam
pshire
Ltd
Perm
anent
Wastetra
nsfer
station
Fareham
Warrenfarm
FA025
WasteWaterTreatm
entW
orks
(WWTW)
MoD
Perm
anent
WWTW
Aldershot
Aldershot
Garrison
SewageT
reatmentW
orks
RM028
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
Aldershot
Sewage
Treatm
entW
orks
RM032
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Fawley
AshlettCreek
Waste
WaterTreatm
entWorks
NF2
24
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Barton
Stacey
Barton
Stacey
Waste
WaterTreatm
entWorks
TV233
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
Chineham
Basin
gstoke
Sewage
Treatm
entW
orks
BA125
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 432
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Beaulieu
BeaulieuWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
NF2
34
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
Bentley
BentleySewage
Treatm
entW
orks
EH153
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Brockenh
urst
Brockenh
urstWaste
WaterTreatm
entW
orks
NFN
P002
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Havant
BuddsF
armWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
HV040
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Eastleigh
ChickenhallWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
EA100
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Chilbolton
ChilboltonWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
TV227
Defence
Estates
Perm
anent
WWTW
WestD
ean
DeanHillMOD
Site
TV211
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
EastB
oldre
EastB
oldreWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
NF2
44
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Lockerley
EastD
eanWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
TV199
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
Pumping
Station
Portsm
outh
Eastney
Pumping
Station
PT055
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
Fleet
FleetS
ewageTreatm
ent
Works
HR0
97
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Stockbrid
geFu
lllertonSludge
Treatm
entW
orks
TV178
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Winchester
Harestock
WasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
WR1
95
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
HartleyWintney
HartleyWintney
Waste
WaterTreatm
entWorks
HR0
99
Tham
esWater
Perm
anent
WWTW
Highclere
HighclereWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
BA123
33Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Kings
Sombo
rne
Kings
Sombo
rneWaste
WaterTreatm
entW
orks
TV230
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Lyndhurst
LyndhurstW
asteWater
Treatm
entWorks
NF2
41
Defence
Estates
Perm
anent
WWTW
Stockbrid
geMiddleWallopStation
SewageT
reatmentW
orks
TV235
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Southampton
Millbroo
kWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
SN061
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Winchester
Morestead
WasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
WR1
25
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Alresford
New
AlresfordWaste
WaterTreatm
entWorks
WR2
06
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Lockerley
OvalR
oad/Bu
tlersClose
WasteWaterTreatm
ent
Works
TV212
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
PeelCom
mon
PeelCottage
WasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
FA074
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Petersfield
PetersfieldWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
EH117
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Portswoo
dPo
rtswoo
dWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
-
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Romsey
RomseyWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
TV217
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTV
Ashurst
RyeDale
NFN
P04
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Marchwoo
dSlow
hillWasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
NF2
23
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Stockbrid
geStockbrid
geTV
214
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
Sway
Sway
WasteWater
Treatm
entWorks
NF2
37
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 434
Com
ments
SiteOperator
Planning
Perm
ission
/End
Date
Prim
aryFu
nctio
n/use
Locatio
nSiteNam
eHCC
Development
Managem
ent
Reference
Southern
Water
Perm
anent
WWTW
WestW
ellow
WestW
ellowWaste
WaterTreatm
entWorks
TV216
35Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Appendix Two: Location of safeguarded sites
The following maps show the location of sites, by district/city, which require safeguarding in Hampshire.
Map 1 Sites requiring safeguarding in Basingstoke and Deane
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 436
Map 2 Sites requiring safeguarding in East Hampshire
37Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 3 Sites requiring safeguarding in Eastleigh
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 438
Map 4 Sites requiring safeguarding in Fareham
39Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 5 Sites requiring safeguarding in Gosport
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 440
Map 6 Sites requiring safeguarding in Hart
41Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 7 Sites requiring safeguarding in Havant
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 442
Map 8 Sites requiring safeguarding in New Forest
43Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 9 Sites requiring safeguarding in Portsmouth
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 444
Map 10 Sites requiring safeguarding in Rushmoor
45Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 11 Sites requiring safeguarding in Southampton
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 446
Map 12 Sites requiring safeguarding in Test Valley
47Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 4
Map 13 Sites requiring safeguarding in Winchester
Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan - Safeguarding Study: Version 448
This document can be made available in large print, on audio media, in Braille or in some other languages. For further information, please contact Planning Policy in the County Planning group: Telephone: 0845 603 5634 or 01962 845517 Email: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy County Planning Economy, Transport & Environment Department Hampshire County Council Floor 1, Elizabeth II Court West Winchester SO23 8UD Internet: www.hants.gov.uk/county-planning _______________________________________________________________________