hadronization of partons by recombination rudolph c. hwa university of oregon summer school on rhic...

Hadronization of Partons by Recombination

Rudolph C. HwaUniversity of Oregon

Summer School on RHIC Physics

Wuhan, China, June 2005

2

Outline

An overview of the recombination model

Some questions and answers on the basics

Shower partons initiated by hard partons

Hadronization in heavy-ion collisions

3

Parton Recombination

First studied for low-pT production in pp collision

Das & Hwa, Phys. Lett. 68B, 459 (1977)

EdNπ

dpL

≡H(x) =dx1x1

∫dx2

x2

Fqq (x1,x2)Rπ (x1,x2,x)

p pFu x1( )Fd x2( )

x

H(x)

Ochs observation: H(x) is very similar to the valence quark distribution in a proton.

4

Valon model -- to get the proton wave function Hwa, PRD (1980a)

Valon-recombination model -- better formulation of recombination Hwa,

PRD (1980b)

5

p+A collisions Hwa & CB Yang (2002a)

We studied the centrality dependence (or the number of collisions) in the valon-recombination model

good data from NA49

Hadronic collisions Hwa & CB Yang

(2002b) h + p h’ +X

h h’

p

K+ + K

m

6

Hadron production at high pT pp collision: mainly by fragmentation

AA collision: there were puzzles according to fragmentation

Recombination solved those puzzlesHwa & Yang, PRC 67, 034902 (2003); 70, 024905 (2004)

Greco, Ko, Levai, PRL 90, 202302 (2003); PRC 68, 034904 (2003)

Fries, Muller, Nonaka, Bass, PRL 90,202303(03); PRC 68, 044902 (03)

More recent developments -- 2004, 2005Correlations in jets

7

Closer examination of the recombination formulas

pdN

dp=

dq1

q1∫

dq2

q2

Fqq(q1,q2 )R (q1,q2 , p)Pion :

Proton :

pdN p

dp=

dq1

q1∫

dq2

q2

dq3

q3

Fuud(q1,q2 ,q3)Rp(q1,q2 ,q3, p)

Fqq (q1,q2 )

Questions:

1. What is the two-parton distribution ?

2. What are the recombination functions ?

R (q1,q2 , p)

Especially in heavy-ion collisions

Rp (q1,q2 ,q3, p)

8

3. What about the gluons?

4. Does entropy decrease?

5. What about the spatial considerations?

6. Isn’t the pion a Goldstone boson?

7. Recombination versus fragmentation:

Which is more important?

8. What is wrong with string fragmentation?

More questions :

Answer in reverse order.

9

recombination

8. String fragmentation

• String model may be relevant for pp collisions,

• String/fragmentation has no phenomenological support in heavy-ion collisions.

but not for AA collisions.

10

High pT physics in pp collisions is well

understood.What was a discovery yesterday is now used for calibration today.

11

7. Recombination versus Fragmentation

Parton distribution (log scale)

p

p

hadron momentum

q1+q2

(recombine)

higher yield

q

(fragment)

heavy penalty

suppressed by power-law

12

6. Pion is a Goldstone boson

Is it a boson due to spontaneous symmetry breaking? Or a bound state of quark-antiquark?

Both are aspects of the pion.

No theory exists that can continuously transform one to the other.

In Drell-Yan process in -p collisions, the quark contents of pion and proton are probed.

p

+

-

13

5. Spatial considerationsWe have formulated recombination in momentum space only so far.

Shouldn’t the spatial coordinates be important also? Isn’t hadron size relevant?

In heavy-ion collisions there are two sizes:

1. nuclear transverse size RA2. hadron transverse size rh

• If partons are parallel, but far apart, they cannot recombine

• If parton trajectories intersect, they must cross at the same space-time region --- relative momentum suppress recombination.

14

Soft partons are restricted to the small spatial spread around the point where hard

parton emerges from the nuclear medium.

Groups at Duke University and Texas A&M University have Monte Carlo codes to implement space & momentum constraints on recombination.

Our approach:

We consider only collinear partons. Hard parton defines the direction of the hadron.

We do not use Monte Carlo code to generate the soft partons throughout the expanding medium. We infer from the soft pion spectrum at low pT what the soft parton

distribution is.Momentum space consideration is sufficient, and that is where observation is made.

15

4. Entropy

u + d → +

color: 3 X 3 1

spin: 2 X 2 1

degrees of freedom decreased

R (q1,q2 , p) = f(q1,q2 , p)δ(q1 + q2 −p)

depends on wave function momentum conservation

g

q1 + q2 =pd

+

uSoft gluon radiation: mutates color & carries away spin without changing

RM cannot account for low momentum partons

Entropy: a global quantity that should take into account expanding volume.

16

3. How do gluons hadronize?

In pp collisions the parton distributions are

Gluons carry ~1/2 momentum of proton but cannot hadronize directly.

Sea quark dist. Fq ~ c (1-x)7

Saturated sea quark dist. F’q ~ c’

(1-x)7

Gluon conversion to q-qbarq

q

g

Recombination of with saturated sea gives pion distribution in agreement with data.

qq

x2u(x)

x2g(x)

x [log]

17

2. Recombination functions

It depends on the wave function.

q

q

uud

p

Consider the time-reversed processuud

p puu

d

What are the distributions of the quarks in momentum fractions in the infinite momentum frame?

18

Deep inelastic scattering

ee

p

Fq

We need a model to relate to the wave function of the proton

Fq

Valon modelp

U

U

Dvalons

19

p

U

U

D

Basic assumptions

• valon distribution is independent

of probe

• parton distribution in a valon is independent of the hadron

xuv (x,Q2 ) = dy2GUx

1

∫ (y)KNS(xy,Q2 )

xdv (x,Q2 ) = dyGDx

1

∫ (y)KNS(xy,Q2 )

valence quark distr in proton

valon distr in proton, independent of Q

valance quark distr in valon, in proton or in pion

%uv (n,,Q2 ) =2 %GU (n) %KNS(n,Q

2 )

%dv (n,,Q

2 ) = %GD(n) %KNS(n,Q2 )

Moments by convolution theorem

known from CTEQ param

cancel in the ratio

the ratio can be determined

20

3-valon exclusive distribution

Recombination function

α =1.76 β =1.05

proton Rp(x1,x2,x3,x) =x1x2x3

x3 GUUDp (

x1

x,x2

x,x3

x)=g(

x1x2

x2 )2.76(x3

x)2.05δ(

x1

x+

x2

x+

x3

x−1)

pion Rπ (x1,x2,x) =x1x2

x2 GUD π (

x1

x,x2

x)=

x1x2

x2 δ(x1

x+

x2

x−1)

From initiated Drell-Yan process

xqvπ(x) =Ax0.64(1−x)1.11 valon

model Gπ (y1,y2) =δ(y1 +y2 −1)

GU (y) = dy2∫ dy3∫ GUUD(y1,y2 ,y3)

GD(y) = dy1∫ dy2∫ GUUD(y1,y2 ,y3)

Single-valon inclusive distribution

Hwa & CB Yang, PRC66(2002)

GUUD(y1,y2,y3) =g(y1y2)α y3

βδ(y1 +y2 +y3 −1)

21

1. Two-parton distributions

Fqq (q1,q2 ) Fuud (q1,q2 ,q3)

pp collisions: low pT and large xF

Fud

(x1, x2 ) =Fu(x1)Fd(x2 )

Heavy-ion collisions:

Low pL (mid-rapidity), large

pTThat is high pT physics.

Traditionally, hadronization at high pT is by

fragmentation.However, fragmentation model has met some difficulties, most notably in p/ ratio at intermediate pT in nuclear collisions.

22

Before describing what the two-parton distribution should be at high pT in heavy-ion

collisions, we must first

• discuss why fragmentation does not work phenomenologically

• what are the shower partons in fragmentation?

• how does the nuclear medium affect hadronization?

Which parton recombines which parton is the core problem in the recombination model.

23

Not possible in fragmentation model:

Dp/ q <<Dπ /q

Rp/π

Rp/π

1

Dp/q

Dπ /q

u

p/ ratio

25

The black box of fragmentation

q

A QCD process from quark to pion, not calculable in pQCD

z1

Momentum fraction z < 1

Phenomenological fragmentation function

D/q

z1

26

Let’s look inside the black box of fragmentation.

q

fragmentation

z1

gluon radiation

quark pair creation

Although not calculable in pQCD (especially when Q2 gets low), gluon radiation and quark-pair creation and subsequent hadronization nevertheless take place to form pions and other hadrons.

27

Description of fragmentation by recombination

known from data (e+e-, p, … )

known from recombination model

can be determined

hard partonmeson

fragmentationshower partons recombination

xD(x) =dx1x1

∫dx2

x2Fq,q (x1,x2)Rπ (x1,x2,x)

28

Shower parton distributions

Fqq '(i )(x1,x2) =Si

q(x1)Siq ' x2

1−x1

⎛

⎝ ⎜ ⎞

⎠ ⎟

Sij =

K L Ls

L K Ls

L L Ks

G G Gs

⎛

⎝

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎞

⎠

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

u

gs

s

d

du

K =KNS+L

Ks =KNS +Ls

Sud,d ,u ,u(sea) =L

valence

sea

L L DSea

KNS L DV

G G DG L

Ls DKSea

G Gs DKG

R

RK

5 SPDs are determined from 5 FFs.

assume factorizable, but constrained kinematically.

29

Shower Parton Distributions

Hwa & CB Yang, PRC 70, 024904 (04)

30

BKK fragmentation functions

31

If our shower parton distributions are reliable, based on the dynamical independence of the shower partons except for kinematical constraints, then we should be able to calculate the quark fragmentation function into a proton.

Data on Dup(z) not well

determined. KKP parametrization has an error.

Nevertheless, there is only a discrepancy of less than a factor of 2 over 4 order of magnitude.

32

Once the shower parton distributions are known, they can be applied to heavy-ion collisions.

The recombination of thermal partons with shower partons becomes conceptually unavoidable.

D(z)

h

qA A

Conventional approach

33

Once the shower parton distributions are known, they can be applied to heavy-ion collisions.

The recombination of thermal partons with shower partons becomes conceptually unavoidable.

hNow, a new component

34

Pion formation: qq distribution

thermal

shower

soft component

soft semi-hard components

usual fragmentation

(by means of recombination)

T

SFqq =TT+TS+SS

Proton formation: uud distribution

Fuud =TTT +TTS +TSS +SSS

35

T(p1)=p1dNq

th

dp1=Cp1exp(−p1/T)

Thermal distribution

Fit low-pT data to determine C & T.

Shower distribution in AuAu collisions

S(p2)=ξ∑i ∫dkkfi(k)Sij(p2 /k)

hard parton momentum

distribution of hard parton i in AuAu collisions

Contains hydrodynamical properties, not included in our model.

36

fi (k) =dNi

hard

kdkdyy=0density of hard partons with pT = k

Input: parton distributions CTEQ5L nuclear shadowing EKS98 hard scattering pQCD

Srivastava, Gale, Fries, PRC 67, 034903 (2003)

dNjet

d2 pTdyy=0

=K C(1+pT / B)β

C, B, are tabulated for i=u, d, s, u, d, g K=2.5

37

T(p1)=p1dNq

th

dp1=Cp1exp(−p1/T)

Thermal distribution

Fit low-pT data to determine C & T.

Shower distribution in AuAu collisions

S(p2)=ξ∑i ∫dkkfi(k)Sij(p2 /k)

hard parton momentum

distribution of hard parton i in AuAu collisions

SPD of parton j in shower of hard parton i

fraction of hard partons that get out of medium to produce shower

calculable

Contains hydrodynamical properties, not included in our model.

38

thermal

fragmentation

soft

hard

TS Pion distribution (log scale)

Transverse momentum

TT

SS

Now, we go to REAL DATA, and real theoretical results.

39

production in AuAu central collision at 200 GeV

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Hwa & CB Yang, PRC70, 024905 (2004)

TS

fragmentation

thermal

40

Proton production in AuAu collisions



TTS+TSS

TSS

41



Proton/pion ratio

42


are needed to see this picture.All in recombination/ coalescence model

Compilation of Rp/ obtained by 3 groups

43

Puzzle in pA or dA collisions

kT broadening by multiple

scattering in the initial state.

Unchallenged for ~30 years.

If the medium effect is before fragmentation, then should be independent of h= or p

Cronin Effect Cronin et al, Phys.Rev.D (1975)

p

q

hdNdpT

(pA→ πX)∝ Aα , α >1

A

RCPp >RCP

πSTAR, PHENIX (2003)

Cronin et al, Phys.Rev.D (1975)

p >

44

RHIC data from dAu collisions at 200 GeV per NN pair

Ratio of central to peripheral collisions:

RCP

RCPh (pT ) =

dNh

dpT

1NColl

central( )

dNh

dpT

1NColl

peripheral( )

PHENIX and STAR experiments found (2002)

RCPp (pT )>RCP

π (pT )

Can’t be explained by fragmentation.

=geometrical factor(central) × Dh

geometrical factor(peripheral) × Dh

(in fragmentation model)

45

RCPp (pT )>RCP

π (pT )STAR

46

d

d

central peripheral

more T more TS

less T less TS

RCPh (pT ) =

dNh

dpT

1NColl

central( )

dNh

dpT

1NColl

peripheral( ) ⇒

more TSless TS

>1

d+Au collisions (to study the Cronin Effect)

47

d+Au collisions





Pions

Hwa & CB Yang, PRL 93, 082302 (2004)

No pT broadening by multiple scattering in the initial state.Medium effect is due to thermal (soft)-shower

recombination in the final state.

soft-soft

48



Proton

Thermal-shower recombination is negligible.

Hwa & Yang, PRC 70, 037901 (2004)

49

Nuclear Modification Factor



RCPp >RCP

π

This is the most important result that validates parton recombination.

2q , each quark has ~1/2 of momentum

3q p, each quark has ~1/3 of p momentum

50

Molnar and Voloshin, PRL 91, 092301 (2003).

Parton coalescence implies that v2(pT)

scales with the number of constituents

STAR data

Azimuthal anisotropy

51

Forward-backward asymmetry in d+Au collisions

Expects more forward particles at high pT than backward particles

If initial transverse broadening of parton gives hadrons at high pT, then

• backward has no broadening

• forward has more transverse broadening

52



Backward-forward asymmetry at intermediate pT

backwardforward

in d+Au collisions

53

More interesting behavior found in large pT and large pL region.

It is natural for parton recombination to result in forward-backward asymmetry

Less soft partons in forward (d) direction than backward (Au) direction.

Less TS recombination in forward than in backward direction.

Forward-backward asymmetry by recombination

54



Hwa, Yang, Fries, PRC 71, 024902 (2005)

Forward production in d+Au collisions

Underlying physics for hadron production is not changed from backward to forward rapidity.

BRAHMS data

55

Summary

We have discussed

• some basic issues about recombination

• application to intermediate and high pT

physics in heavy-ion collisions

• resolved several puzzles on single-particle distributions in HIC

We have not covered

Correlation of hadrons in jets (Thursday)

hadronization of partons by recombination rudolph c. hwa university of oregon summer school on rhic...

Documents

fragmentation recombination

parton recombination

b slide

pp collisions

recombination rudolph

recombination functions

heavyion collisions

recombination formulas