hackney central master plan p60-101
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
1/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
2/43
60
5.6 Management and MaintenanceOne o the objectives o the Masterplan is to
help deliver the physical regeneration o the area,
including that o the public realm. However,
signicant expenditure in the public realm would
be wasted i adequate management and
maintenance regimes o the streets and public
places were not in place, to ensure that the
quality o the environment remains attractive and
continues to support the economic regeneration
o Hackney Central.
Well maintained streets and public places
encourage their use and add to their vibrancy.
Proposals or improvements to the public realm
should be considered holistically, taking account
o the lietime o the project in terms o initial
investment and on-going maintenance.
An overview o the management o the public realm
is also key to its uture quality and success.
Ill-thought-out decisions, such as poorly sited
street urniture, or contractors not replacing
original materials ollowing maintenance work,
can individually and collectively undermine the
quality o our public places. A co-ordinated
approach to the management o our public
realm is thereore necessary to ensure that the
initial schemes are designed and maintained in
an appropriate way and continue to provide a
high quality nish.
In general, proposals or streetscape enhancements
through the public realm strategy, should build in
robustness into their management and maintenance
by:
Detailed Records: Maintaining a detailed recordo the original scheme, including details o the nal
implemented design, materials, street urniture etc;
Skills: Ensure that in-house sta has the necessaryskills to implement and maintain the public realm or
which they are responsible;
Awareness: Ensure that in-house sta is ully awareo the appropriate maintenance procedures;
Utilities: Work with utilities companies to ensure
suraces are replaced with the appropriate materials;
Stocks o Materials: Maintain adequate stockso the relevant materials or repairs and on-going
maintenance;
Maintenance Procedure: Ensure that theappropriate maintenance procedures are in-place to
provide consistent uture management;
Specialist items: Provide or adequate contractualarrangements or specialist items such as bespoke
lighting or public art or provide the necessary
specialist cleaning equipment where required;
Skilled operatives are required to maintain the quality o the public realm An inappropriate tarmac repair where matching stone should havebeen used. This highlights the importance o adequate skilled sta andstocks o materials
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
3/43
61
Robustness:The design o places and the choice
o materials should be suciently robust so as to
be able to cope with the expected level o use and
adopted cleaning methods, equipment and vehicles.
The LB Hackney is responsible or the management
and maintenance o public streets and spaces
within the borough. Management responsibility is
divided between the Waste Operations Department
and Streetscene. These departments will be ully
consulted on all proposals to ensure that they are
both appropriate and able to be maintained within
the capabilities o these units.
Waste Operations: LB Hackney is responsible orthe management and maintenance o the adopted
roads in the within Hackney Central. The Boroughs
own Waste Operations department is responsible
or street cleaning, litter and reuse collection andthere is an extensive published programme or these
operations.
Each adopted street is swept a minimum o twice
a week on previously appointed days, and areas
dened as town centres are swept 5 times a week
and streets identied as extra busy are swept more
regularly.
StreetsceneWhereas street cleaning and litter and reuse
collection is the responsibility o Waste Operations,
Streetscene is responsible or maintaining the
inrastructure o the adopted roads including
highways suraces, ootways, kerbs, reestanding
walls, street urniture and lighting. Streetscenes
area o responsibility normally extends up to the
back o pavement, including the management o
street trees situated within adopted pavements.
Streetscene also maintains no less than 130
green sites elsewhere in the borough and
thereore are normally responsible or the
maintenance o public green spaces.
Streetscene also has 3 grati removal teams
within the borough.
New TreesStreetscene employs a Tree Ocer or the
maintenance o trees within its jurisdiction.
Streetscene approves all new street trees to be
planted within their areas o responsibility, and
these should conorm to their own Design Guide.Issues include tree species, planting size, planting
specication, provision o root defectors etc.
12 month maintenance period under contractTrees adopted by Streetscene are subject to a
3-5 year Young Tree Maintenance Period.
(During the rst 12 months 15 inspections are
carried out o which 9 are carried out in the
growing season. In the ollowing 3-5 years, 4
maintenance visits per year are carried out with
necessary remedial works undertaken, such
as watering, pruning, loosening tree ties etc.).
Established trees are inspected annually with
appropriate works carried out as necessary
(Pollarded trees are re-pollarded every 3 years).
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
4/43
62
6.1 Land use strategyRegenerating Hackney Central town centre involves
not only a range o environmental programmes
but also, and critically, ensuring there exists an
underlying and robust local economic strategy. For
Hackney Central this will ocus on reinorcing the
town centres civic unctions (LBH is one o the
largest employers along with Homerton Hospital)
allied with an emerging cultural and creative ocus
or business, leisure and recreation. To deliver these
overarching objectives, the Masterplan has identied
a palette o land uses that are described in this
chapter.
The strategic land use ramework drawing provides
an overview o the range o land uses proposed,together with their distribution which refects the
emerging Core Strategy.
The Masterplan envisages a mix and distribution
o uses that refect and support the multiunctional
role that Hackney Central perorms as a town
centre. Notably, as a retail, cultural and civic hub,
an important public transport node and as a place
where people also live and work. The proposed
land use mix seeks to maintain and strengthen
existing positive uses, and introduce new uses
that complement the role o the location. In some
cases, and where appropriate, existing uses might
be re-provided, though usually at a greater degree o
intensity, in order to make more ecient use o land
and maximise the potential o the town centre.
This section provides an overview o the suggested
land uses within the Masterplan area. Thesubsequent sections in Chapter 6 provide more
detail on the dierent land use strategies.
06 THEME 3 - Ensuring a unctional towncentre or living, working and shopping
Mixed use city centre development o residential apartments aboveshops
Mixed use development around a high quality landscaped space
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
5/43
63
Figure 6.1 Land use
Land use
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
6/43
64
Policy/Design Principles
6.1 Land Uses
Overall, development should support the
regeneration o Hackney Central and uses should
complement the vision or the area as high density
and mixed use. Future development should abide
by the ollowing broad land use principles:
1. A mix o retail and residential should be included
at the Tesco and bus garage site with:
Enhanced pedestrian access through the
Tescos site, lined with active rontages.
Make greater use o railway arches at Bohemia
Place to acilitate a pedestrian link and converted
to retail units.
A mix o retail and residential uses designed to
overlook adjacent streets and spaces. Potential to accommodate a landmark building.
2. The shops on Lower Clapton Road and Morning
Lane to:
Maximise opportunities or to provide a mix o
uses on these under utilised sites.
3. The Gibbons site (Amhurst Road) to:
Maximise this excellent town centre location by
providing a mix o retail space at ground foor,
with residential and/or commercial space above.
Consider appropriately designed temporary
solutions as land is saeguarded or the
Hackney-Chelsea line (Crossrail 2).
4. Residential Areas should:
Comprise primarily residential uses.
Ensure that proposals or other uses must be
compatible with residential amenity.
5. Community and residential uses would need to
be considered and addressed appropriately where
acilities are aected by proposals or development.Proposals aecting community acilities should:
Retain/enhance and incorporate or re-provide
existing acilities to a high standard.
A mix o Retail and ResidentialMare Street and the Narrow Way would retain their
existing high street character and range o uses,
predominantly retail and related activities such as
caes, oces and residential uses above ground
foor level, in a horizontal and vertical mix. Thepresence o local independent retailers contributes
signicantly to Hackney Centrals interest and
provides a unique selling point or the town. The
proposed arrangement would maintain the existing
situation, although additional choice in terms o
places to eat would strengthen the existing mix.
It is envisaged that the range and extent o the
retail area would be expanded to include the Tesco
store on Morning Lane and the bus garage to the
north. It is likely that the existing Tesco store would
be replaced with a new store. Both are shown to
include a retail and residential mix and improved
pedestrian connections.
The railway arches at Bohemia Place have distinctive
qualities and it is proposed to make greater use
o these and convert a number o units or retail
purposes to complement the existing retail oer on
Mare Street.
The retail rontage on Lower Clapton Road
includes a range o single storey retail buildings
and represents an under utilised site. Such a
location would benet rom a mix o retail units with
residential development above.
In the medium to long term the development o the
Gibbons site is appropriate or a mixed retail and
residential development to take advantage o its
excellent town centre location.
Residential AreasThe majority o the Masterplan area west o
Mare Street comprises predominantly residential
accommodation, and it is not proposed to alter
these areas signicantly. Proposals or alternative
uses in these areas should be appropriate to
a residential environment and amenity o the
neighbourhood.
A mix o Community and ResidentialThe area west o St John-at-Hackney Church
comprises the ormer Rectory, a Scout hut, aLearning Trust acility and a privately owned
yard. This site has the potential to accommodate
additional town centre housing and provide an
improved relationship with the churchyard.
However, the existing community acilities would
need to be considered and addressed appropriately
through the redevelopment o this site.
The land use map suggests that the area would
continue to accommodate the community acilities
although relocation could be acceptable. Theunding o any re-provided acilities will also be a
consideration.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
7/43
65
Policy/Design Principles
6.1 Land Uses (continued)
Proposals to re-locate community acilities
should not be precluded, depending on the
uture needs o the operators and the availability
o suitable alternative locations.
Ensure re-located community acilities are sited
on an appropriate alternative site that is equally
convenient, and accessible within the local area,
where there is a continued requirement or these
acilities.
Ensure there is not net loss in community use.
6. A mix o commercial and residential uses on the
bus garage site should:
Provide or retail elements to address Bohemia
Place and railway arches. Provide interesting and lively rontages to
Bohemia Place and strengthen its role as an
extension o the retail area.
Provide quieter more low-key commercial uses
with residential elements above acing towards
the churchyard in order to maintain its tranquillity
and atmosphere.
7. Oce, Employment, Community and Leisure:
Existing cultural, community and leisure uses
should generally be retained. Proposals or mutually supportive uses, such as
such as a caes or restaurants are encouraged.
Appropriate new uses should be sought or the
Ocean venue.
Proposals should provide active ground level
rontages.
Peripheral locations could incorporate a mix o
commercial uses with residential elements.
8. Parking within Hackney Central should:
Provide town centre parking within a basement
car park beneath Tescos as part o proposals orthe redevelopment o this site.
Provide minimum residential parking.
Provide car club parking spaces within or close
to proposals or residential development.
9. The Bus Garage proposals should:
Retain or re-provide the existing acility to meet
the current and uture requirements o the bus
operator.
A mix o Commercial and ResidentialThe area o the bus garage, identied as a mix o
both residential and commercial uses, refects the
transitional role this area perorms between the busy
Tesco site and railway arches to the south and the
contrasting tranquillity o the churchyard.
Oce, Employment, Community and LeisureThe area around Town Hall Square contains a variety
o uses, including civic unctions, entertainment,
employment/oces and community acilities. This
area orms a cultural cluster arranged around a
memorable public square. It is intended to maintain
the current mix o uses and, where possible,
strengthen this cultural cluster.
In addition, beyond the immediate civic core around
the Town Hall, are several locations which havebeen identied as potential sites or redevelopment.
It is envisaged that these slightly more peripheral
locations would comprise predominantly commercial
uses with residential accommodation situated
above. The commercial unction o these sites
would compliment the existing and emerging oce/
employment activities around the Town Hall.
ParkingThe Tescos site currently accommodates the
main own centre surace car park with someparking also located next to Hackney Central
railway station. Redevelopment o the Tesco
site would require the town centre parking to be
re-provided. Re-development o the station car
park would see these spaces lost.
New residential development would be provided or
with only very limited car parking provision due to
the highly accessible location o the town centre by
means o public transport (see Transport Chapter 7).
Bus DepotA bus garage is necessary to meet the current and
uture requirements o the bus operator. However,
two options are suggested or the re-provision o
the garage on this site in order to make better use
o this important town centre location (see Part III,
Character Area 1). The acility could potentially be
located underground. This solution would be costly,
but would enable a signicantly greater benecial
use o the existing site at ground level and above.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
8/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
9/43
67
Figure 6.2 Retail Strategy
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
10/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
11/43
69
Policy/Design Principles
6.2 Retail Strategy (continued)
Improve the retail mix in uture developments.
Encourage appropriate new uses or the Old
Town Hall such as a cae or restaurant.
6. Bohemia Place proposals should:
Seek to convert the arches to new retail space
to broaden the overall town centre oer and
maximise the central location
Address problems o severance and barriers to
pedestrian movement by orming north-south
link(s) better integrating areas to the east o Mare
Street to Narrow Way and St John-at-Hackney
Church gardens
Create a distinctive and unique location within
the town centre
7. Gibbons site proposals should improve the range
and quality o shops by:
Examining opportunities to incorporate larger
shop units attractive to national multiple retailers
Consider proposals/uses suitable as temporary
solutions as land is saeguarded or the
Hackney-Chelsea line (Crossrail2)
8. Proposals or the redevelopment o the Tescos
and bus garage sites should contribute to the
provision o a shopping circuit by:
acilitating the provision o a new pedestrian link
through the railway arches
Providing an attractively designed street ormed
o several small linked spaces
Be aced on each side by shops and caes at
ground level to help create lively rontages and
an appealing route
Screen the unsightly backs o the buildings on
Mare Street
Implementing high quality public realm
enhancements consistent with the public realmstrategy or Hackney Central
9. Development proposals should incorporate ocal
spaces to sit and relax, including:
spill out spaces to enable caes and restaurants
to provide outside seating and would enliven the
public realm.
Continued on next page
Bohemia Place (railway arches)
At present the arches on Bohemia Place are under-utilised. They contain minimal retail use and a
predominant amount o semi-industrial/automotive
activity. With the redevelopment o both Tesco and
the bus garage, the opportunity exists to open up
access to the arches and integrate them more ully
into the town centre-wide retail oer.
The arches are distinctive and a potentially attractive
part o the town centre, whose character could be
exploited to provide original shopping streets with
character, that would help provide Hackney Central
with a unique retail oer.
Gibbons siteThis site is located within the dened Core Shopping
Frontage area where retail is the preerred use,
and would contribute to the vitality and viability
o Mare Street and Amhurst Road. This is a
large redevelopment opportunity site in the town
centre and has the potential to make a signicantcontribution to the regeneration o a key site in
Hackney Central.
The adjacent retail and leisure uses, and its location
next to a railway line make the redevelopment o the
site or these uses both suitable and the only viable
option. In addition, Amhurst Road and Mare Street
are well served by buses, and Hackney Central
railway station is to the rear o this site.
A key constraint on this site is the Chelsea-Hackney
surace saeguarding that introduces a time actor
on the lie o any uture development (15-17yrs). For
this reason, mixed use development that contains
residential uses may not be appropriate on parts o
the site area.
Shopping CircuitBy developing Tescos and the bus garage a new
shopping circuit would be created, that would
establish routes linking disparate parts o the town
centre. These circuits would link Hackney Central
Station, the Narrow Way, Morning Lane, Mare Streetand Town Hall Square in a loop. Beyond this links
reach out along the Narrow Way, Amhurst Road St
Johns Churchyard Gardens.
A new pedestrian street would be created through
the Tesco site between Morning Lane and the
Narrow Way. It is anticipated that existing railway
arches could be opened to provide a more
convenient and attractive route or pedestrians. This
would provide a positive connection to both the
retailers on the Narrow Way and Hackney CentralStation. The ocus o the strategy is to provide an
attractive, sae and convivial pedestrian route.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
12/43
70
Policy/Design Principles
6.2 Retail Strategy (continued)
10. Leisure (eat and drink) and commercial leisure
acilities proposed within Hackney Central should:
Be provided or within mixed use developments
provided these are compatible with surrounding
residential amenity.
Encourage caes and restaurants in association
with the cultural quarter around Town Hall
Square.
Have regard to issues o saety and security
including the provision o suitable lighting.
The opportunity site on Lower Clapton Road (see
Part III), at the top o the Narrow Way, oers some
potential to be redeveloped as an anchor use
to maximise its position at the top o this retail
street and act as a draw to encourage pedestrian
movement up the Narrow Way. Such a use could
incorporate larger retail units, appropriate leisure
uses such as caes and restaurants.
Focal Spaces to sit and relaxThroughout the area there will be a series o new
and improved public spaces or residents and
visitors to sit and relax. Distinctive public spaces
would also improve legibility and the ability o people
to move through the town centre.
Leisure (eat and drink) and commercial leisure
acilitiesHackney Central would benet rom additional
places to eat and drink which are currently
under-provided or within the existing centre. The
provision o good quality places to eat and drink
would compliment the retail oer and contribute
to an enhanced evening economy. However,
improvements to saety are considered to be an
important part o uture changes to the night
time economy and need to be considered
alongside the public realm strategy.
The cultural quarter o Hackney Central is ocussed
around Town Hall Square, with the Hackney Empire
Theatre and Ocean venue. With the uture o
the Ocean in doubt a positive strategy needs to
be developed or this site, and the potential or
smaller-ormat venues to open could be explored or
potential or conversion to a cinema.
There may be potential to promote growth in the
ca and restaurant sector - in particular, a pre-
theatre dining culture could be developed. Such
uses need not be located on Town Hall Square itselbut could be within easy walking distance.Leisure uses and evening activities are important as part o the mix o
town centre uses
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
13/43
71
Policy/Design Principles
6.3 Housing Provision
1. Residential developments must:
Contribute to the London Borough o Hackneys
London Plan requirement to provide 10,850 net
additional dwellings between 2007 and 2017.
Meet London Plan requirements that 50% o
the total amount o new housing should be
aordable (London Plan policies provide some
fexibility or mixed-use and/or regeneration
schemes that deliver wider benets).
Consider the need or a mix o homes that
provide or larger amilies, especially or those
unable to aord market prices.
Be o suciently high architectural and urban
design standards, as well as meet Code or
Sustainable Homes Level 4 (see also 08 EnergyStrategy) regardless o tenure.
Provide high density housing appropriate to
its town centre location and where applicable
historic context in accordance with London Plan
density requirements; and
Provide high standards o architectural and
urban design with new homes built to Lietime
Homes standards.
support town centre regeneration and complement
much investment to public transport inrastructure.
These housing projections draw on the Hackney
Housing Land Capacity Study by ENTEC Planning
Consultants 2005, which concluded that with
planning intervention the capacity exists to deliver
1,824 new units in Hackney Central (Ward) over 3
phases to 2022.
Housing mixO this total amount o new housing to be
accommodated, the London Plan requires that
50% should be aordable, with 35% social rented
and 15% intermediate, shared ownership Housing
and the remaining 50% private. Evidence rom the
Housing Needs Survey 2003 and demographic
projections underpin the case or a mix o homes that
provide or larger amilies, especially or those unableto aord market prices. Existing UDP policies require
new development to provide 1/3rd o dwellings as
amily accommodation with 3 or more bedrooms
(UDP Policy HO9) and a urther 1/3rd o the 1/3rd
should be our or more bedrooms. With the GLA
increase in housing supply targets to 1,085 p.a., it
will be important to ensure that the strategic target
increase should not be attained at the detriment o
meeting local housing needs or larger amilies.
Housing density and designThe current Masterplan identies a range o new
housing developments across the plan area.
For highly accessible town centre sites such as
Hackney Central, in order to optimise the potential o
development sites, the London Plan recommends a
minimum density o 650 1100 habitable rooms per
hectare (hr/ha), which equates to 240 435 units per
hectare when 2.7 habitable rooms per unit (hr/u) is
applied. The London Plan encourages high standards
o architectural and urban design and requires that all
new dwellings are built to Lietime Homes standards.
The Drat LB Hackney LDF Core Strategy also seeksto establish that residential development should be
built to Level 4 o the Code o Sustainable Homes,
regardless o tenure.
Modern terraced housing Duplex and fat units with a common deck above shared
parking
6.3 Housing provisionThe London Plan 2006 amendments, requires LB
Hackney to deliver 10,850 net additional dwellingsbetween 2007 and 2017. This equates to 1,085
net additional dwellings per year rom 2007/08 to
2016/17. Assessments o housing land capacity
and developments in the pipeline suggest the 1,085
target is likely to be exceeded with a supply o
1,200 net new dwellings p.a. up to 2012, reducing
thereater (Re; Submission or Growth Area Funding
(GAF) (Round 3) Report, LB Hackney, 2007). It is
thereore likely that GLAs target average o 1,085
over the whole period rom 2007/08 to 2016/17 will
be attained.
It is envisaged that much development activity
centres on Hackney Central and Dalston where high
density mixed used development is encouraged to
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
14/43
72
Policy/Design Principles
6.4 Employment Provision
1. Proposals or commercial/employment space
within Hackney central will be required to provide
B1 workspace and/or alternative employment
space that will directly support the ollowing priority
sectors:
Cultural and creative industries.
ICT, design and interactive media technologies.
Finance and business services.
Public services, including government,
education, health and social care; and
Transport.
6.5 Community Facilities
1. The Masterplan will support Hackneys culturalstrategy. (see below) through:
Enhancing the Town Hall square and setting.
Broadening the local retail oer.
Improving streets as settings or wide ranging
activities.
Ensuring access and integration o existing
cultural acilities.
Providing new development opportunities that
include the potential or cultural uses.
2. Key projects within the town centre Masterplan
area will:
Be carried orward in close consultation with
the Learning Trust to determine the adequacy
o existing nursery and primary school provision
in relation to the projected child yield generated
rom new residential development in the area.
3. St John-at-Hackney Church and Gardens should
become a ocus or community activities and events
including:
Opening the southern part o the church as a
community cae, with outside seating space. Utilising some o the larger open spaces or
multiunctional activities and events such as
markets or outdoor theatre.
6.4 Employment provisionHackneys Dened Employment Areas (DEAs) do
not include areas within the Hackney Central town
centre masterplan boundary. Priority areas or
employment are described in the emerging Core
Strategy as being located in and around Homerton
Station and distributed across the Mare Streetsouth environs. These locations both all outside o
the Hackney Central Masterplan boundary, though
the ormer Flowers East building (now Momart) is
included.
The Masterplan provides 18,670 sqm o new B1
employment space in various locations across
the Masterplan area as part o a mix o uses on a
number o the identied opportunity sites. These are
principally located at bus garage site, Floreld Road
and potential sites along Sylvester Path.
Where employment uses are indicated, preerred
development is or B1 use classes and/or non B
use classes which directly support IT / cultural and
creative industries / nance / public services and
transport. 50% o all new / re-provided space must
be suitable or SMEs o 0 - 250 sq.m. It is expected
that these will be accommodated on the ground andrst foors with suitable uses including C3, D1 and
D2 above. Areas suitable or mixed business and
commercial uses are identied on the land use map.
The London Borough o Hackney undertook an
Employment Growth Options Study in March 2006
to inorm the emerging LDF. This identied uture
demand or employment foor space as ollows:
(i) total employment increasing by approximately
26,000 sqm between 2001-2016;
(ii) B use-class employment increasing by
approximately 15,000 sqm between 2001-2016;
(iii) uture gross demand or employment foor space
in Hackney amounting to between 200,000 sqm
and 300,000 sqm or the period 2001 to 2016. The
study urther identies potential sources o supply to
meet the demand and o these, Homerton and Mare
Street south are estimated to provide around 21,000
sqm across a range o types o accommodation.
6.5 Community Facilities
The Hackney Cultural Strategy was produced in2002 and is concerned with promoting cultural
issues in the borough. One o its major themes
is to conserve, maintain, enhance and promote
Hackneys physical environment and heritage.
Issues raised by the Cultural Strategy that are
relevant to this Masterplan include:
- Saety and security in parks within the Borough;
- Saer and better maintained acilities;
- The physical improvement o 50 open spaces;- The promotion o good environmental practice.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
15/43
73
Figure 6.3 Proposed community inrastructure
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
16/43
74
The cultural sector makes a signicant contribution
to the town centre economy and plays a major part
in shaping the character o Hackney Central. The
Town Hall area orms part o the cultural quarter.
Further, Mare Street is currently the centre o cultural
activity with potential or expansion. Hackneys
Community Strategy (2005-2015) identies a
number o key actions including promoting a
strong creative and cultural sector which marks out
an identity or the Borough as a centre o culture.
This is supported by the London Plan and Mayors
Cultural Strategy. Hackneys Cultural Strategy (2003)
recognizes the importance o the development o
cultural and creative industries.
The library in Hackney Central is the most modern
o Hackneys libraries and is co-located within
the Technology and Learning Centre. The centrealso provides training courses, space or creative
industries, school projects and community work.
Hackney Co-Operative Developments (HCD), a not-
or-prot, community benet company, continues to
play a key role in supporting and developing cultural
activities. Its priority target groups are black and
ethnic minority individuals and organisations, emale
entrepreneurs, youth, co-operatives, and green and
ethical businesses.
Educational acilitiesA number o key educational developments are
relevant to the Masterplan area.
Homerton College o Technology - though outside o
the Masterplan boundary, demolition o the ormer
Homerton College o Technology is contextually
relevant. It is to be replaced with a new our storey
building to accommodate an academy, sports hall,
associated hard play areas, recreation areas and
entrance plazas.
The primary schools within the area had sparecapacity at the time early Masterplanning baseline
work was carried out by LBH (2003 / 04). A
secondary school (see below), a Further Education
Institution and the Boroughs only Higher Education
Institution are also relevant to the study though
outside the Masterplan area.
The Hackney Free and Parochial secondary
school that lies on the southern boundary o the
masterplan area is planned to undergo complete
demolition and rebuild.
Healthcare FacilitiesThe Primary Care Trusts (PCT) development o
primary care centres is aligned with Hackneys Core
Strategy that ocuses on the dened town centres
that include Hackney Central and Dalston. The PCT,
however, does not identiy any new requirement or
Hackney Central. The redevelopment o the Lower
Clapton Health Centre, outside o the Masterplan
area, is included as part o the plans or the
redevelopment o Hackney Central.
The closest hospital is the Homerton University
Hospital, located east and outside o the masterplan
area. Some primary care acilities are to move to
Homerton Hospital allowing room or expansion
and development. Stage 1 approval is scheduled
or April 2010 or opening o transerred services to
Homerton. Redevelopment o Lower Clapton Health
Centre would then commence.
Healthcare or London published in December
2006 by the London Strategic Health Authority
outlined proposals or primary care to be provided
alongside a range o health care services in buildings
called polyclinics. Within this context, the City and
Hackney PCT has over the last year been pursuing
a strategy o a greater concentration o our general
practices within a smaller number o larger and
better quality buildings in a way that balances
the need to provide easy access with the need
to provide a wide range o health care in modern
buildings that are t or purpose (Revised Primary
Care Service and Estates Strategy, PCT, Nov 2007).
St John-at-Hackney Church and GardensThe Church is a ocus or community activities and
initiatives and is looking or ways to make the church
building and grounds more accessible and usable
or the community.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
17/43
75
6.6. Development contentThe opportunities or redevelopment and new
development have emerged through a thorough
assessment o the constraints and opportunities
o the study area. In some cases these have been
infuenced by areas o the town under development
pressure, whilst in others through the aspiration
to improve underperorming areas and contribute
towards improving the towns overall level o public
realm quality.
The various oci o growth and change were
tested at public consultation, where general and
overwhelming agreement with the areas was noted.
These were then explored through development o
a range o options, tested with both stakeholders
and through technical appraisal o issues such
as access/movement, engineering, economicsand planning policy conormity. Importantly all the
options were reviewed against the overarching
Masterplan objectives.
Due to uncertainty over specic key sites (e.g. bus
garage/Tesco/Hackney Central station and others),
it was decided that the Masterplan should be
represented through a series o high level ramework
drawings that established the non-negotiables or
design and development principles or the wider
Masterplan area. Such an approach would then
allow various alternative and more detailed scenarios
to be accommodated within opportunity areas
as discussions progress with key landowners /
developers / investors / occupiers.
The proposed development content o the
Masterplan is indicative only and serves to illustrate
the likely yield o new residential and non-residential
uses i a certain set o site scenarios were to be
pursued within the broader ramework (see Part
III, Chapter 9). Under these scenarios the ollowing
development content is proposed:
New retail (anchor): 14,000sq.m
(including servicing/bulk store)
New retail (non-anchor): 3,100sq.m
New commercial (oce): 18,670sq.m
New residential units: 833
New bus garage (basement): 8,000sq.m
Modern high quality mixed use development
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
18/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
19/43
77Figure 7.1 Borough-wide movement context
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
20/43
78
7.1.2 Hackney Centrals Vehicular Movement
NetworkThe key links serving Hackney Central is shown
in Figure 7.2. Key trac routes ollow the primary
and secondary road hierarchy and represent the
most congested vehicular locations, especially at
signicant junctions. Although not a primary route,
the Narrow Way orms an extension to Mare Street,
but is limited to bus and pedestrian trac only.
However, the narrow alignment o the road and
the large number o buses passing along this road
results in signicant bus congestion over large parts
o the day.
7.1.4 Hackneys User HierarchyThe ollowing road user hierarchy is proposed or
Hackney Central:
Pedestrians
Cyclists
Public transport users
Freight distribution (local)
Car users (multi-occupancy)
Car users (local)
Car users (non-local)
People with mobility impairment, the elderly
and parents with children have priority within
each category. The strategy recognises that
this hierarchy needs to be balanced against
the network hierarchy to ensure the ecient
management o all movements.
Mare Street orms part o the secondary road network
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
21/43
79
Figure 7.2 Vehicular movement network
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
22/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
23/43
81
Figure 7.3 Pedestrian strategy
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
24/43
82
Hackney GroveHackney Grove is a narrow lane running behind the
library. This route could orm a stronger connection
between London Fields and Broadway Market
through to Hackney Central, including to St John-at-
Hackney Church gardens via Mare Street.
Case Study: Cornmarket Street, OxordCornmarket is Oxords main shopping street. As
part o the initiative to create a more enhanced
shopping environment and to tackle bus congestion,
daytime pedestrianisation was implemented. The
street is closed o to all trac, including cyclists,
between 10am and 6pm by means o rising bollards
at each end. Cyclists and service vehicles can
access Cornmarket Street between 6pm and 10am.
A number o trac calming elements have beenused to establish the user hierarchy in Cornmarket
Street. For instance, the road surace was treated
to orm a street-wide pedestrianised area in a fat
horizontal prole with an aggregate surace suitable
or heavy service vehicles. The kerb between
the centre o the street and the pavements was
considered inappropriate as this suggested the
priority o vehicles over pedestrians. Other elements
like street urniture have also contributed greatly to
the success to this public space.
Pedestrianisation has created a successul public space
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
25/43
83
Policy/Design Principles
7.3 Crossings and Junctions
The ollowing crossing/junction improvements are
recommended:
1. Improvements to the Amhurst Road / the Narrow
Way junction should seek to give greater priority to
pedestrian movement including:
A new pedestrian acility to cater or the east and
west movement on Mare Street (Figure 7.5).
Trac calming measures on all three arms o
the above mentioned junction to improving
connectivity.
2. Improvements to pedestrian movement across
Mare Street at Town Hall Square by:
Installation o a new pedestrian crossing acilityopposite to the Town Hall.
3. Upgrade the existing crossing to Chalgrove
Road to:
Support the initiative o creating a pedestrian/
cyclist route through the railway arches and
across Morning Lane.
4. Improved acilities are proposed at the ollowing
locations:
Morning Lane at the junction with Paragon Road.
The junction o Amhurst Road, Kenmure Road
and Malpas Road to acilitate pedestrian and
cyclist movement rom the Narrow Way to
Amhurst Road and improve accessibility to
Hackney Downs and Hackney Central stations.
Amhurst Road north at the junction with
Marcon Place to acilitate cyclist and pedestrian
movement originating rom the junction with
Dalston Lane and Pembury Road.
Improve the existing crossing acility at the
junction o Morning Lane and Chatham Place to
urther encourage the use o Churchwell Pathwhich orms part o the signed route or both
cyclists and pedestrians.
7.3 Approach to crossings and junctions
CrossingsTo acilitate the movement o pedestrians across
busy roads, appropriate crossing acilities must be
provided. This is particularly an issue or the east-
west movement across Mare Street at the junction
with Amhurst Road and the Narrow Way. Currently,
pedestrians on the east side o Mare Street wishing
to access the west side o Amhurst Road are
directed to use the zebra crossing at the oot o
Narrow Way and the pelican crossing on Amhurst
Road. This is rather inconvenient to pedestrians due
to the associated trip and is enorced by the barriers
installed along Mare Street on approach to the
junction with Amhurst Road.
South o the Hackney Town Hall, there is a lightcontrolled pedestrian crossing on Mare Street
immediately south o Reading Lane serving an east
to west movement o pedestrians. However, a large
number o J-walkers are observed urther north
between the two bus stops on serving the Town
Hall on the east and west side o Mare Street. An
additional crossing point opposite the Town Hall will
support the desire line o the pedestrian.
On Morning Lane, there are currently two signal
controlled crossing acilities; one in the east-west
direction and the other in the north-south. As
mentioned, Tescos redevelopment plan includes
relocating the car park underground. Thereore,
the absence o cars entering and exiting rom the
western side o the Tescos site would not require
the crossing on the east-west direction.
Improved crossings are proposed in a number
o locations along Amhurst Road to acilitate
movements o both pedestrians and cyclists.
This will have the aim o improving saety where a
number o cyclist accidents have occurred.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
26/43
84
Surace treatmentsUrban design elements can sometimes have
trac calming eects as they can suggest that
pedestrians and cyclists take priority over vehicles.
This could thereore have road saety benets and
also contributes greatly to the visual appearance
o town centres. In Hackney Central, this strategy
nds it appropriate to apply this concept o using
urban design elements to enhance the environmentor pedestrians and cyclists at junctions particularly
those that have had a history o trac accidents.
Currently, due to the signicant trac at the main
junctions, the hierarchy seems to avour vehicles
over more vulnerable users o the road.
It is thereore recommended that surace treatments
be applied to the ollowing junctions in Hackney
Central:
- Mare Street and Morning Lane
- Amhurst Road/Mare Street/Narrow Way- Dalston Lane/Narrow Way/Lower Clapton Road
Surace treatment would comprise using contrasting
and robust paving material which usually includes a
mixture o paving slabs and blocks. These will signal
drivers both visually and physically o a change in the
environment as well as assist pedestrian movement.
Pedestrian riendly surace treatment at junctions and crossings
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
27/43
85
Policy/Design Principles
7.4 Cycle Routes
Enhancements are proposed or the transport
network or cyclists by:
1. Providing signed cycle routes as ollows:
A pedestrian/cyclist route to connect to St
Johns-at-Hackney-Church Gardens adjacent to
the existing bus depot site through the railwayarches and across Morning Lane to Chalgrove
Road.
Along Hackney Grove between Town Hall Square
and London Fields park.
2. Providing improved crossing acilities between:
Chalgrove Road and Morning Lane.
The junction o Amhurst Road, Kenmure Road
and Malpas Road.
3. Providing a signed cycle routes to connect with
the London Cycle Network (LCN): Along Wilton Way to provide an east and west
connection to the LCN.
Signage at the Amhurst Road/Dalston Lane/
Pembury Road junction to inorm cyclists o the
route to join the LCN.
4. Provision o eective signage at various points
along Mare Street to:
Identiy this approach to the main shopping
district; and
To guide cyclists to cycle parking acilities.
5. Provision o secure cycle parking acilities at key
locations within the town centre including:
Hackney Downs and Hackney Central Rail
Stations; and
Shopping locations to urther encourage cycling
within the town centre.
7.4 Cycle routesHackney Borough is recognised or its award-
winning cycling initiatives. This strategy aims to
complement the existing programmes that are
currently being implemented.
Part o the overall improvement o public realm in
Hackney Central envisages increased accessibility
or cyclists and provision o better acilities.
Its aim is to urther strengthen the routes within
and beyond the town centre particularly to support
the east-west movement. Figure 7.4 illustrates
the proposed signed routes and locations o cycle
parking.
Dedicated routes and improved legibility or cyclists
would assist in avoiding the mainstream trac as
the route would be predominantly ree rom vehicle
trac. Secure cycle parking in key locations, such
as at the railway stations also orm part o thestrategy to encourage cycling.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
28/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
29/43
87
Policy/Design Principles
7.5 Public TransportProposals aecting public transport include:
1. Potential pedestrianisation
Assessment o the pedestrianisation o the Narrow
Way involving the potential re-routing o bus routes
currently in using this street.
2. Reducing bus congestion
Measures to reduce/remove bus congestion
rom the Narrow Way should be investigated as
part o proposals to consider the pedestrianisation
o this area.
7.5 Public transport
7.5.1 Bus congestion in Hackney Central
Hackney Central benets rom good bus services
and rail connections. Currently, the issue within the
town centre is bus congestion at Amhurst Road and
the Narrow Way as each serve twelve bus routes.
Amhurst Road caters or northbound movement
while the Narrow Way caters or southbound
movement. As mentioned in the section on
pedestrian routes, the severe bus congestion along
the Narrow Way has resulted in an unpleasant
environment or shoppers due to saety issues
arising rom the potential confict between buses
and pedestrians.
The complete pedestrianisation o the Narrow Way is
identied as a means o improving the environmenton this important section o Mare Street. However,
it is recognised that this may involve a lengthy
investigation. It will be necessary to examine the
technical and operational evidence to determine the
implications and impacts o pedestrianisation on the
wider transport network and environment to assess
its easibility.
On Amhurst Road, there is potential to increase
capacity by removing the existing on-street parking,
which will be discussed in the ollowing section. It
is recognised this may potentially be a contentious
issue or local residents. The strategy however
urges that this would complement aims o improving
bus congestion within the town centre to create a
more pleasant environment or both residents and
visitors.
Trac delay along Mare Street, rom the Amhurst
Road/Narrow Way junction to Graham Road, is
recognised. It is thereore suggested that this part
o Mare Street be included in the study to look at
reducing overall congestion in the town centre.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
30/43
Figure 7.5 Parking, access and servicing strategy
88
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
31/43
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
32/43
90
Policy/Design Principles
7.7 Servicing Strategy
The proposed approach to servicing is as ollows:
1. Bus Depot access
Access to a basement bus garage should:
Provide a ramp with a minimum clearance height
o at least 4.5 metres.
Allow or a structural beam depth o around 1.5m.
Use a ramp gradient no steeper than 1:15 (with a
resulting ramp length o ramp is 90m).
Start the ramp descent some 25 metres rom the
Narrow Way, to allow a north-south pedestrian
route at grade beore buses join the ramp.
Establish an appropriate management system to
minimise bus/pedestrian confict.
Provide a roadway width to allow two busesto pass o 7.5m (taking into account central
separation and structural clearances).
Ensure the ramp design is inormed by a vehicle
swept path analysis at its detailed design stage.
2. Servicing requirements
Potential retail or commercial development at the
existing bus depot site should be accommodated
in uture proposals or this area with regard to the
space requirements or service vehicles.
Servicing should take place at ground level with a
service road rom Mare Street at Bohemia Place.
A loading bay o at least 20 x 20m is
recommended The eventual loading bay size
and layout would be inormed by vehicle swept
path analysis in its detailed design.
3. Tescos Servicing should:
Be accessed rom Morning Lane east to minimise
conficts between road users.
4. Rectory site access should:
Be suciently wide to accommodate re tenders,removal vans and reuse vehicles.
Lead to an area within the development site able
to acilitate three-point turns.
Ensure the detailed design is inormed by a swept
path tracking analysis during its detailed design.
7.7 Servicing strategy
7.7.1 Bus Depot Site
The aspiration is to relocate the bus depot
underground to utilise the existing area or a retail
or commercial development. This would require
a detailed design o access and servicing. In
particular, the access ramp to the underground
bus depot should ideally be placed in the same
alignment as the existing entrance to the bus depot.
Consultation with Arriva suggested uture operational
use o the bus depot will be or overnight storage o
double decker buses and as well as parking, there
would be a need to uel and wash buses on site in
the uture.
7.7.2 Tescos development site
The existing Tesco store is serviced rom a loadingbay at the eastern end o its site. Service access
should continue rom this end o the site but with a
separation between the access to an underground
car park in order to minimise the confict between
cars and service vehicles.
7.7.3 Site at corner o Morning Lane and Mare
Street
It is likely this site would be used or retail uses and
as such service vehicles would need to encroach
onto the designated pedestrian cycling area.
Delivery times should thereore be structured to
minimise conficts or example be limited to hours
between 1900 and 1000.
7.7.4 Development opportunity site to East of theNarrow Way (Rectory site)
This opportunity site is likely to be predominantly
residential but could include other uses such as the
Scout hall. The existing access road rom Mare
Street would need to be at least 5 metres in width
to provide sucient capacity to accommodate re
tenders, removal vans and reuse vehicles. Figure7.6 shows a potential location o the access route.
This access road should only be accessed by
service vehicles as car club parking would be
provided elsewhere close to the site.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
33/43
91
8.1 Introduction
Sustainability considerations are a key component o
the Hackney Central Masterplan. These are set out in
a preliminary energy strategy outlined in this section.
The Energy Strategy has been developed in order to
meet the national, regional and local policies aimed
at mitigating the impact o climate change. National
Government policies are geared to reducing UK
carbon emissions by 80% by 2050. The GLA policy
sets targets or at least 14% o Londons electricity
to be provided using renewable energy by 2010. For
major projects, the GLA requires that measures are
applied to reduce energy consumption and that at
least 20% o power consumption is rom renewable
sources.The vision or o Borough o Hackney is eventually to
become a zero carbon community.
8.2 Energy Hierarchy
The ollowing sections outline a strategy in
accordance with the Energy Hierarchy o the London
Plan (Feb. 2008) with the aim to decrease the overall
CO2 emissions:
1.Using less energy by adopting sustainable design
and construction measures (Policy 4A.3).
2.Supplying energy eciently in particular by
prioritising decentralised energy generation (Policy
4A.6)
3.Using renewable energy (Policy 4A.7)
8.3 Energy Reduction and eciency guidance
Legislation drives development and building design
to be more ecient, thus reducing overall demands.
This includes the ollowing considerations:
Optimised building orientation and passive solar
design (e.g. large windows on the south side,
small window area on the north side) results in
energy savings.
Minimisation o shadowing or maximisation o
solar gains.
Shading devices to avoid overheating risk in
summer.
Warm rooms preerably situated on the south
side. Low U-Values or building envelope.
Good window sealing with double glazing as a
minimum.
High air-tightness o buildings.
Low thermal bridging value.
High perormance condensing boilers (seasonal
eciency minimum 90%) with load compensator
or individual heat supply (where individual heating).
Ecient heating control systems.
Hot water demand reduced through water ecient
appliances.
High levels o insulation on hot water cylinder and
thermostat (where applicable).
Energy ecient lighting.
Energy ecient appliances.
Reduction o number o vents /ans.
The CO2 emission reduction that can be anticipated
rom considering energy eciency measures
can range rom 10% to 20%. In this report an
approximate 15% CO2 emission reduction rom
implementing eective energy eciency measure
is assumed. In general, the best recommendationor an investment into energy eciency measures is
the improvement o outdated insulation standards
to minimise consumption. In addition, reurbishment
potential or insulation can be seen where existing
buildings do not meet the minimum U-value
requirements o Part L.
08 THEME 5 - Promoting orward thinkingsustainable regeneration strategies
Large Wind Turbine
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
34/43
92
8.4 Supply strategy
The Hackney preliminary energy strategy outlines a
distinct heating scenario with the key driver being
the reduction o carbon emissions. District heating
systems provide a wide range o environmental
benets in addition to providing the local community
with:
Hot water and space heat on demand;
Reduced energy bills and lower annual running
costs;
Reduced maintenance costs (no boiler to service/
maintain);
Increased storage/foor space in units as individual
boilers are not required; and,
Ability to buy in to a green development.
The anticipated uture heating demands o three
separate sites (building clusters) were estimated in
the baseline report. The scenario or district heating
supply is now suggested as ollows:
Three building clusters are supplied independently
with individual heating networks (see Figure 8.1).
In practice, the exact number and location o the
energy centres will depend on the nal site layout
as well as on the overall phasing plan. The energy
strategy is based on the assumption o the 3 clusters
where a number o easibility aspects have been
taken into account, such as:
Possible distance to a central heating plant
Heat demands and building sizes
Accessibility or vehicles and underground
pipe-work
Phasing o the redevelopment
As an example, the rst 3 criteria can possibly
determine the Great Eastern Buildings together withthe Floreld Road Depot in Reading Lane as well
as the buildings in Wilton Way and Sylvester Road
as sensible independent clusters. The sites have
thereore been outlined with their own community
heating systems.
The decision about the number and location o the
district schemes will be based on the nal Masterplan
as well as on the criteria mentioned above. The
developers have to work closely with the Council to
determine the optimum strategy. This will considerthe ollowing aspects:
District and community heating schemes are the
preerred technologies to supply space heat and
domestic hot water.
Supply strategies can include district gas CHP
plants or each o the dened clusters. The
diversication o the heat loads is in all cases
easible to implement CHP. The remaining heating
demand can be delivered proportionally by
biomass and gas boilers.
Plant rooms are designed to supply a particular
foor area with heat, considering mainly:
- Number and sizes o main boilers and back-up
boilers, depending on their rated output
- Service, equipment and control room
- Walking and maintenance areas
- Fuel storage acilities and logistics, in case
biomass based heat sources are operating
- Space or later connection o additional sites,o desired
Preliminary plant room sizes are presented in the
baseline report. These gures are however only
indicative and should be revisited by the involved
ESCO and updated based on the heat load pattern
o uture sites.
Future-proo connection acilities should be
integrated i buildings are not immediately
connected to a district network, e.g. because o
phasing plans.
Sites such as the Service First Centre and Town
Hall have planning approval and are currently
being developed with their individual heating
systems. They will however be suitable or a
connection to a large scale district heating system
in the uture, i uture-proo connection acilities
have been considered, i.e. pipe work or possible
linkage is tted.
For the success o energy centres supplying
district heating or electricity it is important or
policy to support the use by both, public andprivate sectors.
Solar Hot Water is not recommended since the
implementation o CHP makes this inappropriate.
It should be retained however as a renewable
option and applied to individual buildings or
residential units which are not linked to the district
network.
Photovoltaic panels can be an optional upgrade
or integration in broad areas or or selected
individual buildings.
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
35/43
93
Figure 8.1 Energy strategy
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
36/43
94
8.5 Energy Service Company (ESCO):
The management o larger district heating networks
and electrical inrastructure can be provided by an
Energy Service Company (ESCO). The ESCO is
usually involved rom the early stage o planning and
will provide an all-round service with the ollowing
benets:
Support in the planning process and supervision o
the network and plant construction.
Reduced investments by a capital contribution or
a revenue share arrangement in lieu o the capital
contribution, e.g. by a joint venture model.
Supply management or all energy services to the
end user as well as or uel purchase.
Optimised plants and networks operation.
Individual consumption metering and billing o endusers.
Maintenance o plant, inrastructure, heat
exchangers and metering equipment.
8.6 General considerations or renewables
In order to determine how to best meet the GLAs
renewable energy target, an assessment o the
technical and economic easibility o a range o
renewable energy technologies must be carried out
with reerence to the nal Masterplan. These include:
Urban wind turbines
Photovoltaics (PV)
Solar hot water systems
Biomass heating
Biomass combined heat and power
Ground sourced heating
Ground sourced cooling
8.7 GLA renewable energy compliance
The toolkit o the Greater London Authority assists indetermining the energy production rom renewables.
In policy 4A the GLA sets targets or CO2 reductions
and requires a percentage o the energy demand to
be supplied by renewable sources.
Solar power can provide only minor savings. In
particular, the expensive and space consuming PV
technology is only easible where small CO2 savings
are required, or could be used to upgrade other
renewable technologies.
The calculation methods provided with the GLA
toolkit, along with detailed results are shown in
Appendix B.
Table 8.1 highlights the estimated carbon dioxide
savings arising rom each individual renewable
technology. A combination o the two major options
gas CHP and biomass district boilers will
thereore be capable o providing a reduction in CO2
emissions o 23.5%, exceeding the GLA requirement.
Figure 8.2 shows the Energy Hierarchy o the London
Plan with the results o the proposed energy strategy
or Hackney. Solar hot water and Photovoltaics
can be applied as independent and decentralised
systems. Thereore, Solar Hot Water and PV are not
included in the gure
8.8 Biomass guidance
Sustainable biomass supply should be established at
an early stage. Investigations showed that wood chip
producing companies generally see a high potential
in the local growth o sucient wood, in particular
in the south-east o England. Potential suppliers are
thereore condent that they can deliver wood uel
and home-grown biomass or the demands oresidential and larger mixed-use developments.
However, current debates consider the easibility o
biomass in London due to transport reduction eorts.
The outcome may eventually result in changes and
thereore infuence the uel strategy. In addition,
the supply security or locally sourced biomass is
dicult to predict in the long-term, as the demand
or biomass is constantly increasing. Other important
issues to be considered are:
Table 8.1: CO2 reductions and cost
Technology CO2 reduction
(%)
CO2 reduction cost
(/kg CO2)
Solar Hot Water 1.5% 7.7Photovoltaics 1.4% 16.3
Biomass boiler
(33% o demand)
17.2% 0.6
Gas CHP 6.3% 1.3
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
37/43
95
Estimating uel demand regarding project phasing
during the re-development
Early planning to allow time or capacity
developments and biomass growth
Establishing contacts with preerably localsuppliers to minimise transport and strengthen the
regional economy
Diversication and identication o numerous
potential suppliers
Determining wood specication, based on the
chosen boiler
Not ignoring current supply markets and installing
boilers which can operate with range o dierent
uel qualities
Long-term contracts or requent uel purchase
to guarantee a repayment o the suppliers
investments
8.9 Low carbon landmarks
The potential to implement low and zero carbon
sites (Code or Sustainable Homes level 6) is being
ollowed in order to create one or more show case
buildings in the London Borough o Hackney. In
response to this, examples o simulated dwellings are
used to outline the approach and the requirements
or low carbon buildings in the area.
The Code or Sustainable Homes assesses
residential developments or their environmental
perormance. In general, dwellings will be required to
meet the minimum applicable standards, i.e. Code
level 4.
Low Carbon houses built to Code level 4 (Upton, Northants)
Figure 8.2 Energy Hierarchy
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
38/43
Example: Code level 5 buildingsAppendix 2 shows an example case and
specications or a Code level 5 apartment,
simulated with NHER 3.1 sotware. As each dwelling
within a block has to comply with the Code,
the model can be easily implemented in various
buildings, e.g. potential fats above Tesco on Morning
Lane.
The pre-assessment checklist in Appendix B shows
moreover possible targets in all categories or Code
level 5 schemes.
Summary:
Biouel red CHP and biomass district boilers are
not sucient to meet level 5. Additional renewable
energy sources, such a Photovoltaics and small
wind turbines are to be considered. The required PV capacity or 200 fats would
summarize to a system size o 100kWp. The
physical size o the panels is thus around 600
m2 which can be placed upon the roo o Tesco,
provided it is not shaded by the surrounding block
o fats.
Four roo-mounted wind turbines, each providing
4,000kWh p.a. help to keep the size o the PV
array low. Vertical turbines are designed or urban
wind patterns and generate less visual impact that
3-bladed turbines. An accurate assessment o the
expected wind capacity is however essential. This
has to include the precise height and shapes o
the surrounding uture buildings.
Example: Zero carbon dwellings (Code level 6)A zero carbon requirement is part o the Code or
Sustainable Homes level 6 which is likely to become
mandatory in 2016.Two examples are given in
Appendix B which highlight the eorts on energy
eciency or a typical house and a typical fat. The
resulting gures give an estimation o the expected
heating and insulation standards and will assist the
specication o a sustainable zero carbon building.
Summary:
Zero carbon homes require very high insulation
standards.
Biomass district or community schemes supply
heat in a carbon-neutral way.
Expensive and large PV systems are required
to neutralise electricity consumption. In addition
electrically driven ground source heat pumps willincrease the necessary PV array.
Zero carbon emissions can be easier achieved in
new buildings which are designed rom scratch.
Reurbishment projects demand larger eorts and
are thereore less recommendable although they
could state a good landmark. Thereore, the ocus
or zero carbon sites should be located on new
and densely populated dwellings such as a block
o fats.
A zero Carbon Home
Carbon neutral fats (St.Matthews, Lambeth)
Vertical roo mounted wind turbine
96
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
39/43
PART III - SHAPING LOCAL CHARACTER
This section outlines proposals or each o the character areas within the
town centre, starting rom the premise o appreciating and strengthening the
character and unique identity that already exists. Indicative development
proposals are envisaged and illustrated on a site-by-site basis. Some sites
are shown as having dierent scenarios to indicate dierent possibilities or
development, dependent on land assembly, viability, cost, etc.
Development proposals should refect the principles demonstrated in this
section or each o the character areas, and developers are encouraged to
engage with the Council early on in orming development proposals or sites.
09 Character Areas and Opportunity Sites
9.1 Character Areas and Sites OverviewThis chapter presents the proposed character
areas structure or Hackney Central town centre
and builds on the existing areas identied in the
baseline report. The various opportunity sites within
the character areas are described where change is
most likely to be accommodated. It also sets out
guidance on how development proposals should be
approached through the application o urban design
principles, specic to each character area and
opportunity site.
Collectively, these character areas refect many o
the distinguishing qualities o Hackney Central as a
whole and illustrate the great diversity in character
across the town centre. The character areas are
dened in terms o streetscape, urban orm and
grain, building type, height and mass, as well
as building material. This chapter thus sets out
guidance on how development proposals should be
tailored to support their parent character area and
in the case o the New Quarter, how the character o
this new urban area should be dened.
97
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
40/43
98
Figure 9.2 Proposed opportunity sites block reerence diagram
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
41/43
99
Figure 9.1 Proposed character areas
9.1.2 Opportunity sitesHackney Central contains a number o areas o
vacant or under utilised land and buildings within
and around the town centre. These sites vary
in scale rom large sites like Tescos and the bus
garage, to small inll opportunities behind Mare
Street and on Sylvester Road. Regardless o their
size, all o the sites identied are capable o making
an important and positive contribution to the uture
o the town. The various sites are identied below.
These are not exhaustive and over the plan period it
is conceivable that urther opportunities may come
orward.
The opportunity areas are not necessarily conned
to individual areas o land ownership. In some
locations it is suggested that they are grouped to
ensure that comprehensive solutions are considered,rather than being dealt with in isolation or on a
piecemeal basis.
The identied opportunity sites are summarised in
Table 9.1 should be read in conjunction with Figure
9.2 which provides a Block Reerence Plan to
identiy the location and character area o each site.
For the purpose o preparing schemes or sites
within the Masterplan area, developers and
designers should read the urban design principles in
association with the strategic ramework themes set
out in Part II o this document.
Hackney Central Masterplan Opportunity Sites
Opportunity
Site re.
BlockRef Site name (address)
A New
Quarter
A1 Tesco (retail ground and 1st foor,
servicing area east, with residentialresidential over retail)
A2 Tescos car park, west/Mare St backs
(ground foor retail, residential over retail)
A3 5-13 Morning Lane
A4 302-304 Mare Street
A5 Bus depot (mixed use blocks east)
A6 Bus depot (mixed use blocks west)
A7 Bus depot (pavilion retail on Mare St)
A8 Bus depot (basement)
A9 Railway arches, Bohemia Place
A10 2-20 Morning Lane and Hackney Trades
Hall
B1 - Station
Plaza/
Amhurst
Gateway
B1 Gibbon site, Station Car Park Amhurst
Road Frontage (south), Marcon Estate,
21-41 Amhurst Road and 1-11 Malpas
Road
B2 - Station
Old Ticket
Oce
B2 Hackney Central old ticket oce and
surrounds
C1 - The
Rectory
C1 Former Rectory, 356 Mare Street,
Land rear o 392-396 Mare Street and
Learning Trust site
D - Narrow
Way
Northern
Gateway
D1 3-17 Lower Clapton Road
D2 Clarence House and 2-12a Clarence
Road
E1 -
Hackney
Yards
E1 Floreld Road Depot, Maurice Bishop
House and 13 Reading Lane
F1 - Great
Eastern Inll
F1 1-10 Great Eastern Buildings and
Land to the rear o 29-39 Horton Road
G1 -
Hackney
Lanes
G1 Oces and land, 70 Sylvester Road and
Oce/Warehouse, 117 Wilton Way
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
42/43
100
9.2.1. Existing eatures to be respected /
enhancedThis opportunity area is the largest site within
Hackney Central but has no overall dening quality
and numerous weaknesses in terms o its current
townscape. It thereore presents an opportunity to
be redened as a new high quality urban quarter.
Key positive characteristics to be respected:
Medium building heights along Morning LaneWest and where the backs o the buildings
ronting Mare Street (typically 3-4 storeys at
present) dene the edge o this area;
Vibrant active area at the ront o the bus garage
site where it meets the Narrow Way and Amhurst
Road junction;
St John-at-Hackney Church Gardens bound the
northern edge o this area and orm a tranquil
parkland area;
At the western end o Morning Lane, Bohemia
Place and side wall o Tescos existing buildings
sit on the back o the pavement;
The amenity o adjacent properties, such as the
backs o buildings on Mare Street looking towards
the Tesco car park;
Active uses in the arches on Bohemia Place;
Subterranean constraints associated with
the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) and land
saeguarded or the possible uture Hackney-
Chelsea underground line (Crossrail2 CR2) must
be taken into account.
Existing negative characteristics that should be
addressed include:
Morning Lane is a busy thorough-are, being a
secondary route east whilst also serving as an
important route to the Tesco supermarket. Whilst
it will continue to provide an important vehicular
route, measures should be taken to enhance
conditions or pedestrians and cyclists;
Poor quality one and two-storey commercialbuildings along Morning Lane and Bohemia Place
undermine the townscape;
A weak edge to the streetscape along therontage o the Tesco car park acing Morning
Lane, results in a poorly dened streetscene;
The backs o the buildings on Mare Street acingthe Tesco car park are unsightly and orm a poor
edge to this space;
The pedestrian link between Mare Street andTescos is a poor quality, unwelcoming route;
The high level railway line divides the two parts
o this area and is a major barrier to north-south
movement in Hackney Central;
The outside walls o the bus garage and Tescos
on Morning Lane are blank resulting in long dead
rontages;
Poor quality public space in ront o 2-20 Morning
Lane.
9.2 Character Area 01: Mare Street East
Active uses in the railway arches on Bohemia Place The pedestrian link rom Mare Street to Tesco is unwelcoming
-
8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101
43/43
9.2.2 Proposals or Character Area 01
As the largest opportunity area within Hackney
Central this Character Area oers the scope or
numerous design options. Figure 9.3 identies a
number o constraints, but also design principles
that, as a minimum, should be addressed through
any proposals or development aecting this area.
There are ve potential components to this:
a) Tescos store redeveloped with underground
car park and two foors o retail development,
with shop windows addressing the adjacent
roads and spaces. Above the store residential
development is provided to make the best use o
the site.
b) The western side o the Tescos car park is
developed and a new pedestrian link is ormed
between Morning Lane and Bohemia Place,
incorporating spill out spaces, it is lined with
shops and caes, it is attractively landscaped and
overlooked by residential properties
above. An improved pedestrian crossing
would be ormed over Morning Lane.
c) The bus garage would either be
relocated into a new basement acility
with mixed use development above or
the existing depot would be retained
at grade with a new development o
shops and oces at the entrance.
Locating the bus garage in a basement
acility would have a number o
advantages in terms o how the site
relates to the surrounding townscape.
Importantly, it would serve to release
highly valuable town centre land and
maximise the opportunity this presentsto positively change the character o this
area, especially at ground level.
New buildings would be able to provide
a signicantly improved relationship with
the adjoining streets and spaces. The
existing bus garage building currently
presents long stretches o blank wall
onto the adjacent St Johns-at-Hackney
Church Gardens, Churchwell Path and
and caes, that would relate to the street and
provide active and lively areas. Quieter uses could
be designed to ace towards the park so as to
maintain its low-key and tranquil atmosphere.
Locating the bus garage below ground is a
signicant undertaking, both in engineering terms
and nancially. However, it is considered to be
technically possible to deliver such a acility.
Although this would be a very signicant cost to
any development nancial assessment o this
option has indicated that it is nancially viable.
d) An enlarged public space would be ormed at the
bottom o the Narrow Way with new connections
through the railway arches.
e) A site on the southern side o Morning Lanewould be redeveloped with mixed retail and
residential uses. Development would take place
at or close to the back edge o the pavement to
create enclosure and a well dened streetscene.
Figure 9.3: Design Principles and constraints to be considered