hackney central master plan p60-101

Upload: min-han

Post on 30-May-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    1/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    2/43

    60

    5.6 Management and MaintenanceOne o the objectives o the Masterplan is to

    help deliver the physical regeneration o the area,

    including that o the public realm. However,

    signicant expenditure in the public realm would

    be wasted i adequate management and

    maintenance regimes o the streets and public

    places were not in place, to ensure that the

    quality o the environment remains attractive and

    continues to support the economic regeneration

    o Hackney Central.

    Well maintained streets and public places

    encourage their use and add to their vibrancy.

    Proposals or improvements to the public realm

    should be considered holistically, taking account

    o the lietime o the project in terms o initial

    investment and on-going maintenance.

    An overview o the management o the public realm

    is also key to its uture quality and success.

    Ill-thought-out decisions, such as poorly sited

    street urniture, or contractors not replacing

    original materials ollowing maintenance work,

    can individually and collectively undermine the

    quality o our public places. A co-ordinated

    approach to the management o our public

    realm is thereore necessary to ensure that the

    initial schemes are designed and maintained in

    an appropriate way and continue to provide a

    high quality nish.

    In general, proposals or streetscape enhancements

    through the public realm strategy, should build in

    robustness into their management and maintenance

    by:

    Detailed Records: Maintaining a detailed recordo the original scheme, including details o the nal

    implemented design, materials, street urniture etc;

    Skills: Ensure that in-house sta has the necessaryskills to implement and maintain the public realm or

    which they are responsible;

    Awareness: Ensure that in-house sta is ully awareo the appropriate maintenance procedures;

    Utilities: Work with utilities companies to ensure

    suraces are replaced with the appropriate materials;

    Stocks o Materials: Maintain adequate stockso the relevant materials or repairs and on-going

    maintenance;

    Maintenance Procedure: Ensure that theappropriate maintenance procedures are in-place to

    provide consistent uture management;

    Specialist items: Provide or adequate contractualarrangements or specialist items such as bespoke

    lighting or public art or provide the necessary

    specialist cleaning equipment where required;

    Skilled operatives are required to maintain the quality o the public realm An inappropriate tarmac repair where matching stone should havebeen used. This highlights the importance o adequate skilled sta andstocks o materials

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    3/43

    61

    Robustness:The design o places and the choice

    o materials should be suciently robust so as to

    be able to cope with the expected level o use and

    adopted cleaning methods, equipment and vehicles.

    The LB Hackney is responsible or the management

    and maintenance o public streets and spaces

    within the borough. Management responsibility is

    divided between the Waste Operations Department

    and Streetscene. These departments will be ully

    consulted on all proposals to ensure that they are

    both appropriate and able to be maintained within

    the capabilities o these units.

    Waste Operations: LB Hackney is responsible orthe management and maintenance o the adopted

    roads in the within Hackney Central. The Boroughs

    own Waste Operations department is responsible

    or street cleaning, litter and reuse collection andthere is an extensive published programme or these

    operations.

    Each adopted street is swept a minimum o twice

    a week on previously appointed days, and areas

    dened as town centres are swept 5 times a week

    and streets identied as extra busy are swept more

    regularly.

    StreetsceneWhereas street cleaning and litter and reuse

    collection is the responsibility o Waste Operations,

    Streetscene is responsible or maintaining the

    inrastructure o the adopted roads including

    highways suraces, ootways, kerbs, reestanding

    walls, street urniture and lighting. Streetscenes

    area o responsibility normally extends up to the

    back o pavement, including the management o

    street trees situated within adopted pavements.

    Streetscene also maintains no less than 130

    green sites elsewhere in the borough and

    thereore are normally responsible or the

    maintenance o public green spaces.

    Streetscene also has 3 grati removal teams

    within the borough.

    New TreesStreetscene employs a Tree Ocer or the

    maintenance o trees within its jurisdiction.

    Streetscene approves all new street trees to be

    planted within their areas o responsibility, and

    these should conorm to their own Design Guide.Issues include tree species, planting size, planting

    specication, provision o root defectors etc.

    12 month maintenance period under contractTrees adopted by Streetscene are subject to a

    3-5 year Young Tree Maintenance Period.

    (During the rst 12 months 15 inspections are

    carried out o which 9 are carried out in the

    growing season. In the ollowing 3-5 years, 4

    maintenance visits per year are carried out with

    necessary remedial works undertaken, such

    as watering, pruning, loosening tree ties etc.).

    Established trees are inspected annually with

    appropriate works carried out as necessary

    (Pollarded trees are re-pollarded every 3 years).

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    4/43

    62

    6.1 Land use strategyRegenerating Hackney Central town centre involves

    not only a range o environmental programmes

    but also, and critically, ensuring there exists an

    underlying and robust local economic strategy. For

    Hackney Central this will ocus on reinorcing the

    town centres civic unctions (LBH is one o the

    largest employers along with Homerton Hospital)

    allied with an emerging cultural and creative ocus

    or business, leisure and recreation. To deliver these

    overarching objectives, the Masterplan has identied

    a palette o land uses that are described in this

    chapter.

    The strategic land use ramework drawing provides

    an overview o the range o land uses proposed,together with their distribution which refects the

    emerging Core Strategy.

    The Masterplan envisages a mix and distribution

    o uses that refect and support the multiunctional

    role that Hackney Central perorms as a town

    centre. Notably, as a retail, cultural and civic hub,

    an important public transport node and as a place

    where people also live and work. The proposed

    land use mix seeks to maintain and strengthen

    existing positive uses, and introduce new uses

    that complement the role o the location. In some

    cases, and where appropriate, existing uses might

    be re-provided, though usually at a greater degree o

    intensity, in order to make more ecient use o land

    and maximise the potential o the town centre.

    This section provides an overview o the suggested

    land uses within the Masterplan area. Thesubsequent sections in Chapter 6 provide more

    detail on the dierent land use strategies.

    06 THEME 3 - Ensuring a unctional towncentre or living, working and shopping

    Mixed use city centre development o residential apartments aboveshops

    Mixed use development around a high quality landscaped space

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    5/43

    63

    Figure 6.1 Land use

    Land use

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    6/43

    64

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.1 Land Uses

    Overall, development should support the

    regeneration o Hackney Central and uses should

    complement the vision or the area as high density

    and mixed use. Future development should abide

    by the ollowing broad land use principles:

    1. A mix o retail and residential should be included

    at the Tesco and bus garage site with:

    Enhanced pedestrian access through the

    Tescos site, lined with active rontages.

    Make greater use o railway arches at Bohemia

    Place to acilitate a pedestrian link and converted

    to retail units.

    A mix o retail and residential uses designed to

    overlook adjacent streets and spaces. Potential to accommodate a landmark building.

    2. The shops on Lower Clapton Road and Morning

    Lane to:

    Maximise opportunities or to provide a mix o

    uses on these under utilised sites.

    3. The Gibbons site (Amhurst Road) to:

    Maximise this excellent town centre location by

    providing a mix o retail space at ground foor,

    with residential and/or commercial space above.

    Consider appropriately designed temporary

    solutions as land is saeguarded or the

    Hackney-Chelsea line (Crossrail 2).

    4. Residential Areas should:

    Comprise primarily residential uses.

    Ensure that proposals or other uses must be

    compatible with residential amenity.

    5. Community and residential uses would need to

    be considered and addressed appropriately where

    acilities are aected by proposals or development.Proposals aecting community acilities should:

    Retain/enhance and incorporate or re-provide

    existing acilities to a high standard.

    A mix o Retail and ResidentialMare Street and the Narrow Way would retain their

    existing high street character and range o uses,

    predominantly retail and related activities such as

    caes, oces and residential uses above ground

    foor level, in a horizontal and vertical mix. Thepresence o local independent retailers contributes

    signicantly to Hackney Centrals interest and

    provides a unique selling point or the town. The

    proposed arrangement would maintain the existing

    situation, although additional choice in terms o

    places to eat would strengthen the existing mix.

    It is envisaged that the range and extent o the

    retail area would be expanded to include the Tesco

    store on Morning Lane and the bus garage to the

    north. It is likely that the existing Tesco store would

    be replaced with a new store. Both are shown to

    include a retail and residential mix and improved

    pedestrian connections.

    The railway arches at Bohemia Place have distinctive

    qualities and it is proposed to make greater use

    o these and convert a number o units or retail

    purposes to complement the existing retail oer on

    Mare Street.

    The retail rontage on Lower Clapton Road

    includes a range o single storey retail buildings

    and represents an under utilised site. Such a

    location would benet rom a mix o retail units with

    residential development above.

    In the medium to long term the development o the

    Gibbons site is appropriate or a mixed retail and

    residential development to take advantage o its

    excellent town centre location.

    Residential AreasThe majority o the Masterplan area west o

    Mare Street comprises predominantly residential

    accommodation, and it is not proposed to alter

    these areas signicantly. Proposals or alternative

    uses in these areas should be appropriate to

    a residential environment and amenity o the

    neighbourhood.

    A mix o Community and ResidentialThe area west o St John-at-Hackney Church

    comprises the ormer Rectory, a Scout hut, aLearning Trust acility and a privately owned

    yard. This site has the potential to accommodate

    additional town centre housing and provide an

    improved relationship with the churchyard.

    However, the existing community acilities would

    need to be considered and addressed appropriately

    through the redevelopment o this site.

    The land use map suggests that the area would

    continue to accommodate the community acilities

    although relocation could be acceptable. Theunding o any re-provided acilities will also be a

    consideration.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    7/43

    65

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.1 Land Uses (continued)

    Proposals to re-locate community acilities

    should not be precluded, depending on the

    uture needs o the operators and the availability

    o suitable alternative locations.

    Ensure re-located community acilities are sited

    on an appropriate alternative site that is equally

    convenient, and accessible within the local area,

    where there is a continued requirement or these

    acilities.

    Ensure there is not net loss in community use.

    6. A mix o commercial and residential uses on the

    bus garage site should:

    Provide or retail elements to address Bohemia

    Place and railway arches. Provide interesting and lively rontages to

    Bohemia Place and strengthen its role as an

    extension o the retail area.

    Provide quieter more low-key commercial uses

    with residential elements above acing towards

    the churchyard in order to maintain its tranquillity

    and atmosphere.

    7. Oce, Employment, Community and Leisure:

    Existing cultural, community and leisure uses

    should generally be retained. Proposals or mutually supportive uses, such as

    such as a caes or restaurants are encouraged.

    Appropriate new uses should be sought or the

    Ocean venue.

    Proposals should provide active ground level

    rontages.

    Peripheral locations could incorporate a mix o

    commercial uses with residential elements.

    8. Parking within Hackney Central should:

    Provide town centre parking within a basement

    car park beneath Tescos as part o proposals orthe redevelopment o this site.

    Provide minimum residential parking.

    Provide car club parking spaces within or close

    to proposals or residential development.

    9. The Bus Garage proposals should:

    Retain or re-provide the existing acility to meet

    the current and uture requirements o the bus

    operator.

    A mix o Commercial and ResidentialThe area o the bus garage, identied as a mix o

    both residential and commercial uses, refects the

    transitional role this area perorms between the busy

    Tesco site and railway arches to the south and the

    contrasting tranquillity o the churchyard.

    Oce, Employment, Community and LeisureThe area around Town Hall Square contains a variety

    o uses, including civic unctions, entertainment,

    employment/oces and community acilities. This

    area orms a cultural cluster arranged around a

    memorable public square. It is intended to maintain

    the current mix o uses and, where possible,

    strengthen this cultural cluster.

    In addition, beyond the immediate civic core around

    the Town Hall, are several locations which havebeen identied as potential sites or redevelopment.

    It is envisaged that these slightly more peripheral

    locations would comprise predominantly commercial

    uses with residential accommodation situated

    above. The commercial unction o these sites

    would compliment the existing and emerging oce/

    employment activities around the Town Hall.

    ParkingThe Tescos site currently accommodates the

    main own centre surace car park with someparking also located next to Hackney Central

    railway station. Redevelopment o the Tesco

    site would require the town centre parking to be

    re-provided. Re-development o the station car

    park would see these spaces lost.

    New residential development would be provided or

    with only very limited car parking provision due to

    the highly accessible location o the town centre by

    means o public transport (see Transport Chapter 7).

    Bus DepotA bus garage is necessary to meet the current and

    uture requirements o the bus operator. However,

    two options are suggested or the re-provision o

    the garage on this site in order to make better use

    o this important town centre location (see Part III,

    Character Area 1). The acility could potentially be

    located underground. This solution would be costly,

    but would enable a signicantly greater benecial

    use o the existing site at ground level and above.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    8/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    9/43

    67

    Figure 6.2 Retail Strategy

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    10/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    11/43

    69

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.2 Retail Strategy (continued)

    Improve the retail mix in uture developments.

    Encourage appropriate new uses or the Old

    Town Hall such as a cae or restaurant.

    6. Bohemia Place proposals should:

    Seek to convert the arches to new retail space

    to broaden the overall town centre oer and

    maximise the central location

    Address problems o severance and barriers to

    pedestrian movement by orming north-south

    link(s) better integrating areas to the east o Mare

    Street to Narrow Way and St John-at-Hackney

    Church gardens

    Create a distinctive and unique location within

    the town centre

    7. Gibbons site proposals should improve the range

    and quality o shops by:

    Examining opportunities to incorporate larger

    shop units attractive to national multiple retailers

    Consider proposals/uses suitable as temporary

    solutions as land is saeguarded or the

    Hackney-Chelsea line (Crossrail2)

    8. Proposals or the redevelopment o the Tescos

    and bus garage sites should contribute to the

    provision o a shopping circuit by:

    acilitating the provision o a new pedestrian link

    through the railway arches

    Providing an attractively designed street ormed

    o several small linked spaces

    Be aced on each side by shops and caes at

    ground level to help create lively rontages and

    an appealing route

    Screen the unsightly backs o the buildings on

    Mare Street

    Implementing high quality public realm

    enhancements consistent with the public realmstrategy or Hackney Central

    9. Development proposals should incorporate ocal

    spaces to sit and relax, including:

    spill out spaces to enable caes and restaurants

    to provide outside seating and would enliven the

    public realm.

    Continued on next page

    Bohemia Place (railway arches)

    At present the arches on Bohemia Place are under-utilised. They contain minimal retail use and a

    predominant amount o semi-industrial/automotive

    activity. With the redevelopment o both Tesco and

    the bus garage, the opportunity exists to open up

    access to the arches and integrate them more ully

    into the town centre-wide retail oer.

    The arches are distinctive and a potentially attractive

    part o the town centre, whose character could be

    exploited to provide original shopping streets with

    character, that would help provide Hackney Central

    with a unique retail oer.

    Gibbons siteThis site is located within the dened Core Shopping

    Frontage area where retail is the preerred use,

    and would contribute to the vitality and viability

    o Mare Street and Amhurst Road. This is a

    large redevelopment opportunity site in the town

    centre and has the potential to make a signicantcontribution to the regeneration o a key site in

    Hackney Central.

    The adjacent retail and leisure uses, and its location

    next to a railway line make the redevelopment o the

    site or these uses both suitable and the only viable

    option. In addition, Amhurst Road and Mare Street

    are well served by buses, and Hackney Central

    railway station is to the rear o this site.

    A key constraint on this site is the Chelsea-Hackney

    surace saeguarding that introduces a time actor

    on the lie o any uture development (15-17yrs). For

    this reason, mixed use development that contains

    residential uses may not be appropriate on parts o

    the site area.

    Shopping CircuitBy developing Tescos and the bus garage a new

    shopping circuit would be created, that would

    establish routes linking disparate parts o the town

    centre. These circuits would link Hackney Central

    Station, the Narrow Way, Morning Lane, Mare Streetand Town Hall Square in a loop. Beyond this links

    reach out along the Narrow Way, Amhurst Road St

    Johns Churchyard Gardens.

    A new pedestrian street would be created through

    the Tesco site between Morning Lane and the

    Narrow Way. It is anticipated that existing railway

    arches could be opened to provide a more

    convenient and attractive route or pedestrians. This

    would provide a positive connection to both the

    retailers on the Narrow Way and Hackney CentralStation. The ocus o the strategy is to provide an

    attractive, sae and convivial pedestrian route.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    12/43

    70

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.2 Retail Strategy (continued)

    10. Leisure (eat and drink) and commercial leisure

    acilities proposed within Hackney Central should:

    Be provided or within mixed use developments

    provided these are compatible with surrounding

    residential amenity.

    Encourage caes and restaurants in association

    with the cultural quarter around Town Hall

    Square.

    Have regard to issues o saety and security

    including the provision o suitable lighting.

    The opportunity site on Lower Clapton Road (see

    Part III), at the top o the Narrow Way, oers some

    potential to be redeveloped as an anchor use

    to maximise its position at the top o this retail

    street and act as a draw to encourage pedestrian

    movement up the Narrow Way. Such a use could

    incorporate larger retail units, appropriate leisure

    uses such as caes and restaurants.

    Focal Spaces to sit and relaxThroughout the area there will be a series o new

    and improved public spaces or residents and

    visitors to sit and relax. Distinctive public spaces

    would also improve legibility and the ability o people

    to move through the town centre.

    Leisure (eat and drink) and commercial leisure

    acilitiesHackney Central would benet rom additional

    places to eat and drink which are currently

    under-provided or within the existing centre. The

    provision o good quality places to eat and drink

    would compliment the retail oer and contribute

    to an enhanced evening economy. However,

    improvements to saety are considered to be an

    important part o uture changes to the night

    time economy and need to be considered

    alongside the public realm strategy.

    The cultural quarter o Hackney Central is ocussed

    around Town Hall Square, with the Hackney Empire

    Theatre and Ocean venue. With the uture o

    the Ocean in doubt a positive strategy needs to

    be developed or this site, and the potential or

    smaller-ormat venues to open could be explored or

    potential or conversion to a cinema.

    There may be potential to promote growth in the

    ca and restaurant sector - in particular, a pre-

    theatre dining culture could be developed. Such

    uses need not be located on Town Hall Square itselbut could be within easy walking distance.Leisure uses and evening activities are important as part o the mix o

    town centre uses

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    13/43

    71

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.3 Housing Provision

    1. Residential developments must:

    Contribute to the London Borough o Hackneys

    London Plan requirement to provide 10,850 net

    additional dwellings between 2007 and 2017.

    Meet London Plan requirements that 50% o

    the total amount o new housing should be

    aordable (London Plan policies provide some

    fexibility or mixed-use and/or regeneration

    schemes that deliver wider benets).

    Consider the need or a mix o homes that

    provide or larger amilies, especially or those

    unable to aord market prices.

    Be o suciently high architectural and urban

    design standards, as well as meet Code or

    Sustainable Homes Level 4 (see also 08 EnergyStrategy) regardless o tenure.

    Provide high density housing appropriate to

    its town centre location and where applicable

    historic context in accordance with London Plan

    density requirements; and

    Provide high standards o architectural and

    urban design with new homes built to Lietime

    Homes standards.

    support town centre regeneration and complement

    much investment to public transport inrastructure.

    These housing projections draw on the Hackney

    Housing Land Capacity Study by ENTEC Planning

    Consultants 2005, which concluded that with

    planning intervention the capacity exists to deliver

    1,824 new units in Hackney Central (Ward) over 3

    phases to 2022.

    Housing mixO this total amount o new housing to be

    accommodated, the London Plan requires that

    50% should be aordable, with 35% social rented

    and 15% intermediate, shared ownership Housing

    and the remaining 50% private. Evidence rom the

    Housing Needs Survey 2003 and demographic

    projections underpin the case or a mix o homes that

    provide or larger amilies, especially or those unableto aord market prices. Existing UDP policies require

    new development to provide 1/3rd o dwellings as

    amily accommodation with 3 or more bedrooms

    (UDP Policy HO9) and a urther 1/3rd o the 1/3rd

    should be our or more bedrooms. With the GLA

    increase in housing supply targets to 1,085 p.a., it

    will be important to ensure that the strategic target

    increase should not be attained at the detriment o

    meeting local housing needs or larger amilies.

    Housing density and designThe current Masterplan identies a range o new

    housing developments across the plan area.

    For highly accessible town centre sites such as

    Hackney Central, in order to optimise the potential o

    development sites, the London Plan recommends a

    minimum density o 650 1100 habitable rooms per

    hectare (hr/ha), which equates to 240 435 units per

    hectare when 2.7 habitable rooms per unit (hr/u) is

    applied. The London Plan encourages high standards

    o architectural and urban design and requires that all

    new dwellings are built to Lietime Homes standards.

    The Drat LB Hackney LDF Core Strategy also seeksto establish that residential development should be

    built to Level 4 o the Code o Sustainable Homes,

    regardless o tenure.

    Modern terraced housing Duplex and fat units with a common deck above shared

    parking

    6.3 Housing provisionThe London Plan 2006 amendments, requires LB

    Hackney to deliver 10,850 net additional dwellingsbetween 2007 and 2017. This equates to 1,085

    net additional dwellings per year rom 2007/08 to

    2016/17. Assessments o housing land capacity

    and developments in the pipeline suggest the 1,085

    target is likely to be exceeded with a supply o

    1,200 net new dwellings p.a. up to 2012, reducing

    thereater (Re; Submission or Growth Area Funding

    (GAF) (Round 3) Report, LB Hackney, 2007). It is

    thereore likely that GLAs target average o 1,085

    over the whole period rom 2007/08 to 2016/17 will

    be attained.

    It is envisaged that much development activity

    centres on Hackney Central and Dalston where high

    density mixed used development is encouraged to

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    14/43

    72

    Policy/Design Principles

    6.4 Employment Provision

    1. Proposals or commercial/employment space

    within Hackney central will be required to provide

    B1 workspace and/or alternative employment

    space that will directly support the ollowing priority

    sectors:

    Cultural and creative industries.

    ICT, design and interactive media technologies.

    Finance and business services.

    Public services, including government,

    education, health and social care; and

    Transport.

    6.5 Community Facilities

    1. The Masterplan will support Hackneys culturalstrategy. (see below) through:

    Enhancing the Town Hall square and setting.

    Broadening the local retail oer.

    Improving streets as settings or wide ranging

    activities.

    Ensuring access and integration o existing

    cultural acilities.

    Providing new development opportunities that

    include the potential or cultural uses.

    2. Key projects within the town centre Masterplan

    area will:

    Be carried orward in close consultation with

    the Learning Trust to determine the adequacy

    o existing nursery and primary school provision

    in relation to the projected child yield generated

    rom new residential development in the area.

    3. St John-at-Hackney Church and Gardens should

    become a ocus or community activities and events

    including:

    Opening the southern part o the church as a

    community cae, with outside seating space. Utilising some o the larger open spaces or

    multiunctional activities and events such as

    markets or outdoor theatre.

    6.4 Employment provisionHackneys Dened Employment Areas (DEAs) do

    not include areas within the Hackney Central town

    centre masterplan boundary. Priority areas or

    employment are described in the emerging Core

    Strategy as being located in and around Homerton

    Station and distributed across the Mare Streetsouth environs. These locations both all outside o

    the Hackney Central Masterplan boundary, though

    the ormer Flowers East building (now Momart) is

    included.

    The Masterplan provides 18,670 sqm o new B1

    employment space in various locations across

    the Masterplan area as part o a mix o uses on a

    number o the identied opportunity sites. These are

    principally located at bus garage site, Floreld Road

    and potential sites along Sylvester Path.

    Where employment uses are indicated, preerred

    development is or B1 use classes and/or non B

    use classes which directly support IT / cultural and

    creative industries / nance / public services and

    transport. 50% o all new / re-provided space must

    be suitable or SMEs o 0 - 250 sq.m. It is expected

    that these will be accommodated on the ground andrst foors with suitable uses including C3, D1 and

    D2 above. Areas suitable or mixed business and

    commercial uses are identied on the land use map.

    The London Borough o Hackney undertook an

    Employment Growth Options Study in March 2006

    to inorm the emerging LDF. This identied uture

    demand or employment foor space as ollows:

    (i) total employment increasing by approximately

    26,000 sqm between 2001-2016;

    (ii) B use-class employment increasing by

    approximately 15,000 sqm between 2001-2016;

    (iii) uture gross demand or employment foor space

    in Hackney amounting to between 200,000 sqm

    and 300,000 sqm or the period 2001 to 2016. The

    study urther identies potential sources o supply to

    meet the demand and o these, Homerton and Mare

    Street south are estimated to provide around 21,000

    sqm across a range o types o accommodation.

    6.5 Community Facilities

    The Hackney Cultural Strategy was produced in2002 and is concerned with promoting cultural

    issues in the borough. One o its major themes

    is to conserve, maintain, enhance and promote

    Hackneys physical environment and heritage.

    Issues raised by the Cultural Strategy that are

    relevant to this Masterplan include:

    - Saety and security in parks within the Borough;

    - Saer and better maintained acilities;

    - The physical improvement o 50 open spaces;- The promotion o good environmental practice.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    15/43

    73

    Figure 6.3 Proposed community inrastructure

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    16/43

    74

    The cultural sector makes a signicant contribution

    to the town centre economy and plays a major part

    in shaping the character o Hackney Central. The

    Town Hall area orms part o the cultural quarter.

    Further, Mare Street is currently the centre o cultural

    activity with potential or expansion. Hackneys

    Community Strategy (2005-2015) identies a

    number o key actions including promoting a

    strong creative and cultural sector which marks out

    an identity or the Borough as a centre o culture.

    This is supported by the London Plan and Mayors

    Cultural Strategy. Hackneys Cultural Strategy (2003)

    recognizes the importance o the development o

    cultural and creative industries.

    The library in Hackney Central is the most modern

    o Hackneys libraries and is co-located within

    the Technology and Learning Centre. The centrealso provides training courses, space or creative

    industries, school projects and community work.

    Hackney Co-Operative Developments (HCD), a not-

    or-prot, community benet company, continues to

    play a key role in supporting and developing cultural

    activities. Its priority target groups are black and

    ethnic minority individuals and organisations, emale

    entrepreneurs, youth, co-operatives, and green and

    ethical businesses.

    Educational acilitiesA number o key educational developments are

    relevant to the Masterplan area.

    Homerton College o Technology - though outside o

    the Masterplan boundary, demolition o the ormer

    Homerton College o Technology is contextually

    relevant. It is to be replaced with a new our storey

    building to accommodate an academy, sports hall,

    associated hard play areas, recreation areas and

    entrance plazas.

    The primary schools within the area had sparecapacity at the time early Masterplanning baseline

    work was carried out by LBH (2003 / 04). A

    secondary school (see below), a Further Education

    Institution and the Boroughs only Higher Education

    Institution are also relevant to the study though

    outside the Masterplan area.

    The Hackney Free and Parochial secondary

    school that lies on the southern boundary o the

    masterplan area is planned to undergo complete

    demolition and rebuild.

    Healthcare FacilitiesThe Primary Care Trusts (PCT) development o

    primary care centres is aligned with Hackneys Core

    Strategy that ocuses on the dened town centres

    that include Hackney Central and Dalston. The PCT,

    however, does not identiy any new requirement or

    Hackney Central. The redevelopment o the Lower

    Clapton Health Centre, outside o the Masterplan

    area, is included as part o the plans or the

    redevelopment o Hackney Central.

    The closest hospital is the Homerton University

    Hospital, located east and outside o the masterplan

    area. Some primary care acilities are to move to

    Homerton Hospital allowing room or expansion

    and development. Stage 1 approval is scheduled

    or April 2010 or opening o transerred services to

    Homerton. Redevelopment o Lower Clapton Health

    Centre would then commence.

    Healthcare or London published in December

    2006 by the London Strategic Health Authority

    outlined proposals or primary care to be provided

    alongside a range o health care services in buildings

    called polyclinics. Within this context, the City and

    Hackney PCT has over the last year been pursuing

    a strategy o a greater concentration o our general

    practices within a smaller number o larger and

    better quality buildings in a way that balances

    the need to provide easy access with the need

    to provide a wide range o health care in modern

    buildings that are t or purpose (Revised Primary

    Care Service and Estates Strategy, PCT, Nov 2007).

    St John-at-Hackney Church and GardensThe Church is a ocus or community activities and

    initiatives and is looking or ways to make the church

    building and grounds more accessible and usable

    or the community.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    17/43

    75

    6.6. Development contentThe opportunities or redevelopment and new

    development have emerged through a thorough

    assessment o the constraints and opportunities

    o the study area. In some cases these have been

    infuenced by areas o the town under development

    pressure, whilst in others through the aspiration

    to improve underperorming areas and contribute

    towards improving the towns overall level o public

    realm quality.

    The various oci o growth and change were

    tested at public consultation, where general and

    overwhelming agreement with the areas was noted.

    These were then explored through development o

    a range o options, tested with both stakeholders

    and through technical appraisal o issues such

    as access/movement, engineering, economicsand planning policy conormity. Importantly all the

    options were reviewed against the overarching

    Masterplan objectives.

    Due to uncertainty over specic key sites (e.g. bus

    garage/Tesco/Hackney Central station and others),

    it was decided that the Masterplan should be

    represented through a series o high level ramework

    drawings that established the non-negotiables or

    design and development principles or the wider

    Masterplan area. Such an approach would then

    allow various alternative and more detailed scenarios

    to be accommodated within opportunity areas

    as discussions progress with key landowners /

    developers / investors / occupiers.

    The proposed development content o the

    Masterplan is indicative only and serves to illustrate

    the likely yield o new residential and non-residential

    uses i a certain set o site scenarios were to be

    pursued within the broader ramework (see Part

    III, Chapter 9). Under these scenarios the ollowing

    development content is proposed:

    New retail (anchor): 14,000sq.m

    (including servicing/bulk store)

    New retail (non-anchor): 3,100sq.m

    New commercial (oce): 18,670sq.m

    New residential units: 833

    New bus garage (basement): 8,000sq.m

    Modern high quality mixed use development

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    18/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    19/43

    77Figure 7.1 Borough-wide movement context

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    20/43

    78

    7.1.2 Hackney Centrals Vehicular Movement

    NetworkThe key links serving Hackney Central is shown

    in Figure 7.2. Key trac routes ollow the primary

    and secondary road hierarchy and represent the

    most congested vehicular locations, especially at

    signicant junctions. Although not a primary route,

    the Narrow Way orms an extension to Mare Street,

    but is limited to bus and pedestrian trac only.

    However, the narrow alignment o the road and

    the large number o buses passing along this road

    results in signicant bus congestion over large parts

    o the day.

    7.1.4 Hackneys User HierarchyThe ollowing road user hierarchy is proposed or

    Hackney Central:

    Pedestrians

    Cyclists

    Public transport users

    Freight distribution (local)

    Car users (multi-occupancy)

    Car users (local)

    Car users (non-local)

    People with mobility impairment, the elderly

    and parents with children have priority within

    each category. The strategy recognises that

    this hierarchy needs to be balanced against

    the network hierarchy to ensure the ecient

    management o all movements.

    Mare Street orms part o the secondary road network

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    21/43

    79

    Figure 7.2 Vehicular movement network

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    22/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    23/43

    81

    Figure 7.3 Pedestrian strategy

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    24/43

    82

    Hackney GroveHackney Grove is a narrow lane running behind the

    library. This route could orm a stronger connection

    between London Fields and Broadway Market

    through to Hackney Central, including to St John-at-

    Hackney Church gardens via Mare Street.

    Case Study: Cornmarket Street, OxordCornmarket is Oxords main shopping street. As

    part o the initiative to create a more enhanced

    shopping environment and to tackle bus congestion,

    daytime pedestrianisation was implemented. The

    street is closed o to all trac, including cyclists,

    between 10am and 6pm by means o rising bollards

    at each end. Cyclists and service vehicles can

    access Cornmarket Street between 6pm and 10am.

    A number o trac calming elements have beenused to establish the user hierarchy in Cornmarket

    Street. For instance, the road surace was treated

    to orm a street-wide pedestrianised area in a fat

    horizontal prole with an aggregate surace suitable

    or heavy service vehicles. The kerb between

    the centre o the street and the pavements was

    considered inappropriate as this suggested the

    priority o vehicles over pedestrians. Other elements

    like street urniture have also contributed greatly to

    the success to this public space.

    Pedestrianisation has created a successul public space

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    25/43

    83

    Policy/Design Principles

    7.3 Crossings and Junctions

    The ollowing crossing/junction improvements are

    recommended:

    1. Improvements to the Amhurst Road / the Narrow

    Way junction should seek to give greater priority to

    pedestrian movement including:

    A new pedestrian acility to cater or the east and

    west movement on Mare Street (Figure 7.5).

    Trac calming measures on all three arms o

    the above mentioned junction to improving

    connectivity.

    2. Improvements to pedestrian movement across

    Mare Street at Town Hall Square by:

    Installation o a new pedestrian crossing acilityopposite to the Town Hall.

    3. Upgrade the existing crossing to Chalgrove

    Road to:

    Support the initiative o creating a pedestrian/

    cyclist route through the railway arches and

    across Morning Lane.

    4. Improved acilities are proposed at the ollowing

    locations:

    Morning Lane at the junction with Paragon Road.

    The junction o Amhurst Road, Kenmure Road

    and Malpas Road to acilitate pedestrian and

    cyclist movement rom the Narrow Way to

    Amhurst Road and improve accessibility to

    Hackney Downs and Hackney Central stations.

    Amhurst Road north at the junction with

    Marcon Place to acilitate cyclist and pedestrian

    movement originating rom the junction with

    Dalston Lane and Pembury Road.

    Improve the existing crossing acility at the

    junction o Morning Lane and Chatham Place to

    urther encourage the use o Churchwell Pathwhich orms part o the signed route or both

    cyclists and pedestrians.

    7.3 Approach to crossings and junctions

    CrossingsTo acilitate the movement o pedestrians across

    busy roads, appropriate crossing acilities must be

    provided. This is particularly an issue or the east-

    west movement across Mare Street at the junction

    with Amhurst Road and the Narrow Way. Currently,

    pedestrians on the east side o Mare Street wishing

    to access the west side o Amhurst Road are

    directed to use the zebra crossing at the oot o

    Narrow Way and the pelican crossing on Amhurst

    Road. This is rather inconvenient to pedestrians due

    to the associated trip and is enorced by the barriers

    installed along Mare Street on approach to the

    junction with Amhurst Road.

    South o the Hackney Town Hall, there is a lightcontrolled pedestrian crossing on Mare Street

    immediately south o Reading Lane serving an east

    to west movement o pedestrians. However, a large

    number o J-walkers are observed urther north

    between the two bus stops on serving the Town

    Hall on the east and west side o Mare Street. An

    additional crossing point opposite the Town Hall will

    support the desire line o the pedestrian.

    On Morning Lane, there are currently two signal

    controlled crossing acilities; one in the east-west

    direction and the other in the north-south. As

    mentioned, Tescos redevelopment plan includes

    relocating the car park underground. Thereore,

    the absence o cars entering and exiting rom the

    western side o the Tescos site would not require

    the crossing on the east-west direction.

    Improved crossings are proposed in a number

    o locations along Amhurst Road to acilitate

    movements o both pedestrians and cyclists.

    This will have the aim o improving saety where a

    number o cyclist accidents have occurred.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    26/43

    84

    Surace treatmentsUrban design elements can sometimes have

    trac calming eects as they can suggest that

    pedestrians and cyclists take priority over vehicles.

    This could thereore have road saety benets and

    also contributes greatly to the visual appearance

    o town centres. In Hackney Central, this strategy

    nds it appropriate to apply this concept o using

    urban design elements to enhance the environmentor pedestrians and cyclists at junctions particularly

    those that have had a history o trac accidents.

    Currently, due to the signicant trac at the main

    junctions, the hierarchy seems to avour vehicles

    over more vulnerable users o the road.

    It is thereore recommended that surace treatments

    be applied to the ollowing junctions in Hackney

    Central:

    - Mare Street and Morning Lane

    - Amhurst Road/Mare Street/Narrow Way- Dalston Lane/Narrow Way/Lower Clapton Road

    Surace treatment would comprise using contrasting

    and robust paving material which usually includes a

    mixture o paving slabs and blocks. These will signal

    drivers both visually and physically o a change in the

    environment as well as assist pedestrian movement.

    Pedestrian riendly surace treatment at junctions and crossings

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    27/43

    85

    Policy/Design Principles

    7.4 Cycle Routes

    Enhancements are proposed or the transport

    network or cyclists by:

    1. Providing signed cycle routes as ollows:

    A pedestrian/cyclist route to connect to St

    Johns-at-Hackney-Church Gardens adjacent to

    the existing bus depot site through the railwayarches and across Morning Lane to Chalgrove

    Road.

    Along Hackney Grove between Town Hall Square

    and London Fields park.

    2. Providing improved crossing acilities between:

    Chalgrove Road and Morning Lane.

    The junction o Amhurst Road, Kenmure Road

    and Malpas Road.

    3. Providing a signed cycle routes to connect with

    the London Cycle Network (LCN): Along Wilton Way to provide an east and west

    connection to the LCN.

    Signage at the Amhurst Road/Dalston Lane/

    Pembury Road junction to inorm cyclists o the

    route to join the LCN.

    4. Provision o eective signage at various points

    along Mare Street to:

    Identiy this approach to the main shopping

    district; and

    To guide cyclists to cycle parking acilities.

    5. Provision o secure cycle parking acilities at key

    locations within the town centre including:

    Hackney Downs and Hackney Central Rail

    Stations; and

    Shopping locations to urther encourage cycling

    within the town centre.

    7.4 Cycle routesHackney Borough is recognised or its award-

    winning cycling initiatives. This strategy aims to

    complement the existing programmes that are

    currently being implemented.

    Part o the overall improvement o public realm in

    Hackney Central envisages increased accessibility

    or cyclists and provision o better acilities.

    Its aim is to urther strengthen the routes within

    and beyond the town centre particularly to support

    the east-west movement. Figure 7.4 illustrates

    the proposed signed routes and locations o cycle

    parking.

    Dedicated routes and improved legibility or cyclists

    would assist in avoiding the mainstream trac as

    the route would be predominantly ree rom vehicle

    trac. Secure cycle parking in key locations, such

    as at the railway stations also orm part o thestrategy to encourage cycling.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    28/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    29/43

    87

    Policy/Design Principles

    7.5 Public TransportProposals aecting public transport include:

    1. Potential pedestrianisation

    Assessment o the pedestrianisation o the Narrow

    Way involving the potential re-routing o bus routes

    currently in using this street.

    2. Reducing bus congestion

    Measures to reduce/remove bus congestion

    rom the Narrow Way should be investigated as

    part o proposals to consider the pedestrianisation

    o this area.

    7.5 Public transport

    7.5.1 Bus congestion in Hackney Central

    Hackney Central benets rom good bus services

    and rail connections. Currently, the issue within the

    town centre is bus congestion at Amhurst Road and

    the Narrow Way as each serve twelve bus routes.

    Amhurst Road caters or northbound movement

    while the Narrow Way caters or southbound

    movement. As mentioned in the section on

    pedestrian routes, the severe bus congestion along

    the Narrow Way has resulted in an unpleasant

    environment or shoppers due to saety issues

    arising rom the potential confict between buses

    and pedestrians.

    The complete pedestrianisation o the Narrow Way is

    identied as a means o improving the environmenton this important section o Mare Street. However,

    it is recognised that this may involve a lengthy

    investigation. It will be necessary to examine the

    technical and operational evidence to determine the

    implications and impacts o pedestrianisation on the

    wider transport network and environment to assess

    its easibility.

    On Amhurst Road, there is potential to increase

    capacity by removing the existing on-street parking,

    which will be discussed in the ollowing section. It

    is recognised this may potentially be a contentious

    issue or local residents. The strategy however

    urges that this would complement aims o improving

    bus congestion within the town centre to create a

    more pleasant environment or both residents and

    visitors.

    Trac delay along Mare Street, rom the Amhurst

    Road/Narrow Way junction to Graham Road, is

    recognised. It is thereore suggested that this part

    o Mare Street be included in the study to look at

    reducing overall congestion in the town centre.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    30/43

    Figure 7.5 Parking, access and servicing strategy

    88

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    31/43

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    32/43

    90

    Policy/Design Principles

    7.7 Servicing Strategy

    The proposed approach to servicing is as ollows:

    1. Bus Depot access

    Access to a basement bus garage should:

    Provide a ramp with a minimum clearance height

    o at least 4.5 metres.

    Allow or a structural beam depth o around 1.5m.

    Use a ramp gradient no steeper than 1:15 (with a

    resulting ramp length o ramp is 90m).

    Start the ramp descent some 25 metres rom the

    Narrow Way, to allow a north-south pedestrian

    route at grade beore buses join the ramp.

    Establish an appropriate management system to

    minimise bus/pedestrian confict.

    Provide a roadway width to allow two busesto pass o 7.5m (taking into account central

    separation and structural clearances).

    Ensure the ramp design is inormed by a vehicle

    swept path analysis at its detailed design stage.

    2. Servicing requirements

    Potential retail or commercial development at the

    existing bus depot site should be accommodated

    in uture proposals or this area with regard to the

    space requirements or service vehicles.

    Servicing should take place at ground level with a

    service road rom Mare Street at Bohemia Place.

    A loading bay o at least 20 x 20m is

    recommended The eventual loading bay size

    and layout would be inormed by vehicle swept

    path analysis in its detailed design.

    3. Tescos Servicing should:

    Be accessed rom Morning Lane east to minimise

    conficts between road users.

    4. Rectory site access should:

    Be suciently wide to accommodate re tenders,removal vans and reuse vehicles.

    Lead to an area within the development site able

    to acilitate three-point turns.

    Ensure the detailed design is inormed by a swept

    path tracking analysis during its detailed design.

    7.7 Servicing strategy

    7.7.1 Bus Depot Site

    The aspiration is to relocate the bus depot

    underground to utilise the existing area or a retail

    or commercial development. This would require

    a detailed design o access and servicing. In

    particular, the access ramp to the underground

    bus depot should ideally be placed in the same

    alignment as the existing entrance to the bus depot.

    Consultation with Arriva suggested uture operational

    use o the bus depot will be or overnight storage o

    double decker buses and as well as parking, there

    would be a need to uel and wash buses on site in

    the uture.

    7.7.2 Tescos development site

    The existing Tesco store is serviced rom a loadingbay at the eastern end o its site. Service access

    should continue rom this end o the site but with a

    separation between the access to an underground

    car park in order to minimise the confict between

    cars and service vehicles.

    7.7.3 Site at corner o Morning Lane and Mare

    Street

    It is likely this site would be used or retail uses and

    as such service vehicles would need to encroach

    onto the designated pedestrian cycling area.

    Delivery times should thereore be structured to

    minimise conficts or example be limited to hours

    between 1900 and 1000.

    7.7.4 Development opportunity site to East of theNarrow Way (Rectory site)

    This opportunity site is likely to be predominantly

    residential but could include other uses such as the

    Scout hall. The existing access road rom Mare

    Street would need to be at least 5 metres in width

    to provide sucient capacity to accommodate re

    tenders, removal vans and reuse vehicles. Figure7.6 shows a potential location o the access route.

    This access road should only be accessed by

    service vehicles as car club parking would be

    provided elsewhere close to the site.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    33/43

    91

    8.1 Introduction

    Sustainability considerations are a key component o

    the Hackney Central Masterplan. These are set out in

    a preliminary energy strategy outlined in this section.

    The Energy Strategy has been developed in order to

    meet the national, regional and local policies aimed

    at mitigating the impact o climate change. National

    Government policies are geared to reducing UK

    carbon emissions by 80% by 2050. The GLA policy

    sets targets or at least 14% o Londons electricity

    to be provided using renewable energy by 2010. For

    major projects, the GLA requires that measures are

    applied to reduce energy consumption and that at

    least 20% o power consumption is rom renewable

    sources.The vision or o Borough o Hackney is eventually to

    become a zero carbon community.

    8.2 Energy Hierarchy

    The ollowing sections outline a strategy in

    accordance with the Energy Hierarchy o the London

    Plan (Feb. 2008) with the aim to decrease the overall

    CO2 emissions:

    1.Using less energy by adopting sustainable design

    and construction measures (Policy 4A.3).

    2.Supplying energy eciently in particular by

    prioritising decentralised energy generation (Policy

    4A.6)

    3.Using renewable energy (Policy 4A.7)

    8.3 Energy Reduction and eciency guidance

    Legislation drives development and building design

    to be more ecient, thus reducing overall demands.

    This includes the ollowing considerations:

    Optimised building orientation and passive solar

    design (e.g. large windows on the south side,

    small window area on the north side) results in

    energy savings.

    Minimisation o shadowing or maximisation o

    solar gains.

    Shading devices to avoid overheating risk in

    summer.

    Warm rooms preerably situated on the south

    side. Low U-Values or building envelope.

    Good window sealing with double glazing as a

    minimum.

    High air-tightness o buildings.

    Low thermal bridging value.

    High perormance condensing boilers (seasonal

    eciency minimum 90%) with load compensator

    or individual heat supply (where individual heating).

    Ecient heating control systems.

    Hot water demand reduced through water ecient

    appliances.

    High levels o insulation on hot water cylinder and

    thermostat (where applicable).

    Energy ecient lighting.

    Energy ecient appliances.

    Reduction o number o vents /ans.

    The CO2 emission reduction that can be anticipated

    rom considering energy eciency measures

    can range rom 10% to 20%. In this report an

    approximate 15% CO2 emission reduction rom

    implementing eective energy eciency measure

    is assumed. In general, the best recommendationor an investment into energy eciency measures is

    the improvement o outdated insulation standards

    to minimise consumption. In addition, reurbishment

    potential or insulation can be seen where existing

    buildings do not meet the minimum U-value

    requirements o Part L.

    08 THEME 5 - Promoting orward thinkingsustainable regeneration strategies

    Large Wind Turbine

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    34/43

    92

    8.4 Supply strategy

    The Hackney preliminary energy strategy outlines a

    distinct heating scenario with the key driver being

    the reduction o carbon emissions. District heating

    systems provide a wide range o environmental

    benets in addition to providing the local community

    with:

    Hot water and space heat on demand;

    Reduced energy bills and lower annual running

    costs;

    Reduced maintenance costs (no boiler to service/

    maintain);

    Increased storage/foor space in units as individual

    boilers are not required; and,

    Ability to buy in to a green development.

    The anticipated uture heating demands o three

    separate sites (building clusters) were estimated in

    the baseline report. The scenario or district heating

    supply is now suggested as ollows:

    Three building clusters are supplied independently

    with individual heating networks (see Figure 8.1).

    In practice, the exact number and location o the

    energy centres will depend on the nal site layout

    as well as on the overall phasing plan. The energy

    strategy is based on the assumption o the 3 clusters

    where a number o easibility aspects have been

    taken into account, such as:

    Possible distance to a central heating plant

    Heat demands and building sizes

    Accessibility or vehicles and underground

    pipe-work

    Phasing o the redevelopment

    As an example, the rst 3 criteria can possibly

    determine the Great Eastern Buildings together withthe Floreld Road Depot in Reading Lane as well

    as the buildings in Wilton Way and Sylvester Road

    as sensible independent clusters. The sites have

    thereore been outlined with their own community

    heating systems.

    The decision about the number and location o the

    district schemes will be based on the nal Masterplan

    as well as on the criteria mentioned above. The

    developers have to work closely with the Council to

    determine the optimum strategy. This will considerthe ollowing aspects:

    District and community heating schemes are the

    preerred technologies to supply space heat and

    domestic hot water.

    Supply strategies can include district gas CHP

    plants or each o the dened clusters. The

    diversication o the heat loads is in all cases

    easible to implement CHP. The remaining heating

    demand can be delivered proportionally by

    biomass and gas boilers.

    Plant rooms are designed to supply a particular

    foor area with heat, considering mainly:

    - Number and sizes o main boilers and back-up

    boilers, depending on their rated output

    - Service, equipment and control room

    - Walking and maintenance areas

    - Fuel storage acilities and logistics, in case

    biomass based heat sources are operating

    - Space or later connection o additional sites,o desired

    Preliminary plant room sizes are presented in the

    baseline report. These gures are however only

    indicative and should be revisited by the involved

    ESCO and updated based on the heat load pattern

    o uture sites.

    Future-proo connection acilities should be

    integrated i buildings are not immediately

    connected to a district network, e.g. because o

    phasing plans.

    Sites such as the Service First Centre and Town

    Hall have planning approval and are currently

    being developed with their individual heating

    systems. They will however be suitable or a

    connection to a large scale district heating system

    in the uture, i uture-proo connection acilities

    have been considered, i.e. pipe work or possible

    linkage is tted.

    For the success o energy centres supplying

    district heating or electricity it is important or

    policy to support the use by both, public andprivate sectors.

    Solar Hot Water is not recommended since the

    implementation o CHP makes this inappropriate.

    It should be retained however as a renewable

    option and applied to individual buildings or

    residential units which are not linked to the district

    network.

    Photovoltaic panels can be an optional upgrade

    or integration in broad areas or or selected

    individual buildings.

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    35/43

    93

    Figure 8.1 Energy strategy

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    36/43

    94

    8.5 Energy Service Company (ESCO):

    The management o larger district heating networks

    and electrical inrastructure can be provided by an

    Energy Service Company (ESCO). The ESCO is

    usually involved rom the early stage o planning and

    will provide an all-round service with the ollowing

    benets:

    Support in the planning process and supervision o

    the network and plant construction.

    Reduced investments by a capital contribution or

    a revenue share arrangement in lieu o the capital

    contribution, e.g. by a joint venture model.

    Supply management or all energy services to the

    end user as well as or uel purchase.

    Optimised plants and networks operation.

    Individual consumption metering and billing o endusers.

    Maintenance o plant, inrastructure, heat

    exchangers and metering equipment.

    8.6 General considerations or renewables

    In order to determine how to best meet the GLAs

    renewable energy target, an assessment o the

    technical and economic easibility o a range o

    renewable energy technologies must be carried out

    with reerence to the nal Masterplan. These include:

    Urban wind turbines

    Photovoltaics (PV)

    Solar hot water systems

    Biomass heating

    Biomass combined heat and power

    Ground sourced heating

    Ground sourced cooling

    8.7 GLA renewable energy compliance

    The toolkit o the Greater London Authority assists indetermining the energy production rom renewables.

    In policy 4A the GLA sets targets or CO2 reductions

    and requires a percentage o the energy demand to

    be supplied by renewable sources.

    Solar power can provide only minor savings. In

    particular, the expensive and space consuming PV

    technology is only easible where small CO2 savings

    are required, or could be used to upgrade other

    renewable technologies.

    The calculation methods provided with the GLA

    toolkit, along with detailed results are shown in

    Appendix B.

    Table 8.1 highlights the estimated carbon dioxide

    savings arising rom each individual renewable

    technology. A combination o the two major options

    gas CHP and biomass district boilers will

    thereore be capable o providing a reduction in CO2

    emissions o 23.5%, exceeding the GLA requirement.

    Figure 8.2 shows the Energy Hierarchy o the London

    Plan with the results o the proposed energy strategy

    or Hackney. Solar hot water and Photovoltaics

    can be applied as independent and decentralised

    systems. Thereore, Solar Hot Water and PV are not

    included in the gure

    8.8 Biomass guidance

    Sustainable biomass supply should be established at

    an early stage. Investigations showed that wood chip

    producing companies generally see a high potential

    in the local growth o sucient wood, in particular

    in the south-east o England. Potential suppliers are

    thereore condent that they can deliver wood uel

    and home-grown biomass or the demands oresidential and larger mixed-use developments.

    However, current debates consider the easibility o

    biomass in London due to transport reduction eorts.

    The outcome may eventually result in changes and

    thereore infuence the uel strategy. In addition,

    the supply security or locally sourced biomass is

    dicult to predict in the long-term, as the demand

    or biomass is constantly increasing. Other important

    issues to be considered are:

    Table 8.1: CO2 reductions and cost

    Technology CO2 reduction

    (%)

    CO2 reduction cost

    (/kg CO2)

    Solar Hot Water 1.5% 7.7Photovoltaics 1.4% 16.3

    Biomass boiler

    (33% o demand)

    17.2% 0.6

    Gas CHP 6.3% 1.3

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    37/43

    95

    Estimating uel demand regarding project phasing

    during the re-development

    Early planning to allow time or capacity

    developments and biomass growth

    Establishing contacts with preerably localsuppliers to minimise transport and strengthen the

    regional economy

    Diversication and identication o numerous

    potential suppliers

    Determining wood specication, based on the

    chosen boiler

    Not ignoring current supply markets and installing

    boilers which can operate with range o dierent

    uel qualities

    Long-term contracts or requent uel purchase

    to guarantee a repayment o the suppliers

    investments

    8.9 Low carbon landmarks

    The potential to implement low and zero carbon

    sites (Code or Sustainable Homes level 6) is being

    ollowed in order to create one or more show case

    buildings in the London Borough o Hackney. In

    response to this, examples o simulated dwellings are

    used to outline the approach and the requirements

    or low carbon buildings in the area.

    The Code or Sustainable Homes assesses

    residential developments or their environmental

    perormance. In general, dwellings will be required to

    meet the minimum applicable standards, i.e. Code

    level 4.

    Low Carbon houses built to Code level 4 (Upton, Northants)

    Figure 8.2 Energy Hierarchy

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    38/43

    Example: Code level 5 buildingsAppendix 2 shows an example case and

    specications or a Code level 5 apartment,

    simulated with NHER 3.1 sotware. As each dwelling

    within a block has to comply with the Code,

    the model can be easily implemented in various

    buildings, e.g. potential fats above Tesco on Morning

    Lane.

    The pre-assessment checklist in Appendix B shows

    moreover possible targets in all categories or Code

    level 5 schemes.

    Summary:

    Biouel red CHP and biomass district boilers are

    not sucient to meet level 5. Additional renewable

    energy sources, such a Photovoltaics and small

    wind turbines are to be considered. The required PV capacity or 200 fats would

    summarize to a system size o 100kWp. The

    physical size o the panels is thus around 600

    m2 which can be placed upon the roo o Tesco,

    provided it is not shaded by the surrounding block

    o fats.

    Four roo-mounted wind turbines, each providing

    4,000kWh p.a. help to keep the size o the PV

    array low. Vertical turbines are designed or urban

    wind patterns and generate less visual impact that

    3-bladed turbines. An accurate assessment o the

    expected wind capacity is however essential. This

    has to include the precise height and shapes o

    the surrounding uture buildings.

    Example: Zero carbon dwellings (Code level 6)A zero carbon requirement is part o the Code or

    Sustainable Homes level 6 which is likely to become

    mandatory in 2016.Two examples are given in

    Appendix B which highlight the eorts on energy

    eciency or a typical house and a typical fat. The

    resulting gures give an estimation o the expected

    heating and insulation standards and will assist the

    specication o a sustainable zero carbon building.

    Summary:

    Zero carbon homes require very high insulation

    standards.

    Biomass district or community schemes supply

    heat in a carbon-neutral way.

    Expensive and large PV systems are required

    to neutralise electricity consumption. In addition

    electrically driven ground source heat pumps willincrease the necessary PV array.

    Zero carbon emissions can be easier achieved in

    new buildings which are designed rom scratch.

    Reurbishment projects demand larger eorts and

    are thereore less recommendable although they

    could state a good landmark. Thereore, the ocus

    or zero carbon sites should be located on new

    and densely populated dwellings such as a block

    o fats.

    A zero Carbon Home

    Carbon neutral fats (St.Matthews, Lambeth)

    Vertical roo mounted wind turbine

    96

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    39/43

    PART III - SHAPING LOCAL CHARACTER

    This section outlines proposals or each o the character areas within the

    town centre, starting rom the premise o appreciating and strengthening the

    character and unique identity that already exists. Indicative development

    proposals are envisaged and illustrated on a site-by-site basis. Some sites

    are shown as having dierent scenarios to indicate dierent possibilities or

    development, dependent on land assembly, viability, cost, etc.

    Development proposals should refect the principles demonstrated in this

    section or each o the character areas, and developers are encouraged to

    engage with the Council early on in orming development proposals or sites.

    09 Character Areas and Opportunity Sites

    9.1 Character Areas and Sites OverviewThis chapter presents the proposed character

    areas structure or Hackney Central town centre

    and builds on the existing areas identied in the

    baseline report. The various opportunity sites within

    the character areas are described where change is

    most likely to be accommodated. It also sets out

    guidance on how development proposals should be

    approached through the application o urban design

    principles, specic to each character area and

    opportunity site.

    Collectively, these character areas refect many o

    the distinguishing qualities o Hackney Central as a

    whole and illustrate the great diversity in character

    across the town centre. The character areas are

    dened in terms o streetscape, urban orm and

    grain, building type, height and mass, as well

    as building material. This chapter thus sets out

    guidance on how development proposals should be

    tailored to support their parent character area and

    in the case o the New Quarter, how the character o

    this new urban area should be dened.

    97

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    40/43

    98

    Figure 9.2 Proposed opportunity sites block reerence diagram

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    41/43

    99

    Figure 9.1 Proposed character areas

    9.1.2 Opportunity sitesHackney Central contains a number o areas o

    vacant or under utilised land and buildings within

    and around the town centre. These sites vary

    in scale rom large sites like Tescos and the bus

    garage, to small inll opportunities behind Mare

    Street and on Sylvester Road. Regardless o their

    size, all o the sites identied are capable o making

    an important and positive contribution to the uture

    o the town. The various sites are identied below.

    These are not exhaustive and over the plan period it

    is conceivable that urther opportunities may come

    orward.

    The opportunity areas are not necessarily conned

    to individual areas o land ownership. In some

    locations it is suggested that they are grouped to

    ensure that comprehensive solutions are considered,rather than being dealt with in isolation or on a

    piecemeal basis.

    The identied opportunity sites are summarised in

    Table 9.1 should be read in conjunction with Figure

    9.2 which provides a Block Reerence Plan to

    identiy the location and character area o each site.

    For the purpose o preparing schemes or sites

    within the Masterplan area, developers and

    designers should read the urban design principles in

    association with the strategic ramework themes set

    out in Part II o this document.

    Hackney Central Masterplan Opportunity Sites

    Opportunity

    Site re.

    BlockRef Site name (address)

    A New

    Quarter

    A1 Tesco (retail ground and 1st foor,

    servicing area east, with residentialresidential over retail)

    A2 Tescos car park, west/Mare St backs

    (ground foor retail, residential over retail)

    A3 5-13 Morning Lane

    A4 302-304 Mare Street

    A5 Bus depot (mixed use blocks east)

    A6 Bus depot (mixed use blocks west)

    A7 Bus depot (pavilion retail on Mare St)

    A8 Bus depot (basement)

    A9 Railway arches, Bohemia Place

    A10 2-20 Morning Lane and Hackney Trades

    Hall

    B1 - Station

    Plaza/

    Amhurst

    Gateway

    B1 Gibbon site, Station Car Park Amhurst

    Road Frontage (south), Marcon Estate,

    21-41 Amhurst Road and 1-11 Malpas

    Road

    B2 - Station

    Old Ticket

    Oce

    B2 Hackney Central old ticket oce and

    surrounds

    C1 - The

    Rectory

    C1 Former Rectory, 356 Mare Street,

    Land rear o 392-396 Mare Street and

    Learning Trust site

    D - Narrow

    Way

    Northern

    Gateway

    D1 3-17 Lower Clapton Road

    D2 Clarence House and 2-12a Clarence

    Road

    E1 -

    Hackney

    Yards

    E1 Floreld Road Depot, Maurice Bishop

    House and 13 Reading Lane

    F1 - Great

    Eastern Inll

    F1 1-10 Great Eastern Buildings and

    Land to the rear o 29-39 Horton Road

    G1 -

    Hackney

    Lanes

    G1 Oces and land, 70 Sylvester Road and

    Oce/Warehouse, 117 Wilton Way

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    42/43

    100

    9.2.1. Existing eatures to be respected /

    enhancedThis opportunity area is the largest site within

    Hackney Central but has no overall dening quality

    and numerous weaknesses in terms o its current

    townscape. It thereore presents an opportunity to

    be redened as a new high quality urban quarter.

    Key positive characteristics to be respected:

    Medium building heights along Morning LaneWest and where the backs o the buildings

    ronting Mare Street (typically 3-4 storeys at

    present) dene the edge o this area;

    Vibrant active area at the ront o the bus garage

    site where it meets the Narrow Way and Amhurst

    Road junction;

    St John-at-Hackney Church Gardens bound the

    northern edge o this area and orm a tranquil

    parkland area;

    At the western end o Morning Lane, Bohemia

    Place and side wall o Tescos existing buildings

    sit on the back o the pavement;

    The amenity o adjacent properties, such as the

    backs o buildings on Mare Street looking towards

    the Tesco car park;

    Active uses in the arches on Bohemia Place;

    Subterranean constraints associated with

    the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (CTRL) and land

    saeguarded or the possible uture Hackney-

    Chelsea underground line (Crossrail2 CR2) must

    be taken into account.

    Existing negative characteristics that should be

    addressed include:

    Morning Lane is a busy thorough-are, being a

    secondary route east whilst also serving as an

    important route to the Tesco supermarket. Whilst

    it will continue to provide an important vehicular

    route, measures should be taken to enhance

    conditions or pedestrians and cyclists;

    Poor quality one and two-storey commercialbuildings along Morning Lane and Bohemia Place

    undermine the townscape;

    A weak edge to the streetscape along therontage o the Tesco car park acing Morning

    Lane, results in a poorly dened streetscene;

    The backs o the buildings on Mare Street acingthe Tesco car park are unsightly and orm a poor

    edge to this space;

    The pedestrian link between Mare Street andTescos is a poor quality, unwelcoming route;

    The high level railway line divides the two parts

    o this area and is a major barrier to north-south

    movement in Hackney Central;

    The outside walls o the bus garage and Tescos

    on Morning Lane are blank resulting in long dead

    rontages;

    Poor quality public space in ront o 2-20 Morning

    Lane.

    9.2 Character Area 01: Mare Street East

    Active uses in the railway arches on Bohemia Place The pedestrian link rom Mare Street to Tesco is unwelcoming

  • 8/14/2019 Hackney Central Master Plan p60-101

    43/43

    9.2.2 Proposals or Character Area 01

    As the largest opportunity area within Hackney

    Central this Character Area oers the scope or

    numerous design options. Figure 9.3 identies a

    number o constraints, but also design principles

    that, as a minimum, should be addressed through

    any proposals or development aecting this area.

    There are ve potential components to this:

    a) Tescos store redeveloped with underground

    car park and two foors o retail development,

    with shop windows addressing the adjacent

    roads and spaces. Above the store residential

    development is provided to make the best use o

    the site.

    b) The western side o the Tescos car park is

    developed and a new pedestrian link is ormed

    between Morning Lane and Bohemia Place,

    incorporating spill out spaces, it is lined with

    shops and caes, it is attractively landscaped and

    overlooked by residential properties

    above. An improved pedestrian crossing

    would be ormed over Morning Lane.

    c) The bus garage would either be

    relocated into a new basement acility

    with mixed use development above or

    the existing depot would be retained

    at grade with a new development o

    shops and oces at the entrance.

    Locating the bus garage in a basement

    acility would have a number o

    advantages in terms o how the site

    relates to the surrounding townscape.

    Importantly, it would serve to release

    highly valuable town centre land and

    maximise the opportunity this presentsto positively change the character o this

    area, especially at ground level.

    New buildings would be able to provide

    a signicantly improved relationship with

    the adjoining streets and spaces. The

    existing bus garage building currently

    presents long stretches o blank wall

    onto the adjacent St Johns-at-Hackney

    Church Gardens, Churchwell Path and

    and caes, that would relate to the street and

    provide active and lively areas. Quieter uses could

    be designed to ace towards the park so as to

    maintain its low-key and tranquil atmosphere.

    Locating the bus garage below ground is a

    signicant undertaking, both in engineering terms

    and nancially. However, it is considered to be

    technically possible to deliver such a acility.

    Although this would be a very signicant cost to

    any development nancial assessment o this

    option has indicated that it is nancially viable.

    d) An enlarged public space would be ormed at the

    bottom o the Narrow Way with new connections

    through the railway arches.

    e) A site on the southern side o Morning Lanewould be redeveloped with mixed retail and

    residential uses. Development would take place

    at or close to the back edge o the pavement to

    create enclosure and a well dened streetscene.

    Figure 9.3: Design Principles and constraints to be considered