h2020 msca rise ethics evaluation - ec.europa.eu · h2020 msca rise ethics evaluation berta...

30
H2020 MSCA RISE Ethics Evaluation Berta Vizcarra-Mir Adam Walendzik REA.A.3, 2 July 2020

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • H2020 MSCARISE

    Ethics Evaluation

    Berta Vizcarra-Mir

    Adam WalendzikREA.A.3, 2 July 2020

  • 1. Being an expert

    2. Ethics appraisal timeline

    3. Ethics appraisal process

    4. Main ethics issues

    Part I

  • Role of the experts

    Assess

    Responsible

    Diligent

  • Principles

    Independent Impartial

    Objective Consistent

  • Confidentiality

    Discuss

    Contact

    Disclose

    Keep

    DONOT

  • Conflict of Interest

    Inform the REA

    Do not evaluate

    Do not hide

  • Conflict of Interest

    • e.g. Involved in proposal

    preparation

    • Benefits if proposal funded

    • Relation to applicants

    • Involved in the management

    structure of the applicant

    organisation

    • …

  • Ethics in H2020

    Described in all proposal

    For all scientific domains

    Integral part of research

    Ethics review

  • Timeline

  • Process

    Scientific evaluation

    Ethical screening

    Assessment

  • Process: Screening

    • Ethics clearanceEthical issues well

    addressed and documents provided

    • Requirements• Conditional ethics clearance

    Ethical issues partially addressed

    • Assessment neededComplex ethical issues (e.g. hESC)

  • Main Ethics Issues - 1

    HESC & Human embryos and foetuses

    Humans

    Human cells/tissues

    Personal data

    Animals

  • Main Ethics Issues - 2

    Third countries / Non-EU Countries

    Environment & Health and Safety

    Dual use

    Exclusive Focus on Civil Applications

    Misuse

    Other issues

  • Part II

    1. Ethics Self-Assessment

    2. Ethics Appraisal Process in RISE

    3. SEP – Workflow

    4. Key Messages

  • Ethics Self Assessment

    The Applicants

    • Identify

    • Handle

    • Detail

  • Ethics Self Assessment

    Part A:

    Ethics self-assessment

    Part B:

    Information can be anywhere

  • Ethics Issues Table

    Indicate pages in Part B of the proposal

  • The Ethics Self Assessment Guidance

    http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-self-assess_en.pdf

  • Appraisal Process in RISE

    Likely to be funded

    Ethics Flagged

    Assess

    Give Opinion

    Requirements

  • Reports Generic Information

    EthIR EthCR EthSR

    • Clear, Concise, Project Specific

    • Identify & address all ethical issues

    • Check the entire proposal

  • Requirements

    • Editable pre-defined text

    • GDPR – Use the updated list of requirements

    • Indicate WHEN it needs to be addressed:

    • Before Grant Signature – clarifications, information

    • By month X of the project – documents to be

    requested

    Indicate which participating organisations must provide

    the documents.

  • Requirements

    • Revised art. 34.2

    • For non-sensitive projects, revise the SEP wording with the sentence below,

    “the copies of the opinions, notifications or authorisations, must be obtained and kept on file and be submitted upon request”

    • Adaptation methodology, if necessary

  • Opinion

    • Ethics clearance

    • Conditional ethics clearance

    • Ethics assessment recommended (limited)

    • Additional information needed

  • Ethics Assessment

    - Not part of the current exercise

    - Recommended for very limited cases only:

    Proposals raising complex ethics issues

    - All proposals involving hESC

    - Recommend in the EthSR whether the

    ASSESSMENT is needed: NO REQUIREMENTS

    - Inform the ethics coordinators

  • Ethics Check

    - Complex and difficult ethics issues

    - Documents not satisfactory

    - Compliance with Ethics requirements needs

    to be checked during the implementation

    - If a check is requested: JUSTIFICATION

    - Indicate the TIME (Month number X of the project)

  • Sensitive Flag

    - Normal / High- High: complex and difficult ethics issues- To signal the sensitivity to the EC/REA officers

    If the high sensitivity flag is selected,

    include a justification

  • SEP – EthIR

    https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/evaluation/workflow/tasks/my.ht

    ml

    https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/evaluation/workflow/tasks/my.html

  • SEP - EthCR

    http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/support/expert/expert

    _evaluation_user_manual.pdf

  • Key Messages

    Require-ments

    • If not already fulfilled in the proposal

    • Conditional clearance

    Check

    • Completeness & Accuracy of your comments

    • Include a justification

    EthSR

    • Will be sent to the applicants

    Sensitive proposals

    • Let the REA team know

  • Thank you

    © European Union 2020

    Unless otherwise noted the reuse of this presentation is authorised under the CC BY 4.0 license. For any use or reproduction of elements that are

    not owned by the EU, permission may need to be sought directly from the respective right holders.

    Slide xx: element concerned, source: e.g. Fotolia.com; Slide xx: element concerned, source: e.g. iStock.com

    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/