h res plan considerations

Upload: jigyesh-pavaya

Post on 04-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    1/114

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    2/114

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    3/114

    Report for

    Mr John Wood

    Director of Environment

    Hertfordshire County Council

    County HallHertford

    SG13 8DN

    Main Contributors

    Alan Chaplin

    Jenni Heaton

    Issued by

    Alan Chaplin

    Approved by

    Entec UK Limited

    Atlantic HouseImperial WayReading RG2 0TDEnglandTel: +44 (0) 1189 036061Fax: +44 (0) 1189 036261

    Hertfordshire CountyCouncil

    HertfordshireEnvironmental Forum

    HertfordshireTechnical ChiefOfficers Association

    HertfordshireRenewable EnergyStudy

    Planning Considerations

    July 2005

    Entec UK Limited

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    4/114

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    5/114

    i

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Executive Summary

    The achievement of sustainable development will require action by many people and

    organisations. It will require radical changes in the way we plan and make decisions; in

    the way we live and carry out our business. Facing up to these radical changes will

    strengthen us as a region now and benefit generations to come. (Source: The East of

    England Sustainable Development Framework, October 2001, The East of England

    Regional Assembly and The East of England Sustainable Development Round Table)

    Entec UK Ltd was engaged by the clients, Hertfordshire County Council, Hertfordshire

    Environmental Forum (HEF) and the Hertfordshire Technical Chief Officers Association

    (HTCOA), to undertake research to identify the realistic potential for renewable energy

    development in the county and to explore the opportunities and constraints to this form of

    development.

    PPS22 sets out the Governments national land use planning policies for renewable energy. The

    ODPM has also produced Planning for Renewable Energy: A Companion Guide to PPS22

    offers practical advice as to how these policies can be implemented on the ground. The

    Companion Guide also includes examples of best practice.

    The East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (December 2004) is currently undergoing review

    and a draft version was the subject of consultation from 8 December 2004 to 16 March 2005.

    An Examination in Public is scheduled to begin on 13 September 2005.

    Renewable energy is used to describe the various ways in which continuous energy flows that

    occur naturally in the environment, from the sun, wind, oceans, plants and the fall of water, are

    harnessed. Energy from waste is also referred to as renewable energy where it emanates fromwithin the earth.

    National policy is to encourage the development and use of renewable energy resources where

    they have prospects of being economically viable and environmentally acceptable. The aim is

    to reduce the adverse environmental impacts of producing energy from fossil fuels, notably

    carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. In addition, renewable energy sources can also contribute

    towards the greater diversity and security of the nations energy supply.

    The accompanying technical report on renewable energy in Hertfordshire, which has also been

    prepared by Entec, concludes that there is the technical potential within Hertfordshire to achieve

    the levels of renewable energy production proposed in the East of England Sustainable

    Development Round Table Study.

    If the 2010 regional targets are to be met, onshore wind must be encouraged, along with all

    other forms and scales of renewable energy schemes. In order to meet the 2020 targets,

    emerging technologies, such as biomass, will be needed, although the long initiation periods for

    bringing such development into operation means that proposals must be brought forward now.

    Renewable energy in new development will only make a marginal difference to meeting the

    regional targets, but would help encourage more affordable and a greater choice of renewable

    energy technologies in the market place, as well as possibly raising public awareness.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    6/114

    ii

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Planning applications for renewable energy projects should be assessed against specific criteria

    set out in local development documents, as well as the East of England Regional Spatial

    Strategy.

    Local planning authorities may include policies in local development documents that require a

    percentage of the energy to be used in new residential, commercial or industrial developmentsto come from on-site renewable energy developments.

    The opportunity for incorporating renewable energy projects in all new development should be

    considered.

    Authorities will need to have a clear understanding of energy usage in their areas in order to set

    clear baselines and be able to track progress against effective targets.

    The options for the planning system in Hertfordshire are set out in terms of three broad ways in

    which the planning system might engage in the future in the promotion of renewable energy:

    Business as usual;

    What is possible; and

    Extending the case for renewables.

    Business as usual is not considered to be an option if Hertfordshire and the East of England

    intend to move towards, yet alone reach, their own targets.

    In terms of what is possible, there is the technical potential within Hertfordshire to achieve the

    levels of renewable energy production proposed in the East of England Sustainable

    Development Round Table Study.

    The last option, extended, provides the basis for blue sky thinking by the local authorities in

    particular, which might provide a convenient way of kicking off the Local DevelopmentFrameworks that are due to prepared over the next few years.

    A number of possible actions and considerations flow from the extended position:

    Renewable Energy in New Development

    The application of renewable energy as a requirement to (virtually) all new

    development, particularly for residential development, appears to offer an

    opportunity that should be seriously considered if there is a serious intent to meet

    renewable energy targets at the regional and county levels

    If this approach was to be adopted, the local authorities would need to think about

    seeking to remove, or at least modify, in Policy ENV8, sub-paragraph (c), of thedraft East of England Plan the words above the same threshold, in order to

    ensure that a regional policy allows local development documents to require all

    developments (or at least all residential development) to incorporate equipment for

    renewable power generation so as to provide at least 10% of their predicted energy

    requirements.

    If this was introduced into the development plan via the new Local Development

    Frameworks, possibly just over half of the new dwellings proposed for

    Hertfordshire in the current regional plan period to 2021 could become the subject

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    7/114

    iii

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    of such a renewable energy requirement, so long as the RSS confirmed such an

    approach and so long as the local planning authorities introduced the requirement

    as a co-ordinated group.

    Community Heating and CHP

    Community heating schemes and combined heat and power are subjects that thelocal authorities should research in detail in due course if it is considered that there

    may be future opportunities for these forms of energy production and distribution,

    particularly with regard to the larger scale of developments that will need to be

    considered in the county.

    Wind Energy

    With regard to wind energy, the local authorities should not only consider aiming

    for at least 5 additional wind turbines in the county, but also whether the

    community is willing to extend its ambitions to accommodating and actively

    encouraging around 30 large wind turbines in Hertfordshire.

    Planning Application Statements

    With regard to energy consumption statements, local planning authorities should

    consider whether they should specifically seek written evidence from applicants on

    an examination of the options for different heating and power systems when certain

    types of development proposals over a particular size are submitted as planning

    applications.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    8/114

    iv

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    9/114

    v

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Contents

    1. Introduction 1

    1.1 The Study 1

    1.2 Study Objectives 1

    1.3 The Renewable Energy Options Report 1

    1.4 Structure of the Report 2

    1.4.1 Sections 2

    1.4.2 Appendices 3

    1.5 The Planning System 31.5.1 National Planning and Policy Statements 3

    1.5.2 Regional Planning and Regional Spatial Strategies 4

    1.5.3 Local Development Frameworks 4

    1.5.4 The Development Plan and the Development Control System 5

    2. The National Planning Context 7

    2.1 Planning Policy Statement 22 (PPS22): Renewable Energy 7

    3. The Regional Planning Context 11

    3.1 East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) 11

    3.2 East of England Sustainable Development Round Table,2001 11

    3.3 East of England Draft Plan, December 2004 11

    3.4 Regional Planning advice for Local DevelopmentFrameworks 13

    3.5 Regional Planning Advice on Location 14

    3.5.1 Sustainable Communities Plan growth areas 15

    3.5.2 Settlements outside growth areas 15

    3.5.3 Non-designated landscapes 15

    3.5.4 Designated landscapes 15

    3.6 Hertfordshire Structure Plan 16

    4. The Local Planning Context 17

    4.1 PPS12 on LDFs 17

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    10/114

    vi

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    5. Planning Issues 19

    5.1 The Different Forms of RE and their Implications forPlanning 19

    5.2 Wind power 195.2.1 Project Initiation 19

    5.2.2 Evaluation 20

    5.2.3 Implementation 21

    5.2.4 Maintenance 21

    5.2.5 Decommissioning 21

    5.2.6 Smaller Scale Turbines 22

    5.2.7 Domestic wind turbines 22

    5.3 Biomass energy 22

    5.3.1 Co-firing 23

    5.3.2 Large-scale power generation 235.3.3 Small to Medium-scale power generation and CHP schemes 25

    5.3.4 Power generation from waste 25

    5.3.5 Transport fuels 26

    5.3.6 EIA requirements 26

    5.4 Water power 27

    5.5 Solar power 27

    5.6 Landfill gas 28

    6. Renewable Energy Development in Hertfordshire 29

    6.1 The Potential for RE in Hertfordshi re 29

    6.2 Meeting the Targets 29

    7. Local Planning Approach 31

    7.1 The Vision 31

    7.2 Sustainability and Plan Objectives 31

    7.3 The Wider Context 34

    7.4 Woking Borough Council 34

    7.5 Cornwall 35

    7.5.1 Cornwall Structure Plan 36

    7.5.2 The District Local Plans 36

    8. Local Planning Policies 39

    8.1 Local Planning Policies 39

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    11/114

    vii

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    8.2 Good Practice 39

    8.3 The Assessment of Policies 40

    8.4 A General Cri ter ia-based Pol icy 42

    8.4.1 Government Guidance 42

    8.4.2 Woking Borough Local Plan 42

    8.4.3 Penwith Local Plan 43

    8.4.4 Rochford District Local Plan 43

    8.4.5 Caradon Local Plan 44

    8.4.6 Oldham Unitary Development Plan 44

    8.4.7 London Borough of Merton 45

    8.4.8 Recommended Policy Wording Checklist 46

    8.5 A Policy for Renewable Energy in New Development 47

    8.5.1 Government Guidance 47

    8.5.2 Planning Officers Society 478.5.3 Woking Borough Council 48

    8.5.4 London Borough of Merton 48

    8.5.5 Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council 49

    8.5.6 Recommended Policy Wording Checklist 50

    8.5.7 South East Plan Opinion Poll 52

    8.6 A Policy Support ing Small -scale Renewable Energy 53

    8.6.1 Government Guidance 53

    8.6.2 Community Involvement 53

    8.6.3 Community-based Projects 54

    8.7 Policies on particular types of Renewable Energy 548.7.1 Government Guidance 54

    8.7.2 Penwith Local Plan 54

    8.7.3 Oldham Unitary Development Plan 55

    8.7.4 Caradon Local Plan 56

    8.7.5 Recommended Policy Wording Checklist 57

    8.8 Policies that promote a form of Renewable Energy in anArea 58

    8.8.1 Government Guidance 58

    8.8.2 Regional and Sub-Regional Considerations 59

    8.9 SMART Polic ies 59

    9. Planning Appl ications 61

    9.1 Planning Applications 61

    9.2 Housing Developments 62

    9.3 Development Control Issues 63

    9.4 Environmental Impact Assessments 64

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    12/114

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    13/114

    1

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    1. Introduction

    1.1 The Study

    Entec UK Ltd was engaged by the clients, Hertfordshire County Council, Hertfordshire

    Environmental Forum (HEF) and the Hertfordshire Technical Chief Officers Association

    (HTCOA), to undertake research to identify the realistic potential for renewable energy

    development in the county and to explore the opportunities and constraints to this form of

    development.

    1.2 Study Objectives

    The objectives of the study were to:

    ! develop a clear understanding of the constraints and barriers to renewable energy project

    development;

    ! develop realistic renewable energy targets with broad agreement from the key stakeholders;

    ! identify locational and technological criteria for assessing proposed projects;

    ! develop scenarios to aid the understanding of policy options and potential implications for

    the county;

    ! develop model policies to inform local development frameworks and development control

    decisions;

    ! improve understanding between planners, developers, potential developers and other key

    stakeholders;

    ! present clear advice on how to maximise the potential direct and indirect benefits of

    renewable energy developments; and

    ! maximise the training potential of this exercise for members and officers in the county.

    1.3 The Renewable Energy Options Report

    This report should be read with the Renewable Options Report which details the technical

    background to renewable energy in Hertfordshire. Together, this and the Options report

    represent the response to the objectives of the study and its brief. The Renewable Options

    Report was first circulated as an interim consultation document in January 2005 when it

    provided key information to stakeholders, illustrated what renewable energy could look like in

    Hertfordshire, and identified what barriers are needed to be overcome to enable renewable

    energy to happen. The January 2005 report was then updated following a workshop for

    stakeholders and published in the form of a separate companion report, entitled Renewable

    Energy Options for Hertfordshire.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    14/114

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    15/114

    3

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Section 7 is an introduction to the local planning approach that authorities can consider,

    including some examples of more general approaches to energy matters that certain local

    authorities have adopted.

    Section 8 sets out an analysis of possible approaches to the construction of local planning

    policies, including examples from other authorities. The report provides a framework for localplanning authorities to be able to consider and construct their own wording and set of policies as

    part of their Local Development Framework process.

    Section 9 provides some basic guidance on dealing with planning applications in relation to

    renewable energy proposals, including an example of advice to planning authorities in London.

    Section 10 deals briefly with question of monitoring and the systems that will need to be

    considered in the future.

    Section 11 concludes by examining the options for planning, expressed in the form of business

    as usual, possible and extended, including recommendations on future planning policy and

    research.

    1.4.2 Appendices

    The report also contains the following additional information in the form of appendices:

    Appendix 1 Recent Renewable Energy Planning Applications in HertfordshireAppendix 2 Examples of Renewable Energy SchemesAppendix 3 Public attitudes to Renewable EnergyAppendix 4 Renewable Energy in an AONBAppendix 5 Code for Sustainable BuildingAppendix 6 Sustainable Building Task Group ReportAppendix 7 Policy ENV8 in the Draft Regional PlanAppendix 8 Information Sources

    1.5 The Planning System

    In dealing with the role that the local planning system might play in the development of

    renewable energy, a brief description of the planning policy context is described below. The

    planning system in the UK operates within a hierarchical structure of guidance and plans

    covering the national, regional and local levels.

    1.5.1 National Planning and Policy Statements

    Climate Convention (1997 Kyoto Conference)

    Under the Kyoto Protocol, the UK has committed to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions overall

    by 12.5% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012.

    Climate Change the UK Programme (2000, UK government)

    In order to achieve the above target, the government has set a domestic goal of a 20% reduction

    in CO emissions by 2010 set out in the Climate Change Programme.

    The Energy White Paper Our energy future creating a low carbon economy (2003)

    This white paper set out four key goals:

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    16/114

    4

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    ! To cut CO emissions by 60%, by about 2050

    ! To maintain the reliability of energy supplies

    ! To promote sustainable economic growth

    ! To ensure every home is adequately and affordably heated

    Achieving emissions reductions of these magnitudes will require significant behaviouralchanges, with potentially major impacts on businesses and communities. Substantial

    improvements in energy efficiency will be required, but will also have to be accompanied by a

    major reduction in fossil fuel usage.

    The Energy White Paper also sets a target to supply 10% of the UKs electricity from zero-

    carbon, or carbon neutral, renewable sources (such as wind, wave, tidal, hydro and solar power,

    and biomass) by 2010, and a target of 20% of the UKs electricity by 2020.

    1.5.2 Regional Planning and Regional Spatial Strategies

    Under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, existing Regional Planning Guidancedocuments (RPGs) are being replaced by new statutory Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS),

    which will form part of the statutory development plan. Each RSS is intended to be more

    regionally specific than previous guidance, reflecting regional diversity, and there will be

    greater flexibility for a RSS to depart from national policy where that is justified by regional

    circumstances.

    The East of England Plan is, at the moment, a draft revision to the Regional Spatial Strategy for

    the East of England. The formerly approved regional plan is known as Regional Planning

    Guidance 14 (RPG14), whilst the new RSS will be referred to as the East of England Plan. The

    East of England Plan is the document that sets out the strategy to guide planning and

    development in the East of England to the year 2021.

    The East of England Plan is dealt with in detail in Section 3 of this report.

    1.5.3 Local Development Frameworks

    In September 2004 the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 introduced significant

    changes for development plan preparation. The old system of Structure Plans, Local Plans and

    Supplementary Planning Guidance is now being replaced with Local Development Frameworks

    (LDFs) for each local planning authority.

    Local Development Frameworks are intended to streamline the local planning process, by

    incorporating greater flexibility and front loading in the process, by increasing community and

    stakeholder involvement, and by promoting sustainability. Local development documents

    (which will make up the LDF) will go beyond the development and use of land, to include

    policies that influence the nature of places and how they function. These documents are

    intended to be developed via a continuous, rather than fixed, interval process. The LDF must be

    in general conformity to Regional and National policies.

    For renewable energy, regional guidance determines the broad criteria and locations for

    development in order to guide the preparation of the local development documents. These

    should contain a spatial strategy for renewable energy including type, mix and broad location of

    development (with details and maps of specific sites and proposals if relevant).

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    17/114

    5

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    LDFs will need to have regard for the resources, in broad terms only, likely to be available for

    implementing policies that encourage renewable energy developments.

    1.5.4 The Development Plan and the Development Control System

    Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states that if regard is to be

    had to the development plan for the purpose of any determination to be made under the

    planning Acts, the determination must be made in accordance with the plan unless material

    considerations indicate otherwise.

    Where a policy or proposal exists in the development plan (i.e. in the adopted RSS or LDF)

    which is relevant to a particular planning application proposal, then the decision-maker must

    have regard to that policy or proposal, unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

    The LDFs will therefore be crucial in setting the local policies and proposals for their areas,

    which in turn will influence how prospective applicants and developers will look at the

    opportunities and constraints within each administrative area.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    18/114

    6

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    19/114

    7

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    2. The National Planning Context

    2.1 Planning Policy Statement 22 (PPS22): RenewableEnergy

    PPS22 sets out the Governments national land use planning policies for renewable energy. The

    ODPM has also produced Planning for Renewable Energy: A Companion Guide to PPS22

    which offers practical advice as to how these policies can be implemented on the ground. The

    Companion Guide also includes examples of best practice. (For PPS22 and the guide, go to

    http://www.odpm.gov.uk/stellent/groups/odpm_control/documents/contentservertemplate/odpm

    _index.hcst?n=5681&l=3)

    The Government is committed to delivering 10% of electricity from renewable sources by 2010

    and 20% by 2020. PPS22 aims to strongly encourage the development of renewable energy

    schemes, in both urban and rural locations, in order to contribute towards these targets. A range

    of sizes of renewable energy developments are anticipated, from domestic through to

    commercial scales, and utilising a wide range of different technologies (e.g. biomass, energy

    from waste using biological and thermal processes, small hydro, solar electricity, solar heating

    and wind).

    PPS22 includes a number of key principles relevant to local planning authorities (LPAs) as

    follows:

    Local Development Documents should contain policies designed to promoteand encourage, rather than restrict, the development of renewable energy

    resources.

    Planning authorities should set criteria to be applied in assessing planningapplications for renewable energy projects. PPS22 underlines that particular

    renewable energy technologies cannot be ruled out or restrained without sufficient

    reasoned justification and that poorly justified constraints may be subject to

    government intervention.

    The wider environmental and economic benefits of renewable energy

    proposals are material considerations in determining whether proposals shouldbe granted planning permission.

    local planning authorities should not make assumptions about the technical and

    commercial feasibility of renewable energy projects.

    Small scale projects can provide a limited but valuable contribution to overall

    outputs

    Local Planning Authorities should foster community involvement in renewable

    energy projects

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    20/114

    8

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Development proposals should demonstrate environmental, economic and social

    benefits as well as how environmental and social impacts can be minimised

    PPS22 and its Companion Guide provide specific advice to LPAs on the preparation of Local

    Development Documents. A summary of the key elements, which are of relevance to

    Hertfordshire, is set out below.

    LPAs should only allocate specific sites for renewable energy in plans where a developer has

    already indicated an interest in the site. Plans should set out criteria based policies for assessing

    planning applications for renewable energy. It is likely that there will be two types of policy

    areas dealt with by criteria-based policies, supported by an overarching policy in the core

    strategy. These would relate to:

    Standalone renewable energy schemes The Companion Guide states that it is

    important that policies address the full range of technologiesand not just those

    highlighted in the Regional Spatial Strategy. The policy should address impacts on

    landscape, townscape, natural, historical and cultural features (possibly referenced

    to a landscape Character and Sensitivity Assessment). There should also bereference to the impacts on the amenity of the area in relation to visual intrusion,

    noise, dust, odour and traffic.

    Integration in new development PPS22 states that LPAs may includepolicies

    that require a percentage of the energy to be used in new residential, commercial

    or industrial developments to come from on-site renewable energy developments.

    Such policies should ensure that the requirement is only applied to developments

    where the installation of renewable energy is viable. They should also be flexible

    and not place an undue burden on developers in terms of the proportion or type of

    renewable energy to be provided.

    PPS22 also provides further policy advice on certain locational considerations. For example, inrelation to nationally recognized designations such as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty

    (AONB), planning permission should only be granted where it can be demonstrated that the

    objectives of the designation will not be compromised by the development. Small-scale

    developments should be permitted provided there is no overriding environmental detriment.

    With parts of The Chilterns AONB falling within Hertfordshire, an example is provided at

    Appendix 4 on planning guidance published within the last year for the Blackdown Hills

    AONB on renewable energy and wind turbines.

    In Green Belts many renewable energy projects will comprise inappropriate development and

    therefore careful consideration needs to be given to the visual impact of the project. Developers

    will need to demonstrate very special circumstances, which outweigh any harm, if projects are

    to proceed.

    PPS22 also points out that LPAs should not adopt a sequential approach in considering

    renewable energy projects, as most renewable energy resources can only be developed where

    the resource exists. Some previously developed sites may, however, be suitable, particularly

    where they are in remote locations unsuitable for other uses. It also states that many type of

    renewable energy are capable of being accommodated in urban, as well as rural, areas and

    that criteria based policies should reflect this situation.

    PPS22 and the Companion Guide advise that Supplementary Planning Documents could play

    a critical role in implementing renewable schemes. Topics that such documents might cover

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    21/114

    9

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    include design guidance on integrating renewables, or site development briefs where renewable

    generation is to be included.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    22/114

    10

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    23/114

    11

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    3. The Regional Planning Context

    3.1 East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS)

    The East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (December 2004) is currently undergoing review

    and a draft version was the subject of consultation from 8 December 2004 to 16 March 2005.

    An Examination in Public is scheduled to begin on 13 September 2005. Following the

    Examination, the Panel will produce a report on its recommendations and, in the light of these

    recommendations, the Secretary of State will propose changes to the draft East of England Plan.

    These proposed changes will then be the subject of a further round of consultation before the

    Plan is published in its final form by the Secretary of State.

    3.2 East of England Sustainable Development RoundTable, 2001

    In order to identify suitable regional targets to help meet national targets, the East of England

    Sustainable Development Round Table regional partnership commissioned research that

    concluded that the renewable energy technologies with the greatest potential for the region are

    off-shore and on-shore wind, biomass, bio-fuels and solar power.

    Table 3.1 Regional renewable energy targets fo r the East of England 2010 and 2020

    2010 2010 2020 2020

    Excl. off-shore wind Incl. off-shore wind Excl. off-shore wind Incl. off-shore wind

    10% 14% 17% 44%

    Although the report in 2001, Making Renewable Energy a Reality: Setting a Challenging

    Target for the East of England, highlighted the fact that use of wind power is expected to

    contribute significantly to meeting the 2010 target, developments using a range of technologies,

    from domestic through to large commercial ventures, will also be required. Many renewable

    energy technologies are best suited to small- and medium-scale generation and distribution such

    that every area in the region, including those not previously accommodating generationinfrastructure, will need to promote renewable energy development. For those technologies not

    yet commercially tested, demonstrator projects would need to be approved now in order to

    establish effective operation in time to meet the targets.

    3.3 East of England Draft Plan, December 2004

    The East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (December 2004), when eventually approved,

    will form the statutory framework for local development plans and transport plans produced by

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    24/114

    12

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    the local authorities in the region. The draft plan aims to address the four keys areas of

    sustainable development, namely:

    Social progress which recognises the needs of everybody

    Effective protection of the environment

    Product use of natural resources

    The maintenance of high and stable levels of economic growth and employment.

    In order to enable the quantum move required towards the use of renewable energy, there are

    many policies within the Spatial Strategy specifically designed to promote its usage. These are

    summarised below: -

    Policy SS16: Quality in the built environment

    Promotion of design excellence, including increased building energy efficiency and use of

    renewable energy supplies.

    Policy NSR1: Promoting cluster and strategic sites

    Renewable energy highlighted as an emerging strategic employment cluster / sector.

    Policy NSR5: Transport infrastructure

    Transport improvements to support renewable energy generation will be prioritised (subject to

    site approval).

    Policy GYL1: Economy and regeneration

    Promotion of renewable energy employment cluster (utilising existing offshore engineering

    skills).

    Policy KL1: Kings Lynn sub-region

    Attraction of investment in expanding economic sectors, including bio-fuels and other

    renewable energy technologies.

    Policy T11: Environment and safety

    When implementing renewable energy, transport planning, movement corridors and investment

    should minimise environmental damage and take into account national designations and

    landscape character.

    Policy ENV8: Renewable energy and energy efficiency

    This is the main policy for the promotion of energy efficiency and renewable energy. The draft

    policy and its supporting text, as published in December 2004, is reproduced in full at

    Appendix 7.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    25/114

    13

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    3.4 Regional Planning advice for Local DevelopmentFrameworks

    The draft version of the East of England Regional Spatial Strategy (December 2004) currently

    requires Local Development Documents to: -

    Contain policies for promoting and encouraging energy efficiency and renewable

    energy, presuming in favour of renewable energy development.

    Require developers to maximise energy efficiencies to be gained from sustainable

    design and construction, community heating and combined heat and power

    schemes

    Encourage developers to strive to achieve energy efficiency standards that exceed

    minimum standards.

    Require energy consumption statements for development proposals above a

    threshold of 1000 sq. m., or 50 dwellings, in order to ensure that the technical,environmental and economic feasibility of alternative systems such as

    decentralised energy supply systems based on renewable energy

    combined head and power (CHP)

    district or block heating or cooling, if available

    heat pumps, under certain conditions

    are considered and taken into account before construction starts.

    Require all developments above a threshold of 1000 sq. m., or 50 dwellings, toincorporate equipment for renewable power generation so as to provide at least

    10% of their predicted energy requirements.

    Specify the locational and other criteria by which applications for renewable

    energy developments will be assessed.

    Define and relate renewable energy and energy efficiency policies to the

    Sustainable Communities Plan Growth Areas, the settlements outside these Growth

    Areas, and designated and non-designated landscapes, in accordance with the

    detailed guidance provided in the RSS.

    Favourably consider the onshore developments associated with offshore energy

    generation.

    Encourage the use of existing infrastructure and the under-grounding of cables

    connecting new plant to the grid, wherever possible.

    Encourage methane exploitation from appropriate landfill sites, provided this is not

    used to prolong landfill operations beyond currently agreed targets.

    Actively encourage the development of community-based schemes in accordancewith the detailed guidance provided in the RSS.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    26/114

    14

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    The RSS considers that supplementary planning guidance and development briefs should be

    used by the local planning authorities to support the above policies, where appropriate.

    Renewable energy technologies include photovoltaic energy, solar-powered and geo-thermal

    water heating, wind (onshore and, where relevant, offshore), energy crops and biomass, energy

    from human sewage and agricultural plant and animal waste, but not energy from domestic orindustrial waste, except the harvesting of methane from existing landfill sites.

    3.5 Regional Planning Advice on Location

    Appendix C of the draft East of England Plan provides further guidance to LPAs on locational

    considerations and criteria. This states that Renewable energy developments have to be

    located where they are technologically and economically feasible. As this can range from

    heavily urbanised to remote rural areas, all parts of the region are potentially suited to some

    form of renewable energy technology. Areas of search for renewables are not considered

    appropriate at this time asrenewable energy technology is subject to rapid technological change,

    with new, and more efficient, equipment constantly coming on-stream.

    The Appendix sets out principles for determining locational criteria for renewable energy

    development based on:

    A regional energy hierarchyi.e. in descending order of priority;

    o use less/reduce the need for energy

    o use energy more efficiently

    o use renewable energy

    o use clean and efficient technology for fossil fuel powered heating and co-generation.

    A spatial approach - local development documents should define and relate

    renewable energy and energy efficiency policies to:

    o sub-regional growth areas

    o settlements outside growth areas

    o non-designated landscapes

    o designated landscapes.

    Small-scale and community-based schemes appropriate to local need are mostlikely to be permissible in areas which are:

    o within or close to settlements

    o within suitable landscapes

    o close to the origin of the energy resource

    o close to groups of buildings (in rural areas).

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    27/114

    15

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    LPAs are advised to incorporate detailed criteria related to the following spatial

    categoriesin their local development documents.

    3.5.1 Sustainable Communities Plan growth areas

    These are seen as areas of maximum potential for the development of renewable energy

    technologyand the application of energy efficiency measuresby virtue of the opportunities for

    new homes, business and commercial developments.

    Given the scale and level of development the scope for energy efficiency measures, combined

    heat and power (CHP) and district heating schemes presents the region with a significant

    prospect of meeting energy saving and climate change/greenhouse gas emission targets.

    The major opportunities are seen as energy from sewage waste, wind, solar and methane.

    Agricultural land within the growth areas also has potential for energy crops with the added

    advantage of reduced transport distances to generation plants that will be easier to locate on

    urban / urban edge sites.

    3.5.2 Settlements outside growth areas

    Whilst development rates will be slower in these areas than the Sustainable Communities Plan

    growth areas there is still seen to be significant potential to develop renewable energy and

    energy efficiency measures in new development.

    Renewable energy technology opportunities will be more limited, with solar and small-scale

    wind being most suitable. Settlement edges however, will have potential for larger-scale wind,

    energy crops, energy from sewage waste and landfill methane. Towns will also provide

    locations for siting generation plants for combusting energy crops from adjacent farms.

    3.5.3 Non-designated landscapes

    These areas comprise primarily agricultural land and woodland, covering the majority of the

    regions area. The non-designated landscapes are likely to be the principal locations for large-

    scale developments associated with wind, biomass and agricultural wastes, with their related

    combustion plants and infrastructure. They may also be the areas to accommodate smaller-

    scale developments, including individual, or small groups of, turbines, hydro schemes and

    sewage plant bio-gas installations.

    The Appendix states that the potential for using these developments as a focus for

    regenerating the rural economy should be a major policy objective of local development

    documents.

    3.5.4 Designated landscapes

    Areas statutorily designated internationally and nationally for the protection of theirlandscape quality, coastal heritage, biodiversity, cultural and heritage interests designations

    are not considered to be suitable for the construction of large-scale renewable energy

    infrastructure, especially wind-turbines. However, small-scale developments of wind

    turbines, energy crops, hydro schemes and bio-gas from small sewage plants may be acceptable.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    28/114

    16

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Developers should be required to undertake assessments to demonstrate that adverse impacts

    can be satisfactorily addressed. They should also show that that there is an overriding need for

    the development in terms of local social and economic conditions.

    The Appendix also states that Local Development Documents and Supplementary Planning

    Documents should specify detailed criteria specifying energy efficiency standards in excess ofthe minimum (using SAP rating, Ecohomes rating or BREEAM (the Building Research

    Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). Local planning authorities should require

    that all new residential development achieve an NHER of at least 10.

    Local Development Documents, supported by supplementary guidance, should also specify

    detailed locational criteria related to the following renewable energy technologies; solar

    photovoltaic, solar thermal, wind, small scale hydro, biomass and combined heat and power.

    These criteria should focus on encouraging the development of such technologies and

    mitigating their effects, rather than as a basis for justifying the refusal.

    3.6 Hertfordshire Structure Plan

    Until the East of England Plan is adopted, the development plan for Hertfordshire will comprise

    the adopted Hertfordshire Structure Plan and all relevant adopted Local Plans. Policy 54 deals

    with energy generation and states that, where there is a viable choice between development to

    generate energy by renewable or non-renewable means, priority will be given to renewable

    generation, subject to the other policies of this Plan. Renewable energy developments are

    supported subject to their impacts.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    29/114

    17

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    4. The Local Planning Context

    4.1 PPS12 on LDFs

    Planning Policy Statement 12 (PPS12) on Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) outlines the

    new system of development plans. The shift towards community involvement, sustainability

    and spatial planning lie at the heart of the change. This approach will require the integration of

    environmental, social and economic considerations in the light of local conditions. In order to

    improve efficiency and effectiveness of the planning system, there is an emphasis on the

    principle of front-loaded and evidence-based decision-making.

    The Local Development Frameworks portfolio will consist of : -

    A Statement of Community Involvement

    Development Plan Documents

    A Core Strategy

    Policies and proposals on land-use topics (including site-specific allocations)

    Area Action Plans

    A Proposals Map

    Supplementary Planning Documents

    Within Hertfordshire, 10 separate local planning authorities (LPAs) will be preparing LDFs, all

    of which will need to include the subject of renewable energy development proposals. A Local

    Development Scheme, submitted by each LPA, sets out the LDF programme and timetable.

    PPS12, in respect of the LDF, talks of LPAs having a proactive positive approach to managing

    development that is:

    Flexible

    Appraised for sustainability

    Managed efficiently

    Sound and based on robust credible evidence

    and that:

    Strengthens community and stakeholder involvement

    Front-loads the process

    PPS12 states that LPAs should adopt a spatial planning approach to LDFs in order to ensure

    the most efficient use of landand to approach this objective by balancing competing demands

    within the context of sustainable development.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    30/114

    18

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    PPS12 explains that the new form of spatial planning:

    Goes beyond traditional land use planning;

    Means that planning can consider the wider issues (such as the issues associated

    with carbon reduction and renewable energy promotion);

    Enables development and land use plans to be brought together with other policies

    and programmes; and

    Means that there is a need to work collaboratively.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    31/114

    19

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    5. Planning Issues

    5.1 The Different Forms of RE and their Implications forPlanning

    Renewable energy is used to describe the various ways in which continuous energy flows that

    occur naturally in the environment, from the sun, wind, oceans, plants and the fall of water, are

    harnessed. Energy from waste is also referred to as renewable energy where it emanates from

    within the earth. National policy is to encourage the development and use of renewable energy

    resources where they have prospects of being economically viable and environmentally

    acceptable. The aim is to reduce the adverse environmental impacts of producing energy from

    fossil fuels, notably carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. In addition, renewable energy sources can

    also contribute towards the greater diversity and security of the nations energy supply. It mustbe recognised, however, that some renewable energy resources can only be utilised where they

    occur and that often their location will be, as a matter of necessity or convenience, in rural areas

    and open landscapes. It is the planning system that is left to try to ensure that a balance is

    achieved between utilising and, indeed, encouraging the particular energy resource and the need

    to take account the potential impact on the local environment and amenities.

    5.2 Wind power

    5.2.1 Project Initi ation

    Wind energy is recognised as one of the most promising renewable resources and the

    technology is well advanced. Wind turbines can be deployed singly, in small clusters, or in

    larger wind farms. Developers are generally attracted to areas of higher elevation and open

    landscapes in order to find the best wind resource with sufficiently high annual mean wind

    speeds. Knowledge of the local wind resource is critical to designing a wind energy system and

    predicting its output. For domestic installations, a good source of information on local wind

    speeds is the NOABL database. For a major wind farm development, a developer would

    normally need to seek permission to erect a temporary mast of at least 40 metres in height for

    monitoring the wind speeds for a period of between 12 and 18 months.

    The scale of the proposed wind power development is seen by developers as crucial to the

    planning risk. Many developers have chosen to concentrate on developments over the 50MWthreshold defined by Section 36 of the Electricity Act, which require DTI approval, rather than

    rely on the unpredictability of local authority planning approvals. However, Hertfordshire is

    probably not best placed to win large-scale development due to local wind conditions.

    Similarly, small-scale schemes tend to involve local power distribution and often local

    ownership, significantly improving local support. It is the mid-range schemes (5 to 30MW)

    which have encountered the most resistance during the planning process. In order to meet the

    regional targets, it will be essential to promote schemes of all scales to obtain maximum benefit.

    Therefore, it is important that planning policies and guidance are tailored to meet the needs of

    each of the various scales of development.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    32/114

    20

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    In order to reduce risk, developers will seek out those local authorities offering favourable

    development climates, i.e. those adopting a proactive rather than reactionary stance. The cost of

    local educational programmes (for the general public, planning officers and committee

    members) has been a significant factor in development appraisals, encouraging developers

    towards local authorities that have engaged with the impact of renewable energy as part of their

    Agenda 21 work.

    5.2.2 Evaluation

    Local authorities can significantly increase the likelihood of development proposals coming

    forward by producing indicative potential development maps for their areas. These could

    indicate not only wind speed data and grid accessibility information, but also safeguarded areas

    (e.g. airport/low flying/radar zones, areas of high landscaping sensitivity), transport route

    separation zones, communication line-of-site pathways, residential developments and

    cumulative wind-farm development separation data. Indications could be given for which areas

    could accommodate large schemes, which would be more suitable for mid-range schemes

    (depending on the particulars of the site), and which could at best support small-scale schemessubject to sensitive development.

    Visual amenity is often a primary factor in planning applications. Individual turbines and wind

    farms are highly visible over wide areas and while it might be possible to locate such

    developments in sympathy with the landform and existing features in the landscape, regard must

    also be paid to their wider landscape impact. (For example, grid connections could be routed

    underground, to ameliorate visual impact, though this will considerably add to development

    costs and environmental disturbance). There is also a need to consider the potential cumulative

    impact that might occur with two or more schemes in an area. i.e. The number, size, layout,

    colour, height, profile and cumulative impact of the proposals need to be considered, together

    with the impact of additional power lines, fencing, buildings, sub-stations, access tracks

    (including surfacing materials, cuttings, embankments, drainage channels), and anemometermasts.

    Wind turbines can also cause problems of shadow flicker, reflected light, television and radio

    interference and noise, both from the turbine and the blade movement. A suggested minimum

    separation could be specified in planning policies between wind turbines and nearby dwellings

    in order to prevent issues of visual and noise disturbance, or left variable (but sufficient)

    depending on factors such as wind direction or background noise. The potential for noise

    generation is generally the biggest factor for deciding how much generating capacity can be

    installed at a potential site. During the EIA and site design process, noise minimisation will

    often heavily influence the layout and design.

    Wind turbines can also affect electromagnetic signals as used by television broadcasting andradio communications, although many options for fixing potential television reception problems

    are available. Fixed communication links require a line-of-sight path between the transmitter

    and receiver and thus a wind farm can be designed so that turbines are placed away from the

    line of sight in order to avoid affecting such communication links. The Radio-communications

    Agency (RA) holds a central register of all civil radio communications installations in the UK.

    Areas of nature conservation or archaeological importance are normally avoided by developers,

    although protected species or habitats might exist at any site. In many cases, archaeological

    features are relatively small and in a buried, or ruined, state. It is relatively straightforward for a

    wind farm to be designed around such features and proper on-site construction standards will

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    33/114

    21

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    ensure that such protected sites remain intact. More significant cultural heritage features and

    their settings are, of course, protected from any developments through national and local

    planning policy. Due to the large investment in planning and developing wind infrastructure,

    larger-scale developers are inclined to avoid areas with designated protection policies in

    development plans, such as Green Belts and AONBs, although it is not uncommon to come

    across proposals for individual turbines in such areas.

    National grid connection, or the lack of it, is becoming an increasingly significant barrier to the

    development of many wind farm projects. A connection to the local electricity network, which

    can carry away all the generated electricity from the site at an affordable price, is essential for a

    successful project. However, small-scale wind power is particularly suitable for remote off-grid

    locations where conventional methods of supply are expensive or impractical.

    As the proportion of energy generated from wind-power increases, the impact on grid balancing

    becomes significant, and use of large-scale energy storage schemes such as hydro-pumping

    become necessary. Local use and storage of the generated electricity mitigates this issue,

    promoting the location of turbines in industrial or urban locations.

    5.2.3 Implementation

    Modern commercial wind turbines are extremely large structures, with a 2MW wind turbine

    having blades of 40 metres in length that would arrive on site on 47 metre-long lorries. The

    erection of a 2MW turbine requires either an 800 tonne mobile crane, or a massive crawler

    crane. Traffic generation during construction needs to be considered and the roads to the site

    must be able to accommodate the largest vehicles, as well as other construction traffic. It must

    also be possible to build roads across the site, which allow the construction traffic to work.

    Wind farm access roads and foundations could effect local hydrology, which in turn will have

    an influence on local habitats and water abstraction. The restoration of temporary construction

    roads back to their original land use could be a matter for planning conditions.

    Typically a developer would expect a 9 to 30-month programme to develop a project (i.e. secure

    planning consent and reach financial close), with a further 9 to 18-month programme for

    construction. These time-scales are of course dependent upon the scale of the project, the site

    location and the prevailing public opinion towards the proposal. Significant public opposition or

    EIA issues can effectively prevent wind-power development due to excessive development

    timescales.

    5.2.4 Maintenance

    The actual land take with wind turbines is minimal. Whilst wind farms usually extend over

    large areas of land, traditional farming is relatively unimpeded and only about 1% to 5% of thewind farm area is normally rendered unusable for farming or other uses by the development.

    Equipment maintenance generates little traffic, with most monitoring and control being

    performed remotely.

    5.2.5 Decommissioning

    Since most wind turbines have an operational life of around 20-30 years, consideration should

    be given to the future of the site. Turbines can be re-powered with more efficient (possibly

    smaller) systems, or replaced, or removed completely. Decommissioning should be the subject

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    34/114

    22

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    of appropriate planning conditions that require the reinstatement of the landscape and its

    vegetation.

    5.2.6 Smaller Scale Turbines

    TV (Thames Valley) Energy provide the support for the Countryside Agencys Community

    Renewables Initiative covering Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire. Their

    information sheet for community groups and not-for-profit organisations states:

    Small wind turbines are sized at a hub height of 25 metres and under. Turbines need

    to be mounted on a tower of a height that reduces the blocking effect of the buildings,

    residential properties and trees. They are noiseless, but a planning application will be

    required. Windspeeds are the vital factor, with wind speeds of 5 m per second and

    above, at a height of 10m being recommended. Clearskies grants are available for 50%

    of installed capital costs and a 6kW turbine will cost in the region of 19,000. This will

    generate approximately 14,000 units of electricity when wind speeds average 5.5m per

    second at a hub height of 15m.

    5.2.7 Domestic wind turbines

    Later this year, British Gas has announced that the company will be commencing a trial

    programme of domestic-size wind turbines on houses in Scotland and South West England,

    which, if successful, could be expanded to include properties across the whole of the UK. The

    vanes extend to 1.75m (about 5ft 9in) from vane tip to vane tip. The structure bolts on to a

    property wall or gable-end of a building, similar to a satellite dish, and stands about 2.5 metres

    (about 8ft 2in) high. British Gas estimates that the small turbine would produce around 1

    kilowatt of electricity, which might cut around one-third of an average household electricity bill

    and reduce CO emissions by about half a tonne per annum. The turbine would cost around

    1,500, including installation, and would operate in wind speeds as low as three miles per hour.It is the first time a major supplier has tested domestic wind turbines, although some

    homeowners have already bought and installed such equipment. Properties taking part in the

    trial will be in both urban and rural areas, although it clearly going to be easier to accommodate

    such potentially noticeable and intrusive structures on larger and more isolated dwellings. In

    many instances, planning permission is likely to be required, for example if the structure is

    higher than the apex of the roof of a dwelling. The turbine manufacturer in the trial, Windsave,

    would like to see permitted development status for all such devices so that homeowners do not

    have to apply for planning permission on an individual basis, although this would appear to be

    optimistic and possibly not acceptable to communities where the visual impact of such

    equipment is perceived as far more obtrusive than ordinary TV aerials and satellite dishes.

    5.3 Biomass energy

    Biomass energy covers the full range from large-scale electricity production such as in

    commercial co-firing power stations, down to medium and small-scale electricity and heat

    production facilities, and domestic heating systems. It also covers transport fuels such as bio-

    diesel and bio-ethanol derived from starch and oil crops and waste products.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    35/114

    23

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    5.3.1 Co-firing

    Existing coal-fired power stations can burn up to 10% biomass products using existing

    technology, (though 5% may be nearer the practical limit due to problems of feedstock

    pulverization and combustibility). Co-firing is currently eligible for ROCs as a method of

    promoting the production of local feedstocks, however this is likely to end in 2016, increasingfeedstock availability for dedicated biomass energy production.

    A wide range of biomass feedstocks have been trialed including specialist wood crops, cereal

    crops, olive pips, waste slurries and palm oil, though most are currently being imported due to

    lack of appropriate and adequate local fuel supplies.

    Increased transportation, associated with the shipment of bulky feedstocks, is the biggest

    planning impact of co-firing technology. However, a significant proportion of power stations

    currently use rail shipment. Since this method of renewable energy generation is unlikely to

    persist once ROC eligibility is removed, significant development in new offsite infrastructure is

    unlikely to be economically viable.

    5.3.2 Large-scale power generation

    In order to be economically viable, biomass plants require large volumes of suitable fuel to be

    available at the lowest possible price, which generally means within a relatively close local area

    of the installation. Biomass may also be hampered in part from the lack of a wide enough

    market for the fuel that it requires to use and which therefore may not be made available in

    sufficient quantities within an accessible distance of the plant.

    Often biomass development occurs close to energy crop production sites or near specialist

    feedstock production such as chicken farms. As technology improvements increase the variety

    of viable feedstocks, the range of potential sites will grow.

    By far the most obvious and wide-ranging visual impact in the countryside is the growing of theenergy crops, which of course does not require planning permission as such. (Although the

    growing of biomass crops does not fall under the control of the planning system, the

    Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations introduced in February 2002 require land

    owners of permanent pastures / semi-natural habitats to inform Defra before converting land to

    intensive agriculture. Defra can then undertake an environmental assessment of this change and

    can prevent harmful changes from taking place.)

    Specialist wood crops such as willow or poplar are grown on a two to three-year rotation period.

    Straw and whole crop cereals can also be used, both annual and less-energy intensive perennial

    varieties. The growth of such crops could be undertaken on set-aside land and the production

    of crops for fuel could prove a valuable form of diversification for local farmers. In order to

    meet the targets defined from energy crops significant areas of land would need to be allocated

    to energy crop production. This would primarily be agricultural land, though the possibility of

    using brownfield land as part of a long-term reclamation process should not be ruled out.

    There must be a sufficient supply of the feedstock, of an appropriate quality and over the long-

    term, in order to operate the plant. The feedstock quality and consistency must be maintained

    throughout the entire life of the project. Grant support is available for the establishment and

    growing of energy crops, subject to certain rules, which include being located within a

    reasonable distance of the end use (10 mile radius for small installations, 25 miles for large

    installations), along with providing a minimum establishment of three hectares. One-off

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    36/114

    24

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    payments are also available for the establishment of the crop. In the past, there was a

    differential between short rotation coppice (SRC) and miscanthus. However, reform of the

    Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has made the enhanced rate for SRC redundant from 2005.

    CAP reform will also lead to replacement of the Arable Area Payments Scheme (AAPS) under

    which set-aside payments are made. The AAPS will be replaced by a single payment scheme

    from 2005. The current maximum limit for grant aid is 500,000. The establishment and

    growing of biomass may be supported through other schemes, including the Woodland Grant

    Scheme and the Farm Woodland Premium Scheme (on which there is up-to-date information

    available on the Defra web site at www.defra.gov.uk).

    Key issues for local planning authorities to consider when evaluating applications for biomass

    plant are: -

    visual intrusion, including any chimneys, noise from engines, boilers, handling

    equipment and traffic,

    light pollution from plant operational around the clock,

    potential pollution of ground and water courses,

    emissions into the air, and

    traffic resulting from the transport of the fuel to the site and the subsequentremoval of by-products and any waste.

    The kind of questions that would need to be asked about proposals that would generate a

    significant amount of traffic would be:

    What will be the traffic flows associated with the scheme?

    What will be the emissions from the vehicles?

    What access routes will be used for the delivery of the crop?

    What traffic management controls will be needed and proposed?

    What are the fuel handling and temporary storage requirements?

    Planning authorities may wish to control the number of vehicle movements of construction and

    operational traffic to and from the site in a specified period and, where possible, the route of

    such movements, particularly of heavy vehicles, by imposing suitable conditions, or entering

    into planning agreements with the developer.

    As with all thermal treatment processes, most concerns expressed involve the emission ofpollutants to the atmosphere. (Pollution Prevention and Control for larger biomass plants is

    covered by the Environment Agency).

    Biomass developments are often seen as high-risk due to the high levels of investment finance

    required, potential variability of local fuel supplies and the need for an affordable national grid

    connection. However, with the increased interest in renewable energy technology as a

    commercial investment and recent changes in the 2004 Energy Act concerning favourable grid

    connection charging for renewable energy sources has lessened the financial barriers.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    37/114

    25

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    5.3.3 Small to Medium-scale power generation and CHP schemes

    Many biomass plants will be small, only provide heat, and may be easily incorporated into

    existing or new buildings. Where they are included in agricultural buildings, they may not

    require specific planning permission if they are ancillary to the main use of the site. However,

    heat and power generation plants will require planning permission. The generating plant andactivities directly related to it are subject to planning control, but the growing and harvesting the

    biomass crops are outside planning control.

    Small-scale schemes are now benefiting from maturing feedstock distribution networks, though

    transport costs can still be significant for locations remote from centres of production, and costs

    associated with storage requirements of sensitive fuels such as wood pellets. Fuel costs remain

    high in relation to conventional heating fuels such as natural gas and heating oil, and generally

    only warrant consideration for sites with no access to mains gas, and a need for constant heat

    production, unless combined with traditional facilities.

    CHP installations can improve economic viability by using heat off-take systems for use on

    adjacent sites and facilities. These are best designed in at initial installation as retro-fitting costscan be prohibitive. Also the existence of a local market for the waste products e.g. as fertiliser

    can significantly reduce running costs. However, unless ROCs are introduced for heat then

    commercial CHP development is unlikely to increase significantly.

    Biomass boilers for district heating, (where heat rather than energy is sold to consumers), are an

    option but currently these are uncommon in the UK. Local authorities could require new

    developments to consider the use of district heating, (particularly in thermally-efficient high-

    density developments), or could mandate a minimum proportional of biomass heating provision.

    The most economically viable schemes at present use standard gas burners combined with solar

    (solar covering summer electrical needs, gas providing both electricity and heat in winter).

    Typically a developer would expect a 9 to 30-month programme to develop a project (i.e. secure

    planning consent and reach financial close), with a further 9 to 18-month programme for

    construction. These time-scales are of course dependent upon the scale of the project, the site

    location and the prevailing public opinion towards the proposal.

    5.3.4 Power generation from waste

    Waste products such as chicken litter as used on a commercial basis as a successful feedstock,

    and trials are being conducted with other waste products such as used tyres. The digestion of

    farm slurry can produce a gas rich in methane, which has in the past been used on a very small

    scale to provide energy on the farmyard. It is possible, however, for slurry from several farms

    to be concentrated at a sewage-treatment works and there combined with sewage from the main

    drainage network before being subjected to digestion to produce bio-gas at an economicallyviable level. The energy produced can be in the form of heat as well as power. The main

    planning implications associated with such development include concern over pollutants, traffic

    generation, the visual impact of the digester tanks, gas holders and transmission lines and noise

    emissions.

    In order to be commercially viable, developments utilising waste products need to ensure long-

    term feedstock supply contracts. (Typically 50-75% of revenues are derived from gate fees).

    Most thermal technologies have limited fuel flexibility, and are unable to track fluctuations in

    feedstock quality and availability over the life of the project.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    38/114

    26

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    The major public concern with the use of waste products as a feedstock is with emissions of

    pollutants into the atmosphere, with difficult planning applications being referred to Public

    Inquiry. Often Local Authority Waste Management Strategies preclude the use of incineration

    as a means of final disposal. Such costs and delays are a major disincentive for investors.

    5.3.5 Transport fuels

    Bio-fuels will undoubtedly become an increasingly important transport fuel. Bio-diesel can be

    used alone, or blended with fossil-derived diesel. It can be used with no engine modifications

    and bio-diesel can even improve engine life due to increased lubrication. It can be delivered via

    the existing fuel infrastructure (e.g. Tesco currently offer a 5% blend). Bio-ethanol can be used

    as a supplement in petrol engines, but may require some engine modifications and development

    of the nation-wide fuel delivery infrastructure.

    The majority of feedstocks used for the production of bio-fuel and commodities traded world-

    wide and therefore influenced by international trade agreements, and hence commercial

    arrangements tend to be more complicated, particularly when considered against the typical

    project investment time-scales of 15-30 years. Currently imported feedstocks such as palm oil

    are more economically attractive than indigenous supplies (such as being used in the proposed

    Teesside facility), although a bio-diesel pilot plant exists in Ashford using waste cooking oil

    feedstock (benefiting from EU legislation forbidding the reuse of waste cooking oil in animal

    feed).

    Bio-fuels are more expensive to produce than fossil-derived fuels, but changes in the fuel duty

    and the increasing cost of a barrel of oil are reducing the margin. Support is also available for

    the establishment and growing of certain energy crops. This is significant since the economics

    of production are heavily influenced by transport costs, necessitating a local plentiful supply of

    feedstock. Major planning issues for fuel production facilities will involve feedstock and fuel

    transportation, storage requirements (visual impact, land use, safety etc.) and pollution control(such as environmental contamination).

    5.3.6 EIA requirements

    All commercial biomass developments are likely to be subject to the need for Environmental

    Impact Assessments where situated within a 'sensitive area' or the area of the development

    exceeds 0.5 hectares. (Smaller thermal power station schemes would be considered eligible

    under Schedule 2, "industrial installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot

    water"). Where the process involves the collection, storage and processing of hazardous or non-

    hazardous wastes, proximity to controlled waters (within 100 metres) is a relevant consideration

    and likewise the collection and storage of combustible gases. The likelihood of significant

    effects will generally depend on the scale of the development and the nature of the potentialimpact in terms of discharges, emissions or odour. For installations, (including landfill sites),

    used for the deposit, recovery and/or disposal of household, industrial and/or commercial waste

    (as defined by the Controlled Waste Regulations 1992), EIA is more likely to be required where

    new capacity is created to hold more than 50,000 tonnes per year, or to hold waste on a site of

    10 hectares or more.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    39/114

    27

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    5.4 Water power

    Whilst older installations are likely to comprise a dam and storage reservoir, new developments

    can be small in scale and utilise a natural pool, or head-pond, in order to supply a turbine via a

    conduit. Water power normally produces electricity and the turbine can be installed in a

    building the size of a domestic garage. Sites with less than a 2 m head tend to not to be cost-

    effective, though pre-existing facilities such as at disused mills, especially when incorporated

    with on-site energy usage can make refurbishment schemes financially viable. While water

    channels and the buildings are likely to be visible, they are not necessarily detrimental to the

    landscape and can often be screened. Extensive civil engineering works tend not to be required

    for low-head schemes, where often the natural features of the watercourse are utilised, and

    problems of noise and traffic movements are normally minimal once construction is complete.

    Visual and ecosystem impacts are very much site-specific. For example the risk of interference

    with sensitive ecosystems or rare species is likely to be higher in national park or semi-

    wilderness areas, and lower on existing weirs on lowland rivers. Input from wildlife of ecology

    experts may be required as part of an Environmental Impact Assessment.Renewable energy generated from pre-existing commercial hydro-schemes does not count

    towards the regional targets.

    5.5 Solar power

    Active solar systems are those which collect the suns radiation and transfer it in the form of

    heat to water or air. Photovoltaic systems convert the suns energy directly into electricity.

    Direct sunlight is not necessary to make these systems effective. Passive solar design uses a

    buildings form, fabric and orientation to capture, store and distribute solar energy with a

    consequent reduction in demand for additional heat and light. The installation of active solar

    systems usually involves fitting solar panels to the roof, photovoltaic cells incorporated into

    roof tiles or glazing, or a separate solar collector system in the grounds. The visual impact of

    such installations will vary depending upon their context but particular attention should be paid

    to their impact in Conservation Areas, on Listed Buildings and in other sensitive locations. This

    is a form of energy which can be generated at the point of use and is available everywhere, and

    also has only a limited impact in visual terms.

    Solar systems often fall within permitted development rights for homeowners (where for

    example a solar panel is more or less flush with an existing roof). However, for listed buildings,

    conservation areas, buildings in Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks or

    covered by Article 4 direction, blocks of flats, (or houses divided into flats), planning

    permission may well be required. Photovoltaic products may be more suitable in areas wherevisual amenity is crucial.

    Installations require maximum light and avoid possible shadows cast by adjacent buildings,

    trees or other obstructions. The visual amenity of installations is good. Active solar thermal

    collectors usually take the form of 3-4m collectors mounted on the roof, resembling dark roof

    lights, arranged in banks on large-scale commercial premises. Photovoltaic collectors can exist

    as panels on roofs or walls, or incorporated into the fabric of the building as external wall

    cladding, roofing systems, solar roof slates or built into glass facades or roofs.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    40/114

    28

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Heat pumps utilising solar heating of the ground are normally free from planning consents, but

    are subject to building regulations.

    5.6 Landfill gasLandfill gas is mainly a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide that can be used through

    combustion for heating and electricity generation. In order to exploit landfill gas, a suitable site

    must be available, which must be provided with a gas collection system and the necessary plant

    for energy generation. This type of energy source is only available in commercially viable

    quantities from extensive landfill sites. As waste is diverted away from landfill, this source of

    renewable energy is likely to drop away.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    41/114

    29

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    6. Renewable Energy Development inHertfordshire

    6.1 The Potential for RE in Hertfordshire

    The accompanying Renewable Energy Options Report, which has also been prepared by Entec,

    concludes that there is the technical potential within Hertfordshire to achieve the levels of

    renewable energy production proposed in the East of England Sustainable Development Round

    Table Study. However, achievement of the technical levels will be dependent upon a range of

    external factors, such as developer uptake, aviation objections (potentially on commercial wind

    projects) and consumer uptake.

    One of the most important factors influencing the uptake is commercial competitiveness

    (financial viability) and this is strongly influenced by much wider-ranging global political

    factors, national policy and regulations, grant schemes and the fundamental economic viability

    of the technologies. Many of these factors will be beyond the direct influence of stakeholders

    within Hertfordshire.

    However, for the more competitive renewable technologies, such as onshore wind, planning

    policy will remain the critical issue for attracting commercial developers. Strong regional and

    local level planning policies and increased public awareness can play a major part in attracting

    developers and influencing the deployment of renewable technologies in Hertfordshire.

    6.2 Meeting the Targets

    In order to meet the 2010 targets defined in the East of England Plan onshore wind must be

    encouraged, along with all other forms and scales of renewable energy schemes. In order to

    meet the 2020 targets, emerging technologies, such as biomass, will need to make a major

    impact. Due to the long initiation periods of many of these projects, effort must be expended

    now in order to win over public opinion and bring developments forward. Although

    requirements for renewable energy in new development will only make a marginal difference to

    the direct achievement of targets, it could have an impact on the public perception of renewable

    energy and the acceptability of new technologies.

    Urban authorities in particular may wish to concentrate efforts on small-scale, building-based

    embedded technologies such as solar, photovoltaic and small-scale wind solutions, with limited

    large-scale projects on brownfield sites where the opportunity arises. However, rural authorities

    may find projects that support the economy and promote employment more beneficial to their

    communities.

    The results of the assessment of renewable energy generation potential are set out in the

    accompanying Renewable Energy Options Report for Hertfordshire and are reproduced below

    for ease of reference.

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    42/114

    30

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    Table 6.1 Potential renewable energy produc tion in Hertfordshire by 2010

    Technology Potentialcapacity

    (MW electri cal)

    Potentialelectrical

    output(GWeh/year)

    Potential totalenergy outpu t

    (GWh/year)

    CO2reduction(tonnes

    CO2/year)

    WIND

    Large Wind Turbines

    Existing: 0.225

    Possible: 10

    Extended: 65

    Existing: 0.25

    Possible: 25

    Extended: 163

    Existing: 0.25

    Possible: 25

    Extended: 163

    110

    10,800

    70,100

    BIOMASS

    Co-firing in large power plant 31 175 175 168,000

    Dedicated CHP facility 17 125 285 94,000

    Bio-diesel

    Bio-Ethanol

    39,000

    107,000

    Animal Slurries and AnaerobicDigestion

    2 14 14 6,000

    Sewage sludge (90% drysolids) EFW

    4 30 30 13,000

    MSW EFW 14 104 104 45,000

    Small scale biomass-heatfacilities

    N/A N/A 35 9,000

    WATER : Hydro Low : 0.1

    High : 2.0

    Low : 0.6

    High : 12.3

    Low : 0.6

    High : 12.3

    260

    5,300

    WIND : Rooftop Low : 0.3

    High : 7

    Low : 0.3

    High : 7

    130

    3,000

    SOLAR ; Photo-Voltaic Low : 0.5

    High : 12

    Low : 0.5

    High : 12

    220

    5,200

    SOLAR : Thermal/Passive Low : 2

    High : 137

    500

    34,300

  • 8/13/2019 h Res Plan Considerations

    43/114

    31

    s:\common\hannah\energy\entec planning considerations report (july 2005).doc July 2005

    7. Local Planning Approach

    7.1 The Vision

    It is suggested that local planning authorities first consider whether the plan should start with a

    vision for the area that covers the subject of renewable energy. The vision for the Local

    Development Framework might be broad in terms of describing future aspirations for the area,

    but local planning authorities can decide just how specific they wish to be, including whether a

    vision for individual topics, such as renewable energy, might be an appropriate starting point.

    However, this will obviously depend upon whether a single vision can be agreed.

    Exactly how a local authority will approach the question of renewable energy will inevitably

    become a controversial subject if the planning authority contemplates encouraging orpromoting such energy provision within their administrative area, as the Government is

    seeking to encourage. Encouraging wind power would inevitably be a possible option if a local

    authority were to be proactive in seeking to make a significant contribution to the provision of

    renewable energy sources, although controversy could equally apply to other forms of

    renewable energy, particularly where significant traffic and/or visual impacts may arise with

    such developments.

    In order for a local planning authority to test the context for drafting planning policies, it

    might be felt appropriate, through the initial community involvement stages of plan making, to

    invite views on what the community see as their overall vision for the subject. This could

    provide the authority with an idea of the extent of any consensus on what the community

    envisages and might accept within their own local area. The key words here are within theirown local area. Whilst it is not difficult to get a general consensus on the virtues that

    renewable energy offers to society in general, it is a totally different consideration in how any

    one local community sees its role and what that community would be prepared to accept in its

    own back-yard.

    As a consequence, the choices that are available to each local community need to be articulated

    in a way i