h. 3442 white paper · collaborate with the existing business-led local workforce investment...

S O U T H C A R O L I N A W O R K F O R C E D E V E L O P M E N T A R E A A D M I N I S T R A T O R S

A S S O C I A T I O N ( S C W D A A A )

H . 3 4 4 2

WHITE PAPER

SOUTH CAROLINA’S WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM:

Preparing for Sustainable Development to Meet the Needs of South Carolina’s Evolving Economy

3 0 1 U N I V E R S I T Y R I D G E S U I T E 1 5 0 0

G R E E N V I L L E , S C 2 9 6 0 1

1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_South_Carolina.svg�

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S

INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………. 3

SOUTH CAROLINA’S WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM DEFINED …… 4

Table 1: South Carolina’s 12 Local Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Regions….... 4

HOW LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARDS FIGURE INTO THE SYSTEM ……………………………………………………………………………… 5

WIB Appointments …………………………………………………………………… 5 WIB Role and Responsibility ………………………………………………………… 5 WIB/WIA System Structure …………………………………………………………. 6 Local WIB Chair Contact Information ………………………………………………. 6

HOW LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT AREAS FIGURE INTO THE SYSTEM …………………………..………………………………………………………. 8

Designation of WIA Regions ………………………………………………………… 8 Administrative Entity …………………………………………………………………. 8 SC WIA Contact Information ………………………………………………………. 8 WIA Program ………………………………………………………………………… 10 Services Available ……………………………………………………………………. 10 Dislocated Worker and Youth Services ………………………………………………. 11 Other Programs and Services ………………………………………………………. 11 LWIA Program Funding ……………………………………………………………… 13 - Table II – PY 2007 WIA Allocation Summary ………………………………… 13 - Table III – PY 2008 WIA Allocation Summary ……………………………….. 14 - Table IV – PY 2009 WIA Allocation Summary………………………………… 15 Fiscal and Program Accountability …………………………………………………… 16

ONE STOP CAREER CENTERS ………………………………………………………….. 17

A BRIEF REFLECTION ON THE EVOLUTION AND FUTURE DIRECTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA’S WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM ………………………………………………………………… 18

APPENDIX ………………………………………..……………………………………..... 19

WIA Performance …………………………………………………………………… 20 WIA Expenditures …………………………………………………………………. 30

S O U T H C A R O L I N A’ S W O R K F O R C E D E V E L O P M E N T S Y S T E M : Preparing for Sustainable Development to Meet the Needs of South Carolina’s Evolving Economy

2

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


Introduction

This White Paper is prepared by the South Carolina Workforce Development Area Administrators Association (SCWDAAA) in cooperation with a consortium of state agencies. The purpose of the White Paper is to support the efforts for improving the Workforce Development System in South Carolina. The SCWDAAA is a volunteer organization of workforce development directors who represent South Carolina’s forty-six (46) counties. Specifically, the SCWDAAA is comprised of administrators of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) program who also serve as directors of twelve (12) local Workforce Investment Boards (LWIBs). The White Paper will provide stakeholders with valuable information on South Carolina’s workforce development system under the WIA for the purpose of aligning strategies and partnerships in order to meet the needs of South Carolina’s evolving economy. Below are some key suggestions and/or focus areas to consider for enhancing the workforce development system:

Build upon the existing statewide One-Stop Delivery System. Collaborate with the existing business-led local Workforce Investment Boards.

Support strong collaboration and coordination between workforce development, education, and

economic development through the local Workforce Investment Boards.

Create more opportunities to align workforce development funding.

3

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

South Carolina’s WIA Workforce Development System Defined Federal Workforce Investment Act (WIA) funds are leveraged through partnerships with other state agencies, 12 regional workforce investment boards, local governments, economic development agencies, and community-based, nonprofit organizations. The WIA Workforce Development System provides business services for employers and opportunities for job seekers to increase their skill and gain employment through a network of One-Stop Career Centers.

SC 12 LOCAL WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) & WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD (WIB) REGIONS

TABLE 1


4

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


How Local Workforce Investment Boards Figure Into the System WIB Appointments The chief local elected official in the area is authorized to appoint the members of the local board for such area, in accordance with the State criteria. In a case in which a local area includes more than 1 unit of general local government, the chief elected officials of such units may execute an agreement that specifies the respective roles of the individual chief elected officials. WIB Role and Responsibility For each WIA region there is a Local Workforce Investment Board (LWIB). By law, each LWIB is chaired by a business person and comprised of a majority of private sector representatives; business owners; chief executives; managers and policy makers. Other LWIB members are drawn from public job service, education, social services, rehabilitation, and economic development agencies as well as from organized labor, and community based organizations. Local boards are certified by the Governor and are responsible for setting policy for the portion of the statewide workforce investment system within the local area. This responsibility requires the boards to develop job training programs for implementation in their respective WIAs, oversee the operation of those programs and determine which companies, educational institutions, and community organizations will receive funding for program operation. The WIA cooperates with local employers and government to select the workforce development programs most beneficial to the region, and to tailor programs to meet the local employment training needs. Each local board also has a Youth Council – a subcommittee that has responsibility for the planning oversight of the WIA Youth Program.

Specific Functions of the LWIB:

a. In partnership with the chief local elected official and local WIA Administrative Entity, develop a local plan to be submitted to the Governor.

b. Select One-Stop Operators and Youth providers. c. Identify eligible providers of training services in the local area. d. Develop a budget for the purpose of carrying out the duties of the LWIB, subject to the

approval of the chief local elected official(s) and local WIA Administrative Entity. e. Conduct oversight with respect to local programs of youth activities. f. Negotiate and reach agreement on local performance measures, in partnership with the chief

elected official and Governor. g. Assist the Governor in developing the statewide employment statistics system. h. Coordinate the workforce investment activities with economic development strategies and

develop other employer linkages with such activities. i. Promote the participation of private sector employers in the statewide workforce investment

system and ensure the effective provision, through the system, of connecting, brokering, and coaching activities, through intermediaries such as the one-stop operator in the local area or through other organizations, to assist such employers in meeting hiring needs.

5

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

WIB/WIA System Structure


WIA Funding

↓ US Dept of Labor

↓ States (Governor)

↓ State Agency

↓ Chief Local Elected Officials

→ Administrative Entity

Planning Oversight

↓ Governor’s Workforce Investment Boards

→ Local Workforce Investment Boards, in conjunction with Chief Local Elected Official and the local WIA Administrative Entity

Local Workforce Investment Board Chair Contact Information

LWIB Chair WIA Region Counties Served Butch Harris Koyo Bearings USA PO Box 100 430 Torrington Road Walhalla, SC 29691 Phone: (864) 718-2315 Email: [email protected]

Worklink

Anderson, Pickens, Oconee

Jesse Sibert PO Box 1366 Greenwood, SC 29648 Phone: (864) 941-8055 Email: [email protected]

Upper Savannah

Laurens, Abbeville, Newberry, Greenwood, McCormick, Saluda,

Edgefield Rita Revels, HR Manager Schaeffler Group USA PO Box 570 Spartanburg, SC 29304 Phone: (864) 591-8887 Email: [email protected]

Upstate

Spartanburg, Cherokee, Union

D. Douglas Dorman, VP Human Resources Greenville Hospital System 701 Grove Road Greenville, SC 29605 Phone: (864) 455-8940 Email: [email protected]

Greenville

Greenville

Reginald Murphy, VP of Operations ASSET Realty 100 Executive Center Dr., Santee Bldg, Suite 218 Columbia, SC 29210 Phone: (803) 744-1670, ext. 101 Email: [email protected] or [email protected]

Midlands

Fairfield, Richland, Lexington

6

mailto:[email protected]






3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


LWIB Chair WIA Region Counties Served

Janet Cappellini Alternative Staffing 1505 Remount Road North Charleston, SC 29456 Phone: (843) 744-6040 Email: [email protected]

Trident

Dorchester, Berkeley, Charleston

Cindy Bryant Precision Tools 100 Perfection Way Timmonsville, SC 29161 Phone: (843) 326-5544 Email: [email protected]

Pee Dee

Chesterfield, Marlboro, Darlington, Dillon, Florence, Marion

Dale Cordes PO Box 850 2748 Wagener Road Aiken, SC 29802 Phone: (803) 649-7981 Email: [email protected]

Lower Savannah

Aiken, Calhoun, Orangeburg, Barnwell, Bamberg, Allendale

Marvin Starks Nibrol 950 Quality Drive PO Box 2649 Lancaster, SC 29721 Phone: (803) 327-9041 Email: [email protected]

Catawba

York, Chester, Lancaster

Sid Isler 509 Broad Street Camden, SC 29020 Phone: (803) 432-0505 Email: [email protected]

Santee-Lynches

Kershaw, Lee, Sumter, Clarendon

Michele Winstead Winstead Financial Services 1575 Victoria Lane Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 Phone: (843) 546-8502 Email: [email protected]

Waccamaw

Horry, Williamsburg, Georgetown

Landon Thorne, Managing Director Midas Advisory Group PO Box 355 Sheldon, SC 29941 Phone: (843) 846-6088 Email: [email protected]

Lowcountry

Hampton, Colleton, Jasper, Beaufort

7








3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


How Local Workforce Investment Areas Figure Into the System Designation of WIA Regions The Governor shall designate local workforce investment areas through consultation with the State board and chief elected officials. In making the designation of local areas, the Governor shall take into consideration matters such as: the geographic areas served by local educational agencies, intermediate educational agencies, postsecondary educational institutions, and vocational education schools. Additionally, consideration should also be given to the extent to which local areas are consistent with labor market areas, the distance that individuals will need to travel to receive services provided in such local areas, and the resources of such local areas that are available to effectively administer the activities. The Governor shall approve any request for designation of a local area from any unit of general local government with a population of 500,000 or more; of the area served by rural concentrated employment program grant recipient of demonstrated effectiveness that served as a service delivery area of substate area under the Job Training Partnership Act, if the grant recipient submitted the request; and of an area that served as a service delivery area under the Job Training Partnership Act (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the WIA) in a State that has a population of not more than 1,100,000 and a population density greater than 900 persons per square mile. Administrative Entity The chief local elected official shall serve as the local grant recipient for, and shall be liable for any misuse of, the grant funds allocated to the local area unless the chief local elected official reaches an agreement with the Governor for the Governor to act as the local grant recipient and to bear such liability. The chief local elected official or the Governor, where the Governor serves as the local grant recipient for a local area, may designate an entity to serve as a local grant subrecipient for such funds or as a local fiscal agent. The chief local elected official or Governor remains liable for any misuse of grant funds regardless of who is designated as the administrative entity. The local board may also employ staff, in which most are employees of the local fiscal agent/administrative entity.

SC WIA CONTACT INFORMATION WIA/LWIB

Director WIA Administrative Entity and

Point of Contact Counties Served

Ms. Nita Colman Worklink WIB 511 Westinghouse Road Pendleton, SC 29670 Phone: (864) 646-1458 Email: [email protected]

Appalachian Council of Governments Steve Pelissier, Executive Director

Phone: (864) 242-9733

Anderson, Pickens, Oconee

Ms. Sandra Johnson Upper Savannah Council of Governments PO Box 1366 Greenwood, SC 29648 Phone: (864) 941-8055 Email: [email protected]

Upper Savannah Council of Governments Patricia Hartung, Executive Director

Phone: (864) 941-8050

Laurens, Abbeville, Newberry, Greenwood, McCormick,

Saluda, Edgefield

Ms. Ann Fesperman Upstate WIB 145 N. Church Street Spartanburg, SC 29306 Phone: (864) 596-2028 Email: [email protected]

Spartanburg County D. Glenn Breed, County Administrator

Phone: (864) 596-2526

Spartanburg, Cherokee, Union

8




3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


LWIB Director

WIA Administrative Entity and Point of Contact

Counties Served

Mr. Dean E. Jones Greenville County WIB 301 University Ridge, Suite 1500 Greenville, SC 29601 Phone: (864) 467-3605 Email: [email protected]

Greenville County Joseph Kernell, County Administrator

Phone: (864) 467-7105

Greenville

Ms. Bonnie Austin Midlands WDB 100 Executive Center Dr., Suite 218 Columbia, SC 29210 Phone: (803) 744-1670, ext. 101 Email: [email protected]

Central Midlands Council of Governments Norman Whitaker, Executive Director

Phone: (803) 376-5390

Fairfield, Richland, Lexington

Mr. Paul L. Connerty Trident WIB 1930 Hanahan Rd., Suite 200 North Charleston, SC 29406 Phone: (843) 574-1815 Email: [email protected]

Charleston County Allen O’Neal, County Administrator

Phone: (843) 958-4001

Dorchester, Berkeley, Charleston

Ms. Vickie Tyner Pee Dee Regional Council of Governments PO Box 5719 Florence, SC 29502 Phone: (843) 669-3138 Email: [email protected]

Pee Dee Regional Council of Governments Johnny B. Brown, Executive Director

Phone: (843) 669-3138

Chesterfield, Marlboro, Darlington, Dillon, Florence,

Marion

Mr. Samuel R. Jordan Lower Savannah Council of Governments PO Box 850 2748 Wagener Road Aiken, SC 29802 Phone: (803) 649-7981 Email: [email protected]

Lower Savannah Council of Governments F. Wayne Rogers, Executive Director

Phone: (803) 649-7981

Aiken, Calhoun, Orangeburg, Barnwell, Bamberg, Allendale

Ms. Nicole Lawing Catawba Regional Council of Governments PO Box 450 Rock Hill, SC 29731 Phone: (803) 327-9041 Email: [email protected]

Catawba Regional Council of Governments J. Randall Imler, Executive Director

Phone: (803) 327-9041

York, Chester, Lancaster

Mr. Les Thompson Santee Lynches Regional Council of Governments PO Box 1837 Sumter, SC 29151 Phone: (803) 775-7381, ext. 383 Email: [email protected]

Santee-Lynches Regional Council of Governments Jim Darby, Executive Director

Phone: (803) 775-7381

Kershaw, Lee, Sumter, Clarendon

Ms. Shirley G. Graham Waccamaw Regional Council of Governments 1230 Highmarket Street Georgetown, SC 29440 Phone: (843) 546-4231 Email: [email protected]

Waccamaw Regional Council of Governments David M. Essex, Executive Director

Phone: (843) 546-8502

Horry, Williamsburg, Georgetown

Mr. James Wood Lowcountry Council of Governments PO Box 98 Yemassee, SC 29945 Phone: (843) 726-5536 Email: [email protected]

Lowcountry Council of Governments Chris Bickley, Executive Director

Phone: (843) 726-5536

Hampton, Colleton, Jasper, Beaufort

9










3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Program In accordance with the State Criteria as established by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), Public Law 105-220, Chapter 2, Section 117, the WIA program combines federally-funded job training programs into a “workforce development” system where individuals can find a job or train for a new career and businesses can find skilled labor and access to incumbent worker training grants. Services are provided through the state’s one-stop delivery system, South Carolina’s One-Stop Career Centers. While employment services and training programs available in each SC One-Stop Center may be somewhat different, they reflect the opportunities and needs of the Local Workforce Investment Area (or “LWIA”; there are 12 in South Carolina), and are developed by a Local Workforce Investment Board. Services Available WIA establishes three (3) basic levels of employment and training services to eligible individuals. All adults, age 18 or older, are eligible to receive “core services”. Additional “intensive services” are available to unemployed individuals who have been unable to obtain jobs through core services and those who are employed but need additional training services to reach self-sufficiency. “Training services” are also available for those who meet intensive services eligibility but were unable to find employment through those services.

Core Services (available to all adults age 18 years or older):

o Job search and placement assistance (including career counseling) o Labor market information (which defines job vacancies; skills needed for in-demand

jobs; and local, regional, and national employment trends) o Initial assessment of skills and needs o Information about and costs for local training providers o Follow-up services to help customers keep their jobs once they are placed.

Intensive Services (available to eligible adults who have been unable to find work through core services, or need additional training to reach self-sufficiency):

o Comprehensive assessments o Development of individual employment plans o Group and individual counseling o Case management o Short-term prevocational services o Out-of-area job search assistance, or relocation assistance o Internships, literacy activities

Training Services (for those who have received “intensive services” but are still unable to find employment):

o Occupational skills training o On-the-Job Training o Cooperative education programs, and private sector training programs o Job readiness training o Adult education and literacy activities o Customized employer training

10

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


Dislocated Worker and Youth Services To be eligible for the dislocated worker program, a person must have received a lay off notice or have been laid off due to a company closure or mass layoff. Workers may also be eligible if they are currently unemployed and are unlikely to return to their prior occupation due to economic conditions in that industry. To be eligible for the youth program, a person must be between the ages of 14 and 21, have low income, and have a substantial barrier to employment or education such as: deficient in basic literacy skills, school dropout, homeless, a runaway or foster child, pregnant or parenting, an offender, or be an individual who requires additional assistance to complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment. Other Programs and Services

Incumbent Worker Training (IWT)

o The incumbent worker training (IWT) program is a federally funded program that is used as an economic development tool by local Workforce Investment Boards. Each board receives a portion of the monies from the U. S. Department of Labor to be used specifically for private-for-profit organizations. The purpose of these funds is to provide resources for employers to train currently employed workers in an effort to keep businesses and workers competitive. IWT provides funding for training needed in current businesses due to expansions, new technology, retooling, new product lines and new organizational restructuring. IWT funds are leveraged against other available State/Federal resources that may also be used to increases the business/worker’s competitiveness.

Apprenticeship Training

o A registered apprenticeship is an employer-sponsored flexible program that cultivates highly skilled workers who meet the workforce demands of a competitive global economy. A registered apprenticeship consists of two complementary components: 1. Supervised on-the-job training that is provided by an employer at the workplace

and is customized to meet job-specific needs; and 2. Related technical instruction (RTI). This is often delivered by a technical college

and serves to reinforce the theory underlying the skills being learned on-the-job. A registered apprenticeship program is sponsored by an employer to meet broad industry standards. It is designed to create a career pathway for an employee to graduate from a lower skill level to the full performance level in a given occupation. Programs can range in length from one to six years as determined by the length of training that is common in the given occupation and the individual employer’s needs. Specific training content is determined by employers within recommended guidelines, and an employer has the discretion to award advanced standing to apprentices who enter a program with demonstrated skills.

11

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)

o TAA is a federal program of the United States Department of Labor that provides re-employment services to workers who have been adversely impacted by increased imports or by a shift in production or services to another country. The goal of the program is to help workers become re-employed in a suitable job as quickly as possible. To the extent practical, the TAA is administered by a LWIA in combination with the WIA Dislocated Worker Program in order to maximize available funding and services.

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)

o ARRA (“Stimulus”) funding for U.S. Department of Labor employment and training programs provided an additional infusion of dollars to the LWIAs. ARRA funds were used to support activities such as: increasing the number of workers to receive training; enhancing the local One-Stop centers; summer youth employment programs; and other appropriate activities designed to preserve jobs, promote the nation’s economic recovery, and assist those most impacted by the recession.

12

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

Local Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Program Funding WIA funds are allocated to states (Governor) using prescribed formulas. Local areas receive eighty-five percent (85%) of the total adult/youth funds and seventy-percent (70%) of the total dislocated worker funds.

Table II – PY 2007 WIA Allocation Summary

NOTE: Pendleton LWIA is now the Worklink LWIA


13

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

Table III – PY 2008 WIA Allocation Summary



14

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

Table IV – PY 2009 WIA Allocation Summary



15

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


Fiscal and Program Accountability Funds allotted to a local area shall be used to carry out employment and training activities prescribed by law (WIA of 1998 – P.L. 105-220). Each local WIA is monitored annually for compliance in the use and expenditure of WIA funds. Fiscal Monitoring The fiscal monitoring is an unyielding process and includes testing of the following systems, at a minimum:

- Allowable costs - Disallowed Costs - Cost Allocation and Cost Pooling - ETA Salary and Bonus Limitation - Procurement, Contracts & Property Management - Audits and Audit Resolution

Additionally, LWIAs are also monitored on their written policies and procedures. At a minimum, the local area is required to have in place written policies and procedures on site, which at a minimum, address the following:

- Budgeting System - Memorandums of Understanding (with One-Stop Operators, Partner Agencies) - Allowable Cost Policy - Financial Management System - Cash Management - Program Income - Procurement/Contract Management - Equipment Management - Sub-Grantee/Vendor Fiscal Oversight - Audits - Audit Resolution - Debt Collection - Closeout System

Program Monitoring The program monitoring process includes an onsite review of WIA programs and activities. At a minimum, the monitoring will test compliance with the following procedures:

- Governance - Procurement Policy and Procedures - One-Stop Delivery System - SC Virtual One-Stop (data reporting and validation) - Monitoring System - Eligibility Determination - Adult, Dislocated Worker and Youth Program Activities

Additionally, the monitoring will review administrative procedures, Memorandums of Understanding, grants, instruction letters and monitoring schedules.

16

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0

ONE-STOP CAREER CENTERS The WIA requires that the local Workforce Investment Board, in conjunction with its chief elected official, be responsible for conducting oversight with respect to the One-Stop Delivery System. The WIB designates or certifies the One-Stop Operators and develops agreements or Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) for the One-Stop Operators and partner agencies that participate in the system. The agreements or MOUs specifies the roles and responsibilities of the parties involved. A comprehensive One-Stop Center is one that offers the public access to all available program services and partner agencies. A satellite One-Stop Center is one that offers the public with access to some, but not all, of the available program services and partner agencies that are provided through a comprehensive One-Stop center.

There are a total of 55 One-Stop Centers (comprehensive and satellite) within South Carolina and they are managed and selected by the region’s local board. The One-Stop Operators include a mixture of state agencies (ESC Workforce Centers), units of local County government, and a private-for-profit company:

- LWIA regions where the One-Stop Center(s) is operated by a State Agency: Upper Savannah, Midlands, Pee Dee, Lower Savannah, Catawba, Santee-Lynches, Waccamaw, Lowcountry.

- LWIA regions where the One-Stop Center(s) is operated by County Government: Greenville, Trident.

- LWIA region where the One-Stop Center(s) is operated by a Private-for-Profit Company: Upstate.

- LWIA region where the One-Stop Center(s) is operated by a Consortium of state agencies: Worklink.


17

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


A BRIEF REFLECTION ON THE EVOLUTION AND FUTURE DIRECTION Evolution of South Carolina’s WIA Workforce Development System On August 7, 1998, President Clinton signed the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), comprehensive reform legislation that supersedes the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and amends the Wagner-Peyser Act. WIA also contains the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (title II) and the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 (title IV). WIA reforms Federal job training programs and creates a new, comprehensive workforce investment system. The reformed system is intended to be customer-focused, to help Americans access the tools they need to manage their careers through information and high quality services, and to help U.S. companies find high skilled workers via a universal access system, or “One-Stop Delivery System.” Any individual will have access to the One-Stop System and to core employment-related services. Information about job vacancies, career options, student financial aid, relevant employment trends, and instruction on how to conduct a job search, write a resume, or interview with an employer is available to any job seeker in the U.S., or anyone who wants to advance his/her career. South Carolina implemented the WIA Workforce Development System on July 1, 2000. The Employment Security Commission (ESC) was designated by the Governor to be the Administrative Entity for the WIA program (as ESC administered the JTPA program on behalf of the state). Local Workforce Investment Boards were certified by the Governor for each WIA region and the boards continue to have planning oversight responsibility for the WIA Workforce Development System. On July 1, 2005, the Governor moved the WIA program administration from the ESC to the SC Department of Commerce. Future Direction In August of 2006, the Governor’s State Workforce Investment Board approved a strategic plan which outlined its major goals. One such goal was that of building a local board capacity by improving the alignment among the vision and goals of the Governor, State Board, and local boards for workforce development. The development and implementation of local board standards is a key strategy in pursuing this goal. The State Board’s strategic plan highlighted two areas relevant to a need for standards development: first, a need for economic and workforce development to work more closely together to improve the economic vitality of the state, and second, a need for strengthening the connection between the State Workforce Investment Board (SWIB) and the local workforce investment boards (LWIBs). LWIB standards are to ensure those needs are met. The standards establish and communicate clear expectations to the state’s 12 LWIBs, local elected officials, and other workforce development stakeholders. Developing LWIB standards is not a static process, but will evolve as the workforce system must adapt to an increasingly complex and dynamic economic environment. The local WIBs and WIA regions have accomplished a lot to provide effective workforce investment services to job seekers and businesses in their respective regions. As South Carolina continues its efforts to create a workforce development system that is accountable to citizens of our state, let’s continue to build upon the significant progress that has already been made by the local WIBs to prepare for sustainable development to meet the needs of South Carolina’s evolving economy by using the current WIA Workforce Development System.

18

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


APPENDIX

19

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


WIA Performance To more fully measure and report to Congress, stakeholders, the public, and other interested parties on how the public workforce investment system is meeting the needs of business and the workforce and contributing to economic growth, the Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration (ETA) requires all states and direct grantees of DOL employment and training programs to report information on all participants. This information will be used to assess the performance of states and grantees under the common measures. The common measures (there are 3 that apply to programs serving adults and youth): Adult (including Dislocated Workers) Measures Youth Measures - Entered Employment - Placement in Employment or Education - Employment Retention - Attainment of a Degree or Certificate - Average Earnings - Literacy and Numeracy Gains The proceeding pages reflect the Common Measures as reported by each state over the past three (3) completed Program Years – 2006, 2007, and 2008.

20

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 74.0% 72.2% 84.0% 81.9% $16,023 $13,595 63.0% 62.3%AL 73.0% 71.3% 80.0% 80.8% $10,500 $9,859 48.5% 53.4%AR 89.0% 92.0% 91.0% 93.1% $11,500 $12,428 77.0% 83.6%AZ 76.0% 81.6% 81.0% 85.5% $9,700 $12,117 62.0% 71.2%CA 74.0% 79.3% 80.0% 84.6% $11,800 $15,732 58.0% 56.9%CO 82.0% 82.6% 84.0% 83.5% $9,600 $11,587 76.0% 74.2%CT 79.0% 80.5% 83.0% 84.4% $10,647 $12,298 69.0% 68.8%DC 68.5% 77.5% 82.0% 77.7% $9,500 $10,830 NA NADE 82.0% 82.4% 75.0% 74.7% $9,400 $10,612 70.0% 66.1%FL 71.0% 82.9% 81.0% 87.5% $12,443 $16,541 53.0% 82.6%GA 84.0% 76.1% 81.0% 80.5% $9,329 $10,573 70.0% 64.6%HI 76.0% 71.9% 83.0% 81.7% $10,332 $10,951 59.0% 69.5%IA 83.0% 79.0% 86.0% 86.8% $9,481 $10,319 62.0% 65.6%ID 87.0% 96.5% 84.0% 89.8% $9,800 $10,232 NA NAIL 75.0% 77.3% 82.0% 84.2% $10,198 $11,288 63.0% 64.0%IN 82.0% 86.8% 84.0% 84.9% $10,403 $10,461 64.0% 73.0%KS 76.0% 82.1% 87.0% 89.0% $11,281 $13,451 65.0% 69.9%KY 78.0% 88.7% 84.0% 85.8% $9,821 $12,179 60.0% 70.0%LA 82.0% 67.4% 84.0% 83.6% $10,500 $12,082 69.0% 59.8%MA 79.0% 79.7% 78.0% 78.7% $10,618 $10,426 69.0% 74.9%MD 91.0% 78.3% 87.0% 86.3% $13,100 $12,096 NA NAME 88.0% 72.2% 86.0% 84.7% $9,400 $9,701 66.0% 55.3%MI 85.0% 86.2% 80.0% 84.3% $9,601 $10,316 81.0% 83.8%MN 86.0% 87.5% 85.0% 82.4% $10,672 $11,203 72.0% 75.2%MO 80.0% 88.6% 81.0% 84.9% $8,788 $9,414 66.0% 74.7%MS 77.0% 62.4% 81.0% 75.5% $7,656 $9,334 NA NAMT 82.0% 85.6% 85.0% 88.5% $10,100 $11,398 71.0% 79.5%NC 80.0% 75.9% 85.0% 84.5% $9,766 $10,259 NA 53.1%ND 74.5% 75.8% 83.0% 77.4% $8,500 $9,235 58.0% 61.0%NE 86.0% 78.2% 87.0% 86.8% $9,424 $9,924 67.0% 60.3%NH 80.0% 69.2% 88.0% 83.4% $10,985 $9,104 70.0% 63.3%NJ 82.0% 83.7% 85.0% 81.0% $11,750 $11,885 57.0% 64.8%NM 78.0% 84.5% 85.0% 89.9% $10,500 $10,658 66.0% 68.0%NV 76.0% 77.5% 76.0% 80.9% $9,600 $11,025 70.0% 64.5%NY 65.0% 62.1% 82.0% 78.8% $11,275 $10,841 72.0% 58.8%OH 75.0% 79.4% 86.0% 84.8% $14,221 $14,860 64.0% 69.4%OK 85.0% 71.1% 86.0% 86.8% $10,200 $11,701 NA NAOR 83.0% 85.6% 83.0% 81.7% $10,000 $10,053 64.0% 73.1%PA 82.5% 76.3% 81.5% 82.6% $12,250 $12,177 NA NAPR 78.0% 91.0% 89.0% 93.5% $6,000 $5,753 65.0% 78.6%RI 82.0% 81.7% 85.0% 81.3% $10,866 $11,213 66.0% 71.6%SC 83.0% 80.4% 83.0% 87.2% $9,362 $9,268 NA NASD 78.0% 80.6% 84.0% 86.8% $9,000 $10,277 67.5% 76.3%TN 83.0% 84.2% 85.0% 82.4% $12,240 $12,692 75.0% 76.2%TX 82.0% 75.1% 83.0% 82.7% $11,600 $11,658 NA NAUT 66.0% 66.6% 83.0% 82.4% $9,300 $12,094 NA NAVA 77.5% 78.0% 82.0% 83.1% $10,500 $9,168 63.7% 63.0%VI 54.0% 28.7% 80.0% 67.4% $8,500 $7,874 78.0% 16.3%VT 83.0% 77.3% 84.0% 77.3% $10,750 $12,107 72.0% 63.8%WA 81.8% 81.5% 83.4% 86.2% $11,419 $11,928 71.3% 72.3%WI 74.0% 76.8% 81.0% 84.9% $9,020 $9,432 65.0% 67.9%WV 80.0% 72.2% 83.0% 80.2% $9,500 $10,509 NA NAWY 89.0% 81.7% 86.0% 85.9% $11,700 $13,817 70.0% 64.4%State Average 79.2% 78.2% 83.4% 83.5% $10,385 $11,142 66.5% 67.1%

Source: State Annual Report data, 1/07/08

PROGRAM YEAR 2006 ADULT MEASURES

NA: state had approved waiver to report common measures outcomes only.

Entered Employment Rate Employment Retention Rate

Average Earnings Credential Rate

21

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 81.0% 73.5% 89.0% 86.2% $20,236 $19,079 74.0% 56.8%AL 79.7% 74.1% 87.0% 88.7% $11,000 $13,471 53.0% 57.5%AR 90.0% 93.3% 97.0% 99.1% $10,302 $13,090 78.0% 86.9%AZ 85.0% 87.0% 88.0% 90.4% $13,262 $15,598 69.0% 70.6%CA 82.0% 83.8% 86.0% 87.9% $15,400 $16,321 67.0% 71.6%CO 88.0% 88.0% 92.5% 89.7% $14,600 $15,282 78.5% 76.0%CT 87.0% 88.7% 91.0% 91.3% $16,600 $16,726 72.0% 75.8%DC 81.0% 87.5% 86.0% 86.2% $14,500 $13,697 NA NADE 84.0% 87.7% 80.0% 71.9% $13,950 $12,906 80.0% 73.3%FL 72.0% 88.6% 84.0% 88.2% $12,500 $15,918 49.0% 75.3%GA 85.0% 81.5% 89.0% 88.3% $13,000 $13,897 72.0% 67.6%HI 81.0% 76.2% 85.0% 87.5% $13,019 $14,640 62.0% 73.9%IA 88.0% 90.1% 91.0% 94.0% $12,216 $12,401 68.0% 72.0%ID 90.0% 94.1% 91.0% 94.1% $13,500 $13,364 NA NAIL 82.0% 85.1% 89.0% 91.1% $15,333 $15,828 65.0% 70.0%IN 87.0% 89.9% 91.0% 92.3% $14,544 $13,652 62.0% 69.7%KS 83.0% 89.9% 93.0% 92.9% $13,624 $15,417 67.0% 70.4%KY 81.0% 85.0% 88.0% 90.9% $12,095 $13,436 57.0% 63.5%LA 89.0% 78.6% 87.0% 85.7% $12,100 $13,459 70.0% 61.8%MA 85.0% 86.5% 87.0% 87.5% $18,500 $17,486 73.0% 80.3%MD 94.0% 88.1% 91.0% 88.9% $17,000 $15,574 NA NAME 90.0% 80.1% 93.0% 87.9% $11,400 $12,285 67.0% 59.1%MI 90.0% 93.4% 88.0% 91.2% $12,849 $12,797 81.0% 87.6%MN 87.0% 87.2% 89.0% 92.6% $16,811 $17,003 69.0% 70.6%MO 88.0% 91.2% 88.0% 92.6% $12,627 $12,830 74.0% 76.0%MS 77.0% 63.5% 84.0% 77.5% $8,800 $10,597 NA NAMT 81.0% 87.3% 90.0% 88.5% $13,900 $13,582 71.0% 66.3%NC 89.0% 83.3% 90.0% 90.6% $12,339 $13,487 58.0% 59.3%ND 82.0% 82.3% 89.0% 88.7% $11,300 $12,388 62.0% 57.7%NE 91.0% 91.6% 93.0% 95.8% $12,930 $14,194 76.0% 70.7%NH 87.0% 72.6% 90.0% 86.4% $16,600 $13,159 72.0% 62.8%NJ 86.0% 87.3% 85.0% 86.2% $16,100 $15,706 67.0% 68.0%NM 86.0% 81.5% 91.0% 93.7% $13,500 $14,248 64.0% 60.5%NV 81.0% 76.8% 88.0% 86.3% $14,700 $14,199 70.0% 67.6%NY 65.0% 63.3% 89.0% 85.4% $14,900 $14,158 65.0% 62.2%OH 86.0% 86.4% 90.0% 92.7% $16,577 $16,744 66.0% 76.3%OK 90.0% 76.8% 91.0% 90.5% $13,200 $12,767 NA NAOR 87.0% 88.7% 89.0% 89.7% $12,879 $13,352 65.0% 76.0%PA 88.5% 81.9% 92.0% 89.9% $16,250 $15,142 NA NAPR 83.0% 94.7% 89.0% 95.1% $6,800 $6,129 68.0% 82.7%RI 89.0% 84.6% 92.0% 85.7% $13,650 $13,273 78.5% 78.0%SC 89.0% 85.6% 89.0% 91.1% $11,509 $11,749 NA NASD 85.0% 83.9% 90.5% 94.6% $11,350 $12,317 74.0% 78.6%TN 86.0% 86.2% 92.5% 88.4% $14,000 $12,970 75.0% 79.7%TX 82.0% 81.3% 87.0% 89.7% $12,800 $13,893 NA NAUT 80.0% 85.6% 89.0% 92.0% $14,200 $15,611 NA NAVA 82.0% 82.8% 87.8% 90.7% $13,923 $12,593 63.7% 61.3%VI 70.0% 30.8% 79.0% 83.3% $10,000 $17,788 80.0% 7.7%VT 85.0% 85.2% 90.0% 91.9% $14,000 $14,969 65.0% 78.0%WA 81.5% 85.0% 90.7% 91.6% $16,857 $18,566 73.0% 75.4%WI 87.0% 84.7% 92.0% 93.3% $13,792 $13,846 69.0% 71.1%WV 86.0% 77.4% 90.8% 87.4% $12,500 $13,318 NA NAWY 93.0% 78.8% 92.0% 85.7% $15,400 $14,492 68.0% 69.2%

State Average 84.6% 83.0% 89.1% 89.4% $13,693 $14,177 68.8% 69.2%



PROGRAM YEAR 2006 DISLOCATED WORKER MEASURESEntered Employment Rate

Employment Retention Rate


22

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK NA 61.1% NA 39.2% NA 80.8%AL NA 51.5% NA 23.3% NA 8.8%AR NA 74.2% NA 65.1% NA 13.0%AZ NA 62.6% NA 48.0% NA 58.4%CA NA 76.1% NA 40.3% NA 2.5%CO NA 64.2% NA 38.1% NA 10.4%CT NA 68.5% NA 32.1% NA 21.2%DC 68.0% 87.0% 53.0% 88.0% 51.3% 88.0%DE NA 58.7% NA 84.1% NA NAFL NA 62.6% NA 48.8% NA 47.5%GA NA 59.2% NA 49.0% NA 65.1%HI NA 48.8% NA 38.5% NA NAIA NA 79.3% NA 47.0% NA 21.7%ID 50.0% 84.1% 49.0% 75.1% 30.0% 42.6%IL NA 59.6% NA 49.7% NA 18.3%IN NA 71.9% NA 62.8% NA NAKS NA 66.3% NA 52.9% NA 8.0%KY NA 66.1% NA 58.1% NA 52.6%LA 66.0% 64.0% 55.0% 52.1% 42.0% 52.2%MA NA 72.0% NA 47.3% NA 6.8%MD 64.0% 64.6% 45.0% 62.6% 51.0% 85.7%ME 82.0% 59.9% 64.0% 73.7% NA NAMI NA 46.4% NA 30.7% NA 44.4%MN NA 60.7% NA 45.7% NA 1.4%MO NA 63.5% NA 44.0% NA 54.5%MS 66.0% 76.4% 49.0% 77.7% 45.0% 28.7%MT NA 80.7% NA 61.8% NA 30.8%NC NA 61.5% NA 47.3% NA 12.1%ND NA 66.9% NA 50.2% NA 45.5%NE NA 76.5% NA 67.5% NA 85.2%NH 99.0% 56.7% 99.0% 53.5% 99.0% 52.5%NJ NA 40.4% NA 24.4% NA 16.4%NM NA 52.8% NA 23.4% NA 52.6%NV NA 42.7% NA 48.4% NA 44.0%NY NA 38.9% NA 19.7% NA 28.4%OH NA 63.4% NA 52.4% NA NAOK 55.0% 60.3% 37.0% 38.3% 15.0% 16.2%OR NA 60.5% NA 14.9% NA NAPA 61.0% 56.5% 53.0% 75.4% 51.0% 46.6%PR 50.0% 75.9% 50.0% 41.7% 50.0% NARI NA 41.6% NA 15.1% NA 48.1%SC 56.7% 68.0% 27.0% 53.5% 35.0% 48.5%SD NA 70.0% NA 58.3% NA 76.1%TN NA 60.5% NA 53.5% NA 23.5%TX 46.0% 56.0% 34.0% 48.2% 34.0% 25.6%UT 59.0% 63.0% 33.0% 34.3% 18.0% 68.2%VA NA 54.6% NA 16.0% NA NAVI 79.0% 63.9% 72.0% NA NA NAVT NA 47.2% NA 9.5% NA NAWA NA 68.8% NA 54.9% NA 67.8%WI NA 69.6% NA 78.0% NA 21.4%WV 61.0% 61.7% 45.0% 51.8% 50.0% 82.9%WY NA 68.8% NA 40.8% NA NA

State Average 64.2% 62.6% 51.0% 49.3% 43.9% 43.1%Source: State Annual Report data, 1/07/08

1 Only states with waivers to report common performance measures outcomes only negotiated goals for these measures.

PROGRAM YEAR 2006 YOUTH COMMON MEASURES


Placement in Employment or

Education 1Attainment of Degree or

Certificate 1Literacy and Numeracy

Gains 1

23

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 74.0% 70.4% 84.5% 79.9% $16,100 $14,689 63.0% 58.3%AL 73.5% 76.6% 82.0% 83.4% $9,500 $11,092 48.0% 45.9%AR 90.0% 92.3% 91.5% 94.7% $12,300 $12,898 78.0% 83.0%AZ 77.0% 81.8% 84.0% 87.1% $11,100 $12,263 64.0% 73.2%CA 77.0% 79.1% 82.0% 84.8% $12,400 $16,640 na naCO 85.0% 87.6% 85.0% 88.2% $10,500 $14,286 na naCT 80.0% 78.4% 84.0% 87.5% $11,050 $11,463 69.0% 64.7%DC 81.0% 68.9% 82.0% 72.2% $11,200 $12,633 na naDE 88.0% 84.2% 76.0% 81.5% $10,500 $9,915 70.0% 68.8%FL 80.0% 77.7% 85.0% 89.5% $15,000 $19,531 78.0% 74.4%GA 80.0% 83.4% 82.0% 85.9% $10,000 $12,046 65.0% 64.9%HI 78.0% 78.2% 84.0% 85.6% $10,500 $12,451 61.0% 70.9%IA 84.0% 84.2% 86.0% 94.3% $10,000 $10,233 65.0% 62.2%ID 87.0% 91.7% 85.0% 89.6% $9,500 $11,796 na naIL 76.0% 76.5% 84.0% 83.8% $11,100 $11,802 na naIN 83.0% 79.7% 84.0% 86.9% $10,403 $11,893 70.0% 70.2%KS 81.0% 88.2% 88.5% 90.3% $12,000 $12,960 na naKY 83.0% 89.4% 85.0% 91.7% $11,000 $15,928 na naLA 70.0% 67.7% 70.0% 81.3% $11,800 $12,537 na naMA 81.0% 82.9% 80.0% 83.6% $10,900 $10,666 70.0% 77.5%MD 89.0% 83.2% 87.0% 81.8% $12,600 $12,245 na naME 86.0% 79.9% 85.0% 82.8% $9,800 $9,989 67.0% 60.4%MI 87.0% 86.1% 84.0% 83.7% $10,000 $10,099 82.0% 83.1%MN 84.0% 88.8% 81.0% 84.9% $11,087 $12,466 65.0% 85.3%MO 84.0% 84.7% 82.0% 86.3% $9,362 $10,466 na naMS 77.0% 63.5% 81.0% 79.7% $9,000 $9,818 na naMT 87.0% 88.1% 87.0% 89.6% $11,600 $13,825 na naNC 78.0% 76.6% 84.0% 85.8% $10,200 $11,634 na naND 76.0% 74.8% 82.5% 81.9% $9,300 $10,499 na naNE 86.0% 82.3% 87.0% 89.0% $10,036 $10,582 67.0% 75.6%NH 80.0% 78.3% 88.0% 83.0% $11,200 $9,211 70.0% 75.1%NJ 83.0% 85.4% 86.0% 85.1% $11,900 $12,177 59.0% 65.3%NM 82.0% 84.1% 88.0% 90.1% $11,100 $11,877 68.0% 70.8%NV 77.0% 78.8% 77.0% 80.3% $10,500 $11,934 na naNY 60.0% 66.9% 81.0% 84.0% $12,500 $15,368 na naOH 77.0% 78.5% 86.0% 86.2% $14,000 $15,040 na naOK 70.0% 69.6% 82.0% 81.9% $10,900 $11,376 na naOR 85.0% 87.8% 83.0% 87.0% $10,000 $10,704 na naPA 84.0% 79.4% 86.0% 82.8% $13,500 $12,469 na naPR 82.0% 76.9% 89.0% 92.5% $6,100 $6,898 71.0% 75.3%RI 82.0% 78.4% 84.0% 85.8% $11,030 $12,507 69.0% 67.3%SC 82.0% 79.1% 87.6% 87.4% $9,425 $9,416 na naSD 79.0% 82.9% 84.0% 86.8% $10,500 $10,745 75.0% 60.6%TN 85.0% 88.1% 86.0% 87.5% $12,600 $13,137 70.0% 79.1%TX 74.0% 73.2% 83.0% 83.1% $11,600 $12,243 na naUT 68.0% 72.4% 85.0% 83.1% $12,200 $12,108 na naVA 82.0% 78.3% 86.0% 79.0% $11,208 $9,924 63.7% 66.9%VI 54.0% 43.6% 78.0% 74.2% $8,500 $9,995 na naVT 81.0% 80.5% 80.0% 84.3% $11,400 $12,647 65.0% 59.6%WA 82.4% 80.1% 85.2% 85.4% $12,220 $12,159 64.0% 68.6%WI 76.0% 73.1% 84.0% 84.7% $9,500 $9,581 66.3% 68.6%WV 80.0% 76.8% 83.0% 87.9% $9,500 $11,246 na naWY 87.0% 83.3% 88.0% 91.9% $12,350 $12,907 71.0% naState Average 79.9% 79.3% 83.9% 85.3% $11,011 $11,981 67.6% 69.5%


States that reported none of the measures in the table are not included.


na: state had approved waiver to report common measures outcomes only.



24

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 81.0% 75.8% 87.0% 84.4% $20,200 $19,972 na 63.6%AL 79.5% 79.4% 90.0% 90.4% $13,200 $14,805 53.0% 50.5%AR 93.0% 97.2% 95.0% 98.3% $13,000 $14,428 81.0% 83.1%AZ 85.0% 86.8% 90.0% 92.0% $14,500 $15,010 71.0% 77.1%CA 85.0% 84.2% 87.0% 87.8% $15,800 $16,978 na naCO 90.0% 91.6% 92.0% 92.5% $14,600 $15,717 na naCT 88.0% 86.8% 90.0% 93.6% $16,796 $16,945 73.0% 70.4%DC 89.0% 76.9% 88.0% 82.4% $14,150 $15,570 na naDE 88.0% 87.1% 82.0% 86.2% $13,900 $13,369 80.0% 69.4%FL 79.0% 89.2% 85.0% 89.9% $14,500 $16,887 70.0% 73.3%GA 84.5% 87.0% 90.0% 92.5% $13,500 $14,682 65.0% 69.7%HI 78.0% 85.0% 85.0% 89.7% $13,500 $15,072 65.5% 82.6%IA 89.0% 92.2% 92.5% 99.3% $12,216 $12,856 72.0% 73.2%ID 91.0% 91.6% 93.0% 94.6% $13,000 $14,164 na naIL 85.0% 84.7% 90.0% 89.0% $15,400 $16,358 na naIN 89.0% 89.6% 91.0% 94.0% $14,544 $14,753 66.0% 66.3%KS 88.0% 89.4% 91.0% 94.6% $15,500 $15,170 na naKY 83.0% 85.5% 88.0% 93.4% $13,000 $13,338 na naLA 83.0% 73.3% 88.0% 76.2% $13,600 $14,554 na naMA 87.0% 87.5% 89.0% 90.2% $18,600 $17,513 75.0% 80.8%MD 94.0% 88.0% 91.0% 88.7% $16,000 $15,713 na naME 91.0% 84.9% 94.0% 88.3% $11,800 $11,916 68.0% 65.1%MI 93.0% 93.6% 90.0% 92.4% $13,000 $13,768 82.0% 84.3%MN 84.0% 89.1% 89.0% 92.0% $16,892 $17,528 60.0% 71.5%MO 90.0% 88.8% 88.0% 89.2% $12,887 $14,460 na naMS 85.0% 65.9% 84.0% 82.1% $10,600 $11,148 na naMT 82.5% 91.3% 91.0% 92.2% $14,100 $17,107 na naNC 86.0% 83.8% 90.0% 92.2% $13,500 $13,683 na naND 84.0% 86.2% 90.0% 90.3% $12,100 $12,042 na naNE 91.0% 91.2% 93.0% 97.6% $13,440 $14,301 76.0% 74.4%NH 87.0% 88.1% 90.0% 90.1% $15,800 $15,903 72.0% 85.5%NJ 87.0% 88.6% 90.0% 88.7% $16,100 $15,698 68.0% 70.6%NM 85.0% 82.9% 92.0% 92.9% $14,000 $13,914 na 67.4%NV 82.0% 81.9% 87.0% 88.5% $14,000 $15,839 na naNY 60.0% 59.5% 81.0% 82.0% $15,825 $17,457 na naOH 86.0% 87.2% 91.0% 92.4% $16,670 $17,451 na naOK 75.0% 78.2% 89.0% 93.6% $12,800 $13,569 na naOR 90.0% 91.1% 90.0% 91.7% $12,900 $13,960 na naPA 90.0% 83.9% 92.0% 91.2% $16,250 $14,901 na naPR 85.0% 88.8% 90.0% 94.5% $6,900 $7,740 72.0% 79.0%RI 87.0% 90.3% 91.0% 90.6% $13,855 $13,986 72.0% 81.9%SC 88.0% 82.3% 92.0% 92.9% $12,000 $12,172 na naSD 85.0% 89.6% 91.0% 92.6% $12,300 $13,193 78.0% 75.3%TN 87.0% 91.0% 93.0% 92.8% $14,100 $13,272 75.0% 79.9%TX 82.0% 82.5% 90.0% 90.1% $14,300 $14,319 na naUT 86.0% 85.7% 91.0% 92.9% $15,600 $14,457 na naVA 85.0% 82.1% 92.0% 90.8% $14,000 $13,368 68.0% 64.9%VI 70.0% 42.2% 75.0% 80.6% $10,000 $13,503 na 15.8%VT 84.0% 92.6% 91.0% 99.1% $14,200 $15,502 60.0% 53.5%WA 85.9% 85.6% 91.3% 91.5% $19,300 $17,928 65.0% 69.4%WI 88.7% 86.7% 93.8% 93.7% $14,175 $14,513 74.0% 71.0%WV 86.0% 86.0% 91.0% 94.6% $12,500 $15,392 na naWY 84.0% 92.3% 90.0% 96.4% $14,500 $14,589 71.0% 58.8%State Average 85.3% 85.0% 89.6% 90.9% $14,149 $14,763 70.5% 69.9%







25

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK na 69.0% na 60.0% na 21.7%AL na 59.9% na 41.5% na 38.0%AR na 76.2% na 72.0% na 58.7%AZ na 69.6% na 60.3% na 44.4%CA 65.0% 66.7% 45.0% 53.5% 15.0% 21.0%CO 56.0% 71.6% 35.0% 53.7% 20.0% 29.6%CT na 84.6% na 27.1% na 23.8%DC 70.0% 88.4% 60.0% 79.4% 51.0% 63.1%DE na 71.6% na 65.3% na 31.8%FL na 61.3% na 58.3% na 25.0%GA na 70.4% na 61.5% na 34.5%HI na 50.5% na 48.5% na 19.0%IA na 85.7% na 50.6% na 27.3%ID 70.0% 80.5% 50.0% 73.6% 30.0% 33.1%IL na 62.6% na 61.6% na 30.5%IN na 74.3% na 62.0% na 14.4%KS 67.0% 67.9% 51.0% 60.6% 35.0% 38.5%KY 64.0% 76.6% 53.0% 72.7% 43.0% 53.5%LA 52.0% 65.1% 42.0% 48.0% 50.0% 25.9%MA na 83.5% na 63.3% na 7.8%MD 64.0% 72.2% 52.0% 73.9% 51.0% 63.2%ME na 66.4% na 84.7% na 11.5%MI na 58.6% na 51.2% na 16.8%MN na 70.8% na 56.0% na 23.5%MO 62.0% 72.1% 43.0% 65.8% 35.0% 39.5%MS 66.0% 79.4% 49.0% 70.7% 45.0% 66.6%MT 68.0% 81.1% 57.0% 78.4% 50.0% 20.0%NC 63.0% 64.8% 50.0% 54.2% 20.0% 38.5%ND 63.0% 63.8% 43.0% 53.4% 30.0% 11.1%NE na 81.9% na 76.3% na 38.1%NH na 60.5% na 50.7% na 48.4%NJ na 54.1% na 41.3% na 30.6%NM na 62.4% na 37.5% na 13.2%NV 46.0% 41.3% 45.0% 30.6% 35.0% 30.8%NY 45.0% 69.7% 35.0% 60.7% 33.0% 37.1%OH 61.0% 62.6% 41.0% 53.9% 49.0% 37.1%OK 60.0% 63.3% 42.0% 44.4% 30.0% 28.9%OR 68.0% 70.2% 65.0% 59.6% 35.0% 30.4%PA 65.0% 60.0% 64.0% 61.8% 51.0% 45.1%PR na 27.5% na 46.5% na naRI na 54.0% na 46.5% na 43.6%SC 66.0% 72.9% 50.0% 59.7% 40.0% 40.5%SD na 74.1% na 63.1% na 33.3%TN na 69.1% na 65.1% na 15.9%TX 55.0% 59.5% 52.0% 52.4% 30.0% 37.6%UT 65.0% 69.5% 37.0% 46.7% 24.0% 29.1%VA na 56.8% na 40.5% na 0.3%VI 57.0% 64.7% 42.0% 70.8% 34.0% 0.0%VT na 42.1% na 9.7% na 0.0%WA na 72.5% na 66.5% na 32.8%WI na 74.4% na 78.2% na 17.7%WV 61.0% 66.7% 45.0% 68.9% 50.0% 44.3%WY na 70.0% na 47.6% na 27.8%

State Average 61.7% 66.7% 48.5% 58.1% 38.7% 30.2%



1 Only states with waivers to report common performance measures outcomes only negotiated goals for these measures. Otherwise "na".





Gains 1

26

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 74.5% 79.2% 85.0% 79.8% $16,250 $16,756 64.0% 67.4%AL 74.5% 70.3% 83.0% 82.0% $9,800 $11,101 48.0% 45.1%AR 91.0% 93.3% 92.0% 93.6% $12,530 $13,717 78.5% 80.3%AZ 78.5% 79.4% 84.5% 84.4% $11,200 $12,831 64.5% 73.1%CA 78.0% 63.3% 83.0% 82.2% $12,500 $16,364 na naCO 86.0% 86.7% 86.0% 88.3% $10,900 $14,904 na naCT 81.0% 80.4% 85.0% 89.0% $11,160 $11,810 70.0% 67.3%DC 82.0% 53.7% 82.0% 71.2% $11,500 $12,168 na naDE 89.0% 83.7% 80.0% 82.0% $10,815 $9,658 70.0% 70.7%FL 74.0% 84.2% 86.0% 91.0% $15,500 $21,583 na naGA 81.0% 81.6% 83.0% 83.4% $10,500 $11,904 60.0% 68.6%HI 79.0% 75.8% 85.0% 83.2% $10,800 $13,403 62.0% 74.8%IA 85.0% 78.8% 87.0% 94.3% $10,200 $11,324 67.0% 61.1%ID 84.0% 85.8% 85.0% 90.4% $9,500 $12,773 na naIL 77.0% 75.2% 84.0% 82.7% $11,300 $12,340 na naIN 70.0% 63.2% 83.0% 82.5% $13,900 $11,274 na 48.8%KS 83.0% 82.4% 89.5% 91.1% $12,500 $15,562 na naKY 83.5% 86.7% 86.0% 91.7% $11,200 $16,012 na naLA 72.0% 66.2% 64.0% 79.8% $9,680 $12,613 na naMA 82.0% 81.9% 81.0% 83.3% $11,250 $11,122 71.0% 76.3%MD 86.0% 77.8% 88.0% 86.6% $13,100 $14,115 na naME 87.0% 77.4% 86.0% 84.8% $10,000 $9,665 68.0% 63.2%MI 88.0% 85.6% 85.0% 85.4% $10,200 $10,939 83.0% 83.0%MN 86.0% 83.9% 82.0% 86.9% $11,308 $12,715 66.0% 78.5%MO 86.0% 81.7% 83.0% 85.2% $9,455 $10,908 na naMS 79.0% 64.1% 83.0% 78.8% $9,200 $10,999 na naMT 88.0% 94.5% 88.0% 89.1% $11,900 $13,036 na naNC 79.0% 76.7% 85.0% 86.7% $10,500 $12,450 na naND 77.0% 72.6% 83.5% 79.1% $9,400 $10,543 na naNE 83.0% 85.8% 87.5% 90.6% $10,186 $10,464 na naNH 80.0% 75.7% 88.0% 82.2% $11,200 $9,414 70.0% 74.4%NJ 84.0% 87.2% 87.0% 83.9% $12,075 $12,127 60.0% 65.4%NM 83.0% 80.2% 89.0% 92.3% $11,200 $13,685 na naNV 78.0% 74.7% 78.0% 81.1% $10,700 $13,232 na naNY 61.0% 67.2% 82.0% 84.1% $12,625 $16,597 na naOH 78.0% 75.3% 87.0% 84.4% $14,500 $15,324 na naOK 71.0% 66.6% 83.0% 83.3% $11,200 $12,113 na naOR 86.0% 62.0% 84.0% 83.1% $10,200 $11,584 na naPA 85.0% 76.8% 86.0% 81.8% $13,575 $11,824 na naPR 84.0% 78.7% 90.0% 93.3% $6,200 $6,384 72.0% 63.5%RI 83.0% 77.5% 85.0% 86.3% $11,194 $11,487 70.0% 70.1%SC 83.0% 70.6% 88.5% 82.8% $9,613 $10,522 na naSD 81.0% 79.7% 86.0% 86.3% $10,800 $10,121 75.0% 56.1%TN 84.0% 87.7% 84.0% 89.2% $12,800 $13,581 na naTX 0.8% 73.4% 0.8% 80.9% $11,800 $11,831 na naUT 69.0% 68.9% 86.0% 83.5% $12,300 $13,320 na naVA 83.0% 74.2% 87.0% 83.2% $11,060 $10,816 65.0% 54.9%VI 56.0% 39.1% 79.0% 60.3% $9,000 $12,276 na naVT 82.0% 77.2% 80.0% 80.8% $11,500 $11,829 65.0% 59.1%WA 82.5% 82.3% 85.5% 88.2% $12,713 $16,881 66.0% 67.9%WI 78.0% 74.8% 86.0% 84.7% $9,800 $10,942 67.7% 66.7%WV 82.0% 77.3% 85.0% 87.0% $10,200 $10,791 na naWY 88.0% 84.4% 89.0% 93.5% $12,932 $14,506 72.0% 73.2%State Average 79.0% 76.7% 83.0% 84.8% $11,272 $12,571 67.6% 67.1%







27

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK 81.0% 80.3% 88.5% 80.3% $20,200 $20,585 74.0% 69.3%AL 80.5% 75.6% 91.0% 90.6% $13,500 $14,005 55.0% 47.5%AR 93.5% 95.6% 95.5% 96.4% $13,200 $15,204 81.5% 73.7%AZ 86.0% 85.0% 90.0% 87.8% $15,000 $14,879 72.0% 76.5%CA 86.0% 75.5% 88.0% 85.6% $15,900 $17,148 na naCO 91.0% 92.4% 92.5% 93.5% $15,000 $17,194 na naCT 89.0% 87.6% 91.0% 92.1% $16,900 $17,135 74.0% 71.8%DC 90.0% 75.0% 89.0% 86.1% $14,500 $16,308 na naDE 89.0% 81.0% 82.0% 87.9% $14,317 $13,363 68.0% 57.5%FL 80.0% 86.4% 86.0% 89.1% $15,000 $19,025 na naGA 85.5% 87.3% 66.0% 89.7% $13,800 $14,996 91.0% 70.9%HI 79.0% 83.8% 86.0% 92.5% $14,000 $15,885 66.0% 81.3%IA 89.0% 89.8% 93.0% 96.9% $12,400 $14,402 74.0% 65.8%ID 89.0% 94.3% 91.0% 93.2% $13,000 $13,954 na naIL 85.0% 84.0% 91.0% 89.5% $15,400 $16,235 na naIN 85.0% 73.7% 90.0% 90.9% $16,500 $14,898 na 52.0%KS 90.0% 90.6% 92.0% 91.9% $16,000 $15,005 na naKY 84.0% 84.7% 89.0% 92.8% $13,200 $13,496 na naLA 84.0% 72.1% 90.0% 83.4% $13,900 $18,418 na naMA 88.0% 90.2% 90.0% 91.3% $18,750 $17,293 76.0% 82.5%MD 91.0% 87.8% 92.0% 90.3% $17,000 $16,341 na naME 92.0% 87.8% 95.0% 90.3% $12,000 $12,743 69.0% 67.1%MI 94.0% 92.9% 92.0% 92.5% $13,200 $13,964 83.0% 85.6%MN 86.0% 90.4% 90.0% 94.3% $17,123 $19,285 62.0% 64.0%MO 91.0% 88.7% 89.0% 91.4% $13,016 $13,312 na naMS 77.0% 67.6% 85.0% 81.2% $11,050 $13,229 na naMT 84.0% 92.9% 92.0% 94.2% $15,000 $14,042 na naNC 86.5% 83.2% 91.0% 91.3% $13,700 $13,594 na naND 84.5% 85.6% 90.5% 85.7% $11,400 $13,579 na naNE 91.5% 92.0% 93.0% 97.6% $13,574 $13,981 na naNH 87.0% 84.3% 90.0% 88.9% $15,800 $15,712 72.0% 80.2%NJ 88.0% 88.7% 90.0% 88.2% $16,200 $15,727 69.0% 70.5%NM 86.0% 87.0% 93.0% 94.1% $14,200 $17,723 na naNV 76.0% 82.7% 88.0% 82.9% $14,100 $15,369 73.0% 69.4%NY 61.0% 55.4% 82.0% 81.9% $15,980 $18,225 na naOH 87.0% 84.9% 92.0% 90.2% $17,000 $17,697 na naOK 76.0% 76.8% 90.0% 91.5% $12,600 $13,634 na naOR 90.0% 71.9% 90.0% 88.2% $13,000 $14,487 na naPA 91.0% 80.9% 93.0% 90.2% $16,250 $15,225 na naPR 86.0% 88.9% 91.0% 94.5% $7,000 $7,069 74.0% 100.0%RI 88.0% 83.6% 92.0% 87.1% $14,063 $14,313 73.0% 77.2%SC 88.5% 72.1% 92.5% 89.0% $12,400 $12,905 na naSD 86.0% 92.5% 92.0% 96.1% $12,600 $13,142 78.0% 61.7%TN 86.0% 89.4% 90.0% 91.6% $13,300 $13,627 na naTX 0.8% 81.9% 0.9% 90.1% $14,600 $14,843 na naUT 87.0% 83.3% 92.0% 92.9% $15,700 $15,554 na naVA 86.0% 80.3% 93.0% 90.7% $14,500 $13,121 69.0% 58.6%VI 72.0% 48.3% 77.0% 72.5% $10,500 $11,890 na naVT 85.0% 86.1% 92.0% 93.8% $15,000 $13,500 61.0% 63.6%WA 85.8% 83.9% 91.3% 89.0% $19,853 $18,028 67.0% 64.6%WI 90.4% 84.7% 95.7% 93.2% $14,400 $14,620 75.0% 64.6%WV 86.0% 88.5% 91.0% 94.7% $13,000 $13,642 na 74.3%WY 86.0% 100.0% 91.0% 100.0% $14,700 $12,811 73.0% 85.7%State Average 84.1% 83.6% 88.1% 90.2% $14,420 $15,026 72.1% 70.6%







28

DeJones

Highlight

State Negotiated Actual Negotiated Actual Negotiated ActualAK na 60.3% na 51.2% na 35.4%AL na 54.8% na 37.4% na 25.6%AR na 79.9% na 77.0% na 54.8%AZ na 66.0% na 62.1% na 50.1%CA 67.0% 68.8% 47.0% 69.8% 30.0% 44.4%CO 57.0% 77.4% 36.0% 61.3% 22.0% 38.9%CT na 77.5% na 73.9% na 22.0%DC 71.0% 51.9% 61.0% 37.4% 52.0% 36.2%DE na 75.0% na 69.9% na 48.8%FL 58.5% 65.3% 57.5% 71.0% 29.0% 36.4%GA na 66.5% na 59.6% na 38.9%HI na 51.1% na 55.6% na 25.5%IA na 78.6% na 49.3% na 23.7%ID 70.0% 76.1% 50.0% 80.4% 30.0% 25.2%IL 56.0% 69.5% 45.0% 70.7% 33.0% 50.0%IN 72.0% 68.8% 63.0% 57.5% 40.0% 22.3%KS 68.0% 67.0% 52.0% 60.2% 37.0% 38.7%KY 65.0% 72.3% 54.0% 73.5% 48.0% 66.3%LA 57.0% 66.8% 44.0% 51.7% 52.0% 43.4%MA na 85.1% na 70.0% na 18.0%MD 67.0% 71.2% 52.0% 71.5% 51.0% 69.0%ME 80.0% 66.2% 65.0% 86.9% na 16.2%MI na 48.2% na 38.6% na 11.0%MN na 61.2% na 46.9% na 14.6%MO 62.0% 77.4% 43.0% 53.6% 35.0% 39.7%MS 67.0% 72.1% 50.0% 75.3% 46.0% 48.7%MT 69.0% 78.0% 58.0% 69.8% 30.0% 16.3%NC 64.0% 63.7% 51.0% 54.0% 35.0% 35.1%ND 64.0% 66.7% 43.5% 53.8% 20.0% 23.6%NE 76.0% 78.5% 73.0% 71.2% 38.0% 49.8%NH 99.0% 57.6% 99.0% 53.7% 99.0% 58.9%NJ na 57.0% na 46.8% na 26.7%NM 64.0% 63.2% 35.0% 38.5% 25.0% 20.6%NV 49.0% 41.1% 46.0% 23.4% 36.0% 32.4%NY 52.0% 71.6% 40.0% 63.9% 35.0% 49.7%OH 63.0% 64.3% 42.0% 57.9% 37.0% 42.7%OK 61.5% 65.6% 43.5% 47.0% 31.0% 26.4%OR 70.0% 65.8% 67.0% 72.1% 40.0% 32.0%PA 65.0% 58.2% 65.0% 67.6% 52.0% 44.2%RI na 43.3% na 39.5% na 60.6%SC 67.0% 65.9% 55.0% 58.5% 45.0% 48.5%SD na 74.3% na 56.7% na 51.0%TN 68.0% 68.7% 69.0% 69.4% 25.0% 33.7%TX 0.6% 64.5% 0.5% 54.9% 0.4% 45.8%UT 66.0% 70.7% 38.0% 61.3% 27.0% 39.7%VA na 50.0% na 42.4% na 1.8%VI 58.0% 16.7% 44.0% 33.3% 36.0% 0.0%VT na 42.0% na 12.9% na 0.0%WA na 62.9% na 66.9% na 38.2%WI na 67.8% na 69.5% na 25.3%WV 62.0% 67.1% 56.0% 69.3% 51.0% 44.2%WY na 75.9% na 63.0% na 25.0%State Average 63.7% 64.3% 52.1% 57.7% 38.5% 34.3%



1 Only states with waivers to report common performance measures outcomes only negotiated goals for these measures. Otherwise "na".





Gains 1

29

DeJones

Highlight

3 / 5 / 2 0 1 0


WIA Expenditures A LWIA has only two years to expend formula funds. Compliance must be separately determined for each funding stream. The proceeding pages reflect the WIA Expenditures as reported by each state over the past three (3) completed Program Years – 2006, 2007, and 2008 and state’s WIA ARRA expenditures thru June 30, 2009.

30

U. S. Department of Labor

Employment and Training Administration

State Formula Spending for Program Year 2006 as of 6/30/07 Reports (as of 01/15/08) WIA Youth, Adults and Dislocated Workers Programs Combined

Unexpended $ as % of Unexpended Unexpended

Carry-In PY 2006 FY 2007 Total Available 7/1/06 - Total Balance Carry-Out

Reg State To PY 2006 7/1/2006 * 10/01/06 Total 7/1/06-6/30/07* 6/30/07* Available 6/30/07* To PY 2007

Total $1,134,049,894 $1,417,670,753 $1,542,572,007 $2,960,242,760 $4,094,292,654 $2,951,361,163 72.1% $1,142,931,491 $1,141,489,545

3 Alabama 16,759,972 18,630,875 19,374,680 38,005,555 54,765,527 40,217,775 73.4% 14,547,752 14,547,752

6 Alaska 1,862,429 4,912,329 5,611,050 10,523,379 12,385,808 7,566,484 61.1% 4,819,324 4,600,141

6 Arizona ** 25,450,547 21,110,142 21,014,744 42,124,886 67,575,433 41,203,214 61.0% 26,372,219 26,372,219

4 Arkansas 12,048,658 13,103,988 13,644,569 26,748,557 38,797,215 24,666,497 63.6% 14,130,718 14,130,718

6 California 131,932,675 196,710,047 214,374,066 411,084,113 543,016,788 428,904,790 79.0% 114,111,998 114,106,458

4 Colorado 21,838,622 18,948,354 21,230,917 40,179,271 62,017,893 36,856,943 59.4% 25,160,950 25,160,950

1 Connecticut 5,020,617 12,061,341 13,696,162 25,757,503 30,778,120 25,138,733 81.7% 5,639,387 5,639,130

2 Delaware 1,826,640 3,164,970 2,925,227 6,090,197 7,916,837 5,645,153 71.3% 2,271,684 2,271,684

2 District of Col 3,806,052 6,124,413 6,547,198 12,671,611 16,477,663 9,886,136 60.0% 6,591,527 6,591,527

3 Florida 62,474,077 48,234,201 51,587,194 99,821,395 162,295,472 108,797,656 67.0% 53,497,816 53,497,815

3 Georgia 24,030,282 28,796,134 33,922,604 62,718,738 86,749,020 55,200,028 63.6% 31,548,992 31,548,992

6 Hawaii 2,883,398 4,015,614 3,563,819 7,579,433 10,462,831 8,446,439 80.7% 2,016,392 2,016,392

6 Idaho 2,107,890 4,070,442 3,867,188 7,937,630 10,045,520 8,272,002 82.3% 1,773,518 1,773,518

5 Illinois 56,428,495 73,413,055 82,922,683 156,335,738 212,764,233 157,873,242 74.2% 54,890,991 54,890,991

5 Indiana 28,150,372 28,621,349 30,450,006 59,071,355 87,221,727 53,193,776 61.0% 34,027,951 34,027,951

5 Iowa 5,602,192 8,136,667 8,783,368 16,920,035 22,522,227 15,466,850 68.7% 7,055,377 7,054,447

5 Kansas 12,429,143 12,012,479 13,125,946 25,138,425 37,567,568 22,221,370 59.2% 15,346,198 15,346,198

3 Kentucky 20,798,877 17,900,723 20,029,433 37,930,156 58,729,033 41,076,660 69.9% 17,652,373 16,599,240

4 Louisiana 23,569,847 23,984,780 27,483,331 51,468,111 75,037,958 52,720,982 70.3% 22,316,976 22,316,976

1 Maine 2,204,576 4,385,604 4,784,734 9,170,338 11,374,914 9,185,128 80.7% 2,189,786 2,189,786

2 Maryland 10,570,884 14,414,203 15,380,381 29,794,584 40,365,468 28,672,306 71.0% 11,693,162 11,693,162

1 Massachusetts 13,632,004 23,569,074 24,101,084 47,670,158 61,302,162 47,707,542 77.8% 13,594,620 13,594,620

5 Michigan 37,069,707 76,939,139 90,318,087 167,257,226 204,326,933 157,573,183 77.1% 46,753,750 46,753,750

5 Minnesota 9,355,569 14,470,581 15,163,085 29,633,666 38,989,235 31,680,121 81.3% 7,309,114 7,309,114

3 Mississippi 6,986,119 21,516,445 24,409,072 45,925,517 52,911,636 37,953,239 71.7% 14,958,397 14,958,377

5 Missouri 10,442,358 31,902,356 34,858,995 66,761,351 77,203,709 64,545,277 83.6% 12,658,432 12,658,432

4 Montana 1,719,928 3,528,565 3,451,057 6,979,622 8,699,550 7,105,401 81.7% 1,594,149 1,594,149

5 Nebraska 6,076,142 4,055,273 4,115,548 8,170,821 14,246,963 8,128,899 57.1% 6,118,064 6,118,064

6 Nevada 2,438,554 5,882,269 6,261,459 12,143,728 14,582,282 11,257,132 77.2% 3,325,150 3,284,592

1 New Hampshire 3,228,483 3,359,369 3,402,689 6,762,058 9,990,541 7,670,437 76.8% 2,320,104 2,320,104

1 New Jersey 31,867,761 29,025,677 30,151,040 59,176,717 91,044,478 70,894,376 77.9% 20,150,102 20,150,102

4 New Mexico ** 12,654,477 10,108,377 10,833,209 20,941,586 33,596,063 21,911,435 65.2% 11,684,628 11,684,628

1 New York 102,728,217 95,258,974 101,152,592 196,411,566 299,139,783 189,720,455 63.4% 109,419,328 109,419,327

3 North Carolina 32,152,726 37,445,492 41,594,088 79,039,580 111,192,306 87,031,711 78.3% 24,160,595 24,160,595

4 North Dakota 1,711,664 2,975,585 2,460,082 5,435,667 7,147,331 4,904,092 68.6% 2,243,239 2,243,239

5 Ohio 81,509,344 70,953,283 79,590,372 150,543,655 232,052,999 154,444,373 66.6% 77,608,626 77,608,626

4 Oklahoma 16,523,795 12,675,150 12,235,821 24,910,971 41,434,766 20,128,823 48.6% 21,305,943 21,211,582

6 Oregon 18,788,235 26,108,159 30,265,652 56,373,811 75,162,046 53,246,102 70.8% 21,915,944 21,915,944

2 Pennsylvania 37,830,376 57,311,206 60,600,617 117,911,823 155,742,199 118,414,624 76.0% 37,327,575 37,327,575

1 Puerto Rico 36,355,484 46,536,810 52,421,013 98,957,823 135,313,307 97,684,528 72.2% 37,628,779 37,600,818

1 Rhode Island 2,955,930 4,113,822 4,229,198 8,343,020 11,298,950 8,647,547 76.5% 2,651,403 2,651,403

3 South Carolina 25,462,510 29,454,093 33,736,018 63,190,111 88,652,621 61,677,361 69.6% 26,975,260 26,975,260

4 South Dakota 2,589,740 3,032,202 2,599,140 5,631,342 8,221,082 5,183,185 63.0% 3,037,897 3,037,897

3 Tennessee 23,149,780 30,734,254 33,830,584 64,564,838 87,714,618 54,202,656 61.8% 33,511,962 33,511,962

4 Texas 77,884,947 121,956,102 129,162,587 251,118,689 329,003,636 249,721,180 75.9% 79,282,456 79,282,456

4 Utah 4,964,493 8,117,977 8,072,979 16,190,956 21,155,449 13,678,224 64.7% 7,477,225 7,477,225

1 Vermont 677,111 2,975,065 2,458,805 5,433,870 6,110,981 4,919,227 80.5% 1,191,754 1,191,754

2 Virginia 19,899,531 16,826,967 17,807,549 34,634,516 54,534,047 38,350,676 70.3% 16,183,371 16,183,371

6 Washington 25,824,515 34,152,090 38,103,889 72,255,979 98,080,494 75,760,474 77.2% 22,320,020 22,320,019

2 West Virginia 4,183,304 8,385,754 8,517,124 16,902,878 21,086,182 17,072,462 81.0% 4,013,720 4,013,720

5 Wisconsin 10,260,671 18,631,435 20,031,859 38,663,294 48,923,965 44,012,924 90.0% 4,911,041 4,911,041

4 Wyoming 1,330,174 2,917,498 2,317,413 5,234,911 6,565,085 4,921,333 75.0% 1,643,752 1,643,752

** Includes data for Navajo Nation

* Includes PY 2006 Youth beginning 4/1/06

PY 2006 Availability

New PY 2006 Funds

Expenditures

31

dejones

Highlight



State Formula Spending for Program Year 2007 as of 6/30/08 Reports (as of 11/14/08) WIA Youth, Adults and Dislocated Workers Programs Combined




Total $1,001,777,913 $1,377,297,373 $1,454,974,206 $2,832,271,579 $3,834,049,492 $2,888,530,809 75.3% $945,518,683 $935,842,041

3 Alabama 12,806,985 15,509,265 15,143,012 30,652,277 43,459,262 33,069,461 76.1% 10,389,801 10,389,548

6 Alaska 3,202,320 5,724,668 6,887,512 12,612,180 15,814,500 11,635,995 73.6% 4,178,505 4,178,505

6 Arizona 20,295,330 16,688,880 20,377,121 37,066,001 57,361,331 38,337,182 66.8% 19,024,149 19,023,184

4 Arkansas 12,821,932 12,193,311 10,920,209 23,113,520 35,935,452 26,865,697 74.8% 9,069,755 9,069,755

6 California 112,342,181 179,972,177 182,874,539 362,846,716 475,188,897 382,761,033 80.5% 92,427,864 92,427,864

4 Colorado 21,672,742 14,557,791 14,411,493 28,969,284 50,642,026 38,257,564 75.5% 12,384,462 12,384,462

1 Connecticut 5,639,130 11,441,497 11,544,715 22,986,212 28,625,342 24,759,148 86.5% 3,866,194 3,866,194

2 Delaware 1,893,198 3,161,155 3,035,940 6,197,095 8,090,293 6,344,310 78.4% 1,745,983 1,745,983

2 District of Col 5,860,962 4,467,047 3,545,998 8,013,045 13,874,007 10,822,084 78.0% 3,051,923 3,051,923

3 Florida 49,738,467 42,774,105 37,751,224 80,525,329 130,263,796 100,954,691 77.5% 29,309,105 29,305,828

3 Georgia 24,665,563 35,238,573 38,060,359 73,298,932 97,964,495 65,152,177 66.5% 32,812,318 32,812,318

6 Hawaii 2,016,392 3,620,548 3,292,698 6,913,246 8,929,638 6,820,917 76.4% 2,108,721 2,108,721

6 Idaho 1,773,518 3,492,899 3,392,495 6,885,394 8,658,912 7,419,314 85.7% 1,239,598 1,239,598

5 Illinois 48,466,709 67,742,508 73,072,300 140,814,808 189,281,517 146,430,505 77.4% 42,851,012 42,133,634

5 Indiana 22,766,617 33,192,238 35,472,681 68,664,919 91,431,536 47,131,236 51.5% 44,300,300 36,660,504

5 Iowa 6,768,249 6,718,641 7,447,875 14,166,516 20,934,765 14,991,478 71.6% 5,943,287 5,943,275

5 Kansas 14,594,666 9,159,966 7,081,918 16,241,884 30,836,550 27,956,089 90.7% 2,880,461 2,880,460

3 Kentucky 16,381,414 25,509,309 30,523,202 56,032,511 72,413,925 45,857,629 63.3% 26,556,296 26,553,609

4 Louisiana 22,316,976 28,810,755 27,554,826 56,365,581 78,682,557 60,785,643 77.3% 17,896,914 17,896,914

1 Maine 2,238,117 4,779,716 5,089,562 9,869,278 12,107,395 9,473,464 78.2% 2,633,931 2,633,278

2 Maryland 11,693,162 14,076,979 14,317,893 28,394,872 40,088,034 30,490,333 76.1% 9,597,701 9,597,701

1 Massachusetts 12,411,475 27,493,095 29,777,439 57,270,534 69,682,009 51,855,895 74.4% 17,826,114 17,826,114

5 Michigan 46,413,614 79,964,782 94,873,820 174,838,602 221,252,216 180,476,371 81.6% 40,775,845 40,741,459

5 Minnesota 6,888,425 12,903,540 13,969,028 26,872,568 33,760,993 28,055,038 83.1% 5,705,955 5,705,955

3 Mississippi 13,045,519 29,732,139 36,112,591 65,844,730 78,890,249 57,522,788 72.9% 21,367,461 21,336,784

5 Missouri 12,658,432 27,351,050 27,893,034 55,244,084 67,902,516 62,636,659 92.2% 5,265,857 5,265,857

4 Montana 1,404,772 3,235,867 3,076,935 6,312,802 7,717,574 6,545,914 84.8% 1,171,660 1,171,660

5 Nebraska 4,928,853 3,924,937 4,016,031 7,940,968 12,869,821 7,769,874 60.4% 5,099,948 4,697,286

6 Nevada 3,284,592 5,388,303 5,682,500 11,070,803 14,355,395 12,094,873 84.3% 2,260,522 2,260,522

1 New Hampshire 2,103,882 3,363,136 3,319,388 6,682,524 8,786,406 7,480,205 85.1% 1,306,201 1,306,201

1 New Jersey 20,150,099 29,020,650 33,993,461 63,014,111 83,164,210 69,011,332 83.0% 14,152,878 14,152,878

4 New Mexico 9,251,946 7,156,665 6,354,245 13,510,910 22,762,856 17,409,518 76.5% 5,353,338 5,353,338

1 New York 78,806,953 91,568,036 90,432,442 182,000,478 260,807,431 182,895,162 70.1% 77,912,269 77,912,269

3 North Carolina 22,599,023 32,517,047 34,331,634 66,848,681 89,447,704 57,474,774 64.3% 31,972,930 31,639,786

4 North Dakota 2,005,000 2,951,678 2,424,426 5,376,104 7,381,104 5,176,420 70.1% 2,204,684 2,204,684

5 Ohio 64,551,283 66,718,637 72,344,909 139,063,546 203,614,829 148,493,230 72.9% 55,121,599 55,121,599

4 Oklahoma 15,167,479 8,095,525 10,582,180 18,677,705 33,845,184 27,747,743 82.0% 6,097,442 5,975,115

6 Oregon 19,316,284 21,578,962 24,908,289 46,487,251 65,803,535 51,088,587 77.6% 14,714,948 14,714,948

2 Pennsylvania 37,327,578 50,526,749 49,136,302 99,663,051 136,990,629 112,373,458 82.0% 24,617,171 24,305,880

1 Puerto Rico 27,849,423 58,579,379 69,549,097 128,128,476 155,977,899 104,898,018 67.3% 51,079,881 51,079,606

1 Rhode Island 2,651,403 5,419,308 5,721,147 11,140,455 13,791,858 8,547,046 62.0% 5,244,812 5,244,812

3 South Carolina 26,975,260 34,424,424 37,078,672 71,503,096 98,478,356 70,661,951 71.8% 27,816,405 27,816,405

4 South Dakota 2,482,072 2,852,426 2,730,538 5,582,964 8,065,036 5,184,064 64.3% 2,880,972 2,880,972

3 Tennessee 27,697,364 30,282,342 34,977,388 65,259,730 92,957,094 61,612,959 66.3% 31,344,135 31,344,135

4 Texas 69,864,166 120,155,385 125,672,998 245,828,383 315,692,549 237,659,946 75.3% 78,032,603 78,006,517

4 Utah 5,592,695 6,783,319 5,936,358 12,719,677 18,312,372 13,198,292 72.1% 5,114,080 5,114,080

1 Vermont 1,191,755 2,971,105 2,438,889 5,409,994 6,601,749 5,194,781 78.7% 1,406,968 1,406,968

2 Virginia 12,393,585 14,745,182 15,800,345 30,545,527 42,939,112 34,740,559 80.9% 8,198,553 8,198,553

6 Washington 22,320,019 31,196,260 31,557,967 62,754,227 85,074,246 67,593,429 79.5% 17,480,817 17,480,817

2 West Virginia 4,013,720 7,479,424 7,349,997 14,829,421 18,843,141 16,100,784 85.4% 2,742,357 2,742,357

5 Wisconsin 4,911,040 17,271,690 18,887,142 36,158,832 41,069,872 35,197,199 85.7% 5,872,673 5,872,674

4 Wyoming 1,565,571 2,814,304 2,247,442 5,061,746 6,627,317 5,517,993 83.3% 1,109,324 1,058,551

Notes:1. Data is as of 11/14/2008. The table does not reflect any changes submitted by states after the data was collected.2. Eights states’ 6/30/2008 cost reports were not finalized at the time the data was collected.3. Due to system constraints, not all rescission related adjustments could be recorded as a part of the 6/30/08 reports and had to be reported 9/30/08 or later. 4. The estimates presented here could change once the factors noted above are resolved. If significant changes are noted, this report will be re-issued.



New PY 2007 Funds

Expenditures

32

DeJones

Highlight



State Formula Spending for Program Year 2008 per 6/30/09 Reports as of 12/20/09 WIA Youth, Adults and Dislocated Workers Programs Combined




Total $934,021,538 $1,390,951,134 $1,556,715,663 $2,947,666,797 $3,881,688,335 $2,937,041,744 75.7% $944,646,591 $943,187,172

3 Alabama 10,389,548 14,379,263 14,720,533 29,099,796 39,489,344 30,381,927 76.9% 9,107,417 9,095,139

6 Alaska 4,178,505 5,742,034 7,169,908 12,911,942 17,090,447 11,849,277 69.3% 5,241,170 5,241,170

6 Arizona 19,030,885 20,017,537 19,410,084 39,427,621 58,458,506 42,023,613 71.9% 16,434,893 16,434,893

4 Arkansas 9,069,757 15,965,643 17,791,050 33,756,693 42,826,450 28,459,081 66.5% 14,367,369 14,367,369

6 California 92,427,865 201,244,165 225,435,105 426,679,270 519,107,135 396,296,757 76.3% 122,810,378 122,810,378

4 Colorado 12,384,462 15,003,240 15,566,276 30,569,516 42,953,978 34,057,050 79.3% 8,896,928 8,896,928

1 Connecticut 3,866,192 11,107,974 11,850,014 22,957,988 26,824,180 24,453,832 91.2% 2,370,348 2,370,348

2 Delaware 1,745,983 3,169,620 3,106,128 6,275,748 8,021,731 6,081,413 75.8% 1,940,318 1,940,318

2 District of Col 3,051,923 5,358,705 6,025,759 11,384,464 14,436,387 9,072,989 62.8% 5,363,398 5,363,398

3 Florida 29,305,826 39,076,977 44,003,343 83,080,320 112,386,146 81,167,088 72.2% 31,219,058 31,219,058

3 Georgia 32,812,317 30,315,887 32,842,354 63,158,241 95,970,558 69,085,583 72.0% 26,884,975 26,884,975

6 Hawaii 2,108,722 3,251,960 3,057,599 6,309,559 8,418,281 6,182,098 73.4% 2,236,183 2,236,183

6 Idaho 1,174,095 3,235,199 3,219,365 6,454,564 7,628,659 6,567,881 86.1% 1,060,778 1,060,778

5 Illinois 42,133,635 61,165,050 65,151,759 126,316,809 168,450,444 133,508,763 79.3% 34,941,681 34,941,681

5 Indiana 36,660,504 30,288,249 31,858,377 62,146,626 98,807,130 68,777,739 69.6% 30,029,391 30,029,391

5 Iowa 5,936,144 6,286,711 6,709,543 12,996,254 18,932,398 14,263,054 75.3% 4,669,344 4,669,344

5 Kansas 2,880,462 8,969,680 9,135,376 18,105,056 20,985,518 17,740,777 84.5% 3,244,741 3,244,741

3 Kentucky 26,537,164 24,896,592 31,925,758 56,822,350 83,359,514 55,586,609 66.7% 27,772,905 27,375,107

4 Louisiana 17,896,915 22,973,177 20,868,338 43,841,515 61,738,430 44,364,571 71.9% 17,373,859 17,373,859

1 Maine 2,575,724 4,851,794 5,170,205 10,021,999 12,597,723 10,283,538 81.6% 2,314,185 2,103,343

2 Maryland 9,597,701 15,227,578 16,852,317 32,079,895 41,677,596 32,587,338 78.2% 9,090,258 9,090,258

1 Massachusetts 17,826,115 32,934,383 36,518,034 69,452,417 87,278,532 70,349,066 80.6% 16,929,466 16,929,466

5 Michigan 40,741,459 104,457,140 138,532,609 242,989,749 283,731,208 218,798,998 77.1% 64,932,210 64,927,904

5 Minnesota 5,552,792 16,296,998 17,067,051 33,364,049 38,916,841 33,955,618 87.3% 4,961,223 4,961,223

3 Mississippi 21,336,783 25,833,206 31,621,470 57,454,676 78,791,459 52,714,022 66.9% 26,077,437 26,077,437

5 Missouri 5,265,857 30,019,833 33,235,269 63,255,102 68,520,959 62,655,064 91.4% 5,865,895 5,865,895

4 Montana 1,171,659 3,092,230 2,910,718 6,002,948 7,174,607 6,043,396 84.2% 1,131,211 1,131,211

5 Nebraska 4,697,286 3,821,701 4,057,822 7,879,523 12,576,809 6,568,522 52.2% 6,008,287 6,007,533

6 Nevada 2,260,522 6,969,020 7,922,578 14,891,598 17,152,120 12,771,301 74.5% 4,380,819 4,380,819

1 New Hampshire 1,306,202 3,421,563 3,742,289 7,163,852 8,470,054 6,472,135 76.4% 1,997,919 1,997,919

1 New Jersey 14,152,878 25,874,856 30,684,038 56,558,894 70,711,772 53,163,317 75.2% 17,548,455 17,548,455

4 New Mexico 3,864,140 6,591,391 6,319,961 12,911,352 16,775,492 13,407,711 79.9% 3,367,781 3,367,781

1 New York 77,912,269 78,397,926 80,826,284 159,224,210 237,136,479 182,162,153 76.8% 54,974,326 54,974,326

3 North Carolina 31,639,784 31,750,757 38,954,775 70,705,532 102,345,316 75,169,668 73.4% 27,175,648 27,175,648

4 North Dakota 2,204,685 2,975,089 2,614,932 5,590,021 7,794,706 5,659,400 72.6% 2,135,306 2,135,306

5 Ohio 55,121,598 79,072,461 94,660,492 173,732,953 228,854,551 162,369,817 70.9% 66,484,734 66,475,237

4 Oklahoma 5,975,115 10,829,575 11,081,460 21,911,035 27,886,150 20,382,672 73.1% 7,503,478 7,503,477

6 Oregon 14,714,949 20,962,323 24,797,237 45,759,560 60,474,509 48,014,705 79.4% 12,459,804 12,459,804

2 Pennsylvania 24,305,880 47,293,283 48,350,975 95,644,258 119,950,138 95,545,227 79.7% 24,404,911 24,255,644

1 Puerto Rico 51,079,607 62,988,435 81,283,025 144,271,460 195,351,067 130,752,991 66.9% 64,598,076 64,598,076

1 Rhode Island 5,244,813 5,151,881 5,626,008 10,777,889 16,022,702 12,179,926 76.0% 3,842,776 3,842,776

3 South Carolina 27,816,405 35,595,817 43,770,492 79,366,309 107,182,714 78,909,881 73.6% 28,272,833 28,272,833

4 South Dakota 2,880,972 3,056,776 2,821,195 5,877,971 8,758,943 6,278,621 71.7% 2,480,322 2,480,322

3 Tennessee 31,344,136 28,288,179 29,193,244 57,481,423 88,825,559 68,139,569 76.7% 20,685,990 20,685,990

4 Texas 78,006,517 98,747,552 96,171,371 194,918,923 272,925,440 220,274,524 80.7% 52,650,916 51,976,240

4 Utah 5,114,079 5,833,047 5,099,372 10,932,419 16,046,498 11,643,596 72.6% 4,402,902 4,402,902

1 Vermont 1,406,968 3,059,589 2,828,296 5,887,885 7,294,853 5,990,981 82.1% 1,303,872 1,303,872

2 Virginia 8,198,553 14,551,587 16,157,922 30,709,509 38,908,062 31,412,589 80.7% 7,495,473 7,495,473

6 Washington 17,441,604 29,805,524 31,371,880 61,177,404 78,619,008 62,424,752 79.4% 16,194,256 16,194,256

2 West Virginia 2,742,357 6,892,254 7,520,162 14,412,416 17,154,773 13,229,632 77.1% 3,925,141 3,925,141

5 Wisconsin 5,872,674 20,978,963 26,728,759 47,707,722 53,580,396 42,367,467 79.1% 11,212,929 11,212,929

4 Wyoming 1,058,551 2,880,760 2,376,752 5,257,512 6,316,063 4,443,445 70.4% 1,872,618 1,872,618



New PY 2008 Funds

Expenditures

33

DeJones

Highlight



State Formula Spending for ARRA Funds per 6/30/09 Reports as of 12/20/09 WIA Youth, Adults and Dislocated Workers Programs Combined

$ as % of Unexpended

Total Available 3/16/09 - Total Balance

Reg State 3/16/09-6/30/09 6/30/09 Available 6/30/09

Total $2,895,421,764 $218,833,097 7.6% $2,676,588,667

3 Alabama 29,944,089 3,638,124 12.1% 26,305,965

6 Alaska 9,161,918 51,947 0.6% 9,109,971

6 Arizona 40,857,192 916,241 2.2% 39,940,951

4 Arkansas 24,656,968 2,527,530 10.3% 22,129,438

6 California 488,646,876 29,221,302 6.0% 459,425,574

4 Colorado 31,132,248 2,725,399 8.8% 28,406,849

1 Connecticut 30,303,943 1,375,308 4.5% 28,928,635

2 Delaware 6,191,756 0 0.0% 6,191,756

2 District of Col 9,305,584 118 0.0% 9,305,466

3 Florida 142,873,204 9,883,656 6.9% 132,989,548

3 Georgia 88,282,518 9,041,742 10.2% 79,240,776

6 Hawaii 6,313,624 435,053 6.9% 5,878,571

6 Idaho 6,985,249 1,093,578 15.7% 5,891,671

5 Illinois 156,527,665 13,943,205 8.9% 142,584,460

5 Indiana 59,284,460 3,839,462 6.5% 55,444,998

5 Iowa 11,952,707 1,551,781 13.0% 10,400,926

5 Kansas 15,027,760 1,134,017 7.5% 13,893,743

3 Kentucky 44,615,045 5,540,332 12.4% 39,074,713

4 Louisiana 37,974,091 4,868,969 12.8% 33,105,122

1 Maine 10,673,865 152,009 1.4% 10,521,856

2 Maryland 27,750,512 1,256,002 4.5% 26,494,510

1 Massachusetts 56,135,152 3,714,186 6.6% 52,420,966

5 Michigan 183,259,217 9,854,254 5.4% 173,404,963

5 Minnesota 45,704,505 4,743,006 10.4% 40,961,499

3 Mississippi 40,670,095 4,153,101 10.2% 36,516,994

5 Missouri 61,712,963 5,247,673 8.5% 56,465,290

4 Montana 5,908,470 682,277 11.5% 5,226,193

5 Nebraska 6,770,135 371,045 5.5% 6,399,090

6 Nevada 25,274,124 1,001,443 4.0% 24,272,681

1 New Hampshire 6,654,415 1,327,374 19.9% 5,327,041

1 New Jersey 62,926,956 2,516,272 4.0% 60,410,684

4 New Mexico 10,828,121 1,236,829 11.4% 9,591,292

1 New York 169,410,659 11,699,511 6.9% 157,711,148

3 North Carolina 79,827,136 3,050,558 3.8% 76,776,578

4 North Dakota 5,068,883 911,428 18.0% 4,157,455

5 Ohio 138,056,135 8,844,820 6.4% 129,211,315

4 Oklahoma 18,381,669 1,743,521 9.5% 16,638,148

6 Oregon 38,558,170 2,927,362 7.6% 35,630,808

2 Pennsylvania 99,675,530 6,582,136 6.6% 93,093,394

1 Puerto Rico 92,110,041 7,334,982 8.0% 84,775,059

1 Rhode Island 15,663,548 613,262 3.9% 15,050,286

3 South Carolina 59,834,567 7,212,075 12.1% 52,622,492

4 South Dakota 5,106,265 1,134,956 22.2% 3,971,309

3 Tennessee 64,307,226 11,081,357 17.2% 53,225,869

4 Texas 170,113,784 17,357,624 10.2% 152,756,160

4 Utah 10,372,357 805,904 7.8% 9,566,453

1 Vermont 5,901,529 446,315 7.6% 5,455,214

2 Virginia 32,325,597 1,683,132 5.2% 30,642,465

6 Washington 55,281,710 3,058,474 5.5% 52,223,236

2 West Virginia 11,333,036 1,683,222 14.9% 9,649,814

5 Wisconsin 35,052,273 2,292,310 6.5% 32,759,963

4 Wyoming 4,736,222 326,913 6.9% 4,409,309

ARRA Availability Expenditures

34

DeJones

Highlight

h. 3442 white paper · collaborate with the existing business-led local workforce investment...

Documents