gu_topicguidesinternetprivacy

8/2/2019 GU_TopicGuidesInternetPrivacy

1/10

motion:

Produced by

We should notexpect our onlineactivities to remain

private

February 2010

onlineprivacy

dolan cummings


2/10

notes

online privacy:

W

academy oF ideas ltd 2010

debating mattersWWW.debatingmatters.com

Key terms

Cyber securityData sharing

Privacy

Privacy policies

1 f 7

We use the internet for an increasing variety of purposes: for reading

news, paying bills, sharing photos, even watching television, and much

more. And not only do our own computers record informaon about all

of these acvies, but we leave a trail on other computers too. Much

of the me we dont even think about this and imagine that what we

do online is our own business. But this informaon trail can have a

number of important consequences [Ref: Wikipedia]. First of all, if we

are careless with sensive informaon like credit card numbers, we can

suer fraud or even identy the [Ref: Identy The]. Similarly, any

pictures or comments we post on social networking sites like MySpace

and Facebook can all too easily end up being seen by people wed rather

not see them [Ref: Tech Radar]. Even if we are careful with our privacy

sengs [Ref: Allfacebook.com], however, and deal only with reputable

websites and companies, informaon about our acvies is out of our

control. Social networking sites actually own the informaon posted byusers, while internet service providers and search engines too rounely

gather informaon for commercial purposes. If we use the internet at

work or school, the management is generally entled to monitor what

we look at [Ref: Privacy Rights]. And governments can require internet

service providers to hand over informaon about individuals internet

use if they believe they are involved in crime, not least terrorism. The

UK government recently created a new unit, the Communicaons

Capabilies Directorate, to implement the controversial Intercepon

Modernisaon Programme, maintaining huge databases of peoples

online acvity [Ref: The Register]. Many internet users are thereforeconcerned that both private companies and governments gather far too

much informaon about our online acvies. Privacy advocates and

campaigners argue that we should not give up lightly on the idea that

we retain control of who knows what about our online acvies [Ref:

Privacy Internaonal].

contents introduction

i 1

K 1

t 2

e 4

bk 6

o 6

i w 7
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/http://www.justice.gov.uk/reviews/datasharing-intro.htmhttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/privacyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookiehttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.techradar.com/news/internet/why-facebook-and-google-hate-privacy-657232http://www.allfacebook.com/2009/02/facebook-privacy/http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs7-work.htmhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/imp_ccd/http://www.privacyinternational.org/http://www.privacyinternational.org/http://www.privacyinternational.org/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/imp_ccd/http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs7-work.htmhttp://www.allfacebook.com/2009/02/facebook-privacy/http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/why-facebook-and-google-hate-privacy-657232http://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_cookiehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policyhttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/privacyhttp://www.justice.gov.uk/reviews/datasharing-intro.htmhttp://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/


3/10

notes

online privacy:

W



2 f 7the online privacy debate in context

W ?Secure soware systems mean it is now generally safe to make

nancial transacons online, whether buying books or selling

shares, while encrypon and other security soware is available

for those with parcular privacy concerns [Ref: Wikipedia].But the queson of whether we should expect privacy is not

merely a technical one. Those who argue that online privacy

is unrealisc believe that the very nature of how we use the

internet today makes old-fashioned privacy concerns irrelevant

or even undesirable [Ref: Guardian]. Irrelevant because the

internet is all about sharing, not concealing and if we are really

concerned about keeping something private, we shouldnt put it

online in the rst place [Ref: WebTechLaw]. It is also considered

undesirable because the benets of privacy are outweighed by

those of convenience [Ref: Visual Revenue] and security [Ref:CNET.com] if we trust internet companies and government

agencies with our informaon. Privacy advocates counter

that whatever the technical dicules, people are entled to

use the internet without surrendering personal informaon

to private companies or governments, however benign [Ref:

Wired]. Controversies about whether internet companies should

collaborate with the authoritarian regime in China, meanwhile,

remind us that there can be a dark side to state supervision [Ref:

Asia News].

t f ?There are undoubtedly benets to surrendering a degree of

privacy online, for example, by accepng tracking cookies from

websites we visit [Ref: Visual Revenue]. If we trust internet

companies with our address and credit card details, we can pay

for books, ights and other services at the click of a mouse.

Users of social networking sites get to use these sophiscated

applicaons free of charge, and can use them to stay in touch

with friends, share arcles and pictures and chat online [Ref:

Social Networking]. While some people object to companiesretaining informaon about things they read and buy online,

others like the fact that web applicaons can then tailor adverts

to their interests rather than annoying them with a scaergun

approach [Ref: eWeb Markeng]. There is also the potenal

for greater speed and eciency in everything from paying tax

to accessing health services if we allow the relevant agencies

to store and share informaon about us. More generally, some

argue that the general culture is simply changing, and that, in

the words of Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg, privacy is no longer

a social norm [Ref: Guardian], especially for younger peoplewho have grown up with the internet and are much more

comfortable sharing pictures and so on [Ref: Wired]. On the

downside, the more personal informaon we share online, the

greater the chance it will be abused by criminals or unscrupulous

companies. Crics argue that any move away from valuing

privacy is a worrying cultural trend, since a degree of privacy is

essenal both to civil liberes and personal well-being, and that

young people do value privacy in their own terms even if they

behave dierently from older generaons [Ref: NPR].

t f ?There have long been concerns that the internet can be used

by terrorist groups to recruit new members, raise money and

plan aacks, and some argue this means we must be prepared

to sacrice some privacy [Ref: Daily Mail]. Security agencies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption_softwarehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://webtechlaw.com/privacy-mythhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-272972.htmlhttp://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Beijing-dampens-Google-controversy-and-censors-news-on-line-17366.htmlhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://www.whatissocialnetworking.com/http://www.ewebmarketing.com.au/seoblog/personalised-ads-give-you-what-you-think-you-wanthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89355786http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89355786http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://www.ewebmarketing.com.au/seoblog/personalised-ads-give-you-what-you-think-you-wanthttp://www.whatissocialnetworking.com/http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://www.asianews.it/news-en/Beijing-dampens-Google-controversy-and-censors-news-on-line-17366.htmlhttp://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-272972.htmlhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://webtechlaw.com/privacy-mythhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encryption_software


4/10

notes

online privacy:

W



3 f 7debate in context continued...

have even been monitoring applicaons like Second Life for

signs of terrorist acvity. A recent paper by the US governments

Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Acvity group argued

that, What started out as a benign environment where people

would congregate to share informaon or explore fantasyworlds is now oering the opportunity for religious/polical

extremists to recruit, rehearse, transfer money, and ulmately

engage in informaon warfare or worse with impunity [Ref:

Washington Post]. In this context, it is argued that we should

all be willing to give up a lile privacy so that security agencies

can keep an eye on suspicious online behaviour. Crics counter

that the scope for terrorist acvity online is overblown, and lile

more than an excuse for governments to snoop on ordinary

cizens. Juan Cole argues in Salon that, Any monitoring by law

enforcement of innocuous acvity and communicaon in avirtual world, conducted broadly and without oversight, would

be unconstuonal and could invade the privacy of millions of

persons. I found no evidence based on my own observaons that

a virtual world is suitable for planning a terror operaon [Ref:

Salon].

s ?Despite the purported benets of giving up a degree of privacy,

many internet users remain insncvely hosle to the idea that

companies and government agencies can track their onlineacvies. They point out that just because the internet makes

it easier to store and share data, that doesnt mean we have

to go along with it. If we do accept it, it should be because we

are convinced of the benets. Telecoms expert Norman Lewis

suggests what really maers is trust: if we genuinely trust

companies with our data, that is very dierent from if they just

assume we do [Ref: Bale of Ideas]. An important queson,

then, is whether we are asked to opt into a system in which

our data will be stored our shared so we can reap benets, or

whether companies simply go ahead and do it for their ownbenet. Similarly, privacy advocates protest that governments

have not convinced them of the need to compromise privacy for

naonal security [Ref: Salon]. Even if surrendering it would help

the security services, they argue privacy remains an important

consideraon in its own terms. While the age-old argument

against privacy is that if we have nothing to hide we have

nothing to fear, crics like law professor John Fitzpatrick argue

that in a free society we all have the right to keep secrets [Ref:

Archive.org]. Just as the privacy of the vong booth is essenal

to democrac elecons, a wider private sphere within whichto think, debate and reect beyond prying eyes is essenal to

democracy more generally. Like other civil libertarians [Ref:

Liberty], security technologist Bruce Schneier argues the real

choice is not between privacy and security but liberty versus

control, because if we are constantly under surveillance, we

are constantly fearful and self-conscious, and not able to act

freely [Ref: Wired]. So while it might be dicult to maintain an

expectaon of privacy in a wired world, some believe we must

do everything in our power not to abandon it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/05/AR2008020503144_pf.htmlhttp://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/battles/3457/http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://www.archive.org/details/IoIXmasLecture09http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/3-privacy/index.shtmlhttp://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/3-privacy/index.shtmlhttp://www.archive.org/details/IoIXmasLecture09http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/battles/3457/http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/05/AR2008020503144_pf.html


5/10

notes

online privacy:

W



4 f 7essential reading

F.T.C.: Has Internet Gone Beyond Privacy Policies?

Media Decoder blog, New York Times 11 January 2010

Rethinking privacy and trust

Norman Lewis Bales in Print20 September 2009Spying on your email

Henry Porter Guardian Liberty Central blog 3 August 2009

Spies Baleground Turns Virtual

Washington Post6 February 2008

Whos afraid of Facebook?

Nathalie Rothschild spiked15 August 2007

Terror laws eat away at privacy

BBC News 6 September 2002

Terrorist threat shis priories in online rights debate

CNET News.com 17 September 2001

F

Privacy no longer a social norm, says Facebook founder

Guardian 11 January 2010

Liming online anonymity - and why thats a good thing

Sarah Warn sarahwarn.com 26 October 2009

Fight against terror must mean the end of ordinary peoples

privacy, says ex-security chief

Daily Mail25 February 2009

The privacy myth

Paul Jacobson Web.Tech.Law2 February 2009

aOther peoples privacy

Nicholas Carr Rough Type 17 January 2010

Why Facebook is Wrong: Privacy Is Sll Important

Marshall Kirkpatrick ReadWriteWeb 11 January 2010

Does more snooping strike the right balance between privacy

and security?

Daily Telegraph 27 April 2009

The Eternal Value of Privacy

Bruce Schneier Wired18 May 2006

i dYou Have Zero Privacy AnywayGet Over It

David Adams OS News 11 December 2009Why Facebook and Google hate privacy

Gary Marshall TechRadar10 December 2009

Danah Boyd: People looked at me like I was an alien

Guardian 9 December 2009

Is Online Privacy a Generaonal Issue?

Heather West Wired1 October 2009

Two-Thirds of Americans Object to Online Tracking

New York Times 29 September 2009

Technology shouldnt give Big Brother a head start

Bruce Schneier MPR News 31 July 2009

Teens Take Advantage of Online Privacy Tools

NPR 3 April 2008
http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/ftc-has-internet-gone-beyond-privacy-policies/http://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/battles/3457/http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/henryporter/2009/aug/03/spy-email-record-snoopinghttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/05/AR2008020503144_pf.htmlhttp://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/3726/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2237050.stmhttp://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-272972.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://sarahwarn.com/2009/10/limiting-online-anonymity/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://webtechlaw.com/privacy-mythhttp://www.roughtype.com/archives/2010/01/other_peoples_p.phphttp://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_facebook_is_wrong_about_privacy.phphttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/5230055/Does-more-snooping-strike-the-right-balance-between-privacy-and-security.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/5230055/Does-more-snooping-strike-the-right-balance-between-privacy-and-security.htmlhttp://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://www.osnews.com/story/22603/You_Have_Zero_Privacy_Anyway_--_Get_Over_Ithttp://www.techradar.com/news/internet/why-facebook-and-google-hate-privacy-657232http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/09/interview-microsoft-researcher-danah-boydhttp://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/business/media/30adco.html?_r=1http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/07/30/schneier/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89355786http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89355786http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/07/30/schneier/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/business/media/30adco.html?_r=1http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/10/is-online-privacy-a-generational-issue/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/09/interview-microsoft-researcher-danah-boydhttp://www.techradar.com/news/internet/why-facebook-and-google-hate-privacy-657232http://www.osnews.com/story/22603/You_Have_Zero_Privacy_Anyway_--_Get_Over_Ithttp://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/05/70886http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/5230055/Does-more-snooping-strike-the-right-balance-between-privacy-and-security.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/5230055/Does-more-snooping-strike-the-right-balance-between-privacy-and-security.htmlhttp://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_facebook_is_wrong_about_privacy.phphttp://www.roughtype.com/archives/2010/01/other_peoples_p.phphttp://webtechlaw.com/privacy-mythhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1154902/Fight-terror-mean-end-ordinary-peoples-privacy-says-ex-security-chief.htmlhttp://sarahwarn.com/2009/10/limiting-online-anonymity/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacyhttp://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-272972.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2237050.stmhttp://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/3726/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/05/AR2008020503144_pf.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/henryporter/2009/aug/03/spy-email-record-snoopinghttp://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/battles/3457/http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/ftc-has-internet-gone-beyond-privacy-policies/


6/10

notes5 f 7



online privacy:

W

US seeks terrorists in web worlds

BBC News 2 March 2008

Osama bin Ladens Second Life

Juan Cole Salon 25 February 2008Virtual terrorists

The Australian 31 July 2007

EU Privacy Czar Claims Right to Prohibit US Access to EU Financial

Records

Jonathan Winer Counterterrorism blog 1 February 2007

Pentagon sets its sights on social networking websites

New Scienst9 June 2006

Perspecve: Net privacy and the myth of self-regulaon

Evan Hansen CNET News.com 16 October 2001

essential reading continued...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7274377.stmhttp://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/virtual-terrorists/story-e6frg6z6-1111114072291http://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/02/eu_privacy_czar_claims_right_t.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/02/eu_privacy_czar_claims_right_t.phphttp://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025556.200-pentagon-sets-its-sights-on-social-networking-websites.html?full=truehttp://news.cnet.com/2010-1071-281580.htmlhttp://news.cnet.com/2010-1071-281580.htmlhttp://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025556.200-pentagon-sets-its-sights-on-social-networking-websites.html?full=truehttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/02/eu_privacy_czar_claims_right_t.phphttp://counterterrorismblog.org/2007/02/eu_privacy_czar_claims_right_t.phphttp://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/virtual-terrorists/story-e6frg6z6-1111114072291http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/02/25/avatars/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/featurehttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7274377.stm


7/10

notes

online privacy:

W



6 f 7bacKgrounders

Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg on privacy

8 January 2010

Privacy, human rights and the law

John Fitzpatrick Instute of Ideas Christmas Lecture15 December 2009

Googles Privacy

Eric Schmidt CNBC3 December 2009

Data matching: a threat to privacy?

James Welch Guardian 23 November 2009

Rethinking Privacy in an age of Disclosure and Sharing

Bale of Ideas 31 October 2009

Facebook should compete on privacy, not hide it away

Bruce Schneier Guardian 15 July 2009

Were Giving Up Privacy and Geng Lile in Return

Bruce Schneier Minneapolis Star Tribune 31 May 2009

Policians Overreacted To Terrorist Threat Online

Techdirt12 March 2009

The Naonal Security Strategy: Implicaons for the UK

intelligence community

Sir David Omand ippr9 February 2009

The Horrifying Dangers Of Online Cartoon-Like Personas

Tim Jones Electronic Froner Foundaon 6 February 2008

Using Web 2.0 tech in a top secret world, podcast

Lewis Shepherd, a former senior technology ocer at the US

Defense Intelligence Agency 14 January 2008

Cookie Survey Results - Convenience outweighs most of the

worries

Emer Kirrane VisualRevenue

Facebooks privacy policyIs Online Privacy at Work a Myth?

Yahoo Hotjobs

organisationsAmerican Library Associaons Oce for Intellectual

Freedom

Becoming paranoid, a weblog about computer security,

privacy and staying safe online

Google Privacy Centre

Privacy Internaonal

Shut your Facebook

What is Identy the?
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/3848950http://www.archive.org/details/IoIXmasLecture09http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1372176413&play=1http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/nov/23/data-matching-privacyhttp://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/session_detail/2515/http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/15/privacy-internet-facebookhttp://www.schneier.com/essay-115.htmlhttp://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090311/0223484069.shtmlhttp://www.ippr.org/security/publicationsandreports.asp?id=646&tid=2656http://www.ippr.org/security/publicationsandreports.asp?id=646&tid=2656http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/02/horrifying-dangers-online-cartoon-personashttp://www.networkworld.com/podcasts/itr/2008/011408voices-dia.htmlhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=%20322332665300http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/jobseeker/tools/ept/careerArticlesPost.html?post=22http://www.privacyrevolution.org/http://www.privacyrevolution.org/http://becomingparanoid.com/http://becomingparanoid.com/http://www.google.co.uk/privacy.htmlhttp://www.privacyinternational.org/http://www.harmsen.net/shut_your_facebook.htmlhttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.harmsen.net/shut_your_facebook.htmlhttp://www.privacyinternational.org/http://www.google.co.uk/privacy.htmlhttp://becomingparanoid.com/http://becomingparanoid.com/http://www.privacyrevolution.org/http://www.privacyrevolution.org/http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/jobseeker/tools/ept/careerArticlesPost.html?post=22http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=%20322332665300http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://visualrevenue.com/blog/2009/07/cookie-survey-results.htmlhttp://www.networkworld.com/podcasts/itr/2008/011408voices-dia.htmlhttp://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/02/horrifying-dangers-online-cartoon-personashttp://www.ippr.org/security/publicationsandreports.asp?id=646&tid=2656http://www.ippr.org/security/publicationsandreports.asp?id=646&tid=2656http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090311/0223484069.shtmlhttp://www.schneier.com/essay-115.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/15/privacy-internet-facebookhttp://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2009/session_detail/2515/http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/nov/23/data-matching-privacyhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1372176413&play=1http://www.archive.org/details/IoIXmasLecture09http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/3848950


8/10

notes

online privacy:

W



7 f 7

Home Oce spawns new unit to expand internet surveillance

The Register28 January 2010

Cybercriminals revive old scams to target smartphones

BBC News 17 January 2010Google Aack Part of Widespread Spying Eort

PC World13 January 2010

Online health records can save lives

Guardian 13 January 2010

Privacy groups le FTC complaint against Facebook

Guardian 17 December 2009

Facebook Privacy Changes Go Live; Beware of Everyone

PC World9 December 2009

Legislaon to access publics texts and emails put on hold

Guardian 10 November 2009

How Facebook tried to put a shine on $9.5m privacy suit

Guardian Technology Blog 21 September 2009

Internet rms resist ministers plan to spy on every e-mail

The Times 2 July 2009

Jacqui drops central snooping database

The Register27 April 2009

Government wants phone and internet providers to track users

Guardian 27 April 2009

Virgin sacks 13 over Facebook chav remarks

Guardian 1 November 2008

US Spies Want to Find Terrorists in World of Warcra

Wired22 February 2008

Sun on Privacy: Get Over It

Wired26 January 1999

in the neWs
http://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.identitytheft.org.uk/what-is-identity-theft.asphttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/imp_ccd/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8459898.stmhttp://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/186786/google_attack_part_of_widespread_spying_effort.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jan/13/online-health-records-saving-liveshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/dec/17/facebook-privacy-ftc-complainthttp://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/184090/facebook_privacy_changes_go_live_beware_of_everyone.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/09/home-office-plan-data-storagehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/21/facebook-privacyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/09/home-office-plan-data-storagehttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/27/jacqui_snooping_database/http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/27/home-office-superdatabase-email-phoneshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/01/virgin-atlantic-facebookhttp://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/02/nations-spies-w/http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/02/nations-spies-w/http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/01/virgin-atlantic-facebookhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/27/home-office-superdatabase-email-phoneshttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/27/jacqui_snooping_database/http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/09/home-office-plan-data-storagehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/21/facebook-privacyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/09/home-office-plan-data-storagehttp://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/184090/facebook_privacy_changes_go_live_beware_of_everyone.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/dec/17/facebook-privacy-ftc-complainthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jan/13/online-health-records-saving-liveshttp://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/186786/google_attack_part_of_widespread_spying_effort.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8459898.stmhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/28/imp_ccd/


9/10

aboutdebating mattersDebang Maers because ideas

maer. This is the premise of the

Instute of Ideas & Pzer Debang

Maers Compeon for sixthform students which emphasises

substance, not just style, and the

importance of taking ideas seriously.

Debang Maers presents schools

with an innovave and engaging

approach to debang, where the

real-world debates and a challenging

format, including panel judges who

engage with the students, appeal

to students from a wide range ofbackgrounds, including schools with

a long tradion of debang and those

with none.

Debang Maers engages a

wide range of individuals, from

the students who take part in

the debates, the diverse group

of professionals who judge for

us, the teachers who train and

support their debaters, and

the young people who go on

to become Debang Maers

Alumni aer school and help

us to connue to expand anddevelop the compeon. If you

enjoyed using this Topic Guide,

and are interested in nding

out more about Debang

Maers and how you can be

involved, please complete this

form and return it to us at the

address below.

Debang Maers Compeon

Academy of Ideas Ltd

Signet House

49-51 Farringdon Road

London

EC1M 3JP

Yes, Id like to know more. Please send me furtherinformaon about the Debang Maers Compeon:

I am a teacher and would like further details aboutevents in my area and how to enter a team

I am a sixth form student and would like rth detailsabout events in my area

I am interested in becoming a Debang Maers judgeI am interested in sponsoring/supporng Debang MaersOther (please specify)

First name

Surname

School/company/

organisaon

Professional role

(if applicable)

Address

Postcode

Email address

School/work phone

Mobile phone

Find out more


10/10

Produced by

teenage citizensthinKing deeplyabout...social

issuesian grant, ceo, britannica

gu_topicguidesinternetprivacy

Documents