gulf of mexico deepwater current structure observations · gulf of mexico deep waters •data are...

24
Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations Presenter and Author: Andy Brown Co-Authors: Dick Crout, Pak Leung, Jordan Krumm, Chunyan Li 1

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations

Presenter and Author: Andy Brown

Co-Authors: Dick Crout, Pak Leung,

Jordan Krumm, Chunyan Li 1

Page 2: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations

+ Location of 42370

Yucatan Straits

Florida Straits Loop Current

Loop Current Eddy

Cyclonic Eddies

Gulf Stream

• Background Information

• Station 42370

• Data Time Series

• Spectral Analysis

• Conclusions

• Future Applications

2

Page 3: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Background • The Notice to Lessees (NTL) established in 2005, requires the collection of current

profile data from oil and gas production platforms and drilling rigs operating in the Gulf of Mexico deep waters

• Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since 2005. Maximum number of reporting stations was over 40 in 2009

• Length of data set from each station varies from a few weeks to years

• Quality of data collected is dependant on the operators requirements • This talk presents high quality current data obtained from a single location in the

North Central Gulf of Mexico and the findings of inertial motions and Topographic Rossby Wave signatures

• Excellent example of a long term oceanographic data set obtained for operational purposes that can also be used as research data

• We conclude with suggestions for future measurement programs

3

Page 4: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Technical Details

• The National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) Station 42370 is a Production Drilling and Quarters Truss Spar permanently moored in 1325m of water in Green Canyon block 645, 150 miles South of New Orleans, Louisiana

• A real time, high quality, current profiling system was designed and engineered in

2004 for the operator of the Spar. Installation was in 2005. The purpose of the system was to support daily marine operations including input to the riser management system and meet or exceed the anticipated 2005 NTL requirements

4

Page 5: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Technical Details • Operator desire for accurate data, design requirements and quality control during the

engineering phase have been key to the success of the system • A near surface deployed 38kHz ADCP and a seabed mounted 75kHz ADCP

• 75kHz ADCP interface to the surface via dual fiber optic data and power cable

running along catenary riser

• Seabed terminal for fly-lead connection utilizes hybrid ROV Wet mateable connectors. Prizm fiber optic multiplexer & 220v/48v convertor in subsea electronics housing

• Continuous operation for almost 7 years

• Data every 20 minutes since May 2005

• No instrument recovery or servicing

5

Page 6: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Average (annual) currents near seabed at GC645 Annual Average Speed 1000 m Depth 1200 m Depth

2006

5.4 cm/s 5.0 cm/s

2007

5.3 cm/s 4.2 cm/s

2008

5.5 cm/s 4.0 cm/s

2009

5.2 cm/s 4.2 cm/s

2010

5.4 cm/s 3.8 cm/s

6

Page 7: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Selected Eddy Events 1000m Depth 10 May 2006 – 9 May 2007

7

Page 8: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Eddy Yankee

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

13

92

78

31

17

41

56

51

95

62

34

72

73

83

12

93

52

03

91

14

30

24

69

35

08

45

47

55

86

66

25

76

64

87

03

97

43

07

82

18

21

28

60

38

99

49

38

59

77

61

01

67

10

55

81

09

49

11

34

01

17

31

12

12

21

25

13

12

90

41

32

95

13

68

61

40

77

14

46

81

48

59

15

25

01

56

41

16

03

21

64

23

1200 m

8

Page 9: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Selected Eddy Events 1000m Depth 10 May 2007 – 9 May 2008

9

Page 10: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1

47

7

95

3

14

29

19

05

23

81

28

57

33

33

38

09

42

85

47

61

52

37

57

13

61

89

66

65

71

41

76

17

80

93

85

69

90

45

95

21

99

97

10

47

3

10

94

9

11

42

5

11

90

1

12

37

7

12

85

3

13

32

9

13

80

5

14

28

1

14

75

7

15

23

3

15

70

9

0

5

10

15

20

14

64

92

71

39

01

85

32

31

62

77

93

24

23

70

54

16

84

63

15

09

45

55

76

02

06

48

36

94

67

40

97

87

28

33

58

79

8

Eddy Albert

Eddy Albert

10

1200 m

Page 11: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Selected Eddy Events 1000m Depth 10 May 2008 – 9 May 2009

11

Page 12: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

14

53

90

51

35

71

80

92

26

12

71

33

16

53

61

74

06

94

52

14

97

35

42

55

87

76

32

96

78

17

23

37

68

58

13

78

58

99

04

19

49

39

94

51

03

97

10

84

91

13

01

11

75

31

22

05

12

65

71

31

09

13

56

11

40

13

14

46

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1

44

4

88

7

13

30

17

73

22

16

26

59

31

02

35

45

39

88

44

31

48

74

53

17

57

60

62

03

66

46

70

89

75

32

79

75

Eddy Darwin

Eddy Darwin

12

1200 m

Page 13: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Selected Eddy Events 1000m Depth 10 May 2009 – 9 May 2010

Great data set, average currents are higher and very periodic

13

Page 14: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Spectral Analysis 1000m Depth May 2005 – May 2010

Full Spectrum Smoothed

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40

1

2

3

4

5

x 104

Frequency - Cycle Per Day (CPD)

Pow

er

Power Spectrum of Motion

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40

1

2

3

4

5

x 104

Frequency - Cycle Per Day (CPD)

Pow

er

Power Spectrum of Motion

14

Page 15: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Spectral Analysis 1200m Depth May 2005 – May 2010

Full Spectrum Smoothed

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

x 104

Frequency - Cycle Per Day (CPD)

Pow

er

Power Spectrum of Motion

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.40

1

2

3

4

5

6

x 104

Frequency - Cycle Per Day (CPD)

Pow

er

Power Spectrum of Motion

15 Inertial waves have degenerated with depth

Page 16: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Power Spectrum 5 Years

Spectral Analysis

1000 meter Depth 1200 meter Depth

Time Period May 2005 – April 2010

Frequency (cpd) Period Frequency (cpd) Period

Near-inertial 0.9045 26.53 hours

Near-inertial 0.9025 26.59 hours 0.90 26.67 hours

Low-frequency 0.0102 98.04 days

Low-frequency 0.0450 22.22 days 0.0495 20.20 days

Low-frequency 0.0580 17.24 days 0.0576 17.36 days

16

26.08 Near Inertial Oscillation for this latitude

Page 17: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

5 Year Power Spectrum Animation

17

Page 18: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Further Investigation - Eddy Ekman June 2009 – Feb 2010

18

Page 19: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Eddy Ekman June 2009 – February 2010

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

13

95

78

91

18

31

57

71

97

12

36

52

75

93

15

33

54

73

94

14

33

54

72

95

12

35

51

75

91

16

30

56

69

97

09

37

48

77

88

18

27

58

66

99

06

39

45

79

85

11

02

45

10

63

91

10

33

11

42

71

18

21

12

21

51

26

09

13

00

31

33

97

13

79

11

41

85

14

57

91

49

73

15

36

71

57

61

16

15

51

65

49

1000 m

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

13

95

78

91

18

31

57

71

97

12

36

52

75

93

15

33

54

73

94

14

33

54

72

95

12

35

51

75

91

16

30

56

69

97

09

37

48

77

88

18

27

58

66

99

06

39

45

79

85

11

02

45

10

63

91

10

33

11

42

71

18

21

12

21

51

26

09

13

00

31

33

97

13

79

11

41

85

14

57

91

49

73

15

36

71

57

61

16

15

51

65

49

Eddy Ekman

1200 m

19

Page 20: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Power Spectrum June 2009 – February 2010

1000 m 1200 m

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Frequency (CPD)

m2/s

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3x 10

4

Frequency (CPD)

m2/s

20

Page 21: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Power Spectrum Energy Eddy Ekman

Depth

Peak NIO Frequency Peak TRW Frequency

1000 m

1.75 x 104 m2/s 1.30 x 104 m2/s

1200 m

0.70 x 104 m2/s 1.35 x 104 m2/s

21

Page 22: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Conclusions

• Currents in excess of 35 cm/s were detected at 1200 m depth as Loop Eddies Yankee, Albert, and Darwin pass south of the GC 645 location

• Wind generated near-inertial oscillations are observed at 1000 and 1200 m depths with more energy present at 1000 m

• Topographic Rossby Waves impact on near-bottom currents is shown during the period from May 2005 through May 2010. They appear consistently at approximately 17 -20 day intervals

• Five year power spectra

• Significant peaks at near-inertial frequencies (near 26.06 hours) and Topographic Rossby Wave TRW frequencies (10 - 100 days)

• Single peak near the inertial frequency at 1200 m and a double peak at 1000 m • Energy at both depths is approximately the same in the TRW frequency range • Energy in the near-inertial band at 1000 m is nearly twice that at 1200 m

22

Page 23: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

Future Applications • High quality data is the result of the operators desire for quality data exceeding NTL

requirements • Unique long term oceanographic data set obtained for operational purposes

providing a unique opportunity to study deepwater current and events from different oceanographic phenomena

• Review of NTL related current measurements suggests that a more rigorous approach

to the data collection is required in order to standardize quality, data return and usability

• Cost of NTL related measurements over 5 years and public access to data

• Alternative - Installation of a Gulf of Mexico observing system utilizing existing platform and fiber optic networks

• Include the need for long term site specific measurements at new development sites

23

Page 24: Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Current Structure Observations · Gulf of Mexico deep waters •Data are obtained from an average of 30 rigs or platforms (stations) at any given time since

24

Thank You