gulf coast carbon center - research on geologic co2 storage - ian duncan - global ccs institute –...
DESCRIPTION
As a part of the Institute's strategic focus on assisting CCS projects through knowledge sharing, three North American roadshow events will help the industry share project experiences and knowledge about CCS. Taking place in the US and Canada, the three events include:• Austin, Texas on November 8, 2011;• Calgary, Canada on 10 November, 2011; and • Washington, D.C. on 19 January, 2012.The first roadshow focused on sharing project experiences and knowledge from the projects in North America but also brought in projects from Europe (Don valley) and Australia (Callide) so that regionally diverse experiences could be shared amongst a global audience. Attendance at the event was around 30 to 35 which allowed open and frank discussions around technical, management, and regulatory issues and how these challenges can impact on a project’s advancement and decision making processes.TRANSCRIPT
Research on Geologic CO2 Storage
Ian Duncan
Gulf Coast Carbon Center
University of Texas at Austin,
Bureau of Economic Geology
Acknowledgements • Gulf Coast Carbon Center researchers: Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel,
Jiemin Lu, JP Nicot, Katherine Romanak, Changbing Yang, David Carr,
Becky Smyth, Jong-Won Choi
• BEG Associate Director: Michael Young
• BEG Director: Scott Tinker
• Funding organizations: The Department of Energy National Energy
Technology Laboratory, Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration
GCCC sponsors
(1) Will geologic sequestration work? (2) Is it safe, secure, long-term storage? (3) How do risks of brine sequestration compare to CO2 EOR?
Research Questions
Natural gas reservoirs have kept gas in the subsurface for tens of millions of years Natural CO2 reservoirs have retained CO2
Why we believe that CO2 Sequestration will work
The 37 year plus record of CO2 injection into depleted oil fields (CO2-EOR) ~ 600 million tons of CO2 transported in pipelines in the US ~ 1,200 million tons of CO2 injected
Why we believe that CO2 Sequestration will work
No known significant environmental issues Excellent safety record
Why we believe that CO2 Sequestration will work
Bureau of Economic Geology’s DOE funded Field Projects: Frio I Frio II SACROC Cranfield Phase II Cranfield Phase III
Why we believe that CO2 Sequestration will work
GCCC Field Monitoring Programs
Cranfield SECARB
Phase II&II
Denbury
Frio Test 1&2 Texas American
Resources
SACROC Southwest
Partnership
KinderMorgan
NM Tech
Hastings Denbury-AP-LLC
NRG
Frio I Brine Pilot:
Funded by
DOE NETL
Frio Brine Pilot
Site
Injection
interval
Injection Well
Observation Well
CO2 Saturation Observed with Cross-
well Seismic Tomography vs. Modeled
Tom Daley and Christine Doughty LBNL
Frio 1 2004-2006
• 1600 tones CO2-A
• 1500 m deep sandstone -
saline
Funded by NETL
Lead: Hovorka/Geo-SEQ
Host: Texas American
Resources
First highly instrumented brine injection Showed … computer simulation fate of CO2 work well and available technologies can monitor CO2
Frio I Pilot Injection Project 2005 -2006
Second highly instrumented brine injection Showed … Capillary trapping of CO2 will be a significant factor is assuring long term secure storage
Frio II Pilot Injection Project 2007 -2008
Modeled evolution of phases of
CO2
First monitoring for leakage in Permian Basin CO2 EOR site Largest (over 80 million tons of CO2 injected over last 37 years) SW Carbon Sequestration Partnership Project hosted by Kinder Morgan (EOR Operator)
SACROC Project 2006 -2010
SACROC Access to Private Water Wells
Showed …. No evidence of leakage of CO2 into groundwater
SACROC Project
May 6th, 2010
Washington DC
Cranfield Injection Projects
Cranfield Field Test Collaboration
SECARB Partnership Project
Managed by SSEB
Denbury Onshore LLC
Schlumberger Carbon
Services
LBNL
LLBL
USGS
ORNL
NETL
QEA
U Mississippi
Miss State
UTPGE
UT DoG
University Tennessee
BP
Princeton
Stanford
University Edinburgh
Gulf Coast Carbon
Center Staff Susan Hovorka
Ramon Trevino
Tip Meckel
Changbing Yang
Jiemin Liu
Katherine Romanak
Rebecca Smyth
Sigrid Clift
Masoumeh Kordi
Stuart Coleman
Yihua Cai
Hamid Lashgari
BEG staff Tongwei Zhang
Jeff Paine
Bob Reedy
Robert Reed
Kitty Millikan
Sandia Technologies
Million ton injection of CO2 into and oil field SECARB Sequestration Partnership Project hosted by Denbury (EOR Operator)
Cranfield Phase II Project 2008 -2010
Cranfield Phase II (EOR) 2008-
continuing
• 1 Million tones CO2-N
• 3000 m deep fluvial sandstone
• SECARB Partnership (SSEB)
Lead: Hovorka, Meckel
Host: Denbury Onshore LLC
Key results: • Develop above zone pressure
monitoring interval (AZMI) show
vertical isolation
Injection well
Monitoring well
Jul.03 Jul.04 Jul.05 Jul.06 Jul.07 Jul.08 Jul.09 Jul.10 Jul.11 Jul.12 Jul.13 Jul.14 Jul.15 Jul.16 Jul.17 Jul.18 Jul.19 Jul.20 Jul.21 Jul.22 Jul.23 Jul.24 Jul.25-10
-5
0
Tubin
g P
ressure
(psig
)
Date
Tubing data
50
100
150
Tubin
g T
em
pera
ture
(F
)
Satellite
transmission
Fluvial Depositional Environment
Stratal slicing seismic interpretation
Channel
erosion
Channel
erosion Channel
erosion
Point bar Point bar
Channel
erosion
Hongliu Zeng, BEG
Average
H: 283 md
V: 47 md
Average
H: 20.5 %
V: 20.7 %
Dedicated observation well
Injection wells
Fault
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
7/1/2008 8/20/2008 10/9/2008 11/28/2008 1/17/2009 3/8/2009 4/27/2009 6/16/2009
Date
CO
2 i
nje
cti
on
ra
te (
Ms
cfd
)
CFU 29-10 CFU 29-12
CFU 26-1 CFU 25-2
CFU 24-2 CFU 29-2
CFU 28-1 CFU 27-1
CFU 29-4 CFU 48-1
CFU 29-7
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
6/1/2008 7/21/2008 9/9/2008 10/29/2008 12/18/2008 2/6/2009 3/28/2009 5/17/2009 7/6/2009
Date
CO
2 i
nje
cti
on
ra
te (
Ms
cfd
)
CFU 29-10 CFU 29-12
CFU 26-1 CFU 25-2
CFU 24-2 CFU 29-2
CFU 28-1 CFU 27-1
CFU 29-4 CFU 48-1
CFU 29-7
Flow Modeling
Modeled CO2 injection rate
Simplified CO2 injection rate
Actual Injection Rates
??
Simplified CO2 injection rate
BEG Observation well
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
2/22/2008 11/18/2010 8/14/2013 5/10/2016 2/4/2019
Date
Pre
ss
ure
(p
si)
Measurement
Calculated
Pressure match at continuous monitoring well
Showed …. Digital pressure gauges in reservoir and at well head are sensitive to relatively small leaks
Cranfield Phase II Project 2008 -2010
First highly monitored million ton a year injection rate into brine
Cranfield Phase III Project 2009 -2010
Cranfield Phase III (stacked) 2009-
continuing
3 Million tones CO2-N
3000 m deep fluvial
sandstone (brine)
SECARB Partnership (SSEB)
Lead Hovorka, Meckel, Trevino
Host: Denbury Onshore LLC
Key results:
Time and space evolution
of saturation
ERT for CCS
NEW PROJECTS
Air-Products & Leucadia Lake Charles
Hastings 2011-2015
Planned 5 Million tones CO2- A + 8
Million tons CO2 N
2000 m deep fluvial sandstone (EOR)
Lead: Nunez, Hovorka
Host: Denbury Onshore LLC
Key results:
Test best commercial technologies for confirming
storage permanence in EOR context
Assessment of faults
NRG JW Parrish Plant 2012-2017
Planned 0.25 ? Million tones CO2- A
from coal-fired capture
2000 m deep
bar sandstones (EOR)
Lead: Smyth
Host: To be announced soon
Key GCCC results:
Test best commercial
technologies for confirming
storage permanence in EOR
context
IS CO2 SEQUESTRATION SAFE?
IS CO2 SEQUESTRATION SAFE?
Risks associated with CO2 sequestration Capture plant CO2 Pipelines Well blowouts Leakage of CO2 into groundwater Leakage of CO2 into oil and gas reservoirs
CONCLUSIONS ABOUT RISKS • Most risks associated with CCS
can be quantified and are similar to other analogous industrial activities
• Risks for well characterized, carefully selected sites are manageable and bounded
• Risk assessment ultimately is site specific
CONCLUSIONS
CO2 sequestration is ready for projects at true commercial scale
Thanks!
For more information: www.beg.utexas.edu