growth and trade, international factor movements appleyard & field (& cobb): chapters...
TRANSCRIPT
Growth and Trade,International Factor Movements
Appleyard & Field (& Cobb): Chapters 11–12
Krugman & Obstfeld: Chapter 7
2
Growth• Economic growth may be due to change in
o technologyo amounts of factors of productiono institutions (e.g. allowing international trade)
• Impact of this changeo producers need to decide how to alter
productiono consumer need to decide how the change
consumptionso world prices may change
3
Growth and PPF
Clothes
Pap
er
Pap
er
Pap
er
Clothes Clothes
capital saving technological change or increase of capital
labour saving technological change or increase of labour force
factor-neutral technological change or capital and labour increase by the same rate
4
Terminology: Production Effects
• Assume a small country (=cannot affect world prices) exporting clothes
• Let there then be an increase in the production possibilities
• Producers select a point from the new PPF, and the production effect may beo neutral: production of
exports and import-competing products grow at the same rate
o protrade: production of exports increase relatively more
o antitrade: production of import-competing products increase relatively more
Clothes (export)
Pap
er
(im
port
)“ultra-protradeeffect”
protradeeffect
antitradeeffect
“ultra-antitrade”effect
neutral effect
5
exportsbefore
Terminology: Consumption Effects
• Similarly consumption effectso (ultra)protrade: consumption
of imports increases more than consumption of exports = larger part of income will be spent on imports after growth
o (ultra)anti-trade: as above, but the other way around
o neutral: no change in the relative consumption pattern
• The total impact of growth on trade depends on the combined production and consumption effects
Clothes
Pap
er
importsbefore
exports
after
Note that we are assuming constant prices at this point
importsafter
6
Rybczynski Theorem• Assumptions: constant
prices (small-country), non-neutral growth in factors
• Growth in one factor leads to an absolute expansion in the output of product that uses that factor intensively and absolute contraction in output of the product that uses the other factor intensively
• Why? Relative factor prices cannot change since we assume constant product prices → K/L ratios of the industries must remain constant → capital must flow to the labour intensive sector
Clothes
Pap
er
Growth of labour force →absolute increase in the labour-intensive product (clothes) and an absolute decrease in the production of capital-intensive product (paper)
7
The Large country case: Change in World Prices
• Large country = influences world prices
• Assume e.g. that growth in the abundant factor (labour) leads to pro-trade production effect and neutral consumption effect
• Then, for any given prices, the country produces more exports and buys more imports
= shift of the offer curve
Exports of good X
Imp
ort
s o
f g
oo
d Y
(PX/PY)2
(PX/PY)1OC0
OC1
8
Shift of Offer Curves (2)
New equilibrium:
• More trade• New terms
of trade = new relative prices
• (PX/PY)E’ < (PX/PY)E
Good X: Exports from country 1
Imports to country 2
Go
od
Y:
Imp
ort
s to
co
un
try
1 ex
po
rts
fro
m c
ou
ntr
y 2
(PX/PY)E = TOTE
Country 1’s offer curves
Country 2’s offer curve
(PX/PY)E’ = TOTE’
9
Terms of Trade Effect• Part of the gains from
trade are lost due to reduction in terms of trade
• That is, the price of exports decrease due to increased supply of exportso alternatively price of
imports increases due to increased demand of imports Clothes
Paper
TOT0 TOT0
TOT1
10
Immiserizing Growth
• The reduction in terms of trade is so large that country’s welfare decreases due to increase of a factor of production / improvement in technology
Clothes
Pap
er
TOT0TOT1
Jagdish Bhagwati (1958): Immiserizing Growth: A Geometrical Note. Review of Economic Studies 25
11
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
• Definition: ownership and control of foreign capitalo An foreign investment is recorded as FDI if it
involves buying more than 10 percent of the outstanding common stock of a foreign firm
o Otherwise the investment is classified as portfolio investment
• The growth of FDI has been dramatically faster than the growth in merchandise trade during the past few decades
• Here we are studying the impact of increase in physical capital due to FDI
12
Reasons for FDI
1. Getting close to the final markets2. Access to raw materials3. Low labour cost4. Risk Diversion5. Firm-specific knowledge6. Trade policy (“getting behind the tariff
wall”)etc.
13
Analyzing FDI
• Assume two countries, two factors of production (labour and capital) and a single homogeneous good with free international movement of capital
• Assume that the marginal physical product of capital (MPPK) is decreasing (when labour is held constant)
• Remember: r=MPPKX*PX
MPPK
Capital
Note that we keep the amount of labour fixed and hence the marginal product of capital is decreasing
14
Capital Market Equilibrium: Two Countries, Free Capital Mobility
Country 1 Country 2
MP
PK
CapitalK1
r1
K2
MP
PK
r2
K2
MP
PK
r2
15
Capital Market Equilibrium: Two Countries, Free Capital Mobility
Total world capital
rA1
Country 1’s initial capital
Country 2’s initial capital
rA2
• In autarky, capital is scarce in country 1 and hence return of capital is higher than in the capital-abundant country 2
When capital movements are allowed, capital flows from 2 to 1 as long as it can get higher return in country 1
In equilibrium, capital returns must be the same in both countries, which implies that MPPK
1=MPPK2
capitalflow
Country 1:MPPK, r
Country 2:MPPK, r
r*r*
Country 1’s eq’m capital
Country 2’s eq’m capital
16
Presenting Output Geometrically
rA1
Country 1’s capital
Country 1:MPPK, r
• The amount of production depends on the amount of inputs and the marginal productivity of inputs: Y=MPPK*K+MPPL*L
• Remember what area means (e.g. area of a square is x*y)
• Thus, when we hold labour constant, we can study the effect of changes in capital on output via the area below the MPPK curve
MPPK
output
17
Effect of Capital Flows in the Two Country Model
Total world capital
rA1
Country 1’s initial capital
Country 2’s initial capital
rA2
• Country 1’s output increases more than country 2’s output decreases → World output increases as a result of more efficient use of world resources
• In country 1, capital owners lose (return on capital decreases) and labour wins (increased capital increases their productivity and hence wages)
• In country 2, the opposite occurs
o we discuss this in more detail in the part about migration of labour
Country 1:MPPK, r
Country 2:MPPK, r
r*r*
Country 1’s eq’m capital
Country 2’s eq’m capital
increase of outputin country 1
decrease of output
in country 2
increaseof worldoutput
18
Possible Benefits fromCapital Flows for the Host Country
1. Increased output and wages (as discussed already)
2. Increased employment (if excess supply of labour exists)
3. Increased exports (usually, though not necessarily the case)
4. Increased tax revenues (if feasible tax policy exits)
5. Realization of scale economies6. Technical and managerial skill spill-
offs 7. Weakening a domestic monopoly
See Appleyard and Field (around page 231) for discussion
19
Possible Disadvantages from Capital Flows for the Host Country1. Adverse terms-of-trade effect (if the country is large
enough exporter of the goods FDI flows into or due to transfer pricing)
2. Decreased domestic saving (“government relaxes its efforts to generate domestic savings”)
3. Crowding out domestic investment (domestic investors could finance multinationals rather than domestic business)
4. Instability of exchange rate (when investment flows in the currency appreciates; when profits are sent back, the currency depreciates)
5. Loss of control over domestic policy6. Increased unemployment (investment in capital-
intensive techniques)
7. New local monopolies (if multinationals run local firms out of business)
8. Inadequate attention to local education and skills
Note that many of the possible benefits & disadvantages are things that we are assuming away in our simple models. Hence we need other models to analyze these possible effects. Models suitable for analyzing some of these effects are introduced later in the course.
20
International Labour Movements
Total world labour force
wA1
Country 1’s initial employment
Country 2’s initial employment
wA2
• Assume homogeneous labour, no costs of migration, no preferences regarding the country of residence
• Then we can proceed as with capital: country 1 is labour-abundant, country 2 labour-scarce → wages are higher in country 2 → there is an incentive to move to country 2 until wages are equal
migration
Country 1:MPPL, w
Country 2:MPPL, w
w*w*
Country 1’s eq’m employment
Country 2’s eq’m employment
21
Distribution of income: a geometrical representation
w
Country 1:MPPL, w
• The amount of production depends on the amount of inputs and the marginal productivity of inputs: Y=MPPK*K+MPPL*L MPPL=(Y-MPPK*K)/L
• Competitve labour market → w=MPPL
X*PX
• Labour gets w*L, capital owners get the rest
MPPL
wages
rents
labour
22
Impact of Migration
Total world labour force
wA1
Country 1’s initial employment
Country 2’s employment
wA2
Country 2: (receiving immigrants)• wages decrease → transfer of income
from labour to capital owners• total output increases more than
what is paid to the immigrants → immigration surplus
• However, there is a decrease in per capita output (given diminishing marginal productivity)
Country 1:• wages increase → transfer of income
from capital to labour• total output decreases more than the
wage sum of those who left → immigration deficit
• But, there is a increase in per capita output (given diminishing marginal productivity)
Country 1:MPPL, w
Country 2:MPPL, w
w*w*
Country 1’s eq’m employment
Country 2’s eq’m employment
transfer from capitalto labour in country
transfer from labour to capital in country 1
gain for the immigrants
imm
igrat
ion
surp
lus
23
Factor Movements, Trade and the World Prices• Capital and labour
flows alter the factor endowments of an economy
• This can be analyzed using the methods introduced in the beginning of this lecture (growth of factor endowments / techonological change)
Capit
al in
ten
sive
pro
duct
Labour intensive product
Country 2
Country 1
Capit
al in
ten
sive
pro
duct
Labour intensive product
24
Total Effects of Growth• The total impact of changed
factor endowments depends on the combined impact on production and consumption and the possible terms-of-trade effect
• Note that you can use this framework to analyse a change in any factor of production. For example, you might assume that there are skilled and unskilled labour and all the migrants are unskilled. Then, you can put skilled labour to the y-axis instead of capital.
Clothes
Paper