group versus team vs.. individuals to group-to-group team continuum individuals group team degree of...

28
Group versus Team vs.

Upload: darrell-stevenson

Post on 26-Dec-2015

270 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Group versus Team

vs.

Page 2: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum

Individuals

Group

Team

Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration

Co

mm

on

alit

y o

f G

oa

l

Adapted from Exhibit 11.1

Page 3: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Work Team Effectiveness Model

Page 4: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Other contextual influences

• Organizational goals• Opportunities for

interaction • Psychological factors

Page 5: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Work Team Effectiveness Model

Page 6: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Types of Groups

Formal

–Command

–Project / Task

–Committee

Informal

Page 7: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Work Team Effectiveness Model

Page 8: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Structural Characteristics & Composition

• Size

• Composition

• Differentiated roles

• Differentiated status

Page 9: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Size

–Social loafing:

–Process costs:

Composition

–Homogeneous

–Heterogeneous or diverse

Structural Characteristics

Page 10: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Composition of Teams

DiversityInnovative solutions to

problemsSource of creativityHealthy level of conflict

KSA

Page 11: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Team Member Roles

Task Specialist Role· Focuses on task accomplishmentover human needs.

· Important role, but if adopted by everyone, team’s social needs won’t be met.

Dual Role· Focuses on task and people.· May be a team leader.· Important role, but not essential if members adopt task specialist and socioemotional roles.

Nonparticipator Role· Contributes little to either task orpeople needs of team.

· Not an important role-if adopted by too many members, team will disband.

Socioemotional Role· Focuses on people needs ofteam over task.

· Important role, but if adopted by everyone, team’s tasks won’t be accomplished.

High

HighLow

Low

Member Social Behavior

MemberTask

Behavior

Page 12: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Structural Characteristics

Role ambiguity

Role conflict

Status

Page 13: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Work Team Effectiveness Model

Page 14: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Team Processes

FormingForming StormingStorming NormingNorming PerformingPerforming

Indicates progression

Adapted from Exhibit 11.4

Page 15: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Case

What stage of

development is this

group in?

Page 16: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Norms

Acceptable standards shared by a group’s members

Page 17: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Members observe the behavior of

others to determine what is appropriate

Members observe the behavior of

others to determine what is appropriate

Norm is establishedNorm is established

Suggested behavior is tolerated even though

disagree with

Suggested behavior is tolerated even though

disagree with

Dissenting member withdraws from groupDissenting member

withdraws from group

New behavior is suggested

New behavior is suggested

Members decide if any past experience

can contribute effective behaviors

Members decide if any past experience

can contribute effective behaviors

Group members

meet

Group members

meet

Members agree on behavior

Members agree on behavior

Members disagree on

behavior

Members disagree on

behavior

Development of Group Norms

Adapted from Exhibit 11.6

Page 18: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Development of Norms

• Early behaviors

• Imported behaviors

• Critical events

• Effects?

Page 19: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Team Cohesiveness

Degree to which team members are attracted to the team and motivated to remain in it

High cohesiveness is attractive feature of team

Page 20: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Positive effects

Increased quality and quantity of group interactions

Strengthened adherence to group norms

Increased effectiveness in achieving group goals

Augmented individual satisfaction with group membership

Positive effects

Increased quality and quantity of group interactions

Strengthened adherence to group norms

Increased effectiveness in achieving group goals

Augmented individual satisfaction with group membership

Negative effects

Useful or creative ideas may be ignored if they deviate from established norms or values

Increased probability of developing groupthink

Potential decrease in intergroup cooperation

Counterproductive norms may be emphasized

Negative effects

Useful or creative ideas may be ignored if they deviate from established norms or values

Increased probability of developing groupthink

Potential decrease in intergroup cooperation

Counterproductive norms may be emphasized

Adapted from Exhibit 11.7

Effects of Group Cohesion

Page 21: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Conflict

• Antagonistic interaction in which one party attempts to thwart the intentions or goals of another●Inevitable ●Intergroup / Intragroup●Positive / Negative

Page 22: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Types of Conflict

•Task

•Process

•Relationship

Page 23: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Case

What type of conflict

would you expect in

this group?

What would be the

impact of the conflict?

Page 24: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Work Team Effectiveness Model

Page 25: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

• Desired Productive Output• Satisfaction

–Cooperation–Feelings

Characteristics of Highly Effective Groups

Page 26: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Managers’ Responsibilities

• Develop appropriate group structures

• Develop appropriate support from the organization

• Obtain appropriate coaching and consultation assistance

Adapted from Exhibit 11.11

Page 27: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Case

As team leader,

what would you do

know?

Page 28: Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of

Self Assessment: How good are you at building and leading a team?