group 1, 2, 3 & 4. while baines and staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator...

11
CHAPTER 2, QUESTION 1 Group 1, 2, 3 & 4

Upload: karen-powers

Post on 17-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

CHAPTER 2, QUESTION 1

Group 1, 2, 3 & 4

Page 2: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

PROMPT

Page 3: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

SIMPLISTIC CRITICISM

While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism of constructivism is far too simplistic.

Research does indicate that using constructivist methods in isolation is not effective; however, it does not mean that all constructivist ideas and methods are “mindless” or “hegemonic”.

Page 4: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

BALANCE OF METHODS

Using any theoretical methodology in isolation would not be effective because variety of teaching methods, assessment, and instruction is the most effective.

Page 5: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

THEORIES Below are some of the most famous

constructivist thinkers and their theories

John Dewey (Social Activism Theory) Albert Bandura (Social Cognitive) Lev Vygotsky (Scaffolding Theory) Jean Piaget (Theory of Cognitive

Development)

Page 6: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

WHY CONSTRUCTIVISM IN PRACTICE IS NOT ALL “MINDLESS”

With research, it is clear that very little information from these theories promote the use of consistent teacher directed instruction.

The following slides will provide brief information that demonstrates some of the useful elements of constructivism.

Page 7: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

SOCIAL ACTIVISM THEORY

Individual growth comes from social experiences

Promotes hands-on

activities connected to real world issues

Curriculum should

connect directly to students’ interests

Page 8: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY Learning comes

from interactions Students learn

from actions and observations

Students learn

through models (teachers and students)

Page 9: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

SCAFFOLDING THEORY

Supports learning through scaffolding, or helping children build on what they already know.

Page 10: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT

Learning as a developmental process

Promotes active learning

Building on prior knowledge

Page 11: Group 1, 2, 3 & 4.  While Baines and Staley’s stance that having the teacher as a facilitator is an effective method for instruction, their criticism

CONCLUSION

Although Baines and Stanley make the point that consistent use of constructivist methods can lead to overuse of directed instruction, they fail to see some of the useful constructivist ideas.

Social interaction Hands-on learning Modelled learning Scaffolding

There needs to be a balance of methodologies used