ground-based secondary eclipse detection of ogle-tr-56

20
Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56 David Sing Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Mercedes Lopez-Morales Carnegie Institution of Washington

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

David SingInstitut d’Astrophysique de Paris

Mercedes Lopez-MoralesCarnegie Institution of Washington

Page 2: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Overview• Introduction

motivation & theory

• Observations VLT & Magellan

• Analysis & Discussion interpretation of results

• Conclusions

Page 3: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Introduction• Revolution with Spitzer anti-transit measurements (Deming 05; Charbonneau 05; Knutson 07, ect.)

• Past ground-based attempts (Knutson 07; Deming 07; Snellen 05; Snellen & Corvino 07, ect.)-near-IR, difficult to do precision photometry

• Lopez-Morales & Seager (2007)- Significant optical flux for very-hot Jupiters Teff ~ 2500 - 3000 K

- precision optical photometry easier than in near-IR

Page 4: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Prediction• Lopez-Morales & Seager (2007) ; z’ band

- Thermal Emission or Reflected light f = re-radiation factor AB = Bond albedo

Page 5: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Prediction• Lopez-Morales & Seager (2007)

Page 6: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Prediction• Lopez-Morales & Seager (2007)

< 0.5 mmag for Ogle-Tr-56

Page 7: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

ObservationsChallenges for Ogle-Tr-56

1) Faint (V=16.56); harder to reach necessary precision; 0.01% 108 photons/1 hour

2) Small signal; secondary eclipse depth of < 0.05%

3) Crowded Field toward galactic center

Page 8: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Observations

Page 9: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

ObservationsVLT 8.2 m Magellan 6.5m

July 2, 2008FORS2 camera

August 3, 2008MagIC-E2Vframe transfer

Z band

Page 10: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Observations

• Aperture photometry

• Remove systematic errors with• SysRem algorithm (Tamuz et al. 05)• multiple linear regression (xposs, yposs, fwhm, airmass)

Page 11: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Analysis

Page 12: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

• ~1 mmag/min• red-noise estimated with “prayer-bead” method

VLTMagellan

σ2depth = σ2

w/N + σ2red

Analysis

σred = 1.1× 10−4

σred = 4× 10−5

VLT

Magellan

Page 13: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

• ~1 mmag/min• red-noise estimated with “prayer-bead” method

VLTMagellan

σ2depth = σ2

w/N + σ2red

Analysis

σred = 1.1× 10−4

σred = 4× 10−5

VLT

Magellan

0.05%

Page 14: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Analysis

Page 15: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

-0.002 0 0.0020

5

10

15

Differential Flux

Normalized Flux Histogram

Analysis

In eclipse Out of eclipse

0.036% lower flux for points in eclipse

Page 16: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Total Eclipse Depth = 0.0363% ± 0.0091%

Analysis

VLT Eclipse Depth = 0.037% ± 0.016% χ2 = 0.90 Magellan Eclipse Depth = 0.036% ± 0.011% χ2 = 0.93

Ogle-TR-56binned

Reference s

νν

Page 17: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Analysis

• Consistent with circular orbit

Page 18: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Analysis

• Teff = 2718±117 K

• Low albedo

• instant re-radiation f > 0.47

Black Body

Page 19: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Non-black body Models• Teff = 2718±117 K (black body)

• Low albedo

• low redistribution f > 0.47

Hubeny 03

• Can not distinguish between models with and without TiO

With TiONo TiO

Page 20: Ground-based Secondary Eclipse detection of Ogle-Tr-56

Conclusions• Ground-based secondary eclipse detected for Ogle-Tr-56

• HOT Dayside temperature; 2718±117 K

• Recirculation and Albedo are consistent with pM class planets

• Do Not have precision to distinguish between models blackbody, with/wo TiO

• Other optical wavelengths and/or near-IR needed

• Other very-hot Jupiters can be detected in z’