gronstal anderson, ingrid, pal case study plant-wide applicability limit for campus air compliance,...

25
PAL Case Study: Plant-Wide Applicability Limit for Campus Air Compliance Ingrid M. Gronstal Anderson, J.D. University of Iowa

Upload: kevin-perry

Post on 22-Jan-2017

93 views

Category:

Environment


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

PAL Case Study: Plant-Wide Applicability Limit for Campus Air Compliance

Ingrid M. Gronstal Anderson, J.D.

University of Iowa

Agenda

• University of Iowa campus overview

• PAL permit basics

• University of Iowa PAL

• Innovation example: Biomass fuel project

University of Iowa

University of Iowa

• Located in Iowa City, IA • Southeast Iowa

• Population 70,000

• Enrollment of 31,000 undergraduate and graduate students

• 1700 acre main campus, 298 major buildings

• Oakdale campus research park • Located 10 minutes away from the main campus in Coralville

• Research facilities

Campus Community

• Many departments and activities on campus contribute to complexity in environmental compliance • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

• Life-safety requirements for generators

• Research facilities

• Classrooms and dormitories • Teaching equipment (e.g. art kiln)

• Museums

• Building maintenance

• Servers/backup power

University of Iowa Utilities Campus Utilities include: Main Power Plant, Oakdale Renewable Energy Plant, 4 Chilled Water Plants, and Water Treatment Plant

Existing air quality programs

• 456 emission sources on campus

• Title V Operating permit for entire campus • Major source

• Main Campus and Oakdale campus treated as one facility

• Construction permits required for all sources unless specifically exempted

• MACT, NSPS, NESHAPS

• GHG reporting

PSD Challenges

• Major facility for PSD

• Difficult to predict permitting costs, timeline

• Equipment modification/replacement uncertainty

• Project aggregation uncertainty

• Synthetic minor status creates operational constraints

• Justification of BACT for state-funded institution is difficult

• Expanding biomass/renewable fuels is a priority

PAL Advantages

• Increase operational flexibility/certainty • Streamlined project management

• Construct or modify sources without going through PSD applicability analysis

• Transition to biomass fuels with fewer permitting hurdles

• Optimal operation of sources based on campus needs while still protecting campus air quality

• Streamlined permitting process

• Option to amend limits previously taken for synthetic minor purposes

PAL Basics • Alternate NSR compliance method

• Part of 2002 NSR Reform rules • 40 CFR 52.21(aa)

• Permit for each criteria pollutant

• Sets cap for criteria pollutant actual emissions. Facility must stay below cap for 10 years

• 10-year permit • renew at permit expiration

• If no renewal, must proportion set cap across existing units

PAL Basics

• Baseline is calculated from a representative 2-year period within the last 10 years from the permit application date • Baseline calculation and emissions cap calculation specified in the rules

• Must stay below facility-wide emission cap • Cap is 12-month rolling average tons/year of each pollutant

• Monthly emissions tracking • Must track monthly emissions from all sources to compare facility-wide

emissions to cap.

University of Iowa PAL permits

• Effective March 24, 2016

• Seven permits total: PM, PM2.5, PM10, CO, NOx, SO2, VOC

Pollutant Abbreviation Capped Emission Level

(tpy)

Particulate Matter (≤ 2.5 µm) PM2.5 85.9

Particulate Matter (≤ 10 µm) PM10 97.72

Particulate Matter PM 111.51

Sulfur Dioxide SO2 1602.97

Nitrogen Oxides NOx 751.84

Volatile Organic Compounds VOC 172.75

Carbon Monoxide CO 444.73

Monthly Monitoring • 99% of emissions come from small

subset of sources. • Prioritize these sources in monthly

monitoring methods. • CEMS, flowmeters, real time data from PI

data historian • Stack testing aligned with existing

requirements

• Small sources • Many sources but small percentage of

emissions • Worked with IDNR to develop emission

factors • Stack test or AP-42/worst case

• Work with IT, Energy Control Center to develop monthly tracking database and emission calculation reports

Additional PAL Considerations

• Unit-specific requirements remain • Construction permit terms

• NSPS, NESHAPS, MACT

• Construction Permitting • Construction permits still required for new sources

• Interaction with Title V Program • Campus air sources that were previously insignificant become significant due

to “applicable requirement”

PAL Collaboration • Collaboration with IDNR key to success of permit process

• Complexity of campus sources and permit novelty required significant time and effort from UI and IDNR to develop permits

2020 Vision - The University of Iowa's Sustainability Targets

1. Achieve Net-negative Energy Growth

2. Green Our Energy Portfolio

Consume less energy on campus in 2020 than consumed in 2010 despite projected growth

Achieve the goal of 40% renewable energy consumption on the campus by 2020

4,000,000 MMBtu per year

4,000,000 MMBtu per year

Biomass Fuel Portfolio

• Industrial byproducts:

• Current: oat hulls • Future: energy pellets, cardboard recycling sludge, scrap from

furniture making

• Wood chips:

• Current/past: timber stand improvement, pallet remanufacture

• Future: opportunity wood, short rotation woody crops

• Energy grasses:

• Current development: Miscanthus

• Future: prairie and switchgrass

Densified biomass

Fuel pellets make use of non-recyclable industrial byproducts

Partnering with UI Chemistry Department to

quantify emissions changes

PROFITABILTY

• ~15% of land within Iowa fields not profitable in corn

ENVIRONMENT

• Planting ~15% of land within Iowa fields to diverse perennials provides disproportionate environmental benefit

ENERGY

• Planting ~15% of land within Iowa fields to perennial high-yielding energy crops provides enough biomass

Slide courtesy of Dr. Emily Heaton, Iowa State University

Science-based Trials of Rowcrops Integrated with Prairie Strips www.prairiestrips.org

Slide courtesy of Matt Helmers, Iowa State University.

(Helmers, M.J., et al., Sediment removal by perennial filter strips in row-cropped ephemeral watersheds. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2012. 41(5): p. 1531-1539.)

Ph

oto

cre

dit

: Jo

se G

uti

erre

z

Summary

• Innovative permit unique in the state of Iowa

• Collaboration with IDNR essential to project success

• Increases project planning certainty

• Allows U of Iowa to develop innovative strategies to provide reliable utilities service to campus, ensure campus air compliance, and pursue cutting edge renewable energy solutions

Thank you

Ingrid M. Gronstal Anderson, J.D. University of Iowa

(319) 384-0993 [email protected]