grid-connected renewable energy...energy toolkit – variety of mechanisms to provide ta → this...
TRANSCRIPT
1a
Grid-Connected Renewable Energy
Pam Baldinger Energy Team
Office of Infrastructure and EngineeringU.S. Agency for International Development
Infrastructure Training Course December 2009
Why Should We Care?
• Clean Energy earmark and climate change funding → increased emphasis on renewables
• Increased interest from USAID countries• Increased interest from some US ambassadors
• Energy Team Response: – Grid-Connected RenewableEnergy Toolkit– Variety of mechanisms to provide TA→ This presentation can help you identify potential areas to focus TA
• Solar • Geothermal• Biomass• Wind energy• Hydroelectric
RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
COMMON RENEWABLE ENERGY GOALS & OBJECTIVES
• Energy independence• Environmental
benefits• Resource diversity• Electricity price
stabilization • Economic
development
KEY BARRIERS
• High capital costs• Utility culture &
framework• Lack of expertise• Limitations on private
sector investment• Lack of transmission
access • Weak grid
Context: Global Renewable Energy Production
DOE Estimates: Slight increase in renewable share, mostly from hydro and wind
Trends: Global Investment in Renewable Energy
ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST OF NEW GENERATION
Trends: cost of all generation is increasingwind is the most competitive of the renewableslarge range in costs for many technologies
LEVELIZED ENERGY COSTS OF VARIOUS POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES
Source: Lazard (June 2008)
Results: Energy efficiency is the most cost-effective investmentRenewable plant costs are comparable to or lower than conventional plants when operating costs are taken into account
Solar plant costs are at the high end of the renewable spectrum
LEVELIZED COST ($/MWh)
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION COSTS
Chart data based on McKinsey, Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve v.2, Jan 2009.
small hydrogeothermal
nuclear
Wind (low
penetration)
Solar CSPSolar PV Wind
(high penetration)
Biomass co-firing
Coal CCS (new build)
Coal CCS (retrofit)
Gas CCS (Retrofit)
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
-5 0 5 10 15 20
Aba
tem
ent C
ost (
$/to
n)
Abatement Potential (GtCO2e/year)
Renewables and nuclear have the lowest estimated carbon mitigation costs
RENEWABLE RESOURCELOAD PROFILES
They’re not all the same!• Baseload power
generation– Hydro– Geothermal– Biomass
• Variable power generation– Solar (PV)– Wind
• May be peaking or dispatchable– Concentrated solar
Take Home Points
• Cost of renewables is virtually all upfront, but long-term benefits are significant
• Project development/construction time can be significant (2-8 years)
• Key, therefore, is finding ways to reduce or spread out costs and attract financing
• Private-sector often plays a critical role – for financing and project development (IPP)
STRATEGIES TO ENCOURAGE DEPLOYMENT
• Promote market development
• Support utility RE procurement
• Encourage private investment
• Provide long-term contracts
• Value RE attributes• Facilitate access to
electricity grid• Train RE designers and
operators
GOVERNMENT AND RE
Governments lay the foundation for RE deployment via:
• Legislation
• Regulatory structure
• Administrative oversight of the energy sector
COMMON TECHNOLOGY DEPLOYMENT POLICIES
• Feed-in tariffs (FIT)
• Mandatory targets:– Renewable
Portfolio Standards (RPS)
– Renewable Energy Standards (RES)
• Hybrid approaches
COMPARISON OF FIT AND RPS POLICIES
FIT system benefits:• Quicker market
development• Supports diverse group
of resources• Certainty of cost• Flexible• Lower transaction cost• Ease of financing• Ease of entry
Mandate system (RPS) benefits:
• Promotes least-cost resources• Certainty of quantity
– sets upper limits• Perceived to be more market
based• Better integration into supply
infrastructure
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000 19
90
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Meg
awat
tsPOLICY EXPERIENCE
CASE STUDY: INDIA
• Currently 3rd largest wind market in the world
• State-level feed-in tariffs are supporting rapid development
• Strong domestic market led to leading global turbine manufacturer, Suzlon
Cumulative capacity →
Annual installations ↓
2008: 9,645 MW
POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
The Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) specifies terms and conditions of payment
• Critical component for IPP financing• Typical term: 15-25 years• Sets prices for energy and capacity payments• Can be used in either RPS or FIT regimes• Pro forma PPA lays out standard terms and
conditions in a competitive tendering process
FINANCIAL INCENTIVE POLICIES
Subsidy-related
Capital subsidies
Grants
Rebates
Public investment
• Low-interest loans
• Loan guarantees
Tax-related
Tax credits
Tax rebates
Tax reductions
Accelerated depreciation allowance
TAX INCENTIVES AND INVESTMENT COSTS
100%
85%92%
75%
96%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Base: 10%ITC, 5-yrMACRS
30% ITC, 5-yrMACRS
Base + PropTax Exclusion
Base + SalesTax Exclusion
All
Impact of Incentives (IPP Financing)
Source: NREL – Sargent & Lundy Report
IMPACT OF FINANCIAL VARIABLES
Private-Taxable BondUtility Purchase70:30 Debt-to-Equity
Private-Commercial DebtPublic-Private Partnership65:35 Debt-to-Equity
Private-Dev Bank DebtPrivate-Tax Exempt Bond75:25 Debt-to-Equity
PPA Price (cents/kWh)
Mod
ified
Inte
rnal
Rat
e of
Ret
urn
(MIR
R)
Source: Black & Veatch
Financial details can have an 8 - 12 cent effect on the ultimate cost of energy from any given plant
TRANSMISSION ISSUES
• Sufficiency• Rules for access• Cost allocation
- Costs can be born by consumers, developers or both
- Most efficient to plan for an entire region/corridor
• Grid integration- Cooperation among regional utilities eases integration
GETTING ALONG WITH THE NEIGHBORS/AVOIDING NIMBY
Giraffes, zebras, and geothermal power plant
BEST PRACTICES
• Develop stable policy environment & framework– Identify responsible agencies– Develop supporting policies and regulations
• transmission planning and access policies• market development policies • pricing & cost-sharing policies• long-term PPA provisions
• Develop and implement enforcement provisions• Monitor & report on progress toward goals• Fine-tune policies prospectively while maintaining
framework stability