green technology economic and environmental benefits from i ct

8/12/2019 Green Technology Economic and Environmental Benefits From i Ct

1/42

G T :D E E B

ICT

A


2/42

G T : D E

2 P

W E F ,

T A

GW E F

A A

A BA

A

& E B ICT

T G

.

J 2009 .


3/42

P 3

B 2007 IT & T I P P , ICT . W

2% , ICT . S

ICT , .

T ( ) , ( )

, .

T , ICT

. T : B A : ; G B I : S , I , A P

I ; M P : .

M ICT

. A ICT , ICT .

W , , . M ,

ICT ICT B .

F ICT ICT

.


4/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

4 P

.................................................................................................................................................. 3

B .............................................................................................................................................. 5

I B .......................................................................................................... 7 A F B IC G C .................................................................. 8

T B A V .................................................................... .............................................................. ................... 8 T ICT L D I ................................................................................................................................... 21 T M ................................................................... ............................................................... ................. 22

E I ........................................................................................................ 24

C .............................................................................................................................................. 25

.............................................................................................................................................. 26

B ........................................................................................................................................... 27

A 1: B A : IC A E ................................................................... 28 A II: G B I & G IC : H A ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ . 38

G B I B ................................................................... ............................................................. 38 G ICT B ............................................................... ................................................................ ............................ 39

A III: C : IC G F ................................................................... 41 WEF F B A A ...................................................................................................................... 41 WEF F ICT L I ............................................................ ................................................... ... 41 WEF F M .......................................................................... ......................................................... . 42


5/42

P 5

T 2007, , NGO . T

T C ICT C C M D . I , G IT T I .

, , .

B &I

S , ,

I :

,

.

E I , .

ET

,

CA &

S ,

.

% %

G /HP/M K /WWF 1


6/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

6 P

ICT

I EE DC

ED

S ,

. S

.

T G CEO

ICT .

T ICT

.


7/42

M IT

ICT, , IT D

O ICT

. T

.

ICT

, , ,

.

T ICT ICT

G IT , . ; .

.

G IT

,

. I , , ,

, GPS , , ,

ICT ,

, . B

CEO , CIO CFO

,

ICT

ICT . I

.

P 7

,

,

ICT ,

.

,

. T

,


8/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

8 P

T IC .

T : B A : ; G B I : S , I , A P

I ; M P : .

Holistic Framework for Green ICT

P IT

. W , , ,

T B M , F , HR, IT O

.

E :

B T .

C T V C

D P .

D D , , T G

BusinessOperations

Service &Support

Manufacturing& Distribution

Sales &Marketing

InfrastructureApplication

Process

Strategy


9/42

P 9

&

T

.

E :

F T ,

/ .

O , C C T

D V I .

C B S B O / .

T ,

, .

E :

T

.

R G B .

P

.

T ICT ,

.

E :


10/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

10 P

EMC

. I EMC 650

CO2 . I EMC

.

I ICT

I .

T . I , ( ) ICT ( ) , ( ) ICT

G F .


11/42

P 11

B F

( ) M

. O

A T ICT ICT ,

, , 12% . 18

T

1.68G CO2 2020 30 T ICT

7% . 30 A C D P (CDP), ''U.S.

. O 47% S&P 500

CDP , 72% FT 500.''. 29

A UK R I C S (2002) UK 18

1.5% GDP . 47

S , B E M S

(BEMS), 5% 40%.55

A S ( )

4

S 20 E . 47

A D T 100 5%

.

39 A H

25 50% . 47

A 2006 E T NO A W W F

20 E U (EU)

F I

C I

M H

I B

B &I

S M

S EM

S EP

CA &

D

Financial ServicesCommunications

& High Tech

Products

Public Sector

Resources

Low Medium High

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

E I

E I

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H H H H H H H H H


12/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

12 P

, , 2010; 22 10

48 A B E A $102

, $17 ( 2 ) . 47

16% , 5% . 18

E A S O P E D I I T N G E


13/42

P 13

&

S

. T

.

O

B

A 300,000 25%

. T 0.9 M CO2 . 55

I ICT 970M CO2 2020 30

A 20 ,230 240

. 47 P 24% 2002 30 P ICT

2G CO2 2020 55 I I 32%

30 R D C L

G UK S C 80 CO2

, . T UK

CO2 14,000 , EU

160,000 32 T U.S.

480 , 500 2.9 1982 2005. 48

T $78 U.S. 4.2 48

T I I 412 . I

15% 3.3% . 47

F I

C I

L H

I B

S B &I

SM

S EM

S EP

C A & V M

D


& High Tech

Products

Public Sector

Resources

Low Medium High

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

E I

E I H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H H H H H H H H H


14/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

14 P

E A

S B C M ,

V .


15/42

P 15

&

C

H S & M

F P L

M

A A ,

206.3 (187 M ) 55

D CO2 0.42M CO2 CD . T

4.3 M CO2 4.7 M CO2

. 55 I , US ,

1.5

(140 2) 1 (942). C CO2

20 M CO2. 55 I US 1 1.65

. I 5 , 2.63

M CO2 . 55 A . 20

. A

16 1. 55

I 2006, E B2C ( , )

$182 . W 34% 2006 2010 ,

, $578 2010. 55 B US E , B2B

( ) 87%

E $2.2 US. 55

F I

C I

M H

I B

SB &

I

SM

S EM

SE

P

CA &

D


& High Tech

Products

Public Sector

Resources

Low Medium H igh

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

E I

E I H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H H H H H H H H H


16/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

16 P

R TIAX C , M ., 3.9 S 840 ,

14 48 I ,

50% ,

, ) . 47

E A

A P P I

E


17/42

P 17

M .

D H

M

S

S S

.

A A

( , ,

, , , )

. 41 I 37% CO2

. C 30% 80%

. 32 E (

) 5% 20%. 55 U WBCSD 2030

ICT 3%, 20% 40% 2030. U

GHG 57, 380 760 M CO2 .

55

P 20 30% , 50%. 55

E 0.6K CO2 , 0.003K

. 32 T

20 2006 38 2009. 32

T 2030 , US $100

, 2,000 5,100 M CO2 . 55

F I

C I

L M H

I B

B &I

E E

C A & V M

D


& High Tech

Products

Public Sector

Resources

Low Medium High

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

E

I

E I

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H H H H H H H H H


18/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

18 P

T 14% 30 O ICT 16% 2

. 30 V 2005 $3.5 30 L 23% 2002 2020 E 30

80% UK 5 30 S 100 26% 28%

30 T (2 )

33 ($52 ) E . 30 ICT SCM ( ) 1.1%

2020. 18

E A

S B O A ( I (W , F C , G T ) I MRP ERP R CAD/CAM E ( )


19/42

P 19

S F S

C H T . S

H 12 18 ICT

O

A 18% PC

13% , 700,000 CO2 (

). 46 C

175,000 20,000 46 42% E

ICT . 46 A IDC, 80% IT

U S IT, 2009 IT $25

. 32 I U.S 61

2006. T

5.8 U.S . 32

T , 1.2 , 8.4

48 A ,

, 75

. 48 T 20

, IT , 6 . 40

T $500 , $150 ,

. T IT $1 . 40

B 2000 2006, , 25,000 . 40

F I

C I

M H

I B

S B &I

SM

S EM

SE P

C A & V M

D


& High Tech

Products

Public Sector

Resources

Low Medium High

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

E I

E I H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H H H H H H H H H H


20/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

20 P

W , 500 3 , 10 . 40

A G , 15 W (2005) 52 W ( 2011),

. 24

A U I , 3 1 1.5 . A 2012

22:1 3:1 . 24 A 60 70%

. 24 8.4% . 35

E A

D D V ( ) E P A N C ,


21/42

P 21

W ,

T

.

W ICT , ICT . T ICT

98% ICT .

T :

T ,

. B , ICT

.

,

F ,

. M ICT

.

A B . B ,

ICT

I IT ,

( ) ,

.

S . W

,

Strategy

Process

Application

Infrastructure

BusinessOperations Service & Support

Manufacturing Sales & Marketing


Process

Manufacturing& Distribution

BusinessOperations

Service &Support

Sales &Marketing

Strategy


22/42

G T : D E

22 P

,

T

T

B H

I ( I )

H

I ( I )

I

I

CO2 (

) (

T

, ICT

BusinessOperations Servi ce & Support

Manufacturing Sales & Marketing


ProcessStrategy

& E B ICT

A

.

. W ,

:

ICT ( ,

.

,

O2 .

ICT . A P U E , CPU U ,

, . I

ICT CO2

).

, . M

ICT . T

. W

E

.

ICT. T

,

.

ICT

)

,

CO2

ICT

.


23/42

P 23

E :

R T

T

/

M

E E

D /L O / C ( / / )


24/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

24 P

T IC ICT . E , ,

ROI .

Phased approach to implementation of the framework

I ,

, , . T

.

Implementongoing

monitoring

Implement ICT inthe business toreduce overallenvironmental

impact

Assessopportunities for

ICT to improvebusinessefficiency

Perform detailedanalysis of high

impact areas

Identify areas withgreatest

environmentalimpact

Narrowing the scopeof the problem

Organisations need toknow where to lookwhen assessing thereduction ofenvironmental impact

Identify high impactbusiness areas forfurther analysis

Management need tofocus effort onaddressing high impactproblem areas

The highest impactareas are assessed inmore detail tounderstand their effect

All opportunities to useICT to reduceenvironmental impactof the problem areaneed considered

Projects should bescoped and costed inenvironmental and $terms

Implementation mustbe carefully managedand tracked to ensurethe environmental and$ case is delivered

Projects are deliveredand tracked againstbusiness casesthrough clear benefitsmanagement

Effects of the chosenaction must bemonitored and newopportunities identifiedand addressed

An ongoingmeasurementframework is put inplace to determinetrend improvements

Identification of whereto focus detailedanalysis

Details of where in thehigh impact divisionremedial action shouldbe taken

Scoped and costedproject portfolio

Measurableimprovements inenvironmental impact

Regular reportspresented toleadership level

1 2 3 4 5

O u

t p u

t

A c

t i v

i t y

R a

t i o n a

l e


25/42

P 25

J L L S ,

, I

,

U.S.$500,000 .

T ; M D (M&D), S S (S&

M (S&M) B O (BO). T , .

A

.

T

.

T ICT . N

, . T ICT ,

. ICT ,

. B ICT ICT .

RelativeProfit

Relative ICT Spend

Relative Growth

RelativeEmissions

Re-assess Discuss

Ad dress Pro gress C u r r e n

t I C T E f f e c

t i v e n e s s

H i g h

L o w

Future ICT Effectiveness

Low High

M&DS&S

S&M

BO

Size indicatingrelative emission

levels

Baseline

Sh ort M edium Lo ng

RelativeEnvironmenta

l Impact

Time

Benchmark Analyse BenefitAssess


26/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

26 P

T , , , A

M , A , BT, CA, C , EMC, G , HP, M , SAS, S WWF.

A .

1 T ICT C C M : W E F , 2002 ICT I . M S . C I

A D C . 20053 L C IT S : C CO2

IT . HP E S P . HP. 2008.4 E M C S , OSI5 A E I T : T I L C

S . . L , J , E M , K . 2007. A C E E (ACEEE).

6 T H B , L C F : T O R G G E . V 1.0. M , K., J , G., B , D

C , J. C R7 A G : H ,

. T CEO C . 2008.8 M E S .

:// . . / / / / .9 S 2020: E . T C G

G SI. 2008.

A

A IOM S P S I G IT G D , M E R , 19 S 2008, G .

B F CA ROI O E M CA.

C V E S I 27 USD$500 USD$2 ,

4 D C :// . . / E A U G, L ( ),

125,000 1,000 B , G .

F C W E & G B C T PG C S A , A M , A , CA, C

G , M


27/42

P 27

1. ACEEE H ICT 2. ACEEE A E I T : T I L C C S3. ACPI A C P I S

4. ADL E C 5. A B A C C : W W B D C I6. A D. L E C O T E C B 7. BT C BT: R , 8. BT M S R A C R9. C D P C D P R 2008: S&P 50010. C I D E R I E E ?11. CERA G E S T 203012. CERA C ? T 13. CERA T E S14. C R T H , : T 15. C T B C F F E W R16. EICTA A I C T17. E & Y G G : S 18. E C ICT B ICT M I : ICT 19. E C A S E E : C ICT C E , S E V ?20. F T D O G IT S21. F I W T 200722. F T G IT S23. F F C F : R 203024. F S & K E E I D C25. G D E V IT26. G A G L C E L ICT S , G 27. G A A : D A IT C28. G D E V IT29. G E S IT: U.S. B S L F E30. G SI & T C G S 2020: E 31. G B C T G G : A F 32. HP ECO C CO2 IT 33. HSBC T C C M 200834. IDC T G IT35. IDC D 36. IDC T G IT: F IDC' US G IT 37. IPTS T ICT 38. K G C : U IT A A E E39. L B T B C C40. M K D : H 41. M K U : A R M I ' A L42. N I C G T 2025: A T W43. NDRC, P R C C ' N C C P44. O W M G IT R : C P I S V D

E D C45. O U S 46. P S

TICT CO2

47. T E C A S E : C ICT C E , S E V ?48. T CEO C A S 49. IPTS T ICT E S50. T M W 51. UK CEED F S : ICT E 52. UK G S R : T E C C53. U N U R : H

54. U I F M D C "G "55. WWF T IT CO2 56. WWF S


28/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

28 P

1

B A

E D B

I

.

R

U

R

E

D

L

I

U

.

R

T

R

CO2 . G

G I ,

R

D

R ,

R


29/42

P 29

B C

D

T , 6

E V S , G C ,

.

E V ,

, . G

. E ( )

. I , E V

.

ICA

M E S

. 8

B I I . U.S.

, , , . O

B $88.3 .

A , .B B

. B

, B . I

$90.3 , $2 .

D T 5

A , 10 ,

20 . I 50%

ES 2020 9 M

44% ,

80%. A 2020 60

M CO2 2020.

& F L IT

CO2 IT 3

A 30

, 23


30/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

30 P

A

E D B

I

,

.

S

C

T

R

, ,

S , ,

R

T V IP R

U

A

.


31/42

P 31

& C

D

E T

5

A ,

. A 30 , 3 ;

37 . S ,

.

V T ' " " E S A, I 27

. O 5 2000 2005 E .

T , ,

, ,

; .

I E 2.1 E

500 E , 4

T ,

6

EME E M , UK. A150 469 P 1 5

, EME ,

, $A270,0006 . T $A 40 1

. I , 38,000 150 (H & J 2001).

G L IT

CO2

IT 3

S C C 80 CO2 , ,

D A G : H

,

7

I 2007, S ( UK )

.


32/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

32 P

& A

E D B

A

T

I

A ,

R ,

D

P

I

I

/

D

. R

E

A ,

,

R

. R


33/42

P 33

& C D

& F T , 6

B C C ( ?) (PPT)

T . T B W C P L , 15 30

, . T $1 .

T , 6

I M ,

. MI T T S L (MITTS)

, . T

T , 6

C S , ,

. S ,

20%. T A C 16% .

IC L IT

CO2

IT 3

R

.A

90.

DV S I J 2007, S J A

2 T S , 166 CD . S , CD ( ) 1,000 . I

, N Y LA.

L . A CD

60 . I 36 (

605,000 CD ), A T S 275 CD

.

L IT

CO2 IT 3

A H 2.43 K 24 . T 58

. A L T

H S E .


34/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

34 P

D A E D B

B F

I

,

S

I

. G

R

A ED

(

)

I

R

I ( , F C ,

G )

A ,

R

I

E

I

,

R

CAD/CA

U ,

R

E

()

I

R


35/42

P 35

D C D

A ICT W S I 1

A ICT 10% 50%,

100% .I 1 3

, .

B L IT

CO2 IT 3

A , H

. T

11.3

L IT

CO2 IT 3

S . O

HP 250 , 4,000 CO2

B W 4 A US

.

D , . I

, ,

.

T

. A

. A .

T $50

.


36/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

36 P

G IC A E D B

D R . T

/ , ,

R

D

R

. S (

)

R

,

(

)

I

.V

.

R

E

R

. P , CPU

R

R

R

,

A

R

. R .

R

R

R . O

VOIP, E .

R

C ,

A

C

.S , ERP

.

R


37/42

P 37

G IC C

D

ES 2020 9 M

44% ,

80%. T 2020

60 M CO2 2020.

D T 5

A , 10 ,

20 . I 50

.

D I M 2006, U L 70% 24/7. T

.

B 2006 2007, 2% 3% PA.

S S G 7 P U I U S , 69,000

, 19,000 7,400 500 . P (IT)

, .

S , , P

20 . T 35 .

S S G 7 U , EMC 1,357

231 , ( , ) $4.6 (

67 ) 3,159,726 CO2 .

A V S B 13 , V W $20

T ' ,

, . T 18

' 2,400 , .


38/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

38 P

&

T B I G ICT.

E I B D E T

65 C 2

P 6% 14%

2 B I $334,628 1

$50,000 $4M E C : E 12%; S 45%;

10%E E

I A $10 $120

$10 , ,

.C 26%

33%

11% 3

D 13 $9

10 A

2,500 S


39/42

P 39

D G ICT , . T

ICT .

A F E & E

M

S 10% 10 20%.

D I . T

1:3 ( 3 ).

N 1:1. 50%

I .

H D , ,

15% 35% 20%.

D ,

I D .

S : 5 15%PC : 10 20%D : 20 40%N S : 60 80%

R 5% 20% 5 50% .

T .

T .


40/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

40 P

GD

W , ,

.

M , , . O

. T $400 $5,000 , , 50,000

E .

T

.A &D

A

W 10

T . U 10:1

20% . U

I 70% ,

.ED

W ( 75%, $65 )

.

D 1,000 $65,000. A

C

P 30 1,000KWH

C . F

5

.

T 12,000 . T 80%

50% .


41/42

P 41

M L E M (LEM) G S A . T

. T CEO

.

LEM / ,

CO2 .

O

. T ,

CO2 .

U WEF,

. A B / LEM

B A F B

, D

, IT LEM. T

, ..

LEM , . T

. T

C B A LEM .W ,

M D LEM .

B , LEM G T

.T . T


42/42

G T : D E & E B ICT

ICT L I B F IT . I , ,

.

H & ICT , ICT

ICT . T , ,

ICT . A

, ICT .

I LEM ERP ,

. I L 24 7 ,

. H . T

.

T LEM , , . U

LEM, . T G

. ,

P , , M G T

. I KPI

ROI .A D LEM .

green technology economic and environmental benefits from i ct

Documents