grant writing workshop for minority serving institutions
DESCRIPTION
Grant Writing Workshop for Minority Serving Institutions. Katina Stapleton, Ph.D . Program Officer National Center for Education Research Meredith Larson, Ph.D. Program Officer National Center for Education Research. Purpose of this Presentation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
Grant Writing Workshop forMinority Serving Institutions
Katina Stapleton, Ph.D. Program Officer
National Center for Education Research
Meredith Larson, Ph.D.Program Officer
National Center for Education Research
ies.ed.gov
Purpose of this Presentation
• Increase awareness of researchers at Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs) of research grant funding at the Institute of Education Sciences (IES)
• Provide tips to MSI researchers on the grant application process
• Increase the number of successful MSI applicants
2
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
Raising MSI Awareness of Funding Opportunities at IES
3
ies.ed.gov
Quick Overview of IES
4
ies.ed.gov
Legislative Mission of IES
• Describe the condition and progress of education in the United States
• Identify education practices that improve academic achievement and access to education opportunities
• Evaluate the effectiveness of Federal and other education programs
5
ies.ed.gov
Organizational Structure of IES
National Board for Education
SciencesStandards &
Review Office
Office of the Director
National Center for Education Evaluation
National Center for Education Statistics
National Center for Education Research
National Center for
Special Education Research
6
ies.ed.gov
Missions of the Research Centers
• NCER– Supports rigorous research that addresses the nation’s
most pressing education needs, from early childhood to adult education
• NCSER– Sponsors a rigorous and comprehensive program of special
education research designed to expand the knowledge and understanding of infants, toddlers and students with or at risk for disabilities from birth through high school
7
NCER
NCSER
ies.ed.gov
IES Grant Programs: Research Objectives
• Develop or identify education interventions (practices, programs, policies, and approaches) – that enhance academic achievement– that can be widely deployed
• Identify what does not work and thereby encourage innovation and further research
• Understand the processes that underlie the effectiveness of education interventions and the variation in their effectiveness
8
ies.ed.gov
NCER Investments by Competition
Program Number of Awards
2002-2012
Investment (in millions)2002-2012
Education Research 548 $897.2Research & Development Centers 20 $204.7Postdoctoral Research Training 35 $22Predoctoral Research Training 26 $121.8Evaluation of State & Local Programs & Policies 13 $53.4Statistical & Research Methodology in Education 33 $23.9Reading for Understanding 6 $113.4Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research 12 $20.2Social & Character Development Research 7 $13.6Unsolicited 31 $44.9Small Business Innovation Research 58 $51
9
ies.ed.gov
NCSER Investments by Competition
Program Number of Awards
2006-2012
Investment (in millions)2006-2012
Special Education Research 233 $422.9
Research & Development Centers 6 $62.0
Postdoctoral Research Training 12 $7.8
Small Business Innovation Research 11 $7.9
Unsolicited Awards 3 $1.4
10
ies.ed.gov
A Quick Overview of MSIs
• Alaska Native-Serving Institutions • American Indian Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities • Asian American and Native American
Pacific Islander-Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs)
• High Hispanic Enrollment and Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs)
• Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)
• Native American-Serving, Nontribal Institutions
• Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions • Predominantly Black Institutions (PBIs)
11
ies.ed.gov
IES Funding Opportunities for MSIs
• There are no targeted funding opportunities for MSIs.
• We encourage MSIs to apply for Education Research and Special Education Research grants and training grants.
• We encourage MSIs to take advantage of the technical assistance IES provides.
12
ies.ed.gov
How can researchers at MSIs get started?
• Recognize that completing a successful grant application is a process that begins before the initial application submission
• Also know that preparing a grant application is part of building your program of research
13
ies.ed.gov
Increase MSI Awareness of Available Funding Opportunities
At the Institutional Level . . .• Scan The Federal Register (
https://www.federalregister.gov), where funding opportunities are announced
• Become knowledgeable about IES funding priorities and competitive grant competitions (http://ies.ed.gov/funding)
• Identify researchers on campus who do work in education research (i.e., potential applicants)– They may come from outside your education
department/school14
ies.ed.gov
Increase MSI Awareness of Available Funding Opportunities
At the Institutional Level . . .• Make sure potential applicants are
aware of available funding opportunities and IES program officers in their areas of interest
• Coordinate phone or in-person meetings with IES staff to discuss your institution’s research capacity and interests
15
ies.ed.gov
Strengthen Research Partnerships
• Research consortia and research networks– Available at the national, regional, and local levels
• Partnerships with LEAs, SEAs, and regional laboratories
• Partnerships with other research universities and firms
At the Institutional Level . . .
Make sure researchers on your campus are fully aware that these partnerships exist.
16
ies.ed.gov
Increase MSI-based Researchers’ Awareness of Available Funding Opportunities
At the Researcher Level . . .• Sign up for the IES Newsflash (
http://ies.ed.gov/newsflash) to be notified about new competitions
• Become knowledgeable about IES funding priorities and competitive grant competitions (http://ies.ed.gov/funding)
17
ies.ed.gov
Our Assumptions of You and What You Want
• We assume that you want…– to help improve education – to carve out your own research agenda– to get funding to conduct your research
• We assume that you have…– expertise in a wide range of topic areas and research
methods/analyses– varying levels of familiarity with grant writing
18
ies.ed.gov
Identifying the Appropriate Funding Opportunity
• Identify your own research interests and strengths and see if they overlap with current funding priorities
• Read the separate Requests for Applications (RFAs), which describe the application requirements
• Contact the relevant IES Program Officer to discuss your ideas (e-mail first)
19
ies.ed.gov 20
ies.ed.gov
First Step? Identify Appropriate Research Program, Topic, and Goal
• Review the RFAs (http://ies.ed.gov/funding)• Identify a program (305A, 324B, etc.)• Identify a topic (Reading & Writing, Postsec, etc.)• Identify a goal (Exploration, Development, etc.)• Review abstracts of other projects within that topic
or goal:– http://ies.ed.gov/ncer/projects – http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/projects
• Talk to IES Program Officers
21
ies.ed.gov
NCER Research Programs
• Education Research Grants (84.305A)• Research Training Programs in the Education Sciences
(84.305B)• Education Research & Development Centers
(84.305C)• Statistical & Research Methodology in Education
(84.305D)• Partnerships & Collaborations Focused on Problems
of Practice & Policy (84.305H)
22
ies.ed.gov
Special Education Research
• NCSER will not hold research or research training competitions for FY 2014.
• If funds for research are available in FY 2014, NCSER will use these funds to make additional awards from the FY 2013 grant slates.
• NCSER anticipates being able to hold a grant competition for FY 2015.
23
ies.ed.gov
Opportunities for the Study of Individuals with Disabilities in NCER
• Partnerships & Collaborations Focused on Problems of Practice & Policy grants program (84.305H)
• Postsecondary & Adult Education topic of the Education Research Grants program (84.305A)
24
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
A Closer Look . . .
Education Research Grants (84.305A)
25
ies.ed.gov
“Does IES fund the kind of research that I (we) do?”
1. What education problem do you want to solve? What question do you want to answer?
2. Does the underlying issue of this research question/problem fit within one of the IES grant topics?
3. What content will you address? What sample will you study?
4. Does your research method fit the requirements of one of the IES goals?
26
ies.ed.gov
NCER Ultimate Outcomes of Interest: Student Outcomes
Grade OutcomePrekindergarten School readiness (e.g., pre-reading, language,
vocabulary, early math and science knowledge, social and behavioral competencies)
Kindergarten – Grade 12
Learning, achievement, and higher-order thinking in reading, writing, mathematics, and science; progress through the education system (e.g., course and grade completion or retention, high school graduation, and dropout); social skills, attitudes, and behaviors that support learning in school
27
ies.ed.gov
NCER Ultimate Outcomes of Interest: Student Outcomes
Grade OutcomePostsecondary(Grades 13 – 16)
Access to, persistence in, progress through, and completion of postsecondary education; for students in developmental programs, additional outcomes include achievement in reading, writing, English language proficiency, and mathematics
Adult Education(Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, Adult ESL, and GED preparation)
Student achievement in reading, writing, and mathematics; access to, persistence in, progress through, and completion of adult education programs
28
ies.ed.gov
Identify Appropriate Topic and Goal
• Your research question(s) and research method(s) determine the topic and goal.
29
ies.ed.gov
Education Research Topics (84.305A)
• Cognition & Student Learning• Early Learning Programs & Policies• Education Technology• Effective Teachers & Effective Teaching• English Learners• Improving Education Systems: Policies, Organization,
Management, and Leadership• Mathematics & Science Education• Postsecondary & Adult Education• Reading & Writing• Social & Behavioral Context for Academic Learning
30
ies.ed.gov
Research Primarily Focused on Professional Development (PD) for K-12 Teachers
– Early Learning Programs & Policies– Effective Teachers & Effective Teaching
• Cognition & Student Learning• Education Technology• English Learners• Improving Education Systems: Policies,
Organization, Management, and Leadership• Mathematics & Science Education• Reading & Writing
– Postsecondary & Adult Education– Social & Behavioral Context for Academic Learning
31
Effective Teachers topic now
consolidates teacher-related
research that used to be submitted to
these topics …
ies.ed.gov
FY 2014 Research Goals
• Exploration • Development & Innovation• Efficacy & Replication• Effectiveness• Measurement
32
ies.ed.gov
Exploration Goal
• Explore associations between education outcomes and malleable factors
• Identify factors and conditions that may mediate or moderate relations between malleable factors and student outcomes
• Possible methodological approaches– Analyze secondary data– Collect primary data– Complete a meta-analysis
33
ies.ed.gov
Development & Innovation Goal
• Develop an innovative intervention (e.g., curriculum, instructional approach, program, or policy)
• OR improve existing education interventions
• AND collect data on its usability, feasibility, and fidelity of implementation in actual education settings
• AND collect pilot data on student outcomes
Development process must be
iterative!
34
ies.ed.gov
Efficacy & Replication Goal
• Evaluate whether or not a fully developed intervention is efficacious under limited or ideal conditions
OR
• Gather follow-up data examining the longer-term effects of an intervention with demonstrated efficacy
OR
• Replicate an efficacious intervention varying the original conditions
OR
• Conduct retrospective analysis of secondary data collected in the past
35
ies.ed.gov
Efficacy & Replication Goal
• Ask what might be needed to implement intervention under routine practice
• Reduce appearance of conflict of interest for developer/evaluators
• Do not require confirmatory mediator analyses but recommend exploratory ones
36
ies.ed.gov
Effectiveness Goal
• Evaluate whether a fully developed intervention that has evidence of efficacy is effective when implemented under typical conditions through an independent evaluation
• Prior to submitting an Effectiveness proposal, at least two efficacy studies of the intervention with beneficial and practical impacts on student outcomes must have been completed
37
ies.ed.gov
Effectiveness Goal
• IES expects researchers to… – Implement intervention under routine practice– Include evaluators independent of development/distribution– Describe strong efficacy evidence for intervention
• IES does not expect wide generalizability from a single study– Expects multiple Effectiveness projects to this end– Sample size is not a key distinction from Efficacy
• IES does not require confirmatory mediator analyses but encourages exploratory ones
• Cost of implementation is limited to 25% of budget38
ies.ed.gov
Measurement Goal
• Development of new assessments or refinement of existing assessments, and the validation of these assessments
OR
• Validation of existing assessments for specific purposes, contexts, and populations
39
ies.ed.gov
The Goals Build on One Another
• Exploration could lead to…– Development or modification of an intervention– Efficacy evaluation of an intervention
• Development & Innovation could lead to an Efficacy evaluation, if the intervention is found feasible and pilot data is supportive
• Efficacy & Replication could lead to an Effectiveness study, if impact is found across multiple efficacy/replication studies
• Measurement could feed into the other goals
40
ies.ed.gov
What if My Project is “Between” Goals or Topics?
PICK ONE! – Read all of the goals in the RFA so that you
understand where your work falls along the continuum of goals. What should come before your project? What should come after it?
– Break the project down into smaller pieces– Don’t just go for the largest amount of money– Aim for a well-crafted project that will deliver
what it promises– Discuss your ideas with a Program Officer
41
ies.ed.gov
Goal Max. Duration & Award (direct + indirect)
Exploration• With secondary data• With primary data
2 years, $700,0004 years, $1,600,000
Development & Innovation 4 years, $1,500,000
Efficacy & Replication• Follow-up study
4 years, $3,500,0003 years, $1,200,000
Effectiveness• Follow-up study
5 years, $5,000,0003 years, $1,500,000
Measurement 4 years, $1,600,000
Maximum Award Amounts (84.305A)
42
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
The Application’s Research NarrativeKey part of your application
4 Sections:Significance
Research PlanPersonnelResources
Requirements vary by topic and goal25 pages, single-spaced
43
ies.ed.gov
Read the RFA Very Carefully
• See pages 11-13 for highlights of changes in the FY 2014 RFA.
• Pay attention to all topic and goal requirements to avoid making errors that will keep your application from being reviewed.
44
ies.ed.gov
Significance
• Describes the overall project– Your research question(s) to be answered, or– Intervention to be developed or evaluated, or– Measure to be developed and/or validated
• Provides a compelling rationale for the project– Theoretical justification
• Logic models, change models– Empirical justification– Practical justification
• Justifies the overall importance of the work
45
ies.ed.gov
Research Plan
• Describe the work you intend to do– How you will answer your research question, or– Develop your intervention, or– Evaluate the intervention, or– Develop and/or validate your assessment
• Make certain Research Plan is aligned to Significance section– All analyses should have justification in Significance (i.e.,
answer the research questions)• Step-by-step process
– Timeline to show when everything will be done
46
ies.ed.gov
Dissemination Plan Now Required
• Part of the Research Plan• Should identify…– the audience– how you intend to reach this audience– the products you will develop
47
ies.ed.gov
Build a Good Team
48
ies.ed.gov
Personnel
• Convince reviewers that your team has the skills and experience to implement the proposed work.
• If all the expertise required for your project is not available on your campus, consider partnering with another institution.
• Demonstrate your productivity.• Make sure the team includes a senior researcher with
a strong grant record.
49
ies.ed.gov
Personnel
• Link each person and their expertise to their role in the project:– Qualifications– Roles– Responsibilities– Percent of time devoted to the project
• Show every aspect of project has person with expertise and time to do it.
50
ies.ed.gov
Personnel Strategies for Principal Investigator (PI)
• Senior Researcher as PI– Show adequate time to be PI– Make credentials clear; not all reviewers may know
• Junior Researcher as PI– Show you have adequate expertise not only to do work but to manage
project• Continuation of graduate research
• Management skills as graduate student
– Reviewers more comfortable if you have senior person(s) on project to turn to for advice• Co-PI, Co-I, contractors, advisory board
• Have them on for enough time to be taken seriously
51
ies.ed.gov
Resources
• Show the institutions involved have the capacity to support the work– Don’t use university boilerplate
• If your institution lacks a strong research or grant management record…– Consider partnering with an experienced institution for initial
research grant submissions
• Show that all organizations involved understand and agree to their roles– Describe the responsibilities of each institution, including schools, to
the project– Show strong commitment of schools and districts—have
alternatives in case of attrition52
ies.ed.gov
Resources
• Data issues– Document permission to use and access confidential data– Show familiarity with data and show that it can be used to
do the proposed work– If merging datasets, show that it can be done
• Proof of access to data and schools is required
53
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
Additional FY 2014 Funding Opportunities
54
ies.ed.gov
FY 2014 Research & Research Training Grant Programs
• Education Research Grant Programs (84.305A)
• Education Research & Development Centers (84.305C)
• Statistical & Research Methodology in Education (84.305D)– Statistical & Research Methodology Grants – Early Career Statistical & Research Methodology Grants
• Partnerships & Collaborations Focused on Problems of Practice & Policy (84.305H)– Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research– Continuous Improvement Research in Education– Evaluation of State & Local Education Programs & Policies
• Research Training Programs in the Education Sciences (84.305B)– Predoctoral Interdisciplinary Research Training – Methods Training for Education Research– Training in Education Research Use & Practice
55
ies.ed.gov
Education Research & Development Centers (84-305C)
• Developmental Education Assessment & Instruction (Postsecondary)– Current developmental education assessment and instructional
practices used by community colleges and other open-access institutions• Describe• Convene stakeholders• Identify and test promising reforms
• Knowledge Utilization– Develop better tools for observing and measuring research use in
schools– Identify strategies that researchers can adopt to make their work
more meaningful to and impactful on education practice
56
ies.ed.gov
Developmental Education Assessment & Instruction (84.305C)
• Research – Document current practices – Identify promising programs and support further
innovation– Assess the effectiveness and scalability of programs (e.g.,
cost-effectiveness, ease of implementation) • Leadership and outreach activities – Convene policymakers, practitioners, and researchers
interested in improving developmental education– Assist efforts by States, colleges, and universities to bring
effective models to scale
57
ies.ed.gov
R & D Center on Knowledge Utilization (84.305C)
• Research– Develop tools for observing and measuring research use in
schools – Describe the conditions that promote or inhibit research use in
schools– Identify strategies that researchers can adopt to make their
work more impactful on education practice
• Leadership and outreach activities– Demonstrate effective means of meaningful knowledge transfer
among researchers, practitioners, and other stakeholders to improve school performance and student outcomes
58
ies.ed.gov
Statistical & Research Methodology in Education (84.305D)
• Statistical & Research Methodology Grants– Wide range of methodological and statistical tools
that will better enable education scientists to conduct rigorous education research
• Early Career Statistical & Research Methodology Grants– Support high-quality work by relatively recent
graduates using a smaller grant award over a shorter time period
59
ies.ed.gov
Partnerships & Collaborations Focused on Problems of Practice & Policy (84.305H)
• Improve the quality of education for all students through advancing the understanding of and practices for teaching, learning, and organizing education systems
• Build close collaboration among researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and education agencies
60
ies.ed.gov
• Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research – Support a new or existing partnership to carry out initial research – Develop a plan for further research
• Continuous Improvement Research in Education – Support well-established partnerships to adapt and revise an existing
approach (or approaches) using continuous improvement strategies
• Evaluation of State & Local Education Programs & Policies – Carry out rigorous evaluations of education programs or policies that are
implemented under routine conditions by State or local education agencies to improve student academic outcomes
Note: Use May 9 version posted on IES website
61
Partnerships & Collaborations Focused on Problems of Practice & Policy (84.305H)
ies.ed.gov
Research Training Grant Programs in the Education Sciences (84.305B)
• Predoctoral Interdisciplinary Research Training– Increase the supply of scientists and researchers in education who
are prepared to conduct rigorous and relevant education research– Interdisciplinary programs with focus on education topics relevant
to education in the United States– Both new and renewal programs
• Methods Training for Education Research– Support training of current education researchers to maintain and
upgrade their methodological skills• Training in Education Research Use and Practice
– Ensure that researchers have the skills to produce relevant, rigorous, and accessible research
Note: Use May 9 version posted on IES website
62
New Names
ies.ed.gov
Award Parameters (84.305 B-H)
Program Max. Duration
Max. Award(direct + indirect)
305B Research Training Programs• Predoctoral Training• Methods Training for Ed. Researchers• Training in Ed. Research Use & Practice
5 years3 years3 years
$4,000,000$1,000,000$1,000,000
305C Research & Development Center• Dev. Educational Assessment & Instruction• Knowledge Utilization
5 years5 years
$10,000,000$5,000,000
305D Stats/Methods305D Early Career Stats/Methods
3 years1.5 years
$900,000$200,000
305H Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships305H Continuous Improvement Research 305H State/Local
2 years4 years5 years
$400,000$2,500,000$5,000,00063
ies.ed.gov
Next Steps?
64
ies.ed.gov
Talk to the Program Officer
• Call or e-mail IES Program Officers early in the process
• IES program staff can provide feedback on…– research idea– topic– goal– abstracts and draft proposals
65
ies.ed.gov
Application Deadline
Letter of Intent Due
Date
Application Package Posted
Start Dates
Sept 4, 20134:30:00 PM
DC Time
June 6, 2013 June 6, 2013 July 1, 2014to
Sept 1, 2014
Important Dates and Deadlines
66
ies.ed.gov
Download Required Documents
Request for Applications• Currently available at http://ies.ed.gov/funding
Grants.gov Application Submission Guide• Will be available June 6, 2013 at http://ies.ed.gov/funding
Application Package• Will be available June 6, 2013 at http://www.Grants.gov
67
ies.ed.gov
Submit a Letter of Intent (LOI)
• LOIs are optional but strongly encouraged• Submit LOI through https://iesreview.ed.gov• Contents
1) Descriptive title 2) Topic and goal that you will address 3) Brief description of the proposed project 4) Name and contact information for PI and Co-PIs 5) Name and institutional affiliation of any key collaborators and
contractors 6) Duration of the proposed project 7) Estimated total budget request
68
ies.ed.gov
Peer Review Process
• Applications are reviewed for compliance and responsiveness to the RFA
• Applications that are compliant and responsive are assigned to a review panel
• Two or three panel members conduct a primary review of each application
• At the panel meeting, the most competitive applications are reviewed by the full panel
69
ies.ed.gov
Notification Process
70
• All applicants will receive e-mail notification that the following information is available via the Applicant Notification System (ANS):• Status of award• Reviewer summary statements
• If you are not granted an award the first time, plan on resubmitting and talk to your Program Officer
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
Additional Resources
71
ies.ed.gov
Additional FY 2014 Funding Opportunities Webinars Available
http://ies.ed.gov/funding/webinars/index.asp
• Application Submission Process• Overviews of specific funding opportunities
(84.305B-H)
72
ies.ed.gov
Research Training Institutes & Workshops
Information available at http://ies.ed.gov/whatsnew/conferences
73
ies.ed.gov
Resources for Researchers
http://ies.ed.gov/resourcesforresearchers.asp74
ies.ed.gov
Tips for Grant Writing
• Reviewers focus on significance of work, research method, personnel, and resources
• Write for education specialist/generalist • Write for substantive person and methodologist• Panel has expert in every component of your study
75
ies.ed.gov
Tips for Grant Writing
• Punchline up front: “Say what you are going to say. Say it. Say what you said.”
• Clear description of intervention• Consistency throughout application• Evidence that work can be done
76
ies.ed.gov
Help Us Help You
• Read the Request for Applications (RFA) carefully
• Call or e-mail IES Program Officers early in the process
• As time permits, IES program staff can review draft proposals and provide feedback
Don’t be afraid to contact us!
77
ies.ed.gov
Remember…
• You can’t get funded if you don’t submit an application
• Revise and resubmit is the rule, not the exception• Persistence (often) pays off
78
ies.ed.gov
Connecting Research,Policy and Practice
http://ies.ed.gov/funding
[email protected]@ed.gov
79