grades...12.7% 10.4% 17.2% 10.2% 9.9% 10.7% 11.0% 22.8% 22.8% 23.4% 22.4% 27.8% 24.8% 27.9% 23.4%...

FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

BOARD COMMUNICATION

BC Number: EA - 2

From the Office of the Superintendent Date: January 11, 2019

Regarding: FreThe purpose of s communication is to provide the Board a progress of Academic metrics for Fresno Unified.

The metrics included in this report are:

• Two years of data for Letter Grades in Quarter 2/Semester 1• Redesignation Rates for Cycle 1 of the 2018/19 school year

If you have further questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at 457-3471.

Approved by Superintendent: J /,J M /J. ,, _ /4. /4� Robe11 G. Nelson, Ed.D. ------2__��----·-�---=----------- Date: / �

Fresno Unified School District Date: 1/10/2019

2018/19 Board Communication Form

ACADEMIC PROGRESSDATE: JANUARY 3, 2019

PREPARED BY EQUITY AND ACCESS

ACADEMIC PROGRESS – QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES

2January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 3RD TO 6TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 3

8.7% 8.8% 7.3% 9.3% 8.9% 7.5% 8.0% 11.0%

17.9% 18.8% 18.3% 16.7% 16.6% 17.0% 16.7%15.9%

26.9% 27.8% 26.7% 25.8% 26.9% 27.7% 27.0% 25.6%

27.2% 27.7% 27.9% 26.7% 28.0% 28.6% 27.5% 26.8%

19.2% 16.9% 19.8% 21.4% 19.6% 19.1% 20.8% 20.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade

2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses 3rd to 6th Grade

A B C D F

9.7% 12.1% 10.4% 12.1% 8.4% 9.8% 11.7% 11.4%

15.7%19.2% 18.8% 16.9%

15.9%19.4% 18.9% 17.0%

23.8%24.4% 26.6% 24.4%

23.9%25.1% 24.4% 25.4%

28.0%24.1% 25.1% 25.0%

28.6%26.1% 25.7% 24.3%

22.7% 20.1% 19.1% 21.6% 23.2% 19.7% 19.3% 21.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade

2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses 3rd to 6th Grade

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH TO 8TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS 4January 3, 2019

10.7% 12.7% 10.4%17.2%

10.2% 9.9% 10.7%

11.0%

22.8% 22.8% 23.4%

22.4%

27.8% 24.8% 27.9%23.4%

28.4% 29.9% 27.6% 26.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

7th Grade 8th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses 7th to 8th Grade

A B C D F

10.5% 14.3% 11.3% 14.3%

15.1%13.6% 14.9%

16.3%

26.2% 26.0% 27.1%26.3%

26.1% 26.1% 25.4%24.6%

22.1% 20.0% 21.4% 18.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


2017-18 Q2 2018-19 Q2

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses 7th to 8th Grade

A B C D F

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


18.2% 13.2% 10.9%4.9%

17.8% 14.2% 10.9%4.2%

12.0%11.3%

10.4%

8.9%

12.1%10.6%

8.6%9.3%

22.5%25.9% 27.9%

27.1%

23.2%25.3%

28.9%

27.7%

23.2% 28.3% 30.0%

31.0%

24.3% 26.4% 28.6%31.8%

24.0% 21.3% 20.8% 28.1%22.6% 23.5% 23.0% 26.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade

2017-18 S1 2018-19 S1

Semester 1 Grades in ELA Courses 9th to 12th Grade

A B C D F

24.0% 22.0% 19.1%11.5%

29.2% 25.2%19.9%

11.8%

13.8% 15.4%15.4%

13.7%

13.3%14.6%

12.8%

15.4%

21.7% 27.1% 27.7%

31.0%

18.7% 23.0%29.9%

30.5%

18.4%20.3% 21.2%

24.3% 17.2%19.9% 20.8% 25.3%

22.1%15.2% 16.7% 19.5% 21.6% 17.2% 16.6% 17.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade

2017-18 S1 2018-19 S1

Semester 1 Grades in Math Courses 9th to 12th Grade

A B C D F

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ENGLISH LEARNER STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


14.0%6.1% 9.6% 10.5%

14.9%6.4% 9.9% 11.2%

22.4%

8.2%

14.4% 14.4%

21.9%

8.1%13.8% 13.5%

31.1%

22.4%

26.2% 25.6%

31.3%

23.5%

26.7% 25.4%

21.8%

32.1%

27.6% 27.2%

21.1%

32.0%

27.5% 27.3%

10.6%

31.1%22.2% 22.3%

10.8%

30.0%22.1% 22.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by EL Status

A B C D F

17.1%8.1% 12.2%

14.0% 17.4%8.4% 12.3%

14.2%

23.5%

10.1%

16.3% 16.6%

25.1%

10.3%

16.8% 16.4%

28.6%

22.9%

25.5% 25.3%

28.3%

22.6%

25.1% 25.0%

20.7%

29.1%

25.2% 24.0%

19.9%

28.7%

24.9% 24.6%

10.1%

29.7%20.7% 20.1%

9.2%

30.0%21.0% 19.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL Current EL Redesignated Ever EL Never EL

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by EL Status

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


6.0%

22.4%12.7% 16.9% 9.5% 6.0%

21.8%11.9%

18.3%10.1%

10.1%

26.9%

20.1%17.3%

13.7%9.5%

26.3%

20.7%13.3%

12.9%

30.7%

27.1%

30.8% 27.7%

25.5%29.6%

26.6%

29.8% 28.0%

25.7%

30.8%

16.3%

23.4%21.4%

28.0% 32.2%

16.0%

24.8%24.2%

27.9%

22.4%

7.4%13.1% 16.6%

23.3% 22.8%

9.3% 12.8% 16.2%23.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SDC RSP DIS 504s None SDC RSP DIS 504s None

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Disability Status 2017-18 to 2018-19

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


6.7%

26.3%15.3%

21.0%12.7%

6.9%

27.6%

12.9%22.9%

12.9%8.7%

30.1%

21.6%

22.3%

15.8%

8.9%

28.4%

21.1%

17.4%

16.0%

34.9%

24.3%

23.4%

26.4%

25.2%

32.9%

23.5%

26.7%

27.8%

24.8%

28.8%

13.0%

21.8%

17.3%

25.1% 32.7%

13.3%

23.0%19.3%

25.2%

20.9%

6.3%

17.9%13.0%

21.2% 18.6%

7.2%16.3% 12.6%

21.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SDC RSP DIS 504s None SDC RSP DIS 504s None

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Disability Status 2017-18 to 2018-19

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


13.1%5.5% 4.0%

10.8% 11.8% 7.2% 8.1% 7.8%13.7%

5.5% 2.3%11.5% 13.1% 6.9% 8.8% 7.8%

16.4%

9.1%5.1%

15.5%19.5%

12.9% 12.6% 10.3%

15.0%

10.0%

4.0%

14.6% 12.8%13.4% 10.7% 9.9%

27.6%

22.8%

19.2%

26.8%25.9%

25.8% 23.5%20.7%

28.2%

22.3%

20.1%

26.8% 29.9%29.4%

24.3%21.5%

26.8%

30.6%

27.1%

27.0% 23.0%

24.4% 28.4%27.9%

26.0%

30.6%

28.7%

27.0% 22.7%26.4%

27.8%27.9%

16.1%

32.0%

44.6%

19.9% 19.8%29.7% 27.4% 33.3%

17.2%

31.6%

44.8%

20.1% 21.5% 23.8% 28.3% 32.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AfricanAmerican

Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican

PacificIslander

Two or MoreRaces

White AfricanAmerican


PacificIslander

Two or MoreRaces

White

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Ethnicity/Race 2017-18 to 2018-19

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


18.2%7.1% 5.7%

14.0%19.3%

8.3% 10.6% 10.5%19.3%

7.1% 4.7%14.3% 14.7%

7.8% 11.6% 9.5%

19.1%

10.6%3.3%

17.7%16.5%

15.9% 13.1% 12.3%

18.5%

11.3%6.1%

17.7% 20.3%

19.5% 12.6% 12.8%

27.8%

22.4%

21.0%

26.0%24.5%

20.6% 22.7% 23.3%

26.7%

22.7%

15.1%

25.6% 21.5%

24.1%23.8% 23.0%

22.7%

28.6%

27.1%

23.8% 22.2%

33.3% 28.0% 25.6%

22.8%

27.8%

23.6%

24.3% 25.6%30.1%

25.0% 26.0%

12.3%

31.2%42.9%

18.4% 17.4% 21.8% 25.6% 28.3%

12.8%

31.0%

50.5%

18.2% 17.9% 18.4%27.0% 28.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AfricanAmerican


PacificIslander

Two or MoreRaces

White AfricanAmerican


PacificIslander

Two or MoreRaces

White

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Ethnicity/Race 2017-18 to 2018-19

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA AND MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY STUDENT GROUP, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


17.3% 17.0%10.6%

17.6%26.7%

11.3%

22.0% 20.9%

15.2%

18.6%

14.4%

14.4%

27.1% 27.4%

26.6%

27.7%23.6%

26.7%

21.1% 21.8%

27.2%

23.0% 21.1%

26.9%

12.5% 12.9%20.4%

13.1% 14.2%20.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Foster Youth Homeless EconomicallyDisadvantaged


2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in ELA Courses by Student Group

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

21.2% 22.3%13.8% 18.9%

29.2%

14.1%

22.5% 23.5%

17.2%

21.3%

20.4%

17.4%

26.1% 26.3%

25.9%

27.1%

25.8%

25.5%

18.6% 17.1%

24.3%

20.1%

18.2%

24.4%

11.6% 10.8%18.8%

12.5%6.4%

18.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%



2017/18 Q2, S1 2018/19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2 Grades in Math Courses by Student Group

A B C D F

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN ELA COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY REGION, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


8.5% 10.9% 11.3% 11.0% 11.2% 11.6% 9.5% 5.1% 7.0%11.7% 12.4% 13.8% 10.8% 11.7% 11.1%

4.2%

11.2%13.4% 14.9% 14.9% 16.6%

17.1%15.7%

8.2%10.4%

11.8% 14.9%14.6% 16.1% 16.4% 13.6%

8.2%

23.6%23.3%

25.6% 27.6% 25.7%25.7% 27.9%

26.7%24.6%

23.9%25.4% 26.0% 26.6% 25.4% 28.4%

26.8%

29.9% 23.8%

27.7% 28.5% 26.1% 26.3% 27.3%

30.2% 29.3%24.2%

26.5% 26.6% 26.9% 26.7% 27.7%

32.5%

26.7% 28.5%20.4% 18.0% 20.4% 19.4% 19.6%

29.8% 28.7% 28.4%20.8% 19.0% 19.6% 19.8% 19.3%

28.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2/Semester 1 Grades in ELA Courses by Region

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

QUARTER 2 LETTER GRADES IN MATH COURSES: PERCENT BREAKDOWN A–F BY REGION, 2017-18 AND 2018-19


12.5% 11.5% 14.8% 13.7% 15.5% 14.3% 13.1% 7.6% 11.5%14.5% 15.2% 13.9% 14.4% 13.4% 14.8%

7.1%

15.4% 16.4%17.3% 15.4%

17.2% 19.3% 17.7%

9.7%

13.8%16.0% 17.1% 18.0% 17.4% 19.8% 16.9%

9.2%

24.5% 25.6%27.1%

25.4%24.6% 23.7% 26.2%

27.1%

24.6%25.0% 24.3% 25.6% 26.1% 23.8% 25.6%

25.7%

25.6% 24.4%23.9%

26.1% 23.2% 23.1% 24.4%

26.7%26.9%

23.6% 24.6%24.3% 22.7% 24.1% 24.2%

30.0%

22.0% 22.2%17.0% 19.4% 19.6% 19.7% 18.6%

28.9%23.2% 20.9% 18.8%

18.2% 19.4% 18.9% 18.5%28.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty

2017-18 Q2, S1 2018-19 Q2, S1

Quarter 2/Semester 1 Grades in Math Courses by Region

A B C D F

January 3, 2019

PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY GRADE LEVEL: 2018/19 YTD

64.1% 62.9% 61.6% 59.5% 57.7%49.9% 44.0% 46.6%

55.2%64.6%

10.5% 10.9% 11.5% 11.9% 16.9%18.2%

14.9%16.7%

16.5%

15.8%9.0% 8.8% 9.1% 9.2%

10.0%11.0%

11.0%11.3%

10.8%

8.9%16.4% 17.4% 17.7% 19.3% 15.4% 20.9%

30.1% 25.5%17.6%

10.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

0 1 2 3 or More

Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLAS January 3, 2019 14

PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY RACE/ETHNICITY : 2018/19 YTD

50.1%

70.3%82.6%

54.0% 57.4% 59.3%64.2% 67.4%

14.7%

12.8%

7.7%

14.8%15.8% 14.6%

12.5% 11.5%11.1%

6.8%3.2%

10.5% 6.8%11.1% 9.2%

7.4%24.2%

10.0% 6.5%20.7% 20.0% 15.1%

14.1% 13.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AfricanAmerican/Black

Asian Filipino Hispanic NativeAmerican/Alaskan

Pacific Islander Two or More Races White

0 1 2 3 or More


PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY PROGRAM GROUP: 2018/19 YTD

50.5%43.1% 45.9% 41.6%

54.7%

11.9%15.7% 12.5%

11.9%

14.6%10.5% 13.4% 13.1%

10.3%

10.4%

27.1% 27.8% 28.5%36.2%

20.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Student w/ Disability English Learner Foster Youth Homeless Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

0 1 2 3 or More


PERCENT BREAKDOWN OF STUDENTS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF D’S OR F’S IN ANY SUBJECT BY REGION: 2018/19 YTD

61.9% 57.0% 51.5% 52.6% 55.0% 52.2%

74.4%

55.1%

13.8%14.0%

15.6% 14.6%14.6%

14.0%

10.5%

15.6%

8.6%9.8%

11.1% 10.4% 10.3% 10.2%

6.7%

10.6%

15.7% 19.2% 21.8% 22.4% 20.0% 23.5%

8.4%18.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Bullard Region Edison Region Fresno Region Hoover Region McLane Region Roosevelt Region Specialty Region Sunnyside Region

0 1 2 3 or More


ACADEMIC PROGRESS - ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION RATES CYCLE 1 & 2

14January 3, 2019

ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION GUIDELINES

ELPAC score of 4 overall

ELA Assessment (Passing at least one)

BAS 1st Grade

DRP for 2nd- 6th Grade

District Interim Assessments 1st – 12th Grade

CAASPP 4th - 9th Grade, 12th Grade (Using last year’s CAASPP results)

PSAT 8th-12th Grade

Teacher evaluation

Parent consultation


ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

14.2%

3.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cycle 1 Cycle 2

Title: Academic Performance Prepared by: Equity & Access Data Source: ATLASNotes: *Redesignation rates shown for 2018-19 are preliminary.

16January 3, 2019

Cycle 1: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC and SBAC in 2017/18. This is the first opportunity for redesigantion and typically, we see a larger rate due to the larger pool of students who recently passed the ELPAC.

Cycle 2: This represents the percentage of students who passed the ELPAC in 2017/18 but did not redesignate during cycle 1. Students must have met an ELA assessment (i.e. BAS 1, DRP, Interim 1 and PSAT) during cycle 2 to be eligible for redesignation. Students who did not pass the ELPAC have to wait until May of 2018/19, so we expect the pool of eligible students to remain low.

ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES K TO 6TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

0.0% 4.

1%

37.5

%

34.5

%

6.5%

14.5

%

17.5

%

0.1%

19.0

%

0.7% 3.0%

0.3%

0.4% 1.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade

Cycle 1 Cycle 2


17January 3, 2019



ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH TO 8TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

10.9

%

7.8%

0.8%

1.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

7th Grade 8th Grade

Cycle 1 Cycle 2


18January 3, 2019



ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

6.9%

1.9%

2.3% 4.2%

1.0%

0.3% 2.1%

1.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Cycle 1 Cycle 2


19January 3, 2019



ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY LENGTH AS AN ENGLISH LEARNER, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

12.5%

21.5%

8.1%6.7%1.0% 1.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

New ELs (0 - 2.9 years) Intermediate ELs (3 - 5.9 years) Long-Term ELs (6+ years)

Cycle 1 Cycle 2


20January 3, 2019



ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY REGION, 2018-19 (CYCLE 1 & 2)

16.1

%

11.1

%

13.5

%

16.9

%

13.0

%

15.5

%

15.0

%

12.6

%

3.3%

3.6%

3.5%

3.9%

3.1% 4.0%

2.9%

1.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Bullard Edison Fresno Hoover McLane Roosevelt Sunnyside Specialty

Cycle 1 Cycle 2


21January 3, 2019



ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – PERCENT REDESIGNATED,BY EL STATUS FOR THE SECOND CYCLE OF 2018-19


22

6.5% 4.3%1.2% 3.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

On-Track At-Risk LTEL All ELs

January 3, 2019

On-Track: Expected redesignation year has not passed and they have scored greater than or equal to their expected score in the most recent ELPAC assessment.At-Risk: Student has missed their year to redesignate goal set by FUSD, but has not been an EL for more than five years.

LTEL: Student has been an EL for more than five years and has yet to redesignate.

ENGLISH LEARNER REDESIGNATION – COMPARISON OF TOTAL NUMBER OF LONG-TERM ENGLISH LEARNERS BEFORE AND AFTER THE SECOND CYCLE OF 2018-19

September 21, 2018

1.18% decrease


23

4477

4423

4200

4250

4300

4350

4400

4450

4500

Before Redesignation After Redesignation

January 3, 2019


BOARD COMMUNICATION

BC Number: EA - 1

From the Office of the Superintendent Date: February 15, 2019

To the Members of the Board of Education

Prepared by: Kristi Phone Number: (559) 457-3896

The purpose o his communication is to provide the Board information regarding the second interim. The Interim II window closed last week, and the majority of the results are readily available to site and district leaders. Third through twelfth grades have their second interim results and reports. However, due to technical difficulties with our scanning machine, results for first and second grades will be postponed pending external vendor service.

The Board Communication scheduled for February 15, 2019 will be delayed until the issue is resolved.

If you have further questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at (559) 457-34 71.

Approved by Superintendent:

Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D.

Fresno Unified School District


Date: -------------- -----

Date: 2/14/2019

02/15/19


BOARD COMMUNICATION

BC Number: EA - 1.

From the Office of the Superintendent Date: Febmary 15, 2019

Phone Number: 457-3471

The purpose £ this communication is to provide the Board information regarding the Assessment Co mittee and Assessment Calendar for 2019/20. The Assessment Committee was recently reorganized under Equity and Access, with representatives from each department, teachers, and site administrators. The Assessment Committee is a steering committee toward ensuring stakeholder voices are present in understanding, developing, and maintaining a districtaligned assessment system. The objective is to ensure instmctional time is preserved by our district assessment commitments, provide a complimentary and aligned system of assessments that articulate formative and summative data points for student, parent/guardian, and staff use and understanding, and protect site funds from assessment expenditures meant to reside in district office budgets toward more impactful and direct-to-student site budgeting.

The newly organized Assessment Committee held their first kickoff meeting on Thursday, December 6, 2018. During this meeting, stakeholders collaborated to identify the components of assessment and data literacy that would be foundational to the future work of the Committee. Stakeholders also collaborated to identify and discuss baseline assessment elements. The product of this first meeting is a district-wide assessment mbric meant to calibrate assessments within our system (see attached). The Assessment Committee is currently utilizing the assessment mbric to analyze assessments throughout the system. Findings will be shared and discussed at the next Assessment Committee meeting at the end ofFebmary.

Additionally, attached is the current Assessment Calendar 2019/20. As noted on the calendar, as the Assessment Committee meets to calibrate and engage in strategic collaborative decisionmaking, this calendar and/or the assessments within it may be revised to meet the objectives stated above. The testing windows for state and national tests are mandated, while district-wide assessment windows are backwards mapped within our department and sites are provided with a 2- to 4-week window (varies by assessment) to select the date(s) that they prefer to test on. In addition, professional learning is provided to site testing coordinators to ensure best common

practices are implemented during test administration.

If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at 457-3471.

Approved by Superintendent:

Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D.

Fresno Unified School D;strict

2018/19 Board Communkation Form

Date: -------------- -----

Date: 2/14/2019

02/15/19

DISTRICT TESTS/ SURVEYS STATE TESTS

Assessment DRDP KAIGGATE

AssessmentBAS/Fluency DRP Interim

Culture/Climate and

Social Emotional

Learning

ELPAC

Summati

ve

Physical

FitnessSBAC CAST CAA

Date

Baseline

Aug 12 - 30

Fall

Aug 22 - Oct 4

Winter

Oct 14 - Mar 143

Spring

Mar 25 - Jun 3

Baseline

Aug 12 - Oct

4

Fall

Oct 7 - Dec

13

Winter

Jan 6 - Mar

13

Spring

Mar 16 - Jun

4

Grade 2

Screener:

NNAT3

Aug 26 - 30

Grade 1

Sept 3 - 13

Grades 2 - 5

Sept 16 - 27

Kinder

BAS 1

Mar 16

BAS 2

Jun 4

1st Grade

BAS 1

Aug 12-

Oct 7

BAS 2

Jun 4

Fluency 1

Aug - Oct 7

Fluency 2

June 4

Fall

Sept 3 - 13

Spring

May 18 -

Jun 4

Interim I

Sep 30 – Oct 11

Sep 30 – Oct 18

(Dual Immersion)

Interim II

Jan 21- Feb 7

Jan 21 – Feb 14

(Dual Immersion)

Conf. Family Income

Sept 17 - Oct 30

Student

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Parent Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Staff Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Feb 3 -

Apr 30

Feb 3 -

Apr 30

Mar 23 -

May 29

Mar 23 -

May 29

Apr 1 -

May 31

Grade Level TK Grade K Grade 1 - 5 Grade K - 1 Grades 2 -

6

Grade 1 - 6

Parents

Students in Grades 4 -

12 take the

Climate/SEL Survey

Staff at School Sites

ALL

EL

Students

Grade 5 Grades

3 - 6

Science

Grade 5

Selected

SDC

Students

Grades 3-6

Contacts

Christopher Delgado

457-3614

Christopher.Delgado@

fresnounified.org

Carmen

Rodriguez

457-3959

Carmen.

Rodriguez@

fresnounified.org

Krysten Ducusin

457-3861

Krysten.Ducusin@

fresnounified.org

Cin Rogers

Phone: 457-3828

Cin.Rogers@

fresnounified.org


Elementary Schools

Assessment Calendar 2019-2020*

2/14/2019Prepared By: Equity and Access * Dates in the calendar are subject to change.


Middle Schools



DISTRICT TESTS/ SURVEYS STATE TESTS NATIONAL

Assessment InterimCulture/Climate and Social

Emotional Learning

ELPAC

SummativePhysical Fitness SBAC CAST CAA NMSQT/ PSAT

Date

Interim I

Sep 30 – Oct 11

Sep 30 – Oct 18

(Dual Immersion)

Interim II

Jan 21- Feb 7

Jan 21 – Feb 14

(Dual Immersion)

Conf. Family Income

Sept 17 - Oct 30

Student

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Parent Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Staff Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Feb 3 - Apr 30 Feb 3 - Apr 30 Mar 23 - May 29 Mar 23 - May 29 Apr 1 - May 31 Oct 16

Grade Level Grades 7 - 8

Parents

Students in Grades 4-12 take

the Climate/SEL Survey


ALL

EL StudentsGrade 7 Grades 7 - 8 Science Grade 8

Selected

SDC Students

(Grades 7 - 8)

Grade 8

Contacts

Carmen Rodriguez

457-3959

Carmen.Rodriguez@

fresnounified.org

Krysten Ducusin

457-3861

Krysten.Ducusin@

fresnounified.org

Cin Rogers

457-3828

Cin.Rogers@

fresnounified.org


High Schools



DISTRICT TESTS/

SURVEYSSTATE TESTS NATIONAL

Assessment Interim

Culture/Climate and

Social Emotional

Learning

ELPAC

Summative

Physical

FitnessSBAC CAST CAA IB Diploma PSAT SAT AP

Date

Interim I

Sep 30 – Oct 11

Sep 30 – Oct 18

(Dual Immersion)

Interim II

Jan 21- Feb 7

Jan 21 – Feb 14

(Dual Immersion)

Conf. Family Income

Sept 17 - Oct 30

Student

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Parent Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Staff Survey

Feb 11 - Mar 6

Feb 3 -

Apr 30

Feb 3 -

Apr 30

Mar 23 -

May 29

Mar 23 –

May 29

Apr 1 -

May 31May 1 - 25 Oct 16 Mar 25 May 4 - 15

Grade Level Grades 7 - 8

Parents

Students in Grades 4-

12 take the

Climate/SEL Survey


ALL

EL StudentsGrade 9 Grades 11

Science

Grade

11 or 12

Selected

SDC Students

(Grades 11)

Fresno High

OnlyGrades 9 -11 Grades 9 -11 Grades 9 -11

Contacts

Carmen Rodriguez

457-3959

Carmen.Rodriguez@

fresnounified.org

Krysten Ducusin

457-3861

Krysten.Ducusin@

fresnounified.org

Cin Rogers

457-3828

Cin.Rogers@

fresnounified.org

Chantea Mclntyre

457-3567

Chantea.Mclntyre@

fresnounified.org

Mony Ward

457-3810

Mony.Ward@

fresnounified.org

ElementsFresno Unified School District Assessment Committee DRAFT Assessment Rubric

1- Not Yet 2- Approaching 3- Meeting 4- Exceeding

Growth and Progress

Monitoring

• Measures student data without an established baseline

• Does not measure growth• Does not assist in monitoring at or

between grade levels• Does not utilize a universal scale or

scale is inconsistent (year to year, between grade levels, from administration to administration, etc.)

• Measures status (baseline) of particulararea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)

• Lacks growth measurement• Monitors student data within grade level• Utilizes a universal scale for status or

growth

• Measures status (baseline) of particulararea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)

• Measures growth of particular area(s), standard(s) and/or skill(s)

• Monitors student data recursively within grade level

• Utilizes a consistent universal scale and corresponding adaptive technology for status or growth

• Measures status (baseline) of alignedarea(s), standard(s), and/or skill(s)

• Measures growth of aligned area(s), standard(s) and/or skill(s)

• Monitors student data recursively within grade level and between grade levels

• Utilizes a consistent universal scale and corresponding adaptive technology for status and growth

Feedback and Utility

• Data is available after a week or more• Even with professional learning, data is

difficult to access, understand, or have limited value for audiences

• Extensive user data entry and/or user led administration

• Data and/or feedback is primarily summative and difficult to drive instruction or support

• Aggregate data is not available• Even with changes to FUSD

infrastructure, raw data is not easily accessible or compatible (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)

• Data is available within a week (reports within 4-7 days)

• Data is user friendly with complex professional learning and supports and/or has value for a limited audience

• Major user data entry and/or user led administration

• Data includes summary feedback and/or implied actions to drive instruction orsupport

• Aggregate data is not exportable• Major changes to FUSD infrastructure

allow for raw data compatibility (IT,databases, ATLAS, etc.)

• Data is timely (reports within 1-3 days)• Data is user friendly with simple

supports for a variety of audiences• Limited user data entry and/or user led

administration• Data includes actionable feedback to

drive instruction or support specific student needs

• Aggregate data is exportable for limited use

• Slight changes to FUSD infrastructure allow for raw data compatibility (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)

• Data is immediate • Data is user friendly for a variety of

audiences• Little to no user data entry and/or user

led administration• Data includes actionable feedback to

drive instruction and support all student needs

• Aggregate data is exportable and able to be manipulated for use

• Raw data is compatible with FUSD infrastructure (IT, databases, ATLAS, etc.)

Alignment, Reliability,

and Validity

• Partially aligns to limited state standards and/or aligns to outdated or un-adopted standards (state other than CA, for example)

• Limited evidence to support relationship to state testing

• Not grade level appropriate or aligned to rigor for the grade level/age

• Partially aligns to the state standards, or is unevenly aligned

• Evidence of a slight positive relationship to state testing (anecdotal, case study, etc.)

• Provides primarily low Depth of Knowledge (DOK 1-2) questions and/or falls below appropriate grade level content

• Aligns to a majority of the state standards

• Evidence of a significant positive relationship to state testing (aligned,corresponding to, in support of, etc.)

• Provides appropriate grade level content

• Aligns to state standards• Evidence of a positive correlation to

state testing; predictability for district, school, and student level

• Evidence that conceptual and application questions adhere to rigor, Lexile Level, Depth of Knowledge (DOK 1-4), etc. requirements for the grade level/age.

Accessibility

• Not all students are able to access the test

• Assessment, information, or reports are unavailable or lack accessibility for audience(s)

• Does not offer accommodations for students

• Assessment is accessible to generaleducation students

• Assessment, information, and reports are available in one language and/or format

• Includes few supports for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting students

• Assessment is accessible to most students with supports

• Assessment, information, and reports are available in a limited number of languages and formats

• Includes specific support(s) for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting students

• Assessment is accessible to all students with supports

• Assessment, information, and reports are available in a variety of languages and formats

• Includes a variety of supports for properaccommodation/modification to be made toward supporting all students

FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTBOARD COMMUNICATION

BC Number: EA- 1

From the Office of the Superintendent Date: February 22, 2019

Phone Number: 457-3896

terim II Assessment UpdateThe purpose oft · communication is to provide the Board an update on 2018 and 2019 Interim II Assessment results.

Attached you will find the data slides to provide an overview of Fresno Unified's 2018 to 2019 Interim II Assessment results by percentage of students who met or exceeded proficiency as well as change from last year's Interim II Assessment results to student performance during the current year.

Additionally, regional Interim II Assessment summaries are provided by region by school.

If you have fmiher questions or require additional information, please contact Lindsay Sanders at (559) 457-3471.

Approved by Superintende� /7 /____, /1 / �

, /4 . /Robert G. Nelson, Ed.D. �-�--��----- Date: 2jaf/9

Fresno Unified School District Date: 2/21/2019


ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE – INTERIM IIDATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2019

PREPARED BY: EQUITY AND ACCESS

INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – OVERALL PERFORMANCE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

39.4% 37.3%

23.1% 22.9%

26.4% 26.8%

11.1% 13.0%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2017-18 2018-19

ELA Standards

Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded

Standard Exceeded Standard Met Standard Nearly Met

Standard Not Met

Total Test Takers

ELA 2017-18 6,477 15,405 13,483 22,956 58,321

ELA 2018-19 7,507 15,514 13,284 21,600 57,905

Math 2017-18 5,425 10,713 15,116 22,748 54,002

Math 2018-19 6,881 11,960 15,178 21,359 55,378

42.1% 38.6%

28.0% 27.4%

19.8% 21.6%

10.0% 12.4%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2017-18 2018-19

Math Standards

Standard Not Met Standard Nearly Met Standard Met Standard Exceeded

Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.

February 15, 2019 2

INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE SEGMENT, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

36.8% 36.5%40.9% 41.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ELA Math

Grades 1st – 6th

2017-18 2018-19

3Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: All recorded Interim II scores for each school year are included in the results above, regardless of current enrollment.

36.2%

18.2%

36.6%

23.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ELA Math

Grades 7th – 8th

2017-18 2018-19

40.1%

19.4%

39.4%

21.9%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

ELA Math

Grades 9th – 12th

2017-18 2018-19

February 15, 2019

INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 1ST TO 6TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

41.5

%

36.1

%

37.4

%

30.8

% 38.0

%

37.0

%43.7

%

40.6

%

42.4

%

35.6

% 42.2

%

40.6

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

ELA Standards

2017-18 2018-19

49.0

%

41.8

%

40.8

%

37.0

%

21.1

% 28.2

%

50.9

%

50.4

%

45.0

%

42.5

%

26.0

% 33.0

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Math Standards

2017-18 2018-19


February 15, 2019 4

INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 7TH AND 8TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

33.5%39.0%

34.8%38.4%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 7 Grade 8

ELA Standards

2017-18 2018-19

15.5%20.9%21.3%

25.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 7 Grade 8

Math Standards

2017-18 2018-19


February 15, 2019 5

INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS - PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY GRADE LEVEL: GRADES 9TH TO 12TH, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

28.6

%

47.2

%

42.2

%

45.4

%

31.4

%

48.7

%

34.9

% 43.0

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12

ELA Standards

2017-18 2018-19

29.0

%

14.9

%

10.4

%

12.0

%

29.3

%

21.6

%

15.9

%

9.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12

Math Standards

2017-18 2018-19


February 15, 2019 6

INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY ENGLISH LEARNER STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

15.5% 16.3%

51.3% 52.2%

33.7% 36.2%40.2% 42.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

ELA Standards

Current ELL Redesignated Ever ELL Never ELL

21.6% 21.8%

35.9%42.2%

28.4%32.6%30.9%

35.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

Math Standards

Current ELL Redesignated Ever ELL Never ELL

Title: Academic Performance – Interim II Prepared by: Equity & Access Date Source: ATLASNotes: Student Categorizations for each School Year pulled as of CBEDS Date (1st Wednesday of October), based on CDE parameters

February 15, 2019 7

INTERIM 1I ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY DISABILITY STATUS, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

2.3% 2.6%

10.0% 11.1%

25.9%30.0%

33.5% 33.8%40.2% 42.6%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

ELA Standards

SDC RSP DIS 504 None

1.0% 0.8%7.7% 9.6%

30.5%37.1%

22.0% 23.8%

31.7%36.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

Math Standards

SDC RSP DIS 504 None


February 15, 2019 8

INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY ETHNICITY/RACE, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

29.5

%

30.4

%

43.9

%

46.0

%

63.4

%

60.1

%

34.8

%

37.5

%

37.8

%

38.8

%

38.2

%

33.2

%

45.5

%

47.3

%55.1

%

55.7

%0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

ELA Standards

20.7

%

23.3

%

38.0

%

42.7

%

53.7

%

50.4

%

27.9

%

32.3

%

29.5

%

31.3

%

32.0

%

35.7

%

35.7

%

39.3

%

41.9

%

46.0

%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

Math Standards

African American/Black Asian Filipino Hispanic Native American/Alaskan Pacific Islander Two or More Races White


February 15, 2019 9

INTERIM I1 ASSESSMENT ELA AND MATH STANDARDS – PERCENT MET/EXCEEDED BY STUDENT GROUP, 2017-18 AND 2018-19

22.3%

30.3%24.1% 22.8%

34.9% 37.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

ELA Standards

Foster Youth Homeless Econ. Disadvantaged

20.6%24.9%

19.3% 20.9%28.1%

32.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2017-18 2018-19

Math Standards

Foster Youth Homeless Econ. Disadvantaged


February 15, 2019 10

Overall DistrictFUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By School

Language Arts

All Test Takers

Report

D3a

Grand TotalGrade 9-12 TotalGr 7-8 TotalGr 1-6 Total

17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District

Interim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19

7.0 3.0 -4.0 7.1 4.5 -2.6 12.8 9.5 -3.3 12.0 8.7 -3.3ALTERNATIVE REGION

7.0 3.0 -4.0 7.0 3.0 -4.0Phoenix Elementary

13.0 7.8 -5.2 13.0 7.8 -5.2Cambridge

8.4 2.4 -6.0 8.4 2.4 -6.0DeWolf

0.0 5.3 5.3 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.5 4.5Phoenix Secondary

33.3 0.0 -33.3 26.3 16.8 -9.5 26.8 16.3 -10.5Young Academy

48.0 50.0 2.0 34.4 37.4 3.0 43.2 46.4 3.1 44.4 46.7 2.3BULLARD REGION

42.6 48.6 6.0 42.6 48.6 6.0Figarden

62.2 65.9 3.6 62.2 65.9 3.6Forkner

50.7 60.0 9.3 50.7 60.0 9.3Gibson

43.0 47.7 4.8 43.0 47.7 4.8Kratt

53.9 49.2 -4.7 53.9 49.2 -4.7Lawless

60.4 54.0 -6.4 60.4 54.0 -6.4Malloch

37.3 38.1 0.8 37.3 38.1 0.8Powers

37.0 34.7 -2.3 37.0 34.7 -2.3Slater

49.6 58.6 9.1 49.6 58.6 9.1Starr

42.3 41.6 -0.7 42.3 41.6 -0.7Tenaya

54.8 21.1 29.0 7.9 21.1 31.3 10.2Wawona

0.0 43.2 46.4 3.1 43.2 46.3 3.1Bullard

28.4 31.0 2.5 51.6 52.6 1.0 58.6 56.6 -1.9 44.0 44.4 0.4EDISON REGION

30.1 26.4 -3.7 30.1 26.4 -3.7Addams

20.2 26.8 6.5 20.2 26.8 6.5Columbia

24.9 24.4 -0.5 24.9 24.4 -0.5King

30.1 35.2 5.1 30.1 35.2 5.1Kirk

32.4 41.2 8.9 32.4 41.2 8.9Lincoln

34.7 38.2 3.4 34.7 38.2 3.4Sunset

82.4 82.1 -0.4 82.4 82.1 -0.4Computech

23.7 25.1 1.4 23.7 25.1 1.4Gaston

58.6 56.6 -1.9 58.6 56.6 -1.9Edison

31.7 34.9 3.2 30.4 33.7 3.3 35.4 32.4 -3.1 32.3 34.1 1.8FRESNO REGION

31.8 42.1 10.3 31.8 42.1 10.3Del Mar

27.1 32.1 5.0 27.1 32.1 5.0Fremont

33.5 33.5 0.0 24.4 21.0 -3.4 30.4 29.3 -1.1Hamilton K-8

27.9 23.5 -4.5 27.9 23.5 -4.5Heaton

37.7 40.8 3.0 37.7 40.8 3.0Homan

34.7 39.2 4.5 34.7 39.2 4.5Muir

28.4 35.3 6.9 28.4 35.3 6.9Roeding

25.5 28.0 2.6 25.5 28.0 2.6Williams

31.8 34.4 2.7 31.8 34.4 2.7Wilson

58.1 56.4 -1.7 46.0 54.1 8.2 49.1 54.7 5.7Cooper

21.1 24.8 3.7 21.1 24.8 3.7Fort Miller

35.4 32.4 -3.1 35.4 32.4 -3.1Fresno

E&A cr: Interim2ReportD3a Page 1 of 3 Printed on 2/15/2019 4:34:41 PM


Language Arts

All Test Takers

Report

D3a


17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District


35.4 38.9 3.5 31.3 33.0 1.7 40.4 38.2 -2.3 35.6 37.7 2.1HOOVER REGION

39.4 35.1 -4.3 39.4 35.1 -4.3Centennial

51.1 51.5 0.5 51.1 51.5 0.5Eaton

27.2 31.8 4.6 27.2 31.8 4.6Holland

48.2 45.2 -3.0 48.2 45.2 -3.0McCardle

22.5 30.3 7.7 22.5 30.3 7.7Pyle

37.3 46.3 9.0 37.3 46.3 9.0Robinson

33.9 41.9 8.0 33.9 41.9 8.0Thomas

40.8 41.3 0.5 40.8 41.3 0.5Viking

30.0 34.2 4.2 30.0 34.2 4.2Vinland

30.9 37.3 6.4 30.9 37.3 6.4Wolters

29.1 31.5 2.3 29.1 31.5 2.3Ahwahnee

34.0 34.8 0.8 34.0 34.8 0.8Tioga

40.4 38.2 -2.3 40.4 38.2 -2.3Hoover

33.9 40.1 6.1 35.2 36.0 0.7 28.2 24.2 -4.0 33.2 37.0 3.8MCLANE REGION

39.6 38.5 -1.1 39.6 38.5 -1.1Birney

47.3 48.6 1.3 47.3 48.6 1.3Ericson

31.4 38.6 7.2 31.4 38.6 7.2Ewing

16.7 24.6 7.9 16.7 24.6 7.9Hidalgo

38.8 45.6 6.8 38.8 45.6 6.8Leavenworth

28.6 36.1 7.5 28.6 36.1 7.5Mayfair

29.4 35.9 6.4 29.4 35.9 6.4Norseman

27.8 38.5 10.7 27.8 38.5 10.7Rowell

30.8 44.6 13.7 30.8 44.6 13.7Turner

46.6 48.1 1.5 46.6 48.1 1.5Wishon

42.9 42.0 -0.9 42.9 42.0 -0.9Scandinavian

27.2 30.4 3.1 27.2 30.4 3.1Yosemite

28.2 24.2 -4.0 28.2 24.2 -4.0McLane



Language Arts

All Test Takers

Report

D3a


17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

36.8 40.8 4.0 36.2 36.5 0.3 40.1 39.3 -0.8 37.5 39.7 2.2District


37.2 41.2 4.0 33.1 29.9 -3.2 28.5 32.6 4.2 34.8 37.8 3.0ROOSEVELT REGION

33.5 46.6 13.1 33.5 46.6 13.1Anthony

36.2 39.6 3.3 36.2 39.6 3.3Balderas

32.7 45.0 12.2 32.7 45.0 12.2Calwa

37.9 39.0 1.1 37.9 39.0 1.1Jackson

42.8 54.3 11.5 42.8 54.3 11.5Jefferson

30.8 27.9 -2.9 30.8 27.9 -2.9Lane

43.4 34.6 -8.8 43.4 34.6 -8.8Lowell

36.5 45.4 8.9 36.5 45.4 8.9Vang Pao

44.4 36.1 -8.3 44.4 36.1 -8.3Webster

31.4 34.8 3.4 31.4 34.8 3.4Winchell

44.7 48.1 3.4 44.7 48.1 3.4Yokomi

27.8 29.9 2.1 27.8 29.9 2.1Sequoia

42.6 29.8 -12.9 42.6 29.8 -12.9Tehipite

28.5 32.6 4.2 28.5 32.6 4.2Roosevelt

70.5 74.3 3.7 61.1 54.3 -6.8 51.9 46.0 -5.9 61.6 60.1 -1.4SPECIALTY REGION

58.8 58.7 -0.1 57.1 56.8 -0.3 58.4 58.2 -0.2Bullard Talent K-8

88.6 93.3 4.8 88.6 93.3 4.8Manchester Gate

47.1 55.9 8.8 63.5 52.8 -10.7 55.1 54.4 -0.8Baird

78.7 71.8 -6.9 78.7 71.8 -6.9Design Science

45.1 41.8 -3.3 45.1 41.8 -3.3Duncan

63.8 55.0 -8.7 63.8 55.0 -8.7Patino

32.0 37.2 5.2 27.0 24.7 -2.3 39.0 38.5 -0.4 32.8 35.4 2.6SUNNYSIDE REGION

31.3 33.5 2.3 31.3 33.5 2.3Ayer

28.8 34.3 5.5 28.8 34.3 5.5Aynesworth

26.4 26.0 -0.4 26.4 26.0 -0.4Bakman

33.7 34.5 0.8 33.7 34.5 0.8Burroughs

30.5 30.7 0.2 30.5 30.7 0.2Easterby

31.7 48.6 16.8 31.7 48.6 16.8Greenberg

23.3 35.4 12.2 23.3 35.4 12.2Olmos

46.2 53.2 6.9 46.2 53.2 6.9Storey

29.2 27.9 -1.3 29.2 27.9 -1.3Kings Canyon

23.6 20.0 -3.6 23.6 20.0 -3.6Terronez

39.0 38.5 -0.4 39.0 38.5 -0.4Sunnyside



23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5

17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

Overall District

District

FUSD Interim Assessment 2 Percent Met/Exceeded by Region & By SchoolMath

All Test Takers

Report

D3aInterim 2 Results: 2017-18 Compared to 2018-19

1.8 5.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.9 1.1 -2.8 3.3 1.5 -1.8ALTERNATIVE REGION

3.75.61.83.75.61.8Phoenix Elementary

-4.40.04.4-4.40.04.4Cambridge

-4.20.04.2-4.20.04.2DeWolf

0.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Phoenix Secondary

0.00.0 0.93.52.60.93.82.90.0Young Academy

43.1 48.6 5.5 21.4 29.0 7.6 26.8 29.0 2.2 35.4 40.1 4.7BULLARD REGION

4.544.640.14.544.640.1Figarden

7.961.653.77.961.653.7Forkner

8.559.050.58.559.050.5Gibson

5.747.341.65.747.341.6Kratt

8.650.642.08.650.642.0Lawless

3.251.548.33.251.548.3Malloch

1.335.334.11.335.334.1Powers

-0.734.335.1-0.734.335.1Slater

10.256.246.010.256.246.0Starr

31.329.1 2.131.329.12.1Tenaya

24.87.9 22.030.07.916.979.5Wawona

2.229.026.82.229.026.8Bullard

31.2 32.2 1.0 30.1 35.7 5.6 28.5 33.3 4.8 30.2 33.4 3.2EDISON REGION

-10.821.732.5-10.821.732.5Addams

3.419.416.03.419.416.0Columbia

0.923.923.00.923.923.0King

1.232.331.11.232.331.1Kirk

10.551.340.910.551.340.9Lincoln

7.054.247.27.054.247.2Sunset

60.354.3 6.060.354.36.0Computech

11.98.3 3.711.98.33.7Gaston

4.833.328.54.833.328.5Edison

29.3 32.6 3.3 13.2 20.5 7.3 16.3 15.5 -0.8 24.1 27.2 3.0FRESNO REGION

8.536.327.98.536.327.9Del Mar

12.838.726.012.838.726.0Fremont

9.212.9 -5.519.925.5-3.7-6.626.232.7Hamilton K-8

-1.618.420.0-1.618.420.0Heaton

-0.340.340.6-0.340.340.6Homan

7.734.727.07.734.727.0Muir

11.540.629.111.540.629.1Roeding

3.024.821.83.024.821.8Williams

-0.731.231.9-0.731.231.9Wilson

25.419.3 2.829.827.06.0-7.342.049.3Cooper

22.28.5 13.722.28.513.7Fort Miller

-0.815.516.3-0.815.516.3Fresno



23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5

17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

Overall District

District


All Test Takers

Report


31.9 37.8 5.8 11.9 21.6 9.7 23.9 27.7 3.8 27.0 33.2 6.2HOOVER REGION

-0.730.431.1-0.730.431.1Centennial

8.354.746.48.354.746.4Eaton

6.536.530.06.536.530.0Holland

-1.841.643.5-1.841.643.5McCardle

11.328.717.511.328.717.5Pyle

18.647.829.218.647.829.2Robinson

2.834.932.12.834.932.1Thomas

5.544.138.65.544.138.6Viking

3.530.727.33.530.727.3Vinland

7.140.433.37.140.433.3Wolters

20.214.3 5.920.214.35.9Ahwahnee

23.38.7 14.523.38.714.5Tioga

3.827.723.93.827.723.9Hoover

37.5 43.5 6.0 19.3 16.7 -2.5 13.5 9.1 -4.4 31.7 35.0 3.3MCLANE REGION

4.143.639.54.143.639.5Birney

2.251.749.52.251.749.5Ericson

9.848.738.89.848.738.8Ewing

3.925.521.63.925.521.6Hidalgo

4.752.247.54.752.247.5Leavenworth

10.944.333.310.944.333.3Mayfair

9.537.327.89.537.327.8Norseman

8.237.128.88.237.128.8Rowell

7.640.232.67.640.232.6Turner

-3.445.749.2-3.445.749.2Wishon

18.718.2 0.518.718.20.5Scandinavian

14.520.4 -5.914.520.4-5.9Yosemite

-4.49.113.5-4.49.113.5McLane



23.218.2 4.134.029.92.521.919.45.04.941.436.5

17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 Δ 17/18 18/19 17/18 18/19 ΔΔ

Overall District

District


All Test Takers

Report


39.2 43.8 4.6 11.4 21.1 9.8 9.9 15.6 5.7 30.1 35.2 5.2ROOSEVELT REGION

16.247.731.616.247.731.6Anthony

3.443.840.43.443.840.4Balderas

8.843.534.68.843.534.6Calwa

10.043.433.410.043.433.4Jackson

8.447.539.18.447.539.1Jefferson

1.832.831.01.832.831.0Lane

-10.637.848.5-10.637.848.5Lowell

4.851.746.94.851.746.9Vang Pao

-7.741.048.7-7.741.048.7Webster

2.242.039.82.242.039.8Winchell

8.246.838.68.246.838.6Yokomi

23.713.6 10.123.713.610.1Sequoia

16.67.4 9.216.67.49.2Tehipite

5.715.69.95.715.69.9Roosevelt

62.9 67.8 4.9 22.6 24.9 2.4 29.1 31.6 2.5 45.6 48.7 3.1SPECIALTY REGION

18.419.8 3.847.543.7-1.36.257.951.7Bullard Talent K-8

1.782.781.01.782.781.0Manchester Gate

29.024.3 7.939.331.44.611.249.237.9Baird

-8.059.267.1-8.059.267.1Design Science

4.024.120.14.024.120.1Duncan

5.440.234.85.440.234.8Patino

33.4 39.6 6.2 16.5 15.9 -0.6 12.8 16.1 3.4 26.4 30.0 3.7SUNNYSIDE REGION

0.034.834.80.034.834.8Ayer

1.432.230.81.432.230.8Aynesworth

-0.327.828.1-0.327.828.1Bakman

8.840.431.68.840.431.6Burroughs

3.636.432.83.636.432.8Easterby

17.549.031.517.549.031.5Greenberg

9.936.426.59.936.426.5Olmos

9.656.947.39.656.947.3Storey

15.820.6 -4.815.820.6-4.8Kings Canyon

16.110.4 5.816.110.45.8Terronez

3.416.112.83.416.112.8Sunnyside


01.11.19 BC NO. EA-2 Acacemic Progess UpdateStructure BookmarksChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChartChart

02.15.19 BC NO. EA-1 Academic Performance Interim II Assessment Update02.15.19 BC NO. EA-2 Assessment Committee and Assessment Calendar 2019-2002.22.19 BC NO. EA-1 Academic Performance, Interim II Assessment Update

grades...12.7% 10.4% 17.2% 10.2% 9.9% 10.7% 11.0% 22.8% 22.8% 23.4% 22.4% 27.8% 24.8% 27.9% 23.4%...

Documents