governor brown's transportation funding plan -...

51
Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding Plan This proposal is a balance of new revenue and reasonable reforms to ensure effciency, accountability and performance from each dollar invested to improve California’s transportation system.

Upload: ngothuan

Post on 06-Mar-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

This proposal is a balance of

new revenue and reasonable

reforms to ensure efficiency

accountability and performance

from each dollar invested

to improve Californiarsquos

transportation system

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Frequently Asked Questions

This proposal is a combination of new revenue and reform with measurable targets for improvements including regular reporting streamlined projects with exemptions for infrastructure repairs and flexibility on hiring for new workload

How much does this program provide overall for transportation improvements

bull Over the next decade the Governorrsquos Transportation Funding Plan provides an estimated $36 billion in funding for transportation with an emphasis on repairing and maintaining existing transportation infrastructure and a commitment to repay an additional $879 million in outstanding loans

How much does it require the average vehicle owner in California to pay

bull The proposal equates to roughly 25-cents per motorist per day according to the Department of Finance The latest TRIP study released and subsequent article in the Washington Post showed that Californians spend on average $762 annually on vehicle repair costs due to wear and tear road conditions etc httpwwwwashingtonpostcomnewswonkblog wp20150625why-driving-on-americas-roads-can-be-more-expensive-than-you-think A figure that should go down significantly with improved road conditions

How will the program improve transportation in California over the next decade

bull Within 10 years with this plan the state has made a commitment to get our roadways up to 90 good condition Today 41 of our pavement is either distressed or needs preventative maintenance A commitment has also been made to repair an additional 200 bridges that are in distressed condition

How does the plan ensure my tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements

bull The plan includes a Constitutional Amendment to Article XIX that ensures that tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements

How does the plan hold Caltrans and local governments accountable to deliver what they promise

bull The proposed legislation requires Caltrans to annually report to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on achievement of performance targets ndash the CTC will then report annually to the Legislature and the CTC may withhold funds from Caltrans if funds are not being appropriately spent Similarly the CTC will evaluate projects submitted by cities and counties for program funding and evaluate the success of the program in reducing deferred maintenance on local roads Finally the State Controller will also audit local government expenditures and will recover andor withhold funds if not appropriately spent

The Road Information Program (TRIP) ndash a nonprofit organization that focuses on surface transportation

1

Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded

from the following sources which would cost the average motorist

about 25 cents per day or $7 per month

New Revenue

bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years

bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

2

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Existing Revenue and Reform

bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program

bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years

Accelerated Loan Repayment

bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows

- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation

- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program

- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program

3

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 2: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Frequently Asked Questions

This proposal is a combination of new revenue and reform with measurable targets for improvements including regular reporting streamlined projects with exemptions for infrastructure repairs and flexibility on hiring for new workload

How much does this program provide overall for transportation improvements

bull Over the next decade the Governorrsquos Transportation Funding Plan provides an estimated $36 billion in funding for transportation with an emphasis on repairing and maintaining existing transportation infrastructure and a commitment to repay an additional $879 million in outstanding loans

How much does it require the average vehicle owner in California to pay

bull The proposal equates to roughly 25-cents per motorist per day according to the Department of Finance The latest TRIP study released and subsequent article in the Washington Post showed that Californians spend on average $762 annually on vehicle repair costs due to wear and tear road conditions etc httpwwwwashingtonpostcomnewswonkblog wp20150625why-driving-on-americas-roads-can-be-more-expensive-than-you-think A figure that should go down significantly with improved road conditions

How will the program improve transportation in California over the next decade

bull Within 10 years with this plan the state has made a commitment to get our roadways up to 90 good condition Today 41 of our pavement is either distressed or needs preventative maintenance A commitment has also been made to repair an additional 200 bridges that are in distressed condition

How does the plan ensure my tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements

bull The plan includes a Constitutional Amendment to Article XIX that ensures that tax dollars will be used for transportation improvements

How does the plan hold Caltrans and local governments accountable to deliver what they promise

bull The proposed legislation requires Caltrans to annually report to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on achievement of performance targets ndash the CTC will then report annually to the Legislature and the CTC may withhold funds from Caltrans if funds are not being appropriately spent Similarly the CTC will evaluate projects submitted by cities and counties for program funding and evaluate the success of the program in reducing deferred maintenance on local roads Finally the State Controller will also audit local government expenditures and will recover andor withhold funds if not appropriately spent

The Road Information Program (TRIP) ndash a nonprofit organization that focuses on surface transportation

1

Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded

from the following sources which would cost the average motorist

about 25 cents per day or $7 per month

New Revenue

bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years

bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

2

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Existing Revenue and Reform

bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program

bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years

Accelerated Loan Repayment

bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows

- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation

- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program

- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program

3

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 3: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded

from the following sources which would cost the average motorist

about 25 cents per day or $7 per month

New Revenue

bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years

bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

2

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Existing Revenue and Reform

bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program

bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years

Accelerated Loan Repayment

bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows

- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation

- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program

- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program

3

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 4: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Funding the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation Proposal would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments are funded

from the following sources which would cost the average motorist

about 25 cents per day or $7 per month

New Revenue

bull Road Improvement Charge ndash implement a new annual road improvement charge as part of vehicle registration The charge would be $65 per vehicle including hybrids and electric vehicles and would raise $20 billion over ten years

bull Gasoline Excise Tax ndash stabilize the current rate at the five-year average of 18 cents for the price-based amount eliminating the annual Board of Equalization adjustments ndash the total state gasoline excise tax would be 36 cents This tax would be adjusted annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

bull Diesel Excise Tax ndash increase the current rate by 11 cents per gallon (to a total of 24 cents per gallon) and index annually for inflation to maintain purchasing power Over ten years this change would generate $5 billion

2

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Existing Revenue and Reform

bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program

bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years

Accelerated Loan Repayment

bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows

- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation

- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program

- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program

3

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 5: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Existing Revenue and Reform

bull Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ndash direct additional Cap and Trade auction proceeds to the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and a new Low Carbon Road Program Funds would be appropriated through the annual budget process and over ten years would total $4 billion for the Transit and Intercity Rail Program and $1 billion for the Low Carbon Road Program

bull Caltrans Reforms ndash Implement cost-saving reforms at Caltrans to generate $1 billion over ten years

Accelerated Loan Repayment

bull Acceleration of $879 million in Outstanding Transportation Loans ndash would direct one-time outstanding loan repayments as follows

- $132 million for highway maintenance and rehabilitation

- $265 million for the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program

- $334 million for the Trade Corridor Investment Fund Program

- $148 million to complete or reimburse projects programmed in the Traffic Congestion Relief Program

3

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 6: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Mac

into

sh H

DU

sers

cts

teve

Doc

umen

tsJ

obs

Jobs

_A-G

gov

_tra

nsfu

nd_p

lan_

fDet

aile

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Rev

enue

10-

year

10-

14-2

015

xls

4

10-Y

ea

r Fu

nd

ing

De

tail

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Fund

ing

Prop

osal

Ye

ar

1 20

16-1

7 Ye

ar

2 20

17-1

8 Ye

ar

3 20

18-1

9 Ye

ar

4 20

19-2

0 Ye

ar

5 20

20-2

1 Ye

ar

6 20

21-2

2 Ye

ar

7 20

22-2

3 Ye

ar

8 20

23-2

4 Ye

ar

9 20

24-2

5 Ye

ar

10

2025

-26

10-y

ear

tota

l H

ighw

ay U

ser F

ee

Cha

rge

a $6

5 pe

r veh

icle

hig

hway

use

r fee

(3

09

mill

ion

vehi

cles

) 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 2

01$

201

$ 20

11

$

Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x(1

) Inc

reas

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

by 1

1 ce

nts

over

the

curr

ent

13 c

ent p

er g

allo

n ra

te

Larg

ely

affe

cts

owne

rs o

f lar

ger t

ruck

s in

clud

ing

owne

rso

pera

tors

of 4

500

00 c

omm

erci

al tr

ucks

(2

) Ind

ex th

e di

esel

exc

ise

tax

to In

flatio

n

Tota

l Die

sel E

xcis

e Ta

x

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

042

$ 0

42$

-$

002

$ 0

04$

006

$ 0

08$

009

$ 0

12$

014

$ 0

16$

018

$

418

$

087

$ 0

42$

044

$ 0

45$

047

$ 0

49$

051

$ 0

53$

055

$ 0

57$

060

$ 5

05$

Inde

x G

as E

xcis

e Ta

x

Elim

inat

e an

nual

adj

ustm

ent t

o th

e ex

cise

tax

rate

and

inde

x th

e ga

s ta

x to

infla

tion

- driv

ers

wou

ld p

ay a

n av

erag

e of

$20

mor

e pe

r yea

r ove

r 10

year

s

-$

011

$ 0

21$

032

$ 0

44$

055

$ 0

67$

079

$ 0

91$

104

$ 5

04$

Cap

and

Tra

de

Allo

cate

$50

0 m

illio

n pe

r yea

r of t

he 4

0 o

f Camp

T re

venu

e th

at is

not

co

ntin

uous

ly a

ppro

pria

ted

0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 0

50$

050

$ 5

00$

Ong

oing

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Rev

enue

2

93$

305

$ 3

18$

331

$ 3

44$

358

$ 3

71$

385

$ 4

00$

414

$ 35

20

$ C

altr

ans

Effic

ienc

ies

Hiri

ng fl

exib

ility

CE

QA

Pub

lic P

rivat

e P

artn

ersh

ips

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

100

$

Pre-

Prop

ositi

on 4

2 lo

an e

arly

repa

ymen

t$8

79 m

illio

n to

tal -

$13

2 m

illio

n S

HA

$26

5 m

illio

n P

TA $

482

mill

ion

TCR

F

013

$ 0

27$

033

$ 0

15$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

088

$

Tota

l 3

16$

342

$ 3

61$

356

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

07

$

Expe

nditu

re P

lan

Loca

lTr

ansi

t Lo

cal P

artn

ersh

ipLo

cal S

treet

s an

d R

oads

(40

of r

emia

inin

g un

allo

cate

d fu

nds)

Loca

l Stre

ets

and

Roa

ds (C

ompl

ete

Stre

ets

GH

G re

duct

ion)

S

ubto

tal

Sta

te SH

OP

PM

aint

enan

ce (6

0 o

f rem

aini

ng u

nallo

cate

d fu

nds)

Trad

e C

orrid

ors

Sub

tota

l E

arly

Loa

n R

epay

men

tTr

ansi

t tra

de C

orrid

ors

Loc

al T

CR

F P

roje

cts

SH

OP

P

Cal

trans

Effi

cien

cies

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

040

$ 0

40$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

025

$ 0

25$

079

$ 0

84$

089

$ 0

94$

100

$ 1

05$

111

$ 1

16$

122

$ 1

28$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

400

$ 2

50$

102

8$

100

$ 1

54$

159

$ 1

64$

169

$ 1

75$

180

$ 1

86$

191

$ 1

97$

203

$

119

$ 1

26$

134

$ 1

42$

150

$ 1

58$

166

$ 1

74$

183

$ 1

92$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

020

$ 0

20$

177

8$

154

2$

200

$ 1

39$

146

$ 1

54$

162

$ 1

70$

178

$ 1

86$

194

$ 2

03$

212

$

022

$ 0

22$

022

$ 0

22$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

-$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

010

$ 0

10$

174

2$

088

$

100

$

Tota

l 3

25$

337

$ 3

50$

363

$ 3

54$

368

$ 3

81$

395

$ 4

10$

424

$ 37

08

$

BO

E-a

djus

ted

gas

tax

is s

et a

t 5-y

ear a

vera

ge o

f 18

cent

s (u

p 6

cent

s fro

m J

uly

1 2

015

leve

l) re

venu

e is

not

sco

red

abov

e be

caus

e of

unk

now

n cu

rren

t-law

futu

re fl

uctu

atio

n b

ut rela

tive

to th

e M

ay R

evis

ion

forc

ast

wou

ld in

crea

se re

venu

e $1

1 b

illio

n in

201

6-17

with

fluc

tuat

ing

amou

nts

ther

eafte

r dep

endi

ng o

n ga

solin

e pr

ices

Th

is re

venu

e is

dis

tribu

ted

by c

urre

nt-

law

form

ula

44

for c

ities

and

cou

ntie

s 1

2 fo

r the

SH

OP

P a

nd 4

4 fo

r the

STI

P

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 7: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Benefits

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 8: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

10-Year Benefits of the Governorrsquos Proposal

The Governorrsquos Transportation funding framework would provide over

$36 billion in the first decade of implementation with an additional

$879 million in early loan repayments These investments would

allow the state local governments and transit agencies to implement

reforms and make significant improvements to our transportation

system

Local Investments

bull Local Streets and Roads Repair would receive $113 billion in additional funding primarily through formulaic allocation that would benefit cities and counties large and small urban and rural For example the City of Los Angeles would receive $650 million the City of Fresno would receive $83 million and the City of Redding would receive $15 million In terms of counties Sonoma would receive $89 million Santa Clara would receive $206 million and San Diego would receive $377 million

bull Transit and Rail would receive $43 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment allocated through the Transit and Intercity Rail Program (TIRCP) which was recently modified by Senate Bill 9 (Beall Chapter 710 Statutes of 2015) If funds are leveraged

like the recent TIRCP grant cycle a total of about $138 billion in transit and rail projects can be accomplished

revenue estimates based on fuel consumption and vehicle ownership forecast

5

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 9: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

bull State-Local Partnership Grants would total $25 billion in additional funding for local transportation projects If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B program a total of about $25 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B program allocated

roughly $930 million to 187 projects and ultimately leveraged $88 billion in other funds)

bull Traffic Congestion Relief Program would receive $148 million in loan repayment for program closeout of remaining programmed projects

State Investments

bull Highway and Bridge Repair would receive $155 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to improve highway pavement to 90 good condition fix an additional 200 highway bridges and improve communities through achieving good service for highway litter pick-up and graffiti removal

bull Trade Corridors would receive $23 billion in additional funding including funds from loan repayment to invest in priority freight corridors to grow the economy and implement the upcoming sustainable freight strategy If funds are leveraged like the recent Proposition 1B

program a total of about $68 billion in projects can be accomplished (The Proposition 1B

program allocated nearly $24 billion to over 80 projects and ultimately leveraged $47 billion in other funds)

bull State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) would be stabilized by eliminating annual Board of Equalization adjustments and setting the applicable gas excise tax rate at the 5-year average of 18 cents Since current projections for gasoline price come in under that average the current STIP funding shortfall would be mitigated and approximately $500 million in additional STIP funding would be realized so currently-programmed projects can receive funding and need not be delayed

6

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 10: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Reforms

bull Extension of Public-Private Partnership Authority The Governorrsquos proposal would extend

the statutory authority for public-private partnerships for new transportation projects by 10 years extending the current sunset until 2027

bull Specific Performance Measures The Governorrsquos proposal includes specific performance measures against which Caltrans will be held accountable for the investment of new transportation funding The department will commit to improvements in highway pavement bridge conditions maintenance activities and flood control measures to be achieved over the next decade The proposal requires the department to report on progress toward these improvements each year to the CTC the Legislature and the public

bull Streamlined Environmental Process The Governorrsquos proposal includes effective streamlining provisions to get projects delivered efficiently They include a limited California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption advancing project environmental mitigation to get more project buy-in early and reduce late challenges and the extension of federal delegation for Caltrans to complete federal and state environmental review concurrently Collectively these efforts will take months off of project delivery timelines

bull Staff Flexibility at Caltrans to Meet New Workload The Governorrsquos proposal allows for greater use of contract staff to deliver projects funded with new transportation revenue As workload will expand Caltransrsquo ability to use outside consultants to meet new demand

for project delivery services should expand too The Governorrsquos proposal allows for up to a doubling of contract staff over the next five years compared to todayrsquos rigid contracting authority

bull More Innovative Procurement Authority The Governorrsquos proposal authorizes Caltrans to utilize a procurement method known as Construction ManagerGeneral Contractor (CMGC) for double the amount of projects it is authorized for use today CMGC is a process in which the design and construction management elements of projects are brought together so projects can be executed more quickly and delivered sooner

bull Dedicated New Transportation Revenue to Transportation Purposes The Governorrsquos proposal includes a constitutional amendment to ensure new transportation revenue is dedicated to transportation purposes The Legislature would not be able to redirect the new revenues to non-transportation purposes

7

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 11: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Justification

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 12: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Updated13 101215

California Transportation Overview

Californiarsquos Transportation System is the largest most complex and decentralized of any state

bull California drivers travel about 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and

roads more than Florida and New York drivers combined

bull There are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas

bull More than 245 million residents are licensed to drive in California about 9 million more than the next highest state Texas

At Caltrans staff is down

bull The Capital Outlay Support (COS) Program is at its lowest staffing level since before the Toll Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program that began in 1997 despite significant temporary increases from Proposition 1B bonds and the Federal Stimulus package As transportation funding has decreased Caltrans has requested staffing reductions to adjust accordingly

- The COS Program is at the correct staffing level based on current transportation funding

- The COS Program staffing is currently the smallest it has been since Fiscal Year (FY) 1997-98 or 18 years

- The COS Program has reduced approximately 3400 Full Time Equivalents in the last eight years based on reduced transportation funding As transportation funding and workload has decreased so has the COS Program staffing This has been accomplished by forecasting future workload restricting hiring and attrition

Comparison of FTEs Project Delivery and Construction Contracts

FiscalYear1

Budgeted13 FTEs2

No ofProjectsPlanned

forDelivery

Actual Noof ProjectsDelivered

PercentDelivered

Capital Value13 of Delivered

Projects($ Billions)

No of OngoingContracts3

Value of OngoingContracts

($ Billions)3

2002-03 12098 212 163 77 17 659 77 2003-04 11050 216 188 87 19 586 82 2004-05 12420 222 207 93 15 617 77 2005-06 13093 174 173 99 24 714 98 2006-07 12662 286 286 100 26 646 104 2007-08 13125 294 294 100 33 705 94 2008-09 12516 334 334 100 31 732 94 2009-10 11517 306 304 99 21 664 96 2010-11 10821 346 342 99 31 814 109 2011-12 10571 279 275 99 27 739 113 2012-13 10407 170 167 98 12 713 123 2013-14 10153 219 214 98 21 673 111 2014-15 9894 343 337 98 23 652 106 2015-16 97034 247 214 6994 944

1Proposition 1B passed in November 2006 2FTE stands for Full Time Equivalents and includes state staff consultants and cash overtime 3As of June 30 of each year 4Estimated as of July 31 2015

8

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 13: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California is Under-Investing in Transportation

According to a study from the Pew Charitable Trusts Californiarsquos

per capita spending on surface transportation both state and local

is $523 annually relative to the US average of $510 However as

a percentage of per capita personal income Californiarsquos surface

transportation spending falls below the national average

Other States are Investing More

In the Pew study 16 states exceeded Californiarsquos $523 in per capita spending (state and local revenue) including the following states Alaska at $1817 Illinois at $674 New York at $1145 and Washington at $723

California Faces Costs Pressures that the Average State Does Not

In addition to the fact that California drivers travel over 330 billion vehicle miles every year on California highways and roads (more than Florida and New York drivers combined) and that there are nearly 33 million registered vehicles in California (approximately 40 more than that of the next highest state Texas) our state faces these cost pressures

bull California is located in a seismically active region resulting in higher costs for seismic strength

bull California has placed a priority on safety and incurred additional costs for collision reduction measures such as wider road shoulders and guardrails These investments have paid off as Californiarsquos mileage death rate per 100 million miles is 091 compared to the national average of 109

bull California is a highly urbanized state resulting in higher costs from more overpasses and

elevated freeways and higher land cost for rights-of-way than more rural states

bull Californiarsquos system is heavily used by heavier freight vehicles that cause more damage to roads

California Is Not Funding The ldquoStatersquos Sharerdquo Of Transportation Costs

bull On a nation level surface transportation funding is 25 federal 40 state and 36 local according to Pew

bull In California surface transportation funding is approximately 25 federal 25 state and 50

local as estimated by the Legislative Analyst

httpwwwpewtrustsorg~mediaassets201409surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfundingpdf httpwwwotscagovOTS_and_Traffic_SafetyScore_Cardasp

9

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 14: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Support

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 15: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

What Theyrsquore Saying About Governor Brownrsquos Plan

to Fix Californiarsquos Transportation Infrastructure

Cities and Counties

California State Association Of Counties (CSAC) Executive Director Matt Cate

ldquoIt is a solid frameworkhellip further delay will only mean an even steeper price tagrdquo

ldquoThis represents a balanced approach that includes many of the con-cepts wersquove been talking about throughout this past year to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compro-mise CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue Further delay will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the linerdquo (9315)

League Of California Cities Executive Director Chris Mckenzie

ldquoA balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideasrdquo

ldquoToday the Governorrsquos office shared a proposed framework that repre-sents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and roads system and public transitrdquo (9315)

10

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 16: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong planhellip the Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromiserdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has a strong plan to help repair Californiarsquos deteriorat-ed roads bridges and highways The Legislature should use his frame-work to reach a final compromise package that gets our roads back in working order With poor roads costing California drivers more than $700 per year in extra vehicle maintenance costs we cannot afford to wait any longerrdquo (9815)

Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos planrdquo

ldquoI strongly support the Governorrsquos plan to make sorely needed repairs to our statersquos transportation infrastructure and I call upon the Califor-nia Legislature to make sure the Governorrsquos plan is fully funded With the worldrsquos 8th largest economy it is critical that California provide safe efficient and well-maintained roads and bridges and the City of Long Beach greatly appreciates the Governorrsquos leadership on this issuerdquo (9815)

Business and Labor Leaders

Bay Area Council President amp CEO Jim Wunderman

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadershiphellip We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreementrdquo

ldquoWe applaud the Governorrsquos leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals that the Legislature can work with to reach bi-partisan agreement Californiarsquos transportation needs are immense and wersquove neglected for too long to provide adequate fund-ing We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governorrsquos framework will move us down the road to meeting the statersquos transportation needs We urge the Legislature to use this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this yearrdquo (9315)

11

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 17: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Los Angeles Area Chamber Of Commerce Senior Vice President Ruben Gonzalez

ldquoContains reforms and revenues both of which are criticalrdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos framework takes ideas from both parties and is a good foundation to negotiate a final package It contains reforms and rev-enues both of which are critical But time is of the essence and all par-ties should come together quickly to reach a final compromise packagerdquo (9415)

Silicon Valley Leadership Group President amp CEO Carl Guardino

ldquoThe right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roadsrdquo

ldquoWith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Brownrsquos transportation proposal released today is the right remedy to help cure Californiarsquos ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Brownrsquos proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have become emblematic of Californiarsquos crumbling highways local streets and roads As we all know in Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the $300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available fundingrdquo (9315)

Orange County Business Council President amp CEO Lucy Dunn

Package ensures wersquore ldquousing all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possiblerdquo

ldquoThe Governorrsquos package includes a mix of reforms to ensure wersquore using all existing and new transportation revenues as efficiently and accountably as possible And it also includes a pared down package of new revenues that will help us climb out of the immense funding pot-hole wersquove gotten ourselves into that has doomed California roads to the most congested and crumbling in the nationrdquo (9415)

12

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 18: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Alliance For Jobs Executive Consultant James Earp

ldquoThe California alliance for jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brownrdquo

ldquoThe California Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve decades of neglect to our crumbling local and state streets roads and highways He has provided a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation funds are protected and will be used for their intended purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape and move projects more quickly through the pipeline Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a modest package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority road repairs at both the state and local levels He also proposes investments in freight corridors that help move 40 percent of the na-tionrsquos goods from the ports to the rest of the countryrdquo (9315)

Associated General Contractors Of California (AGC) CEO Tom Holsman

ldquoBasis to achieve legislative consensusrdquo

ldquoAgreement on a permanent stable funding source for repair and maintenance of Californiarsquos streets roads and highways must be a top priority for the Legislature during the final days of the 2015 legislative session The Governorrsquos framework released last week must be used as a basis to achieve legislative consensus This framework includes pro-posals put forth by both Democrat and Republican leadership and mod-est new revenue sources that would be protected under the California Constitution to guarantee they are spent on transportation projects The framework also includes provisions to address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partner-ships AGC pledges to work with the Governor and the Legislature to arrive at a workable agreement that builds a stable sustainable revenue stream to fund Californiarsquos infrastructurerdquo (9715)

13

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 19: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California-Nevada Conference Of Operating Engineers Director Tim Cremins

ldquoPackage makes a permanent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highwaysrdquo

ldquoWersquore pleased the governorrsquos transportation package makes a perma-nent investment in the maintenance and repairs of Californiarsquos highways while not relying on the unpredictable and volatile General Fund We are further encouraged that the proposal includes a variety of practi-cal and efficient tools to improve the statersquos approach to repairing our highways which includes streamlining the environmental review pro-cess strengthening public-private partnerships and extending local control and financing options to cities and counties In the coming days we look forward to working with the governor and leadership to craft a feasible transportation bill that will bring Californiarsquos highways up to 21st century standards while also creating valuable jobs for workers throughout the staterdquo (9815)

California State Council Of Laborers Director Jose Mejia

This plan provides ldquomuch needed maintenance repairs to our highwaysrdquo

ldquoWe are happy to see a fair infrastructure funding package proposal that can start to address the dire needs of our transportation infrastructure necessities The proposal seeks to responsibly address reforms and ac-countability extending the authority for private investment while ensur-ing constitutional protections on new revenues This plan provides con-fidence for approved projects and much needed maintenance repairs to our highways streets and roadways and at the same time creating jobs ultimately contributing to our economyrdquo (9315)

14

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 20: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

Transportation Leaders

Fix Our Roads Coalition

ldquoThe proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlogrdquo

ldquoWe appreciate the Governorrsquos commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a solid foundation for a po-tential compromise package Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for con-stitutional protections of transportation revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA stream-lining CalTrans reforms and an extension of public private partnerships The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now will only become exponentially more costly in a few years It is time to get this donerdquo (9315)

Transportation California

ldquoA practical solutionrdquo

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transporta-tion California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our road-way preservation needs This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnershipsrdquo (9415)

15

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 21: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Governor Brownrsquos Transportation Funding Plan

California Transportation Commission Executive Director Will Kempton

ldquoA realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issuerdquo

ldquoThe California Transportation Commission has determined that the proposal put forth by the Governor is consistent with the Commissionrsquos adopted principles for reform and revenue and sees the package as a realistic and positive basis for a solution on the transportation funding issue hopefully by the end of next weekrdquo (9515)

California Transit Association

ldquoA HUGE victoryhelliprdquo

ldquoThe new transportation funding framework proposed by Governor Brown is a HUGE victory for those that rely on and need better public transit servicerdquo (9315)

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Executive Director Steve Heminger

ldquoKudos to Governor Brown for his bold plan to shore up Californiarsquos aging roadsrdquo (9315)

San Joaquin Regional Transit District General Manager And CEO Donna DeMartino

ldquoA sensible frameworkrdquo

ldquoGovernor Brown has proposed a sensible framework to improve Cali-forniarsquos transportation infrastructure His proposal would fix our high-ways repair our roads and improve public transit systems We thank the Governor for suggesting this framework and the legislators who had previously introduced bills in the special session to fund public tran-sit ndash these leaders clearly know with better public transportation infra-structure comes better quality of life for riders non-riders community stakeholders businesses and the public at-largerdquo (9415)

16

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 22: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ SECTIONS Q SEARCH Sos ngrks Qhnrs SUBSCRIBE l= WEDNESDAYOCT 14 2015 MOST POPULAR LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS POLITICS OPINION GREAT READS PLACE AN AO

Opinion I Editorial

Browns compromise is Californias best bet to fix roads

SEPTEMBER6 2015 500 AM

A fter spending months on the sidelines and above the fray while legislators

debated how to pay for Californias massive backlog of road repairs Gov Jeny

Brown has finally offered a reasonable compromise that raises fuel taxes and

vehicle fees while tapping carbon pollution fees to fund highway street bridge and public

transit improvements Legislators ought to support it and start reinvesting in critical state

infrastructure

There is bipartisan agreement on the need to fix the roads Caltrans has deferred $59

billion worth of highway and bridge repairs Cities and counties face an even bigger bill

needing $78 billion to return local streets to good condition And the cost of fixing the

roadways increases each year as pavement deteriorates and simple repairs turn into more

expensive reconstrnction projects Thats why Brown called a special session in June to

focus lawmakers attention on how to fund the work

Republican leaders however have predictably opposed tax increases Needing some GOP

votes to pass the funding package Brown has pitched a plan that embraces the leaders calls

for more public-private partnerships and cost-cutting on transportation projects while

generating $36 billion a year in new revenue Thats far less than the $6 billion

transportation advocates say is needed but it would still be the largest infusion of

transportation funding in years

Brown would raise the gasoline excise tax by six cents a gallon and the diesel excise tax by

11 cents a gallon and have both rise with inflation in the future - meaning that lawmakers

could avoid the perennial fights over whether to raise the gas tax He would also impose a new $65-per-vehicle highway user fee that would apply to all vehicles most notably the

electric cars that avoid the gas tax by using less fuel Brown has also proposed taking $500

million from the cap-and-trade program - which generated $22 billion this year from fees

on carbon emissions - to pay for public transit investments such as electric buses and

cleaner rail cars and to help make streets more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly

Republicans want to spend cap-and-trade monies on road repairs but Browns plan is a

more appropriate use of fees that are supposed to fund reductions in greenhouse gas

emissions

Browns proposal is not perfect The combination of higher gas taxes and a flat highway

user fee will hit the poorest drivers hardest And it banks on $100 million in savings

through efficiencies and cost-cutting at Caltrans which may or may not materialize But

the basic premise of the governors plan is sound considering the long-standing bipartisan

support in California for raising gas taxes and user fees to fund road repairs Republicans

cant kick the can down the potholed road Its time to start rebuilding

bull 17

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 23: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Continued next page

18

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 24: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Autos Jobs Real Estate 75deg e-ed1t1on Subscribe Sign In bull

It may not be all we need in California but it may be the best we can do

The new taxes and fees wilJ require two-thirds approval from the state Legislature and its not

going to be easy to get

The plan includes reforming Cal trans hiring procedures and other ideas designed to get

Republican support Meanwhile some in the Democratic caucus are grumbling that the money is

less than they wanted Browns going to have to convince them that this is in Californias best

interest - and then convince the voters

It is definitely in the best interest of Californians to make these investments

Already drivers pay a hidden vehicle tax of$762 per year just because the highways and roads are

in such disrepair A $65 fee would feel painful because its more obvious but in the long run it

could actually save California drivers money

Improving the highways would be good for our economy as well Our ability to move goods

depends on the state of our transit corridors and right now theyre in sorry shape

Browns plan isnt going to please everyone but theres no transportation funding plan that will

The purpose of this summers special session was to create a compromise Its not perfect but it

beats the inertia that has been the default approach for far too long

Editorials

19

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 25: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Sacramento - The Fix Our Roads Coalit ion including cities counties labor business and transportation advocates

issued the following statement today in support of the transportation funding framework being floated by Governors

office today

We appreciate the Governors commitment to addressing this critically important issue His framework represents a

solid foundation for a potential compromise package

Included in the framework are many of the reforms needed to maximize accountability make better use of existing

funding and to streamline project delivery These include ideas for constitutional protections of t ransportation

revenues repayment from the general fund of previously-diverted transportation funds CEQA streamlin ing CalTrans

reforms and an extension of public private partnerships P3s)

The proposal will help put a significant dent in our huge maintenance backlog which if not addressed now wil l only

become exponentially more costly in a few years

It is t ime to get this done

To read the seven principles supported by the Fix Our Roads coalition go to our website here There you can also see a

list of coalition members

bull 20

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 26: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

BAVAQEA - COUNCIL

IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Rufus Jeffris 0 415-946-8725 C 415-606-2337

rjeffrisbayareaccmncilorg

BAY AREA COUNCIL WELCOMES GOV BROWNS DRAFT FRAMEWORK ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

SAN FRANCISCO CA - The Bay Area Council reacted positively to a draft framework unveiled by Gov Jerry Brown today that would generate $36 billion annually to fix Californias broken roads highways and bridges The framework comes as the Legislature works In special session to develop a transportation funding package

uThis framework can help clear the roc~d for a badly needed transportation funding plan said Jim Wundertnan President and CEO of the Bay Area Council We applaud the Governors leadership in presenting a reasonable and workable set of funding proposals tha~ the Legislature can work with to reach bl-partisan agreement Californias transportation needs are immense and weve neglected for too long to provide adequate funding We need good roads and highways to keep our economy moving and growing The Governors framework will move us down the road to meeting the states transportation needs We urge the Legislature to U$e this framework to reach an agreement on a transportation funding plan this year

According to the draft framework which was shared with the Bay Area Council the $36 _billion in funding would come from a combination of $2 billion from a $65 highway user fee $500 million from cap and trade revenue $500 million from a gas excise tax $500 million from a diesel excise tax and $100 million from efficiencies at Caltrans The money would be split equally between state and local uses

About the Bay Area Council The Bay Area Council is a business-sponsored public~poicy advocacy organization for the nineshycounty Bay Area The Council proactively advocates for a strong economy a vital business environment and a better quality of life for everyone who lives here Founded in 1945 the Bay Area Council is widely respected by elected officials policy makers and other civic leaders as the voice of Bay Area business Today approximately 275 of the largest employers in the region support the Bay Area Council and offer their CEO or top executive ~s a member Our members employ more than 443 million workers and have revenues of $194 trillion worldwide

21

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 27: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

September 4 2015 1 of 1 | P a g e

Mark Watts Interim Executive Director 925 L Street Suite 220 Sacramento CA 95814 Phone 916-446-1280

mwattsswmconsultcom

Transportation California Issues Statement in Support of the Governorrsquos Office Transportation Funding Framework

Transportation California a coalition of contractors allied labor material providers and business affiliates issued the following statement today in response to the GovernorrsquosOffice transportation funding framework

ldquoCalifornia is in an urgent roadway maintenance crisis and Transportation California recognizes the strong effort by the Governor to bring a practical solution to the table in the Special Session

We support the Governorrsquos willingness to tackle new revenue by restoring the gas tax to last yearrsquos levels and proposing a per vehicle charge to meet our roadway preservation needs

This approach lsquostops the bleedingrsquo inherent in the existing fuel tax structure resulting from the annual tax adjustment and provides a new vehicle-based revenue source that is immune from the erosion of fuel sales due to improving fuel mileage and alternative fuel vehicle usage

We further support the Governorrsquos proposals that will address better accountability make more efficient use of the new revenues improve CEQA processes address needed reforms of Caltrans and extend public private partnerships (P3s)rdquo

22

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 28: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Homegt Newsgt Press Releasesgt 2015 gt League of California Cities Supports Governors

Transportation Funding Framework Ii Sep32015 Contact Eva Spiegel (916) 658-8228

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

League of California Cities Supports Governors Transportation Funding Framework

The League of California Citiesreg issued the following statement from Executive Director Chris

McKenzie today in supportOf Gov Jerry Browns transportation funding framework

For too long California leaders have talked about the need for additional investment in the

transportation system without taking the needed action Today the Governors office shared a

proposed framework that represents a balanced compromise and incorporates some of the best

ideas from a number of California legislators and stakeholders Included in that framework are a

number of needed transportation reforms and a significant investment in the local streets and

roads system and public transit

The League of California Cities urges the Legislature to come together and adopt a funding package

based on this framework before adjourning next week

The local streets and roads we all rely on are literally crumbling beneath our feet and the tires of

our cars buses trucks and bicycles The conditions are getting so bad that if Californians dont

commit to prioritizing funding to ftx them we will be facing the failure of a large portion of our

bridges streets and roads And our pothole-filled roads are forcing drivers to pay a hidden tax of

$762 per year to repair their vehicles because of poor conditions

Whether you trav~B)Eait tmck bus train- bicyde or onyeur crnfftiVU-feet you are- using a part of

the transportation system California has invested too much to let it go to ruins now We need

bull 23

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 29: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

leadership on this important threat to the safety of Californians and our economy

It is well past time for the Legislature to act

Californias local streets and roads are literally facing the tipping point~ Pavement conditions

according to the 2014 Loca1 Streets and Roads Needs Assessment are at 66 out of 100

Established in 1898 the League of California Cities is a nonprofit statewide association that advocates for cities with the state and federal governments and provides education and training services to elected and appointed city officials

bull 24

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 30: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

~ CALIFORNIA ~~ALLIANCE ~ FORJOBS

Alliance Issues Statement in Support of Governors Transportation Funding Plan September 3rd 2015 1 Posted by John Frith

James Earp executive consultant for tile california Alliance for Jobs issued tile following statement in support of tile Governors transportation funltling proposal toltlay

The Galifornia Alliance for Jobs strongly supports the proposals outlined today by Governor Jerry Brown to help solve aecades of neglect to our crumbling local anlt1 state streets roads anlt1 highways

He has provilt1ed a framework that incorporates many strong reforms called for by the Republicans that will ensure transportation tunas are protected anlt1 will be used for their intenlt1elt1 purpose as well as regulatory changes that will cut through red tape anlt1 move projects more quickly through the pipeline

Characteristic of his fiscal conservatism the Governor has proposed a m0lt1est package of new revenue that will tackle the highest priority roalt1 repairs at both the state anlt1 local levels He also proposes investments in freight corrilt1ors that help move 40 percent of the nations goods from the ports to the rest of the country

Every resilt1ent of Galifornia relies on a transportation network in go0lt1 repair for their jobs their health anlt1 safety anlt1 their quality of life We urge the Legislature to consilt1er the price we will all pay from further inaction anlt1 work diligently to get this lt10ne

bull 25

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 31: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

l[lfittl CALIFORNIA STATE ASSOCIATION OP COUNTIES

PRESS RELEASE

CSAC Supports Gov~rnors Framework for Transportation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 3 2015

Contact Gregg Fishman Communications Coordinator

916-327-7500 ext S16

916-342-9508 mobile

SACRAMENTO - The California State Association of Counties supports the framework for funding trnsportation

improvements in California put forward by the Governor today

This represents a balanced approach that includes many of the concepts weve been t~lking about throughout this past year

to address our critical funding needs for local streets roads and state highways said CSAC Executive Director Matt Cate

It is a solid framework that should serve as the basis of a negotiated compromise

CSAC is urging the Legislature to work on a negotiated package that addresses this critical issue said Cate Further delay

will only mean an even steeper price tag for California down the line

The California State Association of Counties is the voice of Californias 58 counties at the state and federal level

bull 26

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 32: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

CALIFORNJAmiddotN~VAPA CONFERENCJ ()F OPERATING middotENGINEERS OF rHE JNTERlVATIOdegfAL UNION Of OPERATING ENGdegNEERS

1121 L Street 401 bull Sacramento Cf 95814 Phone 916) 44()8710 bull Fax (91~) 44(j-871~

MEDIA

rws$fLL E ~URNS Pr4silent

WM WAGGONER VicemiddotPresldent

El)WARI) CURLY Sect~taiymiddotTre~~urer

TM t~EMINS Qirectot

FOR IMM~bIATE RE~EASE semiddotpt 4 201s

OONTAtT Jana s~astad ~16~S9middotsao19

SACRAM~NTOmiddot Tim Crem1os di(Ctor of Califorhia-Ne~ada Confer~nce of Operating En~ineEr~ tQday r~l~~s~cl th~ middotfollowlng statement in response to the transportatipn prqpQsiil intrO~lceq bY Goy Jerry Brown ye$h~rday middot

Wefre pleased the governors transportation pa~~age m~~es a perrnaoent investment in the rnantenao~e and repmiddotairS ~f california-s hlghways while not relying on ~he unpredictable and votatlie Geii~nil i=und

We ~re further encouraged that the propoal lnelmicrodes a v~rleW of pt~ctcal and centfficient toQls to Improve tti~ stat~$ approach to repairing our highways which lhcludes str~~mJjnjng themiddot envitonm~nt~I review proGes~ strength~nin~ public-private partnershipsj and extending locai control cind flnancirig optioris to

cities and co1mtie$

1bull1n ~he middotcoming d~ys we look forward to workin~ with the governor al)d le~dershiP to craft a feasible transpo~atl9n ~iii that will bring Californias highways up to 21si century standards whlle also ~reating

valuable jobs for workers tl)rm_1ghout the state

Local Union 3 R~fsefl E Burns Business Mona_ger

Local Union 12 WM tlqggO(ler Busine~s MltJnager

-End-

Local U11ion 3f Jerry fltOITfOT

Business Manager

bull Loco Vnlan soz Edward Curly Buslne~ Mimager

27

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 33: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

bull PO llox 255745 Solraromto16Utonda 9586~145 T tlophonio (91~ 4 81~000 FAX Pl 6) 481-8008 E-nall lmci~llitornlopololaquoblds0111 bull Wbull bs1te ltbull Ulolillapolkuhiobori

September920IS

ThoHonotablePAmundOJ~rowqJr Slate CapitolBuildiJJB Sacramentp CA 95al 4

RE Governbr1s Frlfmelork forTrbullmoo1tattou Funding Paclcage Notice of8uppiirt

Plar Oovemor BroWQ

The ealltomla Jo~ice Chiefs Association i$ pieiSed to bullIPP9ri your tramportation fundingpacbgeTheframeworlCwouldprovldemuchneededfuiidingtoJheatate and lo6al roadway system and transit tO address the ovetwhetming bacldog of prel1lrvatiOnaM tniiriJBnapce

The local ~eets and roads we all rely Oil are liWfallycrumblingbeneath our feet presentiogserioos publicsafllty cofiCerOS in neighbltlrboodsacroas ountate The conditions are getting so bad that if California doesnt commit to prioritizing fundirig to fPt them wecoiild be facing~ ~11tastopbe Withomicrottbis additl6ila1 fundmg25oftocalstreelsandroaibwill be infaiJedcooampilonin a VPf short 1() years

~e proposodframewodds bmicrollt o~ ideas put fo~ by tjties couuties transit oOiertansportiOnstakeoodmsand both legislative cauoises1t inclil~~ signifj~constitu1i~ protectionsfornewmeuues cEQAstreamlining and Cal trans refOrms In short this framewodc provides the CoIJlomiSe that is needed to address1he transpllffationneedsofthe state

Californias transpomtionsys~ is on the verge ofcrisiii We e~ot strltlSs enough the importmce of acting on thi transp~nfmicrondingshortfall before the legislatureadjoums fut 2015 For all these teasons andmore the CalifofniaPolfoe Cl)iefs Mspclatiob$npporls a paclcage ballCd on yow framework

Sincerely

David Bejarano President

Lauren Michaels Legislative Affairs Manager

Cc All Members California State Legislature

bull 28

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 34: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

SCllllj ~ Rii cgtllll) ijiA AS~Q~IAtfollllf GOV~RNM~NTS

ManO~ce

8 J 8 Weit ~Venth ~treet

12ti flo~r

Los A11glles1 Califor11 ii

90017middot3435

H2q) 2~61809

f(213) 236-1825

Offi~ers

P1es~n1 Clleryl Vi~~~-Wjilkcr lI laquoentro

f~stV1ee p~ident Mkhefe Martin( Santa Ana

$econd YKe Pr~sl~n~ Marga~ fligt~y OJarte

Immediate Pst President Carl MorehoUse San fkJenawntura

ExecutiY~AdminstratloI Commt~e~ Ch11ir

ltheryt viegumiddotW~fk~~ el Centro

Polcy ~ommltt~ C~alrs

=OJ111)U)i~ Ec~notnlc ap d H111nan Deiibulllopmeiit

BiUJatm Big llfar

fjlergy amp Envlronri1~n Deborah Robertso~ Rialto

T ranjporia~on AlarJ WapneriSan lier~rcino ~s9Ciaecl ~tvernm~nts

Honorable Edmund G Brown Jr Governor State of California Sacramento California 95814

RE SUPPORT of Your Constitutional and LegislativE1 Proposal to Enact a Sustainable Transportation and Infrastructure Funding System

Dear Governor Brown

On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments the nations largest Metropolitan Planning Organization and Council of Governments representing six counties and 191 cities I write tigt express ~upport for your proposal to address the States immediate tran~portation infrastructure needs Cl1d to create a protected framework that wiil ensure a level of funding middot ~ufficiency for the future as well as an asstJrance that any enhanced revenues will be used omiddotnly for transportation related purposes

SCAG applauds the le~dership you have shown to incorporate many of the niost important priorities for our region Your proposal takes the important first step towards addressing the regions system preservation need~ which according to e~timates from SCAGs current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) scheduled for release later this year exceed $273 billion for Southern California over the 25 year life of the plan which includes an estimated $65 billion for state highways and $35 bilOon for regionally significant local streets and roads Accordingly we support your proposals recognition of the need to index any increased revenues to protect against the erosionmiddotof its purchasing power over time We also support consisterit with longmiddot standing policy of our Board appropriate CEQA relief to make needed maintenance and repairs to the existing infrastructure

Finally we are particularly supportive of the proposed robust funding provided to the Trade Corridor Enhancement Account created by the bill funded from the increased diesel fuel tax anq building tipon the existing Trade Corridors Improvement Fund framework and process to fund critically needed il)frastructure enhancements along Californias high volume freight corridors which support Southern California as the nations global trade gateway and provides critical underpinning to the regions economic recovery and well-being

Please feel free to call upon SCAG to support your efforts In any way that we can to ensure passage of viable comprehensive funding reform and again thank you for your leadership and your committed effort to address this most important issue for California

Sincerely

Hasan lkhrata Executive Director

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

2015S7 prinledonrlCfded1J1per

29

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 35: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

SOlfJi~RlI cA~l~()lllllA

~amp~~i~~tampJ Main Office

8l8 West Seventh Street

_2th Fo~r

Los ingeies Calif(irriii

90017-343S

t(m) 23(i 1 eo9

f(2l3)236-825

wviwscagqgov

Orfic~r~

Presldeiit Cheryl Vi~~sW~ker El CentlQ

~lrstVl~e P~esidel~ Michele MarthJetSanta Ana

$~~jd yce Pi~ldent ~arg~rt fnla)I D4arce

l111mediate Pist flesklen~ Carl Moreho~se San Buehalllntura

ExecutiveAdministration middot ()mmitteamp middot~hik middot

cl)ryi Viegas-W~l~er Ei ~ntrltgt

PgtllCy C)mmlttee lt~airs Cori)munffy EmiddotctmC1tnlc and

Hu1ah Development Bill )ahn Big Pear

Jn~rgy amp tnvjroriment Debo~h Robertson Rialto

fr~nsportatJon A)an Wapner SanmiddotllernardJno AssocatecJ(iovernrry~nts

Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon Senate Minority Leader Jean Fuller Assembly Speaker Toni G Atkins Assembly Minority Leader Kri~tin Olsen Southern California Legislative Delegation Secretary Brian Kelly CalSTA Regional Council Tim Egan Capitol Representation Gro~p

The Regional Council consists of 86 elected officials representing 191 cities six counties six County Transportation Commissions one representative from the Transportation Corridor Agencies one Tribal Government representative and one representative for the Air Districts within Southern California

201557 printed on recycled paper

bull 30

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 36: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Damon Connolly 1 DISTRllaquoT

PRESIDENT

Kalie Rice 2 DISTRICT

Kalhri n Sean 3bull0 DISTllCT

VICE PRESIDENT

Steve Klnsey ol lgtSTRlCT

2bullbull VICE PRESIDENT

)udyArl(gtld 5 DISTRICT

Matthew H Hymel COUNTY ADMINl~TRATOR

ClERIC QF THE 80~10

Marin Counly Ovlc ltAnter

3501 centMc Center _Drive Suite 329 Sqn RoFoel CA 94903 415 473 7331 T 415-473 3645 F 415 473 6172 TTY ~morincoun1yor9bos

Septernber 10 2015

The Honorable Governor Edmund G Brown Jr California State Capitol Sacramento CA 95814

Re Governors Transportation Funding SUPPORT

Dear Governor Brown

On be~alf of the Marin County Board of Supervisors 1 join with t~e California State Ass~clalion Qf Counties (C$AC) in strong supp_ort of your propo$ed pl~n to spend an additional $36 billion on fixing Californias crumbling stre~ts roads bridges and highways The proposal also inclu~es ret~rms and amiddotccountabili~y measures including project delivery and environrnenal streamljning innovative procurement methods and refoiins at Caltrans related to workJoa~ and hiring The funds would be split between the state local governments and transit agencies

The plan creates $2 billion in highway user fee ($65 charge per vehicle) spends $500 million a year from cap and trade funds increases the excise tax on diesel fuel to produce $500 1llllion and stabilizes the gas excis~ t~x by indexing it to inflation to generate an additional $500 million Counties and cities would receive $10S billion in dir~ct subventions annually and the package ~oes not sunset Finally with constitutional protection the transportation revenues would be used for transportationmiddot infrastructure only middot

Californias roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy For years we hi1ve left roads highways ahd bridges to crumble and decay The $36 bilihm proposal would be the start of our investment to maintain and rehabilitate our transportation infrastructure middot

TJle Marin County ~oard of Supervisors supports your tr~nsportation-funding plan Thank you fcir your consideramiddottion of our lnput If you have any questions regarding our position please contact me

Re~uuubmitted

~ Katie Rice President Marin County Board of Supervisors

Cc Honorable Senator Mike McGuire Honorable Assembly Member Marc Levine Matt Cate CSAC Executive Director

bull 31

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 37: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Steve Tye Mayor

Nancy A Lyons Mayor Pro Tem

Carol Herrera middot Council Merriber

Jimmy Lin Council Member

Jack Tanaka Council Member

City of Diamond Ba~ 21810 Copley Drivebull Diamond Bar CA 91 765-4178

September 17 2015

The Honor~ble Jerry Brown Governor State of California State Capitol First Floor Sacramento CA 95814 VIA FAX (916) 558-3160

(909) 839-70lgtO bullFax (909) 861-3117

wwwDiamondBarCAgov

RE Increase Funding for Transportation in Special Session

D~ar Gov~rnor Brown

On behalf of the City of Diamond Bar I appl~ud you for extending middotthe special session and respectfully urge you to support a transportation funding package that mak~s a meaningful dent in California$ transportation funding shortfall his is a critical issue for our commumiddotnity that needs to be addressed immediately

Cities and countle~ own and operate more than 81 percent of Californias roads If funding remains at current inadequate levels in middot10 years a quarter of local streets and roads in California will be In failed -condition and the funding shortfall grows by $21 billion According to a r~cent n~tional report poor roads cost the ~verage California motorist $762 per y~ar in extra vehicle maintenance costs

Most importantly if nothing is done projects of regional significance such as the SR-5760 Confluence Project will take decades to receive funding to remedy congestion that impacts millions of motorists each we~k

Wf know these issues arent easy to address but they will have direct and lasting benefits for our community and for California motorists

Wf hope you will support moving a transportation funding package forwar~J

CC Senator Bob Huff 29th District Fax (916) 651-4929 Assembly Member Ling-Ling Chang 551h District Fax (916) 319-2155 City Council City Man~ger Jennifer Quan League of California Cities Joe A Gonsalves amp Son

bull 32

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 38: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Home Policy Leadership Events About Us Press

Silicon Valley Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan Home Posts Press Releases S~n VaDey Leadership Group stands with Governor Brown on balanced transportation funding plan

September 3 2015

SILICON VALLEY - middotw ith a great combination of reform and revenue Governor Browns transportation proposal released

today is the right remedy to help cure Californias ailing local streets and roads and state highway system Governor Browns

proposed $36 billion a year transportation funding package is a sensible solution to fix the cracks and potholes that have

become emblematic of Californias crumbling highways local streets and roads said Carl Guardino CEO of the Silicon

Valley Leadership Group and a member of the California Transportation Commission Ban co ve tinh bullAs we all know in

Silicon Valley where commutes are long and rough there is an urgent need for transportation improvements that grows more

urgent each day The proposed 50-50 split between state and local transportation needs is sound policy and will help with the

$300 billion 10-year gap in transportation priorities and available funding

Contact Steve Wright I swrightsvlgorg 408501 7853

On Septen1ber 3rd 2015 posted in Press Releases by communications Governor Brown transportation

bull 33

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 39: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Local Allocations

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 40: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 16794763 167947625 ALAMEDA COUNTY

ALAMEDA 1216804 12168038 ALBANY 298196 2981960 BERKELEY 1879490 18794902 DUBLIN 856093 8560926 EMERYVILLE 167993 1679935 FREMONT 3586487 35864872 HAYWARD 2451670 24516705 LIVERMORE 1366110 13661100 NEWARK 710662 7106616 OAKLAND 6896300 68962999 PIEDMONT 180340 1803396 PLEASANTON 1170030 11700296 SAN LEANDRO 1404205 14042052 UNION CITY 1201848 12018476

315354 3153543 1496395 14963955

ALPINE COUNTY AMADOR COUNTY AMADOR 3459 34588 IONE 126792 1267918 JACKSON 74797 747972 PLYMOUTH 17198 171981 SUTTER CREEK 47159 471586

5380076 53800756 BUTTE COUNTY BIGGS 28968 289677 CHICO 1415382 14153824 GRIDLEY 107912 1079123 OROVILLE 255889 2558894 PARADISE 427950 4279502

2278898 22788975 CALAVERAS COUNTY ANGELS CAMP 61490 614903

1785418 17854181 COLUSA COUNTY COLUSA 98817 988169 WILLIAMS 85878 858783

13001852 130018525 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANTIOCH 1704675 17046751 BRENTWOOD 876573 8765734 CLAYTON 179347 1793468 CONCORD 2015473 20154735 DANVILLE 697755 6977550 EL CERRITO 385708 3857077 HERCULES 395412 3954116 LAFAYETTE 394867 3948672 MARTINEZ 590755 5907555 MORAGA 264617 2646166 OAKLEY 609699 6096990 ORINDA 289661 2896611 PINOLE 313921 3139209 PITTSBURG 1062758 10627578 PLEASANT HILL 542396 5423959 RICHMOND 1699599 16995990 SAN PABLO 514517 5145171 SAN RAMON 1237333 12373326 WALNUT CREEK 10662166 1066217

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 1 of 12

34

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 41: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 927851 9278511

CRESCENT CITY 124294 1242937 4825375 48253755

PLACERVILLE 168570 1685700 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 385708 3857077

16252021 162520213 CLOVIS 1636347 16363472 COALINGA 305994 3059944 FIREBAUGH 125046 1250463 FOWLER 94205 942051 FRESNO 8256501 82565011 HURON 129418 1294179 KERMAN 230284 2302845 KINGSBURG 187113 1871131 MENDOTA 179747 1797471 ORANGE COVE 176929 1769288 PARLIER 240501 2405008 REEDLEY 419976 4199757 SANGER 410960 4109603 SAN JOAQUIN 65189 651894 SELMA 383946 3839462

2174179 21741794 ORLAND 123029 1230287 WILLOWS 104165 1041653

4251281 42512813 ARCATA 284265 2842646 BLUE LAKE 20257 202566 EUREKA 436886 4368856 FERNDALE 23123 231229 FORTUNA 191789 1917890 RIO DELL 54156 541563 TRINIDAD 5893 58928

DEL NORTE COUNTY

EL DORADO COUNTY

FRESNO COUNTY

GLENN COUNTY

HUMBOLDT COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 2 of 12

35

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 42: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 7264721 72647212 IMPERIAL COUNTY

BRAWLEY 444252 4442516 CALEXICO 649556 6495556 CALIPATRIA 131836 1318359 EL CENTRO 726435 7264345 HOLTVILLE 106343 1063430 IMPERIAL 459256 4592559 WESTMORLAND 39136 391360

2618996 26189963 INYO COUNTY BISHOP 62339 623390

15492377 154923770 KERN COUNTY ARVIN 323881 3238811 BAKERSFIELD 5881854 58818537 CALIFORNIA CITY 240421 2404208 DELANO 871866 8718655 MARICOPA 18895 188955 MCFARLAND 223255 2232547 RIDGECREST 459992 4599925 SHAFTER 279605 2796048 TAFT 149354 1493542 TEHACHAPI 232558 2325583 WASCO 418887 4188868

3225290 32252900 KINGS COUNTY AVENAL 268011 2680113 CORCORAN 417093 4170934 HANFORD 885252 8852525 LEMOORE 407710 4077097

2288748 22887479 LAKE COUNTY CLEARLAKE 244824 2448244 LAKEPORT 82403 824034

2219712 22197123 LASSEN COUNTY SUSANVILLE 297844 2978438

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 3 of 12

36

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 43: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation 99615805 LOS ANGELES COUNTY

AGOURA HILLS 374498 ALHAMBRA 1450163 ARCADIA 920754 ARTESIA 281959 AVALON 61170 AZUSA 787957 BALDWIN PARK 1306733 BELL 624223 BELLFLOWER 1244875 BELL GARDENS 752648 BEVERLY HILLS 580059 BRADBURY 17326 BURBANK 1736926 CALABASAS 383402 CARSON 1574553 CERRITOS 881906 CLAREMONT 604975 COMMERCE 217474 COMPTON 1597611 COVINA 796172 CUDAHY 416805 CULVER CITY 654456 DIAMOND BAR 977104 DOWNEY 1820930 DUARTE 370287 EL MONTE 2025081 EL SEGUNDO 273440 GARDENA 991964 GLENDALE 3329157 GLENDORA 845972 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 254961 HAWTHORNE 1443501 HERMOSA BEACH 316259 HIDDEN HILLS 32667 HUNTINGTON PARK 1039715 INDUSTRY 12875 INGLEWOOD 1908954 IRWINDALE 27655 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 346011 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 99169 LAKEWOOD 1339881 LA MIRADA 808294 LANCASTER 2560143 LA PUENTE 694328 LA VERNE 545262 LAWNDALE 538697 LOMITA 338725 LONG BEACH 7921827 LOS ANGELES 65569886 LYNWOOD 1173681 MALIBU 220420 MANHATTAN BEACH 589971

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015

37

Over Ten Years 996158051 3744985 14501628 9207536 2819588 611701 7879569 13067334 6242229 12448748 7526480 5800587 173262

17369255 3834018 15745526 8819058 6049751 2174740 15976115 7961716 4168051 6544556 9771037 18209303 3702870 20250813 2734398 9919638 33291566 8459723 2549607 14435014 3162588 326667

10397149 128745

19089543 276546 3460112 991692

13398806 8082935 25601432 6943282 5452622 5386969 3387252 79218272 655698865 11736805 2204204 5899708

Page 4 of 12

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 44: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years MAYWOOD 480938 4809376 MONROVIA 640268 6402680 MONTEBELLO 1053358 10533581 MONTEREY PARK 1041284 10412842 NORWALK 1764292 17642919 PALMDALE 2492552 24925519 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 227514 2275142 PARAMOUNT 930506 9305055 PASADENA 2427202 24272024 PICO RIVERA 1077490 10774898 POMONA 2621073 26210731 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 696970 6969704 REDONDO BEACH 1090573 10905725 ROLLING HILLS (2) -ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 131163 1311633 ROSEMEAD 924853 9248529 SAN DIMAS 592661 5926610 SAN FERNANDO 406188 4061884 SAN GABRIEL 688307 6883073 SAN MARINO 218947 2189472 SANTA CLARITA 3348821 33488207 SANTA FE SPRINGS 288188 2881879 SANTA MONICA 1484463 14844629 SIERRA MADRE 178482 1784821 SIGNAL HILL 183590 1835903 SOUTH EL MONTE 362329 3623285 SOUTH GATE 1646403 16464034 SOUTH PASADENA 416517 4165169 TEMPLE CITY 578618 5786175 TORRANCE 2397434 23974341 VERNON 1954 19536 WALNUT 522972 5229720 WEST COVINA 1808728 18087283 WEST HOLLYWOOD 609074 6090745 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 142597 1425967 WHITTIER 1397143 13971434

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 5 of 12

38

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 45: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4666093 46660930

CHOWCHILLA 305066 3050657 MADERA 1008954 10089537

3780947 37809466 BELVEDERE 34829 348285 CORTE MADERA 157185 1571846 FAIRFAX 120755 1207548 LARKSPUR 198530 1985305 MILL VALLEY 228299 2282988 NOVATO 854411 8544113 ROSS 39408 394083 SAN ANSELMO 204071 2040710 SAN RAFAEL 941923 9419229 SAUSALITO 121636 1216356 TIBURON 145559 1455591

1471015 14710150 3413207 34132074

FORT BRAGG 117696 1176963 POINT ARENA 8023 80226 UKIAH 259172 2591721 WILLITS 81699 816989

6128533 61285327 ATWATER 465181 4651807 DOS PALOS 80866 808662 GUSTINE 90442 904420 LIVINGSTON 225000 2250001 LOS BANOS 595175 5951751 MERCED 1299143 12991432

2145518 21455183 ALTURAS 46838 468383

1587499 15874986 MAMMOTH LAKES 132685 1326846

6958780 69587799 CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 65686 656858 DEL REY OAKS 26662 266618 GONZALES 145943 1459434 GREENFIELD 286603 2866026 KING CITY 211549 2115491 MARINA 450545 4505447 MONTEREY 490658 4906576 PACIFIC GROVE 251134 2511335 SALINAS 2506307 25063072 SAND CITY 5493 54925 SEASIDE 559146 5591456 SOLEDAD 454148 4541477

MADERA COUNTY

MARIN COUNTY

MARIPOSA COUNTY MENDOCINO COUNTY

MERCED COUNTY

MODOC COUNTY

MONO COUNTY

MONTEREY COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 6 of 12

39

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 46: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2626546 26265458 NAPA COUNTY

AMERICAN CANYON 320278 3202781 CALISTOGA 85990 859904 NAPA 1261689 12616886 SAINT HELENA 96735 967352 YOUNTVILLE 65205 652054

2686079 26860795 NEVADA COUNTY GRASS VALLEY 208667 2086668 NEVADA CITY 49977 499769 TRUCKEE 260693 2606934

32695670 326956699 ORANGE COUNTY ALISO VIEJO 799871 7998706 ANAHEIM 5662923 56629225 BREA 678908 6789076 BUENA PARK 1347359 13473587 COSTA MESA 1876384 18763836 CYPRESS 800351 8003510 DANA POINT 597705 5977052 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 940626 9406258 FULLERTON 2243932 22439324 GARDEN GROVE 2812190 28121895 HUNTINGTON BEACH 3258411 32584107 IRVINE 3885596 38855960 LAGUNA BEACH 405996 4059963 LAGUNA HILLS 541419 5414191 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1083543 10835428 LAGUNA WOODS 300198 3001977 LA HABRA 1011772 10117720 LAKE FOREST 1267261 12672611 LA PALMA 261078 2610777 LOS ALAMITOS 196481 1964808 MISSION VIEJO 1612920 16129200 NEWPORT BEACH 1391123 13911225 ORANGE 2285198 22851982 PLACENTIA 837565 8375655 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 799775 7997745 SAN CLEMENTE 1101109 11011092 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 596216 5962159 SANTA ANA 5728752 57287524 SEAL BEACH 416501 4165009 STANTON 637306 6373056 TUSTIN 1254787 12547869 VILLA PARK 100995 1009947 WESTMINSTER 1509940 15099397 YORBA LINDA 1109276 11092758

6950718 69507175 PLACER COUNTY AUBURN 221045 2210449 COLFAX 31994 319942 LINCOLN 723888 7238884 LOOMIS 107976 1079764 ROCKLIN 955534 9555340 ROSEVILLE 2032960 20329598

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 7 of 12

40

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 47: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 1767188 17671884

PORTOLA 35997 359975 26517657 265176569

BANNING 485597 4855974 BEAUMONT 654552 6545517 BLYTHE 362297 3622965 CALIMESA 131804 1318039 CANYON LAKE 179747 1797471 CATHEDRAL CITY 846148 8461485 COACHELLA 698700 6986998 CORONA 2548197 25481975 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 448383 4483830 EASTVALE 947736 9477356 HEMET 1305661 13056606 INDIAN WELLS 82371 823714 INDIO 1339897 13398966 JURUPA VALLEY 2035365 20353650 LAKE ELSINORE 908231 9082313 LA QUINTA 711318 7113181 MENIFEE 1526577 15265774 MORENO VALLEY 3190739 31907393 MURRIETA 1704195 17041947 NORCO 438279 4382787 PALM DESERT 833754 8337544 PALM SPRINGS 769270 7692696 PERRIS 1154593 11545929 RANCHO MIRAGE 284153 2841526 RIVERSIDE 5028659 50286595 SAN JACINTO 729605 7296051 TEMECULA 1702017 17020169 WILDOMAR 625344 6253438

19665476 196654755 CITRUS HEIGHTS 1410995 14109948 ELK GROVE 2573114 25731138 FOLSOM 1185194 11851940 GALT 388942 3889423 ISLETON 13515 135151 RANCHO CORDOVA 1086313 10863130 SACRAMENTO 7785396 77853956

1493419 14934195 HOLLISTER 597305 5973048 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 30505 305050

PLUMAS COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SAN BENITO COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 8 of 12

41

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 48: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 25888770 258887703

ADELANTO 520602 5206021 APPLE VALLEY 1133007 11330073 BARSTOW 388814 3888142 BIG BEAR LAKE 100530 1005303 CHINO 1356983 13569826 CHINO HILLS 1264571 12645709 COLTON 849607 8496073 FONTANA 3237482 32374816 GRAND TERRACE 203639 2036387 HESPERIA 1465295 14652952 HIGHLAND 865236 8652361 LOMA LINDA 378133 3781335 MONTCLAIR 601052 6010519 NEEDLES 93020 930201 ONTARIO 2794863 27948633 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2864809 28648086 REDLANDS 1151759 11517586 RIALTO 1624193 16241932 SAN BERNARDINO 3406324 34063237 TWENTYNINE PALMS 493716 4937161 UPLAND 1218693 12186934 VICTORVILLE 1931020 19310204 YUCAIPA 843154 8431540 YUCCA VALLEY 340951 3409510

37678378 376783783 CARLSBAD 1764148 17641478 CHULA VISTA 4101581 41015807 CORONADO 431921 4319215 DEL MAR 74621 746211 EL CAJON 1621423 16214230 ENCINITAS 1043590 10435901 ESCONDIDO 2362157 23621572 IMPERIAL BEACH 427150 4271496 LA MESA 941074 9410742 LEMON GROVE 418438 4184385 NATIONAL CITY 1021204 10212038 OCEANSIDE 2931919 29319195 POWAY 833578 8335782 SAN DIEGO 22036803 220368030 SAN MARCOS 1444046 14440458 SANTEE 929465 9294647 SOLANA BEACH 220709 2207086 VISTA 1561486 15614859

7859861 78598607 SAN FRANCISCO 13708739 137087393

10681388 106813882 ESCALON 117264 1172640 LATHROP 317556 3175559 LODI 1019250 10192502 MANTECA 1167035 11670351 RIPON 247691 2476907 STOCKTON 4818327 48183273

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

YTRAC 1363452 13634519

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 9 of 12

42

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 49: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads Funding Allocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of total among counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 6289935 62899349 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY

ARROYO GRANDE 278068 2780676 ATASCADERO 459176 4591758 EL PASO DE ROBLES 487903 4879033 GROVER BEACH 212590 2125900 MORRO BAY 169867 1698670 PISMO BEACH 139570 1395702 SAN LUIS OBISPO 728164 7281639

9251004 92510040 SAN MATEO COUNTY ATHERTON 120963 1209630 BELMONT 425292 4252921 BRISBANE 70954 709541 BURLINGAME 475349 4753490 COLMA 28904 289037 DALY CITY 1735548 17355484 EAST PALO ALTO 536823 5368233 FOSTER CITY 515110 5151096 HALF MOON BAY 214111 2141112 HILLSBOROUGH 184743 1847432 MENLO PARK 526767 5267671 MILLBRAE 361976 3619762 PACIFICA 647426 6474259 PORTOLA VALLEY 75662 756619 REDWOOD CITY 1293346 12933465 SAN BRUNO 709284 7092845 SAN CARLOS 467887 4678869 SAN MATEO 1603008 16030079 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1054815 10548153 WOODSIDE 91883 918832

6430334 64303338 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY BUELLTON 78352 783521 CARPINTERIA 233567 2335672 GOLETA 497992 4979916 GUADALUPE 114398 1143976 LOMPOC 693592 6935916 SANTA BARBARA 1507698 15076979 SANTA MARIA 1618973 16189730 SOLVANG 88953 889528

20569435 205694353 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CAMPBELL 672438 6724383 CUPERTINO 959922 9599216 GILROY 839295 8392949 LOS ALTOS 479897 4798968 LOS ALTOS HILLS 144791 1447905 LOS GATOS 493236 4932357 MILPITAS 1145770 11457697 MONTE SERENO 58704 587040 MORGAN HILL 659692 6596919 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1229502 12295022 PALO ALTO 1070652 10706522 SAN JOSE 16382736 163827357 SANTA CLARA 1941253 19412527 SARATOGA 512371 5123713 SUNNYVALE 2354807 23548072

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 10 of 12

43

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 50: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties Minimum Allocation = $ -

estmated 2 Sept 2015

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 4260122 42601219

CAPITOLA 163302 1633017 SANTA CRUZ 1015871 10158714 SCOTTS VALLEY 191421 1914207 WATSONVILLE 841377 8413766

4987659 49876595 ANDERSON 173358 1733579 REDDING 1466176 14661759 SHASTA LAKE 165335 1653353

854306 8543055 LOYALTON 14220 142196

3530617 35306173 DORRIS 15068 150683 DUNSMUIR 30793 307932 ETNA 12506 125062 FORT JONES 13467 134670 MONTAGUE 24388 243880 MOUNT SHASTA 59345 593446 TULELAKE 16397 163974 WEED 48520 485197 YREKA 125543 1255427

5877950 58779499 BENICIA 449744 4497441 DIXON 304329 3043291 FAIRFIELD 1761730 17617298 RIO VISTA 133293 1332931 SUISUN CITY 463772 4637716 VACAVILLE 1558155 15581552 VALLEJO 1944551 19445514

8932103 89321034 CLOVERDALE 138754 1387536 COTATI 120659 1206588 HEALDSBURG 191052 1910524 PETALUMA 944773 9447732 ROHNERT PARK 694937 6949367 SANTA ROSA 2726007 27260070 SEBASTOPOL 127192 1271921 SONOMA 172958 1729576 WINDSOR 434019 4340192

8658888 86588875 CERES 744017 7440169 HUGHSON 113981 1139813 MODESTO 3387348 33873482 NEWMAN 173326 1733259 OAKDALE 343353 3433530 PATTERSON 340295 3402945 RIVERBANK 372193 3721926 TURLOCK 1139829 11398288 WATERFORD 141876 1418761

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SHASTA COUNTY

SIERRA COUNTY

SISKIYOU COUNTY

SOLANO COUNTY

SONOMA COUNTY

STANISLAUS COUNTY

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 11 of 12

44

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45

Page 51: Governor Brown's Transportation Funding Plan - …stran.senate.ca.gov/.../governor_brown_transportation_funding_plan.pdf · 03.09.2015 · Governor Brown’s Transportation Funding

Fix Our Roads Coalition Estimates of Proposed New Local StreetsampRoads FundingAllocation half of total among cities on a population basis half of totalamong counties proportionate to registered vehicles and maintained miles

$105 Billion yr = $525 Million cities $525 Million counties estmated 2 Sept 2015 Minimum Allocation = $ -

Annual Allocation Over Ten Years 2696898 26968984 SUTTER COUNTY

LIVE OAK 140771 1407712 YUBA CITY 1051693 10516927

3087483 30874829 TEHAMA COUNTY CORNING 123301 1233009 RED BLUFF 227210 2272100 TEHAMA 7014 70137

1643331 16433308 10566692 105666920

TRINITY COUNTY TULARE COUNTY DINUBA 378966 3789662 EXETER 172173 1721729 FARMERSVILLE 175680 1756798 LINDSAY 202566 2025658 PORTERVILLE 891882 8918819 TULARE 990523 9905227 VISALIA 2075010 20750102 WOODLAKE 126936 1269359

2146695 21466953 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SONORA 78672 786724

10421278 104212778 VENTURA COUNTY CAMARILLO 1068907 10689068 FILLMORE 252799 2527989 MOORPARK 601708 6017084 OJAI 131724 1317238 OXNARD 3260989 32609888 PORT HUENEME 359414 3594142 SAN BUENAVENTURA 1760577 17605769 SANTA PAULA 487567 4875670 SIMI VALLEY 2032095 20320951 THOUSAND OAKS 2085050 20850504

3776734 37767342 YOLO COUNTY DAVIS 1067370 10673695 WEST SACRAMENTO 814042 8140422 WINTERS 113661 1136610 WOODLAND 917359 9173588

2146680 21466796 YUBA COUNTY MARYSVILLE 206041 2060406 WHEATLAND 56975 569746

Total $ 525000000 $ 525000000 $ 10500000000

CaliforniaCityFinancecom 2 Sept 2015 Page 12 of 12

45