government of newfoundland and labrador’s submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the gulf of...

53
DOC-02982 Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to the Review of Fleet Shares for the Gulf of St. Lawrence Atlantic Halibut Fishery Submitted to: Ernst & Young March 23, 2012

Upload: others

Post on 13-Aug-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

DOC-02982

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to the Review of Fleet Shares for the

Gulf of St. Lawrence Atlantic Halibut Fishery

Submitted to: Ernst & Young

March 23, 2012

Page 2: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 3: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ________________________________________1

2.0 Background ________________________________________2

2.1 Atlantic halibut fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence _____________________ 2

2.2 The sharing arrangement process for Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence ___________________________________________________________ 3

2.3 Sharing decisions since 2007 for Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence 4

3.0 The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s position regarding the sharing arrangement process ___________________ 7

3.1 Calculation of fleet shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery________________ 7

3.2 Inconsistency with approaches used to define shares in other fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence__________________________________________________ 7

3.2.1 4RST Greenland halibut _________________________________________ 7 3.2.2 Shrimp in Shrimp Fishing Area 8 (Esquiman Channel 4R)_______________ 8

3.3 The Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s decisions on 4RST Atlantic halibut sharing since 2007 _____________________________________________ 8

4.0 Conclusion ________________________________________11

Page 4: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 5: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

1.0 Introduction In 2004, Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) released A Policy Framework for the Management of Fisheries on Canada’s Atlantic Coast to provide a comprehensive blueprint for guiding fisheries management in Atlantic Canada. The policy framework presented four inter-related objectives and corresponding strategies, one of which was “a stable and transparent access and allocation approach.” The intent of the approach was to create more stable and predictable allocations of fisheries resources, by stabilizing sharing arrangements established for commercial fisheries and ensuring that decisions were made, and conflicts resolved, through a more fair, transparent and rules-based process (Appendix A). Following the release of the policy framework, in 2006 Minister Hearn announced his intention to stabilize existing sharing arrangements for the vast majority of Atlantic fisheries (Appendix B). A year later, the minister announced his intention to bring permanence and stability to sharing arrangements by 2010 and to implement stabilized shares for competitive fisheries where no arrangements existed. In particular, Minister Hearn confirmed his firm intention to implement geographical fleet shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Division 4RST) in advance of the 2007 fishing season (Appendix C). The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador supports the concept of stabilized shares since it can provide enhanced stability and predictability to the fleets operating in those fisheries. It also allows resource users to take more responsibility for the management of their fishery. When the process was initiated in 2007, the province acknowledged the merit of moving towards geographical shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Harvesters on the province’s west coast have historically been major participants in the Atlantic halibut fishery, but competed for catches with fleets from Quebec and the other Atlantic provinces when the stock was brought under quota management in 1988. While the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador had concerns with the process and outcome of shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, it accepted the geographical share allocated to the inshore Newfoundland and Labrador fixed-gear fleet in April 2007. However, subsequent allocation decisions have disregarded the established sharing arrangement and significantly impacted the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet, whose share of the fixed-gear quota in this fishery has not been maintained at 32 percent. This erosion commenced in 2009, just two years after the establishment of the sharing arrangement. The purpose of this position paper is to provide a background of the Atlantic halibut fishery and its importance to the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet, to provide an overview of the decisions made since 2007 in relation to the sharing arrangement process for this fishery, and to highlight the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s key concerns regarding the sharing arrangement process and its position going forward.

1

Page 6: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

2.0 Background

2.1 Atlantic halibut fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (4RST) is distributed throughout the Esquiman Channel, the Laurentian Channel, north of Anticosti Island, and around the Magdalen Shallows and the Magdalen Islands. Although historical landings indicate the Gulf Atlantic halibut stock was once very abundant, reaching annual landings that totaled thousands of tonnes (t), landings declined substantially since the early 1950s and hit a record low in 1982 at 91t. During the 1980s and early 1990s, total landings seldom exceeded 300t. Since the early 2000s, the biomass and abundance of Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence has increased substantially, and the stock status indices observed over the 2005-2010 period have been among the highest in the time series for this stock. In 2008, landings exceeded 500t and in 2009 and 2010 reached levels similar to those in the 1960s. The stock was defined as a management unit in 1987, and in 1988, DFO established the first Total Allowable Catch (TAC) at a level of 300t, with 70 percent allocated to the fixed-gear inshore sector (which is now considered a stabilized allocation). This TAC was maintained until 1999, after which it was increased to 350t from 1999-2006 (an additional 100t was granted in 1999 only with the application of the new management year). The TAC was increased to 475t from 2007-2009, to 600t in 2010 and to 720t in 2011. The annual harvesting season runs from May 15 to May 14 of the following year with fisheries closing as fleets reached their allocations. The TAC includes an allowance for a directed Atlantic halibut fishery, which is conducted by fixed-gear fleets using longlines, as well as a bycatch allowance for fixed-gear fleets directing for other species, in particular for Greenland halibut. Historically, Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence has been fished primarily by inshore fixed-gear fleets from the west coast of Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec’s Gaspé Peninsula. Inshore fixed-gear fleets from other parts of Quebec and the Maritime provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island also fish halibut in the Gulf, but the historical participation of these fleets is far lower. From the mid 1980s to 2004, annual landings by the Newfoundland and Labrador inshore fixed-gear fleet averaged 66t, and increased in 2005 and 2006 to 151t and 136t, respectively. Since the collapse of several groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in the late 1980s, harvesters on the west coast of Newfoundland and Labrador have experienced severe financial difficulties and have never had adequate resource access to provide financial viability. They continue to face a variety of hardships due to issues such as overcapacity, resource fluctuations, low and unstable incomes, and seasonality. The Report of the Independent Chair: MOU Steering Committee, which was released by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador in 2011 and provided a comprehensive financial analysis of the province’s fishing industry, concluded that the inshore fishery on the northeast and west coasts of Newfoundland and the southern coast of Labrador are the least viable and require the highest levels of rationalization. Fishing enterprises in these regions would have to harvest as much as four times their current levels in order to meet

2

Page 7: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

the viability targets. The Atlantic halibut fishery, therefore, both directed and bycatch, has long been of vital economic importance to inshore groundfish harvesters from the west coast of Newfoundland and Labrador. Of the 850 groundfish dependent enterprises in 4R3Pn, over 250 have participated in the Atlantic halibut fishery in each of the past three years. While the volume of annual landings in the Gulf halibut fishery is relatively low, it is an extremely valuable fishery. In 2011, Atlantic halibut landings were worth approximately $1.7 million to harvesters on the west coast of Newfoundland.

2.2 The sharing arrangement process for Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

Prior to 2007, the Gulf Atlantic halibut was fished competitively within the fixed-gear sector between fleets from Quebec and the four Atlantic Provinces. As more restrictive management measures were implemented in an effort to limit overexploitation of groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access to the resource. Fleets from other provinces, particularly Quebec, pushed for a sharing arrangement between the fleets. They were particularly concerned as the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet had been increasing its catch in recent years. On January 19, 2007, DFO announced its intention to establish stabilized sharing arrangements for the inshore fixed-gear sector for Gulf Atlantic halibut. Consistent with previous sharing exercises for groundfish where multiple provinces were adjacent to the resource, DFO announced that historical landings would be a major factor in establishing these shares. A letter of notification, along with an information paper outlining the context, objectives, and process to be used for the exercise, was circulated to government and industry representatives from Quebec and the four Atlantic provinces. The information paper included information on historical landings of Gulf halibut by fleets from the different geographical areas. DFO proposed calculating geographical fleet shares based on catches during either the pre-moratoria period of 1986 to 1991, the post-moratoria period of 1992-2004 or the entire period of 1986 to 2004. Provincial positions on the sharing process, including the proposed time-frames for calculating the geographical fleet shares, were requested by February 28, 2007 (Appendix D). At the time, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador acknowledged the merit in moving towards sharing arrangements for some fisheries, but had several concerns with the process for Gulf of St. Lawrence Atlantic halibut, which were expressed in a letter to DFO on February 21, 2007 (Appendix E). The province noted that DFO did not provide criteria or rationale for how the geographical shares were defined. While Quebec was given three designated areas and Nova Scotia was given two, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, and New Brunswick were each designated one area. In addition, catches of Atlantic halibut over three different time periods were proposed without any established sharing principles to guide the process. Further discussion on this aspect was required, since a lack of established allocation principles provided stakeholders a greater opportunity to identify the time-frame that best suited their needs in relation to the Atlantic halibut fishery. DFO held a consultation meeting in Moncton, New Brunswick, on March 30, 2007, to discuss the concerns raised by provincial and industry representatives. Although several

3

Page 8: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

participants stated that more time was required to adequately participate in the process, stakeholders were asked to finalize their positions by April 10, 2007. Following the consultation meeting, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador reiterated its concerns in a letter to Minister Hearn in April 2007, stating that it was not prepared to take a final position on sharing arrangements without adequate opportunity to conduct a full analysis of the sharing options and to consult with its relevant fleets. Rather than rush the process, the province offered to work with DFO and industry to finalize the sharing arrangements prior to the 2008 fishing season (Appendix E). Instead, the federal government moved forward with the process and, prior to the 2007 fishing season, established a stabilized sharing arrangement for the Gulf Atlantic halibut inshore fixed-gear fleets based on catches from 1986-2004. The Newfoundland and Labrador inshore fixed-gear fleet received a share of 32 percent (see table below):

Geographical fleet shares for the 4RST Atlantic halibut inshore fixed-gear fleet

Region/Fleet Allocation Percent Eastern New Brunswick 5.17

Gulf of Nova Scotia 2.01 Prince Edward Island 1.46

Western Newfoundland 32.03 Quebec North Shore 8.24

Gaspé 44.03 Magdalen Islands 5.44

Scotia Fundy 1.63

2.3 Sharing decisions since 2007 for Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

In 2007, the TAC for Gulf of St. Lawrence Atlantic halibut was increased from 350t to 475t and maintained for the 2008 fishing season. During both years, DFO allocated the TAC to the eight inshore fixed-gear fleets according to the established sharing arrangement. In 2008, DFO announced a temporary transfer of part of the mobile-gear allocation for Atlantic halibut. Since the mobile-gear groundfish fishery is closed in the Gulf, DFO transferred 85 percent (108t) of the mobile-gear Atlantic halibut allocation to the inshore fixed-gear fleet and allocated the remaining 15 percent (20t) to cover by-catch of halibut in other fisheries by the mobile fleet. The Newfoundland and Labrador inshore fixed-gear fleet was allocated 32 percent of the transfer in keeping with the established sharing arrangement. This decision was supported by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, since the mobile gear fishery was closed and the transfer respected the established sharing arrangement for the stock. In 2009, DFO again transferred 85 percent of the halibut allocation from the mobile-gear fleet to the fixed-gear fleet. Unlike the previous year, however, the allocation was split

4

Page 9: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

equally amongst the eight fixed-gear fleets, reducing the Newfoundland and Labrador share of the increase from 32 percent to 12.5 percent. In contrast, fleets from Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Quebec’s Magdalen Islands and North Shore received increases above their percentage share. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador did not support the equal allocation of the transferred portion of the mobile gear quota since it did not respect the stabilized sharing arrangement and did not reflect the historic participation in this fishery. These concerns were raised in a letter to Minister Shea on June 19, 2009 (Appendix E). In 2010, DFO again transferred 85 percent of the Atlantic halibut quota from the mobile-gear fleet to the fixed-gear fleet and split the allocation equally amongst the eight fixed-gear fleets. As in the previous year, Newfoundland and Labrador’s share of the increase was reduced from 32 percent to 12.5 percent. DFO also introduced a quota reconciliation policy to take effect in 2011, in which any overharvest of a fleet’s quota in one year is deducted from the next season’s quota. During a Gulf Groundfish Advisory Committee meeting from March 30-31, 2011, fixed-gear industry representatives from Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick requested that DFO adjust their shares for 4RST Atlantic halibut, since they felt their current shares were too low. This request was supported by the provincial governments of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Despite not being fully satisfied with the sharing arrangement process in 2007, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador did not support a reopening of the sharing arrangement, since the very intention of the process in 2007 was to bring stability, transparency, and predictability to the Atlantic halibut fishery. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador also noted that allocation transfers from the mobile-gear sector to the inshore fixed-gear sector in 2009 and 2010 were not allocated based on the established sharing arrangements, and therefore had strong concerns that a re-opened sharing arrangement process would not honor the principle of historical dependency. These concerns were also expressed at the meeting by Newfoundland and Labrador’s industry representatives. Following the Gulf Groundfish Advisory Committee meeting, on May 13, 2011 DFO announced an increase in the TAC for Gulf Atlantic halibut from 600t to 680t for the 2011/12 management year. Despite the established sharing arrangement for this stock, the entire 80t increase was split equally amongst the eight fixed-gear fleets in the Gulf. The Newfoundland and Labrador fleet received 12.5 percent of the increase (10t) rather than 32 percent (26t). Since catches of Atlantic halibut by the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet has exceeded the quota in recent years, due to increased participation in the fishery and the low TAC for this stock, quota reconciliation further reduced the province’s allocation despite the increase in the overall TAC. Fleets from New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia received increases in their share of the overall quota increase. As in 2009 and 2010, DFO also split the mobile-gear quota transfer equally amongst the eight fixed-gear fleets. These decisions were made by Minister Shea just prior to leaving the DFO portfolio. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador sent a letter to the newly appointed Minister Ashfield on May 26, 2011, requesting that DFO reverse the decision to equally split the increase in Atlantic halibut quota, since it did not reflect the sharing

5

Page 10: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

arrangements established in 2007, Newfoundland and Labrador’s historical participation in the Atlantic halibut fishery, or the principles of historical dependency, transparency, and stability of access that the federal government had committed to apply (Appendix E). Minister Jackman reiterated the province’s request in a meeting with Minister Ashfield on June 9, 2011. The Fish, Food, and Allied Workers also called on Minister Ashfield to reverse the decision and respect the established sharing arrangements (Appendix F). Following Minister Jackman’s meeting with Minister Ashfield, on June 10, 2011, DFO announced an additional increase of 40t in the 2011/12 TAC for the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery; from 680t to 720t. This increase was allocated based on geographical fleet shares; therefore, the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet received 32 percent of the increase (12.8t). DFO also announced that the quota reconciliation reductions would be phased in over three years and, as a result, the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet allocation for 2011 would be 161t. Minister Ashfield also committed to have the sharing arrangement for the fixed-gear fishery reviewed prior to the start of the 2012 fishery. An external review was announced on December 19, 2011 (Appendix G).

6

Page 11: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

3.0 The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s position regarding the sharing arrangement process The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s views regarding the methodology, process used, and considerations employed in the establishment of geographical fleet shares for the Gulf of St. Lawrence inshore fixed-gear Atlantic halibut fishery are outlined below:

3.1 Calculation of fleet shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery

Two of the scenarios proposed by DFO in 2007 to calculate fleet shares based on historical catches, were based on a starting period of 1986. This starting point seems reasonable, since it was just two years prior to the period when the stock was brought under quota management. Also, DFO had advised that catch data at a level of detail required for the sharing exercise existed only from 1986 onwards. The time-frames proposed by DFO, however, did not extend beyond 2004, even though the sharing arrangement process was not initiated until 2007. No rationale has been given as to why catch data from the most recent time period of 2005 and 2006 was not considered for the share calculations. Catches by the Newfoundland and Labrador inshore fixed-gear fleet, a major historical participant in the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery, were higher during 2003 to 2006 than in years prior. Including catches from 2005 and 2006 in the share calculations would have resulted in Newfoundland and Labrador receiving a higher share of just over 34 percent. Suggestions that the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet only increased their effort in 2005 and 2006 because fleet sharing was on the horizon, cannot be substantiated since the fleet landed 62 percent and 60 percent of the fixed-gear allocation, respectively, before DFO initiated discussions on sharing arrangements for Gulf Atlantic halibut. The time-frame used to calculate shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery should therefore have extended to 2006 instead of 2004.

3.2 Inconsistency with approaches used to define shares in other fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence

Examples in which the sharing arrangement process for Gulf Atlantic halibut is inconsistent with approaches used in other fisheries include the sharing arrangement processes for Greenland halibut (4RST) and shrimp (Shrimp Fishing Area 8) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

3.2.1 4RST Greenland halibut

A Greenland halibut (turbot) gillnet fishery was developed in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (4RST) in the early 1980s. Since the stock’s major decline in the early 1990’s, Gulf turbot has mainly been fished by inshore fixed-gear fleets from Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In 1995, an agreement was reached between the Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec harvesters in the Gulf to

7

Page 12: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

split the 4RST fixed-gear turbot quota, with 82 percent allocated to Quebec and 18 percent to Newfoundland and Labrador. These shares were established based on catches of turbot only from the most recent four year period (1991-1994) prior to Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec’s sharing agreement. In 1999, after a request from Quebec for a higher share, DFO attempted to work with fixed-gear harvesters from both provinces to develop a stabilized sharing arrangement for 4RST turbot. Since no agreement was reached, in 2000 the federal Minister asked an Independent Panel to review the situation and recommend a sharing arrangement. In 2001, the Panel recommended that the sharing arrangement agreed to in 1995, providing 82 percent of the fixed-gear quota to Quebec and 18 percent to Newfoundland and Labrador, should be the basis for the permanent sharing of this quota. Following the recommendation, DFO announced that the sharing arrangement for the 4RST turbot fishery would remain as decided in 1995. The approach used to calculate shares for Gulf turbot, which was deemed appropriate by the Independent Panel, is inconsistent with the approach used for the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery, in which the most recent time period was given a lower weighting by eliminating the 2005 and 2006 catches from the share calculations.

3.2.2 Shrimp in Shrimp Fishing Area 8 (Esquiman Channel 4R)

Shrimp harvesters on the west coast of Newfoundland and Labrador (Group A) have been fishing shrimp in the Esquiman Channel portion of the Gulf of St. Lawrence (Shrimp Fishing Area 8) since the late 1960s, resulting in a historical participation in this fishery that has spanned over forty years. In the late 1980s, there was increased fishing effort for shrimp in the Esquiman Channel by fleets from Quebec and New Brunswick (Group B). In 1998, DFO initiated a sharing arrangement process between the Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec, and New Brunswick inshore fleets for the shrimp fishery in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Similar to the sharing process for Gulf Atlantic halibut, DFO proposed alternate time periods for calculating fleet shares based on historical catches of shrimp. Calculating shares based on catches from 1970 to 1989, which reflected the time period the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet had been fishing shrimp in the Esquiman Channel, would have resulted in a Newfoundland and Labrador share of 89 percent. The final sharing formula used, however, considered only the catches of shrimp from a recent time period of 1987 to 1989, resulting in a Newfoundland and Labrador share of 66 percent. Therefore, DFO’s approach to establish shares for Gulf Atlantic halibut is inconsistent with the approach used to establish shares for the shrimp fishery in the Esquiman Channel.

3.3 The Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s decisions on 4RST Atlantic halibut sharing since 2007

Despite the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s dissatisfaction with the sharing development for the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery, it accepted an allocation of 32 percent for the province’s inshore fixed-gear fleet in 2007. However, DFO’s decisions: i) to split the mobile gear allocation equally amongst the eight inshore fixed-gear fleets in

8

Page 13: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

2009, 2010, and 2011; and ii) to split the 80t TAC increase, in May 2011, equally amongst the fleets, are unjustified and simply unacceptable to the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Minister Hearn had explicitly stated his intention in 2007 to bring permanence and stability to sharing arrangements for Gulf Atlantic halibut. Furthermore the recent discussion paper “The Future of Canada’s Commercial Fisheries” reconfirms DFO’s desire for allocation stability, stating:

“While many fisheries - particularly in Atlantic Canada – are stable, Fisheries and Oceans Canada aims to stabilize sharing arrangements in all key fisheries the department manages. Doing so will help fishers make long-term plans with confidence and will give them the tools to make their own decisions on how to manage their fishing enterprises. If resource users want to change established arrangements they will do so cooperatively, negotiating among themselves rather than requiring Fisheries and Oceans Canada to intervene. Only in exceptional cases, such as in response to legal obligations stemming from comprehensive land claims agreements, would the department become involved in adjusting already established sharing arrangements.”

DFO’s decisions since 2009 are in clear violation of the stabilization and transparency process, which the department has been implementing and promoting. In addition, the decisions are in no way reflective of the historic participation in the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery, which since 2009 has eroded the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet’s share from 32.04 percent to just 25.36 percent and increased the shares of fleets with virtually no historical participation in the fishery (see table below). While the fleet from the Gaspé in Quebec has also seen a reduction in their share, the two other Quebec-based fleets have benefitted from recent decisions. The provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island have all seen an increase at the expense of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Fleet shares for the 4RST Atlantic halibut inshore fixed-gear fleet since 2008

Allocation Percentage Region/Fleet 2008 2009 2010 2011* Eastern New Brunswick 5.27 6.99 6.98 7.67

Gulf of Nova Scotia 2.01 4.74 4.59 5.59 Prince Edward Island 1.46 4.29 4.18 5.23

Western Newfoundland 32.03 27.1 27.22 25.36 Quebec North Shore 8.24 9.26 9.29 9.69

Gaspé 44.03 36.12 36.26 33.27 Magdalen Islands 5.44 7.22 7.19 7.86

Scotia Fundy 1.63 4.29 4.30 5.34 *Prior to Minister Ashfield’s decision to increase the TAC from 680t to 720t in June 2011 and prior to quota reconciliation implementation in this fishery.

9

Page 14: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Although DFO allocated a 40t increase in the 2011/12 Atlantic halibut TAC based on geographical fleet shares, this decision does not compensate for DFO’s continued disregard for the established sharing arrangement and the impact on the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet. The repeated violations of the established sharing arrangement for this stock calls into question all of the sharing arrangements that have been established for commercial fisheries across Atlantic Canada.

10

Page 15: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

4.0 Conclusion Despite the fact that the establishment of the geographical fleet shares for the Atlantic halibut fishery in 4RST has limited the Newfoundland and Labrador fleet in recent years, the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador sees no compelling argument to re-open or undo the existing sharing arrangement. Clearly, in the case of 4RST Atlantic halibut, exceptional circumstances do not exist so instead, DFO should simply adhere to the sharing arrangement that was established in 2007 for this fishery. Moving forward in 2012 and beyond, the established TAC for Gulf Atlantic halibut and allocation transfers from the mobile-gear sector to the inshore fixed-gear sector should be allocated based on the established geographical fleet shares. Otherwise, there is clearly no value in DFO establishing stabilized sharing arrangements for fisheries in Atlantic Canada or to continue promoting its desire for stable, predictable, and transparent decisions in relation to access and allocation. Should the federal government re-open the sharing arrangement for Gulf Atlantic halibut, the only reasonable option would be to include the 2005 and 2006 catches into the calculation of the geographical fleet shares. In future sharing arrangement processes, adequate opportunity must be given to provincial governments and industry stakeholders to provide input into the process, which the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador felt was not provided in the sharing development for the Gulf Atlantic halibut fishery. In addition, allocation principles must be established to guide the development of future sharing developments and to help facilitate the complex and often controversial sharing processes.

11

Page 16: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

12

Page 17: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

References

Fish, Food and Allied Workers. Union Calls on New Fisheries Minister to Reverse Halibut Allocation Decision. May 19, 2011. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.ffaw.nf.ca/old/NewsDetails.asp?id=317

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. A Policy Framework for the

Management of Fisheries on Canada’s Atlantic Coast. March 2004. Retrieved February 21, 2012, from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/back-fiche/2004/hq-ac27b-eng.htm

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Canada’s New Government Announces a New Approach to Canadian Fisheries. April 12, 2007. Retrieved February 27, 2012, from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/npress-communique/2007/hq-ac17-eng.htm

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Canadian Science Advisory

Secretariat. Stock Assessment of Atlantic Halibut of the Gulf of St. Lawrence (NAFO Divisions 4RST) for 2009 and 2010. Report 2011/12.

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Commercial Fisheries Quota Reports. Available from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/stats/commercial/yrlist-eng.htm

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Announces a New Approach to Canadian Fisheries. Infoceans- The Quebec Region Bulletin, Volume 10, April-May 2007. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from http://www.qc.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/infoceans/Infoceans200705-eng.asp

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Greenland Halibut (Turbot)

4RST- Factsheet. March, 2004. Retrieved February 18, 2012 from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/infocus-alaune/2004/20040325/sheet-feuillet22-eng.htm

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Hearn Stabilizes Sharing

Arrangements. March 23, 2006. Retrieved February 27, 2012, from http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/media/npress-communique/2006/hq-ac06-eng.htm

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Information Paper: Geographical Fleet Shares Exercise. January 11, 2007.

Government of Canada. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. “The Future of Canada’s

Commercial Fisheries- Discussion Document.” January 2012.

Page 18: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Report of the Independent Chair: MOU

Steering Committee – Newfoundland and Labrador Fishing Industry Rationalization and Restructuring. February 2011.

Page 19: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix A

Page 20: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 21: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 22: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 23: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix B

Page 24: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 25: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 26: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 27: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix C

Page 28: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 29: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 30: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 31: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 32: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 33: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix D

Page 34: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 35: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 36: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 37: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix E

Page 38: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 39: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 40: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 41: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 42: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 43: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 44: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 45: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 46: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 47: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix F

Page 48: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 49: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 50: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 51: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access

Appendix G

Page 52: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access
Page 53: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Submission to ... · groundfish stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, competition for Atlantic halibut led to an increased concern over access