government capacity building support program usaid support to the
DESCRIPTION
Government Capacity Building Support program USAID Support to the Department of Social Development Systems Strengthening Presented by Dr Rita Sonko 21 February 2014. p rogram background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Government Capacity Building Support program
USAID Support to the Department of Social Development
Systems Strengthening
Presented by Dr Rita Sonko
21 February 2014
• USAID & DSD conceptualised a TA program specifically to support DSD & developed a TOR which resulted in this program which was advertised in 2012
• The primary focus of the work is systems strengthening at national, provincial and select districts across the country
• The Pact Consortium was selected & contracted in Sept 2013 until 30 Sept 2018
program background
Prime Implementer
GCDS for DSD consortium partners
GCDS for DSD program objectives
GCDS will provide support to DSD to achieve the following three objectives:
Improve timely availability of reliable data on program performance M&E and information on the social effects of HIV and AIDS and other vulnerabilities faced by children;
Strengthen coordination, management and oversight of community care service structures that protect and care for the most vulnerable children & their families; and
Strengthen inter-sector integration & coordination between DSD and other SAG Departments (DOH, DBE) & build a supportive multi-sector environment led byDSD through system strengthening at the national and provincial level .
• Pact expected to deliver targeted technical assistance to assist the DSD to improve coordination, management and planning for OVC in:
o Task 1: Support and strengthen health and social welfare system coordination and integration for improved OVC services;
o Task 2: Support improved management and outcome evaluations of programs aimed at the most vulnerable children;
o Task 3: Support and strengthen social and individual behavior change to prevent HIV infection for children under 18 years;
o Task 4: Support & strengthen DSD’s monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems & build the research base for cost effective outcomes for vulnerable children
o Task 5: Support and strengthen the child protection response framework;
o Task 6: Strengthen the management of the social welfare workforce
program background
GCDS components at a glance
(Component 1)
(Component 2)(Component 3)
(Component 4)
(Component 5)(Component 6)
GCBS Theory of Change (draft)
• TOC\GCDS theory diagram draft 1.pdf
Customer Focused –Systems strengthening
Who is the Customer?Child Centred Approach
Child Protection Systems: Actors, Context, and Components
Systems Strengthening - “Building Blocks for DSD”
Social Development
Service DeliveryAccess
EfficientEffectiveQuality
3-6
Social Service
Workforce (HR)
(Capacities/Capabilities / Competent)
6
Budgetting & Financing
(Financial Management;)
2Information Management Systems) /
M&E /Research
4
Leadership, Governance,
Management
1,2
Tools/Strategies/
Plans/Policies/
Legislation
1-6
Common areas of community level systems strengthening
1. Enabling environments and advocacy2. Community networks, linkages, partnerships,
and coordination3. Resources and capacity building4. Community activities and service delivery5. Leadership and organisational strengthening6. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and planning
Examples of work plan Activities Activities Outputs
Supporting the development/strengthening of tools, systems and technical support processes
to enhance NPO reporting
Systems for NPO reporting streamlined and strengthened for comprehensive and efficient
data gathering from service delivery sites
Mentoring and coaching DSD managers on implementing sound data quality management
systems
DSD managers at different levels supported to strengthen skills and implement sound data quality management through mentoring and
coaching
Building DSD managers capacity to analyze service delivery data so it can be used for
decision-making and planning
improved availability of data for decision making through deeper analysis of service delivery data
across different districts, provinces and at national level
Illustrative indicators: Accountability
Information Management Systems / M&E /Research
Indicators at district level• Number and percent of districts with staff who have
received training in the past 12 months on MERL (disaggregated by type of training, by province, by gender)
• Number and percent of districts producing quarterly service delivery data analysis reports (disaggregated by province)
• Number and percent of districts implementing standardised data quality management processes and oversight of NPO reporting
• Percentage of registered OVC NPOs in the district reporting into DSD NPO reporting systems in the reporting period
Accountability
Indicators at CBO/community level• Number and percent of CBO’s using standard
data collection tools and reporting formats that enable reporting to national reporting system
• Number and percent of CBO’s that held at least one documented feedback mechanism with the community they serve in the last 6 months
Functions;Governance, Management, Enforcement
Institutional level –Government• Number and percentage of DSD staff in managerial positions who
received training or retraining in management, leadership or accountability during the reporting period (disaggregated by province and gender)
• Number and percentage of districts with staff who have received training in the past 12 months on strategic planning and policy development
• Percentage of districts with an active DACCA (meeting at least twice annually) (disaggregated by province)
Community level• Number of CBO’s with staff who have received training in the
past 12 months on strategic planning and policy development• Number and percent of CBOs with a functioning governing board
- A board of directors meets on a monthly or quarterly basis
Challenges with measuring systems strengthening
• No standards especially in the social development sector; building blocks of the “system” not standardised unlike the case with health- WHO 6 building blocks
• Tons of options of indicators…. Few tested
Challenges
• The E in MERL is particularly methodologically challenging – issues of attribution/contribution; counterfactual-ethical dilemma etc-
• Need to explore and use innovative approaches to evaluation- • developmental evaluations aimed at ongoing
learning and improvement
.
THANK YOU
Key Pact contact:Vincent Titus, Country [email protected] 361 9885
Rita Sonko, Senior MERL [email protected]