golder assoc inc - ri/fs work plan appendices d …park is located at roger edwards avenue, east of...
TRANSCRIPT
July 1991 -i- 893-8026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX G
In Order
AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR CONSENT (INCLUDINGSTATEMENT OF WORK)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM (TAT) REPORT
WARZYN REPORT ON SOIL SAMPLING AT THE EDWARDS1 FIELDLANDFILL
CORRESPONDENCE
SOIL BORING LOGS FROM THE YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILLSITE, STUDIES PERFORMED BY IEPA
(26010915.UPl/cap)
Golder Associates
AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER FOR CONSENT\
(INCLUDING STATEMENT OF WORK)
u
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION V
IN THE MATTER OF I ))
LANDFILL FACILITY ) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER•Y CONSENT RES
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
LAKE COUNTY, WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
Respondents,AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
Proceedings under Section 122(s)of the Coaprehensive Environ*mental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act or 1900, as )amended* _ _ \
U.S. EPA Docket NO.
FIRST JlflfEKPtfENT TO APMTNISTKATTVE ORDER BY CONSENT
The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S.EPA"), the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("IEPA"), andthe Respondents authorized representatives have each agreed tomaking and entry of this amendment to the Administrative Order by
Consent ("Consent Order") effective December 22, 1989, regarding
the Yeoman Creek Landfill Facility ("Facility") located in theCity of Waukegan, Lake County, Illinois.
I. JURISDICTION
This amendment is issued pursuant to Section XXVIII of theConsent Order and the authorities identified in the consentOrder. Except as specifically amended herein, the findings offact, conclusions of law, determinations, and terms, and allrights and obligations of the consent order including withoutlimitation, the Dispute Resolution provisions of section XIX,Reservation of Rights Section XXZI and Reimbursement of costs
Section XXIV, are applicable to this Amendment.
2
U. FTMDIMCS orBased upon information available on the effective date of
this First Amendment to Administrative Order by Consent ("ConsentOrder Amendment"), and vithout admission of any fact, conclusionof lav or liability by the Respondents, the Waste ManagementDivision Director of the U.S. EPA, Region V, and the Director ofthe IZPA make the following findings in addition to those made in
the Consent Order:
A. Edwards Field Park ("Park") is a park owned by thewaukegan Park District, an Illinois municipal corporation. ThePark is located at Roger Edwards Avenue, east of Lewis Avenuerand is approximately 15.8 acres in area. The Park isapproximately 50O feet southwest of the Facility as that Facility
was described in Section v.B. of the Consent order.B. Edwards Field Park was owned by Respondent City of
Waukegan from approximately 1956 through 1968. It was
transferred by the City of waukegan to the waukegan Park Districtin or about 1968. This area is only partially fenced and has
been used for recreational activities since at least 1974.
c. From approximately 1959 until 1964, the Edwards FieldPark area was operated as a sanitary landfill by the same partiesand under the same contract as the Facility as defined in Section
V.B. of the Consent Order. This was a contract entered into bythe City of Waukegan with National Disposal Service. See summary
in Section V.c. of the Consent Order regarding the contract.D. Leachate seepage froa Edwards Field has been reported.
3
S. Upon the effective date of this amendment, the Yeoman
creex Landfill (facility) shall be defined to include the areadefined in Section V of the Consent Order and the Edwards Fieldpar* as defined in Section II of this Consent order Amendment,
III. CQMCLDSTOyS QT IAW
Based upon information available on the effective date ofthis consent Order Amendment, and without admission of any fact,
conclusions of law or liability by the Respondents, the wasteManagement Division Director of the U.S. EPA, Region V, and the
Director of IEPA make the following conclusions of law in
addition to those made in the Consent Order:
A. Pursuant to CERCLA Section 101(9), 42 U.S.C. Section9601(9), and the Kational contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300,the boundaries of facilities are determined based upon thefinding of where wastes have been deposited, stored, disposed of
or placed, or otherwise came to be located; and consequently, the
precise Yeoman Creek facility boundary will be determined after
completing the investigation of the facility.B. The Yeoman Creek Landfill, including the Edwards Field
Park as defined in Section II above and the area defined inSection V of the consent Order, is a "Facility" »» defined inSection 101(9) Of CERCLA.
C. "Hazardous substances" as defined in Section 101(14) ofCERCLA have been deposited, stored, disposed of, placed, orotherwise came to be located at the Facility.
4
0. The spilling, leaking, leaching, dumping, or disposingof hazardous substances into the soils and groundwater at theFacility, and the past, present, and potantial migration or
hazardous substances from the Facility constitutas an actual
and/or threatened •release" of hazardous substances into theenvironment as defined in Section 101(22) of CERCIA,
E. The Respondents are liable persons pursuant to
action 107 of CERCIA and are potentially responsible parties for
the purposes of Section 122 of CERCLA.
IV. DETERMINATION
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions ofLaw the waste Management Division Director of U.S.EPA, Region v,.and the Director of the IEPA have determined, in addition to the
Determinations of section VII of the Consent Order, that:
A. Upon the effective date of this amendment, the Yeomancreek landfill Facility shall include that area defined in
Section V of the consent Order and the Edwards Field Park area as.defined herein, for all purposes of the Consent Order and this
consent Order Amendment.
V. WORK Tp BE PERFORMED
A. The Rl/FS Work Plan for the Facility (as the Facilitywas defined in Section V.B. of the Consent Order) was submittedto 0.S. EPA and IEPA on February 20, 1990, in accordance with the
requirement in Section VXXX.C.l. of the consent Order. The U.S.EPA disapproved this RX/FS Work Plan and specified deficiencies
5
and required modifications in writing in a letter dated April 13,199O. Pursuant to Section VIII.c.5. of tha Consent Order, a
raviaad RI/FS Work Plan incorporating tha required modification*vas to be submitted to U.S. EPA by April 28, 199O, However,because it was not foreseen at the time the Consent Order wasoriginally entered into that the Facility included the Edwards
Field area, the parties hereby replace the April 28, 199O due
date with the dates provided for in paragraph B, below.
B. A revised RI/FS Work Plan for the Facility, includingthe area defined in Section V.B, of the consent Order and theEdwards Field area, shall be submitted to U.S. EPA and IEPAwithin 30 calendar days of the effective data of this Amendment.
This Work Plan shall incorporate the required modificationsspecified by tha Agencies. Any failure to properly address these
deficiencies or required modifications in this RI/FS Work planmay subject Respondents to the enforcement alternatives reserved
by the Agencies in the Consent Order, including stipulated
penalties. For all other purposes, including the schedule in
Sections VIII.C*4 and VHI.c.5. and the activities regarding the
Edwards Field portion of the Facility, this revised RI/FS Work
Plan shall be treated as the initial Work Plan submitted pursuant
to Section VIII,c.l. of the Consent Order.C. The work shall be completed in accordance with the
Consent Order as modified by this Amendment, for the entireFacility, as defined in this amendment.
vi. gyrgcTivB PATEPursuant to Section XXVII of the consent Order, this
* to Consent Pi-dey for the Yeoaan CreeX facility shall be-effective, after signature by the parties hereto with U.S. EPA asfinal signatory, on the date that U.S. EPA sends notificationthat this amendment is effective, in writing, to the Respondents.IT IS SO AGREEDl
respondents:
By:
Byi
Title:
Respondent:Address; _
Title:
Respondent *Address: _
Title:
Respondent:
Address; _
DateMaae of Signatoryi __________________
DateNaoe of Signatory: _________________
DateName of Signatory: __________________
By i -_____________ -—-—-—DataHame of Signatory:
Title: _______
Respondent:Addreee: _
By:Date
Hame of Signatory: .________________
Title:
Respondent:
Address: _
IT IS SO ORDERED AMD AGREED:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency:
By:Bernard P. Killian, Director DateIllinois Environmental Protection Agency2200 Churchill Road, P.O. Box 19276Springfield, Illinois 62794*9276
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:
By:David A. Ullrich, Director DateWaste Management DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V230 South Dearborn streetChicago, Illinois 60604
Effective Dates ____________, 1990
Re: Yeoman Creek Landfill FacilityAmendment to Consent OrderLaJce County, WauJcegan, Illinois
10; or
e* us* «
Shell J« Bleiveisa, Isq.Mcoeraott, Hill & oery111 W. Monroe StreetSuita 2000Chicago, Illinoia 60603(312) 372-2000Faxi (312) 914-7700(representing outboard Marina Corp.)
XI Hanaonoutboard Marina Corp.190 Sea Horse DrivaWaukegan, Illinoia 6OO85(312) 619-6200Fax: (312) 6S9-56S4
Thovaa P. Raaly, Jr., Eaq.Mayar, Brown i Platt190 S» LaSalla StraatChicago, Illinoia 60603(312) 701-7711(representing Brovning-FerriaXnduatriaa of Illinoia, Inc.)
Robert Leaavan, Esq.Hall, Kolmborg, Roach, Johnaton,Fiahar & Laaanan
25 Korth County Straatwaukagan, Illinoia 60085(312) 244-0600Fax: (312) 244-7022(representing Henry Tavea)Clifton D. Warnerwaukegan School District Ho. 6OLincoln Center1201 N. Sheridan RoadWaukegan, Illinoia 60085(312) 336-3100Fax: (312) 360*5412
Ka. even 3. WalehEnviron&antal AffairsProject ManagerBrowning-Farria Industries757 N. EldridgeP.O. BOX 3151Houston, Taxaa 77253(713) 870-7412Fax: (713) 514-8669
Donald M. Lonchar, Jr. Eeq.Lonchar, Kordigian fc Bakk32 N. West Streetwaukagan, Illinois 6O085(312) 623-0112Faxi (312) 623-1770(representing Waukagan School
District Mo. 60)
Pater F. LoKonaco, Baq.325 Washington StraatSuite 401Waukagan, Illinois 60085(312) 623-830OFaxx (312) 623-6328(representing the City of waukagan)John waligora, Esq.Illinoia Environnantal ProtectionAgency
2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield, Illinois
Scott MoyarIllinoia EnvironmentalProtection Agency
2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield, Illinois
(Yeoman creeK PRP CoBunittee)
Thomas P. Healy, Jr.. Esq.Kayer, Brown & Piatt190 S. Lasalle StreetChicago, Illinois 60603(312) 701-70*4Fax: (312) 701-7711 j J(representing Browning-Perris Industries of Illinois, Inc.Ma* Oven 5. Walsh5 Paries ids HayP.O. Box 4266onnond Beach, Florida 32179(904) 677-1185Fax: (904) 677-1291
Peter F. LoMonaco, 2sq.325 Washington StreetSuite 401Waukegan, Illinois 60085(706) 623*8300fax: (708) 623-8328(representing the City of Wauxegan)
Clifton D. WarnerWauXegan School Difitrict No. 60Lincoln Center1201 H. Sheridan RoadWauxegan, Illinois 60085(708) 360-5410Fax: (708) 360-5620(representing Wauxegan School District No. 60)
Shell J. Bleiveiss, Esq.Ncoer&ott, Will 6 Emery227 w. Monroe streetChicago, Illinois 60606(312) 984-3664Fax: (312) 984-7700(representing Outboard Marine Corp.)
Dale T. Vital*, Esq.outboard Marine Corp.100 Sea-Horse Drivewaufcegan. Illinois 60085-2195(708) 689-5431Tax: (708) 689-6264
Thomas p. Stepanieh, 2sq.33 K. County streetHaukagan, Illinois 60085(708) 244-2600Fax: (708) 244-3855
(representing Henry Teves)
1
ATTACHMENT I
CF WCKK FOR CONDUCTING AREWD1AL HWESUGKTECN M» FKASTBmTY STUD*
AT THE YHCMW CKEEX LftMETLL SITE,IMOE COUMTY, HJJNOIS
This document is the Statement of Work (SCW) for conducting a RemedialInvestigation (Rl) and Feasibility Study <FS) at the Yeoman Creek Landfill NPLsite located in Lake County, Illinois. The purpose of this SOW is to providethe direction and intent of the RI/FS. Within 60 days of the effective dateof the Consent Order a RI/FS Work Plan will be submitted that providesdetailed guidance on the execution of the RI/FS.
The purpose of the RI is to investigate the site's physical characteristics,identify the sources of contamination, and determine the nature and extent ofcontamination at the Yeoman Creek Landfill site. The purpose of the FS is todevelop and evaluate remedial action alternatives based on the RI data andreport. All personnel, materials, and services required to perform the RI/FSwill be provided by the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs).
The tasks described herein are grouped into the following three categories:0 Plans and Management,0 Remedial Investigation (RI), and
Feasibility Study (FS),
The Work Plan developed pursuant to this SOW will present a phased, iterativeapproach that recognizes the interdependency of the RI and FS. The overallorganization and interactive nature of this approach are illustrated in Figure1, the flow chart for the remedial selection process. Please note that theactivity sequence depicted in Figure 1 is not consistent with the topicalsequence of presentation in this SOW.
The primary intent of the phased approach is to minimize the need forconducting post-FS or supplemental RI/FS activities by thoroughcharacterization of the migration pathways and early identification of thesite specific data requirements associated with the applicable remedialtechnology.
Brief discussions of the major RI/FS tasks are presented, by major topicalcategories, in the following sections.
WORK PLAN REMEDIAL INNVESTIGATION
PHASE
CONSENT OROtH•nd 8TATEMCNT ot
WOfK
TASK1NVESTKIATION81JTPORT »nd
SITUATION
f ———————FEASIBILITY STUDY
PHASE
II
PHASE
III
TASKO
WORK PLAN
TASK 2 - SITE INVESTIGATION
SOURCE
a IARACTERIZ ATION
MK1RATIONPA1IIWAV
ASSESSMENT
CONTAMNANT
CHARACTERIZATION
TASK 3SITE WVESTWAT1ON
ANALYSIS
TASKSDflAFTRIREPORT
TASK 7REMEDIAL
ALl El MA livessanctum
TASK 9DRAFT FSREPORT
TASKO
•UPPIEMENTALWORK PLAN
PREPARATION
TASK 2PIEMRN
SHE NVESIIOAIION
TASK 4DENCf I/PHOT
smuts
o0
TASKSrwALttllbPOtU
TASK aRFMECHAl
AL1EIINATIV/ESEVAIUAIION
TASK 9FWAL FStttfonr o
FIGURE I. PROPOSED REMEDIAL SELECTION PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SARA
A. RI/FS WORK PLAN PREPARATION
A RI/FS Work Plan will be prepared for the Yeoman Creek Landfill site thatdetails the technical approach, personnel requirements, and schedule for eachtask described in this SOW. The schedule will show the implementation oftasks and submission of deliverables in weeks subsequent to regulatory (e.g. ,U.S. EPA and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)) approval andacceptance of prior deliverables. Incorporated into this Vfork Plan will bethe following specific plans:
1. Access Restriction and Erosion Control Measures Plans
A plan for restriction of site access by installation of a security fencearound the site and by properly posting the site shall be prepared. The fencemust comply with the following specifications:
The fence in nature shall be at least six (6) feet tall with anadditional one (1) foot section of barbed wire strands. The fencemust be constructed in accordance with Section 629 of the IllinoisDepartment of Transportation reference manual titled: "StandardSpecifications for Boad and Bridge Construct ion" (SSRBC) dated Julyl, 1988. The barbed wire section shall also be consistent with thespecifications shown in Figure 2.
0 Materials to be used shall meet the requirements of applicableportions of Articles 710.33 and 710.34<b) of the SSRBC.
0 The fence must surround the entire filled area as shown on Figure 3and must not contact any portion of the filled area, except for theeastern portion of the site consisting of Butrick Road east to theeastern boarder of the site and south to Pine Avenue. There must beat least a five (5) foot buffer zone between the fence and thelandfill where possible. The fence must not inhibit public right-of-ways such as city streets.
The plan must include a map showing the perimeter in which the fence shall beplaced. The Plan shall include the design details, gate locations, signlocations, access considerations, consideration of impacts and permitsrequired for any wetland filling and any other special considerations.
Two large, approximately 20 foot long erosion cuts exist along the westernborder of the filled area, east of Yeoman Creek. A plan shall be prepared toprovide for construction of erosion control measures at these cuts by fillingand installation of coarse aggregate, and stone or concrete riprap, andrevegetation as needed in order to prevent further erosion of these cuts bysite drainage. The materials used shall be consistent with applicable
H-CM|-i0)
ro
Figure 3
WAUKEGAN YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILLNORTH
portions of Section 704 and 705 of the SSRBC and must resist being washed awayduring high flows in Yeoman Creek.
The Respondents shall be responsible for the safety and well-being ofcontractors involved in iiiplementation of the work described in these Plans.
Ihe Plans shall also provide for periodic inspections of the landfill cap andfence during completion of the RI/FS.
2. Field Sampling Plan
A Sampling Plan that addresses all data acquisition activities will beprepared. The plan will contain a statement of sampling objectives andequipment specifications, required analyses, sample types, and samplelocations and frequency. The plans will address specific hydrologic,hydrogeologic , and air transport characterization methods including, but notlimited to, geologic mapping, geophysics, field screening, drilling and wellinstallation, flow determination, and sampling. The application of thesemethods will be described for each major subtask within the site investigation(e.g. , waste characterization, migration pathway assessment, and contaminantcharacterization) .
In addition, the plan will identify the data requirements of specific remedialtechnologies that may be necessary to evaluate remedial alternatives in theFS. It will include an evaluation explaining what additional data arerequired to adequately characterize the site, evaluate the no-actionalternative, and support the feasibility study. It will provide a schedulestating when events will take place and when deliverables will be ready.
3. Quality Assurance Project Plan
A Quality Assurance Project Plan (CftPP) / prepared in accordance with currentU.S. EPA guidance, will be appended to the Sampling Plan. The C PP willdescribe the project and project personnel organization and responsibilities.It will include quality assurance objectives for data (precision, accuracy,completeness, representativeness, comparability, and intended use) andspecify sampling procedures, locations, parameters, number of samples, andsample custody.
The CftPP will specify the type and frequency of calibration procedures forfield and laboratory instruments; the type and frequency of internal qualitycontrol checks; the type and frequency of quality assurance performance auditsand system audits; the preventive maintenance procedures and schedule;specific procedures to assess data precision, representativeness,comparability, accuracy, and corpleteness of specific measurement parameters,and corrective action procedures for field and laboratory instruments.
The cy PP will also describe how the data win be documented and tracked,including documentation materials and procedures, financial reportingprocedures, and documents.
4. Health and Safety Plan
A Health and Safety Plan to protect the health of personnel involved in siteactivities and the surrounding ccnnunity, will be developed on the basis ofsite conditions and be consistent with the following regulations and guidance:
20 CFR 1910.120 (i) (2) - Occupational Health andSafety Administration: Hazardous Waste Operationsand Emergency Response, Interim Rule, December 19,1986.
U.S. EPA Order 1440.2 - Health and SafetyRequirements for Employees Engaged in FieldActivities.
0 U.S. EPA 0 1440.3 - Respiratory Protection.
U.S. EPA Occupational Health and Safety Manual.0 U.S. EPA Interim Standard Operating Procedures
(September, 1982).
•Hie health and safety plan shall provide information on provisions to protectsite visitors, personnel responsibilities, protective equipnent, procedures,protocols, decontamination methods, and medical surveillance.
5. EYKfongprment Assessment Plan
An Endangerment Assessment Plan will be developed quantifying the risks posedby the Yeoman Creek Landfill site and analyzing the public health impacts ofthe remedial alternatives. The methodology presented in this plan willconform to the Superfund PubUg ffiffilth Evaluation Manual (ICF, 1986).
6. Data Management Plan
A Data Management Plan will be developed to document and track investigativedata and results. The plan will identify and establish laboratory and datadocumentation materials and procedures, project file requirements, andproject-related progress reporting procedures and documents.
7. ATSDR Health Assessment
The Vfork Plan for the site shall also provide for collection of adequateinformation to support the ATSDR Health Assessment required by SARA. Sincethe health assessment will be prepared by ATSDR, all draft Vfork Plans andsupport documents will be submitted for ATSDR review and comment to ensurethat their needs and requirements are being met. In the event that the healthassessment has already been completed by ATSDR, the RI report will include andaddress the findings of that report.
B. PREFARATICN AND SUBMISSION OF PIANS
As shown in Figure l, the preparation of the project plans will be preceded byan evaluation of the existing information and initiation of investigativesupport activities (Task 1).
The Vfork Plan will be sutmitted in accordance with the schedule defined inSection VIII (Wbrk to be Performed) of the Consent Order. Specifically, theRI/FS Wbrk Plan will be developed and implemented in conformance with allprovisions of the Consent Order, this SOW, and the standards set forth in thefollowing statutes, regulations, and guidance:
Section 121 of SARA,0 U.S. EPA "Guidance on Remedial Investigations under
CERCEA," dated May 1985, as amended,0 U.S. EPA "Guidance on Feasibility Studies under
CERdA," dated May 1985, as amended.
The National Contingency Plan, dated November 1985,as amended, and
0 Any additional guidance documents provided by theU.S. EFA.
*****************************
II.REMDIAL
A. Gtoiectives
The objectives of the RI are to:0 Characterize the source(s) of potential
contamination;0 Characterize the hydrogeologic setting to
determine the most likely contaminantmigration pathways and physical features thatcould effect potential remedial actions;
0 Determine the migration rates, extent, andcharacteristics of any contamination that maybe present at the site: and
0 Gather data and information to the extentnecessary and sufficient to quantify the riskto public health and the environment and to
the development and evaluation ofviable remedial alternatives in the FS.
B. Scope
The scope of the Remedial investigation consists of sixtasks:
Task l: Description of Current Situation andInvestigative Support
Task 2: Site Investigation
Task 3: Site Investigation Analyses
Task 4: Bench/Pilot Testing Studies
) Task 5: Reports
Task 6: Community Relations Support
Each of these tasks is described in the following sections.
TASK 1 - INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT ME) DESCRIPTION OF CURRENTSITUATION
1. Information and Data Gathering
a. Site Mapping
Prepare an accurate topographic map of appropriate working scale. A base mapof the site with a scale of 1 inch to 100 feet (1" - 100 M and 2-foot contourintervals will be prepared from this topographic map. The base map willillustrate the locations of wetland areas, floodplains, water features,drainage patterns, tanks, buildings, utilities, paved areas, easements,right-of- ways, and other pertinent features. Larger scale maps will beproduced from the base map as necessary.
In addition to the topographic map, a grid plan will be prepared using thebase map and grid overlay. This grid plan will show the location of existingmonitoring wells, sampling locations, and water supply wells. These maps willrequire surveying to establish horizontal and vertical controls for sites ofthe work relative to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.
Review and verify in the field the legal description of the property. Theintent is not to perform a boundary survey, but to locate the boundaries sothat future activities do not carry over onto adjacent property without properpermission.
b. Metes and Bound
Assemble a legal description of the site from existing county and townshiprecords and results of the site survey.
c. Access Arrangements
Make the necessary arrangements to guarantee access to the site andsurrounding parcels. These arrangements will include negotiating accessagreements with landowners and obtaining demarcation clearance for all buriedutilities and construction of access roads.
d. Preparation of Support Facilities
Initiate and implement the necessary arrangements to construct supportfacilities and/or procure the equipment necessary to performing a hazardoussite investigation. "Bus includes preparation of decontamination facilities,utility hook-ups, and site access control stations.
e. Description of Current Situation
Gather and describe the background information pertinent to the site and itsenvironmental concerns, further detailing the purpose of the RI. The datagathered during previous investigations will be reviewed and evaluated.Regional information will be obtained from available USGS and Illinois StateGeologic Survey reports. Ifce existing site information to be reviewed willinclude but not necessarily be limited to:
0 Illinois Department of Natural Resource andEnvironmental Protection Agency files.
Lake County Soil Conservation Servicereports.v
0 Aerial0 Historical water quality data.0 U.S. and Illinois State Geological Survey files.0 Disposal records (if available).
in addition to this literature search, on-site activities may be used toconfirm and/or update certain information. For example, existing monitoringwells may be inspected to determine if they are functional and the locationand status of selected water supply wells field verified.
2. Preparation of Preliminary Site Evaluation Report
Information and data that are gathered during these initial steps will be usedto generate a preliminary Site Evaluation Report that will address thefollowing:
a. A sumnary of the site background that includes the pertinentboundary conditions, general site physiography, hydrology, and geology as wellas a complete history of waste disposal activities and ownership transfer onthe site.
b. The nature and extent of the problem that includes a sunmary ofactual or potential on-site and off-site health and environmental effects.This report will emphasize threats or potential threats to the public health.
c. The history of response actions that includes a sunmary ofresponse actions conducted by local, state, or private parties.
d. A definition of boundary conditions that includes site boundaryconditions that limit the areas of investigation. The boundaries will be setso that the on-site activities will cover the contaminated media in sufficientdetail to support the FS. Boundaries for site access control and sitesecurity will also be identified. Tire boundaries of the study area may or maynot correspond to the property boundaries.
e. Identification of potential receptors that includes theidentification of private and public water supply wells within a two mileradius of the site. If possible, obtain the well construction details forthese wells and other private water supply wells that may have been previouslysampled and prepare a table summarizing the known construction details tosutmit with the original drilling logs.
f. Develop a site conceptual model that includes a description ofthe physical site conditions as to geology, meteorology, hydrology andhydrogeology. All subsequent site investigation activities will refine andvalidate this model. The conceptual model will focus on the groundwater flowsystem and will be based on the depositional history, inferred recharge anddischarge mechanisms, estimated topographic and hydraulic gradients, andexisting and last land use patterns.
As shown in Figure l, the Investigative Support and Description of CurrentSituation (Task 1) will be conducted prior to, or concurrent with, the VtorkPlan Preparation (Task 0). The Preliminary Site Evaluation Report will besutmitted as supporting documentation with the Vfork Plan.
TASK 2 - SITE INVESTIGATIONS
Investigations necessary to characterize the site and its actual or potentialhazard to public health and the environment will be conducted and result indata of adequate technical content to support the development and evaluationof remedial alternatives during the FS. Investigation activities will focuson problem definition and data to support the screening of remedialtechnologies, alternative development and screening, and detailed evaluationof alternatives.
The site investigation activities will follow the Plans set forth in Task 0.All sample analyses will be conducted at laboratories following EPA protocolsor their equivalents. Strict chain of custody procedures will be followed,and all samples will be located on the site map (and grid system) establishedunder Tasks 0 and 1. A description of the types of investigations that willbe conducted is presented below.
a. Source Characterization and Preparation ofTechnical Memorandum,
An investigation will be carried out to characterize the physical and chemicalaspects of the waste materials and the materials in which they are contained.The investigation of these source areas will involve obtaining data relatedto:
0 Waste characteristics (type, quantity, chemical andphysical properties, and concentrations) and
0 Facility characteristics (type and integrity ofcontainment, leachate collection systems, anddrainage control).
This information will be obtained from a combination of existing siteinformation, field inspection, and site sampling activities. Fieldinvestigations may be necessary to determine the integrity of the landfillcovers.
The source characterization will culminate in the preparation and sutmittal ofa Technical Memorandum. This memorandum will summarize the findings of thesource characterization and will recommend parameters, or classes ofparameters, that will be the focus of subsequent contaminant characterizationstudies.
b. Migration Pathway Assessment and Preparation of TechnicalMemorandum.
The migration pathways at the Yeoman Creek Landfill site will be physicallycharacterized through the following types of investigations:
Hvdroqeology - A hydrogeology study will further evaluate thesubsurface geology and characteristics of the water bearing formations. Thisstudy will define the site hydrostratigraFhy, controlling geologic features,zones of preferential groundwater transmission, and the distribution ofhydraulic heads within the water bearing formations. The results of thisstudy will be combined with the existing site data described in thepreliminary site evaluation report, and the results of the sourcecharacterization, to define the groundwater flow patterns and to predict thevertical and lateral extent of contaminant migration. These predictions willform the rationale for locating and designing monitor wells and the subsequentcontaminant characterization.
10
Hydrology - Drainage patterns and runoff characteristics will beevaluated for potential erosional transport. Staff gauges may be used toevaluate the hydraulic connection between surface water bodies and thegroundwater flow system and to determine the potential for sediment transport.
Soils and Sediments - The physical characteristics of the sitesoils and aquatic sediments will be evaluated. Some elements of thisinvestigation may overlap with the hydrogeology and the hydrologyinvestigations .
Air - The potential for airborne particle transport will beevaluated to determine if an atmospheric testing program over and above thatrequired to assure protection of the site workers and surrounding community,should be initiated at later project stages. This information will be derivedfrom a combination of existing data and information and data resulting fromthe field investigations.
The Migration Pathway Assessment will culminate in the preparation andsutmittal of a Technical Memorandum describing the findings of the assessment.This memorandum will contain specific recommendations for the location anddesign of monitoring stations (i.e. , wells, air quality samplers, surfacewater samplers , etc . ) .
c. Contaminant Characterization
Data generated from the Pathway Assessment and Source Characterization will beused to design an environmental sampling and analyses program. The objectiveof this program is to evaluate the extent and magnitude of contaminantmigration along the pathways of concern at the Yeoman Creek Landfill Site.
Monitoring points will be installed in each media previously identified as amigration pathway. This monitoring network may incorporate several of thepiezometers and/or gauges installed during the Pathway Assessment.The analytical parameters list used in this subtask will be based on the datacollected during the source characterization. The selection of parameters orclasses of parameters (i.e., volatile organics, metals, PCBs/pesticides , etc.)will be based upon their source concentration and their persistence andmobility within the most likely pathway of migration. Provisions will be madefor conducting full Hazardous Substance List (HSL) analyses at thosemonitoring stations where there is a reasonable anticipation of detecting acomplex contaminant profile. All samples will be collected, handled, andanalyzed in accordance with the protocols and procedures described in the site
As shown in Figure 1, provisions will be made for conducting additional siteinvestigation activities after the completion of the Remedial AlternativesScreening (Task 7). These supplemental investigations are intended to furthercharacterize the sources, pathways, and/or contaminants and to satisfy thespecific data requirements of the applicable remedial actions. The Plans forthese investigations and the Bench/Pilot Studies (Task 4) will be prepared andsutmitted for Agency comment and approval after the completion of Task 7.
11
TASK 3 - SITE INVESTIGATION ANALYSES
An analyses of all data collected during this investigation will be made toassure that the quality (e.g. , Q?VQC procedures have been followed) andquantity of data adequately support the Endangennent Assessment and FS. Theresults of the site investigations will be organized and presented in a reportthat sumnarizes the type and extent of on-site contamination and submitted toU.S. EFA and lEEft. as the Preliminary Data Transmittal .
Based upon the specific chemicals and ambient levels at the site, the numberand location of the surrounding population, and migration pathways, a secondreport, the Endangerment Assessment , will be conducted by the responsibleparties to evaluate the actual or potential threat to human health, welfare,or the environment. Actual or potential risks will be quantified wheneverpossible. A general outline of work for the Endangerment Assessment follows:
0 Select target chemicals for evaluation based ontheir degree of contribution to the risksassociated with the site.
0 Conduct exposure assessments that include theidentification of acute and chronic hazards ofconcerns and the population(s) at risk.
0 Evaluate existing toxicity information anddetermine the potential acute and chronic effectsof the site contaminants as well as the specificeffects such as carcinogenicity, reproductivedysfunction, teratogeny, neurotoxicity, and othermetabolic alterations; and environmental effects ofaquatic and terrestrial toxicities.
0 Assess impact by identifying acceptable exposureguidelines or standards, comparing estimated doseswith these guidelines or standards. For targetchemicals at the site that are designated ascarcinogens by EPA, use EPA's evaluations toestimate the increased cancer risks.
This assessment will be conducted in accordance with the procedures describedin the Superfund Public HeflHtrtl Fyflll y-frion Manual (ICF, 1986).
TASK 4 - BENCH/PILOT TESTING STUDIES
Bench and piloting scale testing studies will be performed as necessary todetermine the applicability of selected remedial technologies to site specificconditions. These may include treatability and cover studies, aquifertesting, and/or material compatibility testing. As shown on Figure I, these
12
studies will be conducted in the later stages of the RI after the initialscreening of remedial technologies and actions.
TASK 5 - REPORTS
1. Progress Reports
Monthly progress reports will be prepared to describe the technical progressof the RI. These reports shall be submitted to the U.S. EPA and IEPA inaccordance with the provisions of Section IX.E. of the Consent Order.
2. Technical Memorandums
Ine results of specific remedial investigation activities such as theMigration Pathway Assessment, Source Characterization, EndangermentAssessment, etc. , will be submitted in draft form to the U.S. EPA and IEPAthroughout the RI process. All responses to U.S. EPA and IEPA commentsconcerning memorandum issues will be addressed in letters from the RespondentProject Coordinator to the U.S. EFA Remedial Project Manager and will besummarized in the draft RI report. Hie specific technical memorandums andtheir associated schedule of sutmittal will be identified in the project VforkPlan (Task 0) .
3. Remedial Investigation Report
A final report covering the remedial investigations, the RemedialInvestigation Report (RI) , will be prepared. The RI will characterize thesite and summarize the data collected and the conclusions drawn frcminvestigative Tasks 1 through 3. Hie report will be submitted in draft formfor review and Garment. Upon receipt of comments, a draft final report willbe prepared and submitted. ate RI report will not be considered final until aletter of approval is issued by the U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager.
TASK 6 - CCMtfUNITY RELATIONS SUPPORT
A community relations program will be iinplemented jointly by the U.S. EPA andthe IEPA. Ine responsible parties will cooperate with the U.S. EPA and theIEPA in providing RI/FS information to the public. The responsible partieswill, at the request of the U.S. EPA or IEPA, participate in the preparationof information distributed to the public, such as fact sheets by the U.S. EPAor the IEPA to describe activities at, or concerning, the site, including thefindings of the RI/FS.
Community relations support will be consistent with Superfund communityrelations policy as stated in the "Guidance for Implementing the SuperfundProgram" and Ccmnunity Relations in Suoerfund - A
*******************************
13
III.
Y STUD*
The purpose of the FS for the Yeoman Creek Landfill site is to developalternative remedial actions, based upon the results of the RI, that willmitigate impacts to public health and welfare and the environment.
The FS will conform to Section 121 of SARA, the NCP as amended, the FSGuidance as amended, and U.S. ERA policy. The FS is comprised of the fourtasks:
. Task 7: Remedial Alternatives Screening) Task 8: Remedial Alternatives Evaluation
Task 9: Feasibility Stutty Report
The intent and purpose of each of these tasks is outlined in the followingsections; the technical approach and schedule is detailed in the RI/FS frforkPlan (Task 0).
TASK 7 - REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES SCREENING
This task constitutes the first stage of the FS and is comprised of sixinterrelated subtasks. The goal is to develop and evaluate remedialalternatives for additional screening and evaluation. The Public HealthEvaluation results will be considered throughout the evaluation process.
Subtask 7A - Preliminary Remedial Technologies
A master list of potentially feasible technologies will be developed thatincludes both on-site and off-site remedies. The master list will be screenedaccording to site conditions, waste characteristics, and technicalrequirements, in order to eliminate or modify those technologies that mayprove extremely difficult to implement, require unreasonable time periods, orrely on insufficiently developed technology. Elnerging technologies beingevaluated through the U.S. EPA's Site Program will also be considered if thatinformation is available. The results of this task will be summarized in aTechnical Memorandum that will be submitted to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA.
Subtask 7B - Development of Alternatives
1. Developing Remedial Response Objectives
Develop site-specific objectives based on publichealth and environmental concerns for the Yeoman
14
Greek Landfill site, the description of thecurrent situation, information gathered during theRE, Section 300.68 of the National Contingency Plan(NCP) , U.S. EKV's interim guidance, and therequirements of any other applicable U.S. EPA,Federal, and State environmental standards,guidance and advisories as defined under Section 121of SARA. Preliminary cleanup objectives will bedeveloped under formal consultation with the U.S.
and the IEPA.
2. Assembling Alternatives for Remedial Actions
Develop a comprehensive, site-specific approach forRemedial Action by assembling combinations ofidentified technologies that include the following:
a. Treatment alternatives for source control thateliminate the need for long-term management(including monitoring).
b. Alternatives involving treatment as a principalelement to reduce the toxicity, mobility, orvolume of waste.
Develop at least two additional alternatives thatinclude the following:
c. An alternative that involves containment ofwaste with little or no treatment but protectshuman health and the environment primarily bypreventing exposure to, or reducing the mobilityof, the waste.
d. A no action alternative.
For groundwater response actions, a limited number of remedial alternativeswill be developed within a performance range defined in terms of a remediationlevel. The targeted remediation level is the risk range of 10~4 to 10"7 formaximum lifetime risk and includes different rates of restoration. Iffeasible, one alternative that would restore groundwater quality to a 10~6risk for maximum lifetime risk level within five years will be configured.
The remedial action alternatives developed for the Yeoman Creek Landfill sitemay involve both source control and groundwater response actions. In theseinstances , the two elements may be formulated together so that thecomprehensive remedial action is effective and the elements complimentary.Because each element has different requirements, each will be detailedseparately in the development and analyses of alternatives.
15
Subtask 7C - Initial screening of Alternatives
1. Initial Screening Considerations
The alternatives developed under Subtask 7B will besubjected to an initial screening to narrow thelist of potential remedial actions for detailedanalyses; the rationale for eliminatingalternatives will be included. Initial screeningconsiderations include:
a. Effectiveness - degree to which the alternativeto protects human health and the environment;attains Federal and State ARARs or other applicablecriteria, advisories, or guidance; significantlyand permanently reduces the toxicity, mobility, orvolume of the hazardous constituents and aretechnically reliable and effective in otherrespects. Reliability considerations include thepotential for failure and the need to replace theremedy.
b. Iirplemantability - degree to which thealternatives is technically feasible and employsavailable technologies; the technical andinstitutional ability to monitor, maintain, andreplace the technology over time, and theadministrative feasibility of implementing thealternative.
c. Cost - evaluation of construction and long-termcosts to operate and maintain the alternative basedon conceptual costing information. At this stageof the FS, cost will be used as a factor whencomparing alternatives that provide similarresults, but not when comparing treatment andnon-treatment alternatives. Cost will, however, bea factor in the final remedial selection process,however as described in Subtask 8B, Section 1,paragraphs (c) and (d).
2. Intent of Alternatives Screening
One initial screening of alternatives incorporatingtreatment will be conducted with the intent ofpreserving the most promising alternatives asdetermined by their likely effectiveness andimplementability further analyses. The screeningshould result in a range of alternatives remainingfor further analyses as described previously inSubtask 7B(2).
16
innovative alternative technologies will be carried through the screening ifthere is a reasonable belief they offer either the potential for bettertreatment performance or implementability, fewer or less adverse iinpacts thanother available approaches, or lower costs for similar performance than thedemonstrated technologies.
Tire ccaitainment and no-action alternatives will be carried through thescreening process to the detailed analyses.
Subtask 7D - Remedial Alternatives Array Document
To obtain ARARs from IEPA, a detailed description of alternatives (includingthe extent of remediation, contaminant levels to be addressed, and method oftreatment) will be prepared. This document will also include a brief sitehistory and background, a site characterization that indicates thecontaminants of concern, migration pathways, receptors, and other pertinentsite information. A copy of this Alternative Array Document will be sutmittedto the U.S. EPA and the IEPA along with the request for a notification of thestandards.
Subtask 7E - CcmnLinitv Relations Program
A program for community relations support will be developed. "Die program willbe consistent with the Community Relations Program developed under Task 6 andwith the conditions set forth in the Consent Order.
Subtask 7F - Data Reouiranents
Data requirements specific to the relevant and applicable technologies will beidentified. These requirements will focus on providing data needed for thedetailed evaluation and development of a preferred alternative.
TASK 8 - REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES EWVLUATICN
The contractor will conduct a detailed analysis of alternatives which willconsist of an individual analysis of each alternative against a set ofevaluation criteria and a comparative analysis of all options against theevaluation criteria with respect to one another.
The evaluation criteria are as follows:
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment addresses whether ornot a remedy provides adequate protection and describes how risks posedthrough each pathway are eliminated, reduced, or controlled throughtreatment, engineering controls, or institutional controls.
Compliance with ARARs addresses whether or not a remedy will meet all of theapplicable or relevant and appropriate requirements of other Federal and Stateenvironmental statutes and/or provide grounds for invoking a waiver.
17
Loncr-Term Effectiveness and Permanence refers to the ability or a remedy tomaintain reliable protection of human health and the environment over timeonce cleanup goals have been met.
Reduction of Toxicity. M3bilityf or Volume Through Treatment is theanticipated performance of the treatment technologies a remedy may employ.
Short-Term Effectiveness addresses the period of time needed to achieveprotection and any adverse impacts on human health and the environment thatmay be posed during the construction and implementation period until cleanupgoals are achieved.
Impiementabilitv is the technical and administrative feasibility of a remedy,including the availability of materials and services needed to implement aparticular option.
Cost includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs, and netpresent worth costs.
State acceptance (Support Agency) addresses the technical or administrativeissues and concerns the support agency may have regarding each alternative.
Community Acceptance addresses the issues and concerns the public may have toeach of the alternatives.
The individual analysis should include: (1) a technical description ofeach alternative that outlines the waste management strategy involved andidentifies the key ARARs associated with each alternative; and (2) adiscussion that profiles the performance of that alternative with respect toeach of the evaluation criteria. A table summarizing the results of thisanalysis should be prepared. Cnce the individual analysis is complete, thealternatives will be compared and contrasted to one another with respect toeach of the evaluation criteria.
An alternative that is preferred, but does not meet the Federal or statepublic health or environmental ARARs, will be selected only when:
1. The alternative is an interim remedy and willbeccme part of a more comprehensive final remedythat will meet the Federal and State ARARs.
2. Compliance with the ARAR will result in a greaterrisk to human health and the environment than thealternative options.
3. Compliance with the requirements is technicallyimpractical.
4. The alternative will attain a standard ofperformance that is equivalent to that requiredunder the otherwise applicable standard.
18
requirement, or limitation through the use ofanother method or approach.
5. The State has not consistently applied ordemonstrated the intent to consistently apply therequirement at other similar facilities across thestate.
The evaluation of alternatives to select the appropriate remedy will, inaddition to meeting the required findings in Section 300.68(h)(l) of theand reflecting the preferences in Section 300.68(h)(2) of the EKP, alsoconsider and weigh the full range of factors in Section 300.68(e)(2) of theNCP. The selected alternative will represent the best balance across allevaluation criteria.
, TASK 9 - FINAL FS REPORT
The FS will be prepared in a draft report and sutmitted for review andcomment. Upon receipt of comments, a draft final FS report will be preparedand sutmitted. The FS report will not be considered final until a letter ofapproval is issued by the U.S. EFft. Remedial Project Manager. Deliverables andtechnical memorandums prepared previously will be summarized and referenced inorder to limit the size of the report. The report will completely documentthe FS and the process by which the recommended remedial alternative wasselected.
.
**
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION V
IN THE MATTER OF:
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL FACILITYLAKE COUNTYWAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
Respondents, ))
Proceeding under Section 122 (a) )and (d)(3) of the Comprehensive )Environmental Response, )Compensation, and Liability )Act of 1980, as amended. )
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERBY CONSENT RE:
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONAND FEASIBILITY STUDY
U.S. EPA Docket No.
'Q 1 -H- f)w I if U
The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S.
EPA"), Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("IEPA") jointly
referred to herein as the "Agencies") and the Respondents have each
agreed to the making and entry of this Administrative Order by
Consent ("Consent Order").
I- JURISDICTION
A. This Consent Order is issued pursuant to the authority
vested in the President of the United States by Section 122(a) and
(d)(3) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et sea.. as
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986, Pub. L. 99-499 ("CERCLA"), and delegated to the Administrator
of the U.S. EPA on January 29, 1987, by Executive Order
12580, 52 Federal Register 2923, and further delegated to the
2
Assistant Administrator for Solid Waste and Emergency Response and
the Regional Administrators by U.S. EPA Delegation No. 14-14-C on
February 26, 1987 and to the Waste Management Division Director by
U.S. EPA, Region V, Delegation No. 14-14-C on September 14, 1987.
This Consent Order is also issued pursuant to the authority vested
in the IEPA by the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 111. Rev.
Stat. Ch. Ill 1/2, para. 1001 et seq.
B. The Respondents to this Consent Order agree to undertake
all actions required by the terms and conditions hereunder, and
consent to and will not contest or legally challenge the issuance
of this Consent Order or the U.S. EPA's or lEPA's jurisdiction
regarding this Consent Order.
II. NOTICE OF ACTION
A. U.S. EPA has notified all potentially responsible parties
that it has identified as of the date of entry of this Consent
Order of this action to the extent such notification is required,
pursuant to Section 122(e) of CERCLA.
B. U.S. EPA has notified the Federal Natural Resource
trustee of this action pursuant to the requirements of Section
122 (j) of CERCLA. The IEPA has notified, pursuant to Section
104(b)(2) of CERCLA, the State Natural Resource Trustees, who are
the Director of the Department of Energy and Natural Resources, the
Director of the Department of Conservation, the Director of the
Division of Water Resources of the Illinois Department of
Transportation, and the Director of the IEPA.
3
III. PARTIES BOUND
A. This Consent Order applies to and binds the following
persons as defined in Section 101(21) of CERCLA:
(1) U.S. EPA, through the Waste Management DivisionDirector, Region V;
(2) IEPA, through the Director;
(3) the individuals and corporations, their respectivesuccessors and assignees, (referred to collec-tively as "Respondents") identified in AttachmentA of this Consent Order.
B. Each of the undersigned representatives of the U.S. EPA,
IEPA and the Respondents certifies that he or she is fully
authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent
Order and to execute and legally bind such party to this document.
C. No change in ownership, corporate, or partnership status
shall in any way alter the status or responsibility of the
Respondents under this Consent Order. The Respondents shall be
jointly and severally responsible for carrying out all actions
required of the Respondents by the terms and conditions of this
Consent Order. Respondents shall be responsible for ensuring that
all contractors, consultants, firms and other persons or entities
acting under or for it with respect to matters included herein
comply with the terms of this Consent Order. Respondents shall not
raise as a defense to enforcement of this Order that its officers,
directors, principals, employees, agents, servants, contractors,
subcontractors, firms and/or other persons or entities acting under
or for them violated this Consent Order.
4
IV. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
A. In entering into this Consent Order, the mutual
objectives of the U.S.EPA, IEPA and the Respondents are for the
Respondents: (1) to conduct a remedial investigation (RI) to
determine fully the nature and extent of the release or threatened
release of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants from
the Yeoman Creek Landfill Facility, (2) to perform a feasibility
study (FS) to identify and evaluate alternatives for the appro-
priate extent of remedial action to prevent or mitigate the migra-
tion or the release or threatened release of hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants from the Yeoman Creek Landfill
Facility, and (3) to implement certain measures consisting of
restricting site access, and eliminating presently existing
erosion gullies, which shall be incorporated in the work to be
performed during the RI.
B. The activities conducted pursuant to this Consent Order
are subject to approval by the U.S. EPA and IEPA as provided
herein, shall employ sound scientific, engineering and construction
practices and shall be consistent with the National Contingency
Plan, 40 CFR Section 300.68(a) through (j) as amended, CERCLA, and
applicable State laws.
V. FINDINGS OF FACT
Based upon information available on the effective date of this
Consent Order, and without admission of any fact, conclusions of
law or liability by the Respondents, the Waste Management Division
5*
Director of the U.S. EPA, Region V, and the Director of the IEPA
make the following findings:
A. The Yeoman Creek Landfill (Facility) is located in the
City of Waukegan, Lake County, Illinois. The Facility was operated
as a sanitary landfill for the City of Waukegan and is presently a
closed and covered landfill owned and maintained by the Waukegan
Unit School District #60.
B. The Facility is approximately 40-50 acres in area and is
located south of Sunset Avenue, west of Butrick Drive and east of
•' Elmwood and Lorraine Avenues in Waukegan, Illinois. The site is
not fenced and has unrestricted access. Some erosion is occurring
at two gullies on the western edge of the facility. The south
boundary is a peat bog that continues to Edwards Field.
Apartments, homes and businesses directly border the Facility on
the east, west and north.
C. By contract with the City of Waukegan, National Disposal
Service of Illinois, Inc. operated the Facility from 1959 to
February 1969. The city then awarded the contract to T-K City
Disposal, Inc. who operated the Facility until September 1969.
Under the contract, each of these contractors was to collect and
dispose of all residential garbage within the City of Waukegan.
These contractors were also permitted to accept waste materials
from private disposal companies. Since Yeoman Creek Landfill was
the only authorized municipal landfill in Waukegan for the period
in which it was in operation, some industrial wastes were sent for
disposal at the Facility through private disposal companies.
6*
D. Leachate seepage from the Facility is known to enter
Yeoman Creek which is a tributary of the Waukegan River emptying
into Lake Michigan less than one mile from the Waukegan drinking
water aqueduct intake. Tests conducted by U.S. EPA in 1985
indicated the presence of PCBs and other organic chemicals in the
sediments of Yeoman Creek at the Facility and further downstream at
Yeoman Park.
E. The Facility is included in the National Priorities List
(NPL) of hazardous waste sites with a Hazardous Ranking Score of
33.23.
VI. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based upon information available on the effective date of this
Consent Order, and without admission of any fact, conclusions of
law or liability by the Respondents, the Waste Management Division
Director of the U.S. EPA, Region V, and the Director of IEPA make
the following conclusions of law:
A. The Yeoman Creek Landfill, as defined in Section V., is a
"Facility" as defined in Section 101(9) of CERCLA.
B. "Hazardous substances" as defined in Section 101(14) of
CERCLA have been deposited, stored, disposed of, placed, or
otherwise come to be located at the Facility.
C. The spilling, leaking, leaching, dumping, or disposing
of hazardous substances into the soils and groundwater at the
Facility, and the past, present, and potential migration of
hazardous substances from the Facility constitutes an actual and/or
7
threatened "release" of hazardous substances into the environment
as defined in Section 101(22) of CERCLA.
D. The Respondents are "persons" as defined in Section
101(21) Of CERCLA.
E. The Respondents are liable persons pursuant to Section
107 of CERCLA and are potentially responsible parties for the
purposes of Section 122 of CERCLA.
VII. DETERMINATIONS
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law, the Waste Management Division Director of U.S. EPA, Region V,
and the Director of the IEPA have determined that:
A. Respondents shall promptly and properly take appropriate
response action at the Facility by conducting a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study ("RI/FS"), and are qualified to
perform the RI/FS; and
B. In order to ensure orderly conduct of the RI/FS, it is
necessary to implement access restrictions (i.e., a fence) and
erosion control measures.
C. The actions outlined in this Consent Order are necessary
to ensure the protection of public health, welfare and the
environment.
D. The actions required by this Consent Order are in the
public interest and are consistent with the National Contingency
Plan, 40 CFR Part 300, as amended, (hereinafter "NCP") and with
CERCLA.
8*
VIII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED
A. All work to be performed by the Respondents pursuant to
this Consent Order shall be under the direction and supervision of
a qualified professional engineer or certified geologist. Prior to
the initiation of work at the Facility, the Respondents shall
notify the U.S. EPA and IEPA, in writing, of the name, title, and
qualifications of the proposed engineer or geologist, and of the
names of principal contractors and/or subcontractors proposed to be
used in carrying out the work to be performed pursuant to thisw
Consent Order. Selection of any such engineer or geologist or
contractor and/or subcontractor shall be subject to approval by the
U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA. If the U.S. EPA
disapproves of the Respondent's proposed engineer or geologist or
contractor or subcontractor, the U.S. EPA shall specify, in
writing, the bases for such disapproval.
B. Attachment I to this Consent Order provides a Statement
of Work ("SOW") for the completion of the RI/FS, including access
and erosion control measures. The SOW is incorporated into and
made a part of this Consent Order.
C. The following work shall be performed:
1. Within sixty (60) calendar days of the effective date
of this Consent Order, the Respondents shall submit a work plan to
the U.S. EPA and IEPA for a complete Remedial Investigation and
Feasibility Study (hereinafter RI/FS Work Plan). The RI/FS Work
Plan shall be developed in conformance with the SOW, the standards
9*
set forth in CERCIA, including Section 121 of CERCLA, the NCP, U.S.
EPA guidance on remedial investigations and feasibility studies, as
amended, "the Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial Action
Guidance," (February 1985), as amended, and any additional guidance
documents provided by U.S. EPA. In the event that any such
additional guidance document is provided to the Respondents by the
Agencies after the effective date of this Consent Order, the
Respondents shall have fifteen (15) calendar days to revise the
Work Plan as necessary, and any time limits provided in this
Consent Order shall be extended as necessary to accommodate said
fifteen (15) day period.
2. The RI/FS Work Plan submittal shall include, but not
be limited to, the following project plans: (1) an access restric-
tion and erosion control measures plan; (2) a field sampling plan;
(3) a health and safety plan; (4) a quality assurance project plan
("QAPP"); (5) provisions for the preparation of an endangerment
assessment plan; (6) a data management plan, and; (7) a schedule,
including specific dates for implementation of RI/FS tasks and
deliverables such as technical memoranda, preliminary and final
Remedial Investigation reports, preliminary and final endanger-
ment assessments, and preliminary and final Feasibility Study
reports. The preliminary and final Remedial Investigation reports
and the preliminary and final Feasibility Study reports shall be
prepared in accordance with the applicable U.S. EPA guidance.
3. The RI/FS Work Plan shall be subject to review,
10
modification, and approval by the U.S. EPA in consultation with the
IEPA.
4. Within forty five (45) calendar days of receipt of
the RI/FS Work Plan, the U.S. EPA Project Coordinator shall notify
the Respondents, in writing, of approval or disapproval of the
RI/FS Work Plan, or any part thereof. In the event that a longer
review period is required, the U.S. EPA Project Coordinator shall
notify the Respondents of that fact within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of the Work Plan. In the event of any disapproval,
the U.S. EPA shall specify, in writing, any deficiencies and
required modifications to the RI/FS Work Plan.
5. Within fifteen (15) calendar days of receipt of any
U.S. EPA RI/FS Work Plan disapproval, the Respondents shall submit
a revised RI/FS Work Plan to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA which
incorporates the U.S. EPA modifications.
6. In the event of subsequent U.S. EPA disapproval of
the RI/FS Work Plan, the U.S. EPA retains the right to conduct a
complete or partial RI/FS and/or to enforce the terms of this
Consent Order.
7. The Respondents shall commence implementation of
the work detailed in the RI/FS Work Plan within fifteen (15)
calendar days after the RI/FS Work Plan is fully approved by
the U.S. EPA. The fully approved RI/FS Work Plan shall be
deemed incorporated into and made an enforceable part of this
Consent Order. All work shall be conducted in accordance with the
National Contingency Plan, the RI/FS Guidance and the guidance
11specified in paragraph C.I., above, and the requirements of this
Consent Order, including the standards, specifications and
schedule contained in the RI/FS Work Plan.
IX. PLANS AND REPORTS
A. The Respondents shall provide a preliminary and final
Remedial Investigation Report and Feasibility Study Report and any
other plans or reports required by the RI/FS Work Plan to the U.S.
EPA and the IEPA according to the schedule contained in the RI/FS
Work Plan.
B. The U.S. EPA shall approve, in consultation with the
IEPA, the preliminary and final Remedial Investigation Report, the
preliminary and final Feasibility Study Report, and any other
preliminary or final plans or reports specified in the RI/FS Work
Plan as requiring U.S. EPA approval.
C. If the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA, disap-
proves any preliminary or final plan or report, the U.S. EPA shall
specify, in writing, any deficiencies and required modifications
and the Respondents shall submit a revised plan or report to the
U.S. EPA and IEPA within forty five (45) calendar days or such
longer period as the U.S. EPA Project Coordinator may establish,
which plan or report shall incorporate any U.S. EPA modifications
or additions.
D. In the event of subsequent disapproval of any revised
plan or report, the U.S. EPA, and the IEPA under State authority,
retain the right to perform additional studies, to conduct a
12*
complete or partial RI/FS, and/or to enforce the terms of this
Consent Order.
E. The Respondents shall provide monthly written progress
reports to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA. The past reportable month
refers to the month immediately preceding the report submittal
date, and the next reportable month refers to the month following
the report submittal date (e.g., for a report due February 20, the
past reportable month is January, and the next reportable month is
March). At a minimum, these monthly written progress reports shall
include the following:
1. A description of the action during the past
reportable month which has been taken toward
achieving compliance with this Consent Order,
including all plans and procedures completed, and
changes in key personnel;
2. A description of difficulties encountered during
the past reportable month, and all actions taken
to rectify the difficulties;
3. All results of sampling and tests produced
during the past reportable month, relating
to the Facility, and subjected to the QA/QC
program;
4. Results or a description of sampling and tests
produced during the past reportable month,
relating to the Facility, but not subjected to
the QA/QC program. Results of all such sampl-
13
ing and tests, whether subjected to the QA/QC
program or not, shall be submitted by the next
monthly written progress report;
5. All plans, procedures, actions, and data which are
scheduled for the next reportable month;
6. Target and actual completion dates for each
element of activity, including the project comple-
tion, and an explanation of any deviation from the
schedules in the RI/FS Work Plan schedule; and
7. A description of any observed change in the cap
and site security during the past reportable
month, including but not limited to, erosion and
leachate.
F. The monthly written progress reports shall be submitted
to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA by the twentieth (2O) business day of
each month following the date of commencement of the work detailed
in the RI/FS Work Plan.
X. ADDRESS FOR ALL CORRESPONDENCE
Documents, including reports, approvals, disapprovals and
other correspondences to be sent by certified mail or any other
form of mail delivery which records the date of receipt to the
following addresses, or to such other addresses as the Respondent,
the IEPA or the U.S. EPA may hereafter designate for themselves in
writing:
14*
A. Documents to be submitted to the U.S. EPA should
be sent to:
Richard BoiceRemedial Project ManagerRemedial and Enforcement Response Branch (5HS-11)U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V230 S. Dearborn StreetChicago, Illinois 60604
B. Documents to be submitted to the IEPA should
be sent to:
Scott MoyerProject ManagerDivision of Land Pollution ControlIllinois Environmental Protection Agency2200 Churchill RoadSpringfield, Illinois 62706
C. Documents to be submitted to the Respondents should be
sent to a name and address to be designated by the Respondents
within ten (10) calendar days of the effective date of this
Consent Order.
XI. ADDITIONAL WORK
A. In the event that the U.S. EPA, the IEPA or the
Respondents determines that additional work, including remedial
investigatory work and/or engineering evaluation, is necessary to
accomplish the objectives of the RI/FS, written notification of
such additional work shall be provided to each of the other
parties.
B. Any additional work determined to be necessary by the
Respondents shall be subject to approval by the U.S. EPA, in
consultation with the IEPA.
15
C. Any additional work determined to be necessary by the
Respondents or the IEPA and approved by the U.S. EPA, or determined
to be necessary by the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA,
shall be completed by the Respondents in accordance with the stan-
dards, specifications, and schedule determined or approved by the
U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA and shall be incorporated
into this Consent Order and made an enforceable part thereof.
XII. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS
All work undertaken by the Respondents pursuant to this
Consent Order shall be performed in compliance with all applicable
Federal and State laws and regulations, including all Occupational
Health and Safety Administration and Department of Transportation
regulations. The Respondents shall be responsible for obtaining
all State or local permits which are necessary for the performance
of any work hereunder.
XIII. ACCESS
A. To the extent that the Facility or other areas, where
work is to be performed hereunder, is presently owned by parties
other than those bound by this Consent Order, the Respondents shall
obtain, or shall use their best efforts to obtain, access
agreements from the present owners within thirty (30) calendar days
of approval of the RI/FS Work Plan. Such agreements shall provide
access for the Respondents, the U.S. EPA, the IEPA and authorized
representatives of the U.S. EPA and the IEPA, as specified below.
16*
In the event that such access agreements are not obtained within
the time referenced above, the Respondents shall so notify the U.S.
EPA and the IEPA, in writing, and shall specify the efforts to
obtain access, and the responses thereto. If, despite the
Respondents1 best efforts to obtain access under this provision,
the Respondents are unable to obtain access necessary to carry out
the terms of this Consent Order, the Director, Waste Management
Division, U.S. EPA, Region V agrees to recommend that the U.S.
EPA's authority under Section 104(e) of CERCLA be exercised to
secure such access on behalf of the Respondents. This agreement
shall be subject to the following: (1) The U.S. EPA's
determination that Respondents have exercised best efforts to
obtain access necessary to carry out the terms of this Consent
Order; (2) U.S. EPA guidance, including, but not limited to
guidance entitled "Entry and Continued Access Guidance Under
CERCLA," dated June 5, 1987; (3) consultation with the U.S. EPA's
Office of Regional Counsel, the U.S. EPA!s Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Monitoring and, to the extent necessary,
concurrence by the Department of Justice; and (4) agreement by the
Respondents to cooperate with U.S. EPA in the exercise of this
authority. The Respondents are advised that the expenses incurred
by the United States in gaining access are response costs for which
the Respondents may be liable. The U.S. EPA reserves the right to
terminate this Consent Order should the Respondents1 inability to
gain access to the Facility or other areas materially affect the
Respondents1 ability to perform the work required herein.
17*
B. Authorized representatives of the U.S. EPA and the IEPA
shall be allowed access to the Facility and other areas by the
Respondents, and as part of any agreement obtained under paragraph
A above, for purposes including, but not limited to: inspecting
records, operating logs and contracts related to the Facility;
reviewing the progress of the Respondents in carrying out the terms
of this Consent Order; conducting such tests, inspections, and
sampling as the U.S. EPA and the IEPA may deem necessary; using a
camera, sound recording, or other documentary type equipment; and
verifying the data submitted to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA by the
Respondents hereunder. Subject to applicable attorney-client and
work product privileges as defined in Section XXI.B., below, the
Respondents shall permit such authorized representatives to
inspect and copy all records, files, photographs, documents, and
other writings, including all sampling and monitoring data, which
pertains to this Consent Order. All persons with access to the
Facility pursuant to the Consent Order shall comply with approved
health and safety plans.
C. Nothing herein shall be construed as restricting the
inspection or access authority of the U.S. EPA or the IEPA under
any law or regulation.
XIV. PROJECT COORDINATORS
A. On or before the effective date of this Consent Order,
the U.S. EPA, the IEPA and the Respondents shall each designate a
Project Coordinator. Each Project Coordinator shall be responsible
18*
for overseeing the implementation of this Consent Order. The U.S.
EPA Project Coordinator will be the U.S. EPA designated representa-
tive at the Facility. The IEPA Project Coordinator will be the
lEPA's designated representative at the Facility. To the maximum
extent possible, communications between the Respondents, the IEPA
and the U.S. EPA, and all documents, reports, approvals and other
correspondences concerning the activities performed pursuant to the
terms and conditions of this Consent Order, shall be directed
through the Project Coordinators. During implementation of the
RI/FS Work Plan, the Project Coordinators shall, whenever possible,
operate by consensus and shall attempt in good faith to resolve
disputes informally through discussion of the issues.
B. The U.S. EPA, the IEPA and the Respondents shall each
have the right to change their respective Project Coordinators.
Such a change shall be accomplished by notifying each of the other
parties in writing at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the
change.
C. The U.S. EPA Project Coordinator shall have the authority
vested in an On-Scene Coordinator and a Remedial Project Manager
(OSC, RPM) by the National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part 300, as
amended, including the authority to halt, conduct, or direct any
work required by this Consent Order, or to direct any response
action undertaken by the U.S. EPA when conditions at the Facility
may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public
health or welfare or the environment. In the event that the U.S.
EPA Project Coordinator halts or substantially modifies work
19*
specifically required by the Work Plan pursuant to this paragraph,
the Respondent may request a modification of the schedule or work
described in the RI/FS Work Plan and this Consent Order.
D. The absence of the U.S. EPA or IEPA Project Coordinator
from the Facility shall not be cause for stoppage of work.
E. The Project Coordinator for the Respondents or his desig-
nated representative shall be on-site during all hours of site work
and shall be on call during the pendency of this Consent Order.
XV. SAMPLING AND DATA/DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY
A. The Respondents shall make the results, including raw
data, of all sampling and/or tests or other data generated by the
Respondents, or on behalf of the Respondents, pursuant to
implementation of this Consent Order, available to the U.S. EP^ and
the IEPA, and shall submit these results in written monthly
progress reports as required by Section IX of this Consent Order.
B. At the request of the U.S. EPA or the IEPA, the Respond-
ents shall provide split or duplicate samples to the U.S. EPA or
the IEPA of any samples collected by the Respondents pursuant to
the implementation of this Consent Order. The Respondents shall
notify the U.S. EPA and the IEPA at least ten (10) calendar days
or such other time period as may be agreed upon by the project
coordinators, in advance of any sample collection activity. If the
Agencies take their own samples, they shall provide Respondents a
reasonable opportunity to collect split or duplicate samples.
20*
C. Pursuant to applicable Federal laws and regulations,
(Section 104(e) of CERCIA and 40 CFR Part 2), the Respondents may
assert a confidentiality claim with respect to any or all of the
information requested or submitted pursuant to the terms of this
Consent Order. Such an assertion must be adequately substantiated
when the assertion is made. Analytical data and other information
described in Section 104(e)(7)(F) of CERCLA shall not be claimed as
confidential by the Respondents. Information determined to be
, confidential by the U.S. EPA in accordance with applicable Federal>- -t laws and regulations will be afforded the full protection provided
by such laws and regulations. Information determined to be
confidential by IEPA pursuant to applicable State laws and
regulations will be afforded the full protection provided by such
laws and regulations. If no confidentiality claim accompanies
information when it is submitted to the U.S. EPA and the IEPA, or
if information claimed as confidential is determined by the U.S.
EPA or the IEPA not to be confidential, the information may be made
available to the public by the U.S. EPA or the IEPA.
XVI. QUALITY ASSURANCE
A. The Respondents shall use quality assurance, quality
control, and chain of custody procedures in accordance with U.S.
EPA "Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality
Assurance Project Plans" QAMS-005-80 (U.S. EPA, 1980c) throughout
all data collection activities.
21
B. The Respondents shall consult with the U.S. EPA and IEPA
Project Coordinators in planning for, and prior to, all sampling
and analysis as detailed in the RI/FS Work Plan. In order to
provide quality assurance and maintain quality control with respect
to all samples collected pursuant to this Consent Order, the
Respondents shall:
1. Ensure that the U.S. EPA and IEPA personnel and/or
the U.S. EPA and IEPA authorized representatives are allowed access
L to any laboratories and personnel utilized by the Respondents for
I analysis;
2. Ensure that all sampling and analyses are performed
according to U.S. EPA methods or other methods deemed satisfactory
by the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA; and
3. Ensure that any laboratories utilized by the
Respondents for analyses participate in a U.S. EPA quality
assurance/quality control program equivalent to that which is
followed by the U.S. EPA, and which is consistent with U.S. EPA^
document QAMS-005-80. As part of such a program, and upon request
by the U.S. EPA, such laboratories shall perform analyses of
samples provided by the U.S. EPA or the IEPA to demonstrate the
quality of analytical data for each such laboratory.
XVII. FORCE MAJEURE
A. The Respondents shall cause all work to be performed
within the time limits set forth herein, unless performance is
delayed by events which constitute a force majeure. For purposes
22
o.f this Consent Order, a "force majeure11 is an event beyond the
control of the Respondents which delays performance of any obliga-
tions required by this Consent Order. Increases of costs shall not
be considered circumstances beyond the control of the Respondents.
B. The Respondents shall notify the U.S. EPA and the IEPA by
telephone within 24 hours, and in writing no later than five (5)
calendar days after any event which the Respondents contend is a
force majeure. Such notification shall describe the anticipated
length of the delay, the cause or causes of the delay, the measures
taken and to be taken by the Respondents to minimize the delay, and
the timetable by which these measures will be implemented. The
Respondents shall have the burden of demonstrating that the event
is a force majeure.
C. If the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA, agrees
that a delay is attributable to a force majeure, the time period
for performance under this Consent Order shall be extended for the
time period not to exceed that time period attributable to the
event constituting the force raajeure.
XVIII. STIPULATED PENALTIES
A. The Respondents shall be liable for payment into the
Hazardous Substances Superfund administered by the U.S. EPA of the
sums set forth below as stipulated penalties for each day that the
Respondents fail to commence work or submit a report or document or
comply with a schedule in accordance with the requirements contain-
ed in this Consent Order, unless U.S. EPA determines that such
23
delay is attributable to a force majeure as defined in Article XVII
above. Such sums shall be due and payable within fifteen (15) cal-
endar days of receipt of notification from the U.S. EPA assessing
the penalties. These stipulated penalties shall accrue in the
amount of $300 per day for the first seven (7) days, $500 per day
for days 8-28, and $700 per day for each day thereafter.
B. The stipulated penalties set forth in paragraph A of this
section shall not preclude the U.S. EPA or the IEPA from electing
to pursue any other remedy or sanction because of the Respondents'
failure to comply with any of the terms of this Consent Order,
including a suit to enforce the terms of this Consent Order. Said
stipulated penalties shall not preclude the U.S. EPA or the IEPA
from seeking statutory penalties up to the amount authorized by law
in the event of Respondents' failure to comply with any require-
ments of this Consent Order.
C. Any stipulated penalties accruing pursuant to this Consent
Order shall be paid by certified or cashier's check made payable to
the Hazardous Substances Superfund, and shall be remitted to:
U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V
Superfund AccountingP.O. Box 70753Chicago, Illinois 60673
Copies of the transmittal of payment shall be sent to the Office of
Regional Counsel, SWER Branch Secretary, U.S. EPA, Region V, 230
South Dearborn Street, 5CS-TUB-3, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and to
the parties designated in Section X.A. and B., above.
24
D. The payment of stipulated penalties demanded pursuant to
this Article does not preclude U.S. EPA or IEPA from pursuing any
other remedies or sanctions which may be available to them by
reason of Respondents1 failure to comply with any of the
requirements of this Consent Order, nor shall payment of said
penalties relieve Respondents of the responsibility to comply with
this Consent Order. In its discretion, U.S. EPA shall have the
right to reduce stipulated penalties provided for in this
Agreement.
E. Should Respondents fail to comply with a time requirement
of any task required by this Consent Order, the period of
noncompliance shall terminate upon Respondents1 completion of
performance of said requirement. In addition, should Respondents
fail to obtain U.S. EPA or IEPA approval of a plan, report or other
document required to be submitted for approval pursuant to this
Consent Order, the period of noncompliance shall commence upon the
date of receipt of notice of disapproval, and shall terminate upon
Respondents' submittal of an approvable document to U.S. EPA and
IEPA or upon the modification and approval of such document by U.S.
EPA and IEPA, whichever is sooner.
XIX. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. The parties shall use their best efforts to in good faith
resolve all disputes or differences of opinion informally. If,
however, any dispute arises concerning this Consent Order which the
parties are unable to resolve informally, the Respondents shall
25*
present a written notice of such dispute to the U.S. EPA and the
IEPA, which shall set forth specific points of dispute, the
position of the Respondents and the technical basis therefor, and
any actions which the Respondents consider necessary.
B. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of such a
written notice, the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA, shall
provide a written response to the Respondents setting forth its
position and the basis therefor. During the five (5) business
days following receipt of the response, the U.S. EPA, the IEPA and
the Respondents shall attempt to negotiate in good faith a
resolution of their differences.
C. Following the expiration of the time periods described in
Paragraph B above, if the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA,
concurs with the position of the Respondents, the Respondents and
the IEPA shall be so notified in writing and this Consent Order
shall be modified to include any necessary extensions of time or
variances of work. If the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the IEPA,
does not concur with the position of the Respondents, the U.S. EPA,
in consultation with the IEPA, shall resolve the dispute, based
upon and consistent with the terms of this Consent Order, and shall
provide written notification of such resolution to the Respondents.
D. The pendency of dispute resolution set forth in this
Article shall not affect the time period for completion of work
and/or obligations to be performed under this Consent Order, except
that upon mutual agreement of the U.S. EPA, the IEPA, and
26*
Respondents, any time period may be extended not to exceed the
actual time taken to resolve the dispute. Elements of work and/or
obligations not affected by the dispute shall be completed in
accordance with the schedule contained in the Rl/FS Work Plan.
E. Upon resolution of any dispute, whether informally or
using the procedures in this Article, any additions or modifica-
tions required as a result of such dispute resolution shall
promptly be incorporated, if necessary, into the appropriate plan
or procedure and into this Consent Order. The Respondents shall
proceed with all remaining work according to the modified plan or
procedure.
F. In any proceeding to enforce the terms of this Consent
Order or to collect penalties for violations thereof, the
Respondents may defend on the basis that U.S. EPA's resolution of
any properly invoked dispute was arbitrary and capricious or not
otherwise in accordance with applicable law.
XX. COMMUNITY RELATIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENT
A. The Respondents shall cooperate with the U.S. EPA and the
IEPA in providing RI/FS information to the public. As requested by
the U.S. EPA or the IEPA, the Respondents, or their representatives
shall cooperate in the preparation of all appropriate information
disseminated to the public, and cooperate in preparation for public
meetings which may be held or sponsored by the U.S. EPA or the IEPA
to explain activities at or concerning the Facility, including the
findings of the RI/FS.
27
XXI. RECORD PRESERVATION
A. The Respondents agree to preserve, during the pendency
of this Consent Order, and for a minimum of ten (10) years after
termination of this Consent Order, all records and documents in
the possession of the Respondents, or in the possession of any
division, employees, agents, accountants, contractors, or
attorneys of the Respondents, which relate in any way to the RI/FS,
and any other sampling and laboratory analysis, and any other
activities at the Facility. Upon request by the U.S. EPA or the
IEPA, the Respondents shall make available to the U.S. EPA or the
IEPA such records, or copies of any such records, subject to
Paragraph C of Article XV of this Consent Order, and except those
that are subject to applicable attorney-client and attorney work
product privileges.
B. For purposes of this Consent Order "applicable attorney-
client and attorney work product privileges" do not include
investigative reports if they are required by this Consent Order,
or sampling data collected and laboratory analysis related to this
Facility, even if prepared at the request of one of Respondents1
attorneys. Respondents shall provide to the U.S. EPA and IEPA upon
request sampling data related to this Facility collected after the
effective date of this Consent Order and laboratory analyses of
same even if Respondents are not required to collect or analyze
said data by this Consent Order.
28
XXII. CERCIA PONDING
A. The Respondents waive any claims or demands for
compensation or payment under Sections 106(b)(2), ill and 112 of
CERCLA against the United States or the Hazardous Substance
Response Trust Fund established by Section 221 of CERCLA for or
arising out of any activity performed or expenses incurred pursuant
to this Consent Order.
B. This Consent Order does not constitute any decision on
preauthorization of funds under Section lll(a)(2) of CERCLA.
XXIII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
A. The U.S. EPA and the IEPA reserve all rights and defenses
that they may have pursuant to any available legal authority.
B. Nothing herein shall waive the right of the U.S. EPA to
enforce this Consent Order, or to take action pursuant to Sections
104, 106(a) and 107 of CERCLA or to take any other action pursuant
to applicable Federal and State law. The U.S. EPA and the IEPA
reserve the right to take any enforcement action pursuant to CERCLA
and/or any available legal authority, including the right to seek
injunctive relief, monetary penalties, and punitive damages. In
addition, the U.S. EPA reserves the right to undertake any remedial
investigation/feasibility study work, and/or any removal, remedial
and/or response actions relating to the Facility, and to seek
recovery from the Respondents for any costs incurred in undertaking
such actions. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit or in any
way impair the ability of the U.S. EPA to secure satisfaction of
29*
the work to be undertaken pursuant to this Consent Order in the
event the Respondents fail to perform the work in accordance with
this Consent Order, SOW or RI/FS Work Plan.
C. Nothing herein is intended to release, discharge, or in
any way affect any claims, causes of action or demands in law or
equity which the parties may have against any person, firm,
partnership or corporation not a party to this Consent Order for
any liability it may have arising out of, or relating in any way
to, the generation, storage, treatment, handling, transportation,
release or disposal of any materials, hazardous substances,
hazardous wastes, contaminants, or pollutants at, to, or from the
Facility. The parties to this Consent Order expressly reserve all
rights, claims, demands, and causes of action they have against any
and all other persons and entities who are not parties to this
Consent Order, and as to each other for matters not covered hereby.
D. Nothing herein shall be construed to release the
Respondents from any liability for failure of the Respondents to
perform the RI/FS in accordance with the RI/FS Statement of Work
attached hereto and incorporated herein or with the RI/FS Work
Plan or any subsequent work plan incorporated herein. The parties
further expressly recognize that this Consent Order and the
successful completion and approval of the RI/FS do not represent
satisfaction, waiver, release, or covenant not to sue, of any claim
of the United States or the State of Illinois against the
Respondents relating to the Facility, (including claims to require
Respondents to undertake further response actions and claims to
30
seek reimbursement of response costs pursuant to Section 107 of
CERCLA) except that, upon receipt of written notice of satisfaction
as provided in Article XXVIII of this Consent Order, Respondents
shall have no further obligations under this Consent Order.
E. Nothing herein is intended to be a release or settlement
of any claim for personal injury or property damage by any person
not a party to this Consent Order.
F. The Agencies recognize that the Respondents may have the
right to seek contribution, indemnity and/or any other available
remedy against any person found to be responsible or liable for
contributions, indemnity or otherwise for any amounts which have
been or will be expended by the Respondents in connection with the
Facility. This Consent Order constitutes an administrative
settlement within the meaning of Section 113(f)(2) of CERCLA,
provided Respondents are in compliance with this Consent Order.
G. In agreeing to the issuance of and entering into this
Consent Order, Respondents do not admit, accept, concede or
acknowledge, and specifically reserve the right to contest any
determinations, allegations, findings, and conclusions by the
Agencies herein, in any proceeding regarding the Facility other
than a proceeding brought by U.S. EPA or IEPA. Nothing in this
Consent Order may be used in any fashion or admitted into evidence
in any proceeding other than to enforce the terms of this Consent
Order. Furthermore, Respondents specifically deny any fault or
liability under CERCLA or any other statutory or common law and
except as otherwise provided in this Consent Order do not, by
31
signing this Consent Order, waive any right they may have to assert
claims under CERCLA against any person, as defined in Section
101(21) of CERCIA, 42 U.S.C. §9601(21). This Consent Order and the
Respondents' performance hereunder shall not create any private
rights. This Consent Order shall be evidence only of the
agreements contained herein. However, nothing in this Consent
Order shall prohibit its use by the parties hereto to establish its
existence and terms.
XXIV. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. The U.S. EPA and the IEPA shall provide the Respondents
with an accounting, based on U.S. EPA Financial Management System
summary data (SPUR Report) of all response costs incurred by the
U.S. EPA, and an accounting by the IEPA prior to the effective date
of this Consent Order. Within thirty (30) calendar days of
receipt of such accounting, the Respondents shall pay to the U.S.
EPA and the IEPA the total sum of their response costs incurred
prior to the effective date of this Consent Order.
B. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the end of each
twelve (12) month period beginning with the effective date of this
Consent Order, the U.S. EPA and the IEPA shall each submit an
accounting (SPUR Report and State accounting, respectively) to the
Respondents of all response and oversight costs incurred by the
U.S. EPA and the IEPA with respect to this Consent Order during the
previous twelve (12) month period including, but not limited to,
the costs incurred by the U.S. EPA in having a qualified person
32*
oversee the conduct of this RI/FS pursuant to Section 104(a) of
CERCLA. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each such
tabulation, the Respondents shall remit a check to the U.S. EPA
and/or the IEPA for the full amount of their respective costs.
C. Payment to the U.S. EPA for response and oversight costs
incurred by the U.S. EPA shall be made to the order of the
Hazardous Substance Superfund forwarded to the U.S. EPA, Region V,
Attn: Superfund Accounting, P.O. Box 70753, Chicago, Illinois
60673. Copies of all payments to the U.S. EPA shall be provided at
the time of such payments to the U.S. EPA Project Coordinator and
to: U.S. EPA, Region V, SWER Branch, Attention: SWER Branch
Secretary, Office of Regional Counsel, 5CS-TUB-3, 230 South
Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
D. Payment to the IEPA for response and oversight costs
incurred by the IEPA shall be payable to "Treasurer, State of
Illinois, for deposit in the Hazardous Waste Fund", and forwarded
to: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Division of
Administration, Fiscal Services Section, 2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276. A copy of the transmittal
letter and check shall be sent to the IEPA Project Coordinator.
E. The U.S. EPA and the IEPA reserve the right to bring an
action against the Respondents for recovery of any future costs
incurred by the United States or the State of Illinois in
connection with any response activities conducted or to be
conducted at the Facility, other than those response activities
33
completed pursuant to this Consent Order to the satisfaction and
approval of the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA.
XXV. INDEMNIFICATION OF THE UNITED STATES
A. The Respondents agree to indemnify and save and hold the
United States Government and the State of Illinois Government,
their agencies, departments, agents, and employees, harmless from
any and all claims or causes of action arising from, or on account
of, acts or omissions of the Respondents, their officers,
employees, receivers, trustees, agents, or assigns, in carrying out
the activities pursuant to this Consent order.
B. Neither the U.S. EPA nor the IEPA is a party to any
contract involving the Respondents at the Facility.
XXVII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Consent Order shall become effective, after signature by
the parties hereto with U.S. EPA as the final signatory, on the
date that U.S. EPA sends notification that this Consent Order is
effective, in writing, to the Respondents.
XXVIII. SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT
In addition to the procedures set forth in Sections XI, XIV,
XVII, and XIX of this Consent Order, this Consent Order may be
amended by mutual agreement of the U.S. EPA in consultation with
the IEPA and the Respondents. Any amendment of this Consent Order
shall be in writing, signed by the U.S. EPA, IEPA and the
34
Respondents and shall have as the effective date that date on which
such amendment is signed by the U.S. EPA.
XXIX. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION
A. With the exception of those Sections relating to Record
Preservation, CERCLA Funding, Reservation of Rights, Reimbursement
of Costs and Indemnification, the provisions of this Consent Order
shall be deemed satisfied upon receipt by the Respondents of
written notice from the U.S. EPA that the Respondents have
demonstrated that all of the terms of this Consent Order, including
any additional work, modifications or amendments, have been
completed in accordance with the terms hereof to the satisfaction
of the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA. Upon such
demonstration by the Respondents, said written notice shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
IT IS SO AGREED:
BY: 6.( Date
Name of signatory:
Title:
Respondent:
Address; GO
34v
Respondents and shall have as the effective date that date on which
such amendment is signed by the U.S. EPA.
XXIX. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION
A. With the exception of those Sections relating to Record
Preservation, CERCLA Funding, Reservation of Rights, Reimbursement
of Costs and Indemnification, the provisions of this Consent Order
shall be deemed satisfied upon receipt by the Respondents of
written notice from the U.S. EPA that the Respondents have
demonstrated that all of the terms of this Consent Order, including
any additional work, modifications or amendments, have been
completed in accordance with the terms hereof to the satisfaction
of the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA. Upon such
demonstration by the Respondents, said written notice shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
IT IS SO AGREED:
BY: s£*<*l*te** 11-2-89Date
Name of signatory: Gerald K. Burger
Title: Vice President
Respondent: Browning-Ferris Industries of 111inois, Inc
Address:c/o Thomas P. Healv, Jr.______Mayer, Brown & Platt190 South LaSalle St.Chicago, Illinois 60603
34*
Respondents and shall have as the effective date that date on which
such amendment is signed by the U.S. EPA.
XXIX. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION
A. With the exception of those Sections relating to Record
Preservation, CERCLA Funding, Reservation of Rights, Reimbursement
of Costs and Indemnification, the provisions of this Consent Order
shall be deemed satisfied upon receipt by the Respondents of
written notice from the U.S. EPA that the Respondents have
demonstrated that all of the terms of this Consent Order, including
any additional work, modifications or amendments, have been
completed in accordance with the terms hereof to the satisfaction
of the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA. Upon such
demonstration by the Respondents, said written notice shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
IT IS SO AGREED:
w//),.. LL i /. »*t* il .' / h 4-BY: l.Name of signatory: H<=/°/£y ^-Te^jjeS Tie
Title: A//^ ___
Respondent:iAddre So
35
BY: _______________________________ _______Date
Name of signatory:________________
Title:__________________________
Respondent:.
Address:
BY: _______________________________ _______Date
Name of signatory:________________
Title:_______________________ __
Respondent:
Address:
Respondent:
Address:
BY: _______________________________ _______Date
Name of signatory:_________________
Title:___________________________
BY:/> Date
Name of signatory: Cliff ton D. Warner
Title: Associate Superintendent for Business Affairs
Respondent: Haukegan Public Schools District 60
Address: 1201 N. Sheridan Rd., Waukegan, IL 60085
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL FACILITYLAKE COUNTYWAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
34*
Respondents and shall have as the effective date that date on which
such amendment is signed by the U.S. EPA.
XXIX. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION
A. With the exception of those Sections relating to Record
Preservation, CERCLA Funding, Reservation of Rights, Reimbursement
of Costs and Indemnification, the provisions of this Consent Order
shall be deemed satisfied upon receipt by the Respondents of
written notice from the U.S. EPA that the Respondents have
demonstrated that all of the terms of this Consent Order, including
any additional work, modifications or amendments, have been
completed in accordance with the terms hereof to the satisfaction
of the U.S. EPA in consultation with the IEPA. Upon such
demonstration by the Respondents, said written notice shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed.
IT IS SO AGREED:
Name of signatory; Haig Paravonian____
Title: Mayor, City of Waukegan, Illinois___
Respondent: City of Waukegan________
Address: 106 N. Utica, Waukegan, Illinois 60085
36
IT IS SO ORDERED AND AGREED:
Illinois Environmental ProtectionAgency
BY: I*Bernard P. Killian DateDirector
BY:-Ba
/Wasil G- eon t riteTros Director Datfe
Waste Management DivisionU.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region V
EFFECTIVE DATE:
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL FACILITYLAKE COUNTYWAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM (TAT) REPORT
L
LJ\\
. - . ; . - . - ; - : ' - . \ < ;•: T H A M FOR r..MHR(ii-:Ni v R K s r t ^ s s H K M M O V A L -.MI [ 'Ri-vr
Mr. Steven J. raryan September :o , 1388deputy Project OfficerEmergency Response SectionWestern Response Unit TAT-05-G2-00669U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyllth Floor220 South Dearborn Street
Illinois 60604
Ke: Yeoman Creek landfill, Waukegan, Illinois.TDD? 5-8807-14
2ear Mr. raryan:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. HPA) tasked theTechnical Assistance Taam (TAT) to conduct a site assessment fSA)at the Yeoman Creek landfill in Waukegan, Illinois. On July 19,1983, the TAT conducted a SA which included soil sampling.
Sar.ples collected during the SA identified no levels ofcontamination which require removal under the "aticr.alContingency Plan (Section 300.65). Because low levels ofcolychlorir.ated biphenyls (PCSs) vere detected ir. leachateseair.er.t sar.pies , and Yeoman Creek landfill is lccat=d :.- =residential area, the TAT recommends -he following:
o Submit the iata to the Agency fcr Tcxic Substances andDisease Registry (ATSDR) .
Following ATSDR review, it may be necessary to:
o Recap the I indf ill in areas cf known leachate seecs.
o Limit access to the landfill by fencing to enclcse area;south of the nursing home and apartments, east cf YeomanCreek, west cf BuricJc Street, and north cf the Wetlands.
Roy I'. Wcston. Inc.SIMI. I . PRHVI-NTION & EMERGENCY RESPONSE DIVISIONIn A^Miciution with ICF Technology Inc.. C.C.Johnson & Associates, Inc.. KcMmrcc Applications, Inc..(icu/ RcMturcc C.onsultants. Inc.. und [-nvironmcntal Toxicology International. Inc.
Mr. Steven J. Farvan £epteir.cer 23, 13S8
Should you have any questions or require additional information,,lease feel free to contact us.
Very truly you
ROY F. WESrON, INC
Tom EvansBiologist
Scott D. SpringerTechnical Assistance TeaLeader, P.egicr. V
-• **t*cr*"™eri™
SITE ASSESSMENT
FOR
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILLWAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion V
230 south Dearborn street'Chicago, Illinois
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7367
TAT-<32-05-00669
TDD NO. 5-8807-14
Prepared by:
WESTON-SPERTechnical Assistance Team
Region v
September, 1988
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................... iv
1.0 SITS DESCRIPTION......................................... 1
2.0 SITS BACKGROUND .......................................... 3
2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION. ...................................... 4
4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ....................................... 4
5.: THREATS TO HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. ............. 3
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 9
:ABLE : - ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF TATSAMPLING - INORGANICS....
TABLE 2 - ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF TATSAMPLING - ORGANICS......
bi LIST OF FIGURESiu«
?AGZ
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP.................................. 2L_r
FIGURE 2 - SITE MAP. ..........................................Iuu
u
u
LUu
u
3 S'TE DESCRIPTION
Yeoman Creek landfill is a clcsad, clay-capped municipal landfillin a residential and commercial area, northwest of downtownWaukegan, Illinois (Figure 1) . . The site encompasses an area ofapproximately 45 acres located south of Sunset Avenue and east oflewis Avenue. The site is bordered to the west by apartments andrestaurants, to the east by apartments and a YMCA facility, andto the west by apartments and a nursing home. South of the siteare the Daniel Webster High School, Whithier School, and HydePark school. Larson Park, Edwards Field, and Yeoman Creek Parkare also south of the landfill site. The nearest privateresidences are located on Graanwood Avenue, approximately 200feet southwest of the site; however, numerous apartments and anursing home directly borders the landfill. Access to thelandfill is not restricted.
. The nearest body of surface water is Yeoman Creek which runsi t~^ north to south through the western portion of the landfill fory 1,350 feet. Yeoman Creek, after exiting the landfill, passes
Edwards Field, Larson Park, and Yeoman Creek Park. Upstream ofthe site, Yeoman Creek flows within 400 feet of another Waukegan
M landfill, Waukegan Municipal landfill =2. Directly south of the^ site is an area of wetlands which extends south for "0 feet'.
The creek drains from the wetlands, passes through residential! i areas and then into the Waukegan River two miles downstream. TheU Waukegan River flows east inro lake Michigan. The city of
Waukegan1s water intake plant is located in Lake Michigan, approximately 4,800 feet from the mouth of the Waukegan River,jl 14,500 feet from the Yeoman Creek landfill.
According the lake County Health Department (LCHD) personnelthere are two aquifers at different depths beneath the "site. Asite investigation report by the Illinois EnvironmentalProtection Agency (IEPA) indicated the direction of ground water
I , flow is south, southeast. Th« shallow aquifer consists of ajj gravel and sand layer at a' d*p£h of 25 feet. The deeper aquifer
is located in a limestone bedrock layer and is protected by manyclay layers. Residential wells located 1.5 miles northwest of
[j the site, outside of the Waukcgan city limits draw from both ofthese aquifers. Members of th« Waukegan waterworks believe thatall of the residents in the innwdiate vicinity of the landfill
I ; are connected to city water.*««
The topography of the site is __. relatively flat, sloping gently: toward Yeoman Creek. The topography of the overall area slopes[_ gently east toward lake M&higan. In 1984, the U.S.*" Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Field Investigation
Team (FIT) reported the soils of the area to be of a silt-claynature, and relatively impermeable.
:.: JITE SACXGScuiro! ; the i'eoman Creek landfill currently owned cy the Waufcegan School^ District =60 and currently maintained by the City. of Waufcegan,
was operated by national Disposal Contractor from 1959 to 1969,and by T i X Disposal from 1969 to 1970. There is no information
L- regarding landfill construction or depth of fill, and because thelandfill was closed before IEPA involvement, there are no records
I . of disposal activities. According to Mike Kuhn, LCHD, wastes[j from industrial sources were accepted. Mr. Kuhn also reported
that hypodermic needles were found at the site, indicating that. , hospital waste may have also been accepted. In addition, Mr.i f Kuhn believes that the landfill does not have a liner to prevent*•* or reduce migration of contaminants.
U The IEPA performed several inspections of the site since 1973.During their investigations samples of water and sediments from
, Yeoman Creefc were collected. Ground water and leachate samples
U^-^ from the landfill were also collected. Creek water and sedimentsamples collected during a 1981 investigation showed 23 parts perbillion (ppb) of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Samples fromground water monitoring wells and leachate wells which were
| installed in a 1981 site investigation revealed PCBs, lead, andL phenolics, with peak concentrations of 3.8 parts per million
(ppm), 4.51 ppm, "and 4.8 ppm, respectively. Leachate sedimenti I collected April 1981, contained 12 ppm of PCSs.LJ The U.S. EPA FIT contractor performed inspections at the site in
1981, 1984, and 1985. During these three inspections, leachateJj was observed eminating from the landfill. During the 1981^ inspection, 0.02 ppb cf PCBs were detected in a water sample
collected from a sump pump at the nursing home bordering the) * northern edge of the site. Results cf the 1985 investigationL . indicated concentrations cf Arcclcr-1243 in the l to 2 ?pm range^—^ were present in the creek en-site and downstream at Veoman Creek
, j Park. No PCBs were detected upstream of the site. ElevatedM levels of polycyclic aromatics were also detected in on-site and
downstream"sediments.
I j There have been repeated complaints of unpleasant odors emanating*-* from the landfill. According to the Potential Hazardous waste
Site Inspection Report completed by FIT in June 1985, severalI; methane related fires en site have been extinguished. InU addition, a fire occurred in a neighboring building sump pump.
The exact cause of the fire was not determined.
jJ On July 20, 1988, The U.S. EPA Remedial Response Branch informedthe U.S. EPA Emergency Response Section that the Yeoman Creeksite potentially posed an immediate threat to the human health
; and the environment; therefore, the U.S. EPA tasked the Technical*- Assistance Team (TAT) tc conduct a site assessment.
. J a - 1. -
Ly
L
U
TAT members Tom Evans and Paul S?«wzykowski accompanied U.S. EPAOn-Scene Coordinator (OCS) L«n 2lntak during a site inspection atthe Yeoman creek landfill. Oaring the investigation the TATand osc net with Col in Thacker and Mr. Kuhn of the LCHD. Mr. Kuhndirected the TAT and OSC to an area along the southern edge ofthe landfill where orange leachate was observed leaking from thebank of the landfill.
The upstream and downstream areas of Yeoman Creek were observedto have neither visible contamination nor oil layers. it wasapparent from discarded bottle*, cans and pathways on-site thatpeople frequently use the site for recreational purposes.Children were observed fishing in the creek on-site. A pile ofbricks and ashes from a recent fire were observed in thesoutheast corner of the site. The grass near this area was alsoburned apparently a result of a campfire, another sign of
I recreational use of the site. North of the access road, 2 to 3H foot deep gullies had eroded in the east side of the creek. The
perimeter of the site was measured by TAT.
| I Sediment samples were collected by the TAT from Yeoman Creek atJ two locations downstream, one on-site, and one upstream (Figure
2). A leachate and sediment sample were also collected from theI .; southern edge of the landfill. A blank water sample was alsojj collected for quality assurance/quality control purposes (S77).
Samples were collected from areas noted in other investigationsto contain PCBs, and from nearby recreational areas.
The samples were delivered to Suburban Laboratories, Inc., onJuly 22, 1988, under TAT Analytical Services TDD# 5-8807-L6 forHazardous Substance List (HSL) metals and full-scan organicanalyses.
4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The analytical results of samples collected by the TAT werereceived on August 11, 1988, and revealed elevated levels ofcadmium and mercury in the three on-site samples (S71, S73, S75)(Table 1) . The elevated cadmium levels may be attributed tolandfilled debris such as industrial waste, appliances orautomobile parts. Levels of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons(PAHs) were also detected in several samples (Table 2) . Thehighest levels of PAHs were detected in the upstream, off-sitesample. Since the site is located in a well-traveled residentialarea, these results may be attributed to automobile exhaust.
The leachate seep (S-74) and letiftate seep sediment (S-73) showedevidence of PCBs at c. 06 parts per million (ppm) and 9.71 ppmrespectively (Table 2). The 9.71 ppm level falls well below the50 ppm level promulgated under the*Toxic Substances Control Act(TSCA) requiring specific management/disposal practices. The
LANDFILL ACCESS RO
LANDFILL
LEGEND
* S-71 SEDIUENT• S-73 SEDIUENT AND
LEACHATE
FIGURE 2
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL
WAUKEGAN, ILLINOISNOT TO SCALE
DRAWN BYALH
APPROVED BYJ. ONKLEY
DATE9-1-88
DATE9-1-88
PCS1581
TDD3-8807-14
r: rMBit 1
Au. i ly t ic . i l R e s u l t s ot 1AI Samp I ingU'oiiiJM deck landfill Site
Ujukcgan, IIIinoisJuly 20, 1988
(results in
1| METAL
1
(ALUMINUM
IAMMMOMT( A D S E N I C
| BARIUM
IBCRULIUMICAOHIUHJICMROHIUHICOPPC*IIIUHIIEADIHANGANESE -)[MERCURYINICKU( S E L E N I U M(VANADIUMJ Z I M C( C Y A N I D E
ISIJLHDE|PH
1 1 1S71
1647
1.861.35
26.00.391.837.13
37.611078
64.1599
0.0251 i,30.1
1. 14
159
2 4 10.06NO
6.0
S72 I S73
1
1991NO1.64
10.1
0.100.723.S2
12. 05422
13.0240
0.015030.50.50
20.842 .90.06NO
5.0
5 ) 7NO
1.6 4
283HO6.4 /
HO50.9
2010211.9
81.10.0526
103
O.H6
NO
3 1 . 0
O.StiND
7 .U
S75
31761.561.48
26.5NO
1.249.11
29.40303
56.2153
0.052629.4
0.74NO
1.490.120.086.0
S76
1431NO1.25
11.0HD
0.824 .47
21.96892
18.4237
0.042618.60.64
49.406.0
HO0.146.0
typical Element Concentrationsin Natural Soils
Rungc Average
71,0002 10 ......
1 50 10100 3,000 430
0.1 40 60.01 0.7 0.06
I 1 , 000 1002 100 30
2 200 1020 3,000 6000.01 0 .3 0.03
5 500 1000.1 2.0 0.5020 500 1001u tOO 50
1 • Sample:, •malyzed by Suburban Labor a I or icb. Inc.2 • U.S. tPA O f f i c e of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, H.trardons U.iste land Ircatgcni. SU 874 (April 1983).NO Hot Detected at Method O c c t c c t i o n l i m i t s
I A B L t 2
1A N A I I I 1 C A L B t S U L l S O f I A I S A M P L I N G
V coin an C r e e k I a n d f iI I S i t eU j u k e g a n , I l l i n o i s
J u l y 20. 1988(result:, i n p p n u n l e s s o l h c r H i s c i n d i c a t e d )
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| COHPOUNO
| A c cit.i (•!> I It cnr
| II i • 1 1 / i > l I ' ) 1 1 u 1 1 1 .1 1) i li c n e
| II r M ; y 1 hu i y 1 (ill 1 h A 1 .1 t c
)«!:.<? i-iliyllie-yOphthalaio| C h i y-tcn <•
| 0 1 - n • bu t y 1 ptt t h J 1 « t C
|flu<iianlhcnc| f 1 uor CMC| f h c n .1 n t li i c n cj P y r e n c| A n t h r a c e n e| dc 1 t a BMC
|4 . 4 • -DO!
| H c p t a c ti 1 u r c- p o x i d c
| be t a - BIIC
(PCB )2i^
1| Beni ene ( ppb )jChlorobenzenc (ppb)_ - - s _ - - s = _ _ - _ _ _ = _ _ _ - s _ - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -1 sn
0 . 2610.6217.86
1 .09
9.090.4 1
11. J,
0.404 .637.89HD
0.8100. 160
4.45NO
NO
NO
NO,. _ - , _
_ ; - - - _ _ _ _ _ ;
| S72
0.16
HU
NO
0.44
2.420.25-.60.20ND
3.11
ND2.01NO
ND
0. 39
ND
NO
HD
..-,-.___ = -_
| S73
HO
ND
HO
HO
HO
0.28NO
ND
NO
NO
NO
ND
NO
HD
HO
9.71
ND
NO- _ _ _ - , _ _ -
X - - - - - - - - - -
| 574
NA
NA
(J A
NA
NA
NA
HA
HA
NA
NA
NA
NO
NO
ND
HE)
0.06
13.03
52.54
| S75
HO
NO
ND
1 . 14
HO
NO
0.87NO
HD
0.550.230.02HO
0.17NOND
NONO
| S76
0. IS
ND
ND
u. 70NO
HP
2.21
0. 19HO
1 .251. U0.69HO
3.24HOHD
NONO
_ _ _ _ _ = - _ _ _
| S/7
N A
N A
NA
NA
NA
HA
HA
HA
HA
NA
NA
HO
NO
MO
HO
HO
NO
HO. , _ .
1 • S a m p l e s a n a l y z e d by S u b u r b a n l a b o r a l u i i e :> , I n c .H O H o t D e c t e c t e d a t M e t h o d D e t e c t i o n L i m i t s .N A H o i A n a I y i c J .
u
uu
0.06 ppra level is above the 0.002 ?pm Federal Water QualityCriteria (FWQC) for Freshwater Aquacic Life (acute toxicityj.Other organic substances detected in the leachate sample werebelow FWQC levels.
5.0 THREATS TO HUMAN HEALTH ANp THE ENVIRONMENT
Paragraph (b) (2) of part 200.65 of the National Contingency Plan(NCP) outlines several conditions that may be considered towarrant a removal action. These conditions of which exist at theYeoman Creek Landfill, and which will be elaborated on within thefollowing subsections are:
o Actual or potential exposure to hazardous substances orpollutants of contaminants by nearby populations,animals, or food chain*
o Actual or potential contamination of drinking watersupplies or sensitive ecosystem.
5.1 Potential Exposure To Ha^apdous Materials
Yeoman Creek Landfill is located in a residential area and isunrestricted. Yeoman Creek runs through the western side of thes ite and flows through Larson Park, Edwards Field, and YeomanPark. Because there are no records of past disposal activities,there is the potential of industrial wastes existing at the site.After the site investigation was performed, a conversation withMr. Kuhn revealed possible dumping of hospital wastes.
The TAT sampling has revealed low levels of PCBs in leachatesouth of Yeoman Creek Landfill as did soil and water samplescollected in 1981 and 1985 by the FIT. Additionally, ?AHs andr.eavy netals (cadmium and mercury) were detected in on-sitesoils. All investigations noted leachate seeps from the landfilland erosion gullies. The unrestricted access poses a potentialthreat of exposure to human health and the environment.
5.2 Potential Contamination Of pyinkina Water Supplies
There are two aquifers located beneath the site, both used fordrinking water. Yeoman Creek flows into the Waukegan River.Waukegan's city Water Intake Plant is located on Lake Michigan,4,300 feet from the mouth of the Waukegan River. Becauselandfill construction information is not known, effects of thelandfill on the two aquifers cannot be fully evaluated, althoughthe potential does exist. Contamination of the Yeoman creek hasbeen documented; however, the potential for effecting Waukegan'sCity water Intake Plant may be nonexistent.
A.o rECOMMENDATIONSi^ Teoman Creek Landfill is located in a residential area, and is in
an unrestricted area. Analytical data does not show levels of; . contamination warranting a removal action, but does indicate lowL levels of PCBs, other organic* and metals in the sediments.
Based on this, the TAT recommends the following:i ,! i o submit the data to the Agency for Toxic Substances and^ Disease Registry (ATSDR) for further review.
I| Following the ATSDR review, it may be necessary to:
o Recap the landfill in areas of known leachate seeps.I |U o Limit access to th« landfill by fencing the landfill;
i south of the nursing home and apartments, west of VeomanjV"1' Creek, west of Burick Street, and north of the wetlands.u
uM<
u
uu
uuuL
ATTACHHENT A
PHOTOGRAPHS
10
PHOTOGRAPH 1
Yeoman Creek on South sid* of access road.pipes which carry the creek under the road
Photographer: Tom EvansDate: 7/20/88Time: 090O
Note the two culvert
PHOTOGRAPH 2
Close-up of Yeoman Creek shown in Photograph 1contamination was otomerved in the creek.
Photographeri Tom EvansDate: 7/20/88Time: O9OO
No oil or other
PHOTOGRAPH 3
Wetlands and power lines south of l a n d f i l l
Photographer: Tom EvansDate* 7/2O/88Time: O925-093O
£
PHOTOGRAPH 4
YMCA located at southeast corner of l a n d f i l l
Photographer : Tom EvanDate: 7/2O/88Time: OS35-O94O
PHOTOGRAPH 5
Eastern edge of Yeoman Creek Landfill looking north.
Photographer: Tom EvansDatei 7/20/88Time: 0935-OS40
PHOTOGRAPH 6
Leachate seep located in southern bank of l a n d f i l l at edge of1 ands .
Photographer: Tom EvansDate: 7/20/88Time: 1020-1025
PHOTOGRAPH 7
Photograph taken looking north-northwest towards l a n d f i l l 'ramLarsen Park. UetlandB Is in foreground and l a n d f i l l inbackground between groups of tre*s.
Photographer: Tom EvaneDatei 7/20/88Time: 1110-1115
PHOTOGRAPH 8
Photograph taken looking east at Larsen Park, from same locationas Photograph 7.
Photographer: Tom EvansDate: 7/2O/88Tim»i 111O-I115
PHOTOGRAPH 9
^hotograph of Larsen park looking northeast from intersection ofKeith and Western Av#nu#a.
Photographer: Tom EvansDate: 7/2O/88Time i 1I2O-U25
PHOTOGRAPH 1O
Yeoman Creek at Yeoman Creek Park. Note water level.
Photographer : Torn Evans $fDate: 7/2O/88Time: 115O-1155
\
PHOTOGRAPH 11
/eornan Creek at sample 1 ocation S-31, i n Yeoman Creek Park
Photographer i Tom EvansDatei 7/2O/88Time: 1150-1155
PHOTOGRAPH 12
Yeoman Creek at sample location S-32, east of Rodgers Tield
Photographer: Paul SzewezyhowslinDate: 7/20/88Time: 13I5-133O
PHOTOGRAPH 13
TAT members Evans and Paul Szewczyhowsl i nsample at locations S-33f 34.
Photographer i Len ZintackOatei 7/2O/88Time: 140O-1420
collecting a leachate
PHOTOGRAPH 14
Yeoman Creek at southern end of culvert pipe which carries thecreek under Sunset Avenue. Pipe is located behind apartments at1635 Sunset Avenue.
Photographer: Tom EvansDat*i 7/20/8BTime: 1635-1645
.->/•'*>*'
\ . . »*. ' 1\"-' • '
f .- ' •ft'. ; , •>..' ^. ('• '-'••': -
PHOTOGRAPH IS
GuUie cut into e.mtern bank of Yeoman Creek north of l a n d f i l lacces. road. There xs a group of four gulla** located iandf i11
area. in this
Photographeri TomDatei 7/20/88Timei 1710-1715
PHOTOGRAPH 16
Apartment buildings located south of landfill access road on westside of Yeoman Creek. Photograph was taken from access road.Landfilled materials are believed to boarder on apartments.
Photographer : Torn Evane ^fDate: 7/2O/88Time: 1715-172O
SDMS ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDIMAGERY INSERT FORM
SITE NAME
DOC ID #
DESCRIPTIONOF ITEM(S)
REASON WHYUNSCANNABLE
DATE OFITEM(S)
NO. OF ITEMS1>TI A WT?fXlA&Cj
o.u.LOCATION
YEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL
87428
PHOTOGRAPH
X ILLEGIBLE or FORMATOVERSIZED
07-20-1988
1X Remedial Removal Deletion Docket
Volume 11 of 14X Original Update #
Box# 2 Folder # 4
COMMENTS
WARZYN REPORT ON SOIL SAMPLING ATTHE EDWARDS1 FIELD LANDFILL
J
t \mRZYNII.j August 1,1990 )
Richard Kuntz. Esq.r Wildaan Hanold Alien & Dixon
One mM Plaza'*• 225 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611
-i- RE: Edwards Field Soil SamplingWaukegan, Illinois
Dear Mr. Kuntz:II Attached are the results of surface soil sampling conduced by Warzyn at Edwards
Field. Waukegan, Illinois on July 19, 1990. Note that the laboratory has stamped** the data preliminary because the complete data package has not yet been
provided. The complete package should be available on August 3,1990.
Also attached is the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) inclusive of the FieldSampling Plan (FSP) prepared to document sampling and laboratory analysisprocedures. A memorandum describing air monitoring conducted duringsampling is also included.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questionsj please contact AJ Schsidt at (70S) 691-5115 or Gary Parker at (70S) 691-5138.
Sicctrely,
, , WARZYN ENGINEERING INC
T
Alan J. Schmidt, CPGI Project Manager
Gary p.Tarker, P.E.Manager, Hazardous Waste
enclosures: as stated
TlfT PERTFC HVr- TV 11- . . i.V>:
CHICAGO2t»*-COKWKVTl \>\T~
EDWS1
fflWSlDVP
CDW52
E3WS3
EDWS4
EJWSJ
SJWS6
HJWS7MS
SDWS7MSO
BWSI
ZDWS9
ZDWS10
EDWS1
EDWS2
EJWSS
IDW57
EDWS7MS
EDWS7MSO
EDWSI
EOWS9
EDWS10
PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL IUT.
•.;-tr-jf ETC/?aiiccn Mmu Fnfi£oa C«mpouo4
4t3301
41330:
413303
413304
4S3305
413307
413301
4I330tM5
4t::c9U^jlO
4133U
443301
4S33C:
413303
4I33C4
SoQ
413310
4S3311
SoU
iofl
&>£
Soil
SoQ
SoQ
Sou
Soil
Soil
4S33OT Soil
413301 Sea
4I330SMS SeU
4I330IMSD SoQ
413309 ieD
funcid».-?C3
Sea
4.4'-DDT
PuUeidt^Q TAX* wlyttd a*4 w •nelyttt w»»* &uct<4.
9.1
4,4'.pDT
PAH
PAH 7AO iwn^i w
PAH
PAH TA/r ;*TV?^ war
PAH TA/j lovi .'j war
PAH
t wtrt fateud.
M«/>UJ wcr* ditteitALUfis
PAH
PAH
PAH
PAH
FAH
PAH
vtrt
74
• ConunnaoM v< nporu^ «n Dry Wci|hi bull.•**•• Ca«c<anaoa »?on*d U Uu ttita tbc Cwieia Ac^uin4 Dtwcau Uaut
. T)tc dftu rtforud btiviA ti pnliffwitfy. A wm^ltu 4w pkfiki|t «iU foUow « Auttu: 3. 1990.
MEMORANDUM
July 23, 1990
TO: Gazy Parker
FROM: CraigBahr
RE: Air Monitoring Screening at Edwards FieldProject Number 60996
I am providing you with a summary of the air monitoring performed by me at EdwardsField, Waukegan, Illinois as you requested earlier.
Screening of the site was performed with a Photovac TIP photoionization detector(FID). The Photovac used, equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp, reads all compounds whichcan be volatilized with an ionizaubn potential less than 10.6 eV (just like the HNu). ThePhotovac was calibrated off-site upwind. To calibrate, I first zeroed the Photovacreading "clean" air, and then set it to a tank filled with 106 ppm isobutylene.
After calibration, I walked to the main diamond and took readings along approximately50 ft intervals walking in an east-west direction both at breathing and ground levels. Ialso walked around the infold at ground level Minor fluctuations up to 0.2 ppm anddown to -0.2 ppm were observed for brief instances during this testing. When a variancefrom zero (plus or minus reading) was observed, the area was retraced. Locations of thefluctuations were not documented on the map because the variance could not beduplicated when the area was retraced. After I tested the main diamond, Al Schmidtsuggested I go to the practice diamond. On the practice diamond I walked around theoutfield and infield areas taking readings at ground level. I also walked behind the fenceof the main diamond. The highest fluctuation on the practice diamond and behind thefence of the main diamond was also 0.2 ppm with readings usually at zero andoccasionally down to -0.2 ppm. Sketches of my path on the main diamond, practicediamond and behind the cain diamond fence are attached.
1 *^_1 t'J i t • 41_
SOIL SAMPLELOCATION
EDWARDS FIELD
rrrrii£.
I»
I
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) FOREDWARDS FIELD
SOIL SAMPLING INVESTIGATION
Prepared by:WARZYN ENGINEERING INC
Addison, Illinois(708) 691-5000
Auust 1990
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
' 1. INTRODUCTION_______._____._________________ 1
"j 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..———————————.——.—————.—......™ 2
2.1 Projea Objectives and Use of Data ———————.———...—...———.. 2
i 3. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY ————————.... 3
"I 3.1 Overall Responsibility .„«....«..——...——.........................—...—...——..... 3j 3.2 Monitoring and Sampling Operations and Quality Control ..-...—...—..... 3
33 Laboratory Analysis and Quality Control ——.....——....................——........ 33.4 Quality Assurance ......—......——.——.—.......————.«...—..——......... 3
^ 4. OBJECTIVES FOR MEASURING DATA IN TERMS OF PRECISION,ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, REPRESENTATIVENESS, DETECTIONLIMITS AND COMPARABILITY __...«.——————.———————.—.. 4
4.1 Level of Quality Control Effort.——————..——.......——.——............... 44.1.1 Field Sampling Program ~~.———.........———.....——....«—.——.. 44.1.2 Laboratory Analyses ..„...«««......——....———..———.».———..... 5
4.2 Accuracy, Precision and Sensitivity of Analysis ..................——..........—... 54 J Completeness, Representativeness and Comparability.«.»...——.———... 6
5. SAMPLING PROCEDURES ................................................................ 7
| 6. SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOCUMENTATION ..—__———...——__ 8
\, 7. CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY .............................. 10
7.1 Field Instruments ....................————..«..—....................................... 10•*. - 12 Laboratory Analytical Instruments —.—————...«.«....«...._....-....-...... 10
! 72.1 ETC - Toxicon.__.«..________.........................._................ 10
8. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES.______.——...————..——————. 11
8.1 ETC - Toxicon...————.——.————..——————..«-...«..——..——..... 118.1.1 Analytical Procedures _———————————.——..........——— 11
J 9. DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION AND REPORTING———————— 12•I 10. INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECK ———————...——————— 13i
11. PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS-.._.—«.............-....-.....—— 14
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS(continued)
Page
12. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ___..__________________ 15
13. SPECIFIC ROUTINE PROCEDURES USED TO ASSESS DATAPRECISION, ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS __________ 16
14. CORRECTIVE ACTION ____________;_______________ 18
15. QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT™.——___.... 19•vI
I
LIST OF TABLES
1 Soil Sampling Locations, Edwards Field2 Data Generating Activities and Associated Quality Objectives, Edwards Field3 Sample Quantities, Containers, Preservatives and Packaging for Samples from
Edwards Field••
LIST OF APPENDICES^
A Sampling PlanB EPA Target Compound List (TCL)C Document Control, the Evidentiary File System and Examples of Sample
I Documentation Forms for Edwards Fieldti
VI"l
u
Quality Avunnct Proitn
SECTION 1INTRODUCTION
Edwards Field, a recreational park with two baseball diamonds, is located in Waukegan,Illinois and is a pan of the Waukegan Park District. The Edwards Field baseball
• diamonds were constructed on a closed, former landfill area located south of YeomanLandfill, a National Priority List (NPL) site currently undergoing a remedial
-t investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS).i
Based on conversations with U.S. EPA and Waukegan Park District personnel, PCBs,I PAHs and other contaminants were detected in sediments in Yeoman Creek drainage
both upstream and downstream of Edwards Field. Yeoman Creek is an intermittentdrainage that Oows north and south along the east edge of Edwards Field.
Concern about the potential for PCBs and PAHs in tbe soils in tbe playing areas ofEdwards Field that could result in human exposure, lead to a planned limited soilsinvestigation and analysis. Information on pesticides, although not a concern, will beobtained as pan of the PCB analysis. Procedures as described in this quality assuranceproject plan (QAPP) will be implemented so the accuracy, precision, completeness andrepresentativeness of the data collected are known and documented.
This QAPP presents the organization, objectives, functional activities and specific qualityI assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) activities associated with the soil sampling at
the Edwards Field Site. The purpose of the sampling is to determine the presence ofI contamination (if any) at the Edwards Field Site in order to asses the potential for
human exposure.^
»
The QAPP has been prepared with consideration of the following guidance:
- U.S. EPA, December 1980, Interim Guidelines and Specifications for PreparingQuality Assurance Project Plans, QAMS-005-/80.
i • U.S. EPA, Region V, December 1985, Preparation of Federal-Lead RemedialInvestigation Quality Assurance Project Plans for Region V.
ti • U.S. EPA, 1988. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, OSWER Directive 93553-01.
I • U.S. EPA, March 1987. Data Quality Objectives for Remedial ResponseActivities, OSWER Directive 9344.0-7B.
Ti
Quality AAUIUC* Project fluE4**MtFMld
Aufun 1990
SECTION 2PROTECT PgSCRTPTTON
Limited soil sampling at Edwards Field, a recreational baseball field with two diamondsin Waukegan, Illinois, will be conducted to gather information needed to assess whetherPCBs and PAHs are present at the site. This information will be used to assess thepotential for exposure to humans utilizing the site for recreation.
ff
2.1 Project Objectives and Use of DataAnalytical results will provide preliminary information on the presence, and if present,
t the concentration of PCBs and PAHs in the soil at the Edwards Field playing areas thatare most probable points of contact with people using the facility. The data will be used:o provide an indication of the potential for human exposure to the specific constituentsand thus aid in making a decision regarding the acceptability of the park for unrestricteduse.
Soils InvestigationSoil sampling will be focused on areas where the potential exists for human contact withsurface soils. Samples will be collected primarily within the base paths, batter's box andpitcher's mound area. One sample will also be collected in the outfield area at eachdiamond. One additional sample will be obtained from one of the outfield areas withsparse vegetation at the practice field. A background sample will be collected north of
I the park along the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way. A total of ten investigativesamples will be collected. Three quality control samples (one matrix spike, one matrix
I spike duplicate and a sample duplicate) wil] also be collected consistent with Superfundquality control requirements. Samples locations are summarized on Table 1.
iSite VOC ScreeningThe playing areas at Edwards Field will be screened for potential volatile organiccompounds (VOCs) with a Photovac Tip (photoionization meter). The site will bewalked while holding the meter breathing zone level and again at ground level Therange of readings will be documented in a field logbook, with any variance frombackground noted.
SECTION 3PROTECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
3.1 Overall ResponsibilityContractorWarzyn Engineering Inc.2100 Corporate DnveAddison, Illinois 60101
- AlanJ. SchmidtProject Manager(78)691-5115
- Gary E. Parker, P.E.Manager, Hazardous Waste(708)691-5138
ClientWUdman Harrold Alien & DixonOne IBM PlazaChicago, Illinois 60611
- Richard Kuntz, Esq.Attorney(312)201-2577
3.2 Monitoring and Sampling Operations and Quality ControlWarzyn Engineering Inc.2100 Corporate DnveAddison, Illinois 60101
- Alan J. SchmidtProject Manaeer(706)691-5115
3J Laboratory Analysis and Quality ControlETC-Toxicon3213 Montorrev BoulevardBaton Rouge, Louisiana 70814
- Scon BaileyLaboratory Manager(504)925-3012
3.4 QuaHty AssnranceWarzyn Engineering inc.2100 Corporate DnveAddison, Illinois 60101
- Alan J. SchmidtProject Manager(708)691-5115
Quality AMIUC*
SECTION 4OB JECTTVES FOR MEASURING DATA TN TERMS OF PRECISION
ACCURACY. COMPLETENESS. REPRESENTATIVENESS. DETECTION LAND COMPARABILiry
The overall quality assurance objectives are to implement Held sampling, chain ofcustody, and quality control reporting procedures that will provide legally defensible datafrom laboratory analyses in a court of law. Quality control objectives for these data, as
j well as those collected for health and safety purposes, are to obtain reproducible data* consistent with limitations imposed by measurement methods used.i
I Specific procedures to be used for sampling, chain of custody, calibration, laboratoryanalyses, data reporting, internal quality control, audits, preventive maintenance, andcorrective actions are described in other sections of this QAPP. This section definesgoals for the QC effort (accuracy, precision, and sensitivity of analyses and completeness,representativeness and comparability) for data from analytical laboratories* A summaryof data collection activities by subtask and associated data quality objectives is given inTable 2. Precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness and comparability aredefined as follows:
«•
• Precision - a measure of the reproducibility of measurements under a given setof conditions.
V
I • Accuracy - a measure of the bias that exists in a measurement system.
-, • Representativeness - the degree to which sample data accurately and precisely| represent selected characteristics.
~, • Completeness * a measure of the amount of valid data obtained from ameasurement system compared to the amount that was expected to be obtainedunder normal conditions.
• Comparability - expresses the confidence with which one data set can becompared to another.
4.1 Levtl of Quality Control Effort4.1.1 Field Sampling ProgramThe quality of data from the field sampling program for laboratory analyses will beevaluated through the collection of field duplicates, matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicates. Duplicates will be used to assess the combined effects of sample collection.
Qjutiiiy Aarninct ftq i fu»
r
handling and analysis on data precision. The general level of effort will be one fieldduplicate per 10 or fewer investigative samples.
4.1.2 I^hflrfltQTv AnalysesAnalysis of soil samples for PCBs/Pesticides and PAHs will be performed based onlegally defensible analytical procedures similar or identical to Contract LaboratoryProgram (CLP) protocols. Levels of QC effort for these analyses are described in CLPStatement of Work (SOW) 7/87 or most recently approved. Quality control samples forthese analyses include laboratory blanks, laboratory duplicates and calibrationverification standards. Performance criteria for these analyses are included with themethod descriptions. Laboratory (method) blanks are analytical control samplesconsisting of all reagents, internal standards and surrogate standards, that is carriedthrough the entire analytical procedure. The method blank is used to define the level oflaboratory background contamination.
Air Monitoring (Health and Safety)Level of QC effort for air monitoring for health and safety purposes using apbotoionizauon meter (PID) is described in the project Health and Safety plan.
42 Accuracy. Precision and Sensitivity of AnalysisThe QA objectives of analyses with respect to accuracy, precision and sensitivity are toachieve acceptable data based on specified performance criteria. Accuracy and precisionrequirements and method detection limits for CLP-based analyses to be performed onsoij samples are described in CLP SOW 7/87 (or most recent version). Contractrequired detection limits are presented in Appendix B.
Accuracy of field instruments used for health and safety purposes will be determined bydaily calibration. If units fail to calibrate, they will be replaced.
r
Quliry Aimmaet Ptopci
4.3 Completeness. Representativgngss and ComnarabiHtyIt is anticipated that at least 95% of analyses will provide results meeting acceptancecriteria. If required performance criteria are not met by the performing laboratory, theywill re-analyze samples if holding times permit. If holding times are exceeded, theperforming laboratory will inform the Warzyn Project Manager as soon as, possible, sothat a decision whetber to resample or to accept data with limitations noted can bemade. Sampling, preservation and analysis methods are designed to provide resultsrepresentative of the matrix at the sampling point
Qualify A*vini*i fn^t PU»
SECTION 5SAMPLING
Specific sampling procedures to be used are documented in the Sampling Plan(Appendix A). Containers, preservatives, holding times, transport and storage methodsare summarized in Table 3.
Documentation of use of specific procedures in the Sampling Plan will be made byinitialled entries in the field logs book by the sampling team leader. These shall include,but not be limited to, such operations as decontamination of sampling equipmentbetween sampling locations.
r
Quality AAuimnanc
1990
SECTION 6SAMPLE CUSTODY AND DOrt?MENTATION
Sample documentation for field samples will follow chain-of-custody procedures anddocumentation including the use of chain-of-custody forms, sample container tag/labelcustody seals, sample identification records and field notebooks. Specific forms and theiruse are described in the Sampling Plan (Appendix A) and examples are included inAppendix C
Field sampling activities will be documented using a bound notebook/logbook.Information recorded in the field notebook will include date of sampling, sampler,weather conditions, observations and method of preservation. Additional datapenainizg to sampling may also be included in the log book.
Original Held notes and field documents will be maintained by Warzyn in a finalevidence file. Original deliverables for analysis performed by ETC-Toxicon laboratorywill also be contained in this file. Format, contents and maintenance of the Warzyn'sfinal evidence file are given in Appendix C. Evidence custodian will be the WarzynCorporate Quality Assurance Officer or his designate.
Internal chain of custody procedures for ETC-Toxicon laboratory will be as follows.Samples are delivered to ETC-Toxicon laboratory under chain-of-custody. A designatedsample custodian accepts custody of the shipped samples and determines the chain-of-custody seals have not been broken. The sample custodian reviews the information onthe sample tags/labels with that on the chain of custody records. Pertinent informationas to shipment, pickup, courier, etc, is entered in the remarks section. The custodianthen enters that sample tag/label data into a bound logbook which is arranged by projectcode and station number. The sample custodian must acknowledge receipt on the chain-of-custody form. Any comments pertaining to the shipment should be made under•Remarks.*
The sample custodian will use the sample tag/label as identification information toassign a unique sequential laboratory number to each sample. This laboratory number isentered on the chain-of-custody form. Tne information is logged on to the laboratorylogbook. Tne sample custodian will transfer samples to the proper analyst or store thesample in the appropriate refrigerator. Tne chain-of-custody and testing request formsare forwarded to the laboratory supervisor.
Quiity Amnncc Proftct Plu
Laboratory personnel are responsible for the care and custody of samples from thethey are received until the sample is returned to the custodian or refrigerated.
When sample analyses and necessary quality assurance checks have been completed bythe laboratory or after a 3-month time period, whichever is longer, the unused portion ofthe sample will be disposed of properly. Identifying tags, data sheets, and laboratoryrecords shall be retained as pan of the permanent documentation of the project andforwarded to the Warzyn Project Manager for inclusion in the evidentiary file.
Owiity AmmanwuttR
Aufiiftl10
SECTION 7CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREUENCY
7.1 FieldCalibration of the Photovac Tip (pbotoionization meter) which will be used for health
' and safety purposes and for general site screening, will follow procedures recommended1 by the manufacturer.
*
\ 12 Laboratory Analytical Tnstrnmpnt*7.2.1 ETC-Tcm'con
| Calibration procedures for the analyses of samples for PCBs/Pesticides and PAHs willfollow legally defensible protocols similar or identical to those outlined in CLP SOW7/87 (or most recent) for organics.
r
Qwiity AMTUC,
SECTION 8ANAJ-VTICAL PROCEDURES
8.18.1.1 Analytical Prelim
Samples analyzed by ETC-Twicon for PCBs/Pesticides and PAHs wiU follow legallydefensible analytical procedures similar or identical to CLP protocols outlined in CLPSOW 7/87 (or most recent) for organics.
Quibry AMUIUCC Project FluEdwwfKld
AufWt 1990
SECTION 9DATA REDUCTION. VALIDATION AND REPORTING
Specific procedures for the identification and quantification of sample parameters forCLP PCBs/pesticides and PAHs are covered in CLP SOW 7/87 (or most ..recent) andwill be performed by ETC-Toxicon.
Because of the limited use of the analytical data, consistent with the planned data qualityobjectives, data validation will not be performed. However, should data validation berequired in the future, it would be performed by Warzyn using guidelines developed inTechnical Directive Document No. HQ-8410-01, Laboratory Data Validation,Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analyses, February 1988.
Deliverables are similar or identical to those specified in the CLP SOW 7/87 (or mostrecent) for organic.
Owiiry AmtBM
SECTION 10INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECK
Internal quality control procedures are an integral pan of the analytical methods aadare, therefore, discussed in detail in the descriptions of the analytical procedures (CLP
': SOW 7/87).ij The overall objectives of the internal quality control checks are to establish precision,1 accuracy and integrity of the methodology and to support the technical validity of the
data. Where appropriate, internal quality control checks for other than CLP-based[ analyses will include method blanks, laboratory duplicates, laboratory control spikes, and
matrix spike analyses.
Quality ABUTIACC Project FUad
M>U
SECTION 11PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS
' Because of the limited scope and required shon response time (one week analytical_ turnaround) an external audit of ETC-Toxicon will not be conducted.
Internal audits of ETC-Toxicon will be the responsibility of the individual laboratory.
Quality AKUIUBI Projw PitaFkM1990
SECTION 12PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
Maintenance procedures for laboratory instrumentation and equipment associated withCLP protocols are referenced in the CLP SOW 7/87 (or most recent)..- Preventivemaintenance of laboratory instruments associated with non-CLP based analyses will be
' as directed in factory manuals, instrument operating procedures, and analytical methods.I Periodic maintenance by factory representatives will be performed. Daily logs1 documenting use and maintenance activities are kept for each analytical instrument
Quality Aicunaa Preicet
AufUB 1990Ptfc 16
SECTION 13SPECIFIC ROUTINE PROCEDURES USED TO ASSESS DA'
ACCURACY AKD COMPLETENESS
Assessment of precision, accuracy and completeness for analyses based on CUP protocolswill follow specifications stated in the CLP SOW 7/87 (or most recent).
Assessment of precision, accuracy and completeness of analytical data is based on theacceptable result of QC samples. Where appropriate these include blanks, duplicatesamples, laboratory control spikes and matrix spike duplicates. Overall precision of theentire data collection system (field and analytical) will be assessed based on results offield duplicate samples. Assessment of analytical precision only, will be based on resultsof the laboratory duplicates and/or matrix spike duplicates.
Assessment of analytical accuracy is based on laboratory blanks, laboratory controlspikes and matrix spikes. Completeness assessment of sampling activities will be basedon the number of samples successfully collected and submitted to the laboratorycompared to the number proposed. Assessment of data completeness will be based onthe number of analytical results meeting acceptance criteria compared to the totalnumber of usable data points expected.
Method blank results are expected to provide a measured value that is less than or equalto the reported detection limit.
Field and laboratory duplicate sample results are assessed based on relative percentdifference (RPD) between values, using the following equation:
RPD = [(D! - D2)/((Di + D2)/2))] x 100%
where: Dj * first sample valueI>2 = second sample value (duplicate)
Ou»lity AMvuua
199017
Laboratory control spikes results are assessed based on the percent recovery (%R) offortified analytes. Percent recovery is calculated using the following equation:
Percent Recovery - (Qd/Qa) 1 100%
where: Q<j « Quantity determined by analysisQa m Quantity added to sample
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate data are assessed based on recovery of fortifiedanaiytes using the following equation:
Matrix Spike Percent Recovery « ((SSR - SR)/SA) X 100%
where: SSR * Spike Sample ResultsSR = Sample ResultSA » Spike Added
Relative percent difference (RPD) between the matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate iscalculated using the following equation:
RPD - ((Di - D2)/(Di + D2)) X 100%
where: DI « first sample valueD2 8 second sample value (duplicate)
Completeness of sampling activities is calculated using the following equation:
Percent Completeness » (Sa/Sp) x 100%
I where: Sa = Number of acceptable sample units collected and sub mined to lab.Sn = Number of sample units proposed.
Completeness of analytical data is calculated using the following equation:
Percent Completeness • (Da/C^a + Du)) * 10<)%
where: Da • Usable data meeting acceptance criteria.Du « Unusable or missing data.
Quality AJVUUCB ProjectdiURPi|t
SECTION 14CORRECTIVE ACTION
If quality control audits results in detection of unacceptable conditions or data, theWarzyn QAO will be responsible for developing and initiating corrective action.Corrective action may include:
• Re-analysis of the samples, if holding time criteria permits;• Resampling and re-analysis;• Evaluating and amending sampling and analytical procedures; and• Accepting data, acknowledging level of uncertainty.
VW6QAPWlEVK/pti|
Table 1
Soil Sampling LocationsEdwards Field
Sample Identification
EDWS1EDWS2EDWS3EDWS4EDWS5EDWS6EDWS7EDWS8EDWS9EDWS10
Right side batter box, main diamondSecond base sliding area, "tain diamondThird base sliding area, main diamondPitcher's mound,™gl'n diamondCemerfield, main diamondHomeplate area, practice diamondSecond base area, practice diamondShon-stop/third base area, practice diamondArea of sparse vegetation in outfield, practice diamondBackground sample, Commonwealth Edison property
TABLE 2
DATA GENERATING ACTTVmESAND ASSOCIATED QUALITY OBJECTIVES
EDWARDS FIELD
Acivirv Use of Data Data Qualify
Soil Sampling Aid in assessment of r*****"1 contaminant Meet performance criteria formigration pathways. . methods *frKrihfij ia QAPP.
V996QAFP01EVK Tftbk* 2 &ad 3
r
TABLE 3
SAMPLE QUANTITIES, CONTAINERS, PRESERVATIVES AND PACKAGING FORSAMPLES FROM EDWARDS FIELD
AM tvni Bogle* and Jin Pmefvtrtop HeldintTime Volume ef Samples Shfamny Normilmmm*^t^m
SOILS AND SOLIDS
Low or Mad Coacumtioa
I Acid toneubta. h««/Munl Ooc l-« wive Bouttt tad to 4«C 10 d^i unl Fill 3/4 fun Skipped d*i>y- concubkt4
Pcaadcx/POt one l-oi *vk mouth fcrt » 4»C 10 dM fill 3/4 full Shipped daily VtminUuput pr fry owniftu (M«d to eui/
earner wmeuiiu)
VoUulw T*TJ 120 mL wide moutft Ic«d to4OC 10 d*yt Fill eomplctely Shipped daily|Uu vuic BO beadfpace by owrnifnt (M«d ia cmai/
earner
(l>Tbe pacleiAf material should completely cushion the ampk bonks • bonoo. adaa. top.
V9MQAPP01EVK Tablet 2 and 3
APPENDIX A
SAMPLING PLAN
APPENDIX A
FIELD SAMPLING PLANEDWARDS FIELD SITEWAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS
SECTION 1OBJECTIVES
Tbe objective of the sampling program is to assess the potential for human exposure tocontaminants potentially related to the waste materials present in the landfill beneaththe baseball field. Sampling activities described in the plan will be performed todetermine the potential presence of specific landfill constituents using legally defensibleprocedures similar or identical to Superfund requirements.
SECTION!SCOPE^^^^^^^^^^^^»
This Field Sampling Plan (FSP) describes tbe procedures and practices to be used inobtaining site investigation data. These procedures include a description of the sampledesignation system, personnel and their responsibilities, and the sampling methods to beemployed. The activities discussed in subsequent sections of this plan include airsampling and surface soil sampling.
SECTION 3SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND NUMBERS OF SAMPLES
3.1 Surface Soil SamplingSurface soil sampling will be focused on selected areas where the potential exists forhuman contact with surface soil. A total of ten investigative samples wfll "be collected;five at the main diamond, four at the practice diamond, and one background samplenorth of the park along the Commonwealth Edison right-of-way (see Table 1 of theQAPP for specific locations). Three quality control samples will be collected to conformto Superfund quality control requirements; one matrix spike, one matrix spike duplicate,
and one sample duplicate. These samples will be analyzed for polynuclear aromatichydrocarbons (PAHs) and pestitides/PCBs. These compounds have been identified ascontaminants of concern at nearby Yeoman T*
3.2 AirAir quality data collected for health and safety monitoring during the investigation willbe evaluated to assess the potential for release of contaminant to air. Samples will notbe collected for laboratory analysis.
SECTION 4SAMPLE DESIGNATION
A sample numbering system will be used to identify each investigative and qualitycontrol sample. Each sample identifier will include the project identifier code, sampletype and location code, and a sampling event code. The sampler will maintain a logbook containing the sample identification listings.
4.1 Project Identifier CodeA three-letter designation will be implemented to identify the sampling site. The projectidentifier will be "EDW" to signify the Edwards Field site investigation.
A .2 Sample Type and Location CodeEach sample collected will be identified by a one-letter code corresponding to thesample type. The sample type code to be used for surface soil sampling will be *S".
The location code will follow the sample type code. The location code consists of a one-or two-digit numeric code that indicates the sample location. Surface soil samples willuse a consecutive numbering system starting at 1, assigned in the field.
4.3 Sampling T-vemAlthough identified as such on chain-of-custody records, specific sampling codes will notbe provided for matrix spike, matrix spike duplicate, or sample duplicate samples.
44 Example of Sample NumbersEDW-S4 m Edwards Field, surface soil sample from location 4.
SECTION 5L.MPLING EOUIPMENTAND_ER!
5.1 Surface Soil SamplingObjective. The objective of this activity is to chemically characterize surface soil quality.
Personnel and Responsibilities. A team of two Warzyn employees will collect soilsamples.
Methods. Surface soil samples will be collected using stainless steel trowels. Acomposite sample will be prepared and will consist of five sub-samples taken at eachlocation and mixed in a stainless steel mixing bowl. Sampling equipment will bedecontaminated between locations using Uquinox or another non-phosphate detergentand rinsed with deionized water.
5.2 Air AssessmentObjegive. The objective of this activity is to assess the potential for air contamination.
Personnel and RespominiHries. A Warzyn engineer will monitor air quality using aPhotovac FID prior to surface soil sample collection.
Methods. Air quality will be monitored using a Photovac FID. Monitoring is assumed toapproximate everyday conditions, where landfill gas potentially migrates to the playingfields.
SECTION*PECONTAMTNATIQN PROCEDURES
Procedures to be followed to decontaminate equipment and personnel are described in" the Site Safety Plan. The procedures are summarized below.!
- ' Site Personnel Decontamination Procedure:] • Gean outer gloves in Uquinox wash solution (discard if too soiled to clean
_ i thoroughly);" • Dispose of surgical gloves;
j • Wash hands in hand wash.
Site personnel will perform the above mentioned decontamination procedure prior toleaving the site. Outer gloves will be cleaned with a Uquinox or another non-phosphate
~" solution and rinsed with deiooized water after each collected sample.
- Discarded clothing and other articles will be double bagged and disposed of in anappropriate waste receptacle.
—Equipment Decontamination Procedure:
• Decontamination will be performed prior to site entry;~ ' • Decontamination will be performed on-site;
* Contamination will be removed with a brush and Uquinox solution.
•_ An area will be designated as a decontamination area. The stainless steel trowels andI stainless steel mixing bowl will be cleaned with Uquinox or another non-phosphate
— detergent solution and rinsed with deionized water after each collected sample.
SECTION 7SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANAJLYSTS
Samples collected for chemical analysis will be analyzed by a laboratory approved be theU.S. EPA. Samples will be analyzed using Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)methods. Necessary data packages will be provided by the performing laboratory, but afull data validation will not be performed by Warzyn. Data validation can be performedif necessary at a later date.
7.1 Parameter*It appears PCBs are the primary contaminant of concern at the nearby Yeomanand by association, Edwards Field. Apparently, metals and polynucjear aromatichydrocarbons (PAHs) have also been detected at the Yeoman Landfill. Therefore,surface soil from Edwards Field will be analyzed for these chemical parameters:
• Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); and• Pesticides/PCBs.
Additional soil samples will be collected and stored in the laboratory in the event thatmetals analyses are requested at a later date.
T2 SampleSamples will be collected and preserved in a manner appropriate for the analyses theyreceive (see Table 3 of the QAPP). Samples will be preserved before shipmentaccording to the procedures shown in Table 3 of the QAPP. Table 3 of the QAPP shouldbe consulted for detail^ regarding sample packaging and shipping.
SECTIONSSAMPLE DOCUMENTATION
I Field sampling activities will be documented using a bound notebook/logbook.^'\^ Information recorded in the field notebook will include date of sampling, samplers,
I weather conditions, observations and methods of preservation. Additional data—• pertaining to sampling may also be included in the logbook.
IJ Samples will be collected under cbain-of-custody procedures. Standard forms including
sample labels, sample tags, chain-of-custody forms, and custody seals used for sampletracking will be maintained (see Appendix C of the QAPP). A brief description ofsample documents follow:
— A. Chain of Custody Form
1. One Form per shipping container (cooler)— 2. Carrier service does not need to sign form, if custody seals remain intact
3. Use for all samples.
B. Chain of Custody Seals
1. Two seals per shipping container to secure the lid and provide evidence thatsamples have not been tampered with.
2. Cover seals with clear tape.3. Record seal numbers on Chain of Custody Form.4. Use for all samples.
C Sample Tags
1. Each sample container must have a sample tag affixed to it2. Sample tag numbers are recorded on the Chain of Custody Forms.3. Use for all samples.
D. Sample Identification Record Form will:
1. Provide means of recording crucial sample shipping and tracking information.2. Contain information such as:
- Sample number- Sample matrix• Sample location code. Chain of custody number• Lab code. Date sampled* Date shipped. Airbill number. Sampling tag number
Paperwork accompanying the samples being shipped to the laboratory will be sealed in aplastic bag that is taped to the inside of the cooler lid. Copies of the cbain-of-custodyforms, and other paperwork (if possible), will be retained with the field files.
Two sample seals will be placed on opposite sides of the lid and extending down thesides of the cooler. The lid will be securely taped shut prior to shipment.
APPENDIX B
EPA TARGET COMPOUND UST (TCL)(ONLY SEMI-VOLATILES/POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
(PAHs) AND PESTlODES/PCBs LISTED)
APPENDIX B
EPA TARGET COMPOUND LIST ANDCONTRACT REQUIRED QUANTTTATION LIMITS (CRQL)*
(PAHs and PESTICIDES/PCBs only)
Semi-Volatiles
NaphthaleneAcenaphtyleneAcenaphtneneFluorenePhenamhreneAnthraceneFluoranthenePyreneBenzo(a)anthraceneChryseneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBenzomfluorantheneBenzo(ajpyreneIndenoUtA3-cd)pyreneDibenz(a,h)antnraceneBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
CAS Number
91-20-3208-96-883-32-986-73-785-01-8120-12-7206-44-0129-00-056-55-3218-01-9205-99-2207-08-950-32-8193-39-553-70-3191-24-2
Ooantitfltion Limits**Low SoU/Sediment^)
330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330330
Pesticides/PCBs
alpha-BHCbeta-BHCdelta-BHCKamxna-BHC (lindane)RepuchlorHeptachlor EpoxideEndosulfan IDieldhn4t4'.DDEEodrinEndosulfan n4,4-DDDEndosulfan Sulfate4f4f-DDTEndrin KetoneMethoxychlor
Onamitation Limits**Low SoU/SedimentO>)
CAS Number
319-84^319-85-7319-86-858-89-976-44-8309-00-21024-57-3959-98-860-57-175-55-972-20-8 •33213-65-972-54-81031-07-850-29-353494-70-572-43-5
8.08.08.08.08.08.08.08.0
16.016.016.016.016.016.016.016.080.0
APPENDIX B(continued)
Low SoU/StdimentdO
Pesticides/PCBs CAS Number pg/kg
alpha-chlordane 5103-71-9 80.0gamma-chJordane 5103-74-3 80.0Toxaphene 8001-35-2 160.0AROCLOR-1016 12674-11-2 80.0AROCLOR-1221 11104-28-2 80.0AROCLOR-1232 11141-16-5 80.0AROCLOR-1242 53469-21-9 80.0AROCLOR-1248 12672-29-6 80.0AROCLOR-1254 11097-69-1 160.0AROCLOR-1260 11096-82-5 160.0
Notes:
a. Medium Soil/Sediment Contract Required Quantitation Limits (CRQL) for Semi-voiatiJe TCL Compounds are 60 times the individual Low Soil/Sediment CRQL
b. Medium Soil/Sediment Contract Reguired Quantitation Limits (CRQL) forPesticide/PCB TCL compounds are 15 times the individual low Soil/SedimentCRQL
' Specific quactitation limits are highly matrix dependent The quantitation limitslisted herein are provided for guidance and may not always be achievable.
1 Quant i ta t ion l imi ts l is ted for soil/sediment are based on wet weight. Thequantitation limits calculated by the laboratory for soil/sedimenu calculated on dryweight basis as required by the contract, will be higher.
VW6QAPWITVK
1I
Is'-' APPENDIX C
DOCUMENT CONTROL THE EVIDENTIARY FILE SYSTEMAND EXAMPLES OF SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION FORMS
FOR EDWARDS FIELD
APPENDIX CDOCUMENT CONTROL THE EVIDENTIARY FILE SYSTEMAND EXAMPLES OF SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION FORMS
FOR EDWARDS FIELD
ACCOUNTABLE DOCUMENTSAccountable documents will include all logbooks, field data records, correspondence,sample tags, graphs, chain-of-custody records, and other sample documentation formsused, original data including laboratory bench sheets, photographic prints and planningdocuments.
FILE STRUCTUREDocuments will be arranged in the evidentiary file using the format specified in Table 1(attached).
LOGGING OF DOCUMENTSDocuments will be received by the Document Control Officer who will log them andassign a number to each such that documents within each document subclass areseparately serialized. An exception to this will be sample tags, chain-of-custody forms orother documents that are numbered prior to assignment for use.
DOCUMENT ACCESSProject documents will be secured in a file cabinet. Access will be limited by theDocument Control Officer to project personnel. A check-out log will be maintained as arecord of access.
EVTDENCF FTT F ATUpon project completion, the Warzyn Quality Assurance Officer will audit the evidencefile for completeness. Results of the audit will be documented on the attached form andkept in the Final Evidence fije.
FINAL DISPOSITION OF FILE CONTENTSThe Final Evidence will be maintained by Warzyn for a minimum of four years aftertermination of the project.
June 10, 1988 - z -
TABLE 1
DOCUMENT CUSSES AND STRUCTUREFOR SUPERFUND EVIDENTIARY FILES
DocumentClasses F11File Index
Contracts/Proposals/Bids A
Financial B
Correspondence
Contents
Work PlanDocuments
Check out logs and list ofactive files
Proposals, contracts, purchaseorders, spedf1cat1ons-COPIES ONLY
Summary of Invoice status; Invoicescorrespondence re: accountsreceivable; copy of budget andproject task setup; COPIES ONLY
Various Incoming and outgoingletters, nemorandums, diary notes
CMn-houst correspondence;diary notes and eenosC2-Outgoing letters/nemosC3*Incom1ng correspondence
*
^-Correspondence logged
Documents other than proposals; IncludingHealth and Safety plans, Samplingplans, QAPPs, pernlt plans; specialInstructions/outlines for conductingthe project; Work Plans; VEI plansand specifications
June 10, 19 S3
QA F i l e
Field Data
Laboratory Data
QA Work Plan arm *udget; projecthistory f l ic; sample documentationrecords, etc.El-Sanple tagsE2-Cha1n-of-Custody RecordsE3-Rece1pt of Samples forasE4-Transfer of Saoples foras .
Original field data/notebooksFl-Fleld boring logsF2-Vel1 construction detailsF3*6eotechn1cal testingF4*Geophys1cal testing
FS-Vater Quality testingF6-Da11y field logs
F7-Balldown testingFB-Structural testing
F9*H1scellaneous/Other
Laboratory test data, Includingoriginal analytical logbooks, labdata, calculations, bench records,graphs, etc. for or iginal data andquality control dataGl-Analyt1cal laboratory dataG2*Geotechn1cal laboratory data
63-Kater1als testing laboratory data64-Subcontracted laboratory data
June 10, 1988Calculations H
Photographs I
Originals J
Var:yn Reports K
Varzyn Drawings I
Other Reports/ XDrawings
Miscellaneous
Checkprlnt
Calculations, qu*...lty estimates,computer printouts of tabular!zeddataPhotographs, stereo pairs, site naps(published zoning , topography,geology, groundwater, bedrock,negatives)Varzyn original reports or drafts
Copies of the project report orprevious pertinent VCI reports
Reference list of report drawings;copies or reduced copies oforiginal drawings. Note: originalor reduced mylars will be storedseparatelyNon-Varzyn reports and drawingsInc luding literature, references,etc. -Other f i l e Information which doesnot fit Into other categories; f i lemust be namedTEMPORARY FILE of checkprlnts, draftreports or other work 1n progress. FileBust be removed upon job completion.
12660.00RCV/ jp l / JAH[Jpl-601-54*]
PROJECT NO.PROJECT LOCATIONFILE LOCATION
DOCUMENT AUDIT CHECKLIST*
DATE OF AUDITSIGNATURE OF AUDITOR
Have individual files been assembled (field In-vestigation, laboratory, other)?
Cements:
Yes Ho. 2. Is each f11e Inventoried?
Cooroents:_________
L
Yes No. 3. Is there a list of accountable documents?Connents:__________________
Yes_ No_ 4. Are all accountable documents present or accountedfor?
Connents:
* From NEK Procedure Manual for the Evidence Audit of EnforcementInvestigations by Contractor Evidence Audit Teams, EPA-300/9-81-003-R,April, 1984,
Yes_ No_ 5. Is a document numbering sysvea used?Cements:________________
Yes_ No_ 6. Has eich document been assigned a document controlnumber?Contents:
Yes No 7. Arc all documents listed on the Inventory accounted"" "" for?
Cements:
Yes__ Ho_ 8. Are there any documents 1n the file which are not onthe Inventory?Cements:
""i Yes_ No_ 9. Is the file stored 1n a secure area?
Comments:________________
V __________Yes__ No— 10. Are there any project documents which have been
declared confidential?Cements:_____________________
I .~1 . Yes__ No_ 11. Are confidential documents stored 1n a secure
I »separate from other project documents?
Cooments;.
Yes_ Ho_ 12. Is access to confidential files restricted?
Connent*:________________
Yes No 13. Have confidential documents been narked or stamped'Confidential'?Cements:
Yes_ Ho_ 14. Is confidential Information Inventoried?
Cements i___________________
Yes_ No_ 15. 1$ confidential Information numbered for documentcontrol?
- Coments:.V——^
^. No_ 16. Have any documents been claimed confidential underTSCA?
Contents:_________________________
[Jpl-602-84f]
ATTACHMENT 1
EXAMPLES OF SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION FORMS
1. Field recording sheet
2. Field Testing/Single Preparation sheet3. Saaple identification Record (for all sanples)4. Chain of Custody Sheet (for all samples)
5. Sajnple Tags (for all samples)Sample Labels (for all samples)
6. Chain of Custody Seals (for all samples)
[Jpl-601-50]
r .__ f ...f
OUt
FfClO TCSTIHG/SAHPLE PRtPARATIOH
- Lab 1
•
*
-0
-0
Swiple 1Time Filtered/
Anityied 1 PMSpec.Cond. Temp.
Spec.Cond.e 25*
•
•
Antlytt Commcnl s
pii Meter:
Conductivity Heter:
feoiile Types/PrctervAtlon:
CoiMlucllvlty of Sttndtrd:
. 16001]
f t
locNiincAiioK net0*0
CASC/JMNtMBH
*
i
HA 111 II
1i
1ti
SAMftlWJH0C* |A«
t
IA|MMStft
CHAIN OfCUS100T
———————— , — t
OAItSANflCO
MilSHirrcD
A INI tilWMB(»
'i
SJWIC IACMMIIft
•
" —— •' ——— 1
V -r -r -
CHAIN Of CUSTODY HI CORDrROI.NO. fROltCTNAMI
SAMPltRS:
I At HO. OATI TIME I STATION IOCATION
NO.
of
COM.tAIMlftt
HIM AUKS
ReHnqulihedby: Dale ' Time Received by: Rellnqulihedby: Dale / Time Received by:
ReRnqulihcdby: Date ' Time Received by: RcHnqulthedby; Dale / Time Received by:
ReHnqulihedby:
Remarlti
Dale / Time Received lortaboralory by: Date/Tlmt
WO 7 HIT
11111
V
WARZYN
Warzyn Engineering Inc.One Science CourtUniversity Research ParkP.O. Box 5385Madison, Wisconsin 53705
PresefviUvt:, NJOMNOTK
O*r,Riffffd
•OOAnions
Mao«yMcaa
tomnr
7-01990
WARZYN
N2 871304
CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALWARZYN ENGINEERING INC.
ONE SCIENCE COURTUNIVERSITY RESEARCH PARK
P.O. BOX 5385MADISON, Wl 53705
(608) 273-0440
"T1
-i
CORRESPONDENCE
LAW OFFICES
BHYBOES RXSBBOBOUOH MOKHIS FBAKEE AND MTT.T.EBLONCHAB, AWD
LOUIS w sftvoocs. SNAU.TN J.
OCOMC tHAL** MIILCH d**O-J*«»lTHOMAS A. MOHN1S. »*H.-OOMALD L. SIMCJOHN H. KHACKCNSCJMICIIJAMCS «l. •ASOWICCLOUIS W SftVOOCS. JM.OAMICL P. fiCLDLCSUC A. PCTCMSOMQAftfVCLL S. OOOZIHJOHN W. NOfllMS
OAVIO O. 5USLCM
THOMAS K OCRUNOALANM NAmjU*SCOTT C. MCMAMCM•CID S. .tACOSaOMOAftT C. COOKC. IIVAULA A. OOMOIU
. SOLCMLONCHAH. JM
NOHOMIAM
STWOUSCOTCOUMSCL
i90 NOWTH MICMKIAN AVCNUCCMtCAOO. H.UNOIS •0«Oi-79<B
TCLX^HOMC om 7M.se**
•LCASC ftCPLY TO
Waukeganornci
'io MOWTM wearWAUKCOAN. ILLINOIS •OOCS-433O
CABLC: BRAM TWX «e US OM-''AX 70* «4» 479 ft
January 18, 1990
Ms. Mary Daily1809 N. MillSuite CNaperville, IL 60563
JAN 1 9 1990
Dear Mary;
Pursuant to our telephone conversation of this date. I amenclosing the best information I could uncover as to the legaldescription of the properties held by Community Unit SchoolDistrict 60, in the Yeoman Creek landfill area.
When the surveyor lays out the property he will discoverthat it includes land which is buildable not in the landfill, onthe south end of the property. Basically, the landfill areaoccupies the central and northern part of the property.
As we discussed, I am enclosing a copy of the architecturaldrawing which outlines our property and you may already have acopy of this, but I am sending it to you anyways.
If there is anything that I can do please contact me.
Sincerely,
Donald M. Lonctfar Jr
EnclosureDML;sr
WAUKEGAN TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOLDISTRICT #119
Lots Owned InKrenn 5- Date's Third Marque tte
Highlands Subdivision
^ Block 12, Lots 1-2-3-4i Block 13, South i of Lots 3*4, Lots 1 &. 2''Block 14, Lots 1-2-3*• Block 7. Lots 1-2-6-7-8, ,
Block 6, Lots 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-9-10,?Block 5, Lots I -2-3-4-5-6-9- 10,7;*'Block 4, Lots 2-3-^-5-6 ,/
x S tt- Block 3. Lots 1-2-3-4-6 .,T
That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 8, Township 45 North, Range 12,East of the 3rd P.M., described as follows: Commencing at a point on theWest line of said quarter section 10 chains North of the Southwest cornerthereof; thence North on said West line 10 chains; thence East parallel withthe South line of said quarter section 30 chains to the Northwest corner ofthe East half of the Southeast quarter of said Southeast quarter of saidSection 8; thence South 10 chains and thence West 30 chains to the placeof beginning (excepting therefrom the South 485 feet of the West 600 feetthereof and also excepting the North 145 feet of the South 630 feet of theWest 267 feet thereof) in the City of Waukegan, County of Lake, and Stateof 111inois.
The above Blocks and Lots are located in Krenn and Date's ThirdMarquette Highlands, being a subdivision of part of the East halfof the North East Quarter and the North half of the South Eastquarter of Section 8, Township 45 North, Range 12, East of theThird Principal Meridian., according to the plat thereof, recordedMay 11, 1926, as- Document 278628, in Book "P" of Plats, pages42, 43 and 44, in Lake County, Illinois.
\ \ \ \
SOIL BORING LOGS FROM THEYEOMAN CREEK LANDFILL SITE,STUDIES PERFORMED BY IEPA
x
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOO SH. -Of .SH.
("OCNTY Lake SITF vn 09719005
SITF Waukegan/Yeoman Creek.Innp ? "3 1 Qfllf^ * "PC UUIIC C J • 1 30 1 DC"*niVr~i ] A i c. —————————— : ———————— _. ^ MIJKI r\i.NO B-l
pRFPinFHRv Ron St. JohnanHFnav Douglas TolanwFLprp Kenneth Bosie
SORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATF. WELL
TYPF A^r> r FYCTH njrrvsjvr. , . FI
^PRFFVPO INTERVAL FI FViTTnv;
AVVULUS FILL MATERIALC
<
X ~"
GROUND SURFACE o"
Clayey Silt, (cover material }Tbrown, moist ^~
REFUSE , —WPl"
Clayey Silt, (peat) Black, ^1Wet, Organic _,
, ————————————————— _. — ip"^ Boring complete . \ -
1 -_Backfilled with cuttings —
1 .,£*^
1 i1
^
T 7*All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split
*
—Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR - Partial RecoveryN - Blow Count NR - No Recovery
*
r
-
33"
10"
34
.j..
[i
-I
4
YES —————— NO „ * WHirH
z
H t •
--
CASING FT ^
GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETION
A FTP D n A v c
AFTFR DAYS
T45N R12E Sfl
BOVEGROl'ND LEV!
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
—
-2iD
—
—
-
-75
-30
* * z
LPC-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. 1 ,of .SH.
^•COUNTY Lake_________SITE Waukegan/Yeoman Creek
SITE NO. 09719QQ5
June 23. 1981 BORING NO B-?
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
PREPARED BY Ron St. Jor^p
BORED BY Douolas ToUnHELPER ————KennethYES ______ NO __3L WHICH
•YPE AND LENGTH OF CASING FT CASING FT ABOVE GROfND LEVELSCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
-V 'NULUS FILL MATERIAL
A^WP PArKlNH
pAriciNr.
* !FPV^_ _ ——
ranv
ATio
N I
+3.
—
GROUND SURFACE 657 . 50 0
( ayey Silt, w/gravel.dark brttwmp, w/abundant organicsthroughout
655.Clayey SiHy Sand, w/tracep-avel , gray, damp,c ganics throughout
652.f'lty Sand w/little clay andt "*e gravel, gray, damp,w7v_^janics throughout, moist@ 7.5 feet4 lense clayey silt @ 8.1 fe(•oxidized)
64$.Silt, gray, wet
647.
3WFH
lG~—
D&F\_
Bt~
o&--10
perSandy Gravel, w/trace silt and -c'ay w/cbbbles, gray, wet, vep arly sorted, angular througout
U" ~>amples Taken with 1 Inch O.D. Splitif in Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
ry-- —
•15
«K
1
2
3
4
5
' Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery-i Mow Count NR • No Recovery
•
"1v-
__
z
b7 ,
33
4
611
7Iff
.4.
•
.
4•i
*
zVtfj**
-1.Jttj
-•\-_4-
1•
-h
GROUND WATER EL. 2oAT COMPLETION p
<APTFH flAVC ^
AFTFR OAVS W
Sandy Gravel, gray, wet, jnedium-to coarse grained sand and fine-grained gravel -»
Fine to coarse grained gravel@ 17.5 feet "
638.^siity sand, w/n t t ie ciay .20very fine grained
1.0 foot layer of sandy silt@ 25.5 feet .^6" layers of coarse sand @25.0 feet and 26.5 feet —
r
630. SO/Clayey Sandy Silt, w/trace -gravel, —gray to brown, moist 3-
Vt
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
NR
z
66
y6
34
53
22
1623
3124
WH
Ll.
DE
SIG
N 1
1
T45N R12E S8
LPC-34 3/79
•*— wm^ 1. i •• ™* i m^r — • • — -- • ' - , —
^ CDCD O
• *r ~io — «.-h id
' ^ n— • on> 3O- "O
X rt>r* n>rro^rt_j.
03trt
1 1 1 1^1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I*-"! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l°l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I*"*! 1 1 1 1 1
en»-*en
^ i^
K|»f
0|
•
1 1£
K|K
1
oQ
CfCT <-1O
3 -
rD. —
- UD
3 uo nt/» ir» -
c
-».
i£
0W
1 iro
CIS
3J
-f
2o<fD-^
CO
Q.<
to
r*-j
"^
1 fu« n
MI— n —
0 .0 i, T" OJiO (u [u Ij c: ?c r\3
t-* 75- n>MD fDC3 'O c~>O O> O01 ZI C
-< rto> «<o3(U
-1roID
ELEVATION
f
*
N
WELL DESIGN
. I i I . I . I . la. I . I i I . I i is. I . l i I . I i la. I . I . I . I i I a I i I . I i I . l&i I . I .
CDO»5or*on
u>i
ELEVATION
t/tx
N
WELL DESIGN
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING
mnMTv Lake crrr vn 09719005cT-rr Waukeqan/Veoman Creekp>Tr June 23, 1981 BnBIN.n w B-3
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TYPF AN'n r F^T.TH nFrASfvr. PVC 29.2 FT
LOG
PRFPARFD BV
anRm RV
HFIPFR
VFS X vn
CASING _
SH._I_of_LsH.
Ron St. JohnDoualas TalanKenneth Bosie
"'HirnMoni tor (G1031o ?
—— *-•** FT ABOVE r.nnrvn i r\-rSrRF^fn rcTFBVAi. F.i.pVATFnvs 646.50 to 630.50
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL ro
*-|ABOVF pArKiNr, CpttlnQs c<
-SCREEN Fine Gravel 2
+3.
IGROUND SURFACE 657.50 o"NOTE: Borehole is located less -[than 5 feet from boring B-2 ~~
T • \|See B-2 for soils description ^
^MH
Tr -ir --
•
r -_•H
r .,j
-
UI Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split_jpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery
• -
J- J
L. •!
^1 "
(16 feet screened)Z
UJ
LU
-j---J-
""
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTFR 119 nAv* 648.7AFTFR 175 n4Y< 648.2AFTER 323 DAYS 648.8
ELEV
ATIO
N
1
—
•30
-2£
630.50"Boring Complete
T45N R12E S8
^«
-30^ ••
•B
• •
«l • ZLi
i
i or_ 14 T /70
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
/BORING LOG SH. 1 .at .SH.
COUNTY La^e_____________
SITE Waukeqan/Yeoman Creek09719005
June 24, 1981 BORING NO B-4BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
PREPARED BY Ron St. JohnBORED BY _
HELPER __
YES _____
Douolas Tnl^n
Kenneth BosieWHICH
- TYPF AM" r.F.vr.TH nr PASW PVC
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
TLROVP PACING Cuttings
trit^r. 40# Bentonite Pelletsrpp™ 3/8" Gravelf ———————
40.5 FT CASING 0.6 FT i
635.77 to 623.77 (12 feet screened)
f-LI
iVA
TIO
N
+3.
—
(GROUND SURFACE MI «?£
111111
Clayey Silt (disturbed) brown.moist, w/asphalt materialthroughout
660. t
-
)JSand w/ little silt ana gravelarid trace clay (disturbed),black, moist, fine to mediumgrained sand w/slag throughoul
^^6" layer of silty clay(disturbed), gray 9 8.5 feet
iClayey Silt, (peat) w/somesand and trace gravel, black,
'moist
t -5
-
\-l-10"
4V
Sandv Clavev Silt w/little arave-tan and gray, mottled, moist,
_,w/occasiona1 silty lense
TAll Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. SplitSpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
-15
-
1
2
3
4
5
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial RecoveryN - Blow Count NR - No Recovery
•
-•
.z
32
2I
1i
67
4Q
TICi.•
ZwU)
fat
-1-J
f|
! i
s' !i I
\i i
1
u _
••1-L
; t
GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETION
AFTPR US HAYS 645.27
AFTFR 174 nAYS 645.17
AFTER 323 DAYS 645.26
Sandy Clayey Silt w/little
BOVEGROL'ND LEVEI
ELE
VA
TIO
N I
—
gravel, brown, moist, wet @ 18.5feet
."i
•20
642.67 ~Sandy Gravel, brown, moist
640.1
Sandy Clayey Silt, w/gravelbrown, moist
7
-2?
^^~
633.67.30Sandy Gravel w/trace of siltand clay, gray, wet, coarsegrained sand and up to cobb'
..
T45N R12E S8
i orLrL
es• ^
-
6
7
8
9
•
10
11
12
13
z
47
£
46
- 57
35
46
67
ZCVHC•P
U3j
t
\
<
XXX
*'
*'
-34 3/7<J
L P C - 3 4 3 / 6 9 Pq. 2 BORING LOG
B-4Lake CountyWaukegan/Yeoman Creek09719005
zoH<>iUU
-35Sandy Gravel w/traceof silt and clay, gray,wet, medium to coarsegrained and fine to coarse —gravel and cobbles w/fragmerrtof igneous and abundant ~~P*rite__________625.67Clayey Sandy Silt w/trace -Jgravel, brown, wetgray and more gravel @40 feet -40
14
15
622.17H
Boring Complete
-45
-50
•55
-60
16
SH. of SH.
I-V
AT
ION
UJ
•*!
-70
-7?
• •H
-80
il
•90
v»
!i
* z i. DE
SIGN
^
u;S
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of .SH.
rnitwTV Lake crrr vn 09719005
STTF Waukeqan/Yeoman CreekniTr June 24 1981 ftrtB,vr. vn B-5BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TVPF AMn LEN'fiTH OFrASI\T. PVC 19 FT
PREPARED BY Ron $t- John
__ BOREHBY Douqlas To! anHFT PFR Kenneth BosieVE.S X \n wuirufMonltor G1051
CASING _0.9 , pr AROVF r.nnt-vn T rvnSCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
\N\ULUS FILL MATERIAL
ImnvF pATKiNr, Cuttinqs•ATKINS 50# Bentonite Powder:r*FFv 3/8" Gravel
T ————————LICROUND SURFACE 660.68
i1
- f
Silty Sand (disturbed fill)-black, moist
^
653.58 to 642.58 fll feet screened)
I-LG
VA
TIO
N
ii
H
—
—
tlayey Silty Sand w/some gravel 7nray and black mottled, moist
^
and/ Silt w/some gravel and"trace clay (peat) black, wetw/clumps of silt
"llty Sand w/little clay andrace gravel (peat) black,
moist w/lenses of weakly induated clumps of silt throughou
1 Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split. won Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
•*
£
•io~^^
•
\-;t-15
*
1
2
3
4
5
' Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery- Blow Count NR • No Recovery
- z
2I
1226
33
TIE-L. _*.^
^
Z
55c
u
GROUND WATER EL. zcAT rOMP! ETION £
AFTFR 118 p4V<; 655.08 >AFTER 174 HAY*: 654.88 «AFTER 323 DAYS 654.78
Silty Sand, w/little clay and ~~trace gravel, black, wetw/lenses of weakly indurated r~clumps of silt throughout /
/ -1 H Clay (lacustrine) gray, wet, /
H very soft gumbo . /-20i ~ii
x :<
* >i ii
i'.£U
14
'.
j •.;
s •- > I
H1
m • J •
f
1
«
/ *Boring Complete
_
-30
^^«
_ __
——
1
T45N R12E 5fl
LPC- 34^ r ^ J ~
*
7
* z
U
WE
LL D
ES
IGN
1
v *
E :^^^4>»
1
3/7Q
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
"f'f 6 BORING LOG SH 1 _»f . 2 SH
rntrv-Tv Lake qqiTP Waukegan/Yeoman Creek
TFNO 09719005 PRFPAREHRY Ron St. JohnanpFHRV Oouqlas Tnlan
HATF June 24, 1981 pnnrvr. vn
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR
TYPF AND f.FNT.TH OF CASINO P^
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
ARnvFPArifiNr, Cuttinqs
p^rxiNG BentoniteirppFw Fine Gravel
B-6 HFIPFR Kenneth Rnc-ior.F.ArMATF. wFi.r. VFR * vn u'HlCH Monitor (S10<
42.4 „629.25 to 619.
I'LliV
AT
ION
GROUND SURFACE 660.75 Q
NOTE: Borehole is locatedwTtFfin 5 feet of 8-5.
See B-5 for soils descriptionof upper 20 feet.
^_^
Augered through to 20 feet*•
i»*
iAll Samples Taken with 2 Inch O,D. Split
_ Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
-
—
—
-s"
^^^
^^^
^^^
-10"
^
• M
-15
*
• Miscellaneous Data PR - Partial RecoveryN • Blow Count NR • No Recovery
*
it
z.
J...L, i••\
25z5J
_j
ii• &I ;i :•i 'fU11ni :'
fi••1-.-i.
•>
CASIXfi 0.9 cT .
flO feet screened)GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETION
AFTFR lift RAYS fiRd q^
AFTER 174 DAYS .654. 75
AFTER 323 DAYS 654.45
640.75
BOVECIROL'ND LEV
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
—
-20
Clay (gumbo) , gray, lacustrine -
i
63?. ?c
Sandy Clayey Silt, w/tracegravel, gray-brown, gray from30 feet through 32.5 feet,w/occasional 2" sand and gra\Tense
'
T45N R12E SB
1 DPL r t
—
—
-25
.30
'el.
-
1
2
3
4
5
• z
0
0
0
23
34
46
»i•i.\iiiiiMJ
J>
§
1*f
rXXf'f.
'
•34 3/79
i i ( ( f ( ,' ( i f 1 , r1 o,
O—».
Oo3
ro
i 1 i l&i 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i |Xi 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i |£i 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i l^i 1 i 1 i 1
r IlllIII!
S, 1 , 1 i 1 , 1 i Ifti 1 , 1 , 1 i 1 i IS, 1 , 1 . 1 , 1 . 151, 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 lo,
i t i ii tort 31 CXQJ <nn> n
il~f Oi1 <Of O>
— • CO
. — t(£1 rt
13
ro
CO -J 01
• ^« ^,*
'•.'i ^JiJV. V fi-A'vV '-iV.iW. * :-'
1 1 l<^ 1ill 1 1 1 1^1 1 1 1
[ IB-6
(G106)
Lake County
Waukegan/Yeom
an Creek09719005
ELEVATION
t
*
N
WELL DESIGN
ELEVATION
f
*
N
M/PI i HPCICW
TJO
ro
O2zo
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
/BORING LOG SH. SH.
COUNTY
SITF .
DATE
BORING
LakeWaukeqan/YeomanJune 25,
COMPLETED
1981
SI
CreekTE NO. _ 09719005
ROB ING NO
AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE
B-7
WELL
PREPARED BY
RORFDRY
. HEI.PFR
_ X
Ron St.DouglasKenneth
\0
JohnTolanBosie
.WHICH Leachate (L3C
w- TYPE AND LENGTH OF P 25.5 FT CASING 3.5 FT. ABOVE G R O U N D LEYESCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS 652.80 tn 639. flO (13 feet screened)
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL 7.
ABOVE PACKING Concrete & Cuttin ;pPACKING 501 Granular Bentom'te >$rpFFv nppn ta
GROUND SURFACE fifil.flft 0
Clayey Silt w/some sand andtrace gravel (cover material }) —brown, moist ' -
658.8 ~Refuse
•T
V.-X """"
mm
3-
-10"«^ "
Augered through to 15 feetf
+ ^
Methane bubbling profusely-9 15 feet —
•15
-
1
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split" Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery_ N • Blow Count NR - No Recovery
»
i'
zw•••*fm
*•••u.a•]
j..L.ii •• ~^~
GROUND WATER EL. 2O
AT COMPLETION . , , p
AFTFR 117 HAYS 655.70 >
AFTER 173 nAY, 655.10 iAFTER 322 ^ DAYS 655.3
Refuse _
sCI -20E ~li 640.801 Silty Sand w/some gravel andJ little clay, (peat), brown /""
640 ."30 /Boring Complete _2j
*mmm
^v
J -30^ •
4^:m^
•~
TJtChi mor c-oT45N R12E S8
LPC-34t r v J ~
*
SHE
•
NR
.BY
z
22
31
TUBE^a
3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
^'•#0^ BORING LOG SH.J. .or .SH,
LakeCOUNTY.SITE Waukeqan/Yeoman Creek
cjrr-PNn 09719005
June 25. 1981 onptvr. B-8SORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
P R E P A R E D BY
BORED BY __
HELPER____
YES X
Ron St. John.Douglas Tolan-Kenneth Bo?ie
Leachate (L3(— TYPE r.Evr.TH 23.5 FT CASING 4.0 FT ABOVE GROUND LEV]
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATION'S
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
ABOVF piPKiNr: Concrete & CuttiPArKiNc 50# Granular Bentonite^PRFFN Ooen
GROUND SURFACE 664. 39
Clayey Sandy Siltw/some gravel (cover material )brown
656.89 to 644.89 (12 feet screened)
NO&VAUI;J«~
*
0
—
-
659.39 -F
. j f use
^
Augered through to 15 feet
1All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split
•L^
^^M
*
1
Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery_ N • Blow Count NR • No Recovery
•
-•
z*•Va.
Z fi^^u
'
t
J..Li ,•
. . . . _ _
GROUND WATER EL.i
? AT COMPLETION _
AFTFR 117 nAY«i 654.99
AFTFR HAYS
1 Refuse
647.
Sandy Clayey Silt w/ tracegravel , gray
V 645.:
[NO
I1V
A3
13
39"
9~rc Sandy Gravelly SiltE w/little clay -20
Ij 643. 39 ~Boring Complete
12-15-81 Well damaged beyondrepair
••^ T45N R12E S8ji
LPCu r v*
-
—
-30_
*
2
SHE
*
BY
z
33
33
TUBE
M 1
•34 3/7<3
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
A'-- BORING LOG SH. .of .SH.
nm-MTv Lake q!Te Nn 09719005CTTC Waukeaan/Yeoman CreeknATF June 25. 1981 nno.vnvn R-Q
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TYPK ASD T -Pyr.TH "FfASiyr ,?XC , 25.2 PT
PREPARED BY
RORFH RV
HFt PFR
VPS * vn
CASING .
Ron St. JohnDoualas TolanJtenMth Rncie
WHICH Leachate
1-3 FT ARDVF rnni-vn
(L309
«rBrrvrnivTFi»vAi FTFvATrnvc 653.17 to 640.17 (13 feet screened)AKNULUS FILL MATERIAL ^
JABnvFPArKiNr. Concrete & Cuttingsi <p^rKtv^ 50# Bentonite Powder >
^[SCREEN °Pen ^
+7^-r — ~
^ -
"1 —
GROUND SURFACE 663 . 47 fl"
^r Clayey Sandy Silt (cover materialj brown —
1 660.47
^ REFUSE ^
w _
K^M
1 3Augered through to 15 feet
•IP.
i -;i ~-i i
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split
*B
),
1
Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
' Miscellaneous Data PR - Partial Recovery— N - Blow Count NR - No Recovery
•
-•
!
T
*
-!--i'
-M
zw5ui^*^-ju;»
ik' t
t kc; C
ft
-'1-
:*-
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTFP 117 PAYS 655.47AFTFR n^YS
Refuse
644.47Silty Sand w/little clay andgravel, medium to coarsejrained, lithic sand
647.47Sandy Silt w/little clay &trace gravel , brown
^?Q 47
Boring Complete
TASN R1?F ^Pi *t3ii r\i£n oo
LPC
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
—
—
—
\
-20
r—
/-25_
-30
^^^
%
2
SHE
•
NR
PR
.BY
z
159
75
46
TUBE
WEL
L DE
SIGN
)
•j\
•*
•j
^
«
«
: i. >».•s•*» »P* ^P-
-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of—LSH.LakeCOUNTY.
SITE Uaukegan/Yeoman CreekSITE NO. 09719005
Ju1v 7. 1981 BORING NO. B-1Q
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE \VELL
PREPARED BY
BORED BY __
HELPER____YES X
.Ron St. JohnDouglas TolanKenneth
NO WHICH Monitor (G11C*
j
^
— <
m*
•
•
V,
.
TYPE AND LENGTH OF CASING PV^
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
AROVF PACKING . CuttingsPirviwr 151 Bentonite Pellets<rpFi=w 3/8" Gravel
11.3 rr CAStvn 1.3 PT i657.10 to $49.60 (7.5 feet screened)
HLR
VA
TIO
N
+7
GROUND SURFACE 659. $0 0
Clayey Silt (topsoil-fill),tan to black mottled
656.60Sandy Gravel Ash (slag throughfill)* black, wet, fine to coargrained
fisn.inSandy Gravelly Silt w/littleclay, gray, mottled, dry
649. 1C
'Boring Complete
11
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split
—
outser
-5
—
^^^
e•to
1
«^
^m
^^^
*
1
2
4
— apoon sampler unless utnerwue indicated
' Miscellaneous Data f R - Partial RecoveryN - Blow Count NR - No Recovery
*
^
-
z*
4
11
_j_
i1
H* -
4
^
WE
LL D
ES
IGN
4Pd n
1=h»
^ ' « •<
—
^ •* •
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTER 105 DAYS 654.5AFTER 160 PAV* 654.3
AFTER 340 DAYS 654.8
BOVEGROL'ND LEVE
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
—
-20
—
•ll
•
-
B45N R12F SR
-10
• •0
- • z
nin
i i
T^rt
-tr-
*' \
L P C - 3 4 3 /79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH._!_or_J_SH.
•* mnwTv Lake <;iTFvn 09719005 pHppiREnRY Ron St. Johncrrr Waukeqan/Yeoman Creek RnnrnRv Douolas Tolan
•_* HATF July 7, 1981 nnRivr:
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEA
NO.
CHA
B-ll UFI.PF.B Kenneth BosieTF IITLL VFS X vn . ,. , . WHICH Monitor _f_Gm
TYPF i\:n T.EVfiTH nprifiivr. PVC 58 FT CASIN-H 1.1 C-P ,^DFFvmtvTFPVAt FicvA-nnvc 620.76 to 60?. 76 (18 feet screened)
b>
•— '
brf
^^
b.
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL r
2
PAnriwr 20# Bentonite Pellets >SCREEN 3/8" Gravel i
li—
GROUND SURFACE 659.66 o"
NOTE: Borehole is located less-than 5 feet from B-10 —
See B-10 for soils description —; of upper 12.0 feet
^Augered through to 12.5 feet -
^
*,
>.
I -647.16
] Sand and Gravel, coarse grainep-io"sand and fine grained gravel I
1 646. 66\ "Silty Sandy Gravel w/trace \ L
relay (peat), black, moist, \ _| w/abundant organics
T ..?
*
1
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split_Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
' Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial RecoveryN • Blow Count NR - No Recovery
-
-•
z
2I
J..L
. -r•, ,
zna
a*
I1
JR
m » • •
f
GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETION
AFTF.R 105 RAYS 645.26AFTFR 160 n4YS 645.16AFTER 304 DAYS 645.26
Silty Sand Gravel w/trace clc(peat) , black, moist,w/abundant organics /
643.16 /Clay (gumbo), gray, moist,lacustrine
w/organics @ 22.5 feet636.66
Gravelly Sand w/some silt andtrace clay, gray, wet
634.16Sandy Clayey Silt w/tracegravel, green to gray, moist
'
•T45N R12F SR
iLPCi_ r \f
BOVECROl'ND LEVE
ELE
VA
TIO
N
—
h-20
—
—
_.
-25
-30"
*
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
• z
2T
2T
io
c
7
813
69
\i/pi i
nrc
i'-M
1
i
i19*
,
•!|
i»:ii»i
f
i
-34 3 /79
L P C - 3 4 3 /69 Pa. 2 BORING LOG SH. 2 of 2 SH.
B-ll (G-lll)Lake CountyWaukegan/Yeoman Cree09719005
Zc
Sandy Clayey Siltw/trace gravel, green to gray,moist
-35
620.16bandy Gravel w/trace silt and -*£clay, wet, coarse grainedsand and fine to mediumgrained gravel
10
11
12
"'fine to coarse grained sand @ ~42.5 feet, angular, very poorly-sorted
-45
Gray w/fine grained gravel, —subangular, some sorting @ 47.5feet
-so
13
14
15
fine to coarse grained gravel," 15very poorly sorted, angular @50 feet
Predominately gravel @ 52.5 fee4-
604.66-55
Clayey Sandy Silt w/littlegravel, brown to gray, damp,very coarse gravel brown @ 57.5feet
600.66
BORING COMPLETE -60
17
PR
PR
-65
-70
-75
-80
-85
-90
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
rprvTY Lake CITE-NOcrrr Waukeaan/Yeoman CreekDATP J u l y 7, 1981 HOPING NO
BORING
09719005
B-12BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TYPF AND I.ENT.TH OF CASING ... - -
SCRFENFD INTFRVAI, FI.FVATTONS ,., _.
..... ,. PT
LOG *» 1 of 1 __ SH.
PREPARED HY RpH St. John
H O R E H R Y Douglas TolanH F I P F R Kenneth Bosievr- vn X WM]rH
CASING _ FT ARO\-EGROL'NDLEVE
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
AROVF PACKING
PACKING ... .
-
riLH
VA
TIO
N 1
+3
— -
GROUND SURFACE 658. 75o
Silt (cover material),tan
658.25 /
Refuset
, ;gered through to 15 feet
*
•w
F
•1
* * -Z GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETIONAFTFR HAYS
AFTFR HAYS
Refuse
ELE
VA
TIO
N 1
—
—
639.25Sand, gray, fine to mediumgrained
637.25
-20
-
/Boring Complete
Backfilled with 40# bentonite-^Jpellets, then cuttings
-31
-
1SHE
•
.BY
PR
z
TUBE
37
•
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. SplitSpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
' Miscellaneous DataN • Blow Count
PR - Partial RecoveryNR • No Recovery
58
LPC-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
^r - "d BORING LOG SH .1 af 1 qu
H-M»NTV Lake CTTPNin 09719005 poppiRFnav Ron St. John5nT Waukeaan/Yeoman Creek nnornRY DOUqlaS To!———— July 8, 1981 QrtD,vr.vn
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR
TVPF AND LENT.TH HF C ASI\T. PV.C
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANVULUS FILL MATERIAL
ARnvFPAnnNr. Cutting
PArvihir. Rentonite
SPBFFN Fine Gravel
s
GROUND SURFACE 662 . 02
anB-13 HFTPFR Kenneth Rncio
r.PArwATP VVFLL . YF* X vn u*HirH Mom* tor (G113
3fl,n FT r \sivr. £.a „„ FT \637. R? to fi32.82 (5 feet srrPPnedl
HLC
VA
TIO
N
+T
—0
Silty Sand (topsoil-fill ) black "to gray
659.52
Sandy Silt w/some gravel andtrace clay (peat-fill), gray,damp, w/some mica, poorly in-durated, moist @ 7.5 feet
s^1
652.52
Sandy Gravel Slag (fill), blac,wet, w/wood throughout, fine t
coarse grained sand and fine tmedium grained gravel
^
-
—
-5"
—
•10k,00
•15
«•
1
2
3
4
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch 0.0. Split- Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR - Partial RecoveryN • Blow Count NR • No Recovery
•
zc5a
Z £.•mu
;
119 a23 1Iii16 i
- ft
1i H4 s
3w S
?"1
TT,ii —
-»• - -
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTFP 105 PAv^ 653.32AFTFR 160 nAY<: 653.12
AFTER 303 DAYS 643.32
sandy Gravel Slag (fill), blac*et, w/wood, fine to coarsegrained sand and fine to /nedium grained gravel /
1 646. 52 /ft Silty Sand (peat), brown, . 1R 645.52 /Ij ;iay (gumbo), gray, wet,
lacustrine w/3" peat lense
i
637.52B Sand and Gravel w/some clay arIsilt, gray, wet, fine to coar:R grained sand and fine to medui jrained gravel, very poorlyi sortedS
1I 634.02I Sandy CTayey Silt w/traceI gravel, brown to green, wet
1
/\ 633. 02 /
Boring Complete
T45N Ri?F W^wmm. (OPLrL
BOVE GROUND LEVE
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
f
t
•20
-
—
—
d^eim~
f.»—
«K
5
6
7
8
9
• Z
21
10
10
10
63
65
tiL(
L
1
i
Xyi
4
mmm
fmmrnm
-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLLTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of .SH.
iTH^MTV LdKG CTTF1 \IO
cr-rr Waukeaan/Yeoman Creek1, . i ./ Q i no i
PATF , ^ U I V Q, 13O1 BORINO NO .
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE
TYPF A^'n r.F.vnTH e^rr^i^r. . P^C 16.
09719005
8-14WELL0 FT
PRFPARFH RY ,.
B^RFD RV . , ,— .
. HEI.PEB
\-F^ X vn
CASING .
Ron St. JohnDoualas TolanKenneth Bosie
WHIPH Monitor
—LiO, FT ARD\'F nnnrvi
(61V
•» i r\-r
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS 657.15 to 647.15 f 10 feet screened)ANVULUS FILL Nf ATERIAL 7-
4,pnvF pAnciNin Cuttings p
p^CKivr. 501 Bentonite Powder >srpp™ 3/8" Gravel £
—
GROUND SURFACE 662.15 o"
NOTE: Borehole is located less_Ithan 5 feet from B-13.
—
—
See B-13 for soils description ,j
Augered through to 15 feet-10
*• ™
647.15"\ _
- Boring Complete \
* • Z
•
zwV)tua
*
(31X>•
;•
1 •]
! ,S
; .•: <
3 '
R '.
? "
."' '
GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLETION
AFTFR 105 PAY* 654.65AFTFR 160 PAY<; 654.55
AFTER 303 DAYS 655.45
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1
—
—
-20^
—
—
—
-30
- • Z t
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. SplitSpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous DataN-Blow Count
PR • Partial RecoveryNR • No Recovery
T45N R12E S8
LPC-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOO SH. of __ LSH,
COUNTY
SITEDATE
BORING
Lake SITF VO
Waukeaan/YeomanJ u l y 8, 1981
Creek_ BORING
09719005 P R F T » A R F _ D BY Ron St.
a n R F n RV DoualasNO.
COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE
TYPE AND LENGTH OF CASING _ PVC 20.0
B-15WELL
FT
wrr PFR KennethYFS X ^o
CASINO 2 .1
JohnTo! anBosiewHirH Leachate
FT ABOVF. nnnrvn
(L31
t FVF
_
^
w_
w
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
ABOVE pAnciNr, Concrete & CuttipAriqjjn 50# Bentonite PowdercrnFFN Open
650.85 to 640zcngsu;
_±3.
GROUND SURFACE 658.75 0
NOTE: Borehole is located lessthan 5 feet from B-12
1pee B-12 for soi ls description
^1 '*"|Augered through to 18.5 feet
iiI*.
^
k.
1
—
_
—
-i£
-15
*
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split~ Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR - Partial Recovery— N • Blow Count NR • No Recovery
•
.85 (10 feet screened)
Z
-f-
1\(
. i
-4i
i
zV)UJO-jui
1
\ tc: cy F•,
1
•
-•1-
f
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTFR 105 n*v<: 651.05AFTFR 160 OAYS 651.05AFTER 303 DAYS 651.25
638.75BORING COMPLETE
T45N R12E S8
ELEV
ATI
ON
1
—
-20—
_«.
—
^p^—
-3C
^h^V
* * Z
"2
L.C.
u
»iz\=J^^^••
•• ^
LPC-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
• Lake r-rpSITF Waukegan/Ypoman TrppkPATF Julv flr IP^l nnorvr. MO
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE
BORING
09719005
R-lfi
WELL
LOG
PREPARED BY
HORFp RV
HF.I.PFR
VFS X V
SH.JL
Ron St._ Dnnglac
KpnnPt*!
— of_2_SH.
JohnTnlan _________RnsiP
^ TYPF ANP r -F.vnTH riFPASlvn _ EYC,_ 53,0 FT CASI\T. 2*9. . FT \BOV
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS 637.80 to 612.80 (25 feet screened)ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL z
^"[ABOVF PACKING Cuttinqs p'PATINA 40# Bentonite Pellets >
-fSCREEN Gravel! v Sand • u
£_x —
'GROUND SURFACE 662.90 o^-Clayey Silty Sand w/little
gravel .(disturbed-fill), brown —mottled, w/abundant organics
7 . - - . - . - - 658.90 "Gravelly Sand (disturbed-fill )\ .damp, coarse grained gravel and.
Tfine to medium grained sand _1 -5
^^ 656.40Silty Clay w/some gravel black —
vto tan (highly mottled), moist -(fine grained gravel —
r 653.40"Sandy Clayey Silt w/trace graved)rown to gray (highly mottled), -
Tmost, w/fine to coarse grainedgravel and organics, oxidized
» 12,5 feet —rr
-
1
2
3
4
VJl Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split-spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
1 Miscellaneous Data PR * Partial Recovery
*
-•
!
Zc3
z c•••u,
f—
1
«
"" 1
1* 1
>5
iJ.-Li i!
GROUND WATER EL. 2
AT COMPLETION C
AFTFR 105 PAYS 644.70 >AFTER 160 DAYS 644.70 uiAFTER 303 DAYS 640.80
1 Sandy Clayey Silt w/tracegravel, gray, moist, fine to —nedium grained gravel and 4" , _layer of silt (lacustrine) (? —
1 17.5 feet
1 -
~638.40 v
Gravelly Sand, gray, wet "—
m
) —:1ne to coarse sand and fine to —
Jmedium gravel -1I -30
i
-U •
1B w/some clay @ 32.5 feetR
i
i or. QA
ECROl'NDLEVEi
*
5
6
7
8
*
NR
NR
PR
PR
z
•ii
.N«
§
Mit
XK
79
98
3
66
fl9
WP
I 1 or*
:ir:
w i
S
,
. .
»:
1/70
CDO^-j.3lO
oo3"O- — 'o>rtro
1 1^ I I i I l"» I I iI loi 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 l^l 1 I 1 i 1
'||
( *0 0-1 — •Qi tu*< •<<• roC<f.ro (/>rt O»- 3
CLO f>_•. _i.l/i — jrt rtr& £_
-•v.Ol —•o —
rt^t rt
Cn • (D — •H- ro ro»-• rt to-** -1O Oi
1 "> tO1 1 °l -f
\ i/» O>O 31 'O
i *~t Cro — •O. Oi*ifa) t
-C* — •o -••
rt--*> 3-rtv *^*n> ort
Oi3O.
<;ID•*
cn »<»-•- "OoIO OCD I
I 1 i i. ,1 I i f *• iro *-* O
tJ T50 3:
*-4 CO O|(Tk O|CD O| CD l£>|CO ' 1C
UD O CDT — -1Of Of O*< *< <ro - ro
IO — •o» -j *<3 01O- *^ t/"
-. O*-+i 3-" £ °-3 10ro rt x* *•*».rt~ rtO -h -$
-«. Oi0 3 0o ro roo*T rt ww o -••ID — •
O rtl/i OQ| Q| f|t
3 - 5 3o. w» o.1 1 1°,
9 "O> 50
>-|>|00 OJCD
£|
|||||||5?:C4«*»t ' ^>*>X'VAi'3i*?S'r ^TffHlf^^!'^\''V.^.A!/a''>|i.f'A<S!AM'fc|>y.U'^;A^
" 1o s: r- CDVO Ot O» 1• c ? - »-•*-* TC ro enu3 roOiO n-— >O Oi O Clin 3 c »-•
'^.31-'~<i rt enro *-< — -o3Oi3
O•jIDro3 "
ELEVATION
f
*
N
WELL DESIGN
-ao
*£>
T3
ro
C9O
Or-o
S, 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , Ift, 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , |g, , 1 i 1 , 1 , |£, , 1 , 1 i 1 , IS, I , I , I , | , |K, I , I , ELEVATION
*
*
N
WELL DESIGN
CO3:
ro
o
|roCO
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORINC. LOG SH. .of .SH.
COUNTY
SITE ——
Lake SITE NO 09719005Waukegan/Yeoman CreekJuly 14. 1981 BORING NO B-17
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
PREPARED BY _ Ron St. John
BORED BY Douglas TolanHELPER _____YES X
Kenneth Bosievo WHICH Monitor fG-11'
^ TYPE AND LENGTH OF CASING PVE
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
AVNULUS FILL MATERIAL
1 /*••*+* •»*.••AROVF pAfKiNn LuttinqsPArviwr 30# Bentonite Pellets
"^SCREEN 3/8" Gravel
GROUND SURFACE 655.49
Tdayey Sandy Silt w/little'gravel, (disturbed-fill) tan,
damp
TT
2Q.Q FT
642.49 to 636.49
I-LF
.VA
TIO
N
+3.
_
0
—
•?
X_x 648.49
Clayey Silt (peat) w/some sanY-and trace gravel, black, wet
r 645.9
>c9 ~
I Gravelly Sandy Silt w/some \ —clay, gray, wet, w/abundant "—
,_organics (stems and roots)
643.49 ~TGravelly Silt w/some sand and -' trace clay, gray, wet, fine to —
medium grained gravel and fine -ro coarse grained sand —
-15
*
1
2
3
•
PS
PS
JZ
2I
33
54
WE
LL D
ES
ICN
!!
j ejn
!'1:iu •
-, ;
i
CASING I,Q FT ABOV
(6 feet screened)GROUND WATER EL. z
OAT COMPLETION p
AFTER 99 DAVS _649.49 >AFTFR 154 nAYS 649.19 5i
AFTER 297 DAYS 649.19
Gravelly Silt w/some sand —
and trace clay, gray, wet, fine_to medium grained gravel andfine to coarse grained sand,anqular, very poorly sorted i
c • i 637.49w/little gravel, gray, moist / -
"1636.49 /
Boring Complete
—-25
—*•
i —i
-—
•#
-30— ^
EC.ROI'NDLEVEI
-
4
5
• z
14
25
WF
I 1
DF
Sin
wl
•
• «*>
\11 Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. SplitSpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
Miscellaneous Data' Blow Count
PR • Partial RecoveryNR • No Recovery
T45N R12E S8
LPC-34 3/7<?
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
COUNTY
SITE .
DATE
BORING
LakeWaukeqan/YeomanJuly 15, 1981
SITE NO.
Creek_ BORING NO
BORING
09719005
B-18
COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TYPE AMP T.FN'fiTH OF CASINO . P.VC,._ 31 -8 «"
LOG
PREPARED BY
RORFn RY
HE! PFR
VES X
SH._
Rnn St
. DouglasKenneth
vn
-Lof. 1 SH.
,1nhn
To! anBosie
\VHIPH Monitor (Gll£
CASING L4_ FT ABOVE HRm-sin IFVF
--*
M«
BB >
tea
W
*••
W
*1
«.
V.
^
\.
*
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANN'ULUS FILL MATERIAL
AROVP PACKING CuttingspATvivr: 40# Bentonite Powder^PFFN 3/8" Gravel
-S
GROUND SURFACE 656.25
Sandy Clayey Silt (disturbedfill), tan ,
649.75Krlayey Sandy Silt w/trace
gravel (disturbed fill), green-wet, w/slag throughout
646.75t Sandy Clayey Silt w/traceI gravel, tan mottled, moist,
w/organics
' 644. ?5
Clayey Silt (peat) w/some1 sand and trace gravel, black,
1 moist
T
635.85 to 625.85 MO feet screened)
NO
IIVA
'JIU
£
0
-
—
•J
\-*
^^^
^ •B
\I
^^^
^
-13
*
1
2
3
__A1! Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. SplitSpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial Recovery"-"M - Blow Count NR - No Recovery
•
PS
NR
_..
•*itz i
••t
Ji
i
Hiy
f4* J
i j(J
H^^ M H
t
1 1
'
__i___
? GROUND WATER EL. 2- rt3 AT COMPLETION C2 <J AFTFR 98 PAVS 651.^5 >
fe AFTFR 153 nAYS _ 650.65 «
AFTER 296 DAYS 651.35 -
Clayey Silt (peat) w/some ~sand and trace gravel , brown "moist —
L 638.75 / "flsilty Gravelly Sand (peat) -Hw/Httle clay, brown, wet, —1 green @ 20 feet, gray and| moist ? 21.5 feet —BI1
r1 633 .25 /m T C
fl Sandy Clayey Silt w/trace —i gravel , gray, moist ~-\J -UB
Ww/sand and gravel (a 30 feet .3Q|I 624.75 —ffl ———————————————————————ffi Boring Complete *~
i1 fafl x
...
T45N R12F 5fi
zLrL P C - 3 4^ r ^ ^ ~
*
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* z
21
11
11
22
46
34
35
u/ei i
ni
:c»r
-M I
T •.
X
a
-
-j
-i^• •H
• •^ ••
3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
COUNTY L.ake
BORING
siTFvn 09719005CT-PC Waukegan/Yeoman Creekr^T* Julv 16BORING COMPLETED
TYPE AND LENGTH 0
. 1981 HnpiMr. srn B-19
AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
prifiivr. PVC 20.0 rr
LOG SH. _ 1 «t 1 qu
PREPARED RY Ron St. JohnRfiRFnHY Douqlas TolanHFI.PFR Kenneth BnsiPVF5 * vn u"HK~H Monitor
CASING — 2,J) „. FT ABOVE nRnrvn(fill
r PV;
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
^
*
s
^
*
^
f
>*p*
^
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
ARO^p p ifff INC: CuttingsPACKING 35# Bentonite Pellets^OFPV 3/8" Gravel
/
GROUND SURFACE 654.53
Sandy Silty Clay w/trace gravgray and tan mottled, moist
645. 01Sandy Clayey Silt w/trace \gravel, gray, moist w/1" layesilt (lucustrine), wet 9 13.9feet
640.53
Sand w/little silt, trace \gravel and clay, gray, wet,fine to coarse grained,angular and poorly sorted
640.53 to 636.53 (4 feet screened)
|
*
— 1
o
*L
-
—
x_:•10
--IS
-
1
2
3
4
5
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split~~ Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
' Miscellaneous Data PR * Partial Recovery— V • Blow Count NR • No Recovery
•
_ ,
fc •
z^V
z 5*u.
-In
10 |13 ]
116 9IT J**
X
6 !S8 S
u•I
55 K6 ?t
i
TIC.- "i
— - -(-
GROUND WATER EL. 20
AT COMPLETION p
AFTFR 97 nAYS 649.33 >AFTFR 152 nAv^ 649.23 w
AFTER 295 DAYS 648.8
Sand w/little silt, trace r"gravel and clay, gray, wet, /
1 fine to coarse grained, /anular, and poorly sorted /
638.53L Sandy Clayey Silt w/little1 gravel , gray, moist
! 635.03 /
i Boring Complete
"! ~1 -C "—
11 -It
? -3C
'•:
-
"T- T45N R1?F <^fl•
^ L P C - 3 4
-
6
7
• z
35
812
'•_•
i
3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of SH.
COUNTYSITE ——
Lake SITE NO. 09719Q05Waukegan/Yeoman CreekJ u l y 16, 1981 BORING NO. B-2Q
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
PREPARED BY Ron St. John
BORED BY ___Douolas TolanHELPER__YES *
Kenneth BosieN'O WHICH Monitor fG12Q
TYPE AND LENGTH OF CASING _EY£——. 42 n* CASING 1.7 FT ABOVE GROL'ND LEVEI~ SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS
ANVULUS FILL MATERIAL
w. AROVP pArKiNr, Cuttinqslp*,rKINrr 40# Bfntonite Pelletssrpprv 3/8" Gravel
630.19 to 614.19 (16 feet screened)
ELE
VA
TIO
N
1 +TM ~
IGROUND SURFACE 654.49 o"
^Note: Borehole is less than15 feet from B19
See 619 for soils description*tof the upper 19.5 feet
T
Tv-Augered through to 22.5 feet
rrr
—
—
-
^^^
•»•
*— «
•LL
-IS
-
Ul Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split^Jpoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data PR • Partial RecoveryJ . B1nw Cnunt NR . No Recovery
•
_..
Z
-!--i•i H
zfaUlQ-1^U
11I
iH
! ^T
i1....
GROUND WATER EL.AT COMPLETION
AFTFR 97 PAYS 645. 4Q
AFTFR 152 HAY* 645.49
AFTER 295 DAYS 647.19
Augered through to 22.5 feet
In drilling encountered largirocks and small boulders@ 20 feet
631.Sandy Clayey Silt w/littlegravel , gray, wet
.631.49 /
Gravelly Sand w/little siltand trace clay, gray, wet,fine to coarse grained graveland sand, very angular
624.49Sand w/some gravel and tracesilt and clay, gray, wet, finto coarse grained sand andgravel , angular
T A N Q 1 9 r CDi*lDN Kltt Oo
ELE
VA
TIO
N I
t — .
.20
/ -
-25"
• ^
•ta^VI
-30
e _
*
1
2
*
PR
z
X
•
45
45
z•P««-V.j.C
i
1 Dr-74 T /7Q
f f f j f f f f f f f f
( ( 11 *"*'
3IQ
OOu• — •fDriro
i t& i i i i 1^1 i i i is r I i I . i^. I i .1 1 1 |0| | | 1 | 1 | | | |»| | | | | | | 1 | |0| | | | | | | | | H | | .1 |
1
3, 1 , 1 , 1 * 1 , Ift, 1 , 1 , 1 i 1 i l£i 1 i 1 . 1 . 1 . lii 1 . 1 i 1 i 1 i
\
o
f
TDJ<ID__J
*
tf^
Of*<«
3O— *t/»«••*•
1 ,•*
oofui
TTTTl4
1 I
oOf*•<ro*•<too*3CL*•<;c/>•_!•__J
r~t-
£^v.^-J•-«.r+-c-1-ID
°l
•
:*rt
i
,( — ( — ( —in £ rt t/>O» 0> -J D*3 <-* 0* 3o. * no.
fD* -•» «3 -*• W "*vQ- 3 -•- W
fD — *OiQ r* 31 rfr (D(U O O*< 3 mn> o O- ~j• — • o &•- eu n <
1 — * fDtu t/t tu — •3 fD «<
tQ — 01C tO 3• — ' "^ tO O.
O^ Of Di ^
Ul 3 t<• ID ••-«* a.
1 1 i •*•1 1 1 1 -1
CJ
00) 0»
n.'.. .'.-."•f", l •.^..'»«4 v-> J.*.
, 1 , Ift 1 , ,
f f
CD z: r~ col£> Cb PJ 1**j c ?r ro»-• 7^ ID OU> IDOtQ O-~-O O* O C"i01 3 c i-*
-<rt On> *< '—oOf3
Onn>roj -
ELEVATION
f
•
N
WELL DESIGN
ELEVATION
f
•
N
WELL DESIGN
•
ni
OJ-**
CJ
enU3
-a-JD.
ro
aO2or-oo
l/lI
hT"
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of. .SH.
rnirMTV Lake <;TTF vn 09719005
CITP Waukeaan/Yeoman CreekPATF July 29, 1981 nnnivr. MO B-21
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
TYPf? ANPl.F^TunFi-ASIvr; , PVC., . J3.$ FT
PREPARED
BORED BY
HELPERVFC X
C
BY .Ron St. Jnhn.Douqlas TolanKenneth Bosi*»
\O "'H1CH
ASING 2tl FT. ABO
(Leachate L32
V'F r.nnrvn i rvr
SCREENED INTERVAL ELEVATIONS 657.31 to 647.21 (10 feet screened)
«•(
•*<
W.
W
*>
W
^_
^^_
••_
^_
•*.
ANNULUS FILL MATERIAL
ABOVE PACKING Concrete & CuttlPArK-iNc 50# Granular BentonitecrpFFN Open
*/
GROUND SURFACE 658. 71
I
o"
SUty Clay (cover material), ^Brown
656. 21 /~
Refuse
w
648.21
647.21
BORING COMPLETE
i
•F
MO
\__
/-
-15
-
All Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split' Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
' Miscellaneous Data PR • Pirtial Recovery_ N • Blow Count NR - No Recovery
•
PR
PR
~.
^ •
2••i?Ui— f
mtu.3
i
&^^
— i. ...
,•
:
i in '
GROUND WATER EL.
AT COMPLFTIOV
AFTFR 84 HAYS 654.31AFTFR 139 HAYS 654.41
AFTER 282 DAYS 655.51
;
;mt^m
ELEV
ATI
ON
II
—
-20
—
-£
-3C
•^ T45N R12E S8
LPC
* • z i
-34 3/79
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DIVISION OF LAND/NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL
BORING LOG SH. .of .SH.
COUNTY LakeWaukeqan/Yeoman Creek
DATE August 5, 1981 BORING NO. B-22
BORING COMPLETED AS MONITOR OR LEACHATE WELL
PREPARED BY
BORED BY __
HELPER____
YES *
Ooualas TolanKenneth Bosie
vn \vmrn Monitor (G1221
— TYPE AND LENGTH OF CASING PVC CASING—£i4_ FT ABOVE GROCNDLEVE:scREE*FPi*T»«ir rrrvATinv* 650.41 to 630.41 (20 feet screened)
•
1-r1
1
1
1
1
^
^
\
XNNULUS FILL MATERIAL
»jnnvp PArviwr CyttinQS
>ATIN^ 40# Bentonite PelletscrpFFv 3/8" Gravel
GROUND SURFACE fiSft.f
Silty Clayey Sand w/tracegravel, black to brown, damp
r
654.
Sandy Silt w/some clay andtrace gravel, tan, moist,
-. 'ne grained sand
I-LI
-VA
TIO
N
+7
11 o-
—
or-7
650.01Gravelly Sand w/little silt
- and trace clay, gray, wet,1 fine to coarse gravel and saj
w/occasional clayey Tense
IrT .
^,0
-15
-
i
2
3
4
5
- JZ
z
uc3s
1BB
14
X|
87
T
I-:*iiF '
i.-
GROUND WATER EL. ZO
AT COMPLFTTON . . „ ., P
AFTFR 77 niv<; 648.11 >
AFTFR 132 RAY* 648.11 3
AFTER 275 DAYS 648.01Gravelly Sand w/little silt ~~and trace clay, gray, wet,fine to coarse grained ~~gravel and sand
1 t™"
—
-!
,r<X| 631.01| Clayey Silt w/some sand and \ _] trace gravel, gray, moistt
Ii 628.51w -30; Boring Complete —
I J•V
it•v —§
11
*
6
•
PS
NR
NR
z
44
1117
1520
wr-t
t n
psir
wl
•
< P
~ ;
^^^^• ^H^ •
AJ1 Samples Taken with 2 Inch O.D. Split"Spoon Sampler Unless Otherwise Indicated
* Miscellaneous Data.N - Blow Count
PR • Partial RecoveryNR - No Recovery LPC-34 3/79