gm execution model 1. un execution without transfers of funds to end beneficiary 2. un execution...
TRANSCRIPT
GM Execution Model
1. UN Execution without transfers of funds to end beneficiary
2. UN Execution with transfers to End Beneficiary: Grants-Out (Outright Grants)
3. UN Execution with Implementing Partner
4. Fund to Fund Allocation
Grant Execution – 1. UN Execution
Business Scenario Description Umoja Solution
UN Execution Direct Expenses to the project
Any expense from procurement, travel, payroll etc. charged to Simple or Main Implementation Grant
Umoja Presentation to OAH - Grants Management Functionality 2
Grant Execution – 2. UN Execution: Grants-Out (Outright Grants)
Business Scenario Description Umoja Solution
Grants-out (outright grants) to end beneficiary.
Outright grant with payment to the end beneficiary and reporting by nature of expenditure is not required; the full amount shall be recorded as an expense at the point of signature/confirmation of the arrangement.
End Beneficiary is an entity/person that does not charged any administrative costs (overheads).
PO and payment against the PO at the time of signing the funding agreement to the end beneficiary, charged to Simple or Main Implementation Grant
Umoja Presentation to OAH - Grants Management Functionality 3
Grant Execution – 3. UN Execution with Implementing Partner
Business Scenario
Description Umoja Solution
UN execution with Implementing Partners (e.g. UN agencies and NGOs)
UN transfers the portion of the contribution to the Implementing Partner(s) through issuing the advances. The timing of expense recognition should be based on delivery as evidenced in the reports from the implementing partners.
PO and down payment (advance) to IPs from Passthrough Grant. Upon receipt of expenditure reports, expenditures will be recorded against the PO and offset the advance.
Note: Both UNFIP and CERF will follow this approach under IPSAS.
Umoja Presentation to OAH - Grants Management Functionality 4
Grant Execution – 4. Fund to Fund Allocation
Business Scenario
Description Umoja Solution
Fund to Fund Allocations
Allocation from one “internal Fund” to the “other internal Fund” –e.g. UNFIP provide grant to CERF.
UMOJA solution: The voluntary contribution is recoded on UNFIP (original Grant/Fund). Create JV to debit UNFIP expense (allocation given) and credit CERF income (allocation received). This entry will be eliminated upon consolidation of trust funds.
5
Grant Execution – Grant Framework I
Simple Grant and AS1 Series Sponsored Classes:
UN Execution with End Beneficiary:
AS1-GRANTS-OUT Grant Out Expenditure w/o PT
UN Execution with Implementing Partner:
AS1-TRANSFER-IP Transfers to IPs w/ PT
AS1-IP DIRECT IP Direct Expenditures
AS1-IP INDIRECT IP Indirect PSC
Fund to Fund Allocations:
AS1-TRANSFERS Transfer to/ from Fund & Grant
Grant Execution – Grant Framework I
Simple Grant
Passthrough Grant 1
AP1-SC 1 – IP Direct CostAP1-SC 2 – IP Indirect Cost
Passthrough Grant 2
BP1-SC1 - Direct CostBP1-SC2 - Direct Cost
Ect.BP1-SC3 – IP Indirect Cost
AS1 – Sponsored Class Series for Simple Grant
AP1 – Sponsored Class Series for Passthrough Grant
For Framework II AM1 series are used instead of AS1 series
IP PSC
IP PSC
PSC_EXP_UN
Redeployment 1Redeployment 1
Grant Execution: Object Mapper Functionality
Object Mapper is required for budgetingObject Mapper is required for budgeting
Sponsored Classes on Simple and Passthrough Grants
Simple GrantSimple Grant
Passthrough Grant – A seriesPassthrough Grant – A series
Passthrough Grant – B seriesPassthrough Grant – B series
OROR
UN Grant Execution – GM/FM/FI integration
AS1- GRANTS-OUT
Sponsored Class GL AccountsBudgetary Commitment
Item FI30_CI_Class_145 –
Grant-Out78111000 – Grant Out Direct Exp78111010 – Grant Out Staff Cost78112010 – Grant Out Travel78113010 – Grant Out Contractual78114010 – Grant Out Commodity78115010 – Grant Out Operating78116010 – Grant Out Vehic Furnit78117010 – Grant Out Transfer
AS1-IP-DIRECT
Sponsored Class GL AccountsBudgetary Commitment
Item FI30_CI_Class 140 –
Transfer to IP78101000 - IP Direct Expense78101010 - IP Staff Cost78102010 - IP Travel78103010 - IP Contractual78104010 - IP Commodity78105010 - IP Operating78106010 - IP Vehic Furnit78107010 - IP Transfer
UN Program Support Costs Sponsored Classes
PSC-EXP-UN – UN Programme
support expense from UN Execution
Sponsored Class GL AccountsBudgetary Commitment
Item
78201010 - PSC UN FT30_155
78201010 - PSC UN
Grants Execution - PSC
Grant PSC Transaction Use of Passthrough
Grant
Grant Allocations Yes JV No
Grants-Outs to End Beneficiary
Yes (up to 13%) PO exp No
UN execution Yes (up to 13%) PO, Travel Commitments, etc
No
Transfer to IP 3%
Yes Plus IP indirect cost 7-10%
Passthrough and PO (Advance)
Yes
Donor Contribution Agreement
Simple Grant orMain Implementation
Grant
Sponsored Program A
Passthrough Grant
Work breakdown Structure (WBS)Work breakdown Structure (WBS)
Work breakdown ElementWork breakdown Element
13
Purchase Order
Down payment
Invoice/Expenditure report
Grant Execution with Implementing Partners: Process Steps
Steps once contract is signed with IP and passthrough grant is created1.Transfer budget from simple or MIG grant to passthrough grant
2.Create Purchase Order for vendor (e.g. the IP)
3.Create Down payment request and pay advance to IP
4.Record Service Entry Sheet as per IP’s submitted expenditure report
5.Record Invoice as per the Service Entry Sheet
6.Clear vendor account
14
Grant Execution with Implementing Partners: Process Steps