See more essay samples on ESSAYSHARK.COMv

Global Warming Persuasive Essay Sample

HUMAN ENDEAVOUR: TOO WARM FOR ITS OWN GOOD

EssayShark.com - Online Academic Assistance

See more essay samples on ESSAYSHARK.COMv

Since inception of the argument about global warming, which erupted in the scientific and

popular literature during the 1980s, this aspect of environment change has been addressed by

those involved in the geosciences, the biological sciences, astronomy, and environmental

sciences. Other disciplines, such as economics, political science, demographics and

population statistics, medicine, agriculture, and engineering have taken up the debate. A

number of good books discourse about the intricate interactions between these disciplines.

Many authors have attempted to integrate them, and to develop meaningful conclusions and

potentially useful solutions (Strom xii). Here, an effort is made to explore an explanation of

global climate change, examine why it is such a politically-charged issue, and show how it is

humans who are causing the recorded rises in temperature.

In his book Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition, Robert Strom (2007)

attempts to explain the broad – or rather, enormous – cycles of cooling and warming that

have enveloped Earth since the beginning. He explains how catastrophic climate change has

always affected the conditions on the planet’s surface and directed the minute or gigantic

changes in environmental factors – and through them, speciation, and other biological

dynamics (Strom 60). This happened even before humans evolved.

Strom goes on to show how mass extinction events have always been caused by sudden or

gradual changes in Earth’s surface temperatures, caused by climactic conditions or

cataclysms such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and other colossal happenings

(Strom 59).

Other authors and scientists, such as Roy Spencer in his book Climate Confusion (2010) take

up the opposing view and enumerate how climate change hysteria has gathered pace in the

world, fueled by international politics, international skirmishes over finite resources, and

economic doom-saying by stakeholders with ulterior motives (Spencer 20). This popular

scientist appeals to the layperson and gives easy to understand rationales to refute political,

religious, and philosophical reasons placed behind the global warming argument that

proposes the warming aspect can be blamed on human activity.

Spencer (2010) places abuse of authority, both scientific and political, at the root of all the

fights taken up by opposing factions in the debate. He states that just because the science of

the day, and the politicians in power, make persuasive arguments, it does not necessarily

make those opinions watertight or even true.

See more essay samples on ESSAYSHARK.COMv

Human activity is to blame for much of the change in temperature experienced in the last

millennium or so, many scientists purport to show (Spencer 52). Emissions from human

endeavor to feed, clothe, and transport people and their goods around the globe have, since

the industrial revolution and the invention of the internal combustion engine – not to mention

the provision of reticulated fuel and power to all human habitations – caused irreparable

damage to the atmosphere. If these emissions were not continually pumped into the

atmosphere, some say, Earth’s temperatures would not experience the rises and fluctuations,

or the freak weather patterns, which seem to plague all regions in recent times (Strom 39).

Geographical studies and astronomy have shown this to be true. Economics reports have also

shown a correlation between human prosperity and success with the warming of the planet

(Strom 93).

Chapter Five of the seminal collection of essays by Peter Newell et al (2012) shows how

emissions and the continued abuse of Earth’s environment is bound to be perpetuated further

than ever in the history of human interaction and activity, through the new carbon dealings

between groups of nations (Newell et al 104). These political transactions are more to do with

the politics of the day than any true concern with the state of the environment bequeathed to

subsequent generations of users and abusers.

This has always been so, and will continue to be the main reason behind the warming

environment. What also remains true, however, is an important concept few consider when

they enter the debate. This can never be an argument on whether the situation is “natural” due

to the constant cycles of the planet that cannot be interfered with, or a “synthetic” reason

wrought by humans (Spencer 111). Since human life is indubitably normal and biological,

one can only argue that whatever humans do, and however the world gets warmer, because

humans are a natural part of Earth and its dynamic existence, and their activity cannot be as

artificial as some might protest, all reasons to do with the planet’s temperatures must be

entirely natural.

See more essay samples on ESSAYSHARK.COMv

References

Newell, P., Boykoff, M. and Boyd, E. The New Carbon Economy: Constitution, Governance

and Contestation Antipode Books, 2012

Spencer, Roy W. Climate Confusion Encounter Books, 2010

Strom, Robert G. Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition Springer, 2007.

.