global warming = all time record cold? - oilseed crops · global warming is causing this record...
TRANSCRIPT
Global Warming = All Time Record Cold?
In January 2019, all-time record cold swept across the United States, which broke
the all-time low temperature records in some of the coldest places in America.
Many locations were at 60 degrees Fahrenheit below zero, and others were at 45
degrees Fahrenheit below zero.
I stated then, that in about a week, a tidal wave of articles trying to explain that
Global Warming is causing this record cold will come out. Sure enough, one of my
subscribers sent me this link. This was a great find. I'm so glad that he pointed me
in the right direction, Polar Vortex: How the Jet Stream and Climate Change Bring
on Cold Snaps.
Let me point out that “cold snap” is not a correct description of that last event,
an “all-time record cold wave” would be a better description. Anyway, in the
news says, It might seem to be counterintuitive, but global warming plays a role
in blasts of bitter record cold weather. I say, that is what “counterintuitive” mean,
because I just don't understand how that happens. Thermodynamically, it makes
no sense.
The article went on, trying to explain that because of melting sea ice and warming
of the Arctic, more open water leads to feedback loops which creates a wavier jet
stream.
Looking at Arctic sea ice concentrations for that time, you can see the black line
is where we are, that’s in 2019. So if the corporate media is claiming that the sea
ice is melting and causing more open water, which it shouldn’t because it's winter
anyway, where are we on the sea ice, compared to the last few years?
We are right at the 2004 - 2013 average. So I don't know where they get this
premise of “melting sea ice” because the Arctic is actually gaining ice. This is really
an inconvenient fact, but nonetheless…
Then the article continued showing an analysis of the late December 2017-early
2018 East Coast event which they called a “cold snap”. Again, that was an all-time
record cold and an all-time record snowfall event. They quickly analyzed it and
said: The cold spells aren't getting as cold as they could because of Climate
Change and Greenhouse Gases. Furthermore, it was said that due to Arctic
amplification, cold air that’s coming down south was not as cold as it used to be.
Really? It was the coldest ever recorded.
Let me bring you to AccuWeather’s article. By the numbers: Midwest US endures
coldest temperatures, ever. This talked about some of the coldest places during
the winter in the United States that smashed their all-time cold records, like
Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota.
Even before they analyzed everything with a final tally, they still had 340 daily
lows and 340 daily low maximum temperatures broken or tied in the Midwest.
The final tally was completed about a week later because they were looking for
independent stations to add thermometer data. These happened in just that
single polar vortex. So it is not getting warmer, it is getting cooler in the extremes!
Case-in-point, another polar vortex blasted all the way down to Texas with
average temperatures during this event around 16 to 20 degrees Celsius below
the normal.
In relation to this, some astrophysicists are forecasting that we are going into a
Grand Solar Minimum, which means that our Sun is declining in its activity state.
This will usher in changes in our jet streams, due to Earth’s magnetosphere
weakening.
(BELOW) This was the forecast put out a couple of years ago as to when we’d
expect this amplification. The arrows shown in the chart are broken down in
yearly increments, which show the first wave of two that we're about to
experience. We already moved from the yellow portion of the chart to that green
portion, and that's where the amplification in cold events is expected on our
planet this year. There was another gigantic uptick observed at the beginning of
2019 and another forecast uptick observed from 2020 to 2021.
Some of these facts were missed in the corporate media rush to say that winters
are going to be warmer, while the jet streams were affected by you, bad humans,
for producing too much CO2, not the Sun.
The article never even pointed out anything about planetary geometry in the
explanation. But the fact is, these gas giants have electromagnetic effects on our
earth and on our Sun. This is an electromagnetic solar system that we're in, so
when you look at the left image below showing the 79 AD planetary geometry,
you can see these gas giants and their relation to the Earth. We see some exact
match ups on the 2023-2024 planetary geometry shown on the right image. If you
notice, they are nearly identical. See how those gas giants create a seemingly
square pattern, with the Earth at the center. The Earth then is affected in so many
ways, not only by our Sun but also by the gas giants on the outer bands.
In like manner, magnetic poles were not mentioned in the article either. The
magnetic poles are wandering, as it was called, that’s why the GPS needed to be
re-calibrated this year. Also, there are so many runways that needed to be re-
demarcated as to which direction, because the magnetic north pole is wandering.
You might think this is frightening and scary, but you shouldn't, because this is a
natural phenomenon.
(BELOW) Like I said, this is a natural cycle. As an evidence, I'll take you back to 200
AD. Top left of the image is the same direction that the magnetic pole is
wandering toward Russia. Notice that it’s in the same direction as 79 AD, and we
are going to experience nearly the same planetary geometry. Do you think that’s
just a coincidence, or do you think it is a repeating pattern?
This is also one of the things the article did not consider, going back in time and
talking about longer duration timeframes. They're always focused on the satellite
record, the 50-year or a 100-year time frame. What about the last 1,200 years?
Why don’t we also look at the intensity of changes that our planet has endured
naturally, long before CO2, long before factories, long before cars. The
undulations in heat spikes and cold down trends are natural, and we're naturally
heading into another down trend at the moment.
It's all about the magnetosphere, the electromagnetic coupling between Earth’s
magnetic poles and the Sun.
Yet, they very boldly stated that human-caused Global Warming has altered the
strength in the path of the powerful winds, otherwise known as the Jetstream.
They’ve finally come out cleanly saying that the Jetstream has weakened, but as
to the causation, this is what I want to discuss.
Solar wind is a huge component in the dynamics of what's happening on our
planet, and this was not discussed at all, in this article.
To get you with a better representation, this is a strong solar wind.
This on one hand, is when there’s no solar wind. And this is happening right now.
This verifies that the changes in our atmosphere are related to what's happening
in our Sun.
Magnetic field lines form the Earth’s poles, otherwise known as field-aligned
currents, lock our magnetosphere tightly, which in turn lock the jet streams in
place, so that jet streams would have nice and steady flows.
So what if the media comes clean and accepts that the Sun is the driver of these
changes, and that as the Sun decreases its activity state, our weather is going to
get more extreme?
Nevertheless, know that the magnetic field lines would weaken and go out wider
in their locking toroid flow, if you had less incoming energy. So, to put it in
perspective, this declining solar activity over 400-year cycles or 2,000-year cycles
or 3,600-year cycles affect Earth’s magnetic field which locks jet streams in place.
Then when solar winds get weaker, we go from compression, to expansion.
We even have good representations at smAsho mAsh, which puts these
illustrations of with solar wind, and no solar wind daily.
These abnormal images of solar winds are not just representations, they are
happening right now. You can check this out on Space Weather: ULTRA WEAK
Solar Activity, Indoor Tomato Total Reaches 3, WEAK Magnetosphere, and see
how these are all coupling.
Furthermore, if there were electromagnetic changes, we should start to see more
unusual atmospheric lightning events as well, like all the sprites that are being
spotted around the planet. It is not coincidental, these effects are all coupled
together.
The historical cold that swept all the way to the East Coast, including the Great
Lakes, is also evidence of coupling events.
They however said, that during this event, the temperature stations were
registering 20 degrees Fahrenheit - much too warm.
Weather fronts from February 9th to 16th.
More plunging cold temperatures are all the way down to southern Mexico this
time. Even Texas, in the middle of the month.
On the 16th, cold also going to sweep through Florida. The leading edge of the
Jetstream can actually be seen, where it's bent in the wrong direction.
The orientation is off on where the Jetstream should be, this is not CO2, it is the
Sun. Here's another glimpse if you’re not yet convinced. As shown, the Jetstream
should be more of a north-south orientation, instead of east-west orientation.
This is exactly what is seen in Europe. The same mix ups of their jet streams,
where extreme heat is against extreme cold in a north-south orientation.
For comparison, I tried putting some of these GFS model on the left, side by side
with the Maunder Minimum temperature reconstruction on the right. According
to over 2000 peer-reviewed studies, changes in temperature and precipitation is
observed during the Maunder Minimum. Can you spot any similarities in terms of
cold in these two images?
Alaska is where the heat is; the Central US and parts of Canada is exactly where
the cold is; a little bit south of Greenland, you get that heat pocket again; right
through the middle of the Arctic is cold; also, North Africa is cold. I mean 90% of
this map from the Maunder Minimum temperature reconstruction matches with
today's 2019 GFS models. Yet no one has even considered to look into the past
and see if there are some similarities that we should be talking about, to protect
our global food source.
If you recall, back in the 1990's, this Global Warming hype first started with
statements like: “We're going to boil like frogs in a pot.” Science was settled back
then too, like they said.
I really don't know how they can they come out with a straight face and tell us
back in the 1990s that science was settled, we are to boil like frogs in a pot, our
kids would never know what snow was and every winter moving forward is going
to get milder and shorter because the summers is going to be longer; and then
just flip everything into: We told you that heat was going to cause record cold.
They never told us anything of this sort, they just flipped the narrative. Science is
never settled. It never was and it will never be.
So I'm wondering what's next. Are they going to say eclipses are caused by CO2
too? Also, if we put a global CO2 tax, can we change the color of the moon back?
Thanks for reading, I hope you got something out of the article. If you like more
information like this, I produce the tri-weekly Mini Ice Age Conversations podcast,
30 minutes of an in depth analysis on the GSM you can take on the go.
***Mini Ice Age Conversations Podcast***
iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/a...
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/adapt-2030
Libsyn: http://adapt2030.libsyn.com/
For the bi-weekly Grand Solar Minimum climate update newsletter from myself,
David DuByne, (ADAPT 2030) jump over to oilseedcrops.org you can enter your
email and sign up. Move your mouse around for about 10 seconds and this box
will pop up.
Join ADAPT 2030 NEWSLETTER http://www.oilseedcrops.org
***Support ADAPT 2030 by Visiting Our Sponsors***
ADAPT 2030 & My Patriot Supply
2-Week Food Supply 92 servings
www.preparewithadapt2030.com
Taking the Fear Out of Difficult Situations ADAPT 2030 True Leaf Market Link
ADAPT 2030 Amazon Grand Solar Minimum Book Store
https://www.amazon.com/shop/adapt2030
Today’s Story Links
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/02022018/cold-weather-polar-vortex-
jet-stream-explained-global-warming-arctic-ice-climate-change
Tim Ball: In Climate Propaganda, Normal Is Promoted As Abnormal
https://www.technocracy.news/tim-ball-in-climate-propaganda-normal-is-
promoted-as-abnormal/
Global Temperature models
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=us&p
kg=T2ma&runtime=2019021006&fh=-72
smAsho mAsh Channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz6fIPEhT2I71lAA112krnA
*** ADAPT 2030 Social Media Links ***
PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/adapt2030
YOUTUBE ADAPT 2030 Mini Ice Age 2015–2035 Series on YouTube
BITCHUTE https://www.bitchute.com/hashtag/adap...
BRIGHTEON https://www.brighteon.com/channel/adapt2030
STEEM https://steemit.com/@adapt2030
MINDS https://minds.com/ADAPT2030
MEDIUM : https://medium.com/@globalcooling
FB https://www.facebook.com/Miniiceage
TWITTER : https://twitter.com/adapt2030
GAB https://gab.ai/adapt2030
STEEM: https://steemit.com/@adapt2030