global environment outlook 5 for local government: solving global problems locally
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
1/36
authorities
en
v i r onm
en
t
w e t l a n
d
l i f e s t y
l e
p o p u
l a t i o n
c on
s um
p t i on
pr o
d u c t i on
t r an
s p or t
car
t r ai n
metrodrain
c l e an
w a t er
s ani t a
t i on
h o u s
i n g
s l um
i n f o r m a
l
b i o
d i v e r s
i t y
a t m o s ph
e
r e
c h emi c a
l s
waste
c ar b on
d i ox i d
e
ni t r o
g en
s u l ph
ur
e m
i s s
i o n s
c l i m a t e
w e a t h er
rain
o o d
f o o
d
m ar k e
t
f am
i n e
tree
gr a
s s
m e a t
global
c h a l l en
g e
p l a n e t
p e o p l e
s u s t ai n
a b l e
d e v e
l o p m e n t
p u
b l i c
p r i v a t e
c o o p e r a t i o n
town
c i t y
u r b a n
g l o b
a l
r e gi on
a l
g o v er nm
en
t
local
c o l l a b or a
t i on
action
g en
er a
t i on
men
w om
en
youth
future
h o p e
p o s
i t i v e
plenty
port
s h i p
pi n
g
i n t er n
a t i on
a l
goals
target
a s s e s s m en
t
a g r e e m e n t
c a s e s t u d y
trend
m e t r i c
i n d i c a
t or
l an
d
b ui l d i n g
a i r
- c o n d
i t i o n
i n g
p o w er
en
er g
y
r e n e w a
b l e
solar
e c o s y s t em
h a
b i t a t
n a t u r e
e c o
l o g
i c a
l
f o o t pr i n
t
infra
G r e
en
e c on
om
y g a r d e n
R i o + 2 0perature
i n t e r n a t i o n a
l
c h a n g e
s e a
l e v e
l
c o a
s t a
l
s
h i n g
c o r a
lmoney
use
Rio
gas bio
tin
bin
PES
GEO
risk
forces s
l u m p
e c o n o m
i c s
s t o c k
slight
o u r i s
h
f a
i r
e q u
i t y
e q u a
l
j u s t i c e
c o u r t
s e t t
l e m e n t
c o m m u n
i t y
v i l l a g e
c l o s ef ar
reach e s t u a r y
h a r b o u r
e
l d
p a r k
c o n s e r v e
p r e s e r v e
p r u
d e n t
time
Africa
Asia
EuropeAmerica
oil
well
p i p e
pole
line
l o o p
m o
b i l e
p h o n e
c o m m u n
i c a t e
meet
talk
s h
ar e s
p oi l
i n n o v a t e
i n v en
t
w a l k
b i k
e
s h a r e
s i m
p l e
c om
p l ex
c onf u
s e
d e c
i d e
agre
t o g e t h er
a l o n e
A r c t i c
s o l o
s umm
er
s pr i n
g
f or w
ar d
air
a er o
p l an
e
welcome
t u r b
i n e
cell
gr e
en
c on
s t r u c t
c an
a l
or a
f a un
a
r e s t or e
s t r u c t ur e
m e c h ani s m
t r e a t y
d em
o c r a c y
m e t h o d o l o g
y
f u n
d i n g n
e u t r a
l
b r e e
d
wheat
r i c e
m a
i z e
c o n t i n u u m
h u m a n
i t y
t r u s t
d e n s
i t y
s e r v
i c e s
l a b o u t
help
server e s p on s i b i l i t y
r e c r e a t i o n
services
provisioning
s p i r i t u a
l
r e g u l a t e
ow
en
o u gh
try c l e ar ll
full
creep
suburb
commute
play
safe
a t t e m p t
l i g
h t
shop
brick
sun
suffer
hard
success
achievecohort
movementtrust
b i of u
e l
for local governmentsolving global problems locally
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
2/36
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
3/36
authorities
en
v i r onm
en
t
w e t l a n
d
l i f e s t y
l e
p o p u
l a t i o n
c on
s um
p t i on
pr o
d u c t i on
t r an
s p or t
car
t r ai n
metrodrain
c l e an
w a t er
s ani t a
t i on
h o u s
i n g
s l um
i n f o r m a
l
b i o
d i v e r s
i t y
a t m o s ph
er
e
c h emi c a
l s
waste
c ar b on
d i ox i d
e
ni t r o
g en
s u l ph
ur
e m
i s s
i o n s
c l i m a t e
w e a t h er
rain
o o d
f o o
d
m ar k e
t
f am
i n e
tree
gr a
s s
m e a t
global
c h a l l en
g e
p l a n e t
p e o p l e
s u s t ai n
a b l e
d e v e
l o p m
e n t
p u
b l i c
p r i v a t e
c o o p e r a t i o n
town
c i t y
u r b a n
g l o b
a l
r e gi on
a l
g o v er nm
en
t
local
c o l l a b or a
t i on
action
g en
er a
t i on
men
w om
en
youth
future
h o p e
p o s
i t i v e
plenty
port
s h i p
pi n
g
i n t er n
a t i on
a l
goals
target
a s s e s s m en
t
a g r e e m e n t
c a s e s t u d y
trend
m e t r i c
i n d i c a
t or
l an
d
b ui l d i n g
a i r
- c o n d
i t i o n
i n g
p o w er
en
er g
y
r e n e w a
b l e
solar
e c o s y s t em
h a
b i t a t
n a t u r e
e c o
l o g
i c a
l
f o o t pr i n
t
infra
G r e
en
e c on
om
y g a r d e n
R i o + 2 0perature
i n t e r n a t i o n a
l
c h a n g e
s e a
l e v e
l
c o a
s t a
l
s
h i n g
c o r a
lmoney
use
Rio
gas bio
tin
bin
PES
GEO
risk
forces s
l u m p
e c o n o m
i c s
s t o c k
slight
o u r i s
h
f a
i r
e q u
i t y
e q u a
l
j u s t i c e
c o u r t
s e t t
l e m e n t
c o m m u n
i t y
v i l l a g e
c l o s ef ar
reach e s t u a r y
h a r b o u r
e
l d
p a r k
c o n s e r v e
p r e s e r v e
p r u
d e n t
time
Africa
Asia
EuropeAmerica
oil
well
p i p e
pole
line
l o o p
m o
b i l e
p h o n e
c o m m u n
i c a t e
meet
talk
s h
ar e s
p oi l
i n n o v a t e
i n v en
t
w a l k
b i k
e
s h a r e
s i m
p l e
c om
p l ex
c onf u
s e
d e c
i d e
agre
t o g e t h er
a l o n e
A r c t i c
s o l o
s umm
er
s pr i n
g
f or w
ar d
air
a er o
p l an
e
welcome
t u r b
i n e
cell
gr e
en
c on
s t r u c t
c an
a l
or a
f a un
a
r e s t or e
s t r u c t ur e
m e c h ani s m
t r e a t y
d em
o c r a c y
m e t h o d o l o g
y
f u n
d i n g n
e u t r a
l
b r e e
d
wheat
r i c e
m a
i z e
c o n t i n u u m
h u m a n
i t y
t r u s t
d e n s
i t y
s e r v
i c e s
l a b o u t
help
server e s p on s i b i l i t y
r e c r e a t i o n
services
provisioning
s p i r i t u a
l
r e g u l a t e
ow
en
o u gh
try c l e ar ll
full
creep
suburb
commute
play
safe
a t t e m p t
l i g
h t
shop
brick
sun
suffer
hard
success
achievecohort
movementtrust
b i of u
e l
for local governmentsolving global problems locally
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
4/36
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
UNEP promotesenvironmentally sound practices,globally and in its own activities.
This publication is printed on chlorine-and acid-free paper made from wood pulp
from sustainably managed forestsusing vegetable-based inks and other eco-
friendly practices. Our printing anddistribution policy aims to reduce
UNEPs carbon footprint.
First published in June 2012 by the United NationsEnvironment Programme
2012, United Nations Environment Programme
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part andin any form for educational or nonprot services withoutspecial permission from the copyright holder, providedacknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP wouldappreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses thispublication as a source.
No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations EnvironmentProgramme. Applications for such permission, with astatement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction,should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box
30551, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Mention of a commercial company or product in thispublication does not imply endorsement by UNEP or ICLEI.The use of information from this publication concerningproprietary products for publicity or advertising is notpermitted.
DISCLAIMERThe designations employed and the presentations do notimply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on thepart of UNEP, ICLEI or contributory organizations, editorsor publishers concerning the legal status of any country,territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning thedelimitation of its frontiers or boundaries or the designationof its name of allegiances, are therefore not legal des -criptions or any representation of an official UN position.For general guidance on matters relating to the use of mapsin publications please go to: http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/english/9710474e.htm
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Core st u dy tea m : Richard Simpson; Shay Kelleher;Monika Zimmermann; Susanne Salz, ICLEI World Secretariat;and Neeyati Patel, UNEP
The study team acknowledges the support of: the ICLEI regional offices, especially ICLEI Africa
Secretariat, ICLEI European Secretariat, and ICLEIOceania;
the UNEP Regional Coordinators in Africa, Asiaand the Pacic, Europe, Latin America and theCaribbean, and West Asia;
Nick Nuttall, Marcus Lee, Fatoumata Keita-Ouane,Matthew Billot, Amr Elsammak, Peter King andBryan Coll;
the team in GRID Arendal.
Editorial and design: Helen de Mattos and Bart UllsteinPrinted in the UK by Swaingrove
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
5/36
1
The planet and its people are accelerating towards a soberingand largely unsustainable future; a conclusion reached by thefth Global Environment Outlook ( GEO-5 ) an international
assessment coordinated by UNEP. A sharp and decisive turntowards a Green Economy has to occur.
Of 90 key goals set by the international community over thepast decades and assessed in GEO-5 , only in four of them cansignicant progress be shown, for example the phase-out of lead in petrol. No progress has been made towards achieving24 of the goals, including adequately addressing dwindlingsh stocks and the intensication of droughts.
If global and regional environmental trends continue, they willhave signicant adverse implications for human well-being.Local governments already experience many environmental
strains at the local level, along with pressures from localcommunities and businesses. In the absence of strong inter -national action, their responses represent beacons of hope and many of their efforts are decades old. For example, climatechange was a focal point for local action even before theintroduction of international climate mechanisms.
This GEO-5 companion report for local authorities, prepared byICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability in collaborationwith UNEP, highlights that the world is rich in local policies,initiatives and projects. These are rapidly evolving andbecoming ever more sophisticated and integrated. Localinitiatives offer possible pathways for tackling envi ronmentalchallenges and reaching international targets.
This joint ICLEI and UNEP report underlines that many of theseinitiatives have been envisioned and enacted by localauthorities in the worlds cities and towns, where today over half the global population resides. Their actions representa body of accomplishments that can illuminate the path tothe future we want.
The ndings and case studies also offer signposts towardsa set of possible sustainable development goals post- 2015 .The action of local authorities for a sustainable 21st century
already unites developed and developing countries in termsof sharing and evolving experiences through global networkssuch as ICLEI. Take the city of Windhoek in Namibia, for
example, where policies and strategies are under way to better manage water supplies to meet the needs of a growingpopulation, or Cape Town, where biodiversity assets areprotected by innovative mapping and planning.
A public-private partnership in Pangkalpinang, Indonesia, hastransformed an old tin-mining area into a botanical gardenwith important new ecological services including water supplies to local communities.
Tokyo the worlds largest metropolitan area has developeda Cap and Trade system in addition to a Green Buildingsprogramme to reduce carbon emissions by a quarter by 2020
compared to 2000 levels. Among many actions, the Germancity of Bonn promotes the purchase of sustainable goods andservices, thereby acting as a catalyst for the greening of supplychains far beyond the city limits.
Bogota in Colombia has pioneered creative and integratedland-use planning and is internationally known for its bus rapidtransit system. It has also placed the city within the regionalecosystem of surrounding landscapes and settlements.
If a fresh and innovative future is to be charted, then we needall hands on deck, including governments, multilateralinstitutions, companies and citizens. Without sustainablecities, only a partial transition can be possible.
Local authorities, including regional and provincial govern -ments, are already demonstrating that paradigm shifts andradical changes are both possible and benecial. Worldleaders can build upon these examples and achievements atthe Rio+20 Summit to replicate them and scale them uptowards more ambitious action and targets. The opportunityfor world leaders at Rio+ 20 is to accelerate action and turnsustainable development from patchy implementation intoa reality for 7 billion people, rising to more than 9 billionby 2050 .
Forew ord
FOREWORD
Konrad Otto-ZimmermannSecretary GeneralICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability
Achim Steiner United Nations Under-Secretary-GeneralUNEP Executive Director
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
6/36
Global Environment Outlook (GEO) is UNEPs consultative,participatory assessment process reporting on the state,trends and outlook of the global environment, and drawing on
the expertise of close to 300 scientic and policy experts. Theprocess has two other important functions: to provide policyoptions to inform environmental decision making, thusfacilitating the interaction between science and policy, andto build capacity for conducting integrated environmentalassess ments amongst a wide variety of regional and nationalorganizations and individuals around the world.
GEO uses the DPSIR framework drivers, pressures, states,impacts, responses for assessing the state and trends of theenvironment and seeks to answer the following questions:
What is happening to the environment and why( pressure and state )?
What are the consequences of a changed envi -
ronment ( impact )? What can be done at regional and national levels andhow can internationally agreed goals and targets beachieved ( response )?
GEO-5, the latest in the GEO series, released in June 2012 ,provides an assessment of the state and trends of the globalenvironment in relation to internationally agreed goals;evaluates the gaps and barriers in their implementation; andprovides policy options that have the potential to speed-uprealization of these goals.
2
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
The GEO-5 for Local Authorities report has been developedby ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability in col la-boration with UNEP, and draws on the ndings of GEO-5 .The report shows that pressures on the global environmentaffect the local level. Conversely, local decisions andresponses can not only improve local conditions, but alsosignicantly contribute to improving the state of the global
environment. By placing global and regional environmentalchallenges in the context of local policy making, the reportaims to make the ndings of GEO-5 more relevant for localgovernance. The report highlights the role that local autho -rities can play in meeting internationally agreed goals andtargets and in addressing local, regional and global envi -ronmental challenges.
INTRODUCTION TOGEO- 5
PURPOSE OF GEO- 5 for Local Authorities
Kevin G Smith/Alaska Stock/Specialist Stock
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
7/36
The challe n gesUnp recede n ted cha n ges are affecti n g hum an w ell-bei n g GEO-5 shows that currently observed alterations in the
Earth System are unprecedented. While efforts to slow therate and extent of change including measures to enhanceresource efficiency and mitigate the effects of climate change have been moderately successful, they have not managedto halt or reverse adverse environmental shifts. With humanpressures on the Earth System accelerating, humanity haseither exceeded or is approaching several global, regionaland local environmental thresholds. Once these have beenpassed, abrupt and possibly irreversible changes in the life-support functions of the planet are likely to occur, withsignicant adverse implications for human well-being.For instance:
The escalating frequency and severity of climate
events, such as oods and droughts, affects bothnatural assets and human security.
Accelerating temperature change and sea level riseare affecting the social cohesion of many com -munities including indigenous and local ones, withsea level rise posing a threat to natural assets andfood security in some places.
Substantial biodiversity loss and the on-goingextinction of species, including the collapse of anumber of sheries and the loss of species used for medicinal purposes, are affecting the provision of ecosystem services.
Multiple and interacting factors, such as droughtscombined with socio-economic pressures, are affect -ing human security.
In ter n atio n ally agreed goals ha ve on ly p artl y bee n m etA large number of internationally agreed goals are in place toaddress environmental challenges. Despite this, GEO-5 saysthat the international community has made uneven progressin achieving these goals and improving the state of theenvironment. Indeed the trends of environmental deter io-ration identied in GEO-5 demonstrate that much still needsto be done with respect to internationally agreed goals.
The cu rren t p olic y focu sGEO-5 observes that policy is largely focused on addressingthe pressures or symptoms of change rather than the under -lying drivers or root causes. Population growth and economicdevelopment are seen as the drivers of global environmentalchange, with particular facets exerting pressure: energy,transport, urbanization and globalization.
Understanding the growth of these drivers and the connectionsbetween them will go a long way to addressing their collective
impact on the Earth System and in nding possible solutions,thereby preserving the environmental benets on which allhuman societies and economies depend.
Op tion s for actio n Scali n g up p rom isin g p olicies regio n al an d local e x amp lesGEO-5 s regional analysis identies promising policy res -ponses and instruments, based on best practice, that havebeen adopted successfully in one or more regions and thathave the potential to speed up achievement of internationallyagreed goals. These were found to be successful, in part, dueto their enabling environment or local context. Table 1 onthe following pages provides examples from GEO-5 , whichICLEI then builds on, highlighting related case studies of innovative local government action.
3
The global p ers p ecti ve
THE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE
Shehzad Noorani/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
8/36
Table 1 Policy responses and instruments successfully adopted in one or more regions
GEO- 5 area Policy responses/instruments Featured local government policyof focus identied in GEO- 5 examples
4
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
Clim ate cha n ge Removing perverse/environmentallyharmful subsidies, especially on fossilfuels.
Carbon taxes. Forestry incentives for carbon
sequestration. Emission trading schemes. Climate insurance. Capacity building and nance. Climate change preparedness and
adaptation such as climate proonginfrastructure.
EThekwini (Durban), South Africa:integrating adaptation planning into ageneral planning and developmentframework, cemented by institutionalprogramming.
Sofala Province, Mozambique: a pilotproject in the voluntary carbon market.
Tokyo, Japan: Green Building and Cap andTrade programmes to reduce carbonemissions and enhance energy efficiencyin buildings.
Veracruz State, Mexico: the VeracruzProgramme on Climate Change and theState Law on Mitigation and Adaptation toClimate Change Effects promote actionto address climate change and protectvulnerable groups.
New York City, United States: theAssessment and Action Plan is one outputof the Climate Change Task Force to addressthe impact of climate change on water.
Masdar, United Arab Emirates: carbon-neutral city development plan.
Env ironm en talgover n an ce
Multi-level/multi-stakeholder participation.
Increased introduction of the principleof subsidiarity.
Governance at local levels. Policy synergy and removal of conict. Strategic environmental assessment. Accounting systems that value natural
capital and ecosystem services. Improved access to information, public
participation and environmental justice.
Capacity strengthening of all actors. Improved goal setting and monitoring
systems.
Rizhao, China: implementation of an eco-city building plan substantially reducesemissions.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
9/36
Table 1 Policy responses and instruments successfully adopted in one or more regions (contd.)
GEO- 5 area Policy responses/instruments Featured local government policyof focus identied in GEO- 5 examples
5
The global p ers p ecti ve
Lan d Integrated watershed (catchment)management.
Smart growth in cities. Protecting prime agricultural land and
open space. No-till, integrated pest management
and/or organic agriculture. Improved forest management. Payment for ecosystem services (PES)
and Reducing Emissions fromDeforestation and Forest Degradation(REDD+).
Agroforestry and silvo-pastoralpractices.
Pangkalpinang, Indonesia: a public-private partnership with the BangkaBotanical Garden that reclaims landspoilt by mining.
Curitiba, Brazil: through its integratedurban planning and transport policy,Curitiba has prevented urban sprawl andenabled more sustainable urbandevelopment.
Portland, United States: inll, retrots andbrowneld development prevent urbansprawl and land degradation.
En erg y Increased international cooperation inthe transfer and application of energy-saving technologies.
Promotion of energy efficiency. Increased use of renewable energy. Feed-in tariffs. Restriction on fossil-fuel subsidies. Low-emission zones within cities. Research and development, especially
on batteries and other forms of energystorage.
San Jose, California, United States: a greenbuilding policy to reduce energy and water consumption in new residential,commercial and industrial constructionprojects.
Stockholm, Sweden: a low-emission zone.
Air qu alit y Air quality guidelines such as those of the World Health Organization.
National air quality standards.
European Union directives for air quality,vehicles, stationary sources and nationalemissions.
Stockholm, Sweden: a low-emission zone. Bogota, Colombia: urban planning and
transport. Curitiba, Brazil: urban planning and
transport.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
10/36
Table 1 Policy responses and instruments successfully adopted in one or more regions (contd.)
GEO- 5 area Policy responses/instruments Featured local government policyof focus identied in GEO- 5 examples
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
6
Fresh w ater Integrated water resourcesmanagement.
Conservation and sustainable use of wetlands.
P romotion of water-use efficiency. W ater metering and volume-based
tariffs implemented at a national or sub-national level.
Recognizing safe drinking water andsanitation as a basic human right/need.
Effluent charges.
Windhoek, Namibia: protecting water sourcesfrom environmental damage caused by agrowing informal settlement adjacent to a dam.
Stirling, Australia: smart use of water in parksto reduce overall water use and associatednancial costs.
Iloilo, Philippines: rehabilitating, protectingand developing the Iloilo River.
Lima, Peru: reusing wastewater for irrigationto reduce the use of groundwater.
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: developing
integrated coastal zone management to protectthe coastal landscape and its ecosystems.
Tel Aviv, Israel: soil aquifer treatment of wastewater for agricultural irrigation.
Biodiversit y Market-based instruments for ecosystem services, includingpayment for ecosystem services (PES)and Reducing Emissions fromDeforestation and Forest Degradation(REDD+).
Increasing the extent of protectedareas.
S ustainable management of protected areas.
T ransboundary, biodiversity andwildlife corridors.
Community-based participation andmanagement.
Sustainable agricultural practices.
Cape Town, South Africa: advanced tools toensure that biodiversity conservation is anintegral part of sustainable urban planningand development.
Trang, Thailand: assessing and includingbiodiversity in planning and plans.
Bonn, Germany: establishing a favourableframework for biodiversity.
Ocea n s a n dseas
Integrated coastal zone management(ridge-to-reef).
M arine protected areas. Economic instruments such as
user fees.
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: applyingintegrated coastal zone management byestablishing urban development boundaries,setting aside critical areas and designatingnon-development zones, protecting coastallandscapes and other sites of value byredirecting development, and preventinghabitat fragmentation.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
11/36
Table 1 Policy responses and instruments successfully adopted in one or more regions (contd.)
GEO- 5 area Policy responses/instruments Featured local government policyof focus identied in GEO- 5 examples
7
Chem icals a n dw aste
Registration of chemicals. Extended producer responsibility. Product redesign (design for the
environment). Life-cycle analysis. Reduce, reuse and recycle ( 3Rs) and
cleaner production. National and regional hazardous
waste treatment systems. Control of inappropriate export and
import of hazardous chemicals and
waste.
Reykjavik, Iceland: application of environmental criteria as a requirementin the procurement process for cleaningcontracts.
The global p ers p ecti ve
Paul Harrison/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
12/36
Imp rovin g local co n ditio n s w ith global be n etsThe role of local go ver nm en ts
The actions of local governments can cumulatively havepositive global impacts, but they remain the level of gover -nance closest to citizens, and must address the manyand often competing requirements of local stakeholders.Often, they respond to existing and foreseen environmentalchallenges, for example community complaints about local air pollution or economic concerns over losses incurred by oods.However, such concerns can also come from the growingenvironmental awareness of citizens regarding climate changeand its negative impacts on individuals, communities andeconomic activities.
As part of its jurisdictional responsibility and in response toidentied needs, a well-functioning local government pro videsappropriate framework conditions and incentives, moderates,
stimulates ideas, innovates and provides examples to makecontinuous local improvements and mitigate negative local
change. A local governments proximity to local needs, localstake holders and local realities makes it better equippedthan any other government level to determine the local path -way to sustainability.
Local government can drive local policies and processes toaddress climate change, air pollution, biodiversity loss, landdegradation, water dynamics and chemical and waste issues,among others. In consultation and cooperation with stake -holders, there are several approaches that local govern mentscan use to move towards environmental sustainability(Box 1 ).
Table 2 further illustrates, with examples, how internat ionallyagreed commitments can be met through local action.
8
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
REGIONAL AND LOCAL REALITIES
Florian Buettner/VISUM/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
Improving municipal operations by introducing sustain -able procurement, energy-efficient public buildings, etc.
Enabling others by encouraging voluntary action, actingas a role model, providing information, etc.
Improving public utilities and infrastructure by in -creasing resource efficiency in utilities and manage -ment of infrastructure such as transport, changing theenergy matrix, improving waste management, invest ingin green area preservation, etc.
Using the legal and jurisdictional mandate to provide aregulatory framework of building codes, planning andland-use planning, development strategies, etc., andensuring their monitoring and enforcement.
Setting targets and measurable outcomes backed up bybaseline information, data collection, etc.
Conducting environmental impact assessments andstra tegic environmental assessments (EIAs and SEAs)of development plans, programmes and policies.
Public participation/consultation, particularly in spatialplanning exercises.
Data collection and monitoring for informed decision-making.
Access to environmental information and justice. Rewarding innovation and sustainability. Amendment of higher-tier governance acts and stat -
utory reforms to enable local innovation. Setting appropriate local legislative and institu tional
frameworks.
Sou rce: Marti n ot et al. ; Bu lkel y an d Ker n
Box 1 Local government action for sustainability
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
13/36
Table 2 International goals and local action
Goals and targets Internationally agreed goals/ Examples of contributionsassessed in GEO- 5 agreements/commitments or from local government
obligations assessed in GEO- 5
Land
Atmosphere
Regional and local realities
9
Reduce desertication,soil erosion anddeforestation
Reduce hunger
World Food Summit Plan of ActionParagraph 33g (FAO1996 )
Agenda 21 Chapter 11 .12a(UNCED1992 )
United Nations Convention toCombat Desertication (UNCCD1994 )
Millennium Development Goal(MDG)1 (UN2000 )
Local governments play a key role indevelopment planning and urban expansion,thus affecting land-use change. This isevident from examples around the world,where planning, land-use zoning and other administrative functions play a key role indirecting urban development. Localgovernments also inuence the use of ecosystem services, which, amongst other functions, provide food and local livelihoods(TEEB2010 ); and contribute to MDGs 1, 3, 4 ,5 and 7. Examples include the FAOs Food for Cities programme (FAO 2012 ). By managingecosystems sustainably, local governmentscan tackle land degradation while alsodealing with the impacts of climate changeand addressing biodiversity loss at its source.
Limit temperatureincrease to less than2C above pre-industrial levels andreduce anthropogenicclimate change
Reduce air pollution
Promoteenvironmentally soundprojects
United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change(UNFCCC1992 )
Convention on Long-Range
Transboundary Air Pollution(CLRTAP) (UNECE1979 ); WHO( 2006 )
Johannesburg Plan of Implementation (JPOI)Paragraph 9a (WSSD 2002 )
Advisory Group on Energy andClimate Change (AGECC2010 )
Contributions are illustrated by the multipleactions taken by local governments tomitigate and adapt to climate change. Theseare expressed in declarations andcommitments such as the Mexico City Pact(ICLEI2012 a) and Durban Climate ChangeAdaptation Charter (ICLEI 2011 a); targets (CityClimate Catalogue) (ICLEI 2012 a); and
measurable actions (carbon in the CitiesClimate Registry) (ICLEI2012 a).
Local governments show progress in theabsence of a clear and ambitious internationalpost- 2012 climate framework. At UNFCCCCOP16 in Cancun, local and sub-nationalgovernments were recognized as governmentalstakeholders within the global climate regime,in recognition of the global climate advocacyof local governments over two decades.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
14/36
Table 2 International goals and local action (contd.)
Goals and targets Internationally agreed goals/ Examples of contributionsassessed in GEO- 5 agreements/commitments or from local government
obligations assessed in GEO- 5
Sustain resources JPOI Paragraph 26and quality
Universal access MDG 7
Reduce pressure on Convention on Biological The role of local governments has beenbiodiversity; promote Diversity (CBD 1992 ) recognized by the CBD. At its COP 10 inconservation Nagoya, Japan, Parties adopted the Plan
of Action on Sub-national Governments,Cities and other Local Authorities and Biodiversity 2011 2020 (CBD 2010 ). At CBDCOP9 in Bonn, Germany, Decision IX/ 28 wastaken, which rst recognized the critical rolethat cities and local authorities play in theimplementation of the CBD objectives.COP10 advanced on that by providingguidelines that national governments canfollow in order to support local authoritiestowards the mutually benecial goal of achieving the objectives of the CBD(ICLEI2012 a, 2012 b, 2012 c, 2012 d).
Biodiversity
Water
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
10
Local governments are often directproviders of water as well as large water consumers. They develop, regulate, investin, inform and set framework conditions.Effective local-level planning andmanagement can lower the cost of water andsanitation infrastructure. Local governmentshave also made commitments known as the
Lisbon Principles. The Local GovernmentWater Code is a global call for action toresolve pressing and difficult water management situations by carefullyconsidering the moral and ethical dimensionsof decisions on day-to-day water resourcesmanagement (IWA et al. 2012 ). Also seethe ICLEI guide on JPOI and the MDGs(ICLEI2004 ), focusing on water, sanitationand human settlements.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
15/36
Table 2 International goals and local action (contd.)
Goals and targets Internationally agreed goals/ Examples of contributionsassessed in GEO- 5 agreements/commitments or from local government
obligations assessed in GEO- 5
Reduce chemical JPOI Paragraph 23 Local governments and are often directpollution to protect providers of waste management systemshuman health and as well as large producers of waste.the environment Waste management systems are being
pursued in ways that mitigate greenhouseMinimize waste and JPOI Paragraph 23 gas emissions. Through green procurementimprove waste disposal criteria and strategies and using their and recycling purchasing and investment power,
local governments can inuence theamount of chemicals used and limit thewaste produced at source.
Chemicals and wastes
Regional and local realities
11
Shehzad Noorani/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
16/36
THE EXAMPLE OF URBANIZATION
Am ajor dri ver of cha n geThe previous pages provide numerous examples of bestpractice at all levels, available to address key environmental
challenges and realize internationally agreed goals. Thissection aims to use one single example of a driver of environmental change urbanization to show not only thechal lenges faced, but examples of excellent initiatives thatare being implemented at the local level to address them.
Urbanization, from small towns to mega-cities, is identiedin GEO-5 as a key driver of environmental change. Urban areasof fewer than 500 000 inhabitants house the majority of urban dwellers (Figure 1 ). While cities cover just 12 per centof the Earths land surface (Schneider et al. 2009 ) andgenerate the majority of global GDP (Roxburgh et al. 2011) ,they produce 70 80 per cent of total green house gas
emissions (UNEP 2012 ).
Clearly, urban decision making has a profound impact on thestate of the environment and this will increase in importanceas a projected 66 per cent of the world pop ulation will beliving in urban areas by 2020 (Figure 2 ).
Env ironm en tal challe n gesThe emergence of environmental risks associated withunmanaged urbanization is often an incremental process withparticular challenges for local governments. Whatever theurban form and density, a lack of adequate planning exacer -bates the environmental problems that rapid urbanizationcauses. Particular challenges include: Climate change: risks from sea level rise, ooding and
hydro-meteorological disasters as well as impacts on foodsecurity, health and the spread of disease; heat islandeffects; water scarcity and threats to water quality due to alack of sani tation and waste treatment.
Energy security: urban economies high dependency onsecure energy provision; under-recognized urgency of reducing energy demand through higher efficiency andof decoupling energy production from centralized and high-risk sources (Figure 3 ).
Water and sanitation: as cities expand, demand increases,groundwater sources dry up, surface water sources recede,and untreated wastewater pollutes scarce freshwater andposes serious health risks.
Ecosystems and biodiversity: expanding cities degrade,fragment and pollute environmental and urban habitats,impoverishing ecosystem services within urban areas andthe hinterland on which they depend.
Chemicals and waste: risks to human health and qualityof life as a result of ever-increasing waste generation andinadequate disposal.
12
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
0
Urban population , %
10 20 30 4 0 50 60
10 millionor more
51 0 mil lion
City size
15 million
0.51 million
Fewer th a n0.5 million
Figure 1 Urban population by city size
1950 1970 1990 2000 2010 20200
1
2
3
4
5 Africa Asia Europe
Number of people, billion
Latin America and the Caribbean North America Oceania
0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000
2006
2015
2030
Global total
Global total
Global total
Cities 67 % of total
Cities 73 % of total
Cities 69 % of total
Million tonnes oil-equivalent
Figure 3 World primary energy demand in cities
Figure 2 Total urban population by region
Source: UNEP 2012
Source: UN 2007
Source: OECD/IEA2008
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
17/36
13
Case st u dies
Wladimir Bulgar/zoonar.de/Specialist Stock
CASE STUDIES
Local res p on sesLocal environmental governance and urban-based initiativesare extremely important in protecting ecosystems, improving
climate-change mitigation and adaptation measures and
ensuring effective water and waste management. Through suchactivities, local governments can contribute substan tially tomeeting national and global environmental challenges, as
shown by the case studies on the following pages.
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
18/36
14
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
AFRICAWin dhoek, Na m ibia: Protecti n g w ater s upp ly from the Go rea n gab Da m
In the late 1990 s, faced with increasing environ mental
degradation resulting from a burgeoning informalsettlement adjacent to the Goreangab Dam, WindhoekCity Council used a Local Agenda 21 planning process todevelop an environ mental management plan aimed atreducing pollution, protecting a valuable water supplyand preventing further environmental damage. The planincluded a commitment to improve the physical infra -structure and to establish a wide-ranging environ mentalpublic awareness campaign.
Through the Incentive Grants Project (IGP), the counciltook a leading role, building on the previous work of theGoreangab Action Committee (GAC). Plans were based
on an environmental impact assessment (EIA) which wasshared with local communities, particularly in GreenwellMatango. The EIA resulted in:
establishing surface aquaponics on the lake -
shore and reed beds at a nearby water reclamationplant both the reeds and the aquaponics cropsare harvested and used by the community togenerate income;
upgrading public lavatories in the informalsettlement;
installing household lavatories and connectingthem to the water and sewer systems.
These actions were the beginning of a process that aimedto protect the citys water supply in conjunction withthree other dams, the Goreangab Dam supplies 70 per centof this. Combined public involvement and a commitment
to infrastructure improvements have protected a valuablewater source.
Sou rce: ICLEI
EThek w in i, So u th Africa: Cli m ate ada p tatio n
EThekwini municipality, also known as Durban, is apioneering African example of how adaptation planning canbe integrated into the general planning and developmentframework. Risk and disaster management frameworkshave been developed and are being implemented as partof the phased Municipal Climate Protection Programme(MCPP) initiated in 2004 . This provides the institutionalbasis for the city to build resilience, reduce risks for
vulnerable groups, and prepare for the negative impacts of climate change on the municipality.
There are three key components to MCPP: municipaladaptation to ensure the integration of key activities intorelevant line functions; community-based adaptationfocused on building capacity; and a series of interventionsfocused on urban management challenges such as the
Jeremy Jowell/Majority World/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
19/36
15
Case st u dies
AFRICAEThek w in i, So u th Africa: Cli m ate ada p tatio n (contd.)
urban heat-island effect and sea level rise. The MCPP hasbeen developed over time through the following phases:
Phase 1 Impact Assessment: The Climatic Future for Durban Report ( 2006 ) assessed the localimpacts of climate change and proposed pos -sible adaptation and mitigation responses.
Phase 2 Adaptation Planning: A Headline ClimateChange Adaptation Strategy (HCCAS) ( 2006 ) high-lighted some key interventions for successfuladaptation. This has been, and con tinues to be,extended through various adap tation initiativesincluding reforestation projects, sea level risemodelling, community adaptation plans and thedevelopment and implementation of municipal
adaptation plans for the water, health anddisaster management sectors.
Phase 3 Developing the Tool Box: Development
of an integrated assessment tool to enableevaluation and comparison of strategic plansand policies in the context of climate change.
Phase 4 Mainstreaming: Initiatives have inclu -ded the integration of climate change consider -ations into city planning and development bythe creation of a Climate Protection Branchwithin the Environmental Planning and ClimateProtection Department (EPCPD) and the estab -lishment of an Energy Office in 2009 . Other interventions have included hosting a carbonneutral 2010 FIFA World Cup and the COP 17 -CMP7 Climate Conference in Durban.
Sou rce: ICLEI e
The City of Cape Town has shown how biodiversity con -servation can become an integral part of sustainableurban planning and development. Cape Towns urbanexpansion has put international biodiversity hotspots atserious risk, and local government efforts have centred onprotecting the landscape and biodiversity by estab lishinga network of ecological corridors (BioNet).
Using GIS technology, BioNet is a transformative initia -tive that prioritizes and links terrestrial areas, water -courses and wetlands through corridors and urban openspace. Using an holistic approach to sustainable urban
development, BioNet provides a tool and approach toprotect the endangered endemic vegetation habitats in alarge and growing city.
The City of Cape Town has revised its conservation plan -ning analysis to ensure that this adequately caters for the potential impacts of climate change. It is also in theprocess of developing a methodology for mappingecosystem services that will result in products to informfuture investment in the citys ecological infrastructure.
Sou rce: ICLEI f
Cap e Town , So u th Africa: Mai n tai n in g u rba n biodi versit y
Sofala Pro vin ce, Moza m biqu e: A p ilot p roject i n the volun tar y carbo n m arket
A voluntary carbon credit project, established in 2003 inSofala Province, has helped reduce poverty in a region thatis still suffering from the impacts of civil war. By late 2009 ,the project included 1 510 farmers who rely on subsistencefarming, wood gathering and hunting. Between 2003 and2009 , carbon credits totalling US$ 1.3 million were sold,corresponding to 156000 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) atan average price of US$ 9.0 per tonne. The farmers, theinitiating company and its local non-prot subsidiary thatundertook project monitor ing and evaluation each receiveda third of the income. The main difficulties revolved aroundmeasuring and evaluating carbon sequestration, including
the establish ment of a baseline and assessing increasesin stocks, as existing satellite data were insufficient.Other challenges related to community management andgovernance. Earnings were reduced by the relatively highcosts of carbon sequestration, at US$ 3.4 per tonne of CO 2,and by an inability to sell all the credits. Nonetheless, theproject increased rural employment from 8.6 per cent to 32per cent, while 73 per cent of households raised commercialcrops compared with 23 per cent previously. There was alsoa measurable increase in literacy and the development of abusiness ethos and skills.
Sou rce: UNEP
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
20/36
16
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
ASIA AND THE PACIFICPan gkal p in an g, In don esia: A pu blic- p rivate p art n ershi p reclai m s s p oilt la n d
Since the Rizhao municipal government began imple -ment ing its Eco-City Building Plan in 2003 , the localenviron ment and extended urban area have sig nicantlyimproved. At the same time, the city has benetedeconomically and the quality of life of its residents hasbeen enhanced.
Between 2006 and 2010 , sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) andchemical-oxygen-demand emis sions fell by almost 24and 19 per cent respectively; the amount of public greenarea per person increased from 10 .5 m2 in 2000 to 19 m2
in 2010 and, over the same period, clean energy useincreased from 70 to 90 per cent. Urban central heatingsystems fuelled by solar energy heat up to 1 million m,reaching 65 per cent of the city area, and solar lighting
systems are widely used in parks and public squares. Dueto using clean forms of energy, the city saves 3.8 billionkilowatt hours of electricity annually, replacing 1.44 milliontonnes of standard coal, thus reducing annual emissionsof CO2 by 3.25 million tonnes, SO 2 by 2.2 million tonnesand dust by 20 000 tonnes.
Twenty-ve of Rizhaos industrial enter prises have so far attained ISO 14001 environ mental manage ment systemcerti cation, and a further 63 companies are cur rentlyunder going the certication process. Rizhaos effortshave been recog nized at both national and inter nationallevels, and the munici pality hopes that other cities willfollow its example.
So u rce: ICLEI g
The Bangka Botanical Garden (BBG) in Indonesias
Pangkalpinang municipality is an innovative exampleof corporate social responsibility that illustrates thepotential of public-private partnerships. The partnershiptransformed an ecologically important area, formerly usedfor tin mining, into a botanical garden. As well as pro -viding recreational oppor tunities to the community, thegarden supplies clean water to the municipality and hasbecome a signicant wildlife habitat. Furthermore, itscreation has led to the develop ment of the Bangka GoesGreen movement.
The owner of BBG was awarded the national Kalpataru
Award, given to outstanding individuals who improve theenvironment. Strong visionary leadership was providedby Djohan Riduan Hasan, owner of PT Donna KembaraJaya, a local rm that initiated the idea. With support fromthe local government, the land reclamation plan grew intoa botani cal garden rich in species diversity. With its imple -mentation came a greater sense of responsibility andinterest in preserving the local environment.
Sou rce: ICLEI b
Rizhao, Chi n a: An eco-cit y p lan
Stirli n g, Au stralia: Water-s m art p arks
This initiative aims to conserve water and has identiedpriority parks for eco- and hydro-zoning, irrigation systemretrots, soil moisture probes and connection to a cen -tralized irrigation system. Reductions in 2009 2010resulted in the city consuming only 84 per cent of its yearly
groundwater allocation, saving more than 840 millionlitres. Overall, in 2009 2010 the council reduced its totalwater use by a quarter of the 2008 2009 total.
Sou rce: ICLEI
Iloilo, Phili pp in es: Iloilo Ri ver rehabilitatio n
Iloilo City has developed a master plan to rehabilitate,protect and develop the Iloilo River by collaborating withmultiple stakeholders and integrating a set of policiesand strategies. The Iloilo River Development Master PlanProject demonstrates how increased public partic ipation,
joint action and the integration of policies and strategiescan result in a shared vision and agenda for restoring theecological balance of the Iloilo River, while developing itseconomic potential.
Sou rce: ICLEI
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
21/36
17
Case st u dies
ASIA AND THE PACIFICTok yo, Ja p an : Red u cin g gree n hou se gas e m issio n thro u gh e n erg y-efficie n t bu ildi n g
Tokyos Green Building and Cap-and-Trade programmes
are progressive initiatives to reduce the carbon footprintof existing and new commercial buildings through energy-efficient building technologies. As Tokyo is the largestmetropolitan area in the world, its example sets a
powerful precedent for urban market instruments for
climate mitigation. The programmes are fundamentalto the municipalitys goal of reducing CO 2 emissions by25 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020 .
Sou rce: ICLEI h
Yuanyuan Xie/zoonar.de/Specialist Stock
Tran g, Thaila n d: S upp orti n g biodi versit y con ser vatio n
Trang has integrated biodiversity conser vation into urbandevelopment planning, high lighting the need for infor -mation on biodiversity and stakeholder involvement. Themunicipality initiated a conservation project at Nam JedKlong ( klong means canal), working with the Klong Nam
Jed Conservation Group, a locally driven organi zation, torestore and conserve the canals ecology. The initiativehas surveyed and assessed biodiversity to support actionplans and policies.
Sou rce: ICLEI
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
22/36
18
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
Christopher Clem Franken/VISUM/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
Stockhol m , Sw ede n : Air qu alit y m an age m en t p olicies i n a low -em issio n zon e
Stockholms low-emission zone was launched in 1996and initially targeted heavy-duty vehicles entering the citycentre. Vehicles complying with Euro 1 standards wereallowed free acess while those more than eight years oldhad to be retrotted or issued a permit. Enforcement wascarried out by police inspections, leading to an overallcompliance rate of around 90 per cent within a fewyears. Actual air pollution concentrations in 2000 weredown by 0.52 per cent for nitrogen oxides and by 0.59per cent for particulate matter compared to the theoreticalvalues calculated for a no-policy situation.Then, in 2007 ,following a successful trial period in 2006 , a variablecongestion tax was launched for vehicles enteringStockholms city centre during working hours on week -days, with vehicles running on electricity and biofuelsbeing exempt.
It was found that: the number of trips and the distance travelled in
the inner city in 2006 decreased by 100 000 per day and 8.5 per cent respectively;
the share of clean vehicles in the private eetincreased from 5 per cent in 2006 to 14 per centin 2008 ;
average pollutant concentrations decreased inthe inner city by 10 per cent for nitrogen oxides,15 per cent for carbon monoxide and 1520 per cent for particulate matter.
Both air-quality management policies were found to beeven more effective if supported by additional measuressuch as green area networks, clean fuels, clean vehicles,extension of public transport and promotion of cycling
EUROPEBonn , Ger m any : A city w ithi n n at u re
Located on the river Rhine, Bonn is in a bio logically diverse
region characterized by the Rhine and Sieg Valleys, andKottenfrots and the Waldville Ennert areas which are partof the Siebengebirge range of hills. Although the city hasexperienced signicant develop ment pressures, it hasestablished a favourable framework for biodiversity andstill exhibits a high level of species and habitat diversity.Bonn is part of ICLEIs Local Action for Biodiversityinitiative and is committed to the ideal of promotingsustainability as a solution through:
ensuring the avoidance of environmentallyharmful materials in municipal construction andmaintenance in its contract awards;
requiring city employees to give adequate
consideration to environmental precautions andsuitable priority to environmental pro tection,since the city serves as a model for emulation andwishes to promote, through its own purchasing,the development and production of environ -mentally friendly product alternatives;
the citys administration only uses recycledpaper, a practice that conserves wood pulp andwood resources and thus helps protect forestsboth locally and globally.
Sou rce: CBD ; ICLEI ; Bonn
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
23/36
19
EUROPEStockhol m , Sw ede n : Air qu alit y m an age m en t p olicies i n a low -em issio n zon e (contd.)
Bologna has experienced signicant increases in car use.In response, with the aim of protecting the historical cityfrom pollution, preserving monuments and improving air quality, the local authority introduced a radical limitedtraffic zone.
In July 1989 the entire historical centre ( 4 .5 km) of Bologna was converted into a controlled access area.The traffic restriction was enforced from 7:00 a.m. to8:00 p.m. for all private cars. Only public transport, electricand residents vehicles are allowed into the zone, withother private car drivers having the option to gain accessby buying a one- or four-day ticket. However, to minimizeprivate car use, only three such tickets are available per driver each month. Commercial delivery companies are
charged a at rate per year, depending on the emissionlevels of their vehicles.
In conjunction with the limited traffic zone, the municipalauthorities have made a strong commitment to makingBologna a bike- and pedestrian-friendly city. Forty-ve
kilometres of sheltered walkways already exist and, mostrecently, the city has established 128 km of clearly markedcycle lanes. Although detailed gures are not yet available,the limited traffic zone has resulted in signicant re duc-tions of pollution as car use has diminished by 25 per cent,protecting the citys physical and culture heritage whilesubstantially improving urban air quality.
Sou rce: ICLEI e; TRANSLAND
Bolog n a, Ital y : A car-free cit y
Case st u dies
and walking. Nonetheless, the congestion tax has been
shown to generate a net social benet of around US$ 95million ( 70 million) per year in the form of shorter andmore reliable travel times, reduced greenhouse gas
emissions, health and environmental benets, greater
traffic safety, increased use of public transport and higher government revenue.Sou rce: UNEP
The Green Cleaning programme in Reykjavik is an out -standing example of sustainable eco-procurement. Asenvironmental criteria are a requirement in the procure -ment process for cleaning contracts, the programmeensures that public cleaning contracts are fullled in a waythat minimizes negative impacts on both the environmentand human health. The results have been impressive:cleaning costs have been halved and the programme has
motivated the market to supply green cleaning products.In two years the market share for eco-labelled cleaningservices in Iceland has grown from less than 10 per centto more than 50 per cent, demonstrating that localgovernments can increase sustainability while simul -taneously reducing public spending.
Sou rce ICLEI i
Reykjavik, Icela n d: S u stai n able p rocu rem en t
Tel Aviv has been using soil aquifer treatment (SAT) for itswastewater for several decades, and the recovered water is used to irrigate agricultural crops in the south of thecountry. However, in response to the aging systemsdrawbacks, a rising population and an increasing needfor land for urban settlement around Tel Avivs periphery,the city has had to nd a more appropriate and compactsolution for its wastewater treatment. Tel Aviv has piloteda modied version of SAT, which not only is more effective
but also uses less land. The short SAT, combined withnano-ltration, was found to remove microorganisms andmicropollutants quickly and effi ciently, producing water of almost drinkable quality, and highly suitable for irrigation. This combination of tech nologies was found tobe superior to the conventional SAT technology in termsof land use and time parameters, and is equivalent interms of water quality.
Sou rce: SWITCH a
Tel Aviv, Israel: Treati n g w aste w ater for re u se u sin g n at u ral s yste m s
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
24/36
20
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEANCu ritiba, Brazil: Co mp act cities i n tegrati n g u rba n p lann in g an d tra n sp ort
Through integrated urban planning and transport policy,Curitiba has prevented urban sprawl and enabled moresustainable urban development. In the 1970 s and1980 s, physical, economic and demographic growth wasrapid and the city became an important industrial andcommercial centre. Urban planning focused on buildingthe city and decentralizing it. From the 1990 s until today,the citys main planning focus has been on sustainabledevelopment and integration of Curitibas metropolitanregion. A master plan and zoning requirements wereprepared by the Instituto de Pesquisa e PlanejamentoUrbano de Curitiba (IPPUC), which was created in 1965 asan independent agency to supervise and implementurban planning.
The result of the strategy which put people at its centreand emphasized integrated planning is that the city hasbecome a showcase of ecological and humane urbanism,
with ongoing improvements over the past 38 years tosocial, economic and environmental conditions for itsresidents. An axis of intense economic activity providesstructured corridors along which the city introduced arapid transit bus system. The rapid transport catchment,which covers 90 per cent of the city, accounts for 45 per cent of daily personal journeys, has reduced traffic con -gestion, en courages high-density development and hasimproved and maintained air quality. The planning policyadditio nally includes stringent zoning requirements thatconsider density, geological constraints, water andwind direction, type of industry, and urban cultural andsocial factors. One benet of Curitibas comprehensiveapproach to urban planning is that, per person, the citysresidents use about 30 per cent less fuel than their counterparts in other Brazilian cities.
Sou rce: Good m an et al. ; ICLEI
Ron Giling/Lineair/Still Pictures/Specialist Stock
Veracr u z State, Me x ico: An in stit u tion al fra m ew ork for cli m ate cha n ge m itigatio n an d ada p tatio n
The State of Veracruz is the rst state in Mexico toimplement a climate change mitigation and adaptationprogramme and has become a beacon for local govern -ments in other developing countries.
Climate change scenarios predict a 100 150 cm increasein sea level by 2100 . The Mexican coast of the Gulf of
Mexico could therefore lose 500 000 hectares of pasture,250 000 hectares of farmland, and 8 000 hectares of existing tropical forest villages. Furthermore, a warmingof 2oC and a reduction in rainfall of around 10 per centare predicted, accompanied by extreme rainfall events andoods in certain areas. These changes will par ticularlyaffect agri cultural production, but also human health and
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
25/36
21
Case st u dies
LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Veracr u z State, Me x ico: An in stit u tion al fra m ew ork for cli m ate cha n ge m itigatio n an d ada p tatio n (contd.)
Bogot, Colo m bia: Good p ractice i n u rba n lan d-u se p lann in g
Lim a, Per u : Waste w ater re u se for irrigatio n in the u rba n con te x t
Precipitation in Lima is extremely low, making the cityhighly dependent on its surface- and groundwater. Climatechange projections suggest even greater scarcity. The localauthority considered the multi-functional use of water sinks
and recycling treated wastewater for irrigation. As a result,more clean water has become available for higher-valueuses such as drinking.
Sou rce: SWITCH b
With 79 per cent of its population living in cities, the LatinAmerica and Caribbean region has the highest levels of urbanization in the developing world. However, this hasoften occurred without appropriate institutional res -ponses, resulting, for example, in the under deve lopmentof infrastructure and un planned land use, leading toa wide range of envi ronmental problems includingurban sprawl, pollution and loss of agricultural land.Nonetheless, some cities have developed innovativeways of attenuat ing the environ mental pressures relatedto the growth of urban areas. Amongst them is BogotsEnvironmental Management Plan 2001 2009 (Plan deGestin Ambiental del Distrito Capital PGA).
Formulated in collaboration with the Capital Districtauthorities, citizens and inter-sectoral representatives, theplan, together with a Regional Planning Board (PGA), hasencouraged public partici pation, the introduction of environmental standards and urban management. Mainlyfocused on integrated land-use management, the PGA
seeks to resolve environ mental externalities related to thesocio- economic, cultural, political and environmentaltrans formations of the Colombian capital.
This interest in sustainable urban development has en -couraged the PGA to consider the city as part of a broader ecosystem in which regional and local considerationsare interrelated. The Environmental Management Planrelies on:
the Capital District Environmental System, whichestab lishes guidelines, standards, activities,resources and institu tional competencies;
the Environmental Information System, whichsystematizes environmental data;
FOFIGA, a nancial support for PGA programmesand projects which obtains its resources through,amongst others, penalties, nes, redistributivetaxes, compen satory rates, water-use rates andtransfers.
Sou rce: UNEP
biodiversity. At the same time, a preliminary inventory has
indicated that the state emits about 27 million tonnes of CO2, about 8.9 per cent of Mexicos total annual emissions.
The Veracruz Programme on Climate Change and thesubsequent State Law on Mitigation and Adaptation toClimate Change Effects is pivotal in promoting action toaddress climate change and protect vulnerable groups.Initial rst steps date back to 2008 , when the Center for Climate Studies in the Department of Civil Protection of the State University was founded. The State of Veracruzestablished the State Board for Mitigation and Adapta -tion to Climate Change Effects as the body responsible for interagency coordination. Its advice contributes to exist -
ing pro grammes and assists in developing a statewidestrategy for the next six years.
In addition, it:
promotes the participation of different sectorsof society in the states climate change policy-making process;
monitors compliance with the State Law onMitigation and Adaptation;
encourages and promotes coordinated actionsand collaboration;
encourages the use of renewable energy andclean technologies;
manages national and international resources; at state and municipal level it trains people with
the required skills to develop techniques relatingto mitigation and adaptation, and promotes self-
management of resources.Sou rce: ICLEI
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
26/36
22
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
NORTH AMERICASa n Jose, Califor n ia, Un ited States: Gree n bu ildin g sta n dards
Peter Frischmuth/Argus/Specialist Stock
In September 2008 , San Jose, California, adopted a green
building policy to reduce the consumption of energy andwater in new residential, commercial and industrialconstruction projects. The policy is a step forward for San Joses Green Vision, which sets a goal of ensuringthat 4 .5 million m 2 of buildings built or retrotted in thecity will be green within 15 years. Leadership in Energyand Environmental Design (LEED) or Build It GreensGreenPoint standards are used for all new buildings,regardless of type or size. Commercial and industrialbuildings that are 2 300 m2 or more must meet LEEDs
Silver standard. Residential developments of 10 or more
units are to meet the basic LEED certication standard or achieve 50 points under the GreenPoint rating system.Housing structures that are 23 metres or more high arerequired to meet basic LEED standards. Starting in 2012 ,commercial and industrial buildings of 1 000 m2 or moreand residential buildings that are 23 metres high or moremust meet LEED Silver standards.
Additionally, this local government response has set anumber of goals: to reduce per-person energy use by
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
27/36
23
Case st u dies
NORTH AMERICASan Jose, Califor n ia, Un ited States: Gree n bu ildin g sta n dards (contd.)
Can ada: The Q u ebec a n d British Col um bia carbo n ta x es
In 2007 , Quebec became the rst North American state or province to introduce a carbon tax. Energy companies arerequired to pay US 0.8 for each litre of petrol distributedin Quebec and US 0.938 for each litre of diesel fuel.Compared to other jurisdictions this tax rate is very low.
The revenue-neutral carbon tax in British Columbia ismuch more ambitious. Rate increases were phased in,starting at a modest US$ 10 per tonne of CO2-equivalentin 2008 , rising at a rate of US$ 5 a year to US$ 30 a tonne in2012 . The taxs revenue neutrality is achieved by allowingtax reductions for businesses as well as for poorer sectionsof society, which also receive payments. The compre -hensive tax applies to all emissions from fossil fuels,accounting for approximately 70 per cent of the provinces
total emissions. Emissions from fossil fuels exported fromBritish Columbia are exempt. In 2010 , the tax began toapply to biodiesel as well. The new tax did not seem tohave signicant political repercussions the provincialparty that introduced it was re-elected.
Addressing drawbacks typically associated with carbontaxes may have enhanced its acceptability. This includesmitigating or eliminating the potentially regressive natureof carbon taxation, with comprehensive coverage com -bined with targeted tax reductions, and reducing poten -tially large adaptation costs for carbon-intensive industriesthrough a gradual phase-in of the tax.
Sou rce: UNEP
Portla n d, Un ited States: Urba n Grow th Bo un dar y
Portlands Urban Growth Boundary has long been studiedin urban planning discourse, yet this method of ensuringsustainable urban development has never been a moreprescient learning tool for local policy makers around theworld. Inll, retrots of cities, browneld site develop -
ment and the prevention of urban sprawl are the chief initiatives in preventing unsympathetic developmentand land degradation, and in reducing pollution.
Sou rce: ICLEI k
50 per cent, receive 100 per cent of electrical power from
clean, renewable sources, divert 100 per cent of the wastefrom landll and convert waste to energy, and recycle
or benecially reuse 100 per cent of wastewater (about
380 000 m3
per day). Sou rce: ICLEI USA
New York Citys water system is likely to be confrontedby several challenges linked to climate change. Thesewill affect its water supply and both the effectivenessand physical infrastructure of its wastewater system. TheNew York City Department of Environmental Protection(NYCDEP) is responsible for managing the citys water supply as well as its sewer and wastewater treatment
systems. The departments US$ 17 billion, 10-year capitalplan gives an indication of its size.
In 2004 , NYCDEP initiated a Climate Change Task Force,which examined the water and wastewater systems vul -nera bilities to climate change. Released in 2008 , NYCDEPs
Assessment and Action Plan is the rst major output of its work as part of the Task Force. Potential adaptationmeasures include continuing to aggressively protect thecitys water supply; reducing water demand and increas -ing redundancy, for example through greater water-useefficiency and maximized use of existing infrastructure toaddress the projected rise in temperature and seasonal
drought as well as the anti cipated growth in population;upstream ood control; reduced inows to sewers andwastewater plants; protection from storm surge and sealevel rise; and design improve ments for wastewater treatment plants.
Sou rce: SWITCH
New York City, Un ited States: Pla nn in g for ada p tatio n in a m ega-cit y w ith agei n g in frastr u ctu re
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
28/36
24
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
WEST ASIAAbu Dhabi, U n ited Arab E m irates: I n tegrated coastal zo n e m an age m en t
The main objectives of the policy in Al-Karak are to: arrest land degradation and optimize the long-
term productive capacity of land and water resources;
improve the income of vulnerable farmers,especially women, through active participation;
safeguard and upgrade the productive potentialof natural resources and enhance returns;
prevent soil degradation, restore soil fertility andpromote efficient use of soil and water;
strengthen the capacity of local technical andmanagerial staff; and
meet the needs of local farmers.
Technical and nancial support is provided to: build soil and water conservation structures and
improve agricultural production; encourage tree planting; enhance sustainable land and water manage -
ment practices; promote rural micronance to support on- and
off-farm activities; build cisterns and dams for water harvesting; improve animal husbandry; maintain springs and irrigation canals; and construct small reservoirs, known as hara , to
retain run-off for later use.
The coastal zone in Abu Dhabi is facing rising demand
for socio-economic and cultural activities as a resultof increasing urbanization, tourism and zoning for industrial development. With this in mind, the UrbanPlanning Council developed the Plan Abu Dhabi 2030 , anintegrated long-term plan that recognizes the importanceof terrestrial and marine environments with a strongemphasis on integrated coastal zone management. Itrecommends specic action, including the establish -ment of urban development boundaries, setting asidecritical areas and designating non-development zones,pro tecting coastal landscapes and other sites of valueby redirecting development, and preventing the frag -ment ation of habitats.
The Coastal Management Committee, which was estab -
lished by the Abu Dhabi Executive Council, has been takingsteps to reconcile the needs of different users through anintegrated master planning approach to coastal zonemanagement. A new Maritime Strategy was set up andCoastal Development Guidelines with spatial zoning for PlanAbu Dhabi 2030 were completed in coordination with theAbu Dhabi Urban Planning Council. This highlights im -portant habitats for protection including hotspots within theAl Gharbia district. Measures include reviewing existinglegislation relevant to coastal area management, and theuse of environmental impact assessments.
Sou rce: Abu Dhabi Urba n Plann in g Coun cil
Masdar, a city which will spread over an area of approxi -mately 6 km2, is a new clean-technology develop ment thatwill place those companies involved in its constructionat the heart of global renewable energy and cleantechindustries. To be located 16 km outside the centre of AbuDhabi, Masdar aims to become a zero-carbon city on thebasis of a variety of policies. Firstly, passive buildings,smart building management and orientation and energy-efficient performance lie at the heart of its planning anddesign. Secondly, its energy management will be foundedon the most up-to-date and innovative efficiency tech -niques available in conjunction with stringent buildingguidelines to minimize energy consumption for heating
and cooling. All electricity generation will be fromrenewable sources, particularly photovoltaics and solar-tube collectors for domestic hot water. A 10 -megawattphotovoltaic plant is cur rently being developed, thebiggest in the Middle East, and will be connected to theAbu Dhabi power grid.
Currently, all energy requirements for Masdars construc -tion are being met by on-site renewable energy production.Once the city is fully developed, however, 80 per cent of its energy require ments will be generated off-site, but stillfrom renewable sources.
Sou rce: Masdar
Al-Karak, Jorda n : In tegrated agric u ltu ral m an age m en t
Masdar, U n ited Arab E m irates: A carbo n n eu tral cit y
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
29/36
25
Case st u dies
Local communities have beneted from the newly vibrant
agricultural sector through processing local products andhaving better access to nancial services. Some 5 350households have beneted from the various soil and water conservation measures, while spring protection and/or rehabili tation programmes alone have beneted about1 000 households. The improved agricultural extensionservices are estimated to have reached about 22 300house holds, and the provision of loans and sup port for developing alternative income-gen erat ing activities havebeneted more than 5 000 women and landless farmers .
These investments in soil and water conservation have
reduced, and will continue to reduce, the degradation of the fragile ecosystems in the project area. They will alsoimprove vegetative cover, reduce run-off and soil loss,improve soil fertility, and enhance sustainable use of thenatural resource base. The project has raised awarenessabout the impacts of land degradation and deserticationwhile improving farmers livelihoods, diversifying incomesources, and alleviating both poverty and out-migration.
Sou rce: UNEP
WEST ASIAAl-Karak, Jorda n : In tegrated agric u ltu ral m an age m en t (contd.)
City of Masdar
-
7/31/2019 Global Environment Outlook 5 for Local Government: solving global problems locally
30/36
26
GEO- 5 for local go ver nm en t: solving global problems locally
CONCLUSIONS
Local governments play a crucial role in supporting nationalgovernments in implementing multilateral environmentalagreements (MEAs) and facilitating the transition of cities
economies to a green urban economy, as well as setting moreambitious sustainable development goals and targets. Thecontribution of local government to meeting goals and targetsis crucial and deserves recognition.
Findings from GEO-5 reinforce the importance of settingmeasurable goals and targets to effectively monitor progressand advance the sustainability agenda. Goal-setting arenasat the international level include not only public institutionssuch as the UN system but also civil society groups andprivate-sector associations, as well as local authorities.Global goals need to be complemented by syn ergizedregional, national and local goals, as well as concrete national
action plans.
Local governments respond to international and nationalframework conditions. National governments need to agreeon ambitious targets and make relevant commitments. Inimplementation, national and state governments have tobe locally responsive. Higher tiers of government need torespond to local needs by amending institutional, proceduralor other arrangements, and by providing the kind of legal,technical, or nancial support and incentives required onthe ground.
Some of the examples in this report illustrate the commit mentof local governments within enabling frameworks supportedby higher tiers of government. State and national govern - ments can set the conditions for successful and effectivereplication and up-scaling. However, the examples also showthat local governments have expanded their actions and res -ponses to local challenges towards ever more inte grated andholistic approaches, often in isolation from natio nal govern -ment policies, underlining the increasing aware ness andunderstanding of the multiple interdependencies of thehuman and Earth System at the local level.
In the absence of goals, targets and national directives, localgovernments can and have taken action to support thedevelop ment of such national-level objectives. Local govern -ments play an important role in showing what can be doneand providing examples for replication and up-scaling.
Organizational, institutional, legal and political structures andprocesses that promote planning and implementation areneeded to prevent environmental degradation and build urbanand community resilience the infrastructure decisions madetoday will inuence the ability of communities to move
towards sustainability for decades to come. Local govern -ments have to be provided with the necessary conditions andcapacities from national or regional govern ments enabling
frameworks. It is vital that their potential is recognized,supported and facilitated.
GEO-5 highlighted that innovative responses are an oppor -tunity for cooperation messages that resonate with theexamples provided from local governments. Responses at thelocal, national and international levels interact and generateincremental, structural and transformational change. As thereis no universal solution to environmental degradation, arange of tailored responses is required to reect the diversityof regional needs. In areas of common global concern,however, coordination, participation and cooperation arecritical for jointly meeting internationally agreed goals and
targets, while also addressing the capacity decits in a rangeof countries.
Insights from GEO-5 for cooperation include the need to: engage society at all levels in dening a vision of
sustainability; identify policies that are unsustainable and redirect
or reverse them; enhance the role of leverage a successful transition
will require a diverse array of measures that streng -then a sustainability mindset in society througheducation and awareness raising;
change the rules and incentives to advan