gill tract final status survey 2009 september 8 cabrera services radiological environmental...

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY

BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN .FRANCJSCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND SAFETY UNIVERSITY HALL, 3rd FLOOR

BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720-1150

Mr. Ira Schneider, Associate Health Physicist Medical, Academic and Pharmacy Licensing California Department of Public Health Radiologic Health Branch PO Box 997414, MS 7610, Sacramento, CA 95899-7414

September 15, 2009

RE: UC Berkeley Radioactive Materials License (RML) No.l333-0l Request to Remove Gill Tract as a Use Location

Dear Mr. Schneider:

The purpose of this letter is to request a radiological release of the prope1ty identified on License Condition 10. (c) as "Gill Tract University of California, 1050 San Pablo Avenue, Albany, CA" from Radioactive Materials License No. 1333-01.

The University of California, Berkeley has implemented the Gill Tract Vacating Notice and Decommissioning Plan identified as Licensed Condition 13 (e). The final status survey is complete and two copies ofthe final status survey repm1 are attached.

No residual levels of radioactivity in excess of the limits presented in Regulatory Guide 1.86 were detected during these surveys. In addition, the surveys were sensitive enough to detect residual radioactivity, which if it had been present, would result in a dose to future occupants of less than 1.0 mrem/year, based on the conservative resident farmer dose calculation model. These results demonstrate the University's commitment to the as low as is reasonably achievable criterion.

Therefore, we request that you amend our Radioactive Material License to remove Gill Tract as an authorized use location and release it for unrestricted use.

Please contact Greg Yuhas at [email protected] or (51 0) 643-7976 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

,, .D\_ ~~ ~("""""' Gregm~y P. uhas RadiatiOnS fety Officer

Attachment: Final Status Survey Rep011 for Gill Tract, dated August 7, 2009

Cc: Mark Freiberg, Director Anthony Garvin, General Counsel- UC Office of the President Patrick Goff, Associate Director Per Peterson, Chair- Radiation Safety Committee

Gill Tract Amendment Request

GY/dr <:Jt ~ Reviewed by;.;:-.r PG, P-Pfr

Concurrences: Goff, Freiberg, Peterson

Final Document Name: 2009.08. 10 RSGill TractAmend

Files: RS-License Amendment Request 82-Gill Tract

Building File: Gill Tract Department File: Capital Projects

eWeekly Office Chronological

Gill Tract

Final Status Survey University of California

Berkeley, California

Project Account Number 19346A

Prepared for:

University of California

Capital Projects

Prepared by:

BARTLETT SERVICES, INC.

60 Industrial Park Road

Plymouth Massachusetts 02360

and

~ CABRERA SERVICES ~ RADIOLOGICAL· ENVIRONMENTAL· REMEDIATION

September 8, 2009

Gill Tract Final Status Survey Report

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ....................................................................... ....... ............................................ 1 2.0 Site Background ................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Survey Design ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Measurement Techniques .................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Gas Proportional Counter .................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Liquid Scintillation Counter ................................................... ... .......................................... 6 3.2 Wet Smears ............ .... ................ ...... .............................................................. .... .................. 7 3.3 Surface Soil Samples .... ... ...... .... ...... .................................................................................... 7 3.4 Other Samples ...................................................................................................................... ? 3.4.1 Vacuum Pump Oil. ............................................................................................................... 7 3.4.2 Wood Shed .............. ... ................. .. ....................................................................................... 8 3.5 Material Reference Areas ............... ... .................. ................................................................ 8 3.6 Class 1 Final Status Surveys ................................................................................................ 8 3.7 Class 2 Final Status Surveys ................................................................................................ 9 3.8 Class 3 Final Status Surveys ................................................................................................ 9 3.9 Survey Units .......... ...... ................. ... ............... .. .. .. .............................................................. 10 3.9.1 Building Surfaces .................................................... ........................................................... 10 3.9.2 Open Land Areas ............................................................................................................... 10 4.0 Acceptance Criteria ............................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Beta Scan MDC for Building Surfaces ................................... ..... ...................................... 11 4.2 Beta Static MDC for Structure Surfaces ............................................................................ 12 4.3 Liquid Scintillation Counter MDC .................................................................................... 12 5.0 Survey Results ................................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Floor Monitor Scanning Results ........................................................................................ 14 5.2 Hand Held Scanning Results ........................ ....................... .............................................. 14 5.3 Hand Held Static Measurement Results ............................................................................ 14 5.4 Wet Smear Results ............................................................................................................. l5 5.5 Soil Sample Results ................................. ........... ............................................................... 16 5.6 Other Sample Results ......................................................................................................... 18 5.7 Reference Data Results ................. ........ .......................................................................... ... 21 6.0 Data Quality .................................................................................................. ..................... 32 6.1 Data Verification ................................................................................................................ 32 6.1.1 Scan Surveys ................................... ...... ............................ ...... ........................................... 32 6.1.2 Static Measurements .......................................................................................................... 32 6.1.3 Wet Smears ................................. ..... ...... .......... ..... .................................... ... ...................... 32 6.2 Data Validation .................................................................................................................. 32 6.2.1 Floor Monitor ..................................................................................................................... 33 6.2.2 Hand Held Gas Proportional Detectors .......................................................................... .... 33 6.2.3 Laboratory Measurement ...................................... .. .. .. .. ..................................................... 33 7.0 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 35 8.0 References .............. ............................................................................................................ 36

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page i


List Of Figures

Figure 2.1 Gill Tract Map ........................................... ............................... ....... .............................. 3 Figure 2.2 Hybridoma Floor Plan .......................... ..................................... ...... .............................. 5 Figure 5.1 Hybridoma Center Soil Sample Locations .................................................................. 19 Figure 5.2 Planting Field Soil Sample Locations (Supplemental Sampling Effort) ..................... 20 Figure A-1: Room 2 Sampling Locations ... .. ........ ... ............ .. .. ... ...... ...... .. ....... ....... ....... ......... ... ... 38 Figure A-2: Laboratory 2 Sampling Locations ............... ....... ... ..... .......................................... ... .. 39 Figure A-3: Laboratory 3 Sampling Locations ............................................................................. 40 Figure A-4: Room 4 Sampling Locations .... .... ........ .......... .... ... ..... ... ............... ... ........... ............... 41 Figure A-5: Room 5 Sampling Locations .. ................................................ .. ... .............................. 42 Figure A-6: Laboratory 6/7 Sampling Locations .......................................................................... 43 Figure A-7: Room 8 Sampling Locations ......... ..... ............................... ...... .......... ........................ 44 Figure A-8: Room 9 Sampling Locations ..................................................................................... 45 Figure A-9: Room 10 Sampling Locations ........ .. .. ..... .. .... .......................... ... ......... ...................... 46 Figure A -10: Laboratory 11 Sampling Locations ....... ...... ................. .... ............. .. ... ... .. ........... ..... 4 7 Figure A -11: Room 12 Sampling Locations ............ ...... ....................... ........................................ 48 Figure A-12: Room 13 Sampling Locations ........................... ................ .... ..... ...... ................. .. .. .. 49 Figure A-13: Room 14 Sampling Locations ... ... .............. ..... ................. ..... .. .... ..... .. .. .............. .. ... 50 Figure A-14: Room 15 Sampling Locations ................................................................................. 51 Figure A-15: Room 16 Sampling Locations ....................................... .......... ... ........ ..... ......... .. ..... 52 Figure A-16: Hallway Floor Sampling Locations ..................... ........ ............... .. .. ....... .... ............. 53

List of Tables

Table 1: Summary of Static Survey Results ................................................................................. 22

Table 2A: Wet Smear Results - Tritium ........... ..... ....................................................................... 23

Table 2B: Wet Smear Results - Carbon-14 .................................................................................. 24

Table 3A: Planting Field Soil Sample Results: March 2008 Sampling Effort ....... ...................... 25

Table 3B: Hybridoma Area and Reference Area Soil Results: August 2008 Sampling Effort .... 26

Table 3C: Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Gill Tract Planting Field Samples ....... ................ ................... ........ ...... .......... ............................... ... ..... ...... .... ......... ... . 27

Table 3D: Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Reference Area Samples ......................................................................................................................................... 28

Table 3E: Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Biased Soil Samples .................................................................. .. .... .... .... .. .. ................... ........ .... .................................... 29

Table 5: Summary of Reference Material Survey Results: Floor Monitor. .. ... ............................. 30

Table 6: Summary Reference Material Survey Results: Hand Held (126 cm2) Detector. ............ 31

Table B-1: Static Measurements (126 cm2 Detector) ........................ ..... ...................................... 55

Table B-2: 100 cm2 Smear Results ......................................................... ..................................... 59

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page ii


List of Attachments

Attachment A: Sampling Locations Figures Attachment B: Survey Data Attachment C: Instrument Checks and Calibration Forms Attachment D: Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan

cpm

cps

DOE

dpm/100 cm2

ES&H

3H

keY

LSC

MARSSIM

MDC

mrem

NRC

PVC

QAPP

QC

RUA

SAP

SOP

TEDE

uc UCB

USDA

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

Carbon-14

counts per minute

counts per second

U.S. Department of Energy

disintegrations per minute per 100 square centimeters

Environmental Safety and Health

Tritium (Hydrogen-3)

kiloelectron volts

liquid scintillation counter

Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual

minimum detectable concentration

millirem

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

polyvinyl chloride

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Quality Control

Radiological Historical Use Assessment

Sampling and Analysis Plan

standard operating procedures

total effective dose equivalent


University of California Berkeley

United States Department of Agriculture

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page iii


1.0 INTRODUCTION

On February 21, 2008 Bartlett Services, Inc. was contracted by the University of California at Berkeley (UCB) to develop and implement a Radiological Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) in order to ensure that decommissioned materials associated with the Gill Tract Hybridoma Center were identified and disposed of to licensed radioactive materials disposal facilities in accordance with California Executive Order D-62-02 and to perform a Final Status Survey on Open Land Areas associated with soils located around the Hybridoma Center and Gill Tract planting field.

Guidance on designing and implementing radiological surveys of building surfaces was taken from NUREG-1575, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). Guidance on designing and implementing radiological surveys of materials and equipment was taken from the draft supplement 1 to NUREG-1575, Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Assessment of Materials and Equipment (MARSAME).

Radiological surveys of the Gill Tract site, owned by the UCB, have been completed in accordance with the California-approved SAP (Bartlett, 2008a). Materials suspected of containing residual levels of radioactivity in excess of the limits presented in Regulatory Guide 1.86 were removed and properly disposed of as radioactive waste. Radioactivity in excess of naturally occurring background levels has not been identified in the remaining Hybridoma Center or the planting field. This report documents the results of the radiological surveys in and around the Hybridoma Center and the planting field, and supports a decision that the Gill Tract site can be released for use without radiological restrictions.

Based on the results of the radiological surveys at Gill Tract and the associated reference areas, there is no dose above background at the Hybridoma Center or the planting field. The levels of radionuclides in surface soil in the planting area and the radionuclide concentrations in the area surrounding the Hybridoma Center are consistent with reference area concentrations and, under the resident farmer scenario, contribute an annual dose less than 1 mrem.

Based on the results of the final status surveys perfonned at Gill tract, the entire 10 acre property is recommended for release from radiological controls with no restrictions.

BARTLE'IT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page 1


2.0 SITE BACKGROUND

In 1890 Edward Gill, an expert, world-renowned horticulturalist, purchased 104 acres and established the Gill Nursery. Mr. Gill became widely known for the antique roses cultivated at the nursery, some of which are still found in the Bay Area. At that time the property extended from what is now 1-80 to San Pablo A venue and from Codornices Creek to Buchanan Street. Although Edward Gill died in 1909, John Gill continued to farm on the land, until 1928 when the University of California (UC) purchased the nursery and resumed agricultural activities.

In 1939, the UCB gifted 5 acres to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the construction of what is now known as the Western Regional Research Center for the study of products that could be developed from agricultural commodities. In 1945, UC set aside 36 acres fronting on San Pablo Avenue and Buchanan Street, for an agricultural experimental station. This became the home of the northern branch of the University's Division of Biological Control, and later the site of the International Center for Biological Control. Projects pioneered at the Gill Tract included the ftrst major success in controlling weeds with insects in the United States. The Gill Tract became the center for this line of research in the United States in cooperation with the USDA. The Division is also credited with the control of numerous major insect pests on other California crops and pioneered in predator-prey population studies providing the groundwork for the eventual integration of biological, chemical and cultural methods of pest control.

In 1969, a portion of the land (adjacent to the present Ocean View Elementary School) was set aside for community gardens. The year 1969 was also the year that People's Park and Ohlone Park and Greenway were founded, which still exist and are widely recognized as having "kicked off' the modern day Ecology Movement by gaining worldwide recognition of the need for parks and open space in crowded urban areas. Today, community farming activities and experimental studies continue along Edward Gill Drive.

In 1995, the Division at the Gill Tract was joined with the College of Natural Resources, following which many of the research staff were transferred to the Berkeley campus. By 1997 the administration, funding and future of the station at Gill Tract became unclear and only recently has the University decided to develop the land for student and faculty housing, community activities and retail shops (ERS, 2008).

A radiological historical use assessment of Gill Tract (ERS, 2008) was conducted in June and July 2007 for the UCB. The Gill Tract is a University-owned 10-acre agricultural plot on San Pablo A venue. The tract was used for agricultural research and experimentation. As part of the research radioactive materials were used in trace amounts at one location within the Gill Tract called the Hybridoma Center.

Gill Tract is bordered by Buchanan Street to the north, San Pablo Avenue on the east, Monroe Street to the south, and Jackson Street/Eighth Street to the west. Figure 2.1 shows the major features of Gill Tract. Primary access to the site is from San Pablo Avenue, and Jackson Street provides a secondary entrance. Approximately 30 structures are located on the Gill Tract as shown in Figure 2.1. Gill Tract includes approximately 12 single story wood frame structures, 7 greenhouses, 7 large planting boxes, and 6 storage trailers. Use of radioactive materials at Gill Tract was officially terminated via a closeout survey performed by the Environmental Safety and Health (ES&H) group for UCB on January 22, 1997. No residual radioactivity was identified during the closeout survey. The majority of the structures at Gill Tract are abandoned.

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page 2


Figure 2.1 Gill Tract Map

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page3


Historical research has shown that the use of radioactive materials was limited to the Hybridoma Center. The Hybridoma Center includes a single story wood frame structure (approximately 1,300 ft2

), attached greenhouse (approximately 600 ft2), and detached wooden storage shed. The

wood frame structure housed a combination of offices and laboratories. Figure 2.2 shows the floor plan for the wood frame structure and greenhouse at the Hybridoma.

The results of the radiological use assessment indicate that use of radioactive materials was limited to laboratories 2, 617, 11 and the Culture Room (Room 3) located within the Hybridoma and the storage shed next to the greenhouse. However, sporadic indications of radioactive material in the hallways outside the laboratories were also noted. In addition, drains, sewage piping, and ventilation associated with hoods in the laboratories are considered impacted by the use of radiological materials at the Hybridoma Center. The radiological historical use assessment concluded that the laboratories 2, 6/7, 11, the Culture Room, and the drainage system for the Hybridoma would be considered Class 1 areas for closure. While no record of radioactive material use was found for the planting field in the northern portion of Gill Tract, this area was included as part of the final status survey because of the potential for plants impacted by radioactivity from the Hybridoma Center to be transplanted into the planting field could not be excluded.

Prior to performing the final status survey (FSS) for the Hybridoma Center in accordance with the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a), all trash and loose equipment were removed from the Hybridoma Center and the adjacent storage shed was demolished and disposed of as radioactive waste. All asbestos containing materials (including the floor tiles) and hazardous materials were removed from the building. At the time of the final status survey, the Hybridoma Center structure was clean of debris and the only items remaining to be surveyed were the structure itself, 2laboratory hoods (1 each in Room 617 and Room 11), and a built-in autoclave (Room 13).



Room

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16A 168 17 20

Figure 2.2 Hybridoma Floor Plan

Description

Office Lab Culture Room, Refrigerator Office 168 Office Lab Lab Unknown Restroom Unknown Lab, Counting Room Storage Autoclave Room Small Mechanical Room 16A Large Mechanical Room Inner Greenhouse Outer Greenhouse Custodial Closet Hallway

15 14 13

6&7 8 ~ 9 10

20

5 4 3 2 1

BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC & CABRERA SERVICES, INC.

J N

12

11

PageS


3.0 SURVEY DESIGN

The survey design provided in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a) used a graded approach to identify areas of potential residual radioactivity. In other words, additional survey effort was applied in areas more likely to have residual radioactivity.

3.1 Measurement Techniques

The primary measurement technique for the final status survey and reference area surveys was gross beta measurements. Field measurements for the Hybridoma Center were performed using the following detection instrumentation and techniques:

• Large area gas-proportional counter (e.g., 582 cm2 Ludlum Model 239-lF floor monitor with Ludlum Model 2224 scaler/ratemeter). Radiation surveys were performed in accordance with Procedure OP-001, Radiation Safety Procedure for Radiation Surveys, as described in the SAP (Bartlett 2008a).

• Hand-held gas-proportional counter (e.g., 100 cm2 Ludlum Model 43-68 gasproportional detector with Ludlum Model 2224 scaler/ratemeter). Radiation surveys were performed in accordance with Procedure OP-001, Radiation Safety Procedure for Radiation Surveys, as described in the SAP (Bartlett 2008a).

• Laboratory analysis of wet smears and solid samples using liquid scintillation techniques. All smear and solid samples analyses were performed by contracted independent laboratories using approved liquid scintillation counting protocols.

3.1.1 Gas Proportional Counter

There were two kinds of gas proportional counters used to perform radiological measurements at Gill Tract. The large area gas proportional detector has a large active area (e.~., 582 cm2

) while the hand-held gas proportional detector has a smaller active area (e.g., 126 em ). Both detectors were attached to a two channel (i.e., alpha and beta) scaler/ratemeter for performing scan or static measurements.

The large area gas proportional counter was used to perform scanning large, flat surfaces (e.g., floors) inside the Hybridoma Center and to perform static background measurements for reference material. The detector was connected to a ratemeter/scaler for performing individual static measurements and scanning large areas without recording individual measurement results.

The hand-held gas proportional detectors were used to perform scans and static measurements on walls, ceilings, and equipment inside the Hybridoma Center and to collect static background measurements for reference material.

3.1.2 Liquid Scintillation Counter

Liquid scintillation counting involves submersing or dissolving the sample directly in the liquid fluor. The liquid fluor reacts with the radioactivity in the sample to produce flashes of light proportional to the energy of the radiation. Liquid scintillation counting is particularly useful for measuring low-energy beta particles because problems relating to sample self-absorption, attenuation of particles by detector windows, and beta backscattering from the detector are completely avoided.

Wet swipes are optimum for collecting removable 3H contamination. The swipes were analyzed for tritium eH), carbon-14 (14C), and naturally occurring radionuclides. The liquid scintillation



counter (LSC) was set to detect three ranges of beta particle energies. The low-energy channel was set to detect beta particles with low energies and was used to evaluate the potential presence of 3H (maximum beta energy of 18.6 keV) in the sample. The medium energy window was used to evaluate the potential presence of 14C (maximum beta patticle energy of 156 keV). The high energy window was used to evaluate the potential presence of other beta-emitting radionuclides with beta energies up to 2000 keV. All wet swipes collected in FSS areas were analyzed by subcontracted independent laboratories using approved liquid scintillation counting teclmiques.

Samples of solid materials were also evaluated using liquid scintillation counting. Approximately one gram aliquots of samples were processed to convert 3H to water and 14C to carbon dioxide. Water from the sample, including the 3H, was collected and counted using an LSC. Carbon dioxide from the sample was also collected and counted separately using an LSC. Tritium and 14C concentrations in the sample were calculated and reported based on these measurements.

3.2 Wet Smears

Removable tritium and 14C can be reliably detected at low concentrations using wet smears. Ten smears were collected from each survey unit in the Hybridoma Center. Wet smears were collected at the same locations where static measurements were performed. In addition, wet smears were collected at drain line connections to sewer pipes.

In general filter paper was used to collect the wet smears. However, cotton swabs were used for evaluating the inside of the vacuum lines because the inside of the vacuum lines was too small for filter paper. The smears were soaked in laboratory grade deionized water, and moderate pressure was used to collect a sample over an area of 100 cm2

. The cotton swab smears collected in this manner were then immediately placed inside a 20 milliliter glass scintillation vial. When the smears arrived at the contracted radiochemical analysis laboratory, scintmation cocktail was added directly to the vial containing the smear. As with all LSC samples analyzed by the contracted laboratory, the prepared samples were dark adapted for at least one hour ptior to counting to account for photochemiluminescence.

3.3 Surface Soil Samples

Surface soil samples were collected from random locations in the Gill Tract planting field, the outdoor areas immediately adjacent to the Hybridoma Center, and several reference areas identified by UCB. All soil samples were collected in accordance with Procedure OP-005 (refer to the SAP (Bartlett 2008a)). Custody and control of the soil samples were established and maintained in accordance with Procedure OP-008 (refer to the SAP (Bartlett 2008a)) and the Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan (provided as Attachment D). All soil samples were analyzed for 14C and 3H by contracted independent laboratories.

3.4 Other Samples

3.4.1 Vacuum Pump Oil

One oil sample not described in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008) was collected as part of the final status survey. This sample was collected to evaluate the potential for radionuclides in the vacuum system.



3.4.2 Wood Shed

The detached wooden shed adjacent to the Hybridoma Center was demolished and packaged for disposal because it was not practical to survey the porous wood used to construct the shed. A sample of oil was collected from the vacuum pump and sent to an offsite laboratory and analyzed for the presence of 3H and 14C.

3.5 Material Reference Areas

The reference area survey provided information on the background distribution of radioactivity associated with each of the materials identified in Gill Tract. The information from background measurements was used to determine the natural radioactivity levels in the different media types being surveyed at Gill Tract. The field measurement techniques used to collect data for the final status surveys were also used to collect reference area data.

Materials expected to include inherent radioactivity had at least three reference areas. The reference areas were selected from similar buildings at Gill Tract where there is no record of radioactive materials being used. A minimum of 15 one minute static measurements were performed in each reference area for each instrument used during the Gill Tract final status survey.

Materials that were not expected to include any inherent radioactivity had data collected from at least one reference area. Because all of these materials are expected to have a background close to zero, the instrument variability defined the distribution for all of these materials. Materials that were not expected to contain inherent radiation included metal, wood, drywall, glass, vinyl, and plastics. A single reference area in one of the wood frame structures at Gill tract was selected to represent background for materials other than concrete at Gill Tract. A minimum of 15 two minute static measurements were performed for each instrument used during the Gill Tract final status survey.

3.6 Class 1 Final Status Surveys

Class 1 areas had the highest potential for residual radioactivity and may exceed acceptance criteria. Following the graded approach, these survey areas received the greatest level of survey effort. Areas, materials, or equipment where historic spills or contamination were likely to have occurred were classified as Class 1 survey areas. Information from the Radiological Historical Use Assessment (RUA) (ERS 2008) was considered in classification of survey areas.

One hundred percent of all Class 1 areas, materials, and equipment were scanned for radiation. In addition, a minimum of 10 one-minute static measurements and 10 wet smears were collected in each Class 1 survey unit. Sample locations were selected in accordance with the Multi Agency Radiological Site Survey Investigation Manual (MARSSIM) guidelines (NUREG-1575), based on a random-start systematic triangular grid, and identified using Visual Sample Plan software.

Biased measurements were performed and wet smears were collected at locations based on scan results and professional judgment to evaluate areas of concern. Any area where radiation was detected by a scan measurement was cleaned using standard decontamination methods (i.e., soap and water) or removed and disposed of as radioactive waste. Areas of concern included sinks, drains, hoods, and entrances to hood exhaust ducts. Sections of drain lines for laboratory sinks that could not be surveyed were removed and disposed of as radioactive waste.



Class 1 areas at Gill Tract included the floors in laboratories 2, 617 (including the laboratory hood), 11 (including the laboratory hood), the Culture Room (Room 3), and the floor of the hallway inside the Hybridoma Center.

The detached wooden shed adjacent to the Hybridoma Center was also identified as a Class 1 area. However, it was determined that the building materials for the shed could not be adequately surveyed in a cost-effective manner due to the porous nature of the wood used in its construction. The shed was disassembled, sampled for waste characterization purposes, and the entire shed was disposed of as radioactive waste.

With the exception for the wood shed, no Class 1 survey units were located outside the Hybridoma Center.


Class 2 areas had a lower potential for exceeding residual radioactivity acceptance criteria than Class 1. Class 2 survey units received a lower level scanning effort. However, the number of static measurements (based on a random-start systematic triangular grid) was the same as that for a Class 1 survey unit. A minimum of 25% of all Class 2 areas were scanned for radiation. Scanned surfaces were selected based on professional judgment to include areas with the highest potential for residual radioactivity (e.g., window sills, shelves, walls behind large pieces of equipment).

A minimum of 10 one minute static measurements and 10 wet smears were collected in Class 2 survey units. Measurement locations were determined through use of a random-start systematic triangular grid in accordance with MARSSIM guidance (NUREG-1575) and identified using Visual Sample Plan software.

Biased measurements were performed and wet smears collected at locations selected based on scan results and professional judgment to evaluate areas of concern.

Class 2 areas at Gill Tract included the walls and ceilings in laboratories 2, 617, 11, and the Culture Room (Room 3) inside the Hybridoma Center. No Class 2 survey units were located outside the Hybridoma Center.


Class 3 areas have the lowest potential for residual radioactivity. Areas and materials at the Gill Tract site where there was no historical evidence of radionuclide use were classified as Class 3.

A minimum of 10% of floors and working surfaces in the Class 3 survey units inside the Hybrydoma Center were scanned for radioactivity. The scanned surfaces were selected based on professional judgment to include areas with the highest potential for residual radioactivity (e.g., window sills, shelves, areas around floor drains, and walls behind large pieces of equipment).

Class 3 survey units inside the Hybridoma Center had a minimum of 10 one minute static measurements performed and 10 wet smears collected from random locations. For outdoor Class 3 areas, a minimum of 10 surface soil samples were collected from random locations. Random sample locations were selected in accordance with MARSSIM guidance and identified using Visual Sample Plan software. Soil samples from locations covered with asphalt were collected from the soil immediately beneath the asphalt.



Biased measurements were performed and wet smears collected at locations selected based on scan results and professional judgment to evaluate areas of concern. Areas of concern for Class 3 areas included the inside of sewer pipes connected to the Hybridoma Center and the hood exhaust vents on the roof of the Hybridoma Center.

Class 3 areas at Gill Tract include the non-laboratory areas inside the Hybridoma Center (i.e., offices and bathroom), the attached greenhouse, the outdoor areas in the immediate vicinity of the Hybridoma Center, and the planting field.

3.9 Survey Units

3.9.1 Building Surfaces

There were five Class 1 survey units, four Class 2 survey units, and four Class 3 survey units.

The floors areas of laboratories 2 and 3, the combined contiguous floor areas of laboratories 6 and 7, the floor area of laboratory 11, and the hallway floor comprised the Class 1 building surface survey units.

The walls and ceilings of laboratories 2, 3, 6 and 7 (combined as a single survey unit), and laboratory 11 comprised the Class 2 building surface survey units.

Rooms 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 were combined into one Class 3 building surface survey unit and the attached greenhouse (shown in Figure 2.2 as rooms 16A and 16B) were combined into another Class 3 unit.

3.9.2 Open Land Areas

The immediate outside area around the Hybridoma Center and the planting field were separate Class 3 open land area survey units.



4.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Regulatory Guide 1.86, Termination of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Reactors (NRC, 1974), provides a table of acceptable surface contamination levels. The limits for beta-gamma emitting radionuclides, including 14C, are 5,000 dpm/100 cm2 averaged over areas not more than 1 m2

,

and a maximum of 15,000 dpm/100 em for areas less than 100 cm2. The measured residual

surface contamination level (in units of dpm/100 cm2) is determined by accounting for

background radiation, detector efficiency, and appropriate geometric factors associated with the instrumentation. Regulatory Guide 1.86 does not address 3H surface contamination limits.

Regulatory Guide 1.86 limiting values are consistent with guidelines from IPM-88-2 "Policy Memorandum on Clearance Inspection & Survey," December 1, 1997 and Decon-1 "Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and Equipment prior to Release for Unrestricted Use," June 1977 which adopts the surface contamination guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.86.

Although not a regulatory driver, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment (DOE, 1995), provides a table of allowable total residual surface activity. The limits for beta-gamma emitting radionuclides are exactly the same as those listed in Regulatory Guide 1.86 except it provides a limit of 10,000 dpm/100 cm2 for removable 3H. DOE states that removable levels of 3H below this limit are acceptable to ensure that non-removable and residual fractions of 3H on surfaces will not exceed DOE dose limits and constraints.

The acceptance criteria used to evaluate the results of the radiological survey on building surfaces and equipment are the beta-gamma limits of 5,000115,000 dpm/100 cm2 for surface contamination from Regulatory Guide 1.86 for scanning and static measurements, and the 3H removable activity limits of 10,000 dpm/100 cm2 from DOE Order 5400.5 for wet smears.

The acceptance criteria for concentrations of 3H and 14C in soil are 4 pCi/g and 0.5 pCi/g, respectively. These concentrations correspond to 1 mrem/y total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) using the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) soil screening values from the Federal Register, December 7, 1999. The NRC soil screening values are conservative criteria for the Gill Tract site because they were derived using the resident farmer scenario, which assumes several exposure pathways (e.g., milk, meat, and fish ingestion, on-site well as drinking water source) that, in reality, do not exist at the Gill Tract site.

Measurement sensitivity was determined by calculating the minimum detectable concentration (MDC) for scanning, static, and smear measurements as described in the SAP (Bartlett 2008a). An MDC value was calculated for each instrument and measurement technique implemented during the FSS for the Gill Tract site. The MDC is the concentration that a specific instrument and technique can be expected to detect 95% of the time under actual conditions of use. The methodology for determining scan and static MDC values assumed a Type I error rate of 0.05 and a Type II error rate of 0.05.

4.1 Beta Scan MDC for Building Surfaces

The MDC for scanning building surfaces, materials, and equipment was calculated using the following equation as described in Section 4.5.1 of the SAP (Bartlett 2008a):



(60/ i)( 2.48) -Jb: MDCscan= C

-v p E1 (A/100)

where:

MDCscan = minimum detectable concentration for scanning surfaces (dpm/100 cm2)

2.48 = scan performance criteria (see Section 4.5.1 in the SAP (Bartlett 2008a))

bi = number of background counts observed in time interval I (270 cpm or 4.5 cps for Ludlum 43-69 and 539 cpm or 9 cps for Ludlum 239-1F)

p = surveyor efficiency, 0.7 (see Section 4.5.1 in the SAP (Bartlett 2008a))

Et = total efficiency ( c/d) and includes surface and instrument efficiency (0.0925 for low energy beta)

A = area of detector (126 cm2 for Ludlum 43-68 and 584 cm2 for Ludlum 239-1F)

= time interval of observation while detector passes over the source (for the Ludlum 43-68 detector, i = 2.9 seconds; for the Ludlum 239-1F, i = 5.3 seconds)

For example, the scan MDC for 14C on concrete using a Ludlum Model 43-68 handheld gas proportional detector was calculated to be 1,901 dpm/100 cm2 and 564 dpm/100 cm2 for the Ludlum Model 239-1F detector.

4.2 Beta Static MDC for Structure Surfaces

The MDC for static measurements will be calculated using the following equation as described in Section 4.5.2 of the SAP (Bartlett 2008a):

where:

3 + (4.65)-JB MDCsraric = Er (A/100) t

MDCstatic = minimum detectable concentration for static counting (dpm/100 cm2)

B = number of background counts during measurement time interval t (270 cpm)

E1 = total efficiency (c/d) and includes surface and instrument efficiency (0.0925 for low energy beta)

A = area of detector (126 cm2 for Ludlum 43-68)

t = measurement counting time interval (minutes)

For example, the MDC for 14C on concrete using a Ludlum Model 43-68 handheld gas proportional detector was calculated to be 681 dpm/100 cm2

.

4.3 Liquid Scintillation Counter MDC

As described in Section 4.5.3 of the SAP (Bartlett 2008a), the MDC for laboratory samples is similar to the MDC calculation for static measurements. The difference is that the wipes being analyzed represent removable contamination only. Wet smears were taken over an area of 100 cm2 using moderate pressure. The MDC equation for smears becomes:



where:

MDC

b

MDC= 3 + 4.65Jb Et

= minimum detectable concentration for static counting (dpm/100 cm2)

= number of background counts eH = 1.33 cpm, 14C = 2.46 cpm, and Channel C = 13.13 cpm)

Ei = detector 4n efficiency (eH = 26.5%, 14C =50%, and Channel C = 80%))

The background count rate and total efficiency for the smear LSC analysis are based on 3H measurements performed as part of the Gill Tract survey. The final MDC for the 3 LSC channels are as follows: 3H = 31.6 dpm/100cm2

, 14C = 20.6 dpm I 100cm2

, and Channel C = 24.8 dpm/100cm2

. The MDC calculations focus on the sensitivity of the LSC method and do not account for smear efficiency.

The MDC for solid samples is based on the action levels for solid samples. The required MDC for the laboratory is set equal to the action levels for 3H and 14C, 4 pCi/g and 0.5 pCi/g respectively.



5.0 SURVEY RESULTS

Following implementation of the survey design described in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a), the survey results were reviewed, evaluated, and compared to the acceptance criterion described in Section 4.0. No areas with detectable residual levels of radioactivity in excess of the acceptance criterion were identified during these surveys.

5.1 Floor Monitor Scanning Results

Scanning surveys of large horizontal surfaces were performed in all areas of the wood frame structure in the Hybridoma Center. The floor monitor (Ludlum Model 239-1F gas proportional detector connected to a Ludlum Model 2224-1 ratemeter/scaler) was used to scan 100% of the floors inside the Hybridoma Center and the greenhouse.

An action level for scanning was calculated based on the background measurements from reference materials. The minimum detectable count rate (MDCR) above the average background for the reference material was used as an action level while performing the scanning survey (i.e., MDCR for floor= 242 cpm; MDCR for bare concrete= 255 cpm). No areas of elevated beta activity were detected on any of the floors.

5.2 Hand Held Scanning Results

Scanning surveys with hand held gas proportional detectors (Ludlum Model 43-68 gas proportional detector connected to a Ludlum Model 2224-1 ratemeter/scaler) were performed on at least 25% of the Class 2 areas and at least 10% of the surface area in the Class 3 units inside the Hybridoma Center. The scan MDC for the hand held surveys (1,901 dpm/100 cm2

) was sufficient to demonstrate that the Ludlum 43-68 could meet the acceptance criterion value of 5,000 dpm/100 cm2

. Scan surveys performed with hand-held instruments were compared to an action level based on the reference area data. The MDCR above the average background for the reference material was used as an action level while performing the scanning survey ((i.e., MDCR for floor = 170 cpm; MDCR for bare concrete = 185 cpm; MDCR for other surfaces = 149 cpm). No areas of elevated beta activity were identified by the hand held scanning surveys.

5.3 Hand Held Static Measurement Results

Static measurements with hand held gas proportional detectors (Ludlum Model 43-68 gas proportional detector connected to a Ludlum Model 2224-1 ratemeter/scaler) were performed in each survey area. All static measurements were 1-minute counts directly on the surface being measured. Table 1 presents a summary of the static measurements by survey unit. Maps of static measurement locations are provided in Attachment A, Sampling Locations. The static measurement data are provided in Attachment B, Survey Data.

A total of 135 static measurements for gross beta activity were performed in the wood frame structure and greenhouse in the Hybridoma Center. None of the results exceeded the acceptance criteria.

A total of 102 static measurements were performed in the Class 1 and Class 2 laboratories. These areas included the floors, walls, and ceilings in laboratories 2, 6/7 (including the hood), 11 (including the hood), 3 (Culture Room, Refrigerator). Static measurements on floors, walls, and ceilings were performed at predetermined locations, while static measurements on the hoods were performed at locations likely to contain elevated radioactivity. Random start systematic triangular grid locations were identified using the Visual Sample Plan software version 5.3.1.



A total of 11 static measurements were performed on the floor of the hallway (refer to Table 1 for a summary and Figure A-16 for locations) in the Hybridoma structure. Static measurements were performed at locations on a random start triangular grid. The locations were identified using the Visual Sample Plan software. The static measurement results were evaluated using the background for floor where tile had been removed. None of the static measurements on the floor in the hallway exceeded the acceptance criteria.

Thirty four static measurements were performed on the floors where tile had been removed, 26 static measurements were performed on walls, 10 static measurements were performed on the ceilings, 10 static measurements were performed inside the refrigerator (6 on the floor and 4 on the walls), and 22 static measurements were performed on the laboratory hoods and ductwork. The laboratory hoods had static measurements performed in the cabinet base, on all of the interior surfaces, inside the ductwork where it attached to the hood, and where it exhausted on the roof. A man lift was used to access the hood exhaust vent on the roof of the wood frame structure. Static measurements on the floor were evaluated using the floor background where tile had been removed. All other measurements were evaluated against the material/detector specific values. None of the static measurements in the laboratories exceeded the acceptance criteria.

A total of 12 static measurements were performed in the Class 3 areas inside the Hybridoma Center. These areas included Rooms 1, 4, 5, 8, 9 (rest room), 10, 12 (storage), 13 (autoclave room and inner greenhouse entrance), 14 (small mechanical room), and 15 (large mechanical room and outer greenhouse entrance). One static measurement was performed in each room at a random location, which was selected using Visual Sample Plan software. One static measurement was performed at the drain located beneath the autoclave in Room 13, and one static measurement was performed in the doorway between Room 15 and the outer greenhouse. The high traffic path through this doorway had worn away the floor covering exposing a small area of bare concrete with a slightly higher beta count rate than the rest of the floor. The biased measurement in Room 15 was evaluated using the bare concrete background while all other Class 3 static measurements were evaluated using the background for floor where tile had been removed. None of the static measurements in the Class 3 areas exceeded the acceptance criteria.

Using a hand-held gas proportional detector, a total of 10 static measurements were collected from the concrete floor in the greenhouse. Static measurements were performed at locations on a random start triangular grid. The locations were identified using the Visual Sample Plan software. The static measurement results were evaluated using the background for bare concrete. None of the static measurements on the floor in the greenhouse exceeded the acceptance criteria.

5.4 Wet Smear Results

Wet smears were collected in the wood frame structure and greenhouse at the Hybridoma Center at every location where a static measurement was performed and at 11 additional locations where static measurements could not be performed (i.e., inside drains and pipes). The 3 H and 14C analysis results for the wet smears are summarized respectively in Tables 2A and 2B.

Of the 11 additional smears that were collected, four were collected in and outside of laboratory 6/7: 1 in the trap for a sink used for disposal of radioactive waste, 1 at the entrance to the PVC pipe, 1 at the end of the PVC pipe, and 1 at the entrance to the iron sewer pipe. Two additional wet smears were collected outside laboratory 2: 1 at the end of the PVC pipe from laboratory 11 and 1 at the entrance to the iron sewer pipe. Two additional wet smears were collected outside Room 5: 1 where the iron sewer pipe left the building and 1 at the entrance to the sewer line.



One additional wet smear was collected from the drain in the custodial sink in Room 17. These nine wet smears were collected using cotton swabs instead of filter papers because of the limited access to the inside of the pipes and drains. Finally, two additional wet smears were collected from the greenhouse: 1 from the gutter outside the greenhouse (south end facing the paved courtyard) and 1 from the glass plates on the ceiling inside the greenhouse at the same location.

Wet smears were sent to a contracted commercial radiochemistry laboratory for analysis using liquid scintillation. A total of 146 wet smears were collected from the wood frame structure and greenhouse and analyzed for gross beta activity.

All of the wet smear results were below the MDC of 31.6 dpmJlOO cm for 3H (3H window) and below the MDC of 20.6 dpmIlOO cm 2 for 14C ( 14C window). A summary of the swipe results for 3H and 14C can be found in Tables 2A and 213, respectively. Maps of smear locations are found in Attachment A, Sampling Locations. Smear measurement data are provided in Attachment B, Survey Data

5.5 Soil Sample Results

Surface soil samples were collected from random locations in the Gill Tract planting field, the outdoor areas immediately adjacent to the Hybridoma Center, and several reference areas recommended by UCB.

The Gill Tract planting field was initially sampled in March 2008. Fifteen (15) soil samples were collected in accordance to the SAP (Bartlett 2008a), transported to Eberline Services in nearby Richmond, CA, and analyzed for 14C and 3H. The analytical results for those samples are shown in Table 3A.

The measured 3H concentration in each of the initial 15 soil samples from the planting field was below the MDC achieved during the analysis, indicating that any potential radiological impact to a member of the public from residual 3H in the planting field soil, if present, would be very small. However, the measured 14C concentration in each of the 15 samples exceeded the acceptance criterion for ’4C (i.e., 0.5 pCilg), which corresponded to an annual dose of 1 mrem under the resident farmer scenario. The measured 14 C concentrations ranged from 1.95 pCi/g to 34.9 pCi/g (the maximum concentration was observed in sample FSS-010). Because the 14C results for sample FSS-010 were so high relative to all the other sample results, a confirmatory analysis was requested. The second analysis of sample FSS-010 performed by Eberline Services indicated that the 14C concentration was approximately a factor of ten lower than the original results, but still greater than the ’4C acceptance criterion.

In August 2008, the FSS for the Hybridoma Center and the immediate outside area was conducted. Ten (10) soil samples were collected at random locations in immediate outside area of the Hybridoma Center. The soil sample locations are shown in Figure 5.1. Because it was necessary to punch through asphalt in order to collect several soil samples in the immediately area outside the Hybridoma Center, the top 6 inches of soil were collected from a 4-inch diameter area and placed in a steel bowl. Rocks or foreign material (e.g., glass, wood, stones, asphalt chips) larger than ’/4 inch were removed from the sample. Approximately 100 grams of soil were transferred to a re-sealable plastic bag. The bag was labeled with the sample information and sent to an offsite laboratory and analyzed for the presence of 3H and 14C. In addition, 1 sample of sediment from the gutter along the southeast edge of the greenhouse at the Hybridoma Center and 10 soil samples from 3 reference areas near the Gill Tract were collected.



All samples were transport to Eberline Services in Richmond, CA, for 3H and 14C analyses. The results for these samples are provided in Table 3B.

With the exception of 1 soil sample (S0-03), the measured 14C concentrations in the soil samples from the immediate outside areas of the Hybridoma Center were below the MDCs achieved during ’ 4C analyses, although the achieved MDC values were greater than the ’ 4C acceptance criterion. The measured 14C concentration in sample S0-03 was 16.58 pCi/g. Because of the previous laboratory error with soil sample FSS-010, a second 14C analysis for sample S0-03 was requested. The results for that second analysis indicated that the 14C concentration in the sample was non-detectable (i.e., below an MDC of 1.06 pCi/g). To resolve the conflicting results, sample S0-03 was sent to the Areva Environmental Laboratory for ’ 4C analysis. The Areva results confirmed the second analysis by Eberline; that is, that the 14C concentration in sample SO-03 was non-detectable (the MDC in the Areva analysis was 0.4 pCi/g, which was below the 14C acceptance criterion).

The Eberline analysis results also indicated that the 14C concentration in 2 reference area samples (samples RA-03 and RA-05) exceeded the MDC values as well as the ’ 4C acceptance criterion (0.5 pCi/g). As done for soil sample S0-03, these 2 samples were sent to the Areva Environmental Laboratory for ’ 4C analyses in order to confirm the Eberline results. The Areva results (presented in Table 3B) indicated that the 14C concentrations in the samples RA-03 and RA-05 were below an MDC value equal to 0.38 pCi/g, which was below the ’ 4C acceptance criterion. Because of the relatively high MDC values achieved in the Eberline 14C analyses and the conflicting laboratory analyses, confidence in the ’ 4C data from Eberline Services eroded.

As a result of the eroded confidence in the 14C data, a decision was made in the first quarter of 2009 to conduct another soil sampling effort for the Gill Tract site. A supplemental sampling and analysis plan (SAP) was developed and implemented in April 2009. A copy of the supplemental SAP is provided as Attachment D to this report. The supplemental SAP called for the collection of 20 random soil samples from the Gill Tract Planting Field, 20 random soil samples from reference areas identified by UCB, and 13 soil samples from biased locations at or near the Gill Tract site. The soil sampling locations in the Gill Tract planting field are shown in Figure 5.2. All samples were collected and handled in accordance to directions in the supplemental SAP. Three independent laboratories were contracted to perform the 14C and 3H analyses. The primary laboratory was the Areva Environmental Laboratory in Westboro, MA. Eberline Services in Richmond, CA, and GEL Laboratories in Charleston, SC, performed 14C and 3H analyses on 6 split samples for quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) purposes.

The ’ 4C and 3H results from the planting field samples, Reference Area samples, and the Gill Tract biased samples are presented, respectively, in Tables 3C, 3D, and 3E.

The 14C concentrations in all soil samples collected during the supplemental effort were found to be below the MDC value in each analysis. For 14C, the achieved MDC values were less than or equal to the 14C acceptance criterion (i.e., :50.5 pCi.g) in the Areva analyses. The analyses of the QC split samples by GEL Laboratories were within 15% of the 14C acceptance criterion and supported the Areva results. The Eberline 14C analyses results for the QC split samples were approximately a factor of 2 higher than the ’ 4C acceptance criterion and therefore could not be used as confirmation of the ’ 4C measurements.

For 3 H, the achieved MDC values were significantly below the 3H acceptance criterion (i.e., 4.0 pCi/g) in the analyses performed by all 3 laboratories. Eberline Services identified detectable 3H



in 2 of the split samples from the planting field (split soil samples OOL-01-013-F and 001-01-018-F). However, the Areva Environmental Laboratory and GEL Laboratories analyses for these 2 samples indicated that the 3H concentrations were below the MDC values (refer to results presented in Table 3C). Because both the Areva Environmental Laboratory and GEL Laboratories had similar "non-detectable" 3H results for soil samples OOL-01-013-F and 001-01-018-F, the positive results in the Eberline analyses are not considered to be an indication of sample activity.

The results of the ’ 4C and 3H analyses for soil samples collected at the Gill Tract site during the April 2009 sampling effort provide assurance that there is no detectable 14C or 3 H activity in soil as a result of the agricultural research conducted in the Hybridoma Center.

5.6 Other Sample Results

Three samples were collected as part of the final status survey at Gill Tract as discussed in Section 3.7; 2 samples from the shed for waste characterization and 1 oil sample from the vacuum pump in the courtyard. The three samples were analyzed for 3 H and 14C activity and counted using liquid scintillation. No 3 H or ’ 4C activity was detected in any of the samples. The results of the sample analyses are provided in Table 4.



Figure 5.1 Hybridoma Center Soil Sample Locations


Gill Tract Final Status Su

Figure 5.2 Planting Field Soil Sample Locations (Supplemental Sampling Effort)

M

-

F 41

;4

1I 1! . .

!

.w --- -w7, - -

& - -

-

U



5.7 Reference Data Results

Reference data were collected to provide information on background radiation for the hand held gas proportional detector and the floor monitor used to perform the final status survey. Reference data were collected for three types of materials; floors, bare concrete, and all other materials. Other materials included bench tops, drywall, and metal that were present in the Hybridoma Center. The reference areas for the hand held detector floors and other materials were located in the office located near the Jackson Avenue entrance to Gill Tract, while the bare concrete reference area was located in the restroom. The floor and bare concrete reference areas for the floor monitor were located on the concrete pad of a wood frame structure that had burned at Gill Tract leaving the concrete floors in a condition similar to the floors in the Hybridoma Center. The results of the reference area surveys are summarized in Tables 5, 6, and 7.

The ’ 4C and 3H results for soil samples collected from reference areas are presented in Table 313 and 3C.



Table 1: Summary of Static Survey Results

Average Standard

Maximum Number

Survey Area (dp100 CM) Deviation’

cm2) of Static

(dpmIlOO CM) Measurements

Laboratory 2: floor 87.5 182.4 320.9 10 Laboratory 2: walls-ceiling 217.1 119.9 390.4 10

Laboratory 3: floor -196.5 254.5 200.8 10 Laboratory 3: walls-ceiling 46.3 127.4 158.7 10

Laboratory 6/7: floor 100.4 71.4 243.7 10 Laboratory 6/7: walls- 171.6 ceiling 169.7 527.7 10

Laboratory 6/7: 9.0 Hood _1 221.4 441.9 11

Laboratory 11: floor 78.1 130.8 260.8 10

Laboratory 11: 176.7 Walls -ceiling 117.4 373.2 10

Laboratory 11: 141.6 Hood2 152.6 356.1 11

Hallway floor 336.5 104.2 458.2 11 Interior Class 3 158.3 108.3 320.9 11

Greenhouse 40.3 188.0 240.2 10 Room 13: floor drain 175.9 --- 175.9 1

a Standard deviation = r(n - 1)



Table 2A: Wet Smear Results - Tritium

Average Standard Maximum Efficiency Average Maximum MDC (dpm/100 Number of Survey Area (cpm) Deviation (cpm) (c/d) (dpm/100 (dpm/100

cm2) Smears (cpm) 2) Cm 2) CHI

Laboratory 2: floor 4.1 1.3 5.7 0.265 1.5 31.6 10

Laboratory 2: walls-ceiling 2.9 1.0 4.3 0.265 11.7 17.3 31.6 10 Laboratory 3:

floor 2.6 0.7 3.3 0.265 10.4 13.3 31.6 10 Laboratory 3: walls-ceiling 3.3 0.5 3.7 0.265 13.1 14.7 31.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: floor 2.6 1.0 4.7 0.265 10.5 18.7 31.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: walls-ceiling 3.8 1.1 5.7 0.265 15.1 22.7 31.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: Hood 1 3.6 1.0 5.3 0.265 14.2 21.3 31.6 12

Laboratory 11: floor 3.5 0.9 4.7 0.265 13.9 18.7 31.6 10

Laboratory 11: Walls-ceiling 3.6 0.7 4.7 0.265 14.4 18.7 31.6 10

Laboratory 11: Hood 2 3.5 1.0 5.0 0.265 13.9 20 31.6 12

Hallway floor 3.0 0.9 4.3 0.265 12.2 17.3 31.6 11

Interior Class 3 3.2 1.0 4.7 0.265 12.7 18.7 31.6 11

Greenhouse 3.2 0.6 1 4.3 0,265 12.7 1 17.3 1 31.6 12

Room 13: floor drain 3.2 1.4 4.7 1 0.265 13.0 18.7 31.6 8



Table 2B: Wet Smear Results - Carbon-14

Survey Area Average Standard Deviation Maximum Efficiency Average

(dpm/100 Maximum (dpm/100

MDC (dpni/100 Number of

(cpm) (cpm) (cpm) (cld) cm 2) cm 2)

cm) Smears


Laboratory 2: walls-ceiling 4.0 0.8 5.1 0.5 7.9 10.2 20.6 10 Laboratory 3:

floor 3.8 1.2 5.3 0.5 7.6 10.7 20.6 10 Laboratory 3: walls-ceiling 4.2 0.6 5.1 0.5 8.3 10.3 20.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: floor 3.6 1.1 5.5 0.5 7.1 14.5 20.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: walls-ceiling 4.9 1.0 6.5 0.5 9.8 12.9 20.6 10

Laboratory 6/7: Hood 1 5.3 2.0 8.9 0.5 10.6 16.8 20.6 12


Laboratory 11: Walls-ceiling 4.7 0.9 6.1 0.5 9.3 12.3 20.6 10

Laboratory 11: Hood 2 4.6 1.1 6.3 0.5 9.2 13.7 20.6 12

Hallway floor 4.2 0.8 5.3 0.5 8.4 13.8 20.6 11

Interior Class 3 4.4 1.0 5.7 0.5 8.7 11.3 20.6 11

Greenhouse 4.3 1.2 7.3 0.5 8.6 1 14,7 1 20.6 12

Room 13: floor drain 4.2 1.7 1 6.3 0.5 8.4 12.7 20.6 8



Table 3A: Planting Field Soil Sample Results: March 2008 Sampling Effort

Eberline Results Areva Results Measured 3 H 14C Measured 14C 4C Measured 14C

Sample 3H MDC Analysis 14C MDC Analysis 14C MDC Number (pCilg) (pCilg) Date (pCiIg) (pCiIg) Date (pCi/g) (pCilg) FSS-001 0.459 1.21 5/4/08 2.94 1.12 FSS-002 0.802 1.13 5/4/08 4.00 1.06 FSS-003 0.153 1.21 5/4/08 2.91 1.15

FSS-004 0.077 1.14 5/1/08 3.03 1.04 FSS-005 0.6 1.18 5/4/08 1.99 1.03 --- FSS-006 -0.937 1.44 5/1/08 3.13 0.87 --- FSS-007 -0.879 1.45 5/1/08 2.66 0.83 FSS-008 0.524 1.16 5/1/08 2.63 1.03 --- FSS-009 0.442 1.16 5/1/08 1.95 0.99 ---

FSS-010 0.313 1.16 5/1/08 3490 a 1.01

FSS-010 --- --- 5/20/08 3�82b 325 2/09/09 -0.73 0.48

FSS-010 --- --- 5/20/08 4.68 c 3.25 ---

FSS-011 -0.43 1.43 5/1/08 2.14 0.80 --- ---

FSS-012 -0.871 1.39 5/1/08 3.44 0.89 --- ---

FSS-013 -0.032 1.48 5/1/08 3.10 0.86 --- ---

FSS-014 0.382 1.14 5/1/08 2.85 1.02 --- ---

FSS-015 0.825 1.16 5/4/08 2.00 1.03 --- ---

alnitial analysis results. bSubsequent analysis results. cDuplicate sample results in subsequent analysis.



Table 313: Hybridoma Area and Reference Area Soil Results: August 2008 Sampling Effort

Hybridoma Area Reference Area _________

Eberline Results’ Areva esultsb Eberline Resuitsa Areva R esu ltsb

Measured 14C

14C MDC

Measured 14C

14C MDC

Measured 14c

14C MDC

Measured 14C MDC Sample Sample

No. (pCilg) (pCi/g) (pCilg) (pCi/g) No. (pCi/g) (pCilg) (pCi/g) (pCilg) SO-01 0.105 0.927 --- --- RA-01 0.014 0.755 SO-02 -0.228 0.899 --- --- RA-02 0.409 0.763 SO-03 16.58 0.929 --- --- RA-03 0.916 0.774 -0.11 0.38 SO-03 0.3310 1.06 -0.1 0.4 RA-03 --- 0.38 SO-04 -0.217 0.905 --- --- RA-04 0.697 0.770 SO-05 0.664 0.888 --- --- RA-05 1.199 0.754 -0.17 0.36 SO-06 -0.247 0.921 --- --- RA-06 0.043 0.771 SO-07 -0.051 0.910 --- --- RA-07 0.757 0.773 SO-08 0.181 0.915 --- --- RA-08 0.099 0.763 SO-09 0.567 0.914 --- --- RA-09 0.580 0.942 SO-10 0.378 0.924 --- --- RA-lO 0.386 0.929 SO11c 0.281 0.905

Eberline Results’ Areva Results Eberline Resuitsa Areva Results Measured 3 H Measured 3H Measured 3H Measured

Sample MDC 3 H MDC Sample 3 H MDC 3H MDC No. (pCilg) (pCilg) (pCiIg) (pCilg) No. (pCiIg) (pCilg) (pCilg) (pCiIg) SO-01 -0.820 1.21 --- --- RA-01 0.185 1.18 SO-02 -0.357 1.17 --- --- RA-02 -0.214 1.19 SO-03 -1.218 1.21 --- --- RA-03 0.027 1.21 SO-04 -0.746 1.18 --- --- RA-04 0.216 1.20 S0-05 -0.732 1.15 --- --- RA-05 0.343 1.18 SO-06 -0.759 1.20 --- --- RA-06 0.513 1.21 S0-07 0.666 1.18 --- --- RA-07 -0.406 1.21 SO-08 -0.391 1.19 --- --- RA-08 -0.561 1.19 SO-09 -1.032 1.19 --- --- RA-09 0.270 1.21 SO-10 -1.101 1.20 --- --- RA-lO 0.000 1.19

so-li e -0.111 1.18

’Analyses performed from 9/16/08 to 9/24/08. bAnjyses performed 12/2/08. ’Re-analysis results. dDuplicate sample results from Areva. ’Sediment sample from Greenhouse gutter.



Table 3C: Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Gill Tract Planting Field Samples

Eberline Results’ Areva Resultsb GEL Results’ Eberline Results’ Areva Result&’ GEL Resultsc

Measured 14C Measured 14C Measured 14C Measured 3H Measured 3H Measured 3H MDC 14C MDC 14C MDC MDC 3H MDC 3H MDC

Sample NO. (pCi/g) (pCilg) (pCi/g) (pCilg) (pCilg) (pCilg) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCilg) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCilg) OOL-01 -001 -F --- --- -0.33 0.43 --- --- --- --- 0.5 1.8 OOL-01 -002-F --- --- -0.22 0.46 --- --- --- --- 0.41 1.6 OOL-01-003-F --- --- -0.5 0.49 --- --- --- --- -0.29 1.8 OOL-01-004-F --- --- -0.2 0.48 --- --- --- --- -0.7 1.4 OOL-01 -005-F --- --- -0.09 0.46 --- --- --- --- 0.77 1.8 OOL-01-006-F --- --- -0.05 0.48 --- --- --- --- -0.79 1.3 OOL-01-007-F --- --- -0.38 0.5 --- --- --- --- 0.28 1.7 OOL-01 -008-F --- --- -0.51 0.43 --- --- --- --- 0.61 1.6 OOL-01-009-F --- --- -0.33 0.43 --- --- --- --- 0.07 1.8 OOL01010Fd 0.5 1.08 -0.067 0.31 -0.999 0.525 -0.19 1.08 -0.02 1.7 1.26 2.76 OOL-01-011-F --- --- -0.4 0.43 --- --- --- --- -0.03 1.8 OOL-01-012-F --- --- -0.38 0.49 --- --- --- --- 0.25 1.8 OOL01013Fd -0.301 0.978 -0.72 0.48 -1.7 0.556 2.51 1.14 -0.37 1.2 0.419 3.81 OOL-01-014-F --- --- -0.46 0.47 --- --- --- --- -0.25 1.6 OOL-01-015-F --- --- -0.19 0.46 --- --- --- --- -0.21 1.3 OOL-01-016-F --- --- -0.49 0.45 --- --- --- --- -0.15 1.8 OOL-01-017-F --- --- -0.37 0.44 --- --- --- --- 0.72 1.8 OOL01018Fd -0.113 0.983 -0.63 0.47 -1.25 0.575 3.15 1.13 -0.3 1.7 -0.684 2.99 OOL-01-019-F --- --- -0.13 0.47 --- --- --- --- -0.36 1.3 OOL-01 -020-F --- --- -0.3 0.44 --- --- --- --- 0.21 1.8 ___

’Analyses performed between 6/5/09 to 6/14/09. bAnalyses performed between 6/1/09 to 6/15/09. cAnalyses performed on 5/27/09. dSpljt sample (sample analyzed by Areva, GEL, and Eberline).



Table 31): Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Reference Area Samples

Eberline Results’ Areva Resultsb GEL Results’ Eberline Results’ Areva Resultsb GEL Results’ Measured 14C Measured 14C Measured ’ 4C Measured uH Measured aH Measured TH

Sample No 14C MDC 14C MDC 14C MDC 3 H MDC 3H MDC 3H MDC (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCiIg) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g)

REF02001Bd 0.686 0.987 -0.28 0.48 -1.17 0.548 -0.225 0.997 -0.11 1.7 0.801 2.79 REF-02-002-B --- --- 0.02 0.35 --- --- --- --- 0.28 1.7 REF02003Ba 0.088 1.02 -0.22 0.44 -0.489 0.549 -0.234 1.04 -0.06 1.8 0.936 2.76 REF-02-004-B --- --- -0.08 0.4 --- --- --- --- -0.32 1.8 REF-02-005-B --- --- -0.27 0.44 --- --- --- --- -0.59 1.3 REF02005Be --- --- -0.08 0.43 --- --- --- --- 0.21 1.8 REF-02-CONT-01-B --- --- -0.02 0.36 --- --- --- --- 0.21 1.7 REF-02-CONT-02-B --- --- -0.15 0.37 --- --- --- --- 0.12 1.6 REF-02-CONT-03-B --- --- -0.21 0.48 --- --- --- --- -0.27 1.2 REF-02-CONT-04-B --- --- -0.47 0.45 --- --- --- --- 0.45 1.7 REF-02-CONT-05-B --- --- -0.05 0.43 --- --- --- --- -0.3 1.1 REF-02-CONT-05- B’ --- --- -0.39 0.46 --- --- --- --- 0.02 1.5

REF-03-001 -B --- --- -0.29 0.39 --- --- --- --- -0.18 1.7

REF-03-002-B --- --- -0.25 0.38 --- --- --- --- 0.82 1.8

REF-03-003-B --- --- -0.36 0.41 --- --- --- --- 0.87 1.7

REF-03-004-B --- --- -0.14 0.42 --- --- --- --- -0.09 1.2 REF03004Bd --- --- -0.21 0.44 --- --- --- --- -0.31 1.2

REF-03-005-B --- --- -0.27 0.39 --- --- --- --- -0.23 1.8

REF-03-CONT-01 -B --- --- -0.5 0.47 --- --- --- --- -0.34 1.8

REF-03-CONT-02-B --- --- -0.24 0.4 --- --- --- --- 0.55 1.7

REF-03-CONT-03-B --- --- -0.11 0.34 --- --- --- --- 0.28 1.7 REF-03-CONT-04-

0.891 0.997 -0.12 0.36 0.183 0.511 -0.489 1.01 0.3 1.7 1.3 3.26

REF-03-CONT-05-B --- --- -0.47 0.49 --- --- --- --- -0.23 1.8

’Analyses performed between 6/5/09 to 6/14/09. bAnalyses performed between 6/1/09 to 6/15/09. ’Analyses performed on 5/27/09. dSpljt sample (sample analyzed by Areva, GEL, and Eberline). ’Duplicate sample results.


Gill Tract Final Status Survey

Table 3E: Supplemental Sampling Effort (April 2009) Soil Sample Results: Biased Soil Samples

Areva Resuitsa Measured 14C Measured H

It MDC 3H MDC

Sample No. (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g) (pCi/g)

OOL-05-001-B -0.16 0.44 0.02 1.8 OOL-05-002-B -0.36 0.44 0.04 1.7 OOL-05-003-B -0.33 0.45 -0.36 1.3 OOL-05-004-B -0.22 0.41 -0.48 1.7 OOL-05-005-B -0.09 0.37 0.26 1.5 OOL-05-006-B -0.14 0.34 0.11 1.6 OOL-05-007-B -0.33 0.45 -0.31 1.6 OOL-05-008-B -0.54 0.45 -0.22 1.8 OOL-05-009-B -0.32 0.48 0.28 1.8 OOL-05-010-B -0.22 0.47 -0.1 1.7 OOL-05-011-B -0.33 0.4 0.15 1.7 OOL-05-012-B -0.16 0.36 0.78 1.7 OOL-05-013-B -0.36 0.38 0.17 1.8

’ Analyses performed between 6/1/09 to 6/15/09. In order to quantify ’ 4C and 3H, a purified solution obtained via radiochemistry is counted on a liquid scintillation counter. In order to accurately measure the ’ 4C and 3H response of the liquid scintillation counter, the background response of the liquid scintillation counter must be determined. For each batch of samples, a background sample is counted to determine the background count rate for the sample. This background count rate is subtracted from the gross count rate for each sample to determine the net

or 3 H count rate for each sample in the batch. This net count rate is then used to determine the activity concentration in the sample.

For a sample without the presence of 14C or 3H, the gross count rate for the sample will be statistically equivalent to the background. If the background count rate is greater than the gross sample count rate, the activity concentration will be negative. This is statistically equivalent.



Table 4: Results of Other Sample Analyses

3H

Sample ID

Activity (pCilg)

2-a U ncertai ntya

(pCilg) MDA

(pCilg) Activity (pCilg)

2-a Uncertaintya (pCi/g)

MDA (pCi/g)

SHED1 6 5.1 8.3 5.5 3.7 5.9 SHED2 2.4 4.6 7.7 3.5 3.5 5.7 Oil 22 15 24 11 12 20

The 2-a uncertainty is a reporting convention used by the contracted laboratory to indicate the 95% confidence level. Values are as reported by the laboratory.

Table 5: Summary of Reference Material Survey Results: Floor Monitor

Floor, Tiles Removed (cpm)

- Bare Concrete (cpm)

881 907 803 922 787 896 875 - 904 828 - 946 862 - 968 836 - 980 791 - 956 856 - 926 813 - 965 908 - 896 844 - 913 796 - 978 841 - 939 886 - 887

Average 840.5 932.2 StDeva 37.6 31.8

Scan MDC (d pm/i 00cm 2) 535 - 564 MDCR (cpm) 242 - 255

a St Dev = Standard deviation = (n � i)



Table 6: Summary Reference Material Survey Results: Hand Held (126 cm 2) Detector

Average 2-min counts

Office Floor

- Other Surfacesa

-

-

Bare Concrete’

431 379 - 545 429 366 - 518

449 321 - 531 438 331 - 573 475 363 - 554 435 336 - 562 468 355 - 546 434 345 - 528 464 351 - 526 486 328 - 522 453 333 - 535 432 347 - 534 447 - 373 - 549 479 365 - 519

509 - 371 - 558

455.3 - 350.9 - 540.0

Average CPM 227.6 175.5 - 270.0

Static MDC (dpm/1OOcm 2) 628 555 681

Scan MDC (dpm/1OOcm 2) 1745 - 1533 1901

MDCR(cpm) 170 - ---TT

149 - 185

a Reference material measurements made with the hand held detector were 2-minute counts.



6.0 DATA QUALITY

Data verification and data validation were performed to ensure the data were of the proper quantity and quality to support the objectives of the final status survey.

6.1 Data Verification

Data verification ensures that the requirements stated in the survey design (i.e., SAP, Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP), and standard operating procedures (SOP) were implemented as prescribed. The number, type, and location of measurements performed were compared to the survey design in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a). Additional measurements were performed to satisfy the requirements of the survey design as necessary. All of the measurements required by the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a) were performed using the methodologies and SOP specified.

Instruments used to perform radiological measurements were calibrated within the last twelve months as described in the QAPP (Bartlett, 2008b) and the appropriate SOP. Instrument response and background were checked before and after every shift to ensure instruments were operating properly. All radiological instruments were working within acceptable parameters as specified in the QAPP (Bartlett, 2008b) throughout the survey.

6.1.1 Scan Surveys

The scan surveys of horizontal surfaces required in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a) were performed using the floor monitor and hand held gas proportional detectors. Scan surveys of building surfaces in the wood frame structure and greenhouse were completed as required. No conditions were identified that would interfere with the ability to collect adequate data during scanning surveys.

6.1.2 Static Measurements

A minimum of ten static measurements were performed in each area as required in the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a). In addition, there were additional judgmental measurements performed based on the results of the scan surveys with hand held instruments. The only conditions that were identified that could interfere with the ability to collect adequate data were associated with access issues. The hand held gas proportional detectors were too large to fit inside small diameter pipes such as drains and sink traps, so no static measurements could be performed in these areas. Whenever practical the drain lines and sink traps were removed and included in the waste shipment of materials from the detached wooden shed at the Hybridoma Center.

6.1.3 Wet Smears

A minimum of ten wet smears were collected in each survey area as required by the SAP (Bartlett, 2008a). The wet smears were generally collected at the same location where a static measurement was performed. The exception was areas such as inside drains which were inaccessible for static measurements because of the size of the hand held detectors. No conditions were identified that would interfere with the ability to collect adequate data during scanning surveys.

6.2 Data Validation

Data validation ensures that the results of data collection activities support the objectives of the survey as documented in the QAPP (Bartlett, 2008b). The results of the radiological final status survey of Gill Tract were reviewed and evaluated against the survey objectives. Because all



measurements were below the survey method MDC values and did not indicate the presence of any residual radioactivity above background levels, graphical plots were not developed. The data are adequate to support the objectives of the final status survey.

6.2.1 Floor Monitor

The calibration of the floor monitor was performed by an approved vendor prior to collecting data at the site. Efficiency calibrations were performed using 14C, technetium-99, and strontium-90 to provide a range of efficiencies for beta particles with different energies. Carbon-14 has beta particles with the lowest energy, 156 keY, so the 14C efficiency was used to perform all of the detection sensitivity calculations and to convert measurement into activity. A copy of the calibration certificate for the hand held gas proportional counters are referenced in Attachment C, Instrument Checks and Calibration Forms.

The efficiency and sensitivity calculations show that the hand held gas proportional detectors are acceptable for demonstrating compliance with the acceptance criterion for small areas of elevated ’4C activity using scanning measurements, but static measurements of at least one minute are required to demonstrate compliance with the acceptance criterion for average 14 C activity.

6.2.2 Hand Held Gas Proportional Detectors

The calibration of the hand held gas proportional detectors was performed by an approved vendor prior to collecting data at the site. Efficiency calibrations were performed using ’4C, technetium-99, and strontium-90 to provide a range of efficiencies for beta particles with different energies. Carbon-14 has beta particles with the lowest energy, 156 keV, so the 14C efficiency was used to perform all of the detection sensitivity calculations and to convert hand held measurement into activity. A copy of the calibration certificate for the hand held gas proportional counters are referenced in Attachment C, Instrument Checks and Calibration Forms.

The efficiency and sensitivity calculations show that the hand held gas proportional detectors are acceptable for demonstrating compliance with the acceptance criterion for small areas of elevated ’4C activity using scanning measurements, but static measurements of at least one minute are required to demonstrate compliance with the acceptance criterion for average It

activity.

6.2.3 Laboratory Measurement

Laboratory blanks, laboratory duplicates, and laboratory control samples were analyzed with each batch of samples. A total of 11 sets of laboratory QC measurements were performed with the 146 wet smears, or one set of QC measurements for every 13 samples. A total of 4 sets of laboratory QC measurements were performed for the 29 soil samples, or one set of QC measurements for every 7 samples. The QAPP (Bartlett, 2008b) required one set of QC measurements for every 20 samples, so the number of QC measurements was adequate to evaluate the laboratory measurement performance.

The 84 laboratory blank results and the 84 duplicate analyses were all less than the detection limit for the gross beta liquid scintillation measurements. The standard deviation for the 84 LCS results was less than 2% of the mean value. Therefore, all of the laboratory QC analyses complied with the requirements of the QAPP (Bartlett, 2008b). The results of the laboratory measurements are adequate to support the objectives of the final status survey.



During reviews of the raw liquid scintillation data a problem was identified with the luminescence values. The luminescence values are usually less than 10 for liquid scintillation counts, but values as high as 90 were identified for the wet smear counts. The source was identified as chemiluminescence, where a chemical reaction with the scintillation cocktail results in counts that are incorrectly assigned as radioactivity. The laboratory was consulted and the window of beta particle energies was adjusted to exclude counts resulting from chemiluminescence. The change in the window settings resulted in lowering the tritium efficiency from 0.41 to 0.265.

The ability of the liquid scintillation cocktail to transmit the scintillations of light affects the counting efficiency and is measured by placing a radioactive source next to each sample and performing a measurement. The ability to transmit light is recorded as the tSIE value. Values for the tSTE lower than 300 indicate a potential for a reduction in the counting efficiency. Because the gross beta liquid scintillation counts were not associated with a specific radionuclide, the effect of the tSIE on efficiency could not be quantified. The impact on the results is a potential for the MDC to be higher than reported in samples with a tSTE lower than 300 because of uncertainty in the efficiency value. Liquid scintillation results for samples with a tSIE value less than 300 received a J-flag because of the increased uncertainty associated with the reported result. A total of 12 out of the 146 wet smears (8%) reported tSIE values less than 300. The source of the low tSIE values is apparently the larger quantities of dirt or dust from surfaces.



7.0 CONCLUSIONS

The activity levels associated with the wood frame structure and greenhouse at the Hybridoma Center on the Gill Tract site are below the Regulatory Guide 1.86 levels. Based on the results of the radiological surveys at Gill Tract and the associated reference areas, there is no dose above background at the Hybridoma Center or the planting field. The surveys of the laboratory hood exhaust ducts, roofs, and ground floor sump did not identify any radioactivity above the acceptance criterion. There is no indication that the outside surfaces at Gill Tract were impacted by the use of radionuclides at the Hybridoma Center. The levels of radionuclides in surface soil in the planting area and the radionuclide concentrations in the area surrounding the Hybridoma Center are consistent with the reference area concentrations and would not contribute any additional dose to members of the public.

Based on the results of the final status surveys performed at Gill tract the entire 10 acre property is eligible for release from radiological controls with no restrictions.



8.0 REFERENCES

Bartlett 2008a. Sampling and Analysis (SAP): Radiological Final Status Survey Gill Tract University of California, Berkeley California. Bartlett Services, Inc., April, 2008

Bartlett 2008b. Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP): Radiological Final Status Survey Gill Tract University of California, Berkeley California. Bartlett Services, Inc., April 2008

State of California, June, 1977. DECON-1 Guidelines for Decontamination of Facilities and Equipment prior to Release for Unrestricted Use. June 1977.

DOE, 1995. Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, DOE order 5400.5.

ERS 2008. University of California, Berkley, California Gil Tract Radiological Historical Use Assessment, Final. ERS Solutions, Inc. (ERS), May, 2008

NUREG-1575. Multi Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM), Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016 Rev. 1, DOE/EH-0624 Rev. 1, August 2000.

NRC 1974. Termination of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Reactors, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.86. June 1974

NRC 1995. Minimum Detectable Concentrations with Typical Radiation Survey Instruments for Various Contaminants and Field Conditions, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG 1507. August 1995

NRC, 1998. Supplemental Information on the Implementation of the Final Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination, Federal Register: November 18, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 222; pages 64132-64134).

NRC, 1999. Supplemental Information on the Implementation of the Final Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination. Yederal Register: December 7, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 234; pages 68395-68396).

NRC 2003. Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance. NUREG-1757, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Revision 1. September 2003

NRC, 2007. Regulations Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20, Standards for Protection Against Radiation.



ATTACHMENT A

Sampling Locations



Figure A-i: Room 2 Sampling Locations

Hai

01-01

Floor



Figure A-2: Laboratory 2 Sampling Locations

Floor

Note: Floor = Class 1; walls & ceiling = Class 2



Figure A-3: Laboratory 3 Sampling Locations Ceiling

Floor




Figure A-4: Room 4 Sampling Locations hal

Floor

04-01



Figure A-5: Room S Sampling Locations hal

* 05-01

Floor



Figure A-6: Laboratory 6/7 Sampling Locations Ceiling

Floor S Grid Origin (OX, OY, OZ)




Figure A-7: Room 8 Sampling Locations

Restroom

Room 6 & 7

Floor

Custodial Closet

Hallway


Gill Tract Final Status Survey R


Hallway

Room 8

Room 10



Room 9 Restroom


10-01 *

Floor Door



Figure A-lO: Laboratory 11 Sampling Locations




Figure A-li: Room 12 Sampling Locations

Room 13 Autoclave

Hallway Floor Grassy Area

12-01 *

Room 11




Room 14 Small

Mechanical Room

Grassy Area

Room 12



Figure A-13: Room 14 Sampling Locations Inner Greenhouse

14-01

Courtyard Floor Room 13 Autoclave

Hallway



Figure A-14: Room 15 Sampling Locations Outer Greenhouse

Room 14 Small

Mechanical Room

Courtyard

Floor

15-01 *

Hallway

Room 8

Room 9



Figure A-iS: Room 16 Sampling Locations

16-02

*

16-10 * 16-03

* 16-06

* 16-05

*

16-09 l6!0

* * * 16-01 16-04 16-08

Hybridoma



Figure A-16: Hallway Floor Sampling Locations

� Grid Origin (OX, OY, OZ)



ATTACHMENT B

Survey Data



Table B-i: Static Measurements (126 cm Detector)

Survey Area

Sample ID gcpm

bkgd (cpm)

Effic. (c/d)

Measurement ’d m/100

cm 2)

MDC ’d rn/i 00

cm2) Location

Room 2 0201 259 227.6 0.0925 269.4 628 Floor Room 2 0202 265 227.6 0.0925 320.9 628 Floor Room 2 0203 245 227.6 0.0925 149.3 628 Floor Room 2 0204 257 227.6 0.0925 252.3 628 Floor Room 2 0205 253 1 227.6 0.0925 217.9 628 Floor Room 2 0206 220 227.6 0.0925 -65.2 628 Floor Room 2 0207 235 227.6 0.0925 63.5 628 Floor Room 2 0208 228 227.6 0.0925 3.4 628 Floor Room 2 0209 204 227.6 0.0925 -202.5 628 Floor Room 2 0210 192 175.5 0.0925 141.6 628 Floor Room 2 0211 184 175.5 0.0925 72.9 555 Wall Room 2 0212 1 189 175.5 0.0925 115.8 555 Wall Room 2 0213 203 175.5 0.0925 236.0 555 Wall Room 2 0214 214 1 175.5 0.0925 330.3 555 Wall Room 2 0215 186 175.5 0.0925 90.1 555 Wall Room 2 0216 212 175.5 0.0925 313.2 555 Wall Room 2 0217 191 175.5 0.0925 133.0 555 Wall Room 2 0218 221 175.5 0.0925 390.4 555 Ceiling Room 2 0219 216 175.5 0.0925 347.5 555 Ceiling Room 2 0220 192 1 175.5 0.0925 141.6 555 Ceiling Room 3 0301 175 227.6 0.0925 -451.3 628 Floor Room 3 0302 251 227.6 0.0925 200.8 628 Floor Room 3 0303 230 227.6 0.0925 20.6 628 Floor Room 3 0304 193 227.6 0.0925 -296.9 628 Floor Room 3 0305 181 227.6 0.0925 -399.8 628 Floor Room 3 0306 178 227.6 0.0925 -425.6 628 Floor Room 3 0307 1 187 227.6 0.0925 1 -348.3 628 Floor Room 3 0308 250 227.6 0.0925 192.2 628 Floor Room 3 0309 186 227.6 0.0925 -356.9 628 Floor Room 3 0310 216 227.6 0.0925 -99.5 628 Floor Room 3 0311 189 175.5 0.0925 115.8 555 Drywall Room 3 0312 184 175.5 0.0925 72.9 555 Drywall Room 3 0313 194 175.5 0.0925 158.7 555 Drywall Room 3 0314 187 175.5 0.0925 98.7 555 Drywall Room 3 0315 1 185 175.5 0.0925 1 81.5 555 Freezer Room 3 0316 166 175.5 0.0925 -81.5 555 Freezer Room 3 0317 187 175.5 0.0925 98.7 555 Freezer Room 3 0318 144 175.5 0.0925 -270.3 555 Freezer Room 3 1 0319 187 1 175.5 0.0925 98.7 555 Drywall Room 3 1 0320 186 1 175.5 0.0925 90.1 555 Drywall



Survey Area

Sample ID gcpm

bkgd (cpm)

Effic. (cid)

Measurement

cm dm/100

cm Location

Room 6 & 7 0701 236 227.6 0.0925 72.1 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0702 244 227.6 0.0925 140.7 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0703 241 227.6 0.0925 115.0 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0704 246 227.6 0.0925 157.9 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0705 229 227.6 0.0925 12.0 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0706 256 227.6 0.0925 243.7 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0707 227 227.6 0.0925 -5.1 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0708 239 227.6 0.0925 97.8 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0709 1 238 227.6 0.0925 89.2 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0710 237 227.6 0.0925 80.7 628 Floor Room 6 & 7 0711 173 175.5 0.0925 -21.5 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0712 179 175.5 0.0925 30.0 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0713 185 175.5 0.0925 81.5 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0714 195 175.5 0.0925 167.3 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0715 207 175.5 0.0925 270.3 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0716 206 175.5 0.0925 261.7 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0717 237 175.5 0.0925 527.7 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0718 211 175.5 0.0925 304.6 555 Wall Room 6 & 7 0719 183 175.5 0.0925 64.4 555 Ceiling Room 6 & 7 0720 179 175.5 0.0925 30.0 555 Ceiling

Hood 1 HiOl 182 175.5 0.0925 55.8 555 Cabinet Hood 1 H102 169 175.5 0.0925 -55.8 555 Lip Hood 1 H103 164 175.5 0.0925 -98.7 555 Left Side Hood 1 H104 175 175.5 0.0925 -4.3 555 Right Side Hood 1 H105 155 175.5 0.0925 -175.9 555 Base Hood 1 H106 153 175.5 0.0925 -193.1 555 Baffle Hood 1 H107 168 175.5 0.0925 -64.4 555 Splash Guard

Hood 1 H108 161 175.5 0.0925 -124.4 555 Inlet Fume

Hood Hood 1 H109 163 175.5 0.0925 -107.3 555 Inside Duct Hood 1 HilO 225 175.5 0.0925 424.7 555 Drain Hood 1 H113 227 175.5 0.0925 441.9 555 Exhaust

Room 11 1101 222 227.6 0.0925 -48.0 628 Floor Room 11 1102 218 227.6 0.0925 -82.4 628 Floor Room 11 1103 218 227.6 0.0925 -82.4 628 Floor Room 11 1104 243 227.6 0.0925 132.1 628 Floor Room 11 1105 222 227.6 0.0925 -48.0 628 Floor Room 11 1106 244 227.6 0.0925 140.7 628 Floor Room 11 1107 254 227.6 0.0925 226.5 628 Floor Room 11 1108 1 258 227.6 0.0925 260.8 628 Floor Room 11 1109 246 227.6 0.0925 157.9 628 Floor Room 11 1110 242 227.6 0.0925 123.6 628 Floor



Survey Area

Sample ID gcpm

bkgd (cpm)

Effic. (cld)

Measurement ’d mIlOO

cm 2)

MDC

’’d1’ mIlOO

cm) Location

Room 11 1111 190 175.5 0.0925 124.4 555 Wall Room 11 1112 217 175.5 0.0925 356.1 555 Wall Room ii 1113 199 175.5 0.0925 201.6 555 Wall Room 11 1114 202 175.5 0.0925 227.4 555 Wall Room 11 1115 189 175.5 0.0925 115.8 555 Wall Room ii 1116 186 175.5 0.0925 90.1 555 Wall Room 11 1117 1 180 175.5 0.0925 38.6 555 Wall Room 11 1118 198 175.5 0.0925 193.1 555 Ceiling Room ii 1119 181 175.5 0.0925 47.2 555 Ceiling Room 11 1120 219 175.5 0.0925 373.2 555 Ceiling Hood 2 HiOl 171 175.5 0.0925 -38.6 555 Cabinet Hood 2 H102 184 175.5 0.0925 72.9 555 Lip Hood 2 H103 200 175.5 0.0925 210.2 555 Left Side Hood 2 H104 182 175.5 0.0925 55.8 555 Right Side Hood 2 H105 201 175.5 0.0925 218.8 555 Base Hood 2 H106 217 175.5 0.0925 356.1 555 Baffle Hood 2 H107 208 175.5 0.0925 278.9 555 Splash Guard

Hood 2 H108 160 175.5 0.0925 -133.0 555 Inlet Fume

Hood Hood 2 H109 197 175.5 0.0925 184.5 555 Inside Duct Hood HilO 181 175.5 0.0925 47.2 555 Drain Hood 2 Hill 211 175.5 0.0925 304.6 555 Exhaust Hallway 2001 266 227.6 0.0925 329.5 628 Floor Hallway 2002 250 227.6 0.0925 192.2 628 Floor Hallway 2003 281 227.6 0.0925 458.2 628 Floor Hallway 2004 270 227.6 0.0925 363.8 628 Floor Hallway 2005 249 227.6 0.0925 183.6 628 Floor Hallway 2006 279 227.6 0.0925 441.0 628 Floor Hallway 2007 264 227.6 0.0925 312.3 628 Floor Hallway 2008 276 1 227.6 0.0925 415.3 628 Floor Hallway 2009 281 227.6 0.0925 458.2 628 Floor Hallway 2010 252 227.6 0.0925 209.4 628 Floor Hallway 2011 267 227.6 0.0925 338.1 628 Floor Room 1 0101 1 237 227.6 0.0925 80.7 628 Floor Room 4 0401 265 227.6 0.0925 320.9 628 Floor Room 5 0501 229 1 227.6 0.0925 12.0 628 Floor Room 8 0801 258 1 227.6 0.0925 260.8 628 Floor Room 9 0901 255 227.6 0.0925 235.1 628 Floor

Room 10 1001 246 227.6 0.0925 157.9 628 Floor Room 12 1201 242 227.6 0.0925 123.6 628 Floor Room 13 1301 229 227.6 0.0925 12.0 628 Floor Room 14 1401 1 263 227.6 0.0925 303.7 628 Floor



Survey Area

Sample ID gcpm

bkgd (cpm)

Effic. (cid)

Measurement

cm) dm/100

cm) Location

Room 15 1501 241 227.6 0.0925 115.0 628 Floor

Room 15 1502 284 270.0 0.0925 120.1 681 Concrete

Greenhouse 1601 250 270.0 0.0925 -171.6 628 Floor

Greenhouse 1602 291 270.0 0.0925 180.2 628 Floor

Greenhouse 1603 261 270.0 0.0925 -77.2 628 Floor

Greenhouse 1604 234 270.0 0.0925 -308.9 628 Floor Greenhouse 1605 295 270.0 0.0925 214.5 628 Floor Greenhouse 1606 280 270.0 0.0925 85.8 628 Floor

Greenhouse 1607 297 270.0 0.0925 231.7 628 Floor Greenhouse 1608 264 270.0 0.0925 -51.5 628 Floor Greenhouse 1609 298 270.0 0.0925 240.2 628 Floor Greenhouse 1610 277 270.0 0.0925 60.1 628 Floor

Autoclave 1 1302 1 196 175.5 0.0925 175.9 555 Floor Drain


Gill Tract Final Status

Table B-2: 100 cm 2 Smear Results

_____ Region A: 3Ha Region B: 14Cb Region Cc:> 156 key Sample ID Sample #

(cpm) d 2S% 2 dpm/lOOcm cpm d 2S% 2 dpm/lOOcm cpm d 2S% 2 dpm/lOOcm

84221 02-1 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.7 48.5 11.3 12.6 32.6 15.7 84222 02-2 2.3 75.6 9.3 2.5 73.7 4.9 9.2 38.1 11.5 84223 02-3 4.3 55.5 17.3 5.0 51.4 10.1 11.5 34.1 14.3 84224 02-4 5.7 48.5 22.7 6.3 46.0 12.6 12.6 32.5 15.8 84225 02-5 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.3 63.3 6.7 13.2 31.8 16.5 84226 02-6 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.0 66.7 6.0 10.2 36.2 12.7 84227 02-7 5.3 50.0 21.3 5.8 47.8 11.7 12.2 33.1 15.2 84228 02-8 5.0 51.6 20.0 6.7 44.7 13.3 10.9 35.0 13.6 84229 02-9 5.3 50.0 21.3 6.8 44.2 13.7 14.3 30.5 17.9 842210 02-10 3.7 60.3 14.7 5.0 51.6 10.0 11.8 33.6 14.8 842211 02-11 2.0 81.7 8.0 3.2 64.5 6.4 8.6 39.3 10.8 842212 02-12 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.3 63.3 6.7 10.5 35.6 13.1 842213 02-13 1.3 100.0 5.3 3.5 62.1 6.9 9.5 37.5 11.9 842214 02-14 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.4 54.9 8.8 14.2 30.7 17.7 842215 02-15 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.5 54.7 8.9 13.7 31.2 17.1 842216 02-16 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.7 53.5 9.3 12.7 32.4 15.9 842217 02-17 4.3 55.5 17.3 4.4 54.9 8.8 10.9 35.0 13.7 842218 02-18 4.3 55.5 17.3 5.1 51.2 10.2 12.3 33.0 15.3 842219 02-19 3.7 60.3 14.7 3.8 59.3 7.6 8.9 38.7 11.2 842220 02-20 2.3 75.6 9.3 2.8 69.1 5.6 8.5 39.6 10.6 842221 03-1 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.2 56.6 8.3 10.5 35.6 13.2 842222 03-2 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.3 63.3 6.7 11.3 34.4 14.1 842223 03-3 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.6 61.0 7.2 10.7 35.3 13.4 842224 03-4 1.0 115.5 4.0 1.7 89.4 3.3 9.4 37.6 11.8 842225 03-5 2.7 70.7 10.7 5.3 50.0 10.7 13.5 31.4 16.9 842226 03-6 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.9 58.4 7.8 12.9 32.2 16.1 842227 03-7 3.3 63.3 13.3 5.0 51.6 10.0 11.7 33.8 14.6 842228 03-8 3.0 66.7 12.0 5.3 50.2 10.6 12.3 33.0 15.3 842229 03-9 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.5 73.7 4.9 10.8 35.1 13.5 842230 03-10 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.4 62.9 6.8 13.1 31.9 16.4 842231 03-11 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.2 64.9 6.3 12.3 33.0 15.3



Region A: 3lIa _____ Region B: I 4Cb Region Cc:> 156 keV __ Sample ID Sample #

(cpm) d 2S% 2 dpm/lOOcm cpm d 2S% 2 dpm/lOOcm cpm d 2S% dpm/l 2 OOcm

842232 03-12 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.1 56.9 8.3 9.7 37.1 12.1

842233 03-13 4.0 57.7 16.0 4.8 52.8 9.6 9.4 37.7 11.7

842234 03-14 3.7 60.3 14.7 5.1 51.0 10.3 11.9 33.5 14.9

842235 03-15 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.8 59.3 7.6 9.7 37.1 12.1

842236 03-16 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.8 59.6 7.5 11.4 34.2 14.3

842237 03-17 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.4 54.9 8.8 9.0 38.4 11.3

842238 03-18 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.8 59.3 7.6 14.3 30.5 17.9

842239 03-19 3.3 63.3 13.3 3.8 59.6 7.5 13.2 31.8 16.5

842240 03-20 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.9 52.1 9.8 11.9 33.5 14.9

842241 06-1 1.7 89.4 6.7 2.7 70.2 5.4 10.6 35.5 13.2

842242 06-2 1.3 100.0 5.3 2.5 73.7 4.9 15.1 29.7 18.9

842243 06-3 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.9 52.3 9.8 13.9 31.0 17.4

842244 06-4 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.8 59.3 7,6 13.0 32.0 16.3

842245 06-5 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.5 73.0 5.0 9.5 37.5 11.9

842246 06-6 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.1 65.8 6.2 12.0 33.3 15.1

842247 06-7 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.6 71.3 5.3 7.8 41.3 9.8

842248 06-8 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.8 53.0 9.5 10.2 36,2 12.7

842249 06-9 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.5 49.1 11.1 14.3 30.6 17.8

842250 06-10 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.2 64.5 6.4 14.5 30.3 18.1

842251 06-11 5.0 51.6 20.0 5.8 48.0 11.6 8.1 40.6 10.1

842252 06-12 5.0 51.6 20.0 6.0 47.0 12.1 12.5 32.6 15.7

842253 06-13 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.7 53.5 9.3 10.3 36.1 12.8

842254 06-14 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.9 52.1 9.8 13.0 32.0 16.3

842255 06-15 3.7 60.3 14.7 5.0 51.4 10.1 9.6 37,3 12.0

842256 06-16 3.7 60.3 14.7 5.1 51.2 10.2 11.8 33.7 14.7

842257 06-17 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.2 64.9 6.3 11.1 34.6 13.9

842258 06-18 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.4 54.9 8.8 13.5 31.4 16.9

842259 06-19 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.5 62.1 6.9 15.5 29.3 19.4

842260 06-20 5.7 48.5 22.7 6.5 45.4 12.9 13.5 31.4 16.9

842261 11-1 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.1 65.8 6.2 13.5 31.5 16.8

842262 11-2 4.3 55.5 17.3 5.2 50.8 10.3 14.9 29.9 18.7

842263 11-3 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.9 52.1 9.8 1 11.3 34.4 14.1

842264 11-4 4.0 1 57.7 16.0 5.9 47.5 11.8 1 9.1 38.3 11,4



Region A: 3Ha _____ Region B: 14Cb Region Cc:> 156 keV Sample ID Sample #


842265 11-5 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.8 53.0 9.5 11.2 34.5 14.0 842266 11-6 1.7 89.4 6.7 2.6 71.3 5.3 9.6 37.2 12.0 842267 11-7 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.1 51.0 10.3 10.7 35.3 13.4 842268 11-8 3.7 60.3 14.7 3.8 59.0 7.7 10.7 35.3 13.4 842269 11-9 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.3 55.7 8.6 11.2 34.6 14.0 842270 11-10 4.3 55.5 17.3 4.3 55.5 8.7 14.7 30.2 18.3 842271 11-11 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.7 53.5 9.3 9.3 37.8 11.7 842272 11-12 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.3 50.0 10.7 12.0 33.4 15.0

842273 11-13 4.0 57.7 16.0 5.5 49.4 10.9 12.5 32.7 15.6

842274 11-14 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.4 62.5 6.8 15.1 29.7 18.9 842275 11-15 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.3 64.1 6.5 10.2 36.2 12.7

842276 11-16 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.9 52.3 9.8 12.1 33.2 15.2

842277 11-17 4.3 55.5 17.3 4.4 54.9 8.8 9.7 37.1 12.1

842278 11-18 4.0 57.7 16.0 6.1 46.7 12.3 12.3 33.0 15.3

842269 11-19 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.9 58.4 7.8 10.1 36.3 12.7

842280 11-20 4.3 55.5 173 5.0 51.4 10.1 10.9 35.0 13.6

842281 16-1 3.3 63.3 13.3 5.4 49.8 10.8 11.3 34.4 14.1

842282 16-2 4.0 57.7 16.0 4.4 54.9 8.8 16.5 28.4 20.6

842283 16-3 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.4 54.9 8.8 11.5 34.1 14.3

842284 16-4 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.5 61.4 7.1 10.7 35.3 13.4

842285 16-5 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.0 57.7 8.0 13.3 31.7 16.6

842286 16-6 4.3 55.5 17.3 7.3 42.6 14.7 12.7 32.4 15.8

842287 16-7 2.3 75.6 9.3 2.8 69.1 5.6 8.8 39.0 10.9

842288 16-8 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.8 52.5 9.7 11.5 34.1 14.4

842289 16-9 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.1 56.9 8.3 11.3 34.4 14.1

842290 16-10 2.3 75.6 9.3 4.4 54.9 8.8 10.6 35.4 13.3

842291 16-11 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.9 58.7 7.8 14.7 30.2 18.3

842292 16-12 2.7 70.7 10.7 2.7 70.7 5.3 9.4 37.7 11.7

842293 20-1 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.4 54.9 8.8 8.6 39.4 10.7

842294 20-2 4.0 57.7 16.0 4.7 53.2 9.4 11.0 34.8 13.8

842295 20-3 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.7 60.3 7.3 13.8 31.1 17.2

842296 20-4 1 4.3 55.5 17.3 1 4.8 52.8 9.6 1 11.5 34.1 14.4

842297 1 20-5 1 1.3 100.0 5.3 1 2.8 68.6 5.7 1 12.3 33.0 15.3



_____ Region A: 3Ha Region B: 14Cb Region Cc: > 156 keV Sample ID Sample #


842298 20-6 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.5 61.7 7.0 11.5 34.1 14.4 842299 20-7 3.3 63.3 13.3 5.3 50.2 10.6 11.3 34.3 14.2 8422100 20-8 3.7 60.3 1 14.7 4.5 54.7 8.9 11.5 34.1 14.3 8422 101 20-9 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.4 62.9 6.8 12.0 33.3 15.0 8422102 20-10 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.6 53.7 9.3 11.5 34.0 14.4 8422103 20-11 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.7 53.5 9.3 11.2 34.6 14.0 8422 104 01-1 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.1 56.9 8.3 14.7 30.1 18.4 8422 105 04-1 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.5 54.7 8.9 10.5 35.7 13.1 8422 106 05-1 2.3 75.6 9.3 3.4 62.9 6.8 12.6 32.6 15.7 8422 107 08-1 4.0 57.7 16.0 4.5 54.7 8.9 11.3 34.4 14.1 8422 108 09-1 3.7 60.3 14.7 5.1 51.2 10.2 13.2 31.8 16.5 8422 109 10-1 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.5 54.7 8.9 11.2 34.5 14.0 8422 110 12-1 1.3 100.0 5.3 2.5 72.4 5.1 9.8 36.8 12.3 8422111 13-1 3.0 66.7 12.0 5.3 50.0 10.7 11.2 34.5 14.0 8422 112 14-1 4.0 57.7 16.0 5.7 48.5 11.3 12.2 33.1 15.2 8422 113 15-1 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.1 65.3 6.3 14.7 30.1 18.4 8422 121 15-2 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.3 50.4 10.5 12.8 32.2 16.0

8421 1 07-Hood-1 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.8 59.0 7.7 10.5 35.7 13.1 8421 2 07-Hood-1 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.8 68.6 5.7 13.3 31.7 16.6

8421 3 07-Hood-2 3.0 66.7 12.0 3.8 59.3 7.6 11.0 34.8 13.8

8421 4 07-Hood-3 3.0 66.7 12.0 4.0 57.7 8.0 14.8 30.1 18.4 8421 5 07-Hood-4 3.3 63.3 13.3 7.9 41.2 15.8 15.4 29.5 19.2

8421 6 07-Hood-5 4.7 53.5 18.7 8.4 39.9 16.8 14.8 30.1 18.4

8421 7 07-Hood-6 3.3 63.3 13.3 3.8 59.6 7.5 8.7 39.1 10.9

8421 8 07-Hood-7 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.2 50.6 10.4 16.9 28.1 21.1

8421 9 07-Hood-8 5.3 50.0 21.3 8.9 38.7 17.8 11.7 33.8 14.6

8421 10 07-Hood-9 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.4 54.9 8.8 12.8 32.3 15.9

8421 11 07-Hood-

10 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.8 48.0 11.6 11.9 33.5 14.9

8421 12 07-Hood-

11 2.3 75.6 9.3 4.5 54.7 8.9 14.8 30.0 18.5

8422123 07-Hood-

12 3.3 63.3 13.3 4.0 58.0 7.9 11.7 33.8 14.6

8421 13 11 -Hood-1 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.9 47.6 11.8 10.0 36.4 12.6



Region A: 3Ha Region B: I4Cb Region Cc :> 156 keV Sample ID Sample #


8421 14 11 -Hood-1 4.0 57.7 16.0 5.4 49.8 10.8 12.7 32.4 15.8

8421 15 11-Hood-2 2.0 81.7 8.0 3.3 63.3 6.7 9.2 38.1 11.5

8421 16 11-Hood-3 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.0 57.7 8.0 8.8 38.9 11.0

8421 17 11-Hood-4 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.8 48.0 11.6 13.4 31.5 16.8

8421 18 1i-Hood-5 5.0 51.6 1 20.0 6.3 45.9 12.7 9.9 1 36.7 12.4

8421 19 11-Hood-6 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.3 55.5 8.7 9.3 37.8 11.7

8421 20 11-Hood-7 2.7 70.7 10.7 4.8 52.8 9.6 8.4 39.9 10.5

8421 21 11-Hood-8 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.5 61.7 7.0 10.0 36.6 12.5

8421 22 1i-Hood-9 2.7 70.7 10.7 3.3 64.1 6.5 13.7 31.2 17.1

8422 124 11-Hood-

10 3.7 60.3 14.7 4.3 56.0 8.5 12.5 32.7 15.6

8422114 02-Drain-

01 1.0 115.5 4.0 1.8 86.3 3.6 12.5 32.6 15.7

8422115 02-Sewer-

01 4.7 53.5 18.7 5.8 48.0 11.6 14.0 30.8 17.6

8422116 05-Drain-1 4.3 55.5 17.3 4.8 53.0 9.5 11.9 33.5 14.9

8422117 05-Sewer-

1 4.3 55.5 17.3 6.3 45.9 12.7 9.6 37.3 12.0

8422 118 07-Drain-1 3.3 63.3 13.3 3.8 59.6 7.5 13.1 31.9 16.4

8422 119 07-Pipe-1 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.5 72.4 5.1 12.8 32.3 15.9

8422 120 13-Auto-Ol 4.3 55.5 17.3 5.8 48.2 11.5 10.5 35.6 13.2

8422 122 17-Drain-1 2.0 81.7 8.0 2.9 68.1 5.8 13.0 32.1 16.2

aLSC MDC value for 3H = 30.6 dpm/100 cm2. bLSC MDC value for 14C = 20.6 dpmIlOO cm2. C MDC value for this region = 24.8 dpmllOO cm2 . dThe "2S%" values are as reported by the laboratory.



ATTACHMENT C

Instrument Checks and Calibration Forms


Gill Tract Final Status Survey R

ISOTOPE SOURCE ID #: SOURCE CREATION DATE: I OtTo 95TC470-0081 1 1/10/1995

Initial DPM on Source halt life, yrs Decay-to-Date lamda, yr-I decay, yrs Date 19400 I 211E+05 I 1/10/1995 3285E-06 I 000 I 19400

)Xi 00

Source MCI half life, yrs Decay-to-Date lamda, yr-I decay, yrs Date I I I

DPM Based MCI Based Calculated Calculated

Average background Average Source plus Efficiency, Efficiency, counts, cpm background counts, cpm cpmfdpm cpm/dpm

I 270 3 I 4444.2 I I 0210 I I

For: Instrument/Probe ILudlum 2224 w 4368 Serial numbers 187262 / PR1 37088

By: Name Date Performed

Bill Gardner 8/18/2008

Source plus Background Background



Equipment Chi-Square Distribution Worksheet

I Count No. X I x..x I I 1 4440 -48.25 2328.063 Instrument/Detector 2224-1143-66 2 4394 -2.25 50625 Serial #/Serial# 162429/PR149785 3 4479 -87.25 7612.563 Date Performed 18-Aug-08 4 4299 92.75 8602.563 Count time interval (minutes) 1 5 4468 -76.25 5814.063 Source Used Tc-99/95TC470-0081

_a 1401 I zu. 1D

7 4485 -93.25 8695.563 8 4501 -109.25 11935.56 9 4523 -131.25 17226.56

10 4482 -90.25 8145,063 11 4294 97.75 9555.063 12 4248 143.75 2066406 13 4285 106.75 1139556 14 4321 70.75 5005.563 15 4366 25.75 663.0625 16 4483 -91,25 8326.563 17 4309 8275 6847.563 18 1 4352 39,75 1580.063 19 4371 20.75 4305625 20 4364 27.75 770.0625 ntotal 87835 136033.8 Xm 4391.75

I X2 = 30.97 I

Note: Accept 2 between 8.91 and 32.8



InsL#1 62429 Bkgd Source Ser. #1 NA Initial Source Readings Nuclidel Bkgd

Date Result (cpm)

8/18/2008 540

8/18/2008 490 8118/2008 564

8/18/2008 518

8118/2008 528 8/18/2008 554

8/18/2008 553

8/18/2008 570 8118/2008 544 8118/2008 555

Average

542



Inst.#162429 Source Ser. #TC470-00 Initial Source Readings Nuclidel Tc-99

Date Result (cpm)

8/1812008 4440

8/18/2008 4394 8118/2008 4479 8/18/2008 4299

8/18/2008 4468

8/18/2008 4371 8/18/2008 4485

8/18/2008 4501

811812008 4523 8118/2008 4482

Average

4444

8/0818

Pass



Pass

lnst.#187262 Source Ser. #TC470-OO Initial Source Readings Nuclidel Tc-99

Date Result (cpm)

8/1812008 2976

8118/2008 2965 811812008 2733

8/18/2008 2796

8/1812008 2866

- 8/18/2008 2812

8/18/2008 2915

8/18/2008 2856 8/18/2008 3163 8/1812008 3097

Average

2918


Gill Tract Final Status Su

lnst.#1 87262 Bkgd Source Ser. # NA Initial Source Readings uclidel Bkgd

Date Result (cpm)

8/18/2008 447

8/18/2008 420

8118/2008 418

8/18/2008 433

811812008 441.5

8/18/2008 431

8/18/2008 439

8/1812008 433.5

811812008 422.5 8/18/2008 435

Average

432

t:!ªILsl;I!sIsI 41 I:ThIYL,1I*!I1 t;iie7t.1IsU1,IiI I:YM7LI1.I1SIII 41. -



Safety and Ecology Corporation SEC PROCEDURE #

IIC 2800 Solway Road

Knoxville, TN 37931 Page 1 of I

Calibration Certificate 8/1212008

Calibration Certificate for 2224-1,Serial # 187262, Bar Code # ,Property # SEC-5849

Date: 08112108 Date Last Cal. Expires: 08107108 Technician: Carl Hall

Location: 9999, Reason For Calibration: Due for Calibration

EQUIPMENT USED DURING CALIBRATION

MODEL: 500-2

SERIAL #: 132896 CAL DUE: 08111108

MODEL:

SERIAL #: CAL DUE:

AS FOUND DATA Geotropism: SAT

AS FOUND Instrument Condition: SAT AS LEFT Instrument Condition: SAT

U New Batteries? Satiety Check: SAT AS FOUND Mechanical Zero: 0 AS LEFT Mechanical Zero: 0

NIGH VOLTAGE AS FOUND HV AS LEFT NV WINDOW SETTINGS AS FOUND AS LEFT

(+1.10% tolerance) 500 V: 470 V 490 V ST (4 mV +1- A mV): 05 mV AF mV

1000 V: 990 V 1000 V

1500V: 1510 V 152$ V SW (40 mV+i-4mV): 35.7 reV AF mV

AFHVSetting: 1350 V ALHVSetting- 1650 V AT(l20rnV+i-lOmV): 120 mV AF mV

SCAL E RATE CPM AS FOUND % ERROR AS LEFT %ERROR AF 250: 250 % ERR: 000% AL 250: AF % ERR: 0.00% X.1 or

_ AF 2500: 2501 % ERR: 0.04% AL 2500: AF % ERR: 0,04%

400 400 000% AF 0.00% AF 25K: 25.01 K % ERR: 0.04% AL 25K: AF K % ERR: 0.04%

xl or 1000 1300 0.00% AF 0.00% AF 250K: 250.1 K 0Jo ERR: 0.04 1A AL 250K: AF K ’to ERR: 0.04% X10 2600 2500 0.00% .L lstheAs Found Data Within 2O%oftheSetPoint?

4000 4000 0.00 9/6 AF 0.00%

X10 or 10K 10 0.00% AF 0.00% xlOE 25K 25 0.00%AF0.00% xl oral Scale: 250 250 250

40K 40 1 0.00% AF 0.00% xl orxl0 Scale: 2500 2500 2500 I xlOO or lOOK 100 0.00% AF 0,00%

X1000 ’250K,1250 0.00% AF 0.00%-- x110 orxlOO Scale: 25 K 25 K 25K

x100orxl000Scale: 250 K 250 K 250 K

.00r Are the Individual Counts Within 10% of the Average?

,og l the As Found Data Within 20% of the Set Point? Audio Response: SAT

Overload Light: SAT

Low Battery (2.2V): SAT

Comments: Married asa set with: Model: 43-37

Serial 8: PR137088 Bar Code 8:

Does Instrument Meet Final Acceptance Criteria? V Calibration Sticker Attached?

Date Instrument is Due For Next Calibration

Performed by: °EE!v’ Reviewed

Printed Name: Carl Hall

Entered in Computer Inventory By: Date:____________



Safety and Ecology Corporation SEC PROCEDURE

2800 Solway Road, Knoxville, TN 37931 Page 1 of I

Calibration Certificate 8/1312008

Calibration Certificate for 43-37Serlal # PR137088, Bar Code # ,Property # SEC-6597 Date: 08112108 Date Last Cal. Expires: Technician: Carl Nail


EQUIPMENT USED DURING CALIBRATION MODEL: 2224-1 SERIAL #: 187262 CAL DUE 08112109

MODEL:

51ST TRACEABLE SOURCES USED SOURCE ISOTOP

5744-06 Sr-SO

5746-06 Tc-99

5747-06 Pu-239

5748-06 Th-230

77173-513 C-14

AS FOUND DATA AS FOUND Instrument Condition: SAT

Calibration Setpoints

I-tV: v Threshold Beta: ijØmV

Efficiencies from I ground: CPM CPN last calibration

Back AlphaBeta

A-S XTLK Pu-239: CPM CPB

Pu: % Tc-99: CPM CPI/ To: % Th-220: CPM N/A

SERIAL #: CAL DUE

ACTIVITY 2nr ASSAY DATE

21700dprn 15,200 cpm 12/6/2006

34000 dpm 21,200 cpm 1217/2006

27700 dpm 14,100 cpm 1216/2006

34700 dpnl 17,600 cpm 12/6/2006

30600 dprn 19,100 cpm 4/15/2008

AS LEFT Instrument Condition: SAT

AS LEFT DATA after repair or MV adjust

MV: V

Back Alpha Beta

ground: CPM CPM A-B XTLK

Pu-239: CPM CPM

Tc-99: CPM CPM

Th-230: CPM NIA In; 70 ar,-90 NIA CPM SrV-90: N/A CPM

SrY ’ ______ - AS FOUND Pu-239: Tc-99: ___---____-

AS LEFT Pu-239: Tc-99:----------

Efficiencies: Th-230: SrY-90:= Efficiencies: Th-230: SrY.90: ________

Is the As Found Data Within 20% of the efficiency from the last cal.?

Reproducibility: Isotope: Sr-SO I 5998 6037 6082 Average: 6039.6.s Are the individual counts within 10°h of the average?

PLATEAU DATA Source 1: To-SO Source 2: Pu-239

Response ICPMI Response (CPM) Background (CPMI Net to B

High Voltage A ch. B ch. Net Eff, A ch. Bch. Not Eff. A ch. B oh. Xtalk: <10%

1500 3 2700 2 449 8.38% 0 47 17.35%

1550 2 4648 f% 3207

317

374 1158% 0 135 7.45%

1600 5 6665 18.86% 4036 522 14.57% 1 252 6.69%

1650 7 8708 24.28% 4860 �82317-.5-3% 3 453 7.62% -

1700 3 84332358% 5429 1153 19.60% 1 615 0.91%

Alpha Beth HV Pu-239 To-99 Th-230 SrY-90

Background: 5 396 1650 v 4807 CPM 8464 CPM 5915 CPM 6054 CPM

AL Efficiencies: - v- ____

Comments: Married as a set with: Model: 2224-1 Serial #: 187262 Bar Code 8:

Initial calibration. C-14 count = 10cpm Alpha, 7486 cprn Beta. 4 Pi aft. = 23.17%, 2 Pi eft. = 37.13%. Other 2 Pi efficiencies: Pu-239 34.06%, To-OS = 38.06%, Th-230 = 33.58%, Sr-SO = 37.23%.

Does Instrument Meet Final Acceptance Criteria? .11 Calibration Sticker -Attached’?

Date Instrument is Due For Next Calibration:

Performed by: Reviewed by: Date:.,08

Printed Name: Carl Hall

Entered in Computer Inventory By: _Dat]7/t




2800 Solway Road

Knoxville, TN 37931 Paged of I

Calibration Certificate 8/12/2008

Calibration Certificate for 2224-1,Serial # 162429, Bar Code # ,Property # SEC-5532

Date: 08112108 Date Last Cal. Expires: 08/15108 Technician: Thomas Thompson


EQUIPMENT USED DURING CALIBRATION

MODEL! 500-2

SERIAL #: 190580 CAL DUE: 01/25/09

MODEL:

SERIAL 4: CAL DUE:

AS FOUND DATA Geotropism; SAT

AS FOUND instrument Condition: SAT AS LEFT Instrument Condition: SAT

New Batteries? Battery Check: SAT AS FOUND Mechanical Zero: 0 AS LEFT Mechanical Zero: 0

NIGH VOLTAGE AS FOUND HV AS LEFT HV WINDOW SE17INGS AS FOUND AS LEFT

(+f-10% tolerance) 500 V: 500 V AF V ST (4 mV +/- .4 mV): 3.4 mV 4 mV

bogy: 1000 AF v 1500 V: 1500 V AF V

SW (40 mV +1-4 my): 35 mV 35.4 mV

AF NV Setting: 560 V AL NV Setting: 1600 v AT (120 mV +/-10 my): 115 mV 120 mV

j: ALE RATE CP1A AS. QUND %ERROR AS LEFT % ERROR 410250: 250 % ERR: 0.00% AL 250: AF % ERR: 0.00%

X.1 or 100 100 1 0.00% AF 0.00°’ xl 250 250 0.00% AF 0.00%

400 -_xl or 1000 1000 0.00% AF T 0.00% xlO jr 2500 2500 00% AF 0.00%

� 4000 4000 0.00% AF 0.00%

xlO or 10K 10 0.00% AF 0.00% X1 00 25K 25 0.00% AF 0,00%

40K

;XlOOor Li 40 0.00% AF

L.QLP IO2Y X1000 250K

400K I 250 0.00%

400000!

AF

AF 0.00%

Is the As Found Data Within 20% of the Set Point?

Comments: Married as a set with: Model: 43-68

Meter also married with PR 149785

AS 2500: 2500 % ERR: 0.00% AL 2500: AF % ERR: 0.00%

AS 25K: 25.00 K % ERR: 0.00% AL 25K: AF K % ERR: 0.00%

AF 250K: 250.0 K % ERR: 0.00% AL 250K: AF K % ERR: 0,00%

Is the As Found Data Within 20% of the Set Point?

x. I or x1 Scale: 280 250 250

xl or x1 Scale: 2500 2600 2500

x1 or x100 Scale: 25K 25 K 25K

x100 or x1000 Scale: 260 K 250 K 250 K

Are the Individual Counts Within 10% of the Average?

Audio Response: SAT

Overload Light: SAT

Low Battery (2.2V): SAT

Serial 4: PR149785 Bar Code 4:

RJ Does Instrument Meet Final Acceptance Criteria? W Calibration Sticker Attached?

Date Instrument IS Due For Next Calibration

Performed by: Reviewed by: Date: ... 23/4rol

Printed Name: Thomas Thompson

Entered in Computer Inventory By: Date:___________




2800 Solway Road, Knoxville, TN 37931 page 1 of I

Calibration Certificate 811312008

Calibration Certificate for 43-68,SeriaI # PR149785, Bar Code # ,Property # SEC-6163

Date: 08112108 Date Last Cal. Expires: 06122108 Technician: Thomas Thompson


EQUIPMENT USED DURING CALIBRATION MODEL: 2224-1 SERIAL #: 162429 CAL DUE 08/12109

MODEL: SERIAL 4: CAL DUE

NIST TRACEABLE SOURCES USED SOURCE ISOTOPE ACTIVITY 27r ASSAY DATE

4071-02 Th-230 40600 dpm 20,600 cpm 511012005

4072-02 Tc-99 27700 dpm 17,300 cpm 5/1212005

4076-02 Sr-90 13300 4pm 9,300 cprn 5110[2005

4079-02 Pu-239 28700 dpm 14,600 cpm 5/1012005

77173-513 C-14 30600 dpm 19,100 cpm 4/1512008

AS FOUND DATA AS FOUND instrument Condition: SAT

AS LEFT Instrument Condition: SAT

Calibration Setoints AS LEFT DATA after repair or HV adjust HV:1525 V

Threshold Sets: - my NV: v

Back –SiQtis Beta Back Aloha Beta Effi:ienci:rorn

ground: 1 6PM 164 6PM A..ILK ground: CPM 6PM A-S XTLK last calibration Pu-239: 5650 CPM 613 6PM 7.9% Pu-239: CPM GPM

Pu: % Tc-99: 1 CPM 5030 CPM Tc-99: 6PM 6PM To: 19.45% Th-230: 7658 CPM N/A Th-230: 6PM N/A Th: 14.99% SrY90: N/A 2864 CPM SrY-90: N/A GPM

BrY / AS FOUND Pu 239 rig 68, Tc 99 I 2118j AS LEFT Pu 239 _ TeSS

Efficiencies Th 230 18 881 SrY 90 2030/ Efficiencies Th-230 ’ ] SrY 90

F1 Is the As Found Data Within 20% of the efficiency from the last cal.?

Reproducibility: Isotope: Sr-GO 4325 4265 4279 Average: 4289.7 Are the individual counts within 10% of the average?

L AF Sd 004 or pa lb 0 I I PA . 1% 55- ,,3X I I ISO 1 ’o ci inaylSAtI fi O- Sq act

PLATEAU DATA Source 1: Sr-SO Source 2: Pu-239

Response (CPM) Response (CPM) Background (CPMI Net Ato B

High Voltage A ch. B ch, Net Eff. A ch. Bch, Net 6ff. A oh. B ch. Xtalk: <100/,

1500 36

L 36 1977

1525;33 2864 fl9.4% 5162 ,5031798%

20.30% 5650 613 119.68%

736%

1 154 34 , 3151 !22.30% 5994 1 568 120.77% 2 186 6.42%!

1575 1 6353 1 614 22-14% 0 199 6,53%

1600 50 j_S062°/

L 625 [j45433

6613 I 6J04%

6959 1723 H24.24% , 0

2 247

286

6.44°/,

6.28%

Alpha Beta tLY Eti 9 Ic Background: 0 252 1600 V 6637CPM 6400 6PM 8700CPM 4455 6PM

ALEfflcmncws

Comments: Married ass set with: Model: 2224-1 Serial 4: 162429 Bar Cede 4:

Threshold a120 1/4-34.4, 2p efficiencies Pa239 z 43.40, Tc99 = 35.54, Th230 = 42.23, SrY90 = 45.19, C-14 count a 2 CPM 1/7344 CPM 2pi eff = 37.13%, 4pi elf = 2318%

Does Instrument Meet Final Acceptance Criteria? R1 Calibration Sticker Attached?

el rument is Due For Next Calibration:

Performed by: - Reviewed by: Date:

Printed Nam ’ Thomas Thompson

Entered in Computer Inventory By:



ATTACHMENT D

Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan


Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan: Radiological Final Status Survey

Gill Tract


Berkeley, California

Project Account Number 19346A

Prepared for:


Capital Projects

Prepared by:

/

( BARTLETT \..’SERVICES, INC.

60 Industrial Park Road

Plymouth Massachusetts 02360

April 2009

Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan: Radiological Final Status Survey - Gill Tract

1. Introduction

This plan has been developed as an addendum to the approved Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the final radiological survey of the Gill Tract site (Reference 1). All data quality objects (DQOs), acceptance criteria, survey design requirements, quality assurance and quality control aspects detailed in the approved plan (Reference 1) remain in effect during the implementation of this supplemental soil sampling plan.

The scope of this plan is limited (i) to the collection and analysis of soil samples collected from the planting field at the Gill Tract site and from selected reference areas and (ii) to the evaluation of the associated analytical data.

2. Sampling Data Quality Objectives

The objective of this plan is to determine whether the concentrations of carbon-14 (C-14) and tritium (H-3) in the soil of the Gill Tract planting field are below the acceptance criteria in the approved Gill Tract SAP (Reference 1).

Statement of the Problem

Does residual University research related radioactivity, if present in the survey unit (Gill Tract Planting Field), exceed the release criteria?

The potential that the C-14 and H-3 concentrations in the soil of the Gill Tract planting field exceed the acceptance criteria exists. Accordingly, the null hypothesis for this sampling effort is that the C-14 and H-3 concentrations in the soil of the planting field exceed the acceptance criteria. The data from the soil samples collected under this plan will be of sufficient quantity and quality so as to support either the acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis.

Identification of the Decision/Alternative Action

The principal study question was derived from the approved SAP (Reference 1) and modified as follows: Do the C-14 and H-3 concentrations in the surface soil of the Gill Tract planting field exceed the acceptance criteria?

The final decision regarding the radiological status of the Gill Tract planting field will rely on the analytical data from the soil samples collected during the implementation of this plan.

Alternative actions for failure of the C- 14 and H-3 concentrations to meet the acceptance criteria have been limited to performing a site-specific dose assessment.

Inputs to the Decision

Based on an assessment of the historic use of radioactive material at the Gill tract site (Reference 2), C-14 and H-3 are the only radionuclides-of-concern.

Volumetric samples are the only type of measurements to be collected under this plan and soil is the only medium to be sampled.

The acceptance criteria in this plan are limits on C-14 and H-3 concentrations in soil as stated in the approved SAP (Reference 1): _<O.5 pCi per gram of soil for C-14 and :54.O pCi per gram of soil for H-3.

PA

Supplemental Sampling and Analysis Plan: Radiological Final Status Survey� Gill Tract

Define the Boundaries of the Survey

All soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field will be collected within the boundaries shown in Figure 1.

All reference soil samples from the reference areas will be collected within the boundaries shown in Figures 2 through 5. The reference areas are as follows:

� Reference Area 1 (REF-0t) is a South Berkeley garden, located on the north side of Heinz Avenue. The reference area is approximately 2 miles south of the Gill Tract planting field. Figure 2 provides the sampling map for this area and the GPS coordinates and sampling point identifications. Attachment 1 provides the driving instructions from the Gill Tract site to Reference Area 1.

� Reference Area 2 (REF-02) is the University Gardens West, located a short distance in the southwest of the Gill Tract planting field. Figure 3 provides the sampling map for this area and the GPS coordinates and sampling point identifications. Attachment 2 provides the driving instructions from the Gill Tract site to Reference Area 2.

� Reference Area 3 (REF-03) is the Junior High School Garden at the MLK School East, located approximately 1 mile southeast of the Gill Tract planting field. Figure 4 provides the sampling map for this area and the GPS coordinates and sampling point identifications. Attachment 3 provides the driving instructions from the Gill Tract site to Reference Area 3.

� Reference Area 4 (REF-04) is the El Cerrito Hillside Nature Area, located approximately 2.5 miles north of the Gill Tract planting field. Figure 5 provides the sampling map for this area and the GPS coordinates and sampling point identifications. Attachment 4 provides the driving instructions from the Gill Tract site to Reference Area 4.

Constraints on Data Collection

Soil in the planting field has been plowed to a depth of approximately 6 inches and harvested annually. Therefore any potential contamination in the planting field would be homogeneously distributed throughout the top six inches of soil. Accessibility is not an issue for the Gill Tract planting field as long as samples are collected at times when research activities are not being performed. Soil sample collection will be scheduled and conducted to cause the least amount of interference with research activities in the planting area as possible.

Accessibility to the randomly selected sampling locations may be an issue for some of the references areas. However, additional (contingency) sample locations have been randomly selected for each reference area and are identified on Figures 2 through 5. Sampling locations deemed inadequate or inaccessible by the Sampling Team members will be replaced by a sample collected at the next available contingency location.

Quality Assurance

All applicable quality assurance requirements described in the approved SAP (Reference 1) remain in effect during the implementation of this sampling plan. As an added quality assurance measure, at least 15% of the soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field and the reference areas will be identified as split samples to be analyzed for C-14 and H-3 by three independent laboratories.


Decision Rules

The criteria for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis are as follows:

1. If the concentrations of C-14 and H-3 in all samples are below the acceptance criteria and the sum of the ratios of concentration to acceptance criteria is less than 1.0 for each sample location, then the null hypothesis will be rejected. The C-14 and H-3 concentrations in Gill Tract planting field meet the acceptance criteria and the land can be released for unrestricted use.

2. If the average concentrations of C-14 and H-3 in the planting field soil are below the acceptance criteria (and the average sum of the ratios of concentrations to acceptance criteria is less than 1.0) but the concentrations of C-14 and/or H-3 exceed the acceptance criteria at some sample locations (or the sum of the ratios of concentration to acceptance criteria exceed 1.0 at some sample locations), then acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis will depend on the outcome of the Wilcoxon Rank Sum (WRS) test.

3. If the average concentrations of C-14 and/or H-3 in the planting field soil (or the average sum of the ratios of concentrations to acceptance criteria exceeds 1.0), then the null hypothesis will be accepted. The C- 14 and/or H-3 concentrations in Gill Tract planting field exceed the acceptance criteria and the land can not be released for unrestricted use without further evaluation (e.g., site-specific dose assessment).

Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors

The total number of random soil samples, 40 (20 from the Gill Tract planting field and 20 from the references areas), assumes a Type I decision error rate (a) and a Type II decision error rate (13) of 0.05 and includes the recommended 20% additional samples to ensure statistical power.

Analytical uncertainty is controlled by the analytical laboratory through the use of appropriate instruments, methods, techniques, and QC. Minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs) for C-14 and H-3 using specific analytical methods have been established. The required sensitivity for the analysis of the soil samples are: :50.5 pCi/g for C-14 and :54.0 pCi/g for H-3.

Optimize Design

The WRS Test will be applied to the soil sample data. The data from the reference areas identified above will be used in the WRS Test.

3. Instructions

General Sampling Instructions

Prior to conducting sampling, create a field work package that includes a copy of this plan, and copies of Procedure OP-005, Volumetric and Material Sampling, Procedure OP-018, Decontamination of Equipment and Tools, Procedure OP-008, Chain of Custody, and applicable procedure forms.

Use Figure 1 to locate the random sampling points in the Gill Tract planting field. Figure 1 provides a visual reference and the GPS coordinates and label for each sample location. Use Figures 2 through 5 to locate the random sampling points in the reference areas. A GPS unit (with the sample location coordinates as input) should be used to locate each sample point in the Gill tract planting field and in each of the reference areas.

El


Figure 6 provides an aerial view of the neighboring areas of the Gill Tract site, including the planting field and the Hybridoma Center. A total of 10 biased soil samples will be collected from locations at or near the Gill Tract site. The number of samples and targeted areas are:

1. Two samples from the immediate soil area previously sampled on the west side of the Hybridoma Center,

2. Four samples from the soil areas located south of the Hybridoma Center (i.e., 2 samples from the parcel of land on the north side of Monroe Street and 2 samples from the University Park area, including a sample from the baseball diamond (refer to Figure 6),

3. One sample from the soil area located east of the Hybridoma Center (between the Hybridoma Center and San Pablo Avenue),

4. One sample from the soil area located at the northerly section of the Gill Tract site at Buchanan Street, and

5. Two samples from the soil area on the west and east sides of Middle School (i.e., 1 sample from the ball field on the west side of the school and 1 sample from the yard on the east side of the school). Middle School is located on the west side of Jackson Street opposite the Gill Tract planting field (refer to Figure 6).

Because these samples are to be collected on a biased basis, the specific sampling locations will be identified and recorded at the time of the sampling.

All soil samples shall be collected in accordance with Procedure OP-005, Volumetric and Material Sampling (provided in Appendix A to this plan). If necessary, use a 3/8-inch screen to remove gravel, stones, and gross organic debris. Repair the hole created during sampling before leaving the location.

Cleaning of sampling tools shall be performed in accordance with Procedure OP-018, Decontamination of Equipment and Tools (provided in Appendix A to this plan).

Control of all soil samples shall be maintained in accordance with Procedure OP-008, Chain of Custody (provided in Appendix A to this plan).

Retain a copy of all paperwork (procedure forms, field notes, logbook, etc.) as project records.

Sampling should be performed during clement weather and daylight hours.

The labeling convention for collected soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field shall follow the labeling convention shown on Figure 1. Similarly, the labeling convention for collected soil samples from the reference areas shall follow the labeling convention shown on Figures 2 through 5.

Specific Sam pliny Instructions

Coolers (for shipment) and sample containers have been provided by each of the contracted laboratories. Keep these supplies separated by the laboratory that provided them (i.e., do not co-mingle the sample containers) to ensure that the same cooler and the appropriate sample containers are returned to the correct laboratory. During sampling, ensure that:

� The sample containers supplied by the Areva Laboratory are used only for those soil samples to be sent to the Areva Laboratory.

� The sample containers supplied by GEL Laboratories are used only for those soil

5


samples to be sent to the GEL Laboratories. The sample containers supplied by Eberline Services are used only for those soil samples to be sent to Eberline Services.

Once filled and labeled, secure the lid of the sample container with tape and enclose the container in a zip-lock plastic bag for shipment. Verify that each plastic bag is securely closed.

All soil samples shall be maintained in a cool environment through use of a cooler and cold packs. Cold packs shall also be placed in the cooler to keep the samples cool during the sample collection period and also when samples are transported to the laboratories.

A Chain of Custody (CoC) form shall accompany the samples to the laboratory. Ensure that the required sensitivity for C-14 and H-3 analysis (i.e., 50.5 pCi/g for C-14 and :54.0 pCi/g for H-3) and instructions to maintain the samples in a cool environment upon arrival at the laboratory are recorded on the CoC form.

� Use the Areva NP Environmental Laboratory Sample Submission Form (included in Attachment 5) as the CoC form for all samples sent the Areva Laboratory.

� Use the GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request (included in Attachment 5) as the CoC form for all samples sent the GEL Laboratory.

� Use Form OP-008-01, Chain of Custody/Analysis Record (included in Attachment 5) from procedure OOP-008 as the CoC form for samples sent to Eberline Services.

Gill Tract planting field QA split samples:

The soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field are to be labeled OOL-01-001-F through OOL-01-020-F, as indicated in Figure 1. The split samples will be collected at locations 10, 13, and 18 (based on random number generation), and will be identified by Si and S2 at the end of the sample identification code. For example, the 2 split samples from location 10 will be labeled as OOL-01-010-S1 and OOL-01-010-S2.

For each location designated as a split sample location, collect approximately 500g of soil, remove stones and gross organic debris, and thoroughly mix the soil in a single container prior to filling the sample containers provided by the laboratories. After filling the sampling 3 sample containers, return the excess soil to the hole created by sampling.

Biased samples:

The soil samples from the biased locations are to be labeled OOL-05-001-B through OOL-05-010-B. The specific location of each sample will be recorded (e.g., on a copy of Figure 6, the sample forms, in a logbook, or as a GPS measurement).

Reference Area sampling and OA split samples:

Sampling maps (Figures 2 through 5) have been developed for 4 identified reference areas. Each Figure provides several contingency sample locations.

The soil samples from each Reference Areas are to be labeled REF-OX-00 1-B through REF-OX-005-13, where "X" indicates the Reference Area number: 1, 2, 3, or 4 (refer to Figures 2 through 5).

QA split samples will be collected at locations REF-01-001-B, REF-01-003-B, and REF-04-004- B (based on random number generation), and will be identified by Si and S2 at the end of the

rc


sample identification code. For example, the split samples from sample location REF-01-001-B will be labeled as REF-.01-001-B-S1 and REF-01-001-B-S2.

For each location designated as a split sample location, collect approximately 500g of soil, remove stones and gross organic debris, and thoroughly mix the soil in a single container prior to filling the sample containers provided by the laboratories. After filling the sampling 3 sample containers, return the excess soil to the hole created by sampling.

If an identified (i.e., labeled) sampling location at a given reference area is inaccessible, collect a sample at the first available contingency location. Record the reason of inaccessibility and the identity of the contingency location that is used as the replacement location on the sampling form or in a logbook.

If a reference area is inaccessible or unavailable, collect samples at the unused contingency locations in any of the other reference areas. Record the reason of inaccessibility or unavailability of the reference area and the identity of the contingency locations that were used as alternate on the sampling form or in a logbook.

If a sample location is unavailable and a sample is collected from a contingency location, use the labeling convention as shown in Figures 2 through 5 for the contingency locations.

Operation of Trimble GEO HX GPS Unit

Operate the GPS unit by using the following instructions:

1. The GPS unit was sent in sleep mode. To activate push the Green Power button once. Do not hold the button down as you would a cell phone. The device will open in TerraSync mode and display the Gill Tract Planting Field site.

2. Press the "status" dropdown arrow, then select "map." An area map displaying the sampling locations should appear.

3. Press each point to reveal more information. The box below should appear.

1 samples

1 6er corresponds inn I of the table be rough 5 ofthi*.r

0

Longitude

Latitude

0.00 (Height of Antenna)

4. Press the "map" dropdown, then select NAY mode. This will provide directions to the point location.

5. Once the location has been found, return to the data mode by pressing "cancel."

7


Note: if the sample locations are not is sequential order, press the "#" at the top of the column.

6. Select the next sampling location as follows:

a. Press "begin," then select "map mode."

b. Press "options," then select "set NAY target."

c. Select the next sample location (the unit will beep).

d. Select "NAY mode," then follow the display to the next location.

7. Repeat steps 5 and 6 until all samples points have been located and samples have been collected.

8. To switch to another sampling area, return to "data mode," then press "cancel," then press "close." A selection of locations will appear.

9. Select the next sampling area. The project sampling areas are "Gilltract," "REF-0l, " "REF-02," "REF-03," and"REF-04."

10. After selecting the sampling area, press "open," enter "OK" for antenna height of 0.000 ft. A list of sample numbers will appear.

11. Press the "#" at the top of the column to place samples in ascending order (if not already), then select the first sample.

12. Press "begin," and then press "map mode" to view the points, or "NAY mode" to locate sample point. If in "map mode" the sample points are not visible, press "options," then "-zoom extents." This will bring points in view.

13. Follow steps 5 through 12 until all samples have been collected from the sampling areas.

Preparation and Transport of Samples:

Upon completion of sampling, make arrangements to send the samples to the laboratories.

� Include cold packs in each cooler to keep the samples cool during transport. � Ensure that void spaces inside the cooler are filled with packing material. � Secure the cooler lid with strong tape (e.g., duct tape, packing tape) to prevent it

from opening during transport to the laboratory.

The 20 soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field, the 20 soil samples from the reference areas, and the 10 biased samples are to be shipped to the Areva NP Inc Environmental Laboratory, 29 Research Drive, Westborough, MA, 01581-3913.

The 6 QA split soil samples from the Gill Tract planting field and reference areas are to be shipped to Gel Laboratories, 2040 Savage Road, Charleston, SC, 29407, and to Eberline Services, 2030 Wright Avenue, Richmond, CA, 94804-0040.

4. References

1. Sampling and Analysis Plan: Radiological Final Status Survey for Gill Tract, University of California, April 2008.

2. Gill Tract Radiological Historical Use Assessment, Final, ERS Solutions, Inc., May 2008.

ri] []


OOL-0I-09’I 0001-016-F I e

OOL-01-010-F 94OOL-01 -014-F

OOL-01 -013-F � OOL-01-012-F

I

OOL-01 -410-F OOL-01 -0090

COL 01-005-F I

001-01-009-F I

001-01-004-F bc

0

I00L-0 1-003-F

001-01-001-F I

ID X V I LABEL TYPE

1 -122.2993 37.8866 001-01-009-F Random

2 -122.2995 37.8868 OOL-01-013-F Random

3 -122.3002 37.887 001-01-014-F Random

4 -122.2993 37.8862 OOL-01-003-F Random

5 -122.2989 37.8866 001-01-011-F Random

6 -122.2997 37.8874 00L.01.020-F Random

7 -122.3001 37.8865 001-01-005-F Random

8 -122.2988 37,8864 001-01-008-F Random

9 -122.2987 37.8863 001-Contingency -01 Random

10 -122.2994 37.8867 001-01-012-F Random

11 -122.2997 37.8865 001-01-006-F Random

12 -122.299 37.8864 00L-01-007-F Random

13 -122,2996 37.8873 001-01-019-F Random

14 -122.2989 37.8862 OOL-01-002-F Random

15 -122,2997 37.0859 001.01-001-F Random

16 -122.2994 37.8873 001-01-018-F Random

17 -122.2992 37.8866 001-01-010-F Random

18 -122.3005 37.8873 001-01-017-F Random

19 -122.2997 37.8874 00L-Contigency-02 Random

20 -122.3006 37.8873 001-01-016-F Random

21 -122.3003 37.8863 001-01-004-F Random

22 -122.3002 37.8871 001-01-015-F Random

0 100 200 400 600 800 - - Feet

A

Figure 1: The Gill Tract Planting Field (OOL-O 1)


N

-01-C ntingency-05-6

RFE-01 .ConhinBenY-O4.B \\\

REF-01 -contingency-03-8

F-01 -003-B

REF-01-004-B

REF-01-Con5rigency-02-B REF-01-002-B

01-contingenB

ID X Y LABEL TYPE

0 -122.2955 37.8531 REF-01-005-8 Random

1 -122.2954 37.8529 REF-el-contingency-01-B Random

2 -122.2954 37.853 REF-01-004-B Random

3 122.2953 37.8529 REF-01-002-B Random

4 -122,2953 37.8532 REF-01 -Conti ngency-05-B Random

5 -122.2954 37.853 REF-01-contingency-03-B Random

6 -122.2952 37.853 REF-01403-B Random

7 -122.2953 37.6529 REF-01-001-B Random

8 -122.2953 27.8531 RFE-01 -Contingoncy.04-B Random

9-122.2954 37.853 REF-01-Contingency-02-8 Random

0 12.5 25 50 75 100 - - Feet

Figure 2: Reference Area 1 (REF-01)

10


0 REF-02-Confingency-05-B \

A 0RE2-contin gency-o4-B

REF-02-005-8 0

REF-02-Contingency-03-B

EF-02-004-B \

0REF-02-03B


REF02-Contingricy-01-B

REF-02-002-8

0 0REF-02-001-6

I n X V LABEL TYPE

0 -122.3053 37.8835 REF-02-003-B Random 1 -122.3056 37.8838 REF-02Contingency-03-B Random

2 -122.3058 37.8836 REF-02-004-13 Random

3 -122.3054 37.8839 REF-02-005-B Random

4 -122.3052 37,8831 REF-02-001-8 Random

5 -122.3058 378835 REF-02Contingnncy-02-8 Random

6 -122.3055 37.8833 REF-02-Contingcncy-01-B Random

1 -122.3053 37.884 REF-02-Cantinge ncy-04-8 Random

8 -122.3056 37.8842 REF-02-Conningn ncy-05-B Random

9 -122.3053 37.8831 REF-02-002-B Random

0 60 120 240 360 480 - - Feet


11


A REF-03-0 05-B 0

REF-03-Coitingency-05-B

REF-03-004-B 0

REF-03-Conhirigency-04-B


REF-03-003-B 0


REF-03-002-B 0

REF-03-Contingency-01 -0 REF-03001 -B

113 X Y I LABEL TYPE

0 -1222761 37.8824 REF-03 -002-B Random

1 -122.2761 37.8823 REF-03-Contingency.0I-B Random

2 -122.2763 37.8826 REF-03-Contingency-03-B Random

3 -122.276 37.6825 REF.03.Contingency.02.8 Random

4 -122.2761 37.8828 REF-03-004-B Random

5 -122.2761 37.8823 REF-03-O01-B Random

6 -122.2762 37.8825 REF-03-003-B Random



9 -122.2762 37.8829 REF-03-005.B Random

0 25 50 100 150 200 - - Feet


12


A

REF 1-004-E REF-04-0O5-B REF-04-Contr1gercy.03- 0

REF-04-Contingency04B

REF-04-003-B 0

REF-04-Contingency-02-E

REF-04-002-B 0

REF-04-Contingency-01 -EREF.04-OO1 -B 0 0

ID X V LABEL TYPE

0 -122.3033 379213 REF-04-002-3 Random

1 -122.303 37.9214 REF-04-003-B Random

2 -122.3031 379214 REF-04-004-B Random

3 -122.303 37.9214 REF-04-005-B Random


5 -122.3029 37,9213 REF-04-001-B Random

0 -122.3032 37.0214 REF-04-Contingency-03.B Random

7 -122.3029 37.9214 REF-04-Contingency-04�8 Random


9 -122.3031 37.9214 REF-04-Continganc7-e4-8 Random

0 25 50 100 150 200 - - Feet


13


IT

V. SL

74 ’

4L’ I

�1.

t

\

1t t

A’

I A

Ak w Figure 6: Aerial View of Areas Targeted for Biased Sampling

14


Attachment 1: Directions to REF-01

Jackson St to South Berkeley - 000gle Maps Page 1

Cf Directions to South Berkeley

mi- about 8 mine Maw ( From OOL-51 Gill Tract Planting Area (Jackson St. Side)

REF-01 South Berkeley Nursery

° l I / llI

Ailbary S /

Gotcee Id o

5

- -

Fz. Berkeley

- S

bcri.oIr a AaeaL’ur 5 0,

U60A

E ky

r--

- - a

ymow Ort - Cup data S2e02Ereio

Jackson St to South Berkeley - Google Maps Page 2

Jackson St

1 Head south on Jackson St toward Kinkead Way go 0.2 mi total 5 2 ni

1 2. Turn left at Monroe St goO.l ml total 0.3 mi

3. Turn right at CA-1 23/San Pablo Ave go 2.2 tel .Aisoui ii sins total 2505

4. Turn right at Heinz Ave go 0.4 mi Destination will be on the right total 2.9iyi

mis

South Berkeley

The,,’ sjitocticiis irs " o. j .iiuorting purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events nay cause conditions to dimmer from the mop results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route.

Map data 2009 � Tele Atlas

15



Jackson St to 5th St Ooogle Maps

C... Directions to 5th St - 0.6 mi � about 2 mins

REF-02 University Gardens

Page

c

U r to 4

a Path

a ,o O°° C C

I ’5

�5059 Oooe , Mes data �0505 rein 00ev

Jackson St to 5th St - Google Maps Page 2

Jackson St

1. Head south on Jackson St toward Kinkead Way 5502 lii

i son total 02 ml

+1 2. Turn left at 8th St goo.1 ml total O.’t no

r’ 3. Turn right at Harrison St go 0.2 ml total 0 6 mi

f 4. Turn right at 5th St 00449 ft total 0.6 mi

5th St

Thust direction, ire for plattrsing purposes only. You may find that construction projects, traffic, weather, or other events mey cause conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your rests accordingly You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route.

Moo data '2009.Tole Atss

16



Jackson St to Grant St - Google Maps Page I

C,

. I Directions to Grant St � . 2.2 mi - about 7 mins

°°°° REF-03 MILK Middle School Gardens

51 S S I

St �- - c ’s,

F a C

5 0, a

50,

sYr 7i ,,c’oro i’.e S 5

5’ Albarj 0

u S �::

�..c #a7

S

B

SerSolrs

6SF SI - I

Jackson St to Grant St - Google Maps Page 2

Jackson St

1. Head north on Jackson St toward Buchanan St so 367 ft total 367 ft

2. Turn right at Buchanan St 90305 ft total 0,1 ml

3. Continue on Mann Ave go 1.3 ml 000ul 4 altoS total 1,5 ml

1+ 4. Turn right at The Alameda go 0.4 ml About 1 mitt total I 9 m

5. Continue on Martin Luther King Jr Way go 0.1 ml total 2.000

J+ 6. Turn right at Rose St go 0.1ri total l i

+ 7. Turn right at Grant St go 322 ft total 2.250

Grant St

These directions are for planning purposes only. You may Slid trbf c005tacilon prcffcnts, traffic, macthor, or other uvents may cause conditions to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route,

Map data '2009 , Tale Atlas

17



Jackson St to Navellier St - Google Maps Page 1

Directions to Navellier St G ml about 8 mIne REF -04 LI Cerrito Hillside Nature Area

C,5-t SOS

Luoru B P-

T .0 EIlt0

Prk, so

rsu-roulo

6543

ci

105

;cust ça* ElCc,ri:c

� Pec,IuE,eI

0’

S tg50tb -

Alb8ry

An B

700 rlO1ds L ,��,, .

2008 Ocoe Map Sate @2055 Tale AIIm

Jackson St to Nuvcllier St - Google Maps Page 2

Jackson St

Head north on Jackson St toward Buchanan St go ’ ft 10101 367 ft

1+2. Turn right at Buchanan St go 305 ft total 0.1 rsi

3. Continue on Mann Ave goo. 1 fl’s

blat 0 3 ml

() 4. Turn left at CA-123/San Pablo Ave go 2.0mi About S 1511. total 2.3 nil

1+ 5. Turn right at Schmidt Ln go 0.6 ml Atnj1 2 moo total 29 no

’1 6. Turn left at Navellier St go 0.2 ml About 1 min total 31 1111

NavelIier St

These directions are for olotrnlriij purcoses only. IOU may find thot construction projects. trsttic wr.arher. or otrniss e’,ento may 73550 CC1l51t011S to differ from the map results, and you should plan your route accordingly, You must obey all signs or notices legarding your route

Map data '200d , Tell- Atlas

19


Attachment 5

Laboratory CoC-Sample Submission Forms

19

A AR EVA

Client Name:

Client Purchase Order/Contract

Date of Shipment:

Program:

Requested Turnaround Time:

AREVA NP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM (ENVIRONMENTAL/BIOASSAY SAMPLES)

Name of Client Representative:

(Person(s) who should receive the results)

E-Mail:

T24I

REMP 0 Non-REMP 0 Phone:

Standard E3 Rush o (COSTMULTIPLJERMAYAPPLY) Working Days (SPECiFY NUMBER)

Fax:

Radiological Analyses (Check All That Apply) Quarterly mposite

z Lij

>- LSN Sample Type Stationand Description

Collection Period (All Datesfimes Must Reflect EST 01 EDT)

Fleasectieco box below toindisete Se date to decay resjits

Total

Sample0 Amount Shipped

(Apocy Una) (0 fit)

J

z fits

J

d o ec z o rs ec 000 0 0

Start Date (If Applicable

Stop Date (Required) E01

Mid-point Date (If Applicable) [Z51

o is >- i o >-

is >- =

II 111111111111 III[IIIIIIILII’IIIIIIIIIII:I CHAIN OF CUSTODY FIELD TREATMENTS/COMMENTS ELAB ACCEPTANCE STAMP

Collected By: I Phone Number:

Relinquished By: Date/Time:

Received By: Date/Time:

ELAB Comments:

FORM 605.1. REV. 15

of GEL Chain of Custody and Analytical Request "See www.gel.com for GELs Sample Acceptance SOP

GEL Work Order Number:

U1, Laboratories, LLC

Charleston, SC 29407

Phone: (843) 4;56-81 71

Fax: (643) 766-1176

Project 4:

GEL Quote #:

COC Number --

PO Number:

Client Name: Phone Sample Analysis Requested (5) (Fill in the number of containers for each test)

Preservative Type (6) Project/Site Name: Fax #:

-

Address:

Comments Note: extra sample is required for sample

specific QC

Collected by: Send Results

is C

Sample ID list’ itntpaiiles. inidic’til vietCi mid seep e/ate time

ii d

lecns-dd-y) 1t) (hhmot)

QC CS Fit d

Sauspl

TA’) Requested: Normal: Rush: Specify: (Scbjm to Survhenoc) Fax Results: Yes / No Circle Deliverable: C of A / QC Summa / Level I Level 2 / LeycI 3 / Level 4

Remarks: ’Ire there any known hazards applicable to these samples? lisa, please list the hazards Sample Collection Time Zone Eastern Pacific Central ()tltcr Mountain

Chain of Custody Signatures Sample Shipping and Delivery Details

Relinquished By (Sinned) Date Time Received by Signed) Dale Time

I

(sF1, PM: Amanda Rasco

Method of Shipment: Date Shipped:

2 2 .Airbilt 2:

1 3 3 Airbill°:

; Chain of Custody Nunibei Client Deioinunrd -

2) QC Codes N NonnaI Sampl, TB = Trip iSlook, Fl) Field Oupheele, LB = Equipment Blank, MS = Musty Spike Ssiopie, 51Sf) Mcciv Spike Dupiirnlv Ssrnptr, Ci = Cinch C = Coinpvsiin 33 Field Filinred For liquid niatnices. inidicuic oridi en -5’- icr yrs the scmpie wus (told filtered ni--N- fist sample sass cci Sold Slimed 4) Motile (:odrs OW Drmkuig Waist, GWGroimdsvstor, SWiturfave Waist, WW’-Wosin Wioer, W Water. ML-M� Lnqivd, SO=Ssit, SD=Sediineot. Sl.--Sludgr,SS Solid Wosie, O=Oit. F=Fdter. P=Wipe, tl=Urinr FFecu(. N Nov

5.) Scieplethamlysie Rmtevvtvd; Aesaiisnietii methndrequeoted (i.e 82608, 6OIWt/7470A)and itumbor of eoniettnvrs providrdforeaoh (in 82fifffl -3. 6010R.74Oh1 -5

S.) Preservative Typo: HA Hydrerhlvric Acid, NI = Noeic Acid, Sf1 Sadists liydrousdc SA S’uifiariv Avid, tA = .Anvorhie Avid. 1 IX - llononie ST Sodium Thissulfeec, if no preneic’unive is udded - leyve (irk) blank

l’o - -

r Lab Receiving f-ye 0niy

Cux;oey Seal Intact? YES NO

Coulee Temp! C

WHITE = LABORATORY YELLOW = FILE PINK = CLIENT

Revision 0

of

OP-008-01 Chain of Custody I Analysis Record

Radiological Volumetric Sampling

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD /ANALYTICAL REQUEST

Project Name. P roject Manage, 1,cp.rcd by:

Project No,. lanager’s Phone No orm checked before shlpppeg by:

.amplers (pent cameo) . ladrologrcat ocreey performed? )YesINo). Status ofoadiolagical somey’

’B

z

2 1

Cabrera Services, Inc.

Sample ID Bomber

809 Main Street East Hartford CT

06108 Phone: 1860> 289-1885

Fax (860) 289-2261

Remarks composite, ore)

Release Name/ Signature - Data Fed Ex. Tracking No. Received By - Name I Signature of personnel

Release Name I Digeature - Dclv Fed Ex. Tracking No. Rocewad By - Name / Signature 01 pnruorsol

Release Name I Signature Date Fed Sc. Tracking No. Received By - Name ISignatute of personnel

OP-008 CABRERA SERVICES, INC. Page 6 of 7

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY

) U2

ii’\tL\f HEM kftF .O Q NIVERKHT it ILL )rJ tO)iO

)c [r 27. 20119

NO I iou \1’sorLh, Ass,xime I icaith Ph) sicist Med caL Ac deinic and Pharmacy licensing California De1 n icut of Public I Icalth Rhol& gie I icalt h Branch PC Bus 997114. \’IS 7610. Sacramento, (:x\ 9589974 14

RE: t C Berkeley Radioactive Materials License (RML) NoJ333i0I Request to Re m= Ci]] Tract as a Use Location, Errata

iNoir NO AIsoith:

Ibis letter is in response to our request Cr additional ml utiofi reruuding our Sc tember 15, 2004 request to release the property identified on License Condition 10(c ) as ’UiIl ’1 met Univerity olCalilornia, 1050 San Pablo Avenue, Albany, CA’ from Radioactive Materials license No. 1333-01.

Attached please find a aTy ot’the RESRAD run used to calculate the potential residual dose.

With respect to the entry on table 2A Wet Smear Results Tritium, first line Laboratory 2: E]oor, the result iiould have been recorded as 22.7 dpm!] 00cni. not 5.2 dpin! I O0cttr’. The 52 4pm! I 00cm was the standard deviation of the result and I did not catch the ermr in the review process.

Please contact (irec. Yuhas at o uhos:a horkelevedu or (510) 6437976 if von have any questions.

Sincerely,

12Th (iicgorv P. Yuhas Radiation SaIdty Meer

Attachment: Ci 4 res Deta iIhtm

Cc: Mark Freiberg, Director Anthmy Garvin. General Counsel hG OIlier of the President Patrick Gum Associate l)irec]nr Per Peterson. (’hfr * Radiation Safitv Committee

GY/ Reviewed by: PG

Final Document Name: 2009. 10.RSGillTractAmendErrata

Files: RS-License Amendment Request 82-Gill Tract

Building File: Gill Tract Department File: Capital Projects

eWeekly Office Chronological

DndD Residential Sccnaro Page 1 of 2.8

DandD Residential Scenario

DandO Version: 2.1.0 Run OnteiThne 1292008 11:2935 AM Site Name; Gill Tract Description: ( 4 viodefing I eName ( Gdl hact\. 1 1 mcd

Options:

imptidt progeny doses NOT included with explicit parent doses Nuclide concentrations are distributed among all progeny Number of s nthtions 100 Seed for Random Generation: $718721 Averages used for behavioral type parameters

External Pathway is ON Inhalation Pathway is ON Secondary Ingestion Pathway is ON Agricultural Pathway is ON Drinking Water Pathway is ON

Irrigation Pathway is ON Suthtce Water Pathway is ON

Initial Activities:

,11 4C

Distribution

Chain Data:

Number of chains: I

Chain No. 1.: 14C Nuclides in chain: 1

Initial Concentrations: te: All reported values see the upper bound of the symmetric 95% confidence interval for the 0.9 quantile value

L=N"adide Soil Cont.entrati

F-(Pciz) 60t0O

Mode! Parameters:

fiIe;//C:\Documents and Settings\0 11941 883Loca1 Settings\Ternporaty Internet Files\Co, 10/27/2009

Dandi) Residential Scenario Page 2 of 28

General Parameters:

flle://C:\Documents and Settings\Oi I 941 883\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Co.. 10/27/2009

DandD Residential Scenario Page 3 of 28

Cow uiy _JL ° 0

hay

Hn May

fra(I)Bef ( arbon JjMx3s fraction of beef cattle ihat is carbon CNSTANTn Fraction

ltry Car , 0 bon CWJANT(wink ~,)

=6-16-11111 value a ]L!!___ frn(3)MUk (nrbon � li bia traeoon o mb thai s bai ( ONS FANT(norn

4): Eggs (n Fraction

tacton of an eg that a carbon licoNst\N

fcf(1):&ef Forage \4aar bton of net forage consumed by cftithseia carbon

Carbon Fracnon

IDtJtUaUC 1 IUOI -

fef(2):Pouftry Forage Mass fraction of net forage conairroed by Carbon Fraction

IitTT punlir) that a carbon

iJTT Cow Forage

*-

rCONS Carbon Frac tion I milk ths5c arbon _______________

1,10E J 1(101rbon Fraction Fraction _0 by beef cattle that is carNm

g(2):Pou7~poulit~cy 1ra

______- tkm of wet stored grain consumed Iia1STANT(nonc)

arbon Fction thc __L

4.00C40

1fcg3):Mitk Cow Grain 1 iCarmFrac_J Ebyurilk

tioctina of wCt stored grain consumed N cows that is carbon Ai5T(notkJ

i !carbon __T __ _____

ayvT hens ii

lfldwtRthwucd

ifcb(1):11eef tiny (a rbon tiStiat IFraction

fractron of wet stored hay consumed ’1’ heefcatdethat_a carbon

Value 7ct)CO2

fth2):Po&try Hay"]f Mass ftactron of wet stored hay consumed CO’tSl AatT none çonFi’actio jpoul try that is carbon

_ 7O6 SLajme

Cow HaMaw

O2_

k FractioJkcowui!,iscarbo__j

fraction of net stored ha consumed ____________ (nunti ONSfNT

file://C: \Documents and Settings\01 1941 883\Locai Settings\Teniporaiy Internet FiIes\Co,. 10/27/2009

Dand) Residential Scenario Page 4 of 28

Carbon L::_ JANT(e)

Carbon (Iry bon

E L== (12

Fraction

Eli lull [s:Vfc:Anrna ProductSpeciftc ty

\ NSTA nom) fv aw, m id

1 Fr ilnoffomg coed by heel coOk Containinaled Friction Out H

xf(2):Poullry Fog TteuouotTi eipou7IEli Contiminated Fra cOoc J[0 tumittakil

sf(3)d1ilk Cow Forage of iion foroge consumed by milk cows Contam inated

O+OO

iayer lien Forage ]acon of iltrege cottsumcdh hier has

Fracti cent noted

fauft used _value Yauc tOFF too

(7ontaininated Fraction

jxogt2): Poultry G 14

min ’Contaminated fi action tollry that is ContaminIkled

CONSTANT

Contaminated Fraction cows that is contaminated

g(4)LayorUeuGrain ]F_Fraction ofstored grain that s consomed by

1! m na!!d Fract ion ala) erhensthat SconttnitMated

121601 _� 1 = f raoJ 1E;;i;tEl p L

xh(2).Poulary If. Contaminate Frac ion that is willamirawd

lElllTl_ )1

xh(3):Miik Cow Hay by milk- Contaminated Frac tion uon Jestthet is cot kmtnded

CONSTANT(none)

Defattitootue used tOOEtOO

av minated t r _7~tpn ihat is cow,wnimacd Contmnfnnte, Lac Ion

Ds

w(1)teefWstter ]=ftoer

that is

ConbtninatcdFracdonJ tatmnated

kiaukxauaiated __________ jiue

!

xw(2).Poultry Water ofwater by xm lfty Contaminate Fraetin contaminated

LOOEtOft

Ji I1El

fBe:/!C:\Docwnents and Seting01 I 941 883\Local Setthigs\Tc.mporary Internet FiIes\Co.. 10/27/2009

DandE) Residential Scenario Page 5 of 28

et..POokrvJrMmmanconsumlaion

y for jcatjonno pulley

Milk _J[yhaConsumption oImilk

)L"Jifigatiorr No farming

Net - Egg of

ijig Modification: y%o fdrniinn

CONS fANThonci

1(01+00

CtY’JSTAN (m;ne1

1(1k 00

ONS IANT(nonei

ale 510+00

CONSTSN i kg/ yi

V 2140+0

OONS1AN1 (kgy1

4.116F401

(ONYI \Ni(kiLi)________

jIg

1440401

CONS IAN (kgy)

Yitiiie 01+00+00

CONS I AN fikgfyi

0010+00

Lfluail (ONSN1(&

25M0l

CONSTANT(L/y)

yalm 01 000+00

dl CONSTANT(IJy)

lc 2330+02

CONSIANI(kg/y)

11,100+00

1910+01

CONSTANT(kg/y)

0.000*00

(gjijgJf CONSTAN11(k Yy)

IMOF+-01

ONSTANi’(drss)

Nina 3,1050*12

Mys 3.6M14{12

iw3)MiIk Cbw Water Frado of water consumed by milk cows Contaminated F rertion JLthat_is coulamiesled

)ctiudt value uwd

w(4):Lyer Hen Water frci1rumed by ontaminated iraei ion ibm i s contaminated

Defiakwl aloe osil

1t 10TT0 Jwt grown omllc

) Mel Iv Jk dbum ompuno -

aloe used

(3): Diet Fruit Ii ma

Lielault raluc ucd

Uv(4:L)uet Grain iN early human cosupoon olgeaha

LJI!(ILDiq , - Be ekinsumptio-I of beef

specific

Diet - Fish Yearly human eansumpilon of fish produced frau an osile pond

onsunu ption Period mption ecrind the fiSh

ult value use4

I):Couusumptkrn consumption period fir Lenti, iod - Leafy

Fruit

costmpbon perud for other

consumphion period for fruits

3,630+02

ONSTANT(days)

Valuc 3,650*02

Roots

file:/IC:\Documents and Settings\0 11941 883\1 Meal Settings\Temporaiy Internet Files\Co... 10/27/2009


tev(4): Cousumpt ioll Fwd co nsump t ion paid Cor grains !tONS iAV1(da) Period (

Age 163F+02

- -- - - - - - ------- Period - Beef

4

]i)((xmPo pI(1dfo r !dk ]NS ANTd}V4

lL(d 3,65E 02

Food Pt elglgs 11

L)Cbult - --

Number esa i1 re re1em 1 CONS \NTt none) nvo

,urated Layers J1thC a atuted lone

used IMOPO1

J a

TendR_I_ nd _1 rnte ol , thwe scenario ill 1$

:tR time stepNe JiANitdays)

1 be tone ctcps For the ikay 61C,Dones PstepRPrrnt Step S ize edi be ccritten to the bictorv the e cry a CONSTANT(none)

thee etc c

Tfilndoor i time the r spends 1 d5

Period ITht ti= the rsi&-nt spends outdoors

1TTL_ Der

¶FGGardPod]hmetheresident ~xdcl fl frONStAN f(dan/ ear) ________j

a thc one ceer ecpaar_ perad OF \Vi (dec__’)er)

JNSTAN1(aoa)

Factor

fadl Val p LOOEOO

dust 1oading]r dust loading

aced Lower Limit 2,00L,-02 3 OOEthI

~~Aon Factor

Default Value used r Limit LOOF-07

La�CrL USA 8,00E-05

file i/C:\Documents and Settings\O1 I 941 $83Loea1 SettingsVi’emporaiy Internet Files\Co... 10/27/2009


duE

Laria 100tfl7

ti1nLLiwii

Indoor Oust ditst fldftg flfl

PFndnor/1hjdor tdk r dko fl indwv air 1 iNil w L

I. wv e r I flufi 7 01)1 1)1

7 OOL Ui

C-6.Cardening Dust

_______________ *

VRAndoor &:flthrng RAte

IVXIC-10),utdimor Br ea th ing )[ Breathing ratfi he otckors 1TTT.. CONS I ANI (m

0ft+00

YGGardeting Breath 4B1hn rfllfl whk gardening ICONSTANT(rna3/hr)

i70E+00

CR.Soil Ingestion lk.~ragc raw o Transfer Rate

5O01AJ2 j re 1\J 1(0

a icr mrd0 tt a 4soura, of dnnkrnL 4ICr U41phedb

CONSTANT(W)

1 161, 100

urfaee Scfril IThickness iF iL_______________

Value

Zone Thickness of the ;udt d zone ,1 JI2*,IL,’,, nsatarate( Thickness IINTINL 04 , II\IAR(m)

Value 3O5E0l tiM0L~00 668E01 4761003 &U E01 9521003 911 C-10 I L43E02 994E01 1911002 l03E+00 238E42

2801002 114E400 3330402

18104)2 305*00 429002

L3IE+(X) 47604)2 0320+00 524E4)2 0560+00 571002 0580400 619002 0610+00 6671002 169000 762002 0780+00 857002 0800+00 905002 0810100 952002

fule://C:\Documents and Settings\01 194 1883\Loeal Setiings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\Co,, 10/27/2009


194r00 L00E ,0 1,97F-00 I,OMI’ -Ol .92E0fl

2.04E00 114E01 L 19L01

2, 11 E-’OO I 24101 2.32E"OO

2.36E00 1 ’13E 15i

2.371:010 1, 3iiE0i 239E0O 244I4’00 1.4F40i

246F ~00 2,15t400 2.59E00 I 2.63E+00 I 67L0I 240E+00 1.71E01 2.79E+00 I 76E01 23iL00 1 , 81L-0I 2901 ~00 1.8612-0111

29512+00 1.9112-01

10712+00 12)312-01 3. 1 8E00 2.0012-01 3.2215+ 00 ’10512-01 33012–00 21012-01 33412–00 21412-01 3.3712+00 2 1912-0] 3.4412–00 2.2412-01 3.5815~00 2.2912-0] 3.6212+00 2.3312-01 3.6612+00 2.3815-01 3.7412+00 14312-01 3.86E00 14812-01 3.8812-00 2.5212-0] 4.1712+00 2.5715-01 4.2412+00 2.6212-01 4.4412+00 247112-01 4.63E00 17615-01 4.8112+00 2.8112-01 5.1315+90 2.8612-01 31812400 19112-i]] 53412 ~00 19515-01 53312+00 3.0012-01 5.86E00 3.0312-01 3.ii6EU0 3.1015-0] 3.9012+00 3.1412-01 6,0612400 3.1914)] 61312-OX) 3.2412-01 6. 71500 3.291201 6.2212+00 3.33)5-01 6.3112400 3.3815-81 6.36&00 3.4312-81 6.4012+00 3.4815-01 6.44124J0 3.5212-0] 65112+00 33715-0] 125515+00 3.6215-01 66012+00 3.6712-01 6.8612+00 3.7112-0] 129315+80 3.7612-0! 129515+00 3.8612-01 129712+00 32)112-01 7.0915+00 3.9512-01 7.1815+00 42)015-0] 7.3515+00 4.0515-01 7.3612400 41015-01 7.4012+00 4.1412-01 7.4312–00 4.1915-01 71615100 4.241501

ffle://C:\Documents and Settings\01 1941 883\Lorai SettingsVFemporary Internet Files\Co.. 10/27/2009

[)and[) Residential Scenario Page 9 of 28

4.29i.50 I 7.60E400

URI -Of 764Ef00 77E4O0 4431501 8I10E+00 44111501

45214)1

11.71 E00 121401 11.31 1+Ot) 10714)) 11.331–00 4.7)1501 )79)4 00 4,761411 11.1101500 1,111)50) 11.1121>00

4.9)1501 S 891–0)) 4.951501 8.901–00 5.00150 11.991>00 5.051501 9.001>00 5.015-0 9.L3)?00 5.141-0 9. )404430 5.190-00 9.211+00 5i415O1 930)500 5.291-00 9.551+00 5.331-01 0.601+00 9.631409 5.431-00 9.116144)0 5.411)5-01 1 051–01 5.521-01 1.071–01 5.571-01 1.131501 5.621-01 1.151+01 5.67)3-01

5.711501 1.20E-01 5.761501 1.261+01 5.8)1-0) 1.261–01 5.861-01 1.281–01 5.9)1-01 1.3213+0) 5.951501 J.321+0) 6.001401 1.3413+01 6.051401 13413+01 61013-01 130Ei0l 6141401 1.3713–01 6191501 3,39E+01 6.241-03 1,4313401 6.29150) 14513+01 6.331401 1.5113–01 63813-01 15213+01 6.4313--01 1.611401 6.481501 1.6213+01 6.5211-0) 1.65)34 0) 6.5713-01 1(4)35+9) 6.6213-0? 3569)3401 &6713-81 1.741401 6.711-01 1321401 6,761501 3584)3>01 63113,4)1 134)3+0) I .8711>0) 64)135-0) 1.951–01 64)511-01 2.00)3401 7.00)3-01 2.0713–01 7.0513-01 2.0813+01 7.10)3-0) 2.171+01 7.1413-01 1241+01 7.1913-00 2.271+01 7.2419-03 22913+01 7.2913-03 2.2913+03 7.331401 14035401 7.3813-01 2.4713+01 7431401

fi.lesIfC:\Documents and Settings\01 1941 $83\Locai Settings\Temporary Internet Fiies\Co... 10/2712009


Th

of the uriee

:Utttrtted Zone of the wtuttd z one

2 6$EOt 3. 2.72E’(H 7571Ot 373E401 762EM1 2 , 76L~ 0 1 TOE-01 277I4tI 7i1 -01 27tilOI 7,761"110 1

2SE Ot 18 t EO 2S6lO1 76EfH 294i1H 791 E-01 Ifi 79517-01 3,6317--Ut soor-oi 3346+01 06-01

8. 16-01 3,11 6+01 8,191 7 -01 3 1717-01 8246-01 37F301 16206-01 376-01 16336-01 3.226+01 8386-01 3.3917-01 1643601 34817-01 8486-01 3546001 8.526-01 16017-01 8.576-01 3.686+01 8.6213-0] 407f7-01 S 6713-01 4.076~01 16716-01 4,2413+0] 167617-01 429i7--01 16816-01 442E--0] 16866-01 4726001 169)13-01 16976+91 16956-01 5.126+01 90113-0) 6.1317+01 9.0513-01 69D-01 9017-01 6.236–01 9. 146-UI 6.326~01 9.1917-01 6.59134-01 9.2417-01 673171-00 9.291701 7.4717-0l, 93213-01 7.9213+01 93813-01 161213A1 9.4313-0] 162813+00 9.486-01 1647177-fl 9.5217-01 169617-01 9.5713-01 9.4713+01 9.6213-01

.086+02 9.676-0] 61317-02 MI CAI 1.1513002 9.7617-01 1.426+02 9816-0] I .3717002 941613-01 67813+02 9916-01 141013+02 9.956-01 3,161,,’,, f 02 1.0017+00

l;Surftce Soil ratio of the suthiee soil layer

Unsaturated Zone rtOtO of the unseturated zone

V]3D(non)

ffle://C:\Documents and Settings\0 11941 883\Locai Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Co,, 10/27/2009


Ellt _________

r

JIauc 3 128 M4

1,34 1 A,;

4J)84O{I 2. i 1 E-02

4MOX Ô2I 08

8.00E+0 2. 808 00I(i

72340-01

01 80O1700

1iverE 0.4)0E+)0 1.000 ~ 00

iiParameteril Rehihe value of"Y porat-Wer within the L�NOR\(ntne) robabIty _j d istribut ion br th is s6l Lypc

Limii ulpmr Limit

YIiO38

6.07E-01 00017M0

4.I0E01 $ 6233-Ob

6.35E01 4, 76E-O)

7.620-01 400-01

34.3498201 6.200-01 7.051-01

18 40+00

I 230+00 3.791-08

0401+00 0 41L-0

I 221i00 9.821-01

I 621+00 9 9F-0 I

07313+00 1001200

- CONS

[DFRIVIDrn18

erault value

unsaturat ed zone 8_ _

Ksifl I :Sur2ace Sail 11permeiibilitv of rfe soil - -

Perm layer DE1VED[uce)

itj D eud

CONNT ANT(L) VORNOluttle of wa eorrawd2r

fi1e://C\Documents and Seteings\01 1941 883Loca1 Settings\Tcmporary Internet Files\Co, 10/27/2009

Dand!) Residential Scenario

Page 12 of 28

j w:= -

VS8VA’olunic of Witter volurne’-4wwer in Ow pond Finftnd~’("unl ~v

’ALA (ONS 1 ~ I . ......

no pond 00, - ----

iTGGudenhg Period ]ii___ img pia CONSTAN

J

DJAult

gctthks

THV(2): Uo]dp Period: tie___ Ihkhip period 1orihcr vcitahlcs ONSIAN disi

)r fruits

Holdup period orgrams, -

TT ToJJi 1 ’

Nr(dao - .................... .... _______

IT1A(2)Ukhp PerkidTlr . I kldup penod or pmlfly QYNSTANT(days ) Poultry

(TJIA(3)iioidup Period F 1 kiklop period 1r milk F"ON STAN I ldiy) Milk

I

[F

ng F0 ) (g imu.,rpd fo r other

leis

iV(3):Growin . . Mimmum rowm e dPrfru

Period. Fruits CONSTANT(days)

lu 9E+01 _

FCV(3):Crowing Minimum growingpwod $r grains K’ONI4ANNT(dkv ,,,)

flle://C:\Docurnents and Settings\01 1941 883\Loral Srttings\Temporary Internet FiIes\Co,,, 10/27/2009


HProd

!-= ii Cli t):(rowg P4nd

d’!

:FG1(2):( rowing Period Pouftr Fura2e

rowing prrod for 1inae b

pr)d fr lr by othr

JOO. (1

T(}(3)( o Period M im prd hr 1 c

Mi’k Cow Forage curnykcs

Etn," a

ro vi lag Klinin,min fUII period Md m

fNSTANTda)s) J

............. ....... . .....

______. ......

Perod Beef (ow

1 ahuwJ 1y1 O1

LtPeioa: Poultry Crain Ij bYPOUUr

finin growing priud r stared gram

L!!! ....... ! iii

srom for aorrd gram n YCfla Peod: Layer He _[On

... ... . . . . Gargin .

jTG11(t).G.I.Daving Nifininimm growing period for stored hay I CONSTANT(days)

TSH(2)Crowing um 14 stored hay Mitairn growing period

I Period Poultry thiv 1 coasu rmd by poultry

iDER] VE IN, days) Period Milk Cow {ay Judbyu1kcnw

ii(4):Goinj 1 ininram growing period for erad ha frer a

6,00EM)l RV(2)zJnteroepton I iFraction Other IfOLereepOon tiaetioa for ether vegerables UNIFORM(none)

value used [korerJJma lOQEOI

ItYt JftL

flle:!/C:\Documents and Settings\O I 1941 383\Local Settings\Temporaiy Internet File\Co, 10/27/2009


V(4):Jrption !Ibnerocption frmion (N’ amain, ,action - Grains

Fnteon ntcrC4ptiufl thtton kr bfuk knaw rctk Beef Forage

tLr 1 Lj, 1fl r )

1

RF(3):In1ercepion Fraction Milk Cow lntrceptton fratkm ir milk cow forage I) RI VFD(uoue) Forage

Fraeliort Laver flea In terocption fraction for ayrr Iwo krrrge DIRIVFDnmie)

FR� G45,RG( I)thterLeptw TractionBeef Cow Interception fraction Or beef cattle grain UNORMinone) Graht _________________________

ultval rio% 100001 (I00001

IRG(2):Inlemption Poultry Gram

hntcrception frizctkm for poultry grain

C

DERIVED(nune)

k")eiault voltw mcd

RGIoterceptioa FractionMilk Cow 1 lnterception fraction for milk cow grain DERIVED(none) Grain

RG(4):Jnterception Fraction Layer Hen Interception fraction for layer hen grain DERlVFDthcne) Grab

tion C =w fo& cat Jehay

RH(2)lntereephoa -i ction for hay poultry DERIVED(Pone) Fraction ; Poultry Hay

g, nurzcp6onfraction for mil [F

aV ion DRlIDfnom)

RH($):interceptIwn ][C

Fraction Layer Hen Interception fraction for layer hen hay DERIVED(none) j

f1iwlt value need

Cde4fye1dfgctthc COPDNU(M trN1\0kgu s0&2)

Default ygd Prpj 20E+00 kOUE+00

I E400 4,40003 274E+00 600003 176000 176002

file://C: \Docurnents and Settings\01 1941 $83\Local Settings\Ternporaiy Internet Files\Co.. 10/27/2009


Dther De fault

YV(2)Crop Yield

vnd

27E–00 436}Q2 2iO"IOO 48F02 2,82E00 2.g51 +00 217E’00 1o4LoI 259E+00 OOEM1 2 , 911"" 00 29JE00 2 ,96U’ 00 420 29F00 300E00

CA i 3.041‘tOO 9-94F-01

307E+00 9.97-0J 309E00 31H00 LWE 00 3J3E+00 L00L00 3.I5EQ0 1.0,0EA 00

226E+00 0 , OOF+00 229E+00 t0004

I 2.30E00 231 i00 640E03 233E00 1,5202 234E+00 12F02 235E+00 3.44E02 236Ef00 1,40E4H 23$E00 24910I 239E+00 3800-01 140E+00 30R-01 2 , 42,E40 601E-0 243F+00 7.88E-0I 2A4F;+00 884001 24E+00 042E-01 247E-00 9755-01 24E+00 9885-01 2495+00 9965-01 2.l E+00 997541 2525-000 9+05-01 2535+00 005+00 2545+00 1 005~00

LCrmp~ YV!cld for ~frtfits F I its ONTINUOI )JNFAR(k,-.,vwt ruits

2.175+130 0005+00 2205+00 120E-03 2215+00 2405-03 2235+00 6105-03 225+013 805-02 2.275+00 4305-02 2295+00 2315+00 1.385-01 2.325+013 2.145-01 2.345+00 3.275-131 2365000 4.505-01 2.385+00 5.765-01 2.405+00 6.875-01 2A25+00 7.882-01 2432+00 5682-01 2185+00 925241

9.602-01 1 2.472+00 2495+00 9115-01 151E400 9.925-01

fileJ/C:Docurnents and Settings\O1 1941 883\Local Settiags\Temporary Internet Files\Co,, 10%7/2009

Dandi) Residential Scenario Page 16of28

L-21.5EOO OdFUO

1thdOO

Grains

2,8 3dM OOkOO 2 90d4d OO4) 3,02(’40 2 34dM

3 26dM 2 334EM 3.42dO2 3.50 U-0 1 I O$d411

3,74E-0 15F-

01 M!

3 46dM! 4-5 0dM! S

’t 1QEO! 7 30101!! 4 31E-OI Ii 2000! ,13M-A! 9031001 447dM! 951 EM! 459dM1 977dM1 47! Ed! 9910 4;! 4113dM1 996100! 495dM1 999dM1 5 O7FMI 0011+00

1,04F-00 531dM!

op, yield for bcct co0c fdra - !1}ITA(kg dry ofcragdm2! 1F or ge

L)L4thy4 trd tisrLhnJt 3700-01 Upper Lind 534dM!

2360+110 9 400+00

Crop yield for Poultry [P’D:U~I~try F mage

!ow V ttfr 2 )

tI!MLL

I Crop yield for m ilk cow for4cc VI 13th. wet t fogc rn2)

i llicit(4)Crop Yield Laver

[Crop yield for layer. I..iee DFR1VEDik +et w rage!m2) Forage

Op Yield , Bf ]: ainJL grain 2 Crop yield for

cow Grain

QtL33ilM!uaid [aial! 5740-0! taadard Dcviatio 7770-02

_ Yield L yield for grairi 1EDk99

Poultry Grain

0Pte1(1 \1jcrop ck1 for milk cow oern DCRlVLD(ksttgrarn m3)

I fkfault vijkv, use d YG(~):Crop

’ Yj!4d -

Crop yiOd fi.,,r layer heii -,rain DFRIVE17ift %vet wt grain /m"2) Men Crain

Yield Beef ic yield for beef e*Otk bay ED(k11 wet wUO2)

file://C: \Documents and Settings0i 1941 883\Local Settings\Temporaiy Internet Files\Co, 10/27/2009

1)andD Residential Scenario Page 17 of 28

Yid jCrp OrpouRr hay DERVED(k5 wet w2)

Yield: Mk eii i)r milk, cow baa wet wtfm2)

4)Wrop Yield: (Irnp Odd for kwer hen bay iMR1VEO(kg wet wU1102)

I’ Hen Hnv I

~W’V(] ) .Wet/dry Leafy I Vegetables

Ma ,‘dn Conve r4on LaAor f or lcafvveeetabcs

CONTINUOU S bNFAR(mmc)

332E02 OUOEOO 48E02 345hO2

6.9b hO2 96EO2 36&O2

0 7 3017,-02 L73Effl 7O5EO2 20IE-01

242Ob 74bbEO2 772E02 276E-01

3.b bE4)b 834E02 34$E41

9OOEO2 936502 449h-(H 973EO2 9M E-02 499E01 IME-01 3.18F-01

05FO1 553&01 bO9-OI Ii3E01 6221O1 1, 18&O1 656E01 123E01 691 FO

73O1 1,33 E-01 7OEO 1, 35E-01 160E0 142E01 L940a11 l50E01 9.29Ii01 I59E-01 8.641 441

&95EO1 933E-Ob

2� 1Oi-01 967h01 2.56EO 9.9Iii01 324E-01 OOh+OO

eb r toT othr

3SSE-02 OOOeO 4.87EO2 34502 5.46E02 691 F02 5905412 1.045-01 6.295-02 1.311)04)1 6.695102 1735-01 7.025-4)2 2075-01 7346-02 242)001 74)6-02 2.501091 76$5-02 2765-I)) 7995-4)2 3i1E-0) &326-02 3,455-01

file://C: \Doewnents and Seuing01 194188. 3 \Local Settings\Temporary Internet F’iles\Co,. 10/27/2009

1,021"40

1.19F-01 24E0l

35E0

50E01

700,.tH

I201 2.42E0I 3.

ft62 4.159-01 4 41)17-Ui 4,84F-01 4.999-01 5.189-UI 5331k) 54479-UI 6 229-01 6.591741 &9iE-01 7.259-UI 7)17-01 7782-0) 7.949-0 14 299-01 8.649-01 8.949-0) 0339-0 9.676-0) 091 6-01 1.001000

T, IN I2AR


Fruit 11Wct/dy "I"VC 1,Jor4 factrw fm frnio

366O2 47E-O2 54M-O2 593E02 631&02 672E-O2 7O4)2 744E0% 7.52E002 7ThE-4)2 5. 3IO02 5.4SEO2 &78fO02 9,11 E4)2 946EO2 9.82E-02 997E02 ],(12L-()! 1.06100 U0[i01 U41001 1.101001 L24E.01 1.291001 1,34F-6l 1351001 1.4217-UI 1.499-UI

589-UI I .709-UI 1.579-01 2.149-01 2.589-UI 3.251001

C. rai iwto/dry wnvroiion factor far

ry : Beef jhVct/dry cotcckm factor for beofcaetk

I 1139.-Ui 3.2317-01

0.006+00 04517-02 6.916-02

.046-ta 1.38E-01 1, 7 3E-01 2.077--U) 2.426-UI 2.506-Ui 2.766-01 3.11 E-01 3.459-01 3.1409-UI 4.1517-UI 4.4017-Ut 41149-01 4.999-01 5.1817-01 5.539-0) 5.879-4)1 6.229-0) 6.569-01 779147-01 7 2517-01 7.509-0) 7.906-UI 7.941001 7-201001 8.6417-01

9.3317-61 06717-U 9.9)9-01 I .0017+00

8,8010-UI

ffle://C:\Docurnents and Settings\01 1941 883\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Co., 10/27/2009

DandD Residenta1 Scenario Page 19o128

F , flo

ei/dry: i;ouItr isoI 1or r pot

fwdt hi u _____ __

F(3)~=:WW,e.Otry~. Mfilk ’elfdry com;-Tskm 1400r f""n

r44 ’!UO

j%V/driyerVua; (

Reef facto (ON1 ANi(now) rw ( ja

1th.

*

Id am W)ERNEDO rain

Wet/dry Mi’k actor for milk cow

ow (3rain main

ry cOtWOCOt for ayer hen DERR’ED(nooc en Grain

Fev’dEcte,,i&, iacrr tr potiftry hay ERIVFD(noiw Ily

tfl(3) Wet/dry Milk

Fdidl~, cr vcrion actor tr M ilk cow h DERTV[D(none)

owl Hay -fault v*

01 ell Hoy ’faultved___*

l(I)IngLstion Rate oo var It beattle feraV jFTAkr thy t Ioragrith LL==

Uthirs!ed iaUiai1 2 29TrOO L9+OO

on rate t wa A dry -m foragel

Lowcr[imit 34gEO3 Upper Limit 2,82E -02

131 E4,16 1.4112+08

)Jngesfion Rate- cow forage C0NTlNU0UUN1draetd)

6312+00 000F+80 67712400 3.45E02 6961000 691002 liOEtOO 1041001

file://C: \Docurnents and Se.ttings\0 1941 $$3\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Co, 10127/2009


724L+00 73t 00 I 73001 7470+00 2M 7L01

242F01 700L0I) 76M540O 2 76040 7774-09 I 10-01 71170-000 79110+00 aoo+oo 8.13F+00

3300001 4.151091 4490-01

$.31t000 4.440411 $.37t400 49911401 8.420010 5.0004)1

5.1:001 18671000 5.470-01 &8111+00 622E01

56109 1 19.1011400 4.9111411 9.2011000 7.250001 9.31111+00 7.5010-01 9.4517010 76011-01 9.6817400 7,940-01 99311+00 8,290-01 0020+01 8,640001

8.940001 11111401 93310-01 1.2011+01 941711-01 1.330+01 9,910411 1.530+01 10010-00

EEEEEL JT1 Dthuli value used Lower Lim i t I. 190-02

1jłer Limit 2220-02 a 0450+141

7.920001

Beef Cattle Grain IB Pal uthvatue&j 1.690+00

9

2.290+00 1.990+00

wo ale =[B~A(kg thy wra6041__ _dault I Lses09mi 1.040-02

14.4517-02 a 05117+00

14117+00

Q()(3)agetio l[’r milk cw %141u Ingestion raW Milk Cow Grain

NO1MAL(ka dry wt 9raia/di

u1)v9j9ejed 1.7111~00 26217-01

QG ate, tnrdILe Layer Heil Crain h-

19)__

Q1ij141uej 3.51117412

12 I R

6.670-02 1.43174-09 7.9290)1

Ql](1),Ingestion Rate I Agesition vdW for beefcattle Beef Cattle flay hay FE’f~,A(kg dry wt =hayM)

Dth0t vdue used 11"’an1

i3417~0

tile://C:\Documents and Settings\01 1941883VLoca1 Settings’\Temporary Internet Files\Co.., 10/27/2009

Dandi) Residential Scenario

Page 21 of 28

4580100 9900

Qfl(2):Jogesl ion Rote: ’ 9U 00

Poultry Uay 1

______--

Q3!:h:gestion Rote I .[(oNnNuot!s 1 M.\R kg th3 WI

M!k COW }hv

5120+00 0000000 5,43L+00 3450.03 55700410 o 91000? 5.6800W!

041-Al 5.790"’011 1. 380-0! 5890000 1.73 F-0! 5 981 .90

2 , 07 F,_0 I 6,060-r00 3.420-01 608900 2500-01 0 140+0!) 2.760-01 6220+00 3.110-01 6300000 3,450-01 6.380000 3.800-01 6.460000 4.151001 6, 54L4 ,00 4490-0! 6.630000 3841001 6,670000 4990-01 6720000 5.180-0! 6810+00 5.530-0!

16920000 5,87100! 7 030+00 6,220-0l 7.130 ~00 6.568001 7.280+00 6.911001 7390+00 7251001 7.490+00 7.501001 7 560400 7.600-01 7.700000 7.940-01 7.890+00 8291001 8.110100 8.641001 8J90400 8.980-01 8350+00 93314-01 9.440000 9.670001 1.050001 9.910-01 1.270401 1.000+00

CO NSTANTI ko dry WI h!d)

Imault attic Use d

W Iter Rate _Bee f]77tf7IjXXIJor

h)flIuUv’due uced 5.001401

Poultry

DeIOW! ca1u uad YAW 30014-01

Rte L____ Value

QW(4)-Witer ate Laver Hens

rin 1orLfltICnc }

c)4ST44T(Jd)

used ____YA us

QOO)Soil Fraction

lf - I . . ................ . .. . . .......... .... .

I mOlke ftacontörbeetvnth. ] ’ )NS1 5\1thone}

file://C: \Documents and Settings\01 1941 883Loca1 SettingsVicmporary Internet Files\Co,. 10/27/2009


ractkrnI soil irffak’c fm Poultry AN

QD(3)Soil Fratkrn nle friv I milk (ONSAN MikCow FA_J.

- LL -

O(4Frcthn JE 7mlk. ______________

fixtor T" 4 11 09 1 L43 111 ~-,

k r kth UICONIST’ANTI

Lea v, ’q~tables �in

M LV(2): ss4oadig LI kad ficlor fide Nt ether veg1ks ON fANTnoe

N1wft a1 us1

i Fruits

MLV(4):Mathng 1 r Odor Ni grin CONS TAN’ L iore) fr rains JL

LAMBDW:Wehering ]

Rate Wathring mw Or adivily removal Norn

[ CONSTANT(IM) plants

___________ 4 9$NO2 -

c1oadi____r for btefNr ;,Be f Cow Forag

Mall Zd’i. I

1rValue

Milk my Forage

_

1L1(4)MasLoadrng Ecing 0dr fix1ar he Nragc E( ONSTANiinonO Layer Hui Forage

Masio1ing Odor Or heefct1egN (STANf(norO Beef Catt le Gra in J_________ d_’eused I_ oo__ oI

AMA Cow Grain EiIE cfaoue axed J[yie

MIG(4):, i =ass- hen rJSANT(none) Layer lien Graia

IlRed Cattle Bay LO - � ------------

flle://C:\L)ocuments and Settings\01 1941 88’ \Local Settings\Tcmporaly Internet Files\Co,., 10,127/2009


i’miltry Hay

Maskdm &r 1r mk cow hay CON AN1(wwc)

* *

JL1 Td __

Milk Oviv I by

11,11( ass ing. J,aver Hen

1U(ld:flPeOdi 1 iTFFf2)-.Fek,dWg Perio4T] ,Poultry Forage

Feeding for pouhry foragc

TFF(3)Eeeding Period [C()N, "’TANT(d,’ codnw period or mk cow foragc V

___ ThL II_1111 1-1yer Hen Forage

Umfing periud f6- laye ~ he ~l fwage FONSTAN’R,days)

TFG(J):Feediog Period I[TT aFeching peood for beef Cattle graui (NSANUda)

Beef Cattle G rain

Q~Lrllul( 1* _41C lAed 3,65F+02

Njultry Grain

L (3) ’e~in‘g Period -’-’ C t =r,,dingjv6,d1’,,mRkeow min= ’ORSTAXT(day ~~)

IT TE *_

65LNO2

LTFY(-;(4)FeedhwPeriod1FF-cedikig . 11... peood or aer boo gcon CONS AN1(dar er lien G rail j

iO)Id Period ~Reer(’attle Hay

_____________ I[________________ L(2):Feeding

pciiod fhr odiry hay CONSTANflda ry

2

1111ilk Cow May used

I LTFIT(4ffeeding Period

ar)!:~_ I

Fater Period _

’Beef Cattle

filc://C:\Documents and Settings\O I I 941 883\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Co... 10/27/2009


Page 24 of 28

H Vat.

Period FFNVGI): Witter Milk Cows

11 O

.

1W. TiTdmgen I

NSLANUon

doge Ir Or m ilk o’r (tOS LAN1 (ronrr

I a(4).-Hydrogen

frczico Or eggs CONSTANrconc Fraction Eg E ggs

thv(!)Hydrogeo Fraction Leaty I lydrogcn lr=im Or kiIy elahIcs c\STANicocj

Vegetables

41t,q =d ithi

fHvdrogro Fraction Other it ydrogcn I coon Or other vctabIcs iCOIOJANF(nonc) Vege

jFDc1mft riuc uscd OO}OI

Fraction - r;

T(wne)

fh nv,4): Ilyd rogen gen fraction for grains UANT(twme) i Fraction . Grains

l&L4aL4Ig ______jk iOaIOl

Thf(1)Hydrogen Fraction Beef Cow Hydrogen fraction for beef cattle 1bree CONSTANTnrme)

Ell im Th’)Hvdroen 11

Uydroco fraction Or pooltry Orepc CONS rANT~notte) Fraction , Poultry Forim-1

fhf(3):Hydrogen J Fraction : Milk Cow Ilydroe fraction Or milk cow fbrnge CONSTANT(none)

drogen Traction Layer Ilco Hydrogen fraction for her hen forage CONSTANT(none) Forage

fhh(I)llydrogen 1 Fraction Beef Cattle Bydrogcn fraction for beef eatte hay CONSTANT(none)

Value_ p _

ffle://C:\Documents and Settings\0l 1941 883\Loral Settings\Tcrnporary Internet Flles\Co.. 10/27/2009


_______-

flil(3)dtvdrogen rctrnn Milk (nH ____________

lux

(IFraction : Layer Hen droen th1on rlaym hen ha) (ONSiANNoonm

ay

f1g(1)1Iydrogen I Fraction Beef Cattle HVdrOeR flachon ftr hfattk gram CON: S1 AN ilaone

G rain

- ____

[ffig(2)-.lydrogen I * Ircn haUo r pouhr rarn CONSFA\Tocmci

Fraction Poultry

MpIndf Vat

- - - -------

Fraction Milk Cow I fydw,-mi fiaclkm for milk cow grain CONSTANi(none Crain

65OFO2

fhg(4)Hydrogen Fraction Layer Hen llydmgcn fraction f01 layer hen grain CONSTANT(none) Crttin

680h02

Friction t Soil

sam. oil Equivalence. Soil

UCLf�M�ALV� W t�le -t-1110 gut NO

sawvhTritkun Eqivalencet Tritium eq ivaknce: plaot/waier CONSTANT(none) PlantAVater

efgured I In

lsatah: Equivalence: Animal lntium eqexalenre: animal product intake (CONSTANilnooei Products

LOOP

ct [Annual Yield ef beef

jYieldj fCattleL ______

find Val wed

ot mfl __ Yield -. Poultry final

1.

Yield: Milk C

741EO3

A(4):Anima! Piviluct iekl: Layer Hens

Annual yield of eggs per individual animal CONSiANi(g/y)

l26ErOl

o surface area to which resident is via external radiation during

fl1e:f/C:Documents and Seteings\Ol 1941 883\Local Scttings\Ternporary internet Flles\Co. 10/27/2009


Ekrne* Dependant Parameters

Distribution i

ge jhh1j 567EO1 OGOE+OO 7O1 I .O3E-02

363E01 344E412 -273E401 6 71E412 199E01 998E42

4.30E4)1 649E-02 L65E-01 396E4)3 1 91IL(H

$94E-0 2,3; F-0 l24c-01 26301 1116E-01 25IL.01 329EM1

161EM1 3119E-01 194E�01

427F141 540a.O 4610I

492EM1 64OE0I 501 FA 7-07 E-01 799EO1

S,90&61 1,01EfOO 623E01 L13ti+O() 1.26F K10 6,88E-01 1,4 I+OQ 721E01 I.51+OO 74E0 1.7IIE+IK0 7.8IE0I 2A13E+00 & 19E0I 232E+06 &2EO1 171E+60 II85E-01 126E+00 9. 17E0I 4.14E+OO 90E01 5.03E+00 96MOI

file://C: \Documents and Settings\O I 1941 883\Local Settings\Ternporary Internet FiIes\Co, 10/27/2009

Dandi) Residential Scenario

Page 27 of 28

2I FM I 4F+OI

[uiei ii::t Lea~y ’i

plant coD c r

lit M

r F)r (

DeIlaIt_’jij 3.7LOI

lCirain fictot for M \l p( yim

It

JL!ttaL AN

Value 11,01UL"t-00

Ems

Milk lraaMer INNor Ir C

Value 0AW,4(g) _______

Ic E lntnster_’uor

iulafi(mi factor for rii(pc k. wt fish per P0 .1t, water)

1 1L__

Correlation Coefficients:

Summary Results:

9000% of the 100 calculated TEDE values are < 1.63F -01 mrem/year. The 95% Confidence Interval for the 09 qeantilevalneofTEDE is 1.41E0I to 1.93E01 mrem/year

Detailed Results: Note-All reported values, are the upper bound of the symmetric 9% couridwe interval for the a9timintae vliltte

Concentration at Time of Peak Dose:

i Soil Concentration L erConcentration

file://C: \Documents and Settings\0I 1941 883\Local Settings\Tcrnporary Internet Files\Co, 10/2712009


Page 28 of 28

Pathway Dose From All Nuclides (mrem)

Radionuclide Dose through All Active Pathways (m rem)

I All Pathways Dose

E oi iiiiTL Dose from Each Nuclide through Each Active Pathway (mrem)

ir \UthdeJL ter

llcooE+o

i1 Secoadary I _iJ

tcrnaI j

kiludafton

UE0 i][4

fi!ei/C:Documents and Settings\01 1941 883\Local Settings\1’ernporary Internet Files\Co, 10/27/2009

gill tract final status survey 2009 september 8 cabrera services radiological environmental...

Documents

dpmloocmcpm d

rdfloor berkeley

license condition10

associate director

cb region cc

region b

key sample idsample

general counsel uc office