!"#$ $& $&'()*+,-& $& .&-(#/## $& $&+,/"&$ 0)1+" 2)-3 45 /)615#+78#*& -1-,*& "#$% %&'()*+,+ -. /,%01* 2&(&*)3$.4 2&+,/#&% 5)1+# 6)07 80,/+$/& 9:;?@;AB:>;C>;;;D=EF 80)$&/+G$.,.H,+%&I)J$K$,L10)3&,.MF80)40,J1*L0,KJ1KNFB/H$1.&,I#&$&:>8,0+&.&0$,+&O+0,+&4$/&-. %)J&.$1* @$.&0&+1*1$P

Autori:Adina Marina C!l!f!teanu, Dr. & Irina Lonean, Dr. Centrul pentru Dezvoltare Comunitar! Durabil! CDCD Proiectrealizatcusprijinulfinanciaral ComisieiEuropene.Aceast!publica"iereflect!doaropiniaautorului#inureprezint!n mod necesar pozi"ia oficial! a Comisiei Europene. " Detached youth work1 la Giubega $i CmpeniTinerii reprezint! resursa absolut necesar! de care fiecare societate are nevoie pentru a-#i asigura func"ionalitatea. Cel pu"in la nivelul Uniunii Europene ,,a venit timpul ca tineretul s! fieconsideratcafor"!pozitiv!nconstruireaEuropei,nucaproblem!deadministratnnume propriu#itrebuies!liseoferetinerilormijloacelenecesares!#iexprimeideile#is!le confruntecuideisimilarealecelorlal"iparticipan"ilasocietateacivil!.2ns!,valorizarea tineretuluicaresurs!nseamn!investi%iantineri,investi%ianstructurareadeoportunit!%ide dezvoltare personal! $i profesional! pentru tineri. La nivelul structurii sociale, tinerii tind s! fie marginaliza%i,adul%iiorganizndstructuriledeparticiparepentruacestgrup.Astfel,aceste structurinefiindadaptatenevoilor$iintereselorlor,tineriinusuntinteresa%is!fievizibilin spa%iul public $i nu $i fac vocea auzit!.ntrun context profund marcat de probleme economice $i sociale, context n care tinerilor europeni le este din ce n ce mai greu s! g!seasc! oportunit!%i de angajare $i tot mai mul%i tineri ajungncategoriaNEETs,lucr!toriidetineretsuntnevoi%is!identificepermanentmetode$i instrumentedelucrucares!r!spund!nevoilor$iintereselortinerilor.nacestsens,ncadrul proiectuluiDevelopingDetachedYouthWorkPractice,CentrulpentruDezvoltareComunitar! Durabil!piloteaz!ndou!comunit!%idinJude%ulDoljmetodedelucrucarepermitlucrul AL&TURI de tineri $i nu numai PENTRU tineri. Adina Marina C!l!f!teanu, Dr, Irina Lonean, Dr. #Pentruc!nlimbaromn!nuafostidentificatunconceptcares!descriecuacurate"eabordareametodologic!, autorii au p!strat denumirea conceptului n limba englez!.2Cartea Alb! a Comisiei Europene , Un nou elan pentru tineretul Europei, 2001, p .3. $ Developing Detached Youth Work Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348) Dinseptembrie2014,CentrulpentruDezvoltareComunitar!Durabil!estepartenern cadrul proiectului Developing Detached Youth Work Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348) Proiect finan"at de Comisia European! Programul -Erasmus + - Ac"iunea Cheie 2 Parteneriate Strategice n Domeniul Tineretului, proiect implementat deA#enzija$g%a&ag%(Malta),StichtingJONG Rotterdam (Olanda) 'i YMCA George Williams College (MareaBritanie).Proiectularecascopdezvoltareade servicii de detached youth work n Malta 'i n Romnia, utiliznd expertiza 'i experien"a partenerilor din Olanda 'iMareaBritanie.nacestsens,dindecembrie2014 pn!nfebruarie2015aufostevaluateserviciile existente n comunit!"i, din martie 2015, fiind dezvoltate serviciile n dou! comunit!"i din Malta n dou! comunit!"i n Romnia.nRomnia,aufostalesedou!dintrecomunit!"ilencareCDCDfurnizeaz!permanent serviciipentrutinericomunaGiubega'isatCmpeni,ComunaPiele'ti(nparteneriatcu Centrul Educa"ional pentru Resurse 'i Training, CERT) 'i din martie 2015 sunt pilotate primele mecanisme de detached youth work, CDCD beneficiind de supervizare din partea organiza"iilor partenere din Olanda 'i Marea Britanie. Pentru furnizarea acestor servicii: Echipele de lucru ale A#enzija $g%a&ag% 'i Centrului pentru Dezvoltare Comunitar! Durabil!aubeneficiatdeuncursdeformarelaRotterdam,cursfurnizatdeJONG Rotterdam Martie 2015. Aurealizatunstudiuprivindsitua"iaserviciilor,programelor'iproiectelorpentru tinerinceledou!comunit!"i.Studiulestedisponibilaici: http://www.cdcd.ro/2015/01/youth-work-realities-in-giubega-and-pielestiAufoststructurateinstrumenteledesupervizare'imentoratpentrulucr!toriide tineret 'i pentru echipa de management % Aufoststabiliteproceduriledelucru'iindicatoriideperforman"!pentruserviciile furnizate Afostrealizatghiduldepilotaredeserviciidedetachedyouthworkpentru comunit!"ile rurale. Ce este detached youth work? Detachedyouthworkreprezint!oabordaremetodologic!nlucrulcutinerii.Aceast! abordare specific! integreaz! principii 'i practici de nv!"are informal! 'i nonformal!, lucr!torii de tineret lucrnd direct cu tinerii pentru dezvoltarea lor personal! 'i profesional!. Ca orice alt tip deabordaremetodologic!,detachedyouthworksebazeaz!perela"iadencerederepecare tinerii'ilucr!toruldetineretoconstruiesc,acceptarea'isuportulfiindprincipiiledebaz!.Specific acestui tip de abordare este faptul c! interven"ia nu mai are loc pe teritoriul lucr!torului detineret(clubdetineret,centrudetineret,spa"iileinstitu"ionale,etc)cinspa"iultinerilor, oriundeace'tiaalegs!fiepestrad!,ncafenele,ncentrecomerciale,etc.Astfel,rela"iade lucru se construie'te n aceste spa"ii 'i continu! s! fie una flexibil!, pe tot parcursul interven"iei. n plus, serviciile fiind furnizate acolo unde tinerii aleg s! fie, ele sunt perfect adaptate nevoilor tinerilor. n cele mai multe cazuri, lucr!torii de tineret lucreaz! cu tineri 'i cu grupuri care nu sunt neap!rat n standardele sociale impuse tineri mai degrab! marginaliza"i de societate, izola"i la nivelul structurii sociale. (Federation for detached youth work, 2015) Scopul detached youth work (Federation for detached youth work, 2015):1.Lucr!torul de tineret este un agent al schimb!rii, nu unul care exerseaz! controul social 2.Respectulestecelcaredefine'terela"iadelucrudintrelucr!toruldetineret'igrupulde tineri 3.Interven"ia'ifurnizareadeserviciiaulocnurmaunuiprocesdenegociere'idialog astfel nct s! fie adaptate nevoilor tinerilor 4.Are ca scop asigurarea particip!rii tinerilor la via"a comunit!"ii & 5.Sus"inedezvoltareapersonal!'i profesional! a tinerilor 6.Nucaut!s!iaduc!petinerinspa"iile conven"ionale de lucru 7.Lucr!toruldetineretdevineoagen"iede facilitare'idialog,asigurndleg!turatinerilorcu ceilal"i actori din comunitate 8.Tinerii l recunosc, 'tiu exact care este rolul lui. (Rogers, V., 2001) Ce nu este detached youth work: -Un model nestructurat de interven"ie -Un stil de lucru care nu implic! resurse financiare -Un mecanism imediat de rezolvare de probleme -Unsetdetehnici'imetodologiiutilizatepentrua-iconvingepetineris!seal!ture activit!"ilor din spa"iile conven"ionale de lucru. Cnd folosim detached youth work? -Atuncicndserviciilefurnizatenspa"iileconven"ionalenucorespundnevoilor'i a'tept!rilor tinerilor -n spa"iile urbane, chiar dac! exist! infrastructur! -n mediul rural, acolo unde tinerii au acces limitat la resurse. Metodele de lucru cu tinerii ncadrate n categoria detached youth work metodologiile delucrupracticatedelucr!toriidetineretnafaraspa"iilorconven"ionaledelucru(centrede tineret,casedecultur!,centredeactivit!"icoordonatedeorganiza"iileneguvernamentale,etc.) aparnspa"iulanglo-saxonnc!dinsecolulalXIX-lea.Pionierulacestortipdemetodologiide lucru este considerat T.H Tarlton, f!cnd primele vizite n calitatea sa de misionar, n ncercareade a convinge 'i al"i tineri s! se al!ture noii formate organiza"ii YMCA Young Men (1844) YoungMen'sChristianAssociation.ns!,abianadouajum!tateasecoluluialXIX-lea,n ' momentulncarelucr!toriisociale'incepvizitele discrictualencercnds!iajutepetineri,metodelede detached youth work sunt recunoscute ca atare.nceputurilepilot!riiacestormetodedelucrusunt fielegatedencercarealucr!torilordetineret'ia lucr!torilor sociali de a-i aborda pe tineri pe strad! 'i de a-i convinges!seal!tureunuiclubsauunuiproiectsaudeancercas!iconving!s!constituie organiza"iicares!derulezeactivit!"icares!r!spund!nevoilortinerilor.ntotacesttimp, lucr!toriisociali'ilucr!toriidetineretaucontinuats!dezvoltemetodologiidelucrupretabile cadrelorconven"ionalecentredetineret,cluburialetinerilor,spa"iideschisemembrilor'i oferindserviciinfunc"iedenevoileexprimatedemembrii.ns!,ceimaimul"itinerinuerau membriiunorastfeldestructuri'iproblemelelorr!mneauf!r!r!spuns.(Smith,M.K., 1996,2005) Metodologiilededetachedyouthworkaparcasolu"ieder!spunscrizeigeneratede diversificareaproblemelortinerilor.Astfel,lafinalulanilor1950,consumuldestupefiante, delincven"a juvenil!, consumul de alcool, etc., sunt probleme care solicitau lucr!torilor de tineret alte metode de lucru, alte tipuri de interven"ie. n cele mai multe cazuri, aceste probleme ap!reau ncazultinerilorcarenueraumembriiaistructurilordetineret'inubeneficiaudeserviciile centrelor de tineret.Proiectele pilot n domeniul detached youth work au variat ca durat! 'i tip deabordareatinerilor.Delaproiecteledelung!durat!,cu interven"ieclar!ntroanumit!zon!ngeneralsuburbii'izone cuproblemeeconomice'isociale,aten"ia'iresurseles-au concentratapoipeproiectedescurt!durat!,nmomentencare grupurile de tineri aveau nevoi emergente. (De exemplu, n cazul tinerilor NEETs, ncercarea de a-i aduce n spa"ii de formare 'i de identificare de oportunit!"i de angajare).ns!,avndnvedereprofilultinerilorcucarelucrautinericarepotfincadra"i categoriilor de tineri cu oportunit!"i reduse, lucr!torii de tineret au n"eles c! este cazul s! vin! cu unnousetdemetodologii,metodologiidelucruflexibile,bazatepeimplicareavoluntar!a acestortineri,metode'itehnicicares!fieindividualizate'is!r!spund!nevoiloracestor ( categoriispecifice.ns!,acesttipdeinova"ienuafostneap!ratapreciat'idedeciden"i'ide finan"atori, rezultatele acestor tipuri de interven"ii fiind greu de cuantificat. n ceea ce prive'te terminologia, detached se refer! la practicarea metodologiilor de lucru cutineriinafaraspa"iilorconven"ionaledelucru.Lucr!toruldetineretiabordeaz!petineri acoloundeace'tiaseg!sescnacelmomentpestrad!,ncafenele,etc.ns!,ceeacer!mne centralntermenideattachmentestefaptulc!lucr!toruldetineretdezvolt!orela"iedelucru ntrocomunitate,cuunanumitgrup,parteneriaz!cuanumi"iactoridincomunitate,generndu-se, astfel, structuri stabile de lucru. (Smith, M.K, 1996, 2005) nplus,abord!rileteoreticeinsist!clarasupradiferen"ieriintreoutreachyouthwork lucr!torii de tineret ncercnd s! i aduc! pe tineri n spa"iile conven"ionale de lucru 'i detached youth work metodele de lucru practicndu-se acolo unde se g!sesc tineri, f!r! ca lucr!torul de tineret s! ncerce s! i atrag! c!tre organiza"ii sau spa"ii institu"ionale. De asemenea, street work, este mai degrab! ncadrat! ca metodologie de lucru, detached youth work. n cazul street work, lucr!torii de tineret lucreaz! cu tinerii n strad!. Detached youth workers pot s! aib! 'i spa"ii de lucru organizate, spa"ii n care se ntlnesc cu anumite tipuri de beneficiari de servicii. Dezvoltarea serviciilor de detached youth work cu ajutorul Metodei Schimb!torului de Viteze Dezvoltareaserviciilordedetachedyouthworks-af!cutsub supervizareapartenerilordinMareaBritanie$iOlanda,ceidoilucr!toridetineretViorel Buc!tur!(Giubega)$iAdinaEnache(Cmpeni),beneficiind$ideuncursdeformarela Rotteram,nlunamartie2015.nceledou!comunit!%i,din2010,CDCDaorganizat ) permanentactivit!%ieduca%ionalepentrutineri.nplus,nCmpeni,partenerulCDCD CentrulEduca%ionalpentruResurse$iTrainingCERTareunCentrudeVoluntariat/ Centru de Tineret. Alegnd s! lucr!m n aceste dou! comunit!%i, am beneficiat de avantajul experien%eloranterioaredelucru,lucr!toriidetineretreu$inds!organizezerapidprimele etape ale pilot!rii serviciilor.Modelulutilizatnstructurareaserviciilordedetachedyouthworkafostmodelul Schimb!torului de viteze. 1.Viteza 1 DemarajulPentruancepefurnizareaserviciilor,afostnevoiedeviziteperliminareale lucr!torilordetineretnspa"iilencaretineriisentlnesc.Identificareaacestorspa"iia fostf!cut!nperioadadocument!riistudiului.Lucr!toriidetineretauexplicatrolul acestorvizite'iaudezvoltatrela"iiledecooperare'increderedecareaveaunevoie pentru a putea lucra cu tinerii.2.Viteza 2 Alegerea vitezei de deplasarenceade-adouaetap!,lucr!toriidetineretaustructuratprimeleactivit!"icare marcheaz! interven"ia. Activit!"ile pentru cea de-a treia etap! au fost negociate n cadrul unorntlniripublice,rolullucr!torilordetineretfiindaceladeafacilitantlnirilecu reprezentan"ii autorit!"ilor publice locale.3.Viteza 3 Accelerareanacestsens,ncomunaGiubegaafostamenajatParculTineretuluiiarnsatul Cmpeniafostreorganizatspa"iulncaresentlnesctineriiCentrulde Voluntariat/Centrul de Tineret.4.Viteza 4 Croazieran aceast! etap! sunt planificate activit!"ile n care grupul de tineri va fi implicat netapaurm!toare.nplus,avndnvederec!acestaesteunproiectpilot,este structurat!strategiadeie'iredincomunitate(exit)'isuntexploratemecanismelede * transferaserviciilorc!treautorit!"ilepublicelocalesauidentificareadeoportunit!"ide finan"are a serviciilor n structura existent! n cadrul CDCD. Pentruaneasigurac! beneficiemdesprijinulactorilor dincomunitate,ceidoilucr!tori detineretaunegociatacordurile departeneriatcual"iactori interesa"idinceledou! comunit!"i.Astfel,dinlunaiulie 2015,proiectbeneficiaz!de sprijinul: 'colii din Comuna Giubega 'colii din Comuna Piele$ti Prim!riei Comunei Giubega Prim!riei Comunei Piele$ti Sec%iei de Poli%ie din Comuna Giubega Sec%iei de Poli%ie din Comuna Piele$ti Cabinetului Medical din Comuna Giubega Cabinetului Medical din Comuna Piele$ti Rolulacestorparteneriesteesen"ialnfurnizareaserviciiloradecvatenevoilor'i intereselortinerilor.Acorduriledeparteneriatprev!dcooperareapermanent!ntreace'tiactori pentruasigurareaprotec"iei'isiguran"eitinerilorncomunitate'ipentruidentificareade oportunit!"idedezvoltarepersonal!'iprofesional!pentrutineri.Hartaactorilorafostrealizat! ncadrulntlniriiechipeideproiectnaprilie2015,actoriifiindidentifica"idec!treceidoi lucr!tori de tineret n cadrul ntlnirilor s!pt!mnale cu grupurile de tineri. Acest tip de abordare afostextremdeimportantpentruc!apermislucr!torilordetinerets!identifice'iproblemele #+ tinerilor,problemealec!rorsolu"iider!spunspots!vin!dinparteaactoriloridentifica"i'is! furnizeze'iinforma"iiimportantepecareace'tiactorilpotfurnizatinerilor.Trimestrial, lucr!toriidetineretvoraveantlniricuace'tiactoripentruaurm!rirezultateleproiectului.n plus,cei8partenerivorcomunicapermanentculucr!toriidetineret'ivorsemnalacazurilen care au nevoie de sprijin. Principii cheie n pilotarea serviciilor Principiilecheiepentrufurnizareaacestorserviciiaufoststabilitencadrulechipeide proiect la ntlnirea din 20 martie 2015. Aceste principii sunt:!Rolul serviciilor de detached youth work pe care le furniz!m n cele dou! comunit!%i este acela de a structura oportunit!%i pentru tinerii cu oportunit!%i reduse. !Furnizareaserviciilorarelocpreponderentntroanumit!zon!dincomunitatezon! stabilit!nperioadadocument!rii,darvomextindeserviciilec!trealtezone,dac!este cazul. !Lucr!torii de tineret $i definesc orarul de lucru $i l respect! pe parcursul proiectului. n cadrulsesiunilordesupervizare,ceidoilucr!toridetineretdecidcumanagerulde proiect dac! este cazul s! aduc! ajust!ri programului de lucru. !Lucr!toriidetineretbeneficiaz!deoportunit!%ideformare$iaupermanentsuportul CDCD n furnizarea serviciilor.!Lucr!torii de tineret au acces la resursele organiza%iei pentru a furnizarea serviciilor de care au nevoie tinerii resurse financiare, logistice, resurse umane, expertiz!, etc. !Avndnvederemetodologiadelucruabordat!,flexibilitatea$iconfiden%ialitateasunt principii de baz! n serviciile furnizate. Pilotareaserviciilordedetachedyouthworknceledou!comunit!"iruraleavenitpe fondulschimb!riideparadigm!nmuncadetineret.Tineriisuntnipostazancareaula dispozi"ieopalet!larg!deoportunit!"idincarepotalege,ns!,pentrutineriidinmediulrural, accesul la aceaste oportunit!"i este extrem de dificil. n plus, pentru ace'ti tineri pesimi'ti privind viitorullorncomunitate,estenevoiedeserviciicares!r!spund!nevoilorlor'is!determine dezvoltareadecuno'tin"e,atitudini'iabilit!"icares!leserveasc!ulteriorcontinu!riistudiilor, ## ncadr!riipepia"amuncii,dobndiriiroluluipecarelmerit!lanivelulstructuriisociale. Principiul de baz! al serviciilor pilotate este utilizarea comunit!"ii ca spa"iu de nv!"are. n acest sens, serviciile dezvoltate: a.Sunt n acord cu misiunea, viziunea $i valorile organiza%iei b.Sunt furnizate acolo unde sunt tinerii, n spa%iile n care ei decid s! se ntlneasc! c.Nu for%eaz! participarea tinerii particip! voluntar la activit!%i d.Nucaut!s!generezestructuriartificialecares!iduc!petineriicuoportunit!%i reduse n afara spa%iului public.e.Aduc viziunea tinerilor asupra comunit!%ii mai aproape de autorit!%ile publice f.Vin cu o agend! negociat! cu grupurile de tineri. Tot n urma unui proces participativ, sub supervizarea celor doi parteneri (din Olanda 'i Malta), au fost stabili"i 'i indicatorii de performan"! pentru serviciile furnizate. Astfel: Tip de indicatoriImpact la nivel individualImpact la nivel socialIndicatori de tip 1 (HARD) -Cre'terearateide participareatinerilor lasistemuldeeduca"ie formal! -Reducereariscurilor socialelacaresunt impu'i -Cre'tereaautonomiei 'iindependen"ein rndul tinerilor. -Cre'terearatei particip!riitinerilorpe pia"a muncii -Reducerea fenonemenlorde delincven"! -Comunit!"i mai sigureIndicatori de tip 2 (SOFT)-Accesulserviciilorde s!n!tate-Tineri mai s!n!to'i -Tineri mai informa"i #" -Respect de sine -Capacitarea tinerilor -Reducereaindicen"ei cazurilorde discriminare-Coeziunelanivelul comunit!"ii -Tineriiparticip!la via"a comunit!"ii. *Acest set de indicatori a fost negociat 'i cu partenerii locali 'i este supus revizuirii periodice, n urma ntlnirilor trimestriale. Supervizare #i monitorizare EchipaCDCDabeneficiatdetraining'isuportpentruorganizareaserviciilorde monitorizare a activit!"ii celor doi lucr!tori de tineret. Supervizarea 'i monitorizarea se face: 1.Prin ntlniri lunare ale echipei de proiect 2.Prin rapoartele de ntlniri realizate de lucr!torii de tineret n urma vizitelor s!pt!mnale 3.Prin conferin"ele skype n structura de parteneriat conferin"e organizate o dat! la dou! luni. Etapele pilot!rii serviciilor de detached youth work Etapa 1: Cercetare #i documentare naceast!etap!aufostanalizateserviciileexistentenceledou!comunit!"i.Doi cercet!toriaudezvoltatmetodologiadecercetare,metodologiecareainclusinterviurisemi-structuratecureprezentan"iaiautorit!"ilorpublicelocale'intlniricutineriidincomunitate. Aceast!etap!aavutlocnperioadanoiembrieianuarie2015,rezultatelestudiuluifiind disponibile aici: http://www.cdcd.ro/2015/01/youth-work-realities-in-giubega-and-pielesti#$ Astfel,lafinalulprimeietape,amavutla dispozi"ie o hart! clar! a actorilor care furnizeaz! servicii pentrutineri,nceledou!comunit!"i'ioimagineclar! asupranevoilortinerilor'iamidentificatloca"iilencare tineriisentlnesc,ncepnddezvoltareaplanuluipentru furnizarea serviciilor. Etapa 2: Observa"ie #i planificare Aceast!etap!anceputnfebruarie2015, lucr!toriidetineretncepndvizitelepreliminarenloca"iiledentlnire.Acestprimpass-a bazatpeobserva"ie'iconversa"ie,rezultatelefiindapoidiscutateculucr!toriidetineret experimenta"i n pilotarea acestor metodologii la Rotterdam. Partenerul olandez a g!zduit cursul deformarepentrulucr!toriidetineretdinRomnia'iMaltanmartie2015.ncele3zilede formare, lucr!torii de tineret au dobndit instrumente 'i metode specifice detached youth work 'i au vizitat comunit!"ile n care partenerul olandez furnizeaz! astfel de servicii de peste 20 de ani. EchipademanagementabeneficiatdetrainingdinparteapartenerilordinOlanda'iMarea Britanie n dezvoltarea de instrumente de supervizare 'i monitorizare a activit!"ii lucr!torilor de tineret. Lafinalul mobilit!"ii de nv!"are, echipa CDCD a dezvoltat planul de lucru pentru etapa urm!toare. Etapa 3: Contact #i interven"ie n organizarea planului de lucru a fost stabilit calendarul vizitelor n comunit!"i. Avnd n vederespecificulcomunit!"ilor'ifaptulc!nniciunadintrecomunit!"inuexist!liceu,afost agreat!solu"iaplanific!riivizitelornzileledevineri'ismb!t!pentruaputealucra'icu liceenii din comunitate.n cadrul acestor vizite: au fost identificate nevoile 'i interesele tinerilor, a fost identificat! viziunea lor pentru comunitate au fost furnizate informa"ii despre proiect 'i despre tipul de interven"ie #% a fost dezvoltat! rela"ia de ncredere 'i suport au fost stabilite principiile de lucru. nurmaprimelorntlniri, utlizndinstrumentespecifice organiz!riicomunitare, lucr!toriidetineretaunegociat cugrupurileprimeleac"iunipe care le vor derula n comunitate. Acesteac"iunisuntbazatepe nevoileexprimatedetineri.n ambelecomunit!"iafost permanent amintit! lipsa unui spa"iu de ntlnire, parcurile din comunitate nefiind amenajate. n baza planului de lucru organizat cu lucr!torii de tineret, n luna iunie, grupurile de tineri au reamenajatacestespa"ii,resurselepentrureamenajarefiindpuseladispozi"iedeCDCD'i CERTCentrulEduca"ionalpentrResurse'iTraining.nlunileiulie'iaugust,ncadrul ntlnirilors!pt!mnaleestenegociat!adouaini"iativ!comunitar!planificat!pentruluna septembrie. Rezultatele etapei 3: grupuri de tineri ncrez!tori n ini"iativele lor 'i vizibili n cadrul comunit!"ii mecanisme de lucru bine-structurate ncredereapartenerilorlocalin ini"iativele grupurilor de tineri determinareatinerilordea implementa o a doua ini"iativ! comunitar!.Etapa 4: Evaluarea niunieseptembrie2016vaavea locultimaetap!aproiectuluipilot.n #& aceast! etap! se vor organiza rezultatele evalu!rilor intermediare 'i vor fi identificate oportunit!"i de continuare a furniz!rii acestor servicii fie de c!tre CDCD sau de autorit!"ile publice locale. Echipa: Irina Lonean, Dr Adina Marina C!l!f!teanu,Dr. Viorel Buc!tur! Adina Enache #'

Bibliografie: "BelfastEducationandLibraryBoardYouthService(2012)OutreachandDetached Youth Work Guidelines "Belton, B. (ed) (2014) Global Perspectives on Youth Work, Sense Publishers."EuropeanYouthWorkConvention2015,TheDeclaration- http://www.eywc2015.eu/the-declaration"Federation for detached youth work, 2015 - http://www.detachedyouthwork.info/ "Rogers, V. (2011) 101 Things to Do on the Street: Games and Resources for Detached, OutreachandStreet-BasedYouthWork 2ndEditionJessicaKingsleyPub;2edition (February 1, 2011) "Smith,M.K.(1996,2005).Detached,street-basedandprojectworkwithyoung people in theencyclopaediaofinformaleducation.[http://infed.org/mobi/detached-street-based-and-project-work-with-young-people/. "Tiffany, G. (2008) Learning from detached youth work: democratic education published by the Nuffield Review of 14-19 education.#( Anexe: Youth Work Realities in Giubega and Pielesti Research Report ResearchreportdevelopedwithintheprojectDevelopingDetachedYouthWorkPractice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348),withthesupportoftheEuropeanCommission,Erasmus + - Key Action 2 Strategic Partnerships in the field of youth. By Adina Marina C!l!f!teanu, PhD& Irina Lonean, PhDCenter for Sustainable Community Development, Giubega, RomaniaTheEuropeanCommissionsupportforthe productionofthispublicationdoesnotconstituteanendorsementofthecontentswhich reflectstheviewsonlyoftheauthors,andtheCommissioncannotbeheldresponsiblefor any use which may be made of the information contained therein. #) Youth Work in Romania The history of youth work in Romania Re-evaluating the classical theory on welfare state (the safety net theory and the residual modelTitmuss,1950),itcanbeseenthatthereisstillathreepillaredstructurethatprovides theservicesthattheyouthneedsaskfornamely;thefamily,thegovernmentalbodiesandthe civilsociety(Mitulescu,2007).Traditionally,itwasthefirstpillarthatprimarilycaredforthe youngsters, in other words it was the familys duty to support the youngsters and only when not eventheextendedfamilycoulddothis,thesecondpillar,thegovernmentalinstitutions,would interfere.EvenbeforeRomaniabecameanindependentstate,inthethreeprovinces,thelocal communitiesandtheChurchorganizedspecialsettlementsfororphans.Furthermore,whenthe fourprovincesunifiedandbecameanindependentstate,in1918,thestructureoftheyouth supportdidnotchange;orphanagesandvocationalschoolsforyoungsterscomingfrom marginalized and social excluded families still existed. The youngsters coming from aristocratic families could benefit from private lessons and highly qualified teachers; therefore, there was no needforstatesupport(Livad!Cadeschi,2001).Ifinthe1920sthegovernmentalinstitutions could provide help by themselves because the philanthropic youth working was not known in the Romanianarea,nowadays,theseinstancescannotsolemnlysolvethisrequest.Themain problemcanbeseeninthefactthatthesolvingprocedureisthepartnershipbetweenthethree instances. In1944theSovietUnionstartedtoexertitsinfluenceintheareaandin1948Romania officially became a satellite state of the Soviet Union. A totalitarian regime legitimates its power onlyifitmanagestocreateatrulycomplicatednetworkoforganizationsandmanageto transformthesebodiesintomassorganizations.TheRomaniancommunistregime,hadasits main aim, the entire social and political mobilization and for this full control it was obvious that also the youth generation had to be totally involved. In 1948 the Communist Party, following the Sovietic guidelines decided to establish the Union of the Communist Youngsters. Following the Kosmosolmodel,themembershipwascompulsoryforallyoungstersaged1429.This organizationincludedallthehardworkingpupilsandstudents;in1988therateofinvolvement was98%.Eveniffullmembershipinthisorganizationwasrequiredattheageof16,the #* satellitesoftheUnionThePioneersOrganization,TheStatesFalcos,alsoachievedfull involvementintheirstructures(Cioflanca,2006).However,itwasjustaformalstructure, because no participatory mechanisms in the decision making process were given to this structure. The Single Party was the only one providing services that youngsters needed, through the Union of the Communist Youngsters. The leaders of the local committees of these structures can not be considered youth workers, as their responsibilities well fully fledged politically. They were just the multipliers of the exemplary citizens model (Tomescu, 2002).In1989,theViolentRevolutionthatdeterminedthetransformationoftheauthoritarian regimewithasultanicapproach(Linz,1998)producedanewopticfortheplaceofthe youngstersintheRomaniansociety.Theendofideology(Fukuyama,1992)creatednew challenges in the youth approach. To have a clear understanding of the social structure, it has to besynchronizedwiththeunderstandingofthepoliticalregime(Lorenz,2006).Thetransition from authoritarian to democratic regime created two main challenges for the youngsters group, youthtimeastherewasnotthefullinvolvementofyoungstersintheagesof1429,now, legislativelyspeakingallcitizensbetweentheagesof14-35arebeingconsideredyoungsters and the National Authority for Youngsters runs programmes for all aged between 14 29. The secondchallengeisthatofyouthspacebecauseofthechangesintheeducation,youngsters hadtheopportunitytofollowdifferentcoursesandnottogodirectlyfromtheeducational systemtothelabormarket(Kovaceva,2001).Thesetransitiondimensionsproduceddramatic changesinthesocioeconomicsituationofyoungsters.Familiessituationgotworseafterthe privatizationprocessstartedandthisdeterminedtheincapacitytocovertheyoungstersneeds (PetrescuandIlie,2002).Thenewproblemsaskedfornewsolvingmechanismsandfor specializedpersonneltosupporttheseyoungsters.Itwasobvioustherewasaneedfor professional youth workers. Education in youth work profession TheaccessionprocessaskedareorganizationofRomaniaslabormarket.Asaresultof this, not only the preservation of the traditional occupation was important, but also, the creation "+ ofnewprofessionsbecamehighlyrequired.Oneofthesenewoccupationsthathadtobe officially registered was youth work. Although it was supposed to be officially registered in the OfficialOccupationalRegisterin2007,youthworkisnotanofficialprofessionyet.Whenit comes to youth work in Romania, the single theoretical root that could be identified is that of the RomanianresearcherSorinMitulescu,Servicesforyoungsters(2007).Heclaimsthatyouth workinRomaniaasadomainwithofficialrecognitionwillnothappenforatleastanotherten years. The main obstacle in defining the youth work and the official profession was the statute, meaning, was the person supposed to be a youth counselor or a youth worker? The problems can be found in a language problem. In Romanian, the profession, as a term, is almost similar to that of an occupation, as trade or craft. Thus, using the term youth worker could mean that it was a suitableprofessionforthehigh-schoolandvocationalstudies,howevernotforuniversity graduates. On the other side, the counselor, in the formal definition of the National Classification oftheoccupationsinRomaniastipulatesthatthecounselorshouldhavespecialtrainingin counselingandnormallyapsychologystudybackground.Evenifinothercountriesinsteadof thetermyouthworkertermslike,socialanimator,socioeducationalanimator,social pedagogy,mentor,mediator,socialworkercanbeused.InRomanianotonlythetermwasthe problem, but also the expertise area of the profession.Volunteeringorprofessionalyouthworkisatopicthathasbeenhighlydebated,lately. Theneedforprofessionalyouthworkerswouldmaketherelationshipbetweentheemployers andemployeeseasiertheemployerswouldnothavetofindalternativeandartificial occupationstoregistertheseworkersandtheemployeeswouldbeconfidentintheir specialization this would also serve for their future job mobility (Pasaniuc, 2008). The National Authority for Youngsters Initiatives Support launched a survey in 2004, involving 160 workers, whoaremainlyconcernedwithyouthinformationandcounseling.Thepurposeofthisenquiry was to see the typologies of the activities that these workers are doing. The results of the research showed that they were doing a wide range of activities, from counseling, mentoring and advising sessions,toanimationgames,animationcamps,sportsactivitiesandempoweringtheyouth potential. They came to the conclusion that Romania would need 5,000 10,000 youth workers (Mitulescu, 2007). "# In 2007 the first postcommunist youth law and then the law establishing the information and counseling centers were made compulsory, the functionality of an Information Youth Centre, in every county, is not specified. Neither is there a profile on what professionals are supposed to do within these centers (Monitorul Oficial nr. 629 din 20 iulie 2006, Legea nr. 333 din 17 iulie 2006privindnfiin"areacentrelordeinformare#iconsilierepentrutineri).Furthermore,the strategythattheNationalAuthorityforYoungstersInitiativesSupporthadwasaimedat developingtheoccupationusingthePOS-DRUfunds,fromtheEuropeanSocialFund.After morethanoneyearsincethenationalauthoritiesannouncedthattheprofessionoftheyouth workerisgoingtobecertified,officially,onthe28thofOctober2008,NationalAuthorityfor Youngsters Initiatives Support re-launched the idea of this official recognition. The intention of thisbodyistoproduceaprogramme,usingPOSDRUFunds,toensurethetrainingfor560 representatives of the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and to continue the procedures to classify youth work as a profession (Soare, 2008). Astheoretically,youthworkbelongstothesocialprofessions,andmorespecifically, linked to the social it is important to analyze the evolution of this profession. Academically, from 1929until1952inRomania,thesocialworkershaduniversitydegrees.Then,until1959,the UniversityofSocialWorkhadbeentransformedintoaCollege,forVocationalStudiesandin 1959forbiddenbythecommuniststate.Theattributionsofthesocialworkershadbeen transferredtootherspecialists,fromotherfields,whosespecializationsweresuitabletowork with people. The new democratic regime, facing new problems, hidden by the totalitarian one, offeredtheopportunityforreorganizationofthesocialpracticefield.In1992,theFacultyof Psychology,SociologyandSocialAssistancehadbeenreorganized.In1999thethreedomains gotthepublicrecognitionasseparateuniversityfield.Thus,from2000,theFacultyofSocial Assistance became an autonomous specialization, with close links to the Sociology Department (Ghe(!u,2004).Currently,therearefourmainmodulesthatthestudentscanchooseas specialization,socialpoliciesinpublicadministration,familiesandchildswelfare,probation systemsandcounseling.Whenanalyzingthenationalcurriculaonsocialassistanceandthe information available on the Faculty of Sociology and Social Work University of Bucharest, no subject or module could be found that could serve to the formation of the youth workers with the profilestatedintheintroductionofthispaper.Thesocialprofessionofsocialassistantentitles "" the holder of this degree to exercise his / her expertise mainly in one of the four fields that was chosenastheirspecialization(Preda,2006).Nevertheless,alsoanalyzingthepostgraduate programmes, there is no programme that could certify the youth worker or youth counselor with anofficialrecognitionoftheirpractices.Itisobviousthat,professionallyspeakingthereisno link between the social assistant profession and youth worker, in Romania. Moreover, it could be linkedtothesocialworkprofession,asapartofthespecialization,butthereisnotanofficial definitionofthesocialworker.Asfortheeducationalpathfortheyouthworker/counselor,in 2007apostgraduatecourse,hadbeenlaunched,asapartnershipbetweenTransilvania UniversityBra)ovandNationalAuthorityforYoungsters.Itisstillhardtoimaginehowthis post-graduatecourseisgoingtobetransformedfromapilotprojectintoanaccreditedcourse. Evenifthemainobjectiveofthiscoursewastoproducespecialistsinyouthactivities,the specialization means an advance in the field and the university curricula do not offer the base, for thisadvance.Anacademicdisciplineasksforascientifictheoreticalbase,acoherentresearch field,awelldefinedacademiccommunityandpromotingtheresultsofresearchprojects,in academicpublications(DeloyandMayer,2008).Examinationwithinthisframe,itisobvious that,fornow,youthworkasanaccreditedandfullyacademicfieldhasnoclearguidelines,in Romania."$ Role of volunteers today and impact on social work within in the crisis of the welfare state Currently,whenyoungstersneedsupportitiscoveredbynongovernmental organizations.Thesearefullyseparatedfromthestatebodies,buthavethepossibilitiesto develop partnerships with local and national institutions (Preda, 2006). Most of the staff involved inthenonprofitsectorsisvolunteers.Theprofileoftheyouthworker,intheNGOsisa communicative, charismatic, empathic, selfdetermined, fully motivated and perseverant person withahighdevelopedlevelofemotionalintelligence(Impactullucr!toruluidetineretnvia(a comunit!(ii )i a lui, Oradea, 2007). Based on the volunteering model that had been defined in the Romanian legislation these youthleadersactingintheNGOsofferservicesfromsocialanimation,toeducationaland counseling sessions.3 However all these activities are set in non-formal and informal educational patterns and there is no official recognition of what these workers are providing. Moreover, most of these youth workers, at the European level, are recognized as professional youth workers, by their international certifications which are obtained through trainings and seminars, as well as the YouthinActionEuropeanCommissionsprogrammecertifiesthemwiththeYouthPass certificate (Youth in Action Programme Guide, 2006). However in the Romanian frame there is nopossibilitytotransferthesecertificationstogiveofficialrecognition,mostoftheseleaders prefer to reorientate to other fields of work and abandon the youth work activities (Mitulescu, 2008). Future of professionalism versus voluntarism Thelackoftraditioninyouthworkactivities,theabsenceofnationalsocialassistance curricula, as well as the absence of official recognition of the nonformal education and the hard processoffindingthecommonprofessionaltermthatcouldcompresstheresponsibilitiesof professionalsinvolvedinInformationYouthCenters,makesaclearpredictionofthe professionalization of youth work in Romania impossible. Waiting for the official recognition of their work, on voluntary basis, the youth leaders, in NGOs are trying to provide the support that the states structures are not able to give youngsters. Even if there is not an official statistic about "% the number of these leaders working in nonformal and informal educational issues, the possible scenario for the recognition of the youth work as a profession could be imagined as a transfer of expertise and certification.Youth and youth work realities in Giubega and Piele$ti Forthecurrentproject,twocommunitieshadbeenselectedtopilotthedetachedyouth working services within the project Developing Detached Youth Work Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348),withthesupportoftheEuropeanCommission,Erasmus+-KeyAction2 StrategicPartnershipsinthefieldofyouth.TheprojectisapartnershipbetweenAgenzija ZghazaghinMalta,AsociatiaCentrulpentruDezvoltareComunitaraDurabilainRomania, Stichting JONG Rotterdam in the Netherlands and YMCA George Williams College in the UK. The Project aims to develop and strengthen detached youth work services in the partner countries through the exchange of good practice and peer learning and support. The project will evaluate existingservicesaswellasnewlyestablishedservicesandwilldevelopqualityassurancetools that can be used in a detached youth work setting working with youth at risk of social exclusion. ItdrawsontheexperienceachievedbytheDutchandUKpartnerstoenabletheMalteseand Romanianpartnerorganisationstodeveloptheirpracticeinamannerconsistentwithbest practice.Thiswillbeachievedthroughtheprovisionofsupervisionandmentoringtoyouth work managers involved in the setting up of new detached youth work services;the provision of training to youth workers that will also allow for observation of existing projects and the sharing of experiences; the drawing up of polices and procedures in line with quality assurance systems; theevaluationofnewandexistingservicesthrougharangeofmethodsincludingobservation, interviews and documentation of activities; and dissemination of the evaluation report. Expected outcomesincludeanincreasedcapacityofthepartnerstoimplementdetachedyouthwork projects and to monitor their effectiveness as well as offer the required support to youth workers involvedinserviceprovision.Theimpactoftheprojectwillbecalculatedontheabilityofthe partnerorganisationstoeffectivelyengagewithyoungpeopleatriskandtosecureongoing funding for their detached youth work services. ThetwocommunitieshadbeenchosenasCSCDhadbeenimplementingseveral initiativesinthecommunities,GiubegabeingthecommunewhereCSCDhastheofficeand "& develops participation scheme for the youngsters in the area, while Pielesti (specifically Campeni village) is the working community of the main partner of CSCD Educational Center Resource andTraining(CentrulEduca(ionalpentruResurse)iTrainingCERT).Thetwoorganizations partnered up since 2010 in different projects and initiatives granted by the European Commission (YouthinAction),EuropeanYouthFoundationCouncilofEurope(PilotProjects)andEEA grants-startingwithMay2014toMay2015workingwith3initiativegroupsfromGiubega, GaliciuicaandPielestiusingyouthcommunityorganizingmethodologiestoboostupyouth participation against discrimination in rural communities. Methodology Themainresearchquestionofthestudyhadbeenthefollowing:Whataretheyouthservices provided in the two communities? The following sub-questions had been used: -What is the current situation of youth in the two communities? -How does the map of stakeholders involved with youth services look like?The hypothesis of the study conducted had been the following: 1.Youthparticipationintheruralcommunitiesisreducedduetothelackof attention and resources invested by the public authorities. 2.Thenongovernmentalbodieshavethepotentialofdevelopingstructuresand services that would valorize youth as a resource for future not as a problem to be administrated by the authorities.The objectives of the study had been the following: -To offer a general view of the youth needs in the community -To identify the existent services for youngsters in the two communities -To analyze the functionality of the existent services (if any) -To look for good practices of youth services in the community.Forthecurrentstudy,thequalitativestudydesignhadbeenchosen.Asthestudywas conducted according to the how situation and was also looking for explicative mechanisms for the insufficiency or inexistence of the youth services in the two communities. (May, 2004). More "' thanthis,benefitingoftheexistentworkingnetworkinthetwocommunities,thequalitative researchwaspreferredbecauseitcouldenrichthestudywithdetailsandnuanceswhen conductingtheinterviews.Thequalitativeapproachhadbeenchosenalsobecauseofthesmall numberofresearchedsubjects:atotalof6twoineachofthecommunities(2headsofthe educational institutions, two representatives of the authorities, 2 youth workers).Methods of data collection Semi focused interviews Therearetwomaindatacollectionmethodsthathadbeenusedinthisresearch.Thefirstof these methods is the using of the semi - focused interviews using open questions, being focused on a specific issue, well-defined for research purposes. These interviews had been chosen as a research instrument,becausetheyarebasedonaninterviewguide,withopenquestions,thattheinterview operatorcanadaptaccordingtothesubjectandtotheinformationrequiredforhisresearch. (Bryman, 2001) Sampling method and study population The subjects had been chosen using a snowball sampling method, starting from a subject that the researchers contacted easily, in order to get the first information about his topic and contacts for othersubjects.Thesnowballingstartedwiththetworecruitedyouthworkersinthetwo communities,whothenrecommendedtheresearcherstheheadsoftheeducationalinstitutionsand therepresentativesoftheauthorities..Thesnowballsamplingwasthesinglemethodthatcould helptheresearcherstoreachthiselusivepopulation(May,2001).Asyouthworkingisnothavea well defined social recognition in Romania, the 2 youth workers are doing volunteering work in the twopartnerassociations:CSCDandCERTbuttheirhighmotivationtoempoweryouth participationsoservedasacooperationtoolintheinterviewingprocess.Theinterviewguidewas developedforthe6interviewshavingthesamestructure:researchingupontheyouthneedsinthe community, existent youth services and the opportunity to develop new youth services. Additional questionswerealsoaddedduringtheinterviewsregardingtheopportunitytohaveservices developed on partnership basis between the NGOs and the governmental structures. The interviews wereconductedinNovemberandDecember2014inthetwoworkingcommunities:Giubegaand Pielesti, having the results organized in December and January 2015 for the current research report."( Documentation study The second method used in this study was the documentation study. The advantages of using thismethodare:itstransparencyresultsthatcanbeeasilyverifiedandanonreactivemethod becauseitreanalysesdatathatwereregistered.Theseregistereddatacanbeeasilystructuredand integratedafterwards.(Bryman,2001).Theresearchesusedthismethodtoanalysethenormative and legislative frame documenting the path and situation of youth work in Romania as well as the profileofthetwocommunitiesEuropeanusingmainlysecondarysources(literature,legislation, action plans, governmental programmes, resolutions and decisions). Avaluabletoolinconductingtheresearchhadbeentheresearchdiary.Theresearchers usedthistoolinordertocaptureobservations,informalconversationsandpersonalopinions.The tool was especially used when visiting the projects of the twoorganisations .The profile of the researched communities Giubegaisacommunesituatedat49.7kmfromthemaincityoftheSothWestern Region (Oltenia) Craiova, the closest town being Bailesti 12 km far, being firstly registered in1831.Thefirstregistereddataof1885wasshowingapopulationof1551inhabitants,of which123wereliterate.Nowdays,Giubegahasapopulationof2453inhabitantsand1150 households. (Primaria Giubega, 2014)The Romanian Youth Law of 2006 was stating that youth would be clustered to the age range1435yearsold.Consequently,forGiubega,havingatotalpopulationof2036 inhabitants, the youth population would be of a total of 530 inhabitants(10-14 years old 109, 15-19yearsold111,20-24yearsold110,25-29yearsold88,30-34yearsold112). (Census of 2002) Piele)ti is a commune situated in the metropolitan area of Craiova being first registered in 1864. The commune has is composed of 3 villages: Cmpeni, Lnga and Piele)ti. The last census of 2011 was showing that the population is of 3.609 inhabitants, comparing to the census of 2002 whichwasregistering3.665inhabits.Ofthetotalpopulation,theover97.4%weredeclaring themselvesasRomanians,97.53%ofthetotalpopulationbeingorthodox.Comparingto Giubega,ithasbetterinfrastructureand10%oftheinvestmentsininfrastructurehadbeen ") obtained from the European Union grating schemes. Of the total population of 3609 inhabitants, the youth population is of 1002 inhabitants (10-14 years old 172, 15-19 years old 193, 20-24 years old 160, 25-29 years old 214, 30-34 years old 263). (Census of 2002) More than this, being in the Metropolitan Area, it will also benefit of the construction of the newest emergency hospital in the region (with a capacity of 1000 beds). In terms of facilities, itdoeshave3medicalcabinets,adentistcabinetandtwopharmacies.Regardingtheaccessto education, it is being guaranteed through the 3 schools and 3 affiliated kindergartens in the area. The inhabitants access to cultural services is secured through the existence of 3 culture houses, having the 4th one being build soon, with EUs support. Additionally, the commune is situated in the neighborhood area of the International Airport of Craiova, the new development plan of the Airport including infrastructure to be build on Pielesti lands. The commune is also well liked to the main city in terms of transportation having as well the main road that links the region to the Capital city crossing by. Asitregardstheeconomy,themainoccupationsoftheinhabitantswouldbemainly relatedtoagriculture,thelocalauthoritiesinvestingspecialattentionandresourcestothisfield (plans to support the development of the ecological farms and associative structures). Over 150 companies are being registered in Pielesti and surroundings (production and industry companies, sellingpointsofthemainautobrands,constructionmaterials,etc).Additionally,theareahas importantresourcesofnaturalgasthatisbeingexploitedinacommuneclosetoPielesti Ghercesti. The local authorities are also interested into developing the touristic plans of the area and investing in the development of agroturism.Theculturaleventsthattheauthoritiesareorganizingyearlycouldalsobebothan opportunity for the youngsters to get involved in the communitys life as well as an attraction for thetourists.Everyyear,since2009,theauthoritiesareorganizingtheInternationalFolklore SummerFestivalwithdurationof5days.Startingasalocalevent,since2010theFestival becameinternational.Thesecondeventthatisorganizedyearlysince2009istheTwining Festival.EveryOctober,theauthoritiesareinvitingtotheeventdifferentfolkloregroupsfrom Ardeal region. One of the outcomes of this festival is the twinning project of Pielesti and Codlea "* (BrasovCounty).Fortwoofthereligiousfestivals(July20andAugust15),Inter-County Folklore Festivals are being organized.Research findings Asdescribedintheprevioussections,6interviewshadbeenconductedwithinthetwo communities and had been codified as following: S 1 subject 1, representative of the local authorities in Campeni Village S 2 subject 2, youth worker in Campeni village S 3 subject 3, representative of the local authorities in Giubega Village S 4 subject 4 youth worker in Giubega VillageS 5 subject 5 head of educational institutions Pielesti Village S 6 subject 6 -head of educational institution Giubega Village

a.Lackofcoherencewhenitcomestoyouthpolicieswhenconductingthetwo interviews,theresearcherswerealsointerestedintofindingoutwhatkindofmeasures arebeingconsideredbythesubjectsaspartoftheyouthpolicies.Neithertheliterature review nor the interviews would be proving the consistency of youth policies. No special budgetarylineisbeingassignedtoyouthpoliciesinthetwocommunities,the programmes that the schools are running or the culture houses or the local library develop being the main elements clustered. b.Lack of professionalization of youth work the two youth workers are from the studied communities and have extended experience in developing and running youth programmes in the two communities. They both started as volunteers in the two partner associations, havingaswelltheopportunitytojoininternationalactivitiesandeventsandbeing determinedtocontributetothesocialchangeinthecommunity.Oneoftheyouth workers (S 2) used to be one of the trainers within the national project aiming at training youthworkers,consideringthattheprojectisunfinishedandnorealoutcomescanbe $+ identified as far as I know, none of the trained youth workers would be fully using the certification gained(S 2). Consequently, the two youth workers consider that youth work wouldratherbeintothevolunteeringside,beingalsogratefulforthesupportthatthe localstakeholdersareofferingtotheinitiativestheydevelop.Mostofthetimes,the projectideaswouldcomefromtheNGO,gettingaswellgrantedandthenquiteeasy havingthesupportofthelocalauthorities.Butittookmorethan4yearsforustobuild trustinthecommunityandtogetthesupportofthestakeholders.Nowadays,we excellently cooperate with the village halls, with the schools in the community and with the other interested actors. (S 4) c.Youth needs in the two communities essential when documenting the study was to look at the youth needs in the two communities. The same questions had been addressed both totheyouthworkersandtotherepresentativesofthelocalauthorities,theanswered being exactly the same. When it comes to the youth needs, all 4 interviews registered the same answers: thesocialandeconomicsituationsoftheyoungstersthelackofjobopportunitiesand long term unemployment lackofhousingopportunitiesmostofthemstilllivingwiththeirfamiliesevenafter having their family on their own evenifsomeopportunitiesofferedbytheRomanianstatetocontinuetheirstudies, especially for the youngsters from Giubega (the closest highschool being at 12 km far), is stillhard,financiallyspeaking,tocontinuetheirstudiesaftertheyarecompletingthe compulsory education 10 years. Mistrustinfutureandfutureopportunities:Whenspeakingtothem,theyarequite disappointed with the current system, being convinced that no future is possible for them inthevillages.Theywouldalwayssaythattheonlysolutionwouldbetoleavethe country and to go and work abroad. (S 1) The two youth workers also stated that the authorities would not offer any opportunities foryoungsterstobeinvolvedwiththecommunitylife,whiletherepresentativesofthe authorities identified some opportunities that they are offering to young people: access to libraries,membershipinthetraditionaldancesclubormembershipofthefootballclub. $# But when compared to the youth workers answers, the activities are both ineffective and not adapted to the youth needs and interests. Noneofthesubjectsidentifiedalcoholconsumption,drugsconsumptionoranyother vices as being the main problems that youth is facing in the community.D. The need for detached youth work essential for the researchers was also to identify the needforthedetachedyouthworkingservicesinthetwocommunities.Consideringthefact thatthereisnoplaceinthetwocommunitiesspeciallydedicatedtoyouthworkactivities, the project would be an essential opportunity for the youngsters. Most of the times, you will find them in the two bars in the village, eager to share their pessimism about their future but alwaystryingtoportrayabetterfuturenotforthemselves,butfortheirchildren!(S4)In noneofthetwovillagesneitherthebudgetnorthelocationsexistentwouldallowthe development of special places dedicated to youth work. In both communities, the two NGOs developedprojectsonpartnershipbasiswiththeschools,buttheactivitiesarewithinthe school.Consequently,theprojectwouldalsoinvestinownershipandwouldallowusto learn how to pilot activities without being dependent on the schools working spaces or being totally dependent on the authorities decision regarding the opportunity to use these spaces. Also, the youngsters would also be into staying in their comfort zones, so starting to work with them in the places where they hang out the most would work on building trust! (S 3) Conclusions ThecurrentstudyconductedwithintheprojectDevelopingDetachedYouthWork Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348) aimed at framing out the current situation of youth workinthetwocommunitiesaswellastheyouthneeds.Forthispurpose,interviewshad been conducted in the two communities, both with the representatives of the authorities and alsowiththetworecruitedyouthworkerswhowillbepilotingthedetachedyouthworking services.Thetworesearchmethodsused:theliteraturereviewandthesemi-structured interviews aimed at identifying the path of youth work as a profession in Romania, moving then the focus to the current situation in the two studied villages. The conclusions are related totheemergentneedofdevelopingthedetachedyouthworkservicesinthetwo communities. The fact that the authorities are not developing any initiatives to support youth $" andyouthisfacingawiderangeofsocialandeconomicproblemsarebothaffectingthe developmentofthisgroupandalsotheoptimismregardingtheirfuture.Sofar,theyouth workersinvolvedwiththeprojectworkedonpartnershipbasiswiththeauthorities,butthe detachedyouthworkserviceswouldbeanessentialopportunityforthemtobuildonthe ownershipoftheoutcomesaswellastoworkwithyouthinspaceswheretheyfeel comfortable and eager to get involved with personal and professional development schemes. $$ Bibliography Abu-Nimer,M.(2001)ConflictResolution,Culture,andReligion:TowardaTraining ModelofInterreligiousPeacebuilding.JournalofPeaceResearch[Internet], November,38(6),pp.685-704.Availablefrom:[Accessed 01.02.2009]. Agen(iaNa(ional!pentruProgrameComunitarenDomeniulEduca(iei)iForm!rii Profesionale.(2008)MinsiuneaAgentieiNationalepentruProgrameComunitaren DomeniulEducatieisiForm!riiProfesionale(ANPCDEFP)[Internet].Romania, ANPCDEFP.Availablefrom:[Accessed 08.11.2008]. Autoritatea Na(ional! pentru Tineret. (2005) Planul na"ional de ac"iune pentru tineret (PNAT)[Internet].Oradea,Caleidoscop.Availablefrom< http://www.caleidoscop.org.ro/resurse/legislatie/pnat_final.ace/view>[Accessed09.10.2008]. Baistow,K(2000)Cross-nationalResearchWhatwecanlearnfromInter-country comparison.ElectronicLibraryforsocialcare,SocialWorkinEurope[Internet], October,7(3),pp.1829.Availablefrom:[Accessed 11.01.2009]. Blakely, G. (1990) Youth policy. New York, Routledge. Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Cannan,C.,Berry,L.andLyons,K.(1992)SocialWorkandEurope.London, Macmillan. Chelcea,S.(2002)Opiniapublic!-Cndgndescmaseledesprece#icumvor elitele ?. Bucure)ti, Ed. Economic!. $% Cioflanc!,A.(2002).RolulUTCnangrenajultotalitar.Revista22.,ANULXV(876) (22) Decembrie 2006 - 29 decembrie 2006, p. 6.ComissionDecision681/01/ECof21November2001WhitePaperANewImpetus for Youth, final. Commission Communication 200/09/EC of 27 April 2009 An EU Strategy for Youth InvestingandEmpoweringArenewedopenmethodofcoordinationtoaddress youth challenges and opportunities, final. CommunicationfromTheCommissiontotheEuropeanParliament,TheCouncil, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions CommissionLegislativeandWorkProgramme2009Actingnowforabetter Europe- Volume 1, COM (2008) 712, final. Communication to the Council on European policies concerning youth participation and information, COM (2006) 417, final. Dahl, R. (2000). Poliarhiile- participare #i opozi"ie. Ia)i, Ed. Institutului European. Dahl, R. (2003) Despre democra"ie. Ia)i, Ed. Institutului European. Deacon,B.(ed.)ThenewEasternEurope :SocialPolicy.Past,PresentandFuture. London, Sage. Deacon,B.,Hulse,MandStubbs,P.(1997)GlobalSocialPolicy.International Organizations and the Future of Welfare. London, Sage Publications.Deloye,Y.,Mayer,N.(2008).Frenchpoliticalscienceataturningpoint.Montreal, ISPA Congress. DepartmentforEducationandEmployment.(2001).TransformingYouthWork. Developingyouthworkforyoungpeople.London,DepartmentforEducationand Employment/Connexions. $& Direc(ia de Studii )i Cercet!ri pentru Problemele Tineretului Agen(ia Na(ional! pentru Sus(inerea Ini(iativelor Tinerilor (2008) Starea Tineretului din Romnia - Diagnoza 2007. Bucure)ti, ANSIT. Doyle,M.E.andSmith,M.K.(1999).BornandBred?Leadership,heartand informal education. London, YMCA George Williams College/Rank Foundation. Earley,CandSingh,H.(1995)InternationalandInterculturalManagementResearch: What's Next? The Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2) April 1995, pp. 327-340. Esping Anderson, G. (1996) Welfare states in transition. London, Sage Publications. Forum2007alprestatorilordeserviciipentrutineri.(2007)Rezultateateliere-Impactul lucratorului de tineret in viata comunitatii, a tinerilor si a lui. Oradea, 14 - 16 Septembrie 2007. Fukuyama, F.(1992 ) Sfr#itul istoriei #i ultimul om. Bucure)ti, Ed. Paideia. Ghe(!u,R.(2004)Introducerenstructurasistemuluideasisten"!social!Notede curs, anul I. Bucure)ti, Facultatea de Sociologie )i Asisten(! Social!. HMTreasur.(2007).Aiminghighforyoungpeople.Atenyearstrategyforpositive activities. London, HM Treasury/Department for Children, Schools and Families. Ilie, S andPetrescu, C. (2005) Tinerii )i participarea la decizie. Revista Calitatea Vie"ii.XVI, nr. 3-4, pp. 1 36. Bucure'ti, Ed. Academiei Romne.Kovaceva,S.(2001)FlexibilisationofyouthtransitionsinCentralandEasternEurope. Tidskriftforeningen YOUNG.SAGE Publications, pp. 1-27. Lehning,P.andWeale,A.(eds).(1997)Citizenship,DemocracyandJusticeinthe New Europe. New York, Routledge. Linz, J. andChehabi, D.E. (1998) Sultanistic regimes. Johns Hopkins University Press. Liphjart,A.(2000)Modelealedemocra"ieiFormedeguvernare#ifunc"ionaren treizeci #i #ase de "!ri. Ia)i, Ed. Polirom. $' Mahler,F.(1983)Introducerenjuventologie.Bucure)ti,Editura*tiin(ific!)i Enciclopedic!. M!rginean, I. (2004) Politica social! (Studii 1990-2004). Bucure)ti, Ed. Expert. M!rginean,I.(ed).(1996)TineretuldeceniuluiunuProvoc!rileanilor`90. Bucure)ti, Ed. Expert. May, T. (2001) Social Research Issues, methods and process. 3rd edition. Berkshire, Open University Press. Mishra,R.(1999)Lobalizationandthewelfarestate.Chelrenham,UKand Northampton, MA, USA, Edward Elgar.Mitulescu,S.(ed.)(2007)Studiindomeniultineretului.Bucure)ti,Ed.Didactic!)i Pedagogic!. MonitorulOficialnr.629din20iulie2006,Legeanr.333din17iulie2006privind nfiin"area centrelor de informare #i consiliere pentru tineri. MonitorulOficialnr.651din27iulie2006,Legea339din17iulie2006pentru modificarea #i completarea Legii voluntariatului nr. 195/2001. MonitorulOficialnr.651ParteaI,din27iulie2006,Legeanr.350din21.07.2006 Legea Tinerilor. MonitorulOficialnr.75din21mai1990,DecretLegenr.150/11mai1990privind nfiin"area funda"iilor pentru tineret. MonitorulOficialnr.758din20octombrie2003.Constitu"iaRomniei.[Internet]. Availablefrom:.[Accessed: 08.11.2008]. MonitorulOficialnr.767din31octombrie2003,Constitu(iaRomnieirevizuit!)i republicat!. $( Monitorul Oficial nr. 991 din 28 octombrie 2004, Legea nr. 425 din 25 octombrie 2004 privind instituirea zilei na"ionale a tineretului. Monitorul Oficial nr.250 din 15 aprilie 2002, Legea nr.146 din 1 aprilie 2002, privind regimuljuridicalfunda"iilorjude"enepentrutineret#iamunicipiuluiBucure#ti#i al Funda"iei Na"ionale pentru Tinere.Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 459 din 21 mai 2004, Hot!rre nr. 763 din 14 mai 2004 privindnfiin"area,organizarea#ifunc"ionareaAgen"ieipentruSprijinirea Studen"ilor.MonitorulOficial,ParteaI,nr.643din26iulie2006,Legeanr.351din21.07.2006 privindnfiin"area,organizarea#ifunc"ionareaConsiliuluiNa"ionalalTineretului din Romnia. National Human Development Report, Romania. (1998). Bucure)ti, Ed. Expert. Nugent, N. (2006) The Gouvernment and Politics of The European Union. New York, Palgrave Macmillan. Petre, I., Balica, E. and Banciu, D. (2002) Tineret, norme #i valori Repere pentru o sociologie a tineretului. Bucure)ti, Ed. Lumina Lex. PlanulNa"ionaldeAc"iunepentruTineretnRomnia(PNA-T)Edi(iaaIIa, decembrie 2001. Potucke, M. (2004) Accession and social policy: the case of the Czech Republic. Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 14, 3, pp. 253 266. Putman, R. (2001) Cum func"ioneaz! democra"ia. Ia)i, Ed. Polirom. Radaelli,C.(2000)TheItalianStateandtheEuroInstitutions,DiscourseandPolicy Regimes. In Dyson, K. (ed.) (2000) European States and theEuro Europenization, Variation and Convergence. Oxford, Oxford University Press.$) Rajevska,F(2005)SocialPolicyinLatviaWelfarestateunderdoublepressure, Project:Poverty,socialassistanceandsocialinclusionDevelopmentsinEstoniaand Latvia, in a comparative perspective: FAFO Report 498, Oslo. Roche, J and Tucker, S. (2001) Youth in Society. London, Sage Publications. Rujoiu,M.(ed.)(2006)PoliticiledetineretnRomniaRaportdecercetare#i evaluare a politicilor de tineret din Romnia. Bucure)ti,Biblioteca Institutului Social Romn - Ed. Ars Docendi. Savornin Lohman De, P., Kwakkelstein, P. and Dijk Van, A. (1998). Review of National youthPolicy,TheNetherlands.TheHague,MinistryofWelfareandSportandThe Council of Europe. Soare,S.(2008)Lucr!tordetineretunproiectANSITpentruintegrareatinerilorn societate. Bucure)ti,Serverpress. Standing,G.(2001)Governanceandsocialprotection:Promotingeconomicsecurity, Global Social Policy, Vol.1, No.1, pp.20-22. Tomescu, A. (ed.) (2000) Politica de Tineret dup! 1989 Raport Na"ional . Ministerul Tineretului)iSportuluiCentrululdeStudii)iCercet!ripentruProblemedeTineret. Bucure)ti, Ed. Alma Tip Publishing House. DepartmentforEducationandEmployment.(2001).TransformingYouthWork. Developingyouthworkforyoungpeople.London:DepartmentforEducationand Employment/Connexions. Doyle, M. E. and Smith, M. K. (1999). Born and Bred? Leadership, heart and informal education. London: YMCA George Williams College/Rank Foundation. Forum 2007 al prestatorilor de servicii pentru tineri. (2007). Rezultate ateliere -Impactul lucratoruluidetineretinviatacomunitatii,atinerilorsialui.Oradea,14-16 Septembrie 2007. $* InterviucuSorinMITULESCUCercet!torprincipalDirec(iadeStudii)iCercet!ri pentruProblemeleTineretuluiAgen(iaNa(ional!pentruSprijinireaIni(iativelor Tinerilor interviu realizat pe 11 martie 2008. InterviucuMarianANCU+AliderdetineretGorjformatorna(ionalTineretn Ac(iunedirectorexecutivalAsocia"ieiTineret#iDezvoltareRegional!TrguJiu (08.03.2008). Interviuon-linecuJaninaPasaniucfreelancetrainer,liderLifeFoundation. (25.10.2008.)Jeffs,T.andSmith,M.K.(1999b).TheproblemofyouthforyouthworkYouthand Policy No 62, http://www.infed.org/archives/youth.htm. (Retrieved November 24, 2008). Smith,M.K.(2002).'Youthwork:anintroduction',theencyclopaediaofinformal education,www.infed.org/youthwork/b-yw.htm.http://www.infed.org/youthwork/b-yw.htm (Retrieved November 24, 2008). Smith,J.,D.,Rochester,C.,Hedley,R.(1995).Anintroductiontothevoluntarysector. London: Routlegde. %+ Developing Detached Youth Work Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348) Proiect finan"at de Comisia European! Programul -Erasmus + - Ac"iunea Cheie 2 Raport al lucr!torului de tineret vizite n comunitate Data: Loca%ia: Num!r de participan%i: Durata: Numele lucr!torului de tineret: Zona de interven%ie: Planul de lucru: 1.Obiectivele ntlnirii 2.Agenda ntlnirii 3.Activit!"i Propuse Raportul ntlnirii: 1.Descrierea interac"iunii 2.Problemele semnalate de tineri 3.Plan de ac"iune 4.Comentarii ale lucr!torului de tineret %# Developing Detached Youth Work Practice (2014-1-MT01-KA205-000348) Proiect finan"at de Comisia European! Programul -Erasmus + - Ac"iunea Cheie 2 Raport de supervizare Data $i loca%ia: Numele supervizorului:Numele lucr!torului de tineret: Subiecte de discutat: Comentarii/ProblemePlan de ac%iune