getting to goal: ‘ practical tricks of the trade‘ how to achieve the abcs
DESCRIPTION
Getting to Goal: ‘ Practical Tricks of the trade‘ How to Achieve the ABCs. Robert Gabbay MD, PhD Director Penn State Hershey Diabetes Institute Penn State College of Medicine [email protected]. The ‘ABCs’. A 1C B P < 130/80 C holesterol (LDLTRANSCRIPT
Getting to Goal:‘Practical Tricks of the trade‘
How to Achieve the ABCs
Robert Gabbay MD, PhDDirector
Penn State Hershey Diabetes InstitutePenn State College of Medicine
The ‘ABCs’
• A1C
• BP < 130/80
• Cholesterol (LDL<100, if CAD <70)
Evidence based interventions that reduce morbidly and mortality
• HbA1C < 7• BP < 130/80• LDL cholesterol < 100 (or <70 if CAD) • Aspirin age > 50 men, 60 women with 1 risk factor• ACE -age >55• Statin use- age >40• Yearly screen for nephropathy, feet, and eye exams
Current Diabetes Care in US• 71 % < 1 A1c measurements per year
– 18 % A1C > 9.5– ½ A1C > 7
• ~64% blood pressure above goal• 89 % LDL > 100• 37 % no dilated eye exam• 45 % no yearly foot exam
How Low to Go?
What’s the Problem?
• Not Bad Patients or Bad Doctors• It’s the System• Acute Care vs. Chronic Care
–Self-management• Clinical Inertia
A1C < 7Why?How?
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
Conventional Intensive
7.9
UKPDS: Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C)
MedianHbA1C (%)
7.0
-50-45-40-35-30-25-20-15-10
-50
% Risk Reduction
UKPDS: Risk ReductionsAny Diabetes-
relatedEndpoint
MicrovascularEndpoints
Laser Rx Cataract Albuminuria
But I thought it was Bad to Lower A1C too Much
• All recent studies aimed at A1C = 6.5 or lower• No evidence that A1C = 7 is bad• Data says to reduce CVD- its not so much
about Glucose• It’s the Blood Pressure and Cholesterol
Really really important points:
1. Aggressive control early prevents complications.2. Because of the log-linear relationship between control
and complications, absolute benefits are greatest at high HbA1c values.
3. Pushing patients with advanced disease (particularly macrovascular complications) to ‘tight’ control that they cannot achieve probably increases mortality
• attention to hypoglycemia and particularly nocturnal hypoglycemia
Sites of Drug ActionCarbohydrate
DIGESTIVE ENZYMES
Glucose
Defectiveb-cell secretion
Excessglucoseproduction
Resistance to the action of insulin
Reduced glucoseuptake
Excessivelipolysis
Dinneen SF. Diabet Med. 1997; 14 (Suppl 3): S19-24.
Sulfonlyureas MeglitinidesIncretinsInsulin
Alpha-glucosidaseInhibitors, Incretins
MetforminTZDIncretins TZD, Metformin
How to choose?• Pathophysiology – I resist or I secretion?• Cost• Rapid onset- avoid TZD• Co-morbidities
– Renal – no metformin– Liver –no TZD– CHF – no TZD– CAD? – avoid TZD?– Weight- favor metformin, incretins– Concern hypo- avoid SU
Points to remember
• Each oral agent lower A1C 1-2• If A1C >9, start two agents• Follow SMBG, A1C, and Titrate!!!!!
T2DM treatment strategies revisited
7
9
HbA 1
c (%
)
8
Diagnosis
Target-driven therapy*
Adapted from Riddle M. Endo Metab Clin NA 1997;26:659―77.Riddle M. Am J Med 2004;116:35―95.
*Individualise
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 4
OHA monotherapy
OHA combinations
STEP 3
Lifestyle modification
Basal insulin
Basal plus prandial
20 10 0 10 20 30
Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes
Adapted from International Diabetes Center (IDC). Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Years of Diabetes
Relative b-Cell Function
PlasmaGlucose
Insulin resistance
Insulin secretion
126 mg/dL Fasting glucose
Postmeal glucose
6-6
TYPE 2 DIABETES . . . A PROGRESSIVE DISEASE
Over time,most patients will need
insulinto control glucose
6-7
Correcting Fasting Hyperglycemia…
100
200
300
Normal A1C 5%–6%
PG (
mg/
dL)
0800 1200 1800 0800Time of Day
Uncontrolled A1C ~9%
A1C ~6%
Is Usually the First Task!!
…then, Tackle Postprandial Hyperglycemia if A1C still >7%!
“Controlled” A1C <7%
Adapted with permission from Cefalu WT. In: Leahy J, Cefalu W, eds. Insulin Therapy. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002:1
2003 Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc
Titrating Glargine or Detemir
2 units q 3 days until FPG < 100
Its that easy and it works!
50
4:00
25
75
8:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 24:00 4:00
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
PlasmaInsulin ( µU/mL)
Time8:00
Physiologic Serum Insulin Secretion Profile
Blood Pressure<130/80
Why?How?
Benefits of tight vs less tight BP control
Ris
k R
educ
tion
(%)
AnyDiabetes-
relatedEndpoint
Diabetes-relatedDeath Retinopathy Stroke HF
24P=.0046
32 P=.019
34 P=.0038
44 P=.013
56 P=.0043
-70
-20
0
-10
-50
-60
-30
-40
UKPDS: Effect of Intensive BP Lowering on Risk of Micro- and Macrovascular
ComplicationsMI
21P=.13
RenalFailure
42 P=.29
47 P=.0036
Vision Deterioration
UKPDS 36. BMJ. 2000;321:412-419. UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703-713.
UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) was a randomized, prospective trial in which 1,148 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes were allocated to tight (<150/<85 mm Hg, n=758) or less tight (<180/<105 mm Hg, n=390) BP control and followed for a median of 8.4 years. Microvascular endpoints included retionpathy requiring photocoagulation, vitreous hemorrhage, and fatal or nonfatal renal failure.
Consistency Across Guidelines on BP Goal in Patients With Diabetes
• JNC 7:
• ADA: BP Goal Is <130/80 mm Hg
• NKF:Adapted from American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(suppl 1):S33-S50; NHBPEPCC. JNC 7 Express. 2003. NIH Publication No. 03-5233; NKF. Available at: www.kidney.org/general/news/diabetic.cfm?id=64. Accessed March 9, 2004.
ABCD2,3 (132 mm Hg)
AASK1 (134 mm Hg)
High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Require Multiple Agents to Achieve Goal
1Wright JT et al. JAMA. 2002;288:2421-2431. 2Bakris GL. J Clin Hypertens. 1999;1:141-147. 3Estacio RO et al. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:645-652. 4The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997. 5Hansson L et al. Lancet. 1998;351:1755-1762. 6Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860. 7Bakris GL et al. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1555-1565. 8UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703-713.
1 2 3 4Number of BP Medications
ALLHAT4 (135 mm Hg)
RENAAL7 (140 mm Hg)
IDNT6 (140 mm Hg)
UKPDS2,8 (144 mm Hg)
HOT2,5 (141 mm Hg)
AchievedSystolic BP
Evidence Based Guidelines
• < 130/80 (you will report <140/90)• How about LOWER???• ACCORD looked at lower (120)- no better• What is the first line medication?
– Who cares?
20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Cum
ulat
ive
Even
t Rat
e (%
)
0
4
8
12
16
ChlorthalidoneAmlodipineLisinopril
ALLHAT (The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack) participants were randomly assigned to receive chlorthalidone, 12.5 to 25 mg/d (n=15,255); amlodipine, 2.5 to 10 mg/d (n=9,048); or lisinopril, 10 to 40 mg/d (n=9,054) for planned follow-up of approximately 4 to 8 years, mean follow-up 4.9 years.ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. JAMA. 2002;288:2981-2997.
ALLHAT: Cumulative Event Rates for Fatal CHD or Nonfatal MI by Treatment
Years to EventNumber at Risk:Chlorthalidone 15,255 14,477 13,820 13,102 11,362 6,340 2,956 209Amlodipine 9,048 8,576 8,218 7,843 6,824 3,870 1,878 215Lisinopril 9,054 8,535 8,123 7,711 6,662 3,832 1,770 195
Medication Treatment Algorithm?
• Start with ACE or ARB and/or HCTZ– Either one - best might be early combo since all
will likely need it • Third agent based on co-morbidity
– Beta blocker and/or Ca channel• Add the 4th and hopefully you’ve reached goal-
if not call an expert +/- alpha blocker?
Tashko and Gabbay, Integrated Blood Pressure Control (2010)
Practical: What can I do on when I get back to work?
• Track BP• Don’t miss an opportunity to escalate• Shared goals• Standing Orders?
Cholesterol LDL control <100
If CVD <70
LDLTreat the water supply?
%
Follow-up (years)
Placebo
Simvastatin
Benefit/1,000 -1 13 34 47 51 58
P<0.0001
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
5
10
15
20
25
30
HPS Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2003;361:2005-2016.
HPS Substudy: First Major Vascular Event in Patients With Diabetes
22 %
Follow-up (yr)
Cumulativeincidence
(%)
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Atorvastatin 10 mgPlacebo
Number of events: 100Number of events: 154
HR=0.64 (0.50-0.83) P=0.0005
36%reduction
Nonfatal MI (including silent MI) and fatal CHD.Sever PS et al. Lancet. 2003;361:1149-1158.
ASCOT-LLA: Primary End Point
Statins for DM
The question is:Who do we NOT treat?
Putting it All together
The Chronic Care Model
36
Informed,ActivatedPatient
ProductiveInteractions
Prepared,ProactivePractice Team
DeliverySystemDesign
DecisionSupport
ClinicalInfo
Systems
Self-Management
Support
Health SystemResources and Policies
Community Health Care Organization
Improved Outcomes
Self-management support
Increase adherence• Education but most important
SUPPORT• Use handouts, share goals• Combo Rx for pill burden
– Who else on the team can help?– Use Diabetes Educators where available
Delivery System Design
• Distribute tasks amongst team– It takes a TEAM to manage a Chronic disease
• Care management of high risk– Stratifying your population
• Regular f/u by team• Planned Visits• Dealing with CLINICLA INERTIA
The Chronic Care Model
39
Informed,ActivatedPatient
ProductiveInteractions
Prepared,ProactivePractice Team
DeliverySystemDesign
DecisionSupport
ClinicalInfo
Systems
Self-Management
Support
Health SystemResources and Policies
Community Health Care Organization
Improved Outcomes
Decision support
–Evidence based guidelines (ADA)–SHARE WITH YOUR PATIENTS
41
42
Clinical Information systems
Registry!!!!Track outcomes and ID those not at goal with a plan for intensification
Evidence based interventions that reduce morbidly and mortality
• HbA1C < 7• BP < 130/80• LDL cholesterol < 100 (or <70 if CAD) • Aspirin age > 50 men, 60 women with 1 risk factor• ACE -age >55• Statin use- age >40• Yearly screen for nephropathy, feet, and eye exams
QUESTIONS?