gerber

12
Gerber Status of a USDA NRCS Conservation Program: Yes, there can be money for Implementing IPM

Upload: matsu

Post on 15-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Gerber. Status of a USDA NRCS Conservation Program: Yes, there can be money for Implementing IPM. Financial Incentives for Implementing IPM. Ag productivity Nutrients, growing conditions Pest control Resource conservation Environmental/pesticide regulations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gerber

Gerber

Status of a USDA NRCS Conservation Program:

Yes, there can be money for Implementing IPM

Page 2: Gerber

Financial Incentives for Implementing IPM

Ag productivity Nutrients, growing conditions

Pest control

Resource conservationEnvironmental/pesticide regulations

Resource conservation (soil, water, air, plants, animals)

Challenge: Implementing practices that achieves resource conservation and Ag productivity

Page 3: Gerber

Financial Incentives for Implementing IPM

Implementation barriers

Start up costs: Difficult to recover from near-term sales Need incentives for initial grower implementation

• Pest management:Monitoring / forecasting tools

Reduced risk pesticides

Reduced risk methods of application

Biological-based controls

Cultural controls

• Crop management practicesNutrient management

Incentives: Education (MSU), Financial (NRCS)

Page 4: Gerber

Financial Incentives

The goal: Increase implementation of IPM and other on-far, conservation practices to

Address resource concerns

Maintain good agricultural productivity

The opportunity: participation in a federal voluntary conservation program for ‘working lands’--EQIP

Objectives:

EQIP process: status of procedures and funding

Modifications: increase attractiveness for clientele

Partnering on-the-ground: partnerships with consultants, commodities, MSUE, and NRCS

Page 5: Gerber

Review EQIP

Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP)Provide financial incentives to demonstrate use of practices, like IPM, to conserve resources (3 yr contracts)

2000: $3.1 M (Mi)2002: $6.8 M (Mi)2004: $13.6 M (Mi)2005: $ 13.6 M (Mi)

Conservation Security ProgramAssist growers with continued maintenance of

conservation practices (5 yr contracts)

2004: $41 M nationwide, watershed (1 in MI) 2005: $200 M nationwide, watershed (4 in MI)

Page 6: Gerber

Review EQIP Practices

– Pest management

– Nutrient management

– Shelterbreak establishment

– Riparian buffer/Filter strips

– Heavy use area protection

– Irrigation water management

– Ag chemical containment facility

– Field border

– Residue management

– Cover crops

Resource Concerns– Groundwater– Surface water (riparian)– Soil quality/conservation– Air quality– Habitat protection

Page 7: Gerber

Review EQIP Fund allocation to pest management (97-02) Low percentage range: less than 0.2% for 19 states to 3.5% for one state—

0.77% national average 1.3% Michigan average

Legislative intent Increased funding in the new Farm Bill More participation expected by specialty crop grower Address pest and nutrient management

What’s needed Modifications to program: increase attractiveness

Partnering on-the-ground: partnerships with consultants, commodities, MSUE, and NRCS

Page 8: Gerber

Modify program NRCS advisory process

Ranking: application priority increased for IPM 2004/5: address 4 resource concerns (ground/surface

water, soil and air quality) 2003: address 2 resource concerns (ground/surface

water))

Page 9: Gerber

Modify program NRCS advisory process

Incentive rates: Incentive commitment to IPM 2005 fruit/nursery/Xmas tree/sod: $60/acre, up to $5,500/yr vegetables: $30/acre, up to $4,500/yr field crops: $4/acre, up to $3,500/yr 2004 fruit/nursery/Xmas tree: $20/acre, up to $2,000/yr

vegetables: $10/acre, up to $2,000/yr field crops: $3/acre, up to $2,000/yr 2002 long season crops: $5.00/acre short season crops: $2.50/acre

Page 10: Gerber

Partnering on-the-ground

Pilot counties: Oceana, Grand Traverse, Leelanau, Antrim 2005: expand to Ottawa

Goal: More fruit / vegetable participation in EQIP as a means to implement IPM and other practices as conservation tools

Partners: Grower groups and MSU Extension: organize grower meetings, education and awarenessConsultants: work with growers to collect farm data for applicationNRCS: complete application requirements for 2004

Page 11: Gerber

Partnering on-the-ground

46 EQIP applications submitted All approved (>2-fold increase)

Over $1.7 million contracted

Funds to support IPM increased (as high as 13 %, 10% average) Last Farm Bill: 0.77% (US), 1.3% (MI)

Gerber

Page 12: Gerber

Pest management incentive rates in the regionWisconsin: ~$2-3 per acreIndiana: ~$4 per acreMinnesota: ~$2 per acreIowa: ~$4 per acreMichigan: $4 to $60 per acre

Oregon: $7.50 to $27 per acre