geopolitical impact of the u.s. shale revolution

73
The Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution By: John Harpole Presentation to: Montana Petroleum Association August 30, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 22-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

The Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

By:John Harpole

Presentation to:Montana Petroleum Association

August 30, 2017

Page 2: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

2

Page 3: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Harp’s BakeryDeer Lodge, MT

circa 1932

3

Page 4: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007

Let’s discuss your cost of natural gas.

4

U.S expected to import 35% of its natural gas needs by 2020

Page 5: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007

Russia’s Energy Muscle• Energy Used Over 55 times Against Former Soviet Nations Since 1990

Source: Europe Doubles Down on Russian Gas to Feed its Energy Appetite, by Andrew Haney, Ricardo Bracho, Nick Wolfe and Max Faith

5

Page 6: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007

Energy Security?

• By the year 2020, Gazprom will supply nearly 70% of the European Union’s natural gas.

• Would you pursue a conflict with a country that you depend on for the majority of your energy needs?

6

Page 7: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007Gazprom’s Current Near‐Monopoly  Supply Position

Slovakia 100%Macedonia 100%Finland 99%Bulgaria 97%Serbia & Montenegro 87%Lithuania 84%Hungary 80%Czech Republic 79%Greece 76%

% of Supply from Gazprom/Russia

Source: “Domestic Consumption” EIA International Energy Annual, 2007; “Exports 2006 and 2007” Gazexport as cited by Energy Intelligence, March 2008

7

*

*Remember

Page 8: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007Gazprom’s Current Near‐Monopoly  Supply Position 

(cont’d)

Austria 74%Slovenia 64%Poland 62%Turkey 60%Germany 40%Croatia 37%Italy 30%Romania 28%France 25%

% of Supply from Gazprom/Russia

Source: “Domestic Consumption” EIA International Energy Annual, 2007; “Exports 2006 and 2007” Gazexport as cited by Energy Intelligence, March 2008

8

Page 9: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

10/21/2008 in Tehran, IranRussia, Iran and Qatar form natural gas cartel

Iranian Oil Minister, Gholam Hossein Nozari

Alexei Miller, Chief of Russia’s state gas monopoly ‐ Gazprom

Qatar’s Deputy Premier and Minister of Energy and Industry, Abdullah bin Hamad Al‐Attiya 

9

Page 10: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Global LNG Available to Supplement U.S. Supplies As Needed, November 2007

Under Construction

Existing

U.S. regasification capacity is on track for a four fold increase to over 16 bcf/day of capacity

Terminal Capacity Holder

Baseload Sendout (MMCF/D)(1)

Canaport 1,000

Everett - Suez 700

Cove Point 1,800

Elba Island 800

Lake Charles 1,800

Freeport 1,500

Sabine Pass 4,000

Cameron 1,500

Golden Pass 2,000

Altamira 700

Costa Azul 1,000

Total 16,800

Source: Chenier Energy, Inc. November, 2007 presentation(1) Capacity estimated as of 2010

10

Page 11: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Circa 2007U.S. Shale Gas Development Could be 

Slowed by LNG Imports

• “Importing LNG to the U.S. would be economical at an average gas price as low as $3.50/MMBtu.”

• “Whereas shale gas requires an average gas price of at least $6.50/MMBtu to be economical.”

Source: Scott Thetford, VP of Pace Global Energy Services, LLC

11

Page 12: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Wrong!

12

Page 13: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

… and then the U.S. Shale Revolution happened… and the world will never 

be the same again.

13

Page 14: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025

FIGURE 3UNITED STATES NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION

Actual   Forecast

Tight

Price Controls

Section 29 Tax Credits

Lower 48 Conventional 

(Non‐Associated)

Coalbed

Associated

Gulf ofMexico

Shale

Billion CubicFeet Per Day

Source: The Outlook for Oil and Gas, Henry Groppe, Groppe, Long & Littell, May 201714

Page 15: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

15

Source: Midstream to Markets: Oil Markets: Out of the Woods?, RBN Energy, The Energy Summit, August 23, 2017

Page 16: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

1616

Source: Midstream to Markets: Oil Markets: Out of the Woods?, RBN Energy, The Energy Summit, August 23, 2017

Page 17: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: Midstream to Markets: Oil Markets: Out of the Woods?, RBN Energy, The Energy Summit, August 23, 2017

17

Page 18: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

An Assessment of the Geopolitical Backdrop

18

Page 19: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Nation Oil price per barrel required to break even or balance budget

US producers $38-$77

Qatar $58

Kuwait $59

UAE $90

Saudi Arabia $92

Angola $94

Russia $101

Iraq $116

Venezuela $117

Algeria $119

Ecuador $122

Nigeria $124

Iran $136

Source: Reuters, The Saudi Arabian Oil Conspiracy and What it Might Mean for Your Portfolio, The Motley Fool, Adam Galas, January 18, 2015

Survival of fittest as oil tumbles below $65, Bloomberg News, December 1, 2014

A Game of Chicken?

According to data compiled by Bloomberg, “prices have dropped below the level needed by at least 9 OPEC member states to balance their budgets.”

19

Page 20: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: Oilprice.com, The Saudi Arabian Oil Conspiracy and What it Might Mean for Your Portfolio, The Motley Fool, Adam Galas, January 18, 2015

Survival of the Fittest?

Saudis have staying power; $750 billion in foreign country reserves

20

Page 21: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

North KoreaAn unavoidable war?

21

Page 22: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

North KoreaKOGAS – One of the largest U.S. LNG Buyers

• 10% of South Korea’s total demand will be met by LNG from Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass Liquefaction facility in Louisiana.

• 20 year Sales and Purchase Agreement (SPA) officially commenced June 1, 2017

• 3.5 million tonnes of LNG per year (roughly 50 BCF per year)

22

Page 23: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Venezuela

• Population of 30 million people

• One of the largest oil producers in the world with $6.5 billion dollars in debt repayment due soon

• China is subsidizing them as a challenge to the U.S.

23

Page 24: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

VenezuelaCrude Oil Production

Source: http://www.energyeconomist.com/a6257783p/world/worldoverview.html, James L. Williams

24

Page 25: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

VenezuelaCaught in a squeeze of their own making• Venezuela, due to its quality of crude, is a price taker as foreign refiners control them

• Refiners are gradually walking the price down

25

Page 26: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Venezuela200,000 March Against President Maduro 

(May 20, 2017)

26

Page 27: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

VenezuelaTrump: U.S. will not ‘rule out military 

option’ in Venezuela“Venezuela is not very far away… people are suffering and dying” President Trump, August 11, 2017

27

Page 28: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

ChinaMan made islands are a game changer

28

Page 29: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

ChinaWhat’s at stake?

China’s claim encompasses roughly 90% of the South China Sea and all the resources that may exist within it.

Source: https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.com/ 29

Page 30: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

ChinaWhat’s at stake?

“The South China Sea is one of the most important energy trade routes in the world” with “almost a third of global crude oil and over half of global liquefied natural gas (LNG)” passing through it each year.

‐ US Energy Information Authority (EIA), 2013

Source: South China Sea headbutting of nations is about energy security, South China Morning Post, April 5, 2016

30

Page 31: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

ChinaA Sign of Energy Insecurity?

Two‐fold motivation• The South China Sea is believed to have 11 billion proved or probable barrels of oil in reserves and about 190 TCF of natural gas.

• China is the world’s largest importer of crude; importing approximately 7.5 million barrels per day or 2.7 billion barrels per year.

• 82% of China’s oil imports pass through the South China Sea. 

Source: What’s at stake in China’s claims to the South China Sea?, The Conversation, July 14, 2016; China Morning and China’s Energy Insecurity Glaring In South China Sea Dispute, Forbes, September 2, 2016

31

Page 32: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

ChinaPetroleum Consumption

Source: http://www.energyeconomist.com/a6257783p/world/worldoverview.html, James L. Williams

32

Page 33: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Middle EastArab Spring

Hope for democracy was wrong and misplaced

33

Page 34: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Middle EastArab Spring Aftermath?

• 3 failed states: Syria, Yemen, Libya• No orderly transition resulting in a “Cold War” type standoff between Iran and Saudi Arabia

34

Page 35: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

LibyaCrude Oil Production

Source: http://www.energyeconomist.com/a6257783p/world/worldoverview.html, James L. Williams

35

Page 36: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

The Problem?

IranChinaRussia

Are playing for the long‐ term

36

Page 37: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

It is not a scarce resource anymore

37

Page 38: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: My top ten energy charts of the year for 2014, Mark J. Perry, American Enterprise Institute, January 5, 201538

Page 39: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: My top ten energy charts of the year for 2014, Mark J. Perry, American Enterprise Institute, January 5, 201539

Page 40: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: My top ten energy charts of the year for 2014, Mark J. Perry, American Enterprise Institute, January 5, 201540

Page 41: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Fracturing Application Exploded

Source: Chris Wright, Liberty Resources Tuesday Lunch Club Presentation, 3/5/13 

41

Page 42: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

10‐fold growth in 10 years

Source: Chris Wright, Liberty Resources Tuesday Lunch Club Presentation, 3/5/13 

42

Page 43: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

RussiaAre Putin and Gazprom behind U.S. anti‐fracking efforts?Putin is Funding Green Groups to Discredit  Natural Gas Fracking

‐ Newsweek headline, July 11, 2017

“If you connect the dots, it is clear that Russia is funding U.S. environmental groups in an effort to suppress our domestic oil and gas industry, specifically hydraulic fracking.”*

‐ U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R‐Texas), July 10, 2017

*Source: Lawmakers Ask For Probe Into Alleged Russian Funding of Anti-Fracking Groups, Energy in Depth, Seth Whitehead

43

Page 44: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

The Reversal

• Prediction 2007: 4 BCF/d of anticipated demand in Northeast U.S.• Reality 2017: 12 BCF/d of new supply

44

Page 45: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

North American Natural GasDemand Ranges by Selected Sector

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

2013 prediction of 2020 Current acutal 2017 2017 prediction of 2020

Mexico Exports

Industrial

CNG/LNG Vehicles

LNG Export

Power

BC

F/da

y

45

Page 46: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Two Significant Growth Areas for Demand

• U.S. LNG Exports• Pipeline exports to Mexico

46

Page 47: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Cheniere Energy exports

100th LNG cargo

Source: LNG buyers pushing US exporters to be flexible, Harry Weber, Grant Gunter, Gas Daily, S&P Global Platts Publication, February 10, 2017

47

Page 48: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Lithuania Becomes first ex‐Soviet state to buy US natural gas

• “Lithuania became the first former Soviet state to import a shipment of US natural gas on Monday, at a time when Washington has promised to help weaken Europe’s reliance on gas supplies from Russia.”

• “The liquefied natural gas cargo aboard the Clean Ocean tanker is highly symbolic, as Lithuania looks to cement ties and backing from Washington following Moscow’s annexation of Crimea in 2014.”

Source: Financial Times, David Sheppard, Energy Markets Editor, August 21, 2017

48

Page 49: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Rockies Access to Asia

Source: Veresen Corporate Presentation, November 2014 49

Page 50: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Sources: US-Mexico exports hit pre-maintenance levels, J. Robinson and Thad Walker, S&P Global Platts Gas Daily, April 25, 2017North American Gas Forecast Monthly, PIRA, January 30, 2017

South to the Border

50

Page 51: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

The Future?

51

Page 52: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

OPEC Production: Growing Despite Quotas

Source: OPEC*OPEC excl. Eq. Guinea

29.82

29.84

29.70

29.75

29.70

29.99

29.96

32.03

32.09

31.77

31.97

32.07 32

.55

32.71

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

JAN 2017

FEB 20

17

MAR

 201

7

APR 2017

MAY

 201

7

JUN 2017

JUL 2017

Prod

uctio

n (M

MBb

l/d)

OPEC 11 OPEC

OPEC Production: Frustrating for Quota Carrying Countries

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201752

Page 53: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

OPEC: Strong Compliance Led By Saudi Arabia

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201753

Page 54: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Non‐OPEC Quotas: Disappointing, But Getting Better

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201754

Page 55: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

US Production: Economics Support Increased Activity

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201755

Page 56: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 2017

Crude Oil & Petroleum Products: Supply/Demand Imbalance

56

Page 57: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Short Term Production Outlook

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201757

Page 58: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Dry Gas Production 5‐Year Outlook

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201758

Page 59: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

US Oil Production: 5‐yr. Growing Production Profile

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 201759

Page 60: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

YEAR WTI ($/Bbl)

HH ($/MMBtu)

2017 $52 $3.25

2018 $52 $3.15

2019 $60 $3.00

2020+ $60 $2.85

The Crystal Ball Price Forecast

Source: The New Normal(ization): Market Intelligence: FundamentalEdge Outlook, Bernadette Johnson, August 2017

60

Page 61: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

An Update…

61

Page 62: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Gulf Coast refinery capacity and company exposure

Sub‐area Percentage Crude unit capacity

Mississippi / Alabama Gulf Coast 5% 410,000

Mississippi River 30% 2,494,500

Lake Charles 9% 767,800

Port Arthur 18% 1,501,500

Houston 20% 1,663,776

Galveston 9% 770,000

Corpus Christi 9% 722,500

Other South Texas Gulf Coast 1% 114,500

Gulf Coast Capacity 100% 8,444,576

Source: US Oil and Gas; Hurricane Harvey: expect a bigger impact on refining, but looks transitory (for now), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Industry Overview, August 24, 2017 62

Page 63: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: US Oil and Gas; Hurricane Harvey: expect a bigger impact on refining, but looks transitory (for now), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Industry Overview, August 24, 2017 63

Page 64: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Source: US Oil and Gas; Hurricane Harvey: expect a bigger impact on refining, but looks transitory (for now), Bank of America Merrill Lynch Industry Overview, August 24, 2017 64

Page 65: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Conclusions: Crude Oil• OPEC’s compliance has continued to exceed market expectations although compliance has posted troubling declines in the recent months.  Saudi Arabia still remains the driving force behind the compliance and their commitment to the success of the quotas is driven by their impending IPO.

• Collective OPEC production has increased by 841 Mbbl/d since March, primarily due to increasing production from Nigeria & Libya.  These increased are undermining OPEC 11’s goal of inventory normalization.  Inventory normalization to level prior to the price crash are necessary before any sustained price increased can materialize.

65

Page 66: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Conclusions: Crude Oil (cont’d)• Non‐OPEC compliance to‐date has fallen short of promises. Although compliance has increased steadily, Equatorial Guinea becoming a part of OPEC means that the non‐OPEC production remains consistently above promised quotas.  Russia and Kazakhstan’s overproduction are note‐worthy.

• Favorable US production economics, even at current price levels, have generated a steep increase in rig counts since last May. While nearly 50% of the rig additions were in the Permian, there are economic sweet spots in many basins.  These world‐class economics continue to keep a lid on price runs s the US has become the swing producer.

66

Page 67: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Conclusions: Crude Oil (cont’d)• Efficiencies will continue to play a large role in the declining breakeven costs of the most prolific basins like the Anadarko & Permian.  Efficiencies will not only lead to production forecasts possibly getting revised higher, but also in offsetting the impact of possible service cost inflation.  Takeaway capacity & other infrastructure bottlenecks may lead to times where regional differentials blow out and production may get curtailed during these times.

67

Page 68: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Conclusions: Natural Gas• US natural gas supply is growing again. Dry gas production in June 2017 is 1.1 Bcf/d higher than December levels.  June 2017 also marked the first month of production above 2016 levels.  However, year‐to‐date production remains below 2016 levels.  DI expects the largest gains in production during 4Q2017 as pipeline takeaway capacity becomes available.   This will allow a year‐on‐year growth of 0.5 Bcf/d.

68

Page 69: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Conclusions: Natural Gas (cont’d)• Pipeline flows across the country have already changed dramatically as a result of the Marcellus/Utica growth.– A de‐bottlenecking in the Northeast should finally occur in 4Q2017.  Expect Northeast basis to tighten starting this winter

– Bottlenecks in the Permian and Anadarko are emerging.  In the Permian, gas needs to move East in order to reach growing LNG demand while in the Anadarko, the constraints are intra‐basin and to interstate pipelines.

• Over the next 5 years, significant natural gas production growth is expected in the Permian, Anadarko and Marcellus/Utica.  Significant demand growth is also expected, led by LNG exports.

69

Page 70: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Final Conclusion

• The U.S. is poised to meet any decline in worldwide production for oil or gas for the foreseeable future.

• How important is the U.S. Shale Revolution to the U.S. and to the free world?

70

Final Question

Page 71: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

John HarpolePresident

Mercator Energy26 W. Dry Creek Circle, Suite 410

Littleton, CO [email protected]

(303) 825-1100 (work)(303) 478-3233 (cell)

Contact Information

71

Page 72: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

55000

60000

65000

70000

75000

80000

Jun‐17

Jul‐1

7Au

g‐17

Sep‐17

Oct‐17

Nov

‐17

Dec‐17

Jan‐18

Feb‐18

Mar‐18

Apr‐18

May‐18

Jun‐18

Jul‐1

8Au

g‐18

Sep‐18

Oct‐18

Nov

‐18

Dec‐18

Jan‐19

Feb‐19

Mar‐19

Apr‐19

May‐19

Jun‐19

Jul‐1

9Au

g‐19

Sep‐19

Oct‐19

Nov

‐19

Dec‐19

Jan‐20

Feb‐20

Mar‐20

Apr‐20

May‐20

Volume

Source: NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures Contract, May 1, S&P Platts Gas Daily, May 2, 2017

Who really knows where the price will go?

87% of NYMEX HH contract open interest positions are in the nearby 3 months.

There is no long term price liquidity in the NYMEX natural gas contract.

The bid‐ask spread on any contract beyond a 2‐year term reflects that lack of liquidity

NYMEX Henry Hub Gas Futures Contract Open Interest Position

72

Page 73: Geopolitical Impact of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Rockies Supply vs. Regional Export Capacity

Source: George Wayne, Colorado Interstate Gas 73