geomorphometric characteristics of major badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1)...

8
Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland Landscapes of Turkey Aydogan Avcioglu1, Tolga Görüm1, Omer Yetemen1 & Mariano Moreno de las Heras2 1 Eurasia Institute of Earth Science, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey 2 Institute of Environmental Assessment & Water Research, National Research Council

Upload: others

Post on 01-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland Landscapes of

Turkey

Aydogan Avcioglu1, Tolga Görüm1, Omer Yetemen1 & Mariano Moreno de las Heras2

1 Eurasia Institute of Earth Science, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

2 Institute of Environmental Assessment & Water Research, National Research Council

Page 2: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

Study area and Aim of this study

In this study, we present results from a quantitative analysis of a new inventory ofbadland areas (~756 km2) at six major badland landscapes in Turkey. Previouslypartly known but not documented badland geomorphological units were expandedby mapping badland forms from aerial photos and high-resolution multispectralimage interpretations focused on the Western and Central Anatolia.

Our aim is to compare six major badland areas in the different arid and semi-aridsections of the Anatolia to characterize their distribution using local morphometricvariables like Slope Gradient, Lenght Slope and Steepnes(LS), Elevation Texture,Plan-Profile-Tangential Curvatures, Terrain Ruggednes Index(TRI)

Page 3: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

STU

DY

AR

EA

Figure 1: The distribution of major badland areas in Turkey.

Page 4: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

MET

HO

DFigure 2: Flow-chart of the metholody

that followed for this study

Page 5: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

SUM

MA

RY

RES

ULT

S

Figure 3: Multiple comparision of test areas in terms of applied geomorphometric analyzes

Page 6: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

SUM

MA

RY

RES

ULT

S

Figure 4: The display of standart deviation values of Slope and LS variables in badlands areas from non-badlands areas (i.e. Burdur)

Page 7: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

Badlands tanımı Nallıhan Foto ile

SUM

MA

RY

RES

ULT

S

Figure 5: The display of standart deviation values of Texture and TRI variables in badlands areas from non-badlands areas (i.e. Burdur)

Page 8: Geomorphometric Characteristics of Major Badland ... · major badlands areas we concluded that: 1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statistical differences in badland

Conclusion

From our visual interpretation and descriptive statistical results of sixmajor badlands areas we concluded that:

1) Topographic curvatures do not reflect significant statisticaldifferences in badland and non-badland areas.

2) However, slope gradient and related morphometric derivatives (i.e.,LS, Texture, TRI) bear clear signatures of badland and non-badlandareas.