geometrical optics: some applications of the intensity...
TRANSCRIPT
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-161
Geometrical Optics:some applications of the intensity law
David L. ShealyDepartment of PhysicsUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamE-mail: [email protected]
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
ObjectivesConcepts of rays, wavefronts, energy propagation
Review general integral of eikonal equationRelate principal curvatures of wavefront to Laplacian of eikonalReview intensity law of geometrical optics
Ray optics field - solution of scalar wave equationRelate principal curvatures of wavefront to ray optics field amplitudeRelate intensity of field to propagation distance & principal curvaturesReview generalized ray trace equations
Imaging applications of intensity lawCaustic surfaces and optical design via caustics
Nonimaging applications of intensity lawIllumination engineeringBeam shaping
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Concepts of Rays
Vector ray equation can be used to compute trajectory of ray paths r(s):
Propagation vector:Define 3 unit vectors:
Frénet Equations:
( ) ( ) ( )d sd n nds ds
⎡ ⎤= ∇⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
rr r p
b
t
( )0
d sds nk
= =r kt
dds ρ
=t p
= ×b t p
dds
τρ
= − +p t b d
dsτ= −
b p
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Using Frénet Equations
Curvature of ray path:
Torsion of ray path can be evaluated in similar way using Frénet Equations
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )d ndn n nds ds ρ
∇ = = +⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦r pr r t t r
( )1 ln nρ= ∇p ri
pb
t
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Concepts of Wavefronts
Eikonal φ(r0,r) = optical distance along ray path (r0,r)Wavefront satisfies φ(r0,r) = const.Propagation vector satisfies
k = k0∇ φ(r0,r)Rays ⊥ to wavefrontPhase of wavefront is k0 φ(r0,r) Eikonal Equation is
[∇φ(r)]2 = n2r0
r
n(r)
t
p
Wavefronts
RayPath
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
General Integral of eikonalequation
Eikonal equation in Cartesian coordinate
Stavroudis obtained a general integral of the eikonal equation
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2 2
2nx y z
φ φ φ∂ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞+ + =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
r r rr
( )( )( )
,
u
v
ux vy wz h u v
uz u h w
vz y h w
φ = + + +
= +
= +( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
2
2 2 2,
, ,,
,
x y z
x y
u v
pn
u v u v n u v
h u v h u vH u v
u v
p ns h u v uh vh
= −
= + + − −
∂ ∂⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
= − + +
W S H
S e e e
e e
or in Cartesian form
where h(u,v) is arbitrary functionto be determined by boundaryconditions.
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Properties of general integral of eikonal equation
Stavroudis has evaluated differential geometry properties of wavefront:
Surface normal:
Principal curvatures in terms of h(u,v), hu, hv
Caustic surfacesFor more details, see ON Stavroudis and RC Fronczek, “Caustic
surfaces and the structure of the geometrical image,” JOSA 66.8, 795 (1976).
( ),u v
u v
u vn
×= = =
×SW WN t
W W
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Principal Curvatures of Wavefront
Qualitative approach for evaluating relationship between element of area on wavefront and principal radii of curvatures of wavefront. Assume origin of s-coordinate axis is located at dS1. See Born & Wolf, pp. 116-117. ( )
( ) ( )1 1 2
2 1 2
( )dS
dS s s
ρ δθ ρ δφ
ρ δθ ρ δφ
=
= + +⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Q1Q2
δφδθ
ρ2
ρ1
s
s
dS2
dS1
Principal Sections
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Principal Wavefront Curvatures
Taylor expansion of unit tangent vector t
Divergence of tangent vector t = ∇φ/n
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
1 2
0 0
1 21 2
2 1
0 0
0 01 2
01 2
( ) s s
s ss ss s
h hs s
h h
δ
τ τρ ρ
∂ ∂+ = + +
∂ ∂
= + − + −
r r
r r
t r t rt r r t r
e et r e e
t(r0)
t(r0 +δr)
δr
ro
Wavefront
e2
e1
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )
2
1 2 1 2
1 1 1 10 0s s n s s
φρ ρ ρ ρ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤∇
∇ = + = = +⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥+ +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
rt ri
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Intensity Law
Intensity:
Conservation of Energy for E&M fields requires
Applying Gauss’ Theorem
( ) ( ) ( ) 2S ,I t n A= ∝r r r
( ) ( ) 0I∇ =⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦r t ri
11 1 2 2 2
2 1
I or IdS /
I dS I dSdS
= =
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Ray Optics Field
Assume the ray optics fieldsatisfies scalar wave equation
which requires
Luneburg and Kline asymptotic series in (-ik0)-m
( ) ( ) ( )2 2 20 0u k n u∇ + =r r r
( ) ( )0expA ik φ−⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦r r
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )( )
22 2 2 20 0 2 0
A Ak n ik
A Aφ φ φ
⎡ ⎤∇ ∇⎡ ⎤∇ − + − ∇ + ∇ + =⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
⎣ ⎦
r rr r r r
r ri
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Ray Optics Field Transport
Transport equation (2nd term):
Field amplitude satisfies
Thus
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 2 2 22 0A A A A nφ φ ⎡ ⎤∇ + ∇ ∇ = ∇ =⎣ ⎦r r r r r r r ti i
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
0
1/ 2 20 0
0 01and '2 '
s
s
n s dS sA s A s A s A s ds
n s dS s n sφ⎧ ⎫⎡ ⎤ ∇⎪ ⎪= = −⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥
⎪ ⎪⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭∫
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( )( )
1/ 2 1/ 2
1 2
1 2
0 00
0 0A s A
s sρ ρ
ρ ρ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
= ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥+ +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Intensity of Ray Optics Field
Intensity along ray path – principal curvatures
Refraction
( ) ( )( )
( )( )
1 22 2
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
0 01
I II s
s s s sρ ρ
ρ ρ ρ ρ κ κ κ κ= =
+ + + + + +
( ) ( )/ '
cos ( ) cos ( )
r in n
i r
γγ
γ φ φ
= +Ω
=Ω = − +
A A N
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Refraction of ray optics field*Principal and normal curvatures
Intensity – normal curvatures & torsion
General ray trace (GRT) equations
*Burkhard & Shealy, Appl. Opt. 21.18, 3299-3306 (1981)
( ) ( )( ) 2 2
01 ( )
II s
s sκ κ κ κ τ=
+ + + −⊥ ⊥
21 2 1 2 and κ κ κ κ κ κ κ κ τ+ = + = −⊥ ⊥
( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
2 2cos cos
cos cos
r i
r r i i
r r i i
κ γκ κ
κ γκ κ
τ γτ τ
= +Ω
= +Ω
= +Ω
⊥ ⊥ ⊥
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Propagation of refracted field*
*Burkhard & Shealy, Appl. Opt. 21.18, 3299-3306 (1981)
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Refracted Field & CausticsNormal to principal curvatures conversion:
Caustic surfaces
*Al-Ahdali & Shealy, Appl. Opt. 29.31, 4551-4559 (1990)
1 1
2 2
C out out
C out out
ρρ
= += +
X X tX X t
2 21
2 22
1 12 21 12 2
κ κ κ κ κ τ
κ κ κ κ κ τ
= ⎡ + ⎤ + ⎡ − ⎤ +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
= ⎡ + ⎤ − ⎡ − ⎤ +⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
⊥ ⊥
⊥ ⊥
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Caustics & Aberrations
*Shealy, Appl. Opt. 15.10, 2588-1596 (1976)
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Optical Design via Caustics
1. Minimizing separation and spreading of caustics have been used to improve performance of some system
2. Eliminating astigmatism by using GRT equations for rotationally symmetric system (τ=0) and requiring:
which leads to second order differential eq. for z(r):
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2 or r r r rκ κ κ κ= =⊥ 1
( ) ( )2
2 2
cos 0cos cos
ii ir r
γ κ κ κ κ⎡ ⎤ Ω⎡ ⎤− +Ω − =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
⊥ ⊥
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Illumination System
Intensity law => differential equation for sag of one surface in system:
Range of solutionshave been studied for ρ(θ)*
*Shealy, “Classical (non-laser) methods” in Laser Beam Shaping – Theory and Techniques, F.M. Dickey and S. C. Holswade, eds, pp. 313-348, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.
r
z(r)
z
Mirror
Source Detector
ρ
θ
I(θ) E(R)
( ) ( )( )
( )2 2
2 2
' sin 2 ' cos' cos 2 'sin cos
R rZ R z r
ρ θ ρρ θ ρ
ρ θ ρρ θ ρ θ
+ −−=
− + −
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1620
Innovations in laser beam shaping
Overview of 40-year cycle from first concepts of using intensity law to devices reaching market
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Growth in US patents involving beam shaping
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1976-80 1981-85 1986-90 1991-95 1996-02
US PatentsInvolvingBeam Shaping
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Cornwell, “Non-projective transformations in optics,”Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, 1980
Proc. SPIE 294, 62-72, 1981
Differential Power
Conservation of Energy: Ein=Eout
Magnifications of ray coordinates
OPL conditionDetermine sag z(r) of first surfaceDetermine inverse magnificationDetermine sag Z(R) of second surface
( , ) ( , )in outI x y dxdy I X Y dXdY=
( )( )( )1 2
0
1( )x
xx
X x
a u dum x C C
x A um u
⎡ ⎤= +⎢ ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦∫
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
Beam Shaping Applications
In a holographic projection processing system featured on 10 January 1999 issue of Applied Optics , a two-lens beam shaping optic increased the quality of micro-optical arrays.
J.A. Hoffnagle & C. M. Jefferson, “Design and performance of a refractive optical system that converts a Gaussian to a flattop beam,” Appl. Opt. 39.30, 5488-5499, 2000.
Cover Graphics for Nov 2003 issue of Optical EngineeringIrradiance of Gaussian beam propagating through beam shaper developed by Hoffnagle & Jefferson, who contributed this graphics for the special section on laser beam shaping.
16 August 2006SPIE Novel Optics 6289-1616 August 2006
ConclusionsBeam shaping and illumination engineering are significant outcomes of intensity lawWavefront differential geometry provides full description of image surfaces and offers ways to improve imaging systemsLuneburg and Kline asymptotic series offers a way of extending geometrical optics into the domain of wavelength-dependent phenomena