geometric frustration in large arrays of coupled lasers near field far field micha nixon eitan...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Geometric Frustration in Large Arrays of
Coupled LasersNear FieldFar Field
Micha NixonEitan Ronen, Moti Fridman, Amit Godel,
Asher Friesem and Nir DavidsonWeizmann Institute of Science
Degenerate cavity
Mirror
GAIN
Mask
f1f2
Lens (f2)
Lens (f1)
Output coupler
f2 f1
),( yxE
),( yxE
300µm
),( yxE
Degenerate cavity
Mirror
GAIN
Mask Lens Lens Output coupler
Far Field
No coupling
Far Field
With coupling
Kagome array
Near Field
Far Field
Moessner R and Chalker J T “Low-temperature properties of
classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. B 58 12049 (1998)
No φ phase ordering !
32
32
0
?2 ? ?
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
?
??
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
22
2
2
2
22
2
22
?
? ?
3φ phase ordering
Is this a 3φ “condensate” ?
3φ condensate simulations: Ground states using a Monte Carlo simulation that minimizes the spins energy.
XY model
Kagome array with next nearest neighbor coupling
z
Mirror
GAIN
Mask
f1f2
f2
f1
Output coupler
f2 f1
T
nm
zzif
x
nm e4
22
2
NN
NN
nmnm
df
ddx
0
Summary
• Frustration and other ground states of coupled systems (XY model) can be
demonstrated experimentally with large arrays of coupled lasers.
• Coupling strength, range and sign can be easily controlled.
•Study effects of external fields, noise and quenched disorder.
Fourier coupling
Mirror
GAIN
Mask
f1f2
Lens (f2) Pinhole
Lens (f1)
Output coupler
f2 f1
E }{EF
}{EF
U
U}{UFE
Direct measurement of phase decoherence
0 0 0 0,, 0,,
50% fringe visibility 100% fringe visibility
0
Distance1 2 3 4 5 6
Frin
ge v
isib
ility
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Short range phase ordering
Numerical model
• Laser rate equations
• Cavity transfer matrix.
}{
)sin(innj
iji
dt
d
ni
i
e
e
1
M
ni
i
e
e
1