genomic markers for parasitic infections

66
GENOMIC MARKERS FOR PARASITIC INFECTIONS Dr.R.Jayaprada 1

Upload: rangineni-prada

Post on 11-May-2015

853 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

1

GENOMIC MARKERS FOR PARASITIC INFECTIONS

Dr.R.Jayaprada

Page 2: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

2

AGENDA Introduction Tools for Gene detection and analysis . Tools For Molecular Epidemiology of Parasites Functional Genomic Study Application of Genomic Studies in

Parasitology Conclusion.

Page 3: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

3

Introduction Parasites have kept many secrets from the

researchers who have sought to eradicate them over past decades.

Little is known about them: Evade drugs, Escape the immune system, Regulate switching between genes involved in

immune evasion, and Orchestrate development.

Page 4: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

4

IntroductionProblems with Study of Parasites: Lack of reliable culture system (Difficult to

keep and breed) Shortage of material for biochemical studies; Lack of traditional genetic methods to study

gene functions. They parasitize hosts that are not ideal

experimental subjects.

Page 5: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

5

Introduction Human helminths are much more complex

organisms (e.g., they are diploid, have reproductive and other organs, nervous systems, etc.) compared to Protozoans

There are many more species of them They belong to two completely unrelated phyla

(Platyhelminthes and Nematoda) No cell lines are available The developmental cycles cannot be completed in

vitro Their developmental cycles are not only dissimilar

to those of Protozoans, but they are also generally dissimilar to each other.

Page 6: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

6

Introduction The availability of parasite genome sequences

and related genome-based tools have provided substantial opportunities to overcome these problems to a large extent.

Page 7: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

7

Introduction A genome is all of a living thing's genetic

material The genome is divided into chromosomes,

chromosomes contain genes, and genes are made of DNA.

Page 8: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

8

Introduction Gene and chromosome. Coined in 1920 by

Hans Winkler. The complete set of genes in an organism : GENOME. Frederick Sanger in 1977 introduced the “dideoxy” chain termination method to sequence DNA molecules.

Page 9: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

9

IntroductionHuman Parasites Complete sequence: Timeline2001: Encephalitozoon cuniculi 2002: P.falciparum 2004: Cryptosporidium parvum and hominis 2005: E. histolytica, Trypanosoma brucei, cruzi; L.major 2007: Brugia malayi, Giardia lamblia, Trichomonas

vaginalis 2008: P.vivax, P. knowelsi 2009: Schistosoma mansoni, and S. japonicum 2011: Ascaris suumOther parasites: Toxoplasma gondii, Leishmania

braziliensis, L. infantum, L.mexicana,(Partial/ Draft).

Page 10: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

10

Introduction The study of Genomic Markers is expected to

lead to major technological advances: New Diagnostics New therapeutics, and Vaccine development, Understanding of disease mechanisms, Elucidation of Host–parasite interactions, Insight into transmission biology.

Page 11: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

11

Tools For Gene Detection and Analysis

I. Amplification Techniques: PCR Real Time PCR NASBA LAMP LCR

2. Hybridization Techniques: FISH Microarrays

3. Biosensors Liposome Based Lateral Flow Biosensor Matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization time-of-flight mass

spectrometry (MALDI TOF)

Page 12: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

12

Tools For Gene Analysis

Used for MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PARASITES

Multi Locus Enzyme Elecrophoresis (MLEE) Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) Kinetoplastid minicircle DNA (kDNA) RFLP for

Leishmania Gene sequencing and Sequencing of ribosomal loci Multi locus Microsatellite Typing (MLMT) Genome wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP).

Page 13: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

13

Real Time PCRThe primary advantages of real-time PCR over

conventional PCR : It provides high-throughput analysis in a

closed-tube format (no post-PCR handling is required)

It can be used for quantitation over a broad dynamic range

It can be used to differentiate DNA fragments by analyzing the melting curve of DNA.

Simple, fast, closed, and automated amplification system responsible for decreasing the risk of cross-contamination.

Page 14: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

14

Real Time PCR Various Fluorescent chemistries are being used1. TaqMan Probe: One of the most widely used chemistries Assay design is simple and assays are robust. However, Taqman probes do not confirm that

the correct fragment has been amplified (other than by running a gel).

Page 15: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

15

Real Time PCR2. Minor-groove binder(MGB) Eclipse probes3. Molecular beacons4. Fluorescence- (or Forster) resonance-energy-

transfer (FRET)-based assays5. Intercalating Dyes: SYBR Green, BEBO, LC

Green: SYBR Green is the most cost-efficient chemistry and, thus, are the most popular option among researchers.

Page 16: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

16

Applications of RT-PCR Detection of Cryptosporidium, Leishmania,

Trypanosoma, Giardia, Toxoplasma Diagnosis, animal models, drug efficacy and

vectorial capacity for Leishmania Monitoring antimalarial therapy Species discrimination and SNP analysis

(FRET assay) Discrimination between species and

genotypes of Cryptosporidium

Page 17: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

17

Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) LAMP is a method of nucleic acid amplification

with extremely high sensitivity and specificity to discriminate single nucleotide differences

Four primers specially designed to recognize six different sequences on the target gene . Amplification occurs only when all primers bind, thus forming a product.

DNA amplification can be achieved using simple incubators (water bath or block heater) because of isothermal conditions

Page 18: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

18

LAMP Can amplify a few copies of genetic material to

109 in less than an hour Large amounts of white magnesium

pyrophosphate are precipitated from DNA amplification . The turbidity caused by this reaction is proportional to the amount of DNA synthesized. As a consequence, it is possible to evaluate the reaction in real time by measuring the turbidity or, more importantly, by visualization by the naked eye.

The simple requirements make LAMP easily available for small laboratories, especially in rural endemic areas

Page 19: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

19

LAMP Has been used to detect several parasitic

diseases, including the human parasites Cryptosporidium, Entamoeba histolytica, Plasmodium, Trypanosoma, Taenia, Schistosoma, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, and Toxoplasma gondii,

Could detect the miracidium after the first day of exposure in snails, the intermediate hosts of Schistosoma

Mosquitoes carrying the parasites Plasmodium and Dirofilaria immitis have been identified

Page 20: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

20

Ligase Chain Reaction (LCR) DNA ligases are highly specific and do not

tolerate base mismatches (unlike DNA polymerases).

This makes LCR superior to PCR for the detection of SNPs, which has been its chief application

Products of the LCR are detected in real-time by

using either FRET probes as LCR primers or primers that are designed to form molecular beacons once ligated.

Page 21: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

21

LUMINEX Luminex is a bead-based xMAP technology

(multianalyte profiling), a system that combines flow cytometry, fluorescent microspheres (beads), lasers and digital signal processing

Capable of simultaneously measuring up to 100 different analytes in a single sample

Luminex was able to distinguish the species C. hominis and C. parvum in 143 DNA extractions, using oligonucleotide-specific probes for the ML-2 regions (microsatellite region-2 )of each species, without the need for DNA sequencing.

Page 22: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

22

Hybridization Techniques: 1. FISH Uses fluorescently-labeled probes [either DNA

or peptide nucleic acid (PNA)] that hybridize to complementary nucleic acid targets in whole cells to enable the direct detection of organisms in complex communities

PNA probes are pseudopeptides that hybridize to complementary nucleic acid targets (DNA and RNA) with better specificity and stability than DNA probes

PNA probes are expensive to construct.

Page 23: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

23

FISH Applying FISH to whole cells gives information

about microbial identity, cell morphology, abundance and spatial distribution of individual target species

To study the partitioning and chromosome composition of nuclei in Giardia and to detect arthropozoonotic species and genotypes of

Cryptosporidium and Giardia PNA probes have been used for the direct

FISH detection of African trypanosomes

Page 24: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

24

2. MICROARRAYS DNA microarrays provide a powerful tool for

the parallel analysis of multiple genes and gene transcript

Microarrays are arrays of either cDNAs or oligonucleotides that are either spotted onto a glass microscope slide or synthesized on a silicone chip.

DNA or mRNA extracted from cells or tissues is labeled with specific fluorescent molecules and hybridized to the microarray DNA.

Page 25: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

25

Microarrays To improve sensitivity, samples are often pre-

amplified by PCR The resulting image of fluorescent spots is

visualized in a confocal scanner and digitized for quantitative analysis

Has been used to detect and discriminate between a range of parasites, including different species and genotypes of Entamoeba, Giardia and Cryptosporidium in a single assay.

Page 26: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

26

MicroarraysThe main application of microarrays has been to

study gene expression in hosts To study differential gene expression in

different lifecycle stages of T. brucei Gender-associated gene expression in

Schistosoma japonicum Gene expression during asexual development

of T. gondii Gene expression for Plasmodium in

mosquitoes.

Page 27: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

27

BIOSENSORS A biosensor is an analytical device which

converts a biological response into an electrical signal

Sandwich hybridization is used to capture target nucleic acid and the reporter liposome, which contains a dye.

Following capture and washing, the liposomes are lyzed using detergent, which produces a signal.

Page 28: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

28

(Monis et al 2005. Trends in Parasitology 21: 340-46)

Page 29: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

29

MALDI-TOF Matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization

time-of-flight mass spectrometry Based on the detection of diagnostic proteins;

but a database that contains the mass information of the diagnostic biomarkers is needed to use MALDI -TOF as an identification tool

Require expensive, specialized equipment and/or the establishment of appropriate sample databases.

Has been used for the study of Cryptosporidium.

Page 30: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

30

TOOLS FOR MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY: 1. MLEE Non DNA Based Based on phenotypic polymorphism

dependent on protein structures which in turn is based on structural gene sequences.

It can detect polymorphism only within the coding region of the gene, not the mutations in the promoter region or introns.

A set of 10-20 genes is analysed to generate meaningful data.

Extensively used for Leishmania, Trypanosoma, P. falciparum

Page 31: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

31

2. Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) Allows detection of a DNA polymorphism

without prior information on the sequence. Employs PCR to selectively amplify the groups

of restriction fragments of totally digested DNA.

Polymorphisms are identified based on the presence or absence of DNA fragments by polyacrylamide gel analysis

Page 32: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

32

AFLP The advantages of this technique are The ability to search an entire genome for

polymorphisms, The reproducibility of the method, and The possibility of being used against parasites

about which there is no prior genetic information

Highly efficient because of the possibility of analyzing a large number of bands simultaneously, with extensive coverage of the genome

Page 33: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

33

AFLP: Uses To differentiate isolates of C. parvum into two

distinct genotypes Has revealed high genetic variability among

the genome species of Leishmania major, L. tropica and L. donovani, which was sufficient to distinguish between Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Page 34: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

34

3. Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD ) Extensively used for description of strains in

epidemiological studies RAPD is a very simple, fast, and inexpensive

technique which makes survey of parasite genome easier.

Does not require either prior knowledge of the DNA sequence or DNA hybridization

Has been used to delineate strains of microorganisms.

Page 35: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

35

RAPD Highly efficient in the differentiation of

amplification profiles, as well as its ability to distinguish polymorphisms between helminthic parasites.

Used to map genes for the characterization of species, to stimulate the genetic variability and determine the genetic structure of populations of different microorganisms.

It also reveals polymorphisms in the noncoding regions of the genome.

Page 36: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

36

RAPD: Uses Species differentiation of Leishmania, To study polymorphisms of parasites such as

Plasmodium and Trypanosoma Differentiation of endemic strains of

Wuchereria bancrofti.

Page 37: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

37

4. RFLP This reaction is based on the digestion of the

PCR products by restriction enzymes or endonucleases. These enzymes cleave DNA into fragments of certain sizes, whose analysis on agarose or polyacrylamide gel results in different patterns of fragment sizes, enabling the identification .

Diversity of Cryptosporidium spp Diagnosis of species and genotypes of

Toxoplasma gondii.

Page 38: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

38

5. Multi locus Microsatellite Typing (MLMT) Microsatellites are short DNA sequences

(about 300 base pairs) composed of tandem repeats of one to six nucleotides, with approximately one hundred repeats.

Microsatellites are abundant in eukaryotic genomes and can mutate rapidly by loss or gain of repeat units.

They show frequent polymorphism, co-dominant inheritance, high reproducibility and high resolution, require simple typing methods, and can be detected by PCR .

Page 39: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

39

MLMT Microsatellite markers have been developed

only for some parasitic nematodes such as species of Trichostrongyloid .

Strain Typing of L.donovani The low popularity of these genetic markers is

due to the high number of microsatellites, which cause technical difficulties in isolating parasites by PCR.

Page 40: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

40

Genome wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) SNP is a change in a single nucleotide in one

sequence relative to another caused by nucleotide mutation, gene transfer, or intragenic recombination.

Variation in a single base in the genetic code between different individuals of the same species can be detected.

SNP variation occurs when a single nucleotide, such as an A, is replaced by one of the other three nucleotide—C, G, or T. e.g. AAGGTTA to ATGGTTA

Page 41: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

41

Single Strand Conformation Polymorhism (SSCP) It is electrophoretic separation of single-

stranded nucleic acids based on subtle differences in sequence (often a single base pair) which results in a different secondary structure and a measurable difference in mobility through a gel.

Like RFLP,  SSCPs are allelic variants of inherited, genetic traits that can be used as genetic markers

Unlike RFLP analysis, however, SSCP analysis can detect DNA polymorphisms and mutations at multiple places in DNA fragments.

Page 42: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

42

Functional Genomic Study Some of the available genomes are

incomplete, poorly annotated, or not annotated at all.

There are almost no tools available with which gene function can be tested directly.

Without annotation and functional genomic tools, the sequence data are not truly useful.

Annotation: a note added by way of explanation or commentary mentioning what the gene does (its function) to make sense.

Page 43: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

43

Functional Genomic Study Essential to resolve uncertainties in the

molecular physiology of parasites; and To illuminate mechanisms of pathogenesis

that may lead to development of new interventions to control and eliminate these parasites or the diseases.

Page 44: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

44

Functional Genomic StudyTwo Categories1. Bioinformatic tools for sequence mining to

generate hypotheses concerning likely biological function, and

2. Experimental tools with which gene expression can be manipulated in the target organism (or, in the case of parasites, also the host) and the consequences of that manipulation for the biology of the parasite and its relationship with the host can be observed and measured

a. RNA Interference b. Transgenesis

Page 45: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

45

Functional Genomic Study: Bioinformatic Tools The first bioinformatic tools that are applied

are generally genome-wide homologue searches, usually using variants of basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) to generate automatic annotations based on sequence homology.

Very rough guide and at worst downright misleading

In parasites the limited utility of a homology based approach is undermined further by the poor performance of gene-finding software in parasite genomic sequences.

Page 46: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

46

Functional Genomic Study: Experimental Tools: 1. RNA Interfernce

Most important functional genomic tool Gene expression is knocked down by exposing

the parasites to gene-specific dsRNA or small interfering (si)RNA (gene silencing)

Double-stranded RNA [dsRNA] triggers degradation of homologous mRNA transcripts

Efficiency of RNAi in parasites varies between species

Problems often arise with the efficiency, specificity and reproducibility of some methodologies, especially with nematode species.

Page 47: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

47

RNA Interfernce To find out the parasite biology and the possibility

of identifying and validating novel anthelmintic drug targets in B. malayi.

In contrast to the situation in nematodes, RNAi in schistosomes seems to be more robust and reproducible and is currently being used by a number of groups to elucidate the function of some key proteins and pathways in these parasites: Haemoglobin digestion, Tegument formation, and the biological role of tegumental proteins

These approaches have helped to identify vaccine/drug candidates, some of which are in various stages of clinical development.

Page 48: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

48

2. Transgenesis The converse of knock-down of expression is

manipulation of expression by gene knock-in. It is a process by which gene function is

inferred by studying the effects of transferring native or altered copies of genes into subject organisms.

Either transient or heritable transgenesis of at least three species of human parasitic nematodes and trematodes (B.malayi, S.stercoralis, S. mansoni) and in at least one cestode, E. multilocularis has been attempted; apart from malaria parasites.

Page 49: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

49

Functional Genomic Study Help in rational design of agents directed at

defined molecular targets. Important in developing new drugs and

identifying potential vaccine candidates for parasitic helminths and protozoans.

Page 50: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

50

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses.

A. Parasite Systematics: Highly conserved coding regions e.g. Small

Subunit rDNA and certain mitochondrial genes can help in discrimination above species level.

Below the species level, relationships between genes sampled from different individuals are not hierarchical because homologous genes from the two parents combine in their offspring .

Page 51: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

51

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses Above the species level, different taxa are

hierarchical because they are a consequence of speciation followed by long periods of reproductive isolation.

Representation of phylogenetic relationships above the species level as networks rather than as strictly bifurcating trees is gaining interest.

Page 52: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

52

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses

B. Parasite Diagnostics and Epidemiology Discrimination between species by molecular

techniques like multiplex PCR, LAMP etc can be achieved by detecting the moderately conserved regions e.g. coding mitochondrial genes, internal transcribed spacer, rDNA, and other loci

Page 53: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

53

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses Molecular identification is particularly

important when discriminating different parasites with morphologically identical life cycle stages, such as eggs or cysts, from faecal samples, or when attempting to match different life cycle stages of the same parasite from intermediate and definitive hosts

In some endemic areas humans may be infected with more than one species of hookworm or of taenias , the eggs of which are identical.

Page 54: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

54

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses

C. Intraspecies variation study: Finds extensive application in population

genetics; breeding systems (e.g. cross vs. self fertilization); host specificity analysis; molecular epidemiology; conservation (e.g. predicting susceptibility to pathogens); and biosecurity (exotic and emerging pathogens).

Page 55: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

55

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses Genes are analyzed using tools like MLEE

( allozymes), RAPD, AFLP, PFGE, PCR-RFLP, pyrosequencing, mPCR, LAMP, and qPCR.

The extent to which we recognize intraspecific groups of parasites will be a function of the extent to which intraspecific variation is structured among different hosts or among different geographic areas.

Page 56: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

56

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses In T. brucei, for example, three subspecies have

historically been defined on the basis of geographic and host distribution, and the clinical course of disease.

T. b. gambiense : Human parasite distributed through western and central Africa, causing chronic disease.

T. b. rhodesiense : Human parasite distributed through eastern and southern Africa causing acute disease and

T. b. brucei infects domestic and game animals, but not humans and is widely distributed throughout sub- Saharan Africa.

Page 57: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

57

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses

D. Discrimination between individual isolates:

The techniques of “fingerprinting helps in tracking transmission of subgenotypes ; to find out sources of infection and risk factors and also the course of infection

Done by using Mini/microsatellites, SSCP, and qPCR.

Page 58: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

58

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses

E. Identifying phenotypic traits of clinical and epidemiological significance:

Linkage studies between phenotype and genotype of a particular parasite are useful to determine the virulence, infectivity, and drug sensitivity

Done by using genetic map; sequencing and/or RT-PCR of genes thought to be linked to phenotypic trait.

Drug resistance in P. falciparum , virulence in T. gondii and resistance to malaria parasites in Anopheles gambiae have been studied .

Page 59: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

59

Genomic Studies: Applications and Uses Useful to explore genetic changes involved in

resistance to anti-parasitic drugs and understanding the potential mechanisms of drug resistance in human parasites, and can be expected to facilitate development of genetic markers to monitor and manage any future appearance and spread of drug resistance.

Page 60: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

60

Application and Uses To understand how these parasite products

act on immune responses Comparisons of parasite molecules with

orthologues/paralogues from free-living relatives will strengthen efforts to decipher the strategies adopted by parasites to evade and subvert their host immune responses.

This information can be exploited for development of drugs and vaccines against the parasites.

Page 61: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

61

Application and Uses Treatment for helminthic infections, responsible for

hundreds of thousands of deaths each year, depends almost exclusively on just two or three drugs: praziquantel, the benzimidazoles, and ivermectin

Pharmacogenomics with the new helminth genomes represents a practicable route forward toward new drugs. For example, chemogenomics screening of the genome sequence of S. mansoni identified 20 parasite proteins for which potential drugs are available approved for other human ailments [schistosome thioredoxin glutathione reductase, auranofin (an anti-arthritis medication) was shown recently to exhibit potent anti-schistosomal activity].

Page 62: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

62

Conclusions Genomic studies of parasites should be done

keeping the following points in focus: Highly conserved regions can reveal information

about taxonomic relationships between species Moderately conserved regions can differentiate

strains and closely related species; Moderately variable regions can reveal

population genetic structure Highly variable regions enables tracking of

particular isolates in a population; and ‘mapping’of genetic markers can be used to find markers that correlate genotype to phenotype .

Page 63: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

63

Conclusions Sequencing detects the highest level of

variation down to changes in individual base pairs

Techniques based on restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms only detect changes that affect restriction sites, but can be used to sample across the entire genome.

Page 64: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

64

Conclusions The recent research landscape for parasites has

been dominated by rapid progress in genome sequencing of several parasites of significance to human disease.

Future genome-wide analyses will support efforts to elucidate the basic biology of parasites, including immune mediated and other host–parasite interactions that are relevant to parasitic diseases of humans.

They will help to develop novel intervention strategies such as drugs and therapeutic or prophylactic vaccines, as well as to identify parasite biomarkers and devise improved diagnostics.

Page 65: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

65

Conclusions As many of the parasitic infections are

transmitted by arthropod vectors or involve intermediate hosts, a greater understanding of the interaction between vector/intermediate hosts and parasites is also important.

The future may belong to Systems Biology approach to link high throughput molecular sciences such as genomics, proteomics and transcriptomics ; where individual streams of information can be processed as a whole, rather than remaining as an isolated descriptor of the action of individual components.

Page 66: Genomic markers for parasitic infections

66

THANK YOU